分类: politics

  • In Algeria, new focus on English in schools rekindles debate over French colonial legacy

    In Algeria, new focus on English in schools rekindles debate over French colonial legacy

    A seismic shift is reshaping Algeria’s national education system, as English moves to center stage as the first mandatory foreign language for primary school students – a change that comes at the expense of French, and has stirred fierce national debate over pedagogy, colonial legacy, and geopolitical alignment. For the 2024-2025 school year, the reform takes full effect: three years after English was first piloted in primary education, all third-grade pupils will now learn only English, with French instruction delayed until fourth grade, when it will be taught as a second foreign language alongside English.

    This policy marks a break from a 61-year status quo. From Algeria’s independence from French colonial rule in 1962 through 2023, French held the position of the only foreign language taught to third-grade primary students. The current overhaul traces back to a directive from President Abdelmadjid Tebboune, who has framed the expansion of English as a strategic investment: he argues English is the global lingua franca of modern science, making early instruction critical for Algeria’s younger generations. The reform does not stop at primary school; secondary education will also see expanded English teaching hours and a higher weighting for the subject in national end-of-cycle exams, though French instruction in high school remains unchanged for the moment.

    The rollout of the reform has unfolded against a backdrop of institutional upheaval. Algeria’s largest teachers’ union, Cnapeste – which previously criticized the English expansion as a reckless, unprepared move citing a critical shortage of properly trained educators – was dissolved by state authorities last July over alleged violations of strike regulations. Union leaders reject the charges, framing the dissolution as an intentional effort to silence a vocal critic of government policy. With the main union body eliminated, no major teachers’ association has issued formal comment on the final implementation of the reform.

    Opinions are deeply split among other stakeholders. The National Federation of Parents of Students Associations, which typically aligns with the education ministry’s policy agenda, has welcomed the change. The group argues that mastery of English opens doors to global science, technology, and improved higher education and employment opportunities for Algerian youth. But many parents share Cnapeste’s earlier concerns, questioning whether the government can deliver on the promise of quality English instruction.

    Rachida Mahi, a 36-year-old Algiers-based engineer, is one skeptical parent. Her son is starting third grade this year, the first cohort to receive English-only instruction at that level, and she worries the rushed rollout will harm his academic progress. “How will the state manage to provide every school with qualified English teachers in sufficient numbers? Where does it plan to find them?” Mahi asked in an interview with Middle East Eye. Like many Algerians of her generation, Mahi learned French throughout her schooling and completed her engineering degree in French, speaking very little English – leaving her unable to support her son with his homework, a reality that leaves her panicked.

    To understand the stakes of this language shift, one must look back at decades of linguistic policy in post-independence Algeria. Immediately after ending French colonial rule in 1962, the new government established Arabic as the sole national and official language, launching a gradual process of Arabization to erase colonial linguistic legacy. That policy reached its peak in 1991, when a law mandated the use of Arabic across all areas of public life and education. But Arabization never fully succeeded: while law and social sciences were transitioned to Arabic instruction at the university level, scientific fields including medicine and engineering remained French-led, due to a lack of Arabic-language teaching materials and a shortage of educators trained to teach these subjects in Arabic. Even today, most leading global academic research is only accessible in foreign languages, primarily French and English. In line with his primary school reform, Tebboune has already announced plans to phase out French and replace it with English in medical studies by 2025, framing the move as a “wise” step that will align Algerian higher education with global scientific standards, where English is the dominant working language.

    Education and language specialists widely share concerns about the rushed implementation of the reform. Salah Derradji, a veteran language didactics specialist and former university rector, says he has long supported the gradual expansion of English across all education levels – but argues the current rollout lacks the deliberate planning the project requires. “This project must be carried out thoughtfully. And that is not the case today,” Derradji told Middle East Eye. He characterizes the reform as a political, rather than pedagogical, decision, noting that “You cannot train teachers in a few weeks and send them into classrooms. You first need qualified trainers,” adding that the government failed to hold broad consultation with academic specialists before moving forward.

    Rabeh Sebaa, a retired professor of sociology and anthropology at the University of Oran, echoes this criticism, arguing simply that “Algeria does not have the means to teach English – or teach in English – whether in schools or universities.” Back in 2022, as the government prepared to introduce English in primary schools, it launched a high-profile recruitment drive to hire 60,000 new English teachers, targeting university graduates with degrees in English language, literature, and interpretation. But education unions immediately criticized the campaign, pointing out that most new hires lacked any formal pedagogical training and received only rushed, inadequate preparation before entering classrooms.

    Hamid Hani, a 42-year-old parent from Bejaia, has seen the impact of underqualified hiring firsthand. His daughter is entering secondary school this year, and after two years of English instruction with an untrained young teacher, she still cannot speak English comfortably. “This teacher admitted to me during a parent-teacher meeting that she had to manage on her own to find teaching materials and organise her lessons,” Hani said. He accuses the government of gambling with children’s futures through “improvised measures” that put political goals ahead of quality education. Ahmed Tessa, an education specialist and author of a book on the status of French in Algerian schools, agrees, arguing that the reform “is an ideological rather than pedagogical decision.” He questions how quality instruction can be expected when new graduates are sent into classrooms without the minimum two years of initial pedagogical training required to teach effectively.

