标签: Asia

亚洲

  • World’s biggest condom maker to raise prices due to Iran war

    World’s biggest condom maker to raise prices due to Iran war

    The ongoing conflict between Iran and the US-Israel coalition is rippling far beyond global energy markets, now threatening to push up consumer prices for a critical everyday product: condoms. Goh Miah Kiat, chief executive officer of Malaysia-based Karex — the world’s largest condom manufacturer — has announced that the company could raise retail prices by as much as 30%, with even steeper increases possible if hostilities continue to disrupt key raw material supplies.

    Karex is an industry powerhouse, churning out more than five billion condoms annually to supply major global brands including Durex and Trojan, as well as public health systems such as the UK’s National Health Service. In recent interviews with Reuters and Bloomberg, Goh explained that production costs have skyrocketed since the outbreak of the conflict, driven by widespread disruptions to oil and petrochemical supplies that the company depends on.

    The crisis centers on the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most vital maritime chokepoints. After Iran responded to US and Israeli airstrikes by threatening to target commercial shipping passing through the waterway, the strait has effectively been closed to regular traffic. Approximately 20% of the world’s crude oil, liquefied natural gas, and key petrochemical products normally move through this route, so the closure has sent shockwaves through global supply chains.

    For Karex, this disruption hits directly at its core production inputs. The manufacturer relies on petroleum-derived materials for its products: ammonia, a petrochemical byproduct used to preserve latex, and silicone-based lubricants, both of which have seen sharp price increases and supply shortages since the strait closure.

    Compounding the issue, demand for condoms has already jumped by roughly 30% globally this year. Elevated freight costs and widespread shipping delays have further tightened supplies, creating a perfect storm of constrained production and rising consumer need. Goh noted that this demand surge follows a clear trend during periods of economic and geopolitical uncertainty: when people face unclear job prospects and future instability, they are far more likely to prioritize avoiding unplanned pregnancies. “In bad times, the need to use condoms is even more because you’re uncertain with your future, whether you’d still have a job next year,” he told Bloomberg. “If you have a baby right now, you’ll have one more mouth to feed.”

    The impending price increase at Karex highlights a little-discussed downstream impact of the Iran conflict: while much of the global focus has been on rising energy prices, the disruption to petrochemical supply chains is pushing up costs for a huge range of consumer goods that few people connect to oil markets.

    As of Wednesday, the outlook for de-escalation remains uncertain. US President Donald Trump has announced he will extend a bilateral ceasefire between the US and Iran while peace negotiations progress, but there has been no clear update on the status of talks or a timeline for a lasting resolution.

  • Domestic workers legally recognised in Indonesia after ’22-year struggle’

    Domestic workers legally recognised in Indonesia after ’22-year struggle’

    After more than two decades of stalled negotiations and persistent grassroots advocacy, Indonesia’s parliament has finally enacted a groundbreaking law that formally recognizes and protects the rights of the nation’s 4.2 million domestic workers, a workforce overwhelmingly made up of women.

    For years, this critical segment of the Indonesian labor force existed in a legal gray area: prior to this new legislation, domestic workers were not officially classified as workers under national labor regulations, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation, abuse, and poverty with no formal recourse. An estimated 90% of all domestic workers in Indonesia are women, many of whom have long faced systemic marginalization in informal work arrangements that lack basic social protections.

    The Domestic Workers Protection Law, which was first introduced to legislative chambers back in 2004, delivers sweeping new guarantees for domestic workers across the country. Under the new framework, workers will be legally entitled to paid rest days, public health insurance coverage, and formal pension benefits. The legislation also bars recruitment and placement agencies from withholding any portion of workers’ wages as placement fees, and imposes an outright ban on child domestic labor, making it illegal to hire any person under the age of 18 for full-time domestic work.

    Emotional reactions greeted the final passage of the bill, with many long-time advocates and domestic workers describing the moment as the fruition of a decades-long fight for dignity. “It feels like a dream,” Ajeng Astuti, a domestic worker, told BBC Indonesian. “This is our 22-year struggle as marginalized women to gain protection.” Jumiyem, a domestic worker based in Yogyakarta, echoed that sentiment, saying “We’ve been longing for this [law], and now we can feel it.”

    The legislation faced repeated setbacks over its 22-year journey to passage: after its initial introduction in 2004, the bill hit one legislative roadblock after another, with parliamentary discussions put on hold for more than a decade before being revived for debate in 2020. Now that the bill has been signed into law, national regulators have one year to develop detailed implementing regulations that will lay out how the new protections will be enforced across the country.

    Before the new law, even as domestic workers played an unseen but foundational role in Indonesian households and the broader national economy, millions remained completely outside the protection of existing labor laws. Most worked in informal arrangements with no written employment contract, many logging 12-hour or longer workdays for substandard wages, and reports have documented children as young as 12 being pushed into full-time domestic work.

    While human and labor rights organizations have widely praised the law as a historic step forward for worker protections, they caution that the work to secure dignity for domestic workers is far from finished. Lita Anggraini, a representative of Jala PRT, one of Indonesia’s leading domestic worker advocacy groups, told AFP that widespread public education campaigns will be critical to inform employers of their new legal obligations under the law.

    Advocacy groups point to ongoing systemic abuse that the new law must address: between 2021 and 2024, Jala PRT documented more than 3,300 reported cases of violence against domestic workers, including instances of severe physical assault and ongoing psychological abuse. The new legal framework marks the first major national effort to curb these abuses and bring millions of marginalized workers under the protection of the law.

  • Who is calling the shots in Iran?

    Who is calling the shots in Iran?

