博客

  • How match fixing robbed Algeria in 1982, and changed the World Cup forever

    How match fixing robbed Algeria in 1982, and changed the World Cup forever

    Forty-one years before modern football’s biggest debates over competitive integrity, a prearranged match at the 1982 FIFA World Cup in Spain permanently altered the structure of the world’s most popular sporting tournament. That controversial fixture, forever remembered as the Disgrace of Gijón, saw West Germany and Austria collude to knock North African underdog Algeria out of the competition in one of the most infamous scandals in World Cup history.

    Algeria, a first-time qualifier making its debut on football’s biggest stage, had already completed all of its Group 2 matches the day before the West Germany-Austria fixture, and sat perched on the cusp of advancing to the tournament’s second round. The two European sides quickly realized a narrow 1-0 win for West Germany would check all the boxes for both nations: as long as Austria did not lose by three or more goals, both sides would move forward at Algeria’s expense, edging the North African side out of second place on goal difference.

    The match opened with genuine energy, as West German striker Horst Hrubesch nodded a close-range shot into the net to put his side up just 10 minutes after kickoff. But after that opening goal, the intensity of the fixture drained away almost immediately. By halftime, the pattern of play had shifted dramatically: players stopped pressing forward, committed barely any tackles, and spent nearly all of the remaining 80 minutes circulating the ball laterally across the pitch or back toward their own half. Every sideways pass drew deafening jeers from the 41,000 fans packed into the Gijón stadium.

    Scottish referee Bob Valentine, who oversaw the match, later recalled recognizing the collusion by the 30-minute mark, but said he had no official framework to act on the unspoken agreement. “I refereed the game in front of me. It’s all I could do,” he told *The Scotsman* in a 2011 interview.

    Spectators and broadcasters caught on within minutes. One on-air commentator urged viewers at home to turn off their broadcasts and fell silent for the rest of the match, while another pundit remarked that even saying the players’ names left “a nasty, nasty taste” in his mouth. The next day, local Gijón newspaper *El Comercio* published its match report in the publication’s crime section, and leading French sports daily *L’Equipe* argued that all 22 players on the pitch deserved to be shown red cards for their conduct.

    Despite widespread public outrage, players and officials from both European nations defended their actions. West Germany’s goalkeeper dismissed criticism, noting he had only faced two routine possessions during the entire match: “What should I have done? Run up front and throw myself on the ball?” Hans Tschak, head of the Austrian FIFA delegation, went even further, framing the collusion as a legitimate tactical choice and unleashing a vulgar, racist tirade against Algerian fans. “If 10,000 ‘sons of the desert’ here in the stadium want to trigger a scandal because of this, it just goes to show that they have too few schools,” Tschak said. “Some sheikh comes out of an oasis, is allowed to get a sniff of World Cup air after 300 years and thinks he’s entitled to open his gob.”

    Benali Sekkal, then-president of the Algerian Football Federation, called the fixture “scandalous and immoral” and submitted an official complaint to FIFA calling for both West Germany and Austria to be suspended from the tournament. FIFA ultimately rejected the appeal, and the two European sides advanced as planned. Neither went on to claim the trophy: West Germany fell 3-1 to Italy in the tournament final.

    Though Algeria was robbed of a historic second-round spot in 1982, the scandal left a lasting positive legacy for the World Cup. In response to public outcry over the blatant collusion, FIFA changed its tournament rules to require all final group-stage matches to kick off simultaneously. That rule remains in place today, eliminating the opportunity for teams to manipulate results based on pre-existing group standings and protecting the competitive integrity of the world’s biggest sporting event.

  • US considering moving Gulf bases damaged by Iran to Israel

    US considering moving Gulf bases damaged by Iran to Israel

    Amid shifting military and political dynamics across the Middle East, the United States is actively evaluating a major restructuring of its military footprint in the Gulf region, with a potential relocation of some key assets to Israel following a series of damaging Iranian retaliatory strikes earlier this year, according to a recent exclusive report from The Wall Street Journal.

    Under the proposal being discussed, the US would revamp its long-standing naval base in Bahrain, while drawing down its permanent military presence in both Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Two anonymous senior officials cited in the WSJ investigation confirmed that shifting a portion of Gulf-based operations to Israeli territory is a core option under consideration.

    The discussion of this major strategic shift comes in direct response to escalating regional hostilities that unfolded earlier this year. On February 28, the US and Israel launched a coordinated military offensive against Iran, framed by US leadership as a necessary action to eliminate what former President Donald Trump described as imminent threats posed by the Iranian regime. The primary public objectives of the campaign included the complete destruction of Iran’s nuclear program and key military infrastructure.

    In retaliation for the joint attack, Iran launched targeted strikes against American military assets across the Gulf region between late February and June. The US Navy’s central base in Bahrain, a critical hub for American naval operations in the Middle East, was hit repeatedly. The WSJ documented extensive damage to the site, including severe harm to the base’s command headquarters and at least a dozen other supporting structures. To date, the Pentagon has declined to publicly confirm the full scale of destruction caused by the strikes.

    Parallel to these military deliberations, shifting public opinion within the United States has emerged as a major political factor, following the signing of the 60-day Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding between Washington and Tehran. The ceasefire pact paused active hostilities to allow space for negotiations on a permanent end to the conflict, and has coincided with a sharp turn in public sentiment against the war, new polling data shows.

    A national public opinion survey conducted by Quinnipiac University finds that 60 percent of registered American voters now view the US military campaign against Iran as “not worth it.” The poll also reveals that the temporary ceasefire has eroded public confidence in the US’s ability to achieve its core war goals: 61 percent of respondents believe it remains likely that Iran will eventually develop nuclear weapons, despite the joint offensive.

    Notably, this skepticism crosses traditional partisan lines in American politics. Majorities of both Democratic and Republican voters agree that Iran is still either somewhat or very likely to pursue a nuclear weapons program, marking a rare point of consensus between the two major political camps on a divisive foreign policy issue.

    This reporting is part of independent coverage of the Middle East, North Africa and broader global affairs from Middle East Eye, an outlet focused on original, on-the-ground analysis of the region.

