标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Senior Kazakh officials detained after 14 service members swept out to sea

    Senior Kazakh officials detained after 14 service members swept out to sea

    A deadly military training accident off the southwestern coast of Kazakhstan has left 14 service members dead and triggered the arrest of five senior military figures, according to official updates from the Central Asian nation. The fatal incident unfolded on Thursday, when a group of 17 troops was swept into the Caspian Sea during disembarkation from a military vessel as part of the large-scale “Caspian Defense 2026” exercise. Only three of the service members were pulled from the water alive, while 14 lost their lives to the rough conditions.

    Kazakh defense officials have attributed the tragedy to sudden, extreme shifts in local weather: a rapid deterioration of meteorological conditions paired with sharp increases in wind speed that caught the troops off guard during the combat training mission. The accident occurred approximately 43 kilometers (27 miles) off the shore of Aktau, a major Kazakh port city on the Caspian coast.

    In the wake of the disaster, Kazakh authorities have moved to detain five senior military personnel connected to the exercise planning and execution. Those held in custody include the chief of staff and first deputy commander of Kazakhstan’s Naval Forces, two separate military unit commanders, the leader of a marine company, and the captain of the vessel involved in the incident. All five face formal suspicion of criminal negligence, according to official statements.

    A dedicated investigative committee under Kazakhstan’s interior ministry has been established to lead a full review of the tragedy. Deputy Interior Minister Sanzhar Adilov confirmed that a pretrial investigation is currently underway, with investigators examining multiple layers of responsibility. The probe is focusing on decision-making processes at every stage of the exercise, from initial organization to on-the-ground execution. Key lines of inquiry include whether mandatory safety protocols were strictly followed, whether weather forecasts and conditions were properly assessed before the mission, and whether the military vessel used met all required technical safety specifications.

    At the time of the accident, more than 500 military personnel, alongside multiple warships and coastal defense units, were taking part in the Caspian Defense 2026 exercise, a large-scale military drill hosted by Kazakhstan’s defense ministry.

  • Xi backs AI safety with Trump, draws Taiwan line, urges Iran talks

    Xi backs AI safety with Trump, draws Taiwan line, urges Iran talks

    On Thursday, Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump convened a landmark face-to-face summit at the White House, where Beijing formally committed to partnering with Washington on advancing responsible artificial intelligence governance and expanding cross-border cooperation across multiple sectors. This meeting marked the first in-person engagement between the two leaders since May, setting the stage for a series of new agreements and frank discussions on longstanding sticking points.

    President Xi outlined his vision for U.S.-China relations during a formal morning welcoming address, ahead of closed-door negotiations in the Oval Office. According to Chinese state media, Xi raised two key issues during the talks: the question of Taiwan and the ongoing crisis surrounding Iran. As of Thursday afternoon U.S. time, no new trade agreements had been announced by either delegation.

    A centerpiece of Xi’s policy proposals was a sweeping expansion of youth exchange, with a pledge to invite 100,000 young Americans to travel, study, and exchange in China over the next five years. This doubles the scope of a previous initiative launched in San Francisco in November 2023, which hit its original 50,000 participation target in May, two and a half years ahead of the original schedule, according to China’s Foreign Ministry. Additional initiatives put forward by Xi included increasing the number of direct air flights between the two nations to boost bilateral travel and trade, deepening joint counter-narcotics and law enforcement collaboration, and maintaining regular dialogue between the two militaries to strengthen crisis communication and prevention frameworks.

    Addressing the shared responsibility of the world’s two leading AI powers, Xi emphasized that “Both China and the U.S. are leading nations in AI. We have both the capability and responsibility to develop and manage AI for good, and ensure that the development of AI is always under human control and serves the well-being of the people.” He also framed bilateral cooperation as a global public good, noting that “China-U.S. cooperation may not solve every problem in the world, but without our cooperation, it would be hard to solve many of the world’s problems. Working together, we can lengthen the list of cooperation and shorten the list of issues.”

    Xi’s remarks on AI cooperation followed the first formal dialogue on AI governance between Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng and U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, held in New York the previous Sunday. At that meeting, the two sides agreed to launch a dedicated AI safety hotline to enable immediate mutual notification of any high-risk AI incidents.

    ### Key Regional and Global Issues Raised
    During the summit, Xi reaffirmed China’s longstanding position on the Taiwan question, urging the U.S. to adhere to its stated position of opposing Taiwan independence and handle the issue with prudence, per Xinhua News Agency. He stressed that China’s commitment to safeguarding national unity and territorial integrity is unambiguous and non-negotiable. In Washington’s perspective, any forcible unification of Taiwan with mainland China would be viewed as an invasion that would extend China’s military reach beyond the first island chain, stretching from Japan through Taiwan to the Philippines. The Trump administration has held up a proposed $14 billion arms package for Taiwan — the largest ever offered to the island — as a potential “negotiating chip” with Beijing, and no decision on moving forward with the sale has been announced.

    On the Iran nuclear and regional security issue, Xi conveyed China’s hope that the U.S. and Iran would return to the negotiating table as soon as possible. He stated that China supports both parties returning to the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and ultimately reaching a comprehensive agreement that addresses the nuclear issue and other regional concerns. The original MoU, signed June 17, extended a 60-day ceasefire and reopened the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping, but the agreement collapsed in July after Iran attacked commercial vessels transiting the strait. To date, Beijing has rejected U.S. calls to use its economic and diplomatic leverage with Tehran to end the ongoing conflict.

    Addressing the broader nature of U.S.-China relations, Xi pushed back against narratives of inevitable great power conflict, noting that “We do not need to avoid mentioning competition, but our competition should be a healthy one and should be kept within bounds. It should be a race of catching up with one another, not a wrestle in which one either wins or loses.” He reaffirmed China’s commitment to the framework of no conflict and no confrontation, arguing that the so-called Thucydides Trap — the theory that a rising power and an established hegemon are destined for war — can be avoided. “Achieving the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and making America great again can go hand in hand. Let us meet the people’s expectations and show our historical initiative. Let us keep advancing the cause of friendship between our two peoples and work together to build a better world,” Xi said.

    ### Historical Ties and Confidence-Building Measures
    Both leaders leaned on shared World War II history to build rapport during the opening ceremony. President Trump highlighted the legacy of the Flying Tigers, the American volunteer pilots who fought alongside Chinese forces against Japanese expansion in 1941 and 1942. He also noted the origin of the U.S. Marine Corps phrase “gung ho,” which derives from the Chinese term gong he, short for Chinese Industrial Cooperatives. The term was brought back to the U.S. by Marine officer Evans Carlson in the 1930s. “The Marines use it as an expression of great enthusiasm, but in Chinese it literally means working together. Just as our people worked together to win that war, President Xi and I will continue working together to forge a better future for both of our nations,” Trump said.

