作者: admin

  • India’s ‘cockroach’ party founder detained ahead of protest

    India’s ‘cockroach’ party founder detained ahead of protest

    In just five months, a youth-led grassroots movement in India has grown from a sarcastic online reclamation of an insult into a formidable force challenging the country’s top election leadership, forcing authorities to deploy thousands of security personnel across New Delhi to crack down on planned demonstrations. On Friday, just hours before the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) was set to rally in central Delhi’s bustling Connaught Place commercial district, police detained movement founder Abhijeet Dipke, marking the second time in less than a week that the youth leader had been taken into custody.

    The CJP, which draws its unusual name from an offhand comment by India’s chief justice who compared unemployed young people to cockroaches earlier this year, has turned the derogatory label into a unifying rallying cry. Dipke and his supporters embraced the insult, building a movement that first gained national attention in July when thousands of young protesters marched toward India’s Parliament over a leaked examination paper scandal. The demonstration ended in clashes with police, and the widespread public unrest ultimately forced the resignation of India’s education minister, cementing the CJP’s status as a major voice for disaffected youth.

    Today, the movement’s core demand is the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, over widespread allegations of widespread voter list manipulation that the CJP claims benefits Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). At the center of the dispute is the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision, a sweeping overhaul of national electoral rolls that critics argue has removed more than 130 million eligible voters from the rolls, disproportionately disenfranchising voters who are likely to support opposition parties. Both the Election Commission and the Modi government have repeatedly denied all allegations of bias or manipulation.

    Friday’s planned rally was organized partly as a show of solidarity with two senior CJP leaders, Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka, who were jailed for five days earlier this month after entering the iconic protest site Jantar Mantar. The site, which has served as India’s most prominent venue for public dissent near Parliament for decades, was recently declared off-limits to protests by Delhi police, a move the CJP says is intended to push demonstrations out of sight of the country’s centers of power. The two leaders were detained after breaching the new restriction, just days after they were released from custody following a mass crackdown on an earlier CJP protest last Saturday.

    In the lead-up to Friday’s march, Delhi authorities took extensive measures to prevent the gathering from going forward: police served Dipke a formal notice banning the unpermitted rally, closed central Delhi’s Central Park for 48 hours citing administrative reasons, and deployed thousands of police and paramilitary personnel across the city to block access to the planned protest site. Police even offered to allow a small, limited group of CJP supporters to gather at an alternate location to wave the Indian national flag and sing the national anthem, an offer the movement rejected.

    In response to the ban, CJP organizers adjusted their strategy, urging supporters to travel to Connaught Place in small groups of fewer than five people, unfurl the tricolor Indian flag (known locally as Tiranga), take a photo, and disperse. In a social media statement, the movement emphasized: “Waving the Tiranga is not a crime,” and encouraged supporters to share their photos online to show broad support for the movement’s demands.

    The BBC witnessed Dipke’s detention firsthand, as plainclothes officers surrounded the youth leader just moments after he left his residence, where he had been staying with opposition politician Anish Gawande, and forced him into a waiting police car. Several CJP supporters attempted to block the police vehicle from leaving, but were pushed back by officers. Gawande questioned the legality of the detention, telling reporters: “Detaining a lone man walking with the national flag in his hand is bit of a joke.” Delhi police have not yet publicly confirmed the formal grounds for Dipke’s detention.

    By the time the protest was scheduled to begin, between 200 and 300 supporters had gathered near the closed Central Park, and although the turnout was smaller than at previous CJP rallies, the crowd was steadily growing when police began dispersing and detaining participants. The BBC counted dozens of detentions throughout the day, including prominent student activist Neha Bora, a leader of the All India Students’ Association who has emerged as one of the most visible faces of the recent protest wave, and multiple working journalists who were covering the demonstration. Footage captured by on-site reporters shows police dragging protesters across sidewalks and forcing them into waiting detention buses, and the BBC filmed one officer slapping a detained protester inside a police vehicle. Delhi police have not responded to requests for comment on allegations of excessive force against demonstrators.

    The CJP’s campaign against the Election Commission has dovetailed with a broader wave of protest from India’s national opposition parties, which have also leveled allegations of voter list manipulation to benefit the BJP. Last week, opposition leader Rahul Gandhi and dozens of opposition lawmakers attempted to march to the Election Commission’s headquarters in Delhi, but were stopped and detained by police. The opposition has since brought their grievances to President Droupadi Murmu and marched to India’s Supreme Court to challenge the electoral roll revision. While the CJP, student groups and opposition parties have organized separate protests, their demands have converged, and Gandhi has publicly condemned the detention of CJP organizers and called for Jantar Mantar to be reopened to peaceful protest.

    In a pre-protest video message released Thursday, Dipke acknowledged that he was likely to be detained or jailed again, but urged supporters to continue the movement. “I also may be jailed after this, but I am not worried,” he said. “Tricolour is my pride and I will raise it.” He called on supporters who could not travel to Delhi to wave the flag in their own towns and cities, a call that has been echoed by other CJP leaders who have insisted the movement will continue regardless of government crackdowns. Delhi police have defended their measures as necessary to maintain public order, stating that unpermitted large gatherings would disrupt traffic, harm local business activity and block access for emergency response vehicles. Home Minister Amit Shah has also pushed back against opposition criticism, accusing critics of spreading false information about the electoral roll revision and defending the Election Commission’s institutional independence.

