标签: Africa

非洲

  • Some burial societies in Africa now focus on helping the living, too

    Some burial societies in Africa now focus on helping the living, too

    In the crowded, tight-knit Kuwadzana township of Harare, Zimbabwe’s capital, 29-year-old Melisa Kasu faced an unthinkable crisis when her mother passed away suddenly, leaving her family completely unprepared. Across Zimbabwe, cultural norms demand elaborate, costly funeral send-offs that feature feasts, entertainment, and community gatherings to uphold a family’s honor. For low-income households, these expectations often push grieving families into crippling debt or push them to sell vital assets just to avoid public shame. But for Kasu, a local mutual aid group stepped in at the worst moment. Arriving with large cooking pots, sacks of cornmeal, and all the other essential supplies needed for the funeral, members of the Kuchemana Burial Society even helped light the cooking fires to prepare food for mourners.

    “That’s the time I decided to join them,” Kasu recalled, and she took over her late mother’s membership in 2023. What she discovered after joining is part of a quiet, transformative cultural shift reshaping community mutual aid groups across much of Africa: traditional burial societies, long focused exclusively on ensuring dignified end-of-life ceremonies, are expanding their missions to support members while they are still alive.

    Founded by a group of local women in 2021, the Kuchemana Burial Society – whose name translates to “mourning one another” in the local Shona language – was originally created to spare low-income families the public embarrassment of holding a funeral that exposes their financial hardship. Today, it retains its core funeral support: each member pays just $3 in monthly dues, and receives a $150 cash payout when a family member passes away, plus on-site help with food preparation and ceremony logistics. But at a recent gathering of the group held under the shade of a large avocado tree, death was barely mentioned on the meeting’s agenda. Instead, members – most of them women, clad in matching T-shirts and floral skirts – sang together, debated community initiatives, and pitched small business ideas ranging from small-scale poultry farming to homemade detergent production.

    Alongside its core funeral services, the society now runs a collective savings fund, where members pay an extra $10 per month to build a pool of capital. Both members and trusted community members can borrow from this fund at a 20% annual interest rate, and all profits from the interest are split between members at the end of each year. The group also operates a bulk grocery purchasing program, allowing members to access staple food goods at lower prices than they would pay at individual retailers. For Kasu, who was laid off from her job at a local hardware store in 2022, this expanded support has been life-changing. She accessed $100 from the savings cycle in December, then borrowed an additional $30 – no complicated bank applications, no strict eligibility checks, no hidden fees. With that capital, she purchased gas tanks and a sales scale, and now runs a small business selling cooking gas to neighbors in her community. “Business is good. I support myself,” Kasu said.

    Researchers note that this shift is not unique to Kuchemana, but reflects a broader trend across the continent. With more than two-thirds of Zimbabwe’s workforce employed in the informal sector, most workers lack access to formal bank loans, conventional financial services, and government social safety nets. Formal funeral insurance is the most widespread form of insurance held in Zimbabwe today – a legacy of the tradition’s roots dating back to the early 20th century, when colonial-era migrant workers formed the first burial societies to ensure they could receive a dignified burial if they died far from their home communities while working in neighboring South Africa. Today, official data shows that fewer than one in 10 Zimbabweans can access affordable health insurance, while low-cost funeral policies are widely promoted by insurance providers and even mobile phone companies. But community-run burial societies still fill a gap that formal insurance cannot, members and researchers agree.

    “Banks normally do not lend to the poor or the unemployed, and governments are not providing enough support,” explained Sharon Chilunjika, a social sciences lecturer at Zimbabwe’s Midlands State University. “People are using an institution they already trust, the burial society, and expanding it to cover more of their needs.” Chilunjika notes that unaffordable funerals are “one of the most underrated or underappreciated drivers of household poverty” across Africa, where families facing pressure to uphold cultural standards often turn to predatory loan sharks or sell critical farm or household assets to cover costs. Beyond financial support, community burial societies offer a sense of connection and belonging that formal corporate providers cannot match. “It is your neighbor, your church mate. They don’t ask you to fill a form. They come to your home and comfort you,” Chilunjika added.

