标签: Asia

亚洲

  • A southern Chinese region reels from floods and destruction from remnants of tropical storm

    A southern Chinese region reels from floods and destruction from remnants of tropical storm

    As remnants of Tropical Storm Maysak dumped historic volumes of rain across southern China’s Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, authorities and local residents are grappling with widespread destruction, massive displacement, and a growing humanitarian crisis that emerged by Wednesday. As of Tuesday evening, regional officials confirmed six fatalities and 11 people still unaccounted for in the flood disaster, with more than 130,000 local residents forced to evacuate their inundated communities, according to the region’s official propaganda office.

    Many stranded residents remained trapped in affected areas waiting for emergency rescue teams to reach them, even days after the worst of the rainfall began. Lu Xiaofei, a professional working in the nearby tech hub of Shenzhen, shared details of her brother’s trapped family in Lu Village, located in Guangxi’s Qintang District. Her brother, his wife, their 9-month-old infant, his parents, and elderly grandfather have been confined to the second floor of their home, after floodwaters rose to more than the height of an adult. Since Tuesday morning, the household has been cut off from both electricity and running water, Lu told the Associated Press in a phone interview.

    Lu added that her brother reported flood levels climbed further overnight, leaving the family in an increasingly desperate situation: their supplies of drinkable water are nearly exhausted, and local emergency responders have not yet reached their community. Dozens of nearby villagers face identical unaddressed crises, she said. Many other trapped residents have turned to social media to plead for assistance, posting footage of their submerged neighborhoods and drawing public attention to critical shortages of food, water, and emergency supplies.

    Local Chinese outlet Litchi News has also reported a secondary hazard spreading through Hengzhou City: snakes from commercial breeding facilities were swept away by floodwaters and are now loose across populated areas. Multiple residents have reported the loose snakes attempting to enter local homes, with more than a dozen people already bitten by the wandering reptiles, according to a local villager quoted by the outlet.

    China’s National Meteorological Center confirmed that relentless heavy rain has pummeled central-eastern and southern districts of Guangxi since last Saturday. Cumulative rainfall totals have hit between 100 and 400 millimeters (4 to 16 inches) across most affected areas, while the hardest-hit locations have recorded more than 900 millimeters (35 inches) of total precipitation. Forecasters warned that additional heavy rainfall would continue to batter the region through Wednesday, worsening already dangerous flood conditions. In response to safety risks, multiple regional passenger train services have been suspended indefinitely.

    As Guangxi continues its emergency response to Maysak’s aftermath, a new severe weather threat is already approaching southeastern China: Super Typhoon Bavi is projected to make landfall in the region over the coming weekend. The extreme weather disaster in China is part of a broader pattern of deadly monsoon and tropical storm activity across South and East Asia this season. In southeastern Bangladesh, monsoon rain-triggered landslides have killed multiple Rohingya refugees, including five children, while neighboring India has seen more than a dozen fatalities from severe monsoon flooding across its northern and eastern regions over the past three days.

    This reporting featured contributions from AP writer Fu Ting based in Washington, D.C.

  • UN officials urge Western nations to engage with Afghanistan to prevent it sliding into instability

    UN officials urge Western nations to engage with Afghanistan to prevent it sliding into instability

    Two senior United Nations leaders have issued a stark warning to Western nations: continued disengagement from Afghanistan risks pushing the conflict-weary country back into widespread instability, with ripple effects that will extend far beyond its borders. The warning came during a joint visit to Afghanistan by UN High Commissioner for Refugees Barham Salih and UN Development Program chief Alexander De Croo, who spoke to The Associated Press in a shared interview Tuesday. Salih, who joined the conversation via video link, emphasized that recent global policy toward Afghanistan has delivered a clear lesson: turning a blind eye to the country’s crises serves no one’s interests.

    “Despite the long list of unresolved challenges this nation faces, it is far more prudent to remain engaged, provide targeted support and back policy reforms that keep Afghanistan stable and secure,” Salih said. Without active international engagement, he added, the world risks a resurgence of instability that fuels transnational threats including drug trafficking, violent extremism, organized criminal activity and large-scale refugee displacement.

    After four decades of continuous armed conflict, Afghanistan is an impoverished nation almost entirely reliant on international aid, and it currently grapples with a cascading series of overlapping crises that compound one another: devastating natural disasters amplified by accelerating climate change, and the largest single wave of returning refugees the globe has witnessed in 70 years. “In Afghanistan, you never face just one crisis at a time,” De Croo explained to reporters. “Crises stack one on top of the other, and that layered pressure is what we see shaping daily life here right now.”

    Since 2023, nearly 6 million Afghans have been forced to return to their home country, the overwhelming majority expelled from neighboring Pakistan and Iran amid harsh government crackdowns on undocumented migrants. UN projections indicate an additional 2 million Afghans could be forced to return in 2025, placing already strained local communities under unprecedented pressure. With widespread poverty endemic across Afghanistan and acute malnutrition threatening the lives of the most vulnerable groups, most host communities already operate with barely enough resources to support their existing populations.

