分类: politics

  • Kenyan president defends US Ebola quarantine center amid protests

    Kenyan president defends US Ebola quarantine center amid protests

    NAIROBI, Kenya – A heated public and legal debate has erupted over a planned U.S.-funded Ebola quarantine facility at Kenya’s Laikipia Air Base, drawing pushback from local activists and a court suspension even as President William Ruto has publicly defended the cross-border health partnership for the first time.

    Ruto, speaking publicly on the issue for the first time on Monday evening, framed the project as a logical extension of decades of health-focused bilateral cooperation between Washington and Nairobi. He confirmed that the Laikipia site is only one of 24 Ebola preparedness facilities developed across the country under the partnership, which includes a $13 million U.S. investment in regional outbreak response. He noted that he approved the request — first made during the Trump administration — out of long-standing mutual trust between the two nations.

    The project sparked widespread public anger among Kenyans last week after U.S. officials clarified that any American Ebola patients treated under the program would not be repatriated to the United States, and would instead be held and treated exclusively at the Kenyan facility. The Law Society of Kenya and constitutional advocacy group Katiba Institute quickly filed a legal challenge to the plan, arguing that Kenya’s already overstretched, fragile public health system lacks the capacity to safely manage foreign Ebola patients.

    Kenya’s High Court acted swiftly on the challenge, first issuing an order suspending facility construction and the entry of foreign patients last Friday, before extending that blocking order this Tuesday. Despite the legal pause and widespread public protests against the project, Ruto struck a confident tone in his address, pushing back against critics by emphasizing that all 24 facilities, including the Laikipia site, would be available to treat Kenyan patients if a domestic Ebola outbreak occurs.

    “We are a responsible government. We know what we are doing. People should relax,” Ruto said. “Politicians should avoid reckless, unnecessary talk that doesn’t mean anything.”

    The debate over the quarantine facility comes as Kenya navigates a series of concurrent domestic crises, including recent deadly civil unrest linked to sky-high fuel prices, a tragic dormitory fire that killed 16 schoolgirls, and widespread public frustration over the cost of living. Ebola outbreaks across central Africa have raised regional preparedness concerns in recent years, turning this infrastructure project into a flashpoint over sovereignty, public health capacity, and bilateral cooperation.

  • Social Democrat Frederiksen set to start third term as Denmark’s prime minister

    Social Democrat Frederiksen set to start third term as Denmark’s prime minister

    After two months of intensive post-election negotiations, Danish Social Democrat leader Mette Frederiksen has finalized a four-party center-left coalition government, clearing the way for her to start a third term as Denmark’s prime minister.

    The Danish Royal House confirmed Monday that the new administration will bring together Frederiksen’s Social Democratic Party, outgoing Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen’s centrist Moderate Party, the Green Left (SF) and the Danish Social Liberal Party. In remarks Monday evening, Frederiksen outlined the coalition’s guiding mission, saying the government will govern “for the people of Denmark, for the generations to come and for the animals.”

    The path to this new government began when Frederiksen called an early general election in February. The snap vote was called amid a high-profile diplomatic standoff with former U.S. President Donald Trump over Greenland, the semi-autonomous territory within the Danish Kingdom, where Frederiksen’s straight-talking public response to Trump’s claims on the Arctic island was widely expected to give her party a popularity boost.

    When the final votes were counted in March, however, neither the left-leaning nor right-leaning political bloc secured a majority in Denmark’s 179-seat parliament. This outcome is not unusual for the Nordic nation’s proportional representation system, which almost always requires multi-party coalition negotiations to form a working government. Two initial attempts to form a government — one led by Frederiksen and a second bid by former Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen, who aimed to build a center-right administration — fell through before the final four-party center-left deal was reached.

    The 48-year-old prime minister, who has led the EU and NATO member state since mid-2019, saw her party take 36 seats in the latest election, a drop of 12 seats from the 2022 general election. A center-left politician with conservative positions on some key policy issues, Frederiksen has built an international profile for her unwavering support for Ukraine amid Russia’s ongoing full-scale invasion, alongside a strict approach to migration policy.

