分类: politics

  • Indian state on the boil after raped girl’s body fished out of pond

    Indian state on the boil after raped girl’s body fished out of pond

    Two months after the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) made history by winning its first majority in India’s West Bengal state, a horrific crime has thrown the region into chaos, reigniting long-simmering public anger over failures to protect women and children.

    The tragedy unfolded in Surjyapur village, located in the Baruipur area on Kolkata’s outskirts, when an 11-year-old girl left her home Saturday afternoon to purchase a birthday gift for a friend and never returned. Her family filed a missing person report with local police at 8:30 p.m. the same day, but law enforcement dismissed their urgent plea, saying they would launch an inquiry the following morning. Frustrated by police inaction, the girl’s relatives and local residents reviewed closed-circuit camera footage from nearby shops on their own, identifying the child walking alongside Prabhash Mondal, a local resident of the village.

    Early Sunday, a crowd of villagers gathered at Mondal’s residence, detained him, and turned him over to police custody. Hours later, investigators recovered the girl’s body from a nearby pond, with local media reports confirming Mondal led officers to the exact location of the remains. A post-mortem examination determined the child’s cause of death was drowning, leading her family to insist she was still alive when dumped in the water — and would have survived if police had responded immediately to their report. “Had the police acted earlier, she could have been saved,” the victim’s relatives stated publicly.

    In the hours after the body was recovered, public fury boiled over into widespread violent unrest across Baruipur. Protesters vandalized public roads, local shops, and a regional railway station, leaving three separate police cases registered and 40 people detained. In a tragic turn of violence, an innocent young man was beaten to death by the angry mob, a fact later confirmed by West Bengal Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari. Multiple police officers were injured, and dozens of vehicles were damaged as officers worked to regain control of the area. To prevent further unrest, authorities have implemented a ban on public gatherings and deployed hundreds of additional police and paramilitary forces to the tense region.

    Less than 24 hours after Adhikari visited the victim’s family to promise swift justice, Mondal was killed in what police described as a justified encounter shooting. In an official statement released Wednesday morning, Baruipur police said Mondal was being taken to the pond to reconstruct the crime scene as part of the investigation when he attempted to grab an officer’s service weapon and opened fire on the law enforcement team. Officers returned fire, striking Mondal, who was pronounced dead after being rushed to a local hospital. Shockingly, Mondal’s own mother publicly disowned her son following his death, refusing to claim his body and saying he deserved his punishment. “My son has been punished for what he did. I will not accept his body, I will not even bring his body home,” she told news agency ANI.

    Three other men suspected of involvement in the crime remain in police custody, and charges have been filed under India’s Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, the country’s harshest legislation for child sexual abuse crimes. The case has also raised alarming questions about potential police negligence, and a local BJP politician has been dragged into controversy after accused of aiding the suspects. Sushant Mondal, whose home was attacked and ransacked by an angry mob, has denied all claims, asserting he actually assisted in catching the perpetrators. The incident has also threatened to escalate along religious lines: the victim was from the Muslim community, while the three men arrested are Hindu, stoking sectarian tensions in the already volatile region.

    The horrific crime has quickly snowballed into a major political firestorm for the new BJP government. Opposition parties have slammed the administration for failing to deliver on its core campaign promise of making West Bengal safe for women and children. Political analysts note that the BJP’s historic May election victory — which ousted three-term incumbent Mamata Banerjee and her Trinamool Congress party — was partly fueled by public anger over Banerjee’s poor handling of the rape and murder of a junior doctor at a state government hospital, a case that also centered on failures in women’s safety.

    Critics, including human rights activists and opposition leaders, have also questioned the legitimacy of Mondal’s encounter killing, arguing it violates fundamental rule of law principles. Ranjit Sur, a leader with the Association for the Protection of Democratic Rights, called the circumstances of the death suspicious, noting a familiar pattern in extrajudicial police killings across India: the accused almost always tries to snatch an officer’s weapon before being shot dead. The 2026 West Bengal killing echoes a 2019 incident in Hyderabad, where four men accused of raping and murdering a young woman were killed in a controversial police encounter that sparked national debate over extrajudicial justice.

    So far, West Bengal police have not held any public press conference to address the growing list of allegations against the force. In response to the mounting pressure, the state government has formed a special investigation team (SIT) to lead a full inquiry into the child’s death and the allegations of police negligence surrounding the case.

  • Italy expels two Russian diplomats accused of spying: minister

    Italy expels two Russian diplomats accused of spying: minister

    In a sharp escalation of diplomatic tensions between Rome and Moscow, Italy has ordered the immediate expulsion of two Russian military attaches found to be engaged in espionage activities on Italian soil, senior government officials confirmed Thursday. The move comes just 48 hours after Italian law enforcement announced the arrest of two former Italian intelligence agents, who local media reports are accused of leaking highly sensitive military information related to Italy’s support for Ukraine to Russian handlers.

    Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani made the announcement of the expulsions official via a post on social media platform X, confirming the identities of the expelled diplomats as Ivan Petrovich Gorbachev and Mikhail Vasilyevich Astakhov. Tajani said the pair have been given a three-day deadline to leave Italian territory, noting they were directly tied to the espionage ring uncovered by prosecutors in Rome.

    In his statement, Tajani issued a firm condemnation of Moscow’s actions, saying: “Moscow continues to use hybrid warfare to attack the West and Italy — acts of interference that are serious and unacceptable to Italian institutions and national security.”

    The espionage investigation unfolded after Rome police revealed the arrest of the two ex-agents earlier this week. Details released by law enforcement show one of the detainees, a 59-year-old former Italian intelligence operative, was regularly paid by a Russian handler. Over the course of his collaboration, he passed classified information through a network of six sources, four of whom are currently active-duty military personnel assigned to high-security posts, police said.

    Local media reports have shed further light on the scope of the leaked information. The network allegedly passed details to Russia about the SAMP/T, a joint Italian-French air defense system, along with Aster missiles that Rome planned to deliver to Ukraine for field testing in 2024. Russian handlers also sought intelligence on a NATO deployment based in Bulgaria and Avio, the major Italian defense manufacturer that produces engines for military drones and supersonic missiles, according to the reports.
    Leading Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera added that the 59-year-old suspect also disclosed the identities of Italian counter-espionage agents assigned to monitor Russian intelligence operatives working in Italy. Another major national outlet, La Stampa, reported that the former agent shared thousands of separate intelligence documents with his Russian contacts over a 12-year period of collaboration, based on recordings of the suspect’s phone conversations seized by investigators.

    A legal representative for the former agent has rejected all accusations of treason against his client. The lawyer claims the suspect only collected information that is already available in the public domain, and the former agent is scheduled to undergo formal questioning by investigators on Friday.
    Details of the second arrested Italian ex-agent, including their identity and the specific accusations against them, have not been released to the public as of Thursday.

    Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosetto framed the uncovered ring as just a small part of a much larger pattern of Russian activity earlier this week, saying the case is “just the tip of the iceberg” of Moscow’s ongoing hybrid warfare campaign across Europe amid its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
    This is not the first such diplomatic clash between Italy and Russia in recent years. In 2024, an Italian court sentenced a serving Italian navy captain to prison after he was caught selling classified documents to the Russian embassy. That incident also resulted in Italy expelling two Russian officials, followed by Moscow retaliating with the expulsion of one Italian diplomat from Russia.

  • Labour leadership contest takes Burnham closer to UK PM’s office

    Labour leadership contest takes Burnham closer to UK PM’s office

    The path to 10 Downing Street cleared a major milestone for veteran British politician Andy Burnham on Thursday, as the nomination period officially opened for a new leader of the UK’s ruling Labour Party following Keir Starmer’s resignation last month.

    At 56 years old, Burnham stands as the only sitting Labour Member of Parliament that has publicly declared their candidacy to replace Starmer, who stepped down on June 22 after losing the confidence of his parliamentary party amid sustained criticism over repeated policy flip-flops and questions about his decision-making. Thursday morning saw a steady stream of Labour MPs file into the party’s parliamentary headquarters to submit their nominations for their preferred leader, with most insiders already signaling their backing for Burnham.

    With no other declared candidates in the race after a string of potential challengers dropped out in recent days, political observers widely expect Burnham to be formally confirmed as Labour’s new leader – and the UK’s prime minister-in-waiting – at a special party conference scheduled for July 17. He would officially take up residence at 10 Downing Street just three days after the confirmation vote. If a contested leadership election were called, however, a result would not be announced until August 29, after a ballot of rank-and-file Labour members and representatives from the party’s affiliated trade unions.

    Burnham’s path to the top job became all but guaranteed late Wednesday when former armed forces minister Al Carns announced he would not enter the race, ending any last speculation of a contested contest. Carns had initially suggested a leadership race could give Labour a chance to hold a full policy debate, but ultimately backed out and threw his support behind Burnham, arguing that extended internal party infighting was not what the British public needed amid ongoing economic and social challenges. “Months of internal Labour politics isn’t what the country needs right now. We’ve got to get on with the job,” Carns said in his statement.

    To qualify as an official candidate, Burnham only needs the backing of 81 of Labour’s 402 sitting MPs – a threshold that political insiders confirm he will pass far more easily than required. Nicknamed the “King of the North” for his three consecutive election wins as Greater Manchester mayor, Burnham returned to parliament last month after winning a by-election, a move that cleared the way for his leadership bid. He previously served as an MP between 2001 and 2017, and this marks his third attempt to secure Labour’s top leadership post.

