Fresh claims from a senior official within Somalia’s internationally recognized government have pulled back the curtain on an undeclared Israeli military presence in the breakaway region of Somaliland, stirring new friction across the Horn of Africa and the broader Middle East. The disclosure comes months after Israel made a historic and widely condemned decision to grant formal recognition to Somaliland, a self-declared independent state that has not received endorsement from the United Nations or nearly any sovereign nation. In an exclusive interview with Middle East Eye, the senior Somali government source outlined that the deployment of a 50-strong Israeli military contingent took place in early 2024, shortly after Israel resumed open military conflict with Iran in late February. To evade detection and integrate seamlessly into the local population, Israeli military commanders specifically selected troops of African descent, the majority of whom have Ethiopian heritage, the official added, citing intelligence gathered by Somali security agencies. Israel’s path to formal diplomatic ties with Somaliland began in December 2023, when it became the first country in the world to recognize the region’s independence. That unilateral move immediately drew sweeping condemnation from nearly every government across the African continent and the Middle East, as it upends longstanding international consensus on Somalia’s territorial integrity. By April 2024, Israel had completed the first step of formal diplomatic representation, appointing Michael Lotem as its inaugural ambassador to Somaliland’s capital, Hargeisa. When Middle East Eye reached out to the Israel Defense Forces for comment on the allegations of a secret troop deployment, military officials declined to address the claims directly, stating that the matter falls under the jurisdiction of the country’s political leadership, rather than military spokespeople. Outlets including MEE also attempted to secure a response from Somaliland’s government, but those requests have so far gone unanswered. While the Israeli government has not confirmed the deployment of troops, senior Israeli officials have openly acknowledged the long history of covert security cooperation between the two sides. During a public meeting with visiting Somaliland President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi this week, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz confirmed that discrete collaboration has been ongoing for years, operating outside of public view. “For many years, we cooperated under the radar in a series of operations that will remain classified,” Katz said. “Now we are determined to bring our security cooperation to new heights, for the benefit of both peoples and for the benefit of stability in the region.” Earlier this month, CNN reported, citing anonymous sources familiar with the arrangement, that Somaliland has granted Israel access to an additional military facility. This site, the report claims, could be used as a refueling and logistics hub for Israeli aircraft conducting long-range missions targeting Iran. Regional security analysts who specialize in Horn of Africa politics have further speculated that Israel is actively pursuing a permanent naval base along Somaliland’s Red Sea coast. Such a base would position Israel to more effectively counter growing threats from Houthi militants in Yemen, who have targeted commercial shipping in the Red Sea in recent months. In comments released Wednesday, Somaliland’s Defense Minister Mohamed Yusuf Ali denied persistent claims that Israel maintains a military base on Somaliland territory. At the same time, he did not downplay the scope of current bilateral security engagement, confirming that Israeli personnel are supporting Somaliland’s security forces by providing training for both local police and military units. The developing situation has heightened concerns across the region, with many governments warning that deepening Israeli military involvement in Somaliland threatens to destabilize the already fragile security environment in the Horn of Africa and undermine regional efforts to maintain Somalia’s territorial unity.
标签: Asia
亚洲
-

WhatsApp to be led by Indian start-up founder as Will Cathcart steps back
After nearly seven years at the helm of Meta’s globally dominant messaging platform WhatsApp, Will Cathcart has announced his departure from the top role, in one of the most high-profile leadership changes in Big Tech in recent months. During Cathcart’s tenure, WhatsApp expanded exponentially, growing its global user base of private messaging to over 3 billion people, while rolling out new encrypted communication features that cemented its position as the world’s most widely used mobile messaging service. In social media posts shared Monday, Cathcart noted that WhatsApp is currently in the strongest strategic position in its history, making the timing right for him to step back from day-to-day leadership of the platform. While Cathcart will leave his role as WhatsApp head, he will remain a member of Meta’s senior leadership team. Taking his place is Kunal Shah, the founder of Bangalore-based Indian fintech unicorn Cred, a fintech firm that has shaken up India’s credit and payments sector since its launch. Meta chief executive officer and Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg voiced strong public support for Shah’s appointment this week. Zuckerberg highlighted that Shah built Cred into one of India’s most consequential technology companies, and said his builder-focused mindset and global outlook make him uniquely suited to lead the world’s largest messaging platform. “I look forward to working with Kunal to continue to make WhatsApp the best service for billions of people and millions of businesses,” Zuckerberg said. Shah founded Cred in 2018, building a members-only fintech platform that rewards users for making on-time credit card payments, with a core focus on high-income users in India’s fast-growing digital