    Already difficult conditions have been made far worse by deep cuts to international aid, and the Taliban government’s systemic exclusion of half the country’s population: since seizing power in August 2021, following the chaotic withdrawal of U.S.-led NATO troops, the Taliban has banned women and girls from accessing secondary and higher education, and barred women from working in most sectors of the economy. Afghanistan also remains largely diplomatically isolated: no Western country has extended formal recognition to the Taliban-led government, though Russia became the first major global power to grant recognition in 2025. A small crack in this isolation emerged last month, when a Taliban government delegation traveled to Brussels to hold talks with European Union officials focused on diplomatic cooperation and the repatriation of Afghans residing in European countries.

    Against this daunting backdrop, the two UN leaders acknowledged that unexpected progress has been made in key policy areas, most notably public security, anti-corruption efforts and the reduction of illicit drug production. “I would not ignore the progress that has been achieved — progress few observers would have predicted possible just five years ago,” De Croo said. He highlighted that opium production, for which Afghanistan was long the world’s largest supplier, has dropped by 95% since the Taliban government launched a national poppy eradication campaign.

    De Croo stressed that if the international community abandons Afghanistan now, the negative consequences will not be contained within the country’s borders. “If Western nations want to live in peaceful, stable societies, that goal cannot be achieved through domestic policy alone,” he explained. “Your own peace and stability depends on peace and stability in your broader neighborhood.”

    The draconian national restrictions imposed on women and girls remain the single biggest point of tension between the Taliban government and the global community. The UN leaders confirmed they raised the issue directly during meetings with Afghan officials during their visit, and both argued that constructive, sustained engagement is the only path to incremental progress on the issue. “We hope that constructive engagement will open a path forward to reform,” Salih said. “Tangible progress and inclusive policy reforms are essential to building a political system that serves all Afghans.”

    Deep cuts to international aid have already left measurable, lasting damage across the country, De Croo confirmed. Over the past 12 months alone, 422 medical facilities have been forced to shut down because of lost funding, leaving more than 3 million Afghans without access to basic primary healthcare. Earlier this year, the World Food Program announced that funding shortfalls had forced it to turn away three out of every four acutely malnourished children seeking life-saving nutritional support.

    While the Taliban launched its poppy eradication campaign shortly after taking power, De Croo noted that the sharp drop in opium production was also supported by international programs that provided alternative crop options for farming households dependent on poppy cultivation. Funding for these programs has been slashed dramatically amid broader international aid cuts, raising fears that poppy production could rebound if support is not restored. “If we cannot continue working with farmers to provide them with viable alternatives to drug production, we risk seeing the entire trade reemerge,” De Croo warned.

    Although global media and political attention has shifted away from Afghanistan in recent years, Salih noted that despite all the country’s challenges, the current moment offers a critical opening for the international community to reengage. “It is vital to remind the world that the cost of inaction far outweighs the cost of sustained engagement,” Salih said. “The truth is simple: you cannot ignore Afghanistan, and the problems that emerge in Afghanistan will not stay contained in Afghanistan.”

