标签: Africa

非洲

  • Egypt optimistic Salah will be fit to face Australia

    Egypt optimistic Salah will be fit to face Australia

    As Egypt prepares to make history in their first-ever FIFA World Cup knockout stage appearance, the entire North African camp is clinging to cautious optimism that their star captain Mohamed Salah will be fit to face Australia in Friday’s crucial last-32 clash in Dallas.

    Salah picked up a hamstring strain during Egypt’s final Group G match against Iran, the result that secured their spot in the knockout round. This tournament marks only the fourth time Egypt has qualified for a World Cup, and their unbeaten run against Belgium, New Zealand and Iran to finish second in the group was already a breakthrough moment for the Pharaohs. But celebrations following the 1-1 draw in Seattle were cut short when Salah was substituted off in the 57th minute, leaving fans and teammates fearing the worst.

    Initial scans confirmed the 34-year-old forward had sustained a mild hamstring strain, but a flicker of hope emerged this week when Salah returned to the training pitch on Tuesday. The Egyptian Football Association even shared photos of the training session with the triumphant caption “The King is back”, signaling confidence that their talisman could take the field at 18:00 GMT on Friday. Salah is currently working through an intensive, personalized rehabilitation program to build up his fitness ahead of the tie, and head coach Hossam Hassan has moved quickly to downplay public concerns over the injury.

    So far at the tournament, Salah has been the engine of Egypt’s attacking success: he found the back of the net in the team’s 3-1 win over New Zealand and notched two assists across the group stage. If he is ultimately ruled out, all of Egypt’s attacking pressure will shift to Omar Marmoush, the Manchester City forward who was benched for the Iran match before coming on as a second-half substitute. According to sources close to the national camp, Marmoush was disappointed to miss out on a starting spot against Iran, and he is now determined to prove his value if called upon against Australia. Many football observers have noted the 27-year-old has yet to live up to expectations at this World Cup, making Friday’s high-stakes knockout tie the perfect opportunity for him to silence critics and change the narrative around his performance.

    Salah’s injury is not the only fitness crisis facing Hassan as he prepares his starting lineup. Defensive problems have compounded Egypt’s selection headache, with multiple first-team players picking up knocks in the Iran match. Center-back Mohamed Abdelmonem was forced off the pitch just 14 minutes into the game with a knee injury, and he is now in a race against time to be fit for Friday. Left-back Ahmed Fatouh is almost certain to miss the Australia tie after picking up his own hamstring injury; he managed to finish the full 90 minutes against Iran only because Egypt had already used all five of their permitted substitutions. Midfielders Hamdi Fathi and Hossam Abdelmaguid are also dealing with minor fitness issues, leaving Hassan with tough selection choices ahead of facing a Socceroos side renowned for its physical playing style and organized defensive structure.

    Despite all these ongoing concerns, the mood in the Egyptian camp remains upbeat. The team is chasing their first ever victory in a World Cup knockout match, and players and coaching staff alike believe a fit Salah would provide a massive morale and tactical boost to their bid to upset Australia and advance to the quarter-finals.

  • Rights group accuses three paramilitary commanders of war crimes in Sudan

    Rights group accuses three paramilitary commanders of war crimes in Sudan

    In a damning new report released Wednesday in Nairobi, the capital of neighboring Kenya, global human rights watchdog Amnesty International has publicly named three senior commanders of Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), accusing the paramilitary group’s leadership of overseeing systematic war crimes during the deadly 2025 capture of el-Fasher, the capital of North Darfur.

    During the official report launch, Amnesty Secretary General Agnès Callamard laid out the organization’s findings, concluding that RSF forces carried out crimes against humanity and targeted ethnic cleansing during their coordinated assault on the city. The devastating three-day offensive, which concluded with the RSF seizing control of el-Fasher in October 2025, left more than 6,000 people dead, and United Nations experts have already characterized the attack as carrying all the “hallmarks of genocide.”

