分类: politics

  • Exclusive: ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan to address Oxford Union next week

    Exclusive: ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan to address Oxford Union next week

    In a significant development that intersects international justice, political pressure, and institutional debate, International Criminal Court (ICC) chief prosecutor Karim Khan is scheduled to deliver his first public address next week at the world-famous Oxford Union, exclusive reporting from Middle East Eye can confirm. This appearance comes nearly a year after Khan stepped away for extended leave, amid a United Nations-led probe into unsubstantiated sexual misconduct claims that Khan has forcefully denied from the start.

    Late last month, MEE first broke the news that an independent panel of three veteran international judges — handpicked by the Bureau of the Assembly of States Parties (ASP), the ICC’s governing oversight body — had completed its review of the UN investigation and reached a unanimous, clear conclusion: no evidence supported any finding of misconduct or breach of professional duty on Khan’s part. Despite this formal clearing by the panel the ASP itself appointed, Khan has not yet resumed his full official responsibilities. Subsequent MEE reporting revealed that a bloc of predominantly Western and European member states voted at a recent ASP bureau meeting to set aside the judges’ independent findings and launch their own separate assessment, drawing directly from the original UN inquiry.

    Khan’s legal team has repeatedly called on the ASP bureau to honor the independent panel’s conclusions, and has raised urgent alarms that political motivations, rather than transparent, rule-based legal process, are driving the body’s ongoing deliberations. In an official statement released earlier this month, Khan’s legal representatives emphasized: “That Panel, comprising three highly distinguished international judges and appointed by the Bureau itself, reviewed the entirety of the evidential record over a period of three months and reached a unanimous and unequivocal conclusion: that the material does not establish any misconduct or breach of duty of any kind.” The ASP bureau has scheduled a final ruling on the allegations for early June.

    The Oxford Union, an independent student debating society that bills itself as the most prestigious forum of its kind globally, will host Khan at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 5. The event is open to all current Union members, as well as public attendees who purchase entry, MEE has confirmed. While the Union draws its membership primarily from Oxford University students, it operates as an independent private organization separate from the university itself.

    Arwa Hanin Elrayess, the Union’s current president, confirmed the invitation to MEE, noting: “We are deeply honoured to host Mr Khan KC at the Oxford Union. At a time when regimes persecute and sanction those who exercise their right to free speech, institutions like ours have a duty to stand firm and ensure those voices are heard. Mr Khan’s commitment to international law in the face of sustained political pressure is a story that speaks directly to the state of international justice today, and ought to be heard.”

    Elrayess, a Palestinian-Algerian student originally from Gaza, made history last December when she became the first Palestinian, the first Arab woman, and the first Algerian elected to lead the 200-year-old society. She will serve in the role through the end of the current academic year in July.

    The entire misconduct investigation has unfolded against a backdrop of relentless, coordinated pressure targeting both Khan and the ICC as an institution, sparked by the office’s pursuit of war crime charges against Israeli leaders over actions in Gaza. Starting in early 2024, as Khan prepared to file applications for arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, a widespread intimidation campaign was launched against the prosecutor. The threats included a public warning from then-UK Foreign Secretary David Cameron that the United Kingdom would cut all funding and withdraw its membership from the court if the warrants were issued. When the ICC judges approved the warrants in November 2024, pressure increased, and it escalated again in early 2025 as Khan moved to secure warrants for additional Israeli cabinet members. That surge in pressure coincided with new media leaks of the unproven sexual misconduct allegations, and the Trump administration imposed formal sanctions on Khan in February 2025. Prior to that, U.S. sanctions had already been levied against Khan’s two deputy prosecutors and multiple ICC judges.

    MEE reporting from August 2025 detailed the full scope of the intimidation campaign: direct threats to Khan from high-profile global politicians, coordinated briefings damaging Khan’s reputation from close colleagues and family associates, credible safety concerns sparked by intelligence confirming a Mossad surveillance team was operating near the ICC’s headquarters in The Hague, and the steady drip of leaked misconduct claims to international media. Khan took his extended leave in mid-May 2025, shortly after an attempt to suspend him from within his own office failed, and as the UN investigation got underway.

