标签: Asia

亚洲

  • David Briscoe, AP journalist who chronicled Philippines’ democratic revolution, dies at 82

    David Briscoe, AP journalist who chronicled Philippines’ democratic revolution, dies at 82

    Veteran Associated Press journalist David Briscoe, whose decades-long career was defined by his vivid on-the-ground coverage of the collapse of authoritarian rule and the birth of democracy in the Philippines during one of the nation’s most turbulent modern eras, has died at the age of 82. His wife, Leonor Briscoe, confirmed he passed away Sunday at an assisted living community in Kapolei, Hawaii, following an April diagnosis of amyloidosis, a progressive condition marked by dangerous protein buildup that damages vital organs.

    Over a career that stretched across five decades and multiple continents, Briscoe brought his signature relentless curiosity to assignments across his home state of Utah, the nation’s capital in Washington D.C., and Hawaii. But it was his posting as Manila bureau chief that placed him at the center of the most consequential story of his professional life.

    When Briscoe took the reins of the AP’s Manila bureau in 1980, he spent the next six years documenting the final declining years of Ferdinand Marcos’ brutal authoritarian regime, and the national chaos that erupted following the assassination of opposition leader Benigno Aquino Jr. Briscoe and his reporting team crisscrossed the archipelago, traveling via chartered aircraft, rented jeeps, and on one notable occasion, a horse-drawn cart, to keep up with the fast-moving story. They covered a relentless string of corruption investigations, legislative hearings, and the unlikely 1986 presidential campaign that saw Aquino’s grieving widow, Corazon Aquino, pushed into the national spotlight to lead a grassroots democratic movement.

    The iconic finale of that movement, which saw Corazon Aquino sworn in as president and Marcos forced into sudden exile, remained etched in Briscoe’s memory for the rest of his life. He often recalled searing, unforgettable images from that period: “of nuns kneeling in front of military tanks” and “soldiers and civilians crying in each other’s arms.” Writing for AP World, the outlet’s in-house publication shortly after the revolution in 1986, Briscoe noted, “I expect to witness or cover no greater event in my life.”

    Born David Chesley Briscoe on July 30, 1943, in Salt Lake City, Utah, Briscoe grew up in a working-class household, where his father worked as a union steward and his mother as a homemaker, raising Briscoe and his brother in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. He first discovered his passion for journalism while studying at the University of Utah, writing for the campus student newspaper before landing his first professional role at the Deseret News, where he cut his teeth writing obituaries and profiles of high-achieving local students.

    After two years at the Utah paper, Briscoe joined the Peace Corps and was assigned first to Paracale, then to Naga City in the Philippines, where he taught English. For a young man who had barely left his home state of Utah in his early life, every corner of the Philippines was a revelation: from water buffalo cooling off in muddy waterholes to children running along sunbaked dirt roads.

    Briscoe quickly fell in love with his adopted country, and bristled at the thought of leaving when his Peace Corps service came to an end. He took a job at a local Philippine newspaper, and while covering an event featuring a speech by Ferdinand Marcos, he met Leonor Aureus, an editor at a competing local outlet. The pair bonded over their shared love of journalism, and soon married, decorating their wedding aisle with copies of their respective papers, The Naga Times and the Bicol Mail.

    In 1970, Briscoe was hired by the AP’s Manila bureau, where he covered major breaking stories including a deadly earthquake that shook the capital, an assassination attempt on Pope Paul VI during a pastoral visit, and a commercial plane hijacking. By 1971, however, AP leadership ordered Briscoe to return to the United States to take up a domestic posting. He moved back to Salt Lake City, holding out hope that fate would one day bring him back to the Philippines he had come to love.

    During his time back in Utah, Briscoe found himself increasingly at odds with the Latter-day Saint Church that had shaped his upbringing. His wife recalled he faced church discipline after speaking out against the Church’s longstanding ban barring Black men from the priesthood during a discussion class he taught; Briscoe openly opposed the exclusion, which the Church eventually lifted years later. He also ran afoul of Church leadership after co-writing a three-part investigative series with colleague Bill Beecham that examined the Church’s extensive network of business holdings, estimating that annual revenue from member tithing alone exceeded $1 billion. No major Utah newspaper dared to publish the reporting, the pair later said.

    After nine years back in Salt Lake City, AP leadership offered Briscoe the chance to return to Manila as bureau chief. He immediately called his wife with the news, asking her, “Noree, are you sitting down?”

    After completing his six-year term leading the AP Manila bureau, Briscoe relocated to Washington D.C. in 1986, where he covered international affairs. He went on to serve as AP’s Honolulu bureau chief from 2001 until his retirement in 2009. In Hawaii, dressed in casual aloha shirts and soaking up the tropical sunshine, Briscoe often said he felt “halfway back” to the Philippines he cherished.

