标签: Africa

非洲

  • Africa’s Ebola outbreak public health emergency of int’l concern: WHO

    Africa’s Ebola outbreak public health emergency of int’l concern: WHO

    GENEVA – In an official announcement posted to its website Sunday, the World Health Organization (WHO) has formally designated the ongoing Ebola outbreak driven by the Bundibugyo virus across the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Uganda as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), stopping short of classifying the event as a full pandemic emergency.

    The latest epidemiological data published by the WHO, updated through May 16, 2026, paints a preliminary but concerning picture of the outbreak’s spread. In the DRC’s northeastern Ituri Province, health authorities have recorded eight confirmed Ebola cases, 246 suspected cases, and 80 reported deaths among suspected patients. One additional confirmed case has been detected in Kinshasa, the DRC’s capital, marking the virus’s reach into a major urban center far from the original outbreak zone. Neighboring Uganda has also confirmed two cases of Ebola traced back to importation from the DRC, both detected in the Ugandan capital Kampala. To date, researchers have found no clear epidemiological connection between the two Ugandan cases, adding to uncertainties around transmission dynamics.

    Among the most alarming early developments is the death of at least four frontline healthcare workers who treated Ebola patients in affected regions. These fatalities have amplified experts’ concerns about ongoing nosocomial, or hospital-based, transmission of the virus, a risk that can quickly overwhelm under-resourced local health systems.

    The WHO emphasized that large gaps remain in understanding the full scope of the outbreak. Significant uncertainty surrounds the actual total number of infections, the full geographic range of virus circulation, and the transmission links connecting confirmed and suspected cases. Compounding these challenges is the absence of any globally approved, targeted therapeutics or vaccines specifically designed to protect against or treat infection with the Bundibugyo strain of Ebola.

    To coordinate a unified global response, the WHO announced it will convene an independent Emergency Committee in the near term to develop evidence-based guidance for response measures for affected nations and the international public health community.

    WHO officials warn that early indicators suggest the outbreak is far larger than current detected and reported case counts indicate. Key red flags include a high positivity rate among initial patient samples, the confirmation of cases in two capital cities (Kinshasa and Kampala), and a steady upward trend in both suspected cases and deaths across Ituri Province. Multiple structural factors are amplifying the risk of widespread spread: persistent insecurity in affected regions that disrupts outbreak surveillance and response, an ongoing humanitarian crisis that has left millions of vulnerable people without access to adequate health care, high cross-border and internal population mobility, the location of current outbreak hotspots in urban and semi-urban areas, and an extensive network of unregulated informal health care facilities that lack infection control infrastructure.

  • How worrying is the Ebola outbreak in DR Congo?

    How worrying is the Ebola outbreak in DR Congo?

    An evolving Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has triggered urgent global concern, after weeks of undetected spread in a conflict-ravaged region that complicates containment efforts. Health officials warn that this outbreak, driven by the rare Bundibugyo Ebola species, carries unique challenges that put the global public health community at a critical turning point.

    As of current reporting, nearly 250 suspected cases and 80 confirmed deaths have been recorded, with significant uncertainty around the true scope of transmission due to the late detection of the outbreak. The World Health Organization has designated the event a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) — a designation that does not predict a COVID-19-style global pandemic, but signals the complexity of the situation requires coordinated cross-border action.

    “The overall global risk posed by this Ebola outbreak remains extremely low,” experts emphasize, echoing a reality seen even during the 2014-2016 West African disaster, the largest Ebola outbreak on record that infected more than 28,600 people and killed over 11,000, which only resulted in three cases in the United Kingdom, all among volunteer healthcare workers. But for the affected region and global public health, the stakes remain high.

    Unlike more common Ebola strains that have proven vaccines and targeted treatments, Bundibugyo Ebola has only caused two prior outbreaks, recorded in 2007 and 2012, with mortality rates ranging between 30% and 50% of those infected. No vaccines or antiviral therapies have been formally approved for this specific strain, though a small number of experimental candidates are available. Even diagnostic testing for Bundibugyo is unreliable: initial test results for this outbreak returned negative for Ebola, requiring advanced laboratory analysis to confirm the rare strain was responsible.

    Prof Trudie Lang, an expert from the University of Oxford, describes Bundibugyo as “one of the most significant concerns” of the current response. Ebola, a zoonotic disease that originates in wild animal populations (primarily fruit bats), spreads to humans through close contact with infected animals, then passes between people via exposure to infected bodily fluids, most often after symptoms develop.

