分类: world

  • Palestinian Islamic Jihad co-founder threatened with ‘unlawful’ deportation from Syria

    Palestinian Islamic Jihad co-founder threatened with ‘unlawful’ deportation from Syria

    Eleven months after Syrian security forces seized 71-year-old Adel al-Natour, a co-founder of the Palestinian armed faction Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), the elderly Palestinian refugee remains in arbitrary detention with no formal charges, no access to legal representation, and limited contact with his family, his relatives have confirmed in an exclusive interview with Middle East Eye.

    Natour was taken into custody from his family home in a Damascus suburb on September 18 last year. What makes his detention particularly striking is that Natour officially cut all ties with PIJ nearly 30 years ago, back in 1995, after growing disillusioned with the group’s leadership and external influence. According to his family, only four supervised visits have been permitted since his arrest. When they finally saw him four months into his detention, they discovered he had lost 20 kilograms due to poor conditions behind bars.

    “Our entire immediate family is internally displaced in Gaza, living in tents after the recent war, and he was completely cut off from all news – he didn’t even know the conflict had ended,” said Israa al-Natour, Adel’s daughter and a public sector employee. For months, the family stayed silent amid repeated promises from Syrian security officials that Natour would be imminently released. Authorities initially claimed he was detained to protect him from unspecified threats to his life, offering no further details about the grounds for his arrest. That silence broke this weekend, when security officials notified the family that Natour would be deported from Syria within 10 days.

    A lifelong Palestinian political activist, Natour was born in 1955 to a poor refugee family in the Rafah refugee camp in the Gaza Strip. He helped found PIJ in 1981 as a movement opposing Israeli occupation, but his activism has already led to decades of displacement and repeated detentions across the Middle East. Shortly after co-founding the group, he was detained without trial by Israeli authorities, then deported first to Egypt, then to Greece, before finding temporary refuge in Algeria. He was allowed to return to Gaza in 1986, only to be deported again ahead of the First Intifada. A third return in 1990 led to another expulsion, this time with a permanent ban on re-entering Gaza, forcing him to settle first in Libya before moving to Syria with his family in 1992.

    In 1995, Natour formally left PIJ, stepping away from all political and armed activity in protest of growing Iranian interference in the faction. “He believed Iran only funded PIJ as a tool to pressure Israel, not out of genuine commitment to the Palestinian cause,” Israa explained. “He also came to the conclusion that armed resistance only led to endless Palestinian deaths, without advancing the goal of ending occupation.”

    Natour’s history of detention in Syria predates the current government: he was arrested by the former Assad government in 2008 and held for three months in the notorious Palestine Branch prison before being released. When the 2011 Syrian revolution broke out, Natour opened his home in Damascus’ Yarmouk Camp to hide opposition activists, and advocated fiercely for Palestinian factions to remain neutral in Syria’s internal conflict. When fighting broke out in Yarmouk in 2012, he fled the camp, earning a reputation as a neutral humanitarian advocate who provided aid to displaced people regardless of their political alignment. “People called him the Godfather of Yarmouk Camp,” Israa said. “He trusted everyone, even when it put him in danger.”

    Today, Natour’s family is fighting to overturn the deportation order, but their efforts have hit a dead end. Because no formal charges have ever been filed against Natour, courts and lawyers have refused to take up his case. As Palestinian refugees holding only Syrian residency, not citizenship, the family says deportation would leave them stateless. Most countries routinely deny entry visas to Palestinians, and all of the family’s travel documents were seized during the original raid on their home. The family has explored seeking temporary entry to Malaysia, which allows Palestinian tourists to enter without a visa, but they have no guarantee Natour would be granted residency there, leaving him at risk of displacement yet again.

    “Given the option, my father would rather remain in prison than be deported,” Israa said. “Our lives, our work, everything is here – Syria is our second home.”

    Human rights groups have condemned Natour’s detention as unlawful, framing it as part of a broader pattern of arbitrary detentions under Syria’s new interim government led by President Ahmed al-Sharaa, which seized power in December 2024. “Even if he had broken a Syrian law, even if he is not a citizen, he is entitled to due process: a fair trial, the right to know the charges against him, the right to legal representation, and protection from torture and enforced disappearance,” said Bassam Alahmad, executive director of Syrians for Truth and Justice. His organization has documented nearly two dozen cases of enforced disappearance and more than 12 deaths under torture in custody since the new administration took power.

    Natour’s son Muamen warned that the deportation would set a dangerous precedent for the hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees who have made Syria their home for decades. “My father wanted to help build a new, free Syria after the fall of Assad,” he said. “But justice was supposed to be one of the core goals of the revolution. Oppression and forced disappearances have no place here.”

    As of publication, Middle East Eye had reached out to the Syrian Ministry of Interior for comment on the case but had not received a response.

  • A pregnant soldier mourns her 21-year-old husband at his funeral in Ukraine

    A pregnant soldier mourns her 21-year-old husband at his funeral in Ukraine

    KYIV, Ukraine — On a crisp Tuesday in Kyiv, a 21-year-old pregnant widow in a simple black dress stood at the head of her fallen husband’s casket, grieving a love story cut short by Russia’s ongoing full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Yeva and Danyil Smyrnov, both 18 when they enlisted in Ukraine’s armed forces in 2023, tied the knot just two years later in July 2025. Eager to build a life together amid the chaos of war, the young couple rushed to start their family before Danyil’s deployment to the front lines.

