分类: politics

  • How is the US economy really doing under President Trump?

    How is the US economy really doing under President Trump?

    Ahead of the critical 2026 midterm congressional elections, former and current President Donald Trump has been actively touting his administration’s economic track record, asserting that his policies have lifted household incomes, tamed runaway inflation, and fueled unprecedented job creation across the United States. Repeating his signature optimistic framing, Trump has repeatedly declared that the U.S. “has the hottest economy anywhere in the world.” But a new fact-checking investigation by BBC Verify has unpacked the gap between the president’s rhetoric and on-the-ground economic data, revealing a complex picture of strong headline growth paired with uneven burdens falling on working- and middle-class American households.

    To start with the headline metrics the president often cites, the U.S. economy has indeed outperformed many initial projections following Trump’s second-term inauguration, even after his sweeping 2025 “Liberation Day” tariff package. By recent U.S. historical standards, GDP growth is holding at a respectable annualized rate of 2.2%, with total expansion hitting 3.2% since the end of 2024 — just before Trump retook the Oval Office. This outpaces every other G7 advanced economy over the same period, and beats the gloomy downgraded growth forecasts the International Monetary Fund released immediately after Trump’s April 2025 tariff announcement. Crucially, however, the president significantly rolled back those tariffs in the months after their rollout, softening the economic damage analysts had initially projected.

    Another major tailwind supporting U.S. growth right now is an unprecedented boom in corporate artificial intelligence investment, particularly in the construction of new data centers across the country. By August 2026, U.S. businesses were spending $5 billion per month on data center construction alone (excluding the IT hardware that goes inside those facilities) — nearly double the monthly rate when Trump returned to office. Yet analysts warn this growth driver is fragile: if AI investment cools abruptly, the broader economy could face a sharp slowdown.

    On inflation, the issue that dominated voter anger in the 2024 presidential election, the picture is far more mixed than Trump’s claims suggest. Voters ousted Joe Biden in 2024 largely over the 9% peak inflation hit in 2022, and today’s 3.7% national inflation rate is a steep drop from that Biden-era peak. But it remains noticeably higher than the 3% rate Trump inherited when he took office in January 2025. Economists broadly agree that inflation would be lower today if not for two key developments of Trump’s second term: his new import tariffs, and the spillover effects of the US-Israel-Iran war, which has disrupted global energy supplies and pushed up fuel and transportation costs across the U.S.

    The real-world impact of these price hikes is already visible to consumers: a gallon of diesel, a critical input for agriculture, manufacturing, and long-haul shipping, hit an all-time record high of $6.52 in September 2026. Core grocery staples including beef and coffee have also risen in price since Trump’s return to office, though egg costs have fallen from their pandemic-era peaks. Major U.S. retailers have already issued warnings that energy-driven cost increases from Middle East supply disruptions will push food prices even higher in coming months.

    On household incomes, another core claim from Trump, data shows median inflation-adjusted income rose 2.6% in 2025 to $87,460 — an all-time high on paper. But analysis from nonpartisan think tank the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) tells a far more unequal story. When combining the impact of Trump’s signature tax cuts, the expiration of expanded Affordable Care Act subsidies that previously held down health insurance costs for millions of Americans, and inflation-driven price hikes tied to tariffs and the Iran war, ITEP found most American households are actually worse off financially. The middle fifth of income earners face an average net loss of $1,700 in 2026 compared to a scenario without Trump’s second-term policy changes, while the poorest fifth of households see an average loss of $750. By contrast, the wealthiest 1% of Americans gain an average of $12,560, a windfall driven almost entirely by Trump’s tax cuts. ITEP’s findings on the unequal impact of tariffs align closely with separate analysis from another nonpartisan group, the Tax Foundation.

    On job creation, Trump has predicted his tariffs would “flood America with jobs” as manufacturers move production back to U.S. soil to avoid border taxes. Since his inauguration, the economy has added an average of 34,000 jobs per month — a steep drop from the 122,000 monthly jobs added in the final year of Joe Biden’s presidency. The total number of Americans employed in manufacturing, a key sector Trump has prioritized, stands at 12.6 million as of September 2026, which is actually slightly lower than when his second term began. The U.S. unemployment rate does remain low at 4.2%, roughly unchanged from when Trump took office, but that figure is partially propped up by the administration’s aggressive immigration crackdown and deportation program, which has shrunk the total available domestic workforce. A smaller workforce means far fewer new jobs need to be created each month to keep unemployment steady.

    Beyond these core metrics, Trump’s economic policies have driven a sharp increase in federal government borrowing, driven primarily by his large-scale tax cuts. The federal deficit — the gap between government tax revenue and annual spending — hit $2 trillion in the 12 months ending September 2026, equal to roughly 6% of total U.S. GDP. Projections show the deficit could grow to more than 8% of GDP by 2030. This elevated deficit spending is currently propping up GDP growth, but the IMF has warned that excessive borrowing and rapidly growing national debt raise the risk of a future U.S. financial crisis that would inflict severe harm on most households.

    Growing deficits have also pushed up borrowing costs for the U.S. government, which in turn lift interest rates for consumers. Yields on 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds have risen sharply since January 2025 and now top 5%, the highest level since the 2007 global financial crisis. That increase has pushed the average interest rate on a new 30-year mortgage up to 7.4%, up from 6.9% when Trump took office, worsening affordability in the already strained U.S. housing market. Many existing homeowners are now trapped in their current properties, as selling would force them to give up their low-rate mortgages that cannot be transferred to a new home purchase.

    As midterm campaigning intensifies, the gap between Trump’s economic rhetoric and the lived experience of most American households is set to become a core defining issue for voters heading to the polls.

