分类: world

  • Shots fired at US consulate in Toronto for a second time this year

    Shots fired at US consulate in Toronto for a second time this year

    On a pre-dawn Monday in Toronto, a brazen shooting targeted the United States consulate, marking the second such violent incident at the diplomatic site in 2024 and triggering a joint investigation involving local, national and international law enforcement agencies.

    Local time around 4:45 a.m., a uniformed officer posted on security detail outside the consulate building detected a single gunshot ring out. Looking toward the street, the officer spotted an unmarked white sedan with no license plates speeding away from the area, Toronto Police Deputy Chief Frank Barredo confirmed in a press briefing. Responding units quickly initiated a high-speed pursuit of the vehicle, but called off the chase shortly after to prevent potential harm to bystanders and civilian motorists.

    No people inside or outside the consulate were hurt in the attack, according to official updates. Barredo noted that at least two consulate staff were inside the heavily fortified building when the shot was fired, but most people on site never heard the gunshot due to the structure’s advanced security design. Investigators later recovered a single bullet shell casing from the street outside the consulate, and confirmed the building’s outer facade sustained minor damage from the projectile.

    This latest attack comes just months after a nearly identical incident at the same location in March, which Toronto police have already tied to a transnational contract-for-hire gun network. After the March shooting, which was classified as a national security event, police maintained a permanent security presence outside the consulate. Three suspects were arrested following that attack, and a June law enforcement raid targeting connected suspects left one veteran Toronto police officer, 43-year-old Const. Marc Pinizzotto, dead. Multiple suspects aged 18 and 19 are currently in custody, charged with carrying out a series of shootings that included the March consulate attack as part of the organized gun network.

    Royal Canadian Mounted Police Superintendent Jonathan Ko described Monday’s event as “another troubling incident,” a characterization echoed by Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow, who labeled the attack as brazen. Toronto police are leading the ongoing probe, with support from the RCMP and international law enforcement partners, and have put all officers across the city on alert to watch for the fleeing suspects and any leads related to the attack. “We will bring the people responsible to justice,” Barredo affirmed in his statement.

    In a public post on X, the U.S. consulate in Toronto extended its gratitude to Canadian police for their rapid response to the incident. As investigators piece together details of the attack, they have also addressed speculation surrounding a separate violent event over the same weekend: two Jewish-owned bakeries in Toronto were targeted, at least one by gunfire. Toronto police confirmed Monday there is currently no concrete evidence linking the bakery attacks to the consulate shooting, though investigators have not completely ruled out a potential connection between the two events.

    International context adds layers of complexity to the ongoing investigation. Back in May, U.S. federal officials arrested 32-year-old Iraqi national Mohammad Baqer Saad Dawood al-Saadi, who is accused of planning more than a dozen attacks across North America and Europe that targeted Jewish institutions and U.S. diplomatic and commercial interests, including the March 2024 attack on the Toronto consulate. To date, Toronto police have not confirmed whether al-Saadi or his network has any connection to Monday’s shooting, and have not released any information about a potential motive for the latest attack.

  • Conflict in Yemen transforms the lives of long-marginalised Muhamasheen minority

    Conflict in Yemen transforms the lives of long-marginalised Muhamasheen minority

    Generations of Yemeni society have operated under a deeply entrenched tradition where children inherit their fathers’ professions, a path most commonly followed by those denied access to formal education who enter the workforce as teenagers. For 28-year-old Ridhwan Raweh, this meant picking up the family trade of shoe polishing from his father, a routine he followed for more than 13 years. Each morning, he would sling a worn leather bag holding a dented hammer, scuffed polishing brushes, and half-empty jars of polish, then walk to Taiz’s central market to sit cross-legged on the sidewalk, display a handful of shoes for repair, and wait for customers.

    Raweh is a member of the Muhamasheen, an ethnic and social minority group whose name translates directly to “the marginalized” – a label that reflects centuries of systemic, caste-like discrimination that has pushed the community into extreme poverty and social exclusion. For generations, rigid social barriers have confined most Muhamasheen to low-paying, informal work such as street sweeping, shoe repair, and waste collection, jobs that members of majority groups refuse to take.

    While Raweh’s shoe polishing work earned just enough to allow him to marry and support his three young children, it could not lift his family out of the desperate conditions that defined Muhamasheen life. For years, they lived in a flimsy makeshift shelter draped over a wooden frame, with no access to running water or electricity, a leaking roof that offered no protection from monsoon rains, and no permanent walls to guard their privacy and basic dignity.

    Unlike most members of his community who accepted their intergenerational poverty as fate, Raweh was determined to build a safer, more stable life for his children. “I grew up surrounded by hardship, and I never stopped dreaming of changing that story for my family,” he told reporters from Middle East Eye. “But progress was impossible. My work barely put one meal on the table each day – there were days we had nothing at all.”

    As Yemen’s years-long civil war dragged on, Raweh watched a growing number of young men from both his Muhamasheen community and majority Yemeni groups leave their civilian jobs to join armed factions deployed along front lines. Many of these men sought postings to units funded by foreign backers, where fighters received steady salaries paid in stable currencies such as Saudi riyals or U.S. dollars, a stark contrast to the devalued Yemeni rial that left most civilian workers struggling to afford basic goods.

