标签: Asia

亚洲

  • National Portrait Gallery display withdrawn after Churchill row

    National Portrait Gallery display withdrawn after Churchill row

    A heated debate over former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill’s connection to the 1943 Bengal famine has led to the removal of a controversial video installation from London’s National Portrait Gallery, sparking new conversations about artistic freedom, historical interpretation, and institutional accountability.

    Created by Turner Prize-winning artist Helen Cammock, the 40-minute work titled *Persistence* was developed in partnership with the gallery beginning in 2023. Part of the temporary exhibition “Artists First: Contemporary Perspectives on Portraiture”, the piece had been on public display for 10 months and was scheduled to run through August. In her self-narrated installation, Cammock drew a parallel between Oliver Cromwell’s 17th-century mass starvation tactics during military campaigns in Ireland and what she described as “the wilful starvation of the Indian population by Winston Churchill” during the devastating 1943 famine.

    The artist’s framing quickly drew fierce pushback from prominent historical figures and politicians. Churchill biographer Lord Roberts of Belgravia organized an open letter to the gallery leadership, which gathered signatures from more than 50 members of the House of Lords — including Churchill’s own grandson, Sir Nicholas Soames. The letter argued that Cammock’s characterization of Churchill was factually incorrect, dismissing the claim as an “ideologically motivated rant”. Lord Roberts contended that the famine was primarily triggered by a devastating typhoon, and that Churchill had directed his war cabinet to deploy all available resources to support affected regions, even requesting emergency grain shipments from global allies. While this perspective is shared by some historians, other academics have long argued that wartime policy decisions made by Churchill’s government exacerbated the crisis. An estimated 3 million people died in the famine that struck eastern India, and Churchill’s exact role remains one of the most hotly contested topics in modern colonial history.

    Beyond the open letter, the gallery also received direct complaints from members of the public. Initially, the institution defended the work as a legitimate expression of the artist’s personal perspective, but the controversy gained sustained national media attention last week, ultimately leading to the work’s removal on Monday.

    In an official statement provided to BBC News, the National Portrait Gallery confirmed that Cammock had made the independent decision to withdraw her piece. “We respect her decision, just as we acknowledge the opinions of those who were offended by what was said in the film,” the gallery said. It emphasized that the exhibition framework was designed to center artists’ personal creative responses to the gallery’s permanent collection, noting “the work was presented as an artistic piece, not a documentary, and the views expressed in the film do not necessarily reflect those of the NPG.” The institution added that it remains committed to balancing respect for the historical legacies of figures in its collection with support for free artistic expression.

    Cammock, however, has pushed back against what she describes as overwhelming external pressure to censor challenging historical narratives. In her own statement released Monday, she said: “There is an incredible pressure on artists and arts institutions to bend to external pressure; to be benign at best and silent at worst. I do not accept this pressure. To question, challenge and explore ideas and histories is vital to a healthy society and art is intrinsic to this.”

    The artist added that her work was rooted in existing academic research on the famine, and that its core goal was to interrogate how society chooses to honor and memorialize historical figures. “It asks us to think about who is honoured and valorised and who is not; whose stories are told and whose are not,” she said. Echoing activist and artist Nina Simone, Cammock noted: “An artist’s duty, as far as I’m concerned, is to reflect the times, and sometimes this means revisiting, enquiry and challenge.”

  • ‘Devotion is everything’: Breaking Bad star Giancarlo Esposito converts to Islam

    ‘Devotion is everything’: Breaking Bad star Giancarlo Esposito converts to Islam

    Hollywood star Giancarlo Esposito, best known for his iconic Emmy-nominated turn as calculating drug kingpin Gus Fring in *Breaking Bad*, has become the center of a viral global conversation after unconfirmed reports emerged that he has converted to Islam, sparked by his recent public remarks and on-site activities during a film tour in Morocco.

    The 66-year-old multihyphenate — who counts acting, directing and producing among his credits — traveled to the North African kingdom this June to promote *7 Dogs*, a Saudi-backed Arabic-language action thriller in which he portrays Roman, a shadowy antiquities trafficker with deep ties to the elite ranks of the eponymous criminal syndicate.

