标签: Africa

非洲

  • What to know about new Ebola outbreak that has killed 65 people in Congo

    What to know about new Ebola outbreak that has killed 65 people in Congo

    Africa’s leading regional public health authority has officially declared a new Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s (DRC) northeastern Ituri province, triggering urgent coordinated response efforts across Central Africa amid alarming early mortality figures.

    In a formal statement released Friday, the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) announced that health workers have already documented 246 suspected cases and 65 fatalities linked to the outbreak across the affected region. To date, only four of the recorded deaths have received full laboratory confirmation, but public health officials formalized the outbreak declaration following a sustained surge in suspected infections.

    The outbreak is concentrated in the remote, under-resourced Mongwalu and Rwampara health zones of Ituri, a province located more than 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) from the DRC’s capital, Kinshasa. Suspected cases have also been identified in Bunia, Ituri’s provincial capital, highlighting early signs of geographic spread. The region’s underdeveloped road infrastructure and remote location have long complicated large-scale public health responses, a challenge that looms large over current containment work.

    Public health leaders have flagged multiple high-risk factors that could accelerate the virus’s spread beyond DRC’s borders. Most notably, the affected zones sit in close proximity to the national borders with Uganda and South Sudan, while frequent cross-border population movement, including migration linked to regional artisanal mining operations, creates constant transmission risk. Compounding this danger is the ongoing security crisis in Ituri, where violent attacks by armed groups over the past year have killed dozens of residents and displaced thousands, disrupting health care access and contact tracing efforts. Africa CDC also noted critical gaps in contact listing, a core process for identifying and isolating people exposed to the virus, as local teams work to scale up response operations.

    Despite these challenges, urgent action to contain the outbreak is already underway. The Africa CDC has partnered with Congolese national health authorities and global public health partners to launch a rapid, coordinated response. On the same day the outbreak was confirmed, the agency convened an emergency high-level coordination meeting bringing together health officials from DRC, Uganda, and South Sudan, alongside representatives from United Nations agencies, international donor nations, and global health organizations. The meeting focused on aligning priorities for immediate intervention, strengthening cross-border surveillance and coordination, establishing protocols for safe, dignified burials (a key step to reducing transmission), and mobilizing critical financial and logistical resources for the response.

    While safe, effective vaccines for Ebola do exist, response teams face significant logistical and financial barriers that mirror challenges from past outbreaks in the region. The DRC, Africa’s second-largest country by land area, has a long history of struggling to deploy rapid vaccine distributions due to poor infrastructure and vast distances between population centers. During a 2023 Ebola outbreak, for example, the World Health Organization required a full week to deliver vaccine doses after the outbreak was formally confirmed. Funding gaps have also plagued past responses, with public health officials raising alarms last year over the impact of United States funding cuts to outbreak response programs, even after the U.S. Agency for International Development contributed up to $11.5 million to support regional Ebola response efforts across Africa in 2021.

    This new outbreak marks the 17th recorded Ebola event in the DRC since the virus was first discovered in the country in 1976. It comes just five months after the DRC declared its previous Ebola outbreak over in December 2023, which claimed 43 lives. The 2022 outbreak in the country’s Equateur province killed six people, while the devastating 2018–2020 outbreak in eastern DRC killed more than 1,000 people — the deadliest Ebola event on record since the 2014–2016 outbreak across Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia that killed more than 11,000 people.

    First identified near the Ebola River in what is now the DRC, the Ebola virus is highly contagious and can jump to human populations from wild animal hosts. Once introduced to human communities, it spreads through direct contact with contaminated bodily fluids including blood, vomit, and semen, as well as contact with surfaces and materials such as bedding and clothing that have been exposed to these fluids. Ebola causes severe, often fatal illness in humans, with common symptoms including fever, muscle pain, vomiting, diarrhea, and in advanced cases, internal and external bleeding. The first documented outbreaks occurred in remote Central African villages near tropical rainforests, where human contact with wild animal populations put communities at risk.

  • New outbreak of Ebola kills 65 in eastern DR Congo

    New outbreak of Ebola kills 65 in eastern DR Congo

    The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC Africa) has publicly confirmed a new Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo’s northeastern Ituri Province, marking the 17th recorded occurrence of the deadly viral pathogen in the Central African nation since the virus was first discovered in 1976.

