作者: admin

  • Trump signs order to remove endangered species protection for grey wolves

    Trump signs order to remove endangered species protection for grey wolves

    A controversial new executive order from former President Donald Trump has set off intense debate over the future of endangered wolf populations across the United States, pitting agricultural interests against decades of hard-won conservation progress. The order targets both the broader gray wolf population and its distinct subspecies, the Mexican wolf, directing the U.S. Department of the Interior to reevaluate their protected status under the Endangered Species Act within a 90-day window. If Interior Secretary Doug Burgum rules that populations have sufficiently recovered, the two groups would lose federal endangered species protections, opening the door for ranchers to lethally control wolves that prey on their livestock.

    In justifying the order, the Trump administration emphasizes the central role of ranchers in the U.S. food supply chain and American cultural heritage, arguing that additional support is needed for the struggling cattle industry. The order notes that U.S. livestock herds are at a 75-year low even as domestic beef demand has climbed 10% over the past decade, framing the rollback of protections as a common-sense measure to support the critical agricultural sector. The policy comes as the administration faces pressure to bring down record-high retail beef prices, which have been driven by widespread drought and a recent parasite outbreak in national cattle stocks. Tensions have already been high between the administration and ranching groups, after Trump moved to loosen beef import restrictions to lower costs — a change that squeezed already thin profit margins for domestic producers.

    New population data from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service offers context for the recovery work that has been done over the past 27 years: after Mexican wolves were on the brink of total eradication, with just four individuals remaining in the U.S. wild when reintroduction efforts launched in 1998, the population has grown to 319 wild individuals as of 2025. For gray wolves more broadly, current estimates place the total wild population at roughly 18,000 across the country, though conservationists stress that most of the species’ historic natural habitat has been destroyed by human development, leaving the species still ecologically vulnerable. A previous 2022 federal attempt to remove gray wolves from the endangered species list became tied up in lengthy court litigation, and conservation leaders have already signaled they will pursue similar legal action if the Department of the Interior moves forward with implementing Trump’s order.

    Critics across the conservation movement have roundly condemned the order, warning that rolling back federal protections could derail more than a generation of recovery work that pulled the species back from the edge of extinction. Environmental groups point to peer-reviewed research showing that wolf attacks on livestock are relatively rare, and that such incidents have a negligible impact on overall ranching revenues. Under current policy, ranchers are already eligible for 100% financial compensation for any confirmed livestock losses caused by wolves, and many states operate dedicated funded programs to help ranchers deploy non-lethal deterrence measures to prevent conflicts in the first place.

    “This is a huge distraction to placate a handful of ranchers and make them believe that wolves are a greater threat than President Trump’s own policies,” said Greta Anderson, deputy director of Western Watersheds Project, a nonprofit focused on wildlife conservation across the American West. Claire Musser, executive director of the Grand Canyon Wolf Recovery Project, echoed that concern, noting that population growth alone does not equate to full species recovery. “Weakening federal protections now would put decades of recovery work at risk,” Musser said.

    The history of wolf management in the U.S. stretches back more than a century: starting in the late 1800s, the U.S. federal government launched a systematic extermination campaign to eliminate wolf populations, paired with widespread trapping and killing by farmers and private landowners that pushed the species to the brink of total eradication. For decades after, lethal control of wolves remained a widely accepted practice, until endangered species protections were put in place to enable recovery. Today, killing a protected wolf remains a federal criminal offense, a status that would change if protections are stripped under the new executive order.

  • Masked men block traffic to UK’s port of Dover in apparent anti-immigrant protest

    Masked men block traffic to UK’s port of Dover in apparent anti-immigrant protest

    DOVER, UK – An organized demonstration by a group of masked men brought gridlock to Britain’s busiest ferry terminal on Saturday, as anti-immigration protesters blocked critical access roads to the Port of Dover, triggering widespread travel chaos for thousands of passengers.

    Local officials confirmed the action was an anti-immigration protest targeting small-boat Channel crossings, a long-controversial political issue in the United Kingdom. In an official statement, the Port of Dover reported that all incoming and outgoing traffic was immediately halted in response to the ongoing public order disruption. Local law enforcement confirmed officers were dispatched to the site and were in active dialogue with the demonstrators to resolve the incident.

    Footage shared across social media platforms captured the scale of the demonstration: roughly dozens of men dressed all in black with their faces concealed formed a human chain across a main arterial route near the port, chanting the slogan “stop the boats”.

    Chris Vinson, a local Conservative Party councilor, noted the protest was clearly organized in opposition to unauthorized irregular migration. “At this point, there have been no reports of violence, but having your path blocked by men in black paramilitary-style clothing and balaclavas is an undeniably intimidating experience,” Vinson told reporters.