    Amid growing pressure from right-wing parties and warnings of potential increased migration flows linked to regional tensions involving Iran, Frederiksen put forward new migration proposals this year. These include a planned “emergency brake” on new asylum claims and stricter oversight of undocumented migrants convicted of criminal activity. Her outgoing administration already introduced a policy to deport foreign nationals sentenced to at least one year in prison for serious offenses.

    While Frederiksen’s popularity dipped during her second term amid a sharp nationwide rise in the cost of living, the diplomatic standoff with Trump over Greenland ultimately gave her approval ratings a significant boost. The crisis erupted when Trump pushed for U.S. control over the large Arctic island, followed by a short-lived threat in January to impose tariffs on European nations that opposed his position. Frederiksen drew a hard line in response, warning that a U.S. takeover of Greenland would lead to the collapse of the NATO alliance.

    Despite dominating the political agenda and government resources in the first months of the year, Greenland ultimately did not emerge as a major campaign issue, as all major Danish parties share broad consensus on the territory’s status within the kingdom. After Trump backed down from his tariff threat, Denmark, the U.S. and Greenland launched technical negotiations to develop a new Arctic security partnership, and the crisis has since faded from public focus. Instead, core domestic issues — including rising living costs, pension reform and a proposed national wealth tax — became the central talking points of the election campaign.

    Full policy priorities for the new coalition will be officially unveiled Tuesday, with the full list of incoming government ministers scheduled to be announced Wednesday.

  • Albanese government allocated almost $9m to defend CFMEU administrators, hearing told

    Albanese government allocated almost $9m to defend CFMEU administrators, hearing told

    The full scale of taxpayer spending on personal security for administrators of Australia’s powerful Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) has been laid bare at a Senate estimates hearing, with total expenditures reaching almost $9 million amid credible death threats linked to organized crime networks.

    The disclosure on Tuesday laid out how public funds have been earmarked to protect two successive government-appointed administrators brought in to clean up the union after it was placed into voluntary administration in late 2024 over widespread allegations of organized crime infiltration.

    Michael Crosby, a former New South Wales union official who took over the administrator role last month, has been allocated $5.3 million over the next two years in the 2026-27 federal budget to cover 24/7 protective security services, officials told the hearing. His predecessor, Mark Irving, who held the position for just 20 months, received approximately $3.8 million in cumulative budget allocations for his personal safety.

    Australian Federal Police (AFP) assessments have confirmed that death threats against Irving were not only credible, but came from actors with both the means and motive to carry out the attacks, senior officials confirmed. Most threats did not originate from rank-and-file CFMEU members, instead coming from external organized crime groups that had previously operated illegal networks within the union. As of March 31, the AFP is running three active investigations into unlawful activity across the building and construction sector, and has already secured a number of high-profile arrests linked to the probes.

    The hearing also revealed that Environment Minister Murray Watt received close personal protection for an undisclosed period of time amid the ongoing tensions. Watt declined to share further details about his security arrangements in the public forum, noting that disclosing such information posed unnecessary safety risks. ACTU Secretary Sally McManus also received targeted security provision, but government officials confirmed that those costs were not covered by public funds.

    Watt, who defended the decision to draw on taxpayer funds rather than passing costs to CFMEU members, argued that the government carried a core responsibility to protect administrators appointed under federal legislation. The government’s move to place the CFMEU into administration disrupted the illegal business models of criminal networks and corrupt actors, many of whom held ties to both rogue union officials and unethical building employers, he explained.

    Pressed on why the CFMEU or its membership do not cover the security costs, Watt pushed back against alternative funding models. He questioned whether it would be fair to pass the costs to either construction workers (as CFMEU members) or to the broader industry of building employers, pointing out that the cleanup of criminal infiltration is a public responsibility mandated by the Australian Parliament. “Given the parliament had set up this administration scheme, there was a responsibility on government to pay for the personal protection of the person who took on that role from threats being made from outside the union,” Watt said.