    For the leaders of Kuchemana, the new mission is a natural evolution of the group’s original values. “We wanted dignity in death. Now we are striving for it in life,” said Nyadzisayi Mirisawu, the society’s secretary. “We don’t want members suffering while alive.”

  • US urges Europe to step up travel measures to prevent spread of Ebola from Africa

    US urges Europe to step up travel measures to prevent spread of Ebola from Africa

    As a fresh Ebola outbreak spreads across the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda, the Trump administration has issued an urgent call for European nations to tighten entry restrictions for travelers arriving from the affected African regions, warning that inaction could trigger new U.S. travel rules that would impact transatlantic movement even during the upcoming men’s World Cup.

    In a private conversation Tuesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised U.S. concerns directly to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, with the two leaders discussing coordinated transatlantic responses to the unfolding public health emergency, a State Department official statement confirmed.

    “Protecting the health of the American public and stopping the Ebola outbreak from reaching U.S. shores remains this department’s top priority,” the statement read.

    Speaking on condition of anonymity to disclose details of the closed-door call, a senior State Department official struck a sharper tone, noting that the U.S. has already moved aggressively to contain the outbreak’s spread and that the broader global community must now match that effort. The official emphasized that concrete action is required immediately, and failure to act will have measurable consequences for travel between Europe and the United States.

    The administration is pushing for two key actions from the EU: increased financial commitments to Ebola response efforts, and targeted, common-sense entry restrictions for travelers originating from the affected Central and East African region.

    The 2026 World Cup, set to kick off this Thursday in Mexico, will run for nearly six weeks, with the majority of matches hosted across the United States, drawing hundreds of thousands of international visitors including many traveling through European hubs.

    The U.S. has already implemented its own strict measures: a blanket entry ban for any traveler who has visited one of the Ebola-impacted countries in the prior 21 days, and mandatory quarantine protocols for U.S. citizens returning home from the affected regions.

    Public health data puts the risk of direct importation in context: while there are only a handful of direct daily flights between the affected African nations and the U.S., more than 300 direct flights connect Europe and the United States every day, creating a far higher potential route for infected travelers to reach North America if European entry checks are insufficient.

    Since the outbreak was first confirmed last month, the U.S. has committed over $200 million in emergency funding to contain the spread in the DRC and Uganda. Earlier the same day as Rubio’s call, the EU announced it would add an additional 16.5 million euros ($19 million) to its own Ebola response, on top of the 15 million euros ($17.3 million) it contributed to the effort just last month. The EU delegation to Washington has not yet issued a public comment on the call between Rubio and von der Leyen.

    The administration’s response to the outbreak has already drawn political criticism. During last week’s congressional hearings, Democratic lawmakers pushed back against Rubio over the Trump administration’s earlier dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development, arguing that the restructuring may have weakened U.S. capacity to respond quickly to global health emergencies. Rubio countered that early detection programs previously run by USAID have been integrated into existing public health partnerships with African nations, and insisted the U.S. has mounted a swift, effective response to the outbreak.

  • Nigeria’s conflict-hit Borno state battles cholera outbreak that has killed 74

    Nigeria’s conflict-hit Borno state battles cholera outbreak that has killed 74

    MAIDUGURI, Nigeria – A rapidly spreading cholera outbreak that emerged in early May in northeastern Nigeria’s Borno State has already claimed 74 lives and sickened more than 7,000 people, international medical humanitarian organization Doctors Without Borders (MSF, by its French acronym) confirmed in a briefing Tuesday.

    The public health crisis has been recorded across 14 of the state’s 27 local government areas, hitting communities already grappling with health systems gutted by nearly 20 years of violent insurgency led by extremist group Boko Haram. Decades of conflict have left basic infrastructure in the region decimated, leaving populations uniquely vulnerable to preventable waterborne diseases like cholera.

