标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Pregnant and imprisoned: Palestinian women face harsh conditions in Israeli jails

    Pregnant and imprisoned: Palestinian women face harsh conditions in Israeli jails

    On the night of April 30, Israeli military forces raided the West Bank home of Musab Zaloum, a Palestinian father of two, as he and his family slept peacefully. Zaloum was separated from his wife Manar Karaja and their young children within minutes of the soldiers’ arrival, handcuffed and forced outside before he had any understanding of the operation’s target. It was only after he was placed in an armored military vehicle that a soldier informed him: 28-year-old Karaja, who was just two days prior confirmed to be pregnant with the couple’s third child, was under arrest.

    Zaloum, still cuffed, was soon allowed to return to the house, where he found his 5-year-old son Ayman and 4-year-old daughter Layla awake and screaming in terror. Woken by the commotion after the soldiers left, the children immediately begged to know where their mother was. To calm them in that terrifying moment, Zaloum told them intruders had broken into the home, and that their mother would return by morning. That promise was broken, and he soon had to tell the children the truth: the Israeli army had taken their mother.

    Karaja is one of three pregnant Palestinian women currently held in Israel’s Damon Prison, all of whom are being subjected to brutal, degrading conditions that put both their lives and the lives of their unborn children at severe risk, according to the Palestinian Prisoners’ Club. These three women are part of a larger population of 93 Palestinian female detainees held in Israeli prisons, a group that has seen conditions deteriorate dramatically since October 2023. Since that date, no family members nor International Committee of the Red Cross representatives have been granted access to visit the female prisoners.

    The Palestinian Prisoners’ Club released a statement accusing the Israeli Prison Service of ramping up punitive measures against female detainees in recent months. “Some pregnant prisoners have been subjected to harsh interrogations and detention conditions in cells that lack even the most basic sanitary standards,” the organization said. “This has exacerbated their physical and psychological suffering, leading to weight loss, emaciation and extreme exhaustion.” The group added that even pregnant detainees have been forced to undergo invasive, humiliating strip searches.

    For Zaloum, life since Karaja’s arrest has been consumed by worry. The couple had only just learned of their pregnancy days before the raid, and had already begun picking out names for their coming child, a brief burst of joy cut short by the midnight raid. Today, he cares for their two young children alone, and his biggest fear is the lack of proper food and medical care for his wife in detention. He describes the prison conditions as “deplorable”, noting that even the small rations provided to regular prisoners are far from enough to meet the dietary needs of a pregnant woman.

    Through lawyers that visit Karaja every few weeks (the only contact her family is allowed), Zaloum has learned that overcrowding at Damon Prison has forced Karaja to sleep directly on the cold concrete floor since her arrest, and she suffers from constant body pain as a result. Israel is holding Karaja on suspicion of incitement, a loosely defined charge that is frequently used to detain Palestinian women, often based on social media posts, and she remains in detention awaiting trial.

    Karaja is far from alone in her suffering. Thirty-five-year-old Dana Joudeh, a five-month pregnant woman from Nablus, was arrested on April 18. Just months before her arrest, Joudeh underwent gastric bypass surgery, and she had only just learned of her pregnancy when Israeli forces raided her home and detained her. She was first held at the notorious Hasharon detention center, where reports routinely document humiliating treatment, invasive strip searches, and the denial of basic necessities including mattresses and adequate food.

    Joudeh’s family told Middle East Eye that she has repeatedly suffered fainting spells and dehydration in detention, but prison officials have refused to provide the specialized medical care she needs given her pregnancy and recent surgery. “She told her lawyer that the women sleep on the floor in overcrowded, cold cells,” Joudeh’s mother said. “Some pregnant prisoners try to support others by sharing portions of bread and food, despite the already meagre rations and poor-quality meals.” The family lives in constant fear, with repeated requests for medical checkups for Joudeh ignored by prison authorities.

    In Qalqilya, 37-year-old Amina al-Taweel, a mother of four who is four months pregnant, has been held on incitement charges since her March 18 arrest. Her husband Ali Shawahneh, who himself has spent 19 years total in Israeli prisons, says her arrest came as a devastating shock. “On the day of her arrest, I told the officer, ‘Take me instead of her,’” he recalled. “He replied, ‘This time, you’re not the one we’re after – it’s your wife.’ They handcuffed her and took her away while I stood there in shock, and the children cried.” Now caring for their four children alone, Shawahneh says he cannot meet the children’s emotional needs as they grieve for their mother. Al-Taweel, who experiences severe complications in early pregnancy that require ongoing care, has no access to that support in prison. “During my last detention, I lost more than 60 kilograms because of the poor quality and scarcity of food. How is a pregnant woman supposed to endure that?” Shawahneh asked.

    Palestinian human rights defenders say Israel’s treatment of these pregnant detainees crosses every line of international law. Helmi al-Araj, director of the Hurryyat Centre for Defence of Liberties and Civil Rights, said that Israel’s policy of abuse toward prisoners has existed long before October 2023, but has become far more severe in recent months. “Prisoners face collective punishment, abuse, torture, starvation, isolation, and denial of family visits,” al-Araj told Middle East Eye. “All of this negatively impacts the psychological state of female prisoners who are mothers and pregnant women. This Israeli policy existed even before 7 October, but it has become a deeply entrenched policy based on grave violations of the rights of prisoners.”

    Official Palestinian detainee advocacy groups confirm that the broader population of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli custody faces systemic abuse. According to the Palestinian Commission of Detainees and Ex-Detainees Affairs, more than 9,300 Palestinians are currently held in Israeli prisons, including 93 women and more than 350 children. More than 765 women and girls have been arrested by Israeli forces since the start of the military campaign in Gaza in October 2023. Nearly half of all Palestinian detainees are held without charge or trial under indefinitely renewable administrative detention orders.

