分类： world

As Ukraine faces a shifting dynamic in its 3-year full-scale war with Russia, its top military commander Oleksandr Syrsky finds himself on the brink of dismissal, with multiple Ukrainian and international outlets reporting that President Volodymyr Zelensky is actively considering his removal. The 60-year-old Soviet-trained officer has long been a polarizing figure in Kyiv’s military and political circles, celebrated for landmark early victories but mired in conflict with reformers pushing to modernize Ukraine’s armed forces for an era of drone-driven high-tech warfare.

Syrsky’s military career in Ukraine stretches back to the collapse of the Soviet Union. Born in what was then Soviet Russia and educated at a Moscow Red Army academy, he relocated to Soviet Ukraine in the 1980s, stayed on after the USSR dissolved to attend Kyiv’s National Defence University, and built a decades-long career in the newly formed Ukrainian military. He rose to national prominence immediately following Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022, when he led the successful defense of Kyiv that halted Russian forces’ advance on the capital, a turning point that prevented the fall of the Ukrainian government. He followed that success with a swift, devastating 2022 counteroffensive that reclaimed large swathes of the northeastern Kharkiv region, and earlier this year masterminded Ukraine’s brazen incursion into Russia’s Kursk region—the first sustained foreign territorial incursion into Russia since World War II.

Despite these clear military wins, Syrsky has never been able to escape criticism rooted in his Soviet military background and approach to command. Detractors label him a Soviet-style commander who prioritizes territorial gains over troop casualty counts, earning him the derogatory nickname “the butcher.” His management style has also drawn sharp rebuke from military reformers, who argue he stifles initiative among lower-ranking officers and only promotes personally loyal commanders, blocking efforts to update Ukraine’s outdated military systems.

The most high-profile attack on Syrsky came from recently ousted reformist Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov, who was removed by Zelensky in a move that triggered the largest war-related public protests in Ukraine since 2022. Protesters in Kyiv chanted “Shame on Syrsky” and joined calls for his dismissal, as growing public fatigue with the war and anger over military corruption scandals has turned public opinion against the commander. In blistering comments after his removal, Fedorov accused Syrsky of systematically blocking his modernization reforms across key areas including military procurement, equipment standardization, and mobilization policy, adding that Syrsky refused to address these challenges openly.

Syrsky has forcefully rejected these accusations, urging that internal disputes be resolved privately rather than through public spectacle. “A war is won by real work, not by the public drama surrounding it,” he stated in a rare public comment released earlier this week. He has also repeatedly emphasized that he holds no political ambitions, noting that his sole focus is on the 24/7 work of leading Ukraine’s military.

That lack of political ambition is precisely what made Syrsky an appealing choice for Zelensky when he replaced the wildly popular former commander-in-chief Valery Zaluzhny last year. Analysts note that Zelensky has long been wary of military figures with broad public support and independent political cachet, a risk Syrsky does not pose. “He is not a politician. Just look at him. He speaks Ukrainian poorly and is not a public communicator,” explained Anatolii Oktysiuk, an analyst with the Kyiv-based KI Research Group. “He always adapts to what Zelensky wants.”

Syrsky’s Russian roots have also become a frequent target of online criticism and mockery, even though he has been cut off from his remaining family in Russia for years. When he led the Kursk incursion earlier this year, a viral internet meme joked that the attack was motivated by Syrsky wanting to “go home,” a jab at his birthplace that underscored lingering public suspicion about his background.

Even his sharpest critics, including Fedorov, acknowledge that Syrsky’s contributions to Ukraine’s war effort cannot be discounted. The question now facing Zelensky is what comes next if Syrsky is removed, a decision that is being closely watched by military and political observers both in Ukraine and in Moscow. Political analyst Volodymyr Fesenko argues that Zelensky is ultimately seeking a more palatable version of Syrsky: a commander who remains loyal, lacks independent political ambitions, but is more flexible on reform, more adept at public communication, and more popular with the Ukrainian public. “Someone more flexible, more communicative, and more appealing to society — but such a person does not seem to exist,” Fesenko noted.

Syrsky’s potential dismissal comes at a moment that analysts describe as Ukraine’s strongest positional position on the frontlines in months, making the timing of the potential leadership shake-up all the more notable for observers tracking the war’s trajectory.

