作者: admin

  • NYC comptroller backtracks on buying Israeli bonds by saying they aren’t a good investment

    NYC comptroller backtracks on buying Israeli bonds by saying they aren’t a good investment

    New York City’s top financial official has backed away from a high-profile campaign pledge to purchase Israeli government bonds, reversing course over mounting concerns about economic instability and credit risk in the region.

    Mark Levine, a Democratic incumbent who made the purchase of Israeli bonds a central plank of his successful 2025 election campaign, confirmed his decision to The New York Times in recent comments, emphasizing that his choice is rooted purely in fiscal prudence rather than political opposition to Israeli policy.

    “I always said this would be based on financial considerations only, not politics — that’s still my position,” Levine stated. “But as of now, we feel that because of some technical challenges, and because of financial considerations, this is not an investment that we can make right now.”

    The debate over whether New York City should invest pension fund assets in Israeli bonds first erupted into public view in 2023, when then-Comptroller Brad Lander chose not to reinvest in new Israeli bonds after the city’s existing holdings matured. At that time, the city’s pension fund held roughly $39 million in Israeli bonds, which delivered consistent annual returns of approximately five percent. Lander’s decision stopped short of full divestment, however, as the city did not liquidate its existing positions.

    When Levine launched his campaign for comptroller last year, he positioned himself as an avowed supporter of Israel and made the purchase of new Israeli bonds a key campaign promise, setting up an immediate ideological and policy clash with New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who has publicly called for full divestment from Israel over its military conduct in the Gaza Strip. Notably, the mayor lacks the legal authority to override the comptroller’s independent decisions on pension fund bond purchases, meaning Levine’s final call stands regardless of city hall’s position.

    Levine, who speaks Hebrew and has longstanding personal ties to Israel, has not shied away from commenting on Israeli domestic politics. In his recent comments, he shared that he feels a deep personal connection to the country but also expressed heartbreak over its current political climate, echoing widespread international criticism of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s current government.

    Levine’s decision comes against a backdrop of shifting credit ratings for Israeli sovereign debt. In 2024, credit rating agency Moody’s downgraded Israeli bonds, labeling the asset an “increasingly risky investment.” While Moody’s has since revised its overall outlook for Israel upward, the technical credit rating of Israeli bonds still remains below the level it held before the October 7, 2023 attacks.

  • Israeli spyware targeted ‘hundreds of millions’ through zero-click ads, researchers find

    Israeli spyware targeted ‘hundreds of millions’ through zero-click ads, researchers find

    A groundbreaking investigation from Canada’s independent digital watchdog The Citizen Lab has exposed a sweeping global cyber surveillance campaign that leverages mainstream digital advertising infrastructure to deliver the notorious Israeli mercenary spyware Candiru to millions of devices, entirely without any action from the target. This marks the first publicly confirmed instance of zero-click mercenary spyware being distributed via targeted online advertisements, according to the organization’s official report published Thursday.

    The investigation details that Discover-Tech, an Israeli firm that operates under the facade of a legitimate digital advertising company, actually acts as a front for major mercenary spyware operators, including Candiru, which recently rebranded to Integrity Labs following a 2025 acquisition by unsanctioned U.S. private equity firm Integrity Partners. Through its advertising operations, Discover-Tech placed targeted ads that forced millions of devices across dozens of countries to connect directly to Candiru-controlled servers, enabling covert tracking and deep digital reconnaissance of affected users.

    Notably, the report confirms that between 2024 and 2025, at least 45 devices connected to Al Jazeera Media Network were specifically targeted in a string of these zero-click ad attacks commissioned by Discover-Tech. The company controls a proprietary platform called Controlium that enables its mercenary spyware partners to de-anonymize users, collect unique device fingerprints, and automatically deploy malware infections the moment an ad loads on a user’s device. No click, no interaction, and no action from the target is required for the infection to succeed, making these attacks nearly invisible to the average user.

    Over a four-month monitoring period, Citizen Lab researchers recorded Discover-Tech’s ads running across nearly 200,000 distinct websites and mobile applications for both Android and iOS operating systems, spread across dozens of nations. Beyond its partnership with Candiru, the investigation also links Discover-Tech to two other known mercenary spyware actors: Intelos and Bindecy.

    Candiru first drew international regulatory attention in 2021, when the U.S. government added the firm to its trade blacklist over findings that it engaged in activities that threatened U.S. national security and foreign policy interests. Candiru is not the first Israeli spyware firm to face such sanctions: it was added to the blacklist alongside the infamous NSO Group, another major mercenary spyware provider that has been linked to global surveillance of journalists, activists, and government officials.