    In a keynote policy speech delivered in June, Burnham laid out his early policy priorities, promising to deliver “the biggest rebalancing of power our country has seen” by devolving more authority to regional and local communities. “We need to put power in the hands of the people and places who can use it best,” he said, adding that raising living standards for all UK residents would be his core priority. “To fix the economy and the country, we need to change politics and we need to do it now,” he added. He has already moved to reassure financial markets by committing to the outgoing government’s current borrowing limits, pledging fiscal discipline and promising to reduce the UK’s growing welfare spending. One of his signature proposals is the creation of a “No. 10 North” regional prime ministerial office to drive devolution across northern England.

    Carns’ withdrawal follows another high-profile exit from potential candidacy, after former health minister Wes Streeting announced he would abandon plans to run and also back Burnham. Multiple opinion polls rank Burnham as Labour’s most popular national politician, positioning him as slightly left of the more centrist Starmer. Many Labour MPs see Burnham as the party’s best bet to recapture lost voter support from Nigel Farage’s right-wing Reform UK, which has led Labour in national opinion polls for more than a year. Recent polling has narrowed the gap, however, amid growing scrutiny of Farage’s personal finances.

    On the day Starmer announced his resignation, Burnham was sworn in as a Member of Parliament, and more than 200 Labour MPs turned out for a celebratory group photo with him at Westminster, a clear public signal of the party’s overwhelming support for his leadership bid. One anonymous Labour MP told reporters that the party was right to back Burnham, arguing that “he couldn’t be worse than Starmer” and describing him as a potential “breath of fresh air” for British politics. But not all MPs are fully confident: another anonymous lawmaker who backed Burnham expressed concern that the incoming leader will only have a matter of weeks to prepare to take control of government before he officially becomes prime minister.

  • Ukrainian drones batter Russian oil facilities, set more oil tankers ablaze

    Ukrainian drones batter Russian oil facilities, set more oil tankers ablaze

    A fresh wave of coordinated drone attacks carried out by Ukrainian forces targeted key Russian energy infrastructure across multiple regions and commercial oil tankers in the Sea of Azov on Thursday, coming just 24 hours after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a landmark agreement to grant Kyiv a manufacturing license for Patriot air defense systems. This new series of strikes builds on a sustained campaign against Russian fuel networks that has already sparked a growing domestic fuel crisis, with long lines at filling stations, widespread gasoline shortages, and mandatory fuel rationing in at least 10 Russian regions.

    The first strike of the day was reported early Thursday at a large oil storage depot in Tver, a major city in western Russia roughly 100 miles northwest of Moscow. Acting regional governor Vitaly Korolyov confirmed that the attack ignited a significant blaze at the facility, though no immediate casualties were reported.

    Further south, in Russia’s Stavropol Krai, regional governor Vladimir Vladimirov confirmed that multiple large oil storage tanks were set alight by drone assault in the town of Vyazniki. As the fire spread beyond initial containment efforts, local authorities ordered the emergency evacuation of residents from several nearby apartment blocks to protect public safety.

    Offshore in the Sea of Azov, a strategically critical waterway connecting southern Russia to the occupied Crimean Peninsula, Ukrainian drones hit two Russian oil tankers, according to Rostov regional governor Yuri Slusar. Slusay reported that one of the two vessels remained engulfed in flames as of Thursday afternoon, and all crew members from both ships were evacuated before the fires reached critical sections. Thursday’s attack marks the third strike on oil tankers in the Sea of Azov in the past week, part of Ukraine’s intentional campaign to disrupt Russian fuel supply lines to occupied Crimea and frontline Russian military forces operating in southern Ukraine.

    In a statement on the defensive actions taken during the strikes, Russia’s Defense Ministry announced that its air defense systems had intercepted and downed 73 Ukrainian drones across the country between late Wednesday and early Thursday. Ukraine, in turn, reported that Russia launched a massive overnight retaliatory drone and missile strike across Ukrainian territory, deploying 94 long-range attack drones and two ballistic missiles. Ukraine’s Air Force said that 72 of the incoming drones were either intercepted by air defenses or jammed and disabled before impact, but 19 remaining drones and both ballistic missiles caused damage to infrastructure and civilian sites across 13 locations.

    The strikes unfolded against a dramatic shift in U.S.-Ukraine relations, a day after Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy held a high-stakes meeting on the sidelines of the NATO summit in Istanbul, Turkey. During that meeting, Trump announced the U.S. would approve a license allowing Ukraine to manufacture its own Patriot air defense systems, a capability Kyiv has requested for years to counter relentless Russian missile and drone strikes on its territory. This agreement marks a major breakthrough for Ukraine, which has relied on a limited number of donated Patriot systems from Western allies to date.