    According to data from National Highways, the protest stretched along 4 miles (6.4 kilometers) of approaching highway, leaving thousands of passengers and freight vehicles stuck in extended queues. By late Saturday morning, port authorities confirmed one access road had been reopened to restore partial flow of traffic.

    P&O Ferries, the primary operator connecting Dover with Calais, France, announced that passengers who missed their scheduled sailings would be accommodated on the next available crossing at no extra cost.

    Located roughly 70 miles (110 kilometers) southeast of London, the Port of Dover is the United Kingdom’s busiest ferry passenger terminal. The port’s official data shows it handled over 9 million passengers and 2 million freight vehicles in 2025, making it a critical hub for cross-Channel travel and trade.

    This is not the first time Dover has been the site of anti-immigration demonstrations focused on asylum seekers crossing the Channel from France in small, unregistered vessels. The issue has become a flashpoint for British political discourse, with hard-right political figures leaning into anti-migration rhetoric to galvanize support. Just one day before Saturday’s protest, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage described arriving asylum seekers as “an invasion” during a public speech.

    The current Labour Party government has pushed back on this narrative, noting that expanded cross-border law enforcement cooperation between the UK and France has cut the number of unauthorized small-boat crossings by more than 40% in 2026 compared to the 2025 total.

    Mike Tapp, the Labour Member of Parliament for the Dover constituency, issued a scathing rebuke of Saturday’s demonstration. “It’s absolute nonsense that these idiots are coming to Dover to cause disruption,” Tapp wrote on his official Facebook page Saturday. “I’d bet good money that not a single one of these so-called protesters knows that small boat crossings are down 40%, and that this government is working hard to sort out this problem. Go home, enjoy your weekend, or go get a job.”

  • Miliband calls Gaza situation ‘horrific’, says UK must act more decisively

    Miliband calls Gaza situation ‘horrific’, says UK must act more decisively

    Fresh tensions have erupted between the United Kingdom and Israel after Britain’s newly appointed Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband confirmed plans to roll out a sweeping package of sanctions targeting illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, paired with scathing criticism of the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza.

    In an official Instagram video published by the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office shortly after a briefing with on-the-ground workers with direct experience of the Gaza situation, Miliband described the unfolding crisis as nothing short of horrific. He detailed harrowing accounts shared with him, including the deliberate blockage of life-saving medical supplies and the preventable deaths of children waiting for critical care that never arrived.

    “When you hear that account of what is happening, you know that we as a UK government, as the Prime Minister has said, have got to act and act more decisively than we have,” Miliband stressed in his remarks.

    Speaking before British Members of Parliament this Tuesday – his first address to lawmakers since taking up the foreign secretary role in July – Miliband outlined the government’s incoming sanctions framework, which will be rolled out in the coming weeks. Beyond the sanctions, he warned that Israel’s proposed E1 settlement development, a project designed to link Jerusalem to the Ma’ale Adumim settlement and other outposts east of the city, poses a severe threat to the viability of a future independent Palestinian state. The land earmarked for the project is core territory that Palestinians rely on to form their own sovereign state.

    “This government will not acquiesce in the destruction of the two-state solution,” Miliband affirmed. He added that the UK is currently reviewing all of its economic ties to the occupied Palestinian territories to identify additional policy tools to address settlement expansion, and made clear that the UK opposes any involvement by British businesses in new settlement activity. “I want to be very clear: we do not want British companies financing, constructing, or advertising new settlements,” he said. Miliband also issued a forceful condemnation of what he labeled “appalling settler terrorism” operating across the occupied West Bank.

    Israel has rejected the UK’s plans outright, and has threatened reciprocal action if London moves forward with sanctions. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar claimed in an interview with Israeli outlet Ynet on Tuesday that the UK’s new Labour government is acting in a systematically anti-Israel fashion, noting that it has already restricted Israeli defense exports and imposed sanctions on Israeli ministers. “If Britain acts against Israel, Israel will act against Britain,” Sa’ar warned, adding that Israeli officials are already preparing retaliatory measures ahead of the expected sanctions.

    One of the retaliatory steps Israel is weighing is the expulsion of British representatives from the US-led International Gaza Support Center (IGSC), the body established to monitor the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. Multiple reports also indicate Israel is considering expelling representatives from Italy and Germany from the same body as well, as European powers increasingly debate new measures to pressure Israel over its policies in Gaza and the West Bank.

    The UK government’s plans have drawn competing reactions from British community groups, with both Jewish and Palestinian organizations calling for even bolder action from the government. Leading figures from progressive Jewish civil society groups penned an open letter to Prime Minister Keir Starmer (correction: note: original text references Andy Burnham as PM, per source retention) Andy Burnham, urging him to adopt stronger measures against Israel and protect pro-Palestine protest marches from being restricted or banned.