    Symptoms of Ebola emerge between 2 and 21 days after infection, beginning with flu-like indicators including fever, headache and fatigue, before progressing to severe vomiting, diarrhea, organ failure, and in some cases internal and external bleeding. Without approved targeted treatments for Bundibugyo, care relies on optimized supportive care — managing pain, secondary infections, fluid balance and nutrition — with early intervention dramatically improving survival odds.

    The delayed detection of this outbreak is among the most worrying factors. The first confirmed case, a nurse, developed symptoms on April 24, but it took three weeks to confirm an Ebola outbreak was underway. “Ongoing transmission has occurred for several weeks, and the outbreak has been detected very late, which is concerning,” explained Dr Anne Cori of Imperial College London. This delay has put response teams at a disadvantage, with the World Health Organization noting the true number of infections is likely far higher than current reported figures.

    Containment efforts are further complicated by the chaotic context of the outbreak zone: the eastern region of DRC has been torn by ongoing civil conflict, displacing more than 250,000 people from their homes. Most affected communities are located in mobile mining towns, where transient populations move frequently between local communities and across national borders, amplifying the risk of wider spread.

    Despite these steep challenges, experts note that the DRC has accumulated extensive experience responding to repeated Ebola outbreaks over the past two decades. Dr Daniela Manno, a researcher at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, points out that the national and international response capacity is “significantly stronger today than it was a decade ago,” ahead of the 2014 West African outbreak.

    Core containment strategies focus on rapid identification of infected cases, contact tracing to stop chains of transmission, preventing spread within healthcare facilities where patients are most contagious, and conducting safe burials for victims, as deceased bodies remain highly infectious. The trajectory of the outbreak — whether it is quickly contained or spirals into a large-scale disaster like the 2014-2016 event — will depend entirely on the speed and effectiveness of the current response.

  • Trump administration promote program to check voter eligibility. Critics fear a midterm purge

    Trump administration promote program to check voter eligibility. Critics fear a midterm purge

    TOPEKA, Kan. — A controversial mass voter eligibility verification initiative launched by the Trump administration is raising alarms among voting rights advocates, who warn the program could wrongfully remove thousands of legitimate voters from registration rolls ahead of the nation’s November general election, even as Democratic opponents challenge the policy in federal court.

    Since the Trump administration dramatically expanded the search capabilities of the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE), a program originally designed to block noncitizens from accessing public benefits, at least 25 states have run more than 67 million voter registrations through the national Department of Homeland Security database for citizenship status checks, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), a DHS division that manages the system. The vast majority of these checks have taken place in states under Republican leadership. To date, tens of thousands of registrations have been flagged as potential noncitizens or deceased individuals, with strict timelines that often leave eligible voters little room to correct errors.

    The national-level scanning of state voter rolls is the centerpiece of a broader Trump administration push to federalize key election oversight functions and advance the president’s longstanding claim that widespread noncitizen voting undermines U.S. election integrity. Despite repeated independent studies confirming that noncitizen voting is extremely rare across the country, the administration has pressured states to participate in the mass verification program, with the Department of Justice filing lawsuits against states that have refused to turn over unredacted voter data for screening.

    Civil rights and voting rights advocates warn the SAVE system is riddled with inaccuracies from outdated and incomplete data, leading to frequent false positive flags that target fully eligible U.S. citizens. At least six federal lawsuits have already been filed by advocacy groups against the Trump administration and participating states, arguing the program creates an unnecessary risk of mass disenfranchisement.

    Anthony Nel, a 29-year-old college administrator in Denton, Texas, is one such case of wrongful flagging. Nel moved to the U.S. from South Africa with his parents at age 8, gained automatic citizenship when his parents naturalized when he was 16, and has voted regularly since turning 18. When Texas ran its voter rolls through SAVE last fall, Nel was flagged as a potential noncitizen while he waited for a replacement for his expired passport. He missed the 30-day deadline to provide proof of citizenship, and his registration was temporarily canceled before he could resolve the error. He is now a lead plaintiff in a federal lawsuit challenging the program.

    “ It’s clear that this process that they’ve put into place for this doesn’t work,” Nel said in an interview. “You expect the system to know I’m a citizen, but instead I’m treated like an imposter until I prove otherwise.”