  • Mahmoud Khalil petitions US Supreme Court to hear his free speech case

    Mahmoud Khalil petitions US Supreme Court to hear his free speech case

    A former Columbia University graduate student at the center of a high-profile clash over free speech and immigration policy has taken his fight to the nation’s highest court, arguing the federal government is moving to strip independent federal judges of their ability to intervene when First Amendment rights are violated.

    Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian-Algerian activist and former U.S. green card holder, submitted his petition to the U.S. Supreme Court this week, asking the justices to review a legal dispute stemming from his 2025 arrest by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) under the Trump administration’s sweeping crackdown on pro-Palestine speech among non-citizen residents. If the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case, legal experts say it will set a landmark precedent with far-reaching consequences for dozens of other non-citizen scholars and activists targeted in that crackdown—including Georgetown University researcher Badar Khan Suri.

    At the core of Khalil’s legal argument is a challenge to the federal government’s claim that the Immigration and Nationality Act bars independent federal courts from reviewing habeas corpus petitions for immigrants facing deportation. Khalil’s petition maintains the law does not exclude such challenges, and even if it were interpreted to do so, that application would be unconstitutional in his case.

    Habeas corpus, a legal principle dating back to 13th-century England created to prevent unlawful detention by the state without due process, remains a foundational check on executive power for all people on U.S. territory, regardless of citizenship. In June 2025, a New Jersey federal judge invoked this principle to order Khalil’s release after 104 days of immigration detention, ruling the Trump administration’s use of a rarely invoked foreign policy threat provision to arrest him was unconstitutionally vague, and that Khalil posed neither a danger to the community nor a flight risk.

    The federal government immediately appealed the ruling, arguing that independent federal courts have no authority to intervene in deportation proceedings. Unlike immigration judges, who operate under the umbrella of the Department of Justice, federal judges are constitutionally independent— a key distinction at the heart of the legal fight. Currently, the Department of Justice is led by Todd Blanche, former personal lawyer to President Donald Trump.

    Speaking to reporters during a virtual press briefing on Monday, Baher Azmy, a constitutional attorney representing Khalil, framed the case as a fundamental test of executive overreach and judicial oversight. “The question before the court is not directly about the obvious unconstitutionality of this unprecedented weaponisation of immigration power. It’s kind of hard to imagine how anyone could say it is legal for the government to lock up dissenters in order to silence them and others,” Azmy said. “Instead, the question is whether the federal courts, through the great writ of habeas corpus, can address this egregiously unlawful executive action.”

    Khalil, who is married to a U.S. citizen and had his student visa and green card revoked at the time of his arrest in March 2025, missed the birth of his first child during his 104 days in ICE custody. He has already received a formal order of removal from the U.S., but is appealing that decision, and remains free from detention pending the outcome of his legal challenges thanks to the lower court’s earlier ruling. His case has drawn global attention for its implications for free speech and immigrant rights.

    Beyond his fight against the federal government, Khalil recently launched a separate lawsuit against his former institution, Columbia University, accusing the school of enabling systemic discrimination against pro-Palestine student activists. He is joined as a plaintiff in the suit by the Palestine Working Group, a student organization within Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs, and the group’s president, Mohammed Ibrahim Zubairi, a Pakistani Muslim non-citizen. The lawsuit alleges Columbia showed “deliberate indifference towards and failure to respond to instances of severe, persistent, and coordinated harassment” targeting the men because of their pro-Palestine advocacy, their identity as Arab and Muslim students, their national origin, and their non-citizen immigration status.

  • China next-gen solar tech curb to impact SpaceX AI computing plan

    China next-gen solar tech curb to impact SpaceX AI computing plan

    China’s commerce and science ministries have unveiled a sweeping new draft proposal to tighten export controls on 40 critical technologies spanning artificial intelligence, biomedicine, and advanced solar manufacturing, a regulatory update that has sent ripples through global tech and space industries, particularly impacting Elon Musk’s ambitious plans for space-based solar power.

    Under the draft framework, 14 technologies will face full export bans if enacted, while 26 others will require government-issued export licenses. Critically, the ban includes production technology for perovskite and tandem solar cell modules — a next-generation photovoltaic technology that has emerged as an ideal candidate for space-based energy systems. Importantly, finished products manufactured using these controlled technologies will still be permitted for export, and the proposal is currently open for public comment through November 15 before any final rules are set.

    The full list of controlled technologies spans three high-priority strategic sectors. In artificial intelligence, 23 technologies tied to large language models, autonomous AI agents, high-performance computing clusters, and sensitive information processing are included, though technologies already widely available through open-source releases or academic publications are exempt from controls. For biomedicine, five key technologies covering cell and gene therapy platforms, small nucleic acid drugs, and handling of pathogenic microorganisms are restricted, with streamlined automatic licensing available for outbound licensing deals that do not transfer full ownership of the technology. In the solar sector, 12 technologies related to advanced polysilicon production, wafer processing, and next-generation cell manufacturing are covered, with controls extending to the core equipment that embodies these technologies.

    In an official statement explaining the new controls, a Ministry of Commerce spokesperson emphasized that the update follows longstanding common international practice, noting that all major global economies already implement varying degrees of export controls on sensitive technologies. “The aim is to guard against the risks of technology getting out of control and spreading improperly, while safeguarding normal international technology exchanges and cooperation,” the spokesperson said, adding that the revision is a routine periodic update to China’s export control catalog, which has been adjusted regularly by the two ministries since 2001. The update does not target any specific country, region, or private entity, the spokesperson confirmed, and most routine AI and biotech commercial activity will remain unaffected. For example, providing AI models to overseas users via application programming interfaces, cloud-based software as a service, mobile applications, websites, or lightweight on-device versions does not qualify as a controlled export, and downloading open-source Chinese AI models for use on hardware outside China’s borders also remains unrestricted.

