分类: politics

  • Trump heaps praise on Middle East leaders at UN meeting on Iran war

    Trump heaps praise on Middle East leaders at UN meeting on Iran war

    On the sidelines of the annual United Nations General Assembly in New York on Tuesday, former and current U.S. President Donald Trump convened a high-profile gathering of top Arab and Muslim regional leaders, an event that drew widespread global attention amid escalating tensions across the Middle East. While Trump heaped extensive praise on his assembled guests and revealed that U.S. envoys had held a landmark three-hour negotiation session with Iranian officials aimed at de-escalating ongoing conflict, the closed-door meeting concluded without any major policy announcements or concrete agreements to address the region’s long-running turmoil.

    Speaking to reporters shortly before entering the closed meeting, Trump confirmed the surprise diplomatic breakthrough, framing the discussion between U.S. and Iranian representatives as a constructive step toward finding a mutually acceptable exit to the open hostilities that have roiled the region since February. “They had a very good meeting, a very productive meeting,” Trump told the press pool, adding that a follow-up negotiation has already been scheduled for the near future to continue the dialogue.

    During the meeting with regional leaders, Trump personally credited two of his closest associates for spearheading the indirect talks with Iran: special peace envoy Steve Witkoff, and Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law who holds no formal official position in the 2025 administration. “We’ll see what happens with that… We’ve been mediating for a while, but I think there’s a lot of momentum for them to make a deal. That’s what we’re hearing from everybody,” Trump told attendees and the assembled press before reporters were escorted out of the room.

    The gathering brought together a who’s who of top leadership from across the Middle East and Muslim-majority region, including Jordan’s King Abdullah II, Qatar’s Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi, Egyptian Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly, Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, Kuwaiti Crown Prince Sabah Khaled Al Hamad Al Sabah, United Arab Emirates Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan, and Saudi Arabia Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud.

    Trump opened his opening remarks to the group with unusually glowing public praise, calling the gathering a milestone in U.S. engagement with its regional partners. “It’s an honour to be here with some of America’s greatest and closest friends, allies, and partners to continue our effort toward a safer and more prosperous Middle East,” the president said. “Special place, and it’s become more special over the last period of time since I’ve been in politics… I’ve got a lot of great friends sitting around this table. They’re amazing people, and we make sure their lives are good.”

    He went on to note that every participating nation had been “outstanding” in its cooperation with the United States, and thanked leaders for the approximately $21 trillion in regional investment that has flowed into the U.S. economy since he took office in January 2025. Trump reserved particular warm praise for Erdogan, with whom he has cultivated a close personal relationship dating back to his first presidential term, calling the Turkish leader a “fantastic guy” and a “tough cookie.” He joked to the room, “Don’t mess around with him,” drawing laughter from the assembled leaders.

    This marked the second consecutive year that Trump has held this type of dedicated regional meeting on the UNGA sidelines. Last year’s gathering included leaders from the world’s most populous Muslim nations, Pakistan and Indonesia, and centered heavily on brokering an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. That ceasefire ultimately took effect three weeks after the 2024 meeting, though Israeli forces have continued to conduct regular air strikes on the enclave on a weekly basis in the months since.

    This year’s meeting comes as Iran dominates regional policy discussions, following Iranian retaliatory strikes against U.S. interests that triggered the current open U.S.-Israeli campaign against Iran that launched on February 28. In his remarks, Trump boasted of the damage the coalition campaign has inflicted on Iranian military capabilities, claiming: “Operation Epic Fury crippled Iran’s Navy… Eliminated its air force. They have no planes. Hit over 90 percent of its weapons factories and destroyed 450 ballistic missile storage facilities and 800 drone storage facilities.” He went on to issue a fresh warning, saying the U.S. is prepared to launch additional strikes on the key Iranian site Pickaxe Mountain if any military activity is detected there. “We’re not seeing a lot of activity there, but if we do, we’ll blow it up immediately,” he said.

    Following Trump’s opening remarks to press, reporters were ushered out of the meeting room. The assembled regional leaders did not address media, and maintained stoic expressions during Trump’s public comments, with no pushback or public comment on his stark warnings against Iran.

    This report was originally sourced from independent regional outlet Middle East Eye, which provides dedicated, unrivaled coverage of the Middle East, North Africa and surrounding regions.

  • Trump ally Alina Habba to marry Turkish businessman with Congo, Venezuela ties

    Trump ally Alina Habba to marry Turkish businessman with Congo, Venezuela ties

    A high-profile upcoming marriage between one of former President Donald Trump’s closest legal advisors and a reclusive Turkish business leader is drawing widespread attention to overlapping global political connections and controversial commercial ventures stretching from central Africa to South America.

    Alina Habba, the 42-year-old attorney who represented Trump in multiple high-stakes legal cases between 2021 and 2024, is scheduled to marry Turhan Mildon, the 29-year-old chief executive of Turkey-based family enterprise Miller Holding, later this week. Habba, who has long been considered a core member of Trump’s inner circle, was appointed by Trump as acting U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey in 2023, but a federal court later ruled the appointment unconstitutional, forcing her to step down in December that year. She has recently signaled openness to returning to a senior White House role if Trump returns to office, telling reporters last month she would accept the position of White House press secretary if asked to fill an expected upcoming vacancy.

    Unlike his high-profile fiancée, Mildon has deliberately kept a low public profile for most of his career, rarely granting media interviews or making public appearances in his home country of Turkey. In a rare interview with Middle East Eye, he explained his choice to stay out of the spotlight, noting that his businesses do not sell directly to end consumers, making a public brand profile unnecessary. He also firmly pushed back against growing speculation that the upcoming marriage carries any hidden political agenda, stating plainly, “This marriage has no political motivation.”

    According to Mildon, the pair were introduced several years ago by a mutual friend who serves as an ambassador based in the U.S., and the connection gradually developed into a romantic relationship. This will be Mildon’s second marriage: he was previously wed to Betul Gursoy, daughter of the late owner of the Gursoy Group, the construction firm that built Istanbul’s iconic Camlica Mosque, a major infrastructure project personally commissioned by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The pair divorced in late 2024. After his split from Gursoy, Mildon dated the daughter of Remigio Ceballos, a prominent Venezuelan admiral and long-time ally of former Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who currently serves as Venezuela’s ambassador to China. Ceballos has held a series of senior roles in Venezuela, including interior minister, top military commander, and aide-de-camp to Maduro.

    Mildon’s business empire spans multiple industries and has expanded far beyond Turkey’s borders over the past four years, anchored by major infrastructure projects in the Democratic Republic of Congo that began after a high-level introduction from Erdogan himself. Mildon told MEE that during Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi’s official state visit to Turkey, Erdogan personally connected him to the African leader, who subsequently invited him to Kinshasa in 2021, at a time when widespread political and economic instability left most international investors hesitant to enter the country. “People didn’t dare to invest in Congo, so we have taken certain risks,” he said.