economy. Before launching Cred, Shah built a career as an investor and advisor to early-stage startups across India and Southeast Asia, according to his public LinkedIn profile. In his own announcement shared on social media Monday, Shah confirmed he will retain his stake as a shareholder in Cred while taking on the WhatsApp leadership role. He also revealed that Cred has secured $900 million (approximately £679 million) in new investment from Meta, a deal that Bloomberg reports will give Meta a 20% minority stake in the fintech firm. To address growing privacy concerns that have dogged Meta in key emerging markets, Shah emphasized that while Meta will hold a minority stake in Cred, the social media giant will not gain access to any of Cred’s member user data. The leadership reshuffle at WhatsApp comes as Meta works to deepen its foothold in India, WhatsApp’s largest single market by user count. Data from the World Population Review shows that WhatsApp counts roughly 853 million active users in India alone, accounting for more than a quarter of the platform’s total global user base. As part of Meta’s broader “family of apps” that also includes Facebook, Instagram, and Messenger, the company has increasingly looked to WhatsApp to drive new revenue growth, testing new revenue streams including in-app advertisements, paid premium subscription features, and artificial intelligence-powered tools. Despite its massive popularity in the country, WhatsApp and Meta have faced growing regulatory and public scrutiny in India in recent years over the platform’s privacy policies and data sharing arrangements between the app and its parent company. The leadership change and Meta’s new investment in Cred signals the company’s long-term bet on solidifying its position in the world’s largest open digital market, as competition for users and revenue in emerging technology sectors intensifies across South Asia.
-

Myanmar army killed over 700 civilians in six months, UN says
Five years after seizing power in a 2021 coup that ousted Myanmar’s democratically elected government and threw the nation into a devastating civil conflict, the country’s military regime has been implicated in the deaths of more than 700 civilian lives in just six months preceding its widely discredited 2025 election, according to a new United Nations Human Rights Office investigation. The report, which tracks violence from August 2025 through January 2026, draws on cross-verified data from multiple credible on-the-ground sources to confirm a minimum of 702 civilian fatalities, including 224 women and 153 children. The period in scope began when the military junta officially announced its long-promised electoral process — a vote dismissed by the global community as a fraudulent sham, after all major opposition parties were barred from participating and entire swathes of the country controlled by armed opposition groups were excluded from balloting. Myanmar’s civil conflict has already claimed thousands of lives and displaced millions of people across the country since the 2021 coup, with large territories remaining outside the junta’s control. The UN report singles out military air strikes as the single leading cause of widespread destruction and civilian suffering across the nation. The northwestern region of Sagaing, where the military has launched sustained offensives to retake territory from opposition groups, was identified as the deadliest area for civilians, accounting for 191 confirmed civilian deaths, including 60 women and 30 children. The investigation documents two particularly brutal mass casualty attacks that targeted civilian gatherings. In October 2025, a military strike on a crowd gathered outside a school in Chaung-U, Sagaing killed 23 people, four of them children, and wounded more than 60 more. At the time of the attack, attendees were holding a peaceful candlelit vigil to mark the end of Buddhist Lent, demand the release of political prisoners, protest military forced conscription, and reject the junta’s planned election. A second deadly strike in December 2025 hit a public tea shop in Tabayin, Sagaing where civilians had gathered to watch a football match, killing at least 19 people and injuring 20 more. Beyond junta-perpetrated violence, the report also documents ongoing human rights abuses against the Rohingya minority, who are targeted with killings, arbitrary detention, sexual violence, and forced recruitment at the hands of the Arakan Army. In a stark rebuke of fading global engagement with the crisis, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk emphasized that the people of Myanmar have already endured unthinkable suffering under military rule, only to be abandoned by the international community. Cuts to international assistance have drastically exacerbated hardship for millions of people across the country, Türk noted, adding that funding for local civilian protection initiatives has long been the only lifeline for communities facing constant, indiscriminate military attacks. The withdrawal of this support, he said, only compounds the harm already inflicted on vulnerable populations. In the months following the election, the junta has solidified its grip on power: in April 2026, Min Aung Hlaing — the general who led the 2021 coup — was sworn in as the country’s president. The election’s outcome was never in doubt: leading opposition parties were banned from running, conflict-affected regions were barred from participating, the military is constitutionally guaranteed a quarter of all parliamentary seats, and the junta’s own party, the Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), secured nearly 80 percent of the remaining contested seats in a process rigged heavily in its favor. Following a period of major rebel gains starting in 2023, the junta has regained the upper hand across most of the country in recent months, boosted by expanded forced conscription drives and increased access to advanced drone technology that has strengthened its offensive capabilities.