    Amnesty’s investigation built its case around forensic analysis of nine verified video materials, which document clear evidence of atrocities directly linked to the three named commanders: one video shows a senior RSF commander executing unarmed civilians, a second captures another commander torturing detained civilians, and a third captures the third senior leader ordering the abuse of prisoners. Callamard detailed the full scope of atrocities documented by the investigation, including mass murder, forced displacement of civilian populations, arbitrary detention, systematic torture, rape, sexual slavery, other forms of sexual violence, enslavement, mass extermination, and targeted persecution against specific ethnic groups.

    Callamard issued an urgent appeal to the global community, stressing that attacks on civilians continue unhindered across Sudan and require immediate intervention. She called for three key priority actions: an immediate and comprehensive ceasefire across all conflict lines, the rapid deployment of a dedicated United Nations protection force to secure at-risk civilian populations, and sweeping accountability measures to bring perpetrators to justice. “Strengthening accountability requires resourcing and supporting all existing mechanisms for Sudan, including the International Criminal Court, and the fact-finding missions backed by the United Nations and African Union,” Callamard said. “The commanders named in this report must face investigation, and where sufficient admissible evidence exists, they must be prosecuted.”

    To date, the RSF has not issued any public comment in response to the report’s allegations. Amnesty International confirmed it shared a full copy of the findings with RSF leader Gen. Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo last month, but has not received any formal response from the paramilitary group.

    The devastating conflict in Sudan first erupted in April 2023, sparked by decades of simmering tensions between the country’s national army and the RSF, the powerful paramilitary force that rose to prominence in the country’s Darfur region decades ago. The ongoing war has already killed at least 59,000 people, displaced roughly 13 million Sudanese from their homes, pushed large swathes of the country into catastrophic famine conditions, and left more than 30 million people in urgent need of life-saving humanitarian assistance.

  • Sudan’s RSF committed crimes against humanity in el-Fasher, Amnesty says

    Sudan’s RSF committed crimes against humanity in el-Fasher, Amnesty says

    Three years into Sudan’s devastating civil conflict between the country’s official armed forces and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a new bombshell investigation from Amnesty International has laid bare systematic, widespread atrocities carried out by the RSF during its 18-month campaign to seize control of el-Fasher, the main city in Sudan’s war-torn North Darfur region. The rights group’s findings, published Wednesday, confirm the RSF committed crimes against humanity and targeted ethnic cleansing in the territory, in what stands as one of the bloodiest chapters of the ongoing power struggle.

    Amnesty’s investigation draws on firsthand testimonies from more than 200 survivors, analysis of 89 open-source video recordings, and extensive review of satellite imagery captured across North Darfur. The documentation outlines a litany of grotesque violations carried out by RSF fighters: mass murder, forcible population transfers, unlawful imprisonment, systematic torture, widespread rape, sexual slavery, other forms of sexual violence, enslavement, mass extermination, and targeted persecution of non-Arab ethnic communities. The report also notes that evidence collected by researchers may meet the legal threshold for the crime of genocide, echoing earlier findings from United Nations officials that flagged el-Fasher violence as bearing the “hallmarks of genocide.”

    “Children were not collateral damage of this violence – often, they were deliberately targeted and have suffered immensely. They have been killed, injured, raped, abducted, and forcibly recruited on a massive scale,” said Agnès Callamard, Secretary General of Amnesty International, in a statement accompanying the report. Survivor accounts included harrowing tales of unprovoked attacks on civilian communities. A 17-year-old survivor from Abu Zerega, a small town south of el-Fasher, described being tied up and beaten before being shot in the leg, an injury that now leaves him dependent on crutches to walk. Eight of his cousins, four of them boys between the ages of 11 and 17, were killed in the same attack.

    Amnesty’s research confirms that most civilian victims were targeted explicitly because of their ethnic identity. Arab militias aligned with the RSF systematically targeted members of local non-Arab communities across el-Fasher and surrounding areas, with witnesses repeatedly describing mass killings of civilians, systematic sexual violence, and intentional targeting of children.

