标签: Europe

欧洲

  • It’s decision day in Prince Harry’s final privacy suit against British tabloids

    It’s decision day in Prince Harry’s final privacy suit against British tabloids

    LONDON — After months of high-stakes testimony, explosive contradictions, and years of public conflict between the British royal family and the country’s tabloid press, Prince Harry’s long-running legal battle over privacy invasion is set to reach a pivotal turning point on Tuesday, as a London High Court justice hands down a ruling in his lawsuit against Associated Newspapers Ltd., publisher of the *Daily Mail* and *Mail on Sunday*. This verdict closes the third in a series of high-profile lawsuits Harry has brought against British news outlets over allegations of unlawful information gathering.

    The case unites Prince Harry with six other high-profile claimants, including music icon Elton John, actors Elizabeth Hurley and Sadie Frost, anti-racism activist Doreen Lawrence, former lawmaker Simon Hughes, and David Furnish, in a pursuit of substantial compensatory damages. The 11-week legal proceeding has racked up an estimated £40 million ($53.5 million) in total legal costs, making it one of the most expensive celebrity privacy cases in recent British history.

    The core allegation from claimants is that Associated Newspapers oversaw a systemic, years-long campaign of unlawful snooping, leveraging in-house journalists, freelance contributors, and private investigators to tap phones, intercept private voicemails, and obtain sensitive personal information through deceptive means. Hurley laid bare the human impact of the alleged intrusions in her testimony, accusing the outlet of planting listening devices outside her home and stealing confidential medical records. “It is like there is someone peeping into your life and into your home,” she told the court. “My private life had been violated by violent intruders — that there had been sinister thieves in my home all along and that I had been living with them completely unaware.”

    For Prince Harry personally, the lawsuit is far more than a legal dispute. It is the culmination of a decades-long mission to reform what he has called a toxic British tabloid culture, a mission rooted in the 1997 death of his mother, Princess Diana, who was killed in a Paris car crash while being chased by paparazzi. He has repeatedly blamed relentless press harassment of his wife, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, for pushing the couple to step back from senior royal duties and relocate to California in 2020. In emotional testimony earlier this year, a tearful Harry told the court, “They continue to come after me, they have made my wife’s life an absolute misery.” He added that persistent press intrusion left him “paranoid beyond belief,” damaged his personal relationships, and inflicted lasting harm on his mental health.

    Associated Newspapers has forcefully denied all allegations, dismissing the claims as preposterous. Defense lawyers argue that the roughly 50 articles at the center of the case relied entirely on legitimate, lawfully obtained sources ranging from palace spokespeople and royal aides to friends and publicists who voluntarily shared information with reporters. Lead defense attorney Antony White told the court that the claimants’ case rests on unproven speculation and biased inferences, and that Harry was quick to assume unlawful activity where none existed. Unlike a previous 2023 phone hacking case against the *Daily Mirror* that resulted in a ruling against the publisher, dozens of journalists have testified in the *Daily Mail* case to defend their reporting, with many confirming they obtained information through official channels or on-the-record sources. Former *Mail on Sunday* editor Katie Nicholl told the court that Harry’s claims of a closed inner circle were unfounded, saying, “I had very good sources in the inner circle.”

    A key sticking point in the trial has centered on the timeline of allegations, many of which date back to the 1990s — long after the six-year legal deadline for bringing such claims expired. Claimants argue they were unaware of the unlawful surveillance until private investigator Gavin Burrows came forward in 2021 to admit his role in the snooping campaign. Burrows, who once publicly apologized to Harry on a BBC documentary for targeting the prince as a teenager, made a stunning reversal during this trial, testifying that he never worked for Associated Newspapers. He claimed the original statement supporting the claimants was fabricated by the plaintiffs’ legal team and that his signature was forged. The defense has argued that Burrows’ reversal completely undermines the claimants’ case, while the prosecution insists a wealth of other evidence ties the publisher to unlawful activity.

    Tuesday’s verdict coincides with a rare visit by Harry back to the UK, where he is in London to attend charity events. What has dominated headlines, however, is widespread speculation over whether Harry will be reunited with his father, King Charles III, who is currently undergoing treatment for an undisclosed cancer. The meeting would mark the first time Harry has seen his father in person since the king’s cancer diagnosis was announced, and would be the first visit from Harry’s children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, to the UK in several years. The potential reunion remains unconfirmed, as Harry continues to negotiate security arrangements and accommodations; the British government has repeatedly refused Harry’s requests for taxpayer-funded security during his visits, a dispute that has already spawned multiple failed legal challenges from the prince.

    This ruling adds another chapter to Harry’s unprecedented break with royal tradition: three years ago, he became the first senior British royal to testify in a civilian court in more than a century. He already notched two major victories in prior press privacy cases: in 2023, he won a default judgment against *Daily Mirror* publisher Reach plc, where a judge condemned the paper for “widespread and habitual” phone hacking. Just last year, Rupert Murdoch’s *The Sun* issued an unprecedented public apology for years of intrusion into Harry’s life and settled the lawsuit with a substantial damages payment.

  • Zelensky to press Nato for air defence systems after intense Russian strikes

    Zelensky to press Nato for air defence systems after intense Russian strikes

    As a new wave of devastating Russian ballistic missile attacks has left dozens of Ukrainian civilians dead and key infrastructure damaged, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is heading to a NATO gathering in Ankara, Turkey, with a clear and urgent priority: convincing Western allies to deliver the large-scale air defense systems Kyiv desperately needs to fend off Moscow’s escalating aerial campaign.

    Zelensky’s appeal carries unprecedented urgency, coming just days after Russia launched two separate missile barrages on Kyiv that struck residential apartment blocks, claimed more than 50 civilian lives, and laid bare critical gaps in Ukraine’s current air defense network. During the most recent Monday attack, Ukrainian air defenses successfully intercepted nearly all incoming Russian drones, but failed to shoot down a single ballistic missile — a failure that exposes the dangerous shortage of U.S.-made Patriot interceptor missiles, the primary system capable of countering the high-speed weapons that travel at thousands of kilometers per hour.