    The collaborative tone of Wednesday’s meeting stood in stark contrast to a contentious meeting between the two leaders at the White House in February 2025, when Trump publicly berated Zelenskyy over the progress of the war and negotiations. During the latest encounter, however, Trump offered effusive praise for Zelenskyy, commending his willingness to engage in negotiations to end the more than four-year conflict. “He has done an amazing job and been very effective,” Trump told reporters following the meeting.

  • Nominations open in the contest to be UK leader, with Andy Burnham likely the only candidate

    Nominations open in the contest to be UK leader, with Andy Burnham likely the only candidate

    LONDON – The UK’s Labour Party launched its leadership election process Thursday to select a successor to outgoing Prime Minister Keir Starmer, with veteran progressive politician Andy Burnham positioned as the only candidate and set to take the country’s highest office later this month.

    The opening of nominations kicks off a short, orderly contest that appears all but decided before voting even begins. Other prospective challengers have already withdrawn from consideration, leaving Burnham as the sole hopeful. On Wednesday evening, former Defense Secretary Al Carns, who had publicly weighed a run for the leadership, confirmed he would not mount a challenge against Burnham.

    In an official statement announcing his decision, Carns noted that while he had hoped a public leadership contest would spark a robust, needed policy debate for the party, an extended period of internal factional politics is not what the UK public requires at this critical moment. “We’ve got to get on with the job of governing,” Carns wrote, adding “Andy Burnham’s earned this position and he’s got my full backing.”

    Under Labour Party rules, any candidate must collect a minimum of 80 signatures from sitting Labour Members of Parliament to appear on the ballot. Burnham, the former 10-year mayor of Greater Manchester, is already on track to far surpass this threshold, according to party insiders.

    Nominations will close on July 16, with an official confirmation of the new leader expected the following day. Following the announcement, Burnham will travel to Buckingham Palace for an audience with King Charles III on July 20, where he will formally be invited to form a government and take office as prime minister.

    The leadership vacancy was created last month when Starmer announced he would step down immediately after his successor was chosen. Starmer, who led Labour to a landslide general election victory in 2024, saw his approval among both party members and the general public collapse over two years in office, undermined by repeated policy missteps and widely criticized judgment calls that eroded public trust in his leadership.

    Burnham returned to national Parliament just last month, winning a special by-election after nearly a decade leading the major northern English metro region of Greater Manchester. He has campaigned on a platform of sweeping national economic change, promising to reverse almost 17 years of sluggish UK growth that began after the 2008 global financial crisis. His signature policy approach, branded “Manchesterism,” draws on his experience in regional government, and calls for combining private and public sector investment to upgrade underfunded national assets including transport networks, affordable housing, and core infrastructure.

    Despite his momentum and united party backing, Burnham will inherit the same deep-seated challenges that plagued Starmer’s tenure. The UK continues to grapple with stagnant overall economic growth, strained and under-resourced public services, and ongoing cost-of-living pressures that have left millions of households facing financial hardship.

    On foreign policy, Burnham has already signaled he will maintain broad continuity with the existing government’s approach. In an op-ed published in The Times of London, he confirmed that the UK’s “commitment to NATO and the U.K.’s nuclear deterrent will remain absolute.” He added that the country will continue to serve as a steadfast ally to the United States and maintain unwavering support for Ukraine in its ongoing conflict against Russian invasion.

  • Australia agrees to sell uranium to India, ending a long stalemate

    Australia agrees to sell uranium to India, ending a long stalemate

    In a landmark step that deepens bilateral ties between two major Indo-Pacific nations, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced Thursday that Canberra will finally begin selling uranium to New Delhi for civilian energy use, putting a decade-old stalled agreement into motion.

    The joint announcement came during Modi’s visit to Australia for the countries’ annual bilateral leaders’ summit, where the pair also unveiled plans for expanded defense and security cooperation across the Indo-Pacific region. Details on the volume of future uranium exports and the timeline for first shipments were not released immediately.

    Australia holds the world’s largest known reserves of uranium, but produces the material exclusively for export — the country does not operate nuclear power plants or develop nuclear weapons. For India, a stable supply of imported uranium is a critical piece of its ambitious clean energy expansion plan: New Delhi aims to install 100 gigawatts of nuclear generation capacity by 2047, enough to power roughly 60 million households annually. While India has doubled its domestic nuclear power capacity over the last 10 years, nuclear energy still accounts for just 3% of the country’s total electricity output, leaving massive room for growth to meet rising demand from its 1.4 billion population and expanding middle class.

    The path to Thursday’s agreement stretched back more than a decade, blocked for years by longstanding non-proliferation concerns. A 2014 bilateral export framework was never enacted, due to Australia’s longstanding policy restricting uranium sales to countries that are not signatories to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). India has never joined the NPT, arguing the agreement is inherently discriminatory: it only recognizes five countries as legitimate nuclear weapon states — the U.S., China, Russia, the U.K. and France — based on nuclear tests conducted before January 1967, a cutoff that permanently excludes India. After India conducted a series of nuclear tests in 1998, the country faced widespread international trade sanctions on uranium and nuclear technology.

