分类: politics

  • Palestine Action defendant wounded by taser and sledgehammer in raid, court hears

    Palestine Action defendant wounded by taser and sledgehammer in raid, court hears

    A high-profile trial of six Palestine Action activists opened this week at London’s Woolwich Crown Court, with shocking testimony about police use of force and violent confrontations during an August 2024 raid on an Israeli-owned arms factory near Bristol.

    On the first day of witness testimony Thursday, the court heard detailed accounts of the injuries sustained by 30-year-old Leona Kamio, a nursery school teacher from Swansea and one of the six defendants facing joint criminal damage charges linked to the break-in at Elbit Systems’ Filton facility. A medical examination following her arrest documented multiple injuries: taser burns to her right arm and right hip, a bruise to her chin, a small scratch, and a distinct wound to her right hand inflicted by a sledgehammer. Kamio told the court she cannot identify who caused the sledgehammer wound.

    Body-worn camera footage from arresting officer PC Peter Adams played in court shows Adams deploying his taser against Kamio during the raid. After being stunned, Kamio was tackled to the ground, where she hit her chin on the floor and went rigid. Kamio described the experience of being tasered as “not good, very painful”, adding that Adams twisted her arm behind her back and attempted to drag her up by her wrist while she screamed in pain. The footage captures Kamio shouting “you’re fucking hitting me” as Adams attempted to place her in handcuffs, calling the officer an “idiot” in response to his own verbal provocation. Kamio emphasized she was not faking her pain or resisting arrest, joking to the court “I failed drama” to underscore the authenticity of her reaction.

    Alongside Kamio, the other defendants facing criminal damage charges are Charlotte Head, 29, Jordan Devlin, 31, Fatema Rajwani, 21, Zoe Rogers, 22, and 23-year-old Samuel Corner. Corner faces an additional charge of intentionally causing grievous bodily harm, for allegedly striking two police officers with a sledgehammer during the confrontation.

    Testifying earlier on Thursday, Corner – an autistic Oxford graduate with an ADHD diagnosis – explained his actions as a reaction to the panic and disorientation caused by Pava, a synthetic incapacitant pepper spray sprayed at him by PC Aaron Buxton. Corner told the court the spray produced an “all consuming” stinging and burning effect that left him unable to see or focus clearly. He added that he did not initially recognize the approaching responders as police officers, and believed they were aggressive security guards intent on harming him and his fellow activists.

    “I was scared about what they were going to do to us, especially the women,” Corner told the court. He explained that when he heard screaming and saw what he believed was a large male security guard attacking a fellow female activist, he acted instinctively. He has since acknowledged the person he struck was Sergeant Kate Evans, a female police officer who was not attacking Rogers, the activist he thought was in danger.

    Corner admitted he raised his sledgehammer and struck Evans twice, but said he had no intent to cause her serious harm. When pressed by prosecutor Deanna Heer KC on whether attacking a police officer with a sledgehammer was unreasonable, he responded: “it seemed reasonable to do something and I had to act quite quickly. If I had thought about what it was going to do to her, I agree it would have been unreasonable.” When asked if he understood the severity of harm he could have caused, he replied “I genuinely didn’t.” Footage also shows Corner striking PC Buxton twice with the sledgehammer, though Corner says he has no memory of the encounter.

    Multiple character witnesses have described Corner as a gentle, compassionate person with a strong commitment to justice who finds any form of violence abhorrent. The court heard he has even helped fellow prisoners improve their literacy skills while in pre-trial detention.

    Kamio, for her part, told the court how she joined Palestine Action in March 2024, after receiving an email from the direct action group about its campaign to close Elbit Systems facilities across the UK. She was soon added to a Signal messaging group to plan the Filton raid, which the group identified as Elbit’s most important UK site, opened in July 2023 by the Israeli ambassador to the United Kingdom.

    The activists’ stated goal, Kamio told the court, was to remain inside the facility for as long as possible to destroy as many weapons components as possible. Organizers had told the group security would not enter the facility, but head of security Nigel Shaw burst into the area within the first five minutes, an encounter that left Kamio frightened. “He looked so angry. Everything about his body language and face was just rage. He was charging towards us,” she said, adding that she believed Shaw was holding his umbrella in a position to strike her. She said she shouted at him to “fuck off” and told him confronting activists was “above your paygrade” – that stopping them was a job for police, not private security. She only later realized Shaw had been injured and was bleeding.