    Beyond questions of implementation, the reform has reignited a decades-long national debate over the legacy of French colonialism and Algeria’s ongoing relationship with France. The push to downgrade French comes at a moment of already heightened diplomatic tensions between Algiers and Paris, which escalated in 2024 after French President Emmanuel Macron publicly endorsed Morocco’s claim to sovereignty over Western Sahara – a position that directly contradicts Algeria’s longstanding support for the Polisario Front’s push for an independent Sahrawi state.

    Proponents of the reform frame the shift as a necessary assertion of national sovereignty and a break from colonial oppression. El Hachemi Djaaboub, a former minister from the Movement of Society for Peace (MSP), an Islamist-aligned party known for its criticism of French influence, has called the delay of French instruction an act of national sovereignty, and accused critics like Tessa of advancing foreign interests. Abderrazak Makri, former president of the MSP, has called for a complete break from French linguistic legacy: “We must put an end to France’s colonial legacy. Even President Macron speaks more English than French abroad. Today, English is the universal language; it is time for Algerians to adopt it and align themselves with great nations,” he said in 2022. This view resonates with a segment of the Algerian public, with social media discussions reflecting growing support for framing French as a colonial leftover that should be removed entirely from national education. In France, right-wing and far-right media have already seized on the reform, criticizing Algeria’s move as an intentional effort to erode French cultural and political influence in North Africa.

    Critics of the reform, however, push back against the ideological framing, arguing that language policy should be separated from anti-colonial politics. A small number of Algerian political parties, including the Rally for Culture and Democracy and the Workers’ Party, oppose downgrading French, arguing that foreign language instruction should be complementary, not a tool for ideological conflict. Sebaa characterizes the push to eliminate French from education as “visceral, ideologically driven postures.” He notes that many proponents of the shift studied at English-language universities and view English as a neutral global language, while framing French exclusively as a symbol of colonial domination. But Sebaa, who has published research on Algerians’ historical relationship with French, challenges this narrative. He points out that at independence, less than 20% of Algerian children attended colonial schools, meaning the “francisation” of Algerian culture was far less pervasive than often claimed. For most Algerians who lived under colonial rule, French was not only a tool of oppression but also a path to social advancement and cultural expression: the mid-20th century saw the rise of a vibrant body of Algerian literature written in French, with iconic writer Kateb Yacine famously describing French as “a war booty” that Algerians had claimed as their own.

    Critics warn that downgrading French will carry long-term harmful consequences for Algeria. Tessa argues that the move threatens to erode Algeria’s existing French-language cultural production and erase a key strand of the country’s collective memory that is expressed in French. He also warns that shifting away from French will distance Algeria from its neighboring geopolitical environment, which remains majority francophone, and break cultural and social ties between Algerian citizens and the millions of Algerian diaspora members and their descendants living primarily in France and French-speaking Quebec. Today, Algeria is the third-largest francophone country in the world by population, according to the International Organisation of La Francophonie, with an estimated 15.6 million Algerians – roughly one-third of the total population – speaking French.

  • Trump’s response is key as Argentina’s Falklands demands get louder

    Trump’s response is key as Argentina’s Falklands demands get louder

    Long before Argentine President Javier Milei delivered his late-night national address announcing new sanctions earlier this week, tensions over the long-running Falkland Islands dispute had already been rising steadily across Argentina. The high-profile celebration of Argentina’s World Cup victory over England this summer, where jubilant players held up a banner declaring “Las Malvinas son Argentinas” in front of euphoric fans, provided a striking visual of this growing friction – yet this simmering resentment stretches back far deeper into modern history.

    Opening his televised address from an Argentine perspective, Milei walked through a condensed narrative of the islands’ dispute, doubling down on the core argument that has anchored Argentina’s position for decades: the territory rightfully belongs to Buenos Aires. He framed the 1833 British presence as a colonial invasion that violently seized the land from Argentine control.

    The UK government has pushed back on this framing, pointing to key contextual details Milei omits from his retelling. For centuries leading up to the 1830s, multiple European powers had traded control of the unpopulated island chain. When British forces re-established a presence on the islands in 1833, the small Argentine settlement that had been established there had already been removed two years prior – not by British forces, but by the United States. The USS Lexington destroyed an Argentine outpost in December 1831 during a dispute over fishing and sealing rights in the region.

    But even as the U.S. played an unacknowledged role in clearing the way for 19th-century British control, Milei is now betting that Washington will become his strongest ally in advancing Argentina’s 21st-century claim to the islands. That confidence comes directly from former (and current candidate for) U.S. President Donald Trump, who recently announced he is re-evaluating the long-standing U.S. position on the Falklands. In a national address to the Argentine people, Milei declared that “winds of change” are blowing for the dispute.

    For decades, the U.S. has officially recognized British sovereignty over the Falklands while framing its policy as neutral. That neutrality has always been qualified, however: during the 1982 Falklands War, President Ronald Reagan provided critical material support to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a move that reinforced the decades-long transatlantic “Special Relationship” between London and Washington.

