分类: world

  • China steps up ‘propaganda blitz’ in Turkey amid investment fallout

    China steps up ‘propaganda blitz’ in Turkey amid investment fallout

    When Chinese electric vehicle giant BYD paused plans to construct a manufacturing plant in Turkey back in June, shifting its production priorities to existing European facilities, the decision sent ripples through bilateral relations between Ankara and Beijing. What made the reversal particularly awkward for Turkey’s ruling government was the suite of generous tax breaks Ankara had already granted to BYD for domestic vehicle sales, long before any ground was broken on the promised facility.

    The early incentives have already paid major dividends for BYD: the automaker’s Turkish sales skyrocketed to more than 45,000 units in 2025, and industry experts estimate the tax advantages have netted the firm between $500 million and $1 billion in extra profits from the Turkish market to date. The collapse of the plant deal left Beijing’s reputation in Turkey on shaky ground, prompting a sweeping public relations push to reverse the growing negative sentiment, according to a Turkish government consultant who spoke to Middle East Eye.

    Ankara, the consultant added, has grown increasingly frustrated with what it views as a pattern of Chinese negotiating behavior: creating the perception that a final binding agreement has been reached, only to return to the table later with an expanded list of new demands. For observers who track China’s activities in Turkey closely, the accelerated PR campaign has been impossible to miss.

    China’s embassy in Ankara has begun placing unsigned, pro-Beijing opinion pieces in pro-government Turkish media, emphasizing the strategic importance of high-level ties between the Chinese Communist Party and Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP). The embassy has also pushed widespread coverage of the launch of *Volume Five of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China* across government-aligned Turkish media outlets.

    Nurettin Akcay, a Turkish academic who specializes in Chinese affairs, confirms that the BYD collapse has undeniably amplified anti-China sentiment among the Turkish public. He notes, however, that the expansion of China’s public diplomacy work in Turkey is not an entirely new development—Beijing has long cultivated ties with Turkish journalists and opinion leaders, regularly organizing all-expenses-paid visits to China long before the BYD deal fell through.

    Turkey and China have navigated a fraught bilateral relationship for more than a decade, with the status of the Uyghur people serving as the most persistent and divisive sticking point. Until 2020, Ankara worked to limit critical Turkish media coverage of human rights abuses against Uyghurs in Xinjiang, holding out hope that the gesture would clear the way for large-scale Chinese investment. In a high-profile step to improve ties at Beijing’s request, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan visited the Uyghur-majority Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in June 2024, a trip billed as resolving one of the core barriers to closer economic cooperation. Yet despite months of negotiations in the wake of Fidan’s visit, the promised electric vehicle plant investments from both BYD and fellow Chinese automaker Chery have yet to move forward.

    Akcay, who earned his PhD from Shanghai University, has faced personal repercussions for his public tracking of Chinese lobbying efforts in Turkey. He recently revealed via social media platform X that Shanghai University sent him an official email notifying him that the institution had received dozens of complaints over his critical reporting on China. As a result, the university asked him to stop publicly referencing his PhD degree earned at the school, and Akcay says he now expects he will be permanently barred from re-entering China.

    Akcay explains that Beijing’s current outreach strategy in Turkey centers on what he terms “elite engagement”: a curated form of showcase diplomacy that invites prominent Turkish figures to visit carefully selected sites across China to project a sanitized, positive image of the country to the Turkish public. Last month, for example, the China-Turkey Friendship Foundation—a Chinese state-funded organization—organized an eight-day press tour to Xinjiang for journalists from leading Turkish opposition and independent outlets, including T24, Halk TV, Cumhuriyet and Haberturk TV.

    None of the participating journalists published coverage echoing international allegations of systemic mistreatment of Uyghurs in Xinjiang; instead, their reports focused on what they described as terrorist threats from radical groups in the region and China’s economic integration policies. Multiple outlets used nearly identical phrasing in their coverage, highlighting Xinjiang’s central role to China’s industrial growth and the Belt and Road Initiative, while framing tourism as a core driver of the region’s development.