    The proposal comes just weeks after a high-profile bilateral agreement between U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, reached in New York on September 21, where the two nations agreed to mutual notification of AI incidents that could pose national security risks, with non-state cyberattack actors and illicit bioweapons development cited as key examples of the risks the agreement targets.

    For Elon Musk’s sprawling corporate empire, the new controls create significant uncertainty for his recently announced expansion into space solar power. Back in late January, Musk revealed on a Tesla earnings call that the company aims to scale up domestic U.S. solar cell production to 100 gigawatts annually, covering the entire supply chain from raw material processing to finished panels. Media reports indicate a portion of this new capacity is intended to power SpaceX’s satellite constellations, part of Musk’s broader plan to develop low-cost space-based solar power for orbital AI computing and a future permanent Moon city. Just days after the earnings call announcement, Musk dispatched a delegation to meet with leading Chinese solar technology firms working on perovskite and tandem cell technology, with GCL Group confirming the meeting, though JinkoSolar noted no binding agreements were reached.

    In early February, SpaceX completed its acquisition of Musk’s artificial intelligence firm xAI, with the billionaire predicting that within two to three years, space will become the lowest-cost location for large-scale AI computing, powered by near-continuous solar energy from orbiting satellites. Weeks later, Reuters reported that Tesla was in advanced negotiations to purchase roughly $2.9 billion worth of Chinese solar manufacturing equipment, a portion of which would now fall under the proposed export controls.

    Perovskite solar cells, which are often paired with silicon in stacked tandem designs, offer unique advantages for space applications unmatched by traditional satellite photovoltaic technology. They are far more efficient, lighter, and more flexible than conventional silicon cells. While perovskite degrades rapidly when exposed to moisture and oxygen on Earth, the near-vacuum environment of space eliminates this risk, and the cells also have the natural ability to self-repair after damage from cosmic radiation, making them the leading emerging option for next-generation satellite power systems.

    A October 17 report from China’s state-owned 21st Century Business Herald, citing an unnamed senior industry expert, clarified that under the proposed framework, foreign firms would still be permitted to purchase finished perovskite cells from Chinese manufacturers — only the underlying manufacturing technology and core equipment would be blocked from export. Zhao Lei, a senior solar cell technology researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Institute of Electrical Engineering, explained the strategic logic behind the restriction. “Space photovoltaics is the core energy source for strategic industries such as commercial spaceflight, space stations, space computing and deep-space exploration. It serves both civilian and defense needs and bears on the security of China’s space energy strategy,” he said.

    Zhao noted that Western nations have maintained a decades-long technology blockade on China in traditional high-performance space solar cell technology, dating back to the 1989 U.S. arms embargo that barred exports of defense and space technologies — including the gallium arsenide-based III-V multi-junction compound cells that have long dominated the satellite power market, controlled under U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations. For years, tight controls on high-performance epitaxy manufacturing equipment held back China’s domestic space solar development, but that dynamic has shifted dramatically. While China was locked out of traditional III-V cell supply chains, it has pulled ahead in the development of lower-cost crystalline silicon and perovskite-based tandem cells, and currently hosts the world’s most complete end-to-end solar manufacturing supply chain.

    By the end of 2025, Chinese firms controlled 96% of global polysilicon manufacturing capacity and 91.3% of global solar cell production capacity, according to data cited in the 21st Century Business Herald report. Though perovskite solar technology was first developed in Japan in 2009, Chinese companies have led the global push to commercialize and scale mass production. Chinese manufacturer Microquanta Semiconductor launched the world’s first large-scale perovskite module production line in 2023, GCL Group is currently building out a 2-gigawatt commercial production capacity, and LONGi Green Energy Technology set a new global efficiency record of 35.5% for tandem perovskite-silicon cells in July this year.

    For Musk, the practical outcome of the controls is clear: he will still be able to integrate Chinese perovskite cells into SpaceX satellites, but he will not be able to import the manufacturing equipment needed to produce the cells domestically in the United States to power his 100-gigawatt production target.

    In a parallel development aligned with U.S. export control priorities, Taiwan’s Minister of Economic Affairs Kung Ming-hsin announced in an October 12 interview with Bloomberg that the island will add AI servers and cutting-edge semiconductors to its own controlled export list, bringing its rules in line with American restrictions on advanced tech exports to mainland China. Once the new rules take effect, unlicensed shipments of controlled items to mainland China will be classified as a criminal offense under Taiwan’s Foreign Trade Act. “Going forward, some of our measures on controlled items will correspond to American ones,” Kung said, referencing commitments made under the 2025 Reciprocal Trade Agreement between Taiwan and the United States. He declined to share a specific timeline for the new rules to take effect, and added that Taiwan plans to raise billions of dollars to develop U.S.-linked industrial parks to support a local supply chain for Nvidia and other leading American AI hardware manufacturers.

  • UAE government-linked jet lands in Tehran as regional tensions rise

    UAE government-linked jet lands in Tehran as regional tensions rise

    Against a backdrop of soaring regional tensions and growing fears that the United States could launch new military strikes against Iran that would trigger devastating retaliation across the Gulf, a UAE government-linked passenger jet that regularly carries senior Emirati officials touched down in Tehran on Monday, marking its second visit to the Iranian capital in just four days.

    According to open-source intelligence researchers tracking regional aviation movements, the Boeing 737, operated by Royal Jet — a private charter firm wholly owned by the United Arab Emirates government — completed the flight from Abu Dhabi on Monday, following an identical trip it made to Tehran on Saturday.

    The back-to-back diplomatic flights have arrived at a moment when the risk of a full-scale military confrontation between the US and Iran has spiked dramatically. Just one day before the second landing, the US State Department issued an urgent security alert for all American citizens located across the Middle East, urging them to prepare for potential unrest and targeted attacks.