  • UN inquiry: Israel deliberately targeted Palestinian children as part of genocide

    UN inquiry: Israel deliberately targeted Palestinian children as part of genocide

    The United Nations’ leading independent investigative body mandated to probe violations in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has issued a landmark 88-page report concluding that Israeli security forces have systematically and deliberately targeted Palestinian children, committing acts of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes across the Gaza Strip, alongside additional war crimes in the occupied West Bank. The report covers the two-year period from October 7, 2023, to October 7, 2025, documenting that at least 20,179 Palestinian children were killed and another 44,143 wounded in Gaza during this window, with children accounting for 30% of all fatalities and 26% of all injuries recorded.

    Srinivasan Muralidhar, the current chair of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory (including East Jerusalem), emphasized that overwhelming on-the-ground evidence confirms Palestinian children have been intentionally targeted and killed by Israeli forces. He added that even after the ceasefire agreement reached in October 2025, the killing and maiming of children has continued, with Israel consistently ignoring the terms of the truce and its legal obligation to protect Palestinian children under international humanitarian law.

    Drawing directly from the provisions of the UN Genocide Convention, the inquiry concluded that the deliberate targeting of children constitutes clear evidence of Israel’s genocidal intent to destroy the Palestinian group, in whole or in part, within Gaza. This finding builds on the commission’s September 2024 conclusion that Israel was carrying out genocide in Gaza, a finding that former commission chair Navi Pillay described at the time as the most authoritative genocide determination the United Nations had issued to date on the situation in Gaza.

    Unlike previous findings, the new report centers its analysis specifically on the impact of the conflict on children, examining direct violence, arbitrary detention, reproductive harm, and long-term psychological trauma. The inquiry documents a repeated, consistent pattern of children being struck by Israeli precision weapons, including fire from sniper units and attacks by reconnaissance quadcopter drones. Medical workers operating in Gaza documented hundreds of cases where children presented with single gunshot wounds concentrated in the head and upper torso.

    The report details two horrific, representative cases to illustrate this pattern: in April 2024, a 10-day-old infant was shot in the head by an Israeli quadcopter while breastfeeding inside a displacement tent in Gaza’s Nuseirat refugee camp. Four months later, in August 2024, a four-year-old girl was killed by a quadcopter strike to the head while eating a meal with her family in Khan Younis. Seventeen frontline medical practitioners who treated casualties in Gaza confirmed to the commission that this pattern of targeted head and upper torso wounds from sniper and drone fire was uniform across child casualties. One physician told investigators that Israeli soldiers appeared to be engaging in “deliberately shooting teenage boys in a game of target practice.”

    The commission has publicly identified specific Israeli military units it found responsible for these targeted killings, including the Kfir Brigade, the 162nd Division, the 98th Division, the 99th Division, and an elite drone unit known as the Refaim or Ghost Unit.

    The report confirms that lethal violence against children has not ended with the October 2025 ceasefire, which Israel has repeatedly violated despite the agreement’s mandate to end all hostilities. A prominent example cited is the killing of two brothers, aged 9 and 10, who were shot dead by an Israeli drone near Bani Suheila in southern Gaza in late November while collecting firewood. Israeli forces attempted to frame the children as “suspects” crossing a restricted military boundary known as the yellow line, but the commission dismissed this claim as entirely baseless. Investigators confirmed the boys were more than 300 meters from the nearest Israeli troops, their identity as children collecting firewood was unambiguous, and the drone operator had an unobstructed, clear view of the pair before launching the strike.

    Beyond direct targeted killings, the report details the total systemic destruction of Palestinian childhood across every aspect of daily life. As of October 2025, 459 of Gaza’s 564 school buildings had sustained direct military damage, leaving more than 668,000 school-age children completely cut off from formal education and forcing them to miss three full academic years. By January 2026, more than 335,000 children under the age of five face severe long-term developmental delays after the complete collapse of early childhood support services in the enclave.

    Attacks on neonatal medical infrastructure have directly caused hundreds of preventable newborn deaths, the inquiry finds. Before October 2023, Gaza operated 178 incubators across eight full neonatal intensive care units; by November 2024, only 54 incubators remained functional. The report records that miscarriage rates in Gaza have risen by as much as 300% since the start of the conflict, and as of March 2026, 70% of all newborns in Gaza are classified as premature or underweight due to widespread maternal malnutrition and collapsed healthcare.

    The inquiry also documented widespread abuse against Palestinian children detained by Israeli forces, finding that detained children are routinely subjected to torture, sexual violence, forced public nudity, coercive stress positioning, and deliberate denial of food, water, and emergency medical care. One case highlighted is that of a 17-year-old boy from Ramallah who died in Israel’s Megiddo Prison in March 2025 from severe, prolonged malnutrition; Israeli authorities withheld his body from his family for months after his death. The commission classified his death as a deliberate war crime of willful killing.

    Muralidhar emphasized that the harm inflicted on Palestinian children will outlast active hostilities: “Even if the bombs and guns fall silent in Gaza and West Bank, Palestinian children will not simply recover overnight. The destruction of their health, education and development is irreversible.”

    The commission has issued a series of binding calls for action: it demands Israel immediately halt all military operations in Gaza and the West Bank, release all detained Palestinian children, return the bodies of deceased children withheld from families, and end its years-long blockade of Gaza. The inquiry also urges all UN member states to immediately cease all arms transfers to Israel and impose targeted sanctions on Israeli officials responsible for the documented violations, and calls on the International Criminal Court to prioritize the investigation of crimes against children in its ongoing inquiry into Palestinian violations.

    Notably, Israel did not respond to 13 separate formal requests for information or access from the commission to conduct its investigation.