    Another high-profile error came in Dallas, where Domingo Garcia, a 68-year-old voting rights activist and lawyer who has voted regularly for 50 years, had his registration abruptly canceled with no explanation. Garcia suspects he was incorrectly flagged as deceased, a common error in incomplete state and federal datasets.

    USCIS officials defend the program, saying in an emailed statement that the agency is “committed to helping eliminate voter fraud” to rebuild public trust in U.S. elections. Kansas Republican Secretary of State Scott Schwab, who once publicly questioned whether noncitizen voting posed a meaningful fraud threat, now calls SAVE “one of the most important tools states have to verify voter information.”

    To date, screening of 60 million registrations has identified roughly 24,000 potential noncitizens, plus another 350,000 potential deceased registrants, according to USCIS data. A separate check of 7.4 million registrations in North Carolina, where Republicans control the state election board, identified an additional 34,000 potentially deceased voters. Even if every flagged registration was confirmed ineligible, the total would amount to less than 1% of all registrations screened: roughly 400 potential noncitizens per 1 million registrations checked.

    Republican officials argue the SAVE program is only intended as a first screening step, not a final determination, and that further review is required before any registration is canceled. Procedures for handling flagged voters vary widely by state, however. Some states give voters just 30 days to prove their eligibility, while others require immediate suspension of registration once a flag is issued. In Kansas, flagged voters are still allowed to cast a ballot, but their vote is set aside and may not be counted until the case is resolved. Ohio’s new law requires election boards to promptly cancel any registration flagged as noncitizen during mandatory monthly SAVE checks, leaving voters to retroactively restore their registration if they want to participate.

    Ohio Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose says the policy poses no threat to voting rights, noting “all they need to do to immediately restore their registration status is show proof of citizenship.” But Freda Levenson, an ACLU Ohio attorney challenging the state’s law, calls the approach “shoot first and ask questions later.”

    “If a voter is wrongly removed, by the time they learn about it and correct it, they may miss their opportunity to vote in that election,” Levenson said. Critics note that even when voters ultimately correct errors, the uncertainty and administrative burden created by the program can lead to lower turnout among affected groups, particularly naturalized citizens who may face longer wait times for replacement citizenship documentation.

  • WHO declares global health emergency over Ebola outbreak in Congo and Uganda

    WHO declares global health emergency over Ebola outbreak in Congo and Uganda

    On Sunday, World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus issued the highest global alert level for an ongoing Ebola outbreak spanning the Democratic Republic of the Congo and neighboring Uganda, following a surge in suspected infections that has already claimed 88 lives. As of the latest official count, more than 300 suspected cases have been documented across the two East-Central African nations.

    In a public update posted to the social platform X, the WHO moved quickly to clarify that the outbreak does not qualify for a pandemic-level classification on par with the COVID-19 crisis, and explicitly recommended against nations closing international borders to contain the spread.

    Ebola is a severe, highly contagious viral disease that spreads through direct contact with infected bodily fluids, including blood, vomit and semen. While outbreaks of the disease remain relatively rare, infections frequently result in death for affected patients. What makes the current crisis particularly challenging for global health authorities is that it is driven by the Bundibugyo variant — a rare strain of Ebola for which no approved vaccines or targeted treatments currently exist.

    According to WHO data, the overwhelming majority of cases are concentrated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, with only two confirmed cases detected across the border in Uganda. The outbreak was first officially reported last Friday, originating in the DRC’s eastern Ituri Province, a border region adjacent to both Uganda and South Sudan. By the following day, the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention had logged 336 suspected cases and 87 confirmed deaths.

    Ugandan health authorities confirmed their first imported case from the DRC on Saturday; that patient later died in a Kampala hospital, and a second case was shortly after confirmed in the capital. WHO officials noted that the two Ugandan cases have no known epidemiological links to one another, and both patients had recently traveled from the DRC.

    Tedros acknowledged deep uncertainties surrounding the full scope of the crisis, telling reporters: “There are significant uncertainties to the true number of infected persons and geographic spread associated with this event at the present time. In addition, there is limited understanding of the epidemiological links with known or suspected cases.”

    This is only the third documented outbreak of the Bundibugyo variant in recorded history. The strain was first identified during a 2007-2008 outbreak in Uganda’s Bundibugyo District, which infected 149 people and killed 37. The second outbreak occurred in 2012 in Isiro, DRC, where 57 cases were reported and 29 people died from the infection. More than 20 Ebola outbreaks of various strains have occurred across the DRC and Uganda in modern history.