  • Zelensky rallies EU support as Trump says Ukraine leader ‘more difficult to deal with than Putin’

    Zelensky rallies EU support as Trump says Ukraine leader ‘more difficult to deal with than Putin’

    As Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in Brussels Friday for a high-stakes summit with top European Union leaders, former U.S. President Donald Trump unleashed a fresh wave of sharp criticism against him, deepening tensions between the former American leader and the Ukrainian administration amid the ongoing full-scale Russian invasion.

    In an interview with U.S. media outlet Newsmax Thursday evening, Trump compared Zelensky unfavorably to Russian President Vladimir Putin, claiming the Ukrainian leader is “more difficult to deal with” than his Russian counterpart. The former president also denounced Ukraine’s recent resumption of drone and missile strikes targeting Russian oil refineries as “a disgrace”, arguing that the attacks drive up global energy prices.

    The breakdown of a brief, Trump-proposed ceasefire on energy infrastructure attacks explains the renewed hostilities. Zelensky had agreed to pause Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy facilities for three days at Trump’s request, but announced Thursday that strikes would resume immediately. The Ukrainian leader justified the reversal by noting that Russia never halted its own attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure, a violation of the informal ceasefire terms.

    Overnight Thursday, that continuing Russian assault claimed new civilian casualties in northeastern Ukraine. Regional governor Oleg Synegubov confirmed via Telegram that a Russian drone strike on Kharkiv killed multiple civilians and left at least 14 others injured. As of Friday morning, Zelensky has not issued a public response to Trump’s latest critical remarks.

    Top European leaders have publicly backed Zelensky’s position following the collapse of the energy ceasefire. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who greeted Zelensky alongside European Council President António Costa at the Brussels summit, reaffirmed the EU’s unified stance against Russian aggression. “Of course we supported President Trump’s energy ceasefire but we’ve seen that Russia did not respect it, not a single minute,” von der Leyen told reporters on the ground. “Russia escalated and therefore we have to increase sanctions on Russia… We will not lift any sanctions unless Russia stops the war.”

    Trump’s harsh comments signal a clear worsening of relations between the leading U.S. Republican presidential candidate and the Ukrainian government. The former U.S. president doubled down on his criticism, telling Newsmax: “Zelensky is not a good guy for us to deal with. He doesn’t want to settle. He says he wants to settle, but he doesn’t. I’m not a big fan of Zelenskyy.”

    The dispute over energy strikes stems from competing U.S. and Ukrainian priorities. Trump’s frustration with Ukraine’s refinery strikes comes in the wake of a recent U.S. deal to import 300,000 tonnes of Russian diesel to the American market, a move designed to lower domestic fuel prices ahead of the 2024 U.S. presidential election. That agreement already drew fierce pushback from Zelensky, who publicly labeled it a “gift to Putin” earlier this week.

    During his visit to Europe, Zelensky has maintained a packed schedule of diplomatic talks aimed at securing continued military and political support for Ukraine. Following a stop in London a day earlier, where he met with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer (corrected from the original report’s misstatement of Andy Burnham), Zelensky met NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and the heads of state of Poland, France, Denmark, and Belgium in Brussels on Thursday. Friday’s summit schedule includes additional meetings with European Council and Commission leadership, as well as the prime ministers of Hungary, Finland, and Sweden, as Ukraine pushes for continued progress toward EU and NATO membership.

  • China tells Israel to stop ‘forced establishment’ of West Bank settlements

    China tells Israel to stop ‘forced establishment’ of West Bank settlements

    Against a backdrop of decades-long unrest and stalled peace efforts in the Middle East, China has increasingly positioned itself as a neutral diplomatic mediator to de-escalate regional conflicts, with top Chinese diplomat Wang Yi recently delivering clear calls for action to Israeli President Isaac Herzog during a face-to-face meeting on the sidelines of an international conference in Azerbaijan this Thursday.

    According to a statement from Wang Yi’s office, the Chinese foreign minister told Herzog that Israel must immediately end its forced establishment of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank and reverse all unilateral actions that have further eroded Palestinian territorial rights. Wang went on to describe the long-running Palestinian question as the greatest unaddressed historical injustice of the modern century, reaffirming Beijing’s longstanding, unwavering support for the Palestinian people’s right to establish an independent sovereign state. China has for decades held that the two-state solution, which would see Israel and Palestine coexist peacefully within recognized 1967 borders, remains the only viable and correct path to a lasting regional peace.

    This diplomatic engagement is the latest step in China’s broader push to carve out a role as a trusted conflict mediator in the Middle East, a region long dominated by Western diplomatic influence. In 2023, Beijing scored a major diplomatic breakthrough when it brokered a historic deal to restore full diplomatic relations between regional rivals Iran and Saudi Arabia, ending seven years of severed ties and open hostility. Earlier this year, China joined Pakistan in putting forward a joint proposal calling for an immediate ceasefire in the ongoing Israel-Gaza conflict, which has drawn widespread international support from Global South nations.

