分类: politics

  • BBC breaks down Trump’s latest shift on North and South Korea

    BBC breaks down Trump’s latest shift on North and South Korea

    In a surprising policy shift that has drawn widespread international attention, former US President Donald Trump has revealed plans to substantially scale back joint military exercises between the United States and South Korea. The announcement, which was recently broken down and analyzed by BBC, marks another notable turn in Washington’s approach to the Korean Peninsula amid shifting diplomatic dynamics.

    Trump framed the decision around his personal diplomatic approach, telling audiences that his own ‘very good relationship’ with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is the key factor behind the move. The planned drawdown of joint drills, which have long been a source of tension between Pyongyang and the US-South Korea alliance, signals a deliberate effort to de-escalate tensions on the peninsula following years of rising rhetoric and military posturing.

    Diplomatic observers note that this shift represents a break from decades of consistent US military posture on the Korean Peninsula. Since the armistice that halted the Korean War in the 1950s, the US and South Korea have regularly conducted large-scale joint military exercises to maintain combat readiness and deter potential aggression from North Korea. For North Korea, these drills have consistently been viewed as provocative preparations for an invasion, a stance that has repeatedly derailed diplomatic efforts in the past.

    Trump’s decision opens a new chapter in US engagement with the Korean Peninsula, prioritizing personal diplomacy over long-standing military preparedness protocols. While the move has been praised by supporters as a bold step toward peace, critics have raised concerns about the impact on alliance credibility and regional security. As the situation develops, regional powers and global stakeholders are closely watching how North Korea responds, and whether this shift will pave the way for renewed denuclearization talks.

  • Lula calls oil near the Amazon River a passport to Brazil’s future after Petrobras strikes new find

    Lula calls oil near the Amazon River a passport to Brazil’s future after Petrobras strikes new find

    RIO DE JANEIRO — Standing on the soil of Amapa state, northern Brazil, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva made a bold case for expanded offshore oil exploration along the country’s fragile Equatorial Margin on Monday, framing a recently confirmed hydrocarbon find near the mouth of the Amazon River as a transformative opportunity for the nation’s development, just weeks before he stands for re-election in a tightly contested presidential race.

    The discovery, announced by majority state-owned energy giant Petrobras last Friday, came after months of exploratory drilling that wrapped up earlier this year. The find is located roughly 180 kilometers off Amapa’s coastline, within the Equatorial Margin — a vast, under-explored offshore basin that geologists estimate could hold as much as 10 billion barrels of recoverable oil and natural gas, with a projected market value of roughly $720 billion.

    Lula’s remarks came shortly after he toured Petrobras’ offshore drilling rig that carried out the exploration work. In his address to local officials and supporters in Oiapoque, Amapa’s northernmost municipality, Lula pushed back against critics who frame the project as a contradiction to Brazil’s global commitments to fossil fuel phase-out. The president emphasized that his support for new drilling does not weaken Brazil’s position as a global leader in renewable energy innovation.

    “When I call this a passport to the country’s future, I am not backing away from my commitment to a day when we no longer depend on fossil fuels,” Lula said. “Brazil will remain the global leader in biofuel innovation and a major player in the renewable energy sector for decades to come.”

    Under Lula’s current administration, Brazil has positioned itself as a key negotiator for global climate action, most prominently during the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30) that the country hosted in 2024. The government has repeatedly backed international agreements to phase out coal, oil and gas production to limit global temperature rise. At the same time, Lula’s administration has moved aggressively to open new offshore areas for drilling, approving hundreds of millions in new exploration investments to boost government revenue and domestic energy production.

    Petrobras CEO Magda Chambriard accompanied Lula during Monday’s event, confirming that the recent hydrocarbon discovery validates years of geological research into the Equatorial Margin’s potential. “All of our preliminary studies pointed to substantial reserve potential in this basin, and this discovery confirms those findings,” Chambriard said. “We will continue exploration work to fully map the extent of the resources here.” She added that the company still needs years of additional testing to confirm the total volume of commercially viable oil in the area.

    Energy analysts note that full commercial production remains far off. Shigueo Watanabe Jr., an energy expert with Brazilian climate nonprofit ClimaInfo, explained that extensive feasibility and environmental testing would be required before extraction can begin, a process that could take as long as 10 years to complete.