    Kamio added that a second security guard, Angelo Volante, appeared extremely unpredictable, swinging an angle grinder and holding a hammer. “I panicked because I’m at Elbit, this is a very evil company, the people that work there describe themselves as being the backbone of the Israeli military,” she explained. She stressed she never intended to harm anyone, and had the sledgehammer taken from her before she could use it against anyone. She also reaffirmed her belief that the action was necessary: “I came here to do something to stop people from suffering. Working with children, I would put one of their lives before any property.”

    Kamio’s employer at the Swansea nursery where she works submitted a character reference confirming that her extended pretrial detention has “upset and confused” the children in her care, and that “I cannot imagine her ever hurting anyone.”

    The trial, which is being closely watched by activists on both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, is set to continue in the coming days.

  • US says Iran players welcome at World Cup amid Italy uproar

    US says Iran players welcome at World Cup amid Italy uproar

    A controversial idea to swap Iran out of the 2026 World Cup and give their spot to Italy has been firmly rejected by both the U.S. government and Italian authorities, bringing clarity to months of uncertainty around Iran’s participation in the co-hosted tournament. Addressing reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio explicitly stated that Iran’s national football team will be welcomed to the competition, drawing a clear line between Washington’s official policy and the unsolicited proposal put forward by Italian-American envoy Paolo Zampolli.

    Rubio pushed back against widespread speculation that the U.S. had pushed for Iran’s expulsion from the tournament, emphasizing that no official from the U.S. government had moved to bar the country’s athletes from entering. He did, however, note that entry restrictions could apply to other members of the Iranian delegation who are alleged to have links to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), a group labeled a terrorist organization by the U.S. and multiple other governments. “The problem with Iran, it would be not their athletes, it would be some of the other people (they) would want to bring with them, some of whom have ties to the IRGC. We may not be able to let them in, but not the athletes themselves,” Rubio clarified.

    The unapproved proposal originated from Zampolli, a businessman and socialite who claims to have introduced former U.S. President Donald Trump to his wife Melania. Zampolli told the Financial Times he had pitched the idea of Italy taking Iran’s spot to Trump and FIFA, saying it would be a “dream” to see the four-time World Cup champions compete in the 2026 tournament co-hosted by the U.S., Mexico and Canada. Italy failed to qualify for the event, falling to Bosnia and Herzegovina in a penalty shootout in their qualifying playoff final, marking the third consecutive World Cup the side has missed out on.

    Italian officials quickly dismissed the proposal out of hand on Thursday. Sports Minister Andrea Abodi told local news agencies ANSA and AGI that the idea “first, is not possible; second, is not appropriate, you qualify on the pitch.” That stance was echoed by Luciano Buonfiglio, president of Italy’s Olympic Committee, who added: “I would feel offended. You have to earn your place in the World Cup.” The Iranian embassy in Rome also condemned the suggestion, calling it evidence of U.S. “moral bankruptcy” and noting Italy does not need “political privileges” to prove its footballing standing.

    Iran’s participation in the 2026 World Cup has been clouded by geopolitical unrest following the outbreak of open conflict between Iran, the U.S. and Israel in late February. Earlier this year, the Iranian Football Federation confirmed it was in negotiations with FIFA to move the country’s scheduled group stage matches out of the U.S. and into Mexico. But FIFA President Gianni Infantino has repeatedly reaffirmed that Iran will remain in the tournament and play their matches at the venues assigned in the original draw, a position the governing body stood by Thursday when contacted by AFP, pointing to Infantino’s recent public comments. This is not the first time Zampolli has pushed this type of proposal: in 2022, he made an identical push to have Italy replace Iran at the Qatar World Cup amid protests in Iran, a suggestion that was ignored entirely by global football officials.

  • Iran blames US as truce talks reach a deadlock

    Iran blames US as truce talks reach a deadlock

    Truce talks aimed at de-escalating conflict between the United States and Iran have reached an impasse, with top Iranian leaders directly blaming Washington’s bad-faith tactics and uncompromising posture for the breakdown, as escalating military and maritime moves in the strategic Strait of Hormuz threaten global energy supplies. As of April 23, 2026, Washington has unilaterally extended its proposed ceasefire on its own terms, but ongoing exchanges of attacks and counterattacks have continued to disrupt critical commercial shipping through the key waterway, through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil flows daily.

    In a public social media statement released Wednesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian pushed back against US claims that Iran has refused to negotiate in good faith, emphasizing that the Islamic Republic has consistently remained open to meaningful dialogue. “Bad faith, siege and threats are the main obstacles to genuine negotiation,” Pezeshkian said. “The world is witnessing your hypocritical empty talk and the contradiction between your claims and your actions.”