    Since entering the Congolese market, his construction and investment firm Milvest has secured roughly $1 billion in public and private contracts, and has expanded into the mining sector, bringing hundreds of millions of dollars in direct foreign investment to the country, per Mildon’s own account. Earlier this year, the firm won a $67 million contract to build an aerial infrastructure base in Kisangani, a project Mildon clarifies is limited to civilian construction of a runway, control tower, and aircraft hangars, with no involvement in defense operations. The project was completed several months ago, he added.

    Not all of Milvest’s Congolese projects have proceeded without controversy. Two major contracts — the $400 million Kinshasa Financial Center, billed as the largest financial hub on the African continent, and the Arena, a planned indoor sports complex that will be the largest of its kind in Africa when complete — sparked public scrutiny in 2023 after local media reports accused former Congolese Finance Minister Nicolas Kazadi of mismanaging public funds allocated for the projects. Mildon says that as of yet, neither he nor his company have received any formal investigation or inquiry from the Congolese government, and he confirmed the financial center was completed on schedule in December 2023 after 21 months of construction. Kazadi has also denied any wrongdoing, arguing the combined $400 million price tag for both projects came in under initial cost estimates.

    The Arena project has faced additional hurdles, after Congolese officials accused Milvest of improperly securing tax and import exemptions for construction materials. Mildon denies any wrongdoing, but says the dispute delayed construction by eight months and cost his company millions of dollars in avoidable losses. MEE attempted to reach Kazadi for additional comment on the controversies but did not receive a response before publication.

    More recently, Mildon has expanded his business operations into the high-risk Venezuelan market, where he has navigated complex U.S. sanctions and local political disputes to launch a cement revival project through his firm Vancement. After visiting the country and being impressed by its people and landscape, Mildon says he followed legal advice to avoid sanctioned sectors including oil, rare minerals, and chemicals, and instead focused on reviving Venezuela’s idle state-owned cement factories. In 2023, Vancement reached a profit-sharing agreement with the Venezuelan government to restart 10 cement plants that were nationalized in the early 2000s and had been operating well below production capacity. The agreement was reached after lengthy negotiations with the state-owned cement firm Corporacion Socialista del Cemento and then-Industry Minister Alex Saab, a close Maduro ally, and Mildon says the structure of the deal allows his company to operate in Venezuela without triggering U.S. sanctions penalties.

    The Venezuelan venture has also faced public pushback: local contractors have alleged Vancement has failed to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in outstanding bills for work on the project, and Venezuelan legislative leaders have publicly criticized the company for sky-high retail cement prices that have strained working-class consumers. Mildon denies both sets of claims. He argues payment disputes stem from local business customs and misattribution of debt owed by third-party contractors, not any failure by Vancement to meet its financial obligations. On the topic of cement prices, he explains that Vancement sells each bag of cement to third-party resellers for just $3 to $5, but resellers mark up prices to between $20 and $37, for which his company bears no blame. He told MEE that Vancement has asked the Venezuelan government to create a regulatory task force to crack down on excessive resale markups, but no action has been taken to date.

    As the couple prepares for their wedding this week, their union is expected to continue drawing scrutiny from political observers, who are watching for how the connection between a top Trump ally and a Turkish business leader with deep ties to Erdogan, Maduro, and Congolese government leaders could shape policy and commercial outcomes if Trump wins a second term in 2024.

  • Trump threatens to ‘annihilate’ Iran in UN speech as officials from both countries meet on sidelines

    Trump threatens to ‘annihilate’ Iran in UN speech as officials from both countries meet on sidelines

    On the opening day of the 2026 United Nations General Assembly in New York, U.S. President Donald Trump delivered a high-stakes address that blended bellicose rhetoric toward Iran, domestic political campaigning, and bold pledges to reshape global order, capping a day of busy high-level diplomacy that offered tentative hints of progress on Iranian peace talks.

    Addressing a standing-room-only crowd of global diplomats and leaders, Trump opened his speech by touting what he framed as transformative domestic achievements across economic growth, border security, immigration control, and reductions in violent crime. Political observers widely noted the remarks appeared tailored more to galvanize American voters ahead of November’s pivotal midterm elections than to win over the international audience assembled in Manhattan.

    The core of Trump’s address centered on the ongoing conflict between the U.S.-led coalition and Iran, which began with joint U.S.-Israeli military action in February 2026. The war has sent global oil prices soaring and dragged down the president’s domestic approval ratings in recent months. In a remark that marked a dramatic escalation of coercive diplomacy, Trump revealed he was facing an imminent “big decision” between pursuing a negotiated peace deal with Tehran or launching a new, devastating strike that would “annihilate” the Islamic Republic.

    “Will a deal be made with Iran that lets them rebuild and create a far greater country than it ever was before?” Trump asked the assembly. “Or do I annihilate the Islamic Republic and do it quickly, never giving them a chance to kill and destroy people and countries again? Do I drive them into hell?”

    The president framed the current conflict as a necessary step to block Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, arguing it validated his doctrine of “peace through strength” — relying on ultimatums and overwhelming military pressure rather than compromise and traditional diplomacy. He added that he expected a long-elusive peace deal with Iran to be finalized shortly after November’s midterm elections, pointing to what he described as productive behind-the-scenes talks held on the sidelines of the General Assembly.

    Hours after his speech, the White House confirmed that U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff had held a three-hour “very productive” meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, facilitated by Qatari mediators. Iranian state media confirmed the talks, noting that Tehran’s core conditions for any final deal include an immediate end to all military operations across Iranian territory and a halt to what it describes as ongoing U.S. acts of aggression. Leaving the UN compound after the negotiations, Witkoff gave reporters a thumbs-up to signal progress, later posting on X that the first round of discussions had been completed successfully.

    “They successfully completed a round of discussions that we hope will prove constructive and promising,” Witkoff wrote. “The mediators will continue their work.” Only one member of Iran’s official delegation was present in the assembly chamber to hear Trump’s opening address.

    Beyond Iran, Trump used his speech to lay out his broader foreign and domestic policy vision, pushing back hard against the framing of global cooperation laid out earlier in the day by outgoing UN Secretary-General António Guterres. In his farewell address to the General Assembly, Guterres warned that global fault lines were rapidly widening amid intensifying geopolitical rivalries, ongoing wars, the climate crisis, and unregulated AI development, stressing that all world nations are inherently interdependent. He also urged major global powers to acknowledge the limits of their influence, saying “that their power isn’t so super.”

    Trump rejected that framing outright, attacking the United Nations as beholden to a “far-left agenda of globalist bureaucrats who nobody ever elected.” He firmly rejected the concept of a global government, reaffirming his commitment to absolute American national sovereignty and the dominance of U.S. military power.

    On other key global conflicts, Trump reiterated his pledge to broker a lasting peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, where fighting has continued to intensify with both sides launching sustained cross-border missile and drone strikes. “We’re working very closely with the leaders of Russia and Ukraine, and we will get that one done,” he said. “It’s going to happen, I think, more quickly than people understand.” The U.S. State Department later confirmed that Secretary of State Marco Rubio will meet with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in New York on Wednesday to advance those talks.

    On artificial intelligence, Trump pushed back against growing global alarmism around the technology, vowing the U.S. would maintain its global lead over China and reject what he called a “globalist scheme” to exert centralized control over AI innovation. He also announced a rebranding of the technology, arguing that the term “artificial” misrepresents its transformative potential. “The use of the word artificial makes it sound fake,” he said. “It’s not fake, it’s actually amazing. But we have to be careful.”