    Until his final days, Briscoe held his time covering the Philippines close to his heart. As his health declined in his final weeks, his family gathered at his side to pray. He squeezed his wife’s hand, told her he loved her, and asked her to let him pass peacefully.

    Per his family’s plans, a boat will carry Briscoe’s ashes out into the Pacific Ocean, where they will be scattered, with the hope that ocean currents will carry his remains back to the Philippines that became his adopted home. “The land that David learned to love,” his wife said, “and where he met the love of his life.”

  • Rubio to visit Bahrain and reassure Gulf ally amid Iran war, sources say

    Rubio to visit Bahrain and reassure Gulf ally amid Iran war, sources say

    In the wake of escalating conflict between the United States, Israel and Iran that has roiled the Gulf region, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is preparing for a high-stakes visit to Bahrain in the coming weeks, multiple senior Arab, Western and US officials with direct knowledge of the plan confirmed to Middle East Eye. All sources spoke on condition of anonymity, as they were not cleared to discuss the trip publicly ahead of an official announcement.

    This upcoming trip will carry profound symbolic and strategic weight: it marks the first visit by a top-tier US official to the Gulf Cooperation Council region since the joint US-Israel military strike on Iran on February 28, a confrontation that upended global energy markets and triggered unprecedented security risks across the Gulf. According to Arab and US officials familiar with the planning, the visit is explicitly crafted to serve as a public vote of confidence in Bahrain’s ruling Al Khalifa monarchy, and a clear signal that Washington remains committed to its long-standing security and diplomatic partnerships in the Gulf amid rising regional instability.

    “Rubio’s trip will be a tangible demonstration of Washington’s recognition of Bahrain’s importance as a core US ally against Iran,” one senior US official explained to MEE.

    The timing of the visit is particularly significant, coming after months of Iranian retaliatory strikes that have hit Bahrain disproportionately hard. Bahrain, which hosts the headquarters of the US Fifth Fleet in its capital Manama, saw the critical military facility targeted in the early waves of Iranian attacks following the February 28 strike. The spillover from the conflict has extended far beyond military infrastructure, causing severe damage to the kingdom’s already fragile economy.

    The confrontation between Washington and Tehran has triggered the largest disruption to global oil supplies in modern history. Iran responded to the US-Israel strike by restricting shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz — the vital chokepoint through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s daily oil supplies pass — and launching targeted strikes on energy and industrial facilities across the Gulf. Global oil prices have already surged 40 percent as a result of the disruption.

    In Bahrain, key industrial and energy operations have been forced to halt production or suspend output contracts. The Financial Times confirmed that Amazon’s regional cloud computing infrastructure based in the kingdom was hit in an attack. Aluminium Bahrain, one of the world’s largest single-site aluminum smelters and a cornerstone of the kingdom’s export economy, was forced to declare force majeure after sustaining physical damage to its facilities. Bahrain’s national energy firm Bapco also followed suit, declaring force majeure at its main refinery after strikes disrupted operations.

    While a fragile US-Iran ceasefire agreed in April has largely reduced the intensity of conflict across the region, Bahrain faced fresh Iranian targeting just last week, after the US launched new strikes on Iranian ports and military installations along the Strait of Hormuz.

    Bahrain’s economic vulnerability long predates the current conflict. Compared to its wealthier Gulf Cooperation Council neighbors such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain’s economy has struggled for years with high levels of sovereign debt, which currently stands at roughly 140 percent of gross domestic product. The kingdom has relied heavily on emergency financial support from larger regional allies for decades: in 2018, Saudi Arabia led a $10 billion international economic rescue package to stabilize Bahrain’s finances. The kingdom’s only land border and connection to global overland trade runs through the King Fahd Causeway linking it to Saudi Arabia, while ongoing shipping disruptions through the Strait of Hormuz have compounded the damage to its import and export sectors.

    Western and US intelligence officials have assessed that Iran has deliberately focused its retaliatory strikes on Bahrain in an attempt to exacerbate long-standing domestic sectarian divides between the Sunni-led Al Khalifa monarchy and the kingdom’s majority Shia population. Early in the conflict, Bahrain saw large-scale public demonstrations that echoed the anti-government protests of the 2011 Arab Spring, which were violently suppressed by ruling security forces. The recent demonstrations were also put down quickly by authorities.

    Diplomats told MEE that this combination of security threats and domestic pressure has led Bahrain’s ruling family to become one of the most vocal advocates inside the Gulf for a broad, expanded US-led military offensive against Iran.