    The exploration project has faced fierce pushback from environmental advocacy groups and Indigenous communities, who argue that drilling in the sensitive Amazon mouth region poses unacceptable ecological and climate risks. Groups have already filed lawsuits against the Brazilian federal government and Petrobras, arguing the licensing process failed to meet legal requirements to consult with traditional Indigenous communities that depend on the region’s marine ecosystems. They also warn that the government’s environmental impact assessment underestimated the risk of catastrophic oil spills, and failed to properly account for the climate harm of developing new fossil fuel reserves. Petrobras has repeatedly defended its safety record, noting the company has never experienced a major spill in its decades of offshore drilling operations in Brazil.

    Political analysts say Lula’s high-profile announcement of the discovery is closely tied to his 2026 re-election campaign, which officially kicked off on Sunday in Sao Paulo — the city where Lula first rose to political prominence as a metalworkers’ union leader during Brazil’s 1964-1985 military dictatorship. The leftist incumbent is locked in a tight race against Sen. Flávio Bolsonaro, son of former far-right President Jair Bolsonaro, with national opinion polls showing the race is essentially tied heading into the October election.

    During Monday’s event, Lula — wearing a standard orange oil worker uniform — held up a small glass vial of crude oil from the new find, calling the sample “blessed” and saying he would keep it as a memento. He noted that developing the Equatorial Margin reserves would also bring long-overdue economic development to Amapa, a poor northern state that currently relies heavily on exports of agricultural commodities like acai berries and freshwater tucunare fish. Behind him, a large photo showed Lula holding up his oil-stained hands after his tour of the drilling rig — a deliberate echo of a iconic photo from 2008, when Lula announced the discovery of massive pre-salt oil reserves off Brazil’s southeastern coast, during his second term in office when he enjoyed record-high approval ratings.

    Today, Lula is a deeply polarizing figure in Brazilian politics, with polls showing roughly half of Brazilians approve of his presidency, while an equal share disapprove. He has faced particularly low approval in northern Brazil, including Amazonian states like Amapa, where his environmental policies have drawn criticism from both development advocates and conservation groups.
    Breno Rodrigues de Messias Leite, a political science professor at the Federal University of Amazonas, said Lula’s high-profile trip to Amapa is a calculated move to win over northern voters ahead of the election. “For the Amazon region, the possibility of accessing some of the world’s largest untapped oil reserves completely changes the political equation,” Leite explained. “Lula wants to win re-election, and he needs voters in northern states, especially Amapa, to support him.”

  • Former Israeli soldier held captive in Gaza asks Ben Gvir to let him execute Palestinian prisoners

    Former Israeli soldier held captive in Gaza asks Ben Gvir to let him execute Palestinian prisoners

    A shocking exchange between a former Israeli soldier held captive in Gaza and far-right Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir has drawn renewed international scrutiny over the far-right official’s extreme anti-Palestinian policies, coming amid ongoing deadly violations of a fragile 2025 ceasefire in Gaza.

    The conversation unfolded in the debut episode of former captive Rom Braslavski’s new podcast titled *October 8*, which was first reported by Israeli media outlets over the weekend. Braslavski, who was released from Gaza captivity in October 2025, shared a brutal personal request for Ben Gvir during the discussion: that the minister, whose portfolio includes oversight of the Israeli Prison Service, grant him permission to carry out the execution of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli detention facilities.

    “I have a personal request,” Braslavski told Ben Gvir. “Let me be the one who hangs them. I don’t want a rope — with my own hands I will execute every terrorist in the State of Israel.” Ben Gvir responded immediately with enthusiastic support, saying he would “try and turn the world upside down” to fulfill the request. The far-right minister added that watching released captives execute Palestinian detainees is “one of my dreams,” and described Braslavski as “the right person in the right place […] to hang and execute them one by one.” He added bluntly that Palestinian prisoners “don’t deserve to live.”

    This inflammatory exchange comes as Ben Gvir has spent months advancing a sweeping agenda to escalate abuse against Palestinian detainees held in Israeli custody. Inmates have repeatedly reported widespread torture and sexual assault under the harsh policies Ben Gvir has imposed. Just this month, an Israeli court blocked one of the minister’s more extreme proposals: introducing crocodiles into moats surrounding detention facilities holding Palestinian prisoners. In May, the Israeli Knesset approved a bill sponsored by Ben Gvir’s far-right Otzma Yehudit party that establishes public trials and allows the death penalty for Palestinian detainees accused of involvement in the October 7, 2023 attacks that killed 1,200 people and took 251 captives, including Braslavski.

