分类: politics

  • Germany plans to take 40% in Leopard tank maker KNDS, joining France as stakeholder

    Germany plans to take 40% in Leopard tank maker KNDS, joining France as stakeholder

    BERLIN – In a landmark move aimed at bolstering European defense industrial capacity amid shifting global security threats, the German federal government announced on Monday its plan to take a 40% minority stake in leading trans-European defense contractor KNDS. The firm, best known for manufacturing the Leopard and Leclerc main battle tanks that form the backbone of many European armored forces, is already jointly structured between German and French stakeholders.

    Founded in 2015 through the merger of Germany’s Krauss-Maffei Wegmann (KMW) and France’s state-owned Nexter, KNDS currently splits ownership 50/50 between the French government and the German Bode family, which controls the KMW side of the business. Headquartered in Amsterdam, the defense conglomerate posted 4.4 billion euros (equivalent to roughly $5 billion) in total annual revenue in 2023 and employs more than 11,000 workers across its European operations. Beyond its signature main battle tanks, KNDS also produces a range of critical military hardware, including the Puma infantry fighting vehicle and the Boxer and Dingo lines of armored personnel carriers.

    The German government’s stake acquisition comes amid a continent-wide push to scale up defense spending and production after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, paired with growing European uncertainty over long-term United States security commitments to the NATO alliance. Officials in Berlin emphasized that the equity investment will lock in long-term strategic oversight of a company central to European defense and security capabilities.

    “National industrial value creation, technological sovereignty, and the protection of core security interests and key technologies based in Germany will all be strengthened through this stake,” the German government said in an official statement Monday.

    In a coordinated joint announcement, Berlin and Paris confirmed they had struck a broader agreement on the future strategy and corporate governance of KNDS. The two NATO allies outlined a shared goal of becoming equal joint shareholders in the firm through a series of upcoming ownership transactions. While the agreement does not specify a timeline for the ownership restructuring or confirm the final equal stake level, it clears the path for KNDS to launch an initial public offering (IPO) in the near term.

    The transatlantic alliance’s two largest European military powers framed the deal as a concrete step toward a long-held shared goal: “This agreement reflects the shared determination of France and Germany to strengthen Europe’s industrial and defense capabilities, support their armed forces, and strengthen European sovereignty over the long term,” the joint statement read.

  • Keir Starmer went from election landslide to downfall after his supporters deserted him

    Keir Starmer went from election landslide to downfall after his supporters deserted him

    LONDON – When Keir Starmer swept into Britain’s top office in July 2024, voters handed the centre-left Labour Party a landslide parliamentary majority after 14 years of Conservative rule, casting him as a steady, crisis-ending alternative to the relentless chaos, scandal and rapid turnover of Conservative prime ministers Boris Johnson and Liz Truss. Positioning himself as a “safe pair of hands” who would restore dignity and stability to UK politics, Starmer famously pledged to end the “soap opera” of Westminster and deliver a low-drama government focused on public service. Just 22 months later, that promise lies in tatters, and Starmer is stepping down as Labour leader – a spectacular political downfall triggered by a cascade of missteps, internal party unrest, and a catastrophic judgment call that entangled his premiership in the lingering scandal of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.

    In an emotional public address Monday, Starmer confirmed he would resign as leader of the governing Labour Party, remaining in Downing Street only as a caretaker prime minister until the party selects a permanent successor in the coming weeks. “The question my party is asking now is whether I am best placed to lead us into the next general election,” Starmer said. “I have heard the answer of my parliamentary party to that question, and I accept that answer with good grace.”

    Political analysts trace Starmer’s collapse to weaknesses that were visible even on the day he took power. Though Labour won a commanding 411 of 650 House of Commons seats, the party secured just 34% of the national vote, with most of its support driven by widespread voter anger at the Conservatives rather than genuine enthusiasm for Starmer or his policy agenda. That fragile foundation quickly eroded as a series of early missteps eroded public and parliamentary trust: an early controversy over unreported free gifts, including designer glasses and Taylor Swift concert tickets, was followed by a string of awkward policy U-turns, most notably unpopular attempts to cut welfare spending that stoked deep anger within Starmer’s own party ranks.

    The fatal blow to Starmer’s leadership came from his decision to appoint veteran Labour figure Peter Mandelson as UK Ambassador to the United States. Starmer’s government viewed Mandelson as an ideal pick for the role, leaning on his extensive trade expertise and established connections with global elites to navigate the challenges of Donald Trump’s second presidential term. The gamble initially paid off: Mandelson helped negotiate a bilateral trade agreement that spared the UK from steep new tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on dozens of nations. But the appointment backfired spectacularly when newly released documents confirmed Mandelson’s long-documented close ties to Epstein, the convicted sex offender who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Mandelson infamously once referred to himself as Epstein’s “best friend”, and records released in September 2025 laid bare the extent of their ongoing relationship long after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for sex offenses involving a minor.