    “Americans traveling to or from the Middle East should closely monitor updates on airport and airline operations and put contingency exit plans in place,” the advisory read. “Iran and factions aligned with Iran may target US interests and personnel across the region.”

    Tensions between the UAE and Iran shifted dramatically after the US and Israel launched a coordinated military strike against Iran in February 2026. At that time, the UAE emerged as one of the most hawkish Gulf states opposing Tehran, joining the US-Israeli coalition in launching hundreds of strikes on Iranian targets and blocking Pakistani-led mediation efforts to de-escalate the conflict.

    However, the Gulf nation quickly bore the brunt of Iran’s retaliatory operations. Long positioned as a stable, secure economic hub and a regional safe haven for international investment, the UAE faced thousands of Iranian missile and drone attacks across its territory. Most critically, the key Emirati port of Fujairah, located just outside the strategic Strait of Hormuz through a fifth of the world’s global oil supplies pass, suffered repeated sophisticated strikes targeting critical oil export infrastructure.

    In June, Reuters reported that the UAE ultimately struck a secret deal with Tehran, agreeing to pay billions of dollars in protection payments to end the Iranian strikes. Per the report, Abu Dhabi transferred an initial $3 billion to Iran and committed to a total payout of $20 billion, a claim the UAE government has repeatedly denied.

    On Monday, regional policy analysts were awash with speculation that the repeated Emirati flights to Tehran signal ongoing behind-the-scenes negotiations between the two countries, as both sides prepare for a possible new round of US-led strikes on Iran that could reignite open conflict across the Gulf.

    The threat of fresh military action has been amplified by recent comments from former US President Donald Trump, who has upped the ante for new strikes against Iran in a public endorsement of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ahead of Israel’s general elections later this month. Speaking on Sunday, Trump said he wanted Netanyahu to remain in office to help “finish the job” against Iran, adding that Tehran must change its behavior rapidly to avoid new conflict.

    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi issued a sharp, public rebuke of Trump’s comments on the social media platform X. “Last time you wanted to ‘finish the job’, Iran emerged even stronger,” Araghchi wrote. “Want to try your luck again? Be our guest. But be careful; we have unfinished jobs too.” He went on to accuse Netanyahu of pushing the US into a new war purely to keep himself out of domestic legal trouble, arguing the Israeli leader does not care what costs the conflict imposes on Israel, let alone the US presidency.

    The UAE’s diplomatic outreach to Iran comes amid a flurry of parallel diplomatic activity in the region. On the same day as the Emirati jet landed in Tehran, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov held a meeting with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian in the Iranian capital. Multiple international news outlets including the Financial Times have reported that Russia has been providing critical intelligence support to Iran to help the country target US military bases across the Middle East.

  • Abdul El-Sayed confronts heckler linking him to Muslim Brotherhood

    Abdul El-Sayed confronts heckler linking him to Muslim Brotherhood

    With the 2026 November U.S. midterm elections just weeks away, a tense exchange at a Michigan town hall on Saturday has thrown a spotlight on the growing anti-Muslim rhetoric targeting Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, the son of Egyptian immigrants born and raised in the state. The confrontation, which El-Sayed later shared on his official X (formerly Twitter) account, began when an attendee identifying himself only as Tommy stepped forward to demand that El-Sayed publicly disavow the Muslim Brotherhood.

    El-Sayed immediately complied with the request, saying “Sure. Yeah, absolutely,” before pushing back to unpack the underlying implication of the question. He pressed the attendee: “Why would you ask me this? What are you implying?” The heckler, who later described the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, pushed back by saying he had never heard El-Sayed make such a disavowal before.

    In the aftermath of the event, public records and independent reporting revealed that the heckler is Thomas Teeple, a former Republican congressional aide who previously worked on the staff of Missouri Senator Josh Hawley and served as political director for Philip Sarnecki’s 2022 Kansas gubernatorial campaign. The incident was not an isolated act of individual bias, either: it is the latest in a sustained campaign of religiously tinged attacks targeting El-Sayed, who is Muslim, stretching back months.

    El-Sayed drew a historical parallel to the backlash faced by John F. Kennedy, the nation’s first Catholic U.S. president, who faced widespread questioning over whether his religious loyalty would override his duty to the American public. “I am running for the Senate as an American who happens to be Muslim,” El-Sayed emphasized after the confrontation, pushing back against the framing that his faith makes him inherently suspect.

    This line of attack did not originate with Teeple. El-Sayed’s general election opponent, former Republican Congressman Mike Rogers, has repeatedly pushed unsubstantiated claims that El-Sayed holds hidden ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Just weeks before the town hall, a leaked private group chat exposed a coordinated plot to disrupt El-Sayed’s events: a student affiliated with the University of Michigan College Republicans, Iman Dashti, offered students $200 each on behalf of conservative PAC America Next to travel to a Flint town hall and heckle El-Sayed to generate negative press. “Bring your friends. Bring your girlfriend,” Dashti wrote in the GroupMe chat. “Take her out somewhere nice with the $400 you two will make in literally 2.5 hours. All u have to do to get paid is COME AND SHOW OUT AGAINST ABDUL.”

    Former president Donald Trump has also amplified the attacks against El-Sayed, mocking his name and spreading the same baseless Brotherhood affiliation claims at recent rallies in Georgia and Tennessee. “He’s a jihadist,” Trump claimed at one event, mispronouncing El-Sayed’s first name as “Mohammed” and joking that he could call the candidate whatever he wanted. He even mocked the name with a drawn-out, mocking string of syllables: “His name is actually Abduladadalalalala.”