  • Sharpeville massacre survivors file class action lawsuit in South Africa

    Sharpeville massacre survivors file class action lawsuit in South Africa

    More than 60 years after one of the bloodiest atrocities of South Africa’s apartheid era, survivors and bereaved relatives of the Sharpeville Massacre have taken a historic step to pursue long-denied justice, announcing a class-action lawsuit against the national government this Thursday.

    The announcement came during a press briefing held in the Sharpeville township itself, located just south of Johannesburg. Before the formal reveal, family members of those killed in the 1960 violence completed a quiet, solemn procession along the same path that the original 1960 protesters took, acting as living witnesses to the tragedy that still shapes the community today.

    On March 21, 1960, apartheid police opened fire on a crowd of unarmed demonstrators gathered to oppose the racist pass laws that tightly restricted Black South Africans’ movement and rights under the segregationist regime. The deadly crackdown immediately drew global condemnation, and the event became a defining turning point in the international movement to end apartheid. Today, the date is commemorated across South Africa as Human Rights Day, a national public holiday.

    Official apartheid-era police records list the official death toll as 69, with 180 people injured. But new research cited by the lawsuit plaintiffs puts the actual casualties much higher: at least 91 killed and more than 230 wounded. Many families still carry intergenerational trauma from the attack.

    Eighty-seven-year-old Abram Mofokeng is one of three lead representative plaintiffs for the class, which counts more than 70 survivors and relatives who have already committed to joining the litigation. Mofokeng was just 20 years old when he was shot in the foot and back while fleeing the gunfire, and a bullet remains lodged in his back to this day. “It is not possible to forget what happened in 1960,” he said. “I cannot go a day without thinking about how we have been affected.”

    The other lead plaintiffs, Paulina Mathinye and Ishmael Poho, both lost their fathers in the massacre when they were small children. Poho emphasized that the lawsuit extends far beyond individual financial compensation, noting that the harm of the massacre has rippled across the entire Sharpeville community for generations. “This is not a case for an individual as such,” he said. “It is a case for every other person who suffers an injustice.”

    Central to the legal fight is a demand to strike down the 1961 Indemnity Act, a law enacted by the apartheid government immediately after the massacre that has remained on South Africa’s books ever since. The legislation shields apartheid-era officials from all legal liability for the massacre and wiped all existing victim compensation claims off the books. After the massacre, 250 claims were originally filed, but only around a third received any discretionary payments, with the total amount coming to less than 4% of what victims had originally requested.

    If the court strikes down the 1961 law, the plaintiffs will be able to move forward with formal damages claims. Lawyers from Lawyers for Human Rights, which is bringing the case alongside international human rights law firm Leigh Day, note that the legislation violates the current South African constitution’s guarantee of access to the courts. Compensation amounts will be individualized for each claimant, set with input from independent experts, and no total collective value has been announced yet.

    The legal action also addresses gaps in the post-apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission process, which only granted formal reparations to 51 Sharpeville Massacre survivors, leaving hundreds of affected people without recognition or support. As of press time, the current South African government has not issued any public response to requests for comment on the new lawsuit.

    This legal push is part of a growing nationwide movement to confront unresolved apartheid-era injustices. In recent years, South African courts have reopened inquests into the suspicious deaths of dozens of prominent anti-apartheid activists, including Steve Biko, the Cradock Four, and Chief Albert Luthuli. Dan Leader, a partner at Leigh Day supporting the South African legal team, described the Sharpeville case as core to the country’s unfinished democratic project. “This is a time of reckoning for modern South Africa,” Leader said.

    Charne Tracey of Lawyers for Human Rights added that the lawsuit is intended to pressure the government to enter good-faith negotiations with survivors and families over reparations, noting that “they are under no illusions that they must carry a legal stick if their voices are going to be listened to.”

  • Venezuelans’ pride is bruised by deal to give US one-fifth of their oil reserves

    Venezuelans’ pride is bruised by deal to give US one-fifth of their oil reserves

    For more than a century, oil has been the foundational thread weaving together every aspect of modern Venezuelan identity. Rooted in the national consciousness is the deeply held belief that the country’s unmatched reserves of crude – the largest on the planet – belong not to political leaders or private corporations, but to every Venezuelan citizen. That long-held conviction, and the collective pride of a nation that has weathered decades of turmoil, suffered a major blow last week when acting Venezuelan President Delcy Rodríguez signed an agreement granting U.S.-backed entities control over roughly one-fifth of the country’s total proven oil reserves.

    While the deal holds the long-term potential to unlock billions of dollars in investment for an oil sector and broader national economy crippled by decades of mismanagement and international sanctions, it has been widely decried by ordinary Venezuelans as an unprecedented surrender of national sovereignty. Many have linked the agreement to the January U.S. military operation that targeted former President Nicolás Maduro, arguing that seizing control of Venezuela’s vast energy wealth was the unstated core goal of the intervention that left Rodríguez in power.

