标签: Asia

亚洲

  • Small changes in Hanoi’s streets can mean big disruptions for those who depend on them

    Small changes in Hanoi’s streets can mean big disruptions for those who depend on them

    The constant roar of urban renewal echoes across Hanoi today: the sharp crack of hydraulic breakers splitting asphalt, the low groan of excavators shifting rubble, and the crunch of aging brick and concrete being torn from the ground. As Vietnam pursues an aggressive target of double-digit economic expansion, its capital city is racing to remake itself into a ultramodern global hub aligned with a 100-year urban vision.

    In just the first six months of 2026, Hanoi has allocated $2.4 billion to clear land for nearly 1,500 separate infrastructure and development projects, a transformation that is rapidly reshaping one of the world’s oldest continuously inhabited capital cities. City officials frame the large-scale redevelopment as a critical adaptation to the growing threats of climate change: the plans integrate new flood control systems and air pollution reduction measures, addressing long-standing vulnerabilities for Vietnam, which ranks among the countries most at risk from climate-driven extreme weather, including increasingly frequent and intense typhoons, devastating seasonal floods, and record-breaking heatwaves. Hanoi itself has long struggled with severe seasonal smog, regularly ranking among the world’s most polluted capital cities.

    But the promise of modern progress comes at a steep cost for thousands of residents, who have lost homes, family businesses, and generations-old community ties. Fine demolition dust drifts through working-class neighborhoods, coating rooftops, tree canopies, and the few remaining standing structures. For Nguyen Thi Nhan, a former street fruit vendor who lost her 300-square-meter street-front home to make way for a new arterial road, the upheaval has upended her family’s stability. She has yet to receive promised compensation for her lost property, and now pays rent to house her extended family, including her elderly parents. “We just have to wait. I don’t know where they will relocate us,” she said.

    Large billboards dot cleared construction zones, painting a glossy vision of Hanoi’s future: gleaming steel-and-glass skyscrapers in new business and industrial districts, wide tree-lined boulevards, expansive public parks, and scenic waterfront promenades. To make room for this new skyline, the city plans to demolish hundreds of heritage colonial villas, traditional narrow shophouses, and densely packed low-rise residential blocks. The blueprint calls for dozens of new roads, bridges, and mass transit links connecting the city center to Noi Bai International Airport and fast-growing neighboring provinces.

    The centerpiece of the transformation is a $28 billion redevelopment project stretching along both banks of the silty Red River that cuts through the heart of Hanoi. Spanning 11,400 hectares — an area larger than central Paris — the project will deliver new residential districts, commercial hubs, public green space, and most critically, expanded drainage and flood control infrastructure to address the city’s chronic riverine flooding. Another major landmark included in the plan is a $35.2 billion Olympic-level sports complex backed by Vingroup, Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, anchored by a 135,000-seat drum-shaped soccer stadium, one of the largest in the world.

    City officials also note that a complete transport overhaul is designed to rebalance Hanoi’s growth pattern, easing overcrowding and pressure on the crowded historic core by developing new distributed transport hubs across the metropolitan area.

    While experts acknowledge that modern infrastructure is critical to Vietnam’s push to attract foreign direct investment and expand economic opportunity for both residents and domestic businesses, they warn that the breakneck construction boom carries significant systemic risks. “There are huge economic opportunities arising from those projects, but at the same time, there are risks that need to be considered,” said Nguyen Khac Giang, a visiting fellow at the ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore. Giang cautioned that massive public and private investment in large-scale construction risks diverting much-needed capital from the high-tech manufacturing and digital industries that Vietnam has prioritized for long-term growth. The boom has also driven a sharp spike in residential and commercial property prices, leaving many ordinary buyers priced out of the market, while leaving domestic banks heavily exposed to a potential market correction. A 2025 S&P Global report found that Vietnamese real estate developers carry far higher debt levels than their peers in regional economies such as Indonesia and the Philippines, and the real estate sector, while accounting for just 3.5% of national GDP, makes up roughly a quarter of all outstanding bank lending in Vietnam.

    Beyond economic risks, the rapid transformation has sparked growing anxiety over what Hanoi will lose as it remakes its urban fabric. For small business owners and long-time residents, even minor adjustments to street life have created major disruptions. Since November, city authorities have waged a citywide crackdown to clear sidewalks of illegal parking, unlicensed street vendors, and commercial encroachment, with police vans patrolling the iconic Old Quarter in the evenings, using loudspeakers to order vendors to remove outdoor seating that spills onto public walkways. For Thuy, a local beef noodle soup vendor who only shared her first name over concerns of official pushback, the crackdown has cut her income dramatically: she used to be able to serve four additional customers per hour using four outdoor stools and a small table, but now is forced to turn customers away, leaving her barely breaking even. “My profits are already small to begin with,” she said.