    Beijing’s diplomatic efforts focused on the Gaza conflict have centered heavily on advancing Palestinian national unity, a key precursor to any long-term peace deal. In 2024, Chinese diplomats facilitated talks between rival Palestinian factions Fatah and Hamas, resulting in a landmark agreement to form an interim national reconciliation government that would govern both the occupied West Bank and Gaza after the conclusion of the war with Israel. However, that agreement has yet to be implemented, leaving Palestinian political divisions unresolved.

    During this week’s meeting, Wang emphasized that the immediate top priority for the international community is to fully open all border crossings into Gaza to allow unimpeded access for humanitarian aid, in a bid to stop the ongoing spread of what he termed a catastrophic humanitarian crisis. He added that China stands ready to work alongside all responsible members of the international community to bring all conflicting parties back to the negotiating table and advance a comprehensive political settlement to the decades-long conflict.

    In a public post on the social platform X following the meeting, Herzog said he was pleased to hold talks with Wang, noting that their discussion centered on bilateral relations between China and Israel as well as the overall regional security situation. Herzog wrote that he emphasized Israel’s fundamental desire for peace in the Middle East, while also outlining what he described as pressing strategic security threats to Israel, led first and foremost by Iran and what he called its terrorist proxy groups across the region.

    China has long maintained close strategic and economic ties with Iran, and remains the world’s largest buyer of Iranian crude oil, even as Tehran has faced sweeping unilateral sanctions from the United States over its nuclear program over the past decade.

    One year after the entry into force of the current US-brokered ceasefire in Gaza, Palestinian civilians in the enclave continue to face daily threats to their safety, widespread displacement, and severe food insecurity. While the large-scale intensive bombardment of Gaza that marked the first phase of the war has ceased, Israeli military strikes continue to be carried out across Gaza almost every day. Official data indicates that more than 1,400 Palestinians have been killed in Israeli strikes in the 12 months since the ceasefire first took effect in October 2025.

    The current ceasefire was framed as the first phase of a broader deal to end the Gaza war, a conflict that was triggered by the deadly Hamas-led attack on Israeli territory on 7 October 2023 that killed roughly 1,200 people, most of them civilians. However, negotiations to move forward with the second phase of the ceasefire deal, which would lead to a full permanent end to hostilities and the release of all remaining hostages, have been completely stalled. Both Israel and Hamas have repeatedly accused one another of violating the terms of the existing ceasefire agreement, raising ongoing fears that full-scale hostilities could resume at any time.

  • They fled Russia, but the West sent them back

    They fled Russia, but the West sent them back

    In early December 2024, when a deportation flight carrying expelled Russian nationals touched down on the tarmac in Moscow, Russian federal security agents were already waiting on the ground. Among the passengers was Katya – a name changed to protect her from retaliation, as she remains trapped within Russia’s borders – who would later describe the overwhelming terror of that moment: “It was unbelievably frightening. My knees were shaking with fear.”

    Two years prior, Katya had fled Russia after Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, submitting an application for political asylum in the United States that documented her participation in anti-war protests and her membership in a Russian opposition movement. Her application was ultimately rejected.

    Today, Katya’s experience is far from unique. Just over three years after much of the Western world publicly opened its doors to Russians fleeing political repression and conscription, shifting political tides have hardened attitudes toward asylum-seeking Russians. Deportations of anti-war dissidents, army deserters and opposition activists from the U.S. and European Union are climbing rapidly, and returnees face predictable, devastating consequences: long prison sentences for anti-government speech, forced conscription to fight in Ukraine, and routine state harassment.

    After clearing passport control that December day in Moscow, Katya says officers from the Federal Security Service (FSB) interrogated her for hours. When agents discovered what they deemed “incriminating information” stored on her personal phone, she said their demeanor shifted immediately. “I was very afraid that they would simply bundle me off somewhere,” she recalled. Though Katya was eventually released to stay with relatives, constant surveillance has turned her daily life into a prolonged nightmare. “I feel as if I’m in a cage, like in a zoo,” she said. “Whenever I see a police car, I feel terrified and start thinking, ‘What if they’re coming for me?’”

    For male deportees on that flight, the risk was even more immediate: FSB officers distributed military conscription papers, ordering all men to report to local enlistment offices, the same hub through which tens of thousands of Russian conscripts have been deployed to the front lines in Ukraine. Another passenger and activist on the flight confirmed Katya’s account to the BBC.

    Official data underscores the sharp rise in deportations. In the U.S., forced removals of Russian nationals jumped from 222 in 2023 to more than 1,200 in 2025, a surge that comes as part of broader immigration restrictions enacted during the second term of President Donald Trump. Rights activists say many of those deported are known dissidents and army deserters. One high-profile example is Leonid Melekhin, an anti-war activist who fled Russia after being arrested at a protest and sought asylum in the U.S. Melekhin had openly criticized Russian President Vladimir Putin on social media, posting images of the leader alongside the message “Putin: murderer, fascist, usurper.” He was deported back to Russia in 2024, charged with “justifying terrorism,” and sentenced to six years in a maximum-security penal colony.