  • ‘They spat in my face’: Palestinians describe abuse at Gaza crossings

    ‘They spat in my face’: Palestinians describe abuse at Gaza crossings

    For 38-year-old Palestinian academic Mahmoud al-Najjar, the Italian scholarship he had fought so hard to win was supposed to be a second chance at life. After losing his entire immediate family — his father, older brother, wife and all four of his children — in an Israeli bombardment of his Jabalia home in October 2024, al-Najjar had buried his grief to finish a master’s degree in international economics and publish research. Securing a place at Rome Tor Vergata University, with all the required applications, document certifications and interviews behind him, and official Israeli travel clearance already in hand, he saw the opportunity as the first step to rebuild after unspeakable loss.

    That promise of a new beginning was shattered in early June at the Karem Abu Salem (Kerem Shalom) border crossing, where Israeli forces detained al-Najjar, interrogated him, and cut off all contact with the outside world. His traveling companions, part of a group trip coordinated by the Italian embassy, were eventually allowed to proceed, and later shared the news of his arrest with his family. For al-Najjar’s loved ones, the shock of the news was compounded by the unorthodox way they learned of his disappearance: through social media, with no official notification from Israeli authorities.

    “After we said goodbye to Mahmoud and felt happiness that he was starting a new journey, we were shocked to read the news of his arrest across social media platforms,” Mahmoud’s 28-year-old youngest brother Attia al-Najjar told Middle East Eye. “It was very harsh to find out about his arrest and disappearance while browsing social media, without receiving any official notification.”

    After days of outreach, Attia finally connected with the family of a fellow traveler who witnessed the detention. The witness, who was also interrogated before being released, confirmed he saw Israeli forces take Mahmoud into custody. The al-Najjar family has since been left in agonizing uncertainty: Israeli authorities have disclosed no information about Mahmoud’s whereabouts, health, or legal status. A single confirmation came from the Al Mezan Centre for Human Rights, which verified Mahmoud was being held in Ashkelon Prison with a ban on visitor access through June 15. But after that date passed, no human rights organization has been granted access to check on his condition.

    The family’s anxiety has been amplified by existing trauma: Attia’s mother has suffered severe health complications from the ongoing stress, compounded by the 2024 bombardment that killed multiple family members, and the fact that two more of Attia’s brothers are already being held in Israeli prisons following an arrest during a military operation in the family’s displacement camp during the war. Attempts by Middle East Eye to contact the witness family were unsuccessful, as they declined interview requests out of fear for their safety and their son’s future abroad.

    Mahmoud’s detention is far from an isolated incident, according to human rights advocates and testimonies collected from Gaza travelers. Since the partial reopening of the Rafah and Karem Abu Salem crossings under the October 2025 Gaza ceasefire agreement, hundreds of students have attempted to travel abroad to resume their studies or take up academic opportunities, but widespread accounts of arbitrary detention, prolonged interrogation, physical abuse and humiliation have gone largely unreported, silenced by fear of retaliation.

    Mohammed Ahmed, a Gaza student who spoke to MEE under a pseudonym after successfully crossing to Europe to resume his studies, said that most students who have faced abuse refuse to speak out even anonymously. Ahmed himself had faced threats over his work as a journalist during the war, but passed security screening and received his travel permit, and ultimately crossed without incident. That luck did not extend to a colleague with a similar name who traveled shortly after him for the same scholarship program.

    “I was shocked when my colleague told me that he was interrogated by the Israeli army and questioned about journalistic work that I had done while I was in Gaza,” Ahmed said. “Despite telling them that he does not work as a journalist and has a different specialism, they stripped him of his clothes, beat him, abused him and humiliated him, simply because of the similarity of our names, before allowing him to leave.”

    Ahmed added, “Many students have gone through this humiliating experience, but fear for their lives and their families drives them to silence.”

    Lina al-Tawil, director of the Palestinian Center for the Defence of Prisoners, told MEE her organization has collected dozens of similar reports from travelers leaving Gaza — including students, medical patients, and their companions — documenting hours of arbitrary detention, intrusive interrogation, and in some cases, complete denial of exit permission, even for travelers who had already received official clearance.

    “We received direct testimonies from travelers or their families about being subjected to detention and security interrogations, which included questions about places of residence, relatives, movements inside the Strip, affiliations, and details with no direct relevance to travel or treatment,” al-Tawil said. While the organization cannot release a precise number of affected people due to limited access during ongoing conflict, al-Tawil confirmed that “the cases are recurrent and not isolated.”

    Testimonies collected by the center align with longstanding human rights warnings that Israeli authorities are using border crossing approvals as a pretext to detain and abuse Palestinians. Common abuses documented include handcuffing, blindfolding, and public humiliation, with intrusive questions about family members’ whereabouts, political affiliations, and connections that have no connection to travel eligibility.

    Abuse is not limited to Palestinians leaving Gaza: travelers returning to the Strip face identical mistreatment at Israeli checkpoints. Abdel Rahim Abu Toaima, a 39-year-old Gaza resident who traveled to Egypt in 2025 for his son’s open-heart surgery, spoke to MEE about his ordeal after being forced to undergo emergency knee surgery for a ruptured tendon before returning home.

    When Abu Toaima’s bus arrived at the Rafah checkpoint, he was called in for interrogation. After he repeatedly denied knowing the individuals Israeli soldiers asked about, he was beaten and humiliated. Despite informing soldiers of his recent knee surgery, they forced him to stand for two hours in extreme heat without a seat, stripped him naked, forced him to remove his surgical bandage, spat on him, and called him degrading slurs. When he asked for water, his request was denied.

    “After slapping and punching me, the army forced me to strip off all my clothes without respecting my privacy, especially in the presence of female soldiers,” Abu Toaima said. “They also forced me to unwrap the bandage from my knee, even though I could not bend my back. They spat in my face, called me the vilest names, and forced me to stand for two hours in intense heat. Whenever I told them I was tired and I could not stand, they insulted me more.”