    According to the regional health body’s official statement released Friday, the outbreak has so far been linked to 246 suspected cases and 65 confirmed deaths, with the vast majority of infections concentrated in two gold-mining communities: Mongwalu and Rwampara. Preliminary laboratory analysis conducted by the Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale (INRB) in DR Congo’s capital Kinshasa has returned positive Ebola results for 13 out of 20 tested samples, with just four of the total fatalities recorded among lab-confirmed cases. Health officials are also awaiting test results for additional suspected cases that have recently emerged in Bunia, Ituri’s provincial capital.

    As of Friday afternoon, the Congolese national government had not yet issued an official declaration of the outbreak, with a senior government staffer confirming to the BBC that a formal press conference addressing the situation was scheduled for later the same day.

    To contain the spread of the virus, CDC Africa announced it has convened an urgent coordination meeting with DR Congo’s national health authorities, alongside neighboring nations Uganda and South Sudan, and other global public health partners. The gathering will focus on aligning rapid response measures and strengthening cross-border disease surveillance, a critical step to prevent the outbreak from spilling into adjacent countries.

    Ebola, which scientists believe originates in fruit bat populations, first emerged in what is now DR Congo in 1976. The virus spreads exclusively through direct contact with infected bodily fluids, and causes rapid onset of severe symptoms including fever, muscle aches, extreme fatigue, sore throat, and eventually progresses to widespread internal bleeding and organ failure. To date, no definitive cure for Ebola exists, though early supportive care significantly improves patient survival outcomes.

    The current outbreak unfolds against a complex security backdrop in Ituri, which has been under direct military rule since 2021. The Congolese government imposed military governance on the region to counter a decades-long presence of dozens of armed insurgent groups, including the Islamic State-affiliated Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), which has carried out frequent attacks on civilian and government targets across the province for years. This security instability poses additional challenges to rapid deployment of public health response teams to affected communities.

    DR Congo has a long history of Ebola outbreaks, with the country’s deadliest event on record occurring between 2018 and 2020, when the virus claimed nearly 2,300 lives. Just last year, an outbreak in the country’s central Kasai Province killed 45 people. Across all African nations, Ebola has killed approximately 50,000 people since it was first identified 50 years ago.

  • Africa’s top health body confirms new Ebola outbreak in remote Congo province

    Africa’s top health body confirms new Ebola outbreak in remote Congo province

    KINSHASA, Democratic Republic of the Congo — Africa’s leading public health authority, the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC), announced Friday the official confirmation of a fresh Ebola outbreak in the remote northeastern province of Ituri. As of the announcement, the emerging outbreak has recorded 246 suspected infections and 65 fatalities across affected areas.

    Per the agency’s official statement, the vast majority of suspected cases and deaths have been concentrated in two local health zones: Mongwalu and Rwampara. Of the laboratory-confirmed cases identified to date, four have ended in death, while a small number of additional suspected cases detected in the regional city of Bunia are still awaiting confirmatory testing, Africa CDC added.

    First identified in what is now the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in 1976, the Ebola virus is an extremely contagious pathogen that spreads through direct contact with infected bodily fluids including blood, vomit, and semen. While infections remain relatively rare, the disease it triggers causes severe, often life-threatening illness with a high fatality rate.

    This latest public health emergency comes just five months after the DRC declared an end to its previous Ebola outbreak, which claimed 43 lives before being contained. Friday’s confirmation marks the 17th Ebola outbreak the country has faced since the virus was first discovered on its soil nearly five decades ago. The deadliest recent outbreak occurred between 2018 and 2020 in eastern DRC, killing more than 2,000 people.

    Ituri, the epicenter of the new outbreak, is a remote region located more than 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) from the DRC’s capital Kinshasa, marked by underdeveloped, fragmented road infrastructure that complicates rapid response efforts. The challenge of containing the outbreak is compounded by long-running instability in eastern DRC, where the central government has battled multiple active armed insurgencies for years.

    The M23 rebel group, which launched a large-scale offensive in early 2023, currently occupies key population centers in the region, while Ituri specifically faces ongoing attacks from the Allied Democratic Forces, a militant organization linked to the Islamic State that has killed dozens of civilians in recent months across the province.

    As Africa’s second-largest country by land area, the DRC has long struggled with systemic logistical barriers to rapid disease outbreak response. During the 2023 Ebola outbreak, which spanned three months, the World Health Organization reported major early hurdles to rolling out vaccination campaigns, hobbled by limited access to affected communities and critical funding shortages.