    United Nations data has already placed the death toll from the el-Fasher assault at staggering levels: more than 6,000 people were killed in just the first three days of the RSF’s final push to take the city last year. The broader civil war has now killed hundreds of thousands of people overall, uprooted more than 14 million Sudanese from their homes, and pushed 28 million more into acute hunger, marking it as the world’s worst active humanitarian crisis, according to international aid organizations. The United Nations has previously warned that sexual violence against men, women, and children is being systematically used as a weapon of war by both warring parties, which have both been accused of widespread atrocities.

    The timeline of the conflict puts the el-Fasher campaign in context: after pushing the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) out of the capital Khartoum in March 2023, the RSF redirected its military focus to Sudan’s Kordofan region and el-Fasher, laying the city under a brutal 18-month siege before ultimately seizing control. Callamard emphasized that global leaders were given advance warning of the impending humanitarian catastrophe in el-Fasher, yet failed to act to protect civilians. “It is a stain on the conscience of humanity,” she said, calling for an immediate bilateral ceasefire across Sudan and the urgent deployment of an international protection force to shield vulnerable civilian populations.

    Amnesty says it has already identified specific RSF commanders linked to the violations of international law documented in the report, and is calling for full accountability for all perpetrators of atrocities. The RSF has previously acknowledged isolated violations by its fighters, but has consistently claimed the scale of atrocities attributed to the group is exaggerated, and has not issued any specific comment on Amnesty’s latest report. International pressure has grown in recent months to force foreign backers of both the SAF and RSF to cut all military and financial support to the warring parties, amid growing global recognition of the scale of the humanitarian disaster unfolding in Sudan.

  • Bigger than Rumble in the Jungle? DR Congo bid for World Cup history

    Bigger than Rumble in the Jungle? DR Congo bid for World Cup history

    Half a century after two contrasting global sporting moments put the central African nation then known as Zaire in the world spotlight, DR Congo is preparing to write an unprecedented new chapter of its own at the 2026 FIFA World Cup, facing England in the Round of 32 this Wednesday.

    The 1974 journey began with historic achievement: as the first sub-Saharan African men’s national team to qualify for a World Cup finals, Zaire entered the tournament riding high. Just three months prior, the squad – nicknamed the Leopards – had claimed their second consecutive Africa Cup of Nations title, building on a run of regional dominance that included three continental club titles between 1967 and 1973. Then-president Mobutu Sese Seko, who had seized power in a 1965 military coup and renamed the country Zaire in 1971 after independence from Belgium, lavished the squad with rewards: every player received a new house and car, and was pulled from their club duties to focus entirely on World Cup preparations.

    But behind the optimistic buildup lurked unresolved tensions that would unravel the team’s World Cup dream. By 1974, Zaire was already grappling with a severe economic crisis: global copper prices had plummeted, fuel shortages paralyzed daily life, and the World Bank had stepped in to stabilize the crumbling economy. Off the pitch, players grew furious when promised FIFA performance allowances never arrived, with many alleging that national football federation officials had embezzled the funds. The squad initially refused to take the field against Yugoslavia in their second group match, and while they eventually relented, the lack of morale and preparation led to a devastating 9-0 defeat – one of the worst lopsided losses in World Cup history.

    The final group game against defending champion Brazil produced one of the most infamous moments in World Cup folklore. Trailing 2-0 late in the second half, defender Mwepu Ilunga broke from the defensive wall during a Brazilian free kick, and launched the ball far downfield. For decades, the incident was dismissed as proof that Zaire’s players did not understand the laws of the game. But nearly 40 years later, in a 2010 interview with the BBC five years before his death, Ilunga revealed the act was deliberate: he had hoped to receive a red card and walk off the pitch in protest of the stolen bonuses. “I was aware of football regulations. I did it on purpose,” he said. “Why should I play for the benefit of officials who took the players’ money? But I didn’t succeed, the referee didn’t give me a red card.” The protest ultimately changed nothing: Zaire exited the tournament winless, with three losses, 14 goals conceded, and zero goals scored.