    After hours of abuse, soldiers finally allowed Abu Toaima to enter Gaza, but confiscated his phone and other electronics. When he opened his suitcase back at his displacement tent in western Khan Younis, he discovered his and his son’s medication and most of their clothing had been stolen. Left without a phone in a Gaza market where replacement devices cost exorbitant sums out of reach for most residents, Abu Toaima now suffers from persistent swelling and bruising to his knee that requires ongoing treatment at Nasser Medical Hospital.

    “I left Gaza with my injured son, and I returned with a knee injury that has not yet healed, and a harsh, unexpected interrogation experience from whose pain I will never recover,” he said.

    According to Gaza’s government media office, of the 19,600 people who applied to exit Gaza through Rafah after its partial reopening, only around 7,000 — most of them critically ill patients — have been allowed to travel through after security screening. No official data exists for the number of people exiting through Karem Abu Salem, and only around 1,500 people have been allowed to re-enter Gaza through Rafah amid strict movement restrictions. For the al-Najjar family, outreach to the Red Cross and prisoner rights organization Addameer has yielded no new information about Mahmoud’s fate, leaving them trapped in limbo after every other loss they have endured.

    “We never expected this to happen, especially since he had obtained travel clearance from the Israeli side,” Attia al-Najjar said.

  • UK judge renews contempt proceedings against Palestine Action lawyer

    UK judge renews contempt proceedings against Palestine Action lawyer

    One of the United Kingdom’s most prominent human rights barristers is once again facing formal contempt of court proceedings, after the presiding judge in a high-profile Palestine Action trial chose to advance disciplinary action against him for a second time, in a move that legal observers describe as without historical precedent in English law.

    Rajiv Menon KC, a 30-year veteran of the bar who represented defendant Charlotte Head in both trials of six Palestine Action activists, stands accused of violating pre-trial directions issued by Justice Johnson, the judge overseeing the case at Woolwich Crown Court. The six activists were charged with aggravated burglary and criminal damage for damaging equipment at an Israeli-owned arms factory operated by Elbit Systems outside Bristol. After the first trial ended with all defendants cleared of aggravated burglary charges, a retrial in May resulted in four convictions on the criminal damage counts.

    The controversy stems from Menon’s January 2024 closing speech to the jury. Johnson had explicitly barred defense legal teams from referencing the long-held legal principle of “jury equity” — the right of juries to acquit defendants based on conscience, a right first established by the landmark 1670 Bushell’s Case. Johnson also ruled that the defendants could not argue the “lawful excuse” defense, which would have allowed them to claim the damage was justified to prevent greater harms from Israeli military operations in Gaza. He further ordered that all arguments about the broader context of the Gaza war be excluded from jury consideration.

    In his closing remarks, Menon read the inscription from a plaque at London’s Old Bailey that commemorates Bushell’s Case, and told jurors the judge could not order them to issue a conviction. He also noted that the defense had been blocked from presenting evidence about Elbit Systems’ role in Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, arguing it would be unreasonable to expect jurors to ignore this wider context when weighing the defendants’ motives. Menon has repeatedly denied violating the court’s directions, noting he never explicitly used the phrase “jury equity” or directly urged the jury to acquit on conscience, and repeatedly reminded jurors to follow the judge’s guidance.

    A prior attempt by Johnson to initiate contempt proceedings was thrown out by the Court of Appeal in May, when a three-judge panel ruled Johnson had acted unlawfully by referring the matter directly to the High Court. The panel instructed Johnson that he could either handle the allegation himself, refer the matter to the UK attorney general, send it to the Bar Standards Board for professional disciplinary action, or drop the case entirely.

    However, following a directions hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice on Friday, Johnson rejected all three of the Court of Appeal’s suggested options. In a ruling issued Monday, he confirmed he would instead refer the case to a separate High Court judge sitting at the Crown Court to hear the contempt proceedings. Johnson stated that he had concluded “there is a case to answer in contempt” and that advancing formal proceedings is “in the public interest to institute”, rejecting defense arguments that the case is too old to proceed. Johnson emphasized he has not yet reached a final finding of contempt, a decision that will rest with the new presiding judge.

    Adrian Waterman KC, representing Menon, told the court that Menon never “knowingly” breached the court’s orders, and that the barrister was “astonished” when the allegations were first raised. Quoting Menon directly, Waterman told the court: “I absolutely didn’t cross any line, any line whatsoever.” Waterman added that Menon repeatedly instructed the jury to follow the judge’s directions, and that the court could not find Menon in contempt unless it ruled his account of events was intentionally dishonest — a finding Waterman argued is impossible to support on the evidence.

    In contrast, prosecutor Tom Little KC argued that Menon’s closing speech amounted to a “clear, deliberate and sustained breach” of the court’s orders that meets the legal definition of contempt.

    Waterman has warned that the case carries far-reaching implications for the UK’s criminal justice system. He argued that defense barristers must be afforded wide latitude to advocate vigorously for their clients, and noted that Menon spent hours consulting with other senior defense lawyers to craft his closing remarks in line with the judge’s directions. Pursuing contempt charges, Waterman argued, will create a profound “chilling effect” across the legal profession, and could violate Menon’s right to freedom of expression protected under the European Convention on Human Rights.

    The case has already taken a severe personal toll on Menon. The court heard that Menon has suffered “deep anxiety” throughout the process, and that he was unable to be with his father when his father died recently, due to the ongoing proceedings against him.

    Garden Court Chambers, where Menon practices as a senior barrister, released a statement calling the unprecedented proceedings damaging to the UK’s justice system. “The administration of justice depends upon an independent bar willing and able to act in the best interests of their clients, fearlessly and with integrity,” the statement read. “The unprecedented [proceedings against Menon] undermine and diminish our system of criminal justice.”

  • US-Iran war headed for the gray zone

    US-Iran war headed for the gray zone

    When the United States and Iran signed a landmark memorandum of understanding (MoU) on the final day of the G7 summit on June 17, the diplomatic breakthrough was widely celebrated across the international community. Through terms that included the reopening of the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, targeted sanctions relief, and the launch of a 60-day formal negotiation window, the deal was initially viewed as a promising first step toward defusing a years-long conflict that had threatened both regional stability and global energy markets.

