分类: politics

  • Ex-president Hernandez returns to Honduras after Trump pardon

    Ex-president Hernandez returns to Honduras after Trump pardon

    Nearly eight months after former U.S. President Donald Trump issued a highly debated pardon that cut short a 45-year federal prison sentence for drug trafficking, ex-Honduran head of state Juan Orlando Hernandez has touched down back on his home soil. The former leader arrived via private aircraft at Palmerola International Airport, located just outside the Central American nation’s capital of Tegucigalpa, where a crowd of close family members and loyal supporters gathered to welcome his return, according to on-the-ground reporting from Agence France-Presse. Standing among the crowd holding a sign expressing gratitude to Trump, 56-year-old Hernandez supporter Eva Amador described the moment as one of overwhelming joy and excitement for the former president’s backers.

    Hernandez held the presidency of Honduras from 2014 to 2022, but his post-office trajectory took a sharp turn almost immediately after he left power. His left-leaning successor, current President Xiomara Castro, authorized his extradition to the United States to face a slate of federal drug trafficking charges shortly after taking office. In 2024, a U.S. jury found Hernandez guilty of facilitating the smuggling of hundreds of tons of illicit narcotics into American territory over the course of his political career, handing down a 45-year prison sentence that appeared to end his public life.

    The outcome shifted dramatically in the final days leading up to Honduras’ 2024 presidential election, when Trump made a surprise announcement: he had granted a full pardon to Hernandez. Alongside the pardon, the former U.S. president issued an explicit threat to cut off critical U.S. aid to Honduras if conservative candidate Nasry Asfura — a close political ally of Hernandez — failed to win the election. The unprecedented direct interference in Honduras’ domestic electoral process sparked immediate national outcry. Castro and her progressive allies condemned the move as blatant foreign meddling in the country’s sovereign democratic process, a claim that carried extra weight when vote counting concluded with Asfura claiming victory.

    The pardon also drew accusations of political hypocrisy within the United States, coming at the same time Trump was rolling out a high-profile, hardline military campaign targeting drug trafficking organizations across Latin America. The initiative has included U.S. military strikes on vessels suspected of being tied to major cartels, creating a stark contrast with Trump’s decision to clear a convicted drug trafficking facilitator just as he ramped up pressure on other regional actors linked to the drug trade. When he announced the pardon last year, Trump claimed without providing any verifiable evidence that Hernandez had been the victim of a political setup orchestrated by the administration of his Democratic predecessor Joe Biden.

    Now that Hernandez is back in Honduras, he faces a new set of legal challenges in his home country. He is scheduled to appear before a Honduran court on August 3 to respond to multiple long-standing corruption charges tied to his time in office. The former leader has repeatedly denied all allegations of wrongdoing, and has publicly stated that he has no plans to reenter electoral politics, saying he returns to Honduras without any personal political ambitions.

  • Netanyahu says Rubio told him US ‘determined to act forcefully’ against ICC after Khan’s removal

    Netanyahu says Rubio told him US ‘determined to act forcefully’ against ICC after Khan’s removal

    A major shakeup at the International Criminal Court (ICC) has triggered sharp reactions across global politics, after member states voted Friday to remove top prosecutor Karim Khan from his post amid ongoing misconduct allegations.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly issued a public statement celebrating the decision on Sunday, framing the ousting of Khan as a long-overdue reckoning for an institution he claims is riddled with bias and corruption.

    “I welcome the decision, supported by an overwhelming majority of countries, to remove Karim Khan, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court,” Netanyahu posted on the social platform X. Calling the move “a very positive development”, the Israeli leader argued that Khan’s removal strips away a protective layer for alleged institutional misconduct, and lays bare what he claims were the prosecutor’s hidden motives.

    Netanyahu alleged that Khan’s 2023 attempt to secure arrest warrants for him and former Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant, amid accusations of war crimes in Gaza, was a deliberate distraction from the misconduct claims facing Khan personally. “That shield has now been torn away,” Netanyahu said. “What has been exposed is not only Karim Khan’s true motivation, but also the profound injustice and corruption that have infected both the Office of the Prosecutor and the International Criminal Court itself.”

    The Israeli prime minister also claimed he had spoken with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who he says reaffirmed Washington’s commitment to confronting the ICC aggressively. “He once again reaffirmed America’s determination to act forcefully against this institution,” Netanyahu wrote. He went on to condemn the ICC as a body that “undermines justice, attacks democratic and sovereign nations, and seeks to subordinate their security to the decisions of unaccountable and corrupt officials in The Hague.”