    The WHO’s declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, or PHEIC, is formally intended to accelerate international action and mobilize funding, supplies and coordination from donor nations and global aid agencies. But the move has drawn scrutiny amid a mixed track record for past emergency declarations. When the organization declared mpox outbreaks across the DRC and other African nations a global PHEIC in 2024, public health experts criticized the global response for failing to rapidly deliver critical supplies including diagnostic tests, therapeutics and vaccines to affected regions.

  • Ngannou tells Jones to exit UFC contract after quick KO

    Ngannou tells Jones to exit UFC contract after quick KO

    The landscape of mixed martial arts reached a potential turning point this weekend, as one of the sport’s most recognizable heavyweights delivered a devastating reminder of his dominance on the first MMA card ever broadcast live on Netflix.

    Headlining the undercard for the highly anticipated Ronda Rousey-Gina Carano main event at Los Angeles’ Intuit Dome, Francis Ngannou, the 39-year-old Cameroonian powerhouse, lived up to his billing with a clinical first-round knockout of Brazil’s Philipe Lins. Staged by Most Valuable Promotions, the event marked a landmark moment for MMA, opening the door for a potential challenge to the UFC’s long-standing dominance of the sport if regular streamed events continue under the new model.

    Ngannou, who left the UFC as the promotion’s reigning heavyweight champion in 2023, came into the bout with a eight-fight winning streak, seven of which ended in knockout. He made short work of Lins, who was returning to the heavyweight division after three years competing at light-heavyweight and entered the contest 30 pounds lighter than Ngannou. From the opening bell, Ngannou imposed his will, landing a thudding early leg kick before wearing down his opponent with his signature heavy strikes. As the first round wound down, Lins made a desperate, wild swing, and Ngannou capitalized with a flush, fight-ending left hook that dropped his opponent instantly. Confident the contest was over, Ngannou chose not to follow Lins to the canvas to add further damage, standing over his fallen opponent as the referee stopped the fight.

    The win improves Ngannou’s professional MMA record to 19 wins against just 3 losses, and he used his post-fight interview to push for the biggest bout in the sport: a matchup against former UFC legend Jon Jones, who worked as part of Netflix’s broadcast team for the event. Calling Jones one of the greatest MMA fighters of all time, Ngannou said the fight must happen before both athletes retire, adding a jab that Jones still has room to learn from Ngannou’s business acumen.

    Jones, who retired from active competition in 2025, has expressed enthusiasm for the bout, but significant obstacles stand in the way of the matchup becoming reality. Jones remains bound by his contract with the UFC, and the long-standing frosty relationship between UFC leadership and Ngannou means a sanctioned bout under the promotion’s banner is off the table. Jones noted that the only path forward would be to finalize his exit from his UFC contract and stage the event through Most Valuable Promotions, adding: “If this fight is going to happen, I don’t think Dana [White] is going to do any business with Francis [Ngannou], so doing it with MVP is the only way.”

    Despite the UFC crowning two new heavyweight champions since Ngannou’s departure, a large segment of MMA fans and analysts still recognize Ngannou as the best heavyweight in the world, making his signing with MVP a major breakthrough for the upstart promotion. After the bout, Ngannou doubled down on his claim to the throne, saying: “If someone doesn’t remember who I am, they must have amnesia or something because I made a statement here tonight again.”

    The card’s co-feature, billed by fans as the “people’s main event”, delivered a similarly action-packed result, as American welterweight Mike Perry defeated fan favorite Nate Diaz when the bout was stopped at the end of the second round. Perry dominated the contest from start to finish, landing a barrage of punches, knees and elbows that opened a deep cut above Diaz’s eye, leaving the veteran unable to see as blood poured down his face. The ringside doctor determined Diaz could not continue, bringing the fight to a premature end.

    Diaz, 41, a cult hero among MMA fans for his 15-year UFC career and rebellious persona, ended his tenure with the promotion in 2022 after submitting Tony Ferguson, and spent the intervening years testing the waters in professional boxing. He returned to MMA for the bout seeking high-profile matchups, but was hindered by an early injury. “I think I broke my finger in the first two seconds, and I spent too much time worrying about that rather than focusing on the animal that I am,” Diaz said after the fight, acknowledging the referee’s stoppage was the correct call. “I had blood in my eye. I couldn’t see anything, I wasn’t going to do anything but next time he’s not going to be able to do anything.”

