分类: politics

  • Merz vows to keep coalition together for Germany’s ‘democratic future’

    Merz vows to keep coalition together for Germany’s ‘democratic future’

    German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is moving to shore up his shaky ruling administration after his Christian Democratic Union (CDU) suffered historic, devastating defeats in two key September state elections, a shakeup that underscores the dramatic realignment of Germany’s political landscape.

    After a weekend of crushing results that exposed deep voter dissatisfaction with the national CDU-SPD coalition, Merz used a Monday press conference to push back against growing speculation about his political future, insisting he would preserve the three-party grand coalition to safeguard Germany’s democratic future amid unprecedented domestic and global challenges. “We are determined to live up to the historic challenges our country is facing,” Merz stated, referencing the governing pact between his center-right CDU and center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD).

    The results delivered a seismic blow to Merz’s authority, just 16 months after he took office as chancellor. In the northeastern state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) secured the largest share of the vote — and the CDU failed to clear the 5% vote threshold required to earn a seat in the state parliament, an unprecedented collapse for the long-dominant national party. In the capital Berlin, the CDU finished second, with the hard-left Die Linke party claiming the top spot at the ballot box. The AfD also posted substantial vote gains in the capital, extending its growing electoral momentum across the country.

    Merz did not mince words about the severity of his party’s performance, calling the Mecklenburg-Vorpommern result “a heavy blow” and “a profound turning point” for the CDU. “It is a dramatic, unprecedented result for the CDU in Germany,” he acknowledged. Rejecting claims that his own low personal approval ratings were the sole driver of the electoral backlash, Merz pushed back against growing calls for his resignation or a mid-term “chancellor swap” that has been the subject of growing political speculation. “I know that I as an individual played a role in these state elections,” Merz said, before adding: “But the reasons for the results go far beyond just me. We are witnessing a profound transformation of Germany’s political party system, as is happening in many other countries around the world.” Merz also stressed that there had been no internal discussions about replacing him since the election results were finalized.

    The AfD, which has seen its support surge across Germany’s eastern former communist states in recent years, has already predicted Merz’s ouster is imminent. Asked about Merz’s political future earlier Monday, AfD co-leader Alice Weidel told the BBC: “Pretty soon, he’s going to leave.” The latest electoral losses follow another poor showing for the CDU just two weeks prior, when the party saw its vote share cut in half in Saxony-Anhalt, another eastern state where the AfD secured a major victory.

    While the AfD won a plurality of votes in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, it remains far short of the majority needed to form a government on its own, and most mainstream German parties have ruled out entering any governing coalition with the far-right party. German domestic intelligence classifies some branches of the AfD as right-wing extremist, a designation the party strongly rejects. The party’s anti-immigration, “Germany First” and Russia-friendly policy agenda has resonated with many voters in the economically depressed eastern states, turning the region into the party’s electoral stronghold.

    In Berlin, the CDU’s second-place finish means Die Linke, which claimed the highest vote share, will have the first opportunity to negotiate a governing coalition in the capital, marking a major ideological shift for one of Germany’s most prominent city governments.

  • Merz’s political crisis threatens Germany’s obsession with stability

    Merz’s political crisis threatens Germany’s obsession with stability

    Germany’s political landscape, long synonymous with steady, consensus-driven governance, is facing an unprecedented upheaval that threatens to reshape not only domestic politics but also the trajectory of the entire European Union. At the center of this chaos stands Chancellor Friedrich Merz, a former corporate lawyer whose 16-month tenure in office has already cemented his place in German polling history – for all the worst reasons.

    With an approval rating plummeting to just 13%, Merz holds the unwanted distinction of being the least popular German chancellor since systematic public opinion polling began. Voter skepticism of his leadership emerged immediately after he took office, and his support has collapsed faster than that of any predecessor. Many German voters dismiss him as arrogant, disconnected from everyday struggles, and unable to deliver on the core promises that brought his conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) to power.