-

World Cup 2026: Why some US hotels aren’t cashing in on the tourism surge
The 2026 FIFA World Cup hosted across the United States has already made history with unprecedented fan enthusiasm: a staggering 500 million ticket requests have been submitted, and nearly 90% of all available match tickets have been sold. No other event in global soccer has ever seen this level of audience appetite, but the story of the tournament’s impact on the U.S. hospitality sector is far more nuanced than these record-breaking ticket numbers suggest. Across host cities from Houston to Atlanta to Seattle, hoteliers, economists and soccer fans alike are working to unpack a confusing trend of divergent performance that defies early projections.
Industry reports and analyst data paint a divided picture of hotel demand across the 16 host cities. On one hand, some markets have seen explosive growth that aligns with or exceeds pre-tournament expectations. Global travel platform Trip.com reports that cross-border hotel bookings for World Cup dates are up nearly 70% compared to the same period last year. Dallas has emerged as a standout, with group stage hotel bookings surging more than 1,400% year-over-year, driven largely by a flood of international travelers from Japan and South Korea. New York City, meanwhile, has become the top destination for high-income fans, with luxury properties seeing particularly strong demand.
Data from hospitality intelligence firm Kalibri Labs shows that average daily hotel rates across host cities are roughly 20% higher than 2025 levels, with the largest price gains concentrated in major gateway cities like New York and San Francisco. But occupancy growth has been far slower than many operators predicted. Travelers are overwhelmingly clustering in major urban centers that offer robust public transit, a wide range of dining options, and standalone tourist attractions beyond the match venues themselves. As a result, hotels are generating higher revenue per available room from individual bookings, rather than filling a drastically larger share of their inventory.
“What we are seeing is not a demand problem. It is a decision-making problem,” explained Laura Lee Blake, president and CEO of the Asian American Hotel Owners Association (AAHOA), in an interview with Middle East Eye. Blake noted that modern fans are taking far more time to weigh costs, travel logistics, and entry requirements before locking in hotel reservations, a shift from previous World Cup cycles. “International travelers are certainly paying closer attention to border policies, visa processing times, and geopolitical developments than they did in previous World Cup cycles, those factors can create friction, particularly for travelers who have multiple destination options,” she added.
New York City perfectly illustrates this industry divide. CoStar Group data shows the city holds the highest occupancy rate among all U.S. host cities at 57% for key match dates, with an average nightly room rate of $583. For some independent operators, the World Cup bump has already exceeded expectations. Nile Sony, president of the Manhattan View Hotel in Queens, told MEE that his property has been completely sold out on many match nights, with reservations booked as far back as a year in advance—a rarity for almost any major event. “I wouldn’t say a major boost. But yes, a lot of advance reservations. You don’t normally see reservations made one year in advance for any event,” Sony said.
A large share of the industry uncertainty traces back to FIFA’s unexpected accommodation strategy. Three years ago, FIFA pre-reserved massive blocks of hotel rooms across all 16 host cities to accommodate teams, official sponsors, and tournament staff. Most hoteliers operated under the assumption that roughly half of these reserved rooms would be released back to the open market before the tournament began. Instead, FIFA ultimately released 95% of the pre-blocked rooms, only retaining accommodation for match days and the night before each fixture. This sudden flood of thousands of extra rooms hit the market at a time when international travelers were already booking later than usual, leaving operators scrambling to replace the guaranteed revenue they had planned for.
This disruption has been worsened by a pullback in traditional business travel. Large corporate conferences and executive retreats have largely avoided World Cup host cities, opting to reschedule or relocate rather than compete with soccer fans for limited flights, hotel rooms, and restaurant capacity.
Hospitality analysts note this uneven pattern is not unusual for mega-events like the World Cup or Olympic Games. Most large international tournaments are what industry insiders call “average daily rate events” rather than “occupancy events,” meaning the biggest financial gains come from higher per-room pricing rather than massive spikes in the number of rooms sold. “We have always said this is going to be a room rate event with larger room rate increases and some occupancy increases,” Jan D. Freitag, national director of hospitality analytics at CoStar, told MEE. “That was the prediction, and that’s what’s going to happen.” Freitag also added that slow early bookings for knockout rounds are to be expected, since matchups and participating teams remain unknown until the group stage concludes, making it impossible for fans to lock in travel plans early. Trip.com’s data bears this out, showing far slower booking growth for knockout stage matches than for the already-decided group stage fixtures.