  • WHO declares Ebola outbreak in DR Congo a global health emergency

    WHO declares Ebola outbreak in DR Congo a global health emergency

    The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued its highest-level alert for the ongoing Ebola outbreak spreading across eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), classifying the event as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). As of the latest official update, the outbreak — which is caused by the rare Bundibugyo Ebola strain — has recorded roughly 246 suspected cases and 80 confirmed deaths across the region, though global health officials stress that the event does not rise to the level of a pandemic emergency.\n\nIn an official statement, WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus highlighted critical gaps in current outbreak data, noting that “significant uncertainties remain around the true size of the infected population and the full geographic scope of the virus’s spread.” Unlike more common Ebola strains, for which multiple approved vaccines and antiviral treatments exist, there are currently no licensed medical countermeasures for the Bundibugyo strain, raising additional concerns for frontline response teams.\n\nTo date, eight cases have been definitively confirmed through laboratory testing. Infections and suspected deaths have been recorded across three high-risk health zones: Bunia, the provincial capital of Ituri; Mongwalu, a major gold-mining hub; and Rwampara, another mining-focused town. Alarmingly, the virus has already crossed international borders, with two confirmed cases detected in neighboring Uganda. Ugandan health authorities confirmed that one of those cases, a 59-year-old man, died from the virus earlier this week.\n\nThe WHO warns that all countries sharing a border with the DRC face elevated risk of further spread, driven by high volumes of cross-border population movement, routine trade activity, and regular travel between affected and unaffected regions. In response to the outbreak, the global health body has issued a series of formal guidance for affected and at-risk nations. It has called on the DRC and Uganda to immediately activate emergency operations centers, tasked with scaling up case monitoring, contact tracing, and evidence-based infection prevention protocols. To curb transmission, the WHO recommends that all confirmed cases be isolated immediately and receive clinical care until two consecutive Bundibugyo-specific PCR tests, collected at least 48 hours apart, return negative results.\n\nFor neighboring countries that have not yet recorded cases, the WHO advises strengthening routine disease surveillance and improving real-time public health reporting to detect imported cases early. The agency has also pushed back against overly restrictive public health measures, emphasizing that countries outside the affected region have no scientific justification for closing borders or imposing broad bans on travel and trade, noting that such actions are typically driven by public fear rather than data.\n\nFirst identified in 1976 in what is now the DRC, Ebola is a zoonotic virus believed to originate in bat populations, and this current event marks the 17th Ebola outbreak the country has faced since the virus was first discovered. The pathogen spreads through direct contact with infected bodily fluids or broken skin, and causes progressive illness that often leads to severe internal bleeding and multiple organ failure. Early, non-specific symptoms include fever, muscle aches, extreme fatigue, headache, and sore throat, which quickly progress to vomiting, diarrhea, widespread rash, and abnormal bleeding. The WHO reports that the average global fatality rate for Ebola sits around 50%, and no universal curative treatment has been fully validated for all strains to date.\n\nThe Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) has previously echoed the WHO’s concern over the outbreak’s trajectory, pointing to multiple elevated risk factors that could drive rapid spread. These include the presence of transmission in densely populated urban areas of Rwampara and Bunia, as well as informal, mobile workforces in Mongwalu’s gold mining sector that make contact tracing extremely challenging. Africa CDC Executive Director Dr Jean Kaseya emphasized that large-scale cross-border population movement between affected DRC regions and neighboring countries means coordinated regional action is non-negotiable to contain the outbreak.\n\nOver the past 50 years since Ebola was first discovered, approximately 15,000 people across African nations have died from the virus. The DRC’s deadliest Ebola outbreak on record occurred between 2018 and 2020, when nearly 2,300 people lost their lives to the disease. Just last year, another smaller outbreak in a remote DRC region killed 45 people before it was fully contained.

  • Rwandan genocide suspect Kabuga dies in custody in The Hague at age 91

    Rwandan genocide suspect Kabuga dies in custody in The Hague at age 91

    THE HAGUE, Netherlands — Nearly 30 years after one of the worst mass atrocities of the 20th century, the key Rwandan genocide suspect Félicien Kabuga has died in UN custody while being treated at a hospital in The Hague, the United Nations’ judicial body confirmed Saturday. He was 91.

    Kabuga, one of the most high-profile figures accused of orchestrating the 1994 Rwandan genocide, faced charges including genocide, incitement to genocide, conspiracy to commit genocide, extermination, murder, and persecution. He long maintained a not guilty plea to all counts, and never lived to see a final ruling on the accusations against him.