    Just a few months later, the world’s attention returned to Zaire’s capital Kinshasa, this time for what is still widely considered the greatest boxing match in history: the Rumble in the Jungle, a heavyweight world title showdown between Muhammad Ali and George Foreman. Ali had been stripped of his heavyweight crown in 1967 and banned from boxing for three and a half years for refusing induction into the U.S. military to protest the Vietnam War, and by 1974 he was still chasing a chance to reclaim his undisputed title. Promoter Don King brokered a landmark deal: Mobutu agreed to pay $5 million to both Ali and Foreman to host the fight in Kinshasa, a staggering sum for the era. Journalist Justin Kabala Mwana, who covered the event for local media, recalled that Mobutu viewed the bout as a chance to put Zaire on the global map. “Mobutu said that the dignity of his country was beyond price, and that he was prepared to pay whatever it took,” Kabala told BBC Sport Africa. “The whole country was mobilised to welcome this super fight of the century, as if to rise to the challenge.”

    On October 30, 1974, a capacity crowd packed Kinshasa’s Stade du 20 Mai, most cheering for Ali as the underdog. The fight went down in history for Ali’s iconic rope-a-dope tactic: he leaned against the ring ropes for rounds, absorbing Foreman’s heavy blows to tire out the younger, stronger champion. By the end of the eighth round, Ali landed a blistering combination that knocked Foreman out, reclaiming the heavyweight title. “That day it was a celebration all over the country,” Kabala recalled. “People partied right through the night. Beer was flowing freely for up to 48 hours after the fight. Zaire caught its breath a little. Except economically, that wasn’t really the case. You could feel that once the party was over, it was goodbye to the good times.”

    For the 1974 Leopards, the hard times lingered for decades. Ilunga reported that the squad returned home “without a penny,” and admitted in 2002 that he was “living like a tramp.” Star striker Pierre Ndaye Mulamba was shot in the leg during a 1996 home invasion and later fled to South Africa. In 1997, Mobutu’s 32-year authoritarian rule ended, and the country was renamed the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The following years brought two regional wars that drew in nine African nations and killed an estimated six million people, and ongoing conflict in eastern DR Congo continues to destabilize the country today, alongside recent public health crises including an Ebola outbreak that disrupted the 2026 World Cup squad’s preparations.

    It took 52 long years for DR Congo to qualify for another World Cup, coming up just short in 2018 and 2022 before securing their spot this year. A big part of the squad’s success comes from tapping talent from the DR Congo diaspora, a strategy increasingly used by African nations: only six members of the 2026 squad were born in DR Congo, and none play domestically, where the local league has been gutted by decades of federation mismanagement. Yet under French coach Sébastien Desabre, appointed in 2022, the team has built a strong cohesive unit with consistent selection and team spirit. The 2026 Leopards have already broken the 1974 curse: they notched their first ever World Cup goal and point against Portugal in their opening match, followed by their first ever World Cup win against Uzbekistan to advance to the knockout stage.

    For a country that has endured decades of conflict, political instability, and economic hardship, this World Cup run means far more than just sporting glory. Many see it as a chance to replicate the unifying national energy of the 1974 Rumble in the Jungle, and reclaim national dignity after generations of struggle. “The World Cup has given people an investment into our country,” DR Congo supporter Tanya Maria told BBC Sport Africa ahead of the England match. “When people care about a country, when they care about the people that live there. That’s when change can happen.”

    For the current squad, the weight of expectation off the pitch is clear. “It’s not easy in our country,” striker Yoane Wissa, who scored two goals to secure DR Congo’s knockout spot, said after the win over Uzbekistan. “There’s a war in East Congo. Every day, every time we wear this shirt, we think about them. Because we want peace… We came from nothing to be here. Now we write our story.”

    Conditions for today’s players are a world away from the 1974 squad. With new leadership elected to the national football federation in May, there is cautious hope that the World Cup run can help revitalize domestic football and build long-term change. Centre-back Axel Tuanzebe, who scored the decisive goal in the intercontinental play-off against Jamaica that sealed DR Congo’s spot, noted that the squad has all the support they need to compete. “We’re very privileged to have everything that we need,” he said. “We’re not longing for anything and it enables us to go and perform the best we can.”