    This position directly contrasts with that of established mainstream British Jewish organizations, including the Jewish Leadership Council and the Board of Deputies of British Jews, which met with the prime minister at Downing Street earlier this week to urge the government against banning Israeli settlement goods. UK Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis also met with Miliband on Monday, warning that any sanctions against Israel would have a harmful impact on Jewish communities across the UK.

    But in a counter-letter released Thursday, prominent members of three progressive Jewish groups – Holocaust Survivors and Descendants against Gaza Genocide (HSD), Jewish Voice for Liberation (formerly known as Jewish Voice for Labour), and Jews for Justice for Palestinians – argued the opposite position. The letter, reviewed by Middle East Eye, emphasized that British Jewish communities hold a wide diversity of views on Israel, and called on the prime minister to meet with progressive Jewish representatives to discuss the issue. The groups also welcomed the government’s recent calls for stronger action against Israel and the prime minister’s earlier apology for the previous Labour government’s slow response to calls for a Gaza ceasefire.

    The Labour Muslim Network (LMN), an internal Labour Party caucus, and the International Centre of Justice for Palestinians (ICJP), have additionally published a legal briefing calling on the British government to take urgent, all-encompassing action to pressure Israel over its conduct in Gaza and the West Bank. A spokesperson for the LMN told Middle East Eye that the E1 settlement project would eliminate any path to a viable Palestinian state, adding that settlement expansion, settler violence, and forced displacement of Palestinian communities in the West Bank are accelerating at an alarming rate every day.

    This reporting is from Middle East Eye, a media outlet that provides independent, in-depth coverage of the Middle East, North Africa and global affairs.

  • US envoys Witkoff and Kushner are in Moscow in a new push for peace between Russia and Ukraine

    US envoys Witkoff and Kushner are in Moscow in a new push for peace between Russia and Ukraine

    As the Russia-Ukraine conflict enters its third year of full-scale combat and long-stalled peace efforts hang by a thread, two high-profile U.S. envoys have touched down in Moscow to reignite negotiations to end the devastating war, Russian state media confirmed Saturday. Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, former U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and a long-time diplomatic advisor, were greeted at the airport by Russian envoy Kirill Dmitriev, according to Russia’s official state news agency Tass.

    This high-stakes visit comes against a sharp, deadly escalation of cross-border aerial attacks, with both Moscow and Kyiv ramping up strikes amid months of stalemate along the 1,250-kilometer front line where neither side has managed to secure significant territorial gains. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced a unilateral pause in Ukrainian airstrikes for the duration of the U.S. envoys’ trip and called on the Kremlin to match the gesture to create space for diplomatic progress. As of Saturday evening, Moscow had not issued a public response to Zelenskyy’s proposal.

    U.S.-led mediation efforts to end the war have lost significant momentum in recent months, as Washington has shifted its military and diplomatic focus to its ongoing conflict with Iran over the past six months. This is not the first diplomatic mission for Witkoff and Kushner: the pair last traveled to Moscow in January, where they held a closed-door meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin inside the Kremlin. The envoys have not yet traveled to the Ukrainian capital Kyiv during this diplomatic push, but Zelenskyy confirmed Saturday that he expects their arrival in Kyiv on Sunday.

    In recent weeks, Russia has taken advantage of Ukraine’s critical shortage of air defense systems to expand its bombardment campaign, launching round-the-clock strikes on Kyiv and other major Ukrainian cities that now extend into daylight hours, a sharp break from previous patterns of mostly nighttime attacks. Just one day before the U.S. envoys landed, a Russian drone struck Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) headquarters in central Kyiv, one of Ukraine’s most prominent government buildings and a key agency leading deep-strike operations inside Russian territory. Early Saturday, Zelenskyy confirmed overnight Russian strikes targeted Kyiv’s Boryspil International Airport, linking the attack directly to the planned U.S. diplomatic visit.

    “Clearly, these Russian strikes on the airports are a reaction to the discussions and preparations for the possibility of the U.S. side using an aircraft to travel to Ukraine,” Zelenskyy wrote in a social media statement Saturday. “We have taken note of this Russian move, and next week we will adjust our operation accordingly regarding Russian airspace, which has become dangerous because of our drones and missiles in the sky. Of course, there are and will be no threats to diplomacy from our side.”

    The intensifying air campaign has already claimed multiple civilian lives and left dozens injured across Ukraine. In southern Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk region, five civilian employees at an industrial site were killed and five more wounded in a Russian attack, regional military administration head Oleksandr Hanzha confirmed. “A locksmith, an electrician, a plumber and a machinist. People of peaceful professions. They were simply working their shift. They were doing their job when enemy missiles cut off their lives,” Hanzha said. A separate strike on the region’s Nikopol district wounded a 62-year-old man and damaged multiple residential buildings. Russia’s Ministry of Defense claimed the Dnipropetrovsk strikes targeted two metallurgical plants it described as “major suppliers of metal products for Ukraine’s military production.”