    El-Sayed has pushed back sharply against these attacks, framing them as a cynical distraction from policy failures by right-wing leaders. On X, the candidate hit back at Trump’s remarks, pointing out the former president’s own close financial ties to Middle Eastern nations: “He says the name just fine when he’s begging the Qataris for a personal jet or the Saudis for funding for his son-in-law’s private equity firm. Wonder what’s changed?”

    The incident has sparked widespread backlash online, with many observers and political commentators calling out the question as inherently racist targeting a candidate based on his ethnic and religious background. “This is fucking crazy. Asking a Muslim BORN IN MICHIGAN to disavow some foreign group just bc he’s ethnically Egyptian IS RACIST,” one political commentator wrote on X, sharing the clip of the confrontation. The incident has reignited broader conversations about the normalization of anti-Muslim rhetoric in mainstream American electoral politics, as candidates continue to weaponize faith and ethnicity to sully opponents ahead of competitive elections.

  • Seventh day of violent clashes between Albanian protesters and police

    Seventh day of violent clashes between Albanian protesters and police

    Seven straight days of violent unrest have rocked Albania, as anti-government demonstrations led largely by high school and university students have devolved into open conflict between protesters and riot police in the capital Tirana, with demonstrators demanding the resignation of long-serving Prime Minister Edi Rama.

    Pre-counted official data puts the total injury toll at 295 ahead of Monday’s fresh clashes, with 186 of those injured being members of the police force. During a meeting with somber senior police commanders, Rama held up a stone that had been thrown at officers the previous day, stating firmly that if the state chooses to negotiate with the current protest movement, it ceases to function as a sovereign governing body. Since the unrest began, a local police station and multiple central government buildings in Tirana have been targeted by protesters, whose grievances combine demands for improved higher education conditions, widespread anger at systemic government corruption, and repeated calls for Rama to step down after 13 years in power.

    Rama has pushed back hard against the movement, claiming the predominantly young protesters have been radicalized by what he called “dark forces” operating from Europe and the United States, framing the unrest as a coordinated, externally backed attack on Albania’s sovereignty.

    On-the-ground reporting from Tirana’s Rinia (Youth) Park captured the preparation for conflict under clear October skies: protesters pried loose cobblestones from park pathways to use as ammunition for coming clashes with police, mirroring the stone Rama displayed to police leaders. Within minutes, security forces moved in: an armored police convoy advanced along the city’s main boulevard, with a leading water cannon truck firing tear gas canisters into crowds of fleeing demonstrators. Riot squads pursued the student-heavy crowd through the park, with many protesters taking shelter in a nearby cafe where even waiting staff were left teary-eyed from the lingering gas fumes. Volunteer medics in yellow reflective vests remained stationed under park trees to treat people overwhelmed by tear gas. The on-site reporter witnessed one incident where a police officer fired pepper spray at point-blank range into a young man’s face during a verbal confrontation.

    Human rights lawyer Gentian Sejrani, who provides legal representation to more than 100 protesters arrested during the unrest, criticized police conduct as disorganized and unjust. Sejrani noted that police rarely present credible evidence to support arrests in court, citing one client who was detained purely by chance while walking to a bus stop, completely uninvolved in the protests. Conversely, he added, most protesters who throw projectiles at police rarely face arrest, as they are able to outrun security forces.

    Mutual anger has fueled the cycle of violence: police are enraged by injuries to their colleagues, while protesters resent what they view as excessive police heavy-handedness, creating a chaotic, volatile standoff. Protesters have organized grassroots mutual aid, bringing saline spray to treat people exposed to tear gas.

    Sidorela Vatnikaj, a 27-year-old master’s student and veteran activist with eight years of anti-government protest experience, is one of the de facto prominent voices in the leaderless movement. She described the daily reality of participating in the unrest: coordinating across decentralized protest groups, arranging legal support and first aid supplies, checking on the safety of fellow participants, and spending most of the day moving between protest sites while evading police.

    While Vatnikaj says she is uncomfortable with violence targeting state authorities, she blames police for initiating and escalating the conflict. “When I see people throwing stones at the police, I understand their anger. I don’t judge them. I’m not happy, but they have no other way to be listened to,” she explained. She pointed out that many protesters come from families forced to leave Albania over the past decade – a wave of emigration that has seen a million people leave the country – and that young Albanians have been robbed of opportunity, ignored by the government, and now attacked by security forces.

    In response to Rama’s rhetorical question asking what would happen if he stepped down, Vatnikaj called for a one-year technocratic interim government to oversee preparations for free, fair democratic elections. She has accused Rama of rigging previous votes and colluding with wealthy foreign investors and organized crime networks. She added that young Albanian protesters draw inspiration and encouragement from fellow Gen Z protest movements across the globe, noting that the dream of a dignified democratic society that drove previous generations has never been realized.

    Rama, who has dominated Albanian politics since the early 2000s and held the prime ministership for 13 years, has positioned himself as the only leader capable of delivering Albania’s EU accession by the 2030 target.

  • Netanyahu map shows RSF ‘friendly’ to Israel and UAE, backing for separatist movements

    Netanyahu map shows RSF ‘friendly’ to Israel and UAE, backing for separatist movements

    In a high-profile Sunday address where Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu introduced a sweeping updated national security doctrine, a publicly displayed regional alignment map has quickly become the center of diplomatic backlash and regional scrutiny, laying bare the unspoken power dynamics reshaping modern Middle Eastern geopolitics.

    The core shift in Netanyahu’s new security framework, as outlined in an official statement from his office, responds to what the Israeli government frames as the shifting threat landscape after what it terms the “War of Redemption.” The doctrine explicitly reorients Israeli strategy away from traditional defensive and containment approaches, prioritizing pre-emptive offensive strikes to neutralize emerging threats, shoring up domestic civil defense against evolving risks, and formalizing Israel’s self-positioning as a leading regional power. It also emphasizes that shifting regional currents have opened new doors for Israel to build cross-border partnerships both within and beyond the Middle East, the statement added.