    While walking the red carpet for the film’s premiere, Esposito made striking remarks that quickly drew attention: “In your country, Muhammad is everything. For me, it’s the same.” In a subsequent interview with Radio Abraham, filmed while Esposito held what appeared to be Islamic prayer beads, he expanded on his comments, describing Moroccans as “a mirror” for himself. He praised the community’s open devotion, noting their shared understanding “that there is one God, one Allah,” and added that his time in the country allowed him to “see the truth.”

    Days after the premiere, Saudi Arabia’s General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki Alalshikh shared a video on the platform X that pushed the story into viral territory. The footage captures Esposito leading a prayer alongside his *7 Dogs* production colleagues inside Casablanca’s iconic Hassan II Mosque. Alalshikh’s accompanying caption claimed Esposito made the decision to embrace Islam during months of filming *7 Dogs* on location in Saudi Arabia. As of press time, the post has racked up more than 13 million views.

    In a pre-video interview with *Lalla Fatema* magazine at the Casablanca premiere, Esposito himself had already confirmed that his first stop after arriving in Morocco was the Hassan II Mosque, where he said he stopped to pray. To date, the acclaimed actor has not issued an official, personal confirmation of the conversion reports. Multiple requests for comment from Middle East Eye went unanswered ahead of publication.

    Even without an official statement, the news has exploded across social media, with overwhelmingly positive reactions pouring in, particularly from Arabic-speaking users around the world. Dozens of posts across X and Instagram have welcomed Esposito to the Islamic faith, with many users calling the announcement one of the most pleasant and surprising pieces of entertainment news in recent memory. One user wrote on X: “By God, this is the best news of the day. Esposito converted to Islam and pronounced the testimony of faith, may God make him steadfast.” Another commented: “One of the most shocking and heartwarming news stories at the same time. Uncle Gustavo Fring from *Breaking Bad* and *Better Call Saul* embraces Islam. Praise be to God, that God guides whom He wills.”

    Alongside sincere messages of welcome, many social media users have leaned into humor, creating lighthearted memes that tie Esposito’s reported conversion to his most famous on-screen roles. One viral X post edited a classic promotional photo of Esposito standing next to the sign for Gus Fring’s fictional fried chicken restaurant Los Pollos Hermanos, replacing the original logo with that of beloved Saudi fried chicken chain Albaik. On Reddit, users joked: “Los Pollos will now be serving halal chicken.” The playful content has only amplified the story’s reach, turning a celebrity religion story into a global viral conversation.

  • Ben Gvir says Lebanon should be ‘Israel’s playground’, urges Netanyahu to defy Trump

    Ben Gvir says Lebanon should be ‘Israel’s playground’, urges Netanyahu to defy Trump

    In a provocative address that upends ongoing regional ceasefire efforts, far-right Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir publicly ruled out any potential truce with Lebanon on Monday, doubling down on extreme rhetoric that frames the entire country as a legitimate military target for Israeli forces.

    Speaking at the weekly faction meeting of his ultranationalist Otzma Yehudit party held in Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, Ben Gvir issued a direct demand to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: formally reject any negotiated peace agreement with Lebanon in upcoming talks with U.S. President Donald Trump. He argued that Washington would understand the hardline position, drawing a inflammatory comparison to how the United States would never accept hostile armed groups operating along its borders.

    “You wouldn’t tolerate having Nazis on your border. You wouldn’t tolerate your soldiers being attacked and being limited in terms of the response. Our response must be 100 percent,” Ben Gvir stated. “I want to say thank you to the Americans, but our red line is harming soldiers and harming civilians.”

    Going further, the minister issued an explicit threat to the Lebanese capital Beirut, warning it could suffer the same near-total destruction that the Gaza town of Beit Hanoun has endured amid Israel’s ongoing military campaign in the besieged Palestinian enclave. “The equation must be very simple and clear: the State of Israel must be safe. If Israel is not safe, Beirut will look like Beit Hanoun,” he said.