    President Xi echoed this sentiment, noting “During the Second World War, Chinese and Americans fought shoulder to shoulder against fascist aggression. Chinese people have never forgotten that part of history, nor have the American people.” As a further gesture of goodwill, Xi announced that two giant pandas, Ping Ping and Fu Shuang, would soon be relocated to their new permanent home at Zoo Atlanta.

    On the issue of counter-narcotics, Xi’s commitment to expanded cooperation directly addressed longstanding U.S. concerns over the flow of fentanyl precursor chemicals from China to the U.S. The U.S. had already cut fentanyl-related tariffs on Chinese goods from 20% to 10% following the Busan summit last October. Xi also reiterated that China remains open to U.S. businesses and called for fair treatment of Chinese firms operating in the U.S.

    Prior to the summit, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham had called on Trump to raise the case of Jimmy Lai, the jailed Hong Kong pro-democracy activist and British citizen. White House aides confirmed that the case was indeed raised during the talks, as it had been during the May Beijing summit.

    Following the welcoming ceremony on the State Floor, the two leaders reviewed troops in the Rose Garden, with a flyover featuring a B-2 stealth bomber and four F-22 fighter jets. U.S. First Lady Melania Trump and Xi’s wife Peng Liyuan toured the Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art separately, and the Trumps hosted a formal state dinner for the Chinese delegation in the evening. Xi is scheduled to conclude his visit with a stop at the National Archives on Friday.

    ### Trade Truce Extended
    In comments made Wednesday ahead of the summit, Treasury Secretary Bessent announced that the U.S.-China trade truce, first agreed during the October Busan summit and set to expire November 10, would be extended by two months, now running through January 10. This extension is shorter than the six-month extension some media outlets had reported earlier in the week. Bessent explained that the additional time would allow both sides to continue negotiating a broader long-term trade deal. “We’re open to the idea of just continuing the Busan arrangement or examining the bigger deal. We’re fine with both, and we’re going to do what’s best for the American people,” he told reporters.

    On Thursday, China’s Ministry of Commerce spokesperson He Yadong confirmed that the talks between He Lifeng and Bessent covered a range of trade-related topics, including implementing consensus reached in earlier negotiation rounds, pursuing reciprocal tariff reductions, establishing separate bilateral trade and investment councils, and extending the joint framework agreed in Busan last October. Bessent noted that China is on track to meet its commitment to purchase 25 million tons of U.S. soybeans, but is currently behind on its pledge to purchase $17 billion in other U.S. agricultural products. U.S. officials also confirmed last week that China is lagging on its promised deliveries of rare earth materials to the U.S.

  • UN General Assembly 2026: Walkout during Netanyahu’s speech, and Middle East wars in spotlight

    UN General Assembly 2026: Walkout during Netanyahu’s speech, and Middle East wars in spotlight

    As the United Nations General Assembly entered its fourth day of deliberations, the fallout from the US-Israeli military campaign against Iran and the long-running Israel-Palestine conflict remained the centerpiece of global debate, with leaders from across regions and blocs laying out starkly diverging positions on the crises and their far-reaching global impacts.

    For vulnerable economies already grappling with years of internal instability, the ripple effects of the current conflicts have proven devastating, Somalia’s President Mohamed Hassan Sheikh Mohamud told the assembly. The East African nation, which depends almost entirely on imports of food and fuel from the Middle East and relies heavily on customs revenue to fund state operations, has seen steep price hikes for essential goods and a 40 percent collapse in customs collections since the conflict escalated, Mohamud said. Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global chokepoint for energy trade, have triggered disproportionate harm to developing nations like his own, he added, stressing that unimpeded, free navigation through the waterway is non-negotiable to protect the world’s most vulnerable economies. Turning to the Israel-Palestine conflict, Mohamud emphasized that a just, negotiated resolution to the Palestinian question remains a foundational requirement for lasting peace across the Middle East and the wider world, affirming that Somalia stands in unwavering solidarity with the Palestinian people and their internationally recognized right to self-determination and sovereign statehood.

    European Union Council President Antonio Costa opened his address by reaffirming the bloc’s unshakeable commitment to multilateralism, arguing that no single nation can deliver durable peace in an increasingly interconnected world. While he did not explicitly name the United States’ repeated attacks on the International Criminal Court, Costa issued a clear warning against the spread of double standards in the application of international law, and pledged the EU’s full, unwavering support for both the ICC and the International Court of Justice. “We support these courts firmly, and we will defend their independence, integrity and ability to fully carry out their mandate,” he stated, condemning ongoing targeting of the court. The United States has already imposed sweeping sanctions on multiple senior ICC officials, including court president Tomoko Akane and senior trial lawyer Abdoulaye Seye, who were sanctioned in August. Former chief prosecutor Karim Khan was the first to be targeted last February, followed by two deputy prosecutors and nine judges leading investigations into alleged atrocities in Palestine and Afghanistan. Multiple reports this week have confirmed Washington is preparing to roll out even broader sanctions against the court in the coming weeks.

    Costa also indirectly pushed back against former U.S. President Donald Trump’s claims of having achieved a lasting peace deal for Gaza, noting that Israeli military operations in the enclave have continued despite a 2025 ceasefire agreement. Stating that the EU regrets the ongoing stalemate in Gaza and across the occupied Palestinian territories, Costa reaffirmed the bloc’s longstanding position that a two-state solution remains the only viable path to durable peace in the Middle East. Unlike many critics of the current conflict, Costa did not condemn the US-Israeli campaign against Iran, instead saying the EU supports diplomatic efforts to find a negotiated resolution to the standoff. He reiterated the EU’s longstanding policy that Iran must never be permitted to acquire nuclear weapons, and expressed hope that the Iranian people will one day live in conditions of peace, security and full freedom. Costa also joined global calls for unconditional, unhindered freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz.

    Yemen’s Vice President Abdullah Abdulkader al-Alimi-Bawzer used his address to condemn the Houthi militia and urge the global community to unite against the group, which he accused of advancing Iran’s geopolitical agenda at the expense of regional and global security. Alimi-Bawzer noted that the Yemeni people have endured 12 years of crisis since the Houthi coup against the internationally recognized government, adding that Yemeni authorities have repeatedly supported a Saudi- and Omani-backed peace initiative that the Houthis have rejected. Instead of engaging in negotiations, the militia has escalated attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb, he said, turning one of the world’s most critical maritime trade routes into a bargaining chip for Iran’s global confrontation. “The Houthi militia’s use of the safety of navigation as a tool for blackmail threatens not only Yemen. It is taking hostage the entire global economy,” al-Alimi-Bawzer said. He argued that long-term maritime security in the Red Sea, Bab el-Mandeb and the Gulf of Aden cannot be achieved as long as an armed non-state militia controls critical Yemeni coastline, stressing that restoring the sovereign Yemeni state and securing the Bab el-Mandeb waterway are inseparable goals.