    Andrei Pivovarov, a leading figure in Russia’s exiled Anti-War Committee, who is himself currently serving a four-year prison sentence for “operating an undesirable organization,” notes that far longer sentences are common for returnees. “We have several examples of people who got eight years in prison when they crossed the [Russian] border,” he said. The rising risk of deportation has forced his organization to update its guidance for escaping dissidents: the European Union is no longer classified as a safe haven, and activists are now advised to seek refuge further afield.

    Deportations are rising sharply across the EU as well. German government figures show the country deported just seven Russian nationals in 2023, a number that jumped to more than 110 in 2025. Between 2022 and 2025, more than 21,000 Russians applied for asylum in Germany, but the approval rate plummeted from 29% in 2023 to just 6.8% in the first 11 months of 2025. Germany’s Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) told the BBC that protection is only granted to applicants who can prove “an actual, well-founded fear of persecution.” Last year, Berlin suspended its entire humanitarian visa program for Russians. EU-wide data shows the overall asylum approval rate for Russian applicants fell from 23% in 2024 to roughly 17% in the first nine months of 2025.

    This broader clampdown on asylum for Russian dissidents is tied to larger political shifts across the West. Growing public anxiety over high volumes of irregular migration, rising political pressure, and increasing support for far-right populist parties have pushed mainstream governments to tighten immigration rules across the board. Rights advocates say anti-war Russian dissidents, many of whom fled targeted repression, are getting swept up in this broader crackdown.

    “Western governments are focused on limiting humanitarian programmes and asylum seekers,” said Anastasia Burakova, a human rights lawyer and founder of Kovcheg (Ark), an organization that helps anti-war Russians escape the country. The shift, she added, is a direct response to “public concerns and rising support for right-wing populist parties.”

    Even after an asylum application is rejected, many Russian nationals are given a window to leave the receiving country voluntarily. But a growing share are now being forcibly escorted back to Russia, often via indirect routes through third countries. Multiple exiled Russian activists told the BBC that Western immigration officials regularly dismiss the risks they face, claiming they face no danger upon return and often lack basic understanding of Russia’s current repressive legal landscape.

    Artyom, a former Russian soldier who deserted the army in 2022 after his commanders threatened to deploy him to Ukraine, described how his warnings fell on deaf ears. “I tried to explain that if they sent me back, I would be put in prison, or sent to war where I’d be killed,” he said. “They just didn’t believe me.” Even though Artyom provided U.S. officials with official documentation proving a criminal desertion case had been opened against him in Russia, he was still placed on a deportation flight to Moscow, routed through Egypt. “I was preparing for death,” he said. “I was thinking, ‘how can I die without it being painful?’” After being held in a military detention center in Moscow, Artyom managed to escape and is now in hiding in an unnamed third country. “Another country could investigate me better and give me asylum. Why didn’t they give me that chance? Instead they deported me specifically to Russia,” he said. “It ruined my life.”

    In a statement to the BBC, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security defended its policy: “All illegal aliens receive due process. If a judge finds an illegal alien has no right to be in this country, we are going to remove them.”

    Rights groups warn that the risk to deported dissidents is growing because political repression inside Russia has reached unprecedented levels. Memorial, the Nobel Prize-winning Russian human rights organization, reports its official list of recognized political prisoners grew from 803 to 1,265 in 2025, marking the largest single-year increase on record. The Russian Embassy in London declined to comment on this story when contacted by the BBC.

    For many other dissidents, the threat of deportation hangs over them daily. Anti-war activist Mikhail and his wife Dasha – whose names have also been changed to protect their family members still in Russia – are currently awaiting forced expulsion from Finland “any day.” Russian authorities have already blocked Mikhail’s social media accounts for spreading anti-war content that Moscow classifies as “fake information,” and police have repeatedly questioned his mother at their home. Dasha is a member of Jehovah’s Witnesses, a religious group the Russian government has banned as an extremist organization. The couple provided Finnish authorities with extensive evidence of their targeted persecution, including a video recording of police telling Mikhail’s mother that more than 300 of his posts violate Russian law, where even a single anti-war post can carry a multi-year prison sentence.

    Finnish immigration authorities have rejected the couple’s asylum application five times, ruling there is “no reasonable basis to believe” they would face serious human rights violations if returned. “We’re sitting here and someone could knock on our door at any moment, take us to the Russian border and simply hand us over to Russian officers,” Mikhail said. “We fear for our lives! We came to Finland for help, and they’re refusing us. My wife cries constantly.” Amnesty International, which is supporting the couple’s appeal, says they face a “real risk” of detention, prosecution, long imprisonment, and even torture if deported. The Finnish Immigration Service says all of its asylum decisions comply with international refugee law standards, and the approval rate for Russian applicants is in line with the EU average.