    Cholera is a recurring endemic and seasonal health threat across Nigeria, a nation where systemic gaps in water access persist. Official 2020 Nigerian government data shows just 14% of the country’s 200+ million residents have access to reliably managed safe drinking water services. These gaps are far more severe in Borno State, both in the overcrowded state capital Maiduguri and in isolated rural communities. Many remote settlements sit far outside the effective reach of public health authorities, leaving them with virtually no functional sanitation or hygiene infrastructure.

    MSF reports that it has already treated 7,439 cholera patients at its treatment facilities in the region, averaging 185 new patient admissions every day since the outbreak began. Last Friday alone, the organization recorded 500 new patients – the highest single-day caseload recorded since the outbreak started.

    Jessie Kurnurkar, MSF project coordinator in Borno, told reporters multiple overlapping factors are fueling the outbreak’s rapid spread. “Open defecation is making it worse also, and there are fewer aid partners operating on the ground,” Kurnurkar explained. “By the time we receive word of cases in remote communities, local transmission has already occurred, and it becomes extremely difficult to contain the response – the spread has already gained too much traction.”

    The Associated Press spoke with patients receiving care at MSF’s Maiduguri treatment center, who shared harrowing accounts of the disease’s rapid onset. Aisha Ibrahim, one of the cholera patients currently admitted to the facility, said she had experienced nonstop watery diarrhea since first falling ill, and has now been in care for more than four days. “When they initially discharged me, the vomiting stopped, but as soon as I got home, I started stooling again, and it became so severe I had to be rushed back to the center,” Ibrahim said.

  • Who is the Somali referee barred from entering the US for the World Cup?

    Who is the Somali referee barred from entering the US for the World Cup?

    For Omar Artan, a Somali referee who climbed from war-battered local neighbourhood pitches to the cusp of football’s grandest stage, the 2026 FIFA World Cup was supposed to be the crowning achievement of a remarkable career. It was set to be a moment of national pride: Artan, 34, would become the first Somali to ever serve in an on-pitch role at the World Cup finals, a beacon of hope for a young generation in a country fractured by decades of conflict. But that dream has been shattered, after U.S. border officials denied Artan entry into the country despite him holding a valid diplomatic passport and approved single-entry visa.

    Artan’s journey to the World Cup officiating panel is one of relentless grit against overwhelming odds. His playing career came to an early end following a leg injury, and he first picked up a referee’s whistle by accident: during a chaotic local match in Mogadishu, a dispute over the original official led both teams to ask Artan to step in. He accepted the role, and quickly carved out a space for himself in Somali football, honing his skills in informal and semi-organized fixtures at a time when the country’s football institutions operated with almost no structure or international support.

    A formative figure in Artan’s early career was Osman Jama Dirac, the former head of refereeing in Somalia, who provided not just technical coaching but also personal support to up-and-coming officials. “He was like a father to us,” Artan recalled of Dirac, who was killed in 2017, just as Artan was on the cusp of breaking into international officiating. “He was preparing me to become an international [referee]. He would have been proud to see a Somali reaching this level.”

    Artan earned his place on the FIFA listed referees roster in 2018, and steadily rose through the ranks of African continental football. In 2024, he made history as the first Somali to referee a match at the Africa Cup of Nations (Afcon), and by November of that year, the Confederation of African Football (CAF) named him the top male referee on the continent. He capped off this run by officiating the second leg of the 2025 African Champions League final, and in April 2026, FIFA included him in the 52-referee panel for the 2026 World Cup – a milestone celebrated by Somalia’s president Hassan Mohamud, who hailed Artan as “a symbol of inspiration for the new generation of Somalis.”

    In the months leading up to the tournament, Artan threw himself into rigorous preparation, training daily to meet the physical, mental and technical standards required of a World Cup referee. “Preparation for the World Cup is not small work… physically, mentally, and in knowledge,” he explained before departing. “In World Cup football you are dealing with world-class referees at the highest level. You have to reach that standard and stay there.”