    “For ordinary citizens like us, there is nothing we can do to stop this – it is not just worrying, it is outrageous,” said Lisandro Castro, an architect based in the capital Caracas. “Across the country right now, there is real, widespread anxiety about what is unfolding before our eyes.”

    Oil has shaped every corner of Venezuelan life since commercial deposits were first discovered in the country’s northwest in the 1920s. What began as a new energy sector transformed a poor, largely agrarian nation into an urbanized regional economic power almost overnight. American energy workers who relocated to Venezuela introduced and popularized baseball, constructing fields across oil-producing regions that turned the sport into a national pastime for working-class communities before it spread across the entire country.

    The boom created unprecedented economic opportunity that drew waves of European migrants fleeing post-World War II hardship. Portuguese immigrants opened neighborhood bakeries that remain community staples today, while Italian architects designed iconic buildings that still define Venezuelan cityscapes. As a young democracy, Venezuela came to rely almost entirely on oil export revenues rather than domestic taxes on citizens and businesses, creating a dynamic where politicians used oil wealth to secure public support, explained Ronal Rodríguez, a researcher at the Venezuela Observatory at Colombia’s Universidad del Rosario.

    Venezuela went on to become a founding member of OPEC, and by the 1970s, when the country boasted the highest per capita income in Latin America, the government nationalized the entire oil sector with the creation of the state-owned Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., known universally as PDVSA. Under the nationalized model, foreign firms were only permitted to operate as minority partners in joint ventures, and PDVSA’s revenues funded an extensive network of public benefits: heavily subsidized gasoline for all citizens, scholarships for international study, free healthcare and countless other social programs.

    “Every single Venezuelan grows up understanding that oil is a collective right that every one of us can claim,” researcher Ronal Rodríguez noted.

    Over the decades, Venezuela’s history has been defined by the repeated cycle of oil booms and crippling busts. When global crude prices plummeted in the 1980s, the economy collapsed, forcing the government to secure a bailout from the International Monetary Fund and eliminate core public subsidies. The resulting social unrest paved the way for the rise of Hugo Chávez, a young military officer who first gained national attention for a failed coup attempt.

    After being elected president in 1998, Chávez expanded the country’s social safety net dramatically – including expanded access to public health, affordable housing and free education – fueled by a resurgence in global oil prices that generated an estimated $981 billion in revenue for PDVSA between 1999 and 2011. The government distributed everything from new homes to household appliances to free medication, and millions of families secured stable, well-paid jobs across public and private sectors. Emboldened by widespread popular support, Chávez tightened state control over PDVSA, sidelining major U.S. oil firms including ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips in the process.

    But PDVSA’s fortunes declined sharply as oil prices fell again in the 2010s. Systemic corruption and decades of mismanagement eroded production capacity and profits, first under Chávez and then under his hand-picked successor, Nicolás Maduro, who took office following Chávez’s death in 2013. By that time, the country was already sliding into a catastrophic economic crisis, worsened by sweeping U.S. sanctions imposed over concerns about democratic backsliding and human rights abuses that gutted the oil sector and the broader economy.

    What was once a magnet for global migrants became a source of mass emigration: severe food shortages and widespread deprivation linked to economic collapse pushed more than 7 million Venezuelans to leave the country. Even today, while grocery store shelves are fully stocked, soaring hyperinflation has left basic goods out of reach for most working people. Public sector employees now earn an average of roughly $160 per month, while private sector workers averaged around $237 per month in 2024.

    “Something is better than nothing,” said Romel Abreu, a former PDVSA worker who now works as a security guard in Cabimas, the heart of Venezuela’s historic oil region in the country’s northwest. Referring to Venezuela’s current crude production of roughly 1 million barrels per day, he added: “If we had no oil production at all, we would be completely lost.” Like many residents of the oil belt, Abreu holds out hope for another boom that would bring back well-paying jobs for the next generation.

    The new oil deal has deepened widespread skepticism among Venezuelans of all political stripes. After Maduro’s capture in January, many Venezuelans hoped that would end the ruling party’s 27-year hold on power. When that did not materialize – with the Trump administration backing Rodríguez over opposition leaders – many held out optimism that the easing of crippling U.S. sanctions would deliver long-overdue economic improvement. A February regulatory overhaul that opened the door to expanded private investment in the oil sector was widely seen as a sign of coming progress.

    But for critics like Castro, the January intervention was always just a stepping stone to this moment. “Everything that happened on January 3 was just a strategy to get us to where we are today: full U.S. control over our energy sector for their own gain, not to benefit ordinary Venezuelans,” he said.

    Under the terms of the agreement, the U.S. is entering a joint venture with North American Blue Energy Partners, Venezuela’s second-largest private oil operating company, trailing only industry giant Chevron. Rodríguez has granted the joint venture 100-year exploitation rights to 17 oil fields holding 65 billion barrels of proven reserves – roughly one-fifth of Venezuela’s total 300 billion barrel reserve base.

    Industry experts warn that because Venezuela’s energy infrastructure has fallen into severe disrepair after decades of underinvestment, it will take years of large-scale capital investment before production increases significantly.

    Speaking in Caracas this week, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright said the Trump administration’s mission in Venezuela “is to bring peace, freedom, opportunity and prosperity to the people.” In a national address Saturday, Rodríguez defended the agreement, saying she aims to restore Venezuela’s status as a global “energy powerhouse.”