    The UN investigation was conducted by the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), which collected testimony and evidence from both the complainants and Khan. When the independent judicial panel reviewed the OIOS report, however, it found the document “either did not reach conclusive factual determinations or concluded that such determinations were impossible based on the evidence collected.” The panel further noted that the OIOS report relied heavily on hearsay, with no direct evidence of misconduct ever presented. Ultimately, the judges ruled that “there is insufficient evidence to support a finding of misconduct measured against the standard of proof of beyond reasonable doubt.”

    Middle East Eye, which first broke and has continuously reported on this story, provides independent, on-the-ground coverage of the Middle East, North Africa, and global affairs related to the region.

  • Peace efforts stall as US examines latest Iran proposal

    Peace efforts stall as US examines latest Iran proposal

    Diplomatic efforts to reach a permanent end to the ongoing Middle East conflict reached a deadlock this Tuesday, as the United States continues to review Iran’s latest proposal to reopen the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, while Tehran rejects Washington’s claims to dictate the terms of any final agreement.

    Two months since the launch of the US-Israeli military offensive, Iran has maintained a blockade on the strait – a global chokepoint that carries roughly a fifth of the world’s daily oil and natural gas shipments. The closure has sent severe disruptions rippling through global energy markets, driving commodity prices sharply higher and stoking economic uncertainty worldwide.

    According to multiple reports, Iran’s offer would see Tehran gradually ease its restrictions on Hormuz shipping in exchange for the US lifting its own retaliatory blockade on Iranian commercial ports, while wider negotiations on more divisive issues – most notably Iran’s nuclear program – would continue in parallel. The proposal was delivered to Washington via written communications relayed through mediator Pakistan, which also outlined Iran’s non-negotiable red lines on both nuclear policy and control of the strait, Iran’s state-affiliated Fars News Agency confirmed.

    US President Donald Trump convened a meeting with his top national security advisors on Monday to assess the plan, but multiple anonymous sources familiar with the closed-door discussion told CNN that Trump has signaled reluctance to accept the framework. The President has insisted that the status of the strait remain on the negotiating table until a full resolution of the nuclear question is reached, leaving the next steps of the process unclear.

    Iran hit back at Washington’s positioning on Tuesday, with Defense Ministry spokesperson Reza Talaei-Nik stating that the US must abandon what he called its “illegal and irrational demands.” “The United States is no longer in a position to dictate its policy to independent nations,” he told Iranian state television.

    US Secretary of State Marco Rubio offered a mixed assessment of the proposal during an interview with Fox News, acknowledging that it was “better than what we thought they were going to submit” but questioning the sincerity of Iran’s commitments. “They’re very good negotiators,” Rubio said, adding that any final agreement must “definitively prevents them from sprinting towards a nuclear weapon.”

    Regional mediators have also stepped up warnings about the risks of an unresolved standoff. Qatar’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Majed al-Ansari told reporters Tuesday that the international community must avoid the creation of a “frozen conflict” that could reignite at any moment over political disagreements. “We do not want to see a return to hostilities in the region anytime soon. We do not want to see a frozen conflict that ends up being thawed every time there is a political reason,” al-Ansari said, calling for negotiators to prioritize a “sustainable” long-term peace deal.

    Thus far, a temporary ceasefire between US and Iranian forces has held, but talks to lock in a permanent end to hostilities have failed to produce tangible progress. Pakistan, which has served as the primary mediator for the talks, hosted an initial round of negotiations that ended without breakthrough, and plans for a second round of talks over the weekend collapsed entirely. When asked about the path forward last week, Trump simply stated that “if Iran wants talks, they can call us.”

    Tehran has made clear that it will not offer new security guarantees for Gulf waterways without ironclad commitments from Washington and Tel Aviv that they will not launch new military attacks, Iran’s UN envoy said this week. An Iranian army spokesperson doubled down on that position Tuesday, telling state media that Tehran “does not consider the war to be over” and holds “no trust in America.”

    “We have many cards that we have not yet used… new tools and methods of fighting based on the experiences of the past two months of conflict, which will definitely allow us to respond to the enemy more decisively” if hostilities resume, said spokesperson Amir Akraminia.