    For Kabala, who witnessed both the 1974 World Cup disappointment and the triumph of the Rumble in the Jungle, Wednesday’s Round of 32 clash against England is almost a more significant moment for the nation than the iconic 1974 boxing bout. If the 2026 Leopards can pull off an upset against the three-time World Cup contenders, they will write a new chapter of African sporting history that far outlasts any 1974 footnote.

  • Rights lawyers sue Ghana over third-country deportation deal with the US

    Rights lawyers sue Ghana over third-country deportation deal with the US

    ACCRA, Ghana — A transnational coalition of human rights attorneys and advocacy organizations has launched a landmark legal challenge against the government of Ghana, alleging that West African nation has systematically violated the fundamental human rights of asylum seekers by facilitating their forced deportation from the United States back to the conflict-ridden origin nations these people fled. The filing on Tuesday marks the newest high-profile legal action targeting an African government that entered into a controversial third-country deportation agreement with the former Trump administration, which allowed the U.S. to offload non-citizen deportees to nations that are not their countries of birth or citizenship. The lawsuit was submitted to the ECOWAS Community Court of Justice, the regional judicial body for the Economic Community of West African States, and counts the Global Strategic Litigation Council — a broad network of legal practitioners and human rights advocates — among the core members of the coalition bringing the claim. This case marks the first ever legal action brought under a landmark 1979 regional human rights treaty that enshrines protections for free movement across West African borders. The legal challenge represents 27 of the at least 60 people the U.S. has deported to Ghana under the bilateral agreement that took effect in September 2025. According to an official statement released by the rights coalition, Ghana committed to accept these deportees, detain them upon arrival, and coordinate their onward transfer to their home nations — even though the vast majority of these asylum seekers had already received formal protection orders from U.S. immigration judges that barred their deportation to their origin countries due to credible fears of persecution. Most of the 27 named claimants were transferred onward from Ghana to their home nations within mere hours or days of landing, the Tuesday statement confirms, despite the asylum seekers explicitly notifying Ghanaian authorities of their valid U.S. court-ordered protections. Multiple claimants reported being kept in shackles for the entirety of their flight from the U.S. to Ghana. Upon arrival, they say they were held under constant armed guard in a range of facilities, including military camps, unregulated hotels, and airport holding cells, most in unsanitary, overcrowded, and dangerous conditions. The coalition’s core legal argument centers on Ghana’s deliberate violation of the international legal principle of non-refoulement, a binding global norm that prohibits nations from transferring people to territories where they face a proven risk of persecution, torture, or death. A Ghanaian government spokesperson did not issue an immediate response to requests for comment on the lawsuit from reporters. Ghana is not an outlier in these arrangements: it is one of at least nine African nations that have signed third-country deportation pacts with the U.S. Immigration rights advocates estimate that, under these largely untransparent agreements, the Trump administration deported thousands of asylum seekers and migrants to nearly two dozen third-party countries that are not the migrants’ nations of origin, as part of a broader hardline crackdown on unauthorized immigration. Immigration attorneys widely frame these third-country deportation deals as a deliberate legal loophole, designed to allow the U.S. government to bypass domestic asylum protections and indirectly force vulnerable asylum seekers back to the dangerous origin countries they fled. Medical assessments included as evidence in the new lawsuit document significant harm to the claimants: multiple of the 27 people named in the suit showed clinical signs of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and severe major depression linked to their ordeal. The legal team is asking the regional ECOWAS court to issue a number of remedies, including an immediate injunction halting all further onward transfers of deportees held under the agreement, an order compelling Ghana to publicly release the full, unredacted terms of the U.S. deportation deal, financial compensation for the harm inflicted on claimants, and a formal ruling barring Ghana from entering into any similar future agreements. The lawsuit against Ghana follows closely on the heels of another legal challenge brought earlier this month by rights attorneys against Equatorial Guinea, another African nation that signed an identical third-country deportation deal with the U.S. That case was filed before the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Africa’s top regional human rights body, and leveles the same core accusation: that Equatorial Guinea violated international human rights law by facilitating the forced deportation of U.S.-expelled asylum seekers back to their high-risk home nations. This report was contributed by Sophie Banchereau, reporting from Dakar, Senegal.