    Hours after Pezeshkian’s remarks, US President Donald Trump issued his own provocative social media statement, announcing he had ordered the US Navy to “shoot and kill” any small Iranian vessels that attempt to block passage through the strait. “There is to be no hesitation,” Trump added, doubling down on his administration’s aggressive posture toward Iran.

    The day before Trump’s order, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that the White House cites inconsistent messaging from Tehran as a core barrier to progress, noting that US leadership retains full authority to end the unilateral ceasefire extension at any time. “We see a lot of different messaging and rhetoric,” Leavitt said, adding that the US maintains full control of the regional situation and holds significant leverage over the Iranian government. “Not only have they been significantly weakened and obliterated militarily, but they are losing economically and financially every single moment that passes with this blockade. So the president is going to continue to lead the free world, to run the United States of America as we await the Iranian response,” she said.

    In response to the ongoing US blockade and escalating rhetoric, Iranian legislative and security bodies are now reviewing a new framework to assert full sovereign control over the Strait of Hormuz, according to Iran’s official Mehr News Agency. Fada Hossein Maleki, a senior member of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, confirmed Thursday that both parliament and the Supreme National Security Council are conducting joint reviews of proposals for the strategic waterway.

    Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said in a Wednesday social media post that any meaningful ceasefire can only function if Washington ends its maritime blockade, which Tehran argues is holding the global economy hostage. Ghalibaf stressed that reopening full unimpeded navigation through the strait is impossible while Washington flagrantly violates the terms of the proposed truce. “They did not achieve their goals through military aggression, nor will they through bullying. The only way forward is to recognize the rights of the Iranian nation,” he added.

    On Thursday, Iran’s state-run media outlets Islamic Republic News Agency and Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting released the first public footage of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGC-N) operations in the strait, directly contradicting recent claims from the Trump administration that Iran’s naval capabilities have been completely destroyed. The IRGC confirmed it has seized two foreign commercial vessels for violating Iranian shipping restrictions in the waterway, and opened fire on a third vessel that failed to comply with orders.

    Tasnim News Agency, another Iranian state outlet, also reported Thursday that the first revenue collected from new shipping tolls imposed on vessels passing through the strait has been deposited in the Central Bank of Iran, marking the formal launch of the country’s new toll regime for the waterway.

    For its part, US Central Command confirmed Thursday that American forces have diverted or ordered 31 vessels back to port as part of Washington’s ongoing economic blockade against Iran. Most of the redirected vessels are oil tankers, US officials said, and the vast majority have complied with US orders to avoid the region.

    A recent Pentagon assessment, first reported by The Washington Post, estimates that it would take up to six months to clear all naval mines laid by Iran from the strait, a timeline that would keep global oil prices elevated for an extended period. International Energy Agency Executive Director Fatih Birol confirmed the severe impact of the ongoing conflict on global energy markets, noting that the world is currently losing 13 million barrels of oil supply per day due to disrupted shipping and production tied to the confrontation.

  • Turkey and UK to sign strategic partnership agreement during Fidan’s visit

    Turkey and UK to sign strategic partnership agreement during Fidan’s visit

    On Thursday morning, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan touched down in London, kicking off a high-stakes two-day diplomatic visit that will culminate in the signing of a landmark UK-Turkey strategic partnership framework agreement by Thursday afternoon.

    Fidan’s first scheduled engagement of the visit is a formal meeting with British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper set for 4 p.m. local time. While the full scope of the upcoming strategic partnership framework remains under wraps ahead of the signing, preliminary outlines of the agenda have emerged from diplomatic and media sources.

    Turkish state-affiliated broadcaster TRT World has confirmed that Fidan plans to open the discussion by highlighting the steady upward momentum of bilateral ties between Ankara and London, and to lay out Turkey’s ambition to deepen cooperation across multiple priority areas. One key bilateral issue Fidan is expected to raise is the ongoing delays Turkish residents in the UK face when processing applications for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR), a long-term residency status that impacts hundreds of thousands of Turkish citizens currently living in Britain.

    Defense industry collaboration and expanded energy sector partnership are also set to be core topics on the meeting agenda, with both sides expected to formalize a shared commitment to advancing work in these two critical areas. Beyond bilateral concerns, Fidan and Cooper will also turn their attention to regional and global tensions, particularly the ongoing standoff between the United States and Iran. The two top diplomats are expected to explore pathways to advancing a diplomatic resolution to the conflict and align on shared goals for de-escalation.