    For Trump, though, that historic alliance has already frayed. He blames current UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s predecessor Keir Starmer for the breakdown, after the UK declined to join the U.S. in its war against Iran. In a recent interview with GB News, Trump made his frustration clear: “You weren’t there to help me.” He also dismissed the Falklands as “a long way away” from the U.K. – a point that Falkland Islanders, who voted 99.8% to remain a British overseas territory in a 2013 referendum, have pushed back on: the distance from London to the Falklands is actually slightly shorter than the distance between Washington, D.C. and the U.S. territory of Guam in the western Pacific.

    Regardless of that factual pushback, Trump’s comments have already given a major boost to Milei, who is facing growing political pressure at home ahead of next year’s presidential election. His former vice president, Victoria Villarroel, one of his most prominent challengers, has positioned herself as a far harder-line defender of Argentine national sovereignty, repeatedly attacking Milei’s diplomatic approach to the Falklands as weak and ineffective. To counter that attack, leaning into the Falklands dispute and leaning on Trump’s support has become a key political strategy for the incumbent.

    Domestic political calculation is far from the only driver of the renewed tension, however. Milei has framed the dispute as newly urgent, warning of what he calls “a clear and urgent danger.” That urgency stems from upcoming energy exploration work: within the next two years, two energy firms – Israeli-owned Navitas Petroleum and UK-based Rockhopper Exploration – plan to begin drilling operations in the Sea Lion oilfield located off the Falklands coast. Milei has rejected this activity outright, arguing Argentina “cannot allow” the companies to “appropriate the oil reserves under our sea” and vowing that Buenos Aires will “not stand by with our arms folded.” FIFA also fined the Argentine Football Association after the World Cup banner incident, which violated global football rules banning political messaging during matches.

    Beyond economic and domestic political concerns, the dispute also ties into a broader ideological realignment in the Western Hemisphere. Milei and Trump share deep ideological and personal ties, and Milei has openly framed Argentina as a reliable, “trustworthy partner” for Washington. The two leaders have aligned behind what Trump has dubbed the “Don-roe Doctrine” – a playful reworking of the 19th-century Monroe Doctrine, which established U.S. hegemony across the Americas. The core of this new vision is simple: only ideologically aligned leaders should hold power across the Western Hemisphere.

    Within this new framework of reordered spheres of influence, many analysts note it is entirely plausible that Trump will side with his ideological ally Milei over the British Prime Minister, even as the dispute’s implications extend far beyond personal or partisan ties. As the countdown to the U.S. presidential election and Argentine exploration begins, the central question hanging over the coming months is whether this new “Don-roe Doctrine” will outweigh the decades of shared history that define the U.S.-UK Special Relationship.

  • Top Reform officials filmed allegedly plotting to break law on foreign donations

    Top Reform officials filmed allegedly plotting to break law on foreign donations

    A major political controversy has erupted in British politics just as Reform UK opened its annual national conference in Birmingham, after undercover reporting exposed alleged attempts by two senior party officials to circumvent UK electoral law to secure an illegal £500,000 foreign donation from an individual based in the United States.

    The bombshell investigation, broadcast Thursday night on Channel 4 News and conducted by independent investigative group Verbatim Investigations, captured damning on-camera conversations showing the party’s head of policy — James Orr, a serving associate professor at the University of Cambridge — outlining a scheme to disguise a donation from a U.S. national. Under UK electoral regulations, political parties may only accept financial contributions from individuals registered on the UK electoral roll or companies formally registered and operating within British borders, which rules out direct or indirect donations from overseas actors.

    In the filmed exchange, Orr proposed a workaround to an undercover reporter posing as a UK-based donor: the reporter’s American father, played by an actor working with the investigation team, would transfer the full £500,000 to the reporter, who would then officially register as the donor to the party. The plan first centered on an initial £18,000 payment to fund an opinion poll supporting Reform’s general election campaigning, before expanding to the larger six-figure donation.

    The footage also captured party leader Nigel Farage joining a lunch meeting with Farage’s senior personal aide Dan Jukes, the undercover reporter and the actor posing as the American donor. In the meeting, Farage can be seen celebrating the poll’s results, which showed strong public support for Reform, calling the survey “amazing” and praising it for delivering strong “bang for buck.” When the reporter laid out the proposed scheme to channel the American father’s money into the party through his own UK registered donor status, Farage responded simply: “Thank you. Well, both of you. Thank you.”

    By Friday morning, just 24 hours after the report aired and on the first full day of Reform’s conference, both Jukes and Orr stepped down from their official party positions pending the outcome of an internal party investigation. The opposition Labour Party and the centrist Liberal Democrats have already formally reported Reform UK to the Metropolitan Police over the allegations. The Electoral Commission, the UK’s independent elections regulator, confirmed Friday that it is reviewing all available evidence related to the case and has been in direct contact with Metropolitan Police leadership, who announced Thursday night they would launch a formal assessment of the claims to determine whether a criminal investigation is warranted.