    Braslavski was working as a security guard at the Nova music festival in southern Israel while on leave from the Israeli military when the 2023 attack took place. As of June 2026, rights groups estimate more than 9,000 Palestinians are held in Israeli detention facilities, with at least 104 Palestinian inmates dying in custody since the October 2023 attacks. During the podcast interview, Ben Gvir openly acknowledged that Palestinian detainees are enduring harsh conditions — and expressed satisfaction with their suffering. “They are suffering, it’s hard for them, it’s bad for them, and I’m glad it’s bad for them,” he said.

    The conversation soon shifted to the situation in Gaza, where Ben Gvir called for a dramatic escalation of Israeli military attacks, saying the country should kill dozens of Palestinian civilians and fighters every night before ultimately permanently expelling the entire Palestinian population from the enclave. “I think we should carry out targeted assassinations in Gaza, taking down 30 to 40 every night,” Ben Gvir said, clarifying that the targets would “not just those who pose an immediate threat.” He added dehumanizing language: “There are people there who are not worthy of life. They shouldn’t live. They’re not even people.”

    Ben Gvir also publicly split with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over pressure from the United States to limit Israeli attacks in the devastated Gaza Strip, saying he firmly rejects any limits on military operations. He doubled down on his long-standing calls for ethnic cleansing of Gaza, reiterating that the entire enclave should be annexed by Israel and cleared of Palestinians to make way for Israeli settlements. “I see all of Gaza as ours,” he said, adding he wants to see “settlements not just in Gush Katif but throughout Gaza.” He further called for encouraging mass emigration of Palestinians from occupied territories, clarifying that for “terrorists, no emigration, nothing, just to kill them one by one.”

    The inflammatory comments have reignited debate over Ben Gvir’s outsized influence within Netanyahu’s far-right governing coalition. Once a fringe political figure, Ben Gvir has risen to become one of the most powerful voices in Israeli politics in recent years, with his extremist views gaining growing traction among Israeli Jewish citizens. A recent poll from Israeli think tank the Jewish People Policy Institute found that 22 percent of Israeli Jewish citizens support expelling Palestinians from the occupied West Bank, while 38 percent support full annexation of the territory. Most respondents also echoed Ben Gvir’s skepticism over implementing U.S. President Donald Trump’s 15-point Gaza plan.

    Ben Gvir has long faced international consequences for his anti-Palestinian policies: earlier this year, Middle East Eye reported that the International Criminal Court is moving forward with an investigation into Ben Gvir’s alleged crimes against the Palestinian people, and is considering issuing an arrest warrant. He and fellow far-right cabinet member Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich have already been targeted by an international sanctions campaign over their public calls for the extermination and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

    The comments come amid ongoing violence in Gaza, just months after a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hamas took effect in October 2025. Gaza’s Ministry of Health reported last week that 1,258 Palestinians have been killed in Israeli attacks since the ceasefire was signed, with another 4,295 wounded, hundreds of them women and children. Palestinian officials in Gaza have documented thousands of Israeli violations of the ceasefire agreement since it went into effect.

  • Israel formally allows Jewish prayer at Al-Aqsa Mosque in violation of status quo

    Israel formally allows Jewish prayer at Al-Aqsa Mosque in violation of status quo

    In a groundbreaking and deeply controversial shift that upends a long-standing global consensus on one of the Middle East’s most sensitive holy sites, Israeli authorities have for the first time formally permitted Jewish prayer inside the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in occupied East Jerusalem. This step marks the most significant breach yet of the decades-old internationally recognized status quo that has governed access to and administration of the site for generations.

    According to an anonymous Palestinian source familiar with site management from the Jerusalem Islamic Waqf — the religious endowment that oversees the mosque under the status quo agreement — Israeli police allowed Israeli settlers entering the compound on Sunday to bring Jewish prayer books (known as siddurim) and conduct organized group prayer. While unapproved individual Jewish prayer has been quietly tolerated during regular settler incursions in recent years, this marks the first time the practice has received explicit official backing.

    The decades-old status quo framework, which has been accepted by the international community for decades, designates the entire 14.4-hectare Al-Aqsa compound as an exclusively Islamic holy site, with full authority for access, worship arrangements, maintenance and archaeological work falling exclusively to the Jerusalem Islamic Waqf. Since Israel occupied East Jerusalem in 1967, however, the agreement has faced incremental erosion, and the formal permission for Jewish prayer represents the most consequential breaking of that arrangement to date.