    The map presented alongside the doctrine identifies a bloc called the “Hexagon Alliance” anchored by Israel and the United Arab Emirates, with Greece, Ethiopia, and sections of India also listed as aligned parties. What has drawn the most outrage and scrutiny, however, is the map’s classification of Sudan’s southwestern region—currently under full control of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF)—as aligned with the Israeli-UAE bloc. The RSF, led by former Janjaweed commander Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, has been widely accused of perpetrating genocide in Darfur amid Sudan’s ongoing civil conflict. Multiple United Nations expert investigations and independent media reports, including on-the-ground work from Middle East Eye, have documented consistent Emirati military and logistical support for the paramilitary, a claim the UAE has repeatedly denied in official statements.

    Further, the map frames a range of separatist and breakaway factions across the broader Middle East and North Africa as friendly to the Israeli-UAE bloc. In Libya, the eastern Libyan administration led by strongman Khalifa Haftar is marked as aligned with Israel. In Yemen, the UAE-backed Southern Transitional Council— which reorganized into the Transitional Council of South Arabia earlier this year after a brief dissolution—is listed as sympathetic to the alliance. Most recently, Israel made global headlines when it became the first United Nations member state to formally recognize Somaliland, a breakaway region that unilaterally declared independence from Somalia in 1991. Multiple reports have documented expanding Israeli and Emirati military footprints in the territory, which is also marked as aligned on Netanyahu’s map.

    Notably, the map deviates from longstanding formal Israeli diplomatic arrangements by excluding two of Israel’s earliest Arab peace partners from its core alliance bloc. Egypt, which signed a historic peace treaty with Israel in 1979, is categorized as part of a separate “Sunni diamond alliance” alongside Pakistan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia. Jordan, which has maintained a formal peace agreement with Israel since 1994, is only marked as “friendly” to the Israeli-led bloc, rather than a core aligned member.

    The map also retains longstanding Israeli framing of the Tehran-led network of armed groups and allied states as the “Axis of Resistance,” grouping Iran, Lebanon’s Hezbollah, and Yemen’s Houthi movement in the opposing bloc. It additionally notes that Ethiopia, which is currently at heightened risk of full-scale war with neighboring Eritrea, is counted as a friendly state. Prior reporting from Middle East Eye has documented that Israel has long sought to establish a permanent Red Sea military base in Eritrea.

    While regional geopolitical analysts note that the alignments laid out in the map do not come as a major surprise to seasoned Middle East watchers, the public release of the document is expected to create significant diplomatic discomfort for many of Israel’s existing regional partners and harden long-held suspicions among Arab states about Israeli expansionist and interventionist goals across the region. Critics have already raised alarms that the map’s explicit recognition of separatist factions amounts to open Israeli support for partitioning already fragile conflict-affected states, a move that could further destabilize already volatile regions across the Horn of Africa and North Africa.

  • Morocco’s first female prime minister caught between the king, clerics, and feminists

    Morocco’s first female prime minister caught between the king, clerics, and feminists