    In an official statement released Friday morning, a Reform UK spokesperson confirmed the internal probe had been launched, noting: “Reform UK has launched an investigation following the broadcast of a Channel 4 News programme. Both individuals involved have stepped down from their respective positions pending the outcome of the investigation. The party believes it is important that the investigation is allowed to proceed independently and without prejudice. No further comment will be made while the investigation is ongoing.”

    Party leaders have pushed back aggressively against the claims, however. Deputy leader Richard Tice told BBC Radio 4 Friday that the party had already received a formal legal opinion from a senior King’s Counsel asserting no electoral rules had been broken, and he accused Channel 4 of orchestrating entrapment to damage the party’s reputation. Speaking to LBC radio, Farage himself also insisted no wrongdoing had occurred.

    The controversy comes as Farage already faces an ongoing parliamentary investigation over an undeclared £5 million gift he received ahead of his election as a Member of Parliament in 2024, which Farage has repeatedly denied was any violation of parliamentary rules. The latest allegations also add to growing public scrutiny of Reform’s long-rumored ties to foreign political actors, a topic that has drawn increasing media and regulatory attention over the past six months.

    Independent outlet Middle East Eye has previously documented the growing close relationship between Reform, a hardline anti-immigration party, and the government of the United Arab Emirates. Farage made an official trip to Abu Dhabi last December, with all travel and accommodation costs covered by the Emirati government, during which he held meetings with multiple senior Emirati cabinet ministers, including the country’s foreign minister. In April 2025, reporting revealed that senior Reform officials had been actively exploring fundraising from wealthy foreign donors based in low-tax jurisdictions including Monaco, Switzerland and the UAE.

    Notably, multiple Emirati diplomats are scheduled to attend Reform’s Birmingham conference Friday, alongside diplomatic representatives from other major nations including the United States, Israel and India. Political analysts note that the UAE and Reform share a common public opposition to political Islam, a longstanding policy priority for Abu Dhabi that it has advanced across the Middle East since the 2011 Arab Spring, and increasingly in European and North American political circles in recent years.

  • Meloni celebrates her Italian government’s longevity during party rally in Bari

    Meloni celebrates her Italian government’s longevity during party rally in Bari

    On a Friday rally in the southern Italian city of Bari, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni marked a unprecedented political milestone for her right-wing administration, celebrating that her government has become the longest-serving single cabinet in Italy’s post-war republican history. Crossing the 1,414-consecutive-day mark in office, Meloni’s coalition has officially surpassed the previous 1,412-day record set by Silvio Berlusconi’s second administration, which held power from 2001 to 2005.

    Addressing thousands of cheering supporters who chanted her name through the event, Meloni framed the longevity record as clear proof of the unity and resilience of her center-right coalition. “It is no coincidence that the three longest-serving governments in the history of the Italian Republic are all center-right governments,” she told the crowd. Framing political continuity as her government’s foundational achievement, Meloni added: “Stability is our first great reform.” She argued that the unusual stretch of unbroken governance has allowed her administration to advance economic and foreign policy priorities that would have been impossible to pursue under Italy’s historic pattern of short-lived, frequently collapsing administrations.

    In a vulnerable, personal reflection on her time in office, Meloni opened up about the steep obstacles she has faced while pushing forward her policy agenda and pushing back against political opposition to change. “There were days when it felt like I was swimming through glue, but I never gave up and I do not intend to start now,” she said, a comment that drew loud, sustained cheers from attendees. The Bari rally also laid out the core narrative Meloni is expected to center in the lead-up to Italy’s next national election, scheduled for 2027: that consistent, stable governance has delivered tangible results and rebuilt Italy’s global credibility.

    Political analysts note that the milestone caps a remarkable political transformation for Meloni, who made history as Italy’s first female prime minister when she took office in 2022, rising from a fringe political outsider to a central figure in Italian and European politics. When her government first took power, many international and European observers raised alarms over her party’s historical roots in post-war neo-fascism, widely predicting she would adopt a confrontational stance toward EU institutions in Brussels. To date, those fears have not materialized.

    Vera Capperucci, a professor of the history of European political parties at Rome’s LUISS University, described the Bari celebratory rally as a “necessary act” to cement the government’s narrative, adding that foreign policy credibility has been the defining success of Meloni’s term. “Meloni has built credibility with European partners while maintaining Italy’s Atlantic alliances, defying concerns when she took office that her government would pursue a more confrontational course toward Brussels,” Capperucci explained. Since taking office, Meloni has stayed consistent in Italy’s military and political support for Ukraine, worked within existing European regulatory and institutional frameworks, and built close, cooperative ties with key Western allies across the globe.

    Meloni and her supporters credit the government’s political stability for a string of tangible domestic achievements: they point to the creation of more than 1 million new jobs, a steady drop in national unemployment, more disciplined management of Italy’s public finances, and a sharp reduction in irregular migrant arrivals along Italian coasts. For many attendees at the Bari rally, the longevity record alone counts as a major win for Italian politics, which has been plagued by fragmented coalitions and early government collapses for decades. Marco Macrì, a 34-year-old Forza Italia supporter from the small southern town of Alliste, near Lecce, noted that Meloni has successfully held the center-right coalition together in the period following Berlusconi’s death. “Now, with Giorgia, we are all united under one roof … with different symbols but part of one family,” he said.