    In a rare act of public dissent, hundreds of residents from the Bac Cau community along the Red River have hung public banners imploring city officials to scrap plans that would displace thousands of families to make way for new riverfront development. Villagers say the planned arterial roads will erase their generations-old community entirely. “We want to continue to live here, we’ve been here for generations,” said Van, a local resident who also only shared her first name over fears of official repercussions for speaking out.

    While Hanoi has formal rules in place outlining compensation and resettlement support for residents displaced by land acquisition, including payments for damaged structures, relocation allowances, and support for families moving ancestral graves, dozens of displaced residents report they have yet to receive owed compensation, and remain uncertain about their long-term housing and livelihoods.

    Giang argues that the core challenge is not modernization itself, but the breakneck pace of redevelopment and the consistent lack of meaningful consultation with affected residents and urban planning experts. He points to precedent across the region: in the 1960s, Beijing demolished nearly all of its centuries-old imperial city walls to make way for its first subway line and a major inner-city ring road, a loss that urban planners have lamented ever since. Large-scale redevelopment drives in other major Asian cities have repeatedly sparked public disputes, as displaced residents are often relocated to far-flung suburban areas lacking basic services and employment opportunities, tearing apart tightly woven communities that have existed for centuries. “Once we depart from the city’s history, it’s very hard to revert or to turn back,” Giang said.

    Linh Nguyen, lead analyst at global risk consultancy Control Risks, notes that Hanoi’s current transformation marks a fundamental shift from the urban growth of the past two decades, which focused on expanding outward by building new greenfield development on the city’s periphery. Today’s reconstruction targets the existing built-up urban core, requiring the redevelopment of established neighborhoods and the relocation of long-time residents — a far more complex process that raises thorny questions of property rights, fair compensation, and inter-agency coordination. The outcome will also test whether Vietnam’s increasingly centralized state can deliver on decades-old planned infrastructure projects that have never been implemented. “The last 20 years were about building a bigger Hanoi. The next 20 years will be rebuilding the Hanoi that already exists. That’s a fundamentally different challenge,” she said.

  • French student pleads guilty and is fined for a straw-licking stunt in Singapore

    French student pleads guilty and is fined for a straw-licking stunt in Singapore

    SINGAPORE – A 19-year-old French business student studying in Singapore has been sentenced to a S$600 ($465 USD) fine after pleading guilty to a public nuisance charge this Thursday, stemming from a reckless social media stunt that saw him lick a juice vending machine straw before placing it back into the dispenser.

    Didier Gaspard Owen Maximilien admitted he recorded the unsanitary act in March at a local Singaporean shopping mall, filming the stunt specifically for his online social media followers. The video quickly spread across digital platforms after it was posted, prompting authorities to file formal charges against the teen in April. A second separate charge of mischief was also considered by the court during the sentencing hearing.

    Singapore’s legal system allows for a maximum penalty of up to three months of imprisonment for a public nuisance conviction. In this case, prosecutors requested the top allowable fine of S$2,000 ($1,551 USD), arguing that the pre-planned act posed unnecessary public health risks and could erode public trust in the hygiene of publicly accessible vending machines. Multiple mitigating factors led the court to issue a lower fine, and no community-based sentence was ordered. Prosecutors noted that Maximilien personally retrieved the contaminated straw after the stunt, no member of the public ended up using the straw, and no documented harm to any person occurred. They also referenced Maximilien’s age and his decision to enter an early guilty plea as additional mitigating circumstances.

    Maximilien is currently enrolled at a Singaporean business school, and as part of his academic program, he will be based in France from September through December this year. Prosecutors confirmed that Singaporean immigration officials will conduct a separate review of his student pass eligibility following the conviction, with a final decision pending a full assessment of all relevant circumstances.

    His defense attorney, Kalidass Murugayan, told the court that his client has been residing in Singapore without direct family support, and has expressed profound regret over his harmful decision. Murugayan clarified that after filming the stunt, Maximilien kept the licked straw for his own personal use, meaning it was never meant to be accessed by another customer. “He is truly sorry for having caused all this trouble,” Murugayan stated, adding that Maximilien’s parents have required him to pay the full fine using his own money. Following the hearing, the teen left the courthouse without making any public comments to reporters.

    IJooz, the company that operates the juice vending machine where the incident occurred, launched a formal police complaint after learning of the stunt. The company immediately sanitized the entire dispenser unit and replaced all 500 straws stored in the machine as a public health precaution. In response to the incident, IJooz has also announced plans to roll out safety upgrades across its vending machine fleet, including shifting to individually wrapped straws and installing new dispensing compartments that only unlock after a customer completes their purchase.