    When King Mohammed VI of Morocco named 50-year-old Fatima Zahra El Mansouri as the North African nation’s first female prime minister following September’s parliamentary election, the moment was hailed as a groundbreaking milestone for women in politics by supporters. But the historic appointment has also pulled back the curtain on deep-seated conservative reservations about women holding top leadership roles, reigniting long-running debates over gender equality that have divided Moroccan society for decades. El Mansouri, a veteran politician with more than 20 years of public service experience, led her Authenticity and Modernity Party (PAM) to a plurality of seats in the September vote, and she has since formed a governing coalition with three other parties that commands a 207-seat majority in the 395-member parliament. Before her appointment, she served five years as Minister of National Territory Planning, Urban Planning, Housing and City Policy under the previous administration, and previously held roles as mayor of Marrakech and a member of parliament. In remarks after her royal appointment, El Mansouri framed the moment as a historic win for all Moroccan women, saying, “Being the first female head of government is not just a source of pride for me, but for all the women of the kingdom.” Yet even as many younger Moroccans, particularly women, have celebrated the end of a centuries-long gender barrier to the premiership, prominent conservative and religious voices have pushed back against the appointment, reviving outdated narratives to challenge a woman’s right to hold the office. Earlier this month, Mustafa Ramid, a former justice minister from a previous Islamist-led government, shared a lengthy Facebook post questioning the appointment that cited an ancient Islamic saying: “a people who entrust their affairs to a woman will never succeed.” Ramid argued that Morocco, a majority-Muslim nation, had already struck the right balance between gender equality and state leadership, noting that the monarchy, the country’s most powerful institution, remains exclusively held by men. Morocco functions as a constitutional monarchy on paper, but in practice, executive authority remains concentrated in the hands of 63-year-old King Mohammed VI, who holds sweeping powers over defense, foreign policy and other core governance areas, and retains the right to appoint the prime minister. Street interviews conducted by local broadcaster Chouf TV the day after El Mansouri’s appointment revealed widespread ambivalence among older generations of Moroccan men. Many respondents hesitated to share criticism of the appointment, since open criticism of the monarchy carries criminal penalties under Moroccan law, but several admitted discomfort with a woman leading the government. “It feels strange to have a woman as head of government. I’m not sure if it sits well with me,” one unnamed older man told the broadcaster. Online, bad-faith critics have circulated a viral video of two women fighting by pulling each other’s hair, framing it as a preview of how parliamentary disagreements would play out under El Mansouri’s leadership. The divides exposed by the appointment stretch far beyond the premiership, touching on long-running, contentious debates over gender equality across Moroccan law and society. For decades, women’s rights advocates have pushed for sweeping reform of the Moudawana, Morocco’s core family code that governs marriage, divorce, child custody and inheritance. Current law enshrines multiple unequal provisions for women: daughters typically receive only half the inheritance share of sons in comparable scenarios, and the rule of taasib requires female orphans without brothers to split their inheritance with distant male relatives. The country’s leading body of religious scholars, the Higher Council of Ulemas, has repeatedly rejected calls to reform these unequal inheritance rules, citing traditional Islamic jurisprudence. Polygamy remains legal under specific circumstances in Morocco, and while proposed reforms would allow women to add clauses to marriage contracts banning their husbands from taking additional wives, exceptions still allow polygamy in cases where a first wife is infertile or chronically ill – a provision women’s rights groups have decried as a violation of medical privacy and confidentiality. A broad package of Moudawana reforms was announced in 2024, but the changes have not yet been enacted into law. Morocco’s National Human Rights Council confirmed in a 2022 report that these persistent legal inequalities directly contribute to higher rates of poverty among women across the country. Beyond legal reform, many young Moroccan women are also pushing for progress on access to education for girls in rural areas. Official 2025 data from Morocco’s High Commission for Planning shows that while 100% of girls aged 15 to 17 attend school in urban areas, that figure drops to just 55% in rural regions, where poverty, early marriage, long distances to schools, lack of safe transport, and cultural norms that prioritize keeping daughters at home drive high dropout rates. Young advocate Chifae Laazouzi added that many low-income rural girls also cannot afford menstrual hygiene products, and menstrual health remains a widely stigmatized taboo in many communities. “I would like to see free menstrual products in schools,” Laazouzi told the BBC. While many women’s rights advocates acknowledge that El Mansouri’s appointment breaks a meaningful symbolic barrier, they caution that the milestone does not automatically guarantee progress on gender reform. El Mansouri has not made any high-profile public statements on women’s rights issues throughout her career, and has not yet signaled whether she will push for the long-awaited Moudawana reforms to move forward. Analysts also note that the appointment must be understood within the context of Morocco’s political system, and the low 38% voter turnout recorded in September’s parliamentary election – the lowest turnout in two decades. Dr. Irene Fernandez-Molina, a Global South expert at the UK’s University of Exeter, argues the appointment fits a pattern of what she calls “authoritarian state feminism”, a top-down strategy that leverages women’s rights gains to bolster regime legitimacy. “The latter cannot be understood without the former,” she said, noting that appointing a woman to the premiership allows the monarchy to project an image of modernization and progress, even as the broader political system and pace of social reform remain largely unchanged. Women’s rights advocate Yasmina Benslimane added that El Mansouri’s privileged background – her late father was a senior local official and diplomat – means she has had access to political opportunities most ordinary Moroccan women can only dream of, creating a gap between her experience and that of most women in the country. For many observers, the true test of El Mansouri’s premiership will be whether she delivers on concrete reform, particularly of the Moudawana. Even with a symbolic breakthrough, the new prime minister faces significant structural constraints: she must operate within a political system where the king holds most executive power, and any reform to family law would require confronting the all-male, conservative Higher Council of Ulemas. Many young Moroccan women share the view that El Mansouri’s actions, not her gender, will define her tenure. “I don’t think El Mansouri should be judged by the fact that she is a woman. Being a woman in power doesn’t automatically make someone a champion of women’s rights,” said young activist Sara Zouiten. “Her party presents itself as a modernising political force, so I want to see whether that translates into actual change.”

  • Trump seeks to boost white South African immigration after numbers falter: Report

    Trump seeks to boost white South African immigration after numbers falter: Report

    More than a year after the Trump administration rolled out a controversial policy prioritizing white South African Afrikaners for U.S. refugee resettlement, administration officials are now considering allocating over $300,000 to a targeted outreach campaign designed to boost application numbers that have failed to meet the president’s initial expectations, according to reporting from The Guardian.

    The policy, first unveiled in 2024, grew out of unsubstantiated claims from former President Donald Trump that Afrikaners — descendants of Dutch colonizers who settled in southern Africa in the 17th and 18th centuries — face systemic persecution in South Africa. The South African government, including President Cyril Ramaphosa, has repeatedly rejected these claims, with a delegation of white South African leaders who met with Trump in the Oval Office last year dismissing his assertions of an ongoing “white genocide” as completely unfounded.

    If approved, the proposed outreach program would launch a series of focus groups across eight South African cities spanning Gauteng, Free State, Western Cape, and Northern Cape provinces, including the Afrikaner enclave of Orania. Following the focus group discussions, organizers would distribute wide-ranging surveys to measure how many eligible white South Africans are interested in pursuing resettlement to the U.S. under the special priority pathway.

    Critics have pointed to troubling context around the program, noting that the exclusive eligibility for white South Africans — which excludes other South African communities that face documented marginalization — suggests the policy may be rooted in geopolitical retaliation. South Africa has drawn Trump’s ire for bringing a case against Israel before the International Court of Justice, as well as for expanding economic and trade partnerships with China and Iran, moves that conflict with the current administration’s foreign policy priorities.

    The underperformance of the existing priority pathway already been documented: separate Guardian reporting from last month found that roughly 13,000 Afrikaners have entered the U.S. over the past 18 months, while hundreds of other applicants have been rejected. The figures confirm that the resettlement process is far less accessible than the administration initially framed it to be.

    The special priority policy was rolled out as part of a broader, dramatic overhaul of the U.S. refugee program that saw the Trump administration slash annual refugee admission caps to historic lows. One year ago, the administration announced a target of just 7,500 refugees for fiscal year 2026, a massive drop from the 125,000 annual cap set by former Democratic President Joe Biden. That cap was later revised upward to 17,500, still far below the levels of the previous administration.