    Explaining the gravity of the shift, the anonymous Palestinian source emphasized a critical line between visiting the site as a guest under existing rules and imposing new, unapproved practices. “There is an important distinction between coming to visit the site and coming to pray there,” the source said. “When I come to your place as a visitor, you impose your rules on me. But today, they come with their own rules. When the police officially allow that, it means, in one way or another, that you are allowing them to establish their own rules in the space. This is an official breach of the status quo.”

    The source added that the decision has transformed what were once isolated, quiet individual acts of Jewish prayer into an organized, institutionalized group practice. “Jewish prayer at Al-Aqsa Mosque is becoming an organised practice, rather than merely an isolated individual act,” they said. The development is part of a rapidly accelerating campaign of restrictions on Palestinian access to the compound and the Waqf’s administrative control that has picked up dramatic pace since October 2023, the source added. “The pace of developments at Al-Aqsa Mosque since 7 October is staggering. Things are changing at an incredible speed, almost daily. We have essentially lost control.”

    Israeli newspaper Haaretz has confirmed that the push to allow Jewish worshippers to bring prayer materials into Al-Aqsa launched in early 2024, and Israeli police have already permitted prayer, singing and dancing in the mosque’s open courtyard. The paper added that Israeli police confirm their enforcement policies at the site are set “in accordance with directives from the political leadership.”

    Just last month, a mass incursion of ultranationalist Israelis led by far-right Israeli cabinet ministers and lawmakers saw more than 3,500 settlers enter the compound. Leading the raid was Itamar Ben Gvir, Israel’s far-right National Security Minister — who has direct oversight over Israeli police, and is a prominent settler who has long demanded the imposition of full “Israeli sovereignty” over the Al-Aqsa compound. During the July raid, Ben Gvir publicly declared: “Look at what is happening here – Jews praying, feeling like they are the owners here.”

    Mustafa Abu Sway, a senior member of the Jerusalem Islamic Waqf Council, told Middle East Eye that the repeated violations are not isolated incidents, but a deliberate government strategy backed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “This desecration, including the introduction of prayer books inside the mosque, forms part of the systematic dismantling of what remains of the historic status quo at the blessed Al-Aqsa Mosque, with Itamar Ben Gvir determining what happens on the ground, with the approval of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,” Abu Sway said.

    Abu Sway added that alongside the expansion of organized Jewish access and worship at the site, the Israeli government continues to enforce harsh, arbitrary restrictions on Muslim worshippers seeking to enter the compound and limit the Waqf’s ability to carry out its administrative duties. “Muslim worshippers are prevented from entering in a manner that appears arbitrary on the surface but in fact reflects a systematic policy,” he added.

  • Colombian minister under fire over beach holiday post-quake

    Colombian minister under fire over beach holiday post-quake

    A fresh political firestorm has erupted in Colombia just one week after a catastrophic 7.4-magnitude earthquake rocked the country’s western region, leaving hundreds dead and thousands displaced. The disaster, which hit on August 10, marked the strongest seismic event Colombia has experienced in almost 50 years, and arrived just three days after newly inaugurated right-wing President Abelardo de la Espriella took office. With nearly 300 confirmed fatalities and more than 27,000 homes reduced to rubble, the quake has already become an unexpected and grueling first test for the first-term president. In the hardest-hit urban centers of Cali and Pereira, survivors whose homes were destroyed have been forced to sleep out in the open on makeshift beds and thin mattresses, turning entire neighborhood streets into informal open-air refugee camps one week after the tremor. Search and rescue teams have now formally wound down operations to find trapped survivors, with hopes of pulling anyone alive from the rubble all but extinguished, and emergency response efforts have shifted entirely to addressing the growing humanitarian crisis unfolding across affected regions. The latest controversy to engulf the new administration centers on Housing Minister Jaime Andres Beltran, who is facing widespread public backlash and a formal no-confidence motion from left-wing opposition parties after photos and videos circulated over the weekend showing the minister relaxing on a Caribbean coast beach in Santa Marta alongside his family. In a statement posted to the social platform X on Monday, Beltran attempted to push back against growing criticism, arguing that the trip was not an official vacation but rather a brief chance to reconnect with his family after days apart, and claiming he returned to work on post-quake reconstruction immediately after the short break. The controversy over Beltran’s trip is not the first criticism the new president has faced over his administration’s response to the disaster. During a visit to an area near the earthquake’s epicenter Sunday, De la Espriella drew fierce condemnation after his team distributed branded footballs emblazoned with his campaign slogan “Sign for the homeland” from his armored vehicle. Detractors have accused the right-wing populist leader of exploiting the national tragedy to advance his political brand and dismissing the urgent, life-sustaining needs of displaced survivors. Supporters of the president have pushed back against the criticism, framing the gesture as a small attempt to bring moments of joy to children and families affected by the disaster. So far, De la Espriella has unveiled initial emergency measures including rent subsidies for families who lost their homes in the quake, and has called on his political ally, former U.S. President Donald Trump, to suspend existing tariffs on Colombian exports in a bid to soften the economic blow of the disaster for the country.