    Still, the milestone has drawn sharp pushback from political opponents, who argue that Meloni’s government has failed to address Italy’s most persistent long-term challenges. Critics point out that deep structural issues including stagnant productivity growth, chronically low wages, and widespread inefficiencies in public administration and services remain largely unresolved. Opposition leaders also accuse the coalition of cutting critical funding for public health and education services, and argue that the government’s only economic achievements have been limited to controlling public debt and deficit levels, with no actionable plan to boost sustained long-term economic growth.

    It is worth noting that while Meloni leads the longest-serving single uninterrupted government in Italian republican history, Berlusconi still holds the record for the longest total cumulative time in office across multiple separate administrations. No Italian government has ever completed a full five-year parliamentary term without collapsing or being replaced early. As Meloni’s administration basks in the glow of its record-breaking milestone, the national political conversation has already begun to shift: the question is no longer whether Meloni’s coalition can survive, but whether Italian voters will decide it has delivered enough to earn another term in 2027.

  • Argentina threatens oil firms with sanctions as Falkland Islands dispute intensifies

    Argentina threatens oil firms with sanctions as Falkland Islands dispute intensifies

    Decades-long tensions over the South Atlantic Falkland Islands, known as Las Malvinas to Argentina, have reignited in recent weeks after Argentina’s far-right President Javier Milei announced new threats of economic sanctions against international energy companies planning exploratory drilling in waters surrounding the contested archipelago. The move marks a sharp escalation of Buenos Aires’ long-standing campaign to push the United Kingdom to relinquish control of the British Overseas Territory, a dispute that already boiled over into open armed conflict between the two nations in 1982.

    In a nationally televised address to the Argentine public, Milei framed the current moment as a turning point in Argentina’s decades-long sovereignty claim, arguing that shifting global dynamics support Buenos Aires’ position. “The winds of change are blowing in favor of our claim to the Malvinas,” he stated, pointing to recent comments from former U.S. President Donald Trump that have opened the door to a potential reversal of Washington’s long-standing recognition of British sovereignty over the islands.

    Milei recalled that Trump previously threatened to revise the U.S. stance on the Falklands dispute in response to the UK’s refusal to back the U.S. in its conflict with Iran. “Recently, President Trump declared that the US is re-evaluating its historic position in relation to the Malvinas,” Milei added, marking the first time a sitting U.S. or former U.S. president has publicly confirmed a potential review of Washington’s long-held policy on the territorial issue.

    Beyond leaning on potential international support, Milei also sought to frame the dispute through a lens of national decline and resurgence. He claimed the UK is currently on “a path of decline” driven by its immigration policies, contrasting this with what he called Argentina’s flourishing future that will ultimately prevail in the sovereignty struggle.

    The immediate trigger for Milei’s latest escalation is the upcoming start of exploratory drilling at the Sea Lion oilfield, located in waters off the Falklands coast. The project is led by a partnership between British energy firms and Israeli energy company Navitas Petroleum, which holds a 65 percent controlling stake in the development. Milei labeled the project a “clear and present danger” to Argentina’s sovereignty claims, and confirmed that the country would move forward with implementing existing legal powers to sanction any companies involved in unauthorized activity around the islands.

    Argentina has long had legislation on the books that allows authorities to impose economic and legal restrictions on any company that participates in resource exploration projects in the Falklands that Buenos Aires does not authorize. What makes the Sea Lion project notable, however, is Milei’s own political background: the Argentine president has positioned himself as a staunch pro-Israel ally, and had previously avoided harsh criticism of Navitas Petroleum, unlike he has with other international firms seeking access to Falklands energy resources.

    The Israeli government has already acknowledged the diplomatic sensitivity of the situation. In December, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar noted that the involvement of Navitas Petroleum’s British subsidiary had created difficult feelings between the UK and Argentina, expressing regret for the friction while noting Israel’s special bilateral relationship with Milei’s government.

    For its part, the UK has swiftly rejected Milei’s threats and reaffirmed its long-standing commitment to the Falkland Islands and the rights of their population. Downing Street pointed out that economic pressure against Falkland Islanders from Argentine governments is not a new tactic, and emphasized that the island people hold an inalienable right to self-determination — including the right to develop and exploit their own natural resources.

    While both nations have staked competing claims to the archipelago for more than a century, a 2013 referendum held among Falkland Islanders delivered an overwhelming result in favor of remaining an overseas territory of the UK, a result London has repeatedly cited as confirmation of the legitimacy of its rule.