  • Trump says troops turned back from Beirut after Netanyahu call

    Trump says troops turned back from Beirut after Netanyahu call

    On Monday, a fresh wave of diplomatic and military upheaval roiled the Middle East, as Iran paused indirect negotiations with the United States in response to Israel’s intensifying military campaign in Lebanon – just hours before former President Donald Trump announced unexpected claims of a de-escalation between Israeli forces and the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah.

    The escalation traces back to joint military strikes launched by Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against Iran in late February. Since that offensive began, Iranian officials and independent global analysts have repeatedly charged that Israeli leadership is intentionally working to sabotage any diplomatic path toward a lasting regional ceasefire.

    Iran’s state-owned Tasnim News Agency, which has close ties to the country’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), confirmed the suspension of mediated talks on Monday. In its official announcement, the outlet noted that a full ceasefire across all fronts, including Lebanon, had been a core precondition for continuing negotiations. With Israeli attacks ongoing across Lebanese territory, that precondition had been fully violated, prompting Tehran’s negotiating team to pause all talks and draft exchanges through third-party intermediaries.

    In an official statement published by the IRGC-affiliated outlet, the corps warned that any crossing of Iran’s red lines in Lebanon and Gaza constitutes a direct act of war that threatens Iranian national security and the broader Islamic Resistance movement. In response to ongoing violations, the statement confirmed Iran would carry out defensive operations via unconventional tactics, open new military fronts, and maintain its current leverage over the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical global chokepoints for energy trade.

    Tehran has already leveraged this leverage in response to the US-Israeli offensive, restricting commercial vessel traffic through the strait – a key transit route for global fossil fuel and fertilizer shipments. As international oil prices have spiked sharply in response to the supply chain disruption, Trump imposed a US naval blockade of Iran, a measure he has continued to uphold even after a tentative April ceasefire agreement that Israel initially argued did not apply to military operations in Lebanon.

    Shortly after news of Iran’s negotiation suspension broke, Trump spoke to NBC News, saying he had not received official notification of Tehran’s decision, but downplayed the development, saying “I think it’s fine if they’re done talking.” He added that “they’re better negotiators than they are fighters, but they haven’t informed us of that,” and stressed that the US would not immediately launch a new round of widespread bombing.

    Trump’s comments came just days after his administration launched new targeted strikes against Iranian assets over the weekend, which were followed by Iranian retaliatory attacks on US military installations across the Middle East. The president reaffirmed that the US naval blockade would remain in place, adding: “If they don’t want to talk, that’s OK with me. I think it’s fine. I don’t particularly want to talk either. We talk too much.”

    Less than a day after those remarks, however, Trump posted a correction and new announcement on his Truth Social platform, stating he had held what he called a “very productive call” with Netanyahu. In the post, he claimed “there will be no Troops going to Beirut, and any Troops that are on their way, have already been turned back.” He added that he had also held indirect talks with Hezbollah representatives through a third party, and that the group had agreed to a full ceasefire: “That Israel will not attack them, and they will not attack Israel.” Within 15 minutes of that post, Trump added a follow-up note confirming that talks with the Islamic Republic of Iran were “continuing, at a rapid pace.”

    While Iran’s top leadership had not formally confirmed the suspension of talks as of Monday evening, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi issued a clear warning on social media, stating that the existing ceasefire between Iran and the US unequivocally applies to all fronts, including Lebanon. “Its violation on one front is a violation of the ceasefire on all fronts,” he wrote, adding that the US and Israel bear full responsibility for any consequences that stem from the breach.

    Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator and Parliament Speaker, echoed that stance, arguing that the ongoing US naval blockade and the escalation of what he called “war crimes” in Lebanon by the “genocidal Zionist regime” are clear proof the US has failed to uphold its ceasefire commitments. “Every choice has a price, and the bill comes due. It will all fall into place,” he said.