    This visit marks the second high-level meeting between Fidan and Cooper in less than a week, following Cooper’s attendance at the Antalya Diplomacy Forum in southern Turkey last weekend, where the pair held preliminary talks. Beyond his meeting with Cooper, Fidan’s packed two-day schedule includes engagements with British members of parliament, a public address at the University of Oxford’s Global History Centre as part of the university’s Changing Global Order Program, and a closed-door meeting with representatives of the UK’s large Turkish community, which is estimated to number between 350,000 and 500,000 people across the country.

    The visit also comes on the heels of stark remarks Fidan delivered at the Antalya Forum regarding shifting security alliances in the Eastern Mediterranean. During that appearance, Fidan warned that Muslim nations across the region are growing increasingly alarmed by the expanding military partnership between Israel, Greece, and Cyprus, noting that Greece’s participation in the alliance is notable given its status as a fellow NATO member. “Israel has been pursuing an overtly expansionist foreign policy in recent months, so Turkey’s security concerns are not without justification,” Fidan stated at the forum.

    In recent months, Turkey has worked to rebuild and expand regional diplomacy, launching regular formal dialogue mechanisms with key regional powers including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Pakistan to coordinate on shared regional security and policy challenges. This current diplomatic outreach to the UK represents another step in Ankara’s broader strategy of strengthening ties with both regional and Western actors amid a shifting global security landscape.

  • Canada’s US booze boycott could be resolved if Trump addresses tariffs, Carney says

    Canada’s US booze boycott could be resolved if Trump addresses tariffs, Carney says

    As the mandatory July 1 review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) draws near, trade tensions between Canada and the United States have escalated sharply, centered on retaliatory Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol imports imposed in response to sweeping Trump-era tariffs. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has outlined a clear negotiating position: Ottawa is ready to begin detailed trade discussions with Washington immediately, but it will not rush an unfavorable deal and is prepared to wait for the right conditions if necessary.

    The current standoff traces back to 2025, when former U.S. President Donald Trump implemented new tariffs on key Canadian export sectors including steel, aluminum, automobiles and agricultural goods, a measure he claimed would protect American manufacturing and create U.S. jobs. In response, multiple Canadian provinces – led by Ontario, home to the world’s largest single alcohol purchaser, the Ontario Liquor Control Board – pulled all U.S.-produced alcoholic beverages from store shelves. Ontario Premier Doug Ford has remained unwavering in this policy, confirming that U.S. liquor will not return to shelves until the targeted tariffs are fully lifted.

    Carney confirmed Thursday that the reversal of provincial alcohol bans could happen rapidly once progress is made on resolving the core tariff dispute, telling reporters, “Issues such as decisions on which alcohol to put on the shelves – we can make progress very quickly on that with progress in other areas.” He emphasized that the Trump administration’s tariffs violate the terms of the existing USMCA free trade framework, and pushed back against U.S. demands for unilateral concessions, noting “We’re not sitting here taking notes and taking instruction from the U.S.”

    In recent days, senior U.S. officials have ramped up pressure on Canada over the alcohol ban. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick called the restriction “disrespectful” Wednesday, while U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer threatened consequences if the issue is not resolved. Lutnick also dismissed Canada’s cautious, wait-and-see negotiating approach as “the worst strategy I’ve ever heard,” pointing to the vast size discrepancy between the U.S. and Canadian economies.

    Ford, speaking to CNN Thursday, countered that the U.S. is already suffering steep economic losses from the dispute, noting that Canadian consumer boycotts of U.S. goods and reduced cross-border travel are costing the American economy “tens of billions of dollars.” “This can come to a quick end, everyone can thrive and prosper,” Ford said, if Washington agrees to roll back the tariffs.

    Under Canadian law, liquor regulation falls under provincial rather than federal jurisdiction, meaning provincial leaders hold final authority over whether to restore U.S. alcohol sales. Candace Laing, newly appointed to Carney’s Canada-U.S. trade advisory committee and president and CEO of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, confirmed that Canada is open to using the alcohol issue as negotiating leverage to secure tariff rollbacks, but will not make unilateral concessions outside of a balanced reciprocal agreement. “Canada is not going to give any concessions that aren’t in the context of a real negotiation,” Laing said.

    Many policy analysts argue that Canada’s negotiating position has strengthened considerably in recent months. Fen Hampson, a Carleton University international affairs professor and co-chair of the institution’s Canada-U.S. relations expert group, noted that Trump’s domestic political standing has eroded amid widespread public opposition to the U.S.-Israel military campaign in Iran, a factor that could shift control of Congress in upcoming midterm elections. At the same time, Carney has consolidated power, with recent special elections and parliamentary defections granting his government a stable majority in Parliament.