A high-stakes diplomatic gathering is set to unfold in Washington this Tuesday, as Lebanese President Joseph Aoun sits down with U.S. President Donald Trump against a backdrop of fragile ceasefire efforts, growing international pressure, and deep domestic division over the future of the Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah.

The meeting comes as Lebanon’s national military launched its first deployment to a designated “pilot zone” in southern Lebanon on Tuesday, a core provision of a newly struck ceasefire agreement brokered with Israel. One day ahead of the summit, Secretary of State Marco Rubio commended Lebanon’s government for its “determined effort to reclaim Lebanon’s sovereignty, disarm Hezbollah and dismantle its terrorist infrastructure” following a meeting with Aoun, framing the disarmament push as critical to lasting regional peace. “As long as that problem exists, Lebanon will never truly get peace,” Rubio told reporters.

For Israel, full disarmament of Hezbollah is a non-negotiable precondition for a full withdrawal of Israeli forces from southern Lebanon, which Tel Aviv invaded after Hezbollah launched cross-border rocket attacks that dragged Lebanon into a regional conflict in March 2025. The pilot zones, where the Lebanese army is now deploying, sit just outside the territory seized by Israeli forces in that invasion, and are designed as a test case to prove Beirut can enforce the terms of the deal. On Tuesday, Lebanon confirmed its forces had entered the village of Zawtar al-Garhbiya, one of three initial pilot zones, while the Israeli military announced it would adjust its force posture in the area to align with the agreement. The U.S. has repeatedly backed Israel’s demand that Hezbollah disarm before any full Israeli withdrawal.

Aoun, who was elected president in early 2025 with broad Western backing after a career as an army commander, has made disarming Hezbollah a central promise of his administration – a shift that marks a major break from decades of Lebanese political compromise with the militant group. Aoun has openly criticized Hezbollah for dragging the country into the latest conflict, which has killed more than 4,300 Lebanese people according to Lebanese official counts, and is hoping his meeting with Trump will bring additional U.S. pressure to bear on Israel to complete its withdrawal from all of southern Lebanon once the initial disarmament requirements are met. Aoun is also expected to use the summit to request increased military and economic aid for Lebanon’s cash-strapped national army.

But the plan faces steep obstacles. Hezbollah has repeatedly and flatly rejected the deal, refusing to lay down its weapons, which it says are necessary to defend Lebanon against Israeli aggression. The group has fought multiple wars with Israel since its founding, and remains a powerful political and military force within Lebanon. Even as violence has dropped dramatically since the ceasefire was signed, a new escalation between the U.S. and Iran – which has long backed Hezbollah both politically and militarily – has upended regional stability. Iran, which required Lebanon’s inclusion in its initial April ceasefire with Washington, resumed open military conflict with the U.S. on July 7, casting new uncertainty over the future of the ceasefire arrangement.

Analysts warn the agreement itself puts Lebanon in a precarious position. Maha Yahya, director of the Carnegie Middle East Center, noted that while the summit demonstrates ongoing U.S. commitment to Lebanon, it also raises serious questions about what additional concessions Beirut may be forced to make. Yahya called the existing ceasefire deal “deeply disadvantageous” for Lebanon, a country already grappling with years of economic collapse and widespread infrastructure damage from months of conflict. Robert Satloff, executive director at the Washington Institute, added that Trump will arrive at the meeting with his own set of demands: beyond proof of Aoun’s commitment to disarmament, Satloff said the U.S. president will seek guarantees that Aoun will remove any army officers found to have ties to Hezbollah, and that Beirut will work toward a formal peace deal with Israel – a step no Lebanese government has ever taken.

This meeting marks the first time a Lebanese president has been invited to Washington since 2009, a sign of the shifting geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East following the 2025 election of Aoun and the outbreak of the latest conflict between Israel and Hezbollah.

For Rahela Begum, survival has become a chain of unthinkable hardships. After fleeing ethnic violence in Myanmar’s Rakhine State and spending eight years confined to the overcrowded Cox’s Bazar refugee camp in Bangladesh, the 25-year-old Rohingya refugee gambled everything on a dangerous sea crossing to Malaysia — and barely lived to tell the tale. In April, she joined 279 other refugees packed onto an overloaded wooden trawler, setting out from the southern Bangladeshi coastal town of Teknaf. Four days into the voyage, the overburdened vessel sank in the Andaman Sea, leaving Begum adrift with nothing but a discarded wooden plank to cling to for 48 hours.