    For residents of Cabimas, the deal leaves them torn between conflicting fears and hopes. “On one hand, you have to acknowledge that we are handing over control of one of our largest reserve holdings,” said Erwin Ayala, a current oil sector worker, outside his home in Cabimas. “But if this is for the good of the country and for future generations, then we can support it. What good does it do us to hold all this oil in the ground if we have no machinery, no technology, to get it out and use it to improve our lives?”

  • UN report details foreign networks fueling war in Sudan

    UN report details foreign networks fueling war in Sudan

    BRUSSELS – Nearly two years into the brutal civil war pitting Sudan’s regular army against the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a new United Nations investigation confirms that transnational foreign networks have dramatically escalated the violence, turning what began as a power struggle into a humanitarian catastrophe that has killed tens of thousands and pushed millions to the brink of starvation. The conflict, which erupted in April 2023, has already left at least 59,000 people dead according to the latest UN accounting, forced roughly 13 million to flee their homes, and pushed entire regions of the northeast African nation into catastrophic food insecurity approaching full-scale famine. In a public summary of the investigation released Thursday, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk outlined clear evidence that cross-border networks anchored in companies based in the United Arab Emirates, Colombia, and Chad have funneled critical resources to the RSF, including weapons, military training, and foreign contractor personnel. “The mission finds reasonable grounds to believe that a transnational network supplied the Rapid Support Forces with weapons, logistics, training and foreign personnel, including Colombian contractors involved in advanced weapons and drone systems,” the summary reads. The investigation specifically highlights that individuals and corporate entities connected to, operating from, or formally registered in the United Arab Emirates hold a central role in these networks, overseeing recruitment, financing, transportation, and deployment of foreign military contractors to provide direct military support that benefits the RSF. Abu Dhabi has repeatedly and publicly denied all accusations that it provides military backing to the paramilitary group, a position it has maintained even amid growing international scrutiny. While the report’s most concrete findings focus on support to the RSF, investigators also note that externally supplied drones have expanded the Sudanese army’s aerial strike capabilities, adding that additional research into external support for the military remains ongoing and preliminary. Beyond mapping external support, the UN probe documents widespread attacks on civilian targets that may qualify as war crimes committed by both warring parties. Investigators specifically tied foreign-trained fighters to two brutal massacres carried out in 2025 at the Zamzam internally displaced persons camp and the city of El Fasher. More than 100,000 residents have fled El Fasher since the violence erupted there, and surviving witnesses describe RSF fighters systematically gunning down unarmed civilians in their homes and on city streets, leaving corpses scattered across urban areas. Subsequent analysis of commercial satellite imagery has provided visual evidence suggesting RSF units have attempted to conceal the killings by disposing of remains in unmarked mass graves or through open burning. When it comes to cooperation with the UN investigation, the report notes that authorities in Chad, Colombia, and the United Arab Emirates engaged with investigators, but no substantive response has been received from governments in Ethiopia, Libya, South Sudan, and Somalia. Panama, whose offshore finance sector has long faced global accusations of large-scale industrial money laundering, requested additional time to provide a formal response. Notably, neither Sudan’s official military leadership nor the RSF have agreed to cooperate with the UN probe. The UN findings align with an earlier Associated Press investigation published in July that uncovered evidence Colombian mercenaries had been recruited to train child soldiers to fight for the RSF. Human rights organizations have further alleged that these Colombian fighters were recruited by a state-linked firm based in the UAE, a claim the UAE continues to reject alongside broader accusations of military support to either Sudanese warring party. In line with its findings, the investigative panel has called on the UN Security Council to expand and extend the existing arms embargo imposed on Sudan, stressing that all cross-border flows of weapons, financing, personnel, and advanced military technology that sustain the conflict must be cut off to create space for peace talks. The United States has already thrown its support behind new multilateral action, circulating a draft Security Council resolution in August that was reviewed by the Associated Press. The draft resolution condemns the steady influx of external military aid, weapons, and ammunition to both warring parties, noting that outside support prolongs the conflict and undermines international mediation efforts. It specifically calls out the operation of drone and unmanned aerial system programs launched from third-party countries to support the Sudanese war effort, and demands that all nations immediately end any direct or indirect support – whether logistical, financial, or military – that allows the conflict to continue.

  • Body of convicted war criminal Ratko Mladic to be flown to Serbia, president says

    Body of convicted war criminal Ratko Mladic to be flown to Serbia, president says

    BELGRADE, Serbia — Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic confirmed Wednesday that the remains of former Bosnian Serb army commander Ratko Mladic, who died last week while serving a life sentence for war crimes and genocide at a U.N. detention facility in the Netherlands, will be transported to Serbia for burial this Thursday. The United Nations International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals, based in The Hague, has not yet issued an official statement on the release of Mladic’s body following his death in a Dutch hospital.

    Vucic told reporters that Mladic’s family will release detailed funeral arrangements in the coming days, but warned local security officials are bracing for an unprecedented turnout of the convicted war criminal’s supporters. Even after his 2017 conviction for some of the worst atrocities committed on European soil since World War II, Mladic retains widespread heroic status among large segments of the Serbian public. Vucic noted that Serbian police and state intelligence agencies currently project that tens of thousands of admirers could gather for the funeral, creating significant security challenges for authorities.