    Public health experts warn that the combination of poor infrastructure, ongoing conflict, and historical response gaps create significant risks that this new Ebola outbreak could spread faster than response teams can contain it, placing added strain on the already overstretched local health system.

  • Zimbabwe’s vivid English first names carry family histories, from Privilege to Shame

    Zimbabwe’s vivid English first names carry family histories, from Privilege to Shame

    In Zimbabwe, a country in southern Africa with a deep, layered cultural history, naming a newborn child is far more than a simple act of assigning personal identity. Unlike the common practice of picking names for aesthetic or familial tradition in many parts of the world, Zimbabwean naming conventions turn common English words into living, breathing narratives that capture the emotions, struggles, joys and circumstances of a family at the moment a child enters the world.

    For 37-year-old Harare bar manager Privilege Mubani, her name only revealed its full, meaningful backstory as she entered adulthood. Raised never questioning the moniker she carried from birth, Mubani finally asked her father to explain the choice behind her name. What she learned unlocked an unexpected story of stigma, resilience, and quiet gratitude.

    Mubani’s mother had become pregnant before marriage, a status heavily stigmatized in Zimbabwe’s conservative social landscape, where single motherhood is widely frowned upon. Having already resigned herself to a lifetime of unmarried status and public judgment, her mother was surprised when a suitor chose to marry her despite the social stigma attached to her pregnancy. The experience left her feeling redeemed after months of public mockery for carrying a so-called “fatherless” child. “Naming me Privilege was her own expression of gratitude,” Mubani explained with a grin.

    Zimbabwe’s widespread use of English words for given names traces its roots partially to the country’s history as a former British colony, as well as its status as a majority Christian nation, where English remains the official language and the dominant medium of instruction in schools and government operations. But experts explain that the practice of embedding personal and social narrative into names runs much deeper than colonial influence.

    David Chikwaza, a decolonization researcher at Dublin City University’s School of History and Geography, notes that pre-colonial African naming traditions have long carried deep symbolic weight, rooted in the region’s spiritually oriented cultural norms. “Parents would name their child as a way of addressing a societal or a personal issue,” Chikwaza explained. “Colonialism promoted English as a language of sophistication, so Africans simply turned to the English vocabulary for expression, but the meanings remain the same” as they did in pre-colonial naming practices.

    This one-of-a-kind naming culture has often caught the attention of international observers and outsiders. During the 2024 African Cup of Nations soccer tournament, Zimbabwe’s national men’s team went viral on social media worldwide, after users were struck by the striking, meaningful names on the team roster: players including Teenage, Godknows, Divine, Marvellous, Knowledge, Prince and Prosper sparked widespread amusement and fascination on platforms like TikTok, where one user commented she could barely believe the names were real.

    The unusual names have also become a source of comedy for international performers. Learnmore Jonasi, a Zimbabwean comedian who reached the finals of *America’s Got Talent* in 2024, regularly draws laughs from U.S. audiences by joking about his own name and the wide array of unconventional monikers common back home. Beyond Privilege and Learnmore, common names that raise eyebrows abroad include Givemore, Best, Promise, Guarantee, Anxious, Innocent, Confidence, and Hardlife—all of which are unremarkable within Zimbabwe.

    For many Zimbabweans, these narrative names are a source of deep personal pride, and many see their names as a standard to live up to. Lovejoy Mutongwiza, a 33-year-old journalist and chief executive of independent online news outlet 263chat, describes his name as a perfect reflection of his own identity and his parents’ experience. “My mum and dad said they were madly in love and in a happy place in their lives when they conceived me, so they aptly named me Lovejoy,” he said. “It’s a befitting name. I think I have lived up to it because I am rarely angry. I am naturally a bubbly person.”

    Even those with names that outsiders might see as burdensome or negative embrace their monikers as part of their cultural and family heritage. Fifty-one-year-old Shame Chikwana has never felt ashamed of his name, and turned down repeated pressure from his sister to change it to a more conventional name as an adult. “I would never trade it for any other name. I was named after my late grandfather so it’s a heritage I am carrying,” Chikwana said, adding that his parents have never shared why his grandfather received the name. “I hope it stays within the family for generations to come.”

  • A surge in violence followed Trump’s cuts to USAID programs in Africa, a study finds

    A surge in violence followed Trump’s cuts to USAID programs in Africa, a study finds

    A new academic study published Thursday in the journal *Science* has uncovered a clear correlation between former U.S. President Donald Trump’s 2025 sudden decision to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) — a historic leading global aid provider — and a sharp, sustained rise in violent conflict across aid-dependent regions of Africa.