  • 9 children killed as tricycle plunges into a canal in Egypt

    9 children killed as tricycle plunges into a canal in Egypt

    CAIRO — A devastating traffic accident in southern Egypt has left nine children dead and two more injured after their motorized tricycle careened into a local canal on Tuesday, regional authorities confirmed. The incident unfolded in the Abu Tig district of Assiut, a southern Upper Egyptian province located roughly 320 kilometers south of Cairo, best known for its collection of ancient historic landmarks. The governor’s office publicly confirmed the details of the crash in an official statement shared via its Facebook page.

    Preliminary local media investigations point to a steering system failure as the root cause of the crash, which occurred while the vehicle was transporting a group of children home after they finished work on nearby agricultural farms. As of the latest update, the health status of the two injured children has not been released to the public. All recovered bodies of the deceased have been transported to Abu Tig Hospital for processing and identification, per the governor’s office.

    Local Egyptian news outlet Cairo 24 reports that the ages of the children killed in the accident fall between 10 and 17 years old. Images published by the governor’s office show large crowds of local residents gathered along the banks of the canal, while certified divers conducted search and recovery operations in the water.

    Following the tragedy, Assiut Governor Mohamed Elwan has issued an official order mandating that regional authorities roll out new safety protocols to prevent similar future incidents. Key measures include the installation of reinforced concrete safety barriers along the full length of high-risk canal banks in the district.

    This fatal incident is just the latest in a long pattern of deadly road accidents that kill thousands of Egyptians annually. The country has long struggled with a poor national transportation safety record, with systemic issues including widespread speeding, poorly maintained road infrastructure, and lax enforcement of existing traffic regulations cited as the leading contributing factors to frequent fatal crashes. Earlier in 2024, a high-speed collision between a cargo truck and a pickup truck on an Egyptian highway left 18 people dead, according to official government statements.

  • Senegalese MPs move to clip presidential powers as tensions mount

    Senegalese MPs move to clip presidential powers as tensions mount

    A bitter power struggle between Senegal’s top two political leaders boiled over this week as lawmakers approved a controversial package of constitutional changes that shift executive authority to the legislative branch, triggering street clashes outside the National Assembly and throwing the West African nation into renewed political uncertainty.

    The amendments, which passed by an overwhelming majority following hours of heated, tense debate in the chamber, mark the latest escalation in a public feud between President Bassirou Diomaye Faye and parliamentary Speaker Ousmane Sonko — once close allies who swept to power together in 2024 on a platform of transformative systemic change, before their alliance collapsed into open rivalry earlier this year. Tensions between the pair had been simmering for months over disagreements about how to manage Senegal’s mounting debt crisis, with Sonko, who previously served as Faye’s prime minister, openly lambasting the president’s policy approach. The split reached a breaking point in May, when Faye dismissed Sonko from his cabinet. Sonko, however, retained overwhelming support from his Pastef party, which holds a supermajority of 130 out of 165 seats in the National Assembly, and was quickly elected speaker by legislative allies just weeks later.

    The reform package, put forward by Pastef lawmakers, includes multiple key changes designed to expand parliamentary authority at the expense of the presidency. Provisions include broadening lawmakers’ investigative powers to strengthen legislative oversight of the executive branch, requiring full public disclosure of all natural resource contracts to parliament, and expanding the scope of authority held by permanent parliamentary committees. The reforms would also restructure the country’s top constitutional body, replacing the existing Constitutional Council with a new nine-member Constitutional Court, up from the current seven members. Another contested provision bars a sitting president from holding leadership position within a political party — a change widely viewed as targeted at Faye, who remains a dues-paying Pastef member despite stepping back from official party roles. If enacted, analysts say the rule could block Faye from launching his own independent political party ahead of the next national election. A final provision prohibits a sitting president from signing new legislation into law during the transition period between a presidential election and the inauguration of the president-elect.

