博客

  • Israeli settlers held US lawmaker Ro Khanna at gunpoint in occupied West Bank

    Israeli settlers held US lawmaker Ro Khanna at gunpoint in occupied West Bank

    A high-profile progressive Democratic U.S. Congressman Ro Khanna was held at gunpoint by armed Israeli settlers wielding American-made firearms during a fact-finding visit to a displaced Palestinian community in the occupied West Bank, an incident that has reignited scrutiny of U.S. military support for Israel and shifting partisan attitudes toward the Israeli government.

    Khanna, who represents a California district, shared the details of his detention in a public post on X (formerly Twitter) on Saturday, July 11, 2026. “Israeli settlers, brandishing American made M4s, detained me & other Americans on my trip to Palestine,” he wrote. “When the IDF arrived, they sided with the settlers & continued our detention. They made a huge mistake. You will be hearing more soon.”

    The lawmaker’s visit was centered on Khirbet Zanuta, a small Palestinian Bedouin community that has been systematically displaced by repeated violent attacks from Israeli settlers. According to on-the-ground accounts, settlers have driven out most residents through a campaign of intimidation and property destruction: they have burned the local school, looted private homes, assaulted local people with rifle butts and stones, smashed residential windows and community solar panels, drained local water storage tanks, and dumped raw sewage onto agricultural land that local families depend on for livelihoods.

    Speaking to Reuters after his release, Khanna described the sequence of events: “We were at a village that Israeli settlers had destroyed, they had destroyed the school, they had destroyed that village, and we were just looking at it. And these hoodlums come in with machine guns – M4, an American-made machine gun – and they detain us. They block off the road. And then they call the IDF and the IDF is on their side, not on the side of the Americans.”

    Cameron Kasky, an aide who was part of Khanna’s traveling delegation, confirmed that the group was held for more than an hour. Kasky added that during their detention, the delegation made repeated attempts to contact the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem to request official assistance. It was ultimately Israeli police, not the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), that stepped in to secure the group’s release, according to Kasky.

    As of now, there is no public confirmation of whether U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, a known hardline supporter of Israeli settlement expansion, chose to intervene on the delegation’s behalf or issue any public criticism of the incident. The IDF has issued a muted public response, acknowledging that settlers blocked vehicles near Khirbet Zanuta but claiming its own forces were responsible for de-escalating the confrontation – a claim that contradicts accounts from Khanna and his delegation.

    The incident draws particular attention to the longstanding U.S. military aid package to Israel, which provides $3.8 billion in annual funding for Israeli military equipment – including the M4 rifles that the settlers used to detain the congressional delegation. This connection comes at a time of rapidly shifting public opinion within the U.S. Democratic Party, where support for Israel has fallen sharply amid growing public awareness of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza and its discriminatory apartheid policies in the occupied West Bank.

    Recent polling from Reuters/Ipsos underscores this shift: Israel’s favorability rating among Democratic voters dropped from 59% in 2018 to just 22% by May 2026, reflecting a growing backlash against continued unconditioned U.S. military support for the Israeli government amid widespread allegations of human rights abuses against Palestinian people.

  • Iran’s supreme leader vows killers of father ‘will be held accountable’

    Iran’s supreme leader vows killers of father ‘will be held accountable’

    Rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East have taken a sharp turn after Iran’s newly installed Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei publicly pledged retribution for the death of his father and predecessor, Ali Khamenei, who was killed in a joint US-Israeli airstrike on February 28. In a formal written statement released to Iranian media via the supreme leader’s official Telegram channel Saturday, Mojtaba Khamenei framed vengeance for his father’s killing as an unnegotiable national mandate, stating that freedom-aligned people across the globe would soon begin executing key parts of the revenge campaign.

    The pledge comes one day after state-led funeral commemorations for the former supreme leader concluded, wrapping up a week of cross-national memorial events held across Iran and neighboring Iraq. Ali Khamenei was laid to rest Friday at the Imam Reza shrine in the northeastern Iranian city of Mashhad, one of the holiest pilgrimage sites in global Shia Islam. The funeral procession first launched a week prior in the Iranian capital Tehran and the holy city of Qom, before commemorations extended to major Iraqi Shia centers Najaf and Karbala.

    In his statement, the new supreme leader expanded his vow of revenge beyond his father’s killing, promising to hold responsible parties accountable for the deaths of a martyred commander and all Iranians killed in the two most recent regional conflicts. He emphasized that the campaign of accountability is not contingent on his personal participation or the presence of other senior Iranian officials, stressing that retribution is unavoidable and that Iranian sympathizers across the world would contribute to fulfilling the mission. “The killers of the late leader should know that they will be held accountable for their crimes,” Mojtaba Khamenei said.