    For decades, USAID anchored international development and humanitarian support across Africa, channeling critical funding to fragile states grappling with insurgency, post-conflict recovery and civilian crises. The Trump administration’s dissolution of the agency terminated more than 90 percent of active foreign aid contracts, wiping out an estimated $60 billion in committed development funding. The sudden pullout disrupted ongoing aid operations, halted planned programming, and left gaps in staffing, service delivery and procurement across communities that relied entirely on USAID support, the study found.

    A team of researchers from European and American universities analyzed conflict patterns across African regions that had historically received the highest volumes of USAID assistance to reach their conclusions. While the study’s authors stop short of definitively attributing the violence increase solely to the aid cuts, they emphasize that the data confirms a key risk: large-scale, abrupt withdrawals of development aid can severely destabilize already fragile political and social contexts. Crucially, the researchers clarify the findings do not prove that increased foreign aid inherently reduces conflict — they only demonstrate the measurable destabilizing effect of sudden, unplanned disruption to long-standing aid programming.

    The study’s conclusions come amid growing alarm over rising extremist violence across Africa. A separate report released Wednesday by the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) echoed this concern, noting that jihadist-linked violence has grown steadily across the continent over the past four years, with insurgents increasingly targeting civilian populations.

    Case studies included in the new *Science* study illustrate the gaps left by USAID’s exit. In northeast Nigeria, the agency had long supported civilian victims of the Boko Haram insurgency, which has displaced millions and killed tens of thousands since 2002. In Ethiopia’s war-ravaged Tigray region, local authorities depended heavily on USAID funding to launch post-conflict recovery after a two-year civil war that claimed hundreds of thousands of lives. And in northern Ivory Coast, a frontline in regional counter-extremism efforts, USAID had committed significant resources to programs blocking the expansion of al-Qaida and Islamic State-affiliated groups.

    Outside experts warn the damage from USAID’s abrupt dissolution will outlast the funding gap itself. Nathaniel Raymond, executive director of the Humanitarian Research Lab at the Yale School of Public Health, who was not involved in the study, noted that even if funding is eventually restored, much of the institutional knowledge and on-the-ground program experience built up over decades by USAID staff has already been lost.

    Ladd Serwat, senior Africa analyst at ACLED, added that many USAID programs were designed to stop conflict from spreading across borders and into stable communities. “We now see increasing insurgency and spillover, so some of those programs may have supported these communities against insurgent threats, and now they are no longer active,” Serwat explained.

  • African fans face World Cup issues despite visa bond U-turn

    African fans face World Cup issues despite visa bond U-turn

    As the 2026 FIFA World Cup prepares to welcome a historic 10 African national teams to the tri-nation tournament co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, a last-minute policy adjustment from the Trump administration has offered only limited relief to traveling supporters, leaving a host of costly and bureaucratic barriers still in place for fans from the continent.

    In a confirmation issued late Wednesday, the White House announced it would waive the mandatory visa bond requirement for ticket-holding fans from five African countries – Algeria, Cape Verde, Ivory Coast, Senegal and Tunisia – that were included in a broader 2025 immigration rule. The policy, which imposes bonds ranging from $5,000 to $15,000 on visitors from 50 nations, was crafted to curb visa overstays as part of the administration’s wider immigration crackdown. For fans who meet the exemption criteria, the change eliminates a potential $15,000 financial burden ahead of their trip.

    “We are waiving visa bonds for qualified fans who bought World Cup tickets,” U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Mora Namdar confirmed in a statement shared with BBC Sport Africa. However, the exemption comes with a critical caveat: only supporters who registered their valid match tickets through FIFA’s online FIFA Pass system by the 15 April cutoff date qualify for the waived bond. The FIFA Pass system, launched last November, was originally designed to help ticket holders secure expedited visa appointment processing.

    FIFA welcomed the policy shift in an official statement, framing it as proof of the governing body’s productive collaboration with the Trump administration “to deliver a successful, record-breaking and unforgettable global event.” But for thousands of African fans hoping to attend the tournament, the announcement has come too late to remove obstacles to their travel.