    Kuwait’s Crown Prince Sabah Al Khaled used his address to the UN Security Council to condemn what he called illegal Iranian aggression against his country, describing the attacks as a blatant violation of core principles of international law. “These brutal attacks have systematically and repeatedly targeted civilian objects and critical infrastructure… revealing a hostile approach aimed at disrupting the foundations of life,” he said. Al Khaled noted that the security and stability of the Arabian Gulf region is a core pillar of global security, as the ongoing conflict and its spillover have clearly demonstrated. Kuwait has been among the Gulf states hardest hit by Iranian retaliation for the US-Israeli campaign against the Islamic Republic: as host to tens of thousands of U.S. troops and multiple major U.S. military bases, both American facilities and key civilian infrastructure including Kuwait International Airport and national energy sites have been targeted in recent attacks. The country is also exceptionally vulnerable to Iranian disruptions of Strait of Hormuz shipping, as nearly 100 percent of Kuwait’s oil exports are transported via tanker through the waterway. Turning to Palestine, the crown prince reaffirmed Kuwait’s firm, principled position condemning ongoing violations by Israeli occupation forces against the Palestinian people, noting that Palestinians continue to endure brutal living conditions under Israeli policies of displacement, mass arrest and expanding settlement construction. He also praised France and the United Kingdom for their recent decision to impose new sanctions on trade with Israeli goods produced in illegal West Bank settlements. Al Khaled also joined growing global calls for reform of the UN Security Council, arguing that the body must adapt to shifting global power dynamics to remain effective. “There is an urgent need for the council to become more representative, effective and transparent in carrying out its responsibilities,” he said.

    The day’s most dramatic confrontation came during Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s pugnacious address to the General Assembly, where the Israeli leader launched aggressive attacks on critics ranging from New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Western European leaders, as he works to counter growing international isolation for Israel and his government. When Netanyahu took the podium, the assembly hall erupted in loud boos, and a majority of delegates walked out of the chamber in protest. Undeterred, Netanyahu struck a defiant tone, challenging remaining critics to leave. “If there are any other moral cowards who haven’t left this hall, please do so now,” he said with a smile before beginning his prepared remarks.

    Netanyahu devoted a large portion of his address to attacking Mayor Mamdani, accusing the New York leader of capitulating to what he called antisemitic protests. “Mr Mamdani, since you were elected mayor of this city, many Jews no longer feel safe in New York,” Netanyahu shouted. “Mr Mamdani, you tried to stop me from coming here. You tried to silence me. Well, you can’t silence me. You can’t silence the truth.” Outside the UN headquarters, hundreds of protesters gathered ahead of Netanyahu’s arrival and continued demonstrations throughout his speech, echoing widespread global anger at Israel’s ongoing military campaigns across the Middle East. Analysts noted that Netanyahu’s combative address was largely targeted at a domestic American audience and Jewish diaspora voters, coming ahead of Israel’s national elections scheduled for October. Netanyahu’s speech underscored the deepening rift between Israel and much of the international community even as the country expands its military campaigns against multiple neighbors, including Lebanon, Syria, Gaza and the occupied West Bank.

  • Netanyahu paints Israel’s critics as ‘antisemites’ in angry UN speech to near-empty hall

    Netanyahu paints Israel’s critics as ‘antisemites’ in angry UN speech to near-empty hall

    When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stepped up to the podium at the United Nations General Assembly this week, he was met with a cascade of boos and a mass walkout of delegates, a striking public demonstration of Israel’s deepening international isolation over its ongoing military campaign in Gaza and occupation of Palestinian territory. Undeterred by the protest, Netanyahu opened his address with a sharp jab at the departing delegates, quipping, “If there are any other moral cowards who haven’t left this hall, please do so now,” as General Assembly President repeatedly called for order to quiet the disruptive chamber.

    The pugnacious speech saw Netanyahu target a wide range of critics, from New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and major European powers, framing his aggressive tone as a defense of Israel’s right to exist amid mounting global condemnation. A large share of his opening criticism was reserved for Mamdani, whom he accused of capitulating to what he called “antisemitic mobs” and eroding safety for Jewish New Yorkers. Netanyahu also pushed back against Mamdani’s efforts to block his UN appearance, declaring “You can’t silence me. You can’t silence the truth.” Even before Netanyahu entered the UN compound, hundreds of anti-Israel, pro-Palestine protesters gathered outside the building, continuing their demonstration through the duration of his address.

    Political analysts have noted that much of the speech was tailored to two key audiences: American voters and domestic Israeli constituents ahead of the country’s scheduled October national elections, with Netanyahu leaning into partisan rhetoric targeting progressive American politics and courting pro-Israel conservative supporters.

    On foreign policy, Netanyahu framed the recent joint US-Israeli military strikes against Iranian targets as a clear victory, claiming credit for devastating Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. He defended his decision to greenlight the attacks, saying “Devastating Iran’s nuclear facilities was hard. It was very hard to do. But for me, it was one of the easiest decisions I’ve ever had to make as prime minister.” He added that he had made a public promise to block Iran’s Islamist government from developing nuclear weapons that he claimed would target Israel and threaten global security. In a provocative symbolic gesture, Netanyahu held up a Starlink satellite internet receiver during the address, announcing he would leave the device for Iran’s UN delegation. Western intelligence sources have confirmed that the US and Israel have worked to supply Starlink terminals to Iranian anti-government dissidents to help them evade state internet censorship during anti-regime protests, and Netanyahu stated the device would allow dissidents to “freely tell their story on social media” if they flee the country. As of yet, the joint strikes have failed to topple the Iranian government, and Iran has responded by reasserting its military control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, while its allied Houthi movement in Yemen has consolidated control over key territory along the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

    Netanyahu opened his address on the ongoing Gaza conflict by reaffirming his condemnation of the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack that killed roughly 1,200 people in southern Israel, which he called the darkest day in Israeli history. However, he repeated multiple graphic accusations about the attack that have been repeatedly debunked by independent investigators, academic researchers, and even Israeli eyewitnesses. In his remarks, he claimed Hamas “slaughtered Holocaust survivors, they burned babies alive in front of their parents. They beheaded our men, they brutally raped our women, and then they murdered them.”