Beyond tournament-specific logistics, many hoteliers point to broader policy headwinds that are discouraging international inbound travel. A 2026 survey from the American Hotel and Lodging Association found that 65 to 70% of responding operators view visa barriers and ongoing geopolitical tensions as major drags on World Cup-related demand. Overall inbound tourism to the U.S. fell 5.4% in 2025, amid tighter immigration enforcement and expanded travel restrictions affecting dozens of nations. Industry leaders say increased public visibility of Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations, stricter border scrutiny, and more rigorous visa requirements have all contributed to a global perception that the U.S. is a less welcoming travel destination than it has been for previous major international events.
These concerns are not limited to cities hosting matches. Even properties in non-host cities that expected spillover demand are seeing weaker results. Haseeb M., president of the Comfort Inn Chicago Schaumburg, which is located near a host city but not hosting matches itself, had projected a 4% revenue uptick from World Cup spillover. “We are now expecting the impact to be half of what was initially forecast,” he told MEE.
The debate over World Cup hospitality performance extends far beyond hotel revenue. While large-scale sporting events do not always deliver the massive direct financial windfalls that hosts initially project, they remain high-impact opportunities to boost long-term tourism and shape a nation’s global brand. Against this backdrop, many industry figures worry that recent U.S. policy shifts will shape how international visitors perceive the country during one of the most-watched global events of the decade, with potential long-term consequences for future inbound travel.
-

Trump threatens to invade Iran, torpedoing Swiss peace talks
A fresh round of U.S.-Iran peace negotiations in Switzerland has collapsed abruptly after former President Donald Trump issued a series of unprecedented, incendiary threats against Iran, prompting the Iranian negotiating team to walk out of the talks and demand a formal apology before they will return to the table.
The crisis unfolded after Iran announced it would re-close the Strait of Hormuz — a strategic global oil chokepoint critical to international energy markets — over an intensified Israeli military assault on southern Lebanon that violates an existing ceasefire memorandum of understanding (MOU) covering all regional fronts. In a public tirade Sunday, Trump issued a cascade of threats: he warned Iran would cease to exist as a sovereign state if it followed through on closing the strait, explicitly threatened to assassinate Iranian negotiators, and for the first time publicly pledged a full U.S. military invasion to occupy the entire country.
According to Fox News correspondent Trey Yingst, who reported on Trump’s comments, the U.S. leader told Iranian negotiators that if they closed the strait — a move Iran first announced Saturday — “you won’t even make it back to their f***ing country,” a threat widely interpreted as a reference to targeted assassinations of Iranian officials that have already occurred during the early phases of the ongoing conflict.
Multiple international outlets confirm that the threats directly violated the first clause of the negotiated MOU governing the talks. In response, Iranian negotiators filed a formal complaint with Pakistani and Qatari mediators, who have been facilitating the closed-door discussions at a Swiss mountain resort, before leaving the venue immediately.
In a blunt response to the threats, Iran’s chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf dismissed Trump’s rhetoric as empty, stating that his delegation does not take American threats seriously. This pattern of escalatory rhetoric followed by no action is nothing new: over recent months, Trump has repeatedly issued extreme threats to wipe out Iran’s entire civilization and destroy the country to pressure Tehran into making concessions, yet has never followed through on the warnings even as Iran has maintained its negotiating position.
“Don’t they think that if their threats had worked, they wouldn’t have ended up in today’s desperate situation?” Ghalibaf asked. He added that the U.S. would be “better be more careful with their statements,” noting that “our armed forces are ready to respond in a different way. No matter what they say, we are the ones who act.”
While the Iranian delegation has left the negotiation venue, indirect talks continue through participating mediators. According to Lebanese outlet Al Mayadeen, the Iranian team has set two non-negotiable conditions for returning to the table: a formal apology from Trump for his threats, and a full Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory. The Israeli government, for its part, is reportedly considering limited withdrawals from parts of southern Lebanon’s buffer zone, per senior Israeli sources cited by Channel 12, and the officials added that Washington has not pressured Israel for a full pullout.
Sunday’s outburst marks a sharp, sudden reversal from just one week prior, when Trump signaled a major shift by acknowledging Iran’s sovereign right to enrich uranium for civilian nuclear energy, a key longstanding Iranian demand that the U.S. has previously rejected. Analysts say the sudden escalation was triggered by comments from Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, who reaffirmed that Iran would never surrender its right to enrichment and predicted the U.S. would ultimately be forced to accept this position. In response, Trump reportedly warned Pezeshkian to “watch his mouth” and “shape up,” threatening a full U.S. takeover of remaining Iranian territory if he did not comply.