    This incident underscores Singapore’s strict approach to regulating public behavior and maintaining public cleanliness. The densely populated city-state is well known for imposing harsh penalties for acts that threaten public hygiene and order, including littering and vandalism.

  • Ahmet Davutoglu, former PM turned Erdogan critic, ends political career

    Ahmet Davutoglu, former PM turned Erdogan critic, ends political career

    On Wednesday, a pivotal shift shook Turkish politics as former Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, once one of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s closest allies, announced the full dissolution of his opposition Future Party and his permanent withdrawal from organized party politics. In a formal written statement shared on the social platform X, Davutoglu framed his exit as a response to what he described as Turkey’s toxic and unethical domestic political environment.

    Davutoglu stressed that his choice is not an act of surrender, nor a complete abandonment of political engagement. Instead, he positioned it as a moral protest and a urgent call for broader political reflection across the country, urging all actors to reevaluate the current state of Turkish politics.

    Davutoglu launched the Future Party back in 2019, with a clear strategic goal: to siphon disillusioned conservative voters away from Erdogan’s long-governing Justice and Development Party (AKP), and build a new, democratic conservative alternative that could challenge the AKP’s decades-long hold on power. But the venture never gained the popular traction Davutoglu had predicted. The party failed to convince voters it could serve as a credible replacement for the AKP, securing just 0.11% of the national vote in the 2024 local elections, a result that underscored its marginal status in Turkish politics.

    A key strategic decision that weakened Davutoglu’s standing among his core conservative base was his 2023 choice to join the Table of Six opposition coalition and back Kemal Kilicdaroglu, then-leader of the Republican People’s Party (CHP), in that year’s presidential election. For many Turkish conservatives, long-held skepticism of the CHP’s staunch secularist ideology dates back to the founding of the Turkish republic, and the alliance eroded much of the limited support Davutoglu had retained.

    While the coalition arrangement allowed the Future Party to win 10 seats in the 2023 general parliamentary election, the party’s parliamentary caucus shrank to just four members in recent years, as multiple deputies defected to both the AKP and other opposition groups. Beyond political challenges, the party also faced crippling financial strain: an anonymous source familiar with Davutoglu’s thinking confirmed to Middle East Eye that covering organizational costs and sustaining the party’s national infrastructure had become increasingly unfeasible.

    Discussions of a potential merger between the Future Party and the AKP had been circulating in Ankara political circles as early as last year, but talks collapsed after Erdogan rejected the inclusion of both Davutoglu and his close ally, former AKP official Selcuk Ozdag, blocking any path to a political reunion.

    Before his split with Erdogan, Davutoglu built a decades-long career in Turkish politics and academia: a respected academic and once a doctrinaire foreign minister, he pioneered Turkey’s transformative “zero problems with neighbours” foreign policy, which pushed Ankara to deepen political and economic engagement across the Middle East and North Africa. This marked a clear break from Turkey’s historically cautious approach to relations with Arab states, reshaping Turkish foreign policy for nearly a decade.

    Davutoglu ascended to the prime ministership in 2014, after Erdogan won election to the presidency, and for a time remained one of Erdogan’s most trusted lieutenants. But tensions between the two former allies began to mount steadily from 2015, particularly after Davutoglu led the AKP to an election victory in that year’s November snap vote. Internal divisions ultimately centered on constitutional order: Davutoglu privately argued that political authority should rest with the office of the prime minister, aligning with Turkey’s then-parliamentary constitutional framework, while Erdogan pushed to expand the powers of the presidency.

    This power struggle culminated in Davutoglu’s forced removal from the prime ministership in 2016, and he was further sidelined from mainstream AKP politics after the 2018 presidential election that expanded Erdogan’s executive powers. The 2020 state-ordered closure of Istanbul Sehir University, an institution Davutoglu himself founded, only deepened the public rift between the two former allies.

    Davutoglu’s exit from party politics closes a chapter of intra-conservative opposition to Erdogan’s government, leaving remaining opposition groups to adjust to a shifting political landscape ahead of future national elections.

  • US immigration agents are patrolling airports to arrest visa overstayers

    US immigration agents are patrolling airports to arrest visa overstayers

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has launched a new enforcement operation that places agents on patrol at domestic airports across the country, targeting and arresting individuals who have overstayed their valid entry visas, ABC News confirmed in a report published Tuesday.