  • Tanzania suspends political rallies three years after lifting ban

    Tanzania suspends political rallies three years after lifting ban

    In a sudden policy shift that reverses recent democratic reforms, Tanzania’s national government has implemented an indefinite suspension on all political rallies across the country, framing the ban as a critical security measure ahead of a major international event.

    Home Affairs Minister Patrobas Katambi announced the directive to parliament, confirming that the suspension will remain in place until further notice. He explained that security officials have uncovered credible threats, including individuals found stockpiling weapons and plotting coordinated criminal activity that could disrupt public order. Beyond these immediate security concerns, Katambi noted that Tanzania is preparing to host an upcoming international trade fair expected to draw delegates and visitors from across the globe. “We should focus on building our economy,” Katambi said, adding, “During this period, we will not tolerate anyone who engages in any form of disorder.”

    The decision marks a sharp reversal of the liberalizing reforms rolled out by President Samia Suluhu Hassan just two years ago. When she took office following the death of predecessor John Magufuli, Hassan moved quickly to undo a six-year ban on political gatherings that Magufuli first imposed in 2016. At the time of lifting the ban in 2023, Hassan affirmed that all political parties held a constitutional right to host rallies, while urging participants to engage in civil discourse rather than personal insults. Magufuli’s original ban had been widely interpreted as a deliberate tactic to suppress opposition power, with the former president arguing that gatherings wasted public resources and diverted attention from national economic development goals.

    Opposition groups have immediately rejected the new suspension, branding it unconstitutional and a deliberate power grab by the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) party. The main opposition bloc ACT Wazalendo has announced it will challenge the government’s directive in court, accusing CCM of weaponizing state institutions to stifle dissent ahead of growing calls for accountability.

    Veteran Chadema opposition figure Joseph Selasini connected the new ban to the rising popularity of opposition rallies that have drawn massive crowds demanding justice for victims of post-election violence last year. Following the controversial October 2025 general election, widespread protests broke out across the country after the two leading opposition presidential candidates were blocked from contesting the poll. A formal commission of inquiry established by President Samia to investigate the unrest confirmed that 517 people died from unnatural causes during the violence, including 197 people who were shot and killed by security forces. The scale of the bloodshed shocked many observers, as Tanzania had maintained a reputation for political stability and peaceful consensus for nearly 60 years.

    Calls for democratic reform and official accountability for the post-election violence had been growing in recent months, with opposition groups organizing repeated public gatherings to pressure the government. As of publication, the ruling CCM party has not issued any public response to the opposition’s accusations of suppression, nor has it released additional comment on the government’s suspension decision.

  • Deniz Undav’s World Cup success for Germany lifts Yazidi and Kurdish pride

    Deniz Undav’s World Cup success for Germany lifts Yazidi and Kurdish pride

    HOUSTON — As one of the breakout surprise stars of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, German striker Deniz Undav has climbed the tournament’s goal-scoring ranks through a standout run as a substitute. Beyond his on-pitch success, however, the 29-year-old forward carries a far greater weight: he stands as the first global sports representative for two long-persecuted, stateless communities that can never field their own official World Cup side. Born to Yazidi refugee parents and raised in Germany, Undav identifies as a Kurdish Yazidi, and his historic tournament run has sparked overwhelming joy and renewed visibility for Yazidi and Kurdish communities across the Middle East and Europe.

    Since entering the German lineup as a substitute, Undav has notched three goals and two assists, putting him just behind tournament leading scorers including Lionel Messi of Argentina, France’s Kylian Mbappé and Brazil’s Vinicius Jr. in the early standings. Speaking to reporters this week, Undav said he hopes his performance inspires young people across the globe, especially those who share his cultural and religious background.

    “I always get the news from my parents how they view me, how they see me and it’s making me proud, you know, that we finally have somebody,” he told reporters.

    Undav’s roots stretch across the Middle East: his mother traces her family line to a now-abandoned village near Khirbet al-Ghazal, a small Yazidi settlement in northeastern Syria. On Thursday night, dozens of community members gathered in the home of local Yazidi leader Ismail Dalaf to cheer on Undav during Germany’s match against Ecuador, many sharing family ties with the striker’s maternal line. Most residents of Undav’s mother’s original village left decades ago, driven out by economic instability or the violence of Syria’s 15-year civil war.

    For Dalaf, Undav’s rise is more than a sports story: it is a cultural turning point.

    “Undav’s World Cup performance has made him a symbol that shows Yazidis can reach a higher position and be seen with respect,” Dalaf said in an interview. “When people see a Yazidi entering the field, scoring goals and changing the result of matches, it changes public perception. It tells the world that Yazidis have a role in the world.”

    Kurds are the world’s largest stateless ethnic group, with roughly 30 million people living as minorities across Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria. Yazidis, a Kurdish-speaking monotheistic religious minority with ancient roots in the region, number roughly 1 million globally, with the largest concentration centered in Iraq’s Sinjar region, home to the faith’s most holy Lalish Temple. An estimated 235,000 Yazidis now reside in Germany, most having resettled after the 2014 Islamic State genocide that killed thousands of Yazidi and abducted thousands more, who were labeled heretics by the militant group. Many of those who survived remain displaced to this day.

    Irfan Ortac, chair of the Central Council of Yazidis in Germany, said Undav’s success has shifted global conversations about his community away from endless stories of trauma.

    “Until now, we have mostly been known as victims of violence,” Ortac said. “Whenever we spoke about Yazidis, we always had to talk about genocide, discrimination, and displacement. It makes us very proud and happy to be able to talk about something positive.”

    In Iraq, the global center of Yazidi life, community leaders have also embraced Undav’s run. “It makes me very happy to see a Yazidi bringing our name to the World Cup and playing in front of the whole world,” said Luqman Sleiman, spokesperson for the Lalish Temple. Diyar Bakir, a 29-year-old Yazidi from Sinjar whose community survived the 2014 IS onslaught, said he dreams of traveling to Germany one day to watch Undav play in person.

    “His family came from a place where his ethnicity and religion were not appreciated, yet he is now recognized and valued by a great team like Germany,” Bakir said. “He emerged from the womb of suffering, and we wish him every success.”