    In response to the October 7 attack, Israel launched a large-scale military invasion and bombardment of Gaza that has killed more than 74,000 Palestinians to date, the vast majority of them civilians, and injured nearly 175,000 more. The United Nations and dozens of leading global human rights organizations have formally designated Israel’s military campaign in Gaza as a genocide, and the International Criminal Court has issued active arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

    Netanyahu described Israel as fighting a “seven-front war” across the region, praising Israeli soldiers as fighting “like lions,” and pushed back against the countries whose delegates walked out, claiming many of their leaders privately thank Israel for its strikes on Iranian nuclear targets. He doubled down on criticism of European powers that have imposed new trade sanctions on goods from the Israeli-occupied West Bank, calling out Britain and France for what he labeled hypocrisy over colonialism. “They accuse Israel, tiny Israel, of colonialism – some colonialism. And who’s accusing us? Among them are people in Britain and in France. For God’s sake, they invented the term,” he said. Later, he revised his count upward to an “eight-front war,” adding critical global media coverage of Israel’s actions to his list of active adversaries.

    The Israeli leader went after a string of regional leaders, responding to recent comments by Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa condemning Israel’s illegal occupation of the Golan Heights by claiming “Jews have been on the Golan Heights since the days of Moses.” He also launched a blistering attack on Qatar and the Al Jazeera media network, and labeled Turkey a “super-spreader of antisemitic lies,” calling Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan “a tyrant” who “calls for Israel’s destruction almost every single day.”

    The only foreign leader Netanyahu singled out for praise during his address was former US President Donald Trump, declaring “We have no greater partner than President Trump. I thank him.”

    On the issue of growing violence by Israeli settlers against Palestinian communities in the occupied West Bank, Netanyahu dismissed the scale of the unrest, downplaying attacks that have drawn widespread global condemnation. Earlier this week, Jordanian King Abdullah II accused Israel of carrying out de facto annexation of the West Bank and committing war crimes against Palestinian civilians there. In response, Netanyahu claimed only “a handful of young juvenile delinquents, about 150 in number, who throw stones, who chop down olive trees” were responsible for unrest in the territory. He also rebranded the West Bank by its biblical name Judea and Samaria, and claimed Hamas maintains a strong active presence there, in remarks widely interpreted as laying political groundwork for future large-scale military escalation in the occupied territory.

  • Xi got Trump’s red carpet welcome – but not everything he wanted

    Xi got Trump’s red carpet welcome – but not everything he wanted

    The highly anticipated meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Washington drew global attention this week, bringing the long-simmering competition between the world’s two largest economies and military powers into sharp focus. For Xi and Beijing, the summit carried one overarching goal: to push back against what China views as Washington’s deliberate campaign to contain its rise as a global superpower, particularly on issues of trade, technology access and the Taiwan question. While Trump rolled out a full ceremonial red carpet welcome for Xi, including a formal White House state dinner, the Chinese delegation left the talks without securing many of the key concessions Beijing had prioritized.

    On trade, the two sides only agreed to extend a temporary pause in their tit-for-tat tariff dispute by a handful of months, pushing the deadline from November to January. Beijing had pushed for a full year-long extension to create stability through the remaining months of Trump’s current presidential term, a timeline that would align with China’s efforts to insulate its economy from further trade volatility amid domestic headwinds. All the most contentious bilateral trade and technology issues – including lingering U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods, China’s dominant control of global rare earth mineral supplies, and restrictions on Chinese access to cutting-edge American semiconductors – remain unresolved, deferred to future negotiation rounds. The short extension signals the U.S. is unwilling to offer long-term concessions until Beijing makes more tangible progress fulfilling its existing commitments under earlier trade agreements.

    Beijing’s urgency to lock in trade stability stems from mounting domestic economic challenges that the Chinese leadership is grappling with. Though China’s export sector continues to post record global sales, domestic consumer confidence remains weak, holding back broader growth. Youth unemployment has stayed stubbornly elevated, and the country’s property sector has faced a sharp correction in prices – a major concern for ordinary Chinese households, where 80 percent of citizens hold their wealth in residential real estate. With exports currently serving as the main pillar propping up China’s GDP growth, protecting access to the U.S. market and avoiding a return of punishing U.S. tariffs has become a top priority for Xi’s administration.

    The Taiwan question remained one of the most sensitive topics on the summit agenda, with Xi reaffirming that U.S. arms sales to the self-governing island represent a non-negotiable red line for Beijing. Under U.S. law, the United States is required to provide Taiwan with defensive military capabilities, and earlier this year, Xi publicly warned Trump that mishandling the issue could lead to direct conflict between the two powers. Following that warning, Trump delayed approval of a proposed $14 billion arms package to Taiwan, framing the move as a useful negotiating chip with Beijing. During the summit, Xi appears to have capitalized on this opening, arguing that reducing U.S. support for Taipei would lower the risk of confrontation, and reiterated China’s call for the U.S. to stick to what Beijing calls its “correct position” of opposing formal Taiwan independence. To date, however, Trump has not issued any public response to Xi’s remarks, as he faces growing bipartisan pressure from across the U.S. political spectrum to maintain long-standing American support for Taiwan.

    One underdiscussed topic on the agenda was artificial intelligence governance, a rising global priority after a series of high-profile warnings from technology leaders about catastrophic risks posed by unregulated advanced AI development. In recent weeks, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an open letter calling for a slowdown in cutting-edge AI development to improve safety standards, a call that followed a warning from a top Anthropic safety researcher that unregulated advancement carries a greater than 10 percent risk of human extinction. While the two leaders did discuss AI policy, no concrete agreements or next steps – even a commitment to hold a dedicated future summit on the issue – emerged from the talks. Xi stated publicly that it is critical to ensure AI remains permanently under human control, but beyond that vague commitment, no further details of the discussion have been released. For his part, Trump has publicly dismissed fears of AI-driven human extinction as a baseless hoax.

    The most tangible win for bilateral diplomacy to come out of the talks so far is a revival of China’s iconic “panda diplomacy”: Xi confirmed that two giant pandas, Ping Ping and Fu Shuang, will arrive in Atlanta within the next few days, a gift first announced earlier this spring. More announcements are expected as the two leaders are scheduled to hold a follow-up tea meeting and tour the U.S. National Archives on the second day of the summit.

    For Beijing, the biggest immediate victory from the summit may be more symbolic than substantive. The lavish ceremonial welcome, including a personal greeting for Xi at the airport and a state banquet featuring traditional Chinese-inspired dishes, has been widely covered on Chinese social media, helping to reinforce Xi’s domestic image as a global leader on equal footing with the U.S. president. Memes highlighting Xi’s calm demeanor alongside a perceived tense expression from Trump have spread widely across Chinese platforms, with many framing the optics as a win for China’s standing on the global stage.