    This is not Candiru’s first documented targeting of independent Middle Eastern media outlets either. In 2021, it was revealed that the firm’s spyware had been used to target the independent news outlet Middle East Eye (MEE) and dozens of other regional websites. A 2020 investigation by cybersecurity firm ESET uncovered a multi-wave Candiru surveillance campaign running between April 2020 and August 2021 that focused heavily on targets with connections to the Middle East, particularly organizations and individuals focused on the conflict in Yemen.

    A particularly troubling revelation from the new investigation is that Discover-Tech was listed as a certified, approved vendor by both Google and IAB Europe, the leading trade association for the European digital advertising industry. The company was able to place its malicious ads across major global ad networks including Google, Russian search giant Yandex, and ad platform Beeswax.

    Wolfie Cristl, a senior researcher at The Citizen Lab, emphasized the systemic risk this campaign exposes to the global digital ecosystem. “The way online advertising works today is a systemic security threat,” Cristl told Reuters, noting that the risk extends equally to governments, private sector entities, civil society groups, and ordinary individual internet users.

    Confiant, a New York-based advertising security firm, released a parallel independent report on the campaign the same day as The Citizen Lab. Jerome Dangu, Confiant’s co-founder, told reporters that Discover-Tech was deploying as many as 10 million malicious advertisements every day across the globe. Dangu explained that standard industry data-sharing practices, known as cookie matching, allowed the firm to track users even after they left websites or apps that ran its ads. “Very likely hundreds of millions of people would have been touched by Discover-Tech,” Dangu said.

    Following the publication of the two research reports, major digital ad platforms including Google, IAB Europe, and Beeswax have already moved to cut off Discover-Tech’s access to the global digital advertising market, halting its ability to run new malicious ads for the time being.

  • Are student protests being manipulated ahead of France’s presidential election?

    Are student protests being manipulated ahead of France’s presidential election?

    France’s long, storied tradition of mass public protest is once again taking center stage across the country, as three straight weeks of high school blockades and street demonstrations have widened to include union workers and veteran activists from the decade-old yellow vest movement – opening deep rifts over systemic inequality, fiscal policy and political gridlock just six months before the nation’s next presidential election.

    For years, displays of public discontent have shaped French political life: angry farmers have lobbed manure at municipal buildings to push back against costly regulatory burdens, while frustrated youth in marginalized suburban neighborhoods have clashed repeatedly with riot police. Today, that legacy of protest has been reignited by thousands of secondary school students, who have blocked campus entrances and marched on city streets to voice anger at crumbling infrastructure, overcrowded classrooms, understaffed schools and stark educational inequity that disproportionately harms low-income communities in disadvantaged suburbs. This Saturday, a new wave of hundreds of demonstrations is scheduled across the nation, with planned participation from labor unions and prominent figures from the 2018 yellow vest movement, which staged a year of nationwide protests against soaring living costs.

    France’s Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has sparked controversy this week by alleging that the radical left party La France Insoumise (LFI), led by presidential hopeful Jean-Luc Mélenchon, is deliberately manipulating student anger to gain electoral traction ahead of 2027’s presidential vote. “Members of LFI are instrumentalising the high school movement for their electoral advantage,” Lecornu stated this Wednesday, accusing the party of encouraging unrest while performing perfunctory condemnations of violence that erupt during protests. “This hypocrisy damages France.”

    For many protesting students, however, Mélenchon’s platform – which includes a new wealth tax, lowering the voting age to 16, and direct engagement with underfunded schools that most national candidates ignore – has made him a popular figure, with chants of “Mélenchon for President!” common at marches. Prominent yellow vest activist Jérôme Rodrigues, who helped lead the 2018 movement, has publicly urged supporters to join Saturday’s protests, framing the unrest as a fight for basic economic dignity. “Anger has no political party. An empty fridge has no political party,” Rodrigues said in an Instagram video, adding that protesters demand the ability to “live decently, no longer have to count every cent, and no longer have to choose between eating and driving.”

    On the ground in Paris, student protesters say their grievances stretch far beyond electoral politics. Three 17-year-old students blocking their high school entrance in Paris’ 3rd district told reporters that while their campus already suffers from crumbling walls, overcrowded classes and a shortage of teachers, conditions are far worse for peers in poor suburban districts. “France likes to speak of égalité,” they said, “but the reality is the poor here are prejudiced against, while the rich benefit.” Though none will be old enough to vote in next spring’s election, the teens expressed widespread distrust of the political establishment, saying large-scale protest is the only tool left to force authorities to listen to young people. Intergenerational support for the movement is widespread: many mothers have joined marches in solidarity, taking turns to coordinate between student protesters and police after earlier demonstrations saw hundreds injured, including a 15-year-old boy in Lens who lost a hand when police used stun grenades. The French interior ministry has denied accusations of police brutality and has since suspended stun grenade use at high school protests. One participating mother, 37-year-old Gwen, said she does not mind her son missing weeks of classes, noting “It’s a far better education for him to wake up to his civic duty and to fight for what is just in society.” Another 17-year-old protester, Lola, whose mother participated in the historic 1968 May student protests, carried a joint placard with her mother reading “revolution is the most beautiful expression of humanity.” “Now it’s my turn. No point in waiting for the presidential election in France. We want change now,” Lola said.