  • ‘Robbed’: Egypt-Argentina match sparks accusations of World Cup bias

    ‘Robbed’: Egypt-Argentina match sparks accusations of World Cup bias

    A dramatic late comeback victory for Argentina against Egypt in the World Cup round of 16 has been drowned out by widespread controversy, with Egyptian players, coaching staff, fans, and high-profile public figures calling out a series of lopsided key refereeing decisions that they claim cost Egypt a historic quarter-final spot. Egypt looked set to secure a stunning upset after jumping out to a 2-0 lead early in the second half, holding the advantage deep into the closing stages of the match. But Argentina flipped the script with three unanswered late goals, snatching a stoppage-time winner to seal a 3-2 win and advance to the final eight. What should have been a celebration of one of the most dramatic knockout-stage comebacks in recent World Cup history quickly turned into a national outcry for Egypt, with multiple questionable calls at critical junctures sparking fury over biased officiating. The most high-profile dispute came over a disallowed Egypt goal that would have put the North African side 3-1 up, a call that Egyptian camp says changed the entire trajectory of the match. The Egyptian side also had repeated late penalty appeals turned down by officials, and protests from the Egyptian bench were ignored in the moments before Argentina’s match-winning stoppage-time goal. Scenes of anger played out on the touchline immediately after key calls, with members of Egypt’s coaching staff surrounding officials to contest decisions, and players confronting match referees over the rulings. The frustration spilled over onto social media platform X, where thousands of fans and dozens of high-profile figures weighed in to condemn the inconsistent officiating, with many arguing the lopsided calls robbed Egypt of a fair shot at advancing. In his post-match press conference, Egypt head coach Hossam Hassan did not hold back in his criticism, insisting his side was the better team on the pitch and that the final result was fundamentally unfair. He questioned the logic behind the disallowed Egypt goal, and raised eyebrows by suggesting that tournament organizers had implicit “marketing” incentives to keep the previous World Cup champions in the competition. Despite the disappointment, Hassan praised his players’ effort, saying they had delivered everything the nation asked of them. Egyptian winger Mustafa Ziko was visibly overcome with emotion in his post-match interview, breaking down in tears as he accused the referee of unfair officiating. He said the incorrect calls had wasted the hard work and hope of an entire nation, and labelled the entire tournament’s officiating in the match as biased. The criticism extended far beyond the Egyptian camp, with prominent global figures from sports, politics, and other fields adding their voices to the outcry. Former world chess champion and political commentator Garry Kasparov highlighted the clear inconsistency in rulings: he pointed out that Egypt’s goal was disallowed for a minor foul far from the goalmouth, but an identical scenario just minutes later that led to an Argentina goal was allowed to stand. He went further, calling FIFA a “corrupt joke” and accusing the governing body of favoring high-profile star teams. Former England captain and legendary striker Alan Shearer, now a leading football pundit, echoed the criticism of inconsistent decision-making, writing on X that “Either both are fouls or neither is a foul. But they’re not going to re-referee they told us.” BBC Sport football correspondent Dale Johnson also argued that the ruling to disallow Egypt’s goal ran completely counter to the officiating standard used throughout the entire tournament. He noted that match officials had adopted a “light touch” approach to minor contact for the entirety of the competition, making it inexplicable that they would overturn a goal for a very minor shirt-tugging incident via VAR. Football analyst Geronimo Morgans added another layer of criticism, pointing out that VAR failed to review two clear fouls against Egyptian players inside the Argentina penalty area in the build-up to Argentina’s equalizing goal scored by Enzo Fernandez, while a far less significant foul was used to overturn Egypt’s valid second goal. “Why does the treatment have to be so one-sided?” he asked, concluding that “Egypt have been robbed.” Even Egyptian Nobel Peace Prize laureate and former International Atomic Energy Agency head Mohamed ElBaradei waded into the debate, writing on X that FIFA had “lost a lot of credibility and trust” for reasons “known to everyone.” Former British ambassador and political commentator Craig Murray summed up the widespread sentiment of foul play with a viral quip: “Not my invention, but FIFA = Fixing It For Argentina has been blatant.” For Argentina, the controversial win moves them forward to the World Cup quarter-finals, where they will turn their focus to their next matchup. For Egypt, the tournament ends far earlier than the team and its supporters hoped, bringing an end to an impressive unbeaten campaign that captured the imagination of the football world. The early exit leaves a bitter taste for the Egyptian camp, who remain united in their belief that they were denied a fair opportunity to continue their historic World Cup run through lopsided officiating.

  • US cancels waiver allowing Iran oil sales as Gulf vessels attacked

    US cancels waiver allowing Iran oil sales as Gulf vessels attacked

    Escalating tensions in the Gulf region have triggered a major shift in US policy toward Iran, with the Trump administration announcing Tuesday it will revoke a temporary license that had eased oil sanctions on Tehran. The decision comes in direct response to a series of targeted attacks on commercial vessels operating in the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, with both Qatar and Saudi Arabia formally blaming Iran for the incidents that have put global energy security at risk.

    The sanctions waiver, which had allowed Iran to produce, export, and ship crude oil and related petroleum products through August 21, was a core compromise in ongoing negotiations aimed at reaching a permanent ceasefire to end long-running hostilities in the Middle East. The relief had represented the primary economic incentive the US extended to encourage Iranian cooperation in peace talks, a concession that had already emerged as a major sticking point in discussions between the two sides.

    Within a window of just a few hours on Tuesday, three separate commercial tankers came under attack while transiting the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s busiest and most vital maritime chokepoints for global energy trade. Among the damaged vessels was a Qatari liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker that was traveling off the coast of Oman when the attack occurred, according to Qatari government officials and independent maritime monitors.

    In response to the incident, Qatar’s foreign ministry issued a formal condemnation, summoning Iran’s deputy ambassador to Doha to file an official diplomatic complaint. “We demand a full explanation for this unacceptable act and call on Iran to immediately cease any practices that undermine regional security, and refrain from endangering the safety of international shipping and global energy supplies,” the ministry said in an official statement. A second, Saudi-flagged crude oil tanker was also struck in the same area of the Gulf, per announcements from the Saudi foreign ministry, which also publicly blamed Iran for the assault.

    While Iran has not issued any formal claim of responsibility for the attacks, it has been locked in a tense standoff with regional powers over shipping routes in the strait in recent days. Tehran has pushed back against the growing trend of commercial vessels bypassing Iranian territorial waters to use an alternative southern route through Omani territorial waters, a shift that has cut into Iranian revenue and leverage over regional maritime traffic.

    In comments to AFP, a senior United States official reiterated Washington’s firm stance against Tehran’s actions in the region: “Iran’s actions in the strait were wholly unacceptable to the United States and will be met with consequences.” The revocation of the sanctions waiver quickly rippled through global energy markets, with Brent crude, the global benchmark for oil prices, surging nearly 5% in trading as investors priced in heightened geopolitical risk and potential disruptions to energy supplies.