    The scale of Merz’s and the CDU’s crisis was laid bare in three consecutive regional election defeats over the past two weeks. Preliminary results from Mecklenburg-Vorpommern on Sunday delivered the most humiliating blow yet: the CDU failed to clear the 5% electoral threshold required to win seats in the state parliament, an unthinkable rebuke for a party that has long dominated German regional and national politics.

    While the traditional center-right collapses, the nationalist, anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD) has capitalized on voter anger to surge to historic gains. The far-right party, which German federal authorities have partially classified as an anti-democratic extremist movement, emerged as the largest faction in two of the three recent regional elections. In Saxony-Anhalt, it is now poised to enter government – a first for the party since its founding in 2013. Nationally, the AfD now leads all opinion polls, a development that sends deep alarm across Germany given the country’s traumatic legacy of Nazi authoritarianism.

    AfD co-leader Alice Weidel seized on the recent gains to declare that her party has displaced the CDU as Germany’s true “Volkspartei” – a catch-all people’s party. The party rejects the far-right label, arguing it is simply the alternative that disillusioned voters have been craving. It accuses Merz of failing on two critical voter priorities: reviving Germany’s once-dynamic but now stagnant economy, the historic engine of European growth, and delivering workable solutions to widespread public anxiety over immigration and public safety.

    “It is high time for political change,” Weidel said Monday, echoing a growing sentiment across the country.

    Merz’s hold on the chancellorship is now widely seen as precarious. Rumors of an internal party coup to replace him with a more popular CDU figure have circulated for weeks, though no potential challenger has publicly stepped forward, waiting to gauge sufficient support within party ranks. Even if Merz manages to cling to power, analysts agree his political credibility, influence, and room to maneuver within Germany’s fractious coalition government have been permanently eroded.

    Looking visibly deflated in an uncharacteristically downbeat televised address delivered even before final election results were confirmed, Merz struck a defiant tone Sunday evening, saying he would press ahead with planned tax, welfare, and economic reforms to restore German prosperity. “What we need now is backbone, steadfastness and patience,” he said. But German voters’ patience is wearing increasingly thin.

    The current crisis is not an overnight development. For decades after World War II, German voters reliably backed traditional center-left and center-right parties, but public disillusionment has grown steadily for years. Resentment began building after the 2007-2008 global financial crisis, when mainstream parties were seen as prioritizing bank bailouts over struggling families, whose savings and living standards declined steadily.

    The 2015 European migration crisis deepened those divides, when Germany welcomed more than one million refugees and migrants. While many integrated successfully, a series of high-profile attacks linked to some migrants – including a foiled 2024 plot to attack a Munich Christmas market with Islamist motives – left many Germans feeling anxious and unprotected.

    More recently, Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 delivered a crippling blow to Germany’s economic model. The country lost access to cheap Russian energy that its manufacturing and export sectors depended on, while US trade tariffs and rising economic competition from China have further squeezed growth. Today, Germans face some of the highest energy costs in Europe, leaving widespread economic insecurity in their wake.

    On the left, the hardline Die Linke party has also made gains, capitalizing on voter discontent with centrist politics to win recent control in Berlin, squeezing the CDU from both sides of the political spectrum.

    The ripple effects of Germany’s political upheaval extend far beyond its borders. As the EU’s largest economy, the bloc’s biggest net budget contributor, and the largest international donor to Ukraine, political instability in Berlin has immediate consequences for the entire European project. Amid growing pressure on public finances, Merz has already pushed for deep cuts to wealthy EU member states’ contributions to the bloc’s budget, at a time when Brussels is calling for increased spending on common defense, migration management, and AI technology development.

    EU officials in Brussels have grown increasingly concerned about the shifting political landscape, warning that at a moment of rising global threats from Russia and China, energy volatility from Middle East conflicts, and perceived unpredictability from the United States under Donald Trump, European unity is more critical than ever.