    “It will be hard to secure and guarantee security to everybody,” Vucic said. “It will be a demanding job for our security services and we will use everything at our disposal to provide security.”

    Mladic was found guilty of overseeing three of the conflict’s most infamous atrocities: the 1995 Srebrenica massacre that killed more than 8,000 Bosniak Muslim men and boys, the 44-month siege of Bosnia’s capital Sarajevo that killed more than 10,000 civilians, and the systematic establishment of concentration camps where thousands of non-Serb civilians and enemy combatants were abused and executed. The Srebrenica massacre remains the first legally recognized act of genocide on the European continent since 1945; the enclave was designated a U.N. safe haven for Muslim refugees before Mladic’s forces overran the area, executed the civilian population, and buried their remains in unmarked mass graves.

    The Bosnian War, which broke out in 1992 after Bosnian Serb militias backed by Belgrade seized control of large swathes of Bosnian territory to form a separate breakaway state, ended in 1995 with a U.S.-brokered peace deal. The 3-year conflict left more than 100,000 people dead and displaced more than 1 million from their homes, leaving the region deeply ethnically divided decades later. Within hours of Mladic’s death being announced last week, thousands of Serbs gathered for public vigils and marches to honor his memory, a demonstration that drew sharp condemnation across the Balkans from survivors and political leaders.

    For surviving family members of Mladic’s victims, the 2017 conviction represented a long-delayed measure of justice for their murdered loved ones. But attitudes in Serbia, which is currently pursuing European Union membership, remain deeply defiant over the country’s role in the 1992-1995 Bosnian conflict. Last week, Vucic launched a sharp attack on the international tribunal, accusing the court and Western powers of systemic bias that only holds Serbs accountable for war crimes while ignoring atrocities against Serb civilians. He previously condemned the tribunal for what he called “uncivilized behavior” after it denied requests to release Mladic on compassionate grounds to allow him to die at home in Serbia.

  • Dozens missing, 5 dead after migrant boat is found drifting near Spain’s Canary Islands

    Dozens missing, 5 dead after migrant boat is found drifting near Spain’s Canary Islands

    A devastating maritime disaster off the coast of Spain’s Canary Islands has left at least five migrants dead and dozens more missing, with activists reporting an even higher death toll following the vessel’s catastrophic breakdown in the Atlantic Ocean. Only 44 people from the overcrowded boat were pulled to safety by Spanish rescue crews this week.

    Spain’s Maritime Rescue Service confirmed Thursday that a surveillance plane first detected the unstable, drifting vessel around 120 kilometers south of Gran Canaria on Wednesday afternoon. Responding quickly to the distress call, rescue teams immediately airlifted three of the most severely injured survivors to a Gran Canaria hospital by helicopter, while the remaining 41 passengers were transported to shore by rescue vessel. The group disembarked early Thursday at Arguineguín port, where local Red Cross teams stood by to provide urgent medical care and support.

    José Antonio Rodríguez Verona, a Canary Islands-based Red Cross spokesperson, told reporters that all 44 survivors are men, including several underage passengers, who originated from Mali and Senegal. In an interview with the Associated Press, Rodríguez Verona explained that the survivors arrived in a fragile state: many were severely disoriented and dehydrated, with a large number collapsing or vomiting immediately after setting foot on land after weeks adrift at sea.

    Due to the survivors’ poor physical and mental condition, it took responders time to piece together the details of the fatal voyage. Survivors told aid workers they departed from Gambia nearly a month earlier, and had been stranded adrift for far longer than anyone anticipated. When their food and fresh water supplies ran out, desperate passengers were forced to drink seawater to survive, a choice that left many gravely ill.

    The survivors also shared chilling accounts of the scale of the disaster: they told the Red Cross that more than 100 people, including multiple women and one infant, were originally on board the small vessel. As passengers died of dehydration and illness over the course of the journey, surviving passengers threw the bodies overboard, until they eventually became too weak to continue the practice.

    Spain’s Maritime Rescue Service stated in an official emailed statement that rough sea conditions, including 2.5-meter-high waves and strong gusting winds, prevented crews from recovering the remains of five deceased passengers found still on the boat when rescuers arrived.

    In a separate update, Helena Maleno, founder of migrant rights organization Walking Borders — a group that tracks fatalities and missing persons along migration routes leading to Spain — has put the total death toll from this voyage at 83, including three women and the infant. Maleno confirmed via a post on the social platform X that the boat departed Gambia 27 days before the rescue. Maleno’s organization regularly receives distress messages from relatives of missing migrants and coordinates rescue requests with Spanish authorities. The Associated Press has reached out to Maleno and Walking Borders for additional context, but has not yet received a response.

    This disaster highlights the ongoing deadly risk of the West African Atlantic migration route to the Canary Islands, which remains one of the most dangerous migration crossings into Europe. While the number of migrant arrivals to the Spanish archipelago has dropped sharply over the past year, tens of thousands of migrants have died or gone missing on the route in recent years. In multiple extreme cases, overcrowded migrant boats have become lost and drifted all the way across the Atlantic Ocean as far as the Americas before being found.