    This curated narrative directly contradicts findings from global human rights organizations. Human Rights Watch’s 2026 World Report documented that Chinese authorities have tightened ideological controls across Xinjiang and Tibet over the past year, while continuing a harsh campaign of forced assimilation against Uyghur and Tibetan communities. The organization notes that there has never been accountability for crimes against humanity in Xinjiang, where hundreds of thousands of Uyghurs remain arbitrarily detained. Since 2017, the Chinese government has detained hundreds of thousands of Uyghurs in extrajudicial “re-education camps,” demolished thousands of mosques and Islamic cemeteries, and banned religious education for Uyghur communities across Xinjiang.

    “Everything is planned, and China gets precisely what it wants because visitors are shown only what they are intended to see,” Akcay said. “Consequently, journalists who visit China encounter a positive picture without fully understanding the broader context of human rights abuses in the region.”

    Beyond outreach to journalists and ruling party allies, China’s recent influence campaign in Turkey has expanded to include direct engagement with Turkey’s opposition parties, including the conservative Islamist New Welfare Party and the nationalist Victory Party. A New Welfare Party delegation traveled to China in June, and Chinese Ambassador to Turkey Jiang Xuebin met the party’s chairman Fatih Erbakan just last month. Akcay says Beijing has worked to build positive ties with nearly all of Turkey’s opposition factions, regardless of size, with the Uyghur issue once again serving as the core motivating factor.

    Right-wing opposition parties in Turkey can speak relatively openly about the Uyghur issue because it resonates strongly with their conservative, nationalist voter bases, Akcay explains. By cultivating ties across the entire political spectrum, Beijing aims to blunt rising domestic criticism of China within Turkey, and prevent that criticism from escalating into large-scale grassroots campaigns against Chinese investment or policy. While Akcay does not believe the campaign has completely reshaped Turkish public opinion of China, he assesses that the strategy has been partially successful in preventing the emergence of a coordinated, radical counter-movement.

    “China is seeking to minimise domestic criticism within Turkey by pursuing a broad engagement strategy,” he noted, adding: “It may not completely transform public perceptions, but it is pursuing an effective strategy to prevent the emergence of a radical counter-campaign.”

  • German court rules comparing Israel to Nazi Germany constitutes ‘protected speech’

    German court rules comparing Israel to Nazi Germany constitutes ‘protected speech’

    In a landmark ruling that clarifies the boundaries of political expression amid heated global debate over the Israel-Gaza conflict, Germany’s Zweibrucken Higher Regional Court has overturned a lower court’s conviction and acquitted a woman who faced a €2,400 ($2,700) fine for sharing two critical Instagram posts comparing Israel’s military operations in Gaza to the atrocities of Nazi Germany.

    The posts were published at the peak of Israeli military campaign in Gaza, a period that has drawn widespread international condemnation and mass grassroots protests calling for an end to the violence. The first post featured a side-by-side table outlining parallels between Israel’s conduct in Gaza and the historical actions of the Nazi regime, paired with a split image combining the Israeli flag and the Nazi flag, with a portion of a swastika visible. The second post showed Israeli soldiers opening fire into an enclosed space, with blood depicted pooling below the structure, and overlaid a swastika inside the Star of David. Both posts were tagged with the pro-Palestinian hashtags #FREEPALESTINE and #GAZAUNDERATTACK.

    In its ruling, the court emphasized that the imagery and text included in the posts were unambiguously rooted in condemnation of Israeli military actions in Gaza, not endorsement of Nazi ideology. The judgment clarified that even when it involves the use of symbols legally banned in Germany, such speech falls under the protection of freedom of expression when the broader context clearly frames the content as criticism, political commentary, or rejection of extremist ideology. Judges noted that the #FREEPALESTINE hashtag made the woman’s political position unequivocal, and far-right sympathizers would not misinterpret the posts as promotion of neo-Nazi beliefs.

    The court explicitly rejected the common argument that any comparison between Israeli state policy and Nazi Germany automatically constitutes trivialization of the Holocaust or incitement to religious or ethnic hatred. The ruling held that sharp, critical commentary targeting the actions of a sovereign state does not automatically cross the legal threshold for criminal prosecution on these grounds. The same logic was applied to the contested combined swastika-Star of David image: the court found that the depiction of soldiers attacking unarmed civilians, paired with the #GAZAUNDERATTACK tag, made the image’s condemnatory purpose entirely clear, rooted in criticism of Israel’s military offensive rather than hateful extremism.