    In subsequent comments carried on Israel’s Channel 14 and shared widely on social media by the Quds News Network, Ben Gvir doubled down on his radical stance, rejecting the distinction between targeting Hezbollah and launching attacks across the entirety of Lebanon. “Lebanon, all of Lebanon, should become our playground. All of Lebanon should be our target,” he declared, justifying the blanket targeting by noting that Hezbollah operatives hold positions within Lebanon’s national government.

    The minister also reiterated dehumanizing comments he made over the weekend, arguing that no hardship for Lebanese civilians should stand in the way of Israeli military goals. “Not a single tear from an Israeli mother can be tolerated. Even if there are tears from a thousand Lebanese mothers, we need to keep going,” he said.

    Ben Gvir’s hardline rejection of a ceasefire comes as escalating Israeli military activity across Lebanon creates major friction in international diplomacy. Spiking Israeli air strikes and expanding ground deployments in southern and eastern Lebanon have already derailed ongoing ceasefire talks between the United States and Iran, negotiations that were being brokered by third-party mediators including Pakistan and Qatar. The situation on the Lebanon frontier has emerged as a major point of disagreement between the Trump administration and the Israeli government, with Washington and other G7 nations repeatedly calling for Israel to withdraw its forces from southern Lebanon—calls that have been consistently rejected by Israeli leadership.

    For its part, Hezbollah has demanded the Lebanese government refuse any direct negotiations with Israel as long as Israeli attacks on Lebanese territory continue. Despite this, Lebanon’s national government has publicly expressed hope that a U.S.-Iran deal could bring an end to the ongoing hostilities that have devastated large swathes of the country.

    According to Lebanon’s Ministry of Health, Israeli military strikes across Lebanon launched since March 2 have killed at least 3,798 people and wounded an additional 11,781, leaving a growing humanitarian crisis in the conflict zone.

  • Explosion at Qatar gas hub leaves 54 injured and 18 missing

    Explosion at Qatar gas hub leaves 54 injured and 18 missing

    A sudden overnight explosion at Qatar’s primary liquefied natural gas (LNG) processing hub has left at least 54 people injured and 18 others unaccounted for, Qatari authorities confirmed in official statements released Monday.

    The blast took place at the Barzan plant within the Ras Laffan Industrial City, a major energy complex located approximately 80 kilometers north of the capital Doha. Qatari Interior Ministry officials characterized the incident as an “internal explosion” stemming from a technical malfunction, ruling out foul play in the initial assessment. Emergency search and rescue teams were rapidly deployed to the site immediately after the incident was reported, and operators of the facility confirmed they have successfully brought the resulting fire under control.

    In a public update, the ministry emphasized that no hazardous leakage from the facility has been detected, and there is no current threat to broader public safety in the surrounding areas. The facility is operated by QatarEnergy, the Gulf state’s state-owned national energy giant, which confirmed that all emergency protocols were activated without delay after the blast.

    Spanning 295 square kilometers — an area roughly one-third the size of New York City — Ras Laffan Industrial City is the beating heart of Qatar’s multi-billion-dollar natural gas industry, the sector that forms the foundation of the country’s national economy. The complex processes massive volumes of natural gas extracted from Qatar’s offshore North Field, one of the largest natural gas reserves on Earth, converting the raw resource into LNG, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), liquid fuels, petrochemical feedstocks and other valuable energy products for global export.

    The incident comes on the heels of severe damage the facility sustained just months earlier, in March, when Iranian missile strikes targeted sites across Gulf nations hosting U.S. military installations, in retaliation for the U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran. Those strikes damaged two of Ras Laffan’s 14 LNG processing trains and one of its two gas-to-liquid facilities, cutting the country’s total LNG export capacity by 17% overnight. QatarEnergy CEO Saad al-Kaabi explained after the attack that the disruption would take 12.8 million tonnes of annual LNG production offline for three to five years, resulting in an estimated $20 billion in lost annual revenue.