    On the sidelines of the assembly, Trump signed a new bilateral agreement with Danish and Greenlandic leaders to expand U.S. military access to Greenland, the autonomous Danish territory located in the North Atlantic. The deal explicitly reaffirms Greenland’s sovereign status while granting U.S. forces broad access to the island’s airspace and territory, strengthening American strategic positioning in the Arctic.

    Trump’s day of diplomacy also included a packed schedule of bilateral meetings with more than a dozen world leaders, including a first face-to-face encounter with new British Prime Minister Andy Burnham, talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and a gathering with leaders from multiple Gulf and Arab states focused on Middle East security. When addressing tensions in the Western Hemisphere, Trump issued a stark warning that the U.S. would not tolerate hostile presences in the region, saying “If necessary, we will use our unmatched military might to secure the vital national interests of the United States.”

    He launched a sharp attack on Cuba’s communist government, accusing it of cultivating ties to left-wing American groups including the Communist Party USA, Antifa, and the Democratic Socialists of America, labeling Cuba a “failed state.” Immediately after Trump began his remarks on Cuba, the entire Cuban delegation walked out of the assembly chamber in protest.

  • US criticises Australia’s proposed algorithm opt-out laws as ‘censorship’

    US criticises Australia’s proposed algorithm opt-out laws as ‘censorship’

    A global debate over digital regulation has intensified after a proposal from Australia to grant social media users the right to opt out of algorithmic content feeds has drawn sharp public criticism from the United States, which labels the plan a form of censorship. The proposal, which is part of Australia’s draft digital duty of care legislation, mandates that large technology companies must offer all users the clear choice to disable algorithm-driven content recommendation systems, a policy designed to reduce exposure to harmful material online. Firms that fail to comply with the rule would face substantial financial penalties under the draft law.

    In an unusually public formal submission to Australian policymakers, the U.S. Embassy in Canberra outlined broad “serious concerns” about the legislation, arguing that the proposal’s vague definitions of harm open the door to systematic viewpoint-based censorship of constitutionally protected speech. The U.S. further argued that the law could inadvertently push tech platforms to pre-emptively restrict or demote content from independent journalists and minority groups that cover sensitive or controversial topics, out of fear of violating the new rules. Beyond impacts on speech, U.S. officials warn that mandating specific platform design changes to enable algorithm opt-outs would create rigid, one-size-fits-all requirements that do not account for differing platform models, and could reshape the user experience for social media users around the world, not just those based in Australia. The submission also echoed technology industry claims that the rule could allow the personal biases of government officials to disadvantage independent or marginalized viewpoints, and ultimately harm Australia’s global reputation as a pro-innovation regulatory environment.

    The clash comes as Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese traveled to the United States to address the United Nations General Assembly, where he was set to outline his government’s approach to global tech governance. Speaking to reporters in New York local time, Albanese pushed back firmly against U.S. claims that the law amounts to government overreach and censorship. “It’s not about giving government control,” the prime minister said. “It’s about giving people back control over what they receive on their devices.” The proposal gives individual users the choice to opt out of algorithmic feeds that often prioritize engagement over user well-being, putting control of personal digital experiences back in the hands of Australian citizens rather than governments or large tech firms, he added.

    The diplomatic friction over the algorithm rule comes amid a broader split on global tech regulation playing out at this year’s UN General Assembly. In his own address to the assembly, former U.S. President Donald Trump downplayed widespread global concerns over unregulated artificial intelligence, rejecting growing calls for binding safety guardrails for the emerging technology. Trump went so far as to suggest AI should be rebranded as “super intelligence,” arguing that the term “artificial” incorrectly frames the technology as inauthentic or dangerous.

    This latest push for user protection in Australia follows a sweeping policy introduced by the country less than 12 months ago: a national ban on social media use for children under the age of 16, enacted last December, that marked one of the most aggressive child online protection policies in the developed world. Australian users have widely welcomed the algorithm opt-out proposal, with many saying that giving users a clear choice over what content they see is a long-overdue step to reclaim control from big tech.

  • Fergie Chambers faces Spanish court fight over US extradition request

    Fergie Chambers faces Spanish court fight over US extradition request

    The Spanish government has ignited widespread domestic and international criticism after opting not to block a U.S. extradition request for high-profile American pro-Palestine activist and humanitarian donor Fergie Chambers at the preliminary review stage, clearing the way for the case to advance to the Spanish national court system. Government spokesperson Elma Saiz framed the Tuesday ruling as a strictly procedural step, emphasizing that the executive branch only completed a formal review of the extradition filing rather than a substantive judgment on its merits. Now, Chambers’ legal team will mount a challenge to the extradition before Spain’s Audiencia Nacional, after which the Spanish government will issue a final binding decision on the case. Lead defense counsel Baltasar Garzón — the former Spanish judge renowned for pursuing former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet under the doctrine of universal jurisdiction — warned that the government’s decision establishes a dangerous precedent that undermines global advocacy for Palestinian rights. Garzón argued that Spain cannot credibly claim to uphold international law, defend Palestinian people’s rights, and protect humanitarian workers while advancing an extradition request that bears clear hallmarks of political persecution by the U.S. government. The ruling has also drawn sharp condemnation from across Spanish political circles. Ione Belarra, member of Spain’s Congress of Deputies and secretary-general of the left-wing party Podemos, called the outcome devastating for all those who support Palestinian statehood. “This decision is devastating not just for Fergie Chambers and his family, but for the pro-Palestine movement in Spain and across Europe,” Belarra stated. She went on to label Chambers as the first political prisoner in Spanish history held solely for his advocacy for Palestine, accusing Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s government of electing to keep him in detention to advance what she called the Trump administration’s politically motivated persecution. Chambers, an heir to the prominent Cox family fortune, was first arrested on the Spanish holiday island of Ibiza this past July in compliance with the U.S. extradition request. U.S. federal prosecutors have charged him with international money laundering, riot, and conspiracy to riot, alleging that after relocating from the U.S. in 2023, he moved roughly $7.5 million out of the country with the intention of providing material support to Hamas. As of press time, the U.S. Department of Justice has not issued any response to requests for comment on the case. Prior to Tuesday’s government ruling, Chambers’ legal team submitted a formal argument calling on the executive to block the extradition entirely, pointing to what they described as undeniable political motivations driving the U.S. request. The defense outlined three core legal objections: first, that allowing the case to proceed would enable the political persecution of Chambers; second, that U.S. prosecutors have failed to link Chambers personally to any specific acts of violence or property damage, and the charge of “conspiracy to riot” has no equivalent offense under Spanish criminal law; and third, that the money laundering allegation is baseless, as all of Chambers’ wealth was legally obtained through his family inheritance and fully documented. Stella Schnabel, Chambers’ partner, called the decision deeply alarming, arguing it sends a message that pro-Palestine solidarity can be criminalized even in Europe. “This sends a deeply disturbing message that even in Spain, solidarity with the Palestinian people could be treated as a crime, and risks extending the Trump administration’s repression of pro-Palestine and progressive movements into Europe, setting a dangerous precedent for others,” Schnabel said. She also shared the emotional toll of the ruling, saying she is heartbroken that Chambers will remain behind bars, where he can only meet his children through a glass partition and cannot hold his young son or their unborn child due in the near future. Beyond his political advocacy, Chambers has carried out extensive humanitarian work in Gaza. He provided a $100,000 grant to the Zaynab Project, which expands long-term mental health and psychosocial support for orphaned children in Gaza, connecting vulnerable youth to licensed therapists and ongoing counseling. He also donated $250,000 to the Sameer Project, a Gaza-based humanitarian organization that used the funding to build a bakery in northern Gaza, complete a desalination plant to provide clean drinking water, and operate a free medical clinic for local residents. After Chambers’ arrest in July, the charity paused all its operations, a move that has impacted tens of thousands of vulnerable Palestinians who rely on its services. Ahead of the government’s decision, 150 high-profile global public figures signed an open letter urging the Spanish government to reject the U.S. extradition request as an act of political persecution orchestrated by the Trump administration. Signatories included prominent Palestinian writer Mohammed el-Kurd, veteran civil rights campaigner Angela Davis, musicians Bob Vylan and Lowkey, and actors Riz Ahmed and Richard Gere. The letter condemned what it called the Trump administration’s unprecedented crackdown on individuals and organizations working to oppose what they described as genocide in Gaza and uphold international law, noting that Chambers has dedicated his life to supporting marginalized and vulnerable communities around the world. Last week, public protests in support of Chambers were held in six major Spanish cities, including Madrid, Barcelona, Murcia, Seville, and Galicia, drawing hundreds of pro-Palestine demonstrators who called for the Spanish government to reject the extradition request entirely. The controversial ruling comes at a moment of significant political upheaval for Spain, and amid already strained bilateral relations between Madrid and Washington. Spain is scheduled to hold a general election by 2027, and Sánchez’s minority coalition government faces pressure from multiple directions: left-wing parties have criticized the ruling as a betrayal of pro-Palestine values, while the conservative Popular Party and far-right Vox — both of which hold strongly pro-Israel positions — have pushed the government to comply with the U.S. request. Sánchez has already clashed repeatedly with U.S. President Donald Trump this year, most prominently over the ongoing war in Iran: his government refused to allow the U.S. to use Spanish military bases in Rota and Morón for operations linked to the conflict, and later barred U.S. military aircraft involved in the war from entering Spanish airspace.