    Starmer quickly fired Mandelson, but successive revelations continued to escalate the crisis. Documents released in January 2026 indicated that Mandelson, while serving in Gordon Brown’s Labour Cabinet in 2009, shared sensitive, potentially market-moving government information with Epstein. Mandelson has since been arrested and questioned by UK police on suspicion of misconduct in public office, though he has not been charged and faces no allegations of sexual misconduct connected to Epstein. Most damagingly for Starmer, it emerged that Mandelson had failed mandatory security vetting for the ambassador post – yet was appointed anyway, despite the red flags. Starmer’s repeated apologies and claims he had no knowledge of the failed checks failed to defuse outrage across the parliamentary Labour Party.

    Starmer’s background as a career prosecutor may have set him up for failure in the top job, according to political observers. Rob Ford, a professor of political science at the University of Manchester, noted that after entering electoral politics in his 50s following a successful legal career that culminated in his appointment as Director of Public Prosecutions for England and Wales, Starmer lacked the innate political instinct needed to spot avoidable crises. “Starmer’s selling point was ‘no more soap opera politics’,” Ford explained. “Instead, his government was the antithesis of what he said he was going to be about, and it’s very hard to survive that.”

    Opponents had long painted Starmer, knighted for his service at the Crown Prosecution Service, as an out-of-touch elite “lefty London lawyer”, a narrative that stuck despite his humble working-class roots: born to a toolmaker, Starmer is an avid amateur footballer who still plays the sport at 63, and counts watching his beloved Arsenal with a pint at his local pub among his favorite pastimes. He has kept his family life intensely private, with his two teenage children largely out of the public eye.

    Though Starmer’s forensic, prosecutorial style made him a formidable opposition leader, where he repeatedly tore into three successive Conservative prime ministers – most notably scathing attacks on Boris Johnson over the illegal Downing Street lockdown parties during the COVID-19 pandemic – he struggled to adapt to the different skill set required of a sitting prime minister, particularly on domestic policy. He fared far better on the international stage, rallying unified European support for Ukraine in its war against Russia and working to contain the economic and political spillover from the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. That diplomatic work did little to shore up his domestic standing, however, and his decision to take a firmer public stance against Trump – after initially cultivating a friendly cross-ideology relationship – over the Iran war and Trump’s public threats to annex Greenland led to open personal criticism from the U.S. president, who derided Starmer as “not Winston Churchill” and mocked the Royal Navy.

    The final nail in the coffin came on May 7, when Labour suffered a catastrophic trouncing in nationwide local and regional elections. The result triggered a wave of ministerial resignations and open leadership challenges, as lawmakers representing marginal constituencies grew increasingly panicked by plummeting poll numbers and Starmer’s record-low personal approval ratings. In the aftermath, the path was cleared for former Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham to run for a parliamentary seat, which he won decisively, setting him up to be the overwhelming favorite to replace Starmer in 10 Downing Street.

    For Starmer, the end of his premiership marks one of the most sudden and dramatic falls from power in modern British political history, brought on by a failure to deliver on the core promise that won him office: steady, competent governance after years of conservative chaos.

  • Former South Korean justice minister gets 25-year prison term for role in martial law imposition

    Former South Korean justice minister gets 25-year prison term for role in martial law imposition

    In a landmark ruling that closes another key chapter in South Korea’s post-2024 political upheaval, a Seoul district court handed down a 25-year prison sentence Monday to former justice minister Park Sung-jae, finding him guilty of actively aiding ousted president Yoon Suk Yeol’s short-lived, unlawful 2024 declaration of martial law.

    The Seoul Central District Court confirmed that Park occupied a central coordinating role in Yoon’s bid to consolidate power, which unfolded after the president imposed martial law on December 3, 2024 amid a years-long political deadlock with liberal lawmakers who controlled the National Assembly. Court documents outline that Park ordered officials within his ministry to evaluate available detention space at national correctional facilities, a step explicitly taken to prepare for mass arrests of opposition political figures. He also directed state prosecution staff to deploy to Yoon’s ad-hoc martial law command center to back its operational work, and ordered immigration agencies to be on standby to implement immediate travel bans for targeted individuals, the court ruled.

    Yoon’s attempt to impose martial law collapsed within six hours, after opposition lawmakers breached a military blockade set up outside the National Assembly building and passed an emergency vote to invalidate the decree. The vote forced Yoon’s own cabinet to reverse the order, setting off a rapid chain of political consequences that ended Yoon’s presidency. Park was the top justice official in Yoon’s administration at the time of the attempted power grab.