    It remains unclear whether fans from the five affected countries who purchase last-minute match tickets after the registration deadline will still be required to pay the full visa bond. Worse, persistent travel restrictions remain in place for supporters from Ivory Coast and Senegal under the administration’s ongoing entry ban: any fan from these two nations who did not secure a valid U.S. visitor visa before December 2025 will be automatically barred from entering the country for the tournament.

    The partial exemption also does nothing to resolve widespread visa challenges for fans from other African qualified nations. BBC Sport Africa has confirmed that multiple Ghanaian supporters, whose team will play group stage matches in Boston and Philadelphia, have already been denied U.S. entry visas, despite not being subject to the visa bond requirement.

    Beyond visa hurdles, African fans face a cascade of additional financial and logistical challenges that put in-person attendance out of reach for many. The 2026 tournament is spread across three North American countries, requiring most fans to cross multiple international borders just to attend their team’s group stage matches. Only Algeria, Cape Verde and Morocco will play all their group stage games exclusively on U.S. soil. Egypt, Ghana, Ivory Coast and Senegal all have group stage fixtures in Canada, requiring additional Canadian entry visas, while DR Congo, South Africa and Tunisia will play at least one match in Mexico, bringing another set of entry requirements.

    Ticket costs have also reached prohibitive levels for most casual supporters from the continent. As of mid-January, the only tickets available under $1,170 for any of the first 10 matches featuring African teams were $600 seats for Egypt’s group stage fixture against Belgium, listed on FIFA’s official ticketing portal. Remaining tickets for the tournament’s opening match between Mexico and South Africa are listed for $3,840 apiece on the primary market, while FIFA’s official resale platform has seen even more extreme inflation: two category three upper-tier seats for the Mexico City opener are being resold for a staggering $34,500 per ticket.

    On top of steep ticket prices, transcontinental flights, cross-border transit and accommodation across North America carry far higher price tags than most African fans can afford. Adding another layer of uncertainty, the U.S. government late last year expanded entry requirements to demand five years of social media history from most tourists applying for visitor visas, a policy change that rights groups warn opens the door to racial profiling, arbitrary entry denials, heightened surveillance and increased risk of arrest for traveling supporters.

    With 78 of the tournament’s 104 total matches set to be held on U.S. soil, the Trump administration’s partial climb-down on visa bonds marks a small win for African fans, but it does little to address the sweeping barriers that will keep most supporters from the continent from cheering on their nations in person this summer.

  • Over 40% of Sudan’s population face high levels of acute food insecurity, monitoring group warns

    Over 40% of Sudan’s population face high levels of acute food insecurity, monitoring group warns

    CAIRO – As Sudan’s brutal civil conflict approaches its second full year, a leading global food security monitoring body has delivered a grim new assessment, revealing that more than two-fifths of the war-ravaged nation’s population is already suffering from extreme levels of acute hunger. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a global initiative that tracks and grades food insecurity worldwide, published its updated analysis Thursday, laying bare the catastrophic humanitarian fallout of the 14-month-old war between Sudan’s regular army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) paramilitary group.

    According to the report, nearly 19.5 million Sudanese are currently experiencing high levels of acute food insecurity. Of this vulnerable population, 135,000 people are already in the most severe IPC Phase 5, a classification defined by catastrophic food shortages, widespread starvation, acute malnutrition at critical levels, and elevated mortality from hunger and preventable disease.

    The IPC’s assessment warns that the situation is on track to worsen dramatically in the coming months, as Sudan enters the annual June-to-September lean season, when crop supplies from the previous harvest are depleted before new yields can be harvested. Looking ahead to 2026, the group projects that roughly 825,000 children under the age of five will develop severe acute malnutrition – a life-threatening condition that disproportionately kills young children in conflict zones. That figure marks a 7% rise from 2024 levels, and a 25% jump from the rates of severe child malnutrition recorded before the war erupted.

    Even with limited aid access, more than 98,500 children have already received life-saving treatment for severe acute malnutrition in the first three months of 2025, according to IPC data. But widespread gaps in healthcare and humanitarian access leave hundreds of thousands more without the care they need to survive.

    Sudan’s ongoing civil conflict ignited in April 2023, when years of festering power-sharing tensions between the national army and the RSF boiled over into open armed confrontation across the country. The fighting has already killed at least 59,000 people, displaced roughly 13 million Sudanese from their homes, and pushed vast swathes of the country to the brink of mass starvation. Currently, more than 30 million Sudanese – over two-thirds of the country’s pre-war population – require emergency humanitarian assistance to meet basic survival needs.