    Hours after the vote on Khan, Venezuelan foreign minister Felix Plasencia announced his country would make good on an “irrevocable” decision to withdraw fully from the ICC, pointing to longstanding accusations of geographic bias against Global South nations. The withdrawal marks a striking shift in Venezuela’s alignment toward U.S. foreign policy, coming just one week after Rubio pledged a “whole-of-government response to systematically disable” the tribunal.

    By Sunday, U.S. officials openly embraced both the removal of Khan and Venezuela’s exit from the court. In a post on X, the U.S. State Department celebrated Venezuela’s move as a milestone in collaborative, American-led efforts to “dismantle the corrupt and worthless ICC.”

    Hostility toward the ICC has been a consistent policy priority for U.S. conservative administrations for years. The Trump administration repeatedly pushed to undermine the international court, imposing harsh sanctions on ICC prosecutors who launched investigations into alleged war crimes committed by U.S. and Israeli military personnel. In an executive order signed last year, Trump argued the ICC “has engaged in illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America and our close ally Israel”, referencing the November 2023 arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant.

  • Keiko Fujimori’s party wins Senate presidency in Peru ahead of presidential inauguration

    Keiko Fujimori’s party wins Senate presidency in Peru ahead of presidential inauguration

    LIMA, Peru — Just two days before President-elect Keiko Fujimori is set to take office for the 2026–2031 presidential term, the conservative leader’s Popular Force party has secured control of the Senate presidency through a new right-wing alliance, clearing a critical early hurdle for the incoming administration.

    Miguel Torres, a seasoned lawyer and legislator who also holds the title of Peru’s second vice president-elect, won the top Senate post in a 30-to-60 vote Sunday. The victory came via an alliance between Popular Force and the right-wing Popular Renewal party, whose member Alejandro Muñante claimed the Senate’s first vice presidency as part of the power-sharing deal.

    This leadership vote marks a historic milestone for Peru, which has reinstated a bicameral congressional system for the first time in more than 30 years. The newly restructured Congress is still finalizing its full leadership structure: voting to select leadership for the 130-seat lower chamber was expected to conclude in the hours following the Senate result, and the new legislative body is scheduled to launch its first annual session on Monday.

    In his remarks after being sworn in, Torres outlined a moderate, trust-focused agenda for the Senate, saying the body would work toward building a “more prudent” state and repairing the fractured relationship between Peruvian political institutions and the public they serve.

    The new bicameral Congress inherits a steep set of challenges, starting with the deep, long-running governance crisis that has shaken the Andean nation over the past decade. The instability of this period is reflected in an extraordinary political turnover: eight different presidents have held office in Peru since 2014, a pattern of constant upheaval that has eroded public confidence in government across the country. Complicating legislative work further, no single political bloc holds a majority in either chamber of the new Congress, meaning cross-party cooperation will be required to advance any major policy.

    Torres will serve a one-year term as Senate president, having been elected alongside Fujimori and first vice president Luis Galarreta in the country’s recent presidential contest. The incoming administration, led by Fujimori — who secured victory in a tight presidential runoff — will be inaugurated on July 28, when it formally takes power to address Peru’s ongoing political and social challenges.

  • Trump’s move to restore direct Lebanon flights raises diaspora hopes

    Trump’s move to restore direct Lebanon flights raises diaspora hopes

    For more than four decades, the skies between the United States and Lebanon have lacked direct commercial air connections, a decades-long restriction born from the 1985 hijacking of TWA Flight 847 that left a U.S. Navy diver dead during a 17-day hostage standoff.

    This suspension has outlived nearly every major shift in Lebanon’s modern history: it survived the end of the country’s 15-year civil war, multiple rounds of political normalization efforts between Washington and Beirut, and the explosive growth of large, vibrant Lebanese diaspora communities across Canada and the United States. Today, that long-locked door may finally be creaking open.

    Shortly after Lebanese President Joseph Aoun completed a high-profile visit to the White House this week, former U.S. President Donald Trump announced he had directed his administration to greenlight U.S. carriers to resume direct flights to Lebanon — a first since the Reagan administration first grounded the routes in 1985.

    “After meeting with the President of Lebanon, Joseph Aoun, who has done a remarkable job working to transform his Country, I am hereby directing my Administration to allow all U.S. airline carriers to fly directly to Lebanon so that Americans can easily visit this beautiful land,” Trump posted on his social platform Truth Social, closing the announcement with a cheerful “Enjoy!”

    U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy quickly confirmed the administration’s compliance, responding simply: “You got it, Mr. President.”