    For non-citizens who entered the United States through legal channels, overstaying a visa is traditionally classified as a civil violation rather than a criminal offense. Many of these individuals are caught in bureaucratic limbo: their applications for permanent resident green cards remain pending long after their initial visas expire, leaving them in unauthorized status through no fault of their own.

    According to ABC News’ reporting, at least 27 visa overstayers have been taken into custody across nine states since the airport patrol program launched. To identify targets, ICE accesses passenger travel data collected by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), which screens every passenger booked on both domestic and international flights departing from U.S. airports.

    In an official statement, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the federal agency that oversees ICE, claimed that visa overstayers should only use U.S. airports to facilitate “self-deportation” rather than general domestic travel.

    The expanded airport operation is part of the broader agenda of the second Trump administration, led by new DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin. The administration has made meeting former President Trump’s campaign pledge of one million annual deportations of people it labels as “illegal immigrants” — including both unauthorized border crossers and visa overstayers — a top policy priority.

    While many people in immigration limbo entered the U.S. to seek asylum, the administration has effectively closed off nearly all access to this legal protection pathway in recent months. Data from ICE confirms that enforcement activity has surged sharply: last month marked the highest number of new bookings into ICE immigration detention facilities since Trump took office in January 2025. More than 43,000 people were taken into custody to await deportation in June, averaging 1,500 arrests per day across the country.

    Though DHS officially denies the existence of a mandatory arrest quota, off-the-record conversations between agents overheard by third parties reveal that ICE staff are promised financial bonuses for exceeding arrest targets. This new airport patrol operation follows the administration’s earlier controversial large-scale enforcement campaign, Operation Metro Surge, in Minneapolis, which ended earlier this year after widespread condemnation over violent tactics. ICE’s approach to street arrests has remained largely unchanged, however: earlier this month, ICE agents fatally shot two unarmed people in Texas and Maine, neither of whom had any prior criminal record.

    Widespread accounts from detainees and viral social media footage have documented that plainclothes ICE agents often cover their faces and identifiers during arrests, leading targets to believe they are victims of kidnapping when agents tackle them mid-activity, whether they are working, shopping, or walking down a public street. Footage of hundreds of these incidents sparked national outrage across the U.S. last year, and that public backlash appears to have shifted public opinion on immigration policy.

    New data from a Gallup poll conducted earlier this month shows a dramatic reversal of long-standing public attitudes. In 2024, the year Trump was re-elected, 55 percent of U.S. adults said they supported reducing overall immigration levels. Today, that number has dropped to just 30 percent. This shift ends a four-year trend of growing support for stricter immigration limits. Currently, nearly 80 percent of Americans — a record high in polling history — say they believe immigration is a net positive for the country.

    A core component of the Trump administration’s new immigration policy is the elimination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS), a program that allows hundreds of thousands of people from crisis-stricken countries to live and work legally in the U.S. while conditions in their home countries are too dangerous for safe return. TPS is approved in 18-month increments with no statutory cap on total extensions, and allows recipients to obtain formal work authorization during their designation.

    To date, the administration has revoked TPS designations for eight countries: Myanmar, Venezuela, Honduras, Nepal, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, and Cameroon. The existing TPS designations for Haiti and Syria are scheduled to expire this week, meaning more than 350,000 Haitian TPS holders — most of whom have lived in the U.S. since 2010 — and roughly 6,000 Syrian TPS holders, who received designation in 2011, will now become eligible for arrest and detention by ICE.

    “Enforcement will be carried out,” DHS warned in a post on the social media platform X, urging affected people to either coordinate voluntary departure through the CBP Home digital portal or wait for official deportation. The agency has offered up to $2,500 in travel reimbursements for people who arrange their own departure through the app, though there is no public record of any individual actually receiving the promised funds to date.

  • Singapore fines French teen $465 for viral straw-licking stunt

    Singapore fines French teen $465 for viral straw-licking stunt

    A 19-year-old French student studying in Singapore has been ordered to pay a S$600 fine (equivalent to approximately US$465 and £348) after pleading guilty to a public nuisance charge over a reckless social media stunt that sparked widespread public anger. Didier Gaspard Owen Maximilien committed the act back on March 12 at an iJooz vending machine located in Goldhill Centre, an upscale neighborhood in Singapore, shortly after finishing a boxing training session, according to reporting from Channel News Asia.

    Following the incident, Maximilien uploaded a video of himself licking an unused straw taken from the vending machine’s dispenser before placing it back with the rest of the straws. He captioned the post “city is not safe”, which quickly spread beyond his original followers after being reposted to a local community page and picked up by mainstream Singaporean news outlets. Thousands of social media users expressed sharp disgust at the irresponsible act, which put hundreds of other consumers at potential risk of exposure to germs and illness.