    Hampson argued that Canada’s willingness to wait is a deliberate, strategic choice that gives Ottawa a “last mover advantage,” allowing Canadian negotiators to see what terms Trump secures with Mexico and other trading partners before finalizing any agreement. He added that Canada also holds key structural advantages, as it supplies the U.S. with critical goods including energy, base metals and critical minerals that American industry depends on. “The Canadians are very smart here,” Hampson said. “They’re ragging the puck, they’re running the clock down.”

    Washington has identified a handful of ongoing trade irritants with Canada, including the alcohol ban and access to Canada’s protected dairy market, that it hopes to address during the upcoming USMCA review negotiations, which must conclude by July 1 under the terms of the existing agreement.

  • US government watchdog to investigate Epstein files release

    US government watchdog to investigate Epstein files release

    The internal watchdog of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has officially launched a formal investigation into whether the agency has met its legal obligations under a congressional mandate to declassify and release documents tied to the controversial Jeffrey Epstein case. The move from the DOJ’s Office of the Inspector General comes as bipartisan lawmakers have repeatedly slammed the agency for its slow, inconsistent rollout of records, with millions of documents still locked away from public view more than five months after the law took effect.

    In an official statement released Thursday, the inspector general’s office outlined that the probe will center on three core areas of scrutiny: how DOJ staff identify, collect, and turn over records that fall under the scope of the transparency law; whether the department’s internal rules and processes for redacting sensitive information and withholding documents align with the legal requirements set by Congress; and the agency’s overall adherence to the law’s timeline. The statement also noted that if unaddressed issues emerge during the audit, investigators will expand their review to cover those emerging concerns.

    The legal mandate at the center of this controversy, the Epstein Files Transparency Act, was signed into law by President Donald Trump in November 2025. Notably, Trump initially lobbied Congress to reject the bill before ultimately signing it after it passed with bipartisan support. The law requires the DOJ to release every existing document related to Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier convicted of sex offenses, and his convicted co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, within 30 days of the law’s enactment.

    Since the law took effect, the DOJ has released records in staggered, intermittent batches to its public online database. Officials confirm they have published more than three million files to date, but a recent analysis by CBS News, the BBC’s U.S. partner, found that roughly 300,000 of those files were later pulled offline following privacy complaints from Epstein’s survivors, leaving roughly 2.7 million records publicly available. Back in January, a senior DOJ official disclosed that the federal government holds an estimated six million total documents tied to the case, explaining that many records will remain sealed permanently to protect survivors’ personal identifying information or to preserve the integrity of ongoing active investigations.

    That explanation has done little to ease mounting public and congressional frustration. Critics have openly accused the DOJ of deliberately dragging its feet to conceal connections between Epstein and powerful political and celebrity figures, a claim the department has repeatedly denied. Just last month, the DOJ was forced to correct a major oversight when it released previously withheld interview summaries from a woman who had made unsubstantiated sexual assault claims against President Trump. The agency claimed the documents had been kept from public view by accident. Trump, whose name appears thousands of times throughout the released files, including in personal emails and correspondence written by Epstein, has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing connected to the case.

    The push for an independent inspector general review has long been led by two high-profile bipartisan lawmakers who spearheaded the push for the original transparency law: Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna and Republican Congressman Thomas Massie. In an interview with BBC Newsnight last month, Massie made clear he remained deeply unsatisfied with the DOJ’s handling of the file release, and called for greater accountability. “Men need to be perp-walked in handcuffs to the jail, and until we see that here in this country… we don’t have a system of justice that’s working,” Massie told the program.

  • Retiring Kentucky AD Mitch Barnhart won’t take new high-paying role at school

    Retiring Kentucky AD Mitch Barnhart won’t take new high-paying role at school

    In Lexington, Kentucky, a sudden reversal has unfolded around outgoing University of Kentucky Athletic Director Mitch Barnhart, who has walked back plans to take a high-profile, six-figure post-retirement position at the public institution just days after Kentucky’s governor openly questioned the school’s leadership and decision-making around the appointment.

    Barnhart and UK President Eli Capilouto released joint confirmations Thursday that the long-serving athletics leader will not step into the proposed role of executive-in-residence for the UK Sport and Workforce Initiative. According to previously released contract details, the position was set to pay Barnhart an annual salary of $950,000 running through August 2030.

    In his statement, Capilouto explained that Barnhart approached him earlier this week to share his worry that public debate over his planned future role had overshadowed the university’s core work. “Mitch and his family care deeply about this institution and our state, and they want the focus to return to the work that matters most for our students and the Commonwealth,” Capilouto said.