    Virtually all of Ras Laffan’s energy output is shipped to global markets via the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow strategic waterway separating Iran from Oman’s Musandam peninsula that Tehran has effectively closed in response to the ongoing U.S.-Israeli campaign. The combination of the March attack on the facility and the closure of this critical shipping chokepoint has already severely constrained Qatar’s primary export, adding new layers of uncertainty to the country’s energy sector and global natural gas markets already grappling with regional instability.

  • Israeli raid in Hebron kills two Palestinians, including child

    Israeli raid in Hebron kills two Palestinians, including child

    In an early morning military incursion on Monday, Israeli forces stormed the town of Beit Ummar, located northwest of Hebron in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, leaving two Palestinians dead — one a 15-year-old child — and two others injured, local and official sources confirmed. The deadly confrontation unfolded near Karmei Tzur, an unauthorized Israeli settlement built on occupied Palestinian land in violation of international law.

    According to on-the-ground reports, Israeli troops opened fire on a group of young Palestinian locals near the settlement perimeter. Two of those hit were left bleeding for an extended stretch before Israeli forces seized and retained their bodies, per local accounts. The two wounded victims were evacuated to nearby hospitals, where medical staff confirmed their conditions are currently stable. The Palestinian Ministry of Health officially identified the deceased as 15-year-old Reda Sami Hassan Awad and 19-year-old Issa Arafat Ismail Awad.

    Israeli military officials defended the operation, stating that troops fired on the group after members allegedly threw Molotov cocktails and started small fires near the settlement boundary. Following the shooting, the Israeli military carried out an extensive house-to-house search operation across Beit Ummar.

    In response to the killings, the town declared a full general strike to protest the fatal raid. The incident is part of a sharp upward trend in Israeli military incursions and settler expansion across the occupied West Bank, particularly in the Hebron governorate. Over recent months, Israeli forces have launched repeated incursions into Hebron neighborhoods, enforcing multi-day curfews, blocking access to work and basic services, and deploying armored vehicles and bulldozers to seal off community entrances. These raids often facilitate visits by Israeli officials to the occupied city under heavy military guard; earlier this month, far-right Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir led a heavily secured convoy march through central Hebron, a move that stoked widespread Palestinian anger.

    Local residents say the escalating raids have a clear strategic goal: expanding existing Israeli settlement outposts, connecting isolated settlements to one another, and permanently entrenching Israeli settler control across more Palestinian land in the West Bank. Leading international bodies including the United Nations and Amnesty International have repeatedly warned that this pattern of activity constitutes a systematic campaign of ethnic cleansing targeting Palestinian communities, forcing entire populations out of their historic lands to make way for Israeli settlement expansion.

    The latest fatalities have pushed the total death toll from Israeli attacks in the West Bank to 70 since the beginning of 2026, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health. Of those killed, 17 are children, five are women, and two are elderly. Since the launch of Israel’s large-scale military campaign in the Gaza Strip, more than 1,100 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli troops and civilian settlers across the occupied West Bank.

  • ‘They took a healthy kid and returned him dead’: Bedouin dies in Israeli custody with signs of torture

    ‘They took a healthy kid and returned him dead’: Bedouin dies in Israeli custody with signs of torture

    A 21-year-old Bedouin Israeli man held on suspicion of arms smuggling by Israel’s internal security service Shin Bet has died in hospital after being found unresponsive in his cell at a southern Israeli prison, with his family and legal representatives claiming his body bore clear signs of severe abuse. The case of Saber Amitel, a Negev-based locksmith and welder with no prior criminal record, has reignited scrutiny of treatment of detainees in Israeli custody amid a sharp rise in prisoner deaths since the start of the Israel-Gaza war last October.

    According to reporting from Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Amitel was arrested earlier in June and transferred immediately to Shikma Prison in the coastal city of Ashkelon, where authorities blocked him from meeting with legal counsel for days. His family only learned of his arrest after searching for him for two full days following his disappearance during a trip to Beersheba, and reported him missing to local police, who confirmed he had been taken into custody.