    Xi has managed to maintain working-level relations with the notoriously unpredictable U.S. president, and Trump has repeatedly described his personal friendship with Xi as “truly great.” But behind the warm words, ceremonial pageantry, and panda diplomacy, the fundamental power competition between the two global superpowers remains completely unresolved. The summit did little to bridge the deep divides that have defined Sino-U.S. relations in recent years, leaving the core points of contention to be fought out in future negotiations and interactions.

  • Senate edges closer to vote on Israeli accountability for US citizens killed in West Bank, Democrat says

    Senate edges closer to vote on Israeli accountability for US citizens killed in West Bank, Democrat says

    A push to compel accountability from Israel over the deaths of nine American citizens and the detention of three additional U.S. nationals in the occupied West Bank is set to reach a Senate vote as early as next week, according to Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, who announced the timeline Thursday.

    A longstanding advocate for Palestinian human rights and stricter oversight of U.S. military assistance to Israel, Van Hollen introduced Senate Resolution 852 earlier this month. The resolution is rooted in Section 502(b) of the U.S. Foreign Assistance Act, a little-used provision that grants congressional lawmakers the right to formally request the State Department produce human rights compliance reports for nations that receive American foreign aid.

    Israel currently holds the status of the largest single recipient of U.S. foreign assistance, with a planned $3.3 billion in aid allocated for 2025.

    Speaking during a virtual discussion hosted by the IMEU Policy Project this Thursday, Van Hollen expressed cautious optimism about the resolution’s path, noting that 24 Senate Democrats have already co-sponsored the measure.

    “These are Democratic senators who have put their names on the resolution, which is definitely progress from where we were two years ago when fighting for human rights for Palestinians, whether in Gaza or the West Bank, [it] was a lonely effort,” he told attendees of the session.

    As a privileged resolution, the measure bypasses standard Senate scheduling queues after a set period following introduction, allowing it to be brought directly to a floor vote due to its urgent nature for public accountability. If the vote fails to proceed next week, however, it will be pushed to the post-election legislative session following the November 3 midterm contests, Van Hollen confirmed. He has called on American constituents to contact their senators immediately in a final push to secure additional support ahead of the vote.

    “We’re at a moment where we see growing recognition throughout the public that is slowly filtering up and slowly having an impact on the bubble that is the United States Congress, and so I think that this is a moment where we can use the fact that American citizens are not getting accountability and justice to shine the light on the fact that Palestinian children and others in the West Bank are subjected to these kinds of abuses every single day,” Van Hollen said.

    The biggest barrier to passage, Van Hollen noted, is the complete lack of Republican backing: not a single one of the Senate’s 53 Republican members has agreed to support the resolution calling for accountability. The chamber is currently split 53-47 in favor of Republicans, and a tied vote would be broken by Republican Vice President JD Vance, who is widely expected to oppose the measure.

    The resolution comes one month after 45 Senate Democrats signed an open letter to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, urging him to take personal, direct action to protect U.S. citizens and their families operating in the occupied West Bank. The letter highlighted a sharp recent surge in bilateral violence that has prompted large-scale Israeli security deployments, mass Palestinian arrests, and multiple reported attacks by Israeli settlers against Palestinian religious sites and communities.

    “We urge you to take measures to prevent and intercede in this violence, establish a credible mechanism to investigate violations of law, and to make clear that the Government of Israel will not tolerate violence by its people, just as it does not tolerate violence against its people,” the letter stated, adding that Israel must launch full, transparent investigations into the deaths of the nine U.S. citizens.

    To date, high-profile deaths of U.S. nationals in the West Bank have only been investigated internally by the Israeli military, with no independent probe ever demanded by the U.S. government. Notable cases include 2022 killing of Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, who was shot in the head by Israeli forces while on assignment; the 2024 death of activist Ayşenur Ezgi Eygi, killed by Israeli fire during a protest against illegal Israeli settlement expansion near Nablus; and the 2025 killing of Sayfollah Musallet, an ice cream shop worker beaten to death by Israeli settlers.

    Data compiled from regional monitors shows that Israeli operations and attacks by both military forces and settler groups have killed more than 1,100 Palestinians in the occupied West Bank over the past three years.

    This report draws on original independent reporting from Middle East Eye, which provides unrivaled, independent coverage of the Middle East, North Africa and surrounding regions.

  • Why Trump gave Xi an ornate bald eagle statue at the state dinner

    Why Trump gave Xi an ornate bald eagle statue at the state dinner

    Against the backdrop of simmering geopolitical tensions and a fragile trade truce between the world’s two largest superpowers, the traditional diplomatic practice of state gift-giving took center stage during a lavish state dinner in Washington D.C., where U.S. President Donald Trump presented Chinese President Xi Jinping with a custom-designed sculpture of the North American bald eagle, the United States’ iconic national symbol.

    Trump told assembled VIP guests at the Thursday evening event that the handcrafted piece was shaped to capture “the free and soaring spirit of America”, revealing that both he and First Lady Melania Trump had directly contributed to the design process. The exchange of carefully curated gifts, a longstanding but often underappreciated pillar of international diplomacy, forms a key building block for the personal rapport between the two leaders at their three-day summit – a core objective that underpins broader efforts to manage the world’s most consequential bilateral relationship.

    Daniel Kritenbrink, a former 30-year U.S. diplomat with deep expertise in Asian affairs and current partner at The Asia Group, explained that personal connections between heads of state carry outsized weight in this dynamic. “Leaders will tackle all manner of intractable, complex issues, but at the end of the day, they are still two people engaging with one another,” Kritenbrink noted. “That personal bond matters, and the gift exchange is one critical way to nurture that bond.” He added that rapport-building at the leader level is particularly important for Chinese diplomatic culture, and that the direct Trump-Xi relationship acts as the stabilizing glue for a partnership that shapes global security, economic growth, and technological progress. Both leaders, he emphasized, place high value on this style of personal, leader-to-leader diplomacy.

    Gift-giving has emerged as a notable feature of the Trump presidency, with the U.S. leader having received a range of high-value offerings from foreign counterparts, including a luxury jumbo jet, an engraved gold bar, and a gem-encrusted gold ring, among other items. Ole Jacob Sending, a researcher at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, argues that this focus on ceremonial exchanges aligns with Trump’s broader governing style: “If you look at how the Trump presidency operates, broadly defined gift-giving is very much a core part of his approach to diplomacy.”