    Independent regional analysts have framed Iran’s actions as a clear response to Israel’s escalating campaign, with a consistent red line linking Lebanese security to the future of broader diplomacy. “The Iranian message is increasingly clear: no Lebanon ceasefire, no broader framework, and potentially no talks at all,” explained Sina Toossi, senior nonresident fellow at the Washington-based Center for International Policy. Toossi noted that negotiations have fallen into a damaging cycle: “progress, escalation, backtracking.” Many Iranian leadership suspect Trump is intentionally seeking to push down global oil prices ahead of potential further military expansion, while Israel is working to completely derail diplomacy by turning southern Lebanon into a second Gaza, he added.

    The tactics Israel is deploying in Lebanon mirror the “Gaza playbook,” Toossi argued, including widespread scorched-earth operations, mass forced displacement of civilian populations, and what he characterized as ethnic cleansing of the small neighboring country.

    Other analysts have echoed this comparison, pointing to the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, where Israel faces widespread global accusations of perpetrating genocide against the besieged Palestinian population. Assal Rad, a fellow at the Arab Center Washington DC, criticized mainstream media coverage of Israel’s Lebanon escalation, noting that just as the phrase “targeting Hamas” is used to justify widespread destruction in Gaza, labeling areas “Hezbollah-controlled” is used to justify flattening entire civilian neighborhoods in Lebanon. “This isn’t journalism, it’s stenography,” she said, sharing publicly available satellite imagery that shows widespread destruction of residential infrastructure across southern Lebanon. “This is what Israel’s total destruction of southern Lebanon looks like, deliberately destroying people’s homes so they have nothing to return to.”

    Mohamad Safa, who resigned earlier this year as a United Nations representative for the nongovernmental organization Patriotic Vision Association, issued a blunt accusation Monday: “Israel is committing another genocide in real time in Lebanon with complete impunity.”

    Former US Department of Defense advisor Jasmine El-Gamal, who now leads global consulting firm Averos Strategies, noted that the current crisis in Lebanon highlights a long-building conflict of interest between the US and Israel. “Early in the Iran war, I warned that US and Israeli interests would inevitably diverge and that President Trump would have to make a choice: to actually put America first, or to continue to allow Netanyahu to threaten our interests,” El-Gamal said early Monday. “Lebanon is the epitome of this choice.”

  • Historic moment for One Nation as Farrer MP David Farley sworn in

    Historic moment for One Nation as Farrer MP David Farley sworn in

    Australia’s right-wing populist One Nation party has marked a defining new chapter in its federal political history, as its second lower house Member of Parliament was officially sworn into the House of Representatives this week, capping off a dramatic poll surge that has put the party in national spotlight and reignited talk of a potential prime ministerial bid from party leader Pauline Hanson.

    On Tuesday shortly after midday, David Farley, who secured his seat in the rural New South Wales electorate of Farrer at a May by-election, walked into the chamber alongside former Nationals leader and One Nation’s only other sitting lower house MP Barnaby Joyce. The by-election was called after former opposition leader Sussan Ley stepped away from politics earlier this year, following an internal leadership challenge. Farley’s election victory was a major rebuke to the ruling Coalition, with the new MP claiming almost 40% of the primary vote to win the seat.

    Following the traditional swearing-in ceremony, where Farley swore allegiance to King Charles III with guidance from Joyce on the required signing procedures, Hanson welcomed the new MP with a warm embrace. The Queensland senator was joined at the event by One Nation’s upper house representatives Malcolm Roberts, Tyron Whitten and Sean Bell. In a post-event social media statement, Hanson noted that Farley’s swearing-in brings One Nation’s total federal parliamentary caucus to six sitting members. A visibly nervous Farley completed his formal obligations before shaking hands with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, and exchanging greetings with across-bench colleagues including Liberal MPs Tom Venning and Leon Robello, independents Dai Lei and Monique Ryan, and former deputy prime minister Michael McCormack, who offered the new MP well wishes. Farley ultimately took his seat on the crossbench alongside Joyce and Lei.