    Officially, Israeli police have stated Amitel attempted to die by suicide in his cell. But family and lawyers reject this account outright, noting the extensive bruising they observed when they were finally granted access to the detainee at Ashkelon’s Barzilai Hospital on June 8. This access only came after Haaretz journalists contacted Israeli authorities to inquire about the previously unreported detention.

    Amitel remained hospitalized in an unresponsive, brain-dead state hooked up to life support for 12 days before his death on June 20. His body was moved to the National Centre of Forensic Medicine for official examination, but the family has declined to permit an autopsy on religious grounds, limiting officials to only an external inspection of the body.

    In an interview with Haaretz, Amitel’s father Odeh described the devastating shock of seeing his healthy son reduced to an unresponsive patient on life support. “From a healthy boy who was arrested while walking on his own two feet, he ended up in this condition,” he said. “He was under guard and handcuffed. Medical staff told us that this is how he arrived. They took a healthy kid away from me only to return him dead. There’s no law in this country anymore; people are being killed under torture.” Odeh added that his son was never given the opportunity to speak with interrogators prior to being found unconscious, and had never been a violent person.

    Amitel’s legal team has filed an urgent legal petition with the Beersheba District Court, calling for an independent judicial investigation into the circumstances of the young man’s death. The petition names four parties as respondents: the Israel Prison Service, Shin Bet, Israeli police, and Barzilai Medical Center. Attorneys are also requesting access to full closed-circuit camera footage from Shikma Prison, official guard duty logs, and all of Amitel’s medical records from his time in custody.

    “It is inconceivable that the police and Shin Bet detained a young man, healthy in body and mind, with no criminal record, who worked long hours at a factory supporting his family, and returned him to his family as a dead body,” attorneys Esther Bar Zion and Victor Ozen told Haaretz in a statement.

    In response to media inquiries, the Israel Prison Service declined to comment on any personal or medical details related to Amitel, stating only that “the circumstances are being examined by the competent authorities.” Shin Bet issued its own statement claiming that “Amitel was interrogated in accordance with the law,” and repeated the official account that a suicide attempt was discovered in his cell on June 7, after which the detainee was transferred to hospital for treatment.

    The death of Amitel comes amid a growing crisis in Israeli detention facilities, following the start of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza in October 2023. Rights monitors and Palestinian sources report that at least 100 Palestinian detainees have died in Israeli custody since the war began. Many analysts and advocacy groups believe the official death toll is a significant underestimate, and that the actual number of fatalities among detainees is far higher.

    For anyone experiencing mental health crisis or suicidal thoughts, free, confidential support is available globally: In the United Kingdom and Ireland, contact Samaritans at 116 123; in the United States, call or text the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or access online support at 988lifeline.org; additional international resources can be found at befrienders.org.

  • Keir Starmer resigns as British prime minister

    Keir Starmer resigns as British prime minister

    In a sudden development that has shaken British politics, Keir Starmer has stepped down as Prime Minister and Leader of the Labour Party less than two full years after securing a landslide victory in the UK general election. His announcement came Monday morning outside 10 Downing Street, ending days of swirling public speculation about his political future.

    Starmer confirmed in his address that he would formally resign from the party’s top leadership role, and has requested the Labour Party’s National Executive Committee launch a leadership selection timetable that will open nominations on July 9, with the full process wrapped up before parliament’s summer recess. Under this schedule, a new party leader will be confirmed and installed before MPs return to Westminster in September, regardless of whether a contested election is held.

    Addressing the pressure that led to his exit, Starmer acknowledged that the Parliamentary Labour Party had delivered a clear answer on whether he remained the best candidate to lead the party into the next general election. “I have heard the answer of my parliamentary party to that question, and I accept that answer with good grace,” he said. “Every decision I’ve taken has been about putting the country I love first. That is why I will resign as leader of the Labour party.” He added that he had already notified King Charles III of his decision during a conversation earlier that morning.