  • Renewed clashes erupt in southwestern Somalia between government and militias

    Renewed clashes erupt in southwestern Somalia between government and militias

    Fresh armed conflict broke out before dawn on Thursday between Somalia’s federal government troops and aligned militias in the peripheral areas of Baidoa, the key southwestern city at the center of a growing national political power struggle. Witnesses and local officials reported sustained heavy gunfire across the front lines, forcing hundreds of civilian residents to abandon their homes in search of safer shelter as the violence intensified.

    According to statements from Somalia’s Defense Ministry, the outbreak of hostilities followed an offensive launched by fighters loyal to Abdiaziz Hassan Mohamed Laftagareen, the former president of Somalia’s South West state, alongside militants linked to al-Shabab, the al-Qaida-affiliated extremist group that has waged an insurgency in Somalia for decades. Wednesday’s clashes mark the most recent escalation of a bitter political and security dispute between Somalia’s central federal government and Laftagareen over administrative control of the strategic South West region.

    The current crisis traces back to late March, when federal security forces seized full control of Baidoa on March 30. Shortly after the government takeover, Laftagareen stepped down from his position as regional leader, a post he had held since 2018. After several hours of intense exchanges of fire, armed clashes tapered off by early Thursday afternoon. As of the latest updates, no official government statement has been released confirming total casualty numbers or the full scope of destruction caused by the fighting. In the aftermath of the violence, government military units deployed to conduct patrols across Baidoa’s urban streets, while emergency ambulances scrambled to reach injured people trapped near conflict zones. Local residents slowly began to reemerge from hiding to assess damage to their properties and clean debris from public walkways.

    Dr. Abdikafi Omar Mohamud, who leads the emergency department at Baidoa’s Bay Regional Hospital, confirmed to the Associated Press that medical teams at his facility had treated 24 wounded civilians and received the body of one civilian killed in the clashes. Abdullahi Haji, a long-term Baidoa resident, described the chaos of the outbreak in a phone interview with AP, saying he fled his residence immediately after hearing heavy gunfire erupt, noting that stray bullets began hitting residential neighborhoods within minutes of the first shots.

    Located roughly 245 kilometers, or 150 miles, northwest of Somalia’s capital Mogadishu, Baidoa holds outsized strategic and humanitarian importance for the entire country. The city serves as a major coordination hub for international aid organizations working across southern Somalia, and it currently hosts more than 500,000 people who have already been displaced by previous rounds of conflict and the severe ongoing drought devastating much of the Horn of Africa. This latest violence comes just weeks after earlier clashes in and around Baidoa killed at least four civilians and left another 98 people wounded, adding to a growing toll of civilian harm in the already unstable region.

    This report was compiled with on-the-ground contributions from Associated Press correspondent Bishar Mayow Mukhtar in Baidoa, Somalia.

  • The West Bank: the Middle East’s orphan war

    The West Bank: the Middle East’s orphan war

    Against a decades-long backdrop of Israeli occupation, a coordinated campaign of displacement is unfolding across the rural West Bank, as state-aligned settler groups methodically push Palestinian communities off their ancestral land to consolidate Israeli control. The overarching goal, openly stated by senior members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling coalition, is to force Palestinians into overcrowded urban enclaves or into exile, cementing permanent Israeli control over all of the West Bank through the creation of irreversible “facts on the ground.” Despite widespread international condemnation that labels these actions illegal under international law and a fatal barrier to any future Middle East peace deal, Israeli officials have largely ignored external objections to advance their territorial agenda.

    At the forefront of this campaign are the Hilltop Youth, a militant faction of civilian settlers that establishes makeshift, unauthorized outposts on hilltops adjacent to Palestinian rural communities. Backed openly by the Israeli military, these settlers employ a wide range of intimidation and violence to force out local residents: targeted physical assaults, the destruction of homes and agricultural infrastructure, the theft or slaughter of livestock, the arson of cultivated crop fields, and deliberate sabotage of critical water access. For Palestinians living in these at-risk areas, there is virtually no path to legal protection or intervention from Israeli authorities.

    The Israel Defense Forces (IDF), which exercises full security control over most of the West Bank, claims it has no mandate to discipline Israeli settlers who attack Palestinians, arguing that this responsibility falls exclusively to civilian police. However, civilian police only operate within the boundaries of recognized Israeli settlements, leaving settlers in unauthorized outposts effectively beyond the reach of any law enforcement. This systemic gap creates a permissive environment for unchallenged violence, as confirmed by former IDF soldiers who have spoken out about their experiences. Nadav Weiman, a retired IDF sniper and researcher with Breaking the Silence – an organization that collects testimony from veterans who served in the Palestinian territories – says most frontline soldiers receive no formal instructions to intervene in settler attacks on Palestinian communities. “It’s almost impossible to enforce the law on violent settlers and very easy to do whatever we want to Palestinians,” Weiman explained in an interview.

    Netanyahu has sought to frame the violence as the work of a small fringe of extremist settlers unrepresentative of the broader settler community, promising that perpetrators will face arrest and prosecution under Israeli law. But these pledges ring hollow against political reality: Netanyahu’s governing coalition relies heavily on far-right politicians who explicitly oppose any crackdown on settler activity and openly endorse the displacement of Palestinians to eliminate any possibility of a future Palestinian state. In February, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich laid out the government’s unvarnished long-term goal, stating that Israel would formally “embark on a path toward sovereignty, while encouraging emigration. There is no other long-term solution.”