    While the ruling does not grant blanket immunity for all such comparisons, it establishes a critical legal precedent: Germany cannot automatically criminalize comparisons between Israeli actions and Nazi conduct when the speech in question is clearly part of an unmistakable condemnation of ongoing Israeli violence in Gaza. Following the appellate judgment, the woman was cleared of all charges against her.

  • Russia says seven killed and 40 injured by Ukrainian drone hitting busy beach

    Russia says seven killed and 40 injured by Ukrainian drone hitting busy beach

    A deadly drone strike on a crowded Black Sea holiday beach in southern Russia has left seven civilians dead, including three children, and injured dozens more, regional authorities confirmed this week. The incident, which unfolded near the small coastal village of Arkhipo-Osipovka in Krasnodar Krai, has amplified tensions over escalating cross-border attacks amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.

    Verified social media footage shared by the BBC captures the drone diving toward a coastal cliff before slamming into the sand below, erupting into a massive fireball as shocked tourists scattered on the shore and in shallow water. Krasnodar Governor Veniamin Kondratyev announced that 40 people were injured in the strike, with 17 requiring urgent hospital treatment. The regional governor immediately pinned responsibility on Ukraine, calling the incident a deliberate attack on unarmed civilian vacationers. Ukraine has not issued any official response to the accusation, and both sides have consistently denied intentionally targeting civilian populations since the full-scale Russian invasion began in February 2022.

    The target of the drone remains unconfirmed, with conflicting accounts emerging about what led to it crashing on the beach. Some Ukrainian independent outlets on the messaging platform Telegram have argued the drone veered off course after Russian electronic warfare systems jammed its navigation signal. Multiple eyewitnesses quoted by Russian media reported hearing sustained gunfire moments before the explosion, suggesting Russian air defense units attempted to shoot the drone down before it impacted the crowded coastline. Shockingly, tourists and local residents reported no air raid sirens were activated ahead of the strike, leaving vacationers completely unprepared for the attack. Many shared harrowing accounts of the chaos: one holidaymaker described hiding under sun loungers as the blast hit, while another recalled hearing machine gun-like fire before the earth-shaking explosion. One parent, whose children witnessed the incident firsthand, told reporters their child is now suffering from a severe nervous breakdown.

    Arkhipo-Osipovka’s beach has long been a top summer destination for domestic Russian tourists, a popularity that has grown even more since international sanctions imposed after the invasion barred most Russians from leisure travel to Western countries. The strike is one of a growing string of long-range attacks carried out by Ukraine deep inside Russian territory over the past 12 months, targeting energy infrastructure and commercial sites Kyiv says are being used to support Moscow’s military effort. Cross-border strikes have increasingly caused civilian casualties over recent weeks: eight civilians across multiple Russian cities were killed in attacks just last weekend.

    Separately, Ukraine has focused recent targeting campaigns on warehouses operated by Wildberries, Russia’s largest domestic e-commerce platform often called the “Russian Amazon.” The latest strike hit a Wildberries facility in the Vladimir region, roughly 100 miles east of Moscow, overnight on Monday. Dozens of the company’s warehouses scattered across Russia – many located thousands of kilometers from the Ukrainian border – have now been hit in these attacks. Kyiv argues that Wildberries depots are being repurposed to store and distribute supplies for the Russian military, a claim the Kremlin and the company reject. Public records show that until recently, the platform openly sold a range of military-related equipment including body armor, as well as dual-use materials that can be adapted for both civilian use and drone production.

    The latest civilian casualties on both sides come as long-range strikes have intensified on either side of the front line. Just on Saturday, Russian ballistic missile strikes on Kyiv killed at least nine people and injured dozens more, according to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko confirmed a residential apartment building in the city’s central Shevchenkivskyi district was partially destroyed, leaving multiple people trapped under rubble. A week earlier, a Russian strike on a residential structure in Kryvyi Rih killed an entire family of 10. Since the start of its full-scale invasion, Russia has launched thousands of strikes on Ukrainian urban residential areas, killing and wounding thousands of Ukrainian civilians.