This latest threat of full occupation stands in stark contradiction to Trump’s own recent comments, in which he acknowledged that extending the war would trigger a major U.S. economic catastrophe, and even acknowledged that limited ground operations — such as a proposed mission to seize Iranian uranium facilities — would be too costly in lives and resources to be justified. The ongoing war with Iran is already deeply unpopular with the U.S. public, even without the deployment of American ground troops: recent polling shows a majority of Republican voters oppose deploying ground troops to escalate the conflict, and senior U.S. military leaders have already shelved plans to seize strategic Iranian sites including Kharg Island out of fear of massive American casualties.
In another controversial remark, Trump told Yingst that the U.S. could position itself as the “guardian angel” of the Strait of Hormuz, collecting tolls from commercial shipping and seizing oil from exporting nations that use the waterway. He offered no details on how the U.S. would secure control of the strait to enact this plan.
Iran’s decision to threaten closing the strait came in direct response to Israel’s deepened occupation and intensified bombing of southern Lebanon, actions that violate the MOU’s ceasefire provisions. Ending Israel’s occupation of southern Lebanon is a non-negotiable red line for Tehran in the peace talks: the Israeli campaign has killed more than 4,000 people and displaced over 1.2 million Lebanese civilians from their homes in the region.
Off the record, Trump has privately acknowledged that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is deliberately using the Lebanon campaign to sabotage the ceasefire and drag the U.S. into a full-scale regional war. In his conversation with Yingst, Trump acknowledged he was “disappointed Israel can’t put Hezbollah away,” adding that Israel “can’t do anything without knocking buildings down.” He also noted he is close to granting Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, former leader of al-Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate, permission to lead operations against Hezbollah.
Even as Trump has publicly and privately criticized Israel’s actions and accused Netanyahu of undermining peace efforts, he has taken no concrete action to force Israel to comply with the terms of the ceasefire MOU. Analysts warn that this contradictory approach from the White House puts the entire peace process at severe risk.
“The mixed messages coming out of the White House are going to make it much harder to end the war, and could in fact spark further conflict,” noted Jeet Heer, a staff writer at *The Nation*.
Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, described Israel’s ongoing military escalations as “an existential threat” to the U.S.-Iran peace process. He told ABC News that Iran’s threat to close the strait ahead of the Geneva talks was intended to signal how seriously Tehran views its demand for an Israeli withdrawal, clarifying the stakes for all parties.
“Israel would prefer for this war to continue until you have a complete defeat of the Iranians, which, of course, is not in the cards,” Parsi explained. “The Israelis sold this war to Trump as a quick, easy fix to the region’s problems that would take no more than four days, and they were dead wrong. Now, Trump is recognizing that U.S. interests necessitate that he pull out of this war and strikes this deal, but the Israelis are trying to sabotage it because they are afraid they’re going to be left out, that the balance in the region is going to shift against their interests. They’re willing to essentially jeopardize their relationship with the United States over this.”
-

Three dead in Philippines high school shooting over bullying ‘grudge’
A devastating targeted attack at a central Philippine high school has left three students dead and seven others injured after two teenage boys opened fire inside a classroom, in what law enforcement officials describe as an extremely rare school shooting for the Southeast Asian nation. The incident, which unfolded at San Jose National High School in Tacloban City, has prompted urgent national calls for stronger gun safety practices at home and improved student welfare monitoring in schools, after investigators confirmed the attack was driven by a long-held grudge over persistent bullying.
The two suspects, aged 14 and 15, carried out the attack with two illegally accessed firearms: a .38 caliber revolver and a 9mm pistol that was registered to a police officer, who is a relative of one of the teenagers and has since been taken into custody for failing to secure her weapon. Following the shooting, one suspect was arrested at the scene within minutes, while the second turned himself in to authorities a short time later.
Colonel Allen Rae Co, national spokesperson for the Philippine National Police, told reporters on Monday that the teen perpetrators walked directly into the classroom without warning and opened fire immediately. As of the earliest stages of the investigation, it remains unclear whether the pair’s intended targets were actually present in the room at the time of the attack. Of the seven injured people, three suffered direct gunshot wounds, while four were hurt during the panicked evacuation that followed the start of the shooting.
A key emerging detail from the investigation has raised serious questions about whether the attack could have been prevented. Co confirmed that investigators discovered violent social media content posted by one of the suspects, showing the teen firing a gun in advance of the attack. He described these posts as clear warning signs, or “red flags,” that were overlooked by people around the teens.
“This is very obviously red flags… we’re not putting blame on anybody, but if anybody was able to monitor these red flags, this could have been prevented,” Co told reporters.