  • US judge blocks deportation of DoorDash driver shot by ICE

    US judge blocks deportation of DoorDash driver shot by ICE

    A high-profile encounter between U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and a Venezuelan DoorDash delivery worker in Texas has sparked fierce public debate, legal action, and political pushback after the 28-year-old man was shot during an arrest, with a federal judge now temporarily halting his deportation. Wilber Rafael Garces Perez, the immigrant in question, remains in ICE custody holding an unfired bullet in his back with untreated injuries that have raised alarms over inadequate medical care in detention facilities. The incident, which unfolded on a Sunday afternoon in Austin, has reignited long-simmering tensions over federal immigration enforcement tactics in sanctuary jurisdictions.

    According to Garces Perez’s immigration attorney, Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch, her client was on a routine delivery when an unmarked black vehicle — later confirmed to be tied to ICE — sideswiped his car. Unaware that the vehicle belonged to law enforcement, Garces Perez made a U-turn to escape what he believed was an attack or robbery, only to be hit a second time by the ICE truck before agents exited the vehicle and opened fire. The gunshot fractured his clavicle, leaving him with severe swelling, chronic pain, and unexplained loss of mobility that has yet to be fully diagnosed by medical professionals. He currently wears an arm sling to manage his injury.

    Following the shooting, Lincoln-Goldfinch filed an emergency federal lawsuit requesting a temporary restraining order to block Garces Perez’s deportation before his case could receive a public court hearing. On Wednesday, Judge Orlando Garcia — a federal district court judge appointed during the Clinton administration — granted the temporary block, scheduling an in-person hearing for Garces Perez on September 30. This ruling means the immigrant cannot be removed from the U.S. before the hearing concludes.

    In a social media post following the judge’s ruling, Lincoln-Goldfinch called the order a critical first win, but emphasized that the legal fight is far from over. “For now, we have secured a temporary block on his deportation while his case moves forward,” she wrote. “This is an important step, but our work is not over. Wilber still needs appropriate medical care, and we will continue fighting to protect his rights.”

    The attorney has further alleged severe mistreatment of Garces Perez while in ICE detention. She claims that after his initial hospital treatment, he was transferred back to the detention facility while still injured, placed in full restraints — handcuffs, ankle shackles, and a waist chain — and handled roughly by staff. Detention officials later revoked his communication privileges, moved him out of the facility’s infirmary, and confined him to an isolated cell with a non-adjustable hard bed, even as he continued to experience severe pain from his gunshot wound. It was only after he lost all mobility in one arm that he was transported back to the hospital for further care, before being returned to detention once again.

    Released police footage from the Austin Police Department, which was not involved in the ICE operation but responded to the scene after the shooting, corroborates that Garces Perez sustained a single gunshot wound to the back. While the footage does not capture the actual shooting, multiple gunshots can be heard on one officer’s dashcam recording, and a separate clip shows officers approaching Garces Perez’s vehicle before cutting away his t-shirt to reveal the entry wound on his back.

    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which oversees ICE, has pushed back aggressively against claims of mistreatment, dismissing widespread public criticism as “false narratives” spread by sanctuary city leaders and media outlets. In a public statement to the BBC, DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin defended the agency’s actions and claimed Garces Perez, who entered the U.S. without legal authorization and saw his work permit expire last year, has received top-tier medical care. “Contrary to their claims, this person is an illegal alien who has no legal status to be here and has been given some of the best medical care he’s ever received in his life,” Mullin said. He added that “no amount of smears and false narratives will slow down ICE from doing its job by removing dangerous illegal aliens from our communities and making America safe again.” DHS has also denied claims that Garces Perez was denied pain medication or forced to sleep on the floor, confirming he was placed on a standard bed after returning to detention following hospital treatment.

    A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Texas declined to comment on the ongoing case when reached by reporters.

    This shooting comes just months after another ICE officer fatally shot a man during an operation in Houston, amplifying calls for accountability this time around. Prominent Texas Democrat Congressman Joaquin Castro was among the first public officials to call for Garces Perez’s immediate release from detention, and a coalition of local and state leaders has formally demanded a full independent investigation into the shooting and subsequent handling of the detainee.

    Within hours of the shooting, dozens of protesters gathered at the incident location to demonstrate against federal immigration enforcement in Austin. Many carried signs calling for ICE to exit the city, while some waved the national flags of Mexico and Guatemala to show solidarity with immigrant communities. In response to the protests, DHS reiterated Tuesday that the agency has no plans to scale back its operations in Austin.

    As the country awaits the September 30 court hearing, the case remains a flashpoint in the ongoing national battle over U.S. immigration policy, law enforcement use of force, and the treatment of immigrants in federal detention.