    A sudden diplomatic reversal following recent US-Iran talks in Islamabad has laid bare the dramatic new power dynamic reshaping Iran in the wake of six weeks of coordinated US-Israeli military strikes. On April 17, Iranian foreign minister and lead nuclear negotiator Abbas Araghchi took to the social platform X to announce that the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz was “completely open,” a signal that Tehran was prepared to show flexibility on two sticking points in negotiations: uranium enrichment limits and Iranian support for regional proxy armed groups.

    Within days, however, that public outreach was completely reversed following backlash from Iran’s most powerful institution. Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, a former Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) commander newly appointed as secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, filed a formal complaint criticizing Araghchi for deviating from the negotiating mandate set by the IRGC leadership. The entire Iranian negotiating delegation was recalled to Tehran, state-run media launched scathing attacks on Araghchi, warning that his public statement had handed then-US President Donald Trump a political opening to falsely declare victory in the conflict, and the Iranian government issued a new declaration that the Strait of Hormuz was closed.

    This high-profile public clash is not an isolated misstep, argues King’s College London defense studies associate professor Andreas Krieg in analysis shared via The Conversation. It is the clearest visible indicator of a permanent power shift that has transformed Iran’s political order: the IRGC now holds total control over all state decision-making, while civilian and traditional religious institutions have been reduced to little more than a ceremonial facade.

    The decapitation strikes that opened the US-Israeli military campaign eliminated decades of entrenched Iranian leadership. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was killed in the opening day attack, alongside dozens of his most senior colleagues. Where Iran was once described as a sovereign state with an exceptionally powerful militia, Krieg argues the new reality is the opposite: Iran is now a powerful militia with a state, structured entirely around the IRGC as its core governing authority.

    Traditional centers of Iranian power, including the elected civilian government and the senior Shia clergy, have been pushed to the margins as mere front organizations. Even the newly appointed supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, son of the late Ali Khamenei, functions only as a symbolic legitimizing figure. Multiple reports confirm Mojtaba Khamenei sustained severe injuries in the strike that killed his father, and he plays no active role in governing the country.

    The undisputed holder of power in contemporary Iran is IRGC leader Ahmad Vahidi, a founding member of the corps with decades of experience in Iranian security and politics. The IRGC was founded immediately after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, when Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and his allies distrusted the existing conventional military and state bureaucracy to protect the new revolutionary order. Over the subsequent 47 years, the IRGC expanded far beyond its original mandate as guardians of the revolution, evolving into an all-encompassing network that spans every sector of Iranian life: it operates a conventional military force, a domestic intelligence apparatus, a multi-billion dollar transnational economic conglomerate, and a regional expeditionary network that projects Iranian power across the Middle East.

    Its domestic arm, the Basij militia, enables mass social control across Iran’s population, while the elite Quds Force manages the IRGC’s network of proxy armed groups across Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Yemen and other regional states. Far from dismantling this network, decades of international sanctions against Iran actually strengthened it: sanctions pushed the IRGC to build a sprawling web of front companies for illicit trade and patronage networks that enriched IRGC-aligned elites, creating a parallel state that gradually outgrew the formal civilian government in both power and influence.

    The IRGC’s organizational structure is built around a “mosaic defense doctrine,” a decentralized network design with a centralized core that sets strategic direction, surrounded by semi-autonomous cells that can continue operating even after decapitation strikes that eliminate top leadership. This structure was explicitly designed to allow the IRGC to keep functioning even when facing large-scale military attacks targeting its command structure, a design that has been vindicated by recent events.

    After IRGC chief Mohammad Pakpour was killed on the opening day of the conflict, Vahidi— a former Iranian interior minister and founding IRGC figure— stepped into the top role in an emergency appointment. He has since consolidated full control over Iranian governance as civilian institutions have been hollowed out by war losses. With the new supreme leader incapacitated and the clergy sidelined, Vahidi and his coalition of hardline IRGC commanders and security council allies, including Ali Akbar Ahmadian and Zolghadr, now set all negotiating mandates and red lines for ongoing ceasefire and nuclear talks with the United States.

    The IRGC’s non-negotiable red lines are well-defined: it will not abandon its uranium enrichment program entirely, it will preserve its ballistic missile program and its regional network of proxy groups (known as the “axis of resistance”), it demands full lifting of international sanctions and the unfreezing of billions of dollars in Iranian overseas assets. Only narrow technical details, such as enrichment level limits, sanctions lifting timelines, and the formal language of any final agreement, are open to negotiation.

    The decimation of pragmatic Iranian political figures in Israeli strikes has cleared the last remaining obstacles to IRGC control. Former Supreme National Security Council secretary Ali Larijani, a leading pragmatic voice, was killed by an Israeli strike on March 16, leaving no prominent opposition to the IRGC’s hardline agenda. While the war accelerated the IRGC’s consolidation of power, Krieg notes this shift was decades in the making: the IRGC spent generations entrenching its influence across Iranian institutions, capturing economic assets, and building up its coercive capacity. The war only provided the final opportunity to eliminate competing power centers, most notably the senior clergy, and solidify total control.

    This new power structure has profound implications for ongoing US-Iran negotiations. US negotiators are not bargaining with independent civilian diplomats; every Iranian negotiator operates on a short leash held directly by the IRGC leadership. Any progress in talks cannot be measured by public statements from Iranian diplomats, but only by what the IRGC is actually willing to implement in practice.

    The US-Israeli decapitation strategy failed to break the IRGC’s structure, and the hardline network now finds itself emboldened, as it recognizes the White House is desperate to secure a diplomatic exit from the conflict. Krieg argues that assumptions the IRGC will quickly capitulate to US demands are unfounded wishful thinking.