    The milestone comes as One Nation is experiencing its most sustained popularity surge in recent history. A new joint poll conducted by the Australian Financial Review, Redbridge Group and Accent Research released earlier this week found the party has overtaken the center-left Labor Party to become the most popular political force in the country. This growing electoral support has emboldened Hanson to increasingly openly discuss a potential run for the office of prime minister, a bid that would require the party leader to move from her current Senate seat into the lower house of parliament.

    When asked by 2GB on Monday whether she would be prepared to contest the next federal election for the top job, Hanson downplayed concerns over her health, saying: “It will come down to my health. I’ve got nothing wrong with me. I take no medication, nothing. I’ve got more energy in me than a lot of these other people.”

    Not all political figures have accepted Hanson’s claims of fitness for office, however. Liberal frontbencher Andrew Hastie quickly pushed back against the suggestion, pointing to Hanson’s age and her low attendance record at Senate estimates hearings to argue she lacks the capacity for the role. Speaking to the ABC, Hastie said: “Up until this point, she has been running a political party, but she is now talking about being prime minister. For that you need drive and commitment and energy, and I think the attendance record shows otherwise.”

  • Tasmania senator Jacqui Lambie fire up over veterans’ reforms, asks how many more will ‘drop dead’

    Tasmania senator Jacqui Lambie fire up over veterans’ reforms, asks how many more will ‘drop dead’

    A fiery parliamentary grilling has erupted over the Albanese government’s newly announced 2026–27 federal budget measure that imposes a $5000 annual cap on allied health services for Australian veterans, with independent Tasmanian senator and veteran herself Jacqui Lambie launching a blistering attack on the policy.

    During Tuesday’s Senate inquiry, Lambie delivered a passionate, personal tirade against the cap and an accompanying fee increase for healthcare providers, pressing Disability Minister Jenny McAllister and senior Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) officials to publicly admit how many aging Vietnam veterans and war widows the government expects to pass away before needing access to more funded care.

    Drawing from her own lived experience as a veteran managing chronic complex pain, Lambie revealed she had exhausted the full $5000 annual allowance in just 10 weeks, even after turning down free informal care from friends to offset official costs. She outlined that weekly physiotherapy alone costs her $450, and she has turned to experimental peptide treatments after exhausting standard covered care options. Lambie also slammed long-standing systemic delays in DVA processing that already block veterans from accessing timely hospital care, arguing the new cap will only push more vulnerable former service members into life-threatening health risk. She questioned where the government plans to extract its projected $94 billion in savings from the measure, calling on officials to be transparent about the human cost of the budget cut.

    “The government is scaring the hell out of us,” Lambie said during the inquiry. “Just as veterans are trying to get back on their feet, you are mucking around with our lives.”

    In their defense of the policy, Minister McAllister and departmental leaders framed the cap and fee adjustment as a reform designed to improve treatment consistency and reduce unnecessary administrative burdens for veterans. McAllister said the changes directly address longstanding veteran frustrations, particularly the requirement for frequent repeat GP referrals to continue ongoing care. Officials emphasized that 90% of veterans currently use less than $5000 in allied health services annually, and veterans with complex, high-level needs will still be eligible for additional care after crossing the annual threshold.

    A public consultation process for veterans requiring more than $5000 in annual support is scheduled to take place in August, with officials confirming they will refine the eligibility process for extra support based on feedback from the veteran community, aiming to make accessing additional care as streamlined as possible.

    But Lambie rejected these assurances, demanding an urgent formal response from the government within 24 hours for all affected veterans, saying incremental delays and vague promises amount to a miserable failure of the government’s duty to veterans.

  • Denmark’s Mette Frederiksen to form government after months of negotiations

    Denmark’s Mette Frederiksen to form government after months of negotiations

    Nearly three months after Denmark’s inconclusive general election held in March, Social Democratic Party leader Mette Frederiksen has finalized a deal to form a new centre-left minority coalition government, securing her third consecutive term as the country’s prime minister. The March election delivered a fragmented parliament, with 12 separate political parties securing seats – a result that left no bloc close to an absolute majority and triggered weeks of tense bargaining to put together a viable administration.