    A turning point came in 2008, when the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group granted India a special waiver that allowed member states to sell uranium to the country for civilian use. Since then, New Delhi has actively pursued bilateral sales agreements with major uranium producers, including a deal signed with Canada in March this year. After the 2008 waiver, Australia softened its longstanding opposition to sales, agreeing in 2014 to allow exports conditional on strict International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards and the separation of India’s civilian and military nuclear programs. Thursday’s administrative agreement removes the final bureaucratic barriers to activating the 2014 framework.

    Beyond the uranium deal, the two leaders used Thursday’s summit to reinforce their growing strategic alignment. In a joint statement, they pledged to advance deeper defense and security cooperation across the Indo-Pacific, framing the move as a “step‑change in the depth and ambition” of the bilateral relationship. The announcement of closer security ties came just days after Australia publicly criticized China for test-firing a long-range ballistic missile from a nuclear-powered submarine into the South Pacific, a region protected by a regional anti-nuclear treaty. The two leaders did not name China in their public statements Thursday and declined to take questions from reporters.

    Modi’s regional tour also included a previous stop in Indonesia, where he sealed a landmark deal for Indonesia to purchase India’s BrahMos missiles, and will continue with a first-ever visit to New Zealand starting Friday. India and New Zealand signed a bilateral free trade agreement back in April.

    Economically, India has emerged as one of Australia’s most critical trade partners: official Australian government data puts the total value of two-way goods and services trade at 54.4 billion Australian dollars, or $37.7 billion, for the 2024-2025 financial year, making India Australia’s fifth largest trading partner. Tens of thousands of local residents gathered in central Melbourne to catch a glimpse of Modi during his visit, reflecting the deep people-to-people ties between the two countries.

  • South Korea’s Supreme Court upholds prison sentence for Yoon in first martial law case

    South Korea’s Supreme Court upholds prison sentence for Yoon in first martial law case

    South Korea’s top judicial body has finalized a seven-year prison sentence for former President Yoon Suk Yeol, marking the first of his multiple criminal cases tied to his controversial 2024 martial law declaration to reach the nation’s highest court. In a ruling delivered Thursday, the Supreme Court upheld an April conviction issued by the Seoul High Court, which found Yoon guilty of three distinct violations of law arising from his short-lived emergency declaration.

    The charges center on Yoon’s actions in the hours before and after his December 3, 2024, martial law proclamation. Court documents confirm Yoon unlawfully violated the deliberation rights of Cabinet members required to weigh in on such a historic emergency measure. Multiple witnesses, including then-Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, have testified that Yoon gathered 11 officials at his office late that night only to unilaterally announce his already final decision, rather than open the matter for discussion. Nine additional Cabinet members were either never called to the meeting or notified too late to participate, stripping them of their legal right to contribute to the decision-making process.

    Further, Yoon was found to have falsified the official martial law proclamation to cover up the failure to follow required consultation procedures, then destroyed the altered document after the fact. The court also upheld the conviction that Yoon deployed presidential security personnel to illegally block law enforcement officers from carrying out an arrest warrant issued in the weeks following his impeachment.

    Yoon’s declaration of martial law lasted barely a few hours before legislators overcame a cordon of armed soldiers and police blocking entry to the National Assembly, holding an emergency vote to overturn the decree that forced Yoon’s Cabinet to formally withdraw the measure. The sudden political upheaval threw South Korea into a period of national crisis, grinding partisan politics to a halt, pausing high-level diplomatic engagement, and triggering volatility in domestic financial markets. Yoon was removed from office by the Constitutional Court in April 2025, which ruled his martial order lacked any legal foundation and violated required procedural rules — a finding that aligned closely with Thursday’s Supreme Court decision. The crisis resolved only after liberal opposition leader Lee Jae Myung won a snap presidential election the following June.

    The former president remains in pre-trial detention and did not appear in court for the final ruling. His legal team released a statement after the decision, expressing deep disappointment with the outcome. The team argued that Supreme Court justices had closed the case without conducting an adequate, thorough review of the evidence.

    This conviction is only one of multiple pending legal matters facing Yoon. He is currently appealing a life sentence handed down on the most serious charge against him: rebellion related to the martial law declaration. A separate appeal is also pending for a 30-year prison sentence stemming from accusations that he ordered military drone flights into North Korean airspace in 2024 to intentionally escalate cross-border tensions, with the goal of creating a pretext to impose martial law at home. Yoon’s defense has countered that the drone operations were a legitimate defensive response to thousands of trash-carrying balloons launched by North Korea into South Korean territory.