    Barnhart, who has held the position of athletic director since 2002 — making him the longest-tenured AD in the history of the Southeastern Conference — will still officially retire from his current role on June 30. Capilouto clarified that all contractual exit compensation for Barnhart will be covered by newly raised private donations, explicitly ruling out the use of general university funds, athletics department budgets, or money earmarked for Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) opportunities for student athletes.

    Barnhart echoed the sentiment that the ongoing controversy made the current moment a poor fit for the new role. “Work has already begun on the Initiative but recently it has become apparent that now is not the right time and we would never stand in the way of what we deem best,” he said.

    The about-face came only 48 hours after Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear issued a public statement voicing growing alarm over leadership decisions at the state’s flagship public university. Beshar said he was “losing confidence and growing increasingly concerned” about both Barnhart’s planned role and broader governance choices at UK. Beyond the proposed executive post, the governor’s criticism extended to another high-profile personnel decision: the appointment of a new law school dean who was the only finalist not recommended by the school’s faculty. Beshear specifically called out the undefined nature of Barnhart’s planned new position, noting it was a newly created role paying nearly $1 million per year with no clear set of core responsibilities.

  • Why a bitter political feud has left a former Zambian president unburied 10 months after his death

    Why a bitter political feud has left a former Zambian president unburied 10 months after his death

    Nearly a full year after his passing, the body of former Zambian head of state Edgar Lungu remains interred unburied in a South African mortuary, trapped in a bitter high-stakes feud that has gripped two southern African nations and drawn international attention to a long-simmering political rivalry. Lungu, 68, died on June 5 last year at a South African hospital while receiving treatment for an undisclosed illness, but what should have been a period of national mourning has devolved into a months-long legal and political standoff over where and how he will be laid to rest.

    The core of the dispute stems from deep-seated animosity between Lungu’s family and current Zambian President Hakainde Hichilema, Lungu’s long-time political adversary. According to Lungu’s relatives, the former president’s explicit final wish was that Hichilema be barred from any proximity to his funeral. Citing this instruction and ongoing safety concerns rooted in their political conflict, the family has insisted on burying Lungu on South African soil, refusing government calls to repatriate the remains for an official state funeral. The Zambian government, by contrast, has argued that a state burial for a former head of state is a matter of national interest, and has already reserved a plot for Lungu at the national cemetery reserved for former Zambian leaders, which has sat empty for 10 months. The government launched a formal legal case to secure custody of Lungu’s remains shortly after his death, derailing a planned funeral service the family had organized in South Africa last June, forcing mourners in funeral attire to abandon the service and attend an emergency court hearing.

    The bitter rivalry between Lungu and Hichilema stretches back more than half a decade across Zambia’s turbulent democratic landscape. The two men faced off in the tightly contested 2016 presidential election, where Lungu narrowly defeated Hichilema to retain the presidency. Just one year later, Hichilema was arrested and charged with treason after he allegedly refused to yield his vehicle to Lungu’s presidential motorcade; he spent four months in prison before the charges were dropped, following widespread international condemnation of the arrest as a politically motivated attack. When Hichilema defeated Lungu to win the 2021 presidential election, Lungu alleged that the new administration targeted him for harassment, claiming he had been effectively placed under house arrest and blocked from leaving the country to seek urgent medical care. Hichilema’s government has repeatedly denied these allegations. Ultimately, Lungu reportedly slipped away unnoticed to a local airport, purchased a last-minute ticket, and traveled to South Africa for treatment, where he died weeks later.

    In the legal battle that followed, a South African court ultimately ruled in favor of the Zambian government, ordering that Lungu’s remains be turned over for repatriation by the agreed date of May 12. But a dramatic new twist erupted earlier this week, turning a simmering dispute into a full-blown constitutional and legal crisis. On Wednesday, the Zambian government announced that it had taken custody of Lungu’s body from the private Pretoria funeral home where the family had stored it, with assistance from South African law enforcement authorities, and had moved it to a separate facility ahead of repatriation. But within hours, the South African court intervened, issuing an emergency order demanding that the body be returned immediately to the family’s control. The court ruled that the early seizure of the remains constituted direct contempt of court, as it violated the court’s timeline for the handover set for May 12.