    Raweh recalled that many of his regular customers, close relatives, even small shop owners in the market closed their businesses and traveled to front lines along the Saudi border to fight against Houthi forces. “They came back after months driving new cars and building solid, permanent homes, so I made the decision to join the same battle lines to make my dream come true,” he said.

    In early 2023, Raweh joined a group of 12 other young Yemeni men who traveled from their homes in Taiz to Marib Governorate, before moving north to the Saudi border front. None of the men had any prior military training or combat experience; their only motivation was the promise of a steady salary and the chance to escape generational poverty.

    After two years of service on the relatively quiet border front, Raweh returned home with far more than unfulfilled dreams: he had the savings and clear plans to build the stable life he had long sought. “I didn’t even go back to our old tent first – I checked straight into a hotel where my family was waiting for me,” he said. “The very next day, I rented a proper home far from our old slum neighborhood. I swore I would never go back to that tent life, and I would keep my children far away from that suffering.”

    Today, Raweh earns a monthly salary of 2,500 Saudi riyals (approximately $665), a wage that puts him far above most Yemeni civilians. With his accumulated savings, he purchased a plot of land, built a two-story permanent home for his family, and bought two minibuses. He drives one minibus himself for a local transport route, and leases the second to another driver for a steady daily income.

    Raweh emphasized that since the UN-brokered truce came into effect in April 2022, large-scale combat operations across most Yemeni front lines have largely halted. This period of relative calm has made enlistment even more attractive to desperate young men, who can collect a steady foreign-currency salary without facing the high risk of dying in intense combat. “There was no heavy fighting along the border when I was there, so it was a good opportunity for me to reach my goal and give my family a better life,” he said, speaking with clear pride in what he had achieved.

    Even as he celebrates his improved circumstances, Raweh has no intention of passing his new path down to his children, just as he refuses to let them inherit the shoe polishing trade he learned from his father. “I was forced to fight to put food on my family’s table, but I will never let my children do that. They will have civilian careers,” he said. Today, his three children attend a well-regarded private school in Taiz. Denied a formal education himself, Raweh has prioritized their schooling, hoping it will free them from the cycle of marginalization that has trapped generations of Muhamasheen. “I inherited shoe polishing from my father, but I refuse to pass either that job or fighting to my kids,” he said. “We hope for a better Yemen, where our children can build a peaceful future.”

    Raweh’s story of success is far from the norm, however. In recent months, thousands of desperate young Yemenis have attempted to enlist in the Saudi-backed factions along the border and the Republic Guards on Yemen’s west coast, where salaries are paid in stable foreign currency. But many have been turned away, as recruitment for these units has been paused in recent months.

    One of those rejected was 39-year-old Hani, another Muhamasheen man who had worked as a low-paid street cleaner for years. Left with no other options to earn a living wage, Hani was targeted by unlicensed brokers recruiting Yemeni fighters to deploy to the Russia-Ukraine war, who promised large salaries and signing bonuses.

    “Like so many other men here, Hani couldn’t provide for his family, and he felt he had no other choice but to go to war,” his wife Ahlam told Middle East Eye. “He didn’t want to go to Russia, but after he couldn’t enlist with the local factions, it felt like his only option left.” After more than two months of hesitation and grief over leaving his family, Hani departed for Russia two months ago, hoping to save enough money to return home, open a small business, and build a permanent home for his wife and children, just as his more successful neighbors had done.

    “We were heartbroken when he left, but we held onto hope that he would come back and give us the better life we all dreamed of,” Ahlam recalled. “Unfortunately, we weren’t as lucky as the other families. A month ago, we lost all contact with Hani and all the friends he traveled with.” For weeks, the family waited anxiously for any word from Hani, their sole provider who had promised them a future out of poverty. But their worst fears were confirmed just 10 days ago, when they received official notice of his death.

    Ahlam says she deeply regrets that she could not convince Hani to stay, and now she urges all families to block their loved ones from enlisting in any conflict, “even if you have to starve.” “I advise every woman to stop her husband, son, or brother from joining battles anywhere,” she said. “Nothing is worse than losing them forever.”

    There are no official government statistics on the total size of the Muhamasheen population, but local research and nonprofits estimate the group numbers around 3.5 million people, roughly 10 percent of Yemen’s total population. The vast majority live in makeshift slum settlements on the outskirts of major Yemeni cities, with little to no access to clean water, electricity, healthcare, or formal education. While this level of deprivation has long been unique to the Muhamasheen, the 2015 outbreak of full-scale civil war has pushed millions of other Yemenis into similar desperate conditions. According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), an estimated 22.3 million Yemenis – more than half the country’s total population – still require urgent humanitarian assistance and protection.

    The growing flow of marginalized Yemenis into armed groups has already reshaped the country’s centuries-old social hierarchy, a shift visible in even small daily interactions. Abdullah, a 51-year-old government worker who asked to only use his first name, currently rents a home in Taiz from a Muhamasheen fighter – a situation that would have been unthinkable a generation ago, when Muhamasheen were almost never able to afford to own multi-story residential buildings.