  • A mountain of rubbish in Indonesia has been on fire for more than a week

    A mountain of rubbish in Indonesia has been on fire for more than a week

    An eight-day underground fire that has ravaged a massive open-air waste mountain on the outskirts of Jakarta has pushed hundreds of residents from their homes, pushed local hospitals to treat a surge of respiratory illness, and laid bare a systemic national waste management crisis decades in the making. The inferno, which ignited on June 30 at the Jatiwaringin Landfill in Tangerang Regency, has spread across more than 15 hectares of piled waste, blanketing nearby residential neighborhoods in thick, toxic smoke that pushed local air quality into hazardous levels, according to Indonesia’s Ministry of Environment.

    Initial investigations by environmental activists point to a buildup of methane gas released by decomposing organic waste trapped beneath thousands of tons of uncompacted rubbish as the most likely cause. A small initial spark, fanned by strong seasonal winds, spread the fire across multiple hard-to-reach sections of the waste mountain, where deep-seated smoldering continues to plague firefighting efforts eight days on. Unlike conventional surface fires, this blaze burns within the compacted layers of waste, requiring specialized response tactics. Authorities have deployed a large contingent of resources including helicopters, water tankers, bulldozers, and surveillance drones to contain and extinguish the fire, with officials projecting full containment by the end of the week.

    For local residents, the impact has been immediate and devastating. Hundreds have been forced to evacuate their smoke-filled homes to government-run emergency shelters, with many reporting severe respiratory irritation from toxic fumes. “The smoke was so thick you couldn’t see anyone,” 45-year-old local resident Sarmanah told reporters. “It stings the nose, makes you cough and have a runny nose, and makes you unable to breathe… We were forced to leave the house because we couldn’t take it anymore.” As of the latest update, local health authorities have examined at least 234 residents for smoke-related respiratory issues, with 72 confirmed cases of acute respiratory tract infection. While hazardous air quality has eased slightly in recent days, active hotspots and smoldering pockets of fire remain in the western and southern sections of the landfill.

    Environmental campaigners say the Jatiwaringin fire is not an isolated accident, but a predictable “ecological disaster resulting from systemic negligence” that has plagued Indonesia’s waste management sector for years. According to the Indonesian environmental NGO Forum for the Environment (Walhi), the Jatiwaringin facility was only designed to handle 2,700 tons of waste per day, which meets just 59% of Tangerang Regency’s total daily waste output. The excess waste is dumped illegally in unregulated open sites within 100 meters of residential neighborhoods, creating sprawling, unmanaged waste mountains that trap methane and create a persistent public safety risk.

    Long before the current blaze, local residents reported constant issues with foul odors, pest infestations, and fears of catastrophic landslides from the overgrown waste piles. Climate change and more frequent extreme heat waves have exacerbated the risk, turning these unregulated dumping grounds into what activists describe as “time bombs” waiting for a single spark to ignite. This pattern is not unique to Jatiwaringin: major landfill fires swept across multiple Indonesian sites in 2023, including a 40-hectare blaze at Bandung Regency’s Sarimukti Landfill and a fire that destroyed 80% of a 35-hectare Tangerang landfill, both linked to methane buildup from poor waste management.

    In response to the disaster, Indonesian officials announced that a full investigation into the cause of the Jatiwaringin fire will begin once extinguishing operations are complete. The Ministry of Environment and Forestry also plans to conduct a nationwide evaluation of 390 landfills starting in early August 2026, and confirmed that Jatiwaringin already received administrative sanctions for poor management practices in 2025. Authorities have ordered local governments to transition to controlled landfill systems, where waste is compacted and regularly covered with soil to reduce methane buildup and fire risk.

    But activists warn that incremental changes and emergency responses are not enough to address the root of the crisis. Walhi campaigner Wahyu Eka Styawan argues that persistent underfunding for regional waste management, weak enforcement of existing environmental regulations, and a lack of public education on source-separated organic waste have created conditions where disasters like this are inevitable. “This is a time bomb of accumulated waste management problems that have been ignored for years without fundamental improvements,” Wahyu said. Without systemic changes that reduce waste at the source, implement consistent sorting, and process organic waste to prevent methane formation, he added, “It could definitely catch fire again if the pattern isn’t changed. Once the weather gets hot again, be prepared for more fires.”

  • Chinese men in Germany used Telegram groups to share rape videos and drugging tips, prosecutors say

    Chinese men in Germany used Telegram groups to share rape videos and drugging tips, prosecutors say

    BERLIN — Framed to outsiders as an exclusive “German expert driving school”, a sprawling network of hidden Telegram group chats hid a horrific, well-organized criminal enterprise: a ring of predators who openly bragged about raping drugged, unconscious women, traded step-by-step tips for carrying out attacks, and even shared graphic photos and videos of their assaults. Court documents reveal the group used dehumanizing coded language to mask their crimes: women were labeled “cars”, sedating medications “fuel”, rape “driving”, and victims were dismissively called “dead pigs”.

    After years of the network operating undetected, German law enforcement has uncovered a ring primarily made up of Chinese men targeting mostly Chinese women living across Germany. To date, three core members of the group have been convicted on rape and related charges, with a fourth high-profile defendant awaiting a verdict in a Berlin court.