    The conflict has also shifted Bahrain’s long-standing regional alignment. While the kingdom has traditionally maintained close ties to Saudi Arabia, diplomats and regional analysts note that Bahrain has moved closer to the United Arab Emirates’ policy camp since the outbreak of the war. Bahrain became one of the first Arab states to normalize diplomatic relations with Israel under the US-brokered Abraham Accords in 2020, and in March of this year, joined the UAE in supporting a draft UN Security Council resolution that would have authorized international military intervention against Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The draft resolution never advanced to a vote.

    Despite the United States maintaining a continuous military presence in Bahrain since the 1940s, the Iranian strikes on US and Bahraini infrastructure have sparked internal debate among US officials and military leaders about the future of American force posture in the Gulf. Former CIA director and top US Middle East military commander David Petraeus acknowledged this shifting perspective in comments to Bloomberg in May, noting that “The truth is that we are not as inclined to occupy these bases now that we have seen what the Iranians can throw at them.”

    To contextualize the long-running territorial dynamic between Iran and Bahrain: the territory that makes up modern Bahrain was part of the Persian Safavid Empire until the 18th century. The Al Khalifa family, which has ruled Bahrain for more than 200 years, invited British colonial protection in the 19th century, and Bahrain became a British Trucial state before gaining full independence in 1971. That same year, Iran under the Western-backed Shah formally renounced all territorial claims to Bahrain.

  • Belfast race riots see non-white families targeted and houses torched

    Belfast race riots see non-white families targeted and houses torched

    Overnight on Tuesday, large-scale race-fueled rioting erupted in Belfast, the capital of Northern Ireland, leaving a trail of destruction as hundreds of masked rioters targeted properties belonging to non-white residents, migrant families, and asylum seekers. The unrest was triggered by the arrest of a 30-year-old Sudanese asylum seeker, Hadi Alodid, who holds indefinite leave to remain in the UK, hours before the violence broke out. Alodid has been charged with attempted murder in connection with a filmed knife attack on a man in a residential neighborhood, an incident many commentators have characterized as an attempted beheading.

    Local law enforcement has stated that the attack itself does not appear to be terror-related, but the incident quickly became a flashpoint for anti-migrant sentiment stoked by high-profile figures far beyond Northern Ireland. On Tuesday afternoon, far-right activist Tommy Robinson — whose legal name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon — and Elon Musk, the South African-born American billionaire who owns the social platform X, openly called for nationwide protests over the attack on the platform. Musk went as far as to urge repeated, large-scale public demonstrations in a post, writing: “Only by protesting REPEATEDLY and LOUDLY will there be any change!!” Both Robinson and Musk shared planned protest locations across the UK on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

    By Tuesday evening, the calls to action translated to extreme violence on the streets of Belfast. Rioters constructed makeshift roadblocks from street furniture to set up unauthorized checkpoints, stopping and searching passing vehicles to identify non-white people and foreign nationals. Targeted attacks focused on public council housing occupied by migrants, asylum seekers, and refugee families, with rioters setting ablaze multiple homes, private vehicles, and a local bus. A Middle Eastern-owned supermarket was also set on fire amid the chaos.

    Footage from the scene captured children being evacuated from adjacent properties as fires spread across neighborhoods. Local pastor Jack McGee told the BBC that many residents were forced to flee their homes simply “because they’re black”. Jamie Corry, a resident on east Belfast’s Lendrick Road, described the rapid escalation of violence: “the cars started to explode, the doors started smoking, the windows started melting, and the next thing the house was going to go up on fire”. Rioters were filmed kicking in residential doors, smashing windows, and shouting that they were “getting foreigners out” of the area. On west Belfast’s Shankhill Road, rioters breached the door of a home where an ethnic minority woman had been spotted at a window, throwing bricks through the property’s windows. Elsewhere, rioters were seen riding motor scooters while carrying hammers and petrol-filled milk cartons.

    Emergency responders including police and firefighters were forced to carry out dangerous rescue operations, pulling trapped families out of burning buildings through thick smoke and flames. Across Belfast, major streets were blocked by rioters, leaving entire neighborhoods under the control of violent crowds for hours.

    The unrest was not isolated to Belfast. Anti-migrant demonstrations and related violence erupted across the United Kingdom on Tuesday night, including in London, Glasgow, and Southampton — the site of anti-migrant rioting just one week prior following the killing of a local young man. In Glasgow, approximately 300 masked men marched through city streets, with footage showing multiple clashes with passers-by and a violent attack on a delivery driver.