    “Today, it’s fighters – both from the Akhdam (the local name for the Muhamasheen) and other groups – who have the money to build large multi-story homes. Meanwhile, people like me who get irregular, small salaries can barely afford to pay rent,” Abdullah said. Even with a bachelor’s degree in accounting and a stable job at Taiz’s public electricity authority, Abdullah’s modest salary is not enough to support his family of seven. His eldest son was forced to drop out of high school to work as a daily construction laborer to help cover the family’s basic costs.

    “I don’t look down on any social group,” Abdullah said. “I am just pointing out that uneducated fighters now get more respect from society and more recognition from leaders than educated professionals, all because they carry guns.”

    Yemeni sociologist Fahd Al-Thobhani explains that war always reshapes social hierarchies, a process that disproportionately rewards fighters and war profiteers while the vast majority of civilian society suffers. “We see Muhamasheen men who can’t even write their own names owning modern, comfortable homes, while university professors are forced to work as street vendors just to feed their families,” Al-Thobhani said. “This is the natural outcome when formal state governance breaks down, and power shifts to armed groups that value fighters over scholars.”

    Al-Thobhani warned that the greatest long-term damage will fall on Yemen’s next generation, who grow up watching educated professionals struggle to get by while armed fighters enjoy wealth and high social status. He added that while Yemen’s centuries-old rigid caste system is breaking down, this shift is not happening for progressive or equitable reasons.

    “The Muhamasheen have been stuck at the bottom of Yemeni society for as long as the caste system has existed,” he said. “Today, though, we see traditional upper-class Yemenis taking orders from a Muhamasheen commander simply because he has money and armed power. Money – not traditional family lineage, not education – now controls people who are desperate for work and stability.”

  • A Nigerian soldier is arrested for tipping off criminals – but does it go deeper?

    A Nigerian soldier is arrested for tipping off criminals – but does it go deeper?

    For more than a decade, widespread violence carried out by a fragmented network of armed groups has terrorized civilian populations across Nigeria, leaving thousands dead and hundreds of thousands displaced. Now, a recent high-profile arrest has pulled long-simmering allegations of insider collusion between military personnel and violent non-state actors into the public spotlight, prompting renewed scrutiny of the country’s struggling security apparatus.

    According to Nigerian military spokesperson Mohammed Goni, Private Mohammed Yusuf was taken into custody Saturday evening at a bus terminal in Maiduguri, the largest city in Nigeria’s violence-plagued northeastern Borno State. The arrest came less than two weeks after Yusuf deserted his post at an army equipment manufacturing facility, where he had access to standard-issue military uniforms. Goni confirmed that the soldier had been hiding in Maiduguri with assistance from an unidentified associate, and was intercepted while attempting to cross the border into neighboring Cameroon to evade capture. Yusuf has not issued any public response to the allegations against him as of this reporting.

    The arrest has immediately reignited widespread public and expert speculation that covert cooperation between serving military personnel and armed groups is a key driver of Nigeria’s persistent insecurity crisis. Multiple factions of armed actors – including jihadist insurgents Boko Haram and its offshoot Islamic State’s West Africa Province (ISWAP), separatist militias in the country’s southeast, and bandit gangs that target civilians for ransom in the northwest – regularly operate disguised in stolen military uniforms to carry out attacks and avoid detection.

    Official data underscores the staggering scale of the violence. Between January 2024 and April 2025 alone, Nigeria’s National Human Rights Commission recorded at least 3,000 kidnappings and 3,580 killings linked to armed groups. Mass abductions have surged in recent years, driven largely by ransom-seeking bandit gangs and insurgent attacks, with school kidnappings emerging as a particularly devastating recurring threat. Data from the International Centre for Investigative Reporting (ICIR) shows that between April 2014 and May 2026, 26 major attacks on educational institutions resulted in the abduction of at least 2,416 students. Official estimates put annual ransom payments to criminal groups in the millions of dollars.

    The claim of insider collusion is not new. In April 2025, Borno State Governor Babagana Zulan, who has overseen years of counter-insurgency efforts in his state, publicly alleged that Boko Haram informants and collaborators operated within the Nigerian armed forces, national political leadership, and local communities. “What we need to do is to strengthen our intelligence and to deal with them ruthlessly,” Zulum stated during a public security meeting at the time. Just months after Zulum’s remarks, a special court-martial sentenced three Nigerian soldiers to life imprisonment after convicting them of involvement in a large-scale illegal arms and ammunition trafficking scheme, finding them guilty of theft, unlawful weapons dealing, and “aiding the enemy.”

    Security analysts point to multiple root causes for this alleged corruption within military ranks. Retired army major and security analyst Bashir Galma told the BBC that inadequate compensation for low-ranking soldiers creates financial incentives for corrupt collaboration, while ideological alignment with armed groups also drives some personnel to secretly support extremist or criminal factions. “I know there have been instances where plans are made for an attack on a location and the information finds its way to either Boko Haram or another criminal gang,” Galma explained, confirming long-reported patterns of insider tip-offs to armed groups.

    A serving Nigerian soldier, who spoke to the BBC on condition of anonymity to protect their safety, confirmed that collusion cases are regularly discovered but frequently handled internally without public transparency. “There have been instances of soldiers caught dealing with the other side, but such matters are often hushed and dealt with internally,” the soldier said.