    In a blunt, frustrated video address delivered on the eve of the summit, Zelensky condemned the slow pace of military production, calling it “absurd” that output has not been scaled up to meet the clear need to protect Ukrainian civilians from what he terms “ballistic terror.” He has repeatedly called on European NATO members to release their stockpiled Patriot missiles, arguing that stockpiling weapons while Ukrainian civilians die serves no strategic purpose. “Russia is placing its bets on ballistic weapons, and those who want peace must place their bets on protection against ballistic attacks,” Zelensky stated, laying out his core argument for allied leaders in Ankara.

    Beyond the urgent push for air defense, the Ankara summit will also give Zelensky a high-stakes opportunity to meet with former U.S. President Donald Trump, where he will make the case that Russia’s brutal current aerial offensive is actually a sign of weakness, not strength. Zelensky will argue that mounting Ukrainian long-range drone strikes on Russian military and energy targets have severely strained Moscow’s capabilities, opening a narrow window of opportunity to pressure Russian President Vladimir Putin into negotiations for a “dignified” peace that preserves Ukraine’s sovereignty.

    Over recent weeks, Ukraine has ramped up its deep-strike drone campaign, hitting targets hundreds of kilometers inside Russian territory with growing frequency and accuracy. Strikes have taken out key oil refineries across Russia, from western regions to as far east as Omsk in Siberia, 2,500 kilometers from the Ukrainian border, triggering widespread fuel shortages that have seen Russians queuing for hours to buy gasoline and even fighting over limited allocations. Drone strikes have also hit Moscow and St. Petersburg ahead of major Russian political events, and daily attacks on Russian-held Crimea have disrupted military logistics, energy infrastructure, and civilian supply chains, prompting local authorities to declare a state of emergency over widespread power, fuel, and food shortages. One local Crimean resident described the situation as “catastrophic,” comparing current conditions to the economic chaos that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union in the 1990s — a direct rebuke of Putin’s core political claim that he pulled Russia out of post-Soviet chaos and restored national stability.

    NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has already echoed Zelensky’s call, urging alliance member states to “pull their weight” and deliver the military assistance Ukraine needs to defend its sovereignty. Rutte noted that Ukraine has already shifted the battlefield dynamic, stalling Russian ground advances in eastern Ukraine and gaining a critical upper hand through its deep-strike drone campaign.

    Despite this momentum, critical challenges remain. Patriot defense systems and interceptor missiles are in short supply globally, and it remains unclear how many additional systems Ukraine can secure even after Zelensky’s push. To address long-term gaps, Zelensky has also raised the possibility of Ukraine producing its own domestic equivalent of the Patriot system with NATO support.

    Moscow has framed Ukraine’s deep strikes as “terrorist” attacks, echoing the same language Russia has used for years to justify its own strikes on Ukrainian civilian infrastructure, including widespread winter attacks on power generation facilities that left millions without heat. For Zelensky, however, the drone campaign is a deliberate “influence campaign” designed to erode Russian public and political support for the war and force Putin to the negotiating table on terms acceptable to Kyiv — terms that do not include surrendering the entire eastern Donbas region, as Moscow continues to demand.

    Trump, who spoke with Putin for 90 minutes by phone earlier this week to hear the Russian leader’s perspective on the conflict, has recently signaled cautious support for Ukraine, adding uncertainty to the outcome of the upcoming meeting. For Kyiv, the summit comes as a critical moment: Ukrainian leaders aim to end the war before another harsh winter sets in, whether through continued military pressure or diplomatic negotiations. But Zelensky will make clear that to secure that outcome, Ukraine first needs the air defense capabilities to protect its people and cities from Russia’s intensifying missile terror.

  • What to know about NATO’s summit in Turkey as America steps back from its defense of Europe

    What to know about NATO’s summit in Turkey as America steps back from its defense of Europe

    As leaders of the world’s largest military alliance gather in Ankara, Turkey this week for a critical two-day NATO summit, the bloc finds itself at an unprecedented crossroads, driven by a shifting U.S. security posture that has shaken long-standing trans-Atlantic trust. U.S. President Donald Trump’s opening demand for “loyalty” from alliance members has set a tense tone for the gathering, coming after several NATO partners refused to grant American forces access to their domestic military bases for strikes targeting Iran amid the ongoing regional conflict sparked by the U.S.-Israel war. Trump has publicly singled out major European powers — Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Spain — for criticism over their reluctance to back U.S. military action in the Middle East, deepening divisions ahead of formal talks.

    Ordinarily, a NATO summit serves as a highly symbolic showcase of shared commitment to collective defense, reaffirming the core Article 5 pledge that an attack on one member is an attack on all. This year, however, the trans-Atlantic bond is more fragile than it has been in decades, as the U.S. pulls back from its decades-long role as the primary security guarantor for Europe. The summit has been framed around the official theme of “a stronger Europe in a stronger NATO,” with the Trump administration pushing for a sweeping overhaul it has dubbed “NATO 3.0” — though the full details and implications of this restructuring remain unclear, with delegates hoping to hash out concrete plans over the course of the two-day meeting.

    Hosting the event is Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has welcomed leaders to his sprawling Bestepe Presidential Compound on the outskirts of Ankara. In preparation for the summit, Turkish authorities completed a high-profile conversion of an old military airfield into a new commercial airport specifically to accommodate visiting delegations, and have implemented unprecedented security measures across the capital. Air defense systems are on high alert, tens of thousands of police officers have been deployed to duty, adjacent residential neighborhoods have been closed to civilian traffic, and some public sector workers have been granted time off to keep key transport corridors clear. All public gatherings in the area have been banned, and pre-summit security sweeps have resulted in more than a dozen detentions — including two working journalists, according to the Turkish Journalists Association.