    Even as debate unfolded inside parliament on Monday, unrest broke out outside, where security forces were forced to deploy tear gas to disperse crowds of demonstrators who had gathered to oppose the reforms. Inside the chamber, opposition lawmakers walked out of the vote en masse to protest what they decried as an undemocratic power grab. Pastef leaders have defended the changes, framing them as a critical step to reinforce the separation of powers between Senegal’s executive, legislative, and judicial branches, and deliver on the 2024 campaign promise of deeper democratic reform. But critics across the political spectrum and civil society say the initiative is nothing more than a naked power grab by Sonko, who retains near-total control over the legislative majority and is seeking to weaken his former ally ahead of upcoming political contests.

    In a surprise announcement during Monday’s debate, Justice Minister Moussa Sarr confirmed that President Faye intends to put the constitutional amendments to a national referendum, a step required for constitutional changes under current law, though no timeline for the public vote has yet been announced. The announcement immediately sparked pushback from Sonko, who questioned whether the president had the legal authority to call a public referendum after the reforms had already been approved by a legislative majority. Opposition parties and dozens of civil society organizations have already called for the full bill to be withdrawn immediately, warning that the power shift will erode democratic checks and balances and deepen political gridlock in the country. Protesters have repeatedly accused the ruling Pastef party of using the reforms to redirect executive authority away from the presidency and into the hands of the legislative branch controlled by Sonko.

    The ongoing rift within what was once a united reform movement has plunged Senegal into a period of heightened political uncertainty just two years after the coalition won power on a pledge to clean up corruption and revitalize the country’s economy. With both sides digging in on their positions, the upcoming referendum process is expected to further polarize the West African nation.

  • Congo bans gatherings in areas far from Ebola outbreak. Some say it limits dissent

    Congo bans gatherings in areas far from Ebola outbreak. Some say it limits dissent

    KINSHASA, DRC – A new government ban on public demonstrations and large-scale gatherings across four provinces of the Democratic Republic of Congo – none of which have recorded confirmed Ebola cases – has triggered fierce backlash from opposition politicians and civil society groups, who claim the public health measure is a thinly veiled attempt to stifle political dissent ahead of a planned anti-government protest.

  • Floods in Ghana and Ivory Coast leave at least 24 dead following torrential rains

    Floods in Ghana and Ivory Coast leave at least 24 dead following torrential rains

    ACCRA, Ghana – Days of unrelenting torrential rainfall have unleashed catastrophic flooding and deadly landslides across the capital cities of West African nations Ghana and Ivory Coast, leaving at least 24 people dead as emergency responders race to evacuate hundreds of trapped residents from waterlogged structures, national authorities confirmed Tuesday.

    In Ghana’s capital Accra and the adjacent industrial port city of Tema, the floodwaters swallowed entire buildings, swamped major roadways, and severed travel access to multiple hard-hit neighborhoods by Monday. The Ghana National Fire Service has recorded 12 confirmed fatalities in the country, including a mother and her young child who were swept away by rushing floodwaters in the densely populated Achimota-Agbogbloshie district, said service spokesperson Alex King Nartey in an interview with The Associated Press.

    Across the border in Ivory Coast, the sustained downpour has caused devastating flooding that killed more than a dozen people, the vast majority of whom lived in the Attécoubé and Yopougon municipalities of Ivorian economic capital Abidjan, stated Minister of National Cohesion Myss Belmonde Dogo. Local media reports confirm that at least nine of those fatalities were crushed under collapsed building rubble in Abidjan’s Mossikro neighborhood, after days of rain that first began saturating the region on Saturday.

    Footage circulating from Accra captures the urgent, community-led response to the disaster: local residents wade and swim through neck-deep floodwaters to pull trapped neighbors to safety, while dozens of vehicles sit abandoned on inundated roads that have become impassible. For emergency teams, reaching cut-off communities has presented a major logistical barrier that forced officials to request additional support from the country’s military, Nartey explained. As of Tuesday morning, dozens of residential neighborhoods remained partially submerged.

    Ghana’s National Disaster Management Organisation reported that emergency alert calls began flooding agency communications starting around 7 a.m. Monday, as alarmed residents realized rising waters were seeping into their homes. “The whole place was flooded. It’s alarming,” said Mariam Dongyela Millah, the agency’s deputy director of communications.

    Looking ahead, the Ghana Meteorological Agency has issued new warnings urging local residents to brace for additional heavy rainfall across Accra throughout the rest of the week.