    Accounts from kidnapping survivors add chilling anecdotal weight to the collusion claims. One recently freed hostage, whose family paid a 57 million naira ($42,000) ransom for their release, described a disturbing encounter after his release: “They dropped us off in one location and there were security personnel who they shook hands and laughed with,” the survivor said, speaking on condition of anonymity. While he has no concrete proof, the survivor said he believes the security personnel he encountered received a cut of the ransom payment.

    Other survivors have raised allegations of high-level collusion. A farmer who was held hostage for 30 days in late 2024 recalled hearing a military helicopter land just meters from the remote camp where he was held blindfolded. “The first time I heard it I was expecting that the Nigerian Air Force had come to rescue us,” he said. “But we could hear the helicopter leaving afterwards.” He told the BBC he heard the helicopter return multiple times, leading him to conclude that the gang holding him had high-level logistical support from within the security establishment.

    Farmer Yahuza Isa, who survived a kidnapping in Nigeria’s northwestern Zamfara State, voiced the widespread frustration of communities living under constant threat of violence. “I myself know where these criminals are,” he said. “So why not deal with them completely?”

    Security expert Abdullahi Abdullahi noted that armed groups benefit from collaboration not just from rogue security personnel, but from civilian informants embedded within local communities – a dual support network that has allowed the insurgency and criminal violence to persist for more than a decade despite repeated military crackdowns. “And that is why the issue is continuing after all these years,” he said.

    While the decade-long security crisis has exposed deep systemic failures in Nigeria’s governance and security infrastructure, the arrest of Yusuf marks a rare public acknowledgment by the military that collusion within its own ranks is a real problem. Whether this acknowledgment will lead to widespread, systemic reforms that root out corrupt collaboration remains to be seen. Yusuf remains in police custody, and investigations are ongoing to identify any additional co-conspirators and map the full scope of his alleged smuggling operation. The BBC’s request for comment to Major General Markus Kangye, the Nigerian military’s director of media operations, went unanswered as of publication.

  • Chile captures fugitive convicted of singer Victor Jara’s murder under Pinochet

    Chile captures fugitive convicted of singer Victor Jara’s murder under Pinochet

    Nearly three years after fleeing a definitive prison sentence for his role in the kidnapping and murder of iconic Chilean protest folk singer Victor Jara, retired Chilean colonel Nelson Haase has been apprehended by national police in the country’s southern region. Haase, one of eight former military officers convicted over the 1973 killing that became a global symbol of state brutality under Augusto Pinochet’s dictatorship, was located Saturday in Puyehue, a remote community in Los Lagos Region some 950 kilometers south of the capital Santiago.

    Jara’s murder stands as one of the most searing atrocities committed in the immediate aftermath of the 1973 CIA-backed coup that brought Pinochet’s military regime to power, just five days after the coup ousted democratically elected socialist president Salvador Allende. A beloved performer whose pacifist, pro-labor protest songs made him a leading voice for Allende’s government, Jara was among roughly 5,000 political dissidents rounded up in the coup’s first days and detained at Santiago’s National Stadium. Surviving detainees documented that Jara was subjected to horrific torture: soldiers intentionally crushed his hands and fingers, taunting him that he would never play guitar again, before executing him with 44 gunshot wounds.

    Haase was first found guilty of Jara’s kidnapping and murder alongside seven other officers in a 2018 trial. After five years of prolonged appeals, Chile’s Supreme Court upheld the convictions and issued a final sentence in August 2023: 15 years in prison for murder and an additional 10 years for kidnapping. The 80-year-old retired officer failed to turn himself in to authorities to begin serving his sentence and immediately became a fugitive.

    Haase’s capture marks the close of another chapter in the decades-long fight for accountability for crimes committed during Pinochet’s 17-year authoritarian rule, which saw an estimated 3,000 people killed or disappeared and thousands more tortured. Of the seven other officers convicted alongside Haase, former General Hernan Chacon died by suicide as police moved to arrest him in 2023, while the remaining five have been in custody serving their sentences. Separately, in 2023 the United States extradited retired army lieutenant Pedro Barrientos to Chile to face trial over Jara’s killing, after a Florida civil jury previously found him liable for the murder in a 2016 ruling.

    Decades after his death, Victor Jara remains a global symbol of artistic resistance against authoritarianism and a lasting reminder of the human cost of Pinochet’s coup, with his case continuing to drive demands for full accountability for dictatorship-era crimes in Chile.

  • Chad says will withdraw from the International Criminal Court

    Chad says will withdraw from the International Criminal Court

    In a move that adds to a growing wave of withdrawals from the International Criminal Court (ICC), the central African nation of Chad announced Monday it would exit the Hague-based tribunal, citing longstanding criticisms of the court’s uneven effectiveness and its disproportionate focus on African nations.

    Chad becomes the fifth country in recent months to launch withdrawal procedures, following Venezuela, Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger — all of which have raised similar objections to the ICC’s mandate and operations. The announcement comes just days after ICC member states voted to remove chief prosecutor Karim Khan over unproven sexual assault allegations that Khan, 56, has categorically denied. His legal team has already announced plans to challenge the dismissal, questioning both the legality and fairness of the decision reached by member states.

    In an official statement released by the government, Chadian officials confirmed the exit decision followed a comprehensive review of the ICC’s performance since the court first began operations in 2002. The review, the statement said, confirmed longstanding concerns that the tribunal’s impact has remained limited and inconsistent across global regions.