    This month’s German regional election results also kick off a pivotal year of elections across the EU, with major member states including France, Italy, Spain, and Poland all set to hold national polls. Pollsters predict widespread gains for nationalist, Eurosceptic, and anti-immigration parties across the bloc – a shift that is being closely watched by leaderships in Moscow and Beijing.

  • CNN, MS NOW and Politico to file lawsuit against Trump’s White House ban

    CNN, MS NOW and Politico to file lawsuit against Trump’s White House ban

    A major clash over press freedom has erupted in U.S. politics after three leading national media outlets—CNN, Politico, and MS NOW—announced they are taking legal action against the Trump administration following an abrupt ban that blocked their reporters from entering the White House complex.

    The controversial restriction was first announced by former President Donald Trump on a Friday, when he publicly lashed out at the three organizations, claiming they had deliberately published what he called “fiction or lies” covering his administration. The punishment moved from announcement to enforcement just one day later: when the outlets’ reporters attempted to enter the White House for scheduled work on Saturday, they were turned away at security checkpoints and had their official press credentials seized by officials, with no prior warning or formal disciplinary process.

    In a coordinated joint statement released to the public on Monday, legal teams for the three media outlets laid out their case for challenging the ban in court. The core of their argument centers on defending fundamental rights enshrined in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits the federal government from curtailing press freedom. For decades, federal courts have consistently interpreted this constitutional language to bar the government from retaliating against media outlets or excluding reporters from official spaces based purely on disagreement with their coverage.

    “Without notice or process, the White House revoked our journalists’ credentials because it objected to our reporting,” the joint statement read. The outlets emphasized that the lack of any formal hearing or prior notification for the credential revocation makes the action constitutionally problematic. They added that if the ban is allowed to stand without legal pushback, it would set a dangerous precedent that undermines not just the independence of the press, but also the American public’s right to receive unfiltered, independent reporting about government activities that is not subject to official censorship.

    Legal experts note that the case marks one of the most direct confrontations between a sitting presidential administration and major national media outlets over access to official government spaces and constitutional press protections in modern U.S. history. The outcome of the lawsuit is expected to set a key precedent for the boundaries of presidential authority to regulate press access to the White House going forward.

  • ‘No surprises’ as results emerge in Russian parliamentary election

    ‘No surprises’ as results emerge in Russian parliamentary election

    As preliminary vote counts roll in from Russia’s recent parliamentary election, political observers and analysts are describing the projected outcome as entirely predictable, with no unexpected shifts in the country’s legislative power structure. Early data from election commissions across the nation points to a clear victory for United Russia, the political party closely aligned with the Kremlin and current presidential administration. The projected seat share indicates the party is well-positioned to hold onto its constitutional supermajority, a level of representation that allows it to pass constitutional amendments and advance core policy priorities without requiring support from opposition factions. Political commentators have widely noted that the projected result follows pre-election polling and expert projections that consistently showed United Russia holding a significant lead over competing parties. This outcome is expected to reinforce the current political balance in Russia’s national legislature, maintaining the status quo that has defined the country’s parliamentary landscape for multiple election cycles.

  • ICE agent shoots and wounds man in Texas as locals demand answers

    ICE agent shoots and wounds man in Texas as locals demand answers

    A shooting involving a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent in Austin, Texas has ignited public outrage, drawn hundreds of protesters to the streets, and intensified long-simmering tensions over the Trump administration’s aggressive second-term immigration enforcement policies.

    The incident unfolded shortly before 1 p.m. local time on Sunday, when ICE agent opened fire on 28-year-old Venezuelan national Wilber Rafael Garces Perez, striking him in the torso. Garces Perez was rushed to a local hospital for treatment, and was confirmed to be in ICE custody by his attorney, Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch. According to Lincoln-Goldfinch, Garces Perez managed to call his wife from the hospital while screaming in pain from his injury. As of Monday, few additional details about the shooting have been released, and local officials have not been able to confirm whether Garces Perez was an intended target of ICE operations at the time of the incident.