    Political leaders across the UK have widely condemned the violence and those who incited it. On Wednesday morning, Labour Party Chair Anna Turley issued sharp criticism of Musk, calling his role in encouraging protests “appalling”. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer denounced the disorder in a statement, saying: “There is no justification for the violence and disorder that we saw threatening our communities, nor for those who encouraged it, online or elsewhere. It is clear that people were targeted last night because of their background and I will not tolerate it.” Michelle O’Neill, First Minister of Northern Ireland, called the actions of the rioters indefensible, noting: “Groups of masked men burning families out of their homes is nothing less than disgusting cowardice. This has nothing to do with community. This is outright thuggery.”

    The coordinated wave of violence has sparked widespread public concern over the potential for further unrest across the UK this summer. It follows a similar period of national rioting in August 2024, when disorder spread across the country for more than a week after the killing of three young girls in Stockport.

  • Three Indian sailors missing after US says it hit tanker in Gulf of Oman

    Three Indian sailors missing after US says it hit tanker in Gulf of Oman

    Escalating maritime enforcement actions amid a months-long regional conflict have put the U.S. military at the center of a new diplomatic incident, after U.S. Central Command (Centcom) announced it had disabled a Palau-flagged oil tanker carrying an Indian crew in the Gulf of Oman over accusations it violated an American blockade on Iranian oil shipments.

    In a public post on the social platform X, Centcom confirmed that a U.S. military aircraft launched precision-guided munitions at the engine room of the vessel, identified as the Settebello. The strike was carried out, the command said, after the ship’s crew ignored repeated orders to halt and comply with inspections from U.S. forces operating in the area. Centcom also published footage it claims shows the damage to the tanker’s engine compartment following the attack.

    Indian government officials have confirmed that three Indian nationals among the Settebello’s crew remain missing, while 21 other Indian crew members have been safely rescued from the disabled vessel. In an official statement, New Delhi condemned the incident, saying that “the targeting of commercial shipping and civilian infrastructure in the region must end.” Following the attack, Indian authorities summoned the deputy chief of the U.S. diplomatic mission in New Delhi to raise formal objections, multiple government sources confirmed to the BBC.

    This strike marks the second time in one week that U.S. forces have targeted a Palau-flagged oil tanker with an Indian crew in the Gulf of Oman. Earlier this week, Centcom carried out a similar strike on the Marivex, another vessel accused of violating the blockade. All 24 crew members of that vessel were eventually rescued by Omani military forces, Indian officials confirmed.

    The U.S. imposed the full naval blockade on access to Iranian ports in mid-April, after Iran blocked traffic through the Strait of Hormuz — a critical global chokepoint through which roughly 20% of the world’s daily oil and natural gas supplies pass. Since the blockade went into effect on April 13, Centcom reports that U.S. forces have disabled a total of eight vessels that violated the blockade, and redirected 134 other ships to comply with the restrictions.

    The incident comes as broader regional tensions between the U.S. and Iran remain at a boiling point, with no sign of de-escalation despite a recent temporary ceasefire. On Wednesday, former U.S. President Donald Trump issued a harsh new threat against Iran, saying the U.S. would strike the country “hard” if Tehran did not move quickly to sign a negotiated peace deal. Trump accused Iranian leaders of dragging out negotiations to deceive the U.S., saying they were “playing Americans for suckers.”

    Trump’s comments came just days after an American helicopter was shot down on Monday, an incident that broke the fragile ceasefire agreed to by both sides in April. That ceasefire was initially scheduled to last two weeks, but has been repeatedly violated by both sides in recent weeks. Iran has accused the U.S. of being the first to break the terms of the truce.

    The current full-scale conflict in the Middle East traces back to February 28, when the U.S. and Israel launched coordinated surprise strikes on Iran that killed the country’s supreme leader. Iran responded immediately with large-scale missile and drone attacks against Israel and U.S. ally states across the Gulf region. Fighting spread rapidly across the Middle East, with Lebanon officially joining the conflict in March.

  • Rights groups call for release of detained pro-Gaza activists in Libya

    Rights groups call for release of detained pro-Gaza activists in Libya

    Nearly two months after 10 international pro-Palestinian activists were taken into custody by forces loyal to prominent Libyan military commander Khalifa Haftar in eastern Libya, global human rights organizations are escalating calls for their immediate and unconditional release. The activists, who hail from Spain, Poland, the United States, Argentina, Uruguay, Portugal, Tunisia and Italy, were arrested in late May while participating in the Global Sumud Convoy, a grassroots humanitarian initiative organized to deliver critical assistance to the blockaded population of the Gaza Strip.