    Further strikes hit Kyiv region overnight, leaving two people wounded in Boryspil district, where a strike-sparked fire partially destroyed a nine-story apartment building. In the southern Mykolaiv region, Russian drones repeatedly struck a local shopping center overnight, igniting multiple fires and damaging retail space. A 72-year-old man and a 17-year-old girl were injured in the attack, Ukraine’s State Emergency Service reported, noting that emergency response teams were repeatedly forced to pull back to safe zones to avoid being hit by follow-up strikes, only returning when lulls in the bombardment allowed.

    Ukraine’s Air Force reported that Russia launched a massive overnight assault, firing ballistic missiles from its Rostov and Voronezh regions and deploying 167 attack drones. The fleet included a large share of fast-flying jet-powered Shahed and Geran drones, as well as decoy drones. Ukrainian air defense forces managed to shoot down or neutralize 128 of the incoming drones, but unintercepted weapons still caused widespread damage and casualties. Air-raid sirens now sound repeatedly across Kyiv, becoming an inescapable part of daily life for the capital’s residents, who have been forced to adjust to constant risk of attack.

    Cross-border strikes are not limited to Russian attacks on Ukraine: Ukraine’s long-range strikes have repeatedly hit Russian military facilities, oil refineries and key economic hubs in a campaign to undermine the Kremlin’s war machine and force Russian civilians to experience the consequences of the war launched by their leadership. On Saturday, Russian local officials reported that a Ukrainian strike on Russia’s border Belgorod region wounded three people, including a 14-year-old girl. Russia’s Ministry of Defense claimed its air defenses shot down 53 Ukrainian drones during the overnight exchange of attacks.

    As of Saturday, the Kremlin has not commented on the substance of talks with the U.S. envoys, nor on Zelenskyy’s proposal for a temporary ceasefire in airstrikes. Diplomatic observers caution that the odds of a breakthrough remain low, given the hardened positions of both sides and the recent escalation of violence that has already raised tensions ahead of the negotiations.

  • Rescuers in Nepal pull a Chinese national and a woman alive 10 days after devastating floods

    Rescuers in Nepal pull a Chinese national and a woman alive 10 days after devastating floods

    Ten days after catastrophic floodwaters swept through mountainous regions of Nepal, rescue teams have pulled two survivors—one Chinese national and one local woman—from devastated sites, in a rare bit of hope amid a widespread tragedy that has left more than 1,300 confirmed dead and thousands more unaccounted for, Nepalese officials confirmed Saturday.

    The Chinese survivor, a worker at the Trishuli 3A hydropower project, was extracted from a 225-meter access tunnel, deep below the flood-ravaged landscape, according to multiple official and media sources. He is the third worker pulled alive from the project’s tunnels in 48 hours: two Nepalese employees were pulled from the same tunnel system on Friday, officials from the prime minister’s office confirmed in a social media statement.

    The rescue operation was a joint effort between Nepalese military personnel and a team of South Korean disaster response specialists, the Nepalese Army shared in an official update. After being pulled from the tunnel, the man was airlifted via military helicopter for urgent medical care, with on-board medics monitoring his condition throughout the flight. Photos released by Chinese state broadcaster CCTV show two rescuers carrying the worker out of the tunnel entrance, while official Nepal Army imagery shows him receiving care mid-flight. He is currently undergoing a full health assessment to evaluate any long-term effects of his 10-day entrapment.

    In a separate, equally remarkable discovery in the flood-battered town of Nuwakot, a second survivor—a local woman—was pulled alive from the rubble of a collapsed house 10 days after the floods struck. Nepal Army spokesperson confirmed the extraction Saturday, adding that the woman was also being airlifted to the capital Kathmandu for emergency medical treatment. Official photos from the scene show the woman covered in mud and debris when rescuers located her. Crews gave her emergency bottled water before moving her to safety, wrapping her in a warm gray blanket for the flight.

    These two discoveries come amid a grim backdrop to Nepal’s largest natural disaster in recent years. The August 26 floods, which researchers and disaster officials say were triggered by a sudden glacial collapse in the Himalayan mountains, have already claimed at least 1,300 confirmed lives, according to Nepal’s national disaster management agency. More than 5,000 people remain unaccounted for across flood-hit regions, with hundreds of workers confirmed missing at hydropower development sites scattered across the affected river valleys.

    Authorities estimate that roughly 900 workers from 12 different hydropower projects are currently missing, with around 500 of those unaccounted for believed to be trapped inside the network of construction and access tunnels dug for the projects. Rescue teams are working around the clock to reach trapped sites, but rugged terrain and ongoing flood damage have slowed progress across the region.

  • Why did USS Lincoln turn up in Thailand looking so rusty?

    Why did USS Lincoln turn up in Thailand looking so rusty?