    In delivering the verdict, presiding Judge Lee Jin-ganto emphasized that Park had violated his core constitutional duty to uphold South Korea’s democratic legal framework by aligning with Yoon’s authoritarian push. “By participating in this plan to undermine the nation’s elected legislature, Park abandoned every obligation he owed to the South Korean people and the rule of law,” Judge Lee noted in the ruling.

    Park has consistently denied all charges against him, arguing he was only fulfilling routine responsibilities required during what was framed as a national emergency. As of Monday, his legal team had not yet announced whether they would file an appeal against the conviction and sentence.

    This ruling adds to a string of convictions for senior members of Yoon’s ousted administration connected to the 2024 martial law incident. Yoon himself was impeached by the National Assembly on December 14, 2024, formally removed from office by the Constitutional Court in April 2025, and taken into custody in July that same year. He has already been sentenced to life in prison on charges of rebellion stemming from the martial law declaration, and received a separate 30-year sentence for orchestrating unauthorized drone flights over Pyongyang, North Korea, in October 2024. Prosecutors argue the drone incursion was deliberately planned to stoke inter-Korea tensions and create a pretext for imposing martial law domestically. Yoon has filed appeals against both of his convictions.

    Other senior officials have already been sentenced for their roles in the scheme. Former Defense Minister Kim Yong Hyun was handed two concurrent 30-year prison terms: one for his central role in mobilizing military forces to enforce martial law and target opposition politicians, and a second for his involvement in the North Korea drone plot. Former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, who was initially sentenced to 23 years in prison for helping secure formal cabinet approval for Yoon’s martial law decree to grant it procedural legitimacy, saw his sentence reduced to 15 years on appeal.

  • Protest led by India’s ‘cockroach party’ enters its third day

    Protest led by India’s ‘cockroach party’ enters its third day

    Three consecutive days of sustained protests have unfolded in India’s capital New Delhi, as hundreds of students, young working professionals and job-seeking candidates rally to call for the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. The unrest follows a major paper leak scandal that has upended one of India’s most high-stakes competitive medical entrance examinations.

    Organizing the demonstration at Delhi’s iconic protest venue Jantar Mantar is the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP), a grassroots political collective that has rapidly gained viral online traction for its sharp, satirical commentary on mainstream Indian politics. Taking aim at Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) through its name, the group, which uses a cockroach as its official mascot, has centered its activism on pushing for greater transparency and accountability across India’s education system.

    The current wave of protests is rooted in the NEET-UG controversy. The entrance exam for undergraduate medical programs was thrown into chaos earlier this year after widespread allegations of a question paper leak, triggering massive public anger from thousands of aspirants and their families. In response to the outrage, Indian authorities annulled the original exam results and ordered a full re-examination for millions of candidates.

    On Sunday, those millions of candidates returned to testing centers across the country to sit for the new exam, held under stringent enhanced security protocols including mandatory biometric identity verification. The National Testing Agency (NTA), the government body tasked with administering NEET-UG, released a statement shortly after the re-test concluded claiming the exam had proceeded without major incident and that no new allegations of paper leaks had been received.

    Yet for protesters gathered in central Delhi, the re-examination has done little to resolve the deeper issues at the heart of the controversy. Many demonstrators argue that the scandal is not an isolated incident, but evidence of systemic failure that has let down millions of young students across the country, and that top officials must be held accountable for the breakdown.

    “We are here for accountability,” CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke told assembled supporters at the protest site on Sunday, issuing a call for more people across India to join the movement. Dipke, a student at Boston University currently based in India, launched the CJP’s first protest at Jantar Mantar earlier this month before traveling to other Indian cities to expand the movement. Since its launch, the collective has seen steadily growing online engagement and has organized coordinated demonstrations in multiple regions across the country.

    The sit-in protest at Jantar Mantar officially began on June 19, after Delhi Police granted a permit for the demonstration that expired at 5:00 PM local time on June 20. When the permit expired, hundreds of protesters refused to vacate the site, vowing to continue their demonstration until Pradhan steps down from his post.

    Over the weekend, demonstrators camped out on sidewalks on mattresses, blocked local roads, and endured rising Delhi temperatures as they sang protest songs, debated the need for broad education reform, and received food and water from volunteer supporters. Organizers have accused Delhi Police of deliberately cutting power to the site and restricting access to clean water and public restrooms after the protest permit expired, though they later confirmed basic services had been restored. Delhi Police has not yet issued any public response to these allegations.

    The protest has drawn widespread support from members of the public who have no direct connection to the NEET-UG exam, reflecting broader frustration over systemic issues in India’s education and employment sectors. “I came because I believe they are doing the right thing,” said Jyoti Thakur, a 23-year-old storekeeper based in Delhi. “The path to a better society is through a better education system.”