    While the IPC confirmed that no regions across Sudan are currently classified as being in formal famine, the organization warned that 14 local areas across three hard-hit provinces – North Darfur, South Darfur and South Kordofan – are at imminent risk of famine if conflict intensifies, food access continues to shrink, healthcare and sanitation infrastructure further collapses, and more people are forced to flee their homes. Famine was formally confirmed in two Sudanese locations last year: el-Fasher, the largest city in western Darfur, and Kadugli, the capital of South Kordofan.

    Compounding the existing crisis driven by internal conflict, Sudan’s agricultural sector – the backbone of the country’s food supply – is facing new, external pressures that threaten to deepen food shortages in the coming months. Farmers across the country are bracing for a prohibitively expensive planting season, as key input costs for fertilizer, fuel for farm machinery, and diesel for irrigation pumps have skyrocketed, driven in large part by ongoing tensions in the Middle East that have disrupted global supply chains.

    More than half of Sudan’s imported fertilizer arrives via sea routes from the Gulf region, where hundreds of commercial vessels have been stranded in recent weeks amid heightened tensions around the Strait of Hormuz. The resulting supply disruptions have pushed domestic fuel prices in Sudan up by roughly 30%, making it even harder for small-scale farmers to plant the crops that would feed millions in the coming year.

  • Springboks’ Ntlabakanye given 18-month doping ban

    Springboks’ Ntlabakanye given 18-month doping ban

    South African international rugby prop Asenathi Ntlabakanye, who features for the Johannesburg-based Lions franchise, has received an 18-month competition ban after being found in violation of global anti-doping regulations. The sanction will effectively exclude the 27-year-old front-rower from competing at the 2027 Rugby World Cup hosted in Australia.

    The case dates back to a routine out-of-competition test conducted in 2025, where Ntlabakanye returned a positive result for Anastrozole, a classified hormone and metabolic modulator. While a positive test for this substance alone does not trigger an automatic mandatory suspension under current anti-doping frameworks, the prop further complicated his case when he voluntarily admitted to also using Dehydroepiandrosterone, more commonly known as DHEA.

    According to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), DHEA is categorized as a banned substance because it works to naturally boost the body’s testosterone production. Elevated testosterone levels accelerate muscle recovery and growth, which can deliver an unfair competitive advantage to athletes who use the compound. Court documents confirm Ntlabakanye told investigators he was unaware DHEA was prohibited, believing it was a permitted supplement.

    Following formal charges brought by the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS), an independent anti-doping tribunal reviewed the evidence and handed down the 18-month suspension. The ban officially entered into force on 13 May 2025, and is scheduled to end in November 2026 – which falls after the conclusion of the 2027 Rugby World Cup in Australia. Ntlabakanye retains the right to launch an appeal against the ruling within a 21-day window from the announcement of the decision.

    In an official statement confirming the sanction, the Lions Rugby Company acknowledged that SAIDS had notified the club of the anti-doping rule violation. The franchise added that it would stand by the player throughout the remainder of the process, saying: “During this time, the Lions Rugby Company will continue to support Ntlabakanye as he navigates the process ahead.”

    Ntlabakanye earned his first senior international cap for the Springboks against Italy in July 2025, and went on to feature in two more test matches for the world-famous national side, bringing his total senior South Africa caps to three before the ban was announced. His final outing for the Lions came just last Saturday, where the Johannesburg side fell to defeat against Irish giants Leinster in the United Rugby Championship.

  • Former Nigerian minister sentenced to 75 years in rare corruption verdict

    Former Nigerian minister sentenced to 75 years in rare corruption verdict

    In a landmark conviction that has sent shockwaves through Nigeria’s political landscape, former Nigerian Power Minister Saleh Mamman has been handed a 75-year prison sentence for laundering 33.8 billion naira (equivalent to roughly $24.7 million), marking one of the rare high-profile convictions of corrupt senior officials in the West African nation.

    The 68-year-old ex-minister, who led Nigeria’s power sector from 2015 to 2021 under former President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration, was found guilty last week on 12 separate corruption charges. Prosecutors proved that Mamman used privately owned front companies to siphon and launder public funds allocated for government-backed power infrastructure projects.