    Since taking office after his father’s assassination, the new supreme leader has not made any public appearances. Multiple unconfirmed reports indicate he was wounded in the same airstrike that killed Ali Khamenei. In a report citing senior anonymous sources based in Tehran, global news agency Reuters confirmed that Mojtaba Khamenei is currently recovering from his injuries, but has not regained enough strength to appear before the public. The report added that Iranian security officials have also intentionally restricted his public exposure, amid ongoing credible threats of follow-up targeted attacks against the country’s new leadership.

    The latest statement from Tehran comes at a moment of already extreme friction between the United States and Iran, with a recently agreed temporary ceasefire outlined in last month’s memorandum of understanding rapidly falling apart. Iranian officials confirmed that US airstrikes carried out across six Iranian cities earlier this week killed 17 people and wounded 115 more. On Friday, one day before Mojtaba Khamenei’s statement, the US Treasury Department announced a new round of harsh economic sanctions targeting a key financial backer of the new Iranian supreme leader, alongside 13 additional individuals and entities with ties to the Iranian government.

    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi issued a sharp rebuke of the US actions, accusing Washington of deliberately violating the terms of the interim ceasefire agreement. Araghchi argued that the recent airstrikes and new sanctions prove the United States has abandoned its previously established diplomatic commitments, further eroding trust between the two long-adversarial nations.

  • Pro-Palestinian groups urge ‘decisive action’ after Burnham’s Gaza apology

    Pro-Palestinian groups urge ‘decisive action’ after Burnham’s Gaza apology

    As the race to determine the next leader of Britain’s Labour Party — and the country’s next prime minister — enters its final phase, leading contender Andy Burnham has issued a rare public apology for his party’s flawed initial response to Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, drawing measured praise from pro-Palestine groups and fellow Labour figures who are now pushing for tangible policy change to match his words.

    Burnham, who is widely tipped to secure the leadership in the upcoming vote this month, broke ranks with earlier party messaging earlier this week to acknowledge widespread public anger over Labour’s early handling of the Gaza crisis. “I know many people feel that at the start of Israel’s military action in Gaza, my party didn’t get it right, and I am sorry about that. The response has too often not been good enough. We need to do better,” he said in his public remarks.

    Describing the catastrophic “unbearable suffering” unfolding across Gaza as “a scar on our collective conscience”, Burnham pulled no punches in criticizing Israel’s decades-long expanding occupation of Palestinian territories. “We’ve got to do more to put pressure on the Israeli government,” he added.

    The apology has drawn a mostly positive early reaction from within Labour’s own ranks. Wes Streeting, former UK health secretary, called Burnham’s comments “extremely welcome”, while Norwich South MP Clive Lewis framed the statement as “an important and much-needed first step”. Ealing Central and Acton MP Rupa Huq echoed that sentiment, noting “High time this is acknowledged and glad something will be done about it.” The Labour Muslim Network, an influential group representing Muslim party members, described the intervention on X (formerly Twitter) as “A huge and important intervention from the potential next leader of the Labour party.”

    Burnham, a former Greater Manchester mayor who returned to Parliament last month via a Makerfield by-election, took care to acknowledge steps already taken by Keir Starmer’s outgoing Labour government, including its formal recognition of Palestinian statehood, sanctions targeting far-right Israeli cabinet ministers, and a ban on the transfer of British-made bombs and ammunition to Israel. “We have taken some important steps,” he said. “But let’s be honest, the UK was too slow to call for a ceasefire. And we must now do more to strengthen our approach.”

    He went on to warn that ongoing Israeli actions are undermining any path to a lasting two-state solution, pointing to repeated violations of existing ceasefire agreements and a sharp surge in violent extremist settler attacks across the West Bank and East Jerusalem. “Netanyahu’s government is clearly attempting to make a two-state solution impossible,” he said. If elected leader, Burnham pledged to explore further sanctions against violent Israeli settlers and implement new restrictions on trade with illegal Israeli settlements built on occupied Palestinian land.

    Notably, Burnham stopped short of formally endorsing the growing global consensus that Israel’s campaign amounts to genocide, arguing that such a designation is a matter for international judicial bodies rather than elected politicians. “There is increasing evidence that war crimes appear to have been committed,” he said, adding “it was for international courts, and not politicians, to decide.”