  • An Italian region defies US pressure to end a Cuban doctors program

    An Italian region defies US pressure to end a Cuban doctors program

    In the sunbaked, underdeveloped toe of Italy’s boot, a quiet standoff over geopolitics and public health is playing out. Calabria, Italy’s poorest region, has become an unlikely exception to a growing global trend: it continues to host hundreds of Cuban medical professionals, defying long-running U.S. efforts to shut down Cuba’s iconic international medical program. For decades, Cuban doctors have brought their specialized experience delivering care in low-resource settings to developing nations across the globe, but Calabria is one of the few places in Europe where the program still operates under mounting American pressure.

    Calabria’s decades-long struggle with healthcare access creates the urgent need for foreign medical staff. For 17 years until April, the region operated under special national administration due to persistent budget shortfalls, compounded by systemic corruption and Mafia infiltration that gutted planned investments in public health. Young Italian medical graduates overwhelmingly leave for higher-paying careers in the wealthy, industrialized north, leaving gaping staffing shortages that shuttered entire hospital departments by the early 2020s. Before the first cohort of Cuban doctors arrived in Polistena Hospital in January 2023, chief physician Francesco Moschella told the Associated Press he was single-handedly keeping the facility’s emergency room open. At one point, patients faced waits of up to 12 hours just to see a provider.

    Today, more than 200 Cuban doctors work across remote Calabrian hospitals, filling half of all emergency room staffing in some facilities. Zoila Yakelin Arevalo Cruz, an emergency medicine specialist who left her young son in Cuba to take up her post in mid-2023, works in Polistena’s ER, which treats 30,000 patients annually. The 38-year-old, who now speaks fluent Italian and even picked up the local Calabrian dialect from visiting patients, said she and her colleagues had no idea how severe the doctor shortage was in a European first-world region. Thanks to the addition of Cuban staff, she said, wait times have dropped from multiple hours to under 60 minutes. Local residents echo that praise: 72-year-old Maria Morano, a regular patient at Polistena, said the Cuban doctors bring a rare combination of skill, empathy and humility that many local patients don’t see from Italian providers. “We are lucky they came, otherwise our hospital would have been closed entirely,” she said.

    The U.S. government has spent years targeting Cuba’s medical program, which it labels a lucrative revenue stream for Cuba’s socialist government and accuses of operating as a form of human trafficking, citing the Cuban state’s practice of collecting a portion of doctors’ salaries and claims of passport confiscation. Under successive U.S. administrations, Washington has pressured allied nations to cut ties with the program, and many have complied: in March, Jamaica ended its 50-year medical cooperation agreement with Cuba, displacing nearly 300 healthcare workers, while Honduras expelled more than 150 Cuban medical staff this year. But not all nations have bowed to pressure: Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum publicly defended the program in March, noting it delivers critical care to underserved populations that would otherwise go without treatment.

    Cuba says it currently deploys 22,000 medical personnel across 55 countries, framing the program as a global mission of solidarity rooted in the country’s longstanding commitment to universal healthcare. In February, U.S. officials including charge d’affaires to Cuba Mike Hammer traveled to Calabria to meet with regional governor Roberto Occhiuto to press for an end to the arrangement. The meeting was cordial, but Hammer made clear Washington would prefer Calabria source foreign staff from other countries. Occhiuto, a senior member of a strongly anti-communist Italian political party who was even featured in the official newspaper of Cuba’s Communist Party, is an unlikely defender of the program. But he makes no apologies for prioritizing his region’s people over geopolitical pressure: he told the AP that while he shares Washington’s opposition to Cuban socialism, his first responsibility is keeping local hospitals open. “I’ve faced pressure during the Biden administration, but it grew much more intense under Trump,” Occhiuto said. “I told U.S. officials we are working on incentives to lure local Italian doctors back to Calabria, but right now, we need these doctors to keep care accessible. I intend to keep all currently deployed Cuban doctors in their posts.” Occhiuto added that he would even like to triple the number of Cuban medical staff in the region to roughly 1,000, but has held off to avoid escalating conflict with Washington.

    To address U.S. concerns, Calabria structured its agreement with the Cuban doctors unusually: rather than sending payments to the Cuban government agency that runs the country’s international medical missions, the region signs individual contracts with each doctor and deposits their full salary directly into Italian bank accounts. Even so, many Cuban doctors told the AP they voluntarily send up to half of their earnings back to the Cuban government, as a contribution to the state that trained and educated them. Daisy Luperon Loforte, a Cuban cardiologist working in Calabria, rejected the U.S. claim that doctors are forced into the program and exploited. “We do not consider ourselves modern-day slaves at all, as somebody has called us,” she said. “We love our country, we give an economic contribution, and we are happy to do so. Sixty-three Cuban doctors, many with prior experience in the country’s international missions, have already applied to extend their stays in Calabria and take up independent roles in the regional health system, according to the governor. The Cuban government has not commented on the applications, and the U.S. State Department declined to answer questions about its meeting with Occhiuto. For patients and local leaders, however, the arrangement is not about geopolitics—it is about keeping critical healthcare open for a neglected region that has few other options.