    In an unusual turn of proceedings, the Abuja High Court handed down the sentence on Wednesday in absentia. Nigeria’s lead anti-graft agency, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), confirmed that Mamman has gone missing, and has been untraceable since the guilty verdict was issued. Just days after his conviction, the court issued a formal arrest warrant for the former minister on Monday. Mamman has not issued any public response to the charges or conviction.

    What makes the case even more remarkable is the timing: just weeks before his sentencing, Mamman officially announced his intention to run for governor of Taraba State in Nigeria’s 2027 general election, running on the ticket of the country’s ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). He made the announcement in a social media post, writing that he had picked up his Expression of Interest and Nomination Forms “with a deep sense of responsibility and unwavering commitment” to serve the state.

    Buhari, whose administration campaigned on a promise to crack down on endemic public sector corruption, ultimately removed Mamman from his cabinet in a 2021 reshuffle following what the presidency described as an “independent and critical self-review” of government performance.

    Along with the prison sentence, the high court ordered Mamman to repay 22 billion naira ($16 million) of the laundered funds to the Nigerian government. His conviction is part of a broader ongoing anti-corruption crackdown by the EFCC targeting former senior government officials. The agency is currently pursuing investigations into other high-profile figures, including former Justice Minister Abubakar Malami and former Humanitarian Affairs Minister Sadiya Umar Farouq, who was recently declared a wanted person by the EFCC. Both officials have denied all allegations against them.

    The verdict has also reignited long-simmering public anger over Nigeria’s ongoing national electricity crisis, a problem Mamman was tasked with solving during his tenure as power minister. Despite being one of Africa’s largest energy producers, Nigeria suffers from chronic, nationwide power shortages that bring frequent, extended blackouts to residential and commercial areas across the country. Millions of households and businesses are forced to rely on expensive private fuel-powered generators, and soaring global fuel prices have left countless Nigerians unable to afford the cost of backup power, deepening economic hardship across the country.

  • Underwater memorial to wrecked slave ship draws pilgrims seeking to connect with their roots

    Underwater memorial to wrecked slave ship draws pilgrims seeking to connect with their roots

    Off the sun-dappled coast of Key West, Florida, Ruthie Browning slipped into the glassy Atlantic waters in early May, expecting nothing more than a quiet moment of respect at a sunken memorial. She had joined a cohort of Black divers and community advocates on a journey to a sacred maritime site: the final resting place of the Henrietta Marie, a British slave ship that sank 326 years ago, at the height of the brutal trans-Atlantic slave trade.

    The vessel’s tragic story is etched into the seafloor: after delivering 200 kidnapped West African people into chattel slavery in Jamaica, the ship set sail for Britain in 1700, only to be swallowed by a storm at New Ground Reef, where the Atlantic merges with the Gulf of Mexico. Today, a six-meter-deep concrete marker anchors the site, a permanent tribute to the lives stolen and forever altered by the trans-Atlantic slave trade. Browning arrived ready to observe, honor, and depart—but the moment she reached the marker, an unexpected wave of emotion overtook her.

    Staring at the memorial, now a thriving micro-reef draped in soft corals and sponges, tears flooded her eyes. As she quieted her mind to listen, she felt a gentle, unmistakeable connection to the ancestors whose stories the site holds: “My daughter, we’re so glad you’re here.” Overwhelmed by gratitude, she lingered at the marker, which bears the inscription: “Henrietta Marie. In memory and recognition of the courage, pain and suffering on enslaved African people. Speak her name and gently touch the souls of our ancestors.” “Without their stamina, their spirit and survival, I wouldn’t be here today. None of us would be here today,” Browning reflected after her dive.

    This pilgrimage was years in the making. The group’s 2023 attempt to reach the site was foiled by dangerously choppy waters, which group members framed as a sign the timing was not right. “The ancestors were not smiling down on us then,” said Jay Haigler, a master diving instructor with Underwater Adventure Seekers, the world’s oldest Black scuba diving club. “This year was different.”

    Michael Cottman, an author of two books on the Henrietta Marie and a member of the National Association of Black Scuba Divers that installed the memorial in 1992, noted that this journey was never supposed to be simple. The site carries what he calls “spiritual turbulence”: “Even if it wasn’t carrying enslaved people, it embodies the oppression of our people.” After annual pilgrimages in the 1990s lapsed, the 2024 trip was revived by an underwater oral history project led by Stanford University anthropologist Ayana Omilade Flewellen, who serves on the board of Diving With a Purpose, a Black-led nonprofit dedicated to documenting and preserving slave shipwreck sites.