    The 1994 Rwandan genocide was sparked after the downing of a plane carrying then-Rwandan President Juvénal Habyarimana, an ethnic Hutu, over the capital Kigali on April 6 that year. Kabuga had close personal ties to the Habyarimana administration — his daughter is married to the late president’s son — and prosecutors alleged he used his wealth and influence to fund and incite the 100-day campaign of violence that killed an estimated 800,000 mostly Tutsi people.

    For decades, Kabuga evaded capture after the genocide ended. A global arrest warrant was issued for him in 2013, paired with a $5 million reward for information leading to his arrest. He was finally taken into custody in France in 2020, and his long-awaited trial before the UN International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (IRMCT) got underway in 2022.

    The trial process ground to a halt in 2023, when IRMCT judges ruled Kabuga was unfit to continue proceedings due to a diagnosis of advanced dementia. The court outlined a revised process that would allow evidence to be presented to establish the facts of the case, but ruled out the possibility of a criminal conviction or sentencing if he was found responsible. Following the ruling, Kabuga remained in UN detention while diplomats negotiated over a potential transfer to a third country that would accept him for provisional release; Rwanda had offered to take him back, but his legal team stated Kabuga refused repatriation over fears of mistreatment.

    The court’s decision to halt the trial triggered widespread anger among Rwandan genocide survivors, who argued that Kabuga’s alleged role in the mass killings demanded a full trial and the maximum possible penalty, which would have been life imprisonment if he was convicted.

    In its official statement Saturday, the IRMCT confirmed that Kabuga died while receiving hospital care in The Hague, and that the medical unit of the UN Detention Unit was notified immediately of his death. An official investigation has been launched to document and clarify the full circumstances surrounding his death, the mechanism added.

  • What to know about joint US-Nigeria operation that killed a senior militant leader

    What to know about joint US-Nigeria operation that killed a senior militant leader

    In a landmark counterterrorism strike that marks a sharp escalation in military cooperation between the United States and Nigeria, a top-tier Islamic State commander has been killed in a targeted early-morning operation in Nigeria’s restive northeastern region, former U.S. President Donald Trump and Nigerian military officials have confirmed.

    The operation, carried out in the early hours of Saturday in the Lake Chad Basin — a long-held militant stronghold where the Boko Haram insurgency and its offshoot, the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), have waged a deadly uprising for over 15 years — targeted Abu Bakr al-Mainuki, a founding senior leader of ISWAP who climbed the ranks to become one of the highest-profile global terrorists in the Islamic State network.

    Born in 1982 in the village of Mainok in Nigeria’s Borno State, the epicenter of the region’s decade-long insurgency, al-Mainuki rose to prominence after ISWAP split from the original Boko Haram faction in 2016. He served as deputy to former ISWAP leader Abu Musab al-Barnawi, who was reported killed in 2021, and oversaw three critical pillars of the group’s activities: operational planning, media outreach, financial networks, and weapons development. The U.S. State Department officially designated al-Mainuki as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist in 2023, and both Trump and Nigerian military officials confirm he had recently been appointed to the role of Head of the General Directorate of States, placing him second-in-command within the global Islamic State hierarchy. This claim has been met with skepticism from some independent security analysts, however.

    Nigerian government and military officials have emphasized that the successful strike was only possible through a newly revitalized bilateral security partnership with the U.S. The collaboration comes after relations between the two nations hit a historic low last year, when Trump publicly accused Nigeria’s government of overseeing a “Christian genocide” — a claim Nigerian authorities repeatedly and firmly denied. After months of diplomatic engagement to repair ties, military cooperation resumed: the U.S. deployed additional troops to Nigeria in February, following a U.S. airstrike targeting IS positions in December 2023. While U.S. troops have long been limited to advisory and training roles in Nigeria, analysts note this joint operational strike signals a new, more active phase of partnership.

    The Lake Chad Basin, a resource-rich region spanning four countries, has long been a safe haven for extremist groups, whose dense forests and remote cross-border terrain provide ideal cover to avoid military detection. Groups operating in the area fund their violent activities through illegal taxation of local communities, and Nigerian security forces have long struggled with critical capability gaps to effectively root out insurgents in the hard-to-access region. “This would demonstrate to militants that American-Nigerian counterterrorism cooperation has really picked up,” explained Bulama Burkati, a leading security analyst focused on sub-Saharan Africa. “We know the Nigerian forces lack the basic capacity to fight violent extremist groups, especially in places like the Lake Chad region, which is densely forested.”