    Of the 200 activists that made up the cross-border convoy, all but 10 were forcibly deported from eastern Libyan territory following the operation by the Libyan Arab Armed Forces (LAAF), Haftar’s primary military wing. In protest of their arbitrary detention and repeated denial of access to legal counsel and family communications, the 10 detainees launched a hunger strike that ran from June 1 through at least June 4, according to public statements from rights monitors.

    Amnesty International has confirmed that the activists are currently being held in pre-trial custody as investigators pursue charges of “unauthorized assembly.” If convicted on these counts, the campaigners could face up to six months of prison time and substantial financial fines. Mahmoud Shalaby, regional researcher for Amnesty International, issued a harsh rebuke of the detentions, describing the targeting of Gaza-focused humanitarian campaigners on what he called “bogus charges” as outright disgraceful.

    “No one should be punished for undertaking peaceful humanitarian action and trying to stop human rights abuses,” Shalaby said in an official statement. He added that the LAAF must not only release the activists immediately and without preconditions, but also grant them prompt, regular access to family members, their respective consular representatives, legal teams and any necessary medical care while they remain in custody.

    The detentions unfold against a backdrop of longstanding political division that has fractured Libya since the 2011 NATO-backed overthrow of longtime authoritarian ruler Muammar Gaddafi. Today, the country is split between two competing centers of power: a UN-backed unity government based in the capital Tripoli that controls western Libya, and Haftar’s self-governing administration in the east, which is backed by regional allies including the United Arab Emirates and Egypt.

    The Global Sumud Convoy, a land-based initiative connected to the high-profile sea flotillas that have long challenged Israel’s blockade of Gaza, was first launched by North African activists before drawing international participants. The convoy carried a substantial cache of humanitarian supplies: seven ambulances, 20 mobile housing units, 10 aid trucks, and it included among its participants medical professionals, engineers, educators and independent legal observers.

    After entering the 5+5 security zone near the contested coastal city of Sirte – a buffer zone established under the terms of Libya’s October 2020 national ceasefire agreement – the group was intercepted by LAAF forces. The activists had entered the zone in hopes of negotiating safe passage to continue their journey toward Gaza.

    While many participants and observers have praised the convoy’s core mission of breaking the 17-year Israeli blockade on Gaza and highlighted the organizers’ unwavering commitment to the humanitarian cause, some veteran activists who have taken part in previous Gaza solidarity initiatives argue the mission suffered from critical planning oversights that led to the current crisis.

    Felipe, a 29-year-old Chilean-Palestinian activist who has participated in multiple previous sea-based Gaza flotillas, told Middle East Eye that the convoy’s leadership bore partial responsibility for the detention outcome. During the group’s two-week stay in Tripoli prior to entering eastern Libya, Felipe said it became increasingly clear that organizers had made little to no contingency plans for the risk of detentions or armed confrontation with LAAF forces.

    “If we were not able to go through east Libya, we should not have kept pressuring them because we were going to shift the narrative from Israel to Libya,” Felipe explained. “We were waiting in the desert for nine days doing nothing.”

  • Israeli settlers attack Christian village as West Bank violence escalates

    Israeli settlers attack Christian village as West Bank violence escalates

    In a fresh escalation of ongoing settler violence across the Israeli-occupied West Bank, Israeli settlers targeted the ancient Palestinian Christian village of Taybeh early Tuesday, setting fire to swathes of local agricultural land. Local sources confirmed no casualties were reported in the overnight incursion, which took place in areas adjacent to the village, located east of Ramallah. This attack marks the latest in a string of repeated assaults on Taybeh that has stretched over months, triggered by the construction of a new Israeli settlement on land the village has long claimed.

    Taybeh is no stranger to such violence. Last year, settlers set fire to the village’s centuries-old Church of Saint George and its adjacent historic graveyard, an act that drew rare public criticism from Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel — a well-known vocal advocate for expanding Israeli settlements in the occupied territories. Even after that rebuke, however, attacks on the majority-Christian community have continued unabated. Tuesday’s assault also included settlers opening fire on residential homes and throwing incendiary Molotov cocktails, according to on-the-ground reports shared by Middle East Eye.

    Established more than 3,000 years ago during the Canaanite period, Taybeh counts roughly 1,340 residents, 90 percent of whom identify as Christian, per 2017 census data from the Palestine Central Bureau of Statistics. The village’s fertile, expansive grazing lands have long supported a local economy centered on sheep herding, but this valuable land has also drawn aggressive encroachment from Israeli settlers, who have steadily seized village territory with the explicit backing of the Israeli military.