    Gaurav Jain, a 39-year-old lawyer who spent one night at the protest camp, echoed that sentiment, saying he joined the movement over his own concerns about systemic lack of accountability, and is calling for a far more transparent and responsible education governance structure.

    To date, neither India’s Education Ministry nor the ruling BJP has issued a public response to the demands for Pradhan’s resignation. The BBC has reached out to both institutions for comment, and has not yet received a reply.

    The CJP itself emerged just last month, born from a public backlash against comments made by India’s Chief Justice Surya Kant that went viral online. During a recent court hearing, Kant compared some unemployed young people in India to “cockroaches” and “parasites”, remarks that critics condemned as dehumanizing to an entire generation of young people grappling with widespread youth unemployment.

    While the Chief Justice later clarified that his comments were directed at people who use fake educational degrees to secure work, not unemployed young people as a whole, the damage had already been done, and the backlash quickly spread across Indian social media. Within days, Dipke launched an online movement around the hashtag #MainBhiCockroach, which translates to “I too am a cockroach”. The movement quickly gained traction, drawing tens of thousands of direct supporters, earning backing from opposition political figures, and amassing more than 22 million followers on Instagram alone.

  • First round of US-Iran talks ends with encouraging progress, mediators say

    First round of US-Iran talks ends with encouraging progress, mediators say

    The first round of high-stakes negotiations between the United States and Iran aimed at reaching a permanent peace agreement has wrapped up in Switzerland, with mediating nations Qatar and Pakistan confirming tangible, encouraging progress toward a deal within a two-month timeline. The development marks a pivotal shift after months of open conflict that has spilled across the Middle East, particularly into Lebanon.

    In a joint statement released early Monday, the two mediating powers announced that negotiators from both Washington and Tehran had established a clear roadmap to finalize a comprehensive accord within 60 days, anchored by a new High Level Committee to oversee talks. Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi affirmed that the discussions delivered major progress toward ending the ongoing conflict that has devastated Lebanon, framing the Qatari-Pakistani mediation effort as a clear success.

    The breakthrough follows a preliminary memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed one week prior, which laid out core commitments to end hostilities across all active fronts — including Lebanon — and re-open the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, a global chokepoint that carries roughly 20% of the world’s annual oil and natural gas trade. Under the terms of the initial deal, the U.S. has already agreed to lift its military blockade on vessels traveling to and from Iranian ports, waive restrictions on Iranian oil and petrochemical exports, and release a portion of Tehran’s frozen international assets. The framework also includes a $300 billion plan for post-conflict reconstruction and economic development across Iran.

    Following the opening round of political talks in Lucerne that kicked off Sunday, the lead Iranian negotiation team has departed Switzerland, with lower-level technical discussions set to continue in the coming weeks. The mediators’ statement also confirmed that a permanent direct communication line has been established between the two sides to prevent accidental clashes and miscommunication, with the explicit goal of guaranteeing safe passage for commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Additionally, the two parties have agreed to launch a tripartite de-confliction cell involving the U.S., Iran, and Lebanon, supported by the mediating nations, to coordinate the end of military operations across Lebanese territory. Araghchi noted that this new mechanism will serve as the “first real test” of the agreement’s commitments.

    Tensions remain high, however, in the weeks since the initial MoU was signed. After a sharp uptick in clashes between Iran-backed Lebanese armed group Hezbollah and Israeli forces in southern Lebanon, which included Israeli airstrikes that killed dozens of Lebanese civilians, women and children among them, a new ceasefire was declared between the two sides late last week. The upsurge in violence prompted Iran to announce Saturday that it would close the Strait of Hormuz, though public maritime tracking data from MarineTraffic continues to show commercial vessels transiting the waterway undisturbed, contradicting Tehran’s announcement.

    As talks opened Sunday, former President (now U.S. lead administration) Donald Trump took to social media to demand that Iran immediately rein in its proxy forces operating in Lebanon, issuing a blunt threat to launch renewed major military strikes against Iran if the regime failed to comply. Iran’s chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf quickly pushed back against the warning, dismissing the threat as empty. “Don’t they think that if their threats had any effect, they wouldn’t be in this desperate situation today?” Ghalibaf said in his response. “No matter how much they talk, it is we who take action.”

    As of Sunday, overall fighting had diminished across southern Lebanon, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reaffirmed that Israeli military forces would remain deployed in the region for as long as necessary to protect northern Israeli communities. Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem has rejected any permanent Israeli military presence in southern Lebanon, stating that the group will continue to defend Lebanese territory against the occupation.