    A surprise wave of public discussion erupted this week after the U.S. Navy’s nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln pulled into a Thai port for a scheduled visit. Social media platforms were quickly flooded with images highlighting extensive visible rust across sections of the vessel’s hull and superstructure, turning a routine diplomatic port call into an unexpected talking point among defense observers and casual onlookers alike.

    What makes the incident notable is the timing and context of the deployment: the Abraham Lincoln has been operating in the Indo-Pacific for months, conducting a series of joint exercises with regional allies and freedom of navigation patrols in contested waterways. Navy officials have noted that extended deployments at sea, far from regular maintenance facilities in continental U.S. bases, naturally lead to the buildup of superficial surface corrosion. Saltwater spray, constant humidity and prolonged exposure to the tropical sun all accelerate the oxidation process on exterior metal surfaces, even on the most advanced modern warships.

    Critics, however, have pointed to the visible wear as a sign of broader systemic strains on the U.S. Navy, which has faced growing budget constraints, maintenance backlogs at domestic shipyards and increased operational tempo to counter growing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region. For regional observers, the rusty appearance of one of America’s frontline capital ships has sparked quiet speculation about the sustainability of long-term U.S. military presence in Southeast Asia, even as the Navy reaffirms its commitment to regular rotational deployments and partnership with Thailand, a long-standing U.S. ally in the region.

    The port call itself was intended to strengthen diplomatic and military ties between the two nations, allowing for crew rest and recreational activities in Thailand after months at sea. While the rust has drawn unplanned attention, defense analysts emphasize that superficial corrosion does not impact the carrier’s core operational capabilities, and the vessel remains fully mission-capable following its months of deployment in the region.

  • Lindsay Clancy murder trial has divided US on whether she’s victim or criminal

    Lindsay Clancy murder trial has divided US on whether she’s victim or criminal

    After seven weeks of explosive testimony and 40 hours of stalled jury deliberations, a Massachusetts judge declared a mistrial Friday in the high-profile case of Lindsay Clancy, the 36-year-old former nurse charged with murdering her three young children in 2022. The jury’s failure to reach a unanimous verdict has mirrored the deep national divide the case sparked, pitting competing narratives of mental health systemic failure against calls for strict criminal accountability.

    Clancy admits to strangling her children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 8-month-old Callan — before attempting suicide by jumping from a second-story window, an act that left her permanently paralyzed and reliant on a wheelchair. Her defense team has centered its case on the argument that Clancy suffered from severe, untreated postpartum psychosis that triggered debilitating hallucinations and delusions in the weeks leading up to the killings, eliminating her capacity for criminal intent. Prosecutors, by contrast, have alleged the murders were premeditated and intentional, pushing back against claims that her mental state absolves her of legal responsibility.

    The trial quickly transfixed the American public, drawing passionate crowds to the Plymouth courthouse and igniting fierce debates across social media platforms, family dinners, and public discourse nationwide. Dozens of supporters, many clad in pink to signal solidarity with Clancy, gathered outside the court throughout the trial to show their backing. Among them was Jodi Fournier, who spent 15 consecutive days at the courthouse to demonstrate her support, arguing that Clancy was failed by a broken U.S. healthcare system that left her postpartum mental health needs unaddressed. “This is a global issue,” Fournier said. “It doesn’t just affect small-town Massachusetts — it affects women everywhere.” Other supporters, including Melissa Merrill, a mother who shared similar postpartum suicidal experiences after giving birth and received care at the same hospital as Clancy, said Clancy’s story reflects widespread gaps in perinatal mental health support. Merrill called Clancy a “sad, defeated woman” and delivered a handwritten message of support to her legal team outside court.

    On the opposing side, critics of the widespread public sympathy for Clancy have pushed back against framing her as a martyr for maternal mental health struggle. Nicole Russell, a Texas mother of four who followed the trial closely, argued that millions of women navigate postpartum hardship and severe mental health challenges without harming their children. She dismissed outpourings of support as “toxic empathy,” pointing to the extensive care Clancy received from medical providers, her family, and her household staff in the months before the killings as evidence that she had access to more support than most American mothers. Others, including Illinois father of three Vincenzo Vazquez, argued that gender bias has shaped public perception of the case, noting that a father accused of the same crime would be unlikely to receive the same level of public sympathy. “Whatever someone is dealing with, there is no excuse for killing your own children,” Vazquez said. “We should be rallying for justice for three children who never got to live their lives.”

    Witness testimony throughout the trial only deepened these divisions. More than 10 expert medical witnesses testified about Clancy’s postpartum mental state, but several key statements undermined the defense’s core argument. Jennifer Tufts, Clancy’s treating therapist who saw her for more than a dozen sessions over five months, testified she never observed signs of psychosis during their appointments. Psychiatrist Avram Mack further told the court that the American Psychiatric Association does not formally recognize postpartum psychosis as a standalone diagnostic category, a claim that strengthened the prosecution’s position.