Gun violence remains a persistent challenge across the Philippines, but targeted shootings at schools are exceptionally uncommon. Local law enforcement confirmed this is the first recorded school shooting in Tacloban City in modern history. The tragedy has sparked outrage from victims’ families, who are demanding accountability for how the teenagers gained access to deadly weapons.
Jennelyn Badoria, the mother of a 15-year-old student killed in the attack, told Agence France-Presse that anyone who allowed the minors to access the firearms must face legal consequences. “I’m asking that the gun owners be charged, because the guns wouldn’t have ended up in the children’s hands if it weren’t for them,” Badoria said in an interview outside the school campus.
Local police officials have echoed that call, urging all Filipino households that own firearms to take greater responsibility for securing their weapons. Evalyn Diaz, a representative of Tacloban City Police, urged parents “to be more responsible, hide their firearms, make sure those are properly hidden, talk to their children” about the dangers of unsecured weapons.
National leaders and education authorities have responded to the tragedy with statements of grief and a commitment to systemic review. Claire Castro, spokesperson for President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., said the president had been deeply “saddened by what happened” and acknowledged that the attack would spark profound grief and fear among all affected families. The Philippine Department of Education released a statement expressing “deep concern” and calling for national prayer for the victims and their families.
Working alongside national police, the education ministry has launched a full review of national school safety protocols, anti-bullying policies, and student mental health and behavioral monitoring systems, to identify gaps that allowed this attack to occur.
Philippine national police data shows that overall gun violence across the country has declined steadily in recent years, with just under 5,000 recorded gun-related incidents nationwide in 2024. Tacloban City, located on Leyte Island in the central Visayas region roughly one hour’s flight from the national capital Manila, is home to roughly 250,000 people. The city is still recovering from the devastation of Super Typhoon Haiyan in 2013, which killed more than 6,000 people across the region and pushed thousands of households into deeper poverty.
-

Former South Korean justice minister gets 25-year prison term for role in martial law imposition
In a landmark ruling that closes another key chapter in South Korea’s post-2024 political upheaval, a Seoul district court handed down a 25-year prison sentence Monday to former justice minister Park Sung-jae, finding him guilty of actively aiding ousted president Yoon Suk Yeol’s short-lived, unlawful 2024 declaration of martial law.
The Seoul Central District Court confirmed that Park occupied a central coordinating role in Yoon’s bid to consolidate power, which unfolded after the president imposed martial law on December 3, 2024 amid a years-long political deadlock with liberal lawmakers who controlled the National Assembly. Court documents outline that Park ordered officials within his ministry to evaluate available detention space at national correctional facilities, a step explicitly taken to prepare for mass arrests of opposition political figures. He also directed state prosecution staff to deploy to Yoon’s ad-hoc martial law command center to back its operational work, and ordered immigration agencies to be on standby to implement immediate travel bans for targeted individuals, the court ruled.
Yoon’s attempt to impose martial law collapsed within six hours, after opposition lawmakers breached a military blockade set up outside the National Assembly building and passed an emergency vote to invalidate the decree. The vote forced Yoon’s own cabinet to reverse the order, setting off a rapid chain of political consequences that ended Yoon’s presidency. Park was the top justice official in Yoon’s administration at the time of the attempted power grab.
In delivering the verdict, presiding Judge Lee Jin-ganto emphasized that Park had violated his core constitutional duty to uphold South Korea’s democratic legal framework by aligning with Yoon’s authoritarian push. “By participating in this plan to undermine the nation’s elected legislature, Park abandoned every obligation he owed to the South Korean people and the rule of law,” Judge Lee noted in the ruling.
Park has consistently denied all charges against him, arguing he was only fulfilling routine responsibilities required during what was framed as a national emergency. As of Monday, his legal team had not yet announced whether they would file an appeal against the conviction and sentence.
This ruling adds to a string of convictions for senior members of Yoon’s ousted administration connected to the 2024 martial law incident. Yoon himself was impeached by the National Assembly on December 14, 2024, formally removed from office by the Constitutional Court in April 2025, and taken into custody in July that same year. He has already been sentenced to life in prison on charges of rebellion stemming from the martial law declaration, and received a separate 30-year sentence for orchestrating unauthorized drone flights over Pyongyang, North Korea, in October 2024. Prosecutors argue the drone incursion was deliberately planned to stoke inter-Korea tensions and create a pretext for imposing martial law domestically. Yoon has filed appeals against both of his convictions.