    The exchange was reciprocal: earlier that same Thursday, Xi announced two major goodwill gestures from China to the United States: a gift of two giant pandas, Ping Ping and Fu Shuang, that will soon take up residence at Zoo Atlanta, and a new 100,000-student exchange initiative that will welcome 100,000 American students to study in Chinese institutions over the next five years. “Giant pandas have long served as envoys of friendship between the Chinese and American people,” Xi said. “In a few days, these two pandas will arrive at their new home to meet the American people.” It remains unclear whether additional gifts were exchanged, and the BBC has reached out to the White House for further comment.

    Scholars of diplomatic practice note that lavish state gift-giving is far more common in autocratic regimes and Gulf monarchies today, with research co-authored by Morten Skumsrud Anderson, who worked with Sending on a study of diplomatic gift exchange, finding that “autocracies like China tend to give far more expensive gifts” than democratic states. In Western democracies, longstanding legal guardrails and transparency rules have scaled back the value of state gifts. For the United States, the Constitution’s emoluments clause caps the value of gifts a sitting president can accept from a foreign government at $525. Any gift exceeding that threshold becomes property of the federal government, unless the president chooses to purchase it at full value out of their personal funds. U.S. presidents are also required to secure congressional approval for gifts above the limit unless they cover the cost personally. Anderson emphasized that these rules mean diplomatic gift exchange is anything than impulsive: “This is not a last-minute souvenir purchase at an airport.”

    Every detail of the exchange – from the type of gift to the timing, venue, and format of the reveal – is negotiated for weeks by lower-level diplomatic teams, resulting in a tightly scripted, carefully planned ceremony. Sending explained that missteps in gift-giving can carry real diplomatic consequences, pointing to high-profile blunders from past exchanges. During Xi’s 2013 state visit to the U.S., then-President Barack Obama gifted Xi a handcrafted inscribed bench made from California redwood, the native tree of the state where the two leaders met, a gesture that was widely praised as thoughtful and appropriate. That stands in contrast to a 2009 exchange between Obama and then-British Prime Minister Gordon Brown: Brown gave Obama an ornamental pen holder crafted from timber of a 19th-century anti-slavery ship, a historically significant gift, while Obama gifted Brown a box-set of DVDs that were incompatible with UK region-locked players. “That’s a classic example of an embarrassing misstep,” Sending said, noting that the incident was less consequential because the two leaders were close allies. For powers navigating deep-seated disagreements, however, a misjudged gift could derail broader negotiating goals.

    This summit marks the third face-to-face meeting between Trump and Xi since the start of Trump’s second term, held at a moment of significant friction between the two nations. The talks come amid growing global anxiety over AI competition, as both countries race to establish dominance in the fast-growing transformative technology, and follow a years-long bitter trade war that has only resulted in a temporary truce, extended during Xi’s visit.

    For Kritenbrink, the entire ceremonial apparatus of the state visit – from military flyovers to cultural performances, formal dinners, and the carefully planned gift exchange – all serves a single core purpose: laying the groundwork for stable bilateral relations. “It’s all protocol, optics, and relationship-building as a means to an end, which is stable US-China relations,” he said. “I’ll take a fragile truce over an all-out trade war any day.”

  • Iranian-American group sues Trump for ‘unconstitutional’ war on Iran

    Iranian-American group sues Trump for ‘unconstitutional’ war on Iran

    A Washington-based Iranian-American civic advocacy organization has initiated a landmark constitutional lawsuit against former U.S. President Donald Trump, demanding a federal court invalidate his ongoing military campaign against Iran as an unconstitutional overreach of executive power that bypassed required congressional authorization. The National Iranian American Council (NIAC) Action, the group’s advocacy arm, filed the 16-page complaint for declaratory judgment on Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, represented by prominent constitutional scholars and attorneys Alan Morrison and Bruce Fein.

    Lead counsel Morrison told reporters gathered at the National Press Club for the official announcement that the legal team would pursue the case through every available appellate level, regardless of early procedural hurdles. Morrison acknowledged that the U.S. Supreme Court has avoided ruling on core war powers questions throughout the nation’s 236-year history, but argued that the current circumstances present an unprecedented opportunity for judicial intervention. Notably, both the Republican-controlled Senate and Democratic-led House of Representatives already passed a bipartisan War Powers Resolution in June seeking to curb Trump’s authority to continue military operations against Iran, shifting the political landscape that has historically discouraged courts from taking up such cases. “This changed dynamic makes the court far more likely to accept our case and issue a binding ruling on the constitutionality of this war,” Morrison added.

    In response to the June congressional War Powers Resolution, the Trump White House issued a formal statement claiming that no active hostilities were ongoing, asserting that all combat operations launched February 28, 2026 were formally terminated by a presidential ceasefire order issued April 7 the same year. Despite that official ceasefire declaration, fragile truce has broken down repeatedly, with the U.S. conducting sustained multi-day bombing campaigns across Iran’s southern coastal region earlier this month. One of those strikes hit a civilian wedding venue, killing and wounding dozens of non-combatant civilians.

    NIAC President Jamal Abdi emphasized that Trump’s unauthorized war has exposed critical gaps in long-assumed checks and balances on executive war power, revealing that long-held guardrails were merely informal gentlemen’s agreements rather than enforceable constitutional limits. “This moment is not just about ending this ongoing catastrophe. It is about setting a binding precedent for the future, so no single president can drag our nation into war without explicit congressional approval,” Abdi told reporters. “This is a matter of life and death for innocent people on both sides, and it is long past time this fundamental constitutional question is settled once and for all.”

    At the heart of the legal challenge is the Constitution’s explicit Declare War Clause, which grants sole authority to initiate war to the legislative branch, not the executive. NIAC legal team argues that Trump’s months-long bombing campaign directly violates this core constitutional separation of powers. For decades, however, the constitutional requirement for congressional war declaration has fallen into disuse: the U.S. now routinely conducts large-scale military operations, including targeted extrajudicial killings, across multiple sovereign nations without formal declarations. The 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), passed days after the September 11 terrorist attacks, has been repeatedly stretched by successive administrations of both parties to justify open-ended military campaigns across the globe, many of which never deploy large ground combat forces. The executive branch has also gradually accumulated broad deference on foreign policy matters from both Congress and the courts over the past century.

    Co-counsel Bruce Fein noted that the dispute over executive war authority requires judicial resolution: “The president claims he has unilateral authority to wage this war, and every other branch and most constitutional scholars disagree. That is exactly why we are in court—there is no other body that can settle this constitutional question definitively.” In recent weeks, the Trump administration has launched a coordinated messaging push led by Vice President JD Vance, ordering reporters to avoid labeling the military campaign a “war,” and instead refer to it as sporadic “hostilities” or “skirmishes.” Morrison pushed back sharply on this rhetoric: “If you have been bombing another country continuously for seven months, that is a war. If you enforce a full blockade and kill hundreds of civilians, that is a war. When you have already spent $44 billion on military operations, that is unequivocally a war.”