    While settler violence against Palestinian communities has been a persistent reality in the occupied West Bank for decades, experts and international bodies have documented a dramatic, unprecedented surge in attacks since the start of the 2023 Gaza war. Today, settlers carry out near-daily assaults across the region, ranging from property vandalism and arson to forced displacement of Palestinian communities and violent physical attacks, many of which involve the use of firearms.

    Coinciding with Tuesday’s attack on Taybeh, the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory released a landmark report detailing the sharp, sustained escalation of settler violence that has put Palestinian communities at severe risk. The commission’s investigation concludes that the Israeli government directly facilitates these attacks through a combination of direct funding, logistical support, and military protection for settlers.

    “Violence by settlers is the direct outcome of Israeli policies that support, enable and protect their actions,” said Srinivasan Muralidhar, chair of the UN commission, in a statement accompanying the report. “The relentless, daily assaults by Israeli settlers against Palestinians are intolerable – and must end. Israel must stop supporting this violence and ensure that its security forces safeguard the Palestinian civilian population.”

    The report’s data underscores the severity of the crisis: in 2025 alone, Israeli settlers killed seven Palestinians and injured 832 more, representing a 130 percent increase in casualties compared to 2024. This deadly trend has continued into 2026, with attacks occurring on an almost daily basis. Data from the Palestinian Authority’s Colonization and Wall Resistance Commission puts the total death toll from settler violence at 50 Palestinians since October 2023, 15 of which have occurred in the first half of 2026.

    The UN commission also found that Israeli judicial and law enforcement bodies routinely grant settlers impunity for violent acts against Palestinians, enabling the cycle of violence to continue without accountability. The commission’s final recommendation calls for unified international action to pressure Israel to comply with its obligations under international law, including immediate decisive steps to dismantle illegal settlements and outposts and bring an end to settler violence permanently.

  • Scientists discover a deep whale graveyard that is teeming with life

    Scientists discover a deep whale graveyard that is teeming with life

    Beneath more than 22,000 feet of frigid, pitch-black water in the southeastern Indian Ocean, researchers have made a landmark deep-sea discovery: the largest, deepest, and oldest whale necropolis ever documented, where diverse marine communities have thrived for millions of years feeding on the sunken remains of massive cetaceans.

    Whale falls, as these sites are informally called, form naturally when the bodies of dead whales sink to the abyssal sea floor. What would be a grim end for the massive mammals becomes a life-sustaining oasis for deep-sea organisms, which rely on the concentrated energy and unique chemical composition of whale bones to survive in an environment where food is extremely scarce.

    Lead researcher Xikun Song, a deep-sea biologist with the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, explained that the size of whale carcasses and the unique chemical makeup of their bones are what allow these complex underwater ecosystems to develop. Song, who participated in the expedition that uncovered the site, also noted that the extreme inaccessibility of the deep ocean makes locating these rare graveyards an extraordinary challenge for marine scientists.

    Over the course of multiple research dives conducted by deep-sea submersibles in 2023, the international research team mapped the full extent of the site, collected biological and fossil samples, and documented the scope of the discovery. The team identified five distinct whale carcass sites and fossils, including well-preserved whale skulls from beaked whales and baleen whales. Radiocarbon and geological dating confirmed the oldest of these remains date back more than 5.3 million years, making this the oldest confirmed whale graveyard ever found.

    When the team examined the remains, they found a thriving, diverse community of marine organisms calling the whale bones home. Countless species, from brittle stars and jellyfish to tubeworms, sea cucumbers, squat lobsters, and saltwater clams, have made these sunken carcasses their feeding and breeding grounds. According to the team’s findings, published Wednesday in the peer-reviewed journal *Nature*, many of these organisms may represent entirely new species that have never been formally documented by science.

    Outside experts not involved in the research say the find reshapes what we know about deep-sea ecosystem development. Stephen Godfrey, a paleontologist at the Calvert Marine Museum in Maryland, called the volume of specimens uncovered at the site “astounding.”

    Study authors have outlined multiple factors that allowed the whale bones to remain preserved for millions of years in the deep ocean. The dense structure of large whale bones allows them to withstand degradation from bone-eating worms, while the site’s deep location protects remains from being completely buried by sediment and loose particulate matter. A thin, naturally occurring mineral coating from surrounding seawater also sealed the bones, slowing decomposition significantly over millennia.

    The team has also put forward multiple hypotheses to explain why so many whale remains accumulated in this specific location. It is possible the whales were native to the region and died of natural causes, while some may have succumbed to exhaustion or illness related to deep diving. The site’s natural V-shaped geography may also have acted as a natural funnel, guiding sunken whale carcasses to this concentrated resting area over millions of years.