  • Trump warns US will ‘bomb shit out of’ Oman if it strays from Washington’s line on Iran

    Trump warns US will ‘bomb shit out of’ Oman if it strays from Washington’s line on Iran

    In a startling revelation from Fox News, former US President Donald Trump has issued a direct and aggressive threat to bomb Oman if the Gulf nation disrupts Washington’s ongoing diplomatic efforts to strike a new agreement with Iran over control of the strategic Strait of Hormuz. The inflammatory comment came during an exchange with Fox News correspondent Trey Yingst, who posed a question to Trump about the parallel bilateral negotiations between Iran and Oman focused on strait governance. Yingst confirmed that Trump’s blunt response was unreserved: “If Oman gets in the way, we’ll bomb the shit out of them.”

    This threat lands against a backdrop of advancing diplomatic progress between Tehran and Muscat, which have already reached a preliminary understanding on a new framework for managing maritime transit through the strait. The two neighboring states are currently working through final technical and procedural details to release an official joint statement outlining the agreement, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei confirmed amid continued negotiations on Monday. Baghaei noted that the talks have been slowed by persistent security instability stemming from recent US and Israeli military operations across the region, describing the process of drafting the maritime transit route framework as uniquely time-consuming due to overlapping security complexities inherent to the strategically critical waterway. “The issue is inherently complex,” he added.

    The proposed bilateral mechanism, according to Baghaei, is designed to achieve two core, mutually reinforcing goals: protecting the full sovereign rights and national interests of both Iran and Oman, while also guaranteeing unimpeded safe passage for commercial shipping vessels moving through the strait. He emphasized that this framework marks a historic first for the region, creating a structured system that simultaneously upholds the sovereignty of the two littoral states and addresses the global need for secure commercial transit through the key chokepoint. Intensive negotiations to finalize the joint statement are still ongoing, he confirmed.

    The Strait of Hormuz, which carries roughly 20% of the world’s daily supply of oil and liquefied natural gas, saw a sharp, unexpected drop in shipping traffic over the most recent weekend. Data compiled by leading shipping analytics firm Kpler shows that only five commodity-carrying vessels transited the strait on Saturday, with zero recorded transits on Sunday — a dramatic decline from the 31 vessels that passed through the same route the previous weekend.

    In additional comments made on Monday, Trump doubled down on his hardline stance toward Iran, urging the country to what he described as a “white flag of surrender.” He dismissed Iran’s negotiating position, claiming “They’re good poker players, but they’re dying.” The former president also made an unprecedented admission, confirming that Washington maintains active backchannel communication directly with officials from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a group that the US has formally designated as a foreign terrorist organization. “We have a backchannel with the IRGC. We are speaking directly with the IRGC officials in Iran,” Trump stated.

    Turning to the ongoing conflict in Gaza, Trump made unexpected claims about ceasefire and disarmament efforts, saying “Israelis should not be striking in Gaza. Hamas agreed to lay down their weapons.” He further confirmed that the US maintains a separate, dedicated channel of communication with Hamas leadership, asserting “We have a different channel with Hamas, and ultimately they are giving up their guns.”

    Trump’s reported approach to Gaza centers on a revised peace plan that would see Hamas complete full disarmament in exchange for a complete withdrawal of Israeli military forces from the Gaza Strip. Even as Washington pushes forward with this proposal, Israeli officials have publicly rejected the framework, creating a diplomatic deadlock that persists as of Monday.