  • US launches more strikes on Iran with blasts reported in south of country

    US launches more strikes on Iran with blasts reported in south of country

    Escalating tensions in the Middle East have reached a new critical flashpoint, after the United States launched a sweeping new round of military strikes against Iranian targets along the Strait of Hormuz, marking the end of a month-long ceasefire agreement between the two longstanding adversaries.

    The escalation follows a series of tit-for-tat attacks that unfolded this week, starting with alleged Iranian strikes on commercial shipping vessels in the strategic international shipping lane on Tuesday. That attack prompted immediate U.S. retaliatory strikes late Tuesday, with President Donald Trump promising further heavy action Wednesday evening.

    Iranian state media has confirmed multiple large explosions across southern Iranian port cities located along the Strait of Hormuz, including Sirik, Bandar Abbas, Jask, Konarak and Chabahar. According to Iranian reports, multiple missiles hit port infrastructure in Sirik and Jask, while eight explosions were recorded in Bandar Abbas, the country’s key southern trade hub. Strikes were also reported on Abu Musa, a disputed island claimed by both Iran and the United Arab Emirates. Local Iranian outlets have documented blackouts across parts of Chabahar and an active fire at an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps barracks in Bushehr, though full details of casualties and infrastructure damage remain undisclosed as of Wednesday night.

    U.S. Central Command (Centcom) confirmed in an official statement Wednesday that the operation targeted 90 Iranian military assets along the country’s coastline, including integrated air defense systems and military logistics infrastructure. The command said the strikes were intended to “further degrade Iran’s ability to attack commercial shipping and innocent civilian mariners” in the strategically vital waterway, through which roughly 20% of global oil trade passes daily. Centcom added that the new operation followed successful offensive strikes carried out against Iran the previous night.

    Speaking directly to reporters aboard Air Force One Wednesday evening, President Trump confirmed the strikes were deliberate retaliation for the Tuesday shipping attacks. In a subsequent post to his Truth Social platform, Trump emphasized: “This is in retribution for yesterday’s bombing of ships by Iran. If it happens again, it will get much worse!” The president also revealed that Iranian officials had reached out to Washington Wednesday seeking to restart negotiations, but cast doubt on whether Tehran could be trusted to honor any future agreement. “I just don’t know if they’re worthy of making a deal – I don’t know that they’re going to honour the deal, that’s the problem,” he said. Trump also formally declared the 17 June ceasefire memorandum of understanding (MoU) “over”, calling further negotiations with Iran “a waste of time” and using exceptionally harsh language to describe the Iranian leadership.

    Top Iranian officials have issued sharp, defiant responses to the new U.S. strikes. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran’s parliamentary speaker and chief nuclear negotiator with the U.S., wrote on the social platform X that “America still hasn’t learned that bullying and breaking promises are no longer cost-free.” He added a clear warning: “Let me put it plainly: if you strike, you’ll get hit.” Ghalibaf also reaffirmed Iranian sovereignty over the strait, stating that shipping access would remain under Iranian control, not “American threats.” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi similarly rejected Trump’s inflammatory language, saying: “We do not answer vulgarity with vulgarity, but with action: fearlessly and with great valour.”

    The escalation has already sent ripples across the Gulf region. Local media and officials have confirmed explosions in Manama, the capital of Bahrain, a key U.S. ally in the region. Kuwait’s military confirmed it intercepted incoming missiles and drones launched from Iran, while Qatar’s interior ministry issued a nationwide security alert for civilians.

    The June MoU was meant to de-escalate tensions after months of escalating attacks on commercial shipping in the strait. The 14-point agreement included a 60-day ceasefire to allow for comprehensive negotiations, guarantees for safe commercial passage through the Strait of Hormuz, and U.S. sanctions relief for Iran. The 60-day negotiating window has not yet expired, but this week’s attacks have collapsed the fragile truce entirely. This is not the first time the truce has been tested: the U.S. launched limited strikes in late June after an Iranian attack on a cargo ship, but both sides agreed to step back from escalation at that time.

  • Platner’s disastrous candidacy exposes rifts that could dampen Democrats’ Senate hopes

    Platner’s disastrous candidacy exposes rifts that could dampen Democrats’ Senate hopes

    In a sudden and dramatic turn that has upended one of the nation’s most competitive congressional contests, Graham Platner, the Democratic nominee for Maine’s high-stakes U.S. Senate race, announced Wednesday night he was suspending his campaign. The exit comes just 48 hours after a bombshell report from Politico detailed a sexual assault allegation from Platner’s ex-girlfriend, who accuses him of entering her home uninvited while intoxicated in 2021 and assaulting her — claims Platner has forcefully denied.