    Frederiksen’s Social Democrats emerged as the largest single party in the poll, but the result marked the party’s weakest electoral performance since 1903. The party captured just 21.9% of the national vote, translating to 38 seats in parliament – a loss of 12 seats from the previous legislature, and far short of the 90 seats required to form a majority government. The party’s main centre-right rival, Venstre, also suffered a historic defeat, posting its worst result in more than 100 years with only 10.1% of the vote, finishing behind the Socialist People’s Party (SF). Meanwhile, the far-right Danish People’s Party saw a major surge, more than tripling its vote share to 9% overall.

    Following a meeting with King Frederik X, which took place aboard the Danish royal yacht Dannebrog while the monarch is travelling, Frederiksen confirmed the coalition agreement had been reached after months of difficult negotiations. She announced she would officially unveil the full lineup of her new cabinet on Wednesday, with King Frederik X set to formally receive the new government at Copenhagen’s Amalienborg Palace, the official residence of the Danish royal family, on the morning of 3 June 2026. By the time the deal was struck, Denmark had operated without a permanent new government for 69 days, according to figures from national public broadcaster DR.

    The new four-party coalition will bring together Frederiksen’s Social Democrats alongside the left-wing Socialist People’s Party, centre-left Radikale Venstre, and centrist Moderates. Speaking to reporters after the royal audience, Frederiksen emphasized the hard work that went into reaching the cross-party agreement, and later posted on her official Instagram that the new government’s agenda will focus on delivering policies that benefit current and future generations of Danes, as well as advancing animal welfare protections – a key issue for voters in the election.

    The new administration will immediately face a stacked policy agenda, both international and domestic. Most notably, the government will have to respond to repeated public comments from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who has openly stated he wants the United States to take control of Greenland, the large semi-autonomous Danish territory that holds major strategic importance for North Atlantic and Arctic security. On the domestic front, Frederiksen’s government will need to tackle widespread voter concerns including ongoing cost-of-living pressures, broader economic stability, and anxiety over the future of Denmark’s social welfare system. Other urgent priorities identified by voters include strengthening animal rights protections, addressing high levels of pesticide contamination in drinking water linked to the country’s large pig farming sector, and cutting the significant climate footprint of Denmark’s agricultural industry.

  • Canada is failing the Jewish community and Jews are being targeted, Prime Minister Carney says

    Canada is failing the Jewish community and Jews are being targeted, Prime Minister Carney says

    TORONTO – In a stark and urgent address delivered at Toronto’s Holy Blossom Temple on Monday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has sounded the alarm that Canada’s social contract is failing Jewish Canadians, who are facing increasingly brutal, targeted attacks driven by rampant antisemitism across the country.

    Carney emphasized that current levels of anti-Jewish hate have not been witnessed at any point since the end of World War II, painting a grim picture of the state of religious tolerance in the nation. Data shared by the prime minister underscores the severity of the crisis: while Jewish Canadians make up just 1% of the country’s total population, more than two-thirds of all religion-motivated hate crimes committed in Canada last year were directed at members of this community.

    “The horror and shame are global. Our actions must be local. They start with clearly admitting that Canada’s civic compact is failing Jewish Canadians,” Carney stated during the address.

    The prime minister detailed the escalating and violent nature of antisemitic attacks occurring across Canadian regions. Perpetrators have carried out brazen acts including firing bullets at Jewish educational institutions, throwing firebombs at Jewish synagogues, and launching assaults on Jewish community centers. Beyond physical violence, Carney noted that antisemitic harassment has pushed Jewish business owners to face targeted boycotts and attacks on their livelihoods, and has driven Jewish students away from shared public spaces on Canadian university campuses.

