作者： admin

On Monday, Iran’s foreign ministry issued an official travel advisory urging all Iranian citizens to cancel non-essential trips to France, Belgium and Italy, citing a sharp escalation of civil unrest and breakdowns in public order across the three European nations. The guidance goes further, asking Iranians already residing or traveling in the three countries to steer clear of tense protest hotspots and avoid all unnecessary movement through unstable areas.

The unrest prompting the advisory is most severe in France, where escalating mass protests driven in part by a deepening cost-of-living crisis have rocked cities across the country. As of the latest updates, the unrest has left at least two civilians dead, more than 2,000 people arrested by police, and multiple protesters with severe injuries – including two individuals who lost hands after being hit by police stun grenades. In one high-profile incident reported by Reuters, a 14-year-old boy named Eden suffered a broken jaw and shattered teeth after a police tear gas projectile struck him in the face in a Paris suburb.

French authorities in multiple major cities have already imposed formal bans on new demonstrations, and the national government has declined to rule out declaring a national state of emergency, a move that would grant law enforcement expanded powers to conduct searches and carry out arrests without standard judicial oversight. Human rights organization Amnesty International has publicly condemned French police for deploying unnecessary and excessive force against demonstrators, a large share of whom are high school and university students. Anne Savinel-Barras, head of Amnesty International France, emphasized that children and young people engaging in peaceful protest to demand their right to education deserve protection, not beatings, tear gas exposure, or arbitrary detention.

The travel advisory comes as Iranian officials have launched a blistering public rebuke of French President Emmanuel Macron over his foreign policy alignment. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi criticized Macron on social media platform X for siding with what the statement called the Israeli-U.S. campaign against Iran. “Macron made his bed when he assured POTUS that he welcomes atrocities against Iranians,” Araghchi wrote Monday. “Too late to blame the war his ilk helped cause. The French people demand wholesale change, including freedom of assembly. Listen to the future of France, Mr President.”

The criticism from Tehran centers on what Iran calls clear double standards from the French government when it comes to the right to protest. In comments made on October 6, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei called out Paris for its divergent reactions to demonstrations in Iran versus its own territory. Back in January 2026, Baghaei noted, France publicly called for the Iranian government to respect peaceful assembly and exercise restraint in the face of mass street protests in Iran, even as Paris labeled current student-led demonstrations in France “urban violence.”

Baghaei pointed out that France’s interior minister has rejected calls for restraint, instead demanding security forces deploy swift, decisive force to crack down on unrest and restore public order. “Why are the same behaviors and the same standards interpreted one way when the protester is in Iran and another way when the protester is in France?” he asked.

This public rebuke from Iran puts a spotlight on the contradiction inherent in France’s public position: Paris has openly supported mass protests in Iran while harshly cracking down on demonstrations in its own borders. The irony is underscored by the Iranian government’s own response to January 2026 protests in the country: independent reports confirm thousands of protesters were killed in a brutal security force crackdown that saw live ammunition fired into crowds and thousands more detained. Amnesty International noted at the time that even against Iran’s long record of severe human rights violations during protest waves, the scale and severity of the January 2026 crackdown was unprecedented.

In response to Iran’s criticism, Paris escalated the diplomatic conflict on October 7, when French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot summoned Iran’s ambassador to France to protest what Paris calls a “disinformation campaign carried out by the Iranian authorities regarding the high school student movement in France.” The ongoing exchange marks a sharp deterioration in already strained bilateral ties between the two nations, amplified by the overlapping crises of European domestic unrest and Middle Eastern geopolitical tensions.

A controversial execution carried out by Saudi Arabia has drawn sharp international condemnation from global human rights organizations after it emerged the person put to death was convicted for crimes he was accused of committing when he was a minor. The case has reignited widespread scrutiny of the kingdom’s use of the death penalty against people who committed alleged offenses before reaching adulthood, even after legal reforms purported to ban such practices.

Hassan Zaki al-Faraj was executed by Saudi authorities this past Saturday, according to a public statement released by New York-based Human Rights Watch (HRW). Court documents and rights group investigations confirm al-Faraj was just 14 years old at the time of the alleged offenses, which included charges of “meeting and developing friendships with other detained and wanted individuals.”

Joey Shea, senior Saudi Arabia researcher at HRW, described the execution as unconscionable, noting the case relied heavily on evidence obtained through torture and followed a pattern of widely documented unfair trial proceedings in Saudi Arabia’s judicial system. Shea also warned that a second young man, Yousef al-Manasif, now faces imminent risk of execution after Saudi Arabia’s Supreme Court upheld his death sentence earlier this year. Al-Manasif was convicted for alleged offenses committed when he was between 15 and 16 years old.

According to HRW’s timeline of the al-Faraj case, he was first taken into custody by Saudi security forces in 2017. It was not until 2022 that the kingdom’s Specialized Criminal Court handed down the death penalty. His legal team has repeatedly alleged that al-Faraj was subjected to routine torture while in detention and was forced to sign a confession that was later used as the primary evidence against him at trial. HRW also confirmed that al-Faraj was held in prolonged solitary confinement throughout his detention, a practice widely criticized by international human rights bodies as a form of cruel and inhumane treatment.

The European Saudi Organisation for Human Rights (ESOHR), which has documented hundreds of death penalty cases in Saudi Arabia, has also corroborated details of al-Manasif’s case. Al-Manasif was arrested in April 2017 on charges related to participating in protests against the Saudi government’s treatment of the country’s Shia minority, as well as attending funeral processions in 2011 and 2012, when he was a minor. In 2024, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention released an official opinion finding that the detentions of al-Faraj, al-Manasif, and three other Saudi detainees – Jawad Qureiris, Abdullah al-Derazi, and Jalal al-Labbad – were arbitrary, and their judicial proceedings included severe violations of international fair trial standards. The UN body concluded that the detentions violated multiple provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and called for the immediate release of all five men, as well as financial compensation for their unlawful detention.