    For Flewellen, the submerged interviews conducted during the pilgrimage became a deeply personal spiritual practice. “I felt a kind of tenderness in my heart,” she said. Processing the traumatic history of death and suffering that defines the site has long been a challenge, she explained: “It’s hard to attach your life with this history. The only way I could do that was turn toward what the divers were experiencing on this pilgrimage. That’s where it all bloomed and blossomed.”

    Beyond the underwater memorial, the pilgrimage also included a land-based ritual at Higgs Beach, where 297 African refugees who were rescued from three illegal slave ships in 1860 are buried. After the U.S. Navy intercepted the ships *Wildfire*, *William* and *Bogota*, the government housed more than 1,400 surviving refugees in a coastal compound, but hundreds died from the devastating health effects of their inhumane confinement on the crossing, explained Corey Malcom, lead historian at the Florida Keys History Center.

    Forgotten for nearly 150 years, the burial ground was rediscovered by researchers using ground-penetrating radar, and in 2010 a mass grave holding 100 additional bodies was found at a nearby community dog park, which has since been fenced off to protect the site. During this year’s pilgrimage, the group gathered at the cemetery to hold a traditional libation ceremony, an ancient Afro-Caribbean spiritual practice. One by one, members poured white rum—believed to act as a messenger between the living and ancestral worlds—onto the sand, tearfully honoring the lives lost. “To honor your ancestors and the road they’ve traveled is very, very important because we’re all connected,” said Addeliar Guy, a group elder and lifelong diver.

    For many participants, the most striking revelation of the pilgrimage was that the Henrietta Marie site is not merely a place of death and grief—it is a place of living history. Joel Johnson, president and CEO of the National Marine Sanctuary Foundation, trained for weeks to complete his first open-water dive at the site. He was surprised by the vibrant life that now surrounds the memorial: colorful fish dart through swaying corals, and seashells dot the sandy seafloor. Protecting these marine habitats, he said, is inextricably linked to protecting the history they hold. “This was not a place of death, but a place of life,” Johnson explained. “I didn’t feel like I was grieving for my ancestors. I felt like I was in the stream of history, recognizing that I’m a part of that. It made me happy.”

    Michael Philip Davenport, president of Underwater Adventure Seekers, left the site inspired to create new art depicting ancestors emerging from the memorial. “Their spirituality is still in that space,” he said. “I was feeling their lives and their tragedy.”

    For Dr. Melody Garrett, an anesthesiologist who has worked with Diving With a Purpose to locate another slave shipwreck, the Guerrero, this pilgrimage is more urgent now than ever. She pointed to recent political efforts to erase references to slavery and Black history from U.S. national parks and federal cultural institutions, including moves during the Trump administration that labeled teachings on slavery as divisive “anti-American propaganda.” As the United States prepares to mark its 250th founding anniversary, Garrett said the site reinforces a fundamental truth about American identity: “Black people have been here since before this country’s inception, longer than many other people have. This is our country.”

    Fragments of the Henrietta Marie’s wooden hull still rest beneath the sand at the wreck site. Discovered in 1972 by treasure hunter Mel Fisher, the wreck was fully excavated in 1983, yielding hundreds of intact artifacts. Out of an estimated 35,000 ships that transported more than 12 million enslaved African people across the Atlantic, only a handful have ever been located—most were destroyed intentionally to cover up evidence of the illicit trade. Today, the Henrietta Marie’s artifacts fill an entire floor of Key West’s Mel Fisher Maritime Museum, including more than 80 sets of iron shackles, many sized for children.

    When Kory Lamberts, who runs a nonprofit working to expand equitable access to aquatic recreation, first visited the exhibit, the wooden display planks creaked under his feet, and the gravity of the history hit him instantly. “It was visceral,” he said. “It took me to a place. It also tells me that these were young people — children. These are baby shackles. There’s no sugarcoating it. The truth really hits you.” After his dive, Lamberts brought back fish caught near the Henrietta Marie site—fish he believes carry the ancestral DNA of those who died there. The group ate the fish for dinner the night after their dives, a quiet sacrament of connection. “I don’t practice a faith, but isn’t this what people are doing every Sunday at church?” he asked. “I wasn’t just bonded with this site through the experience of being there, but at this molecular level with a full circle moment of connection with myself and my history.”

    This coverage of religious and cultural practice is supported by the Associated Press through a partnership with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP holds sole responsibility for this content.