  • Iran denies talks with US as Trump halts strikes at the last minute

    Iran denies talks with US as Trump halts strikes at the last minute

    In a sharp contradiction of former U.S. President Donald Trump’s public announcement that bilateral negotiations with Iran would kick off on Monday, Tehran has firmly denied that any direct talks with Washington are currently underway. The dispute comes just days after Trump announced he would call off planned new military strikes against Iran, a decision he framed as a step to clear the way for a diplomatic agreement.

    Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday, Trump claimed that negotiations would get underway the following afternoon, arguing that Iran had clear incentive to reach a deal. “Obviously, they don’t want to be attacked,” Trump stated. But Iran’s foreign ministry quickly pushed back on that narrative, confirming that Tehran is currently engaged in talks only with Oman focused on securing navigation through the strategic Strait of Hormuz, not with the United States.

    Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei emphasized during a formal press briefing that discussions with Oman have been constructive, with the core goal of finalizing an agreement for new safe shipping routes through the strait. “We are not currently negotiating with the United States. Our negotiations are with Oman to secure passage through the Strait of Hormuz,” Baghaei said. He called on both regional and international powers to recognize Iran’s responsible approach to the issue and engage constructively with Tehran’s efforts. Baghaei also warned that as long as the U.S. maintains its naval blockade on Iranian ports, the volatile security situation in the Strait of Hormuz will remain unchanged.

    Despite the conflicting statements from the two sides, global oil markets reacted strongly to Trump’s initial announcement, with benchmark crude prices dropping sharply in trading on Monday. As of 09:15 GMT, October-delivery North Sea Brent crude, which traded as the global benchmark contract for the first time in this session, fell 4.59% to settle at $83.89 per barrel.

    The diplomatic back-and-forth also follows a key phone call between Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Trump over escalating regional tensions, confirmed by Saudi state media over the weekend. During the conversation, the crown prince stressed that prioritizing diplomatic dialogue to de-escalate conflict is critical, and that all possible efforts should be made to reach a truce that creates space for long-term diplomatic solutions. He added that such diplomatic outcomes are essential to preserving regional security and stability, and preventing the area from being pulled into a wider, more destructive conflict. The conversation came after Saudi Arabia publicly raised concerns about Trump’s original plans for military strikes on Iran.

    The ongoing clash between the U.S.-Israel bloc and Iran, which launched in February, has already killed thousands of people and inflicted massive economic harm across the Gulf region, where repeated Iranian attacks have disrupted daily economic activity. The persistent threat of closure to the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint through which roughly 20% of global oil shipments pass, has been one of the most damaging disruptions to regional economic activity, making the permanent reopening of the waterway a top priority for all parties involved.

    In a separate update on Monday, Hassan Qashqavi, spokesperson for Iran’s parliamentary National Security Committee, noted that Tehran is close to finalizing its agreement with Oman over the Strait of Hormuz. He also confirmed that Omani mediators are currently working to revive the 2015 nuclear deal-era Memorandum of Understanding between Iran and the United States.

  • Hundreds of migrant children are stranded in Spain’s Ceuta after mass crossing

    Hundreds of migrant children are stranded in Spain’s Ceuta after mass crossing

    In the early hours of last Thursday, a massive wave of more than 60,000 migrants pushed across the border from Morocco into Spain’s North African enclave Ceuta, in one of the largest single mass crossing events in recent Mediterranean migration history. Four days later, as most adult migrants have been repatriated or voluntarily returned to Morocco, hundreds of unaccompanied migrant minors remain stranded in the territory, facing dangerous conditions and an uncertain future.

    Among them is a 17-year-old girl from Tangier, whose story lays bare the human cost of this sudden migration crisis. She, her 8-year-old younger brother, and her mother joined the thousands of people who attempted to swim around the border breakwater to reach Spanish soil, all chasing the promise of better economic and life opportunities unavailable in their home country. While the teenager successfully made it through the rough Mediterranean surf to shore, her brother drowned before he could reach land. Spanish authorities pulled his small body from the water, the girl told an Associated Press photojournalist, on condition of anonymity to protect her safety as a vulnerable minor. In the chaos of the mass crossing, she was also separated from her mother, who remains missing.