  • Tunisia’s top court upholds opposition convictions in a state security case

    Tunisia’s top court upholds opposition convictions in a state security case

    TUNIS, Tunisia — Tunisia’s highest judicial body, the Court of Cassation, has delivered a final ruling upholding long prison sentences for dozens of high-profile opposition leaders, legal practitioners and human rights advocates convicted in a widely divisive state security conspiracy case, according to judicial sources cited by Tunisia’s state-run news agency TAP Thursday evening. The court rejected all appeals filed by the defendants, leaving intact sentences of up to 45 years originally issued by a lower appellate court in 2023. This verdict has amplified already widespread international scrutiny of President Kais Saied’s administration, deepening alarms over the erosion of judicial independence and political pluralism in the North African nation. The conspiracy case stands as a central pillar of a sweeping government crackdown that has unfolded since Saied seized nearly unchecked executive power in July 2021, when he moved to suspend parliament, dismiss the sitting prime minister’s cabinet, and rule the country via presidential decree. The charges brought against the defendants include conspiracy against the state’s internal and external security, membership in a terrorist organization, and plotting to alter the country’s system of governance — all allegations that the accused have consistently and vehemently denied, with their legal teams repeatedly challenging the legitimacy of the judicial process. Speaking at a Friday press conference, Faiza Rahem, wife of detained opposition activist Issam Chebbi, announced that families of the convicts would shift their legal fight into a broader political movement following the top court’s ruling. “After four years of ongoing harassment and persecution, we will not stop our work to defend the detainees. We will never grow tired or surrender,” Rahem stated. She added that the government’s repressive tactics have only hardened the opposition’s commitment: “As authoritarianism has grown more brutal, our ranks have grown, too. Every time they try to silence our voices, we only speak louder.” Saied has publicly backed the convictions, framing the prosecutions as a critical measure to safeguard Tunisia’s national security and hold what he calls enemies of the state accountable. He has previously labeled his political opponents “traitors” and “terrorists,” claiming the defendants in this case plotted to destabilize the country and incite widespread social unrest. Elected to the presidency in 2019 on a populist platform promising to dismantle Tunisia’s corrupt, dysfunctional post-Arab Spring political system, Saied has repeatedly rejected accusations that he is engineering a full authoritarian takeover to suppress all dissent. He maintains his sweeping executive actions are necessary to root out systemic corruption and shield Tunisia from foreign interference. Defense lawyers for the convicted individuals have already raised sharp objections to the handling of the appeal process, noting they received just three days’ advance notice of Thursday’s final hearing. The extremely short timeline, they argue, deprived them of adequate time to prepare a robust defense for their clients. The list of high-profile figures handed lengthy sentences includes veteran opposition leader Ahmed Nejib Chebbi, prominent activist Chaima Issa, and seasoned politicians Jaouhar Ben Mbarek, Ghazi Chaouachi, Ayachi Hammami, Khayam Turki and Abdelhamid Jelassi. A number of the defendants spent multiple years in pretrial detention before their convictions, while others who were released on bail during the lengthy appeals process have now been rearrested to begin serving their sentences after this final ruling. Global human rights organizations have harshly condemned the convictions. Amnesty International had publicly urged the Court of Cassation to overturn the guilty verdicts ahead of the ruling, describing the entire case as blatantly politically motivated and noting the trial was plagued by repeated violations of due process and basic legal rights. The organization has also raised urgent alarms over poor prison conditions for the detained opposition figures, warning that many convicts are already suffering from declining health, conditions that have been severely exacerbated by recent repeated heat waves in overcrowded, poorly ventilated prison facilities. In August, Haifa Chebbi, a lawyer and the daughter of 82-year-old Ahmed Nejib Chebbi, shared that her father, one of the most high-profile detainees, was experiencing severe shortness of breath and chronic extreme fatigue, with prison officials only providing minimal monitoring of his fragile health condition.

  • Trump’s peace envoys to visit Moscow and Kyiv over weekend, reports say

    Trump’s peace envoys to visit Moscow and Kyiv over weekend, reports say

    Fresh momentum is building behind U.S.-led diplomatic efforts to end the nearly three-year-long Russia-Ukraine war, as two top American envoys are set to travel to both Moscow and Kyiv this weekend for the first time in their shuttle diplomacy mission.

    Jared Kushner, former U.S. president Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior advisor, and veteran negotiator Steve Witkoff have spearheaded Trump’s ongoing push to broker a durable ceasefire and lasting peace agreement between the two warring nations. Multiple anonymous U.S. officials confirmed to Axios that the pair will hold one-on-one talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow this Saturday, before traveling to Kyiv to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy the following Sunday. Multiple prior trips have seen the pair visit Russia for preliminary discussions, but this weekend’s meeting in Ukraine will mark their first on-the-ground talks with Ukrainian leadership since the mediation effort launched.

    The planned diplomatic shuttle comes amid a fresh wave of Russian attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure just days ahead of the envoys’ arrival. On Friday, Zelenskyy confirmed that a Russian drone strike targeted the office of the head of Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU), Oleksandr Poklad, in central Kyiv. Poklad escaped the attack without injury, and Zelenskyy said he has ordered the security chief to launch an adequate retaliatory response to the strike.