    Undav’s path to stardom has not been without hostility. He has faced repeated online and in-person abuse targeting his Yazidi-Kurdish heritage. Last year, when his club VfB Stuttgart played an away match against Turkey’s Fenerbahce, the striker was targeted with obscene chants about his mother. Two Kurdish anti-discrimination organizations documented a surge in racist, ethnically motivated insults targeting Undav on social media after the match. The striker also faced backlash from some Turkish fans after choosing to represent Germany at the international level, rather than Turkey, a path other German-born players of Turkish heritage have taken.

    But amid the abuse, Undav’s popularity has skyrocketed, and his presence has sparked a broader shift in conversations about migration, identity and belonging in Germany, a country that has welcomed millions of refugees from the Middle East over the past two decades.

    Düzen Tekkal, a German documentary filmmaker and author of Kurdish Yazidi heritage who co-founded Scoring Girls, a nonprofit that offers free soccer programming to girls from marginalized backgrounds, said the “Deniz Undav effect” extends far beyond the soccer pitch.

    “There definitely is a Deniz Undav effect and it’s very important,” Tekkal said. “It lets children who share our heritage celebrate who they are and feel they belong in Germany at a time when migration is often treated as a political problem. It is no coincidence that he plays with this lightness and freedom. People are asking how come he’s so good under pressure or he can cope with so much pressure? Because he doesn’t know it any other way. That is the DNA, that is the resilience. … That’s how he scores these goals because what is that pressure compared to being Kurdish or Yazidi?”

    After scoring against Curacao in the team’s opening group stage match, Undav celebrated with a traditional Yazidi jig, hands clasped behind his back. He was joined in the dance by German star Antonio Rüdiger, a Black German player who has faced repeated racist and anti-Muslim abuse throughout his career. Tekkal called the moment one of the most iconic of the entire tournament, regardless of how Germany fares in the coming matches.

    “Dancing is a form of expressing resistance for us,” Tekkal emphasized. “We dance on the graves of our dead. Our mantra is that resistance is life. He’s dancing there for his forefathers who were oppressed.”

    For many stateless Kurdish fans, Undav’s run gives them a team to cheer for at the World Cup, the global stage that excludes stateless communities by rule. Mahmoud Kanabi, a Kurd from Irbil who moved to Berlin in 2020 and works at a Kurdish restaurant in the city, bought his first ever Germany jersey this year because of Undav.

    “Unfortunately, for us Kurds, we don’t have a team because we don’t have a country,” Kanabi said. “Now, when a Kurdish player is in a team, we have to be fans of it. It doesn’t matter what team it is.”

    Reporting for this article was contributed by Martany in Irbil, Iraq; Fahey in Berlin; Ellingworth in Duesseldorf, Germany; and AP Sports Writer Ron Blum in East Rutherford, New Jersey. This coverage is part of AP’s religion reporting partnership with The Conversation US, supported by funding from Lilly Endowment Inc., with the AP solely responsible for all content.

  • Ireland stuns India in a historic first cricket win as Sooryavanshi sits out

    Ireland stuns India in a historic first cricket win as Sooryavanshi sits out

    In a landmark result that shook international men’s cricket, Ireland earned its first ever victory over India in a T20 international fixture at Belfast’s Stormont ground on Friday, just months after India secured back-to-back T20 World Cup titles. The historic upset came as India opted to rest 15-year-old batting sensation Vaibhav Sooryavanshi, whose senior team debut has been one of the most anticipated events in the global cricket community following his breakout IPL performance that saw him top the tournament’s batting averages against some of the world’s top bowlers.

    Ireland won the toss and chose to bat first, and got off to a rocky start, slipping to 51 runs for the loss of four wickets early in the innings. But a resilient lower-middle order fightback dragged the hosts to a competitive total of 182 for 9 wickets by the end of their 20 overs. The standout of Ireland’s batting performance was Gareth Delany, who delivered a blistering late finish, smashing three consecutive sixes off Indian paceman Prasidh Krishna before falling for 49 off 32 deliveries. Wicketkeeper-batter Lorcan Tucker, who stepped into captaincy after five of Ireland’s first-choice players picked up injuries, also contributed a quickfire 50 off 35 balls to anchor the recovery.

    India’s bowling attack made an early impact, with Harshit Rana claiming three powerplay wickets to leave Ireland reeling, and finished with Arshdeep Singh taking 2 wickets for 28 runs and Axar Patel claiming 2 for 33. However, dropped catches off both Tucker and Delany proved costly for the reigning world champions, allowing Ireland to post a challenging total.

    Chasing 183 for victory, India’s innings got off to a promising start via opener Abhishek Sharma, who raced to 49 off just 20 deliveries before being caught in the deep. But the visitors collapsed from there, losing regular wickets across the innings and being bowled out for 148 with seven balls still left in the chase, handing Ireland a 34-run historic win.

    The day belonged to Ireland’s two debutant bowlers, who produced match-winning performances on their first senior international appearance. India-born left-arm fast bowler Jai Moondra picked up 2 wickets for 25 runs, dismissing star Indian opener Sanju Samson with his very first delivery in international cricket, then later claimed the wicket of Shivam Dube, India’s last recognised top-order batter, caught and bowled. Medium-pacer Matt Hollard was even more impressive, claiming Indian captain Shreyas Iyer, Ishan Kishan, and Washington Sundar to finish with figures of 3 wickets for 28 runs. Left-arm spinner Matthew Humphreys matched Hollard’s return, also taking 3 for 28, despite injuring his hand while attempting a difficult caught-and-bowled chance. Strapping his hand up, Humphreys closed out the match by dismissing Harshit Rana and Arshdeep Singh in the 19th over, and was mobbed by jubilant teammates after the final wicket.

    India entered the match as heavy favourites, having won their second consecutive T20 World Cup in March, and retained seven players from that title-winning starting lineup for Friday’s fixture. Iyer, captaining the side for this series, noted after the match that the team opted to rest Sooryavanship to stick with the proven core that delivered the world title. “(Sooryvanshi) is a gun player but we have some tremendous players who have done well for us so we are backing them. He will get his chance,” Iyer said. This was Iyer’s first T20 international appearance since 2023.