    In the four days since she arrived, the teen has survived on the kindness of local Ceuta residents, who shared food, clothing, and a chance to bathe with her. When she sought support at the government-run youth care center, she found the facility already overwhelmed and at full capacity. “I saw people stepping on the dead,” she recounted through a translator, who stepped in because she does not speak Spanish. “Now we are children begging on the street.”

    Local official data confirms she is not alone. As of Monday, roughly 860 migrant minors remained in Ceuta after the surge, making up a large share of the 3,000 to 5,000 migrants who have avoided expulsion from the original 60,000 who crossed. Official death tolls underscore the danger of the crossing: Spanish authorities have confirmed 72 fatalities, most from drowning, and Morocco’s separate count of 11 additional deaths is not included in that total. Beyond the 17-year-old’s story, AP reporters on the ground have documented other minors begging for food in the streets of Ceuta, with resources stretched far beyond capacity.

    Spanish law mandates a specific legal framework for migrant care: while adult migrants can apply for asylum, most Moroccan adults face extremely low approval rates for humanitarian protection, and those rejected face expulsion. By contrast, unaccompanied migrant minors are legally required to receive state protection and care. But on-the-ground reporting shows enforcement of this rule is inconsistent. An AP journalist witnessed Spanish soldiers escorting a crying unaccompanied Moroccan boy to the border for repatriation, only halting the process at the last minute after local residents and media protested that the child qualified for protection under Spanish law.

    Beyond the remaining Moroccan migrants, Ceuta’s remaining population of stranded migrants also includes people from across Africa and the Middle East: Sudanese fleeing civil war, Palestinians from Gaza, Afghans escaping instability, and people from multiple other sub-Saharan African nations.

    Ceuta’s primary migrant reception center, built to hold just 600 people, has been completely filled for days, leaving hundreds of migrants to sleep on public beaches and the surrounding hills. Food and clean water are already scarce among the stranded population. Local migration activist Ramsés Mohamed Azumik, with the Ceuta-based advocacy group Asociación Elín, says the current situation is no accident. “The strategy is that hunger, thirst and exhaustion forces these people to finally decide to voluntarily return to Morocco,” Azumik explained.

    For the hundreds of stranded minors, the goal of reaching mainland Spain, just across the water visible on the hazy horizon, remains out of reach for now, leaving their lives and futures hanging in the balance.

  • Inside city gripped by deadly protests in Pakistan-administered Kashmir

    Inside city gripped by deadly protests in Pakistan-administered Kashmir

    In the tense aftermath of a wave of fatal demonstrations that have paralyzed daily life across Pakistan-administered Kashmir, the British Broadcasting Corporation has made history as the first international news organization to secure entry to the restive city of Rawalakot. This unprecedented access grants a rare, unfiltered look into a region that has been largely cut off from outside scrutiny since the deadly protests erupted.

    Prior to the BBC’s entry, independent reporting from Rawalakot had been severely limited, leaving large gaps in global understanding of the scale of the unrest, the grievances driving demonstrators, and the human toll of the clashes that have shaken the city. During the on-the-ground reporting, BBC correspondents were able to hold direct conversations with local residents, protest participants, and witnesses to the violence, collecting firsthand accounts that have not been shared with the international public until now.

    The protests, which have already claimed multiple lives, have pushed the already volatile Himalayan region into a new state of emergency, with increased security deployments and widespread disruptions to transportation, commerce, and basic public services. Rawalakot, the capital of Pakistan-administered Kashmir’s Poonch district, has emerged as one of the epicenters of the unrest, making the BBC’s access a critical breakthrough for global audiences seeking accurate information about the unfolding crisis.