    While Carney acknowledged that rising antisemitism is a shared crisis plaguing other Western nations including the United States, Europe and Australia, he stressed that the situation in Canada carries unique characteristics, is exceptionally severe, and requires tailored, targeted policy intervention. Global monitoring organizations have recorded a dramatic spike in antisemitic incidents worldwide since the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war in October 2023, a surge that has impacted Canada as heavily as many other nations.

    In response to the growing threat, Carney outlined concrete steps his administration has already taken and plans to implement in the coming months. Over the past year, the federal government has introduced new legislation designed to crack down on antisemitism and all other forms of targeted hatred. The prime minister also confirmed a $75 million Canadian dollar investment – equivalent to approximately $54 million U.S. dollars – that will go toward upgrading security infrastructure and hiring additional security personnel at faith-based institutions across the country, with a focus on protecting Jewish community sites.

    “It pains me that we had to commit $75 million to this, any dollar to this,” Carney said, expressing regret that public funds need to be diverted to protect communities from targeted hate.

    To build a long-term, evidence-based strategy to counter antisemitism, Carney announced the launch of a new Ministerial Advisory Council on Rights, Equality and Inclusion. This special body will be tasked with conducting a comprehensive review to map the nature, full scale and root causes of antisemitism in Canada. Following the council’s assessment, targeted investments in public education, hate prevention and community safety initiatives will be rolled out, according to a statement from the Prime Minister’s Office.

    Carney took the opportunity to clarify the scope of upcoming policy measures, emphasizing that new interventions will not infringe on fundamental Canadian rights. “I want to be clear about what these potential measures are, and what they are not. They are not curtailments of freedom of expression. They are not constraints on legitimate criticism of any government on any subject anywhere,” he said.

    Instead, the prime minister framed the actions as a defense of fundamental public values: “They are the basic standards we owe one another, in our shared public institutions, to ensure that no Canadian community is driven from those institutions by hatred.”

    Ahead of Carney’s address, Noah Shack, CEO of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, reiterated that the Canadian federal government needs to go further to reinforce Jewish community security and systematically root out systemic hate, a call that the new policy package directly answers.

  • Egyptian-born doctor and Gaza volunteer wins New Jersey Democratic primary

    Egyptian-born doctor and Gaza volunteer wins New Jersey Democratic primary

    In a primary election result that underscores shifting currents within U.S. Democratic politics, Egyptian-American combat surgeon Adam Hamawy has secured a decisive victory in New Jersey’s 12th District Democratic primary, all but guaranteeing him a seat in the U.S. Congress next year.

    With over 93% of ballots counted by 10 a.m. local time Wednesday, Hamawy captured more than 28% of the vote, outpacing his closest competitor by a substantial margin. The 12th District, home to the prestigious Princeton University, has been a reliably Democratic stronghold for at least 15 years, leaving little doubt that Hamawy will defeat his Republican challenger in the November general election. If he wins as expected, he will make history as the first Muslim to represent New Jersey in Congress; the candidate grew up in the state and still resides there today.

    Hamawy’s political profile weaves together a rare combination of military service, frontline medical experience, and high-profile progressive and centrist endorsements. A veteran combat surgeon, Hamawy’s path to politics first intersected with current U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth in 2004, when he treated the then-soldier for life-threatening injuries in Baghdad that required a double leg amputation. Duckworth has long credited Hamawy with saving her life, and she repaid that debt 20 years later by supporting his campaign from its launch, marking a rare centrist endorsement for an candidate aligned with the modern progressive Democratic movement.

    Hamawy catapulted to national attention earlier this year for his harrowing 2024 medical mission to Gaza, where he was deployed to the European Hospital in Khan Younis as part of a delegation organized by the Palestinian American Medical Association. When Israel closed the Rafah Crossing into Egypt, Hamawy and 19 other U.S. healthcare workers were trapped inside the besieged enclave. After the Biden administration negotiated safe passage for the 17 delegation members who held U.S. citizenship, Hamawy refused to evacuate until every member of his team was guaranteed exit. He eventually reached Jordan in late May 2024, and upon returning to the U.S., he repeatedly pressed congressional leaders to address the humanitarian catastrophe unfolding in Gaza.