    Reflecting on the upset defeat, Iyer emphasised that the result would be a key learning moment for his side. “We are not going to forget what happened and there’s a lot to learn from this game. Going to come out all guns blazing in the next game,” he added.

    Ireland’s stand-in captain Tucker called the win over the world champions one of the most special results of his career, played out in front of a home crowd. “It’s pretty special to beat the world champions at home. We scrapped through the game, we had some tough periods but we stuck to it, we were diligent,” Tucker said.

    The two sides will face off in the second and final T20 of the series at the same Stormont ground on Sunday, before India travels to England for a five-match series against the hosts.

  • Nicholas Rossi, accused of faking death and fleeing US to Scotland after rape charges, has died

    Nicholas Rossi, accused of faking death and fleeing US to Scotland after rape charges, has died

    A convicted sexual assailant who spent years evading American justice by faking his own death and fleeing across continents has died while in custody at a Utah correctional facility, state law enforcement officials confirmed Friday.

    Thirty-eight-year-old Nicholas Rossi, also known by the alias Nicholas Alahverdian, passed away Thursday night due to complications from a pre-existing chronic health condition, according to Richard Piatt, public information officer for the Utah Department of Corrections. Piatt confirmed that Rossi had made the personal decision to discontinue ongoing medical treatment prior to his death, and that both his surviving family members and the victims of his crimes have been formally notified of his passing. Details of Rossi’s specific health issues have not been released per privacy regulations, but court observers noted he appeared throughout his 2025 trial in a wheelchair and required supplemental oxygen during proceedings.

    Rossi’s death closes out a years-long, international manhunt that began in 2018, when investigators matched Rossi’s DNA to a decades-old unprocessed rape kit collected from an earlier assault. Following the 2018 charges, a staged online obituary was published in early 2020 claiming Rossi had died from non-Hodgkin lymphoma on February 29 of that year. But investigators and people close to Rossi—including his former legal counsel and a former foster family—immediately raised doubts about the claim of his death, launching a cross-border search that would span multiple years.

    After faking his death, Rossi fled the United States for Europe, eventually settling in Scotland where he was arrested in 2021 while receiving treatment for COVID-19. Hospital staff recognized him from the international arrest warrant by his unique tattoos, including a forged Brown University crest inked on his shoulder—Rossi had never actually attended the Ivy League institution. Even after his arrest, he continued to obstruct justice, claiming he was a innocent Irish orphan named Arthur Knight who had been wrongfully framed for crimes he did not commit. Investigators ultimately confirmed that Rossi used more than a dozen separate aliases over decades to avoid detection and evade law enforcement.

    Rossi was finally extradited back to the United States from Scotland in 2024 to stand trial for two sexual assault charges brought by Utah prosecutors. In 2025, he was convicted on both counts and sentenced to serve a minimum of 10 years in state prison. During the trial, details of his abusive pattern of behavior emerged: one victim told the court Rossi raped her in her apartment after she confronted him for stealing money from her to purchase a computer. A second victim, who met Rossi through a personal advertisement posted to Craigslist, said the pair became engaged within weeks of meeting, during which time Rossi pressured her to cover all of his living expenses, lend him $1,000 to prevent eviction, and take on personal debt to purchase their engagement rings. The trial judge ultimately labeled Rossi a “serial abuser of women” during sentencing.

    At his October 2024 sentencing hearing, Rossi again maintained his innocence, claiming “I am not guilty of this. These women are lying.” Local prosecutors noted Wednesday that despite his continued claims of innocence, Rossi never escaped accountability for his crimes. “Mr. Rossi was a sexual predator who tried to escape accountability,” said Salt Lake County prosecutor Sim Gill. “The survivors of his heinous acts have the consolation that he died in prison with the knowledge of the crimes he committed.”

  • Trump threatens 100% tax on European imports if countries impose tax on digital services

    Trump threatens 100% tax on European imports if countries impose tax on digital services

    The simmering transatlantic trade dispute over digital service taxes erupted into a new standoff Friday, as former U.S. President Donald Trump issued an ultimatum threatening steep 100% import tariffs on any nation moving forward with levies targeting American digital firms.

    In a public social media post, Trump specifically called out European countries that he claims are preparing to imminently roll out new digital tax regimes. For years, the U.S. leader has leveraged tariff threats to discourage such policies, as a growing number of governments across the globe seek new tax revenues from the digital economy — a sector overwhelmingly dominated by large U.S. tech corporations.

    “Please let this statement serve to represent that any Country that imposes such a Tax will immediately be met with a 100% TARIFF on any and all Goods sent to the United States of America,” Trump wrote in the post. He added that the proposed tariffs would override all previously negotiated bilateral and multilateral trade agreements. While the threat applies to all countries pursuing digital taxes, Trump’s post centered European nations as the primary target.

    Policy analysts warn the aggressive move could escalate into a full-scale transatlantic trade war. If the 27-nation European Union chooses to retaliate against the tariffs, the resulting trade disruption would push up consumer prices, slow global economic growth, and unravel years of incremental trade progress between the two blocs.

    The European Commission swiftly pushed back against Trump’s threat Friday. “Unilateral measures targeting such legitimate policies are unjustified. If pursued, the EU will respond swiftly and decisively to defend its rights and regulatory autonomy,” said commission spokesperson Olof Gill. Gill emphasized that the EU’s digital tax framework is non-discriminatory, applying equally to all large tech firms regardless of their country of origin.

    This is not the first time Trump has threatened tariffs over digital taxation. Last August, he issued a similar warning, arguing that foreign digital tax and regulatory policies “are all designed to harm, or discriminate against, American Technology.”

    The latest tariff threat comes ahead of a July 4 deadline for the implementation of a U.S.-EU tariff deal reached earlier this year. The agreement, first negotiated tentatively by European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen during a 2024 visit to Trump’s Scottish golf resort, caps most tariffs on EU exports to the U.S. at 15% after months of fractious internal debate within the bloc. Notably, digital service taxes were excluded from the deal, leaving the issue as the most intractable sticking point in U.S.-EU trade relations.

    The U.S. government has already opened Section 301 trade investigations into foreign digital service taxes under the 1974 Trade Act, but it remains unclear whether Trump will follow through on his latest threat, or how the tariffs would be structured if implemented. It is also unknown whether the administration would roll out broad tariffs immediately or target specific countries initially.