  • Hundreds flee fighting in northern Ethiopia as fears rise of return to civil war

    Hundreds flee fighting in northern Ethiopia as fears rise of return to civil war

    Four years after the conclusion of a devastating two-year civil war, Ethiopia’s Tigray region has been shaken by some of the most intense fighting since the 2022 peace deal, triggering a new wave of cross-border displacement and stoking international fears of a return to large-scale violence.\n\nOver the weekend, heavy confrontations broke out early Saturday in Shererina, a small strategically located community in western Tigray near the Ethiopia-Sudan border. Clashes, which featured heavy artillery fire and drone strikes according to a senior Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) source, continued through Sunday, forcing hundreds of ethnic Tigrayans to flee for safety into neighboring Sudan. Witnesses in the region reported continuous sounds of explosions, heavy small arms fire, and military aircraft operating over the area throughout Saturday, while Sudanese medical and local sources confirmed that both wounded combatants and civilian refugees have crossed the border. The full death toll from the latest outbreak of violence remains unconfirmed as of press time.\n\nThe 2020–2022 civil war between the TPLF and Ethiopia’s federal government killed hundreds of thousands of people before an African Union-mediated peace agreement brought active hostilities to a close in November 2022. However, core provisions of the peace deal have never been fully implemented, and tensions have escalated sharply in recent months after TPLF forces retook full control of Tigray region, ousting the interim administration established as part of the peace settlement. The latest fighting in Shererina adds another layer of complexity: the wider western Tigray area has been the site of long-running territorial disputes between Tigray and Ethiopia’s southern Amhara regional state, making the border locality strategically sensitive to multiple competing stakeholders.\n\nBoth sides have immediately traded blame for initiating the clashes, deepening the risk of further escalation. The TPLF-led Tigray regional administration has labeled the federal government’s actions an “open war” against the region, accusing Addis Ababa of violating the 2022 peace deal in a deliberate campaign to subjugate and divide the people of Tigray. For its part, the Ethiopian federal government has not released a full official public statement, but Minister Abraham Belay publicly confirmed the clashes had occurred in a social media post. Belay blamed the outbreak of violence on what he called the “TPLF clique,” warned that continued conflict would bring “worse consequences” for the region, and simultaneously called for diplomatic engagement, noting that all outstanding disputes must be resolved through peaceful negotiation rather than armed confrontation. \”Today, it is better to reach out for peace before destruction,\” he wrote.\n\nBeyond Ethiopia’s borders, regional observers have raised growing concerns that the renewed Tigray conflict could become entangled with the ongoing civil war in Sudan, turning the northern Ethiopia border region into a new front for a proxy conflict. Multiple diplomatic sources have reported unconfirmed accusations that rival factions in Sudan are providing military backing to opposing sides in the Tigray dispute, a development that could dramatically destabilize the entire Horn of Africa region if the current clashes expand.

  • Israel conveys ‘concerns’ to US on Gaza plan and keeps striking

    Israel conveys ‘concerns’ to US on Gaza plan and keeps striking

    Fresh tensions have emerged between the Israeli government and the Trump administration over a proposed framework to end the months-long Gaza war, with Jerusalem formally conveying its sharp concerns to Washington on Monday while continuing military strikes across the besieged Palestinian territory. This latest disagreement exposes a growing rift between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Donald Trump, just months before Netanyahu faces a critical reelection contest in October — a race where the Israeli leader has centered his campaign on his close personal and political alliance with the U.S. president, whom he met with just last week.

    At the heart of Israel’s objections is the demand for concrete, verifiable full disarmament of the Hamas militant group, which last Friday announced it would surrender its weapons to a newly formed interim Palestinian governing committee under the Trump-backed peace plan. In an official statement to Agence France-Presse, Doron Spielman, spokesperson for Netanyahu’s office, confirmed that Israeli officials had shared their reservations with U.S. counterparts. “The version that has been made public does not reflect Israel’s positions,” Spielman said, adding that Israeli intelligence assessments confirm Hamas has spent the months since the October 2024 ceasefire brokered by Trump actively rearming and recruiting new fighters, in clear preparation for future attacks.

    The October ceasefire has reduced the intensity of large-scale conflict, but Israel retains military control over more than 60 percent of the Gaza Strip. According to Gaza’s local authorities, over 1,200 Palestinians have been killed in the territory since the truce took effect. The Israeli military, for its part, has confirmed that five of its soldiers and one civilian contractor have been killed in Gaza during the same period.