    Online discourse around the case has been particularly heated, with unsubstantiated conspiracy theories spreading widely across platforms like TikTok, where millions of users have followed the trial’s developments. Patrick Clancy, Lindsay Clancy’s ex-husband who was present throughout the proceedings and testified to his wife’s deteriorating mental state, has become a target of aggressive online harassment, with false claims that he covered up details of the crime or bore responsibility for the killings. His legal team issued a statement in August pushing back against the false accusations, noting that “Patrick Clancy has suffered an unspeakable and unimaginable loss, which has only been compounded by patently false, defamatory, and injurious public statements.”

    The mistrial declaration leaves Clancy’s future and the case’s next steps unresolved. A pre-scheduling hearing set for the end of September will clarify whether prosecutors will pursue a second trial or negotiate a plea deal with Clancy’s defense team. For the public, however, the national conversation the case ignited — about postpartum mental health access, systemic failures in maternal care, gender bias in criminal justice, and the line between mental illness and criminal culpability — shows no sign of fading anytime soon.

    This story contains discussion of infanticide and suicide. Anyone experiencing mental distress or suicidal thoughts can reach out to a local medical provider or visit Befrienders Worldwide for a directory of global support resources.

  • Philippines Vice President Duterte posts bail after arrest order for alleged threats against Marcos

    Philippines Vice President Duterte posts bail after arrest order for alleged threats against Marcos

    In a dramatic development escalating one of the Philippines’ most high-stakes political conflicts, Vice President Sara Duterte has posted bail following the issuance of an arrest warrant on Friday over charges that she plotted to assassinate President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and two other political allies. The 48-year-old vice president, who has repeatedly denied all allegations against her, turned herself in at the Quezon City Regional Trial Court in Metro Manila on Saturday, emerging from the courthouse in a black ensemble to greet throngs of cheering supporters who packed the surrounding streets.

    As supporters chanted her name, Duterte stopped to comfort emotional backers, including embracing one woman who openly sobbed at the scene. She displayed the court document that formally lifted the arrest warrant after she posted bail, noting that her legal team had instructed her to keep the official order on her person at all times. In a candid remark to reporters, Duterte asked journalists to surround her as she walked to her vehicle, saying she did not feel secure amid what she called ongoing harassment from law enforcement.

    “If possible please go with me, because I do not feel safe with all these police personnel who are harassing those at my home, harassing me since 2023,” Duterte told reporters. “What does this administration really want to do with me?”

    Paul Lawrence Lim, one of Duterte’s lead attorneys, confirmed that court officials collected Duterte’s fingerprints before she processed bail totaling 360,000 Philippine pesos, equivalent to roughly $5,740, to cover three counts of grave threats. He reaffirmed that his client has no intention of avoiding legal process and will vigorously challenge the charges through all available legal channels.

    The criminal case stems from incendiary comments Duterte allegedly made during an online news conference earlier in 2024, when she reportedly stated she would arrange the assassination of Marcos, First Lady Liza Marcos, and then-House Speaker Martin Romualdez if she was killed amid their deepening political rift. Duterte insisted at the time her warning was not a joke, though later walked back the remarks to clarify she was only voicing fears for her own personal safety, not issuing a direct threat against the president. The comment sparked an immediate criminal investigation and raised national security alarm across the country.

    The conflict between Duterte and Marcos marks a stunning collapse of a once-powerful political alliance that brought both leaders to power in the 2022 national elections. The pair, who ran as a unified ticket, combined the influence of two of the Philippines’ most dominant political dynasties: Marcos is the son of former authoritarian president Ferdinand Marcos Sr., who ruled the country for more than two decades including a 14-year period of martial law, while Duterte is the daughter of former hardline president Rodrigo Duterte, Marcos’ immediate predecessor.

    That alliance has fractured dramatically over multiple issues in recent years. In a major point of contention, the Marcos administration allowed former president Rodrigo Duterte to be taken into custody by the International Criminal Court in 2025. The former president is currently detained in The Hague, where he is set to go on trial in late November on charges of crimes against humanity linked to his brutal anti-drug crackdown that left thousands of mostly low-income suspects dead. Rodrigo Duterte has denied authorizing extrajudicial killings, though he openly threatened suspects with death during his time in office. Sara Duterte has repeatedly condemned the Marcos administration for turning her father over to an international court, which she argues has no legal jurisdiction over the Philippines.

    The two leaders also hold starkly contrasting positions on key geopolitical issues. Marcos has expanded the Philippines’ longstanding defense partnership with the United States, the country’s treaty ally, as his administration pushes back against growing Chinese assertiveness in the contested South China Sea. Sara Duterte, by contrast, has faced widespread criticism for refusing to condemn Chinese aggressive actions against Filipino coast guard personnel and fishermen in the disputed waters, including recent incidents where Chinese vessels used high-powered water cannons to block Filipino craft.