    Recent events have confirmed that the IRGC now governs Iran as a militia with a state, using the formal civilian and religious institutions of the Islamic Republic as a public outer layer. While there remains space for negotiation to reach a mutually acceptable agreement, the US administration must approach talks with a clear-eyed understanding of the IRGC’s non-negotiable red lines, and the resilience of a hardened network that has repeatedly demonstrated it can absorb severe punishment and maintain control.

  • Japan’s easing of weapons export restrictions opposed

    Japan’s easing of weapons export restrictions opposed

    On Tuesday, two connected moves by the Japanese government sparked sharp condemnation from China and drew criticism from both domestic and international peace advocates, with observers warning that Tokyo’s accelerating remilitarization trajectory demands heightened global vigilance against resurgent Japanese neo-militarism.

    Early this week, Japan’s cabinet officially approved revisions to the country’s Three Principles on Transfer of Defense Equipment and Technology, along with associated implementation guidelines. The policy change clears legal and procedural barriers for the export of lethal weaponry, eliminating the longstanding requirement for prior parliamentary approval before such shipments can move forward.

    Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun emphasized that this latest policy shift, paired with a string of other destabilizing developments in Japan’s military and security sphere, directly contradicts Tokyo’s repeated public claims of commitment to peace and its stated adherence to an exclusively defense-oriented national security policy. He recalled that Japan’s brutal wartime aggression and atrocities committed against China and other Asian nations gave rise to a series of binding international postwar legal frameworks, including the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation, and Japan’s own Instrument of Surrender. These documents explicitly require that Japan be completely disarmed and barred from maintaining industrial capacity that could enable large-scale rearmament. Furthermore, Japan’s own post-war Constitution imposes strict limits on the country’s military strength, its right to engage in belligerency, and its right to wage offensive war. For decades after World War II, Japan maintained tight restrictions on military expansion and arms exports under its exclusively defense-oriented principle, with a 1976 official policy stance committing the peaceful nation to strict caution on all arms exports.

    Guo noted that a growing community of experts and analysts share deep concerns that Japan is actively rebuilding its wartime military infrastructure and positioning itself to become a global exporter of lethal arms, with tangible steps toward accelerated remilitarization already well underway. In recent years alone, Japan has dramatically expanded its annual military budget, deployed intermediate-range offensive missiles, systematically rolled back arms export restrictions, proposed sweeping amendments to its pacifist post-war Constitution, and pushed to abandon its longstanding three non-nuclear principles.

    Lyu Yaodong, a senior researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, pointed out that Tokyo’s primary justification for the new arms export rule changes — a claimed need to counter a so-called “China threat” — has no basis in fact. Lyu explained that the actual goals of the policy shift are twofold: to steadily erode the legal constraints imposed by Japan’s pacifist Constitution, and to open up new economic opportunities for Japanese defense contractors amid long-running domestic economic stagnation.

    Atsushi Koketsu, professor emeritus at Yamaguchi University, echoed these concerns, noting that Japan’s national security policy is increasingly being restructured around the misleading framing of “preparing for war in the name of peace”. For decades, the prospect of a remilitarized Japan has been a core source of concern for China and other Asian nations that suffered from Japanese wartime aggression, and that long-feared outcome is now becoming a tangible reality, Koketsu added.

    Even within Japan, opposition to the policy change remains strong. On Tuesday, hundreds of Japanese citizens who oppose constitutional revision gathered outside Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s official office, holding protest signs reading “Do not let Japan become a war merchant” and “No to exporting lethal weapons”.

    In a second provocative move that drew harsh Chinese condemnation on the same day, Prime Minister Takaichi sent a ritual offering to Tokyo’s Yasukuni Shrine, the iconic symbolic center of Japanese wartime militarism and aggression that honors 14 convicted Class-A World War II war criminals.

    Guo confirmed that Beijing has formally lodged solemn diplomatic representations with Tokyo over the offering, stating that Japan’s repeated provocative actions tied to the Yasukuni Shrine amount to a deliberate attempt to evade accountability for wartime atrocities, an affront to global justice, a direct provocation to the millions of people victimized by Japanese aggression, and a fundamental challenge to the internationally recognized outcome of World War II. These actions, Guo added, have been consistently condemned and rejected by the international community.

    Guo stressed that Japan now faces a clear choice: it can either allow the specter of pre-war militarism to spread, distort historical fact, and continue whitewashing its aggression-era crimes, or it can offer a deep, sincere reckoning with its wartime history, build a correct public narrative of the past, and earn back the trust of its Asian neighbors and the broader global community. Peace-loving forces across the world cannot allow resurgent neo-militarism to threaten regional peace and stability, Guo said, urging the entire international community to maintain close vigilance against Japan’s growing historical revisionism.

  • UN urges freedom of navigation in Hormuz

    UN urges freedom of navigation in Hormuz

    Tensions are rising across the Persian Gulf as a fragile ceasefire between the United States and Iran is set to expire Wednesday, with the United Nations calling for urgent action to preserve open navigation through the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz. Against a backdrop of conflicting rhetoric from both sides and ahead of a second round of peace talks scheduled in Islamabad, global powers are scrambling to prevent a wider regional conflict that could upend global energy markets.

    During a Monday press briefing, Stephane Dujarric, spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, outlined the world body’s deep concern over recent maritime disruptions and escalating incidents in the strait over the prior 48 hours. The UN chief is calling for the immediate full restoration of international navigation rights through the waterway, which Dujarric noted has been plagued by conflicting reports and widespread uncertainty over its operational status. Dujarric emphasized that freedom of navigation must be respected by all parties involved, and rejected any military actions that target civilian infrastructure or intentionally harm civilian populations.