    The summit’s official schedule brings together a wide range of global partners beyond the alliance’s 32 member states. On Tuesday evening, Erdogan will host a formal dinner in his compound’s “Winter Garden,” with top officials from Indo-Pacific partners Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand in attendance, alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Parallel to the dinner, foreign ministers will convene the newly established NATO-Ukraine Council, while defense ministers will hold separate talks with their Indo-Pacific counterparts. An additional working session with officials from Gulf Arab states is also planned, and Trump is scheduled to hold a one-on-one meeting with Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa. The only closed working session for NATO heads of state alone will take place on Wednesday morning, scheduled to last just three hours, with a short public summary of outcomes expected immediately after the meeting concludes.

    Two core issues top the formal summit agenda, starting with defense spending — a long-running point of friction between the U.S. and its European allies, where Washington has consistently pressured partners to increase their military investments. Ahead of the gathering, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte highlighted that European allies and Canada increased their collective defense spending by 20% in 2025, marking one of the largest annual jumps in modern alliance history. Even so, this progress is not expected to satisfy the Trump administration, after leaders committed at the last summit to match U.S. defense spending levels as a share of gross domestic product. The 2026 U.S. military budget totals $901 billion, equal to roughly 3.3% of U.S. GDP — a target most European allies remain far from meeting.

    Beyond spending targets, NATO is aiming to showcase progress on modernizing its military capabilities, converting the billions in new public investment into cutting-edge military equipment adapted to 21st-century warfare. A dedicated defense industry forum will be held on the summit’s sidelines on Tuesday, bringing together senior alliance officials and industry leaders to accelerate weapons production and drive innovation in emerging defense technologies. The second top formal agenda item is ongoing military and humanitarian support for Ukraine, which is now entering its fifth year of full-scale war against Russian invasion. European allies and Canada currently cover the vast majority of Ukraine’s defense needs, including approximately 90% of the country’s national air defense systems.

    Despite the formal agenda, most of the behind-the-scenes debate is expected to center on two unaddressed tensions: the future of U.S. troop levels in Europe, and the escalating regional fallout from the war between Israel and Iran. European allies and Canada have been repeatedly caught off guard by Trump’s sudden announcements of troop cuts over the past 18 months, and are seeking clear reassurance about Washington’s long-term security commitment to the continent. Just ahead of the summit, the Pentagon surprised allies by announcing a six-month review of the entire U.S. military presence in Europe, which will assess both European progress toward self-defense and whether the U.S. retains full, unimpeded access to military bases and overflight rights across the alliance.

    NATO as an institution has not taken an active role in the ongoing war against Iran, and the alliance has no collective agreement with the U.S. on shared use of member bases or airspace, even though individual members have reached bilateral arrangements with Washington. At a joint public appearance with Rutte on June 24, Trump doubled down on his criticism of allied reluctance to join the U.S. campaign, telling reporters “We don’t need their money — we don’t need anything. I just want loyalty.” The demand has left many alliance members confused: NATO’s founding treaty already enshrines equal commitment to collective security through Article 5, the core mutual defense guarantee that forms the foundation of the entire organization. What additional terms of loyalty the U.S. president is seeking remains undetermined, leaving allies to navigate a summit defined more by uncertainty than shared purpose.

  • Three tankers hit in latest attacks in the Strait of Hormuz, British military says

    Three tankers hit in latest attacks in the Strait of Hormuz, British military says

    DUBAI, United Arab Emirates – A series of coordinated attacks targeting commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most critical energy chokepoint, has sent shockwaves through global maritime and geopolitical circles Tuesday, as Iran grapples with the state funeral of its longtime supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, killed earlier in an ongoing regional conflict.

    The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO), a British military-run maritime security body, confirmed that three separate tankers were struck in attacks within the narrow waterway that connects the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea. Two vessels were hit by projectiles in the early part of the day, while a third was targeted by a drone hours later. Officials confirmed no fatalities or serious injuries across all three incidents.

    Of the two initial projectile strikes, one liquefied natural gas tanker sailing off Oman’s coast caught fire following the impact. Iranian state television claimed the vessel ignored official warnings before the attack, but stopped short of directly claiming responsibility for the assault. Initial assessments indicate the second tanker sustained structural damage, though its exact location at the time of the strike has not been publicly disclosed. The third vessel hit by the drone only suffered minor damage and was able to continue its scheduled voyage after the attack, UKMTO added. No environmentally hazardous leaks have been reported from any of the damaged vessels, and local maritime authorities have launched a full investigation into the coordinated assaults.

    Qatari officials later identified the attacked LNG tanker as the Al Rekayyat, which was carrying Qatari natural gas through the strait. Majed Al-Ansari, spokesperson for Qatar’s foreign ministry, condemned the strike as an unacceptable violation of international navigation rules and global energy security, calling it a “serious and explicit violation” of international law. In a post on X, Al-Ansari said Qatar holds Iran fully legally responsible for the attack.

    The attacks come amid escalating tensions over shipping access in the strait, which historically carries roughly 20% of the world’s traded oil and natural gas in peacetime. Last Thursday, Iran’s joint military command issued an official warning requiring all tankers transiting the waterway to use only Tehran-approved shipping lanes, and threatened “rapid and decisive reaction” to any interference by U.S. forces in the area. Just one day before the attacks, the U.S. Navy-led multinational Joint Maritime Information Center reassured shipping companies that the expanded route along Oman’s coast remains open and safe for all commercial traffic.

    Negotiations between Washington and Tehran, which aim to secure full reopening of the strait, roll back Iran’s disputed nuclear program, and end the ongoing regional conflict that began on February 28, have been paused this week as Iran mourns Khamenei, who was killed in an airstrike earlier this month. The 86-year-old supreme leader’s body was transported Tuesday to Qom, the holy center of Shiite seminary education, ahead of his final burial in his native Mashhad at the Imam Reza shrine. Massive crowds of hundreds of thousands of mourners gathered at Jamkaran Mosque just south of Qom to pay their respects, with many holding banners featuring images of Khamenei and his son, Mojtaba Khamenei, who has been named as the new supreme leader. The younger Khamenei has not appeared at public funeral events, and is widely believed to be in hiding after sustaining wounds in the same airstrike that killed his father. Israel, which has targeted top Iranian leaders throughout the ongoing conflict, has openly threatened to kill Mojtaba Khamenei as well. Many mourners chanted calls for the death of U.S. President Donald Trump during Tuesday’s processions.