    Outside the EU, the United Kingdom — which left the bloc in 2020 — has already enforced a 2% digital services tax since that year, applied to revenues earned by search engines, social media platforms, and online marketplaces that derive value from UK-based users. UK policymakers justified the tax by arguing that long-standing corporate tax rules for digital businesses have created a mismatch between where profits are taxed and where economic value is actually generated. The tax includes revenue thresholds that mean it applies almost exclusively to large multinational corporations, with the stated goal of ensuring big global tech firms pay a fair share to support UK public services.

  • ‘Repel the enemy’: Crimean Tatars have become a key asset for Ukraine’s war effort

    ‘Repel the enemy’: Crimean Tatars have become a key asset for Ukraine’s war effort

    On the outskirts of Kyiv, just a short distance from Ukraine’s battered capital, a small gathering of Crimean Tatars finishes their weekly Friday prayers at the Kyiv Islamic Cultural Centre with the traditional Islamic greeting of taslim. Among them is 60-year-old Isa Akayev, a veteran warrior who walks out of the prayer hall last, his frame still bearing the quiet dignity of a man who has spent more than a decade fighting for his people.

    Akayev retired from frontline service in December, but he still proudly wears a shirt emblazoned with the insignia of Ukraine’s Military Intelligence, paired with his traditional beard and taqiyah skullcap. Seated on a handcrafted traditional Crimean wooden bench in the centre’s hallway – a space that also houses the Religious Administration of Muslims of Crimea – he reflects on how dramatically the character of war has shifted since he first took up arms.

    “War has changed a lot. The head-on assaults we carried out years ago are impossible today,” he explained in an interview with Middle East Eye. “Now, the fighting is dominated by heavy artillery and FPV drones. A single kill zone can extend up to 30 kilometers, and infantry have to move on foot to avoid giving away their position to enemy surveillance.” This new era of high-intensity, long-range warfare, the battle-hardened Tatar acknowledges, is no longer suited to his experience as a ground commander.

    Akayev’s fight stretches back to 2014, when Russian forces invaded and occupied the Crimean Peninsula. Within weeks of the occupation, he founded the Crimea Battalion, the first all-Tatar military unit fighting in defense of Ukrainian sovereignty and the rights of Crimea’s indigenous Muslim community. At the time of the 2014 annexation, more than 250,000 Crimean Tatars lived on the peninsula, most having only recently returned to their ancestral homeland after decades of mass deportation under Soviet rule.

    Moscow’s 2014 annexation, which followed a hastily organized referendum widely condemned as illegitimate by the United Nations and the vast majority of the international community, has been met with unwavering resistance from the Crimean Tatar community. Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, that resistance has grown far more visible, with distinct Crimean Tatar military units serving alongside regular Ukrainian forces on frontlines across the country, explains Filiz Tutku Aydin, a political science professor at Ankara’s Social Sciences University. Alongside Akayev’s original Crimea Battalion, these units include the Noman Celebicihan Battalion and the Grey Wolves squad.

    Crimean Tatars, whether serving in these dedicated formations or integrated into Ukraine’s regular armed forces, have paid a devastating price for their resistance, with dozens killed in combat. When a Tatar soldier falls in battle, the community publicly honors him as a shaheed, or martyr, a reflection of the deep spiritual meaning that the fight to liberate Crimea holds for the entire people, Aydin notes.

    Beyond frontline military service, Crimean Tatars have risen to key positions of leadership within the Ukrainian government. Most notably, Rustem Umerov, a prominent Crimean Tatar politician and close advisor to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, served as Ukraine’s Minister of Defense from September 2023 to July 2025. For Akayev, Umerov’s appointment was a historic breakthrough: he became the first Crimean Tatar ever to hold a Ukrainian cabinet position, carrying profound symbolic weight for the entire community.

    Today, between 30,000 and 50,000 Crimean Tatars live as displaced members of the community on mainland Ukraine, where they remain deeply engaged in political and civic action to advance their cause, while more than 200,000 remain on the peninsula under Russian occupation, according to Russian government statistics. In 2023, displaced Tatar leaders launched the Crimean Front, a cross-sector platform that unites business owners, volunteers, and civil society organizations to coordinate support for the war effort and keep global attention focused on their struggle.

    “The whole point of this platform is to remind the world that Crimean Tatars are constantly contributing to the fight for liberation,” explains Lenur Mambetov, one of the Crimean Front’s co-founders. “We all share one goal: not just to push back the Russian invader, but to take back our land and return home to Crimea.”

    Russian rule has grown increasingly repressive on the peninsula since 2022, with widespread crackdowns on any expression of pro-Ukrainian or pro-Tatar identity, making the liberation of Crimea an existential priority for the community. “For Crimean Tatars, Ukraine’s victory is even more important than it is for ethnic Ukrainians. As a displaced people fighting to rebuild our community, this is a matter of life and death,” Aydin says.

    Akhtem Seitablayev, a prominent Ukrainian-Crimean Tatar actor, screenwriter, and director who heads the Kyiv-based Crimean House, a state-funded cultural institution dedicated to supporting displaced Crimeans, echoes this urgency. “Of the more than 300 political prisoners held by Russia in occupied Crimea, the vast majority are Crimean Tatars. That alone makes clear where our community stands on the occupation,” he says.

    Seitablayev, who joined the Ukrainian army after the 2022 full-scale invasion, continues to lead cultural initiatives to preserve Crimean Tatar memory and build international awareness of their struggle. The hallways of Crimean House are lined with posters from films about Crimean history, including his award-winning 2013 historical drama *Haytarma*, which chronicles the 1944 Soviet mass deportation of Crimean Tatars.