    Diplomatic efforts are continuing to de-escalate tensions, with Pakistani-mediated peace talks set to open in Islamabad early Wednesday. Unnamed Pakistani officials, speaking on condition of anonymity due to their lack of authorization to speak publicly, confirmed to The Associated Press that US Vice President JD Vance will lead the American delegation, while Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf will head Tehran’s negotiating team. Multiple regional media outlets have confirmed additional high-profile members of the US delegation, including Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, the US president’s son-in-law and senior advisor.

    US President Donald Trump has delivered stark warnings about the outcome of the talks, telling PBS NewsHour Monday that if no agreement is reached before the ceasefire expires, “lots of bombs” will be launched against Iran. Trump has also left open the possibility of making a surprise appearance at the talks, after previously telling the New York Post that he would be willing to meet directly with senior Iranian leaders if negotiators are able to secure a preliminary breakthrough.

    Iranian leaders have pushed back against American pressure, issuing firm statements rejecting what they describe as coercive diplomacy. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian wrote Tuesday on the social platform X that honoring commitments is the only foundation for meaningful negotiation. He noted that Iran holds deep, historically rooted mistrust of US actions, and that contradictory and unconstructive signals from Washington make clear the US is seeking Iran’s unconditional surrender — a outcome Pezeshkian said will never happen. “Iranians do not submit to force,” he wrote.
    Iran’s top diplomat Abbas Araghchi echoed that sentiment during a phone call with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, saying contradictory US positions undermine Washington’s claims of pursuing diplomacy. According to Iran’s Mehr News Agency, Araghchi reaffirmed that Tehran will take all necessary steps to protect its national interests and security.

    Senior Iranian military commander Ali Abdollahi also issued a warning Tuesday, saying Iranian armed forces are fully prepared to deliver immediate, proportional responses to any aggression from the US or its allies. Speaking in a statement marking the anniversary of the founding of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Abdollahi said the Iranian people are proud of the IRGC’s recent heavy missile and drone strikes against Israel and US targets. He added that Iranian forces will not allow the Trump administration to manipulate the situation or spread false narratives about battlefield conditions, especially developments surrounding the Strait of Hormuz.

    Tensions spiked further this week after US military forces seized an Iranian container ship, the Touska, off Iran’s southern coast in the Sea of Oman Monday. Iran’s Foreign Ministry condemned the action as an act of “maritime piracy” and a blatant violation of international maritime law, per Iran’s official IRNA news agency. The ministry called on the United Nations, International Maritime Organization, and the international community to issue a firm, decisive response to what it called a criminal attack on legitimate international commercial shipping, adding that Iran will use all available tools to defend its national security and interests.

    A second maritime incident followed Tuesday, when the US Department of Defense announced that US forces had boarded the Tifani, an oil tanker previously sanctioned for smuggling Iranian crude oil to Asian markets. The Pentagon said the operation was a routine right-of-visit maritime interdiction and was completed without incident.

    The escalating conflict has already triggered serious consequences for global energy security. Fatih Birol, executive director of the International Energy Agency, told France Inter radio that the ongoing US-Iran tensions have sparked what he described as “the world’s worst-ever energy crisis” in modern history. With roughly 20% of global oil shipments passing through the Strait of Hormuz daily, any prolonged disruption to navigation through the waterway would send global energy prices soaring, exacerbating already strained energy markets worldwide.

  • Israel must take sharply declining US public support seriously, think tank warns

    Israel must take sharply declining US public support seriously, think tank warns

    A leading Israeli security research institution has issued an urgent warning: the sharp, ongoing drop in Israel’s public approval across the United States has evolved into a major threat to the country’s national security, and cannot be ignored if Israel hopes to preserve decades of robust backing from Washington. The new analysis, published Monday by the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) — a think tank with formal ties to the Israeli military and Tel Aviv University — draws on recent polling data to highlight the far-reaching implications of this shifting public sentiment, arguing that without a dramatic reversal in American opinion, Israel will soon face a critical loss of support in the U.S.

    The INSS analysis centers on April polling from the Pew Research Center, which confirms that 60% of U.S. adults now hold an unfavorable view of Israel, up from 53% just one year prior. Newly released joint data from INSS and Pew breaks down this trend by age, revealing that 75% of young American adults between 18 and 29 hold negative views of Israel, with 67% of 30 to 49-year-olds sharing that sentiment. Partisan divides are even starker: 80% of Democratic voters hold unfavorable views of Israel, compared to 41% of Republican voters. For younger Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters, the negative rate climbs to 85% among 18-29-year-olds and 83% among 30-49-year-olds.

    The erosion of support is not limited to age or partisan groups, the report notes: falling approval cuts across nearly all major U.S. religious demographics, with majorities of Catholics, Protestants, and white evangelical Christians under 50 holding unfavorable opinions of Israel. Catholics are the most critical, with 74% of under-50 Catholic adults viewing Israel negatively. Even among white evangelicals — a core demographic of former President Donald Trump’s conservative political coalition — half of adults under 50 now hold negative views of Israel, versus just 47% who view it positively.

    A separate recent survey adds further evidence of this trend, finding that support for Israel has also dropped sharply among American Jews, with a majority opposing any U.S. war with Iran. Conducted by GBAO Strategies for Washington-based liberal Zionist group J Street, the poll found that 70% of American Jews oppose unconditional U.S. military and financial aid to Israel. Thirty percent of respondents reported greater sympathy for Palestinians than Israelis, a statistic INSS cites as further proof of the scale of Israel’s declining popularity.