    The lawsuit names eight Iranian-American plaintiffs who have suffered direct, personal harm from Trump’s bombing campaign, connecting their individual injuries to the legal challenge to establish standing for the court to hear the case. Kowsar Gowhari, one of the plaintiffs who spoke at Thursday’s press conference, lost four immediate family members in a U.S. strike, including a 70-year-old elderly cousin and a two-month-old infant. “I have an absolute responsibility as an American citizen to make sure their deaths are not forgotten and their loss does not go unanswered,” Gowhari said. “This is my country, I built my life here, and I cannot stand idle as my nation perpetuates this violence in violation of its own founding values. This war must end here, and it must end now.”

    Another plaintiff, Nima Dilmaghani, reported that his cousin was severely injured when the commercial warehouse where she worked was destroyed in a U.S. bombing. The woman suffered a fractured leg, permanent eardrum damage, and the amputation and unsuccessful reattachment of her index finger, which has permanently lost all function. Ten of her coworkers were killed in the same strike. U.S. Army veteran Alan Band, another Iranian-American plaintiff, shared that his family living in northern Tehran has endured repeated nearby explosions that shook their home’s foundations, cut off access to clean water and electricity for weeks at a time, and left the entire family traumatized. Parveen Esmaeilzadeh’s in-laws remain at constant risk of new strikes, suffer from severe post-traumatic stress disorder, and face catastrophic economic hardship. Her mother-in-law’s apartment building has sustained structural cracks from repeated blasts, and her nieces and nephews have not been able to attend a single day of school since the U.S.-Israeli joint campaign began February 28.

    Abdi closed by framing the lawsuit as a test of core constitutional principles: “This lawsuit asks one fundamental question that goes to the heart of our democracy: can a single person, acting alone, decide to keep an entire nation at war without the consent of the people’s elected representatives?”

  • From Nagaland to a path to the Oscars: Indian film brings a rarely seen world to global cinema

    From Nagaland to a path to the Oscars: Indian film brings a rarely seen world to global cinema

    Against all odds, a tiny-budget debut feature from one of India’s most remote regions has captured one of global cinema’s most prestigious honors, opening the door for underrepresented Indigenous storytelling on the world’s biggest stage.

    *Angh*, the first feature film from 24-year-old Naga director Theja Rio, was filmed entirely in Konyak—a little-known tribal language spoken by fewer than 300,000 people in Nagaland, India’s mountainous northeastern frontier state that is home to less than two million residents overall. With nearly every cast member making their first ever on-screen appearance, the quiet, intimate drama claimed the Toronto International Film Festival’s Platform Prize, an award granted by a jury of industry peers to films with uniquely distinctive directorial voices, this September. Jury members highlighted Rio’s “refreshing perspective” and his sensitive portrayal of a world that has rarely, if ever, been centered in mainstream international cinema.

    The unexpected victory also grants *Angh* a historic, unconventional path toward 2027 Academy Awards consideration. New Oscar rules allow winners of designated awards at six major international festivals to qualify for the International Feature Film category without needing to be selected as their country’s official entry—an opportunity that has pulled a work from a marginalized tribal community into a global conversation that has long excluded these types of narratives.

    In an interview just 72 hours after his win, Rio admitted he still feels stunned by the reception. “There were a lot of good films in the competition, including work from far more seasoned directors,” he said. “My producers were confident we’d win. I wasn’t.” Before turning to filmmaking, the first-time director originally dreamed of becoming a rapper, drawing eclectic inspiration that ranges from *The Roots* frontman Black Thought to legendary Iranian arthouse director Abbas Kiarostami. For his debut, he chose to turn his camera toward the place and people he knows best.

    Set in the early 1960s, just months before Nagaland formally attained statehood within India, *Angh* follows ageing hereditary village chief Anghba—leader of a Konyak community, where traditional chiefs are known as *Anghs*—and his curious young son, as sweeping social and religious change arrives at their doorstep. As Christianity spreads across the region, the pair remain among the last adherents of their community’s ancestral faith, until the arrival of an American missionary, played by Scottish actor Douglas Henshall, deepens the generational rift already growing between them: the father holds fast to inherited tradition, while his son is drawn to the new world on offer.

    Rio drew the inspiration for the film from a work trip to Nagaland’s Mon District, the heart of Konyak country, where he was struck by the extraordinary coexistence of past and present in local communities. “It feels like you’ve jumped on a time machine,” he explained. “Within a single family, a grandfather might be a former headhunter with traditional facial tattoos, and two generations later, his grandson could play guitar in a rock band. The past and the present sort of coexist together.”

    That era of rapid transition that forms the film’s backdrop was a turning point for Konyak society. For decades, Christianity had been reshaping not just religious belief, but deeply rooted customs, rituals and daily life. Dr B Amo Konyak, a leading scholar of Konyak culture, notes that many traditional practices were lost entirely, while others “survived in fragments” preserved in the memories of elders and family heirlooms, shifting from everyday life to formal cultural heritage. But he emphasizes that culture did not disappear—it adapted, as communities carried pieces of their tradition into new religious and social structures, altering meaning as they changed form.

    It is exactly that nuance of transition that Rio set out to capture. “The past 50 or 60 years have brought extraordinary churn, widening the distance between generations,” Rio said. The film explores this rift through the quiet, loving bond between Anghba and his son, who “intimately love and care about each other very deeply, even as their worlds begin to pull apart.”

    Film critic Siddhant Adlakha, who has praised *Angh* extensively, highlighted the film’s refusal to lean into simplistic tropes. “Progress and tradition can be nonlinear, even entwined, rather than strictly opposing forces,” he noted, praising the gentle ambiguity Rio brings to the story. While the film has not yet been released to wide audiences, its trailer hints at the immersive, atmospheric world Rio has built: mist-shrouded green mountain slopes, quiet paths winding through dense forests, faces lit by firelight in the dark. The landscape is not just a scenic backdrop; it is a small, tight-knit world held together by ritual and family, as outside forces press in from its edges.

    Most notably, *Angh* upends the long history of outsider portrayals of Konyak and Naga communities. For centuries, outside observers from colonial explorers to foreign filmmakers have framed Konyak people as exotic curiosities, fixating on their traditional facial tattoos, historical headhunting practices and cultural artifacts while ignoring their full, complex humanity. Rio set out to reverse that gaze. “There have been several films and documentaries made about Nagaland, but these sort of films tend to follow the gaze of the explorer rather than the subject,” he explained. With *Angh*, he aimed to invite viewers to “step inside the shoes of these characters.”