    A core point of criticism from Chad is the ICC’s disproportionate focus on African states. Since the court entered into force, 9 of its 13 active investigations target African nations, while only four probes have been opened in other regions — none of which have yielded meaningful progress, according to the Chadian government. To date, the court holds just seven individuals in custody, six of whom are linked to African conflict situations, the statement added.

    The timeline of the decision has sparked controversy over external influence: last week, an initial posting on the Chadian foreign minister’s official website claimed the withdrawal came in response to a request from the United States. The statement noted that U.S. Deputy Secretary of State for African Affairs had pressed Chadian officials to re-evaluate their ICC membership during a Thursday telephone call with Foreign Minister Abdoulaye Sabre Fadoul, adding that U.S. officials had raised their own concerns about the court’s functionality and urged Chad to reconsider its ratification of the Rome Statute, the treaty that established the ICC. However, Fadoul pushed back on that narrative Friday, telling AFP that “it was not at the Americans’ request that we decided to withdraw from the ICC.”

    Chad’s exit announcement also arrives amid heightened international scrutiny of the country’s role in the ongoing civil conflict in neighboring Sudan. The Sudanese army and multiple international non-governmental organizations have accused Chadian authorities of allowing the United Arab Emirates to ship weapons through Chadian territory to the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), the paramilitary group fighting Sudan’s sitting government.

    Legal advocates warn that the withdrawal will complicate ongoing efforts to hold actors accountable for potential war crimes in the region. French lawyer Vincent Brengarth, who submitted a formal report on the alleged weapons transfers to the ICC on behalf of NGOs, said Chad’s exit undermines the chances of the accountability initiative succeeding. “Beyond this case, this withdrawal weakens the international architecture of criminal justice and heightens fears that the perpetrators of the most serious crimes will escape any prosecution,” Brengarth said.

    Chad’s decision fits into a rapidly growing trend of rejection of the ICC among nations across Africa and Latin America. Last Friday, Venezuela formally confirmed its own withdrawal, also citing claims of institutional bias. Venezuela’s exit comes as the ICC conducts an active investigation into alleged crimes against humanity committed under the government of President Nicolás Maduro. Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger — all Sahel nations currently led by military governments — have previously denounced the ICC as an “instrument of neocolonial repression in the hands of imperialism.”

    Earlier this month, the ICC’s executive leadership issued a formal statement expressing deep concern over the withdrawal of the three West African nations, noting that repeated exits undermine the global effort to deliver justice for mass atrocities. The growing number of departures has sparked new debate over the court’s legitimacy and its ability to fairly prosecute grave crimes across all regions of the world.

  • South Africa’s Ramaphosa calls for African action on migration

    South Africa’s Ramaphosa calls for African action on migration

    Against a backdrop of escalating anti-foreign-national violence and growing domestic political pressure, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has issued a urgent call for coordinated collective action among African nations to manage cross-border migration, warning that the continent cannot tackle the unfolding crisis through isolated national efforts alone.

    Ramaphosa delivered his appeal during an official session of the Pan-African Parliament, the legislative arm of the African Union, on Monday. His address comes after weeks of widespread xenophobic protests across South Africa, where fringe activist groups have scapegoated undocumented African migrants for the country’s persistent crime rates, high unemployment, and overstretched public infrastructure and services.

    The current wave of unrest traces its origins to demonstrations that began in 2024, centered on disputes over undocumented migrants’ access to public healthcare. Tensions surged sharply this year when extremist xenophobic groups issued a deadline demanding all undocumented foreign nationals leave South Africa by June 30. To date, the violence has claimed at least four confirmed migrant lives, though several foreign governments have stated the actual death toll is significantly higher. According to an Agence France-Presse count compiled from data provided by repatriating governments, more than 160,000 foreign nationals have left South Africa over the past two months, marking one of the largest coordinated migrant exoduses the country has seen in recent history.

    “Unmanaged cross-border movement poses a tangible risk to regional security and social cohesion, and no single country can confront this challenge on its own,” Ramaphosa told lawmakers. “As African states, we must first recognize and address the root conditions that force people to leave their home countries in search of safety and opportunity. These include ongoing conflict, political instability, failed governance systems, widespread poverty, and deep social division.”

    Ramaphosa explicitly condemned the ongoing attacks, describing the violence as “sad and abhorrent.” “We in South Africa deeply regret and mourn every life lost to this hatred,” he said. “Our government has taken a firm, unwavering stand against xenophobia, Afrophobia, and hatred directed at people from other African nations.”

    This latest outbreak of anti-migrant violence has drawn sharp condemnation from across the continent. Ghana, which has been one of the most vocal critics of the attacks, has pushed the African Union to convene a formal debate on the crisis. Two Ghanaian citizens have also submitted a petition to the International Criminal Court calling for a formal investigation into repeated xenophobic attacks in South Africa, a move that South African officials have dismissed as “opportunistic.”

    As Africa’s most industrialized and wealthiest economy, South Africa has long been a magnet for economic migrants and asylum seekers from poorer and conflict-affected nations across the continent. But the country has grappled with recurring cycles of xenophobic violence for nearly 20 years. The deadliest outbreak on record occurred in 2008, when anti-immigrant riots left 62 people dead and displaced thousands more. Subsequent waves of violence followed in 2015 and 2016, and 2019 attacks left at least 12 people dead, most of whom were South African citizens caught up in the unrest.