    This agenda aligns with Netanyahu’s longstanding political views, which have framed Palestinians as interlopers on land that rightfully belongs to Israel. As early as the 1970s, he was associated with the American lobby group “Jordan is Palestine, Inc.,” which argued that Jordan – already home to a large population of Palestinian refugees – should serve as the Palestinian national homeland.

    For many Palestinians, the current campaign of displacement amounts to a second Nakba, or “catastrophe,” referencing the mass expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians during the 1948 and 1967 Arab-Israeli wars, whose descendants have never been allowed to return to their ancestral land. Amina Khalil, a 78-year-old 1948 refugee, told The New Arab that fear of a repeat of this catastrophe now haunts younger generations of Palestinians. “My grandchildren don’t ask me, ‘What happened?’ They’re asking, ‘Is this possible now? Will it happen again?’” she said.

    Human rights organizations have documented the rapid acceleration of displacement since 2023. New York-based Human Rights Watch (HRW) confirms that at least 5,900 Palestinians have been fully or partially displaced from 107 West Bank communities over the past year. The Israeli government actively enables this campaign, HRW says, even providing monthly $50 stipends to settler groups that carry out harassment of Palestinian communities. “The Israeli government and the settlers share the same goal of maximum land and minimum Palestinians, with the authorities not only failing to stop settler violence, but actively enabling it,” wrote Sarah Sanbar, an HRW researcher focused on the region. “Settlers shoot, attack and expel Palestinians from their land, and the state provides the weapons, the legal cover, and the budget to do it.” The Israeli government has repeatedly denied it maintains any formal policy of forced displacement.

    The legal structure of occupation creates additional barriers to accountability for settlers. Only Israel’s internal intelligence service, Shin Bet, can order the IDF to arrest Israeli civilians suspected of attacking Palestinians – a resource entirely inaccessible to Palestinian residents. The Israeli government also publishes almost no public data on arrests of violent settlers, unless an incident generates damaging international public relations. High-profile arrests are extremely rare: in June, six Hilltop Youth members were arrested for arson of a mosque and destruction of property in the village of Deir Dibwan after the attack was filmed and shared widely on social media, but no trial date has yet been set. When Shin Bet has ordered mass detentions of Hilltop Youth members, it has almost always targeted acts of violence against Israeli security forces, not Palestinian civilians.

    In mid-August, Defense Minister Israel Katz acknowledged the growing frequency of violence by proposing that Israeli police take over responsibility for curbing settler attacks, arguing that the IDF’s core mission should focus on countering Palestinian resistance and border defense rather than policing settler activity. “The IDF’s role is to fight Palestinian terrorism, focus on defending borders and communities against threats, not chase boys on the hilltops,” Katz stated, though he has yet to release a formal plan or timeline for the proposed shift.

    The Hilltop Youth movement itself traces its ideological origins to a call from late Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, who urged settlers to seize strategic hilltop territory to expand Israeli control. “Everyone that’s there should move, should run, should grab more hills, expand the territory. Everything that’s grabbed will be in our hands. Everything we don’t grab will be in their hands, Sharon famously declared. After the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks that killed more than 1,200 people in southern Israel, Netanyahu authorized the creation of armed settler militias, framing the move as a security measure to prevent future incursions. The program has since devolved into widespread, unregulated vigilantism against Palestinian communities, with attacks growing in frequency and intensity across the West Bank.

    On-the-ground examples of this campaign illustrate the systematic nature of the displacement. In the village of Qusra, near the northern West Bank city of Nablus, armed Hilltop Youth have besieged a single family home that currently shelters a dozen neighbors displaced from nearby properties for the past two weeks. Settlers occupied one of the abandoned local homes, and IDF troops who regularly visit the site make no attempt to remove the intruders. After settlers cut the village’s main water pipe, a UNICEF team has been delivering emergency food, water, medicine, and other critical supplies to the trapped residents, with no end to the siege in sight.

    One of the most high-stakes ongoing expansions targets the E1 area, an 8-square-mile stretch of land between Jerusalem and the large Israeli settlement of Ma’ale Adumim that is currently home to 33,000 Bedouin Palestinians. Netanyahu recently announced plans to construct more than 1,200 new settlement apartments in the area, with a long-term goal of building 8,000 total residences that will be formally annexed to Jerusalem, effectively cutting the West Bank into two disconnected segments. The Bedouin community of Khan al-Ahmar, which has 6,000 residents, sits directly in the path of the new development and is marked for forced expulsion. For years, the Israeli government has refused to connect Khan al-Ahmar to water, electricity, and road infrastructure shared with the adjacent Ma’ale Adumim settlement, and leading Israeli human rights group B’Tselem warns that the coming demolition of the entire community – including a local school that serves children from 11 nearby Palestinian communities – amounts to a war crime for which Israeli leaders bear direct criminal liability. The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has called for an immediate halt to the forced displacement and settlement expansion, but Netanyahu has moved forward with the plan, approving $92 million for the construction of a separate Palestinians-only road along the eastern edge of Ma’ale Adumim to segregate Palestinian and Israeli traffic.