    Artan traveled to the U.S. via Istanbul, Turkey, to attend the mandatory pre-tournament referee seminar hosted at FIFA’s Miami training hub – a requirement for all on-pitch officials, even those who would later officiate matches held in co-host nations Canada and Mexico. But upon his arrival in Miami, Artan ran into immigration barriers tied to a travel restriction policy first introduced by the Donald Trump administration, which lists Somalia as a restricted country.

    Artan told the New York Times he was held for questioning by border officials for 11 hours, with much of the interrogation focused on the Somali militant group al-Shabab. Ultimately, he was denied entry over unspecified “vetting concerns” and placed on a flight back to Turkey, where he currently remains, and is expected to return to Mogadishu this Wednesday.

    In a statement to the BBC, the U.S. State Department defended its process, noting it welcomes “legitimate travellers” to the World Cup and adjudicates each visa application individually “after rigorous review and thorough vetting,” with “national security and public safety” cited as core considerations.

    FIFA has confirmed it is unable to intervene in the case, as immigration and visa decisions fall exclusively under the authority of host nation governments. “FIFA is not involved in host country immigration processes, including visa adjudications, and has been informed by authorities that Mr Artan’s status will not be changed at present,” the global governing body said in a Monday statement. “A host government ultimately determines who receives a visa and who is admitted into their country.”

    The Somali government has launched diplomatic efforts to reverse the decision, but current indications suggest Artan will not take part in the 2026 tournament. Artan has responded to the setback with measured grace, expressing gratitude for the outpouring of support from the global football community and reaffirming his commitment to his refereeing career. “I would like to thank FIFA and CAF for all their support and I promise to keep my refereeing levels up as I concentrate on the future,” he told Reuters. “I wish my colleagues all the best success during the World Cup and I look forward to joining them again in future competitions.”

    Six referees from Africa will still take part in the 2026 World Cup, which kicks off Thursday and runs through July 19, representing Algeria, Egypt, Gabon, Mauritania, Morocco and South Africa. But for Artan and Somalia, what was set to be a groundbreaking, hope-filled milestone has been cut short by U.S. immigration policy.

  • Ghanaian women defy odds to get Cambridge degrees

    Ghanaian women defy odds to get Cambridge degrees

    This week, a story of resilience against systemic educational inequality will reach a landmark milestone, as three Ghanaian women who once faced near-certain secondary school dropout due to poverty are set to graduate with Master of Philosophy degrees in Education from the University of Cambridge.

    Each of the three women — 26-year-old Fadila Issah, 25-year-old Francisca Arhinful, and 29-year-old Jemimah Mensah — navigated extreme financial barriers to reach one of the world’s most prestigious higher education institutions, supported by two mission-aligned organizations working to expand educational access for marginalized African girls: the UK-based international education charity Camfed, and the Mastercard Foundation Scholars’ Program, which covered the full cost of their postgraduate studies at Cambridge’s Faculty of Education.

    For Issah, growing up in the Savelugu community of northern Ghana, the path to graduation has been especially groundbreaking. Northern Ghana reports some of the lowest female secondary school completion rates in the country, and until 2017, most Ghanaian high schools charged tuition fees that put education out of reach for low-income rural households, who also faced additional boarding costs for students studying outside their home communities. Issah earned top marks throughout her early schooling, but her family’s already precarious financial situation collapsed after her father — who had prioritized her education despite the family often struggling to afford food — suffered an accident that left him unable to work. Issah took on two part-time jobs to keep her studies going, until a Camfed teacher-mentor noticed her determination and stepped in to cover tuition, textbooks, and clothing costs. It was a life-changing intervention. “I felt like I was dreaming. I could stop working and dedicate my time to study,” Issah said. Today, she makes history as the first person from her home community to earn a degree from Cambridge, and she plans to pay that opportunity forward: “I hope to help girls in similar situations realise their dreams.”

    Arhinful’s journey began in Ghana’s central Ajumako District, where her family could not cover the cost of high school. They arranged for her to live with an aunt who they hoped would sponsor her education, but it was Camfed that ultimately stepped in with a full scholarship, along with access to the Camfed Association — a global network of young women who share similar experiences of overcoming poverty through education. “It really improved my self-esteem and encouraged me to keep going,” Arhinful explained.