    The growing threat of deportation comes as growing numbers of Russians are once again considering fleeing the country. Unconfirmed rumors of a new wave of military mobilization to reinforce Russian troop levels in Ukraine have spread widely in recent months, a move the Kremlin has repeatedly denied. The 2022 mobilization round prompted more than 700,000 Russians to flee the country in a matter of weeks, mostly to neighboring ex-Soviet states like Armenia and Georgia. Burakova says requests for help from Russians seeking to escape have increased tenfold in August 2025 compared to May of the same year. For the growing number of Russians hoping to flee repression and conscription, the core question remains unanswered: will the West offer them safe refuge, or send them back to face harm?

  • ‘Onion cartel’ in Philippines fined $28m for price shock

    ‘Onion cartel’ in Philippines fined $28m for price shock

    More than a year after a severe onion price crisis roiled household budgets across the Philippines and tested the new national administration, regulators have handed down the largest antitrust penalty in the country’s modern history to six companies linked to a collusive onion cartel. The Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) announced Wednesday that the combined fine against the group of onion importers, cold storage operators, and shipping distributors totals 1.76 billion Philippine pesos, equal to roughly $27.9 million or £21 million – the biggest penalty issued by the agency since it was founded in 2016.

    The crisis unfolded between late 2022 and early 2023, when the price of onions – an irreplaceable staple in nearly every Filipino household and cuisine – surged to an unprecedented 800 pesos per kilogram. At that peak, the cost of a single kilogram of onions outstripped the country’s daily minimum wage and even surpassed the retail price of most cuts of beef and pork, a shocking shift that made headlines around the world.

    The sudden price hike triggered widespread disruptions across the food sector: many local restaurants removed onion-dependent dishes from their menus to avoid passing on exorbitant costs to customers, the vegetable became a prime target for cross-border smuggling rings, and it even gained unexpected status as a luxury item – with one viral case seeing onions used in place of flowers for a wedding bouquet. For then newly-inaugurated President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., who had campaigned on a promise to rein in skyrocketing food costs for working-class families, the crisis created immediate political pressure to act. Marcos responded by approving emergency imports of onions, and publicly vowed to hold accountable those responsible for the artificial shortage, stating at the time that vulnerable Filipinos were facing hunger and deepened poverty because of the cartel’s actions.

    After a months-long investigation, PCC officials confirmed that the six accused companies controlled nearly half of all approved onion import clearances across the Philippines in 2020 and 2021. The commission found the group engaged in an illegal coordinated scheme to manipulate the market, controlling supply through aligned practices across importation, cold storage, and wholesale distribution to create an artificial shortage and drive up prices. A separate parliamentary investigation launched after the crisis also reached the same conclusion, confirming a cartel was behind the artificial price surge.

    The crisis ultimately abated in late 2023, when large local onion harvests entered the market, boosted supply, and pushed prices back down to stable, affordable levels. Today’s penalty, regulators emphasized, sends a clear message that anti-competitive behavior will not be tolerated in any sector of the Philippine economy, including the critical food space. The PCC added that beyond the civil fine, the firms and their executives could still face criminal prosecution through the Philippine Department of Justice, underscoring the gravity of the offense.

  • Gulf states have downplayed damage caused by Iranian strikes: Report

    Gulf states have downplayed damage caused by Iranian strikes: Report

    In a bombshell report published this week, news agency Reuters has uncovered widespread claims that Arab monarchies across the Arabian Gulf have deliberately hidden the true scale of infrastructure damage inflicted by a series of coordinated attacks attributed to Iran and its regional allied militias. The disclosure has thrown into sharp question the accuracy of official statements from Gulf governments about the security of their energy and strategic assets in the escalating regional conflict that followed a February 28 cross-border strike targeting Iran by the United States and Israel.

    After that US-Israeli strike, Iran launched retaliatory missile and drone operations against multiple Gulf states including Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Kuwait, while Yemen’s Houthi movement — an Iran-aligned group — has stepped up attacks on the world’s largest oil exporter, Saudi Arabia, in recent months. What makes the revelation more alarming is that the strikes deliberately targeted civilian and critical infrastructure, including energy processing facilities, oil and gas pipelines, and even a United Arab Emirates nuclear energy site, putting energy supplies and civilian lives at severe risk.

    Reuters’ assessment highlights a consistent gap between official narratives and on-the-ground reality across all affected Gulf states. The most high-profile discrepancy involves Saudi Aramco’s headquarters in the eastern city of Dhahran. After a Houthi drone strike, Saudi Arabia’s energy ministry downplayed the incident, claiming only a “limited fire” had broken out at the site. But anonymous sources with direct knowledge of the damage told Reuters that the facility suffered “extensive damage”: the top three floors of the building, including the executive office of Aramco CEO Amin Nasser, sustained severe structural harm, with partial ceiling collapse and all windows and doors blown outward by the blast force.

    The pattern of underreporting repeats across the region’s most strategic assets. At the UAE’s Barakah nuclear energy plant, a strike hit the roof of a critical electrical substation, forcing one of the plant’s four operational reactors to switch to backup emergency diesel generators to maintain safe operation. Two Gulf officials and one Iranian official confirmed to Reuters that Iranian operatives had detailed advance intelligence of the plant’s layout and the exact location of the substation, confirming the strike was a deliberate, precision targeting rather than an errant attack.