“I was floating like a dead body, and after great difficulty managed to raise my head slightly,” Begum recalled, describing her ordeal before a passing rescue vessel spotted her and pulled her from the water. She is one of the lucky ones: new data from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) confirms 2025 was the deadliest year on record for Rohingya attempting these perilous voyages, with nearly 900 refugees counted dead or missing at sea. So far in 2026, the death toll has continued to climb at an alarming rate.

More than one million Rohingya displaced from Myanmar currently reside in Cox’s Bazar, the world’s largest refugee settlement, where conditions have deteriorated sharply in recent years. Bangladesh’s national restrictions bar most refugees from leaving the camp, working formal jobs, or accessing stable economic opportunity, leaving the displaced population trapped in what many describe as an “open-air prison” with insufficient food, shelter, and basic services. With daily rations amounting to just 16 taka ($0.13) per person and most families only able to afford two meals a day, desperation has driven a surge in refugees turning to human trafficking networks to reach neighboring Southeast Asian countries including Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand.

Trafficking has grown into a highly lucrative criminal enterprise for transnational networks that span Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand, and Malaysia, with recruiters operating openly within the Cox’s Bazar camps and along the border. A trafficker who spoke to AFP on condition of anonymity explained the operation: refugees are first gathered in Teknaf, packed onto small local trawlers, then transferred to larger sea-going vessels once they reach international waters. Recruiters can earn up to 250,000 taka ($2,000) per person they smuggle, and many do not view their exploitation of desperate refugees as a crime, instead framing it as fulfilling a demand for escape.

UN data shows more than 6,500 Rohingya attempted sea crossings in 2025, meaning roughly one in every seven refugees who set out died or went missing at sea. The pace of departures has only accelerated in 2026: between January and May, UNHCR recorded 2,300 attempted departures from Cox’s Bazar, more than double the 1,180 recorded during the same period in 2025.

Bangladeshi authorities have declared a “maximum alert” to curb the trafficking surge, but resources and capacity gaps have left them struggling to dismantle powerful transnational criminal networks. Coast Guard Lieutenant Mohammad Rawnak Rahman, who patrols the Naf River border between Bangladesh and Myanmar, says his team has already rescued 618 trafficking victims so far this year, but the crisis continues to outpace their response. Across the border in Rakhine State, ongoing clashes between the ruling Myanmar junta and Arakan Army rebels have added more instability, pushing additional Rohingya to flee toward Bangladesh’s already overstretched camps.

At the Cox’s Bazar courthouse, lead prosecutor Tawhidul Anwar described being overwhelmed by the scale of the crisis, saying his office is currently handling roughly 500 active trafficking cases. “Investigators aren’t very effective, it’s hard to obtain evidence. The traffickers are very powerful,” Anwar explained, noting that even traffickers arrested following high-profile shipwrecks like Begum’s April voyage have been released on bail, despite facing potential life sentences for their crimes. Local police superintendent ANM Sajedur Rahman echoed that frustration, adding that authorities lack the funding and personnel to break up the sprawling trafficking networks.

Sayed Ullah, president of the United Rohingya Council, said the desperation driving refugees to risk their lives at sea should come as no surprise to the international community. “Each person has to survive on two meals a day, and 16 taka ($0.13),” he said. “No one should be surprised that people try to leave, hoping to find something better.” Bangladeshi officials have long argued that easing movement and work restrictions for refugees is unfeasible, as the country’s own limited resources are already stretched thin by hosting more than a million displaced people.

For the Rohingya, community leaders say the only long-term solution is a lasting peace agreement in Myanmar that would allow refugees to return safely to their homes. But that outcome remains distant: the civil conflict ignited by the 2021 military coup in Myanmar continues to rage across the country, with US-based conflict monitoring NGO Acled recording more than 100,000 total deaths from fighting to date.

Back at her makeshift bamboo-and-tarpaulin shelter in Cox’s Bazar, Begum says her dream of freedom sank along with the boat that was supposed to carry her to a better life. “God has granted me peace nowhere in this world,” she said. “Not in my country, not here.”