    Local authorities and elected leaders have swiftly called for a full independent probe into the shooting, citing growing community distrust of federal immigration practices. Austin Mayor Kirk Watson, a Democrat, emphasized in a Sunday media briefing that local residents have both a right to transparency and a right to feel secure in their neighborhoods. “They should know the truth,” Watson stated, adding that he welcomed the city’s formal involvement in the investigation. The mayor also confirmed that ICE enforcement operations have increased sharply across Austin in recent weeks. U.S. Representative Greg Casar, a Texas Democrat, joined the call for action, demanding an immediate independent investigation, the public release of all body camera footage from the incident, and legal accountability for any ICE officer found to have violated the law. The Austin Police Department has confirmed that none of its officers were involved in the shooting.

    Within hours of the shooting, dozens of demonstrators gathered at the scene to protest ICE’s expanding presence in the city. Many carried signs calling for ICE to withdraw from Austin, and several waved national flags of Mexico and Guatemala, two of the largest source countries for migrants in Texas. Local media footage captured protesters gathering across the street from a blue Toyota Corolla that sustained visible damage to its passenger-side door, with uniformed ICE agents standing guard nearby. This shooting marks the second high-profile fatal or injurious shooting involving ICE in Texas in just months: back earlier this year, an ICE officer shot and killed Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, a Houston resident who was not the target of the agency’s investigation, during a routine traffic stop, according to U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) records.

    The incident comes as the Trump administration’s second-term immigration crackdown has sparked widespread unrest across multiple U.S. cities. The administration has defended its strict enforcement policies and controversial ICE tactics as critical to protecting public safety and fulfilling Trump’s campaign promise of mass deportations. However, immigrant rights advocates have accused the administration of violating fundamental due process and free speech rights, and congressional Democrats have pushed for sweeping ICE reforms, including mandatory body cameras for all agents and a ban on agents concealing their identities during enforcement operations.

    This Austin shooting also follows a rare federal action against an ICE agent earlier this month: the U.S. Department of Justice charged an agent with lying about a 2025 non-fatal shooting of another Venezuelan migrant in Minnesota, one of the few times the current Justice Department has brought criminal charges against a federal law enforcement officer for on-duty conduct. Even some within the Republican Party have pushed back against the administration’s hardline tactics. Florida Republican Congresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar, who has publicly criticized the mass crackdown, recently released a campaign ad condemning the targeting and detention of migrants with no criminal history. Appearing on CBS’s *Face the Nation* on Sunday, Salazar said she had spoken directly with President Trump about her concerns, and that she believes he will keep U.S. immigration policy on the right track. “He gets it more than anybody,” she said.

    The BBC has reached out to both ICE and the Department of Homeland Security for comment on the Austin shooting, as of this reporting no formal statement has been issued by either federal agency.

  • Russia’s elections had few surprises – but how the Kremlin uses the results is far from clear

    Russia’s elections had few surprises – but how the Kremlin uses the results is far from clear

    For more than four and a half years, Russia’s full-scale conflict in Ukraine has shaped every corner of domestic life in the country, bringing heavy military casualties, widespread economic strain, and repeated infrastructure disruptions from Ukrainian drone strikes, including recent attacks that have triggered widespread petrol shortages across multiple regions. Against this turbulent backdrop, Russia’s latest parliamentary election has delivered the outcome that political observers nearly universally predicted: a sweeping victory for the Kremlin-aligned ruling party United Russia, with no unexpected shifts in the makeup of the State Duma.

    Under Russia’s tightly centralized political system, controlled firmly by the Kremlin, United Russia was always projected to hold onto its power in the lower house of parliament. Preliminary vote counts confirm the party will retain its constitutional supermajority, enough to pass any constitutional amendment without opposition support. Even more notable is the fact that every party that has cleared the 5% vote threshold to enter the new Duma is the exact same cohort of parties that held seats in the outgoing legislature — a body that uniformly backed the Kremlin’s agenda and the so-called “special military operation” in Ukraine, with zero consistent opposition to the war effort.