    Zelenskyy first hinted at the upcoming visit on Thursday, telling reporters that tentative dates had been locked in for the U.S. mediators to arrive in Kyiv in the coming days. Ukrainian lawmaker Oleksiy Honcharenko later corroborated the timeline, confirming the Kyiv meeting was scheduled for Sunday immediately after the envoys concluded their Moscow talks. Russia’s state-owned news agency Tass also confirmed the 5-6 September travel schedule, citing an unnamed Russian government source. When pressed for comment this week, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov declined to confirm the details in advance, telling reporters that official updates would be released once the contacts are underway.

    Despite the new push for negotiations, significant gaps remain between the two sides. Speaking at an international economic forum on Thursday, Putin acknowledged that there are concrete chances to reach a peace agreement, but added that any deal first requires direct agreement between Moscow and Kyiv. The Russian leader has given no indication that he plans to step back from his core maximalist demands, which include major territorial concessions from Ukraine that would formalize Russia’s control over nearly 20% of Ukrainian territory, an area Russia has occupied since launching its full-scale invasion in February 2022.

    Kyiv and its Western and European allies have repeatedly rejected Russia’s terms, framing them as an unacceptable demand for unconditional Ukrainian capitulation that violates international law and the country’s territorial sovereignty. While the new diplomatic push has raised cautious hopes of a breakthrough, observers warn deep divides over core terms will make reaching a final deal a significant challenge.

  • Cambodia’s army to resume joint military exercises with the US next year

    Cambodia’s army to resume joint military exercises with the US next year

    After nearly a decade of suspended military cooperation, Cambodia and the United States are set to restart formal joint military exercises in early 2025, according to an official announcement published Friday on the Royal Cambodian Army’s Facebook page. The planned drill, named Exercise Angkor Sentinel 2025, will be held in February, marking a key milestone in efforts to repair strained bilateral ties that have been fractured since Cambodia halted all joint U.S. military exercises in 2017.

    This breakthrough follows a series of high-level diplomatic and defense meetings between senior officials from both nations over recent months, held with the explicit goal of bridging longstanding divides. One of the most significant points of tension has been Washington’s long-held concerns over Cambodia’s deepening economic and political partnership with China, particularly surrounding Chinese development of a major Cambodian navy base on the Gulf of Thailand. U.S. officials have repeatedly raised suspicions that Beijing secured secret, exclusive military access to the upgraded facility, claims Cambodian authorities have consistently and categorically denied.

    Beyond the base dispute, the U.S. has also openly criticized Cambodia’s human rights record, pointing to ongoing government crackdowns on political opposition and dissenting voices, carried out largely through court proceedings that independent human rights organizations argue are controlled by Prime Minister Hun Manet’s ruling Cambodian People’s Party.

    Diplomatic momentum for a reset picked up noticeably in August, when Hun Manet held formal defense-focused talks with Elbridge A. Colby, the third-highest-ranking official at the U.S. Department of Defense. During that meeting, Hun Manet expressed public satisfaction with the “positive momentum in Cambodia–U.S. relations” and welcomed the progress made in preparing for the revival of the Angkor Sentinel exercise series, as well as continued U.S. support for capacity building for Cambodian armed forces.

    “Joint exercises and training do not only build military capability,” Hun Manet stressed during the talks. “They also serve as a vital bridge to foster close friendship between the armed forces of both countries.”

    In a separate high-level meeting also held in August, U.S. Navy Adm. Steve Koehler, commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, held discussions with Cambodian Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief Gen. Vong Pisen. The pair confirmed plans to restart a separate bilateral maritime exercise that was also suspended alongside land-based drills in 2017.

    In its official announcement Friday, the Royal Cambodian Army said the upcoming Exercise Angkor Sentinel 2025 is designed to boost interoperability between the two militaries and strengthen shared disaster response capabilities. The drill “reflects renewed momentum in Cambodia–U.S. military cooperation and a shared commitment to strengthening defense cooperation,” the statement added. Analysts view the resumption of exercises as a sign of incremental progress in easing tensions, even as core disagreements over Cambodia’s relationship with China and domestic policy remain unresolved.

  • Kenya’s Ruto orders Indian company Tata Chemicals to leave the country

    Kenya’s Ruto orders Indian company Tata Chemicals to leave the country

    In a bold announcement delivered at a public rally Thursday, Kenyan President William Ruto has ordered Indian industrial firm Tata Chemicals to end its decades-long operations in the country, accusing the company of failing to deliver tangible economic benefits to one of Kenya’s key natural resource export sectors.

    Tata Chemicals Magadi Limited, the firm’s local subsidiary, has held rights to extract and process soda ash from Kenya’s Lake Magadi since 2005. Soda ash, a critical raw material used in manufacturing glass, soaps and detergents, is derived from trona deposits found naturally in the lake, where large-scale commercial extraction of the mineral first launched more than a century ago, in 1911. Official Kenyan government data shows that between August 2024 and July 2025, soda ash exports from the country totaled 254,779 tons, with a combined market value of $56.9 million, marking the sector as a notable contributor to Kenya’s export revenue.