    In response to the incident, iJooz — the company that operates the popular vending machine chain, which sells freshly squeezed orange juice for S$2 per cup and has machines placed across Singapore in shopping districts, train terminals, and public housing estates — took immediate precautionary action. The firm replaced all 500 straws stored in the affected machine’s dispenser to eliminate any public health risk.

    Under Singaporean law, convictions for public nuisance carry a maximum penalty of up to S$2,000 in fines, three months of imprisonment, or both. In this case, both prosecution and defense legal teams agreed that a fine was the appropriate sentencing for the first-time offender. Speaking on behalf of her client, Maximilien’s defense lawyer told The Straits Times that the student has expressed deep regret for his actions. “He is truly sorry for having caused all this trouble,” the lawyer stated, adding that Maximilien now recognizes what he initially thought was a harmless prank has turned into a serious incident with far-reaching consequences.

    The case has reignited public conversation in Singapore about social media stunts, personal responsibility, and the potential for reckless acts to create unnecessary harm and disruption for the wider community.

  • Recovery operations continue in Kumamoto after quake

    Recovery operations continue in Kumamoto after quake

    Days after a powerful earthquake shook southwestern Japan’s Kumamoto region, recovery and cleanup operations are still ongoing as local authorities and private stakeholders work to assess full damage and restore normalcy to affected communities. Among the hardest-hit sites are two major local economic hubs: the popular Aeon shopping mall and a large production facility operated by Nippon Paper Industries. Both locations have been confirmed to have sustained substantial structural damage that has disrupted operations and displaced workers and shoppers. While full damage assessments are still being compiled, early reports indicate that the impact to both properties will require significant repair work before they can reopen to the public and resume regular operations. Local emergency management teams have prioritized clearing debris from affected areas, inspecting adjacent infrastructure for safety, and supporting businesses as they navigate the path to recovery. The earthquake, which struck without warning, has underscored the ongoing seismic risk that Japan faces, and has prompted renewed calls for updated infrastructure resilience plans across high-risk regions. As recovery work continues, residents and business owners are working alongside emergency crews to rebuild what was damaged, with many hoping for a swift return to daily life.

  • Hope dwindles for rescue in southwestern Japan quake as death toll climbs to 23

    Hope dwindles for rescue in southwestern Japan quake as death toll climbs to 23

    Two full days after a devastating magnitude 7.1 earthquake tore through rural communities on Japan’s Kyushu Island, rescuers are locked in a race against the clock to locate trapped survivors, as the official death toll from the disaster rose to at least 23 by Thursday. The powerful tremor, which struck Tuesday afternoon in Kumamoto Prefecture, triggered a string of catastrophic secondary damage: it sparked an explosion at a crowded regional shopping mall, toppled a factory chimney, and reduced hundreds of residential structures to rubble, leaving dozens injured and hundreds unaccounted for. The Kumamoto prefectural government confirmed that at least 63 people sustained injuries in the quake, five of whom are in critical condition, though the full number of people missing across the affected region has not yet been confirmed. For those who escaped the initial collapse of their homes, the immediate aftermath was marked by frantic efforts: many survivors described returning to flattened properties to dig through debris with their bare hands to pull trapped family members out, with dozens rushed to area hospitals for emergency treatment. Thousands of displaced residents have been forced to seek emergency shelter in large public facilities including community gymnasiums across the region, with many spending a second frigid night away from their homes on Wednesday. Many properties remain cut off from running water and power, while even homeowners with structurally intact homes say they are too afraid of aftershocks to return to their properties. Japan is globally recognized for its strict, earthquake-resistant building codes, developed in response to the country’s frequent seismic activity, but the affected region is home to a large number of older traditional Japanese homes, which lack the modern reinforcement needed to withstand powerful tremors, leaving them disproportionately vulnerable to collapse. The worst single loss of life occurred at the Aeon Mall in Kashima Town, a popular retail hub that was packed with thousands of shoppers when the quake hit in the late afternoon. Company officials confirmed that roughly 3,000 customers were successfully evacuated to an open parking lot before an explosion struck a less crowded section of the mall where maintenance and retail staff were still working. The quake caused the mall’s second floor to cave in, trapping multiple people who had not yet exited the building. Kumamoto local authorities confirmed that as of early Thursday, six of the 11 people pulled from the mall’s wreckage have been declared dead. In sweltering, humid conditions, anxious family members of people still unaccounted for have gathered near the ruined mall, wandering the perimeter waiting for updates on their loved ones with little information to go on. Another major disaster unfolded at a Nippon Paper Industries factory in Yatsushiro, where a large factory chimney toppled during the tremor. Disaster response teams confirmed that 10 workers were pulled from the rubble alive, but eight workers were killed, and one remains missing. As of Thursday, more than 22,800 homes across the prefecture remain without power, and more than 10,000 people are sheltering in roughly 400 emergency evacuation centers. Response teams have been working to install additional power capacity at the shelters to run air conditioning, as residents cope with unseasonably hot weather in the aftermath of the disaster. Associated Press writer Yuri Kageyama contributed reporting from Tokyo, Japan.