    The collapse of Starmer’s leadership follows a string of damaging political setbacks. A catastrophic round of local election results, widely blamed on Starmer’s deep unpopularity among voters, preceded last week’s by-election win in Makerfield by Andy Burnham, the former popular mayor of Greater Manchester. That victory solidified Burnham’s position as the overwhelming favourite to replace Starmer, and political insiders now widely expect him to run unopposed, potentially taking office as prime minister as early as mid-July.

    In his departure speech, Starmer defended his two years in office, framing his tenure as a period of necessary reset for the Labour Party. “I inherited a Labour Party that was politically, financially and morally bankrupt,” he said. “We changed our party, ripping out the poison of antisemitism and restoring trust on the economy, defence and national security.” He pledged full, unwavering support to his successor, adding: “They will inherit a Britain that is far stronger and fairer than the one I inherited two years ago, better prepared for the challenges ahead and better able to ensure the Labour Party secures a second term in office.”

    Burnham is scheduled to take his seat in the House of Commons later on Monday, completing his transition from municipal leadership to national politics. While former Health Secretary Wes Streeting previously indicated he would enter the leadership race, sources close to Streeting have confirmed he is now reconsidering his bid. Polling data shows Streeting is even less popular among Labour Party members than the outgoing Starmer, making a successful challenge unlikely.

    Politically, Burnham is positioned on the soft left of the Labour Party, and has long been described as a pragmatic “political chameleon” who has adjusted his policy stances significantly over his career. During his tenure as Greater Manchester mayor, he and his allies developed a policy framework they have branded “Manchesterism”, which he now proposes to roll out across the entire country.

    Unlike Starmer’s more centrist economic approach, Manchesterism advocates for far more interventionist government action in the economy – stopping short of full socialism, but bolder than the outgoing government’s vision. In Burnham’s own framing, it is a “modern and functional response to the high-inequality, low-growth trap that came from the 1980s drive to privatise economic power and overcentralise political power in the Treasury”. He has already publicly pledged to bring water and energy utilities back into public ownership if he takes office.

    Still, questions remain about which policy iteration of Burnham voters and party members will see as prime minister. During his recent by-election campaign, he indicated he would retain key elements of Starmer’s policy agenda, most notably continuing the government’s push to dramatically cut net immigration. This position is intended to win back voters who have defected to the right-wing Reform Party, but it has already become a potential target for criticism from the left-wing Green Party, which has seen a major surge in national polling in recent months.

    Burnham and his campaign team are well aware of the political risk posed by the Green Party’s rise, and observers expect many of his upcoming economic policies will be crafted to appeal to left-leaning voters who have abandoned Labour for the Greens. If Burnham takes office as expected, the coming months could bring sweeping policy shifts across British politics.