    That stance has drawn pushback from major pro-Palestine advocacy groups, including the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), one of the UK’s largest pro-Palestine activist organizations, which warned that words alone are not enough and demanded immediate decisive action to follow the apology. The group pointed out that a United Nations commission of inquiry, alongside multiple independent human rights organizations and legal experts, already confirmed last month that Israel is committing acts of genocide in Gaza.

    “You have stated that this is something for the international courts to decide, but the Genocide Convention requires all states – including Britain – to take action to prevent genocide as soon as they become aware there is a serious risk of it,” the PSC wrote in an open letter to Burnham. The group also criticized the UK’s historical complicity in Israeli actions, noting the country has long actively supported Israeli policies and “willfully ignoring rulings of the courts”, including the International Court of Justice’s landmark 2004 ruling that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory is unlawful, and that all third-party states must end any actions that aid or abet Israeli violations of international law.

    The PSC laid out clear demands for Burnham: formally recognize the UN commission’s genocide finding, adopt the 2025 Labour Party conference policy mandating a full arms embargo on Israel and broad sanctions, ban all trade with illegal Israeli settlements and any trade that props up the Israeli occupation, and roll back the use of what the group calls “authoritarian” public order and anti-terror laws to crack down on peaceful pro-Palestine protests.

    Currently, the United Nations, dozens of major human rights organizations, and hundreds of independent human rights experts have formally classified Israel’s military campaign in Gaza as genocide. The offensive has killed more than 73,000 Palestinians in the enclave to date, according to latest public health counts from Gazan authorities.

  • Exclusive: Syria, Iraq and US plan to unveil Mediterranean pipeline deal to bypass Strait of Hormuz

    Exclusive: Syria, Iraq and US plan to unveil Mediterranean pipeline deal to bypass Strait of Hormuz

    A landmark transnational energy project is set to move forward after senior Iraqi and regional officials confirmed to Middle East Eye that Iraq, Syria and the United States have reached an agreement to reactivate the decades-old Kirkuk-Baniyas oil pipeline, a 500-mile corridor stretching from northern Iraq’s major oil fields to Syria’s Mediterranean coastline. The initiative is framed explicitly as a strategy to reduce Iraq’s overreliance on the Strait of Hormuz, where Iran has tightened control amid escalating regional tensions tied to the US-Israeli war. The formal unveiling of the agreement is scheduled for next week, during Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi’s upcoming visit to the White House for talks with US President Donald Trump, sources confirmed.

    Leading the behind-the-scenes negotiations on the US side is Tom Barrack, Trump’s ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria and Iraq, who has spent weeks ironing out project details ahead of Zaidi’s trip, which will also include a stop in Texas, America’s core energy production hub. Senior Iraqi sources tell MEE that Barrack has built a strong working partnership with Zaidi, and frames the pipeline project as a blueprint for future US-aligned commercial development across the Levant that would deliver mutual benefits to Washington and regional host governments.

    Originally completed in 1952 by the Iraq Petroleum Company, the pipeline was built to carry up to 300,000 barrels of crude oil per day. It was shut down by Baghdad in the 1980s after Syria aligned with Iran during the Iran-Iraq War, then suffered extensive damage following the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq, leaving it completely non-functional for decades.

    Extensive modernization and reconstruction work will be required to bring the corridor back online, including new storage infrastructure, upgraded pumping stations and replacement electrical systems. One senior regional official told MEE that a full, wholesale replacement of the aging pipeline is the most likely path forward, with a total construction timeline of two to three years. The official added that a consortium of US energy firms has already been assembled to lead the reconstruction effort, a clear signal of the US government’s commitment to advancing the project.

    Initial discussions between Baghdad and the new Syrian government to revive the pipeline first emerged in late 2024, shortly after Islamist militias loyal to Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa ousted long-time ruler Bashar al-Assad. Those early talks failed to gain sufficient momentum to move forward, until shifting regional dynamics created new urgency for the project.

    That urgency stems directly from Iran’s expanding control over the Strait of Hormuz amid the ongoing regional war. In recent months, Iraq has relied on small-scale crude exports via tanker trucks crossing into Syria, but volumes have been far too low to meet Baghdad’s revenue needs.

    “Iraq has started to see Syria in a different light,” independent Iraqi analyst Sarhang Hamasaeed told MEE. “Prior to the war, there was deep skepticism. The reality of the war made it clear that Iraq needs Syria as an alternative export route.”