    Speaking during a visit to Moscow this week, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi claimed the conflict had demonstrated Iran’s “true power” and regional stability, but the mood inside Iran remains far grimmer. Small business owner Farshad, speaking to AFP journalists in Tehran, described widespread economic disruption from the ongoing standoff. “Everything in the country is up in the air right now. I have not worked for a long time,” he said. “The country is in complete economic collapse.”

    Beyond the bilateral US-Iran standoff, violence continues to simmer on the conflict’s Lebanese front, where a recently extended ceasefire between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah has failed to stop all clashes. Hezbollah drew Lebanon into the broader conflict when it launched rocket attacks on Israel, prompting Israel to launch retaliatory airstrikes and a limited ground incursion into southern Lebanon.

    On Tuesday, the Israeli military issued evacuation orders for more than a dozen villages and towns in southern Lebanon, saying repeated “violations of the ceasefire” by Hezbollah left it no choice but to resume military action. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar emphasized that his country “has no territorial ambitions in Lebanon” and will withdraw its forces from border areas once Hezbollah and its armed factions are fully dismantled. The comment came a day after Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem reaffirmed the group’s commitment to the fight, vowing that it would “not back down” from its positions.

  • Ukraine accuses Israel of importing grain ‘stolen’ by Russia as Zelenskyy warns of sanctions

    Ukraine accuses Israel of importing grain ‘stolen’ by Russia as Zelenskyy warns of sanctions

    A sharp public diplomatic dispute has erupted between Kyiv and Jerusalem this week after Ukraine accused Israel of allowing the entry of Russian-harvested grain stolen from occupied Ukrainian territories, triggering conflicting official statements and formal protests.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy made the allegation public on Tuesday via the social platform X, confirming that at least one cargo vessel carrying the illicitly traded grain had already reached an Israeli port and was preparing to offload its cargo. Zelenskyy emphasized that under international law and standard domestic legal frameworks, trafficking in stolen property carries clear legal consequences, noting that Ukrainian intelligence services have already begun compiling targeted sanctions packages against the companies and individuals facilitating these illegal shipments. The Ukrainian leader added that Kyiv will coordinate closely with its European Union allies to push for the inclusion of these involved parties in existing bloc-wide sanctions regimes against Russian-connected entities.

    Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry expanded on the accusation, stating that Kyiv had pre-notified Israeli officials about the suspect vessels, and that more than two cargo ships carrying grain stolen from occupied Ukrainian lands have already entered Israeli territory. Ministry spokesman Heorhii Tykhyi confirmed that Israeli ambassador Michael Brodsky was formally summoned to receive an official protest note from Kyiv, over what Ukrainian officials describe as a persistent flow of these illegal shipments into the Israeli market.

    According to the Ukrainian foreign ministry, Ukrainian investigators have already confirmed the fraudulent origin of the grain, and are well aware of the tactics Russia uses to cover up the theft—including covert ship-to-ship transfers of cargo in the Black Sea to mask the product’s original source. Despite repeated formal requests from Kyiv for Israeli authorities to detain the suspect vessels and their cargo, the illicit shipments continue to reach Israeli ports and enter domestic commercial circulation, the ministry said. Crucially, Ukrainian officials stressed the issue is not an isolated incident, but a systemic pattern of trade that poses a clear risk to bilateral relations between the two countries if it is not resolved immediately.

    Israeli officials have pushed back against Ukraine’s claims, offering a conflicting account of the situation. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar told reporters in Jerusalem that the Israeli Tax Authority has launched an investigation into a vessel reportedly bound for Haifa port, but dismissed Zelenskyy’s public statement as unproductive “Twitter diplomacy.” Saar said that Ukraine had failed to provide sufficient supporting evidence for its claims and had not submitted a formal request for legal assistance from Israeli authorities.

    Public tracking data from marine tracking portal MarineTraffic.com complicates the conflicting accounts, showing that the vessel in question has already been anchored in the port of Haifa for several days—contradicting Israel’s claim that the ship has not yet entered the port or submitted required entry documentation.