    The announcement marks one of the clearest, most tangible deliverables from Aoun’s Washington trip, which Lebanese officials framed as a mission to secure visible U.S. backing for the country at a fragile geopolitical moment. Aoun’s visit came as Beirut seeks American support for a U.S.-brokered stability framework with neighboring Israel, and as the Lebanese government works to demonstrate that diplomatic engagement with Washington can deliver concrete, actionable benefits for the Lebanese public.

    Despite the major political significance of the announcement, aviation industry leaders have been quick to emphasize that direct flights will not take off immediately. The process of restoring service will require months of technical and diplomatic groundwork first.

    Captain Mohammad Aziz, director general of Lebanon’s Civil Aviation Authority, explained the timeline in an interview with Middle East Eye, noting that officials must first assess whether new direct routes are commercially viable and technically feasible. “We need one or two months to conduct a feasibility study,” Aziz said.

    Once the study is complete, the next step will be launching formal bilateral negotiations between the two countries’ civil aviation bodies. “The first step after which we can say that this track has entered the practical phase is the formation of negotiating delegations between the two countries to discuss the bilateral agreement,” Aziz told MEE. He added that the 1985 suspension was itself a presidential decision that led to the termination of the original bilateral aviation agreement between the two nations, so a new formal agreement is required to move forward.

    The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration has confirmed it will coordinate with U.S. airlines and other federal agencies to carry out Trump’s directive. Still, for Lebanon, the announcement is already being viewed as a critical initial step toward rolling back one of the longest-running barriers connecting the country to North America’s large Lebanese diaspora.

    Aziz pointed out that the global aviation landscape looks drastically different today than it did in 1985, when Lebanon’s national carrier Middle East Airlines operated direct flights to New York, which was then the hub of the U.S. Lebanese community. “Back then, Middle East Airlines used to fly directly to New York, where the largest Lebanese presence was. Today, the circumstances have certainly changed,” he said.

    For Lebanese officials, one of the most exciting potential outcomes of the U.S. decision extends beyond a new Beirut-New York route: it could clear the way for direct flights to Canada, which is home to one of the largest Lebanese diaspora communities outside the Middle East. Official counts vary: the Canadian government estimates the community numbers between 200,000 and 400,000 people, while Statistics Canada’s 2021 census recorded 210,605 people identifying as having Lebanese ethnic or cultural origin.

    “This step would certainly make possible what Lebanon wants, which is to open a direct route to Canada,” Aziz said. “Lebanon had previously concluded a bilateral agreement with Canada, but it was blocked by the United States. This is something that could be achieved if the American decision takes its course all the way to the end.”

    For Lebanese expatriates living across North America, the change would have a deeply personal impact, affecting how often they can return home to visit family and maintain cultural ties to their home country. Marwan Ayan, a Lebanese student studying in Montreal, told MEE he greeted news of the potential resumption with “great enthusiasm.”

    “Visiting Lebanon is usually only a yearly plan because of the long commute,” he said. “I am a student, and I can only visit my family when I have a long vacation. If a direct flight opened and I could reach my hometown in less than a day, it would definitely increase my visits, as I am sure it would for thousands of Lebanese living here.”

    Currently, nearly all travelers flying from North America to Beirut must route through connecting hubs in Europe, the Gulf, or other regional airports. This requirement adds hours of travel time, pushes up ticket prices, and leaves journeys far more vulnerable to disruption — especially during periods of conflict or instability across the Middle East.

    If direct flights are ultimately launched, analysts say the move could provide a meaningful boost to Lebanon’s struggling tourism sector, increase the flow of remittances (a critical lifeline for the country’s economy), and strengthen connections between the state and its far-flung diaspora, which remains central to Lebanon’s social and financial stability.

    Even so, the path forward remains uncertain. Restoring full service requires completing new legal agreements between civil aviation authorities, conducting thorough security assessments, securing buy-in from commercial airlines, and finalizing route planning. Lebanese officials also acknowledge that the commercial case for direct routes today is very different from it was in the 1980s, when the Beirut-New York route served a different travel market and a different geographic distribution of the Lebanese diaspora.

    For now, Trump’s announcement has reopened a door that has remained closed since 1985. Whether it will ultimately lead to regularly scheduled direct flights will depend on the success of the technical, commercial, and political work that lies ahead.

  • Trump paused attacks on Iran to make space for talks, US ambassador says

    Trump paused attacks on Iran to make space for talks, US ambassador says

    After nearly two weeks of relentless tit-for-tat military exchanges that shattered a fragile June ceasefire between the United States and Iran, US President Donald Trump has halted offensive attacks on Iran for a second consecutive night to open space for diplomatic negotiations, the US ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz has confirmed.