The UN working group’s report also detailed allegations from al-Manasif that he was subjected to both physical and psychological torture while in custody, and was coerced into signing confessions that were later used to secure his conviction. Multiple other detainees facing death sentences for alleged childhood offenses have raised similar claims. Ali al-Mabyook, another Saudi national, was sentenced to death for offenses that included attending funeral processions before he turned 18, according to HRW and unsealed court documents. Rights groups have raised alarm over his case as well, citing misuse of counterterrorism legislation and repeated allegations of coerced confessions. Jawad Qureiris, who was sentenced to death in 2022, was also convicted over acts he allegedly committed as a minor. The UN working group confirmed that Qureiris alleged he was tortured and held in solitary confinement for 270 consecutive days to force him to confess.

In April 2026, Saudi authorities executed Ali al-Subaiti, according to an official announcement from the Saudi Press Agency. HRW investigations found that al-Subaiti was sentenced to death for participating in a public demonstration when he was just 12 years old.

Saudi Arabia introduced legal reforms in 2018 with a new Juvenile Law, followed by a 2020 executive order, that were marketed to the international community as new protections against the death penalty for offenses committed by people under 18. However, HRW and other rights groups argue that these reforms contain critical loopholes that exclude many defendants prosecuted under the kingdom’s broad counterterrorism legislation. As a result, dozens of people convicted over alleged childhood offenses remain on death row and at imminent risk of execution.

In a statement following al-Faraj’s execution, Shea warned that Saudi Arabia’s ongoing wave of executions – particularly of people convicted for offenses committed as children – shows no sign of slowing in 2026. “This underscores the urgent need for the international community to press the Saudi government to immediately halt all executions and abolish the death penalty once and for all,” Shea said.

Saudi government officials have rejected all these allegations, stating that claims of systemic human rights violations in these cases are unfounded. The government maintains that all judicial proceedings and capital punishment practices in the kingdom comply with international human rights standards.

A bombshell new investigation from Amnesty International has pulled back the curtain on a widespread, coordinated campaign by British higher education institutions to stifle pro-Palestine student protests against university partnerships with Israel amid its ongoing military campaign in Gaza.

Released this Tuesday, Amnesty’s *Silencing Dissent* report draws on thousands of pages of documents obtained through Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to dismantle the narrative that universities have acted independently in their responses to Palestine solidarity demonstrations. The investigation confirms that institutions operated within an interconnected, institutionally supported network that actively pushed for harsh, repressive measures against student activists.

Internal communications obtained through FOI requests reveal that university administrators across the country openly coordinated punitive actions against protesters, from seeking court-ordered injunctions to block demonstrations to referring participating students to the UK’s controversial Prevent counterterrorism program, a scheme designed to root out extremist radicalization that critics have long accused of targeting Muslim and anti-war communities.

One revealing email exchange from the University of Northampton shows senior administrators directly collaborating to share crowd control tactics, with one senior staff member asking peers at other institutions whether they were “locking in” student protesters — a reference to confining demonstrations to specific, limited campus areas to minimize their public impact.

At the center of this cross-institutional coordination is Universities UK (UUK), the national representative body that counts 142 British universities among its member institutions. The report documents that UUK played a foundational role in standardizing the crackdown, hosting weekly strategy calls for vice-chancellors whose campuses hosted pro-Palestine encampments to share tactics and align their responses to demonstrations.

This collaborative effort did not stop at the university sector gate: the coordination extended directly into the UK government. FOI documents from the University of Kent confirm that UUK maintained close, ongoing ties with Whitehall departments and senior government ministers. The organization arranged direct meetings between university leaders and Downing Street officials, while simultaneously communicating official government expectations for protest management to its member institutions.

As protests grew in size and intensity through 2024 and 2025, UUK deepened its partnership with the Department for Education and the Office for Students (OfS), the national regulator for higher education. The group provided targeted guidance to universities on mitigating reputational damage, managing protest actions, and pursuing legal avenues including civil injunctions to shut down demonstrations. As of publication, UUK has not responded to repeated requests for comment on the report’s findings.

Beyond senior administrative coordination, the report also documents that campus security leadership organized its own unified response through the Association of University Chief Security Officers (Aucso), the trade body representing security leaders across UK higher education.

Ahead of planned national student mobilizations, the chair of Aucso’s South West regional division circulated formal strategic briefings to prepare institutions for increased protest activity. In those documents, Aucso advised universities to consult data protection teams and apply FOI exemptions to keep internal security communications about protests hidden from public disclosure. The organization also provided pre-written press release templates that institutions could adapt locally to shape public narratives and deflect scrutiny of their crackdowns.

The investigation further reveals that at least nine UK universities received private threat assessments from commercial intelligence firms, including Horus Security Consultancy Ltd, Mitie Intelligence Hub, and risk specialist Global Situational Awareness (GSA). These private intelligence updates routinely categorized entirely non-violent student protest actions as high-level security threats.

In one notable example, student-led national weeks of action planned for May 2025 were labeled a “high threat” and classified as a coordinated security risk by the Global Security Operations Centre (GSOC), a private firm that markets itself as a 24/7 centralized command hub for monitoring domestic security threats. The firm’s briefings even labeled common peaceful protest slogans, including the widely used “From the river to the sea,” as “escalatory rhetoric,” and advised authorities to monitor the social media accounts of at least 15 university-based Palestine solidarity societies, including prominent groups at SOAS University of London, the University of Leeds, Imperial College London, and the University of Glasgow.