  • ‘We are settling years of unfinished business’: Trump talks up Iran, Gaza, Latin America strategy

    ‘We are settling years of unfinished business’: Trump talks up Iran, Gaza, Latin America strategy

    In a 38-minute address to the United Nations General Assembly Tuesday, former U.S. President Donald Trump (in his second term) laid out his 20-month foreign policy legacy through sweeping, unsubstantiated claims, while issuing a stark demand that all UN member states withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC).

    Compared to his fiery 2024 UNGA speech packed with direct personal attacks, this year’s address carried a calmer tone on the surface, but retained multiple debunked, unproven allegations against regional adversaries. Most notably, Trump claimed without evidence that 72,000 Iranians were killed by their own government during late 2024 and early 2025 anti-government protests. This figure stands in stark contradiction to all available public data: Iranian authorities put the death toll at approximately 3,500, while independent international human rights monitors estimate the count at roughly 5,000 or higher. Throughout 2025, Trump has cited inconsistent figures ranging from 40,000 to 82,000 for these deaths, with no verifiable source for the inflated numbers; even satellite imagery, which has been used to confirm mass casualty events in other global conflicts, has shown no evidence to support his claims.

    The president also repeated a false allegation that Hamas and other Palestinian groups tortured, mutilated, and killed numerous infants during the October 7, 2023 attacks in southern Israel. Israeli independent media investigations have already debunked these specific claims, and the Israel Defense Forces acknowledged that at least one soldier provided incorrect information to Israeli rescue organization Zaka that fueled the false reports. While five young children (including one four-year-old, two five-year-olds, and two six-year-olds) were among those killed on October 7, the majority of child fatalities that day were between 12 and 17 years old, with some killed by errant rocket fire.

    The ICC’s recent issuance of arrest warrants for three Hamas leaders (all subsequently killed by Israeli forces) as well as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant drew fierce condemnation from Trump, who labeled the court “out of control” and “a rogue institution” run by “an evil group of people.” “I call on all nations that are members of the ICC to officially resign from this rogue institution immediately,” he told the assembled delegates.

    Turning to the ongoing U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran, now in its seventh month, Trump doubled down on his longstanding pledge to block Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. He claimed that shortly after taking office for his second term in 2025, he opened direct negotiations with Tehran, offering full economic cooperation in exchange for ending Iran’s nuclear program and what he calls support for terrorist groups—an offer he said Iran “absolutely refused.” While the decision to pursue direct talks drew some early praise, the diplomatic effort, led by special envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, has faced widespread criticism for mismanagement and incompetence.

    Since March 2025, Iranian retaliatory strikes against U.S. allies in the Gulf have disrupted global shipping, closing key chokepoints including the Strait of Hormuz and the Bab el-Mandeb (blocked by Iran-aligned Houthi forces in Yemen). The disruption has sent U.S. gasoline prices soaring, worsening a persistent affordability crisis that has not eased significantly since the COVID-19 pandemic. At least 14 U.S. military personnel have been killed in regional attacks, with nearly 600 more wounded. Echoing the blunt framing of his old reality television show *The Apprentice*, Trump teased a potential post-election deal to end the conflict: “Will a deal be made with Iran that lets them rebuild and create a far greater country than it ever was before, maybe one of the greatest in the Middle East or even the world, or do I annihilate the Islamic Republic and do it quickly, never giving them a chance to kill and destroy people and countries again?” He added that he expects a deal to be reached shortly after the upcoming November 3 midterm elections, claiming Iranian leaders are waiting to see the election’s outcome—though he noted he is not on the ballot this cycle. Forecasters widely expect the midterms to flip the U.S. House of Representatives from Republican to Democratic control, with the Senate also likely to flip or end in an even split; the results are widely viewed as a public referendum on Trump’s first 20 months of his second term.

    Trump also forcefully pushed back against a recent report from his own Department of Defense inspector general that warned the U.S. is depleting its weapons stockpiles due to sustained military support for allies in the Iran campaign. “The cowards and traitors would love to say the United States is low on munitions, but that’s not true,” he said. “We have more munitions than we could ever possibly even think of using, and we’re building them at levels that we have never done before… There are 18 new massive munition plants being built by the world’s largest defense contractors right now.” He closed his remarks on Iran by calling for global collective action to enforce full economic isolation of Tehran until it halts attacks on commercial shipping, abandons its nuclear program, and ends support for armed groups he labels terrorist.

    Trump’s address came just two weeks ahead of the third anniversary of the October 7, 2023 attacks, and three weeks after a Trump-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hamas went into effect on October 10, 2025. UN Secretary-General has criticized the ceasefire as a “lesser fire,” noting that Israel has continued carrying out air strikes that killed more than a dozen children in Gaza just this month, with few of the ceasefire’s obligations met by Israeli authorities. According to the Palestinian Ministry of Health, the confirmed death toll in Gaza has now reached nearly 74,000, with the final count expected to surpass 100,000 once rubble clearing operations recover the remains of missing people.

    Despite little tangible progress on the Trump-created “Board of Peace” for Gaza, a body of which Trump named himself chairman for life, the president used his UNGA platform to highlight supposed international praise for the initiative, citing endorsements from the leaders of Pakistan, Azerbaijan, and Armenia. He also thanked donor nations that have contributed $1 billion to the initiative, despite multiple unconfirmed reports that the dedicated World Bank account for Gaza relief remains empty. Trump thanked the UN Security Council for unanimously approving his 20-point Gaza peace plan and formalizing the Board of Peace, noting that his administration added a last-minute reference to Palestinian self-determination to the draft resolution to win support from Arab and Muslim nations, which the administration hopes will contribute troops to a proposed international stabilization force for Gaza. Regional diplomats are scheduled to hold follow-up talks with Trump on the sidelines of this year’s General Assembly, focused largely on Iran.

    Trump linked his decision to launch the February 28, 2025 military campaign against Iran to the successful U.S. abduction of former Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in early January 2025, framing the operation as proof of U.S. willingness to use military force to advance its interests in the Western Hemisphere—a core priority driven by hawkish Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has long pushed aggressive policy toward Latin American adversaries. The New York Times reported earlier this year that Venezuela’s new government, led by Maduro’s former deputy Delcy Rodriguez, is effectively controlled from Washington. Trump also announced a historic $65 billion oil concession deal with Venezuela, covering 65 billion barrels of crude that he claimed would lower global energy prices, though analysts note benefits to U.S. consumers will not materialize for at least a decade, and critics question whether the deal will improve quality of life for ordinary Venezuelans.

    Cuba, another longstanding U.S. adversary facing a crippling Trump administration embargo that has worsened the island’s ongoing energy crisis and collapsed its national electrical grid, was also a target of Trump’s remarks. The Cuban UN delegation walked out of the General Assembly hall mid-speech in protest as Trump called for fundamental regime change in Havana, claiming the communist government is “an absolutely failed state” facing greater pressure than ever before. He noted that Marco Rubio is leading ongoing negotiations with Cuban officials, adding “let’s see what happens.”