    Regional sources confirm that Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani will travel to the US to attend the official signing ceremony for the pipeline agreement. The project comes amid a sweeping reset in US-Syria relations: after al-Sharaa toppled Assad, he aligned with Washington, and now enjoys strong backing from Turkey and Gulf powers including Qatar and Saudi Arabia. The Trump administration has already rolled back multiple layers of sanctions on Syria, including sanctions on al-Sharaa’s former rebel group Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which evolved from al-Qaeda’s former Syrian affiliate al-Nusra Front.

    Last week at a NATO summit in Ankara, Trump issued unusually public praise for al-Sharaa, calling him “fantastic” and “highly respected”. The US also announced last week it would remove Syria from its list of State Sponsors of Terrorism, a designation the country had held since 1979. The delisting clears a major regulatory hurdle for US firms to participate in the pipeline project.

    Earlier this month, the Iraqi government already approved a preliminary agreement for US firms Capital TI and Chevron, alongside a Qatari energy company, to explore development of both the original Kirkuk-Baniyas route and a second line from the Iraqi oil hub of Haditha in Anbar Province to Baniyas.

    For Iraq, the stakes of the project could not be higher. Roughly 95% of Iraq’s oil exports currently flow through the Strait of Hormuz, leaving the country extremely vulnerable to Iran’s chokehold on the waterway. Data from energy analytics firm Vortexa released last month shows that Iraq’s seaborne oil exports in May fell to just 8% of the 2024 average. With oil sales accounting for 90% of the Iraqi government’s annual budget, the disruption has created a severe fiscal crisis for Baghdad, making an alternative export route a matter of national economic survival.

    Baghdad’s ruling coalition is dominated by Shia political parties and militias with close ties to Iran, which have historically been wary of partnering with al-Sharaa, a Sunni leader with a history as a hardline Islamist insurgent. But the acute economic pressure from disrupted Hormuz exports has pushed Baghdad to prioritize the project despite internal opposition.

  • Trump says US ready to ‘destroy’ Iran after Israeli intelligence warns of ‘assassination plot’

    Trump says US ready to ‘destroy’ Iran after Israeli intelligence warns of ‘assassination plot’

    Escalating tensions between the United States and Iran have reached a new boiling point after former U.S. President Donald Trump issued an extraordinary threat of overwhelming military retaliation against Tehran, following Israeli intelligence warnings of an alleged plot to assassinate him. The dramatic escalation comes as a previously Pakistan-brokered ceasefire between the two nations teeters on collapse, marked by new airstrikes, fresh sanctions, and dueling accusations of broken commitments.

    According to a Wall Street Journal report citing anonymous intelligence sources, Israeli security agencies recently shared new details of what they described as a “specific” and “active” Iranian plan to target Trump with Washington. CNN further confirmed that the intelligence prompted elevated security precautions, leading the U.S. Secret Service to request a last-minute change to Trump’s travel itinerary following the NATO summit held in Washington D.C.. Trump ultimately departed the region aboard an older aircraft, while his newer, Qatari-donated jet was sent separately to his next destination in the United Kingdom, a shift directly tied to the newly uncovered threat.

    In a fiery post shared on his Truth Social platform, Trump doubled down on the warnings, announcing that 1,000 American missiles are already locked and targeted at the Islamic Republic of Iran, with thousands more waiting to be deployed immediately should Tehran move forward with the alleged plot. “Orders have already been given, and the U.S. Military is ready, willing, and able – for a one year period of time, subject to extension – to completely decimate and destroy all areas of Iran – PRAISE BE TO ALLAH!” the post read.

    The threatening rhetoric comes amid a rapidly unraveling interim truce agreed through a Pakistan-brokered memorandum of understanding just one month prior. Earlier this week, the U.S. launched two consecutive nights of airstrikes across six Iranian cities, which Iranian officials say killed 17 people and wounded another 115. On Friday, the U.S. Treasury Department unveiled a new round of sanctions targeting Mojtaba Khamenei, a key financier linked to Iran’s supreme leader, alongside 13 additional individuals and entities – a move that directly violates the terms of the interim agreement, according to Iranian officials.

    Paragraph 9 of the signed MoU explicitly prohibits the U.S. from imposing new sanctions or deploying additional military forces to the region, while allowing Iran to maintain its current nuclear program status. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi took to social media platform X to condemn the actions, noting that Iran has strictly upheld its end of the agreement while Washington has flagrantly violated its commitments. “Iran has so far kept its word, unlike the so-called US Treasury Secretary who is violating Para 9 of the MoU,” Araghchi wrote, adding that “there can only be mutual compliance” moving forward.