    U.S. President Trump reignited tensions Monday during a White House appearance, warning Iran that it must “make a deal, or we’re going to finish the job.” “I’d rather make a deal, because I don’t want to affect 91 million people,” Trump said. “We can knock down their bridges in one hour. We can knock out their energy supply.”

    The current standoff over the strait stems from an interim 60-day truce deal that allowed commercial ships to transit the waterway without fees, but Iran has since insisted it retains the right to control shipping routes and impose passage fees – a move that upends decades of established open-access practice for the international waterway. The U.S. and a coalition of Gulf Arab states have rejected Tehran’s demand for tolls. Prior attacks on shipping in the strait have sparked U.S. retaliatory strikes in the past, worsening regional conflict.

    Despite the escalating tensions, data from shipping analytics firm Kpler shows that at least 108 commercial vessels crossed the strait via multiple routes over last weekend, indicating ongoing commercial activity even amid the standoff.

  • Jailers and officials at Russia’s ‘torture prisons’ in Ukraine exposed by BBC

    Jailers and officials at Russia’s ‘torture prisons’ in Ukraine exposed by BBC

    Three years of unthinkable captivity left 64-year-old Liudmyla Huseinova with permanent physical and emotional scars — and a relentless mission to see the men she accuses of brutal abuse held accountable for their actions. Her harrowing account, at the core of a new BBC World Service investigation, has helped unmask three alleged perpetrators who now live seemingly ordinary lives in Russia and occupied Ukraine, shedding rare light on a shadowy detention system that has operated beyond the reach of global justice for nearly a decade.

    Liudmyla’s nightmare began on an early October morning in 2019, when she left her home in Novoazovsk, a Donetsk region city that had fallen under Russian-backed paramilitary control after Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea and invasion of eastern Ukraine. Working as a safety engineer at a local poultry farm, Liudmyla had quietly supported Ukrainian forces and cared for local orphans under occupation; she believes a photo of a Ukrainian flag she shared with trusted friends tipped off separatist authorities, leading to her abduction. A group of masked men seized her bag, threw her into the back of a waiting car, and delivered her to Izolyatsia — a former factory and modern art centre that had been converted into one of the most notorious detention sites in the occupied region, where widespread accounts of torture have emerged from survivors for years.

    The first days inside Izolyatsia were defined by unrelenting cruelty and terror. Liudmyla recalls being surrounded by men who subjected her to dehumanizing verbal abuse immediately upon arrival. Detainees were forced to stand continuously from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. each day, and bright lights were kept on around the clock to prevent sleep. “I have never heard such terrible screams before,” she told the BBC, describing the constant sounds of abuse echoing through the facility’s walls. Two weeks after her arrival, she was taken to a second-floor room where the worst of her abuse unfolded. A man known to prisoners only as “Koval” sexually assaulted her, she says — while Yurii Temerbek, a former Ukrainian traffic policeman who had joined the Russian-backed separatists, stood by laughing and making sarcastic comments.

    The BBC’s investigation, carried out in partnership with two Ukrainian open-source investigators working with local non-profit Truth Hound, has confirmed Temerbek’s identity and uncovered his current circumstances. Now 56, Temerbek is a husband, father, and grandfather who studied Ukrainian language at university. Pre-2014 social media posts confirm he worked as a local traffic officer in the Donetsk region before joining the separatist Ministry of State Security (MGB). Ukrainian prosecutors have already launched criminal proceedings against him for participation in a terrorist group, and Liudmyla says he repeatedly threatened her during her captivity, including a late 2021 encounter where he called her a slur and threatened to send her to Siberia. Investigators found Temerbek and his family now reside in Russia’s Rostov region, just across the border from Ukraine, living an ordinary life far from the detention centre where he allegedly abused detainees.

    The investigation also unmasked a second Izolyatsia guard, known to prisoners as “Yermak”: 46-year-old Ruslan Yeriomichev, a law graduate from Donetsk National University who was first identified by investigative group Bellingcat and former Izolyatsia detainee and journalist Stanlislav Aseyev. Liudmyla says Yeriomichev once ordered her to eat uncooked food mixed with dirt and rubbish; when she spat most of it out, he beat her for refusing to comply after she answered “I’m for justice” to his question “Are you for Ukraine?”. The trauma of that incident still haunts her today: she cannot bear the smell of cooking food and struggles to maintain a normal diet. Social media posts show Yeriomichev still lives in occupied eastern Ukraine, taking family holidays in Russian-annexed Crimea and sharing photos of trips with friends and family as recently as 2024. Like Temerbek, he holds both Ukrainian and Russian citizenship, and faces multiple charges from Ukrainian prosecutors including cruel treatment of civilians and prisoners of war.

    Beyond the Izolyatsia case, the investigation mapped the full scale of the secret detention network run by Russian and Russian-backed forces across occupied Ukraine and Russia itself. Cross-referencing testimony from survivors, human rights reports, and open-source data, the BBC confirmed 93 active detention sites holding civilians and prisoners of war in occupied Ukraine between 2023 and 2025 — nearly a third of which are unofficial, operating out of repurposed buildings ranging from tax offices to hotels and private garages. An additional 102 detention sites were identified on Russian territory. None of these facilities have been open to unmonitored access by international human rights organizations.