    In a sweeping generalization on global religious freedom, Trump claimed that “Christians are being persecuted all over the world,” criticizing the UN Human Rights Council for failing to address the issue. His remarks align with repeated statements from senior administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who have argued the U.S. should identify as a Christian nation in spite of the constitutional separation of church and state. Trump also used the moment to defend his administration’s hardline immigration policies, including the closure of the U.S. southern border and the rollback of multiple legal immigration pathways, claiming the UN pushes for open U.S. borders to admit criminal gangs from unstable regions.

    In the only concrete policy announcement of his speech, Trump revealed that for all official U.S. government documents and communications, the term “Artificial Intelligence” will be replaced with the new name “Super Intelligence.”

    This report was sourced from independent open-source reporting by Middle East Eye.

  • US to build two military bases in Greenland under new deal with Denmark

    US to build two military bases in Greenland under new deal with Denmark

    In a watershed moment for Arctic security, leaders from the United States, Denmark, and Greenland have signed a landmark updated defense agreement that clears the way for two new U.S. military installations on the semi-autonomous Arctic territory, while formally reaffirming Denmark’s long-held sovereignty over the region. The signing ceremony took place on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, where U.S. President Donald Trump was joined by Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen to formalize the pact.

    Right before the signing, Trump announced that work to develop the expanded U.S. military footprint would begin without delay, telling reporters “we will immediately begin the process of developing a large military presence in the appropriate locations”. All three leaders framed the deal as a mutually beneficial outcome. Frederiksen noted the agreement serves the interests of not just the three signatory parties, but also Europe and the broader NATO alliance, while Nielsen called the outcome an unambiguous “win-win-win”.

    The agreement brings a close to more than 18 months of rising geopolitical tension over Greenland, sparked last year when Trump publicly threatened to seize the territory over stated U.S. national security concerns, highlighting its critical strategic location in the Arctic and abundant untapped mineral reserves. His aggressive rhetoric drew widespread condemnation from Greenlandic officials, the Danish government, and other European leaders, who issued a joint rebuke arguing that his threats undermined transatlantic cooperation and risked triggering a dangerous escalation in the region.

    This new deal amends and modernizes the original 1951 bilateral defense agreement between Denmark and the U.S. that has governed U.S. military activity in Greenland for 75 years. Under the terms of the updated pact, the U.S. gains permission to establish two new designated defense areas at Narsarsuaq in southern Greenland and Mestersvig on the island’s eastern coast. U.S. Northern Command has confirmed that U.S. military survey teams have already assessed Narsarsuaq, a former World War II military base and decommissioned civilian airport that already offers deep-water port access and a fully functional large runway. Mestersvig, by contrast, is a remote, barely developed outpost currently used only by a Danish naval dog sled patrol unit.

    Critical details of base construction and operations, outlined as “modalities and technical details” in the agreement, have not yet been finalized and require mutual approval from all three signatory parties, meaning U.S. activity in Greenland is not unlimited and cannot proceed without formal consent from Copenhagen and Nuuk.

    The U.S. already maintains Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland, and the new agreement allows the U.S. to upgrade and expand its existing operations at that site. A key non-proliferation clause bars any non-NATO member state from constructing manned or unmanned military installations on Greenland, or maintaining a permanent military presence on the island. While this provision is explicit in the updated text, military access for non-allied nations was already effectively prohibited prior to the deal.

    Notably, the agreement involves no cession of territory to the United States, and Washington explicitly recognizes both Denmark’s full sovereignty and territorial integrity over Greenland, as well as Greenland’s constitutionally protected right to self-determination. This represents a clear retreat from Trump’s earlier public calls to acquire the Arctic island, but still delivers on his core goal of expanding U.S. military influence in the increasingly strategic Arctic region, a outcome that is already being framed as a major policy win among many U.S. political circles.

    Before the deal can enter into force, it must still receive formal ratification from both the Danish parliament and Greenland’s legislative assembly.

    Despite months of acrimonious public tension over the territory, the atmosphere at Tuesday’s signing was uniformly cordial and optimistic. Trump praised the pact, saying “We going to have a tremendous relationship, a secure relationship. This is tremendous for Europe and for the United States, for everybody, and for Greenland it’s going to be incredible.”

    Frederiksen framed the signing as a major milestone in the long-standing transatlantic defense partnership between the two nations, noting “Seventy-five years ago we entered into an agreement about the defence of Greenland. Today, we’re signing an even bigger and better agreement – a deal that can last forever.” She reiterated that the agreement fully upholds Danish sovereignty and Greenlandic autonomy.

    For his part, Nielsen emphasized that this agreement was negotiated with Greenlandic input at its core, saying “for Greenland, it is not only an agreement about us, it is an agreement with us. It takes into account the people of Greenland, our rights, our livelihoods and the development of our country. Greenland matters for North American security and for transatlantic security.” Nielsen also highlighted NATO’s central role in maintaining stability in the North Arctic amid a shifting global security landscape. The agreement also includes a provision confirming that Greenland would retain its NATO membership if it achieves full independence from Denmark in the future.

    The original 1951 agreement already allowed the U.S. to deploy as many military personnel to Greenland as it deemed necessary, and the U.S. currently stations more than 100 permanent troops at Pituffik Space Base. For months, Trump pushed for a move to purchase or annex Greenland, arguing the territory was vulnerable to growing influence from U.S. strategic rivals Russia and China. He also framed control of Greenland as critical to his proposed “Golden Dome” national missile defense system, though the new deal only mentions the project once and includes no binding commitments to advance it.

    Shortly after the signing, a NATO spokesperson issued a statement welcoming the agreement, noting that it would “help advance security, stability and cooperation in this vital region”. In Denmark, the deal has been broadly celebrated as a major diplomatic success, with multiple major political parties already announcing they will support ratification. For Greenland, a territory of just 56,000 people, the agreement brings a welcome end to months of political uncertainty. By securing formal recognition of its autonomy and sovereignty alongside the expanded defense cooperation, Greenlandic leaders have emerged from the standoff with a deal that addresses their core priorities, bringing a long period of geopolitical crisis to a close.

  • ‘A blatant affront’: Israeli embassy upgrade angers pro-Palestine voices in Morocco

    ‘A blatant affront’: Israeli embassy upgrade angers pro-Palestine voices in Morocco

    On September 16, a high-profile meeting between Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar and Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita in New York yielded a landmark agreement to deepen bilateral relations between the two North African and Middle Eastern nations. The core of the new deal elevates both countries’ existing diplomatic missions to full embassy status and paves the way for the appointment of resident ambassadors, marking a major step forward in the normalization process that began with the 2020 Abraham Accords brokered during former U.S. President Donald Trump’s first term. Two supplementary pacts — one focused on investment protection and another addressing double taxation — are also scheduled to be finalized before the end of 2024.

    In a joint statement released after the announcement, the United States, Israel, and Morocco reaffirmed their commitment to the principles of the Abraham Accords, arguing that full, peaceful diplomatic and friendly ties between Rabat and Tel Aviv serve the shared interests of all parties, with the potential to drive regional stability and unlock new economic and social opportunities across the Middle East and North Africa.