    Speaking ahead of the official talks at the Bürgenstock resort in Switzerland, U.S. lead negotiator and Vice President JD Vance said that Trump had instructed the American delegation to pursue a new path in relations with Tehran. Vance added that if Iran’s leadership agrees to abandon its role as what he called a “driver of regional instability” and give up long-term nuclear weapons ambitions, the U.S. is prepared to fundamentally restructure its bilateral relationship with Iran. Tehran has repeatedly and consistently maintained that its civilian nuclear program is entirely peaceful and has no military dimension.

    While many core security and economic terms have already been agreed to in the preliminary MoU, the future of Iran’s nuclear program remains one of the key unresolved issues set for future negotiation. Israel has drawn a clear distinction between its conflict with Hezbollah and the broader war against Iran that it launched alongside the U.S. on February 28. Lebanon was drawn into the conflict shortly after the war began, when Hezbollah launched retaliatory rocket strikes into Israel after an Israeli strike killed Iran’s supreme leader. In response, Israel launched a large-scale bombing campaign across Lebanon and occupied roughly 5% of the country’s southern territory in an effort to push Hezbollah fighters back from the Israeli border, and has thus far refused to commit to a full withdrawal.

    Official casualty figures from Lebanon’s health ministry show that at least 4,106 people have been killed in Lebanon since March 2, with the data not drawing a distinction between combatants and civilian casualties. Israeli authorities report that 36 Israeli soldiers and four civilians have been killed on both sides of the Lebanon-Israel border since the fighting began.

  • Taiwan begins 5-day military drill with tanks patrolling streets

    Taiwan begins 5-day military drill with tanks patrolling streets

    TAIPEI, Taiwan – Against a backdrop of persistent cross-strait military tension, Taiwan launched a five-day intensive Immediate Combat Readiness Exercise on Monday, focused on sharpening the island’s ability to respond to potential sudden military aggression from mainland China. The drill got underway with visible activity across Taoyuan, the city that hosts Taiwan’s busiest international gateway, Taoyuan International Airport. Visual evidence from the exercise shows main battle tanks maneuvering along public urban streets and major highways, as armored detachments from the Army’s 269th Infantry Brigade carried out combat readiness patrols through the morning hours.

    Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense announced the drills in a public statement released Sunday afternoon, outlining that the training is structured around realistic, real-world scenarios, with core priorities placed on “real-time response, live-fire operations, and on-site tactical execution.” Per Taiwan’s semi-official Central News Agency, the exercise series is specifically designed to simulate the strategic period immediately preceding an enemy’s large-scale amphibious assault. Looking ahead, the exercise framework also leaves room for unscheduled, ad-hoc drill sessions that will test Taiwan’s military’s ability to adapt in real time to ongoing Chinese military activities near the island.

    The drills come as China continues its steady pattern of so-called “grey-zone” military pressure against Taiwan, a set of aggressive actions that stop short of full-scale direct conflict. These tactics range from sustained naval patrols near Taiwan’s territorial waters to repeated drone incursions into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone. In the 24-hour period from Sunday to Monday morning alone, Taiwan’s defense ministry confirmed that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) deployed 23 aircraft toward the Taiwan area, alongside seven PLA Navy vessels and five additional Chinese government ships.这种持续的常态压力已经成为 daily reality: Chinese military aircraft, drones, and naval vessels conduct operations near the island on a near-daily basis.

    This drill is the latest in a series of regular readiness exercises Taiwan has held to upgrade its defense capabilities, as the island faces unrelenting military pressure from Beijing. China claims the self-governing island of Taiwan as an inalienable part of its sovereign territory, and has repeatedly refused to rule out the use of military force to achieve unification. Earlier this June, Taiwan held another major exercise that marked the first time the island has conducted live rocket fire drills toward waters off the coast of mainland China as part of its training.

    The report was filed by Wu reporting from Bangkok, Associated Press.

  • Former East Timor president and independence fighter Francisco Guterres dies at 71

    Former East Timor president and independence fighter Francisco Guterres dies at 71

    DILI, East Timor – The Southeast Asian nation of Timor Leste (East Timor) is mourning the passing of one of its most revered founding figures: Francisco Guterres, the former president and central leader of the country’s decades-long fight for independence, has died at the age of 71.

    Widely recognized by his nom de guerre “Lu Olo”, Guterres passed away on Sunday at Malaysia’s Prince Court Medical Centre, where he had been receiving treatment in an intensive care unit. The announcement of his death was shared via the late leader’s official Facebook page by his family, who did not immediately release details on the specific cause of death.

    Guterres’s five-decade public career was inextricably tied to the story of Timor Leste’s path to becoming the world’s youngest sovereign nation in 2002. His single term as president from 2017 to 2022 marked the final chapter of a lifelong commitment to securing freedom and democratic governance for his people.