    The full scale of the abuse remains shrouded in secrecy, in large part due to strict German privacy rules that restrict public disclosure of court details and limit what prosecutors can share outside of official proceedings. During the ongoing Berlin trial, portions of hearings have even been closed to the general public. This lack of transparency has contributed to the case flying under the radar in mainstream German discourse, but members of Germany’s local Chinese community — mostly women — have mobilized to show solidarity, traveling hundreds of kilometers to attend court hearings to support victims they have never met.

    Fu Xiao, one community member who made the 310-mile trip to Berlin to observe the trial, emphasized the anger over the group’s blatant misogyny. “What makes one really angry is to see that such groups hate women, they have no respect. Women aren’t seen as people,” she said.

    While Chinese state media has covered the court proceedings extensively, public discussion on Chinese-language social platforms including Rednote has faced partial censorship. Screenshots and searches confirm that posts using direct keywords referencing the case are often deleted or banned, while content using indirect phrasing such as “date rape” or “students studying abroad in Germany” often avoids removal. Neither China’s Ministry of Public Security nor Rednote have responded to requests for comment on the censorship policy.

    Legal observers and judges have drawn clear parallels between this case and the high-profile Gisèle Pelicot trial in France, where a woman was drugged and repeatedly raped by her husband and dozens of strangers he recruited over a decade. Pelicot’s choice to waive her anonymity sparked a global reckoning with systemic rape culture, and German judges note the “German Driving School” case is far from an isolated incident tied to any single nationality or region.

    “This is not a Chinese or French phenomenon, but one that also exists in Germany and, ultimately, worldwide,” said Judge Markus Koppenleitner during a Munich hearing for one of the convicted defendants.

    The exposure of the German ring has already rippled across the globe, triggering new investigations and arrests linked to similar networks of predatory misogynist groups. Last year, German investigators shared intelligence with Los Angeles law enforcement that led to charges against a Chinese graduate student accused of drugging and assaulting three local women, who allegedly obtained his sedatives from a contact connected to the German network. Just last month, Dutch police arrested four men on suspicion of drug-facilitated sexual abuse after receiving tips from German and UK authorities; the Dutch group also used social media chat groups to share assault footage and coordinate attacks.

    Last week, the European Union’s law enforcement agency Europol launched Operation Medusa, a coordinated international crackdown specifically targeting online networks that facilitate drug-facilitated sexual assault. Led by law enforcement from Germany and the United Kingdom, the operation has already resulted in 57 arrests across multiple countries.

    The case has also reignited long-simmering criticism of Telegram, the encrypted messaging platform that hosted the abusive chats for years in direct violation of the platform’s own terms of service. Questions continue to mount over how the chats — some boasting tens of thousands of members dating back to at least 2020 — operated undetected for so long. In 2024, Telegram’s founder was arrested in Paris over allegations the platform has repeatedly become a haven for criminal activity, ranging from drug trafficking to the distribution of child sexual abuse material. He has denied all wrongdoing, framing the abuse as a growing pain tied to Telegram’s surging user base that outpaced content moderation capacity.

    In a generic statement, Telegram said “Sexual violence is explicitly forbidden by Telegram’s terms of service and such content is routinely removed,” adding that the platform complies with all legal obligations under the EU’s Digital Services Act. The company declined to answer specific questions about the German network, including whether moderators were aware of the abusive content, what steps were taken to remove it, and whether the platform alerted law enforcement to the ongoing criminal activity before police made their own discovery.

    Court documents confirm the earliest chats linked to the network date to 2020. Magdalena Gebhard, an attorney who represented one victim in a prior convicted case, told reporters the network had a core inner circle of eight ringleaders, while some of the broader public chat groups counted up to 50,000 members. German police only first learned of the network’s existence in 2024, after ringleader Dapeng Z. shifted his tactics from assaulting female acquaintances to targeting strangers he met online, leaving a trail that alerted authorities. Dapeng Z. was arrested in Germany the same year in a joint operation with Chinese law enforcement, and sentenced to 14 years in prison in February on charges of aggravated rape, attempted murder, and other offenses. He has since filed an appeal, and his legal team has not responded to requests for comment.

    Authorities have not publicly released a full count of confirmed victims or linked perpetrators, and stress the investigation remains ongoing. Multiple victims only learned they were assaulted after police uncovered graphic video footage of the attacks stored in the group chats. On Wednesday, the fourth inner circle defendant, Zhiting S., will receive his verdict in Berlin. Prosecutors allege Zhiting S. used his prior medical training to share detailed guidance with the chat group on which sedatives were most effective for subduing victims before assault, and at least one attacker followed his instructions to carry out an assault in Frankfurt. He is also charged with possession of child sexual abuse material and the repeated sexual assault of a woman in China, which he documented and shared to the network. Under German law, defendants are not required to enter formal pleas, and Zhiting S.’s legal team has declined to comment on the charges.

    Editor’s Note: This report contains discussion of sexual violence. Individuals affected by sexual assault can seek support at 1-800-656-4673 in the U.S., 116 016 in Germany, and 15117905157 in China.