    The only anti-war party cleared to appear on the national ballot this cycle, Yabloko, was removed from the party list just 12 days after official registration, in a ruling by Russia’s Supreme Court. The abrupt removal came amid signs the party’s pro-peace messaging was resonating with a growing segment of the Russian public, a development that triggered concern from the Kremlin. Even after being struck from the national party list, roughly 100 Yabloko candidates still ran in individual constituency races, but the party faced relentless official pressure throughout the campaign.

    Yabloko chairman Nikolai Rybakov says the expected pro-Kremlin makeup of the new Duma comes as no surprise to his party. “What other result can there be if there were 10 parties on the ballot and they all support the policies of President Putin?” Rybakov told reporters. “I don’t think the Duma will change. They’ll vote 100% for the policies of Putin just like they did.” Rybakov also outlined widespread barriers to Yabloko’s participation: “Some of our candidates, who should have been running, are in jail, many were barred from running and some of our election observers weren’t registered and were unable to keep an eye on the voting.”

    On the final day of the three-day voting period, Ukraine launched a large-scale drone strike that targeted infrastructure in the Moscow region, hitting a major city oil refinery. Speaking to reporters at a polling station near the damaged facility, local voters displayed little shock at the attack. After more than four and a half years of war, periodic strikes on Russian territory have become a routine part of life, and Muscovites responded with quiet resignation rather than outrage. “People in the Donbas, as well as in Bryansk, and Belgorod near the Ukrainian border, hear this kind of thing every day,” said Viktor, a voter who had just cast his ballot. “They just get on with their lives.”

    While the election outcome was entirely predictable, what comes next for Russia’s war policy remains uncertain. The Kremlin is widely expected to frame the lopsided result as evidence that the Russian public has united behind President Vladimir Putin and the war effort, using the outcome to justify future policy and military decisions. Just days before the vote, Putin publicly ruled out the possibility of a new wave of national mobilization, stating “There is no scenario today that would require it.” But despite that official reassurance, widespread anxiety over a future mobilization persists across Russian society, with many residents questioning whether the policy will remain off the table in the months ahead. Analysts widely agree that the Kremlin will at minimum treat the lopsided election result as a public mandate to continue its military campaign in Ukraine.

  • Why a new Pakistan-China border pact has irked India

    Why a new Pakistan-China border pact has irked India

    For decades, India has refused to acknowledge any formal boundary between China and Pakistan across portions of the Himalayan region that New Delhi claims as sovereign Indian territory. That long-running dispute reignited last week after Islamabad and Beijing moved to formally institutionalize their border arrangement through the operationalization of the Pakistan-China Boundary Joint Commission – a step that drew an immediate, harsh rebuke from India.

  • Israeli president pardons soldier convicted for killing wounded Palestinian

    Israeli president pardons soldier convicted for killing wounded Palestinian

    More than a decade after a fatal shooting that split Israeli society and roiled the country’s political landscape, Israeli President Isaac Herzog has issued a full pardon to former Israeli soldier Elor Azaria, overturning his 2017 manslaughter conviction and wiping clean his criminal record. The announcement, first reported by Israeli newspaper Haaretz on Saturday, comes amid deep divisions over the decision, which directly contradicts official advice from Israel’s top military leadership.

    The incident that sparked this long-running debate dates back to 2016, in the occupied West Bank city of Hebron. Azaria, then a young Israeli soldier, shot 21-year-old Palestinian Abdel Fattah al-Sharif in the head moments after al-Sharif had already been wounded by Israeli fire during a reported stabbing attack in the Tal Rumeida neighborhood. A Palestinian photographer working for Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem captured the killing on video, turning the case into an international incident that sparked mass outrage across the occupied Palestinian territories and deep polarization within Israel.