  • Kenya’s leader backtracks after comments mocking Nigerians’ English

    Kenya’s leader backtracks after comments mocking Nigerians’ English

    What started as an offhand comment about regional English accents in Africa has erupted into a cross-border social media firestorm, pushing Kenya’s President William Ruto to issue a public clarification to ease growing tensions. Last week, during a private engagement with Kenyan expatriates in Italy, Ruto made remarks that quickly went viral: he boasted that Kenya’s education system produces globally competitive human capital with top-tier English proficiency, then added that listeners often need a translator to understand English spoken with a Nigerian accent.

    The comment triggered immediate widespread condemnation online, sparking a heated digital rivalry between citizens of the two East and West African nations. Both Kenya and Nigeria are former British colonies that retain English as an official language, but each has developed distinct accent patterns shaped by their own indigenous linguistic landscapes. Nigeria’s more than 500 native languages have heavily influenced the cadence, intonation, and phonetics of its spoken English, while Kenya’s mix of Bantu, Nilotic, and Cushitic languages has produced its own unique pronunciation style.

    The opportunity for clarification came during a mining development conference hosted in Nairobi, Kenya’s capital, where Nigeria’s Minerals Minister Henry Dele Alake was in attendance. Taking the stage after Alake’s lighthearted address — in which Alake noted that Nigeria’s people had tasked him with assuring Ruto that Nigerians speak good English — Ruto leaned into the moment of good-natured banter to set the record straight.

    Ruto told the gathered crowd that his original remarks were never meant for public consumption and had been deliberately taken out of context by commentators. He reframed his original point to emphasize that *all* African populations speak high-quality English, regardless of regional variations. The controversial line, he explained, was merely an offhand comparison of differing accent patterns, not an attack on Nigerian English proficiency. He also reminded the audience of his personal family ties to Nigeria: one of his daughters, June, is married to a Nigerian man, making millions of Nigerians his extended in-laws.

    In a playful closing quip directed at Alake, Ruto asked the minister to send his greetings to Nigerian President Bola Tinubu, adding, “Tell him I said that in good English… so that there will be no consequences.” He wrapped up his remarks by expressing relief that the misunderstanding could be resolved directly with his Nigerian counterparts, noting, “It is as well that we can have this conversation – my in-laws I hope there will be no consequences for whatever was done.” The lighthearted exchange stood in stark contrast to the harsh wave of criticism Ruto faced in the days after his original comments were leaked and spread online.

  • Former Guangxi political adviser indicted on bribery charges

    Former Guangxi political adviser indicted on bribery charges

    In an official announcement released Tuesday, China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) confirmed that Peng Xiaochun, a former senior political advisor in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, has formally been indicted on criminal charges of bribery.

    The 64-year-old, who previously served as vice-chairman of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Regional Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, was first taken into custody on bribery suspicion following a full investigation conducted by the National Commission of Supervision. After the investigation concluded, the case was transferred to prosecutorial authorities for formal review and prosecution proceedings. Per an official arrangement from the SPP, the Foshan People’s Procuratorate of Guangdong Province has been assigned to lead prosecution, and the case has already been officially filed with the Foshan Intermediate People’s Court.

    Prosecutorial officials noted that throughout the review and prosecution phase, Peng was fully notified of all his legal rights, underwent formal questioning, and all legal arguments submitted by his defense counsel were properly reviewed and considered as part of the process.

    Court documents outline that Peng abused authority across multiple senior leadership positions he held over his decades-long career to secure illegal benefits for third parties. These positions included deputy Party chief of Liuzhou, deputy secretary-general and director of the General Office of the Communist Party of China Guangxi Regional Committee, Party chief of both Hezhou and Baise, and ultimately his role as vice-chairman of the regional CPPCC. In exchange for these favors, Peng unlawfully accepted an especially large sum of money and high-value valuables, prosecutors say, which meets the threshold for criminal liability on bribery charges.

    A native of Guangxi, Peng launched his formal professional career in 1989, after joining the Communist Party of China in April 1985. His entire decades-long public service career was spent within Guangxi, where he rose through the ranks to hold key leadership roles at both municipal and regional levels. He assumed the position of vice-chairman of the Guangxi regional CPPCC in 2018 and held the role until he retired from public office in 2023.

    The corruption investigation into Peng was first opened in June 2025, and by December of that same year, he was expelled from the Communist Party of China and stripped of all his former public offices and associated benefits.