    Beyond the immediate standoff over student grievances, the unrest lays bare deeper structural crises facing France, the European Union’s second-largest economy: spiraling public debt, a deeply fragmented parliament, a revolving door of prime ministers (six in the last five years alone) and widespread public disillusionment with the status quo. Leading economists have pushed back against widespread speculation that France is approaching a Greek-style 2012 debt crisis, noting that the nation retains the fiscal capacity to address budget shortfalls. “The markets recognised already in 2024 that we would have a budgetary problem after snap elections left parliament deeply divided between three opposing political blocs but they also realise France is a big country with the ability to raise taxes if necessary,” explained Anne-Laure Delatte, a tenured CNRS researcher at Paris Dauphine University and a leading commentator on French public finance. Delatte compared France’s current fiscal strain to the 2023 UK crisis under then-Prime Minister Liz Truss, noting that the crisis was short-lived because markets recognized the UK had the tools to correct course. For France, she said, “it would be painful, but a 4% increase in VAT would raise the 120bn euros needed to plug government debt. Investors know that.” She added that the European Central Bank would likely intervene if France’s fiscal troubles threatened to spill over into other EU economies. Even so, policy moves like tax hikes or cuts to welfare and education spending would likely trigger even deeper public anger, given the widespread discontent already visible on French streets.

    Delatte argued that no new president, regardless of political affiliation, will be able to resolve France’s underlying challenges without systemic constitutional change. The Fifth Republic’s system concentrates power in the presidency, leaving parliament to block initiatives rather than build cross-bloc consensus, she explained. “We need a system where MPs have more power and should learn consensus and coalition-building from our European neighbours,” Delatte said, adding that underfunded, unequal education systems drag on long-term economic growth by stifling innovation and productivity. “Our current system of inequality in schooling and low wages for teachers means we lose out from benefiting from the best and brightest across French society. That is not only unfair on individuals but our economy ultimately loses out on innovation and productivity.”

    Centrist French senator Anne-Catherine Loisier, a member of the Centrist Union in the upper parliament and vice president of the parliamentary group for sciences and technology, said immediate progress can be made by reallocating existing education funding and decentralizing power away from Paris. “Our budgets are limited, but you don’t necessarily need more money. You can make improvements by redistributing funding better. Education is a regional competence in France. Every region should take a look at local needs and address priorities accordingly. That action can be taken immediately,” Loisier said, echoing calls for greater regional power that mirror similar pushes in the UK. “France has traditionally been very Paris-centric but so much could be improved by decentralising the country. My France isn’t broken. We need to give power back to the people. Local governments can look people in the eye directly, so voters feel they have power over their own future, rather than politicians handing them their fate from up high. That way I hope we can restore voters’ – and students’ – faith in politics.”

    The promise of reform is a common refrain from all political factions ahead of next year’s election, but polling across France and much of Europe shows public trust in the political establishment continues to decline, leaving the outcome of the upcoming election – and the future of France’s growing protest movement – far from certain.

  • US judge bars Trump from punishing rights groups for liaising with ICC

    US judge bars Trump from punishing rights groups for liaising with ICC

    A U.S. federal judge has dealt a legal blow to the Trump administration’s crackdown on groups cooperating with the International Criminal Court (ICC), issuing a preliminary injunction this week that shields two American human rights organizations from potential civil or criminal liability for their work supporting ICC investigations.

    Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York ruled that the two groups, Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN) and the Taxpayer Alliance Against Genocide (TAAG), had demonstrated a strong likelihood of proving that the Trump administration’s executive order violated their First Amendment rights to free speech. In his ruling, Furman emphasized that any interruption to First Amendment freedoms, even for a short period, constitutes irreversible harm to constitutional protections. The judge’s order specifically blocks any punitive measures targeting the two groups that are rooted in their protected speech activities.

    The legal challenge was launched in July, shortly after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio published an op-ed declaring the administration’s intent to “dismantle the ICC brick by brick.” A separate, ongoing lawsuit was filed a month later by four additional U.S. human rights groups, which argue that Trump’s sanctions on the ICC are rooted in a manufactured national emergency with no factual basis.