    Known to the Tatar people as surgunlik, or exile, the 1944 deportation was one of the largest forced population transfers of the Stalin era. Over just three days, Soviet authorities deported more than 190,000 people – overwhelmingly Crimean Tatars, alongside smaller groups of Greeks, Armenians, and other non-Slavic communities – to Central Asia via overcrowded cattle trains, erasing nearly all trace of Tatar cultural and political life from the peninsula. Many scholars classify the deportation as ethnic cleansing, while Crimean Tatars universally recognize it as an act of genocide. The deportation killed tens of thousands through starvation, disease, and exposure, shattered Tatar cultural institutions, and scattered the community across a global diaspora that has never been able to fully reassemble on its homeland. Like Akayev and Mambetov, Seitablayev was born in Uzbekistan, where most deported Tatars were resettled, and only returned to Crimea following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

    *Haytarma* is regularly screened at Ukrainian embassies around the world ahead of May 18, the annual national day of remembrance for the 1944 deportation. Seitablayev attended a screening in Berlin earlier this year, and notes that international interest in Crimean Tatar art and storytelling has grown dramatically since 2014, and especially after the 2022 full-scale invasion. “That growing interest is something we deeply welcome,” he says.

    To amplify their cause, Crimean Tatars have leveraged a far-flung global diaspora that stretches from Central Asia to North America and Western Europe. The largest and most politically influential diaspora community is based in Turkey, where hundreds of thousands of Tatars settled beginning in the late 18th century, after the Russian conquest of Crimea and amid growing persecution under Tsarist rule. With shared Turkic linguistic and cultural roots, and close geographical proximity to Crimea, Turkey has long been a safe haven for displaced Tatars, and the diaspora there grew further after the 2014 annexation and 2022 full-scale invasion.

    “Turkey has been a reliable partner for us: it has held the same position since 2014, supporting Ukraine’s territorial integrity and rejecting the legality of the occupation of Crimea,” says Refat Chubarov, chairman of the Mejlis, the elected representative body of the Crimean Tatar people. The Mejlis has emerged as a key diplomatic channel for Ukraine during the war, with Chubarov and other leaders regularly engaging with international officials to highlight the plight of Tatars under Russian rule. Most recently, Chubarov took part in the 2025 Antalya Diplomacy Forum, where he held talks with Turkish government officials focused on the ongoing repression of Crimean Tatars and continued support for Ukraine.

    While Turkey has not provided direct military assistance to Crimean Tatar units, the Crimean Front has built close humanitarian partnerships with Turkish authorities, and has also secured support from other Muslim-majority nations including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. After the destruction of the Kakhovka Dam in 2023, Saudi Arabia provided emergency humanitarian aid through the Crimean Front, while the UAE donated critical power generators for displaced communities, Mambetov says. Beyond the Middle East, Crimean Tatar diaspora communities across Canada and Europe work closely with Ukrainian diaspora groups to advocate for sanctions on Russia and support for Ukraine’s territorial claims.

    For decades after the collapse of the Soviet Union, relations between the Ukrainian government and the Crimean Tatar community were marked by mutual mistrust, shaped by decades of Soviet propaganda that framed Tatars as a disloyal minority. That has changed dramatically under President Volodymyr Zelensky, who has taken a series of historic steps to formalize the recognition of Crimean Tatar rights and identity. In April 2025, Zelensky signed a presidential decree dedicated to protecting the distinct national identity of the Crimean Tatar people and formally recognizing the legal status of the Mejlis, a move the community has hailed as a landmark milestone after decades of campaigning.

    Chubarov recalls that for years after 1991, lingering Soviet-era influence left many Ukrainians viewing Russians as “closest brothers” while viewing returning Crimean Tatars with suspicion. “Many saw us returning from exile as a threat. Some politicians even claimed we wanted to seize the peninsula for ourselves or bring it under Turkish influence,” he says.

    Today, that distrust has given way to growing partnership and integration. In 2023, Zelensky established a new annual tradition of hosting an official iftar dinner for Crimean Tatar leaders during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, a gesture that took the community by surprise. “It was a shock. For a Ukrainian president to give that level of recognition to Muslims and Crimean Tatars was completely unprecedented,” Mambetov says. In 2024, Zelensky unveiled a national memorial in central Kyiv to commemorate the victims of the 1944 surgunlik deportation, extending recognition of Crimean Tatar history from the political sphere to the national historical memory of Ukraine.

    “Since 2014, public perceptions of Crimean Tatar art, culture, and identity have changed dramatically, for the better,” Seitablayev says. “To some extent, the war helped push that change forward, but I also believe it was part of the Almighty’s plan.” Mambetov adds that many Ukrainians have also let go of old prejudices against Islam, with growing public understanding of the Crimean Tatar community’s faith and traditions.

    The steps Kyiv has taken to guarantee the integration and autonomy of the Crimean Tatar community are now enshrined in Ukrainian law, and have built deep trust between the Ukrainian government and the Crimean Tatar independence movement, Aydin explains. “Ukraine understands that integrating Crimean Tatars is a necessary step to eventually re-integrate Crimea after liberation,” she says, adding that this policy also eliminates any risk of separatist sentiment within the community.

    For Crimean Tatars, the pursuit of cultural autonomy and full membership within a sovereign Ukrainian state is not contradictory – it is the core of their political stance, Aydin notes. That position is shared by the Mejlis and all leading figures of the community.

    “Allah ordained that Crimea is part of Ukraine, so how could we go against His will?” Akayev says with a smile. Even as some Western politicians, including former U.S. President Donald Trump, have floated the idea of ceding control of Crimea to Russia as part of a potential peace deal, Akayev rejects any such compromise out of hand.

    “I do not know what the future holds, but as long as God gives me strength, I will continue to fight by every means permitted by Sharia for our homeland to return to us,” he says. “Because the graves of my ancestors are there. Because I want to be buried there myself. Because without Crimea, there would be no Crimean Tatars.”

  • ‘I was doxxed’: UK doctors welcome BMA protections for criticism of Israel

    ‘I was doxxed’: UK doctors welcome BMA protections for criticism of Israel

    At its annual representatives meeting this week, the British Medical Association (BMA)—the body representing more than 200,000 doctors across the United Kingdom—passed a landmark motion rejecting the adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism within the National Health Service (NHS). The vote marks the highest-profile pushback yet against UK government policies that healthcare workers say are being used to stifle legitimate criticism of Israel’s actions in Gaza and suppress advocacy for Palestinian human rights.