    Speaking to Fox News on Sunday, Waltz outlined that the administration’s decision to stand down offensive operations is intentional: the president is deliberately creating breathing room for diplomatic talks to progress. Shortly after the US announced its pause, an Iranian army spokesperson confirmed that Tehran has also halted all retaliatory military actions across the region in a reciprocal response to the American move.

    Despite the temporary de-escalation, Waltz stopped short of confirming that the Trump administration has ruled out further military escalation entirely. When asked by NBC whether the president had formally rejected expanding hostilities for good, he responded: “I wouldn’t go that far at all. The president is keeping all options on the table.”

    Waltz also pushed back against recent reporting from *The New York Times* which claimed that senior administration officials had warned that expanding the conflict would rapidly deplete already depleted stockpiles of US air defense munitions. “The US military… has everything that it needs to conduct this campaign as effectively as it needs to be,” he stated in a firm denial of the reports.

    Parallel to the diplomatic overtures, Iranian and Omani officials held multiple rounds of technical negotiations in Tehran across Friday and Saturday focused on cooperative management of the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic chokepoint that sits at the center of the latest cycle of US-Iran tensions, according to Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei. Competing claims over control and access to the strait rekindled open hostilities between Washington and Tehran earlier this month, and the waterway remains the single largest stumbling block to reaching a permanent end to the conflict.

    The road to the current crisis began in June, when the US and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding that established an immediate ceasefire, reopened the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping, and laid out a 60-day timeline to negotiate a full permanent end to the war. That agreement collapsed on July 13, when Iranian forces targeted commercial oil transiting the strait, prompting the US to resume large-scale airstrikes on Iranian targets and reimpose a strict naval blockade on all Iranian commercial ports.

    Iran responded immediately with coordinated strikes on US military facilities and bases across the Middle East, which killed four American service members. Iranian health ministry data confirms that US retaliatory strikes have since killed dozens of Iranians across the country. The conflict, which first began in February as a US-Israeli joint military campaign against Iran, has now killed thousands of people across the Middle East, official figures show, with the overwhelming majority of fatalities recorded in Iran and Lebanon.

    Across the Atlantic, new UK Defence Secretary Wes Streeting announced that he will meet US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth in the coming week to coordinate policy on the strait, which is one of the world’s most critical chokepoints for global trade in oil, liquefied natural gas, and other essential commodities. “When it comes to securing maritime freedom and free commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, that’s where we are absolutely aligned,” Streeting told the BBC, confirming the UK’s alignment with US policy on the waterway.

    The return of open conflict has already sent ripples through global energy markets: earlier this week, global benchmark oil prices climbed above $100 a barrel for the first time since May, as traders priced in growing risks to global energy supply chains.

    As the conflict approaches its fifth month of continuous fighting, it remains deeply unpopular with the American public, according to a new CBS/YouGov opinion poll. The survey found that 57% of Americans report feeling frustrated with the ongoing conflict, while just 19% express optimism about the situation.

    Looking ahead, President Trump is scheduled to hold talks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on Tuesday, where the pair are expected to discuss the path forward in the Middle East conflict.

  • Brazil recalls ambassador after Argentina’s President Milei insults government officials

    Brazil recalls ambassador after Argentina’s President Milei insults government officials

    A major diplomatic rift has erupted between two of South America’s largest economies after Argentine President Javier Milei launched a series of vitriolic personal attacks against top Brazilian government officials during a public appearance on Brazilian soil, prompting Brasilia to withdraw its top envoy from Buenos Aires for urgent consultations.

    Brazil’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs made the announcement of the ambassador recall on Sunday, just 24 hours after Milei traveled to São Paulo to attend a political rally where Flávio Bolsonaro, son of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, was officially named the 2026 presidential candidate for Bolsonaro’s right-wing party. Former President Jair Bolsonaro is currently under house arrest, serving a 27-year prison conviction after being found guilty of orchestrating a 2023 coup attempt against the Lula administration.

    During his Saturday speech to the crowd of right-wing supporters, Milei launched an unprovoked verbal assault against sitting Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, labeling him with slurs including “thief” and “delinquent”. The Argentine leader also targeted Supreme Federal Court Minister Alexandre de Moraes, calling the justice “trash” after Moraes blocked Milei’s request to visit the imprisoned former Brazilian president.

    Edson Fachin, president of Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court, condemned the outburst, emphasizing that Milei’s offensive remarks targeted a sitting magistrate of Brazil’s highest judicial body and were delivered directly on Brazilian national territory, making the incident a clear violation of diplomatic courtesy.