    Researchers emphasize that discoveries like this are critical to expanding our understanding of life in Earth’s most extreme environments. Study co-author Giovanni Bianucci, a paleontologist at the University of Pisa in Italy, explained that studying these deep-sea whale graveyards helps scientists unpack how life adapts to extreme conditions: perpetual darkness, extremely low oxygen levels, and crushing water pressure thousands of times greater than what is experienced at the ocean surface.

    The Associated Press’ Health and Science Department receives funding support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. AP retains sole editorial responsibility for all content.

  • An underground detector in China unveils its first major findings about mysterious ghost particles

    An underground detector in China unveils its first major findings about mysterious ghost particles

    NEW YORK — One of the most ambitious particle physics experiments of the decade has delivered its first groundbreaking data, bringing scientists closer to unraveling one of the biggest unsolved mysteries of the universe: the nature of neutrinos, the nearly massless ‘ghost particles’ that permeate every corner of space. On Wednesday, the international collaboration behind China’s Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO) published its first major findings in the journal *Nature*, marking a major milestone in global particle physics research.

    Located 700 meters (2,297 feet) underground to block out interfering cosmic radiation, the massive spherical JUNO detector began its official data collection phase in August this year. The observatory was built to study neutrinos — ultra-tiny subatomic particles that originated in the Big Bang, travel close to the speed of light, and pass trillions strong through the human body every second without any measurable harm. For decades, neutrinos have baffled researchers: their near-zero mass makes them extremely difficult to detect, despite their ubiquity in the universe.

    Instead of directly observing ancient cosmic neutrinos, JUNO focuses on studying antineutrinos — the antimatter counterparts of neutrinos — produced by fission reactions in two nearby operating nuclear power plants. When antineutrinos collide with particles inside the detector, the interaction generates a faint flash of light that researchers can capture and analyze to map the particles’ properties.

    From just two months of initial data collection, the JUNO team has already produced some of the most precise measurements ever recorded of a key neutrino behavior: the phenomenon of neutrino oscillation, in which the particles shift between three distinct ‘flavors’ — electron, muon, and tau — as they travel through space. These early measurements confirm that the observatory is functioning at the sensitivity its designers projected, even earlier than many project members expected.

    While the initial results have not yet settled the central question that drove the construction of JUNO — determining the exact mass ordering of the three neutrino flavors — researchers say the data proves the detector can deliver on its core promise. Physicists currently know that two of the three flavors have similar masses, while the third differs significantly, but they have not confirmed whether the outlier is lighter or heavier than the other two. Resolving this mass ordering question will reshape fundamental understandings of cosmology and the formation of the early universe.

    “The initial results already demonstrate that JUNO will be able to probe the subtle differences that separate the neutrino flavors and their mass hierarchies,” explained Liangjian Wen, study co-author and member of the JUNO international collaboration. Outside physicists not involved in the research also expressed enthusiasm about the milestone. Kate Scholberg, a particle physicist at Duke University, noted that the first data release builds major excitement for future discoveries from the observatory.

    JUNO’s findings will eventually be cross-checked by two other cutting-edge neutrino experiments currently under development: Japan’s Hyper-Kamiokande and the United States’ Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE). Both facilities are scheduled to begin data collection within the next 10 years, using different experimental approaches to verify JUNO’s conclusions and advance global research into neutrino properties.

    This reporting, produced by the Associated Press Health and Science Department, receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, with the AP retaining full editorial control over all content.

  • Iran targets US bases across the Middle East after strikes near Hormuz

    Iran targets US bases across the Middle East after strikes near Hormuz

    On Wednesday, Iran initiated a broad series of drone and missile strikes targeting multiple United States military installations scattered across the Middle East, launching the assault in direct retaliation for recent American military operations near the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most strategically critical maritime chokepoints.

    Iran’s highest joint military authority, the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, confirmed the operation in an official statement distributed by the country’s state-run media outlets. The command emphasized that the attacks were a direct response to what it labeled unprovoked American aggression against targets in southern Iran. The statement also carried a stark warning to Washington: if the United States continues its military actions against Iranian soil and interests, Iran will respond with even more extensive and destructive strikes in the future.

    According to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Iran’s elite military force, the operation specifically targeted the regional headquarters of the US Fifth Fleet based in Bahrain, alongside multiple US military facilities located in Kuwait and Jordan. The IRGC also claimed that the strike campaign successfully hit 21 distinct US targets across the Middle East, encompassing both key air bases and naval installations.

    Footage obtained by Middle East Eye, an independent regional news outlet, showed a bright flash of light near the US military compound in Bahrain timed to coincide with the reported attacks. However, US officials have pushed back against Iran’s claims of a successful operation, downplaying any major damage or accurate hits. A senior anonymous official speaking to the Financial Times confirmed that multiple Iranian missiles and drones were launched toward targets in Bahrain and Kuwait, but stressed that there was no conclusive evidence that any of Tehran’s projectiles hit their intended objectives. The official further added that there is no proof any US facility in Jordan was damaged or struck during the assault.