  • Ukraine accuses Israel of receiving shipments of grain ‘stolen’ by Russia

    Ukraine accuses Israel of receiving shipments of grain ‘stolen’ by Russia

    A sharp diplomatic dispute has exploded between Kyiv and Jerusalem after Ukrainian officials accused Israel of allowing shipments of grain stolen by Russia from occupied Ukrainian territories to enter its ports, triggering warnings of damaged bilateral ties and drawing in the European Union over its ties to Moscow’s war effort.

    The confrontation began with an initial investigative report from Israeli daily Haaretz, which claimed that four cargo ships carrying grain harvested in Russian-occupied Ukrainian regions had already been unloaded at Israeli ports in 2025. The outlet added that a fifth vessel carrying suspected stolen grain had anchored in Haifa Bay by Sunday morning, waiting for clearance to enter the port.

    By Monday night, the clash moved to public social media, when Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha announced on X that his ministry had summoned Israel’s ambassador to Kyiv to protest what he called Israel’s failure to act on previous Ukrainian complaints about a prior stolen grain delivery to Haifa. “Now that another such vessel has arrived in Haifa, we once again warn Israel against accepting the stolen grain and harming our relations,” Sybiha wrote.

    Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar pushed back immediately, rejecting Ukraine’s public, social media-focused approach to the sensitive diplomatic issue. Saar stressed that diplomacy between friendly nations does not occur on public platforms, and emphasized that Israel is a rule-of-law state with independent law enforcement bodies that will review the claims properly. “If you have any evidence of theft, submit it through the appropriate channels,” Saar noted, adding that Kyiv had failed to share formal evidence or file a legal assistance request to back up its allegations. He also clarified that the vessel currently anchored off Haifa has not yet entered port or submitted cargo documentation, meaning Ukrainian claims that the cargo papers were forged cannot yet be verified.

    The following morning, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy waded into the dispute, doubling down on Kyiv’s accusations. Zelenskyy argued that the trade of stolen Ukrainian grain “is not – and cannot be – legitimate business,” adding that the practice even violates Israeli domestic law. He noted that Ukrainian authorities had already taken all required diplomatic steps to block these shipments, yet another vessel had still reached Israeli waters. Zelenskyy warned that continued inaction from Israeli authorities would undermine bilateral relations, and confirmed that Ukraine is working alongside European partners to prepare a targeted sanctions package targeting any individuals and entities involved in transporting and profiting from the stolen grain.

    Ukraine’s foreign ministry further detailed its claims, stating that a Russian-flagged bulk carrier named the Abinsk was unloaded at an Israeli port in mid-April, and was allowed to depart despite Kyiv’s formal request to Israeli officials to detain the ship and its cargo. The ministry added that Israeli officials also ignored a request to take action against a second vessel, the Panormitis, as it approached Haifa.

    Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov declined to comment on the dispute when approached by reporters, and Russia has consistently denied previous accusations that it steals grain from occupied Ukrainian territories.

    The European Union has already waded into the row, with foreign affairs spokesperson Anouar El Anouni confirming that the bloc has taken note of the reports of a shadow Russian fleet vessel carrying stolen Ukrainian grain being permitted to unload in Haifa. “We condemn all actions that help fund Russia’s illegal war effort and circumvent EU sanctions, and remain ready to target such actions by listing individuals and entities in third countries if necessary,” El Anouni told the BBC. The EU formally documented in 2024 that it had confirmed evidence of Russia illegally seizing large volumes of grain and other agricultural products from occupied Ukrainian territories, then rebranding the goods as Russian products for export to global markets.