    In a message of condolence shared with Guterres’s family and the people of East Timor, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim paid tribute to the leader’s unwavering dedication. “Throughout his life, he remained committed to the freedom of his people and the building of a democratic nation,” Ibrahim wrote.

    Fretilin, the revolutionary political party Guterres led for many years, described his passing as a “profound loss” for all who worked toward the vision of a free, democratic and sovereign Timor Leste. The party highlighted Guterres’s enduring legacy of commitment to the independence movement, as well as his lifelong work to advance national unity, constructive political dialogue, peace and domestic stability across his decades in public life.

    Born September 7, 1954, in Ossu, a town in what was then Portuguese Timor’s Viqueque District, Guterres rose to prominence as a core leader of the armed and political resistance during Indonesia’s 24-year occupation of East Timor, which ran from 1975 to 1999. As a senior Fretilin figure, he played an indispensable role in the country’s transition to sovereignty after the 1999 UN-backed independence referendum that set Timor Leste on the path to statehood.

    In 2001, Guterres served as president of the Timorese Constituent Assembly, where he oversaw the drafting of the new nation’s foundational constitution. When East Timor formally gained independence in 2002, he became the national parliament’s first speaker. After falling short in several earlier presidential campaigns, Guterres finally won election to the nation’s highest office in 2017. He lost his 2022 re-election bid to current President Jose Ramos-Horta, a longtime comrade from the independence struggle.

    Guterres is survived by his wife, Cidalia Lopes Nobre Mouzinho Guterres, and their children. Details of his funeral arrangements are expected to be announced to the public in the coming days.

  • Australia and Canada sign a $1.75B deal to build long-range radar in Canada

    Australia and Canada sign a $1.75B deal to build long-range radar in Canada

    CANBERRA, Australia — In a landmark move that deepens bilateral defense ties and cements Australia’s growing footprint in the global defense export market, Australian and Canadian defense officials signed a AUD 1.75 billion agreement on Monday to deliver an Australian-engineered over-the-horizon long-range radar system to Canada. This marks the largest defense export deal in Australia’s history.

    The first phase of the pact was signed by Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles and Canadian Secretary of State for Defense Procurement Stephen Fuhr. The radar network will provide critical early warning coverage stretching from the Canada-U.S. border all the way into the Arctic, a region that has grown in strategic importance amid shifting global geopolitics.

    Speaking to reporters at Australian Parliament House, Marles emphasized that the agreement transforms the two nations into core development partners for the cutting-edge over-the-horizon radar technology. “This brings a truly strategic dimension to the defense and industrial partnership between Australia and Canada,” Marles said.

    Fuhr echoed the sentiment, pointing to the long-standing aligned interests of the two middle powers, both members of the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing alliance alongside the United States, the United Kingdom and New Zealand. “For generations, our two nations have stood shoulder-to-shoulder on global security matters,” Fuhr noted during the joint press appearance. “As the world adapts to new strategic and economic realities, there is no stronger partner for Canada to collaborate with on critical defense capabilities than Australia.”

    The deal had been in the works since Mark Carney took office as Canadian Prime Minister last year, when he announced Canada would select the Australian radar design over competing American technology. Earlier this year, Carney made the first visit to Australia by a sitting Canadian prime minister in 12 years. During that trip, Carney and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese formalized a commitment to expand cross-border collaboration across three key strategic sectors: defense technology, artificial intelligence and critical minerals supply chains.

    BAE Systems Australia, which will support the joint development and deployment of the Arctic Over-the-Horizon Radar, confirmed its role in a public statement. The Australian over-the-horizon system is the product of more than 40 years of iterative research and development. Unlike conventional radar systems, which cannot detect objects beyond the curve of the Earth, the Australian technology refracts high-frequency electromagnetic waves off the ionosphere, allowing it to identify distant threats and objects that are invisible to standard radar setups.

    Prior to this agreement, Australia’s largest defense export was a $700 million deal reached in 2024 to supply 100 locally manufactured Boxer heavy weapon carrier vehicles to Germany. The new radar deal more than doubles that record, signaling Australia’s emergence as a competitive global exporter of advanced defense technology.

  • Britain’s economic woes fuel discontent with Brexit a decade after historic vote to leave EU

    Britain’s economic woes fuel discontent with Brexit a decade after historic vote to leave EU

    LONDON – Ten years after the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union in a historic 2016 referendum, unfulfilled campaign promises and stagnant economic growth have left even once-committed supporters frustrated with the outcome of the country’s most significant political shift in a generation. The divide that opened up across business, politics and the general public a decade ago remains deeply entrenched, even as discontent with Brexit’s real-world impacts grows steadily.