    On Capitol Hill, shifting sentiment among elected Democrats was on display last week, when the U.S. Senate voted down two resolutions to block the sale of military bulldozers and the transfer of 12,000 1,000-pound bombs to Israel. Even with the resolutions failing, a historic number of Democratic senators supported the measures: 40 of 47 backed halting the bulldozer sale, while 36 voted against the bomb transfer. Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen argued that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s current administration “helped launch the Iran war, has unleashed an offensive in Lebanon and continues to harm civilians in the West Bank and Gaza,” adding that “we shouldn’t send taxpayer-funded bombs and equipment to facilitate this brutality.”

    INSS emphasizes that the growing negative trend among both the American public and political leaders poses a grave threat to Israeli national security, given Israel’s decades-long dependence on U.S. backing. According to an October 2025 report from the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations, the U.S. has provided more than $300 billion in total aid to Israel since the country’s founding in 1948. While Washington has extended large foreign aid packages to other Middle Eastern nations, including Egypt and Iraq, Israel has received more military and economic support than any other country in the world. Today, just 37% of the American public holds a favorable view of Israel — a rating lower than that of longstanding U.S. adversaries Russia, Iran, and China, the report notes. Netanyahu himself also carries an unfavorable rating among most U.S. adults, the Pew data confirms.

    The report frames this shift in American public opinion as a long-term trend that has been drastically accelerated by the Gaza conflict, with the U.S.-Israel war on Iran, widely viewed in the U.S. as initiated by Netanyahu, causing further damage to Israel’s reputation. While the recent ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran could help modestly improve Israel’s standing, INSS warns that a fundamental shift in how the U.S. public perceives Israel is already taking hold. Even if Israel sees a small rebound in approval, the report argues that without significant policy changes from the current Israeli government, this negative image is likely to become permanent. Pushing the current U.S. administration to provide maximum support for Israeli military escalation across multiple fronts, the report adds, could eliminate any chance of repairing Israel’s standing in the long term.

    The warning comes as Israel prepares to mark its Independence Day Tuesday evening, a celebration overshadowed by combative rhetoric from top Israeli officials. Speaking Sunday, Netanyahu stated that Israel’s fight against Iran is “not over yet,” warning that “any moment could bring us new developments.” On Tuesday, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said he and Netanyahu had ordered the military to “operate with full force, both on the ground and from the air, even during the ceasefire” in Lebanon. Katz also confirmed the Israeli military would continue demolishing residential properties in Lebanon and issued a direct death threat to Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem.

  • Why police are seeking to arrest billionaire K-pop mogul behind BTS

    Why police are seeking to arrest billionaire K-pop mogul behind BTS

    South Korean police have formally asked prosecutors to secure an arrest warrant for Bang Si-hyuk, the legendary entertainment industry executive who built global K-pop supergroup BTS and founded HYBE, one of the world’s most valuable entertainment conglomerates. The charges stem from allegations of fraudulent stock manipulation ahead of HYBE’s $7.3 billion initial public offering on the Korea Exchange (KRX) in 2020.

    Investigators allege that in 2019, while Bang was secretly advancing plans to take HYBE public, he intentionally misled early investors and venture capital stakeholders by claiming an IPO was off the table. This deception, police claim, induced early stakeholders to sell their HYBE shares to a private equity fund with undisclosed ties to Bang. After HYBE debuted on the Kospi index in October 2020 – with its IPO price doubling on the first day of trading – the private equity fund sold its stake for massive gains, and Bang is alleged to have taken a 30% cut of the illicit profits, totaling roughly 200 billion won ($136 million).

    Bang, 53, has repeatedly and vehemently denied all wrongdoing, maintaining his actions were fully legal and transparent. His legal team released a statement this week saying, “We regret the police’s decision to request an arrest warrant. We will continue to cooperate fully with all legal procedures and make every effort to clearly demonstrate the legitimacy of our position.” HYBE has also pushed back against the allegations, noting that a copy of the disputed profit-sharing agreement was provided to IPO underwriters, who advised that no public disclosure was required.

    The investigation into Bang is not a new development. It has dragged on for months, with police executing search raids at HYBE’s Seoul headquarters, freezing a portion of Bang’s personal assets, and imposing a travel ban that has barred him from leaving South Korea since August. Industry calls for him to step down as HYBE chairman have also circulated amid the probe.

    The news of the arrest warrant request comes at a pivotal moment for HYBE, just weeks after BTS – the group that drove the company’s explosive growth and global fame – launched their first world tour in nearly four years following an extended group hiatus. The tour, which will stop at 34 cities across the globe, is already completely sold out, with industry analysts projecting HYBE will earn more than $1 billion from ticket sales, merchandise, and associated tour revenue. When the tour was announced in January, HYBE shares surged to a four-year high, adding more than 1 trillion won to the company’s total market capitalization. In a recent interview with Billboard, Bang reflected on BTS’s unprecedented cultural impact, calling the group “a tourist attraction… widely recognised and embraced by the global public.”

    Bang’s journey to becoming one of the most powerful figures in global entertainment began decades ago, rooted in an early love of music. He performed his own original compositions as a member of a middle school band, and honed his songwriting craft during his university years. In 1997, he co-founded JYP Entertainment, now one of South Korea’s “Big Four” K-pop powerhouses, alongside Park Jin-young, earning the iconic nickname “Hitman Bang” after producing a string of chart-topping hits for early K-pop act g.o.d.