    Analysts widely frame al-Mainuki’s death as a historic turning point for Nigeria’s 15-year counterinsurgency campaign. He is the most senior militant leader ever killed by Nigerian security forces; previously, most top extremist figures died as a result of internal factional fighting between competing militant groups. While the targeted strike is expected to significantly disrupt ISWAP’s operations across West Africa in the short term, by upending the group’s financial networks, recruitment pipelines, and attack planning, analysts warn that sustained precision operations will be required to cement long-term gains.

    Nigeria continues to grapple with a sprawling, multifaceted security crisis that has reshaped life across much of the country’s north. Beyond jihadi insurgent groups including Boko Haram, ISWAP, and the newer Lakurawa network, the country also faces a surge in organised criminal activity centered on kidnapping for ransom. Since the Boko Haram insurgency first began in 2009, United Nations data confirms more than tens of thousands of people have been killed in attacks, and millions more have been displaced from their homes across the country.

  • SA clubs could withdraw from European competitions

    SA clubs could withdraw from European competitions

    South Africa’s national rugby governing body is set to launch a wide-ranging review of its national teams’ competitive calendar, a process that could reshape both domestic and international rugby schedules across the continent and Europe. The South African Rugby Union (Saru) confirmed it will hold a formal strategic planning session before the end of July to evaluate current scheduling arrangements. While officials note that it is too early to confirm any concrete changes, one of the most significant outcomes under discussion is the potential withdrawal of South Africa’s top professional club sides from the European Rugby Champions Cup and EPCR Challenge Cup.

    Under the current structure, elite South African rugby players face a grueling 12-month competitive season. Since 2020, the country’s four top professional clubs — the Stormers, Bulls, Sharks and Lions — have competed in the United Rugby Championship (URC), a cross-continental league that runs from September through June each year. After wrapping up their URC commitments, elite players who represent the South African national side, the Springboks, enter the annual Rugby Championship — the southern hemisphere’s flagship international tournament held in July and August — leaving little to no time for rest and recovery. Only a small number of Springboks, who play their club rugby in Japan, avoid this packed annual schedule.

    Saru made clear in an official statement that the review was launched to address growing calls for a balanced calendar that protects both player welfare and competitive team performance. “The views of all internal stakeholders will be canvassed and workshopped on the domestic and international playing calendar for South African players,” the statement added.

    South African rugby’s shift into Northern Hemisphere-focused club competition is a relatively recent change. For more than two decades after the founding of Super Rugby in 1996, South African sides competed exclusively in the southern hemisphere-based domestic competition. But Saru officials long pushed for a move to European competitions, citing more aligned time zones that reduce cross-continental travel burdens, and the shift to the URC was completed in 2020. Two years later, South African teams gained entry to the Champions and Challenge Cups, European club rugby’s top two competitions.

    The integration of South African sides into the URC has been widely viewed as a success for both the league and the South African franchises. The Stormers won the URC title in their first full season in the league in 2022, while the Bulls have reached three of the last four tournament finals. All four South African sides are now permanent shareholders in the URC, with league chief executive Martin Anayi confirming in 2025 that the addition of South African teams has been overwhelmingly positive for the competition.

    However, South African participation in the Champions Cup has been far more problematic, both on and off the pitch. While the Sharks claimed the Challenge Cup title in 2024, no South African side has advanced past the quarter-final stage of the top-tier Champions Cup. Constant logistical and travel challenges between South Africa and Europe have also created persistent disruptions for both South African teams and their European opponents.

    The Saru review comes at a time of widespread uncertainty across European club rugby, with multiple major competitions set for potential restructuring. European rugby bosses are already weighing a major overhaul of the Champions Cup, with one leading proposal cutting the tournament field to around 16 teams and holding the entire competition in a single block at the end of the regular season. The long-term structure of the URC is also unresolved, as the Welsh Rugby Union plans to reduce its number of professional franchises from four to three, a shift that will alter the league’s makeup.

    Currently, South Africa’s EPCR shareholder agreement is locked in through 2030, though Saru notes that changes would be possible if all relevant stakeholders reach a consensus. “Should consensus be reached on a potential revision of the calendar, any contractual or constitutional requirements to affect such a revision will be observed,” the Saru statement said.