    DAWN, which was founded by the late Jamal Khashoggi, a former Middle East Eye columnist murdered in 2018, confirmed this week that it will continue its work after the court’s ruling. The organization has submitted multiple filings to the ICC that document alleged atrocity crimes committed by Israeli officials in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, as well as the complicity of U.S. officials in these alleged crimes. DAWN’s legal team explained that the group’s work is not limited to supporting ICC investigations, but also aims to build broad public pressure to hold state actors accountable to international law.

    The court ruling does not, however, reverse the Trump administration’s broader sanctions regime targeting the ICC itself. That regime was established 18 months into Trump’s presidency via Executive Order 14203, which authorized the imposition of sanctions on any foreign individual that supports ICC investigations into U.S. or Israeli nationals suspected of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. The order also criminalized providing or receiving any “service” connected to sanctioned individuals or entities connected to the ICC. The administration justified these measures by claiming the ICC’s investigations represent a national emergency, arguing the court has no jurisdiction over crimes committed by U.S. or Israeli citizens during armed conflict.

    The U.S. has a long history of ambivalence toward the ICC: while it participated in the court’s founding negotiations and signed the Rome Statute in 2000 under President Bill Clinton, it never sent the treaty to the Senate for ratification, over longstanding fears that U.S. military personnel and officials could face prosecution for alleged war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq. Trump has been openly explicit that his administration’s actions are specifically intended to punish the ICC for its investigations targeting Israel. To date, the administration has used Executive Order 14203 to sanction ICC prosecutors and judges, three leading Palestinian human rights groups (al-Haq, al-Mezan, and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights), and United Nations special rapporteur Francesca Albanese, who investigates human rights abuses in the occupied Palestinian territories.

    When DAWN and TAAG first filed their lawsuit, their legal team argued that the executive order’s vague definition of “service” gave the government broad power to penalize almost any activity that benefits sanctioned parties. The groups warned they could face prosecution for routine activities such as filing legal briefs with the ICC, sharing evidence, or even collaborating with Palestinian human rights groups or Albanese. Prior to the court ruling, the threat of legal action had already forced many organizations to self-censor, halt work related to the ICC and cut professional ties with sanctioned individuals and groups. Joe Pace, the attorney representing DAWN and TAAG, described the Trump administration’s actions as a “textbook infringement on the First Amendment,” noting that the Constitution does not allow the government to dictate what topics American citizens can discuss with domestic or foreign parties.

  • UK MP John McDonnell raises ‘alarm’ about arrest of journalists at Palestine Action protest

    UK MP John McDonnell raises ‘alarm’ about arrest of journalists at Palestine Action protest

    A senior UK Labour politician has sparked fresh debate over press freedom and police conduct after tabling a parliamentary motion to condemn the controversial arrest of five journalists covering a pro-Palestinian protest in Leicester. The incident, which unfolded on October 8 outside the offices of UAV Tactical Systems — a local subsidiary of Israeli arms manufacturer Elbit Systems — has drawn sharp criticism from political figures and media unions over allegations of excessive police force.

    The five detained media workers included two reporters from the Leicester Gazette and two freelance journalists accredited by the National Union of Journalists (NUJ). According to the reporters’ accounts, they were taken into detention under Section 13 of the UK’s Terrorism Act despite explicitly showing official press credentials to multiple police officers at the scene. After holding the journalists for three hours and collecting their personal data, officers ultimately de-arrested the group without filing any charges.

    John McDonnell, the veteran Labour politician behind the motion, formally labeled the arrests as unjustified police overreach in his Early Day Motion, tabled before UK Parliament last Thursday. He argued the incident poses a serious threat to the fundamental right of press freedom that underpins democratic society. Speaking to Middle East Eye, McDonnell emphasized that intimidating or detaining journalists simply for carrying out their professional work constitutes a clear violation of basic human rights, adding that such repressive actions have no place in a free democracy and cannot be accepted.

    The National Union of Journalists has also joined the push for accountability over the incident. NUJ General Secretary Laura Davison confirmed the union has raised formal concerns with the National Police Chiefs’ Council, echoing McDonnell’s criticism of excessive police action. Davison noted that following the UK government’s recent official ban on the protest group Palestine Action, the union has repeatedly stressed that journalistic coverage of the group — including taking photos or video of protest placards — does not amount to criminal support for the organization.

    In an official response to requests for comment, a spokesperson for Leicestershire Police defended the law enforcement action, explaining that the decision to detain all people at the protest site — including the journalists — was made to support a thorough investigation amid chaotic on-scene conditions and a large crowd. The spokesperson clarified that once officers interviewed the detained individuals, collected their details and confirmed no offenses had been committed, the journalists were immediately de-arrested and were never moved to police custody. Overall, police confirmed that 35 people were detained under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act during the protest, with just one individual facing additional arrest on suspicion of a racially aggravated public order offense. All 35 detained people have since been released on conditional bail.