  • ‘He’s a real hero’ – Trump meets teen lifeguard after dramatic rescue

    ‘He’s a real hero’ – Trump meets teen lifeguard after dramatic rescue

    A remarkable act of youth bravery earned a 16-year-old California lifeguard a special invitation to the nation’s capital, where he was received at the White House by former President Donald Trump. The honor came three weeks after Ryder Williams pulled a 10-year-old child from a dangerous drowning situation at a local California beach on July 25, a rescue that quickly drew national attention and praise for the teen’s quick thinking and courage.

    During the private meeting at the White House, the former president lauded Williams’ selfless action, describing the teenager as “a real hero” for putting himself at risk to save the life of a younger child. The encounter marked a rare moment of cross-generational recognition, with one of the nation’s most prominent political figures highlighting the importance of everyday courage and community service through Williams’ story.

    Local officials in California had previously recognized Williams for his rescue, noting that his training as a lifeguard allowed him to react instantly when the 10-year-old boy began struggling in rough surf off the state’s coast. The White House meeting capped off a series of honors for the teen, turning his life-saving act into a national story of inspiration.

  • Dozens detained in Russia as only anti-war party struck from election

    Dozens detained in Russia as only anti-war party struck from election

    In a move that further narrows political opposition ahead of September’s parliamentary elections, Russia’s Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from Yabloko, the country’s only openly anti-war political party, confirming the organization’s exclusion from the upcoming vote. Following the court’s ruling, security forces carried out detentions of dozens of people connected to the party, according to on-the-ground reports. Yabloko, which has long positioned itself as a voice for liberal opposition and outspoken criticism of Russia’s military operations, had challenged the initial ban that barred it from placing candidates on the ballot. The party’s leadership had argued that the exclusion was a politically motivated attempt to eliminate anti-war sentiment from the official electoral process. The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the ban solidifies the elimination of any registered anti-war opposition from the September election ballot, drawing quiet concern from international observers who have repeatedly raised alarms about the shrinking space for political dissent in Russia in recent years. The detentions of dozens of Yabloko supporters and members following the ruling add to a pattern of crackdowns on opposition voices that have intensified since the start of the full-scale military campaign in Ukraine. Rights groups note that this ban is part of a broader series of actions targeting any political organization that does not align with the Kremlin’s current policy agenda, leaving voters with no officially registered option to express opposition to the ongoing war through the parliamentary election process.

  • US considering nuclear weapons against Iran as war falters, claims Marjorie Taylor Greene

    US considering nuclear weapons against Iran as war falters, claims Marjorie Taylor Greene

    A stunning allegation has emerged from former Republican U.S. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, who claims that the administration of former president and current presidential candidate Donald Trump is actively debating the use of nuclear weapons against Iran, as U.S. military forces face growing strain in the months-long conflict launched by Washington and Tel Aviv. In a social media post published late Sunday, Greene offered an unusually blunt warning to the American public, rejecting any suggestion that her claims are unfounded speculation.

    “I’m not speculating, I know. And it’s pure evil,” Greene wrote in the post, which has since drawn widespread attention across global political circles. The ex-congresswoman, who was once counted among Trump’s most loyal and high-profile allies in Congress, has urged Americans across the political spectrum to speak out against any move to escalate the conflict, framing any potential nuclear strike as an act of catastrophic insanity that must be stopped before it is too late.

    Greene’s break with Trump came after she pushed for the declassification of documents linked to Jeffrey Epstein, the deceased convicted sex offender and wealthy financier who counted Trump and dozens of other global political and business elites among his extensive social connections. In her latest comments, she also drew attention to the contradictory intelligence that shaped the lead-up to the war, accusing Washington of launching the conflict on the back of repeated, unsubstantiated warnings from Israel about Iran’s civilian nuclear program.

    Greene pointed out that U.S. intelligence agencies had repeatedly confirmed Iran was nowhere close to developing a functional nuclear weapon, even as Israel recycled its decades-old talking point that Tehran was just weeks away from building a bomb. “And now our government is the one actually discussing lowering the nuclear threshold in order to use nuclear weapons against Iran even though Trump claims he’s won the war like 40 times and says the U.S. controls the Strait of Hormuz,” she added.