    For Mensah, educational access was interrupted at age 14, when she dropped out of secondary school to help her mother run the family’s small catering business, their only source of income. “I dreamed of going back [to education], but I didn’t know when it would happen,” she said. “For people like me, that was normal.” Her path opened up when a free public high school opened near her community, allowing her to resume her studies and work toward her long-held academic goals.

    All three women first earned funding for their undergraduate degrees in Ghana through Camfed’s support programs. The organization then nominated them for the Mastercard Foundation Scholars’ Program, which provided full funding for their one-year postgraduate studies at Cambridge.

    Founded jointly in Cambridge and Zimbabwe, Camfed works across six African nations — Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe — to address systemic poverty and gender inequality through expanded access to girls’ education. The scope of the challenge the organization confronts is stark: Unesco data shows that four out of 10 African girls fail to complete secondary education, and fewer than one in 10 of the continent’s poorest children finish secondary school.

    Committed to lifting up other marginalized girls facing the same barriers they once did, the three graduates have already completed training to serve as Camfed learner guides — peer mentors who teach life skills and wellbeing curricula to students across Africa, with a specific focus on supporting vulnerable girls to stay enrolled in school. Their graduation marks not just a personal achievement, but a testament to the impact of targeted educational aid in unlocking potential that systemic inequality too often leaves untapped.

  • First war crimes complaint against Sudan’s paramilitary forces filed in Kenya

    First war crimes complaint against Sudan’s paramilitary forces filed in Kenya

    NAIROBI, Kenya — In a groundbreaking push for global accountability, 12 survivors of alleged atrocities tied to Sudan’s ongoing civil war have submitted a formal complaint to Kenyan prosecutors, demanding investigations into widespread torture, sexual violence, and other grave crimes allegedly carried out by members of Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF). This filing marks the first known attempt to prosecute RSF members outside of Sudan’s borders, opening a new chapter in efforts to end impunity for war crimes in the conflict that has plunged the country into catastrophe.

    The RSF, a powerful paramilitary force that has been locked in a brutal open conflict with Sudan’s regular military since April 2023, has faced repeated accusations of war crimes and crimes against humanity from global human rights bodies and international observers. The complaint, filed by Switzerland-based international legal advocacy group Legal Action Worldwide, documents horrific abuses allegedly committed by RSF members between April 2023 and March 2025, when the paramilitary controlled Khartoum and much of its surrounding areas.

    Survivors detail being held in dehumanizing detention conditions, with little to no access to adequate food, clean water, or functional sanitation. They allege systemic physical abuse including beatings, burnings, suffocation, electric shocks, and widespread sexual violence including rape. Multiple survivors told investigators they were forced to remove and transport the bodies of deceased detainees from RSF detention facilities. The legal filing asks Kenya’s Director of Public Prosecutions to approve formal charges against 10 named RSF members, several of whom are suspected to currently reside within Kenya’s borders.

    The case carries unique diplomatic and political weight: the RSF has long maintained documented ties to the Kenyan government, and Kenyan President William Ruto previously hosted RSF leader Gen. Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo for peace negotiations, a decision that sparked sharp international diplomatic tension. The Associated Press has reached out to the RSF for comment on the allegations, but no response has been issued as of yet.

    Legal Action Worldwide founder Antonia Mulvey argues that Kenya is uniquely positioned to hear the case under its 2008 International Crimes Act, which grants domestic courts jurisdiction over severe international crimes regardless of where they were committed. “For Kenya, despite the sensitivity of the matter, it is an opportunity to lead in the fight against impunity,” Mulvey said in an interview. “Authorities can now demonstrate the strength of the country’s investigative, prosecutorial, and judicial institutions in addressing the most serious international crimes, regardless of where they are committed.”