    Following the incident, Brazil confirmed that its current Ambassador to Argentina Julio Bitelli has been recalled to Brasilia for consultations to review the bilateral relationship in the wake of the attack. As of Sunday afternoon, Lula has not issued a direct public response to Milei’s insults. However, in an opinion piece published by *The Washington Post* on the same day the recall was announced, Lula pushed back against external interference in Brazilian affairs. In the piece, which criticized new U.S. tariffs on Brazilian exports as a misguided strategic error, Lula stressed that “Brazil’s destiny is determined only by Brazilians without external interference, without subservience.”

    This latest diplomatic escalation comes only one day after Brazil’s Foreign Ministry made another unexpected move, rejecting visa applications for two U.S. State Department officials who had planned to travel to Brazil for an official visit next week. The ministry has so far declined to offer any public explanation for the visa denial.

    The current political context adds additional layers of tension to the dispute: Lula is gearing up for his 2026 re-election campaign, where his main opponent will be Flávio Bolsonaro, whose political family has maintained long-standing close ties to the administration of former U.S. President Donald Trump.

  • US says ‘it is time to dismantle’ ICC after Venezuela announces withdrawal

    US says ‘it is time to dismantle’ ICC after Venezuela announces withdrawal

    The United States has publicly celebrated the newly installed Venezuelan government’s historic decision to cut all ties with the International Criminal Court (ICC), framing the exit as a key step in a broader American-led campaign to dismantle what Washington calls a biased and illegitimate global judicial body.

    In an official statement shared via the social platform X, the U.S. State Department lauded Venezuela’s move as an important milestone for collaborative efforts to undermine the court. The statement specifically called out the ICC’s stalled investigation into former Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro—who was removed from power during a U.S.-backed military incursion in January 2026—claiming the probe had yielded no meaningful outcomes.

    Instead of advancing accountability, the State Department argued, the ICC has squandered its resources targeting individuals from nations that already maintain functional, independent judicial systems, and that have never formally recognized the court’s jurisdiction. The statement blasted the court’s actions as “blatant overreach, political bias and selective enforcement,” concluding that the institution “is neither credible, independent, nor legitimate.” Echoing the Trump administration’s long-held stance, the statement called for the full dissolution of the ICC, urging all remaining member states to follow Venezuela’s lead and withdraw from the Rome Statute, the founding treaty that established the court.

    Venezuela’s exit announcement comes on the heels of a major shakeup at the ICC itself: last Friday, member states voted to remove Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan from office over multiple misconduct allegations. Shortly after that vote, Venezuelan Foreign Minister Felix Plasencia confirmed the government had formally notified the United Nations of its “irrevocable” decision to leave the ICC, pointing to the court’s long-documented “geographical bias” against Global South nations as the core justification for the withdrawal.

    The move marks a sharp deepening of political alignment between the new Venezuelan government and U.S. foreign policy, arriving just one week after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio pledged a “whole-of-government response to systematically disable” the tribunal. The Trump administration has waged a years-long campaign to erode the ICC’s authority, imposing harsh economic sanctions on ICC prosecutors who launched investigations into alleged war crimes committed by U.S. and Israeli military personnel.

    Last year, former President Trump issued an executive order doubling down on this position, claiming the ICC had pursued “illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America and our close ally Israel.” The order referenced the November 2025 ICC arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his then-defense minister Yoav Gallant, issued over alleged war crimes in the Gaza Strip.

  • Romania scrambles F-16 jets and downs a suspected Russian drone, the third in 3 days

    Romania scrambles F-16 jets and downs a suspected Russian drone, the third in 3 days

    BUCHAREST, Romania — In a sharp escalation of cross-border security risks stemming from Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine, Romania, a joint member of NATO and the European Union, downed a suspected Russian drone that entered its national airspace Sunday. This incident marks the third unauthorized Russian drone incursion into Romanian territory in just three days, according to the country’s head of state.

    NATO officials confirmed that two Romanian F-16 fighter jets, operating under the alliance’s integrated operational command and launching from the country’s Fetești airbase, intercepted and destroyed the unmanned aircraft over Romanian territorial waters in the Black Sea’s Sulina-Chilia region at 10:13 a.m. local time, Romanian President Nicusor Dan publicly confirmed.

    President Dan added that forensic analysis of debris from one of the two previously intercepted drones has definitively identified it as an Iranian-made Shahed-type drone, the same model Moscow has widely deployed to strike targets across Ukraine in its full-scale war of aggression. This latest downing brings to four the total number of unauthorized NATO airspace-violating drones that Romania has shot down in coordination with the alliance, according to Colonel Martin O’Donnell, spokesperson for NATO’s Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE).