  • Israel deployed troops to Somaliland after recognition, source says

    Israel deployed troops to Somaliland after recognition, source says

    Fresh claims from a senior official within Somalia’s internationally recognized government have pulled back the curtain on an undeclared Israeli military presence in the breakaway region of Somaliland, stirring new friction across the Horn of Africa and the broader Middle East. The disclosure comes months after Israel made a historic and widely condemned decision to grant formal recognition to Somaliland, a self-declared independent state that has not received endorsement from the United Nations or nearly any sovereign nation. In an exclusive interview with Middle East Eye, the senior Somali government source outlined that the deployment of a 50-strong Israeli military contingent took place in early 2024, shortly after Israel resumed open military conflict with Iran in late February. To evade detection and integrate seamlessly into the local population, Israeli military commanders specifically selected troops of African descent, the majority of whom have Ethiopian heritage, the official added, citing intelligence gathered by Somali security agencies. Israel’s path to formal diplomatic ties with Somaliland began in December 2023, when it became the first country in the world to recognize the region’s independence. That unilateral move immediately drew sweeping condemnation from nearly every government across the African continent and the Middle East, as it upends longstanding international consensus on Somalia’s territorial integrity. By April 2024, Israel had completed the first step of formal diplomatic representation, appointing Michael Lotem as its inaugural ambassador to Somaliland’s capital, Hargeisa. When Middle East Eye reached out to the Israel Defense Forces for comment on the allegations of a secret troop deployment, military officials declined to address the claims directly, stating that the matter falls under the jurisdiction of the country’s political leadership, rather than military spokespeople. Outlets including MEE also attempted to secure a response from Somaliland’s government, but those requests have so far gone unanswered. While the Israeli government has not confirmed the deployment of troops, senior Israeli officials have openly acknowledged the long history of covert security cooperation between the two sides. During a public meeting with visiting Somaliland President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi this week, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz confirmed that discrete collaboration has been ongoing for years, operating outside of public view. “For many years, we cooperated under the radar in a series of operations that will remain classified,” Katz said. “Now we are determined to bring our security cooperation to new heights, for the benefit of both peoples and for the benefit of stability in the region.” Earlier this month, CNN reported, citing anonymous sources familiar with the arrangement, that Somaliland has granted Israel access to an additional military facility. This site, the report claims, could be used as a refueling and logistics hub for Israeli aircraft conducting long-range missions targeting Iran. Regional security analysts who specialize in Horn of Africa politics have further speculated that Israel is actively pursuing a permanent naval base along Somaliland’s Red Sea coast. Such a base would position Israel to more effectively counter growing threats from Houthi militants in Yemen, who have targeted commercial shipping in the Red Sea in recent months. In comments released Wednesday, Somaliland’s Defense Minister Mohamed Yusuf Ali denied persistent claims that Israel maintains a military base on Somaliland territory. At the same time, he did not downplay the scope of current bilateral security engagement, confirming that Israeli personnel are supporting Somaliland’s security forces by providing training for both local police and military units. The developing situation has heightened concerns across the region, with many governments warning that deepening Israeli military involvement in Somaliland threatens to destabilize the already fragile security environment in the Horn of Africa and undermine regional efforts to maintain Somalia’s territorial unity.

  • WhatsApp to be led by Indian start-up founder as Will Cathcart steps back

    WhatsApp to be led by Indian start-up founder as Will Cathcart steps back

    After nearly seven years at the helm of Meta’s globally dominant messaging platform WhatsApp, Will Cathcart has announced his departure from the top role, in one of the most high-profile leadership changes in Big Tech in recent months. During Cathcart’s tenure, WhatsApp expanded exponentially, growing its global user base of private messaging to over 3 billion people, while rolling out new encrypted communication features that cemented its position as the world’s most widely used mobile messaging service. In social media posts shared Monday, Cathcart noted that WhatsApp is currently in the strongest strategic position in its history, making the timing right for him to step back from day-to-day leadership of the platform. While Cathcart will leave his role as WhatsApp head, he will remain a member of Meta’s senior leadership team. Taking his place is Kunal Shah, the founder of Bangalore-based Indian fintech unicorn Cred, a fintech firm that has shaken up India’s credit and payments sector since its launch. Meta chief executive officer and Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg voiced strong public support for Shah’s appointment this week. Zuckerberg highlighted that Shah built Cred into one of India’s most consequential technology companies, and said his builder-focused mindset and global outlook make him uniquely suited to lead the world’s largest messaging platform. “I look forward to working with Kunal to continue to make WhatsApp the best service for billions of people and millions of businesses,” Zuckerberg said. Shah founded Cred in 2018, building a members-only fintech platform that rewards users for making on-time credit card payments, with a core focus on high-income users in India’s fast-growing digital economy. Before launching Cred, Shah built a career as an investor and advisor to early-stage startups across India and Southeast Asia, according to his public LinkedIn profile. In his own announcement shared on social media Monday, Shah confirmed he will retain his stake as a shareholder in Cred while taking on the WhatsApp leadership role. He also revealed that Cred has secured $900 million (approximately £679 million) in new investment from Meta, a deal that Bloomberg reports will give Meta a 20% minority stake in the fintech firm. To address growing privacy concerns that have dogged Meta in key emerging markets, Shah emphasized that while Meta will hold a minority stake in Cred, the social media giant will not gain access to any of Cred’s member user data. The leadership reshuffle at WhatsApp comes as Meta works to deepen its foothold in India, WhatsApp’s largest single market by user count. Data from the World Population Review shows that WhatsApp counts roughly 853 million active users in India alone, accounting for more than a quarter of the platform’s total global user base. As part of Meta’s broader “family of apps” that also includes Facebook, Instagram, and Messenger, the company has increasingly looked to WhatsApp to drive new revenue growth, testing new revenue streams including in-app advertisements, paid premium subscription features, and artificial intelligence-powered tools. Despite its massive popularity in the country, WhatsApp and Meta have faced growing regulatory and public scrutiny in India in recent years over the platform’s privacy policies and data sharing arrangements between the app and its parent company. The leadership change and Meta’s new investment in Cred signals the company’s long-term bet on solidifying its position in the world’s largest open digital market, as competition for users and revenue in emerging technology sectors intensifies across South Asia.