  • No ‘magic wand’: Trump faces layers of resistance on Turkey F-35 deal

    No ‘magic wand’: Trump faces layers of resistance on Turkey F-35 deal

    During a joint appearance with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Ankara ahead of the NATO summit, former President Donald Trump made a sweeping promise to roll back existing U.S. sanctions on Turkey and revive the stalled sale of American F-35 stealth fighter jets to the NATO ally. “We don’t want to sanction friends. It’s very simple,” Trump stated, adding that a final decision on the F-35 deal – which he described as “the best plane by far” – would be finalized after careful consideration.

    Despite Trump’s public confidence, regional and foreign policy experts warn that significant legal and political barriers stand between the proposed policy shift and implementation, with congressional buy-in emerging as the single biggest obstacle.

    Geopolitically, Turkey occupies a uniquely important position for the Western alliance today: it boasts NATO’s second-largest standing military, and has gained renewed goodwill across European capitals amid ongoing efforts to counter Russian aggression following the invasion of Ukraine. For many policymakers in Washington, Turkey also serves as a critical counterweight to Iranian regional influence, particularly after Ankara-backed Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa ousted the Iran-aligned Assad government in 2024. For Trump personally, the push for warmer ties is also shaped by a longstanding close personal relationship with Erdogan – so much so that Trump confirmed he attended the NATO summit primarily as a favor to his Turkish counterpart.

    But that warmth has not extended to Capitol Hill, where Turkey has faced deep, bipartisan criticism for years. U.S. lawmakers have repeatedly condemned Erdogan’s domestic crackdown on political opposition, while foreign policy disagreements have further strained relations: pro-Kurdish lawmakers have decried Turkish military incursions into northern Syria, pro-Israel legislators have pushed back against Ankara’s support for Palestinians and Erdogan’s description of Hamas as resistance fighters, and supporters of U.S. ally Greece have criticized Turkey’s longstanding territorial disputes in the Aegean Sea.

    The most consequential rift, however, dates back to 2019, when Turkey completed its purchase of Russia’s S-400 air defense system, triggering sweeping U.S. punitive measures that derailed the original F-35 partnership. Before the S-400 purchase, Turkey was an integrated partner in the F-35 joint production program, set to manufacture roughly 900 parts for the jet and purchase 100 aircraft for its own air force. Within days of the S-400 delivery, the Trump administration at the time removed Turkey from the program and canceled the sale. In 2020, the Turkish Defense Industry Agency (SSB), the country’s arms procurement body, was formally sanctioned under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), a law initially crafted to respond to Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

    Experts note that Trump does retain limited flexibility to work around CAATSA sanctions: the administration recently notified Congress of a planned $700 million sale of jet engines to Turkey for its domestic Kaan fifth-generation fighter program, bypassing SSB by structuring the deal directly with Turkish Aerospace Industries. But that small step is far different from reviving full F-35 participation and sales, which face additional legal barriers. A 2020 National Defense Authorization Act amendment explicitly bans F-35 sales to Turkey as long as it retains possession of the S-400, with no provision for a presidential waiver.

    This has sparked speculation of a behind-the-scenes compromise between Trump and Erdogan to resolve the S-400 impasse. Notably, Turkey has never activated the S-400 system, with most components still stored in original packaging, a choice experts frame as a deliberate gesture to Washington. Former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey James Jeffrey, now a senior analyst at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, told Middle East Eye that he expects a deal under which Turkey would render the S-400 permanently inoperable. “I suspect Trump and Erdogan are talking behind the scenes on some sort of deal to render the S-400 inoperative,” Jeffrey said.

    Aaron Stein, president of the Foreign Policy Research Institute, echoed that assessment, noting that any path forward hinges on redefining what “possession” of the S-400 means for the purposes of U.S. law. “Trump wants to sell stuff, but he is prevented from doing so by pieces of legislation that he has no control over. One option is to lean on Congress to make changes. He can also certify non-possession and get Congress to agree,” Stein explained. Even if the two leaders reach a compromise on the S-400, however, experts warn that congressional opposition remains a major risk. Longstanding procedural rules allow any chair or ranking member of the House or Senate Foreign Affairs Committees to place a hold on proposed arms sales, and the Trump administration already faced pushback over the recent jet engine deal, overriding a hold placed by House Foreign Affairs Committee ranking member Gregory Meeks, who accused the White House of refusing to share details of the transaction.

    For F-35 sales, opposition is expected to be even fiercer. As Gonul Tol, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, put it: “The engine sale is low-hanging fruit. The most challenging element to the sanctions is Turkey becoming part of the F-35 production line again.” In a reflection of the long odds facing the proposal, Stein noted that Trump has no ability to unilaterally override existing law. “This is very messy. Trump can’t wave a magic wand,” he said.

  • Search under way for cargo plane that vanished off Pakistan coast

    Search under way for cargo plane that vanished off Pakistan coast

    A multi-agency search and rescue mission is currently active in waters off southern Pakistan after a cargo plane carrying five crew members disappeared from radar near the nation’s major port city of Karachi, national aviation authorities have confirmed.