    This disaster underscores a long-documented pattern of deadly extreme weather across much of Africa. Deadly seasonal flooding is a recurring hazard across many regions of the continent, which the World Meteorological Organization ranks as one of the globe’s most vulnerable regions to climate-driven extreme weather events – despite the fact that African nations contribute only a tiny fraction of global greenhouse gas emissions that drive climate change.

  • Cape Verde will beat Argentina 1-0 in World Cup clash, predicts president

    Cape Verde will beat Argentina 1-0 in World Cup clash, predicts president

    Cape Verde, the tiny Atlantic island archipelago making its first ever FIFA World Cup appearance, is gearing up for one of the biggest underdog stories in modern football history. Fresh off becoming the smallest nation ever to advance to the tournament’s knockout round, the country’s president José Maria Neves has boldly predicted that his side, nicknamed the Blue Sharks, will pull off a seismic upset against defending champions Argentina in their upcoming round of 32 clash.

    In an exclusive interview with the BBC conducted from Cape Verde’s capital Praia, Neves laid out his optimistic vision for Friday’s match, scheduled for 22:00 GMT in Miami. “I think Cape Verde can beat Argentina 1-0,” he stated. “We are playing to win… when expectations are low regarding a team, and if that team has the urge to win, anything is possible. A small nation like Cape Verde should always strive to do exactly that — to permanently surprise the world.”

    Neves’ confidence stems from Cape Verde’s already historic run through the group stage, a stretch of results that has cemented the Blue Sharks’ reputation as giant-killers before they even take the pitch against Lionel Messi’s side. The team opened their World Cup campaign with a stunning goalless draw against European powerhouse Spain, where 40-year-old veteran goalkeeper Vozinha delivered a player-of-the-match performance to shut down one of the world’s most dangerous attacks. They followed that up with an exciting 2-2 draw against two-time World Cup winners Uruguay, then secured their knockout spot with another goalless draw against Saudi Arabia on Saturday. Finishing as Group H runners-up behind Spain, who defeated Uruguay in the final group match, Cape Verde wrote a new chapter of World Cup history as the smallest nation ever to reach this stage of the tournament.

    The gap between the two sides on paper could not be wider. FIFA’s current world rankings place Argentina at the top of the global standings, while Cape Verde sits 63 spots below, ranked just 13th among African national teams. That gap means nothing to Neves, who says the Blue Sharks bring far more heart and determination to the pitch than their ranking suggests. “Our team has 100% faith, 100% hope, and they will leave every last drop of effort on the pitch. So, we have a 100% chance to win against Argentina,” he said.

    The president’s bullish outlook aligns with the mindset of the entire Cape Verde camp, echoing comments made by head coach Pedro Leitão Brito, widely known as Bubista, over the weekend. Standing before reporters draped in his country’s flag, Bubista declared “to us, nothing is impossible” after the team secured their knockout spot. The coach added that the team’s core mission extends far beyond results: “From the very beginning, we’ve said that one of our main goals was to show our country to the rest of the world. To be able to play Argentina and Messi at this stage of the World Cup is a win for our country, no matter what happens in the match itself.”

    For the players, the run already feels surreal. Midfielder Deroy Duarte called the experience “like being in a dream,” acknowledging that facing Argentina will be an enormous challenge but adding that the side remains fully focused on causing an upset: “It will be tough, but let’s believe. Anything is possible.”

    Even if the underdog run ends on Friday, Neves says there is no reason for disappointment, framing the entire tournament as a success for the small island nation. “There is no such thing as failure for us here,” he explained. “Regardless of the outcome, we will leave the World Cup with our heads held high, knowing we accomplished every mission we set out to achieve. We came to this tournament to write our own destiny, and that destiny starts with facing the best champions in the game.”

    Cape Verde fans across the globe have already celebrated the team’s historic run, with many describing the Blue Sharks’ progression to the knockout stage as nothing short of a miracle. As kickoff approaches, the entire football world will be watching to see if the smallest underdog in the tournament can pull off the biggest upset in World Cup knockout history.