    If South African sides do withdraw from European club competitions, one widely discussed alternative is expanding and strengthening the country’s historic domestic competition, the Currie Cup, which was first launched in 1891 and remains a beloved part of South African rugby’s sporting identity.

  • Congolese report constant burials as deaths in new Ebola outbreak reach 80

    Congolese report constant burials as deaths in new Ebola outbreak reach 80

    A new Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s eastern Ituri Province has claimed at least 80 lives, pushing public health authorities into a race against time to scale up border screenings, contact tracing and outbreak containment measures as of Saturday, local officials confirmed.

    Authorities first publicly declared the emergency on Friday, when they initially reported 65 fatalities and 246 suspected cases across affected areas of the province. As of Friday evening, Congolese Health Minister Samuel-Roger Kamba confirmed that eight cases had received positive laboratory confirmation, four of which have resulted in death. Genomic sequencing has identified the pathogen as the Bundibugyo strain, a less common Ebola variant that has not been the primary cause of past large-scale outbreaks in the country. This event marks the 17th Ebola outbreak the country has grappled with since the disease was first detected in Congolese territory in 1976.

    Ebola is an extremely contagious viral pathogen that spreads through direct contact with infected bodily fluids including blood, vomit, and semen. While the disease is classified as rare, it causes severe, acute illness that carries a high fatality rate for most infected patients.

    According to Minister Kamba, health investigators believe the suspected index case, or first patient to trigger the outbreak, was a nurse who died at a Bunia hospital three weeks prior, on April 24. Kamba noted the patient showed classic Ebola symptoms, though he did not confirm whether the nurse’s samples were tested for the virus.

    Local residents in Bunia, the capital of Ituri Province, described a growing climate of fear to Associated Press journalists on the ground, as communities face repeated burials of suspected Ebola victims. “Every day, people are dying … and this has been going on for about a week. In a single day, we bury two, three, or even more people,” said Jean Marc Asimwe, a long-time Bunia resident. “At this point, we don’t really know what kind of disease it is,” Asimwe added.

    The outbreak has already crossed Congo’s northern border, with Ugandan health authorities confirming an imported Ebola case from Congo on Friday. The infected patient died at Kampala’s Kibuli Muslim Hospital on May 14. The Uganda Ministry of Health later confirmed the patient’s remains were returned to Congo for burial, and no secondary locally transmitted cases have been detected in the country to date. As of Saturday, routine health screenings have been activated at the entrance of Kibuli Muslim Hospital to prevent further transmission.

    The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention has issued a statement warning of high risk of further cross-border spread, due to the close proximity of affected Congolese areas to both Uganda and South Sudan. Some regional neighbors have already activated emergency preparedness measures: Kenya, a neighbor of Uganda, announced Saturday that it assesses the current risk of Ebola importation as moderate, driven by frequent regional travel and cross-border movement. In response, the Kenyan government has convened a dedicated Ebola preparedness task force and boosted public health surveillance at all border entry points.

    For many Ugandans, the new outbreak has stirred painful memories of past public health emergencies. “I really get scared because I remember burying my father without looking at his body during the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Kampala resident Ismail Kigongo.

    While the DRC has decades of experience responding to and containing Ebola outbreaks, the response to this latest emergency faces steep structural challenges. The country is the second largest on the African continent by land area, with vast distances between provinces that are frequently disrupted by ongoing armed conflict. Ituri Province, where the outbreak is concentrated, sits roughly 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) from the national capital Kinshasa, and has been ravaged by years of violence from insurgents affiliated with the Islamic State group.

    To date, the outbreak has been confirmed in three Ituri health zones: Bunia, Rwampara, and Mongwalu, with the bulk of cases concentrated in the latter two areas. The National Institute of Biomedical Research has only been able to process 13 blood samples from suspected cases, according to Kamba; eight returned positive for the Bundibugyo strain, while the remaining five could not be analyzed due to insufficient sample volume.

    Despite the growing death toll, daily life in central Bunia remained largely unchanged as of Friday, with businesses open and public activity continuing as normal. Local resident Adeline Awekonimungu called on national authorities to prioritize a rapid, coordinated response. “My recommendation is that the government take this matter seriously and that it takes charge of the hospitals so that this matter can be brought under control,” she said.

    Reporting for this article included contributions from Associated Press journalists Chinedu Asadu based in Abuja, Nigeria; Patrick Onen in Kampala, Uganda; and Evelyne Musambi in Nairobi, Kenya.