    In the 8,000-person village of Tel, known for its fertile fig and olive harvests, annual violence has destroyed the local agricultural economy. Over 38 years, settlements and a military base have surrounded the village, uprooting hundreds of olive trees to make way for construction. This year, a raid by dozens of settlers left four Palestinians and two Israelis dead, after which the IDF sealed off the entire village and arrested 40 residents. This year’s fig harvest is rotting unpicked on the trees, leaving residents with no source of income. “The sweetness of Tel’s figs has turned into bitterness,” said local resident Omar Ishtayeh. “The fruit that once symbolized prosperity has become a witness to a new reality threatening both the land and the people who live on it.”

    Decades-old Palestinian refugee camps in the West Bank, established after the 1948 and 1967 wars, have become another major target of Israeli military and settler activity. The camps, long centers of resistance to Israeli occupation, have been systematically raided and bulldozed over the past year, with narrow alleyways flattened to make way for Israeli tanks and aircraft. According to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), the UN body responsible for supporting Palestinian refugees, at least 700 residents have been killed, 23,000 arrested, and more than 33,000 displaced in the operations. While UNRWA has developed reconstruction plans for destroyed camps in Gaza, it has only been able to address urgent humanitarian needs for displaced refugees in the West Bank, with no plans for rebuilding and no permission for residents to return to their former homes to recover belongings.

    Even Palestinian Christian communities have not been spared, despite Israeli efforts to court evangelical Christian support internationally. The 1,200-person Christian village of Taybeh has faced ongoing systematic harassment from settlers, who graze livestock on village farmland, set fire to crops, destroy fences and infrastructure, cut water and power lines, and break into private homes. After senior Vatican leaders and the World Council of Churches condemned the attacks and called for accountability, the IDF established a closed military zone around the village to bar settler entry. However, the closure also blocks residents from accessing their agricultural fields and prevents visitors, pilgrims, and aid workers from entering the village, while Hilltop Youth continue to gather at the perimeter to taunt residents in open violation of the military order.

    International criticism of the campaign has been widespread but largely ineffective. The European Union has repeatedly confirmed that Israeli settlements in the West Bank, including the E1 expansion, are illegal under international law, but has rejected calls from the European Parliament to cancel preferential trade deals that benefit Israel. In the United States, a State Department spokesperson says the Trump administration does not officially support Israeli annexation of the West Bank, and US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee – a longtime supporter of Israeli settlement expansion – has called violent settlers “terrorists” despite previously arguing that settlements are legitimate Israeli communities. No diplomatic or punitive actions have followed these public statements, leaving the displacement campaign to proceed unimpeded.

  • More than 80 migrants feared dead after boat rescued off Canary Islands

    More than 80 migrants feared dead after boat rescued off Canary Islands

    A devastating tragedy has unfolded on one of the world’s most dangerous migration routes, where dozens of people — including an infant — are now presumed dead after a packed migrant vessel spent 27 days adrift in the Atlantic Ocean off Spain’s Canary Islands.

    Spanish Maritime Rescue teams located the stricken boat on Wednesday around 65 nautical miles southwest of Arguineguín, a coastal town on the island of Gran Canaria. When rescuers reached the vessel, they found 44 alive survivors and five corpses already on board. Based on accounts of the boat’s departure, human rights defenders estimate that a total of 83 people have died in the incident.

    According to early reports, the overcrowded vessel departed The Gambia, West Africa, in early August carrying an estimated 127 people. Helena Maleno Garzón, a prominent human rights activist and founder of the Spanish NGO Caminando Fronteras, confirmed the projected death toll that includes an infant. While the exact number of original passengers has not been independently verified by Spanish rescue authorities, the gap between the known 49 people found (44 survivors + 5 deceased) and the reported 127 initial occupants leaves 83 people unaccounted for, leading to the widespread presumption of their deaths.

    Tough sea conditions forced rescue teams to make a devastating decision: they were unable to retrieve the five recovered bodies from the boat before departing the area. In an official statement, Maritime Rescue explained that severe adverse weather, marked by 20-knot winds and 2.5-meter-high swells, made body recovery operation unsafe to carry out after the survivors were evacuated.

    All 44 survivors identified as men from across sub-Saharan Africa. Three of the survivors were airlifted to a local hospital in serious, critical condition, while the remaining 41 were transferred by rescue vessel to Gran Canaria. The group disembarked on the island in the early hours of Thursday morning to receive medical care and processing.

    Fernando Clavijo, the president of the Canary Islands regional government, publicly condemned the ongoing loss of life in a post to the social platform X. “It is intolerable that lives continue to be lost,” he wrote. “The Canaries cannot get used to or accept as normal the fact that the Atlantic continues to be a death trap.”

    The migration route stretching from West Africa across the Atlantic to the Canary Islands has long been recorded as one of the deadliest migrant crossings on the planet. Every year, thousands of people fleeing conflict, poverty, and instability in their home countries undertake this extremely perilous journey in the hopes of reaching Spanish territory, even though the route is known for its unforgiving conditions, including rough open seas, powerful unpredictable currents, and extremely long voyages that often stretch for weeks with limited food or water supplies. This latest incident once again highlights the deadly human cost of unmanaged irregular migration across the Atlantic.