Other senior officials have already been sentenced for their roles in the scheme. Former Defense Minister Kim Yong Hyun was handed two concurrent 30-year prison terms: one for his central role in mobilizing military forces to enforce martial law and target opposition politicians, and a second for his involvement in the North Korea drone plot. Former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, who was initially sentenced to 23 years in prison for helping secure formal cabinet approval for Yoon’s martial law decree to grant it procedural legitimacy, saw his sentence reduced to 15 years on appeal.
-

Protest led by India’s ‘cockroach party’ enters its third day
Three consecutive days of sustained protests have unfolded in India’s capital New Delhi, as hundreds of students, young working professionals and job-seeking candidates rally to call for the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. The unrest follows a major paper leak scandal that has upended one of India’s most high-stakes competitive medical entrance examinations.
Organizing the demonstration at Delhi’s iconic protest venue Jantar Mantar is the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP), a grassroots political collective that has rapidly gained viral online traction for its sharp, satirical commentary on mainstream Indian politics. Taking aim at Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) through its name, the group, which uses a cockroach as its official mascot, has centered its activism on pushing for greater transparency and accountability across India’s education system.
The current wave of protests is rooted in the NEET-UG controversy. The entrance exam for undergraduate medical programs was thrown into chaos earlier this year after widespread allegations of a question paper leak, triggering massive public anger from thousands of aspirants and their families. In response to the outrage, Indian authorities annulled the original exam results and ordered a full re-examination for millions of candidates.
On Sunday, those millions of candidates returned to testing centers across the country to sit for the new exam, held under stringent enhanced security protocols including mandatory biometric identity verification. The National Testing Agency (NTA), the government body tasked with administering NEET-UG, released a statement shortly after the re-test concluded claiming the exam had proceeded without major incident and that no new allegations of paper leaks had been received.
Yet for protesters gathered in central Delhi, the re-examination has done little to resolve the deeper issues at the heart of the controversy. Many demonstrators argue that the scandal is not an isolated incident, but evidence of systemic failure that has let down millions of young students across the country, and that top officials must be held accountable for the breakdown.
“We are here for accountability,” CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke told assembled supporters at the protest site on Sunday, issuing a call for more people across India to join the movement. Dipke, a student at Boston University currently based in India, launched the CJP’s first protest at Jantar Mantar earlier this month before traveling to other Indian cities to expand the movement. Since its launch, the collective has seen steadily growing online engagement and has organized coordinated demonstrations in multiple regions across the country.
The sit-in protest at Jantar Mantar officially began on June 19, after Delhi Police granted a permit for the demonstration that expired at 5:00 PM local time on June 20. When the permit expired, hundreds of protesters refused to vacate the site, vowing to continue their demonstration until Pradhan steps down from his post.
Over the weekend, demonstrators camped out on sidewalks on mattresses, blocked local roads, and endured rising Delhi temperatures as they sang protest songs, debated the need for broad education reform, and received food and water from volunteer supporters. Organizers have accused Delhi Police of deliberately cutting power to the site and restricting access to clean water and public restrooms after the protest permit expired, though they later confirmed basic services had been restored. Delhi Police has not yet issued any public response to these allegations.
The protest has drawn widespread support from members of the public who have no direct connection to the NEET-UG exam, reflecting broader frustration over systemic issues in India’s education and employment sectors. “I came because I believe they are doing the right thing,” said Jyoti Thakur, a 23-year-old storekeeper based in Delhi. “The path to a better society is through a better education system.”
Gaurav Jain, a 39-year-old lawyer who spent one night at the protest camp, echoed that sentiment, saying he joined the movement over his own concerns about systemic lack of accountability, and is calling for a far more transparent and responsible education governance structure.
To date, neither India’s Education Ministry nor the ruling BJP has issued a public response to the demands for Pradhan’s resignation. The BBC has reached out to both institutions for comment, and has not yet received a reply.
The CJP itself emerged just last month, born from a public backlash against comments made by India’s Chief Justice Surya Kant that went viral online. During a recent court hearing, Kant compared some unemployed young people in India to “cockroaches” and “parasites”, remarks that critics condemned as dehumanizing to an entire generation of young people grappling with widespread youth unemployment.
While the Chief Justice later clarified that his comments were directed at people who use fake educational degrees to secure work, not unemployed young people as a whole, the damage had already been done, and the backlash quickly spread across Indian social media. Within days, Dipke launched an online movement around the hashtag #MainBhiCockroach, which translates to “I too am a cockroach”. The movement quickly gained traction, drawing tens of thousands of direct supporters, earning backing from opposition political figures, and amassing more than 22 million followers on Instagram alone.