    Even amid the open hostilities, Trump confirmed that negotiations toward a final comprehensive peace agreement with Iran will continue, despite declaring the month-old ceasefire “over.” The outbreak of renewed violence was sparked by attacks on Qatari and Saudi oil tankers near the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz earlier this week, which triggered the U.S. airstrikes and subsequent Iranian missile and drone strikes on U.S.-affiliated military sites across the Middle East.

    Trump stated on social media that Iran itself requested that talks continue, and the U.S. has agreed to move forward with negotiations, even as the truce is no longer in effect. However, Iranian lead negotiator and parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf rejected any claims that Tehran would surrender to U.S. pressure, stressing that Iran has maintained full military preparedness in case Washington fully abandons the interim agreement. “We have never stopped preparing to defend our country, and if at any moment the Americans betray the understanding, we are ready for full-scale defence,” Ghalibaf said. “Ending the war is a priority for the countries of the world, but everyone should know that this conflict will never end with Iran’s surrender.”

    Pakistan, which has served as the primary mediator for the talks between Washington and Tehran, has stepped in to urge de-escalation. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif held a phone call with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, where he emphasized the urgent need for both parties to uphold the terms of the MoU and work to restore regional stability.

    Senior U.S. officials speaking to CBS News offered a nuanced perspective on the recent tanker attacks, noting that Iranian representatives have attributed the assaults to rogue hardline factions that seek to derail diplomatic negotiations. “They came back to the table and said, ‘We screwed up. We made a mistake. Let’s keep talking,’” one unnamed senior official told the network.

    This report was originally published by Middle East Eye, which provides independent, in-depth coverage of the Middle East, North Africa, and surrounding regions.

  • Russian strikes kill six in Ukraine, officials say

    Russian strikes kill six in Ukraine, officials say

    A new barrage of Russian missile, drone and guided bomb attacks across Ukraine on Saturday left at least six civilians dead and dozens injured, Ukrainian authorities have confirmed, marking the latest escalation in Moscow’s ongoing full-scale invasion that began in February 2022.

    In the capital city Kyiv, regional officials reported that 12 people were wounded in the strikes, including two minor children. AFP correspondents on the ground in Kyiv confirmed hearing two distinct waves of explosions in the early hours of Saturday, with a nationwide air alert siren activated only minutes after the first blast rattled the city.

    While Russian forces have launched near-daily airstrikes against Kyiv since the invasion began, a recent surge in deadly attacks deploying large volumes of ultra-fast ballistic missiles has stretched Ukraine’s overstretched air defense network to breaking point. In a public post on social media platform X Saturday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed that Russia launched more than 120 drones and 12 missiles overnight, with half of those projectiles being hard-to-intercept ballistic missiles.

    “Civilian infrastructure was hit even before the air raid alert was issued,” Zelenskyy said, alongside shared footage showing first responders and emergency crews searching for survivors through smoke and rubble of destroyed structures. He added that apartment blocks, commercial office buildings and a theological academy in Kyiv sustained heavy damage, with search and recovery operations ongoing across multiple affected regions.

    Casualties were reported in two other major Ukrainian cities outside the capital. In the northern city of Sumy, a guided aerial bomb strike killed four people, including a young girl, Sumy Mayor Artem Kobzar confirmed. A separate missile attack on the southern port city of Odesa left two more civilians dead, regional governor Oleg Kiper announced.

    Zelenskyy noted that Ukrainian air defenses successfully intercepted the majority of incoming Russian targets, but struggled against the faster ballistic missiles. He renewed his longstanding plea for Western military allies to speed up and expand security assistance to help Ukraine fend off the invasion, which has entered its third full year of conflict. Specifically, he called on the United States to quickly finalize a pledge to allow Ukraine to domestically produce Patriot air defense systems. Earlier this week, U.S. President Donald Trump announced the U.S. would approve Ukrainian domestic manufacturing of Patriot missiles, though Zelenskyy noted Thursday that key technical details of the agreement are still being negotiated.

    Saturday’s pre-air-alert strike on Kyiv marks the second time in less than a week that Russian projectiles hit targets before sirens could be activated. Sergiy Sternenko, an advisor to Ukraine’s defense minister, wrote on Telegram that the early impacts suggest Russia is repurposing its S-400 anti-aircraft systems to conduct ground strikes, a tactic that makes incoming projectiles far harder for Ukrainian radar systems to detect in advance. “There is no military logic to such attacks. It is simply terrorism for the sake of terrorism,” Sternenko added.