    But President Ruto has rejected the company’s argument of its contribution to the national economy, arguing that Tata Chemicals has extracted billions of dollars worth of Kenyan natural resources for decades without delivering on local development commitments. Ruto specifically emphasized that the firm has failed to make meaningful infrastructure or industrial investments in Kajiado County, the administrative region that hosts Lake Magadi. “They have not built any factory or employed people [locally],” Ruto told attendees of the rally, adding that “they have been taking our resources and shipping them to India.” Under the president’s order, Tata Chemicals must “pack and leave” to clear the way for a new investor that will be required to build a domestic glass manufacturing facility to create local jobs and add value to Kenya’s natural resource exports before they are shipped overseas.

    The national government first paused the company’s operations back in July, when the Kenyan Ministry of Mining suspended all activities pending a broad compliance review. The president’s order comes as the review is still ongoing, and the development raises immediate concerns over potential economic fallout: industry analysts warn that an abrupt exit by Tata Chemicals could lead to widespread layoffs for local workers and a significant short-term drop in national export revenue before a new operator can fully ramp up operations.

    In an official statement filed with the National Stock Exchange of India on Friday, Tata Chemicals pushed back against the Kenyan government’s claims, asserting that it remains “fully compliant” with all local regulatory requirements. The company noted that it has not yet received formal official notification of Ruto’s exit order, and said it remains committed to “constructive engagement” with the Kenyan government to resolve the ongoing dispute over its operations.

  • China is boycotting a major Asian art festival over the naming of a Taiwanese exhibition

    China is boycotting a major Asian art festival over the naming of a Taiwanese exhibition

    A diplomatic and cultural standoff has disrupted Asia’s leading contemporary art event, the Gwangju Biennale in South Korea, after a cohort of Chinese artists pulled out of the exhibition in protest of organizers’ decision to allow Taiwanese participants to exhibit under the label “Taiwan Pavilion.”

    China has long upheld the one-China principle, which holds that the self-governing island of Taiwan is an inalienable part of Chinese territory. Beijing formally refers to the island as “China’s Taiwan region” and rejects any framing that suggests Taiwan has independent sovereign status. In comments released Thursday, China’s Foreign Ministry issued sharp criticism of the biennale’s organizing committee, accusing the group of “stubbornly clinging to the wrongful practice, allowing China’s Taiwan region to participate under a designation that is completely incompatible with its status.”

    Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun added that Beijing expects the South Korean government to translate its formal political commitment to the one-China principle into tangible action. On the same day the ministry released its statement, the participating Chinese artists confirmed their withdrawal from the exhibition, which is scheduled to open Saturday and run through mid-November.

    The contested “Taiwan Pavilion” is part of the biennale’s Pavilion Project, a parallel program featuring roughly 25 small national and institutional galleries hosted separate from the event’s main exhibition grounds. In an interview with reporters, Chinese curator Ruan Yuelai, speaking through an interpreter, framed the naming dispute as an unauthorized injection of political controversy into the cultural sphere. “The organizers of the Gwangju Biennale used an incorrect name for China’s Taiwan region over its participation in the exhibition, causing a political issue to spill over onto the realm of art,” Ruan explained. “The Chinese exhibition team cannot accept this and unanimously agreed to withdraw from the exhibition to express our strong protest.” As of Friday afternoon, the Chinese contingent had not yet removed the paintings, sculptures and other artworks originally prepared for display in the event’s China Pavilion.

    The naming disagreement has a tangled recent history. Back in August, Taiwan’s Ministry of Culture confirmed the island’s participants had originally planned to exhibit under the “Taiwan Pavilion” banner, and even protested when organizers initially proposed rebranding their space as the “National Taiwan Museum of Fine Arts Pavilion.” In a statement released Wednesday, the biennale organizers offered a public apology “for causing concerns and confusion” among stakeholders in the Pavilion Project, acknowledging that disagreements over the naming had persisted between the event team and the Taiwanese museum.

    Organizers clarified that they had signed a participation contract with the National Taiwan Museum of Fine Arts under the assumption that Taiwanese artists would exhibit under the museum’s widely used acronym, NTMoFA. Per the event team, the Taiwanese museum later demanded that the space be called “Taiwan Pavilion,” leaving organizers feeling pressured to accept the name change.

    This latest dispute is part of a broader pattern of growing diplomatic pressure from Beijing over Taiwan’s international participation. Earlier this same week, China issued a formal warning of unspecified consequences after Taiwan’s foreign minister addressed a diplomatic forum in Palau. In May, Beijing pressured an African nation to bar Taiwanese activists from taking part in an international human rights conference. Beijing has ramped up coercive diplomacy targeting Taiwan in recent years, poaching the island’s remaining formal diplomatic allies; Taiwan now counts just 12 countries that officially recognize its sovereignty. The two sides have been politically separated since the end of the Chinese civil war in 1949.

    It remains uncertain whether the current protest will escalate into a full-scale diplomatic rift between Beijing and Seoul. South Korea’s current liberal government has made improving bilateral ties with China a policy priority, and China is South Korea’s largest single trading partner. For its part, South Korea’s Foreign Ministry has moved to distance itself from the decision, noting that the naming choice was made exclusively by a non-governmental organizing body and has no connection to the South Korean government. The ministry added that Seoul hopes the dispute will not negatively impact bilateral cooperation and relations between the two countries.