    But this latest advancement in normalization has unfolded against widespread public opposition in Morocco, where broad popular support for the Palestinian cause and consistent condemnation of formal ties with Israel have remained deeply entrenched since the original accords were signed four years ago. The announcement also comes just one week ahead of Morocco’s September 23 general elections, leaving the sitting government in a caretaker role with limited authority to act on major policy changes — a detail that has sparked internal political discussion over who holds ultimate decision-making power over foreign affairs in the kingdom.

    When the Abraham Accords were first signed in 2020, the Islamist-leaning Justice and Development Party (PJD) held the premiership under Saadeddine El-Othmani. PJD officials have long clarified that the 2020 accords did not contradict the party’s official pro-Palestine stance, pointing to Morocco’s unique political structure, where ultimate authority over international relations rests with the monarchy, not the sitting head of government. “Yes, PJD was in power when the Abraham Accords were signed, but the decision was made by the king; the head of government in Morocco does not have the power over international affairs,” a senior active PJD member, speaking on condition of anonymity to Middle East Eye, explained. The caretaker status of the current government during the recent announcement, he added, only reinforces that the monarchy retains full control over this major foreign policy shift.

    To date, PJD remains the only officially registered political party in Morocco that has openly condemned the latest agreement to deepen ties with Israel. Following an urgent virtual meeting held the same day as the New York announcement, the party released an official statement reaffirming its “firm and unwavering stance against any form of normalisation or agreements with Israel.” The banned Islamist movement Al Adl Wal Ihsane has also publicly denounced the diplomatic upgrade, with Dr. Boubker El Ounkhari, a senior member of the movement’s political circle, calling the move “a blatant affront to Moroccans’ sentiments and a provocation against the popular will.”

    El Ounkhari emphasized that at a moment when international pressure should be mounting on Israel to hold it accountable for its ongoing occupation and military campaign in Gaza, Rabat has instead chosen to formalize and deepen its bilateral relationship with Tel Aviv. Morocco’s current governing coalition, made up of the leading National Rally of Independents (RNI), the Authenticity and Modernity Party (PAM), and the Istiqlal Party, has remained largely silent on the agreement, with senior party members citing the sensitive pre-election context as a reason to avoid public comment.

    A senior RNI member, also speaking anonymously, told Middle East Eye that internal party reaction to the deal was marked by “a kind of rationality and calmness.” He framed this muted response as predictable, noting that Moroccan-Israeli relations have been an established, non-negotiable part of the kingdom’s foreign policy since the 2020 accords were signed. A senior PAM member echoed the sentiment of caution, explaining that no party figure would risk commenting on a divisive issue that could be weaponized by political opponents in the final days of campaigning.

    Moroccan officials have sought to justify the diplomatic upgrade by framing closer ties as a tool to advance humanitarian and diplomatic support for Palestinians. Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita told reporters that despite deeper cooperation, “Rabat does not agree with Israel 100 percent” — a narrative that mirrors the justification Rabat used when it deployed military personnel to the U.S.-backed International Stabilisation Force in Gaza as part of the 2020 Trump peace plan. The RNI member echoed this government framing, arguing that “Morocco can use its relations with Israel as a channel of diplomatic dialogue and pressure for stopping escalation and advancing a two-state solution,” though he acknowledged that “Moroccan-Israeli cooperation does not automatically translate into benefits for the Palestinians.”

    Critics of normalization have rejected this justification outright. Ahmed Ouihmane, president of the Moroccan Observatory Against Normalisation and a member of the national secretariat of the Moroccan Working Group for Palestine, dismissed the claim that normalization serves Palestinian interests as “nothing but nonsense and an insult to the intelligence of the Moroccan people.” He challenged the government’s narrative, asking: “If normalisation is a means to serve the Palestinian cause, what results have actually been achieved for the Palestinians through it?”

    Ouihmane pointed to the staggering human cost of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, where the United Nations has recorded that at least 21,000 Palestinian children have been killed in Israeli attacks since October 2023. He argued that tangible support for Palestinians would require cutting all cooperation that enables Israel’s military operation, including ending Morocco’s role as a key transit hub for arms shipments bound for Israel — a role that has included facilitating transport of components for F-35 fighter jets used in attacks across Gaza. “Real aid for Palestinians would begin by denying the Israeli war machine any form of cooperation, support or facilitation – such as allowing Moroccan ports to receive ships laden with lethal weaponry destined for the Zionist killing machine,” he said.

    The announcement of the diplomatic upgrade comes at a particularly fraught time for the Moroccan government, which is already navigating multiple concurrent crises ahead of the general election. These include ongoing fallout from the Ceuta migrant crisis, allegations of Moroccan involvement that the kingdom has denied, a major high-profile leak that exposed the personal data of more than 70,000 Moroccan intelligence personnel, and a controversial Spanish bill that would grant citizenship to Sahrawis born in Western Sahara during the Spanish colonial era — a move that Rabat strongly opposes.

    Many political observers and insiders frame the ongoing advancement of normalization as rooted in long-standing geopolitical and strategic priorities, most notably Morocco’s claim to sovereignty over Western Sahara. In December 2020, the United States formally recognized Morocco’s sovereignty over the disputed territory in a side agreement that was tied directly to Rabat’s signing of the Abraham Accords. The Western Sahara dispute has dominated Morocco’s foreign policy for decades, with the kingdom locked in a long-running regional rivalry with Algeria, which supports the pro-independence Polisario Front’s claims to the territory.

    The PJD member acknowledged that Western Sahara is a core driving force behind the kingdom’s policy, explaining: “The state has its own geopolitical calculations that drive it to make such difficult decisions, that sometimes run counter to the will of the people.” Even so, he added, the rights of Palestinians remain a core principle for pro-Palestinian activists across the kingdom, and no strategic calculation can justify formal ties with Israel.

    El Ounkhari echoed widespread public frustration, noting that Moroccans have consistently rejected normalization across every recent poll and public protest, yet official policy continues to move steadily toward deeper ties with Israel. “The official process continues in the opposite direction, moving from one stage to another in deepening relations with the Zionist entity,” he said.

    Since the start of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza in October 2023, peaceful pro-Palestinian protests have been held every week outside Morocco’s parliament in Rabat, drawing thousands of participants from a broad coalition of trade unions, political groups, and civil society organizations. The Moroccan Working Group for Palestine, which Ouihmane serves on, is one of the leading umbrella organizations coordinating this grassroots movement.

    Just four days after the diplomatic deal was announced, Ouihmane was physically assaulted by alleged members of a pro-normalization group called “We Are All Israelis” on a major street in central Rabat, requiring hospitalization. Local activists note that the attack marks an escalation of tensions: prior to the assault, the loose network of pro-Israel Moroccans, which formed after October 2023, had limited its activities to online harassment of anti-normalization activists.

    Despite the attack, Ouihmane told Middle East Eye that the grassroots movement would continue its fight across all levels to reverse the normalization process. “We will continue our struggle at all levels […] our goal is to overturn the normalisation process,” he said. The movement’s demands are clear: end all normalization efforts, close the Israeli liaison office in Rabat, and cut all forms of cooperation with what Ouihmane calls a “rogue entity.”