    This is not the first time US officials have downplayed the impact of Iranian attacks on American interests; in past incidents, initial official statements minimizing damage have later been contradicted by independent media reports revealing extensive destruction to infrastructure. Local authorities across the region offered conflicting details on the attack’s outcome. Jordanian officials confirmed that their national air defense systems successfully intercepted multiple incoming projectiles launched by Iran. Meanwhile, emergency response protocols were activated in both Bahrain and Kuwait, and air raid sirens sounded across populated areas of the Gulf states as the attack unfolded.

    The Iranian strike campaign came just hours after the United States carried out what it described as defensive self-defense strikes against Iranian military infrastructure. The American strikes were launched in response to the downing of a US Apache attack helicopter over the Strait of Hormuz. Local Iranian media reported multiple explosions across sites in southern Iran, including Qeshm Island, Bandar Abbas, Jask, and Sirik. The IRGC released a statement noting that the American strikes damaged a telecommunications tower in the coastal city of Sirik and destroyed two large water storage tanks at the targeted site, but inflicted no other major damage.

    US defense officials clarified that the selection of targets for Wednesday’s American strikes was designed specifically to limit civilian casualties while reducing Iran’s capacity to threaten international commercial shipping and US military assets operating throughout the Gulf region. The escalating exchange of strikes has raised fresh concerns across the international community about a broader regional conflict unfolding amid already heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran.

  • Yohei Kono, who apologized for Japan’s wartime sexual abuses of ‘comfort women,’ dies at 89

    Yohei Kono, who apologized for Japan’s wartime sexual abuses of ‘comfort women,’ dies at 89

    TOKYO — Yohei Kono, a towering figure in Japanese politics whose landmark 1993 apology to wartime sexual slavery victims cemented his legacy as a vocal advocate for reckoning with Japan’s 20th-century military history, has passed away at the age of 89. The office of Kono’s son, former Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Kono, confirmed the veteran statesman died of natural causes linked to old age on Monday.

    Born in January 1937, Kono entered Japanese politics in 1967, following the death of his father Ichiro Kono, a prominent lawmaker within Japan’s long-governing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). Over his 42-year political career before retiring in 2009, Kono held a string of the country’s most influential positions, including Chief Cabinet Secretary, President of the LDP, and Speaker of Japan’s lower house of parliament — the more powerful chamber of the country’s bicameral national legislature.

    Kono’s most defining contribution to Japanese and regional history came in 1993, when as Chief Cabinet Secretary he delivered an unprecedented formal apology to the tens of thousands of “comfort women” forced into sexual slavery by Japan’s wartime military across occupied Asia. The apology followed an official Japanese government investigation that confirmed the military’s direct role in operating frontline brothels and coercing women into sexual servitude. This groundbreaking statement laid the groundwork for the broader 1995 apology for wartime atrocities issued by then-Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama.

    Internationally, both the Kono Statement and the Murayama Statement were widely seen as critical steps toward Japan acknowledging its wartime aggression and reconciling with neighboring countries that suffered under Japanese occupation. For decades, the statements served as a cornerstone for improved diplomatic relations between Japan and its Asian neighbors China and South Korea, which were among the nations most impacted by Japan’s pre-1945 imperial expansion.

    However, the commitments made in the Kono Statement have faced persistent backlash from Japanese nationalist and conservative political factions, who argue Japan should abandon focus on what they frame as “negative history” to rebuild national pride. Pressure to water down or erase the apology grew significantly during the tenure of nationalist former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, with multiple high-profile attempts to revise the original statement. Kono remained unflinching in his defense of his 1993 remarks, repeatedly warning that any effort to whitewash established historical facts would ultimately damage the international reputation of the Japanese people.

    Beyond his work on historical reconciliation, Kono placed consistent priority on building and maintaining constructive, friendly relations with China, South Korea, and other Asian nations that endured Japanese wartime atrocities. Even long after his formal retirement from electoral politics in 2009, Kono remained active in diplomatic outreach, almost annually leading cross-party and business delegations to China to help stabilize bilateral relations during periods of tension. Earlier this year, he was still planning a new visit to Beijing, amid a sharp downturn in Tokyo-Beijing relations that followed a controversial statement from current Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi. In November, Takaichi claimed a hypothetical Chinese military operation against Taiwan would justify a deployment of Japanese troops, prompting fierce pushback from Beijing.