  • Israeli PM’s rivals join forces for elections

    Israeli PM’s rivals join forces for elections

    JERUSALEM – In a high-stakes political shift reshaping Israel’s electoral landscape ahead of the country’s scheduled October general election, opposition leader Yair Lapid and former prime minister Naftali Bennett announced a formal political merger on Sunday, a move explicitly designed to unseat incumbent prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The new unified bloc will carry the name “Together”, with Bennett set to serve as its head, according to a statement from Bennett’s office. As part of the push to build a broad anti-Netanyahu coalition, Bennett also extended an invitation Sunday to Gadi Eisenkot, leader of the centrist Yashar party, to join the joint electoral list.\n\nLapid, who leads the centrist Yesh Atid party, framed the merger as a critical step to eliminate fragmentation within Israel’s anti-Netanyahu voting bloc. In an official statement, he emphasized that the alliance’s core goal is to “unite the bloc, put an end to internal divisions and focus all efforts on winning the critical upcoming elections.”\n\nThis is not the first collaboration between the two politicians. Lapid and Bennett previously joined forces to form a unity coalition government in June 2021, an administration that ended Netanyahu’s 12-year consecutive tenure in office and made history by including Ra’am, an independent Arab Israeli party, as the first Arab faction to formally join an Israeli governing coalition. That government collapsed in June 2022 when Bennett announced the coalition was no longer politically viable, leading to a short caretaker prime ministership for Lapid and snap elections that brought Netanyahu back to power at the end of 2022. Since the 2022 election, Lapid has served as leader of the parliamentary opposition, while Bennett stepped back from active political life – until this latest announcement.\n\nRecent public opinion polls have identified Bennett as the most electable challenger to Netanyahu in the upcoming October vote, a key factor behind the strategic merger. A onetime senior policy advisor to Netanyahu early in his political career, Bennett has over the years evolved into a fierce critic of his former mentor’s leadership and policy agenda. A right-wing politician known for his longstanding support of Israeli settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank, Bennett’s profile is expected to help the unified bloc draw votes from centrist and right-leaning voters dissatisfied with Netanyahu’s tenure.\n\nNetanyahu, 76, the leader of the right-wing Likud party who has already served more cumulative years as prime minister than any other leader in Israeli history – topping 18 years across multiple stints – has confirmed he will lead the Likud party’s electoral list in the upcoming vote, which is required to be held no later than the end of October.\n\nSeparately, alongside the major political announcement, the Israel Defense Forces confirmed Sunday that one Israeli soldier was killed and six additional service members sustained injuries in a drone attack carried out by the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. This latest fatality pushes the total number of Israeli soldiers killed in ongoing cross-border violence between Israel and Hezbollah to 16. The current escalation of hostilities between the two sides began in early March, amid the broader regional war with Iran.

  • Belarus frees journalist Andrzej Poczobut in prisoner swap

    Belarus frees journalist Andrzej Poczobut in prisoner swap

    In a landmark breakthrough that signals a potential thaw in icy relations between Belarus and the West, prominent journalist Andrzej Poczobut has walked free from a Belarusian prison as part of a cross-border prisoner swap mediated by the United States, officials from both Belarus and Poland confirmed Tuesday.

    The exchange, which involved a total of 10 detainees being released across multiple countries, marks the latest in a string of diplomatic breakthroughs that have unfolded during Donald Trump’s second presidential term, as Belarus’ long-ruling authoritarian leader Alexander Lukashenko pursues improved ties with Western capitals after years of international isolation.

    Poczobut, a veteran correspondent for Poland’s leading independent newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza and a high-profile community leader among Belarus’ large Polish ethnic minority, had been serving an eight-year prison sentence following a 2021 conviction that was widely decried across Europe as a politically motivated prosecution. His detention drew sharp condemnation from European governments and human rights organizations, and in recognition of his advocacy for press freedom, he was later awarded the European Union’s highest honor for human rights defenders, the Sakharov Prize.

    Details released by diplomatic officials confirm the structured terms of the exchange: Belarus released five detainees, three of whom traveled to Poland, in exchange for three individuals that Poland transferred back to Belarus, with the remaining four freed prisoners involving other participating partner states. John Coale, Trump’s special envoy for Belarus, confirmed the breakdown of releases in a post on X, noting that three Polish citizens and two Moldovan citizens were set free as part of the agreement. “We thank Poland, Moldova, and Romania for their invaluable support in this effort, as well as President Lukashenko’s willingness to pursue constructive engagement with the United States,” Coale wrote.

    This prisoner swap builds on a broader diplomatic deal reached earlier this year between Minsk and Washington. In March, Lukashenko ordered the release of more than 250 political prisoners from Belarusian detention facilities, a concession that led to the rollback of some crippling U.S. sanctions imposed on the regime in previous years.