  • Macao’s first national security case raises concerns over fairness a year after arrest

    Macao’s first national security case raises concerns over fairness a year after arrest

    It has been 12 months since former Macao pro-democracy legislator Au Kam San was taken into custody in July 2025, a landmark arrest that marked the first public use of the region’s 16-year-old national security law. Today, nearly all details of his case remain hidden from public view, and even Au’s own daughter has been barred from meaningful access to the legal process, drawing sharp new scrutiny of how Beijing is expanding its crackdown on dissent across China’s special administrative regions.

    A former Portuguese trading port that reverted to Chinese control in 1999, Macao operates under the “one country, two systems” framework, mirroring the structure of neighboring Hong Kong. Long known globally as a major casino and tourism hub, Macao has never seen the large-scale pro-democracy activism that shaped Hong Kong’s recent political landscape. Au, a 69-year-old who stepped down from his lawmaker seat in 2021 from a legislature dominated by Beijing-aligned loyalists, remained one of the few public voices willing to criticize government policy and political trends through social media and public interviews—criticisms that observers widely describe as mild.

    When police took Au into custody last year, they leveled a series of national security charges against him: colluding with unspecified anti-China organizations based outside Macao, distributing false and seditious materials online and abroad, and repeatedly supplying misleading information to foreign entities and their affiliated media outlets to incite hatred against Beijing and the Macao regional government. On July 2 of this year, a court upheld the full indictment, labeling Au the primary perpetrator of multiple offenses including subversion of state power, breach of national confidentiality, and colluding with overseas groups to carry out acts that threaten national security. A conviction on all counts could carry a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison.

    From the moment of his arrest, Au has been held under conditions that have sparked widespread concern over the fairness of his upcoming trial. Most critically, his family has been blocked from providing a legal representative of their own choosing. Au’s daughter, Au Hon I, who resides in London, says the family’s independently selected lawyer was denied access to her father in detention, and authorities ultimately forced the appointment of a court-approved lawyer, a decision the court justified citing a binding opinion from Macao’s national security committee, which is chaired by Macao’s Chief Executive Sam Hou Fai. The court has claimed that Au’s legal rights have been fully protected under Macao law, but the younger Au rejects that assertion.

    “For almost a year my family could not speak with my father as he was kept in cruel incommunicado detention,” Au Hon I told the Associated Press. “Now we are still unable to speak to him about his case nor provide him with a lawyer so he can properly fight his case.”

    Authorities also seized books from Au Kam San’s home connected to the 1989 Tiananmen Square pro-democracy movement, according to the family. The preliminary hearing held in July was closed to the public, as permitted under Macao law when national security interests are deemed to be at risk, and no public trial date has been announced. The Macao government has not responded to requests for comment on the case.

    Notably, Au Kam San has also been cut off from any direct contact with his family. Even as he maintained unwavering faith in Macao’s justice system before his arrest, that system has now left him isolated, his daughter says. “He always believed in the justice system of Macao. He believed it so much that he feels that he will be protected by the very own justice system that is putting him in where he is right now,” Au Hon I said.

    Au’s case has drawn comparisons to the broad national security crackdown in Hong Kong, where Beijing imposed a sweeping national security law in 2020 that has led to more than 400 arrests and over 180 convictions. Critics, however, note that Au’s treatment is in many ways more restrictive than even the highest-profile cases in Hong Kong. For example, Jimmy Lai, the former Hong Kong media mogul and pro-democracy activist who was sentenced to 20 years in prison on national security charges, was allowed family visits shortly after his detention and was permitted to select his own legal representation, even after a requested British lawyer was blocked from the case.

    “It’s much worse than Hong Kong,” Au Hon I said of her father’s case.

    Michael Polak, a British barrister representing Au’s family internationally, confirmed that Au Kam San holds dual Chinese and Portuguese citizenship, and the Portuguese consulate in Macao requested consular access to him, a request that was ultimately denied. This mirrors the case of Lai, a British citizen who was also denied British consular access, as China does not recognize dual nationality for its citizens. Polak has called on the Portuguese government and European Union to publicly condemn the case, and the EU has already issued a statement arguing that the denial of due process violates Au’s fundamental rights, noting that it continues to raise concerns directly with Macao authorities.