-

Taiwan begins 5-day military drill with tanks patrolling streets
TAIPEI, Taiwan – Against a backdrop of persistent cross-strait military tension, Taiwan launched a five-day intensive Immediate Combat Readiness Exercise on Monday, focused on sharpening the island’s ability to respond to potential sudden military aggression from mainland China. The drill got underway with visible activity across Taoyuan, the city that hosts Taiwan’s busiest international gateway, Taoyuan International Airport. Visual evidence from the exercise shows main battle tanks maneuvering along public urban streets and major highways, as armored detachments from the Army’s 269th Infantry Brigade carried out combat readiness patrols through the morning hours.
Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense announced the drills in a public statement released Sunday afternoon, outlining that the training is structured around realistic, real-world scenarios, with core priorities placed on “real-time response, live-fire operations, and on-site tactical execution.” Per Taiwan’s semi-official Central News Agency, the exercise series is specifically designed to simulate the strategic period immediately preceding an enemy’s large-scale amphibious assault. Looking ahead, the exercise framework also leaves room for unscheduled, ad-hoc drill sessions that will test Taiwan’s military’s ability to adapt in real time to ongoing Chinese military activities near the island.
The drills come as China continues its steady pattern of so-called “grey-zone” military pressure against Taiwan, a set of aggressive actions that stop short of full-scale direct conflict. These tactics range from sustained naval patrols near Taiwan’s territorial waters to repeated drone incursions into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone. In the 24-hour period from Sunday to Monday morning alone, Taiwan’s defense ministry confirmed that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) deployed 23 aircraft toward the Taiwan area, alongside seven PLA Navy vessels and five additional Chinese government ships.这种持续的常态压力已经成为 daily reality: Chinese military aircraft, drones, and naval vessels conduct operations near the island on a near-daily basis.
This drill is the latest in a series of regular readiness exercises Taiwan has held to upgrade its defense capabilities, as the island faces unrelenting military pressure from Beijing. China claims the self-governing island of Taiwan as an inalienable part of its sovereign territory, and has repeatedly refused to rule out the use of military force to achieve unification. Earlier this June, Taiwan held another major exercise that marked the first time the island has conducted live rocket fire drills toward waters off the coast of mainland China as part of its training.
The report was filed by Wu reporting from Bangkok, Associated Press.
-

Former East Timor president and independence fighter Francisco Guterres dies at 71
DILI, East Timor – The Southeast Asian nation of Timor Leste (East Timor) is mourning the passing of one of its most revered founding figures: Francisco Guterres, the former president and central leader of the country’s decades-long fight for independence, has died at the age of 71.
Widely recognized by his nom de guerre “Lu Olo”, Guterres passed away on Sunday at Malaysia’s Prince Court Medical Centre, where he had been receiving treatment in an intensive care unit. The announcement of his death was shared via the late leader’s official Facebook page by his family, who did not immediately release details on the specific cause of death.
Guterres’s five-decade public career was inextricably tied to the story of Timor Leste’s path to becoming the world’s youngest sovereign nation in 2002. His single term as president from 2017 to 2022 marked the final chapter of a lifelong commitment to securing freedom and democratic governance for his people.
In a message of condolence shared with Guterres’s family and the people of East Timor, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim paid tribute to the leader’s unwavering dedication. “Throughout his life, he remained committed to the freedom of his people and the building of a democratic nation,” Ibrahim wrote.
Fretilin, the revolutionary political party Guterres led for many years, described his passing as a “profound loss” for all who worked toward the vision of a free, democratic and sovereign Timor Leste. The party highlighted Guterres’s enduring legacy of commitment to the independence movement, as well as his lifelong work to advance national unity, constructive political dialogue, peace and domestic stability across his decades in public life.
Born September 7, 1954, in Ossu, a town in what was then Portuguese Timor’s Viqueque District, Guterres rose to prominence as a core leader of the armed and political resistance during Indonesia’s 24-year occupation of East Timor, which ran from 1975 to 1999. As a senior Fretilin figure, he played an indispensable role in the country’s transition to sovereignty after the 1999 UN-backed independence referendum that set Timor Leste on the path to statehood.
In 2001, Guterres served as president of the Timorese Constituent Assembly, where he oversaw the drafting of the new nation’s foundational constitution. When East Timor formally gained independence in 2002, he became the national parliament’s first speaker. After falling short in several earlier presidential campaigns, Guterres finally won election to the nation’s highest office in 2017. He lost his 2022 re-election bid to current President Jose Ramos-Horta, a longtime comrade from the independence struggle.
Guterres is survived by his wife, Cidalia Lopes Nobre Mouzinho Guterres, and their children. Details of his funeral arrangements are expected to be announced to the public in the coming days.