    But just weeks later, developments over the past weekend have laid bare the extreme fragility of this tentative agreement. While negotiators from both sides confirmed incremental progress during the first round of talks held in Switzerland, a cascade of new developments has stoked widespread fears that the entire diplomatic process could collapse, plunging the region back into open hostilities. Most notably, former President Donald Trump’s renewed threats of military intervention against Iran, paired with growing concerns over the physical safety of Iranian negotiating teams, have injected deep uncertainty into the process.

    Even the one tangible win the US claimed from the deal—the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint through which 20% of the world’s daily oil shipments pass—remains shrouded in uncertainty. As it stands today, the agreement is best characterized not as a permanent resolution to decades of conflict, but merely as a temporary pause in hostilities. It has largely restored the pre-escalation status quo, but has left core tensions between the US, Iran, and Israel entirely unaddressed.

    One critical, underdiscussed factor hanging over the process is Israel’s awkward outsider position. The country is one of the parties most deeply affected by any US-Iran deal, yet it was excluded from negotiations entirely. It retains the capacity to derail any diplomatic progress, and its ongoing military assault on Lebanon stands in direct violation of the MoU’s terms, creating a persistent flashpoint for renewed escalation.

    Most analysts agree that the most probable long-term outcome is a return to what has become known as gray-zone conflict: a state of persistent hostility that falls short of open, full-scale war. In this context, that would likely mean a continuation of proxy warfare, cyberattacks, economic coercion, and periodic spikes in military confrontation. While active large-scale shooting has paused, all the underlying geopolitical and ideological forces that sparked the original conflict remain firmly in place.

    This incomplete outcome represents a major setback for US strategic goals in the region. When Washington launched its current round of confrontation with Tehran, it promised three core outcomes: the full dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program, the rolling back of Iran’s regional influence, and the restoration of American deterrence across the Middle East. Instead, the MoU delivers significant economic relief to Iran, while leaving all three core US objectives unmet—including unresolved disputes over Iran’s ballistic missile program, its regional proxy networks, and long-term caps on uranium enrichment.

    For Iran, by contrast, simply maintaining its ruling regime’s survival through the pressure campaign already qualifies as a strategic victory. Despite sustained coordinated pressure from both the US and Israel, the Iranian government remains fully intact and is now negotiating from a position of strength rather than surrendering to US demands.

    The conflict has also laid bare the fundamental limits of Western-led security arrangements in the Gulf. Gulf Arab states have witnessed firsthand that even the overwhelming military superiority and advanced weapons arsenals of the US and Israel do not guarantee decisive political outcomes, nor do they provide reliable protection against unintended escalation.

    For the US, the MoU also serves as a public acknowledgment of the mounting economic costs of its years-long confrontation with Iran, which have already surpassed $132 billion and continue to climb. Disruptions to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz drove global energy prices higher, strained longstanding US alliances in the region, and proved that military coercion has clear limits. While sanctions relief and the resumption of Iranian oil exports may ease near-term economic pressures, it also reinforces a dangerous perception (for US strategic goals) that sustained pressure and gray-zone aggression can force even a global superpower to the negotiating table.

    Perceptions carry enormous weight in international politics. For Washington’s Gulf partners, the MoU has sparked new doubts about America’s willingness to stick to ambitious regional strategic objectives when the political and economic costs of confrontation grow too high. For Iran, on the other hand, the deal has left it strategically stronger: it creates much-needed breathing room for economic recovery and strategic adaptation, making it almost certain that Iran will continue expanding its regional influence through cyber operations, proxy networks, and other gray-zone tactics.

    Israel faces perhaps the most challenging strategic reckoning of any party. For decades, its national security doctrine has been built around maintaining unchallenged military superiority, backed by $4 billion in annual military aid from the US. The MoU makes clear that Israel’s core strategic priorities are now directly at odds with those of its closest ally and patron. It has forced open uncomfortable questions about how far Washington is willing to align its own regional goals with Jerusalem’s security demands.

    Israel’s long-standing strategic culture prioritizes self-reliance when it comes to countering Iranian threats. This means it will almost certainly continue pursuing covert operations, targeted assassinations, and unilateral military strikes against perceived Iranian assets and interests across the region. While the formal US-Israeli security alliance has not fractured, the open strategic rift could make future coordination far more transactional, even as Israel remains deeply dependent on American military and diplomatic support. Addressing the divide, US Vice President JD Vance pushed back against criticism of the MoU from Israeli cabinet members during a June 19 White House briefing, noting that “Donald J Trump is the only head of state in the entire world who is sympathetic to the nation of Israel at this moment in time.”

    Beyond the immediate dynamics of the US-Iran conflict, the June 17 MoU offers critical insight into the changing nature of geopolitical conflict in the 21st century. Modern great power confrontations rarely end in clear-cut victory or defeat. Instead, they increasingly devolve into prolonged, low-intensity competitions waged in the gray zone between formal peace and open war. When full-scale escalation becomes too costly for all parties, states simply regroup and continue their rivalry through alternative, non-conventional means.

    For the Middle East, this reality means significant risks will remain for the foreseeable future. A comprehensive permanent settlement within the 60-day negotiation window appears extremely unlikely, given the intractable ongoing disputes over sanctions, nuclear enrichment, and regional security. Continued Israeli military operations in Lebanon could unravel the fragile truce at any moment, and Gulf US allies may respond to the persistent uncertainty by deepening their economic and security ties to China and Russia to hedge against American unpredictability.