    A second survivor, 42-year-old Kherson-based cargo sailor Oleksii Sivak, shared his own account of abuse to the BBC. After Russia captured Kherson in 2022, Oleksii quietly resisted occupation by cooking for elderly residents and distributing pro-Ukraine leaflets. He was arrested and taken to a former police station repurposed as a detention centre, where he says guards tortured him with electric shocks to the genitals and beat him with blunt objects. When Ukrainian forces retook Kherson in late 2022, Russian-backed forces fled the city, taking most detainees with them; Oleksii escaped only because the departing convoys did not have enough space to hold him.

    The BBC identified the commander of the Kherson detention facility as Andrey Spivak, a 40-year-old former prison guard from Russia’s Omsk region. Ukrainian prosecutors have charged Spivak with cruel treatment of civilians and violations of international war law. Investigators found Spivak has since returned to Omsk, where he works as a taxi driver and posts photos of his outdoor hobbies including fishing, hunting, and cross-country travel on social media.

    The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has documented that torture, sexual violence, arbitrary detention, and cruel treatment are systematic and widespread across this network of detention centres. Former detainees have consistently reported beatings, electric shock torture, mock executions, and sexual assault, and families of the detained are rarely given any information about their loved ones’ fates. Ukraine’s general prosecutor’s office says more than 16,000 Ukrainian civilians have been captured or disappeared since 2014, and over 400 cases of conflict-related sexual violence against detainees have been documented since Russia’s full-scale 2022 invasion. The Kremlin has repeatedly dismissed these allegations as biased and “groundless lies”, and added Russia to the UN’s global blacklist of countries accused of using sexual violence in conflict in 2024. When contacted by the BBC about the allegations against Temerbek, Yeriomichev, and Spivak, none of the three men responded. The Russian Embassy in London stated that Russia “consistently advocated respect for international law and the rule of law” and that all allegations of abuse are investigated.

    Liudmyla was released in a prisoner exchange in October 2022, three years and 13 days after her abduction. When she was welcomed home by friends, she found she could not cry: years of abuse had frozen her emotions, a condition she still lives with today in Kyiv, where she resides with her husband. She now runs a support organization for other female former detainees, and operates a secret network to deliver parcels from Ukrainian families to their loved ones still held in Russian-backed detention facilities.

    To date, Ukrainian prosecutors have opened proceedings against dozens of alleged abusers, but very few have been arrested. Most are convicted in absentia, and only one senior former Izolyatsia commander has been sentenced to prison in Ukraine. The Izolyatsia facility itself remains operational under Russian-backed control, according to Ukrainian authorities. For Liudmyla and other survivors, unmasking the identities of the men who abused them is a critical first step toward accountability. “If the men I accuse aren’t found and imprisoned, then justice for me will be their names as criminals, and torturers, will be known to their children,” she said. “For me, justice is not revenge. For me, justice is confirming that these people intentionally, deliberately did what they did. I want them to be punished by law.”

  • Ronaldo’s World Cup career ends in tears as ‘pandering’ Martinez departs

    Ronaldo’s World Cup career ends in tears as ‘pandering’ Martinez departs

    The 2026 FIFA World Cup’s round of 16 delivered one of the tournament’s most poignant moments in Dallas, as a 1-0 extra-time win for Spain over Portugal closed the book on what is almost certainly Cristiano Ronaldo’s final appearance at the global competition.

    Mikel Merino’s injury-time winner secured Spain’s spot in the quarter-finals, but the post-match narrative centered squarely on Ronaldo, the 41-year-old Portuguese icon who left the pitch in tears as his decades-long World Cup dream of lifting the trophy went unfulfilled. Long lauded as one of the greatest players to ever step onto a football pitch, Ronaldo retires from World Cup competition holding a host of unparalleled records: he is the only player to score in six consecutive World Cups, one of just two players to feature in six tournaments alongside long-time rival Lionel Messi, and he retires with 11 total World Cup goals, good for ninth on the all-time leaderboard.

    Across his entire club and international career, Ronaldo has notched a world-record 976 goals, claimed five Ballon d’Or awards, five Champions League titles, and a European Championship crown with Portugal in 2016. Yet despite 20 years of World Cup appearances dating back to 2006, when Portugal reached the semi-finals – his deepest run in the competition – the sport’s biggest prize eluded him entirely.

    While Ronaldo has confirmed this was his final World Cup, he has not yet confirmed his retirement from international football, telling reporters post-match that he would “meet the family and take decisions with a calm head” on his future with the national side. Still, the loss sparked immediate and fierce debate over whether Portugal manager Roberto Martinez’s decision to consistently start Ronaldo, despite the forward’s reduced form and output, ultimately cost the team a deeper run in the tournament.

    Match statistics underscore the critiques of Ronaldo’s role in the side: against Spain, he touched the ball just 19 times across 90 minutes, registered three shots, created only one goal-scoring chance for a teammate, and across five World Cup matches, he created just one total chance. While he ended the tournament with three goals and 18 total shots – tied with seven-goal joint-top scorer Erling Haaland for the fourth-most attempts at the tournament – 366 other players recorded more touches than Ronaldo, despite him missing just nine minutes of Portugal’s entire campaign.

    Speaking on BBC Radio 5 Live from the match venue in Texas, former England striker and BBC pundit Chris Sutton did not mince words in his criticism of both Ronaldo and Martinez. “He’s waddling around the field like a grandad, that’s why Portugal are out,” Sutton said. “Cristiano Ronaldo does nothing; he did nothing. What is Roberto Martinez doing? How can you pander to a player so much? Portugal are out because of Roberto Martinez.”

    Sutton doubled down on his criticism of Martinez for failing to insert young in-form striker Goncalo Ramos, who scored a hat-trick in the 2022 World Cup round of 16 after then-manager Fernando Santos dropped Ronaldo to the bench. “How did Goncalo Ramos not get on the pitch? It’s an absolute embarrassment from the manager, just pandering to his star player,” Sutton said. “He’s the most decorated player that Portugal have ever had but you’ve got to be stronger than that. We’re four years further on, Ronaldo is four years older and look what’s happened.”