    Legal analysts who study the two special administrative regions say the differing treatment of Au reflects deeper structural differences between Hong Kong and Macao’s legal systems. Under Macao’s rules, all lawyers seeking to represent defendants in national security cases must receive approval from a designated judge, and all requests are vetted by the national security committee. Jorge Menezes, a Portuguese lawyer with decades of experience practicing in Macao, notes that while Hong Kong’s national security crackdown has been more high-profile, Hong Kong’s judiciary still retains a stronger tradition of judicial independence, and its legal community has a far more active culture of defending civil liberties. In Macao, by contrast, judges are less independent, and lawyers rarely take on high-profile civil rights cases, creating what Menezes calls “the land of silence.”

    “The trial itself will be a farce,” Menezes said. “It’s a politically conducted trial.”

    Urania Chiu, a law lecturer at Oxford Brookes University, says direct comparisons are complicated by the fact that Au’s case is the first of its kind under Macao’s 2009 national security law. Still, she points to the complete lack of public information around the proceedings and the barriers facing Au’s family as clear red flags. “What stands out is the complete secrecy that all of these procedures have been conducted in,” Chiu said.

    For Au Hon I, the past year has taken an enormous personal and emotional toll. She says she is heartbroken that her father, who spent decades prioritizing the needs of his constituents and community, has been publicly portrayed as a villain. Before his arrest, Au Kam San told his daughter that if he ever ran into political trouble, she should focus on living her own life and not worry about him. But she has refused to abandon his case, even though the situation has forced her into exile.

    “I don’t think it would be wise for me to set foot in Macao again, which is also very sad because I don’t know when I could ever see my dad again,” she said, weeping during the interview.

  • Samsung reports record profit as South Korean chip giants benefit from global AI boom

    Samsung reports record profit as South Korean chip giants benefit from global AI boom

    The global artificial intelligence boom has delivered historic financial results for the world’s two largest memory chip manufacturers, both based in South Korea — but growing investor anxiety over massive capital expansion plans and rising competition from China has sent their share prices sharply downward in recent trading.

    Samsung Electronics, South Korea’s largest technology conglomerate, announced Thursday that it notched a record 89.5 trillion won (equal to $62 billion) in operating profit for the second quarter of the year, spanning April through June. This milestone result marks a more than 19-fold jump from the same period one year prior, and nearly all of the profit can be traced back to Samsung’s semiconductor division. The segment’s explosive growth has been fueled by skyrocketing demand for AI infrastructure, which has pushed up prices for memory chips and driven sharp increases in shipments of advanced high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips — the core component that powers modern generative AI systems. This strong performance from semiconductors more than offset an operating loss reported in the company’s consumer division, which includes mobile devices, televisions, and home appliances, where higher component costs weighed on margins.

    Samsung also hit an all-time high for quarterly revenue, which reached 171.5 trillion won ($119 billion). In a statement accompanying its earnings release, the company projected that robust demand for its memory products will continue through the second half of 2024, supported by ongoing global expansion of AI infrastructure and the growing mainstream adoption of agentic artificial intelligence. The firm added that demand for server-specific memory chips is expected to accelerate further, leaving the global market in a state of persistent undersupply.

    Samsung’s blockbuster earnings report comes just one day after crosstown rival SK Hynix, the world’s second-largest memory chipmaker, released its own record-breaking second-quarter results. SK Hynix reported 60.5 trillion won ($42 billion) in quarterly revenue, a new all-time high, but its bottom-line profit fell short of the high expectations set by market analysts. The miss sent SK Hynix shares tumbling more than 9% on Monday, and Samsung’s stock has also declined this week amid broader market jitters.

    The share price pullback comes as retail investors, who are the main driver of sharp volatility in South Korea’s equity market, have grown increasingly concerned about two key risk factors. First, both Samsung and SK Hynix have launched massive capital expenditure plans to expand semiconductor manufacturing capacity and build new data centers, part of South Korea’s broader national push to solidify its lead in the global AI arms race. But a growing number of industry analysts are questioning whether these multi-billion-dollar investments will ultimately deliver enough returns to justify the huge spending. Second, investors are growing wary of intensifying competition from Chinese chip manufacturers. Recent reports confirm that a Chinese state-owned enterprise has begun mass production of domestically developed immersion deep-ultraviolet (DUV) lithography machines, a critical piece of technology required for advanced chip manufacturing. Investor jitters were further amplified by the blockbuster, highly successful initial public offering of ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), China’s leading homegrown memory chipmaker, which saw its shares surge on the Shanghai stock exchange in its debut.