    What sets the 2024 crisis apart from previous outbreaks is the unprecedented coordinated response: for the first time, multiple African governments have organized simultaneous voluntary repatriation programs to move thousands of their citizens out of South Africa amid ongoing threats.

  • Questions mount after deadly Berlin Pride attack. Here’s what to know

    Questions mount after deadly Berlin Pride attack. Here’s what to know

    BERLIN – A wave of collective mourning swept across Berlin this week, after a 21-year-old German citizen with confirmed Islamic State ties carried out a deadly extremist attack near the city’s annual Pride festival, leaving one person dead and 29 others injured. The incident has ignited urgent national scrutiny over how the convicted extremist was permitted to remain at large in the community ahead of the assault, just months before key regional elections across Germany. The attacker, Abdul Ballout – a German-born man of Lebanese descent – was shot and killed by law enforcement following a nearly 24-hour manhunt that ended Sunday. Investigators and federal authorities have confirmed the incident was an Islamist terror attack: Ballout deliberately drove a rental van into a crowd of pedestrians near the Pride festival grounds on Saturday night, before exiting the vehicle and attacking additional bystanders with a machete.

    Questions around Ballout’s release from custody have quickly become the central point of public and political controversy, with top German officials demanding a full review of how the attack could have been prevented. Prosecutors confirmed Ballout has a long documented history of extremism: in 2025, he traveled from Germany to Lebanon, with the explicit intention of crossing into Syria to join the Islamic State. He was arrested by Lebanese authorities before he could complete the journey, and convicted by a Lebanese military court on charges including incitement to religious and sectarian conflict, serving a three-month prison sentence before being deported back to Germany. He was taken into custody immediately upon his arrival at Berlin’s airport.

    In May 2025, a Berlin juvenile court – which hears cases for offenders between 18 and 21 years old under German law – convicted Ballout on multiple charges, including preparing a serious act of state-endangering violence and distributing Islamic State propaganda via his public Instagram account. He was sentenced to one year and 10 months of youth custody, a ruling Berlin public prosecutors appealed in search of a harsher penalty. Conflicting initial statements initially muddled details of the sentence: some officials claimed it had been suspended, but Berlin courts clarified that no final suspension had been granted. Instead, Ballout was released from pre-trial detention – which had already been extended for a longer period than standard – because he did not meet statutory thresholds to be deemed a flight risk or an imminent threat of reoffending under current German law.

    The court’s decision to release Ballout has drawn sharp criticism from senior government officials, who are now calling for a full investigation and potential reform to Germany’s juvenile sentencing rules, which critics argue are excessively lenient for extremist offenders. “It makes no sense that this man, with his confirmed conviction and history of supporting ISIS, was free on our streets,” Federal Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt told public broadcaster ZDF in an interview Monday. “It stands to reason that placing this person in custody would have been the correct and responsible step.” Berlin Mayor Kai Wegner, while stopping short of questioning the constitutional independence of the German judiciary, described the outcome as “unfathomable.”

    Deradicalization officials who evaluated Ballout prior to the attack have confirmed they repeatedly flagged him as a high-risk threat who refused to cooperate with intervention programs. The Berlin-based Violence Prevention Network, a non-profit that works with at-risk extremists from both Islamist and far-right backgrounds, was ordered by the court to conduct three evaluations of Ballout for a court-mandated high-risk deradicalization program. The organization’s communications director, Cornelia Lotthammer, told reporters Ballout was scheduled to attend his third and final evaluation on the very day the attack occurred. Staff planned to recommend Ballout be rejected from the program, Lotthammer said: unlike most high-risk extremists, who openly espouse their ideology during assessments, Ballout deliberately attempted to mislead evaluators by pretending he had abandoned extremist beliefs, and refused to engage honestly with the intervention process. “Everyone knew he was a high-risk person,” Lotthammer said. “But if he will not cooperate, there is nothing our program can do. No one associated with our work would have ever said he was not a threat and should be released.” She added that evaluators had no prior indication Ballout was planning an imminent attack, and would have alerted law enforcement immediately if they had seen any warning signs.

    The tragedy comes at a politically charged moment for Germany, with three regional elections – including one in Berlin – scheduled for September 2025. Political analysts warn the attack will likely amplify already tense debate over migration and extremism, and could benefit the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), which has already centered its campaign on anti-migration rhetoric after finishing second in the 2025 federal election. The party is currently seeking to win its first state governorship in the eastern state of Saxony-Anhalt, and has already seized on the Berlin attack to attack the current federal and city government. “How is an Islamic State supporter able to walk free in Germany after being convicted of extremism?” AfD’s Berlin leader Kristin Brinker wrote on social media platform X. “Who in the city government bears responsibility for this failure?”

    German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has echoed the demand for full accountability, saying the federal government’s top priority must be closing gaps in public safety that allowed the attack to occur. “We must do everything in our power to protect the German public as effectively as possible from criminals and dangerous people who cannot be taken into custody for any reason,” Merz said Monday. Officials have confirmed a full inter-agency investigation is now underway to review every step of Ballout’s case, and to identify what regulatory or legislative changes are needed to prevent similar attacks in the future.