    He left JYP in 2005 to launch his own independent label, Big Hit Entertainment, the precursor to today’s HYBE. In 2010, he began developing a seven-member hip-hop focused boy group, eventually shifting to a traditional K-pop idol model to align with industry market demands. That group, launched in 2013 as BTS, would go on to redefine global pop music: the act became the first Korean group to top Billboard’s Hot 100 chart and the first Asian act to surpass 5 billion streams on Spotify, cementing their status as one of the most successful musical groups in history. Today, HYBE also represents other top global K-pop acts including Seventeen, Le Sserafim, and newest breakout group Katseye.

    When Big Hit launched its IPO in 2020, shares debuted at $235, more than double the original $110 offering price, and Bang’s net worth skyrocketed as a result. A 2019 Bloomberg estimate pegged his net worth at $770 million; as of last month, data from Seoul-based corporate research firm Korea CXO Research Institute shows Bang holds more than 13 million HYBE shares, worth roughly 5 trillion won, pushing his total net worth past $2 billion.

    In December 2024, South Korea’s financial regulator launched a formal probe into the undisclosed profit-sharing agreements between Bang and private equity funds ahead of the IPO, expanding the existing investigation. Following the announcement of the arrest warrant request this week, HYBE shares closed 2.3% lower on Tuesday, defying a 2.7% gain in the benchmark Kospi index. Shares of the other three major K-pop conglomerates also fell in tandem with HYBE’s drop.

    The case against Bang comes amid a broader government crackdown on stock market manipulation in South Korea. In recent years, penalties for illicit trading have historically been relatively lenient, limited mostly to administrative fines and formal warnings. But current President Lee Jae Myung has pushed for far harsher sanctions for market misconduct. In August, authorities launched a new joint task force staffed by officials from national financial regulators and the Korean Stock Exchange, tasked exclusively with investigating illegal trading activity. The task force operates under a strict “one strike and you’re out” policy, which mandates immediate suspension of any accounts linked to illegal activity, and allows for fines of up to twice the value of illicit gains.

    Bang is not the first high-profile South Korean figure to face stock manipulation charges. In recent years, other prominent public figures including Samsung chairman Lee Jae-yong, Kakao founder Kim Beom-su, and former first lady Kim Keon-hee have all been indicted on separate stock rigging charges, and all were ultimately acquitted. Under current South Korean law, however, anyone convicted of illicit gains totaling 5 billion won or more faces a minimum of five years in prison, up to a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

  • Hotpot, bubble tea and sportswear: China’s new exports take on the world

    Hotpot, bubble tea and sportswear: China’s new exports take on the world

    Walk through any major shopping center in Singapore today, and you will almost certainly encounter long, winding queues outside brightly branded stores with catchy, memorable names. Bubble tea chains from China, including Mixue, Chagee, and Molly Tea, are drawing massive crowds not only across Southeast Asia, but also in far-flung global hubs from Sydney and London to Los Angeles. This growing global footprint is part of a far larger trend: Chinese companies are evolving beyond their historic role as low-cost contract manufacturers for Western firms, and building globally recognized consumer brands that compete directly with long-dominant industry leaders.

    Many of these new global players cut their teeth in China’s massive, fast-growing consumer market – the second largest in the world – building impressive scale and operational expertise early on. But cutthroat domestic competition, combined with a slowing domestic economy and shifting consumer demographics, has turned global expansion from an opportunity into a strategic necessity for most large Chinese consumer firms. As they enter international markets, these brands are pushing past the long-held stereotype that “Made in China” equals low-quality, low-cost goods.

    “China has moved beyond a replication economy,” explains Tim Parkinson, a consultant at Storyteller China. “Its products now meet the expectations of a new generation of demanding global consumers.” For decades, China served as the world’s workshop, producing goods for Western brands to market and sell globally. In that process, local suppliers and manufacturers learned far more than just assembly: they mastered large-scale branding, global distribution networks, and mass-market sales strategies that now power their own global growth.

    Retail giant Miniso, which produces licensed toys and merchandise for entertainment brands including Disney, Marvel, and Warner Bros., has leveraged this institutional knowledge to build a presence in more than half of the world’s countries. “Consumers aren’t particularly concerned about where the brand comes from,” says Vincent Huang, Miniso’s general manager for overseas markets. “They’re more focused on the shopping experience – the designs, value for money, and enjoyment.” Fast turnaround from factory to shelf and strategic global licensing partnerships sit at the core of Miniso’s successful global model.

    The shift toward globally competitive Chinese brands extends far beyond fast-moving consumer goods. Electric vehicle manufacturer BYD recently overtook Tesla to become the world’s largest EV producer by volume. The company gained its edge by betting on core EV technology early in the global transition, then used China’s huge domestic market to scale production and drive dramatic cost efficiencies. Today, BYD is expanding beyond vehicle manufacturing, developing ultra-fast charging infrastructure that can add hundreds of kilometers of range in minutes, as it works to build a full mobility ecosystem around its brand.

    China’s central government helped accelerate the EV sector’s growth through targeted subsidies and consumer incentives that boosted domestic demand, but that support has drawn fierce criticism from policymakers in Europe and the United States, who argue it gives Chinese firms an unfair competitive advantage. Beijing rejects these claims, noting the sector’s growth is a reflection of China’s industrial innovation and manufacturing leadership, not unfair support.

    Sportswear giant Anta offers another example of this global rise. The firm now operates nearly 13,000 stores worldwide, and has climbed to become the third-largest sportswear brand on the planet, trailing only Nike and Adidas. After dominating China’s domestic market, Anta expanded its global footprint through strategic acquisitions of established international brands including Salomon and Wilson, and most recently purchased a 29% stake in German sportswear brand Puma.