    In 2016, leave campaigners painted a rosy portrait of a post-Brexit Britain: freed from what they framed as overreaching rules from Brussels-based EU bureaucrats, the nation would regain full control over its laws and borders, unlock dynamic economic growth, and carve out a prosperous new role as a global trading power. Eight years after the UK completed its formal withdrawal from the bloc in January 2020, that vision has yet to materialize. The country continues to grapple with new trade barriers that have raised costs for businesses, anemic economic expansion, strained public services, and persistent challenges managing irregular migration across the English Channel.

    The cross-section of business leaders who backed opposing sides in the 2016 campaign now share a sense of disillusionment with Brexit’s current state. Simon Boyd, managing director of REIDSteel, a Dorset-based prefabricated steel structure manufacturer that exports to markets as far-flung as Ghana and Barbados, voted for Leave in 2016 and still stands by that decision. But he acknowledges that the outcome has fallen far short of the promises made during the referendum campaign. “No, it’s not delivered everything that was said it would deliver on the tin, but it is delivering,” Boyd told the Associated Press. “It’s very sluggish. You only need to look at the statistics to see that.”

    Boyd blames lackluster results not on the core idea of Brexit itself, but on successive governments that failed to fully commit to delivering a clean break from the bloc, alongside unforeseen global shocks that have roiled the UK economy over the past decade: the COVID-19 pandemic, the ongoing war in Ukraine, and rising geopolitical instability in the Middle East. He also rejects calls to reverse the 2016 result, arguing that rejoining the EU on the terms currently available would be untenable. “Imagine if we were to rejoin … today. The conditions upon which we would be allowed back in would be akin to us re-boarding the Titanic on the condition that we surrender our life vests first,” he said. “Need I say any more?”

    On the opposite side of 2016’s debate is Mike Hawes, chief executive of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, the leading trade body for Britain’s iconic automotive industry. Hawes’ sector was one of the most vocal opponents of Brexit ahead of the referendum, warning that new trade red tape for car parts and finished vehicles would fracture the integrated cross-border supply chains that the industry depends on.

    Those warnings have largely been borne out. Uncertainty around Brexit has deterred foreign direct investment in UK manufacturing, as global automakers no longer see Britain as a reliable gateway to the EU single market. While the industry has adapted to new rules, the added costs and barriers have created persistent pressure. “We have been able to move with the times, so to speak, but undoubtedly it’s putting us at more cost into the industry, more pressure,” Hawes said. The sector is now pinning its hopes on new independent trade deals negotiated by Britain post-Brexit to boost overseas demand for its products.

    Economic analysts agree that Brexit has left a clear long-term mark on the UK’s overall economic performance. Creon Butler, who leads the global economy and finance program at London-based independent think tank Chatham House, said leaving the single market has carried unavoidable long-term costs. “Whatever was promised, whatever one hoped for, (you have) to accept that it has been a major loss of wealth and prosperity for us through the choice we made to leave,” he said. “That’s a decision the British public have made, and they are entitled to make it, but it does make us poorer.”

    A new study by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) underscores that assessment. Researchers from the UK, Germany and the U.S. compared the UK’s current economic performance to a synthetic control group of 33 peer countries, estimating that Brexit has reduced Britain’s overall gross domestic product by between 6% and 8%, cut overall business investment by 12% to 13%, and dragged down productivity by 3% to 4%, compared to what the outcomes would have been if the UK had stayed in the EU.

    Beyond trade and macroeconomics, the end of free movement of people – a core principle of the EU – has created acute labor shortages in sectors that relied heavily on cheap labor from Central and Eastern Europe. That disruption has hit one of Britain’s most iconic cultural institutions: the neighborhood curry house. Many curry restaurant owners backed Brexit in 2016 after receiving assurances that the policy would open up more visa pathways for South Asian chefs. Instead, the end of free movement pushed thousands of Eastern European hospitality workers to return to their home countries to avoid burdensome new visa requirements, while promised visa reforms for South Asian cooks never materialized.

    “We feel betrayed,” said Oli Khan, president of the Bangladesh Caterers Association UK and owner of a popular restaurant in Stevenage, north of London.

    While supporters of Brexit point to the dozens of independent trade deals Britain has signed with countries around the world – from Australia and India to the U.S. – as evidence of the policy’s benefits, official data shows the EU still remains the UK’s largest trading partner, accounting for 41% of exports and 50% of imports as of 2025.