  • Anger, shock and grief – questions remain in the wake of the Berlin Pride attack

    Anger, shock and grief – questions remain in the wake of the Berlin Pride attack

    Germany is grappling with overlapping waves of grief, shock, and growing public anger following a deadly assault that targeted Saturday night’s Berlin Pride celebration, leaving one Polish woman dead and at least 29 other people injured. The 21-year-old main suspect, Abdul Ballout — a German citizen of Lebanese descent — was fatally shot by police during an operation Sunday afternoon, ending the immediate manhunt but opening intense scrutiny of how a man flagged for extremism and criminal activity remained free to carry out the attack.

    Details of Ballout’s long-documented extremist ties and criminal history have emerged in the days after the violence, raising urgent questions about systemic failures in German law enforcement and judicial processing. Prosecutors’ investigations outline a clear pattern of radicalization stretching back more than a year: in 2025, Ballout made the deliberate decision to travel to Syria via Turkey and Lebanon to join the Islamic State group’s armed insurgency, and met with individuals he believed to be IS operatives while in Lebanon. He was arrested by Lebanese authorities in July 2025, receiving a three-month prison sentence for inciting religious and sectarian conflict before being deported back to Germany.

    Upon his arrival at Berlin Brandenburg Airport in November 2025, German authorities took Ballout into pre-trial detention. In May of this year, a Berlin court handed down a juvenile sentence of one year and 10 months for the charge of “preparing a serious act of violence endangering the state.” In a decision that has now sparked national fury, the court suspended the sentence pending an appeal from prosecutors, who had argued for a far longer custodial term. Ballout was released immediately and placed only under the supervision of a probation officer, despite being formally flagged as a security risk.

    German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt publicly acknowledged that the suspended sentence decision was “certainly incomprehensible” given the severity of the threat Ballout posed, confirming that national authorities have launched a full investigation into the handling of his case. Berlin’s Governing Mayor Kai Wegner, a member of the centre-right Christian Democratic Union, echoed the public frustration, telling local media he was left dumbstruck by the judiciary’s handling of the case. While he declined to overtly critique the court’s ruling out of respect for judicial independence, Wegner noted that Ballout was tried under juvenile law and ultimately released on a suspended sentence, leaving him “really at a loss for words.”

    Opposition parties have seized on the attack to level sharp criticism at German security policy. The far-right Alternative for Germany’s home affairs spokesperson Martin Hess called the assault a “total failure of security policy,” demanding a full inquiry into why a known Islamist threat was permitted to move freely in public. Even as political leaders criticize the court’s decision, new details have emerged about how Ballout managed to convince authorities he had renounced extremism: Der Spiegel reports that Ballout told the Berlin court during spring proceedings that he had fully distanced himself from extremist ideology and violence. Thomas Mücke, an extremism researcher with the Violence Prevention Network who met with Ballout, told public broadcaster ARD that the suspect presented a calm, controlled, and friendly facade to social workers — a demeanor that Mücke now says masked his true intentions, noting that such controlled performances often make it difficult for intervention specialists to detect hidden radicalization.

    The attack has reignited a national debate over whether Germany needs to tighten its anti-terrorism legislation and reform its juvenile justice framework. Peter Neumann, a security studies expert at King’s College London, told German public broadcaster ZDF that Germany’s existing anti-terrorism criminal law is “too lenient” by European standards, with the country’s sentencing guidelines producing far shorter sentences than comparable European nations. Neumann also called for a full review of Germany’s juvenile justice system, which he argued prioritizes rehabilitation and education over public safety.

    Other political leaders have pushed back against claims that the law itself is flawed, arguing instead that the failure lies in inconsistent application of existing rules. Sebastian Fiedler, home affairs spokesperson for the centre-left Social Democrats, told Deutschlandfunk radio that the core question is not the text of criminal law, but why Ballout remained at large despite repeated red flags. “We need to look more closely at why [Ballout] was still at large,” Fiedler said. “Another key question is: ‘What actually happened after his release from prison? Who was he still in contact with?’ Although he was under surveillance, there was clearly a gap in the system.”

    German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has promised decisive action in response to the attack, saying that while it is too early to outline specific political consequences, the government will act with both prudence and determination. Merz argued that any individual classified as a security threat who cannot be held in full detention must have their movement restricted “as much as possible,” questioning why modern tracking technology allows for personal location monitoring globally, yet German security agencies cannot consistently track the whereabouts of known threats. The chancellor has already requested the interior ministry conduct a full review of German laws governing monitoring jurisdiction to close gaps that allowed Ballout to remain free.

    On Sunday, hundreds of mourners gathered near Berlin’s iconic Brandenburg Gate to honor the victim of the attack, a quiet demonstration of grief that comes as the nation demands accountability for the systemic failures that allowed the violence to occur.

  • South Africa investigates death of Nigerian who collapsed during arrest

    South Africa investigates death of Nigerian who collapsed during arrest

    Diplomatic tensions between Nigeria and South Africa have escalated following the death of a second Nigerian national during a South African police operation this month, with Nigerian officials condemning what they call a pattern of abuse against foreign nationals. The latest incident unfolded last week in Cape Town, where 42-year-old Ibeh Chika Simon collapsed and died as officers moved to arrest him during a residential search, according to official statements.