    For many Chinese brands eyeing Western markets, Southeast Asia has served as a critical testing ground for global expansion. The region is home to more than 650 million young, increasingly affluent consumers, offering both scale and market diversity, while intense competition from established Western brands pushes companies to maintain high quality standards. Leading hotpot chain Haidilao opened its first overseas location in Singapore back in 2012, and today is the world’s largest hotpot operator with 1,300 restaurants across 14 countries.

    “Haidilao’s story is not just a restaurant success,” says Zhou Zhaocheng, vice chairman of Haidilao International. “It reflects China’s 30 years of economic transformation and internationalization.” Zhou notes the chain’s global success relies on a strong core brand, a robust operational ecosystem, and a loyal global customer base. Each overseas market brings unique complexities shaped by different cultures, legal frameworks, and consumer preferences, he says, making intentional localization of menus, ingredients, and service non-negotiable for success. To that end, Haidilao is currently pursuing halal certification for its operations in Indonesia and Malaysia, a move that will open the door to expansion across Muslim-majority markets in the Middle East.

    Other Chinese consumer brands are expanding at a staggering pace. Mixue, the budget bubble tea and ice cream chain, now operates more global store locations than either McDonald’s or Starbucks, while competitor Molly Tea has built an international footprint just a few years after its founding. Market research firm Euromonitor International reports that more than 70% of Chinese firms already operating in Southeast Asia plan to expand their regional footprint further in coming years.

    Southeast Asia is also home to some of the world’s fastest-growing smartphone markets, and widespread social media adoption has supercharged the popularity of Chinese consumer brands, often with almost no traditional advertising. Collectible toy brand Pop Mart’s Labubu figurines, for example, became a global viral sensation through organic social media engagement. Since 2024, Pop Mart’s sales in the United States have grown by a staggering 900%. Even as the company’s share price has dropped sharply in recent months amid investor questions about long-term growth sustainability, Pop Mart still boasts a higher market valuation than the combined worth of U.S. toy giants Hasbro and Mattel, plus Japanese entertainment firm Sanrio, the owner of the Hello Kitty brand.

    This outward push, known in Chinese as “chuhai” or “going out to sea”, has been accelerated by mounting pressure at home. A sluggish domestic economy, saturated consumer markets, intense competition, and a declining birth rate have all squeezed domestic growth margins, pushing companies to seek new customer bases abroad. Even long-established global brands operating in China are feeling the impact of rising local competition. Starbucks’ domestic market share in China has more than halved since 2019, as local chain Luckin Coffee now operates almost four times as many stores across the country as its U.S. rival. Luckin’s mobile-first business model keeps overhead costs low and service speeds high, resonating with domestic consumers.

    In November 2025, Starbucks announced a deal to sell a controlling stake in its China operations to Hong Kong-based private equity firm Boyu Capital. Even after a major accounting scandal in 2020 that forced Luckin to delist from the Nasdaq exchange, the brand has continued rapid expansion both at home and abroad, opening new locations in Singapore, Malaysia, and New York, and is reportedly preparing to relist on a U.S. stock exchange.

    Industry analysts note that global consumer perceptions of Chinese brands are shifting dramatically. Where “Made in China” once carried an automatic association with low-cost, low-quality goods, Chinese brands are increasingly seen as innovative, design-forward, and competitive with established Western players. “Brands like BYD combine superior quality with emotional storytelling and local adaptation,” says marketing expert Foo Siew-Ting.

    Even with this progress, significant challenges remain for Chinese brands expanding globally. Tariffs, political scrutiny, and ongoing debates over data security continue to complicate expansion efforts, as seen in high-profile cases of Chinese technology firms like Huawei and TikTok. Questions also linger over whether fast-growing cross-border platforms like Shein and Temu can maintain their rapid growth momentum in competitive Western markets over the long term.

    Despite these headwinds, the broader trajectory is unambiguous: Chinese companies are no longer defined by low prices alone. Today, they are innovating rapidly, capitalizing on emerging global consumer trends, building recognizable global brands, adapting their offerings to fit local market needs, and competing directly with – and in some cases outpacing – long-established legacy global players.

  • Israeli forces block Palestinian student protest after barring access to school

    Israeli forces block Palestinian student protest after barring access to school

    In the occupied West Bank south of Hebron, a peaceful student demonstration demanding unimpeded access to education was broken up by Israeli forces on Sunday, capping more than a week of blocked school access for dozens of Palestinian children in the village of Umm al-Khair.

    The crisis began more than 10 days ago, when Nivo, a settler leader who serves in a security role at the adjacent Israeli settlement of Carmel, erected a 50-meter barbed wire fence across the only direct, safe road connecting Khirbet Umm al-Khair to the local school. The 1.5-meter-wide thoroughfare is the primary route for residents to access school and other essential external services, leaving no viable alternate routes that do not put children at grave risk.

    The only alternative path cuts through an unauthorised Israeli settler outpost, a site stained by recent violence: it was here that an Israeli settler fatally shot Awdah Hathaleen, a prominent Palestinian activist and English teacher. Settlers have pushed this dangerous alternate route as a so-called solution, forcing children to walk 3 kilometers across terrain that local residents describe as incredibly hazardous. This proposal has been uniformly rejected by local families, who say they will not compromise on their children’s right to a safe education.

    In total, 55 students have been barred from reaching their classes for a second straight week, including the two children of Khalil Hathaleen, a local education official. Speaking to Middle East Eye, Hathaleen outlined the community’s core demands: “Our message is clear: today, they are attempting to take away our right to education. Our goal is clear: we demand the right to education for our children through safe routes, a safe learning environment, and an end to home demolitions in Khirbet Umm al-Khair.”