    The pullback in South Korean AI chip stocks has also aligned with a broader global trend: AI-sensitive equities have declined in recent sessions across major international markets, dragging down broader index values worldwide.

  • ‘We have special forces’: Netanyahu unbothered by global threats of arrest

    ‘We have special forces’: Netanyahu unbothered by global threats of arrest

    In a wide-ranging interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity, a long-time personal associate of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli leader brushed off concerns over the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) November 21, 2024 arrest warrant targeting him, stating that Israeli special operations forces would prevent any attempted detainment if he travels to a state that recognizes the court’s authority.

    When Hannity asked whether the warrant could complicate international travel for Netanyahu amid medical emergencies or official trips, the prime minister acknowledged the scenario had crossed his mind, but noted his own military background and the capabilities of Israeli special units. After Hannity highlighted the strength of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Netanyahu joked that the military would be given a new mission to secure his safety.

    The interview came as Netanyahu traveled from Israel to Washington D.C. aboard the official Israeli government jet ‘Wing of Zion’ for talks with U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House. Flight tracking data confirmed the jet transited the airspace of four ICC member states—Greece, Italy, France, and Canada—all signatories to the Rome Statute that established the Hague-based court. This transit prompted widespread criticism from global observers, who accused the four governments of facilitating travel for an internationally wanted suspect.

    The ICC’s arrest warrant cites reasonable grounds to conclude Netanyahu bears criminal responsibility for multiple war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza, including the use of starvation as a method of warfare, murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts. Netanyahu dismissed the court as a corrupt, unelected international bureaucracy, warning that the body could eventually target American leaders and service members just as it targeted him, given that the U.S. does not recognize the ICC’s jurisdiction, just as Israel does not.

    The prime minister also confirmed he intends to travel to New York City for the United Nations General Assembly in September regardless of any potential legal action New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani may pursue. Mamdani has called on the U.S. federal government to arrest Netanyahu based on the ICC warrant, a move that has led Israeli officials to accuse him of antisemitism. Netanyahu labeled the mayor a hate-spewing official who is stoking division against Jewish New Yorkers, drawing a parallel to rising antisemitism in 1930s Europe. Mamdani has repeatedly pushed back on these claims, reaffirming his commitment to protecting the safety and rights of all Jewish residents of New York.

    Following his Tuesday White House meeting with Trump, which lasted just under 90 minutes, Netanyahu called the gathering one of the best meetings the two leaders have ever held. However, he clarified to Israeli reporters that the meeting included multiple senior officials, rather than the private one-on-one session many observers had expected. This arrangement has fueled speculation that Trump’s senior advisers sought to limit Netanyahu’s ability to sway the president unilaterally on key policy issues. Netanyahu rejected suggestions of a rift in the U.S.-Israel alliance, telling Hannity that critics looking for fractures would instead find a ‘wall of granite’ holding the partnership together.

    Despite Netanyahu’s framing of the alliance as rock-solid, Trump has publicly expressed frustration with the Israeli leader in recent weeks. Earlier on Tuesday, Trump told Fox News that Netanyahu has pushed him to maintain aggressive action against Iran, a course the U.S. president may no longer favor.

    Netanyahu acknowledged that both the U.S. and Israel share the core goal of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons that could threaten American interests, global stability, and Israeli sovereignty, noting that this goal could be achieved through either diplomatic or military channels. But the prime minister made clear he remains deeply skeptical of diplomatic outreach to Iran, a stance that has already put him at odds with the Trump administration.

    Shortly after the U.S. and Iran signed a joint memorandum of understanding in June, which included a requirement for Israel to end hostilities against the Iranian-allied militant group Hezbollah in Lebanon, Israel escalated its offensive across southern Lebanon, pushing attacks as far north as the Lebanese capital Beirut. Trump publicly criticized the escalation, saying Israeli strikes were disproportionate and causing excessive civilian casualties.

    Pressed on whether moderate Iranian factions could successfully negotiate a diplomatic solution, Netanyahu repeated his skepticism, arguing that Iranian factional divides are rooted less in ideology than in differing assessments of Western and Israeli resolve. He emphasized that the only path to a successful outcome, whether diplomatic or military, rests on shared U.S.-Israel resolve to block Iran’s nuclear program.

    The trip comes amid lingering tensions from the joint U.S.-Israel war against Iran launched on February 28. Before the war began, the entire U.S. intelligence community under the Trump administration assessed that Iran posed no imminent threat to the U.S. or its allies. This assessment led to the immediate resignation of Joe Kent, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, within hours of the first offensive missile strikes.