    ideologically, Hamawy runs on a progressive platform aligned with the wave of new left Democrats who have found electoral success across the U.S. in recent months, prioritizing cost of living affordability and universal equitable access to healthcare. His campaign earned early and widespread support from leading progressives, including the full Congressional Progressive Caucus, Senator Bernie Sanders, Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib. He also secured backing from climate advocacy groups, the national nurses union, and multiple veterans organizations. He entered the primary as the clear frontrunner in both polling and fundraising, with his campaign reporting a total haul of $1.4 million ahead of election day.

    Democratic Party leaders welcomed Hamawy’s primary win. “Democratic voters throughout New Jersey have once again demonstrated that they understand the stakes of this moment,” Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin said in a statement Tuesday night. “As a veteran, combat surgeon, and small business owner, Adam Hamawy has continually served his community and our country. He is a proven fighter for working families. We look forward to welcoming him to Congress.”

    Progressive and pro-Palestinian advocacy groups framed Hamawy’s victory as a watershed moment for the Palestinian cause in U.S. electoral politics, noting that the crisis in Gaza has become a defining issue for young Democratic voters in 2024. “Voters were drawn to Dr Hamawy’s candidacy because he knows firsthand the reality of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza like few do – having worked to save the lives of Palestinian children under bombardment and unimaginable conditions. His experience is necessary in Congress now more than ever, as too many of the people meant to represent us continue to look the other way while our tax dollars fund injustices here and abroad,” the IMEU Policy Project and Justice Democrats said in a statement Tuesday night.

    Jewish Voice for Peace linked Hamawy’s win to a growing global movement that is reshaping domestic U.S. politics. “Last night, Palestine was on the ballot – and won,” the group wrote. “We are on our way to solidifying Palestine as part of popular politics that is intertwined with the fight for working people across the country.”

    Hamawy’s path to the primary win was not without conflict, as he faced sustained attacks from pro-Israel and right-wing political actors ahead of the vote. When asked ahead of the election about the criticism he faced, Hamawy downplayed the attacks, noting he had endured far greater adversity during his medical and military career. “I have done harder things than mount a political campaign,” Hamawy told Middle East Eye on the eve of the election. “What’s the worst thing they’re going to do? Call me some names, attack me? I have seen much worse.”

    Last month, The Wall Street Journal published an op-ed that drew a false equivalence between Hamawy’s values and those of Omar Abdel Rahman, the convicted “Blind Sheikh” who was found guilty of plotting terrorist attacks in the 1990s and died in U.S. prison in 2017. Notably, Hamawy himself testified as a witness in Rahman’s 1995 trial, the largest terrorism trial in U.S. history at the time, where he told the jury that while the cleric expressed anti-American views, he never explicitly outlined plans for a murder plot. Later, Jewish Insider published an article tying Hamawy to al-Qaeda, citing his 1994 volunteer medical mission to Bosnia with the Benevolence International Foundation, a Saudi charity that was not blacklisted by the U.S. or United Nations until 2002, eight years after Hamawy’s work with the group.

    The attacks drew national condemnation from progressives, and even reached the Senate floor, where Montana Republican Senator Tim Sheehy, who drew international attention earlier this year for breaking the arm of a pro-Palestinian activist who disrupted a Senate hearing, tweeted, “Democrats are now running actual terrorists for Congress. Surprising? No. Disappointing? Yes.”

  • As Trump attacks anew, Iran says Europe’s ‘appeasing aggressors’

    As Trump attacks anew, Iran says Europe’s ‘appeasing aggressors’

    Escalating cross-border hostilities between the United States and Iran have sparked a sharp diplomatic rebuke from Tehran, which on Monday slammed the European Union for what it calls a blatant display of biased moral judgment in the group’s response to recent Iranian strikes against US military sites in the Middle East. The condemnation comes as the Trump administration carried out new offensive operations against Iran over the weekend, leaving tentative peace negotiations deadlocked.