    The U.S.-Israeli invasion and ongoing military campaign against Iran launched on February 28 has already left a devastating toll: months of sustained air and ground attacks have killed thousands of Iranian civilians, thrown global energy markets into chaos and disrupted critical supply routes, yet failed to dislodge Tehran’s control over the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic chokepoint through which roughly a fifth of global oil supplies pass daily.

    Greene issued a grave warning about the consequences of any nuclear escalation, arguing such a move could trigger a global nuclear holocaust, trigger a worldwide economic depression, and cause mass casualties on a scale not seen in modern history. She also pushed back against the common assumption that the U.S. is insulated from retaliation, stressing “America is not untouchable.”

    Her explosive allegation comes at a time when the U.S. military is already facing significant logistical and readiness challenges, with weapons stocks depleted after months of sustained combat operations. Reuters recently reported that U.S. forces have already used up virtually all of their stock of long-range precision missiles, while heavy expenditures of Patriot and THAAD defensive interceptor missiles have left U.S. military readiness weakened in other strategic regions around the world.

    Earlier this month, NBC News also confirmed that the U.S. Pentagon is drafting a new military strategy that would expand the role of shorter-range tactical nuclear weapons in regional conflict scenarios. “Our view is that we need credible nuclear options,” a senior anonymous U.S. defense official told the network in confirming the draft strategy. To date, the U.S. remains the only country in history to have used nuclear weapons in combat, when it carried out atomic bombings of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II in 1945, killing more than 200,000 civilians in the attacks.

  • Russia’s prominent anti-war politician jailed for 11 years

    Russia’s prominent anti-war politician jailed for 11 years

    In a sweeping escalation of Russia’s crackdown on domestic dissent amid its ongoing full-scale invasion of Ukraine, one of the country’s most high-profile anti-war opposition politicians has received a lengthy prison sentence, while the only major registered opposition party has been formally blocked from competing in upcoming national parliamentary elections.

    Sixty-three-year-old Lev Shlosberg, deputy leader of the liberal opposition party Yabloko, was handed an 11-year and one-month sentence in a maximum-security penal colony by a court in the northwestern Russian city of Pskov on Monday. The conviction centers on charges of discrediting Russia’s armed forces and disseminating false information about the military, allegations that stem from critical comments Shlosberg published on social media platforms.

    Prosecutors had originally pushed for a 12-year and one-month prison term, but the court handed down a slightly reduced sentence. Shlosberg has forcefully rejected all charges against him, framing the conviction as a targeted act of political retribution. In a closing statement to the court, a transcript of which was published by independent Russian outlet Novaya Gazeta, Shlosberg dismissed the entire proceedings as a fake investigation designed to achieve an unlawful end. He noted that the court’s sole purpose was to punish a citizen for holding an unpopular political, public, and civil position. Throughout his closing remarks, Shlosberg reiterated his longstanding call for an immediate ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine war and a return to political dialogue between the two sides, and he was repeatedly cut off by the presiding judge during his statement.

    The verdict against Shlosberg came down mere minutes before Russia’s Supreme Court issued a ruling rejecting Yabloko’s final appeal against its disqualification from the September parliamentary elections, scheduled to take place between September 18 and 20. Yabloko, which made history as the only registered Russian political party to publicly oppose the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, was removed from election ballots earlier this month over two contested claims. Russian authorities argued the party publicly supports the so-called international LGBT movement, which Russia’s Supreme Court has labeled an extremist organization, while a separate lawsuit filed by pro-Kremlin nationalist party Rodina also accused Yabloko of copyright violations. Yabloko has denied all accusations against it, and party leadership confirmed it would pursue an appeal against Shlosberg’s conviction.

    This series of actions comes as part of a broader nationwide crackdown on all remaining opposition to Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has held power for nearly 27 years. Since the invasion began in early 2022, any public dissent against the war has been effectively criminalized under strict wartime censorship laws, with violations carrying penalties ranging from steep fines to decade-long prison sentences. All 10 other political parties that will appear on September’s ballots are open supporters of the war in Ukraine.

    Latest polling from Russian state-owned pollster VCIOM shows that support for Putin’s ruling United Russia party slipped to 32.1% earlier this month, marking the lowest rating the party has recorded since May. Despite this drop in public approval, political analysts widely expect the Kremlin to leverage its extensive administrative and regulatory resources to secure the election outcome it favors. Independent election monitoring groups have already been stripped of nearly all their authority to oversee the voting process and challenge any irregularities or unfair practices.