    The incident comes amid growing tensions across the UK over protest policing, press freedom, and restrictions on pro-Palestinian advocacy following the government’s recent ban on Palestine Action, raising new questions about how law enforcement balances public order with protections for media and civil liberties.

  • Irish police social media accounts breached by hackers

    Irish police social media accounts breached by hackers

    A high-profile cyber incident has disrupted official social media channels of Ireland’s national police force, An Garda Síochána, after unauthorized actors gained access to two prominent accounts on the X platform earlier this week to push cryptocurrency promotions. According to Ireland’s national public service broadcaster RTÉ, the compromised accounts — @GardaTraffic, the force’s main account for road safety and traffic updates, and @GardaInfo, a general public information account — had their official Garda branding stripped from their profiles by Wednesday night. The bad actors replaced the original branding and began publishing a stream of posts advertising an unspecified cryptocurrency. Multiple posts were automatically flagged by X’s content moderation systems, which added warnings linking the content to an already suspended third-party profile. The hackers also altered the profile location setting to list Amsterdam, masking the actual origin of the activity. In an official statement released shortly after the breach was discovered, An Garda Síochána confirmed that the unauthorized access was limited exclusively to its two public-facing X accounts. The force emphasized that no internal police data systems were compromised in the incident, and there has been no loss of sensitive police information or disruption to core operational work. A police spokesperson issued a public advisory urging social media users to avoid interacting with any content posted to the two compromised accounts, or any imposter accounts claiming to represent the official Garda channels. “An Garda Síochána continues to carry out our internal enquiries and work with the X platform to understand how this unauthorised access has occurred,” the spokesperson added in the initial statement. By Thursday, the force issued an updated announcement confirming that the two compromised accounts had been successfully recovered and restored to police control. However, officials confirmed the accounts will remain inactive over the coming days to allow the Garda National Cyber Crime Bureau to conduct a full forensic investigation into the incident, identify the attackers, and shore up any security vulnerabilities that allowed the breach. The incident highlights the growing risk of unauthorized access to public institution social media accounts, which bad actors often target to spread misinformation or promote fraudulent schemes to large follower bases.

  • Bus hits train stopped on French side of  Channel Tunnel, with 19 injured

    Bus hits train stopped on French side of Channel Tunnel, with 19 injured

    A traffic incident near the Channel Tunnel’s French entrance in Coquelles, close to Calais, has left 19 people injured after a bus collided with a parked freight train on Saturday evening, according to local French authorities.

    The vehicle involved in the crash was transporting lorry drivers who were scheduled to board a shuttle rail service through the tunnel when the collision occurred at approximately 19:27 local time (17:27 GMT) on the tunnel’s loading platform.

    Agathe Cury, the local sub-prefect, confirmed to reporters that two of the 19 injured people, which include the bus driver and 18 passengers, have sustained severe injuries and were airlifted to nearby medical facilities via helicopter. As of the latest update, none of the injured are reported to be in life-threatening condition.

    Cury also noted that all people affected in the crash are men from multiple different nationalities. Images released by local French newspaper La Voix du Nord show emergency response personnel crowded around the scene, where the damaged bus with visible dents and breaks to its front and side panels is parked alongside the stationary freight train.

    In terms of traffic impact, Cury stated that only a brief pause in both freight and Eurostar passenger transit through the tunnel was ordered, to allow emergency teams to evacuate injured people. Beyond this short suspension, regular traffic flow through the Channel Tunnel was not disrupted in the longer term.

    Eurostar, the high-speed rail service that operates passenger routes through the tunnel between the United Kingdom and mainland Europe, later released an official statement confirming that the crash took place several kilometers from the tunnel proper. The company clarified that the incident does not involve any Eurostar trains traveling to or from London, and all services have continued to operate on schedule as planned.

  • Welsh parliament drops poet from opening ceremony after Gaza reference in poem

    Welsh parliament drops poet from opening ceremony after Gaza reference in poem

    A controversy has erupted over artistic expression and political speech in Wales after the national poet was excluded from the opening ceremony of the Senedd, the country’s devolved parliament, which was presided over by King Charles III, when officials rejected her work for referencing pressing global and domestic political issues.

    Hanan Issa, a Welsh-Iraqi writer who holds the title of Wales’s national poet, was commissioned to compose and perform an original poem for Thursday’s official opening in Cardiff. But just one day before the event, Issa revealed that her original submission had been turned down explicitly on the basis that its political content made it unsuitable for the occasion.