    Prior to this weekend’s string of interceptions, O’Donnell noted, Romanian jets downed an errant drone over Estonia back in May. Currently, Romanian aircrew and aircraft are forward-deployed to Lithuania as part of NATO’s enhanced eastern flank deterrence posture, giving them broad reach to respond to airspace violations across the Baltic and Black Sea regions. “As we continue to prove, NATO is constantly on the watch and prepared to defend itself from any threat,” O’Donnell said in a statement reinforcing the alliance’s collective defense commitment.

    The string of incursions comes as Romania has moved to strengthen its counter-unmanned aerial capabilities, recently acquiring the MEROPS counter-drone system. The platform deploys low-cost, three-foot-long intercept drones to neutralize incoming threats including Shaheds and other common attack drone variants. Romania’s defensive upgrades are part of a broader alliance-wide effort to harden NATO’s 1,000-plus-mile eastern border against growing drone and cruise missile threats spilling over from the war in Ukraine.

    The risk of conflict spillover into NATO territory first gained widespread public attention back in May, when an out-of-control Russian drone launched during a mass attack on Ukrainian infrastructure went astray and crashed into an apartment building in eastern Romania. The strike injured two civilian residents and sparked intense alarm among alliance members over the potential for expanded conflict.

    “It is inadmissible and intolerable that the Russian Federation continues to violate Romanian airspace, which is also NATO and European Union airspace,” President Dan emphasized Sunday. “Such actions are unacceptable and we treat them with all seriousness, together with our allies.”

    The international community quickly rallied to support Romania following the latest incursion. Belgium, another NATO and EU member, called Sunday’s incident a “stark reminder of the ongoing threat Russia’s war poses to European security.” “Belgium stands firmly with Romania after several drones were shot down over its territory in the past days. Romania’s investigation has already confirmed that one of them was a Russian Shahed drone,” said Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prévot. Prévot also noted that 300 Belgian military personnel are currently deployed to Romania as part of NATO’s eastern flank deterrence force.

    Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Romania and other NATO allies bordering Ukraine have faced a steady stream of stray drone and missile incursions, linked to both Russian and Ukrainian operations. This latest string of incidents underscores the persistent risk that the war could draw NATO into direct conflict with Russia, even as the alliance continues to supply Ukraine with military and humanitarian aid while avoiding direct participation in hostilities. This report includes contributions from McNeil, reporting out of Brussels.

  • Exclusive: In a Ukrainian bomb shelter, Laura Loomer explains shift on Russia’s war

    Exclusive: In a Ukrainian bomb shelter, Laura Loomer explains shift on Russia’s war

    In a striking about-face that has sent ripples through American political circles, far-right commentator and long-time Donald Trump ally Laura Loomer has publicly renounced her years of anti-Ukraine rhetoric, admitting that she was duped by Russian propaganda that shaped her earlier opposition to Kyiv. The polarizing figure, who built her reputation spreading conspiracy theories to a loyal online following, made the admission during an interview with The Associated Press from a Kyiv bomb shelter, as Russian ballistic missiles targeted the capital in an attack that forced the interview to be relocated mid-session.

    Loomer’s journey to Ukraine, which included a trip to the eastern front lines, a sit-down with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and meetings with top government and religious leaders, marks one of the most high-profile shifts in the American conservative movement’s stance on the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian War. After spending years repeating Russian talking points that downplayed Moscow’s aggression and pushed false claims about Ukraine being overrun by neo-Nazis, Loomer now says her on-the-ground observations have completely upended her views.

    The commentator traces her past misinformation to a shift in her media consumption after being banned from major American social media platforms. Banned from mainstream apps, she turned to Telegram, a platform where Russian state-aligned media and propaganda are widely circulated. That shift, she says, allowed Russian operatives to capitalize on her anger over the 2020 U.S. presidential election — an election she still falsely claims was stolen from Trump — to indoctrinate her with anti-Ukraine falsehoods. Her change of heart unfolded gradually, she adds, as she watched prominent conservative podcasters, including Tucker Carlson, adopt anti-Trump rhetoric that she discovered was being amplified by Russian sources to divide American conservatives.