    Ultimately, the US-Iran MoU is far less a peace agreement than it is a temporary diplomatic holding pattern. It has reduced immediate tensions and stabilized global energy markets, but it leaves all the underlying drivers of conflict completely intact. Relations between the US, Iran, and Israel will therefore almost certainly continue to oscillate between periods of confrontation and tentative accommodation for years to come. Addressing the deep roots of regional instability—including competing regime security concerns, ideological rivalry, and sprawling transnational proxy networks—would require a far more ambitious, comprehensive settlement than any 14-point memorandum can ever deliver.

  • ‘Killed pursuing her dream’: Gaza girl on her way to school dies in Israeli drone strike

    ‘Killed pursuing her dream’: Gaza girl on her way to school dies in Israeli drone strike

    In the heart of Gaza City, a 17-year-old Palestinian teenager with a single, unshakable dream – to complete her secondary education and secure a future through learning – would never reach the classroom that awaited her. Just days before her final exam preparatory classes were set to kick off, Raghad Ashour had already turned down a marriage proposal, choosing books over a walk down the aisle in a conflict zone where normal childhoods have long been erased by violence.

    On a quiet Monday morning, Raghad stepped out of her family’s makeshift tent in a central Gaza displacement camp and set off toward a private learning center just a short walk away. She never crossed the center’s threshold. Mere meters from her destination, an Israeli drone strike in the Rimal neighborhood took her life instantly. The double-tap attack left at least five additional people wounded, their fates added to a growing toll of civilian casualties in the renewed hostilities.

    Raghad’s story is far from an isolated tragedy in Gaza’s collapsing education system. For three consecutive years, more than 658,000 school-aged children across the enclave have been locked out of in-person learning. Israeli attacks have damaged or destroyed more than 97% of Gaza’s school infrastructure, and the few buildings left standing have been repurposed as emergency shelters for the tens of thousands of families displaced by bombing campaigns that began in October 2023.

    To address the ongoing crisis, the Palestinian Ministry of Education rolled out limited remote learning options, prioritizing senior secondary students gearing up for critical exams. Lessons, study guides, and academic support are distributed via digital platforms, messaging apps, and pre-recorded or live online sessions where connectivity allows. But for the vast majority of Gaza’s student population, accessing these resources remains an insurmountable challenge. Widespread destruction of electricity and telecommunications networks has left most displacement camps and residential areas with little to no power or stable internet access.

    To overcome these barriers, many desperate students travel to public spaces like cafes powered by solar panels or scarce fuel generators to download study materials, charge their devices, and sit for online exams. Others, like Raghad, turn to small private learning centers that offer in-person supplementary support to bridge gaps left by interrupted remote learning.

    Speaking to Middle East Eye as he received mourners at Raghad’s funeral, her great-uncle Jamil Ashour recalled the teenager’s relentless determination to pursue her education against all odds. “Despite everything she had been through, she was determined to attend her classes,” he said. “She found a centre near the camp and went there every morning. She studied hard and would arrive early to secure a desk and make sure everything was ready before lessons began. But she never made it to the centre.”

    Raghad faced constant setbacks: frequent blackouts that left her unable to charge her phone back at the tent, broken devices, and the constant uncertainty of life under bombardment. But nothing could sway her from her goal. Orphaned as a toddler when her father was killed in an Israeli attack when she was just three years old, Raghad saw education as her only path to stability and independence. “She grew up a single orphan and came to realise that nothing could support her like an education that would secure her a good job,” Jamil Ashour explained.

    As the only daughter in a family of five children, Raghad was the heart of her displaced family’s tent. Her mother, who raised Raghad and her four brothers alone after her husband’s death, called the teenager not just a daughter, but a friend and companion through the darkest days of displacement and grief. “Just yesterday, I visited them in their tent and drank tea she had made with her own hands,” Ashour recalled. “She told me stories, and we laughed together. She was the flower of the house. Her brothers adored her.”

    When a marriage proposal came for Raghad just days before her death, her mother was overjoyed – after decades of hardship, she had never imagined she would live to see her daughter reach marriageable age. But Raghad was unwavering in her refusal. She called her great-uncle to mediate, insisting she would first finish secondary school and go on to university. “But Raghad completely refused the idea. She didn’t want to get married, so she called me to come over and convince her mother. She wanted to finish her education and go to university,” Ashour said.

    The shock of Raghad’s death was too much for her mother to bear; she fainted immediately after news of the strike reached the camp and was admitted to hospital, where she remained as of Tuesday. “Her heart simply couldn’t bear it; she fainted despite everyone trying to comfort her,” Ashour added.

    Raghad is one of more than 1,011 Palestinians killed in Israeli military operations in Gaza since a ceasefire agreement ended a previous round of hostilities in October 2025. More than 3,000 additional people have been wounded in the renewed violence, a toll that continues to climb daily. Like many civilian casualties, Raghad was not a target of the strike – Jamil Ashour points to the common Israeli justification that strikes are aimed at specific militants, a claim that rings hollow for the families of innocent children caught in the crossfire.

    “This is just a child. What does she have to do with all of this?” Ashour asked. “She insisted on continuing her education, despite being deprived of her father, her home, and any chance to live a normal childhood.”

    Originally from Beit Hanoun in northern Gaza, Raghad and her family had been displaced multiple times after the 7 October 2023 outbreak of hostilities, their home reduced to rubble by an Israeli airstrike before they settled in the central Gaza camp. For the family, what little consolation exists comes from the knowledge that Raghad died chasing the future she fought so hard to build. “Our only consolation is that she was killed on her way to pursuing her dream,” Ashour said.

    Official data from the Palestinian Ministry of Education underscores the scale of the catastrophe facing Gaza’s student population. Since October 2023, at least 19,100 Palestinian K-12 students and 1,379 university students have been killed in Israeli attacks, with another 28,419 K-12 students and 3,017 university students wounded. For the surviving students, the dream of education remains out of reach for most, trapped between collapsing infrastructure and ongoing violence that shows no sign of abating.