    The incident unfolded at 21:21 local time (16:21 GMT) on Tuesday, when the Boeing 737 cargo jet experienced a rapid loss of altitude and cut off all communication with air traffic control controllers moments after reporting a critical navigation system malfunction, according to a spokesperson for the Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority. The aircraft was traveling on a scheduled commercial cargo route from Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, bound for Karachi when it disappeared.

    Flight-tracking service Flightradar24’s preliminary data matches official reports, showing erratic, extreme altitude shifts on the jet’s flight path immediately before it entered the steep, uncontrolled descent that led to its disappearance.

    The missing plane is operated by K2 Airways, a private Pakistani cargo carrier headquartered in Karachi that was founded less than a decade ago in 2018. On Wednesday, the airline released an official statement confirming the identities of the five crew members on board, noting that the company has activated its full emergency response protocol to coordinate with national aviation officials and other government departments leading the search. “We continue to pray, earnestly, for the safety of our colleagues,” the statement read.

    Pakistan’s airport authority confirmed that both the country’s navy and air force have been deployed to the search area to aid recovery efforts, though no wreckage or signals from the plane’s black boxes have been reported as of the latest updates.

    This disappearance comes as the most significant aviation incident in Pakistan since 2020, when a domestic Pakistan International Airlines passenger flight crashed on approach to Karachi airport, leaving only two survivors out of 99 people on board. That disaster triggered widespread calls for improved aviation safety inspections and regulatory overhauls across the country’s commercial aviation sector.

  • Trump says he is working to remove Turkey from US sanctions list

    Trump says he is working to remove Turkey from US sanctions list

    During a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the NATO summit held in Ankara on Tuesday, U.S. President Donald Trump made a landmark announcement: he intends to remove Turkey from the U.S. sanctions blacklist that he first imposed during his initial presidential term.

    Speaking alongside Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Trump told assembled reporters, “We’re going to be taking the sanctions off. Okay? It’s time to do that… We don’t want to sanction friends. It’s very simple.” As his remarks were translated, the typically reserved Erdogan reacted with an uncharacteristic broad smile and a public thumbs-up to the announcement, a visible display of approval for the new U.S. stance.

    The sanctions in question stem from the 2017 Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), a federal U.S. law that placed Turkey alongside designated U.S. adversaries North Korea and Iran after Ankara moved forward with a deal to purchase Russia’s advanced S-400 air defense system. In addition to being blacklisted, Turkey was expelled from the multinational F-35 stealth fighter jet program over U.S. fears that sensitive military technology could be compromised by Moscow. Trump also noted Tuesday that he is open to reconsidering Turkey’s participation in the F-35 program, opening the door for Ankara’s potential return to the initiative.

    Analysts say the announcement marks a significant symbolic shift in bilateral ties. Alper Coskun, a former Turkish diplomat now based at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, called the news “music to Ankara’s ears” in comments to Middle East Eye. Coskun emphasized that while the announcement aligns with signals the Trump administration has sent for months, it makes clear Trump intends to work with Congress to formalize the policy change. For sanctions to be fully lifted, Coskun noted, Turkey will likely be required to completely abandon its S-400 acquisition from Russia.

    Because CAATSA is a congressional statute, legislative approval will be required to fully roll back the blacklisting. That said, Coskun explained that the Trump administration could take an interim step by reinterpreting existing sanctions rules, arguing that the conditions that triggered Turkey’s blacklisting no longer apply. The president also holds the authority to issue a sanctions waiver, though it remains unclear whether he will pursue that unilateral route or seek bipartisan agreement with a Congress currently controlled by his Republican party. Control of both congressional chambers could shift to the Democratic party following the upcoming November midterm elections, adding uncertainty to the legislative path ahead.

    The announcement fits into Trump’s broader pattern of sidelining and criticizing other Western NATO allies while prioritizing closer ties with Ankara. Trump has openly lambasted the leaders of major Western European nations including the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Spain, accusing them of weak policies on defense and immigration. He launched a high-profile dispute with Denmark over Greenland’s territorial status, and is currently locked in an open public feud with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. Since March, he has repeatedly expressed frustration that these allies have refused to back his hardline policy against Iran.

    Trump made his tilt toward Turkey explicit during Tuesday’s press interaction, saying, “I was very disappointed with NATO, and frankly, if [the summit] weren’t held in Turkey, where my friend happens to be a very strong leader, a very strong person, it’s possible that I wouldn’t have attended. I felt I had to attend because of the fact that, you know, I know he’s gone all out…but we weren’t treated well [by western Europe] because we did something in Iran. We don’t need anybody’s help. I didn’t even want their help, but before I asked, they said they wouldn’t be there.”

    He went on to frame the bilateral relationship in stark terms, adding, “We have a better relationship with Turkey,” and praising what he described as Turkey’s unique loyalty compared to other NATO allies.