    During the search of the Cape Town property, Western Cape police reported recovering an unlicensed firearm and substances suspected to be illicit drugs. Police spokesperson Colonel Andre Traut explained that as officers attempted to take Simon into custody, he suddenly became unwell and collapsed. Emergency medical services were dispatched to the scene immediately, but Simon was pronounced dead on site.

    Preliminary post-mortem examinations conducted on Simon’s body revealed he had multiple bruises and abrasions across his back and chest, according to the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (Ipid), South Africa’s independent oversight body for police conduct, which is now leading the official probe into the death.

    Nigeria’s top diplomat in Johannesburg, Consul General Ninikanwa Okey-Uche, released a scathing statement this week saying her nation was deeply appalled by reports of excessive police tactics that led to Simon’s death. She called for a fully transparent, independent investigation into the incident, highlighting what she described as an alarming pattern of unresolved extrajudicial killings and serious misconduct targeting foreign nationals in South Africa. Okey-Uche emphasized that all criminal suspects are guaranteed the right to due process under the law, and no law enforcement body is exempt from this requirement.

    The consul general also added that a second Nigerian national, Egwabor Patrick Chuks, was shot during the same police operation and remains hospitalized with life-threatening injuries. However, Western Cape police have stated they hold no official record of this shooting incident.

    Nigeria’s foreign ministry spokesperson Kimiebi Imomotimi Ebienfa described the episode as a deeply unfortunate situation in comments to the BBC on Monday, echoing the diplomatic community’s concern over the case.

    This death comes just weeks after South African authorities confirmed the death of another Nigerian man, Emeka Charles Iroegbu, in June during a similar arrest operation. That incident is also the subject of an active Ipid investigation. The two deaths have amplified existing tensions between the two African powers, which have already been strained by repeated allegations of targeted xenophobic violence against Nigerian residents in South Africa.

    South African officials have acknowledged the gravity of the incident and confirmed that official investigations are underway. During a regular public briefing on national migration policy held Sunday, the country’s Inter-Ministerial Committee on Migration confirmed it was monitoring the probe. Justice Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi, who chairs the committee, noted that during the Cape Town operation last Thursday, a group of foreign nationals had resisted law enforcement action, though she did not provide further details on the confrontation.

    As investigations proceed, both diplomatic communities are awaiting full forensic and investigative reports to clarify the circumstances of Simon’s death and address growing concerns over police conduct toward foreign nationals in South Africa.

  • Bali bans Dutch expats whose run club allegedly excluded Indonesians

    Bali bans Dutch expats whose run club allegedly excluded Indonesians

    A recent controversy involving an unauthorised running event on Indonesia’s resort island of Bali has led to permanent entry bans for two Dutch organisers, reigniting long-simmering tensions between foreign expatriates and local communities on the island popular with digital nomads.

    Indonesian immigration authorities confirmed the ban Friday, noting the two men — aged 35 and 37 — had already departed Bali for Singapore before the announcement was made public. The bans bar them from ever re-entering Indonesian territory. The event in question was organised by Entourage Bali, a community group catering primarily to foreign digital nomads that has come under fire after widespread online allegations of systemic discrimination against local Indonesian applicants.

    The controversy erupted after Entourage Bali opened registration for a 5-kilometre run scheduled for July 22. Multiple social media users shared testimonies claiming the organisation rejected Indonesian applicants while approving foreign registrations without issue. One Indonesian woman shared a viral post stating her application was held up indefinitely due to her local name and Indonesian phone number, while her husband, who uses a Western name and foreign phone number, was accepted within minutes.

    In response to the backlash, Entourage Bali released an official statement pushing back on the discrimination claims, arguing that any rejections of local applicants were the result of an accidental technical glitch. The group said its automated chat group approval system incorrectly blocked numbers registered in Indonesia, and that Indonesians actually made up nearly 25 percent of participants for its past events — the largest single national contingent in the community. It also emphasised that its membership is open to all people regardless of nationality, founded to help new arrivals to the island connect through shared activities, and that digital nomad status is not tied to citizenship.

    To address the ongoing controversy, the group announced it would pause all scheduled events indefinitely while it implements internal reforms. The organisation had previously held a popular “disco run” in May that drew a large crowd of mostly foreign participants.

    Indonesian officials have defended the ban, saying the organisers violated two key national rules: first, the event was planned and publicised without obtaining the required government permits, and second, the alleged discrimination ran counter to local laws and social norms. Indonesia’s immigration chief Hendarsam Marantoko framed the incident as part of a broader crackdown on foreign operators acting outside the law on Bali, saying the unregulated, exclusionary community amounted to an unacceptable “state within a state.”

    Bali Governor I Wayan Koster also publicly vowed Sunday that local authorities would take strict enforcement action to prevent similar exclusionary, unpermitted events from being organised in the future. The case comes as Bali has seen steady growth as a top global hub for digital nomads over the past decade, a boom that has also brought growing friction between foreign transplants and local residents over issues of access, entitlement, and exclusionary practices by some expatriate communities.

    Authorities have made clear they intend to step up oversight of foreign-led activities on the island to ensure all events comply with local regulations and respect equal treatment for Indonesian residents.