  • China’s newest aircraft carrier sails through the Taiwan Strait

    China’s newest aircraft carrier sails through the Taiwan Strait

    Tensions across the Taiwan Strait have flared again this week, after China’s most advanced domestically built aircraft carrier sailed through the contested waterway on Tuesday, just 24 hours after Taiwan launched a five-day military exercise focused on repelling a potential Chinese attack, Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense confirmed. The Fujian, China’s third and latest aircraft carrier, is no stranger to the strait: it first completed a trial transit through the 180-kilometer waterway that separates mainland China from the self-governing island of Taiwan back in September 2023, and made its first crossing as an officially commissioned active-duty vessel this past December. The warship was formally commissioned into the People’s Liberation Army Navy in November 2024, and according to the U.S. Naval Institute, it holds the distinction of being the largest non-nuclear powered aircraft carrier currently in operation anywhere in the world. Outfitted with a modern electromagnetic catapult launch system, the Fujian is widely recognized as technologically superior to China’s two older aircraft carriers, the Liaoning and the Shandong. For decades, Beijing has maintained its territorial claim over Taiwan, which has governed itself autonomously since 1949, and Chinese officials have repeatedly declined to rule out the use of military force to reunify the island with the mainland. In recent years, Chinese military activity near Taiwan has grown exponentially: regular patrols of naval vessels and combat aircraft around the island now occur on an almost daily basis, as Beijing ramps up political and military pressure on the Taipei government. Taiwan’s drills, which kicked off on Monday, are explicitly designed to test and refine the island’s military protocols for responding to a full-scale Chinese invasion, according to Taiwanese defense officials. The latest transit comes amid long-standing trans-Pacific tensions over the Taiwan issue, with the United States and several of its key allies conducting periodic freedom of navigation transits through the Taiwan Strait to send a clear signal to Beijing that they oppose any unilateral attempt to alter the status quo through force. U.S. Navy warships regularly sail through the waterway, a practice that has drawn fierce condemnation from China, which views such operations as provocative violations of its territorial sovereignty.

  • Leading Pakistan activist given life sentence over soldier’s killing at rally

    Leading Pakistan activist given life sentence over soldier’s killing at rally

    A prominent Pakistani human rights defender who has spent more than a decade advocating for victims of enforced disappearances in the restive southwestern province of Balochistan has received a life sentence in connection with the 2024 killing of a paramilitary soldier during a mass protest. Mahrang Baloch, head of the Balochistan Unity Committee (BYC), was found guilty of murder and terrorism charges alongside BYC activist Sibghatullah, in a ruling that has drawn sharp condemnation from human rights groups and global activists over allegations of procedural bias.

    Prosecutors have alleged that the two activists incited a crowd of protesters to launch a fatal attack on Federal Constabulary soldier Shabbir Ahmed during the rally held in the strategic port city of Gwadar. A senior security official claimed that Baloch delivered an inflammatory speech that spurred 30 to 40 attendees to attack a military vehicle with stones and sticks, leading to Ahmed being separated from his unit and beaten to death by the crowd. However, both Baloch and Sibghatullah have vehemently denied all accusations, and joined their full legal team in boycotting the entire trial proceedings to protest what they describe as unfair treatment.

    The conviction was handed down by an anti-terrorism court based in Quetta, Balochistan’s capital. In its ruling, the court stated that the two BYC leaders participated in an illegal gathering organized by the group and shared common intent in the killing of the law enforcement official. Alongside the life prison term, the court ordered the pair to pay a fine of 200,000 Pakistani rupees, equivalent to roughly $719 or £543, as compensation to Ahmed’s surviving family. Local media reports confirm that Baloch and Sibghatullah have already been detained in custody for two years while facing a broad range of unrelated charges.

    The verdict has quickly drawn widespread criticism from domestic and international observers. The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, the country’s leading independent human rights body, has called for an immediate judicial review of the ruling, arguing that the Pakistani state has repeatedly equated legitimate advocacy for fundamental civil rights with violent extremism, producing lopsided and biased administrative and judicial outcomes.

    Nadia Baloch, Mahrang Baloch’s sister and a member of her legal team, condemned the ruling as unlawful, saying the defendants were systematically denied access to due process. She and the legal team have described the proceeding as a ruling from a “faceless court,” noting that defense attorneys were barred from conducting proper cross-examination of prosecution witnesses, who testified against the defendants via pre-recorded video link.

    The verdict also drew rebuke from high-profile global activist Greta Thunberg, who took to social media to denounce the trial as a blatant “mockery of justice” conducted in complete secrecy. Thunberg accused the Pakistani government of deliberately criminalizing peaceful political dissent against state policies in Balochistan.

    In response to the criticism, a spokesperson for the Balochistan provincial government told the Associated Press that prosecutors held “undeniable evidence” to support the convictions, and rejected claims that the case was politically motivated.

    Mahrang Baloch, who was named one of the BBC’s 100 Women of 2024 for her human rights work, first entered activism after her own father was allegedly abducted by Pakistani security service officers in 2009. His tortured body was recovered two years after his disappearance. In late 2023, she made global headlines when she led hundreds of female family members of missing Baloch people on a 1,600-kilometer, or 1,000-mile, march from Balochistan to Islamabad, the national capital, demanding accountability for the decades-long crisis of enforced disappearances in the province.

    The BYC, the grassroots organization Baloch leads, campaigns for an end to enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings in Balochistan, a region that has seen a decades-long push for greater political autonomy from the Pakistani federal government. The BYC has repeatedly denied Pakistani government claims that the group maintains ties to armed Baloch separatist militant groups.