    Sutton also noted that Martinez, who previously mismanaged a highly talented Belgian golden generation that crashed out of the 2022 World Cup in the group stage, repeated the same mistake with Portugal, which boasts a deep squad of elite talent including four Champions League-winning players from Paris Saint-Germain and Premier League player of the year Bruno Fernandes of Manchester United. “His job was to try and win the World Cup and put the best team out for Portugal. Has he done that? Absolutely not,” Sutton said. “It’s scandalous the way he has managed this team. He made a mess of Belgium when they had an opportunity of really doing great things with that golden generation; they ended up Belgian buffoons. Now Portugal, it was pathetic to see a manager act in that manner.”

    Shortly after the final whistle, Martinez announced he would step down as Portugal manager, ending his contract which expired after the tournament. “I came to Portugal with the objective of winning the World Cup and because I haven’t won it wouldn’t make sense to continue,” he explained. The departing manager offered a glowing tribute to Ronaldo, calling him a “football icon” and defending his choice to keep the star in the starting lineup. “When you need a goal you cannot take Cristiano off, at least in 90 minutes, he is physically capable – his presence, open space, dead-ball situations, we need his experience,” Martinez said. “We need to thank him for what he tried to do at this World Cup. His dream was to win this World Cup, he did this with an amazing example. He is a prime example of football and the human being that is behind that athlete.”

    The end of Ronaldo’s World Cup journey also closes a defining chapter in modern football fandom: the decades-long rivalry between Ronaldo and Lionel Messi. For generations, fans have divided into camps aligned with one player or the other in the endless debate over who deserves the title of the greatest of all time, a rivalry explored in a new BBC iPlayer documentary released this summer. While neither player had won the World Cup through 2022, Messi claimed the trophy with Argentina in Qatar four years ago, eliminating the only major mark against his legacy. Now, Ronaldo will finish his career without ever lifting the prize.

    Today, as both legends wind down their careers – Ronaldo plying his trade in Saudi Arabia’s Pro League with Al-Nassr and Messi playing in Major League Soccer with Inter Miami – Messi continues to outperform his old rival at the 2026 World Cup, currently sitting as joint-top scorer with seven goals, matching his 2022 output. Ronaldo has scored just four goals across his last two World Cup tournaments, and sits second to Messi on the all-time World Cup goalscoring list, with 11 to Messi’s 20.

    Former Manchester United teammate Wayne Rooney paid tribute to Ronaldo’s unprecedented career following the exit. “He is a genius, a superstar. What he has given to football and millions of people is something very rare,” Rooney said. “He will be disappointed because he believed he could win this tournament. But time gets us all. It’s a sad day for football.”

    Many Portugal fans who spoke to the BBC after the match shared that same sense of emotion but chose to celebrate Ronaldo’s legacy rather than lament the defeat. “One of my dreams was to watch Ronaldo live. I was happy to see him. He has meant a lot,” one fan said. “I’m really emotional. We were just not lucky this time. What Ronaldo has done has been beautiful. We don’t have to cry, we have to laugh because we saw him.”

  • A stoic Cristiano Ronaldo exits last World Cup with ‘clear conscience’ after Portugal loses to Spain

    A stoic Cristiano Ronaldo exits last World Cup with ‘clear conscience’ after Portugal loses to Spain

    ARLINGTON, Texas — For soccer legend Cristiano Ronaldo, the final chapter of his unprecedented World Cup journey ended not with celebration, but quiet stoicism Monday. The 41-year-old Portuguese icon walked off the field following his team’s 1-0 round-of-16 defeat to neighboring rival Spain, offering only a brief wave to the cheering crowd and barely showing the emotion he later acknowledged feeling.

    After the final whistle, Ronaldo briefly raised his right hand to shield his eyes, opening up about his disappointment. “Sad — it’s normal after being eliminated like this,” he told reporters. This tournament marked the sixth and final World Cup appearance of Ronaldo’s storied career, a milestone no other men’s player has reached in modern tournament history.

    Reflecting on his decades of contributions to Portugal’s national side, Ronaldo made clear he had no regrets about his effort on the sport’s biggest global stage. “I’ve given everything, I’ve given my best, and I leave with a clear conscience,” he said. “This is soccer, this is life for a soccer player. Sometimes you win and sometimes you lose.”

    Ahead of the knockout clash with Spain, Ronaldo had shared he hoped to extend his tournament run and savor every remaining moment. Even before the match, however, he confirmed what he repeated after the loss: this four-year cycle tournament would be his last. Throughout his World Cup career, the furthest Ronaldo ever led Portugal was a semifinal finish during his tournament debut in 2006, a result that remains the country’s deepest World Cup run to date.

    The match itself held a near-miss that could have shifted the momentum for Portugal. In the first half, Ronaldo had a potential goal stopped by an extraordinary leaping save from Spain’s record-setting goalkeeper Unai Simón. The chance came after teammate João Félix’s header bounced off Simón’s shoulder, leaving Ronaldo to launch a right-footed backward strike. Simón, still airborne, managed to reach back and secure the ball with both hands — one of three shots Ronaldo took, two of which landed on target.

    As for what comes next in his legendary career, Ronaldo said he would not rush into any decisions. “Yes, it was my last World Cup, but everything else I’ll have time to think about, to be with my family, and not make any decision hot-headed and move on with life,” he explained.

    Portugal’s head coach Roberto Martínez was quick to praise Ronaldo’s unparalleled legacy and leadership, framing the forward as a generational talent that deserves global celebration. “He is an example, a role model to follow. This is somebody that we need to celebrate. We’re talking about a football icon,” Martínez said in translated comments. “There aren’t too many Cristiano Ronaldos out there. I think we need to thank him. His dream was to win the World Cup and he did this as an amazing example in the locker room.”