    Ukrainian officials have embraced Loomer’s visit, seeing it as a unique opportunity to win over hearts and minds in the conservative wing of U.S. politics ahead of a planned meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy in Washington next week. “It takes courage to come to Ukraine and not be deterred by Russian propaganda or air raid sirens,” Zelenskyy’s office wrote in a social media post welcoming Loomer. In addition to her meeting with Zelenskyy, Loomer toured the Dormition Cathedral of Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, a historic monastic complex targeted in a Russian attack just last month. Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister and Culture Minister Tetyana Berezhna noted Loomer’s outsized influence in U.S. conservative circles, saying she hopes the commentator’s first-hand observations will shift American public opinion ahead of the high-stakes Washington meeting. “I do really hope and I believe that her visit will have a huge impact on relations with the U.S. administration,” Berezhna told the AP.

    Loomer has remained a close and influential informal advisor to Trump despite holding no official role in his campaign or orbit. She says she spoke with Trump by phone immediately after her meeting with Zelenskyy, and Trump has already publicly embraced her new stance, sharing video of her conversation with the Ukrainian leader on his social media platform with the comment “Very good!!!” Loomer occasionally travels with Trump on the 2024 campaign trail, and last year she convinced him to purge multiple members of his National Security Council staff after she raised questions about their loyalty to him during an Oval Office meeting. She expects to meet with Trump personally upon her return to the U.S. from Ukraine.

    The commentator’s reversal has already stirred mixed reactions: while Ukrainian leaders have welcomed the shift, it has sparked confusion and suspicion among some of her former allies in the American right. Loomer has repeatedly pushed back against claims that Ukraine is funding her trip, noting that she risked her life traveling to a war zone to see the conflict first-hand. “If it’s fake, why did I risk my life? I’m in a bomb shelter right now. I barely slept this week,” she said.

    Even as she has reversed her stance on Ukraine, Loomer’s long history of bigotry and conspiracy mongering remains unchanged. Days into her trip, she posted a bigoted comment on social media saying, “One thing I really love about Ukraine is I haven’t seen a single Muslim here. It’s so refreshing.”

    Despite her own history spreading misinformation, Loomer now argues that the spread of Russian propaganda through rogue online platforms and independent podcasters represents a critical national security threat to the U.S. She says the “information war” waged by Moscow is potentially more destructive than any conventional military conflict the U.S. could face, and has called on a future Trump administration to take the threat of foreign influence operations far more seriously than current U.S. leaders have. “They have been able to warp people’s minds to the point where people aren’t even capable of analyzing a subject with common sense anymore because they want to depend on these personalities to give them the opinion that they think they should have,” she said of the podcasters who spread Russian talking points. She added that she is already seeing MAGA movement supporters change their minds after her visit, saying she has received hundreds of messages from followers saying she opened their eyes to Russian disinformation.

    Loomer’s turnaround comes as the U.S. Congress debates new sanctions against Russia and just days before Zelenskyy is set to meet with Trump in the Oval Office, a meeting Loomer says her visit has already helped set up for success for Ukraine. “Going into this meeting next week at the Oval Office is looking pretty good,” she said.

  • Left-wing Democrats are on a winning run – but can they lure back crucial swing voters?

    Left-wing Democrats are on a winning run – but can they lure back crucial swing voters?

    Beneath hazy skies still tinted by wildfire smoke drifting south from Canada, hundreds of Michigan voters packed Detroit’s century-old Opera House last Saturday evening, leaping to their feet in thunderous applause as two of America’s most prominent progressive leaders—Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez—stepped onto the stage. The high-profile gathering was far more than a routine campaign stop: it was a public declaration that left-wing Democrats are positioning physician and Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed as the future of the party, as the nation gears up for November’s pivotal midterm elections.

    El-Sayed, a former Wayne County health director, is running on a unapologetically progressive platform anchored by Medicare for All, a wealth tax on billionaires, and the complete rejection of corporate campaign donations. His rally crowd carried signs emblazoned with his signature universal healthcare slogan, and wore shirts calling for an end to harsh immigration enforcement and cuts to U.S. military aid to Israel. But the eyes of the entire nation are fixed on this race, which has become a defining test of the progressive movement’s ability to win in critical battleground states amid deep internal divisions within the Democratic Party.

    El-Sayed’s opponent in the August 4 primary is Congresswoman Haley Stevens, a well-funded centrist incumbent backed by the Democratic establishment, including Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and outgoing Senator Gary Peters. Stevens has drawn massive financial support from corporate donors and pro-Israel lobbying group AIPAC, which has poured nearly $30 million into her campaign. For Democrats, the outcome of this primary will do more than pick their general election candidate: it will shape the party’s ideological direction ahead of 2028, as the faction split between establishment-aligned centrists and grassroots progressives continues to widen.