    When local residents, led primarily by school-aged children, organized a peaceful protest to demand action, heavily armed Israeli forces accompanied by security dogs and military vehicles were deployed to disperse the demonstration. Local resident Ahmad Hathaleen framed the road closure as part of a broader pattern of intimidation rather than an isolated incident. “This issue is more than just a route closed off by a settler, because these settlers do not stop at a certain point,” he explained. “These children are being denied a simple and vital right to education, which children all around the world are entitled to have. The actions settlers have committed in Khirbet Umm al-Khair are a violation and consist of vicious acts against children, aimed at depriving them of the most basic right: education.”

    Umm al-Khair, located in the Masafer Yatta region of the southern occupied West Bank, has long been a flashpoint for displacement and settler aggression. The village’s current residents are descendants of refugees displaced during the 1948 Nakba, when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were forcibly expelled by Jewish militias during the creation of Israel. The community has lived on the land, which they purchased more than five decades ago, while the neighboring Carmel settlement was built on privately owned Palestinian land in the 1980s.

    Settler violence targeting Palestinian communities in the West Bank, which has long received implicit backing and protection from Israeli military forces, has accelerated dramatically since the start of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. A United Nations report released on March 17 documented a sharp surge in attacks: between November 2024 and October 2025, more than 36,000 Palestinians were displaced across the West Bank amid a wave of settler violence that included arson, infrastructure vandalism, property destruction, and targeted shooting at civilians. Over the same period, 1,732 violent incidents resulting in casualties or property damage were recorded, marking a 25% increase from the previous year. Since October 2023, more than 1,150 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank by either Israeli forces or armed settlers, according to collective data from regional monitors.

  • UK: Newham council investigates Labour mayoral candidate’s past flat purchase

    UK: Newham council investigates Labour mayoral candidate’s past flat purchase

    As campaigning intensifies ahead of England’s critical local elections on May 7, a high-profile dispute over a former council property has upended the mayoral race in London’s Newham borough, placing Labour’s lead candidate Forhad Hussain under increasing scrutiny.

    The controversy centers on a one-time council flat that Hussain, then a senior sitting councillor in Newham, purchased in 2016 with financial support from the local authority he served. Last month, a public interest referral was submitted to Newham Council’s monitoring officer, chief executive, and independent external auditors, calling for a formal probe into the transaction. The referral requests investigation into “the acquisition and disposal of a council-derived housing asset by an individual who held elected public office within the authority [Newham] at the relevant time,” a document obtained by Middle East Eye (MEE) confirms.

    Hussain has issued a firm denial of any improper conduct in the deal. Correspondence dated April 17 from auditors Ernst & Young to a local resident, also seen by MEE, confirms that the council’s monitoring officer has launched an inquiry into the complaint. The letter notes that after the complainant raised the issue with the council’s interim chief executive, the local authority committed to a full investigation, and the monitoring officer has agreed to update auditors on the probe’s progress.

    Earlier reporting from local outlet London Centric pointed out that Land Registry records indicate the property was transferred via a process typically reserved for Right to Buy, a UK government scheme that allows sitting council tenants to purchase their rented homes at significant discounted rates. London Centric also highlighted that the purchase price Hussain paid the council for the publicly owned property in 2016 is not listed on public Land Registry records. Three years after purchasing the flat, Hussain sold it for £255,000.

    In an interview with MEE, Hussain pushed back against these claims, rejecting the characterization of the purchase as an improper Right to Buy transaction. He explained the flat was an empty council property offered to eligible buyers through the council’s own Newham New Share shared ownership scheme, a program open to all qualifying Newham residents. “My wife and I were registered for that scheme, expressed interest in the property, and were successful through the same process available to other eligible Newham residents,” he said.

    Hussain added that the council independently valued the property at £190,000, and he and his wife paid their agreed share of the full market value, with no negotiation and no discount comparable to those offered through Right to Buy. He clarified that when the couple later paid off the council’s remaining stake in the property, as outlined in the terms of the shared ownership scheme, they did so at the property’s current increased market value. “Any suggestion that I benefited from my position is categorically untrue. I did not receive preferential treatment at any stage,” Hussain said.

    The candidate also disputed claims that an investigation is currently active, saying, “I have been informed that no new investigation is taking place, and any previous enquiries into this matter have already been concluded.” Newham Council declined to provide any comment on the dispute when contacted by MEE, and the national Labour Party also did not respond to requests for comment.

    The controversy has broken as mayoral campaigning in Newham reaches a fever pitch. During a recent local radio debate, Green Party mayoral candidate Areeq Chowdhury raised questions about the transaction, arguing that “there are serious questions about why that was issued as a Right to Buy. It was an empty flat, apparently an empty flat, issued as a Right to Buy.” Chowdhury confirmed that the council’s monitoring officer has launched an investigation, rejecting Hussain’s claim that the matter is already closed: “the idea that it is a closed matter is false.”

    In response, Hussain dismissed the allegations as entirely baseless and accused Chowdhury of engaging in “gutter politics.”

    The May 7 elections will see more than 5,000 council seats up for grabs across 136 English local authorities, in what is widely viewed as the first major electoral test for Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Labour government since he took office in July 2024. The Green Party is positioning itself as a left-wing challenger to Labour, and Newham is one of the key target boroughs where the party hopes to seize control of both the council and the mayoralty from Labour. Independent candidate Mehmood Mirza, representing Newham Independents and backed by Jeremy Corbyn’s Your Party, is also contesting the mayoral post.