    In Qatar, a strike on the Ras Laffan liquefied natural gas (LNG) export facility — one of the largest LNG production hubs on the globe that supplies a huge share of global energy demand — also showed sophisticated Iranian targeting. The strike hit specialized “cold boxes” that house the cryogenic cooling equipment required to convert natural gas into its liquid export form. Industry experts note that this custom equipment can take multiple months to manufacture and replace, making any damage to the facility a long-term disruption risk for global gas markets.

    No site demonstrates the gap between official claims and actual damage more clearly than the UAE’s Fujairah Port, a vital chokepoint for global oil exports that handles millions of barrels of crude and refined products daily. According to Reuters’ investigation, based on satellite imagery and on-the-ground sources, Iran struck the port multiple times, even launching follow-up attacks after the UAE completed repairs to damaged infrastructure.

    The first strike on Fujairah on March 3 left two large oil storage tanks burning for multiple consecutive days. A second strike targeted the port’s matrix manifold, a critical transfer system that connects 62 pipelines moving crude oil and refined petroleum products from onshore storage terminals to waiting shipping tankers. Emirati officials attempted to dismiss the damage from both strikes as nothing more than harm caused by falling debris from intercepted missiles or drones — but Reuters found this explanation directly contradicted independent damage assessments.

    Ramanan Krishnamoorti, a professor of petroleum engineering at the University of Houston, described the damage to the manifold system as a critical blow to the port’s core function. “This is a wound to the brain and heart of the facility,” he told Reuters, noting that the official explanation of incidental debris damage was not credible given the nature and location of the strike.

    Follow-up strikes in March damaged the port’s second intact matrix manifold, forcing the UAE to launch an urgent round of emergency repairs to restore full export capacity. While UAE officials announced the port was fully operational by the end of March, Iran launched another drone strike on the site in May, targeting the same pipeline network that had been damaged in the initial March attack. According to export data cited in the report, shipments of refined petroleum products from Fujairah did not return to pre-attack levels until September, more than six months after the first strike.

    The report’s findings are expected to deepen concerns about regional security and the vulnerability of critical global energy infrastructure amid escalating tensions between Iran and Western-aligned regional states, while also raising new questions about transparency around security incidents that can have global economic impacts.

  • Congresswoman Ilhan Omar’s cell phone confiscated, family members subpoenaed

    Congresswoman Ilhan Omar’s cell phone confiscated, family members subpoenaed

    A deepening federal investigation into Minnesota Democratic Congresswoman Ilhan Omar has sent shockwaves through U.S. political circles, with new details emerging about subpoenas, evidence gathering, and the Trump administration’s aggressive broader agenda targeting immigration and naturalization. The Minnesota Star Tribune first reported Thursday that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), now led by Attorney General Todd Blanche, a former personal lawyer for President Donald Trump, has issued subpoenas to several of Omar’s immediate relatives — excluding her husband and daughter — as part of an ongoing inquiry into alleged immigration fraud.

    The development comes just days after federal agents with Homeland Security Investigations carried out a pre-dawn raid at Omar’s Washington D.C. residence this Monday, a search that has now been confirmed resulted in the seizure of her cell phone, personal laptop and all other electronic devices held at the home.

    Omar, a Somali-born refugee who arrived in the United States as a child in 1995 and made history as the first hijab-wearing Muslim member of Congress, has been one of Donald Trump’s most persistent political targets since her election to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2018. With just weeks remaining until her November 3 re-election bid, the investigation has raised urgent questions about political interference in law enforcement.

    The core of the DOJ’s current inquiry centers on the circumstances of Omar’s naturalization: she obtained U.S. citizenship at age 17 through her late father, who had already completed his own naturalization process. Investigators are now probing whether Omar was actually 18 at the time of her naturalization, a distinction that would have required her to submit a separate citizenship application independent of her father’s. For years, Trump has repeatedly called for investigations into Omar’s citizenship status, even going so far as to baselessly claim she married her own brother to fraudulently secure immigration status. Omar has repeatedly and forcefully denied all such allegations. Despite this, both Trump and Vice President JD Vance have spent the past year publicly demanding the inquiry move forward, with Trump infamously leading crowds at his political rallies in chants of “send her back” targeting the congresswoman.

    On Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing anonymous senior U.S. officials, that the current administration is actively building a legal case to revoke Omar’s U.S. citizenship and ultimately deport her. The reported plan is part of a much broader push by the Trump administration to strip citizenship from more people than any modern U.S. administration. Just last week, the DOJ announced an unprecedented move to initiate citizenship revocation proceedings for 40 people. Historically, such actions have been extremely rare, with most presidential administrations targeting fewer than five individuals per term. This crackdown aligns with Trump’s long-stated goal to deport as many as one million people annually from the U.S., regardless of whether their immigration status was obtained through legal or irregular pathways.