    Belarus, a close military and political ally of Russia, has been cut off from much of the international community for decades. Lukashenko has held authoritarian control over the country of 9.5 million people for more than 30 years, and successive rounds of Western sanctions have been levied against his government over systematic human rights abuses, the violent crackdown on opposition protests following disputed elections, and Minsk’s decision to allow Russia to use Belarusian territory as a staging ground for Moscow’s full-scale 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

  • ‘It’s bizarre’: Californians grapple with revelation that press gala gunman suspect was neighbour

    ‘It’s bizarre’: Californians grapple with revelation that press gala gunman suspect was neighbour

    Torrance, a sun-dappled coastal suburb of Los Angeles, has long been known to locals by its affectionate nickname: “Bore-ance.” A quiet community boasting top-rated public schools, gentle ocean breezes, and sprawling million-dollar single-family homes, the city has cultivated a reputation for being a place where major excitement never finds its way. That quiet normality shattered abruptly this weekend, after 31-year-old Cole Thomas Allen, a Torrance resident who lived with his parents just two blocks from where local resident Vince Terrazzino raised his 10-year-old daughter Alessandra, was arrested in Washington D.C. on charges of attempting to assassinate former President Donald Trump at the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner.

    Neighbors who spoke to the BBC described a collective stunned disbelief when Allen’s face — handcuffed, shirtless, and face-down on the floor of the Washington Hilton after he allegedly breached a security checkpoint armed with multiple weapons — flashed across national news broadcasts. “It’s bizarre that this person lives two blocks away from your house,” Terrazzino told reporters, recalling the wave of law enforcement activity that descended on the quiet suburban street within hours of Allen’s arrest.

    Within hours of the D.C. arrest, FBI agents descended on the Allen family home, executing a search warrant that kept helicopters circling the neighborhood through the entire night. The constant rotor noise kept nearly every resident awake, all glued to 24-hour news broadcasts trying to piece together what had happened from their quiet corner of California. Agents knocked on doors along the street searching for witnesses and clues, but declined to answer questions from residents or reporters, leaving locals to fill in the gaps with speculation.

    For many adult residents, the sudden swarm of media trucks parked along their narrow sidewalks and traffic jams that clogged the residential street were an unwanted nuisance. But for neighborhood children like Alessandra, the chaos was a rare break from “Bore-ance” routine – the 10-year-old hounded FBI agents for updates and described the scene as exciting and “popping.” On Monday, kids on wheelie bikes zoomed past clusters of national reporters, hoping to catch a spot on evening news broadcasts or influencer social media clips, all echoing the city’s familiar “nothing ever happens here” nickname.

    Court documents paint a stark picture of the alleged plot in Washington. An affidavit from prosecutors confirms Allen was carrying a semi-automatic handgun, a pump-action shotgun, and three knives when he rushed past the event’s security perimeter. An exchange of gunfire between Allen and Secret Service agents left one agent wounded before Allen was finally subdued. Prosecutors also allege Allen pre-warned relatives of his plans, writing that he intended to target as many members of the Trump administration as possible. Allen made his initial court appearance on Monday, and has not yet entered a plea to the charges against him.

    Along the residential street where the Allen family has lived, none of the neighbors the BBC spoke to said they knew Cole Allen well beyond casual smiles and waves when passing one another. Most said they knew his parents, who many described as a friendly, well-regarded local couple, and many neighbors went out of their way to express sympathy for the family amid the global media firestorm. “Leave those poor people alone,” one anonymous neighbor told reporters, explaining he was fed up with gridlock on the narrow street caused by press vehicles. Countless reporters knocked on the Allen family’s door over the weekend and Monday, but no one answered; most locals speculate the family is staying with friends or relatives outside the area to avoid the attention.

    A few miles from the family home, at a tutoring center where Allen worked, the location remained closed over the weekend with no sign of Allen. Cesilia Peralta, who works at a business next door to the center, told the BBC she regularly saw Allen during his lunch breaks, where he always ate alone. “He wouldn’t look at you. He wouldn’t interact,” Peralta said. “He never made eye contact.” Peralta’s 11-year-old daughter, who has received tutoring at the center, recognized Allen from his photo when shown by reporters, echoing the pervasive shock that has spread through the local community: “You never know who you’re around,” Peralta said.