    Michigan’s open Senate seat is a make-or-break race for Democrats. The state flipped from Joe Biden in 2020 to Donald Trump in 2024, and holding the seat is critical to the party’s goal of retaining Senate control and blocking Trump’s policy agenda. The primary winner will face Trump-endorsed Republican Mike Rogers in the November general election, raising urgent questions among party members about which candidate can win over swing voters.

    This race comes at a moment when progressives have already notched a string of primary wins across the country this summer, most notably Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York City’s mayoral race. But political analysts warn that replicating that success in the Midwest, a historically working-class region with many purple swing districts, will be far more challenging. “They got a big win with Mamdani in New York City, but New York is an outlier,” explained Adrian Hemond, a Michigan-based political strategist. “Progressives have struggled to gain traction in more politically mixed, traditionally purple areas like this.”

    For many progressive voters, however, El-Sayed’s campaign has sparked unprecedented enthusiasm, drawing first-time volunteers like 35-year-old Corie Johnson, who has never canvassed for a candidate before. “Millennial voters aren’t stuck in the old, rigid ways of politics,” Johnson said while canvassing door-to-door in Hamtramck. “That’s why he’s building such momentum here.” El-Sayed’s campaign message, centered on stripping big money out of politics and lowering everyday costs for working families, has resonated with voters struggling with skyrocketing prices for groceries, gas, housing, and healthcare—issues consistently ranked as top priorities by Michigan voters in pre-election polling.

    Les Lukacs, a lifelong Democrat from Monroe who lacks health insurance, says El-Sayed’s platform has earned his unwavering support. If El-Sayed loses the primary, Lukacs says he will not vote for Stevens in November. “We can barely afford basic groceries and gas,” he said. “I have to cut corners everywhere, and healthcare is the first thing that goes.” El-Sayed argues that the Democratic Party’s declining favorability, which dropped 12 points to 67% among self-identified Democrats in 2025 Gallup polling, stems from the party’s failure to prioritize the needs of everyday working people. “If Democrats cared more about the struggles of ordinary people, they’d be fighting for the exact same policies I am,” he told the BBC.

    A spokesperson for Stevens’ campaign pushed back on that framing, saying the congresswoman “will fight for all Michiganders from every corner of the state to lower costs, protect manufacturing jobs, and take on Donald Trump’s corruption and abuses of power.”

    The Israel-Gaza war has emerged as another defining fault line in the race, with particular resonance in Michigan, home to the nation’s second-largest Arab-American population. The son of Egyptian immigrants, El-Sayed has labeled Israel’s military campaign in Gaza a genocide and repeatedly called for an end to U.S. military aid to the country, drawing a sharp contrast with Stevens, who supports maintaining unconditioned U.S. aid to Israel and has received massive backing from AIPAC. Polling shows growing opposition to continued U.S. support for Israel among Democratic voters, and community leaders like Rex Nazarko of the American Muslim Engagement and Empowerment Network expect El-Sayed to win over thousands of Michigan Democrats who refused to support Biden and Harris in the 2024 presidential election over their Israel policy.

    That divide reflects a broader existential dilemma for the national Democratic Party, which has long relied on support from both Jewish and Arab-American communities to win competitive races, according to Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics. “They have to make a choice,” Sabato said. “Both sides are working to make that choice as painful as possible for party leadership.”

    Even as progressives turn out enthusiastically for El-Sayed, many Democrats across the state remain skeptical that a far-left candidate can hold the seat against a Trump-aligned Republican. Seventy-four-year-old Colleen Houlihan of Ferndale, who plans to vote for Stevens, says she supports many of El-Sayed’s policy goals but worries he is too progressive to win in November. “I want radical change for this country, but first we need an electable candidate to get power back into reasonable hands,” she said. Other Democratic officials, speaking off the record, note that Stevens’ corporate fundraising gives her a critical advantage in a high-stakes general election, arguing that established political connections are necessary to advance policy change.

    Even some of El-Sayed’s own supporters share that anxiety. “I’m a little scared, a little nervous,” said 70-year-old Claire McHugh, who attended Saturday’s Detroit rally. “I just hope enough people are fed up with the status quo to turn out for him.”

    For his part, El-Sayed says he is focused on building a new vision for the party, regardless of the primary outcome. “I’m not concerned with fighting over the future of the Democratic Party,” he said. “But if Democrats want to find their future, we’re showing it to them right here in Michigan.”

    Sabato says it remains unclear which faction of the party will emerge victorious in the primary, but warns that failure to bridge the growing ideological gap will have long-term consequences for Democratic electoral hopes. “The party is already fraying,” he said. “If they don’t repair this divide quickly, certainly by 2028, they’re going to have to get used to losing for a long time to come.”