    While Omar has been one of the most vocal critics of Trump’s policy agenda, she is far from the highest-profile opponent of the administration within Congress. Even many Republican lawmakers have pushed back on the investigation, arguing it is a deliberate distraction from pressing domestic issues that matter most to American voters. Marjorie Taylor-Greene, a former Republican House member who has become a prominent critic of Trump, posted publicly on social media platform X Wednesday saying she shares the view held by many of Omar’s supporters that the probe is a political distraction.

    “Me and Ilhan Omar are far apart policy wise. I’m pro life, she’s pro abortion. I’m pro 2A, she’s pro gun control. And on and on,” Greene wrote. “But can someone tell me how pretending to get ready to deport Ilhan Omar is going to bring gas down under $2, make health insurance freaking affordable, make a family’s weekly grocery bill make sense, and stop sending our beloved military off to fight for another fucking foreign war??? People are so sick and tired of the bullshit.”

    This is not the first time Omar has faced federal scrutiny: The New York Times has confirmed that during Democratic President Joe Biden’s prior administration, federal officials launched an investigation into Omar’s personal financial dealings back in 2022. That inquiry ultimately stalled and was closed after investigators failed to turn up sufficient evidence to support any charges.

  • Canada PM warns ‘stakes are high’ as Alberta separation vote nears

    Canada PM warns ‘stakes are high’ as Alberta separation vote nears

    As Canada stands on the brink of a historic electoral test of national unity, Prime Minister Mark Carney has launched a two-day campaign blitz across Alberta, urging residents to reject regional separation and cement the province’s place within Canadian Confederation in Monday’s upcoming independence referendum. With polls showing a narrow majority leaning toward remaining in Canada, Carney warned Thursday that the stakes of the vote could not be higher, stressing that complacency among pro-unity voters could upend the expected outcome.

    Speaking to a energized crowd of more than 7,000 supporters at a pro-unity rally in Calgary, Carney characterized the referendum as mis-timed at a moment of global economic volatility. He called on Albertans to deliver a clear, decisive rejection of separation, rejecting arguments that polling alone guarantees a pro-union outcome. “Turnout will determine the outcome,” Carney told the gathered crowd, echoing warnings from pro-union organizers who fear low voter enthusiasm could hand separation advocates an upset victory.

    The referendum, scheduled for October 19, was called earlier this year by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith after a grassroots separatist movement collected nearly 300,000 signatures on a petition demanding a binding vote on provincial independence. Smith, a Conservative whose core political base includes a vocal bloc of separatist supporters, has publicly backed retaining Alberta’s place in Canada but framed the vote as a necessary step to amplify Albertans’ voices on long-simmering grievances against the federal government.

    Separation advocates center their campaign on the argument that Alberta, a landlocked province rich with oil and gas reserves, has been systematically sidelined by federal policymakers in Ottawa despite the massive economic contribution its energy sector makes to national revenue. Over the past decade of successive Liberal federal governments, separatists claim, national climate and environmental policies have been prioritized over the growth of Alberta’s key fossil fuel industry, and an independent Alberta would be able to retain far more of its resource wealth for provincial investment and public services.

    Pro-unity campaigners, by contrast, argue that separation would carry catastrophic near- and long-term economic consequences for the province. An independent Alberta, they warn, would immediately inherit billions in new sovereign debt, and widespread economic uncertainty would drive away major business investment and push thousands of skilled jobs across the newly created border into remaining Canadian territory. Carney and other pro-unity leaders have drawn explicit parallels between the Alberta referendum and the 2016 Brexit vote, cautioning that a vote to leave carries a host of unforeseen economic risks that will take generations to reverse.

    In a nod to the legitimacy of long-held frustrations among many Albertans, Carney acknowledged in his Thursday speech that “the frustrations that many Albertans have felt are real.” To address those grievances, the prime minister has already moved in the lead-up to the vote to demonstrate federal support for Alberta’s energy sector, announcing plans to fast-track regulatory approval for a major new oil pipeline connecting Alberta’s oil fields to Canada’s Pacific coast. Carney has framed the pipeline project as a demonstration of national solidarity, noting it will help Canada diversify its export markets at a time of ongoing trade tensions with the United States driven by tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump.

    Before wrapping up his two-day trip, Carney is scheduled to hold a second pro-unity rally on Friday in Edmonton, his hometown, after spending Thursday morning meeting with local business owners and pro-unity volunteers working to boost voter turnout. On the same day, Premier Smith will join Conservative Opposition Leader Pierre Poilievre – another prominent backer of retaining Alberta’s place in Canada – at a separate pro-unity event in Calgary. Separation advocates, for their part, are planning a final get-out-the-vote rally in Edmonton on Saturday to shore up support in their strongest regional strongholds.

    As of this week, early voting data points to extraordinarily high voter engagement: more than 450,000 Albertans have already cast ballots either through early in-person voting or mail-in ballots, a total that already exceeds the number of ballots cast in Alberta’s most recent provincial general election. While most public opinion surveys continue to show a majority of respondents favor remaining in Canada, both campaigns have spent the final stretch of the race working feverishly to turn out their base, knowing that even a small shift in turnout could reshape the future of Canada.