    Earlier in his life, Allen studied at the California Institute of Technology, one of the most prestigious STEM research universities in the United States. While he was a student in nearby Pasadena, he attended services at the Pasadena United Reformed Church. Pastor Movses Janbazian told the BBC he still remembers Allen from his time as a student, describing him as a quiet young man who came to services regularly before returning immediately to his campus studies. “CalTech is very competitive. He was studying a lot,” Janbazian said. “He would come and go.” The pastor declined to discuss politics, and said he did not know what Allen’s political beliefs were, or whether Allen continued to attend church after he graduated and moved away. “I knew him casually,” Janbazian said. “I don’t have a lot to add.”

    As the media presence lingers on the suburban street, one local resident wanted to make sure reporters didn’t walk away with only the negative story: he reminded the BBC that 1936 Olympic runner and World War II hero Louis Zamperini, one of Torrance’s most famous native sons, also lived just down the same street from the Allen family home. “Good things also come out of Torrance,” the neighbor noted.

  • US government critical of Australia’s ‘opposition’ to ISIS bride repatriation

    US government critical of Australia’s ‘opposition’ to ISIS bride repatriation

    A diplomatic rift has emerged over the fate of 13 Australian citizens – four adult women and nine children – currently stranded in northeastern Syria, after senior United States State Department officials publicly condemned Canberra’s ongoing refusal to facilitate their repatriation. The stranded group, all linked to members of the defunct Islamic State (ISIS) militant network, had recently attempted to leave the overcrowded al-Roj camp where they have been held for years, only to be turned back and detained once again, a reversal that drew direct criticism from US policymakers.

    In a February 18 correspondence obtained and published by the *Sydney Morning Herald*, a senior State Department policy analyst laid out Washington’s formal position, noting that the US has actively pushed for all nations to repatriate their citizens held in Syrian detention camps. The official emphasized that this push has grown more urgent amid rapidly shifting security and political developments across northeastern Syria, where the future of camp governance remains deeply uncertain. “I see that the Australian government has dug in on its opposition to repatriating them from the camp,” the analyst wrote, adding that the frustration of the stranded group, now forced back to al-Roj after a failed exit, is entirely understandable. “I can only imagine how frustrating their return to Roj is,” the correspondence read.

    The group had made tangible progress toward a return to Australia earlier this year. With support from prominent Sydney community leader and respected medic Jamal Rifi – an Order of Australia recipient who has spent more than a decade assisting this population – the citizens secured valid Australian passports. By Saturday last week, they had exited al-Roj camp and even held confirmed tickets for commercial flights back to Australia, only for the effort to collapse when Australian authorities blocked the repatriation, forcing them back to the camp. Rifi has long argued that Australia’s domestic security is better served by bringing the group home, particularly the children, who he calls innocent victims of their parents’ ideological choices. In a February statement, Rifi noted, “I said publicly that these children were the first victims of the terrible actions of their fathers,” adding that bringing the group home would leave Australia safer than leaving them stranded in a unstable region where extremist radicalization remains a persistent risk.

    Major Australian Islamic and community organizations have echoed Rifi’s calls, placing mounting public pressure on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s center-left government to reverse course. The Australian National Imams Council, the Muslim Legal Network, and the Lebanese Muslim Association have all publicly urged the government to allow the group to return, framing the children’s situation as a humanitarian crisis that cannot be ignored.

    In response to the unfolding controversy, the Albanese government has denied providing any official assistance to facilitate the group’s exit from Syria, though it has acknowledged that the citizens hold a legal right to enter Australian territory under existing national legislation. Prime Minister Albanese doubled down on his long-held position during a press briefing in Canberra Tuesday, reaffirming his opposition to voluntary repatriation for adult citizens who chose to join ISIS. “My views have not changed with regard to people who went overseas and chose to support ISIS rather than Australia, when ISIS had an objective of setting up a caliphate to literally attack democracies like Australia,” he told reporters. He did, however, acknowledge the vulnerable status of the children, describing them as “victims of their parents’ bad choices, evil choices, to undermine Australia’s national interest” – a stance that leaves the government caught between legal obligations, political pressure, and diplomatic criticism from its closest ally.