    The fallout from Wednesday’s actions has set the stage for a new phase of legal confrontation. The court has ordered both Zambian government representatives and the South African authorities who assisted in moving the body to appear in court to explain why they should not face contempt of court charges. The bizarre, morbid standoff has become a subject of widespread public fascination in both Zambia and South Africa, shining a harsh spotlight on the deep political divides that continue to shape Zambia’s post-election landscape more than two years after Hichilema took power.

  • Turkey opts for silence on von der Leyen remarks to avoid straining EU ties

    Turkey opts for silence on von der Leyen remarks to avoid straining EU ties

    A controversial comment from European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that grouped Turkey with Russia and China as a source of potential malign influence has sparked behind-the-scenes diplomatic maneuvering, with Ankara opting for an unusually muted response rather than the sharp public rebuke many observers expected, Middle East Eye has confirmed.

    The incident unfolded during a speech Monday at an event celebrating the 80th anniversary of German newspaper Die Zeit in Hamburg. Von der Leyen argued that failure by the European Union to expand its bloc would leave neighboring nations vulnerable to falling under the sway of external powers, specifically naming Russia, Turkey and China as sources of influence that would work against European interests. The remark marked an unprecedented public framing of Turkey — a NATO ally and official EU candidate country — as a hostile force targeting European unity, triggering immediate diplomatic unease in Ankara.

    Brussels moved swiftly to contain the fallout, releasing an official clarification within 24 hours that walked back the phrasing. A commission spokesperson emphasized Tuesday that Turkey is “unquestionably an important partner” to the EU, noting that von der Leyen’s comment was intended only to acknowledge Turkey’s significant geopolitical influence, geographic size and regional ambitions, not to draw an equivalence between Ankara and Moscow or Beijing.

    The clarification reaffirmed Turkey’s status as a key economic and political partner, highlighting its central role in high-profile strategic projects including the EU’s Connectivity Agenda and the Trans-Caspian Middle Corridor. It also underscored long-standing cooperation on migration management and restated Turkey’s position as a critical NATO ally and ongoing EU accession candidate, cementing its role as a core diplomatic interlocutor for the bloc.

    According to a senior Turkish official speaking to Middle East Eye on condition of anonymity, the Brussels clarification has been sufficient to satisfy Ankara, which has no intention of issuing a formal public criticism or condemnation of von der Leyen’s comments at this stage. Turkish leadership has little appetite for open confrontation with the EU right now, the official added.

    The decision to remain publicly silent has surprised many analysts, given Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s history of forceful, public pushback against perceived slights from European leaders. Multiple overlapping geopolitical and economic factors explain the restrained approach, which aligns with a broad shift in Turkey’s foreign policy dating back to 2023, when Ankara began actively pursuing improved relations with Europe and other NATO allies.

    Economic pressures top the list of priorities driving the shift. Turkey’s economy has faced years of sustained strain, with high inflation and weakening investor confidence already exacerbated by regional instability stemming from escalating conflict in the Middle East, which has eroded Turkish central bank reserves. An open diplomatic crisis with the EU would further damage investor sentiment, a risk Ankara is unwilling to take at this juncture.

    A second key factor is a pending draft EU regulation that would prioritize “Made in Europe” automotive and green technology products in public procurement processes. The policy introduces mandatory minimum local content requirements for key green goods — including electric vehicle batteries, solar and wind energy components, and zero-emission vehicles — to strengthen European domestic manufacturing. Under the new framework, the lowest bid will no longer be the sole deciding factor in awarding public sector contracts.

    Erdogan and Turkish Trade Minister Omer Bolat have lobbied heavily in recent weeks to secure access for Turkish companies to EU supply chains under the new rules, citing the existing EU-Turkey Customs Union as legal basis for favorable treatment. Turkish officials are currently drafting amendments to Ankara’s own public procurement laws to meet EU demands for reciprocal access, which would allow European firms to compete on equal terms in Turkish public tenders in exchange for Turkish firms gaining access to European procurement markets. Barcin Yinanc, a prominent columnist for Turkish outlet T24, noted that the EU has already made this reciprocal requirement clear to Ankara: unless Turkey opens its own procurement market to European competitors, Turkish firms will be locked out of the new EU scheme.

    Oguz Arikboga, a Netherlands-based Turkish academic with decades of experience working with EU institutions, argues that Turkey’s restrained response stems from broader strategic goals beyond the procurement dispute. “Ankara is currently in a position where it wants to tread carefully on the international stage and avoid escalation, having solidified its role as a mediator and key regional player,” he explained. “In the current international climate, it is seeking deeper cooperation on different files with all actors – not least with the EU. With the upcoming NATO summit in Ankara and COP31 climate summit in Antalya, it is not keen on escalating the situation.”