  • US police identify remains of man found in barrel in shrinking reservoir

    US police identify remains of man found in barrel in shrinking reservoir

    Receding water levels driven by climate change-fueled drought have unearthed a decades-old mystery at Lake Mead, the United States’ largest man-made reservoir, and investigators have finally identified the human remains found in a corroded barrel near the shores of the lake more than a year ago.

    After years of exhaustive investigation, law enforcement officials in Nevada have confirmed the identity of the victim found stuffed inside the rusted barrel as Edward “Buddy” Lelburian Jackson. The remains were first discovered in May 2022, when falling water levels triggered by a record-breaking severe drought exposed the barrel that had laid hidden for decades. When authorities recovered the barrel, they found Jackson’s body with a single gunshot wound to the head, indicating he was the victim of a homicide.

    For more than a year, the victim remained a John Doe, until investigators recently used DNA testing to trace Jackson’s identity and connect with his surviving family members, according to a statement from the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. Homicide detective Robert Price addressed widespread public speculation that the killing had ties to organized criminal activity in the Las Vegas area, noting that at this stage of the investigation, no evidence has emerged to link Jackson’s death to any known criminal groups or the mob.

    “At this point in our investigation, we don’t have information to support those theories,” Price said during a press briefing Thursday.

    Investigators believe Jackson was shot and killed sometime in the 1980s, when he was between 55 and 59 years old. A native of Arkansas, Jackson was known for his frequent cross-country travels, particularly across the Western United States, and had previously lived in both California and Utah. He had a prior arrest record in Salt Lake City, Utah, but Price confirmed that Jackson had no known connections to Las Vegas and was never filed as a missing person. His extended family in Arkansas told authorities that Jackson was a habitual traveler who would disappear for long stretches and reappear without warning.

    “He would travel the country. He would show up when he showed up,” Price explained.

    Beyond the victim’s clothing, no other evidence — including the fatal bullet — was recovered from the barrel, complicating the ongoing investigation into Jackson’s killer. Authorities are still working to trace potential associates of Jackson and determine a clear motive for the shooting. Price noted that Jackson was not known to be a gambler, which makes tracking down people who may have known him decades after his death a particularly challenging task.

    Jackson’s identification marks the fourth set of human remains recovered from the receding waters of Lake Mead since drought conditions began worsening. Two of the previous sets of remains were determined to be victims of drowning, while the third remains unidentified and the cause of death remains unexplained. Law enforcement has warned for months that as drought continues to push water levels lower, more human remains are likely to be discovered as areas previously submerged for decades are exposed.

    Lake Mead, which supplies drinking water to more than 20 million people across the Southwest from Las Vegas to Los Angeles, has seen steady water level decline since 2000. Climate scientists confirm that human-caused climate change has accelerated the rate of drying in the region, worsening multi-decade megadrought conditions across the American West.

    This phenomenon of long-dormant discoveries emerging from receding waters is not unique to the American Southwest. This year alone, drought conditions across Europe have exposed long-submerged remnants of past conflicts. In Budapest, Hungary, the receding waters of the Danube River revealed the remains of two German World War II soldiers alongside a mostly intact Wehrmacht motorcycle, while other WWII wreckage, including a broken ship hull, has been found near Prahovo, Serbia in recent months.

  • Three children and a teacher killed by 16-year-old at Oregon primary school

    Three children and a teacher killed by 16-year-old at Oregon primary school

    A horrific act of gun violence has left four people dead at an Oregon elementary school, in a tragedy that has shaken the small community of Bend. On Thursday afternoon, a local 16-year-old male suspect launched a deadly attack at Silver Rail Elementary School, leaving three children and one educator dead, and two more people fighting for their lives in hospital.

    According to official statements from Bend Police, the teen attacker forced entry into the campus by firing multiple shots at the school’s locked entry doors. Police chief Mike Krantz confirmed that a civilian community member spotted the suspect entering the school building, followed him inside and confronted the gunman, fatally shooting him before law enforcement could fully secure the scene. Additional law enforcement details clarify that the first 911 call came in at 12:59 local time, initially reporting an unknown shooter opening fire on a vehicle outside the school. Crime scene photos released by authorities show a red truck marked with multiple bullet holes. Within just three minutes of the first report, at approximately 1:02 pm, the gunman was confirmed dead.

    The victims of the attack include three children aged 5, 8, and 11, and one teacher who was killed during the rampage. A 7-year-old child and a 54-year-old teacher were rushed to a local hospital and remain in critical condition, as of the latest official update. Investigators have not yet confirmed whether the 16-year-old suspect had any prior connection to the school, and authorities have withheld the suspect’s name pending the completion of the ongoing investigation.

    Bend-La Pine Schools Superintendent Steven Cook released an official statement expressing the community’s overwhelming grief following the shooting. “We are stunned and heartbroken by this senseless tragedy,” Cook said. “No words can adequately express the grief our community is experiencing.” This latest incident adds to the long-running national debate over gun control and school safety in the United States, where mass shootings at primary and secondary education campuses have become an increasingly frequent public safety crisis.