  • Supreme Court kills suit claiming Cisco’s technology helped China persecute Falun Gong members

    Supreme Court kills suit claiming Cisco’s technology helped China persecute Falun Gong members

    In a landmark decision that reshapes the scope of U.S. court jurisdiction over international human rights claims filed against American corporations, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in favor of tech giant Cisco Systems, bringing a long-running lawsuit brought by Falun Gong practitioners to an abrupt end. The plaintiffs had accused Cisco of intentionally designing and providing custom surveillance technology that Chinese authorities used to systematically persecute members of the spiritual movement. The nation’s highest court concluded that U.S. judicial forums lack proper jurisdiction to hear the case, rejecting the plaintiffs’ arguments that the litigation could proceed under two long-standing federal statutes: the 18th-century Alien Tort Statute (ATS) and the 1991 Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA).

    Written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the 6-3 majority opinion closed the narrow exception that the high court had tentatively opened in a 2004 ruling, when the court suggested that a limited category of international human rights claims could be heard under the ATS. Barrett explicitly stated that the supposed class of viable ATS claims for actions occurring outside U.S. borders is effectively an empty set. While she acknowledged that the allegations in the case involve acknowledged horrific, inhumane conduct, Barrett affirmed that U.S. courts are not the appropriate venue to address alleged wrongs committed by foreign governments on foreign soil.

    In a sharp dissenting opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned that the ruling does not merely block access to court for the Falun Gong plaintiffs in this case, but effectively shuts the door to all future litigants seeking redress for violations of international law brought under the ATS.

    The legal dispute stretches back more than a decade to 2011, when Falun Gong members filed suit against Cisco, alleging that the company deliberately customized its networking and surveillance technology for the Chinese government, fully aware that the tools would be deployed to track, detain, and torture practitioners of the spiritual movement. To overcome the court’s long-standing skepticism of overseas human rights claims brought in U.S. courts, the plaintiffs argued that a significant share of Cisco’s core work related to the Chinese government’s surveillance project was developed and carried out at the company’s facilities within the United States. Cisco has repeatedly and vigorously denied all allegations of wrongdoing in the case.

    Background context for the suit has been reinforced by award-winning investigative reporting from the Associated Press, which last year published a sweeping investigation documenting how major American technology companies have actively collaborated to build and design China’s extensive domestic surveillance infrastructure. The reporting, which earned AP the 2024 Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting, confirmed that successive U.S. presidential administrations from both major political parties have encouraged this collaboration, even as human rights activists repeatedly warned that the surveillance tools would be weaponized to suppress political dissent, target religious minorities, and persecute marginalized communities.

    Declassified documents and internal corporate presentations from 2008, leaked and reviewed by the AP, show that Cisco publicly framed China’s Golden Shield internet censorship and surveillance program as a major profitable business opportunity. Internal materials from that year even repeated the Chinese government’s official labeling of Falun Gong as an “evil cult,” and one company presentation confirmed that Cisco’s products could accurately identify more than 90 percent of Falun Gong-related online content. Additional internal presentations reviewed by AP show that Cisco categorized Falun Gong content as a national “security threat” for the Chinese government, and assisted in building a nationwide digital tracking system specifically designed to monitor Falun Gong practitioners. During oral arguments before the Supreme Court in April, Sotomayor pointedly noted that Cisco was fully aware its technology would be used to torture Falun Gong members, a claim the company’s legal team has repeatedly rejected.

  • Thai woman faces a Myanmar court in an immigration trial tied to US diplomat’s killing

    Thai woman faces a Myanmar court in an immigration trial tied to US diplomat’s killing

    BANGKOK – In a high-profile case unfolding under Myanmar’s military-led administration, a Thai citizen has made her second court appearance this week, facing an initial immigration charge tied to the alleged murder of her former American diplomat husband earlier this year.

    Pavinee Suparivisarn was found connected to the May killing of the U.S. diplomatic official, whose identity has still not been made public by authorities. While a murder charge carrying the maximum penalty of death is already filed against her, Myanmar’s judicial system is moving forward first with the separate immigration violation charge. Under local law, this charge can be applied to any foreign national who commits a criminal offense within Myanmar’s borders, carrying a sentence of between six months and five years in prison if convicted.

    Tuesday’s hearing at Yangon’s Kamayut Township Court saw three prosecution witnesses – including two immigration officials – give testimony, according to a legal professional familiar with the case who spoke to the Associated Press on condition of anonymity. The source cited fear of retaliation from Myanmar’s ruling military junta as the reason for withholding their name. They added that Pavinee was accompanied by two court-appointed legal representatives, but no additional details on the proceeding were available, and it remains unclear whether the defendant has formally entered a plea to the charge.

    An official from the Kamayut Township Immigration and Population Department independently confirmed that witness testimony was held during the hearing, but also declined to share further details, speaking anonymously as they were not granted permission to engage with international media.

    Multiple key institutions connected to the case have declined all requests for comment. This includes the investigation team leading the murder probe, the prison where Pavinee is believed to be detained, and the court itself. Under current rules in Myanmar, independent journalists are barred from observing open court proceedings, leaving little public visibility into the progression of the case. It is also still unknown how long the immigration trial will run, or when the separate murder trial – which could result in a 10-year prison sentence or capital punishment – will begin.

    The killing took place on May 11 at the Sakura Residence & Hotel, a Yangon accommodation located just 1.5 kilometers from the U.S. Embassy, a popular venue for international diplomats, business executives and foreign visitors. According to the legal source, the deceased diplomat was found dead at the property with multiple stab wounds to the head and neck. The U.S. State Department has publicly confirmed the death of the American official but has declined to release any additional details, including the victim’s full identity.

    Thailand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has confirmed it is providing consular support to Pavinee, consistent with standard consular practices for Thai nationals facing legal proceedings overseas, but has also refused to share further details on the case.

    The proceeding comes against a volatile backdrop in Myanmar, which has been locked in widespread civil conflict since the military seized power in a 2021 coup that ousted the democratically elected government led by Aung San Suu Kyi. Since the coup, junta authorities have severely restricted press freedom, limited public access to judicial proceedings, and rarely engage with independent international media.