    Issa’s original poem, titled *To Grow*, was crafted to blend English and Welsh language, framing Wales as a community garden and elected lawmakers as the garden’s caretakers—an extended metaphor to explore the responsibilities of governance. Rejecting calls to produce a generic, apolitical piece focused only on natural scenery, Issa wove in references to urgent ongoing issues, most notably a passage calling out violence against civilian children in Gaza. The poem also touched on contentious domestic policy debates around cuts to transgender healthcare and the rising threat of far-right fascism across Europe.

    When told the direct political references were unacceptable, Issa revised the poem, softening the language to be more abstract and replacing the explicit reference to “Gazan children” with the coded phrase “watermelon children”—a widely recognized symbolic reference to Palestinians, as the watermelon’s green, white, black and red stripes match the colors of the Palestinian flag. Even this toned-down second version was rejected by Senedd organizers.

    Following the second rejection, Issa announced she would boycott the entire ceremony, saying she was no longer welcome to participate. In an interview with BBC Radio Wales Breakfast, she explained her reasoning for including political content: the original commission brief only requested a poem celebrating elected representatives and their commitment to the Welsh public, with no explicit rule barring engagement with current issues. “It felt like a disservice to write something that was quite surface level, when so many pressing issues are affecting the lives of people in Wales today,” she said. Issa added that she found the rejection deeply concerning: the Senedd is Wales’s legislative body, where political debate is the core function, so barring political commentary from a national poet’s contribution sends a worrying message about open discourse in Welsh democracy.

    In a brief statement responding to the controversy, the Senedd Commission, the governing body that oversees parliamentary operations, only said that “after a development process, we concluded that the poem was not the right fit for this occasion.”

    Literature Wales, the organization that supports literary work and the national poet role, acknowledged the Senedd Commission’s final decision while expressing regret over the outcome. “The role of the national poet is to inspire reflection, conversation and positive change,” the group said in a statement. “We are disappointed that this formal celebration of Welsh democracy will not include a literary contribution.”

    The incident has reignited conversations across the United Kingdom about the limits of free expression in institutional public events, particularly when it comes to commentary on the ongoing Israel-Gaza conflict, which has become one of the most divisive global political issues in recent years.

  • ​​Libya: Racism and ‘resettlement’ conspiracies fuel fear among Tripoli’s migrants

    ​​Libya: Racism and ‘resettlement’ conspiracies fuel fear among Tripoli’s migrants