    Trump framed Hamas’s announcement of weapons surrender as a transformative breakthrough for peace, calling the move a “major milestone” in efforts to end the devastating conflict that began when Hamas launched the deadliest single attack on Israeli soil in the country’s history on October 7, 2023. The U.S. president told reporters Friday that Israel was “very happy” with the development, but Netanyahu has until now remained publicly silent on the plan, breaking that silence only with Monday’s formal transmission of concerns to Washington.

    Spielman argued that Hamas’s continued rearming activity proves the group is planning another large-scale attack similar to the October 7 massacre, noting that the Trump administration’s own Board of Peace roadmap outlines a vision for Gaza as “a deradicalised terror-free zone that does not pose a threat to its neighbours”. “That vision stands in direct contrast to the current reality and to Hamas’s stated intentions,” he said. “The indispensable first step toward any lasting arrangement is the genuine, verifiable and irreversible demilitarisation of Hamas. Anything short of full demilitarisation will leave Hamas with the capability to threaten Israel again.”

    The four-day-old roadmap released by the Board of Peace calls on Israel to immediately and fully end all military operations in Gaza, and outlines a timeline for a phased Israeli military withdrawal from the territory — terms that run counter to Israel’s long-held position that its forces will remain in Gaza until Hamas’s disarmament is fully completed. This disagreement over the Gaza plan is not the only rift between the two allies: Israel has also openly expressed skepticism over Trump’s diplomatic push to end the brief Iran-Israel war that broke out in late February.

    On the ground in Gaza, violence has continued unabated despite the ceasefire agreement. A Gaza-based security official confirmed that Israeli strikes carried out since early Sunday have killed 19 Palestinians, among them multiple women and children. Palestinian authorities added that an Israeli airstrike on Saturday destroyed a large stockpile of critical medical supplies, a loss that exacerbates the already catastrophic humanitarian situation across the strip. Israel has long defended its strikes, stating that Hamas systematically uses civilian infrastructure to hide weapons and fighters, and that Saturday’s strikes targeted two individuals it accuses of planning imminent attacks on Israeli civilians and military personnel.

    The growing gap between U.S. and Israeli positions has drawn sharp criticism from senior Palestinian leaders involved in drafting the peace plan. Mohammad Dahlan, a prominent Palestinian political figure who played a central role in negotiating the framework, said that after the roadmap’s release he spoke with Trump’s senior aide and son-in-law Jared Kushner, who initially indicated Israel would end all strikes starting Sunday. Dahlan quickly walked back that claim on social media, revising his statement to say Kushner only confirmed he was “working with the Israeli side to halt the attacks”. Dahlan later accused Netanyahu of actively undermining the best chance to end the devastating conflict. “Netanyahu is working to obstruct the most promising opportunity to begin ending this war,” he said.

  • Uganda’s military unveils statue of Netanyahu’s brother who died in 1976 Entebbe hostage rescue

    Uganda’s military unveils statue of Netanyahu’s brother who died in 1976 Entebbe hostage rescue