    Survivors have little chance of seeing justice inside Sudan, Mulvey explained, as the country’s collapsed justice system is currently “inaccessible, unavailable, and ineffective” across large swathes of territory controlled by the warring parties. She added that the International Criminal Court’s existing jurisdiction over Sudan is limited exclusively to crimes committed in the Darfur region, leaving abuses in and around Khartoum unaddressed by the global court.

    Willis Otieno, the Kenyan-based lawyer who submitted the complaint to national prosecutors, confirmed that multiple lines of evidence indicate several persons of interest in the case have established ties to Kenya, and that the country’s existing legal framework is fully equipped to handle the investigation and prosecution. Otieno expressed confidence in Kenya’s Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, noting: “We have faith that the office will act. For now, let’s treat them with that goodwill.”

    The RSF traces its origins to the notorious Janjaweed Arab militias that carried out widespread ethnically motivated atrocities against East and Central African communities in Sudan’s western Darfur region in the early 2000s. Since the 2023 outbreak of full-scale war, the group has been repeatedly accused of mass atrocities including targeted killings, gang rape, and ethnic cleansing across Sudan, including a devastating October 2025 assault on the Darfur city of el-Fasher that killed more than 6,000 people in just three days. UN-appointed independent experts have labeled the offensive as bearing all the “hallmarks of genocide.” The United States’ Biden administration has formally designated the RSF’s abuses as genocide and imposed targeted sanctions on Dagalo and other senior RSF commanders.

    Since the war began, the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project, a U.S.-based independent conflict monitoring organization, estimates that at least 59,000 people have been killed in the fighting. The group has warned that the actual death toll is almost certainly far higher, as widespread insecurity blocks accurate reporting of casualties across most of Sudan. The conflict has spawned the world’s worst current humanitarian crisis, according to United Nations data: roughly 34 million Sudanese — nearly two-thirds of the country’s entire population — require urgent life-saving humanitarian assistance.

    Reporting for this story was contributed by Magdy from Cairo, Egypt.

  • World Cup ref from Somalia who was denied entry to the US was about to make history for his country

    World Cup ref from Somalia who was denied entry to the US was about to make history for his country

    As the 2026 FIFA World Cup co-hosted by the U.S., Mexico and Canada prepares to kick off this Thursday in the U.S., a historic breaking development has upended expectations for one of Africa’s top soccer officials. Omar Artan, the Somali referee set to become the first official from his conflict-affected East African nation to officiate at a men’s World Cup, has been denied entry to the United States at Miami International Airport and subsequently removed from the tournament’s official roster by FIFA.

    Artan’s path to the World Cup was a story of perseverance against extraordinary odds. Selected for FIFA’s final referee roster two months ago, he had already earned recognition as the African Football Confederation’s 2025 Best Male Referee, and just last month he handled the decisive second leg of the African Champions League final, the continent’s most high-profile club soccer fixture. In a recent interview with Al Jazeera, Artan opened up about the daily challenges he has navigated building his career in Somalia, where ongoing instability in the capital Mogadishu often forced him to change his route to referee training to avoid street explosions. Despite these barriers, he called the World Cup selection his life’s biggest goal, saying “You cannot give up as a referee.”

    Last week, Artan was issued a valid U.S. travel visa through the Somali Embassy in Kenya, which processes the country’s U.S. visa applications. But when he arrived in Miami Saturday to join the global cohort of World Cup referees for their pre-tournament training camp, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) detained him for additional screening, a step agency officials described as routine for verifying traveler admissibility. Following the inspection, CBP ruled Artan inadmissible to the U.S. citing unspecified “vetting concerns”, and did not elaborate on the nature of those concerns in its official statement. In an unusual detail, CBP did not name Artan in its statement, only referencing a Somali national who is a World Cup referee — a description that applies exclusively to Artan, the only Somali official selected for this year’s tournament.

    The incident follows a pattern of travel restrictions implemented by the Trump administration last year that targeted a list of mostly African nations, including Somalia, with heightened immigration screening and entry limits. Even before Artan’s denial, soccer stakeholders had raised concerns that players, fans and officials from these restricted countries could face entry barriers to the U.S.-hosted World Cup despite holding valid travel visas. As of Tuesday, Somalia’s Ministry of Sports and Youth said it had still not received a formal explanation for why Artan was turned away, and the country’s U.S. embassy has launched urgent diplomatic efforts to reverse the decision and clear Artan to take up his place at the tournament.