    At the time of the shooting, the Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs labeled the killing an “extrajudicial execution”, while the Israeli military openly acknowledged that Azaria had violated the service’s official code of ethics. In his 2017 military court trial, Azaria was found guilty of manslaughter and sentenced to 18 months in military prison, a term that was later reduced to 14 months by then-military chief Gadi Eisenkot. He ultimately served just nine months of the shortened sentence before being released in May 2018.

    From the moment of Azaria’s arrest, the case became a lightning rod for Israeli right-wing politics. Mass demonstrations were organized demanding his release, and sitting politicians quickly joined the calls for clemency. Just three months after the Hebron incident, then-Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon, who had openly condemned Azaria’s actions, resigned from his post, citing a breakdown of trust in then-Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over his handling of the controversy. Avigdor Liberman, a public supporter of Azaria, was appointed to replace Yaalon, and began pushing for a presidential pardon almost immediately, an effort that former President Reuven Rivlin rejected.

    In justifying his decision to grant the pardon this year, Herzog framed the move around the spirit of Yom Kippur, Judaism’s Day of Atonement and one of its most sacred holy days. In an official statement released Saturday, the president’s office noted that Azaria had already “bore the consequences of his actions” for many years, and that the former soldier had expressed remorse for the harm resulting from the shooting. “This decision was made out of a belief in the importance of repair, reconciliation, and the ability to move forward,” the statement read.

    However, the move runs directly counter to the explicit recommendation of current Israeli military chief Eyal Zamir, who sent a formal letter to Herzog opposing the pardon. Zamir argued that Azaria has never shown public remorse for the killing of al-Sharif. That objection was echoed by Yaalon, now one of Netanyahu’s most prominent political critics, who condemned the pardon as “a disgrace” on social media platform X. Yaalon also accused Herzog of aligning with political attacks on Eisenkot, who is currently leading public opinion polls ahead of Israel’s scheduled October general election. Pointing to Azaria’s own words from the trial, Yaalon noted that the former soldier never claimed he shot al-Sharif out of fear for his life, saying instead that the Palestinian “deserved to die”.

    Defense Minister Israel Katz, who submitted the official pardon request to Herzog, praised the president’s decision as “a correct, humane, and fitting decision”. Katz argued that the pardon sends a clear message to active-duty Israeli soldiers and their families: “We do not abandon soldiers and do not leave them behind.” Far-right Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, who participated in public protests for Azaria a decade ago, said he was “thrilled” by the ruling, claiming that if the current far-right government’s updated rules of engagement had been in place in 2016, Azaria would never have faced conviction at all.

    Azaria himself reacted to the pardon with open celebration, telling Channel 14 News that it had been “a blessed week”. “Thank God we have reached this moment,” he said, adding that, “It is important that no fighter goes through what I went through.” He also publicly thanked his family, Katz, and Herzog for the outcome.

    The pardon has renewed longstanding concerns over impunity for Israeli security forces operating in the occupied Palestinian territories, highlighted in a recent report from B’Tselem. The group documented that between October 2023 and June 2026 alone, Israeli forces killed 1,087 Palestinians in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem, including 242 children and 21 women. B’Tselem described current Israeli policy in Palestinian territories as “a sweeping Israeli assault that is systematically and at an accelerating pace dismantling the foundations of Palestinian existence”, noting that Israeli soldiers, police, and settlers are granted “broad impunity” for violence against Palestinians. Data from the group shows that between 2016 and 2024, just 22.7 percent of formal complaints against Israeli soldiers resulted in investigations, and only 0.9 percent ended in criminal indictments.