    In early October, a planned mass xenophobic demonstration targeting foreign migrants in Tripoli that had been weeks in the making failed to materialize at scale, overshadowed by a large-scale teachers’ strike demanding unpaid wages from the internationally recognized Government of National Unity (GNU) that controls western Libya. But the failed protest did little to ease the rising tide of anti-migrant sentiment that has been building in the Libyan capital since spring 2025, leaving hundreds of thousands of vulnerable people facing growing threats of violence, discrimination, and exclusion. In the lead-up to the 1 October deadline for protests, dozens of social media groups and pages flooded platforms with openly xenophobic content, replete with racist slurs targeting Sub-Saharan African, Arab, and Asian migrants, in a coordinated campaign to push Libyans into the streets. Migrant rights organization Refugees in Libya even confirmed it received a handwritten threat targeting “black people” that included a bullet just days before the planned demonstration. While the 1 October protests drew barely any turnout, small factions of demonstrators did gather in Tripoli’s Martyrs’ Square on 2 and 9 October, chanting slogans including “Libya for Libyans” and “No to resettlement.” These small actions are part of a steady string of similar demonstrations that have taken place multiple times per month in central Tripoli since April, slowly amplifying hostility toward the large migrant population concentrated in the capital. Today, Tripoli is home to nearly 700,000 Sub-Saharan African migrants and refugees, including 335,000 Sudanese people who fled the ongoing war in their home country. For years, the Libyan capital has served as a key transit hub for migrants seeking to cross the Mediterranean to reach Europe. Data from the first eight months of 2025 shows that roughly 80% of all migrants arriving in Italy via the Mediterranean departed from Libyan territory, with over 90% of those departures launching from western Libya’s coastline between Tripoli and Zuwara, a longstanding major departure point for migrant smuggling networks. Long before the recent wave of public anti-migrant protests, migrants in Libya already faced systemic abuse that the United Nations has labeled widespread and systematic human rights violations. These abuses include exploitation by smuggling networks, arbitrary detention, kidnapping, torture, enslavement, and violent interception by Libyan authorities at sea. But the rising tide of public hostility has added new layers of risk, with migrants facing growing threats in their homes, workplaces, and public spaces that did not exist at the same scale just a year ago. “I feel that Libyans are increasingly allowed to do whatever they want to us, without obligation to abide by the law,” explained Albert G, a 37-year-old migrant from Sierra Leone who resides in eastern Tripoli, in an interview with Middle East Eye. “Not only will torture and imprisonment continue to be a reality for migrants, which is already a well-known problem, but it also adds more common difficulties when there is no way for us to enter the public places or look for work to survive.” Albert told reporters that anti-migrant sentiment began growing after the first wave of public protests in spring, and became genuinely frightening by the start of summer. The first large, coordinated anti-migrant protest took place in June, when hundreds of demonstrators gathered to oppose what they claimed was a secret UN-backed “resettlement plan” to keep migrants in Libya permanently, rather than allowing them to continue their journey to Europe. Despite immediate and firm denials from both the International Organization for Migration (IOM) and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), protesters blocked the UNHCR headquarters in Tripoli on 4 June, accusing international aid agencies of seeking to alter Libya’s demographic makeup. The June protests were followed by widespread anti-migrant violence across multiple western Libyan cities, with police and armed factions aligned with the Libyan interior ministry launching waves of arrests targeting Sub-Saharan African people. Many members of the migrant community stayed locked inside their homes for days to avoid violence, as unrest spread. While large-scale unrest died down over the summer, small anti-migrant gatherings and sporadic violent incidents continued. Tensions flared again on 7 September, when a group of Libyan protesters stormed an IOM Migrants’ Response Centre in western Tripoli. While no one was killed or injured in the attack, the incident sent shockwaves through Tripoli’s Sub-Saharan African community. “If the authorities can allow an IOM camp to be attacked, many lives will be impacted because there will be no safe place for migrants,” Albert said. After the attack on the response centre, the GNU released a statement acknowledging that “the right to peaceful protest can never justify assault, vandalism or threats to life,” and warned that perpetrators would face legal consequences. But when Middle East Eye asked the Libyan interior ministry what concrete steps it had taken to hold attackers accountable or prevent future incidents, the ministry failed to respond. Meanwhile, the large social media pages and groups that launched the anti-migrant campaign earlier this year remain active on Facebook and X (formerly Twitter), continuing to spread hate speech and call for future mobilization. Groups including “Libyan News – No to the Resettlement In Libya,” which boasts 76,000 members, and “The Tripoli Activists Movement,” with 39,000 members, publish hateful content targeting migrants on a daily basis. To date, the full extent of coordination behind the movement and its original origins remain unclear. An August investigation by the BBC found that the June large-scale protests were primarily fueled by unfounded online rumors spread to stoke public anger. On the ground, a small number of public Libyan figures including lawyer Thuraya al-Tuwaibi and journalist Salma al-Shaab have repeatedly led the protests, which they describe as “peaceful,” and have kept the movement’s momentum going. “These campaigns are still ongoing, even though they are based on false and misleading information,” said Ahmed Hamza, a Libyan human rights activist, in an interview with Middle East Eye. “The actions of those advocating for or coordinating this criminal movement constitute criminal acts punishable under the Libyan Penal Code.” Hamza pointed to a “state of complacency, complicity, and suspicious silence from the interior ministry and other authorities” that has allowed the anti-migrant movement to grow unimpeded. Migrants themselves echo this criticism, noting that while the GNU officially allows migrants to live and work in Libya – and even employs some in low-wage roles – it has never taken meaningful steps to guarantee the safety of migrant communities in Tripoli. Kingsley, a pseudonym for a Cameroonian refugee who has lived in Tripoli for four years, told reporters he has “never felt safe in Libya.” The 29-year-old was arrested twice by Libyan security forces in 2024 and 2025, and says he was only released after paying ransom to what he describes as his “kidnappers.” Human rights groups have repeatedly documented that armed groups affiliated with official Libyan state institutions, alongside independent criminal gangs, routinely hold migrant civilians for ransom. “Now, I see the vast majority of Libyans as a threat,” Kingsley said. While Sub-Saharan African people remain the primary target of online and offline anti-migrant hate, the movement’s rhetoric has also expanded to target Palestinian, Syrian, and Bangladeshi communities – groups that have long had a large presence in eastern Libya and are increasingly visible in Tripoli. Migrants report that even minor, everyday interactions with locals are now marked by increased disrespect and rights violations, even in incidents that are not directly tied to the anti-resettlement movement. “Last week, I worked at a construction site for two days and received no money. I had to go home on an empty stomach,” Albert said. While no new large anti-migrant protest dates have been announced publicly, tensions across Tripoli remain high, and human rights advocates warn the situation could escalate into widespread violence at any time. “Authorities must assume their responsibilities. Matters could escalate and get out of control,” Hamza warned. To date, the rising hostile climate has not forced large numbers of migrants to flee Tripoli, but many are now considering leaving for neighboring countries in search of safety. The IOM runs voluntary return programs for migrants, which assisted around 16,000 people in 2025, while Libyan official authorities deported more than 37,000 migrants last year. “Even if the situation is terrible there too, I would rather be in Tunisia, or Algeria,” Albert said. “I don’t know what the coming months have in store for us here.”