    In a public statement following the denial, FIFA confirmed it would remove Artan from the World Cup roster, noting that host national governments retain final authority over entry and visa decisions for event participants. The governing body added that it had been informed by U.S. authorities that Artan’s admissibility status would not be adjusted in time for the tournament, making it impossible for him to complete required pre-tournament training or officiate any matches. The decision comes amid longstanding close ties between FIFA leadership, including president Gianni Infantino, and the Trump administration, ties that Infantino and FIFA had publicly highlighted as a guarantee of smooth operations for the 2026 co-hosted tournament. Infantino has not issued any public comment on Artan’s case as of press time.

    In a statement released through FIFA, Artan struck a measured, optimistic tone despite the disappointment. “Despite the circumstances, I am in a positive mood and I am focused on the next challenges in my refereeing career,” he said. He thanked FIFA and the African Football Confederation for their support, extended well wishes to his fellow referees ahead of the tournament, and said he looked forward to competing in future global competitions.

  • Kenyan police fire tear gas at protest against US Ebola quarantine centre plan

    Kenyan police fire tear gas at protest against US Ebola quarantine centre plan

    Fresh unrest has erupted in the central Kenyan town of Nanyuki, where local law enforcement deployed tear gas to disperse demonstrators gathering to oppose the planned construction of an Ebola quarantine facility exclusively for United States citizens. This demonstration marks the latest round of public pushback against the project, which has roiled local communities and sparked legal challenges since it was first announced.

    Wednesday’s protest saw small clusters of demonstrators marching through Nanyuki, waving national Kenyan flags, holding hand-painted placards criticizing the government and project partners, and carrying a symbolic coffin marked with the word “Ebola” to underscore their fears of the virus. The group’s core demand is the full cancellation of the plan to build the 50-bed isolation centre. The demonstration comes just one week after two local residents were shot and killed during police operations to break up an earlier identical protest.

    Public anger over the facility has centered on two core grievances: widespread concerns about the risk of cross-border Ebola transmission into Kenya, which has not recorded any confirmed cases of the current outbreak, and repeated criticism that the Kenyan national government has failed to provide transparent information about the facility’s operations, safety protocols, and long-term plans. Last month, Kenya’s High Court ordered an immediate halt to all construction work on the site, after a local human rights organization filed a legal petition arguing that the centre posed “grave and imminent risks” to local public health.

    Despite the court ruling, satellite imagery analyzed by the British Broadcasting Corporation confirms that construction work has continued at the facility, which is being built on a local airbase. United States officials have confirmed the facility is intended to treat American citizens who contract Ebola during the ongoing outbreak in the neighboring Democratic Republic of the Congo, where the virus has killed more than 100 people out of 608 confirmed cases to date. The facility would be staffed entirely by American medical personnel. A US official told the BBC that Kenya was chosen as the site for three key reasons: its geographic proximity to the DRC outbreak epicenter, limited appropriate airport infrastructure in closer locations, and the need to ensure timely medical care for any affected Americans. The outbreak’s center in the Congolese city of Bunia sits roughly 780 kilometers from Nanyuki, with Uganda positioned between DRC and Kenya.

    For local residents, the project has already had tangible negative impacts on daily life. Protester Priscilla Imani told Reuters that fear over the facility has kept visitors away from Nanyuki and the wider Laikipia County, harming local livelihoods. “Laikipia is not a dumping site and our voices must be heard,” Imani said in a statement to reporters.

    Kenyan President William Ruto has publicly defended the plan, pushing back against growing opposition. Ruto explained that the Kenyan government received a formal request from the US to host the facility, and argued that turning down the request would be “inhuman.” He urged Kenyans against turning the public health issue into a political football, calling on political leaders to avoid what he described as “reckless” commentary surrounding the project. US officials remain confident that the project can move forward despite the legal challenge: last week, a US administration representative told reporters that the government is aware of the ongoing court case but remains “optimistic we can resolve objections.”