  • Sister of Pakistan’s ex-PM Imran Khan arrested

    Sister of Pakistan’s ex-PM Imran Khan arrested

    In a sharp escalation of political tensions ahead of nationwide pro-Imran Khan demonstrations planned for next week, Pakistan’s ruling administration has detained the former prime minister’s outspoken sister, Aleema Khanum, in a move that has drawn immediate condemnation from Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party. The arrest, carried out Sunday afternoon in the eastern metropolis of Lahore, has been labeled an “illegal detention” by PTI officials, who explicitly tie the action to efforts to suppress the upcoming 27 September protest movement.

    The detention order issued by Lahore’s deputy commissioner lays out the government’s formal justification, alleging that Khanum has organized and mobilized Imran Khan’s supporters across both public gatherings and social media platforms. The order further claims her activities are intended to stir unrest, create disruptions to public law and order, and spread anti-government sentiment through critical slogans. Under the terms of the order, Khanum will remain in custody for 30 days at Lahore’s high-security Kot Lakhpat jail, a location confirmed by a local police official contacted by the BBC.

    In the immediate hours following the arrest, Khanum’s family reported they were cut off from her, with no information about her location or condition. Her son, Shahrez Khan, took to the social platform X to issue a public demand for transparency. “We demand the government immediately disclose her whereabouts and ensure her safe return,” he wrote in his post.

    Political observers and PTI supporters universally connect the timing of Khanum’s arrest to the mass protest mobilization scheduled for 27 September, when thousands of demonstrators plan to march from across Pakistan to the capital city of Islamabad to demand Imran Khan’s release from prison. In preparation for the demonstration, the incumbent government has already deployed large shipping containers to block key streets across Islamabad, positioning the barriers to secure government buildings and block access to central parts of the capital. Local Pakistani media has quoted Interior Ministry officials as saying the protests threaten national stability, and the government will use all available measures to prevent the demonstrations from proceeding.

    This latest political crackdown comes amid a years-long legal and political campaign against Imran Khan, the 71-year-old former cricket star who rose to national power before being ousted from office in 2022. Khan has remained in state custody since 2023, when he was handed an initial three-year prison conviction over charges that he failed to declare income earned from selling state gifts he received during his time in prime minister. Since that first conviction, he has faced more than 100 additional criminal charges, ranging from corruption and unlawful land deals to allegations of leaking state secrets. Khan and his supporters have consistently decried every one of these charges as politically motivated, engineered to remove him from the Pakistani political landscape.

    Last year, a special court handed Khan a 14-year prison sentence in a separate land corruption case, the longest penalty he has received to date. While incarcerated, his physical health has steadily declined, a situation that has drawn growing concern from his supporters. Just last month, Khan was transported from prison to a civilian hospital for urgent medical examinations amid reports of worsening health issues.

    Khanum has long been one of the most visible public faces of the campaign to support Imran Khan since his imprisonment, regularly speaking to media outlets and addressing crowds of his supporters to condemn his detention. Her arrest marks the most high-profile crackdown on PTI leadership ahead of the 27 September protests, signaling the government’s intention to disrupt the protest movement before it can gather momentum.

  • US and Saudi Arabia lack plan as Houthi strikes expose Riyadh’s vulnerability

    US and Saudi Arabia lack plan as Houthi strikes expose Riyadh’s vulnerability

    A major escalation in Yemen’s years-long conflict has laid bare the gap between security cooperation and operational capability between Washington and Riyadh, as multiple sources confirm the two allies have no unified counterstrategy to reverse recent Houthi gains on the strategically critical Red Sea coast. Multiple anonymous U.S. officials confirmed to CNN that even with expanded American intelligence and targeting support provided to Saudi forces, Riyadh has failed to dislodge Houthi fighters from the recently seized island, a position that puts critical commercial shipping lanes at risk.

    For months, U.S. intelligence agencies have warned that the Iran-aligned movement would seek to close off an additional key waterway for global trade, mirroring actions Tehran took earlier this year. Despite a decade of Saudi assurances that it had successfully trained Yemeni government forces loyal to Riyadh to counter Houthi advances, U.S. officials remain convinced that Saudi-led forces lack the capacity to reverse the group’s territorial gains.