    Arikboga also noted that Ankara’s approach is shaped by its ambition to integrate into Europe’s evolving security architecture amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and growing transatlantic friction between the United States and the EU. Against a backdrop of U.S. skepticism toward NATO commitment from the Trump administration, Turkey has expanded joint defense investment partnerships with European powers, most notably Italy, making improved political ties with the EU a strategic priority.

    The academic added that von der Leyen’s misstep has further weakened her standing across Europe: “Although what she said about Turkey is not a fringe view in many EU political circles, the fact that she said it and failed to anticipate the consequences will further damage her credibility.”

    Internal divisions within the EU over the comments have already emerged. On Wednesday, Cypriot President Nikos Christodoulides, who currently holds the rotating presidency of the EU Council, publicly backed von der Leyen’s original framing, reminding audiences that Turkey has occupied northern Cyprus since 1974, with Turkish forces still deployed on what the EU recognizes as European sovereign territory.

    By contrast, European Commissioner for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Marta Kos struck a conciliatory tone during an address to the European Parliament this week, reaffirming Turkey’s outsized strategic importance to the bloc. “We need Turkey in light of the changing geopolitical realities in Europe and the Middle East,” Kos said, adding that Turkey is already the EU’s fifth-largest trading partner, with bilateral trade volume twice that of the EU’s trade with either Mercosur or India.

  • Iranian women held by US immigration not Qassem Soleimani’s relatives: Report

    Iranian women held by US immigration not Qassem Soleimani’s relatives: Report

    In early April, two Iranian women residing in the United States were taken into immigration custody after their residency permits were abruptly revoked. The detention came after far-right American activist Laura Loomer drew public attention to the pair on social media, claiming they were direct relatives of the late Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani, and reported them to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for allegedly sharing content sympathetic to the Iranian government.

    Weeks after the arrest, new evidence unearthed by U.S.-based independent outlet Drop Site News has upended the initial claims linking the detainees to the assassinated military leader. After examining Iranian birth registries, official identification documents, a family will and other verified personal records, the outlet confirmed that 66-year-old Hamideh Soleimani Afshar and her 20-something daughter Sarina share no blood relation, even distant, to Qassem Soleimani – a finding that corroborates an early denial issued by Soleimani’s biological daughter Zeinab immediately after the April arrest.

    Far from being supporters of the Islamic Republic as U.S. officials have claimed, Drop Site News’ investigation reveals Hamideh Soleimani Afshar is a longstanding Iranian dissident who actively participated in anti-government protests throughout the 1990s and 2000s. Her activism landed her a week in an Iranian prison for dissent, forcing her and her daughter to flee the country years later to seek safety in the United States.

    The official narrative from the U.S. State Department at the time of the arrest painted Soleimani Afshar as an open backer of Iran’s “totalitarian terrorist regime”, alleging she had praised Mojtaba Khamenei, the rumored successor to Iran’s current Supreme Leader, and labeled the United States the “Great Satan”. But speaking from immigration detention, Soleimani Afshar pushed back against these claims, clarifying that while she opposes exiled monarchist leader Reza Pahlavi and former U.S. President Donald Trump’s aggressive foreign policy toward Iran, she and her daughter fled the Iranian regime to escape political persecution.

    “We came to America to find peace and safety, away from that regime,” she said from the facility. “And now we’re being treated almost the same – even worse than we were in Iran. We’ve been locked up for three weeks now, and I have no idea what will happen to us next.”

    The case has also raised urgent alarms over the detainees’ access to medical care. Sarina Soleimani told reporters her mother lives with autoimmune hemolytic anemia, a serious blood disorder that requires ongoing medication and monitoring. Since being detained, she has been denied consistent access to her necessary treatment. Her hemoglobin levels have dropped to dangerously low ranges, leaving her frequently disoriented and unconscious. Sarina added that her mother recently fainted on the floor of the detention center and remained unresponsive for more than 10 minutes before receiving any assistance.

    For Sarina, the situation is a devastating betrayal of the promises of free speech and political asylum the United States claims to uphold. “My mom has always been passionate about speaking out,” she said. “She was threatened and imprisoned in Iran for talking about politics, and she thought she could come here to speak freely. Now she’s in prison again for the same thing.”

    Qassem Soleimani, the long-serving head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force, was killed in a targeted U.S. drone strike in Baghdad’s international airport in January 2020. The attack also killed Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, deputy commander of Iraq’s Popular Mobilisation Forces, and escalated tensions between Washington and Tehran to levels not seen in decades, sparking global fears of a full-scale regional war.