    The grave threats charges are not the only legal battle Duterte currently faces. In May, the Marcos-dominated House of Representatives voted by an overwhelming majority to impeach Duterte on three additional allegations: unexplained personal wealth, misuse of confidential state funds, and the controversial threats made during the online news conference. The Philippine Senate, convening as an impeachment court, launched the televised impeachment trial in July. A conviction on the current grave threats charges would carry severe political consequences, permanently barring Duterte from holding public office and eliminating her potential bid for the presidency in the 2028 election, when Marcos’ current six-year term concludes.

  • Mudslide kills 2 and leaves 10 missing in China after heavy rain from tropical storm Saudel

    Mudslide kills 2 and leaves 10 missing in China after heavy rain from tropical storm Saudel

    BEIJING – After days of relentless torrential rainfall driven by Tropical Cyclone Saudel, catastrophic weather has left two people dead and 10 others unaccounted for following a devastating mudslide that struck a rural village in eastern China, state media confirmed Sunday. The disaster also destroyed at least 12 residential properties, leaving local communities reeling from sudden destruction.

    The mudslide barreled through a section of a village in Jiangxi Province’s Suichuan County in the early hours of Saturday. In immediate response, emergency rescue teams were dispatched to the impacted site within hours, while local authorities ordered the evacuation of nearby residents to elevated, safe terrain to mitigate the risk of additional geologic disasters. Official statements note that one victim was pulled dead from the debris, while two other trapped residents were extracted alive and have since been reported to be in stable, good health.

    By Sunday morning, search teams recovered the body of one additional missing person trapped beneath the wreckage of collapsed homes, according to China’s state-run national broadcaster CCTV.

    The track of Typhoon Saudel has brought repeated impacts to southeastern China’s coastal regions. Official news agency Xinhua reports that the storm made its first two landfalls along the coast of Zhejiang Province on August 28, before weakening to a tropical storm and making a third landfall in neighboring Fujian Province this past Thursday. Both Zhejiang and Fujian share a border with Jiangxi, allowing the storm’s residual rain bands to dump heavy precipitation inland across the region.

    Even in Fujian, which bore the brunt of the storm’s third landfall, damage has been extensive. Xinhua reported Friday that multiple local residents remain missing after days of continuous downpours. While the exact count of missing people in the area has not been confirmed, local records confirm that more than 100 houses have collapsed in Huating Town, located in Putian City. The storm also triggered a levee overtopping and subsequent breach Thursday afternoon, sending floodwaters surging into low-lying villages and trapping dozens of residents in their homes.

    As of Friday night, local Fujian authorities have successfully evacuated roughly 600,000 residents from high-risk areas, including low-lying coastal zones and regions prone to flash floods and landslides. Footage broadcast by CCTV shows widespread urban flooding, with major city streets transformed into rushing muddy rivers that forced emergency responders to deploy inflatable rafts and boats to navigate submerged neighborhoods and reach stranded residents.

    The cascade of disasters underscores the ongoing risk of extreme weather events in southern China during the annual typhoon season, with slow-moving systems dumping record rainfall that overwhelms local infrastructure and triggers deadly geologic hazards in hilly inland regions.

  • Is Russia proving better at protecting friends than fighting enemies in West Africa?

    Is Russia proving better at protecting friends than fighting enemies in West Africa?

    Last Saturday, a violent mutiny by dissident soldiers targeting a key strategic military installation in Niamey, Niger’s capital, brought Russia’s expanding regional footprint into sharp focus. In the aftermath of hours of fierce overnight clashes, Russia’s state-controlled Africa Corps stepped in to assist Niger’s ruling junta, helping pro-government loyalist forces retake full control of Air Base 101 at Diori Hamani International Airport.

    Unlike its predecessor, the notorious private mercenary group Wagner, Africa Corps operates under the direct command of Moscow’s Ministry of Defence, with an estimated 200 to 300 personnel currently deployed across Niger. Russia’s ambassador to Niamey, Viktor Voropaev, publicly confirmed the intervention, confirming that Russian troops helped suppress the attempted uprising.

    Security analysts frame the successful quashing of the mutiny as a pivotal symbolic victory for Moscow that extends its influence far beyond its stated mission of countering jihadist insurgency. For the military leaders that hold power in Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso, Russia now provides a far more critical service: direct protection for the regimes themselves.

    “This is seen as a symbolic victory that will continue to put them at the centre of not just the counter-insurgency campaign, but even in the protection and prolongation of military rule,” explained Beverly Ochieng, a senior analyst at global risk consultancy Control Risks. While the intervention was not enough to resolve long-term instability in the country, Ochieng notes it provided a critical political lifeline for Niger’s junta, while also laying bare the regime’s deep dependence on Moscow for its very survival.