    Protesters have repeatedly made their position clear in mass rallies across every region of Morocco, Ouihmane added, and the message remains unchanged: “Palestine is a Moroccan national cause, […] while normalisation is a betrayal.”

    El Ounkhari emphasized that official state policy does not make normalization inevitable or acceptable to the Moroccan public. “Embassies may be opened, and ambassadors exchanged, but that does not mean normalisation has become acceptable to the Moroccan people. Palestine will remain present in the conscience of Moroccans,” he said.

  • How Ceuta, football and Israel are shaping Morocco’s election

    How Ceuta, football and Israel are shaping Morocco’s election

    As Morocco prepares to hold its parliamentary elections this Wednesday, 27 political parties are competing for 395 seats in the country’s House of Representatives, with disillusioned young voters emerging as the central demographic all campaigns are scrambling to win over. In a political system structured as a constitutional monarchy, where King Mohammed VI holds ultimate executive authority—appointing the prime minister from the top-performing party and presiding over the kingdom’s highest policy-making body, the Council of Ministers—this election comes against a backdrop of growing youth frustration over systemic economic stagnation and political disconnect. Just weeks before voting day, a historic mass migration event laid bare the depth of this discontent: roughly 60,000 people, most of them young Moroccans desperate for better opportunities, risked their lives crossing from northern Morocco to the Spanish enclave of Ceuta, a surge that left at least 100 dead in the deadliest crossing event the enclave has seen in modern history. This moment of crisis followed a nationwide wave of Gen Z-led protests that erupted in September 2025, when thousands took to the streets to decry sky-high youth unemployment, failing public healthcare, and soaring living costs. Demonstrators chanted calls for “freedom, dignity, and social justice,” before their demands escalated to targeted calls for current Prime Minister Aziz Akhannouch to step down. The government’s crackdown on the unrest resulted in more than 2,400 protesters facing criminal prosecution, but the movement has nonetheless pushed a small cohort of young activists to run for office themselves, seeking to channel grassroots anger into institutional change. Among these new candidates is 29-year-old Hamza El Kharroubi, a former protester who was briefly detained during last year’s demonstrations. Running for a parliamentary seat with the small, green-aligned Environment and Sustainable Development Party, El Kharroubi represents the small but growing number of young people choosing to enter politics despite deep systemic skepticism. A native of Tetouan, just 21 miles from the Fnideq beach where the Ceuta migration surge began, he has made accountability for the crossing victims a core part of his platform, calling for financial compensation for the families of those who died. El Kharroubi frames the mass crossing as a direct consequence of Morocco’s long-running economic crisis: IMF data puts national unemployment at 13% for last year, with youth unemployment (for 15 to 24-year-olds) reaching a staggering 37.3%. Rather than aiming to defeat the country’s established political heavyweights this cycle, he says his goal is to claim a parliamentary seat to lay groundwork for a stronger youth-led political bloc by 2031. “As young people, we have to enter the parliament so by 2031 we have strong young politicians who can compete for a seat in the government,” he explained. Not all young activists share his belief in institutional change, however. Siham Azeroual, a 32-year-old environmental activist from the Atlas region, says she sees the current political landscape as little more than performative spectacle. “I have no hope for this election. I’m ashamed of our political scene. It’s a complete circus,” she told the BBC. Azeroual, who has taken part in both the 2011 February 20 movement that rewrote Morocco’s constitution and last year’s Gen Z protests, argues that meaningful change must start at the grassroots community level rather than inside parliament. Still, she says she plans to cast a ballot on Wednesday, seeing even incremental participation as a necessary step toward progress. While many young voters remain deeply skeptical of traditional parties, one political outsider has emerged as a surprise breakout star of the 2026 campaign: Fouzi Lekjaa, the wildly popular head of the Royal Moroccan Football Federation, who is also a senior finance ministry official. Credited with driving the success of the Moroccan men’s national team, the Atlas Lions, which became the first Arab and African squad to reach a World Cup semi-final in 2022, Lekjaa joined the centrist Party of Authenticity and Modernity (PAM) back in July. With Morocco set to co-host the 2030 World Cup alongside Spain and Portugal, the football-mad nation has latched onto Lekjaa’s campaign, with videos of his rallies going viral online and crowds chanting the iconic “Sir” (meaning “Go” in Moroccan Arabic) catchphrase that defined the 2022 World Cup run. Lekjaa has leaned into this popularity, promising to lift Morocco to a top-six global ranking in education and healthcare—matching the current FIFA ranking of his national team. The ruling National Rally of Independents (RNI), led by incumbent Prime Minister Akhannouch, is seeking a second term, and has renewed its core campaign pledge to create one million new jobs by 2030, a promise that echoes across previous election cycles. Political analyst Rachid Aourraz, of the Moroccan Institute for Policy Analysis, says such promises are hollow. “The slogan ‘one million jobs’ has become an overused electoral slogan. There is also talk of raising the minimum wage, but what is proposed cannot withstand a structural inability to create stable net jobs,” Aourraz noted, adding that Morocco’s major parties do not compete over alternative governing models—only over how to implement policies already outlined by the royal palace. Alongside economic promises, foreign policy has also become a key dividing line in the campaign, with the Islamist Justice and Development Party (PJD) seeking a political comeback by weaponizing widespread public anger over Israel’s actions in Gaza. Morocco normalized diplomatic relations with Israel in 2020 as part of the US-brokered Abraham Accords, a deal negotiated when the PJD held power. Now led by populist former prime minister Abdelilah Benkirane, the party is running on a promise to fully cut diplomatic ties with Israel, calling the 2020 normalization a historic mistake. Widespread pro-Palestinian protests have rocked Morocco throughout the Gaza war, with tens of thousands demonstrating weekly in the capital Rabat, leading to the closure of Israel’s liaison office and the suspension of direct flights between the two countries. Despite this public outcry, Morocco and Israel announced earlier this month an agreement to reopen full reciprocal embassies, following talks between their top diplomats and the US ambassador to the United Nations. Benkirane has seized on the announcement to rally supporters, telling a Marrakesh campaign rally: “If we work hard, the king will close the Israeli embassy. The king does not like going against his own people.” For all the focus on winning youth votes, demographic data shows young people remain drastically underrepresented among the electorate: while more than half of Morocco’s 38.8 million population is under 35, just 4% of the 15.8 million registered voters are between 18 and 24. Many young Moroccans in the diaspora have also been shut out of participation, despite being at the forefront of last year’s protest movement. Hiba, a 27-year-old Moroccan living in Montreal, Canada—home to a community of more than 100,000 Moroccan expats—co-organized multiple pro-protest events for Gen Z in the city, where activists could speak freely without fear of prosecution that they would face at home. She says she would have voted via proxy, the only option for diaspora voters, but was unable to arrange for a representative in Morocco. Even so, she sees the protest movement as having already delivered small wins: “Gen Z protests didn’t go in vain. We achieved something. At least now we see more debates with young people on state TV,” she said. As polling stations open across the kingdom on Wednesday, the election will not only determine the makeup of the next government—it will also serve as a critical test of whether Morocco’s political establishment can address the deep-seated frustrations that have pushed a generation of young people to protest, risk dangerous migration, and question the status quo.