  • Myanmar army killed over 700 civilians in six months, UN says

    Myanmar army killed over 700 civilians in six months, UN says

    Five years after seizing power in a 2021 coup that ousted Myanmar’s democratically elected government and threw the nation into a devastating civil conflict, the country’s military regime has been implicated in the deaths of more than 700 civilian lives in just six months preceding its widely discredited 2025 election, according to a new United Nations Human Rights Office investigation. The report, which tracks violence from August 2025 through January 2026, draws on cross-verified data from multiple credible on-the-ground sources to confirm a minimum of 702 civilian fatalities, including 224 women and 153 children. The period in scope began when the military junta officially announced its long-promised electoral process — a vote dismissed by the global community as a fraudulent sham, after all major opposition parties were barred from participating and entire swathes of the country controlled by armed opposition groups were excluded from balloting. Myanmar’s civil conflict has already claimed thousands of lives and displaced millions of people across the country since the 2021 coup, with large territories remaining outside the junta’s control. The UN report singles out military air strikes as the single leading cause of widespread destruction and civilian suffering across the nation. The northwestern region of Sagaing, where the military has launched sustained offensives to retake territory from opposition groups, was identified as the deadliest area for civilians, accounting for 191 confirmed civilian deaths, including 60 women and 30 children. The investigation documents two particularly brutal mass casualty attacks that targeted civilian gatherings. In October 2025, a military strike on a crowd gathered outside a school in Chaung-U, Sagaing killed 23 people, four of them children, and wounded more than 60 more. At the time of the attack, attendees were holding a peaceful candlelit vigil to mark the end of Buddhist Lent, demand the release of political prisoners, protest military forced conscription, and reject the junta’s planned election. A second deadly strike in December 2025 hit a public tea shop in Tabayin, Sagaing where civilians had gathered to watch a football match, killing at least 19 people and injuring 20 more. Beyond junta-perpetrated violence, the report also documents ongoing human rights abuses against the Rohingya minority, who are targeted with killings, arbitrary detention, sexual violence, and forced recruitment at the hands of the Arakan Army. In a stark rebuke of fading global engagement with the crisis, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk emphasized that the people of Myanmar have already endured unthinkable suffering under military rule, only to be abandoned by the international community. Cuts to international assistance have drastically exacerbated hardship for millions of people across the country, Türk noted, adding that funding for local civilian protection initiatives has long been the only lifeline for communities facing constant, indiscriminate military attacks. The withdrawal of this support, he said, only compounds the harm already inflicted on vulnerable populations. In the months following the election, the junta has solidified its grip on power: in April 2026, Min Aung Hlaing — the general who led the 2021 coup — was sworn in as the country’s president. The election’s outcome was never in doubt: leading opposition parties were banned from running, conflict-affected regions were barred from participating, the military is constitutionally guaranteed a quarter of all parliamentary seats, and the junta’s own party, the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), secured nearly 80 percent of the remaining contested seats in a process rigged heavily in its favor. Following a period of major rebel gains starting in 2023, the junta has regained the upper hand across most of the country in recent months, boosted by expanded forced conscription drives and increased access to advanced drone technology that has strengthened its offensive capabilities.