    Platner, an oysterman and former U.S. Marine who pulled off one of the most shocking primary upsets in recent Democratic politics, saw his rapid ascent from political obscurity collapse into chaos this week. After defeating popular sitting Maine Governor Janet Mills, a candidate hand-picked by party establishment leaders, Platner built a grassroots movement of more than 15,000 supporters across the state and earned endorsements from progressive icons Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. He was tapped as the party’s official challenger to five-term Republican incumbent Susan Collins, a race widely viewed as make-or-break for Democrats hoping to flip control of the U.S. Senate in November’s midterm elections.

    This latest allegation is not the first controversy to trail the first-time candidate. Since he launched his campaign last August, reports have emerged of offensive past social media posts, a chest tattoo with documented Nazi ideological ties, sexually explicit text messages sent to women after his 2023 marriage, and multiple accusations from former partners of threatening, toxic behavior. Despite these repeated red flags, 72% of Maine Democratic primary voters backed Platner in June’s nominating contest, a testament to the appetite among the party’s base for anti-establishment, working-class progressive candidates.

    But in the wake of the new sexual assault allegations, political support evaporated within hours. Every major institutional backer, including Sanders and Warren, withdrew their endorsements, and the national Democratic Party cut off all campaign funding. By midweek, it was clear Platner’s campaign could not survive. In his 11-minute pre-recorded announcement video posted to social media, however, Platner pushed back against the narrative that he was stepping down over the allegation. “We went toe to toe with one of the most entrenched political systems in the history of the world, and we won,” he said. “And now they are not going to let us have it, not if it’s me.” He added he would not formally file withdrawal paperwork until he secures guarantees that his replacement will be chosen through an open, democratic process, rather than picked behind closed doors by party leaders.

    The sudden exit has thrown Maine Democrats and national party strategists into panic mode. To win a Senate majority this November, Democrats must flip four Republican-held seats while defending all of their own incumbents, making the Maine seat a critical must-win target. Platner’s departure has not only derailed months of campaign planning but also re-opened deep, long-simmering rifts between the party’s progressive grassroots wing and moderate establishment that could have ripple effects all the way to the 2028 presidential election.

    State party leaders are now rushing to select a new nominee before a mandatory July 27 deadline, announcing this week that a convention of hundreds of delegates will pick a replacement within the next two weeks, with a promise of public input to avoid accusations of a closed-door power grab. The process has already sparked open friction: state party chair Devon Murphy-Anderson accused Platner’s campaign of attempting to manipulate the selection process, a claim Platner’s allies rejected, countering that they only want an open process that blocks an establishment-backed candidate from being anointed without input.

    Political observers warn that mismanaging the nominee selection could alienate Platner’s passionate base, a group Democrats desperately need to turn out in November. “So much of Platner’s base, whose passion Democrats are going to want to have, will sit on their hands and be very angry if it looks like this is another case of the establishment triumphing over what the people want,” said James Melcher, a politics professor at the University of Maine at Farmington.

    Multiple established Maine political figures have already signaled interest in stepping into the race, including former Maine Senate leader Troy Jackson, former gubernatorial candidate and state epidemiologist Nirav Shah, and current Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, who was the Democratic nominee against Collins in 2014. Still, former state Senator Lynn Bromley, who backed Mills in the primary, warned that uniting voters around a new candidate in just three months will be an uphill battle. “The thing I’m the most worried about is we run somebody and he or she loses, and then we spend the next four years pointing fingers at whose fault that was,” she said.

    Platner’s campaign represented a key test of a growing national trend among Democratic voters: the embrace of outsider candidates who promise uncompromising progressive policy, including universal healthcare, a wealth tax, and expanded affordable housing, and appeal to working-class rural voters that have increasingly abandoned the party in recent cycles. A Platner win in November would have cemented the case that left-wing, working-class candidates can win competitive battleground seats, a precedent that would have boosted prospects for a progressive presidential nominee in 2028. That opportunity is now all but gone.

    Analysts note that Platner’s survival through multiple earlier scandals underscores how hungry Democratic voters are for a new kind of political representation, but it also highlights the major risks of nominating charismatic political newcomers who have not undergone rigorous vetting before running for high office. While some Maine Democrats argue the upheaval could be a blessing in disguise, allowing the party to put forward a more vetted, traditional candidate, the clock is ticking, and five-term incumbent Collins — a proven tough competitor who has defeated Democratic challengers for 30 years, including overcoming poll deficits to win in 2020 — waits for whoever emerges. “It’s not as though it was going to be easy before, and now it’s hard,” Melcher noted. “Beating Collins was always going to be hard.”