    Under Ronaldo’s leadership, Portugal has claimed its first-ever major international titles: the 2016 UEFA European Championship, followed by UEFA Nations League trophies in 2019 and 2025. He leaves the World Cup holding a string of unprecedented records: he is the only player to score in five consecutive World Cups, and sits as the all-time leading goalscorer in men’s international soccer with 146 career goals across national team matches. He notched three goals in this 2026 tournament, bringing his total career World Cup goals to 11 — a mark that ties him for ninth on the all-time leaderboard.

    Monday’s exit bookended a historic World Cup rivalry with Spain that began eight years ago, when 33-year-old Ronaldo scored a stunning group-stage hat trick to secure a 3-3 draw against the Spanish side, a match still widely regarded as one of the greatest in World Cup history. That performance made him the oldest player to record a World Cup hat trick, a record that stood until 38-year-old Lionel Messi scored three for Argentina in a June 2026 group-stage win over Algeria.

  • Spain sets World Cup record with 6th clean sheet in a row and keeper Simón extends scoreless mark

    Spain sets World Cup record with 6th clean sheet in a row and keeper Simón extends scoreless mark

    ARLINGTON, Texas — The 2026 FIFA World Cup delivered another chapter of historic soccer achievement on Monday, as Spain cemented its place in international tournament record books with a sixth straight clean sheet and a tense 1-0 knockout-stage victory over Portugal. This milestone broke a three-way tie that had stood for decades, with Spain moving ahead of Italy’s 1990 side and Switzerland’s 2006-2010 squad for the longest consecutive run of World Cup matches without conceding a single goal.

    Spain’s defensive streak first began back in the 2022 Qatar World Cup, when the squad held Morocco scoreless through 120 minutes of regulation and extra time in a round-of-16 clash, ending in a goalless draw before Morocco advanced via penalty shootout. When Spain kicked off its 2026 group stage campaign, the team earned an unexpected 0-0 draw against underdog Cape Verde, a result that would kick off a dominant run of defensive form: four straight shutout victories that carried La Roja through to the tournament’s quarterfinals.
    Leading the historic defensive charge is starting goalkeeper Unai Simón, who stretched his personal record of consecutive scoreless minutes to an incredible 609 minutes – a mark that far outpaces the previous 517-minute record set by Italian legend Walter Zenga, who set the original benchmark during Italy’s 1990 home World Cup run with five straight clean sheets. Simón first surpassed Zenga’s record earlier last week, during Spain’s 3-0 knockout-stage opening win over Austria, a match where the Austrian side failed to register a single shot on target.

    Simón’s shutout streak actually traces back to the final group stage match of the 2022 Qatar World Cup, a 2-1 loss to Japan where the keeper’s scoreless run began after conceding the second goal of the match. Entering Monday’s high-stakes clash with Portugal, Simón had only needed to make four total saves across the entire 2026 tournament, but the star keeper was called into action twice in the first half by Portuguese icon Cristiano Ronaldo – both stops preserving Spain’s clean sheet and historic streak.
    The second of those two saves will go down as one of the most memorable highlights of the tournament: a spectacular diving stop where Simón, still airborne after launching himself to intercept the shot, reached back to secure the ball with both hands. The opportunity came after Portuguese defender Jose Sa’s header deflected off the shoulder of the 29-year-old Athletic Bilbao shot-stopper, leaving Ronaldo with an open look at goal that Simón somehow turned away.

    The late 1-0 winning goal from Mikel Merino not only sent Spain through to the World Cup quarterfinals, but also brought an end to Ronaldo’s unprecedented run of six consecutive World Cup appearances spanning from his 2006 debut, closing the book on one of the most legendary international careers in soccer history.

  • Mikel Merino’s late goal sends Spain to quarterfinals and ends Cristiano Ronaldo’s World Cup career

    Mikel Merino’s late goal sends Spain to quarterfinals and ends Cristiano Ronaldo’s World Cup career

    ARLINGTON, Texas — A last-gasp goal from substitute Mikel Merino in the first minute of second-half stoppage time handed Spain a dramatic 1-0 round-of-16 victory over Iberian rivals Portugal at the 2026 FIFA World Cup on Monday, bringing an end to Cristiano Ronaldo’s legendary career on soccer’s biggest global stage.

    The game-changing sequence unfolded after Merino was brought down by a Portuguese defender, drawing a foul call. As Portugal’s playmaker Bernardo Silva contested the referee’s decision with officials, Merino stayed alert, quickly played the ball back into open play, sprinted toward the penalty area, and slotted a calm finish past Portuguese goalkeeper Diogo Costa after receiving a perfectly weighted pass from Ferran Torres.

    The result pushes Spain through to the World Cup quarterfinals for the first time since the Spanish side lifted their only World Cup trophy in South Africa 2010. La Roja will face off against the winner of the round-of-16 clash between the United States and Belgium this Friday in Inglewood, California, for a spot in the tournament’s final four.

    For 41-year-old Ronaldo, the defeat marks the close of an unprecedented World Cup journey that spanned six consecutive tournaments, dating back to his 2006 debut. The all-time leading men’s international goalscorer with 146 goals across 233 national team appearances entered the match chasing history: he was aiming to guide Portugal to back-to-back World Cup quarterfinals for the first time in the nation’s history.

    Merino’s storybook match is already one of the tournament’s most surprising narratives. The Arsenal midfielder, who played a key role in the Gunners’ first Premier League title win in more than two decades earlier this season, only entered the round-of-16 clash in the 85th minute. A series of injury issues that disrupted his club campaign had left his spot in Spain’s World Cup squad in doubt just weeks before the tournament kicked off.

    Monday’s tightly contested clash between the neighboring Iberian rivals was a stark contrast to their unforgettable 2018 World Cup group stage opener, widely regarded as one of the greatest World Cup matches in modern history. That eight years ago contest ended in a thrilling 3-3 draw, highlighted by Ronaldo’s only World Cup hat-trick at the senior international level.