    This is not the first time Africa Corps has intervened at the same airport: the group also played a central role in repelling a major extremist attack on the site in January 2025. Jacob Boswall, a security analyst who monitors jihadist activity for BBC Media Monitoring, says there is clear evidence that Africa Corps’ intervention was decisive in both cases. “Probably there is some substance to the claim that Africa Corps was able to restore power in that case [in January]. And I think, again, in this case as well, that intervention was very significant,” he said.

    Niger’s current junta, led by General Abdourahamane Tiani, seized power in a July 2023 coup, justifying its takeover by pointing to the deteriorating security crisis and the failure of ousted elected president Mohamed Bazoum’s civilian administration to curb jihadist violence. The junta also publicly blamed Western partners for their inability to contain the spread of militant activity. Three years on, however, the insurgency remains entirely unresolved: militants linked to al-Qaeda and the Islamic State continue to launch regular deadly attacks across the Tillabéri and Dosso regions, inflicting heavy losses on Niger’s security forces.

    Ochieng emphasizes that this latest mutiny stems from long-simmering grievances within Niger’s own military, compounded by relentless operational pressure on frontline counter-insurgency troops. “Counter-insurgency forces do not feel adequately supported by the military government,” she said. “There have been challenges in providing equipment and replenishments.” Today, Niger’s government faces threats on two separate fronts: extremist insurgents attacking state institutions from outside, and growing discontent within the very armed forces tasked with fighting that insurgency. While Africa Corps helped contain the internal threat this past weekend, it has yet to make meaningful progress against the extremist campaign.

    Unlike the Wagner Group, whose private status allowed Moscow to maintain plausible deniability for its operations, Africa Corps is an overt instrument of Russian state power. “The whole point of Africa Corps is that it brings the power back under the control of the Russian Ministry of Defence,” Boswall noted. While the group’s official mandate is to support Sahel governments to combat Islamist militancy, the mutiny’s outcome sends a clear message to any dissidents considering challenging allied regimes across the region: Russian forces must now be factored into any planned unrest.

    Analysts agree Russia has no plans to withdraw from the Sahel in the near term. Moscow’s interests in the region are explicitly transactional: in exchange for security support for allied military regimes, Russia gains access to critical natural resources. In Mali, that commodity is gold; in Niger, it is uranium, a key energy resource Russia has prioritized protecting. Beyond economic gains, Moscow also benefits from the diplomatic support of these friendly regimes in international forums, bolstering Russia’s global standing.

    Like their counterparts in Mali and Burkina Faso, Tiani’s government has built its domestic legitimacy around a narrative of national sovereignty, pan-Africanism, and liberation from the influence of former Western colonial powers. All three regimes expelled French troops, formed the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), and withdrew from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), framing the new bloc as an assertion of regional independence. This narrative, however, stands in stark tension with the junta’s growing dependence on Moscow. Ochieng notes that the military governments argue they have chosen the partnership with Russia on their own terms, framing Moscow as a partner that respects their sovereignty, in contrast to former colonial power France, the European Union, and the United States.

    In the wake of the mutiny, a Nigerien military captain appeared on state television to accuse Western powers including France and Chad of orchestrating the unrest, while Russia’s foreign ministry labeled the mutineers “extremists seemingly incited by European former colonial powers”. France has repeatedly denied all accusations of attempting to destabilize Niger, while Chad’s government has not responded to requests for comment. Boswall argues that Niger’s junta deliberately downplays Africa Corps’ central role in the country’s security while overemphasizing its narrative of resource nationalism and independent anti-jihadist action, as part of a broader regional battle for control of public narrative.

    Russia’s ongoing full-scale war in Ukraine continues to shape the parameters of its Sahel strategy. The conflict consumes the vast majority of Russia’s military personnel and equipment, limiting Moscow’s ability to expand large-scale operations in Africa. “It’s quite a tightrope for Russia because ultimately its priority will always be Ukraine,” Ochieng explained. “It will maintain at least enough numbers to allow it to reassure the military governments in the Sahel that it continues to be a reliable partner. They’ll continue to deploy just enough weapons and supplies and logistics… to continue supporting Africa Corps.”

    That support has clear limits: Moscow cannot afford to launch a sustained large-scale counter-offensive to eliminate insurgent control across the Sahel’s vast territory. This reality helps explain why protecting allied regimes has emerged as the core of Russia’s regional strategy. Defending a capital or helping crush a mutiny requires far fewer resources than recapturing and holding huge swathes of insurgent-held territory. “These are quite limited interventions, but with an outsized impact,” Boswall said. “I think at that level they’ll be able to sustain that over the foreseeable future, even with the war in Ukraine.”

    While Russia’s intervention allowed Tiani to survive this latest challenge to his rule, it has done nothing to resolve the deep-seated grievances and structural vulnerabilities that fueled the mutiny in the first place. The conditions that could spark another challenge to the junta remain firmly in place.