    Nearly half a century after one of the most audacious hostage rescue missions in modern military history played out on Ugandan soil, Uganda’s military has dedicated a permanent memorial to the fallen Israeli commando who led the operation: Yonatan Netanyahu, older brother of current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The bronze statue, which depicts the lieutenant colonel holding an assault rifle in a combat-ready stance, was formally unveiled Saturday by Gen. Muhoozi Kainerugaba, Uganda’s top military commander and the eldest son of long-serving President Yoweri Museveni, widely viewed as his likely political successor. Kainerugaba, who personally commissioned the monument, used the opening ceremony to honor the fallen soldier’s extraordinary courage and commitment. The memorial stands on the grounds of Entebbe International Airport, the exact site where the 1976 raid unfolded, and the event drew a crowd that included Israeli nationals based in the region, among them local businessman Barak Orland. The story of the Entebbe raid began when pro-Palestinian hijackers — two Palestinian militants and two German collaborators — seized an Air France passenger flight carrying 106 people, diverting it to Entebbe Airport. The hijackers separated Jewish and Israeli passengers from the rest of the group and issued an ultimatum: they would execute the hostages unless Israel released dozens of imprisoned Palestinian militants within a week. Over seven days of stalled negotiations, Israeli military planners secretly prepared a high-risk rescue mission that would go down in military legend. On the night of July 3, 1976, Israeli commandos landed at Entebbe, stormed the terminal, and engaged hijackers and responding Ugandan forces. In the under-an-hour operation, Yonatan Netanyahu, the raid’s commander, was fatally struck by enemy gunfire — the only Israeli commando killed in the mission. Just three hostages died in the crossfire, and the vast majority of captives were brought to safety. Dozens of Ugandan soldiers were also killed during the clash. At the time of the 1976 raid, Uganda was ruled by dictator Idi Amin, who had cut diplomatic ties with Israel and openly supported the Palestinian independence movement. Israel’s successful rescue severely humiliated Amin, and the operation drew sharp criticism from the Organization of African Unity, the precursor to the modern African Union, which condemned the raid as a violation of Ugandan national sovereignty. For Israel, however, the mission has become a defining moment in the nation’s modern history, widely celebrated as one of the most extraordinary military achievements in its history. Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly stated that his brother’s death during the raid fundamentally altered the trajectory of his own life and political career. In his remarks at the unveiling, Kainerugaba emphasized the enduring meaning of the memorial beyond just remembrance. “Today, this memorial stands not only in remembrance of a distinguished soldier, but also as a tribute to the enduring values he embodied: courage in the face of danger, unwavering commitment to protecting innocent lives, and steadfast devotion to duty,” he told attendees. Today, relations between the Ugandan government and Israel are officially cordial, with President Museveni having repeatedly stated his public support for a two-state solution to resolve the long-running Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The unveiling of the monument marks a striking shift from the diplomatic tensions that surrounded the original raid, representing a public acknowledgment of the fallen soldier’s sacrifice decades after the historic mission.

  • Sudan army drone strike on court session kills 35, rights group says

    Sudan army drone strike on court session kills 35, rights group says

    Three years into Sudan’s devastating civil conflict between the national army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a deadly drone attack has left dozens dead and wounded in the restive Darfur region, amplifying global concerns over escalating violence against civilian populations.

    A local Sudanese human rights monitoring group, the Emergency Lawyers Group, has confirmed that 35 people lost their lives in the Sunday afternoon strike, which hit an open-air traditional court session in Ghara al-Zawiya village. The village is currently under RSF control, a faction that holds sway over most of Darfur, Sudan’s western territory. Dozens of additional civilians and attendees were injured in the attack, and as of Monday, the Sudanese army has not issued any public statement acknowledging or responding to the incident.

    Witnesses to the strike shared chilling details with Agence France-Presse, confirming that the informal court gathering was held under a tree, with local community leaders in attendance. Among those killed were four prominent tribal leaders and two RSF commanders, the witness reported. Local outlet Darfur 24, a privately owned regional news site, cited a resident who said two unmanned aerial vehicles circled the settlement before launching at least four missiles into the gathering.

    The Emergency Lawyers Group has issued an official statement condemning the attack, calling for an immediate independent investigation into the strike. The organization emphasized that deliberately targeting civilian gatherings and community infrastructure constitutes a severe violation of established international humanitarian law. It also drew attention to a worrying growing trend in the conflict: the increasing use of drone strikes to target populated civilian areas and public gatherings, a shift that has drastically raised safety risks for millions of Sudanese civilians trapped in crossfire.

    The current conflict, which broke out in April 2023 between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the RSF, has already been marked by widespread atrocities against civilian populations on both sides. The RSF has faced repeated accusations of war crimes and mass atrocities, including large-scale drone strikes targeting civilian communities over the course of the three-year war. A United Nations fact-finding mission concluded last year that the RSF’s prolonged siege and assault on el-Fasher, Darfur’s largest remaining major city, carried all the identifying characteristics of genocide—a finding the RSF has repeatedly denied.

    As the army continues to mobilize its supporters amid ongoing frontline clashes across the country, the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan shows no sign of abating. The conflict has killed more than tens of thousands of people to date, and forced millions more to flee their homes as internally displaced persons or cross-border refugees into neighboring countries.