    As frustration with Brexit mounts, new Prime Minister Keir Starmer has opened exploratory talks with the EU to renegotiate closer trade ties, in an effort to unlock growth for the stagnant UK economy. Recent polling from Ipsos, the Policy Institute at King’s College London, and UK in a Changing Europe shows growing public discontent with Brexit: 48% of respondents to a May 2026 survey of 2,245 UK adults said Brexit was performing worse than they expected, up from just 28% in March 2021. Only 9% said the policy is performing better than expected, while roughly one third said outcomes are in line with their expectations.

    For leave supporters like Boyd, however, the 2016 referendum result remains the settled will of the British people, and cannot be reversed. Even with its slow start, he remains convinced that Britain will ultimately build a more prosperous future outside the bloc, once political leaders fully embrace the opportunities of Brexit.

  • China’s import of custard apples is sparking fears in Taiwan

    China’s import of custard apples is sparking fears in Taiwan

    A uniquely textured, heart-shaped tropical fruit has emerged as the newest point of friction between Beijing and Taipei, after Taiwan’s top agricultural regulator warned local producers against Beijing’s newly announced plan to ramp up purchases of the specialty crop. The fruit in question, the atemoya, is a sweet hybrid cross between two distinct custard apple varieties, prized for its creamy, soft white flesh and grown almost exclusively in Taiwan’s eastern Taitung County, where it has become a signature agricultural product.

    China has long served as the largest export market for Taiwanese atemoya, and earlier this month, Chinese authorities and trade groups announced a new commitment to increase purchases of the fruit. But in an official press release issued Saturday, Taiwan’s Ministry of Agriculture framed the expanded import pledge as part of what it calls Beijing’s long-running ‘raise, trap, kill’ economic strategy, a tactic that the ministry argues first builds dependency among Taiwanese farmers on the Chinese market before sudden policy shifts leave producers grappling with collapsed demand and massive financial losses.

    Cross-Strait relations have grown increasingly strained in recent years. Beijing claims the self-ruled island of Taiwan as part of its sovereign territory, has refused to rule out military force to assert control, and has ramped up large-scale military exercises near Taiwan’s coasts, including simulated full blockades of the island. Beyond military pressure, global observers have noted that Beijing has increasingly turned to non-military, economic tactics to pressure Taiwan’s government – and fresh fruit has repeatedly become a key tool in this strategy.

    The 2021 Chinese import ban on Taiwanese pineapples serves as a prominent example. The ban, which came without advanced warning, devastated the livelihoods of thousands of Taiwanese pineapple farmers and triggered a massive domestic ‘buy pineapple’ movement in Taiwan, widely seen as a grassroots response to what residents framed as economic coercion from Beijing. Now, Taiwanese agricultural authorities warn the same pattern is repeating with atemoya.

    According to the Taiwanese Ministry of Agriculture’s statement, Beijing has already cycled through disruptive shifts in atemoya trade policy over the past four years: it first fully suspended imports of Taiwanese atemoya in 2021 over unsubstantiated pest concerns, only partially resumed trade in 2023, then imposed steep new tariffs on the fruit in 2024. These inconsistent policy changes have created massive volatility for Taiwan’s atemoya industry, exposing smallholder farmers to extreme financial risk, the ministry added. It also noted that China has rapidly expanded its own domestic atemoya cultivation in recent years, creating a long-term structural threat to Taiwan’s export-dependent sector.

    The current controversy over atemoya trade traces back to an industry forum held earlier this month in Xiamen, a Chinese coastal city on the edge of the Taiwan Strait. At the gathering, Chinese firms announced expanded purchase commitments for multiple Taiwanese agricultural exports, including atemoya, fish and tea. The event drew attendance from Taiwanese business leaders and opposition politicians, despite an official ban on participation from Taiwan’s ruling central government. Following the forum, Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council, the agency that oversees cross-Strait policy, announced that any Taiwanese officials who violated the participation ban could face formal investigation.

    In response to the controversy, Taiwan’s Ministry of Agriculture said it would prioritize supporting sustainable agricultural development and stable farm incomes, and is guiding the atemoya industry to diversify its market outlets and product lines, including developing value-added products such as frozen atemoya chunks, fruit puree and fruit wine.

    But opposition politicians from Taiwan’s Kuomintang party, which traditionally favors closer cross-Strait trade ties, have pushed back against the government’s warnings, arguing that Taipei is unnecessarily politicizing the atemoya industry in a move that will ultimately harm the farmers it claims to protect. Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an, a prominent Kuomintang leader, went so far as to accuse the Mainland Affairs Council of using the trade dispute to ‘bully and oppress’ Taiwanese farmers. Chiang even compared the fruit to Taiwan’s most iconic industrial success story, calling atemoya the ‘TSMC of the fruit world’, arguing that ‘There is not a country in the world that can produce a fruit as delicious and special as Taiwan’s atemoya.’