    This time around, Spain’s suffocating defense and in-form goalkeeper Unai Simón kept Portugal’s star front line quiet for the full 90-plus minutes. Ronaldo, who notched three goals across Portugal’s run to the knockout stage, only mustered one clear goalscoring chance: a deft backheel flick in the 37th minute, after a deflected header from Joao Felix fell into his path. The attempt bounced softly enough for Simón to recover and make the game-saving grab, extending the keeper’s historic World Cup scoreless streak to 609 minutes. With the clean sheet, Spain also set a new tournament record, becoming the first nation ever to record six consecutive shutouts at a single men’s World Cup.

    Portugal threw everything forward in search of an equalizer during eight minutes of second-half stoppage time, with Silva coming closest to leveling the score when his late header drifted just over the crossbar. The outcome adds another chapter to the two nations’ World Cup rivalry: 16 years ago in South Africa, Spain also eliminated Portugal 1-0 in the round of 16, on their way to lifting the trophy. Monday’s result also reverses the outcome of last year’s UEFA Nations League final, a back-and-forth 2-2 draw that Portugal won on penalties, played almost exactly one year before this World Cup knockout clash.

  • France’s Marine Le Pen, who brought hard-right National Rally to cusp of electoral success

    France’s Marine Le Pen, who brought hard-right National Rally to cusp of electoral success

    As France’s right-wing nationalist figurehead Marine Le Pen awaits a key verdict from a Paris appeals court this Tuesday, the future of her decades-long political career hangs in the balance. Should the court rule to bar her from running in the 2027 French presidential election, it would bring an abrupt close to a political journey that has reshaped the country’s far-right landscape for a generation.

    In a gathering with supporters over the weekend in Liévin, located in the heart of her Pas-de-Calais constituency, the 57-year-old leader made clear her plan if the ruling goes against her: if barred from seeking the presidency, she will step back and throw her full support behind her hand-picked protégé, current National Rally head Jordan Bardella. Observers who attended the event noted that the moment carried the quiet air of a planned leadership transition, even as Le Pen and Bardella publicly presented a united front ahead of the verdict.

    Le Pen’s path to this crossroads stretches back more than half a century, rooted in the legacy of her father Jean-Marie Le Pen, who founded the original National Front (FN), the predecessor to today’s National Rally, in the 1970s. Her first brush with the dangers of her family’s political life came at just 8 years old, when a bomb destroyed the Le Pens’ central Paris apartment in 1976. Though Marine and her two elder sisters escaped with only minor injuries, the attack was a formative “night of horror,” as she later described it, that cemented her awareness of her father’s place in French politics.

    Eight years later, her family fractured when her mother left the household to live with her father’s biographer, later posing for *Playboy* magazine. All three sisters stood by their father, but it was the youngest, Marine, who would go on to inherit his political mantle. She once reflected in a 2004 television interview: “You’re born Le Pen’s daughter, you die Le Pen’s daughter. He’s the man of my life. He’s made me the woman I am.”

    By the early 1990s, Le Pen had graduated from law school in Paris and launched her formal political career. Her family name led to boycotts from fellow legal professionals, pushing her to focus full-time on party work within the National Front. She rose steadily through the ranks: becoming vice-president of the party in 2003, winning a seat in the European Parliament in 2004, and finally taking the party’s top leadership from her father in 2011, nine years after he reached his own political peak by advancing to the 2002 presidential runoff against Jacques Chirac.

    Once in charge, Le Pen set out on a deliberate mission to de-demonize the party her father built, working to distance it from the overt racism and antisemitism that had long defined the FN’s public image. She expelled Jean-Marie Le Pen from the party in 2015 to solidify this shift, a move that sparked a bitter family feud; after her father’s death last year, she acknowledged she would “never forgive myself for this decision, because I know it caused him immense pain.” She completed the rebrand in 2018, renaming the FN the National Rally, repositioning the once-fringe movement as a mainstream political contender while retaining its core anti-immigration platform focused on prioritizing French nationals for housing, jobs, and social benefits.

    Le Pen’s own electoral record reflects the party’s growing popularity: she placed third in the 2012 presidential race, then advanced to the runoff twice, losing to incumbent Emmanuel Macron in both 2017 and 2022. With Macron constitutionally barred from seeking a third term in 2027, Le Pen currently leads early polling for the race, positioning 2027 as her strongest ever shot at the Élysée Palace.

    But the legal conviction that led to this week’s appeal stems from a 2024 ruling that found Le Pen played a “central role” in a scheme that diverted €1.4 million (£1.2 million) in European Parliament public funds to pay unqualified National Rally party assistants. She has rejected the charges, but a disqualification from running would end her presidential bid before it formally begins.

    Le Pen’s political career has also been marked by controversial ties to the Kremlin. Decades ago, when major French banks refused to lend to the far-right party due to its history of bigotry, the National Rally turned for financing to a Russian-Czech bank linked to the Kremlin — a deal struck the same year Vladimir Putin illegally annexed Crimea from Ukraine. Le Pen openly praised Putin for years, met him at the Kremlin ahead of the 2017 election, and infamously told the BBC on the eve of the 2022 full-scale invasion that she did not believe Russia would attack Ukraine, though she later voiced support for Ukrainian sovereignty. That handshake photo with Putin has repeatedly come back to undermine her credibility with centrist voters.

    Outside of politics, Le Pen holds a professional certification in cat breeding, a hobby she has long said could be a post-political life. After suffering a regional election defeat in 2015, she told *Le Parisien* she could easily “stop everything, do something else — breed cats for example.” She earned her official breeding diploma five years later, once even earned a small side income from the venture, and was most recently spotted carrying a kitten in a pet carrier during a visit to the prime minister’s official residence in 2025. Yet for many observers, it is hard to imagine Le Pen stepping fully away from the political sphere she has inhabited since childhood.

    As the country waits for the court’s ruling, one thing is clear: whatever the outcome, the next chapter of French right-wing politics will likely be led by a new generation, with Jordan Bardella waiting in the wings to carry forward the movement Le Pen built.