  • What happened and why?

    What happened and why?

    A historic milestone in global soccer officiating has fallen through at the last minute, after Omar Artan — the Somali referee set to make history as the first official from his country to work at a men’s World Cup finals — was removed from the tournament’s official roster of match officials. The sudden shakeup comes directly after U.S. border authorities denied Artan entry into the country, derailing his preparations for the high-profile global competition. The development was first reported 59 minutes ago under Africa Sport coverage, leaving the international soccer community surprised by the unforeseen barrier that blocked Artan’s once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. No further details on the specific reason for the entry denial or whether a replacement referee has been named have been released as of the latest update.

  • Blow for Kenya’s ex-deputy president as court upholds his impeachment

    Blow for Kenya’s ex-deputy president as court upholds his impeachment

    In a landmark ruling that reshapes Kenya’s political landscape months ahead of a general election, the country’s High Court has formally upheld the 2024 impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, permanently barring him from holding any public office. The decision comes after months of legal wrangling following Gachagua’s dramatic ouster, which capped a bitter public falling out with his former political ally, President William Ruto.

    Three presiding High Court judges rejected all of Gachagua’s legal challenges to his impeachment, including his core claim that the entire removal process was driven by political bias and manufactured to sideline him. While the court did acknowledge a procedural violation—finding Kenya’s Senate had infringed on Gachagua’s right to due process when it refused to adjourn impeachment proceedings after he fell ill mid-hearing—judges ruled this error did not rise to the level of invalidating the final removal result. As partial redress for the rights violation, the court awarded Gachagua 50 million Kenyan shillings, equivalent to roughly $386,000, in damages.

    Gachagua, who once ran alongside Ruto on a winning joint election ticket in 2022, had been expected to attend the 350-page ruling’s public release but was absent from court. His legal team has already announced plans to appeal the decision, framing the outcome as a politically motivated miscarriage of justice.

    The impeachment of Gachagua followed a rapid and public collapse of his political partnership with Ruto, just two years after the pair won the presidency by leveraging Gachagua’s deep popularity in Mount Kenya, the traditional political heartland of the Kikuyu ethnic community, Kenya’s largest voting bloc. After splitting from Ruto, Gachagua reemerged as one of the president’s fiercest public critics, building a large and loyal grassroots following in his home region and repeatedly rallying opposition to Ruto’s administration. Kenya’s Senate voted by an overwhelming majority to remove Gachagua from office last year, advancing charges of corruption, incitement of ethnic conflict, and sabotage of government operations. Gachagua has repeatedly denied all accusations, calling them baseless, politically motivated attempts to end his career.

    Alongside upholding Gachagua’s removal, the court’s ruling on Monday formally confirmed the appointment of Kithure Kindiki, Gachagua’s replacement as deputy president, cementing the executive branch’s new leadership structure ahead of 2027 general elections. For Gachagua, the ruling delivers a major blow to his long-rumored ambition to run for president in next year’s election, as the lifetime ban on holding public office rules out a presidential candidacy.

    Ahead of the verdict, Gachagua publicly urged his supporters to avoid unrest, saying he was prepared for any outcome and hoped the court would deliver justice both for him and his millions of supporters across the country. He also signaled his intent to continue challenging Ruto through the electoral process, telling followers to prepare to “express their anger at the ballot box” when Kenya heads to the polls next year.

    Gachagua’s impeachment last year took place against a backdrop of growing public unrest across Kenya. Months before his ouster, widespread anti-government protests rocked the country, triggered by unpopular new tax hikes that the Ruto administration ultimately was forced to roll back. Protesters breached parliamentary security and set part of the building on fire during the demonstrations, and a subsequent crackdown by security forces left dozens of protesters dead. Public discontent with the administration has persisted in the months since, with new large-scale demonstrations held just last month to protest skyrocketing fuel prices.