    The approved motion does more than reject the definition: it calls for an urgent independent inquiry into how the IHRA framework has impacted lawful political speech and professional expression regarding Israel’s military campaign in Palestine. It also affirms the right of UK healthcare institutions to push back against attempts to use the definition to shut down public debate over alleged war crimes and human rights violations. With the motion’s passage, BMA members are now authorized to lobby the UK government, NHS England, and key sector stakeholders to reverse current policy aligned with the IHRA definition.

    In an official statement provided to Middle East Eye (MEE), the BMA emphasized the core motivation behind the vote: “Doctors have witnessed in horror the humanitarian crisis that has unfolded during the Middle East conflict, with the devastating loss of civilian life and in particular, the attacks on healthcare workers and healthcare facilities, and must be able to legitimately challenge the actions of states and armed forces without being unfairly accused of any kind of discrimination, or threatened with disciplinary action.”

    The BMA’s decision comes in direct response to policy moves from the UK’s Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), which earlier this month formally backed the findings of a government-led review into anti-Jewish hate in the NHS. That review, led by controversial government antisemitism adviser Lord John Mann, centers the IHRA definition—a document long mired in debate for its framing that critics say conflates legitimate criticism of the Israeli state with antisemitism. The Mann review’s recommendations include mandatory antisemitism training for all NHS staff, a ban on political symbols in NHS workplaces, and a prohibition on doctors and nurses attending political protests while in official uniform.

    Weeks before the BMA vote, MEE revealed that a cross-coalition of UK healthcare workers had already submitted an open letter to the DHSC calling for an immediate halt to the rollout of the Mann review’s recommendations. At this week’s annual meeting, BMA delegates passed a separate emergency motion backing that call to pause implementation. Though some attendees alleged the motion amounted to antisemitism and called for it to be pulled from the agenda, the BMA’s internal legal team confirmed the motion complied with all rules, and it passed after full debate.

    The vote follows a growing pattern of disciplinary action and regulatory investigations targeting UK doctors who have publicly criticized Israel’s actions in Gaza. Many of these cases have explicitly cited the IHRA definition to justify disciplinary measures, giving the BMA’s decision immediate personal stakes for hundreds of medical professionals across the country.

    London-based emergency doctor Dr. Nadeem Crowe is one of the most high-profile doctors targeted: he was abruptly suspended from his role at London’s Royal Free Hospital mid-shift in August 2024 after an anonymous complainant used the IHRA definition to label his social media posts about Palestinian rights as antisemitic. The suspension was only lifted after Crowe was pressured to delete the posts, with hospital leadership threatening a full formal investigation if he refused to comply.

    Crowe described the personal and professional toll of the action in an interview with MEE: “I know the reality of this weaponisation intimately – after dedicating 15 years to my clinical career, I was abruptly suspended following an anonymous complaint that used the IHRA definition to brand my private social media posts regarding Palestinian rights as ‘antisemitic’. It completely derailed my career, and the toll has been severe personally – this hostile regulatory overreach profoundly aggravated a long-standing clinical anxiety disorder, forcing me onto sick leave, requiring increased medication, and causing severe emotional and psychological distress. Being stripped of your livelihood mid-shift over your identity and humanitarian beliefs doesn’t just impact your job, it rips you apart emotionally.”

    Crowe has since filed a legal claim against the hospital trust alleging racial discrimination and harassment, and is awaiting a court ruling on the case. He called the BMA’s vote to reject the IHRA definition a long-overdue win for healthcare workers’ rights. “For too long, this deeply flawed framework has been misapplied, serving instead to systematically stifle legitimate political speech, humanitarian concern, and criticism of the state of Israel. The BMA is finally standing up for intellectual honesty and the rights of healthcare professionals to speak out on global humanitarian crises,” he said.

    Another UK doctor, Dr. Nizar Mhani, has faced a barrage of repeated anonymous complaints over his public criticism of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, all citing the IHRA definition. Though every investigation launched by his regulator and hospital has cleared him of any wrongdoing, he said the campaign of complaints was explicitly designed to intimidate him into silence. “There are malicious groups who have been canvassing for complaints against me, on the grounds that I allegedly support terrorism and am an antisemite. Their intention was to harass me into feeling intimidated to the point where I was no longer able to criticize Israel or support the Palestinian cause. I was doxxed, webpages were set up with my details on, and information shared about how to complain about me. I’ve had investigations by my regulator and my hospital, and every single one has concluded there is no case to answer and that I committed no wrongdoing,” Mhani told MEE.

    Despite the harassment, Mhani said he has no plans to stop speaking out. “I don’t think I will stop speaking out – the price I’m paying is small compared to what Palestinians are going through,” he said. He welcomed the BMA’s rejection of the IHRA definition, calling it a deeply flawed and overly politicized framework that has been weaponized to target pro-Palestine healthcare workers.

    Alongside rejecting the IHRA definition and pausing the Mann review rollout, BMA delegates passed two additional key votes this week. The first called for an immediate end to vexatious complaints against doctors, which the union says are regularly used to misuse UK medical regulatory processes to intimidate and harass staff who speak out on Middle East issues. The second vote opposes the General Medical Council (GMC), the UK’s medical regulator, having the legal authority to appeal rulings issued by its own independent tribunal service—a power that allows the GMC to re-investigate and re-sanction doctors who have already been cleared of all allegations.

    That vote aligns with legal action the BMA launched earlier this month challenging the GMC’s appeal power, which many healthcare workers say is being explicitly used to crack down on pro-Palestine advocacy. The most prominent example of this is the case of prominent British-Palestinian surgeon Dr. Ghassan Abu Sitta, who was cleared of allegations of antisemitism and glorifying terrorism brought by the pro-Israel lobby group UK Lawyers For Israel. Despite the tribunal’s ruling clearing Abu Sitta, the GMC has since launched an appeal to overturn the verdict.

    Abu Sitta told MEE the appeal lays bare how the regulator has become a tool for political pressure from pro-Israel lobby groups. “The decision by the GMC to appeal to the High Court to overturn the findings of its two tribunals and to effectively say it needs a third attempt to find a judge who will give it the right political verdict highlights the extent to which the regulator has become a tool for political pressure at the hands of UK Lawyers For Israel. All of the complaints against me came from UK Lawyers For Israel, and that in itself highlights the complicity of the GMC in pandering to an organisation that says it exists to wage lawfare against those that it considers the enemy of Israel,” he said.