  • UK legal regulator dismisses complaints against UK Lawyers for Israel patrons

    UK legal regulator dismisses complaints against UK Lawyers for Israel patrons

    A long-simmering dispute over the intersection of legal professional ethics and Middle East political activism has taken a new turn, after the United Kingdom’s independent regulator for barristers ruled it will not open a formal investigation into three prominent senior barristers who hold patron positions with UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI).

    The case stems from a joint complaint filed earlier this year by two legal advocacy organizations—the London-based Public Interest Law Centre (PILC) and the European Legal Support Centre (ELSC)—acting on behalf of multiple charities and pro-Palestine campaign groups. The complaint targeted three high-profile legal figures: Lord David Pannick KC, Lord Anthony Grabiner KC, and Stephen Hockman KC, arguing that their formal association with UKLFI lent unearned professional legitimacy to the group’s aggressive legal campaigns targeting Palestine solidarity activists.

    UKLFI, founded in 2011 as a limited guarantee company with an affiliated registered charitable trust, defines its core mission as countering what it frames as the delegitimization of Israel and opposing the global Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. A core component of the group’s work is sending legal warning letters and formal complaints to individuals and organizations hosting pro-Palestine events or activism that UKLFI deems antisemitic or problematic. The names of the three barristers who are UKLFI patrons appear prominently on the header and footer of these legal communications.

    Internal documents obtained by Middle East Eye confirm that the Bar Standards Board (BSB), the body tasked with regulating barrister conduct in England and Wales, has closed the complaint without opening an investigation, citing what it calls insufficient evidence of professional misconduct. In its official outcome notification to the complaining legal groups, the BSB acknowledged that the three barristers are formally named as patrons of UKLFI, but ruled that their association does not violate the BSB Handbook of professional conduct.

    “Whilst the Barrister is a named Patron on the official letterhead for UKLFI, there is no evidence that the Barrister is the author of the letters sent out on behalf of UKLFI,” the BSB’s decision explained, adding that it is standard practice for non-profit organizations to highlight the professional standing of their official patrons. A BSB spokesperson declined to comment further on the specific case when contacted by Middle East Eye, in line with its policy on individual complaints.

    The ruling has been met with immediate pushback from PILC and ELSC, which have called the regulator’s conclusion unconvincing and pledged to formally challenge the decision through the BSB’s appeal process. The advocacy groups argue that the well-documented professional prestige of the three barristers is intentionally leveraged by UKLFI as a tool of “lawfare” designed to intimidate and deter peaceful, fully lawful pro-Palestine activism and protected political expression.

    “We reiterate our clients’ concerns around the use of distinguished barristers’ names and professional status on UKLFI correspondence, which lends authority to legal threats and contributes to the suppression of lawful Palestine solidarity activity,” the groups said in a joint statement. “Campaigners deserve to trust that legal regulators will adequately scrutinise harmful deployments of the law; we will persist in our efforts to ensure accountability for our clients.”

    Under BSB rules, an appeal of a closed complaint can be granted if new evidence emerges, a procedural error is identified, or the original ruling is found to be materially incorrect. PILC and ELSC say they already have sufficient grounds to launch an appeal and are currently compiling additional evidence to submit to the regulator in support of their challenge.

    The ELSC tracks efforts to restrict pro-Palestine activism across the United Kingdom in its Britain Index of Repression database, where UKLFI is listed 128 times. The advocacy group says the cumulative impact of UKLFI’s repeated legal threats has created a widespread “chilling environment” that pushes even fully lawful organizations and individual activists to cancel or alter pro-Palestine events out of fear of costly and time-consuming legal action.

    This is not the first complaint over UKLFI’s tactics filed by the two legal groups. Last year, PILC and ELSC submitted a separate complaint to the Solicitors Regulatory Authority (SRA) against Caroline Turner, a serving director of UKLFI. That complaint accuses Turner of violating the SRA’s professional principles and code of conduct, including through the use of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs)—a tactic defined as baseless legal threats used to silence critics and deter free expression on matters of public interest.

    Per documentation compiled by the complaining groups, between January 2022 and May 2025, UKLFI has sent at least eight formal threatening letters to individuals and organizations engaged in Palestine solidarity work. Recipients who shared the correspondence with complainants say the letters follow a clear pattern of “vexatious and legally baseless” messaging targeted at silencing grassroots campaigners, academic researchers, and civil society groups working on Palestine-related issues.