    This cutback has had sweeping humanitarian consequences. When Trump suspended the existing refugee resettlement program shortly after returning to office in January 2025, at least 12,000 vulnerable people who had already received conditional approval and booked their travel to the U.S. were left in indefinite limbo. An additional nearly 90,000 already approved applicants were also blocked from entry. While the Biden administration set a higher annual admission cap of 125,000, data from the Migration Policy Institute shows actual admissions fell short of that target: 25,465 refugees were admitted in 2022, 60,014 in 2023, 100,034 in 2024, and just 27,308 in 2025 before Biden’s term ended.

    Humanitarian and refugee advocacy groups have harshly condemned the administration’s decision to prioritize Afrikaners over other displaced populations. Sharif Aly, president of the International Refugee Assistance Project, criticized the policy in a statement shared with Middle East Eye, arguing that it exposes how far the administration has gone to abandon the U.S.’s longstanding commitments to displaced people globally. Aly noted that by privileging this one specific group while blocking entry to thousands of already vetted and approved refugees from other regions, the administration is overtly politicizing what should be a neutral humanitarian program.

  • Ukrainians dying because US restricting intelligence sharing, Zelensky adviser tells BBC

    Ukrainians dying because US restricting intelligence sharing, Zelensky adviser tells BBC

    A top adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has made explosive claims that gaps in U.S. intelligence sharing about incoming Russian missile and drone attacks have already resulted in civilian deaths, amid a growing rift between Kyiv and the Trump administration over Ukraine’s war effort.

    Serhii Beskrestnov, a key presidential adviser known by the call sign “Flash”, spoke exclusively to BBC, confirming that inconsistent and delayed U.S. intelligence has left Ukrainian officials unable to issue timely air raid warnings to at-risk populations. “It’s dangerous… I think it’s really very bad… People [have] already died,” Beskrestnov said, detailing that in multiple recent cases, U.S. warnings of Russian ballistic missile strikes arrived too late for civilians to reach shelter. Just Monday morning, Zelensky himself confirmed on social media that one of two overnight ballistic missile attacks on Kyiv came with no advance warning at all, while the second only gave residents minutes to find safety.

    Beskrestnov’s claims contradict repeated public denials from Washington. The White House has repeatedly stated there have been no changes to intelligence sharing arrangements with Ukraine, while U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Monday that he was unaware of any pause in intelligence support, suggesting reports of disrupted sharing likely stemmed from an unreported software glitch on Ukraine’s own early warning system. This contradiction comes just one week after Kyiv first publicly reported a three-day pause in U.S. intelligence sharing, a disruption that coincided with a sharp diplomatic row between the Trump administration and Ukraine over Kyiv’s controversial deal to import Russian oil.

    While Zelensky told NBC News over the weekend that intelligence sharing had been restored after the three-day halt, Beskrestnov pushed back on that framing, telling the BBC that American intelligence on incoming attacks remains incomplete and erratic. “Sometimes we receive this information before the attack, another time we do not,” he said, adding that in the overnight Monday attack, U.S. intelligence arrived just one minute before impact — too little time to activate a full public warning. He emphasized that other areas of U.S.-Ukrainian cooperation remain intact, and the problem is isolated to the air raid warning component of intelligence sharing.

    Beyond intelligence sharing gaps, Beskrestnov also confirmed that ongoing restrictions to Ukraine’s access to Starlink and its military-focused subsidiary Starshield remain in place, with no clear explanation from U.S. stakeholders. Last week, Starlink imposed a 100mph speed limit on mobile units connected to Starshield, a service that Ukrainian military forces rely on for drone operations, helicopter communications, and frontline troop coordination. The restriction has directly limited Ukraine’s ability to intercept incoming Russian drones and launch mid-range strikes on Russian-occupied territory.

    Starlink owner Elon Musk has previously stated that Starshield, a platform originally built for the U.S. Pentagon, falls under ultimate U.S. government control, implying Washington may have ordered the restrictions. President Trump has denied any involvement in the changes. Beskrestnov said Kyiv has received no clarity on who is responsible for the restrictions, adding that the simultaneous occurrence of intelligence sharing gaps and Starlink limitations is “probably” a deliberate pressure tactic to force Kyiv into negotiations with Moscow. “It’s probably the United States trying to say [to] us, ‘let’s have the conversation, negotiation with Russia, you should find the compromise’,” he told the BBC.

    In response to the growing uncertainty over U.S. support, Beskrestnov confirmed that Ukrainian officials are already actively pursuing alternative communication systems to replace Starlink for both military and civilian use. While Ukraine operates its own domestic radar networks that can provide limited advance warning of incoming attacks, the capability is far from sufficient to replace U.S. intelligence. “Now we understand that something begins to happen with Starlink, and we’re not sure what will be the next step,” Beskrestnov said. “We understand that we should be prepared for some problems in future. And now we’re thinking about an alternative for Starlink, not only for air defence, for communication between our forces, between our staff, for civilians also, because we don’t know what we should expect in future regarding Starlink.”

    When asked about the intelligence sharing dispute during a press availability Monday, Trump struck a critical tone toward Kyiv, saying “We’ve given a lot to Ukraine. They’ve given us nothing.” A senior anonymous White House official later reaffirmed that there have been no changes to intelligence sharing operations, noting that the Trump administration is focused on ending the war and has provided more total aid to Ukraine than any other country. The BBC has reached out to Starlink for comment on the restrictions, but has not yet received a response.

    As diplomatic tensions simmer, Russian strikes against Ukrainian civilian targets continued Monday. Ukrainian officials reported that at least six people, including a toddler in a pram and an 11-year-old girl, were killed in a Russian drone strike on a park café in the Kharkiv region in northeast Ukraine. Fourteen additional people were injured in the attack, which Zelensky described as an “absolute atrocity”.