    That commitment to authenticity guided every step of production. Konyak cultural advisors consulted on dialogue, costume, and set design, nearly all local cast members were first-time performers from the community, and Rio and cinematographer Adam Pietkiewicz even made the deliberate choice to shoot on 16mm film. Drawing inspiration from 1950s and 1960s archival footage of missionaries and Naga communities, they sought to recreate the grainy, textured atmosphere of those mid-century images—while shifting the point of view from outsider observer to community insider. The choice created extraordinary logistical challenges: unlike digital film, 16mm could not be reviewed on set, so every four to five days, unprocessed reels had to be flown thousands of kilometers to Mumbai for development, leaving the crew shooting blind for days. Even smaller shoots went awry: during one night scene with Henshall, a vintage World War II Jeep that ran perfectly in rehearsal stalled as soon as cameras rolled, forcing the crew to capture the entire shot in a single take.

    The unexpected success of *Angh* also highlights the growing diversity of contemporary Indian cinema, with more regional filmmakers from underrepresented parts of the country gaining international acclaim. Adlakha points to other northeastern Indian filmmakers such as Assam’s Rima Das and Meghalaya’s Dominic Sangma, whose work has expanded global understandings of what Indian cinema can be. Rio notes that Nagaland’s film industry remains “at a very nascent stage,” far from the resources and reach of established Indian filmmaking hubs like Mumbai. But he hopes his film’s win will shine a spotlight on the many untold stories waiting to be told from his home region.

    For now, though, after the chaos of back-to-back interviews and cross-continental travel following his TIFF win, Rio just wants to return to normalcy: “I want to go back to Nagaland and play football with my friends.”

  • UN General Assembly 2026: ‘Do not allow another Nakba’, Mahmoud Abbas warns

    UN General Assembly 2026: ‘Do not allow another Nakba’, Mahmoud Abbas warns

    In a pre-recorded address to the United Nations General Assembly on Thursday, Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas issued a stark, urgent warning: the Palestinian people stand on the edge of a second Nakba unless the international community follows through on its repeated promises to support Palestinian self-determination. For the second year in a row, Abbas was unable to address the assembly in person, blocked by a visa ban imposed by the Trump administration on Palestinian officials and civil society groups that engage with UN-affiliated international judicial bodies, including the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court.

    Opening his remarks, the 90-year-old leader rejected the unlawful punitive measures targeting the PA, pushing back against the justifications used to impose them. “We affirm that we have fulfilled our obligations, carried out a comprehensive national reform programme and upheld our commitment to international law, to shunning violence and terrorism, and to the two-state solution and to peace on the basis of resolutions of international legitimacy,” Abbas stated. He emphasized that neither the Palestinian people nor their leadership deserve punishment for demanding an end to occupation and turning to legitimate international institutions to uphold their rights.

    While the Trump administration has effectively abandoned long-stated international support for a two-state solution, several key Western allies including Canada, the United Kingdom, France, and Spain formally recognized the State of Palestine last year and opened diplomatic missions for the PA. Abbas, however, slammed the gap between global rhetoric and tangible action: despite public statements of support and pledges of aid for PA security infrastructure and humanitarian work in Gaza, the international community has applied no meaningful pressure on Israel to halt its expansion of illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank, end escalating settler attacks on Palestinian communities, or stop ongoing air strikes in Gaza that have killed a dozen children in just the past month.

    Abbas warned that the threat facing Palestinians extends far beyond the erosion of the two-state solution. “The danger is no longer limited to undermining the two-state solution and preventing the realisation of the Palestinian state. It has now come to threaten the very life and existence of the Palestinian people on their homeland,” he said. He framed ongoing violence and displacement across Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem not as isolated incidents, but as a deliberate colonial project designed to make life unlivable for Palestinians and force them out of their historic homeland.

    The dire humanitarian reality on the ground underscores Abbas’ warning. Two million Palestinians trapped in Gaza are currently crowded into just one-third of the small enclave, most sheltering in flimsy tents with no adequate supplies to withstand winter weather. Since the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on southern Israel and the subsequent Israeli military campaign in Gaza, nearly 74,000 Palestinian bodies have been recovered, a figure officials expect to surpass 100,000 as search and clearance of rubble continues. More than 1,400 of these deaths have occurred since a nominal ceasefire was declared in October 2025. UN Secretary-General António Guterres recently described repeated short-term ceasefires as futile, calling them merely “lesser fires” that do nothing to end the underlying conflict.

    In the occupied West Bank, where Israeli security crackdowns have intensified parallel to the assault on Gaza, more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed so far this year, according to the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees.

    Abbas expressed deep regret that the PA’s commitment to a peaceful, institutional path to secure Palestinian rights – including its willingness to engage with Trump’s controversial 20-point Gaza reconstruction plan – has failed to deliver any tangible improvement for his people. “This was to halt the aggression against our people and their humanitarian suffering, and secure the withdrawal of the occupation forces from the Gaza Strip, and begin rebuilding the Gaza Strip. However, regretfully, we have not seen any of this materialise on the ground,” he said. Israeli attacks and killing of Palestinian civilians, including women and children, continue unabated in Gaza nearly a year after the UN adopted Resolution 2803 and established the Board of Peace, the transitional body tasked with overseeing Gaza’s reconstruction and governance. Only one year remains in the designated transition period, which is scheduled to conclude by the end of 2027.

    Last week, Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and the lead figure coordinating the reconstruction effort, acknowledged that the Board of Peace has faced significant “delays” in the 11 months since its formation. International aid agencies warned last month that the body is not just delayed, but actively failing the people of Gaza, saying it has only functioned “to further entrench Israel’s unlawful presence” in the territory.

    Abbas pushed the international community to answer a critical question: “What is the international community waiting for in order to protect the Palestinian people, ensure their continued presence on their land, end the Israeli occupation, and implement the two-state solution on the basis of international legitimacy?” He stressed that the transitional period cannot be allowed to become an open-ended, permanent status quo with no clear, time-bound path to Palestinian statehood.

    The PA President reaffirmed that the Palestinian Authority has met all its commitments to domestic political reform, including strengthening institutional governance, improving public financial management, increasing transparency and accountability, enacting anti-corruption measures, and upholding the rule of law. To cement these reforms, Abbas confirmed that long-delayed Palestinian legislative elections are still scheduled for November 28, followed by a presidential election. This will be the first general Palestinian election held in two decades; Abbas has held the presidency since 2005.