  • ‘No obligation to provide’: Israel accused of withholding water from Jordan

    ‘No obligation to provide’: Israel accused of withholding water from Jordan

    Diplomatic friction between Israel and Jordan has escalated in recent weeks after Israel declined to renew a bilateral water supply agreement that supplements the core terms of the countries’ 1994 peace treaty, multiple Israeli media outlets have confirmed. In reports published Monday, Israel’s public broadcaster Kan 11 and leading news site Ynet outlined that the Netanyahu administration has so far refused to sign off on an extension of the 2021 deal, which added an extra 50 million cubic meters of annual water to the 50 million cubic meters Israel is obligated to supply under the original peace accord, leaving water-dependent Jordan facing growing pressure amid a persistent regional water crisis.

    Jordanian officials have privately raised alarm over the holdup, telling Kan 11 that water access is not only a critical national priority for the kingdom but also a binding component of the 1994 peace treaty. The official also warned that Amman would be forced to respond to the ongoing Israeli delay, with widespread speculation that the Israeli government is leveraging water access as a diplomatic bargaining chip amid severely strained relations that have deteriorated since the outbreak of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza in 2023. Back in March, Kan 11 previously reported that Jordan’s King Abdullah II made any meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu conditional on resolving outstanding water disputes alongside progress on Palestinian issues, setting the stage for the current standoff.

    As tensions mount, the United Arab Emirates has stepped in to mediate, proposing a trilateral summit in Abu Dhabi that would bring together energy ministers from the UAE, Israel, and Jordan to negotiate a path forward. According to Ynet’s reporting, the proposed talks would address the water agreement renewal as well as revive a UAE-backed initiative to build a joint Israeli-Jordanian desalination plant that would expand the kingdom’s long-term water access. The diplomatic push from Abu Dhabi comes as regional actors work to defuse rising tensions between Jordan and Israel, which have hit their lowest point in decades following the outbreak of the Gaza conflict.

    Israeli officials have pushed back against suggestions that the country is violating the terms of the original peace treaty, noting that Israel continues to deliver the 50 million cubic meters of water required by the 1994 accord. In comments to Ynet, an anonymous Israeli official clarified that the government has no legal obligation to provide the extra 50 million cubic meters added in the 2021 temporary deal, arguing that additional supply is contingent on goodwill between the two neighboring states. The official added that Israel’s decision to hold off on a long-term extension is also rooted in a historic drought that is the most severe the country has faced in a century, with the government prioritizing replenishing its own reservoirs to support domestic agricultural needs. The official also framed the potential trilateral summit in Abu Dhabi as an opportunity to advance broader normalization, resolve water issues, and rebuild bilateral ties, noting that “when you help your neighbours, you expect warmer relations.”

    To understand the scope of the current dispute, it is necessary to look back at the long history of water cooperation between the two states. Since the 1994 Israel-Jordan peace treaty, water management and supply have been among the most sensitive and consequential issues in bilateral relations, as Jordan faces chronic, worsening water scarcity that has left the kingdom heavily reliant on imported water from Israel. The original 1994 treaty codified an annual supply of 50 million cubic meters from Israel to Jordan, with both sides committing to collaborate on regional water security through developing new sources, curbing pollution, and reducing waste. In 2021, Israel agreed to a three-year temporary deal doubling annual supply to 100 million cubic meters. When that deal expired in 2024, the Netanyahu administration only approved a six-month short-term extension, rejecting Jordan’s request for a five-year renewal. After signing the short-term extension in May 2024, Israeli Energy Minister Eli Cohen stated that Israel would “continue to use our natural resources to strengthen Israel’s standing in the region.”

    Jordan has already prepared contingency plans to secure its water independence amid the ongoing political standoff. In February, Jordanian state broadcaster Al-Mamlaka TV reported that the kingdom had finalized emergency measures to guarantee national water security regardless of external political pressure or regional instability. To date, the Jordanian government has not issued any public comment on the current dispute, leaving negotiations unfolding behind closed doors.

    The current water clash comes against a backdrop of severely deteriorated bilateral relations since the start of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. Jordan formally recalled its ambassador to Israel, Ghassan Majali, in November 2023 in protest of the campaign, and last week King Abdullah issued a royal decree officially ending Majali’s posting with no replacement planned. This development aligns with broader reporting that Israel is increasingly using water access as a diplomatic tool across the region, including in Gaza, where Israel has been widely accused of restricting water access as a weapon of war. Notably, Jordan has cooperated with regional partners to intercept Iranian drone and missile attacks targeting Israel in recent conflicts, a step that has not softened Israel’s current stance on water negotiations.

    Beyond the bilateral diplomatic standoff, the dispute underscores a growing global crisis of water insecurity that is particularly acute in the arid Middle East. Climate change has amplified drought conditions and water scarcity across the region, with a recent United Nations report warning that the world has entered an era of “Global Water Bankruptcy,” with nearly three-quarters of the global population living in countries classified as either water-insecure or critically water-insecure. Interestingly, Israel has emerged as a global leader in desalination technology, with 70 to 80 percent of domestic household water coming from domestic desalination plants that currently produce 804 million cubic meters of potable water annually. Last month, the Israeli government approved an ambitious expansion plan that will boost the country’s desalination production capacity to 2 billion cubic meters per year by 2050, cementing its status as a regional water power.