    The CNN disclosure follows a surprising early end to U.S. President Donald Trump’s weekend retreat at Camp David, where he cut his stay short Saturday to return to the White House. While the White House attributed the schedule shift to incoming severe weather in rural Maryland, the sudden departure aligned exactly with a major military escalation by the Houthi movement against Saudi Arabia.

    Early Saturday morning, the Saudi-led coalition fighting in Yemen confirmed that the Iran-backed group launched a ballistic missile targeting Riyadh. Local Saudi media reported that authorities issued an uncommon early-morning public alert ordering residents to take shelter indoors. First responders were called to extinguish a blaze at a fuel storage depot near King Khalid International Airport, where an Aramco-branded tanker caught fire following the attack.

    Coalition spokesperson Major General Turki al-Maliki confirmed that Riyadh’s air defenses intercepted the missile over the capital, adding that additional incoming attacks targeting Taif, Baish, Farasan and the Red Sea coastal city of Yanbu were also intercepted before reaching their intended destinations. Houthi spokesperson Yahya Saree immediately claimed responsibility for the coordinated strikes, framing the attacks as retaliation for what he called “criminal attacks by the Saudi enemy on the Yemeni capital Sanaa.”

    In response to the heightened risk of wider conflict, the U.S. State Department and multiple American diplomatic missions across the region issued urgent security warnings for U.S. citizens in the area. The alerts highlighted “the potential for unforeseen escalation” and noted that “Iranian-supported Houthis have engaged in hostilities against Saudi Arabia, including attacks targeting civilian airports.”

    Weekend’s coordinated missile attacks are part of a wider, accelerated Houthi offensive aimed at seizing full control of Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline and the Bab al-Mandeb strait, one of the world’s most vital chokepoints for global oil and commercial shipping. The rapid advance has exposed critical gaps in Saudi military capabilities: regional defense sources confirm the kingdom is currently facing critical shortages of air defense interceptors needed to protect critical domestic infrastructure, and has already requested urgent air defense support from Paris, London, Islamabad and Cairo.

    Recent defense agreements Riyadh signed with Ankara and Islamabad have failed to deliver immediate tangible military support. While Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan condemned the Houthi attacks and pledged to uphold the trilateral security pact with Saudi Arabia, he also warned Riyadh against becoming entangled in the broader standoff between Iran and the United States. For its part, Pakistan only stated it would take action “when the time comes,” offering no immediate commitment of support.

    Despite the rapidly deteriorating security situation for Saudi Arabia, the Trump administration has repeatedly ruled out direct U.S. military involvement in the expanding conflict. Administration officials have made clear that the U.S. red line rules out direct American kinetic strikes against Houthi targets, limiting U.S. engagement to intelligence sharing and the provision of targeting data. That said, the State Department recently approved a $24.3 billion sale of F-35 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia, framed as a measure to “deter current and future threats” to the kingdom.

    Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman reportedly held two phone calls with Trump last week to formally request U.S. military strikes against Houthi positions, but all requests for direct American intervention were rejected. Trump has repeatedly stated his goal to keep U.S. forces out of the Yemen conflict, telling reporters recently: “The Houthis called us and they don’t want to fight with us… It’s just one country they’re not too happy with, and we’ll get that straightened out.”

    This deliberate hands-off approach from Washington has sparked deep alarm among other U.S. Gulf cooperation partners, who view the expanding Houthi offensive as a dangerous new escalation of broader regional proxy tensions between Iran and Western-aligned states. As Houthi advances worsen an already severe global energy crisis and force Saudi Arabia to reduce crude oil exports, Riyadh is confronting an increasingly grim reality: amid reports that Washington is negotiating its own separate ceasefire with the Houthis through backchannel talks in Oman, the kingdom is left to manage a rapidly expanding conflict largely on its own.