    Abu Sitta added that doctors hold a unique moral responsibility to speak out on human suffering they witness, and that targeting them for that testimony is an attempt to silence the truth. “Doctors are in a unique position to become bearers of witness to human suffering in a way no other profession can – those who are behind this oppression want to silence the witnesses’ statements, and punish them by having them thrown out of the profession,” he said.

    In a response to MEE’s request for comment on the BMA’s votes and the Abu Sitta case, a GMC spokesperson defended the regulator’s actions, saying: “Our focus is protecting the public, and we are satisfied given the nature of the allegations that it is right that we appeal in [Dr Abu Sitta’s] case. We operate independently of both the government and the medical profession, and make all of our fitness to practise decisions on the facts of each case, assessing whether there is any current or ongoing risk to public protection, public confidence in the medical profession, and professional standards and conduct.”

    Mhani echoed the BMA’s concerns about the GMC’s appeal power, saying the mechanism is being exploited by political lobby groups to target dissenting doctors. “This is a dangerous lever to the processes that exist, and it is being used as a vehicle for political entities and lobby groups who are putting pressure on the GMC to overturn decisions. The regulator runs the risk of becoming a vehicle for abuse and a conduit for harassment towards its registrants, and it is slowly becoming unfit for purpose,” he said.

    In a final vote reaffirming core professional rights, BMA delegates voted to uphold all doctors’ right to freedom of speech on political issues, matters of public conscience, international conflict, and international humanitarian law. Delegates noted that widespread belief among UK doctors that political pressure is unduly influencing GMC disciplinary processes, with restrictions on speech only being enforced when that speech supports Palestinian rights. Mhani summarized that view, saying: “It is only now that opinions have been shared in support of the Palestinian cause that apparently political views are sensitive and need curtailing, and this in and of itself is part of the dehumanisation of Palestinians.”

  • Congo files an ICJ case against Rwanda over decades of violence in eastern Congo

    Congo files an ICJ case against Rwanda over decades of violence in eastern Congo

    In a landmark legal move that escalates long-simmering tensions between two central African neighbors, the Democratic Republic of Congo announced Friday it has initiated formal proceedings against Rwanda at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the United Nations’ highest tribunal for inter-state disputes. The filing seeks to hold Rwanda legally accountable for more than 30 years of widespread violence that has devastated the mineral-rich eastern region of Congo, leaving millions of civilians displaced and suffering systemic human rights abuses.

    Congo’s legal application accuses Rwanda of violating multiple foundational international conventions, including pacts banning genocide, racial discrimination, torture, and systemic discrimination against women. The legal documents outline that since the early 1990s, civilian communities in eastern Congo have endured mass targeted killings, extrajudicial executions, widespread torture, systematic sexual violence, mass forced displacement, and ongoing ethnic and gender-based persecution perpetrated by Rwandan-backed armed factions.

    The conflict that has torn eastern Congo apart for generations has roots stretching back to the 1994 Rwandan genocide, when Hutu militias responsible for the mass killings fled across the border into eastern Congo to escape prosecution. In the decades that followed, Rwanda has repeatedly deployed cross-border military incursions and armed proxy groups, justifying its actions as necessary to neutralize the remaining Hutu extremist fighters and safeguard Rwanda’s national security. However, both Congolese officials and the U.S. government have long alleged that Rwanda uses the security threat as a cover to gain control over eastern Congo’s vast reserves of valuable strategic minerals, which are critical to global tech and manufacturing supply chains.

    Today, the region remains mired in instability as government forces and allied militias battle more than 100 active armed factions. The most powerful and disruptive of these groups is the M23 movement, which has been repeatedly linked to Rwandan support. M23 fighters launched sweeping offensive operations in early 2023, rapidly seizing key strategic population centers including the major eastern city of Goma and expanding their territorial control across large swathes of North Kivu province.

    The United Nations has classified the ongoing crisis in eastern Congo as “one of the most protracted, complex, serious humanitarian crises on Earth.” More than 6 million people have been displaced by the decades of violence, according to U.N. data, with millions more facing acute food insecurity and limited access to basic humanitarian aid.

    In its filing, Congo named a litany of Rwandan-backed rebel groups that it holds responsible for the decades of bloodshed, with the M23 topping the list of accused factions. The Congolese legal team is asking the ICJ to issue a formal ruling that Rwanda bears international legal responsibility for the violations, order an immediate halt to all Rwandan-backed hostile activities within Congolese territory, require formal assurances that such actions will not be repeated in the future, and order substantial reparations to be paid to both the Congolese government and the civilian victims of the violence.

    Responding to the filing, the ICJ confirmed in a public statement that it had received Congolese application to institute proceedings, but has not yet made any determination on whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the full case. The Rwandan government has not issued any immediate public response to the new legal action. While Rwanda has consistently denied any official support to armed groups operating inside Congo, U.N. expert panels have published multiple findings documenting concrete evidence that Rwandan military personnel have fought alongside M23 fighters and directly directed the group’s military operations.

    This new legal filing marks the third time Congo has attempted to bring Rwanda before the ICJ over the cross-border conflict. The first case was voluntarily withdrawn by Congolese authorities in 2001, and the court dismissed the second attempt in 2006 for lack of jurisdiction, finding that Rwanda had not ratified all of the international treaties cited by Congo, or had entered formal reservations that barred the court from hearing the dispute.

    The landmark legal action comes amid stalled diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict: separate U.S.- and Qatar-mediated peace negotiations between Congolese and Rwandan officials have so far failed to produce a durable ceasefire or lasting political settlement. Just one day before the ICJ filing was announced, the U.S. government imposed new economic sanctions on a Rwanda-based gold refinery, Gasabo Gold Refinery, which U.S. officials say forms part of a transnational criminal network that operates in coordination with M23 to illegally extract and smuggle gold out of eastern Congo. U.S. officials emphasized the sanctions are intended to support ongoing diplomatic peace efforts by cutting off a key source of funding for the armed group.

    The new legal challenge adds another layer of complexity to an already intractable regional crisis, setting the stage for a high-stakes international legal showdown that could shape the future of security and stability in central Africa.