    Moscow has denied intentionally targeting civilian populations in Ukraine, claiming in a statement that its Saturday strikes only hit “military-industrial facilities in Kyiv and seaport infrastructure in Odesa.” The attack comes one day after Ukrainian drones struck multiple oil refineries in southern Russia, part of Kyiv’s recent campaign targeting Russian energy infrastructure to disrupt its war machine.

  • South Africa seeks tariff exemption as US probes forced labor tied to imports

    South Africa seeks tariff exemption as US probes forced labor tied to imports

    JOHANNESBURG – As tensions between the United States and South Africa continue to simmer over bilateral trade and foreign policy, Pretoria has formally pushed Washington to grant it an exemption from planned punitive tariffs tied to a sweeping U.S. trade probe into forced labor import bans across dozens of nations. South Africa’s core argument rests on its existing, robust legal framework that strictly bans the use of forced labor in domestic production and imports.

    This week, a high-level delegation from South Africa’s Department of Trade, Industry and Competition presented Pretoria’s case to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) in Washington D.C. The appearance comes as part of USTR’s ongoing Section 301 investigation, which assesses whether 60 major global economies enforce sufficient restrictions on imports of goods produced with forced labor.

    During the hearing, the South African delegation emphasized that the country has ratified all core International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions that prohibit forced labor. It also highlighted that Pretoria has already enacted domestic legislation granting law enforcement authorities the power to seize and block any imports manufactured through forced labor practices. Beyond that, South African law already explicitly bans the production of goods via prison labor, closing a key loophole that investigators often flag in other jurisdictions.

    The delegation made a specific push to block USTR’s proposed 12.5 percent tariff on South African exports to the United States, calling for full exemptions for the country’s most critical export sectors. These key goods include platinum group metals, passenger and commercial vehicles, citrus produce, seafood, wine, and tree nuts, with the delegation noting there is no credible evidence linking any of these products to forced labor.

    The request comes amid a period of growing friction in trade and diplomatic relations between Washington and Pretoria. Over the past several years, the two partners have faced repeated disagreements over existing tariffs, Pretoria’s domestic economic policies, and clashing stances on global conflicts – most recently the 2023-2024 war in Gaza.

    For decades, South Africa has enjoyed duty-free access to the huge U.S. consumer market under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), a preferential trade program designed to boost economic development across sub-Saharan Africa. The initiative has supported billions of dollars in annual exports from the region, but its future remains uncertain as it is set to expire imminently without reauthorization from the U.S. Congress.

    South African Trade Minister Parks Tau reaffirmed that the United States remains one of South Africa’s most important trading partners, and that Pretoria will maintain constructive, ongoing engagement with Washington both on the Section 301 probe and other outstanding trade disputes. These include longstanding U.S. tariffs on South African steel, aluminum, and automobile exports.

    Following this week’s hearing, USTR has opened a window for additional public and official submissions, due by Thursday, before the agency moves to a final decision on the proposed tariffs and exemption requests.

  • More than 40 kidnapped children and teachers freed after Nigerian army operation

    More than 40 kidnapped children and teachers freed after Nigerian army operation

    Two months after gunmen stormed three schools in Nigeria’s southwestern Oyo State and seized 44 pupils and staff, Nigeria’s military has announced the successful rescue of all captives, alongside the arrest of multiple suspects linked to the mass abduction. The operation, however, came at a cost: several military personnel lost their lives during the month-long mission that spanned across security and local enforcement agencies.

    The abductions, carried out on May 15, targeted three educational institutions in Osiire district: Baptist Nursery and Primary School, LA Primary School, and Community Grammar School. While official confirmation of captives’ ages has not been released, most pupils at these types of Nigerian schools range between 2 and 18 years old. The incident sparked national outrage not only for its large scale, but also because it occurred in the southwest, a region predominantly made up of Christian communities where mass school abductions are far less common than in Nigeria’s mostly Muslim northern regions, where such attacks have long plagued communities.

    In a formal statement released Friday evening, Army spokesman Danjuma Jonah Danjuma confirmed that all freed abductees are currently receiving medical care at an undisclosed medical facility, and will be reunited with their families once they are cleared for discharge. While relatives and educators have expressed relief that the long hostage crisis has concluded, many families described the 60-day wait as an agonizing, harrowing experience that has left lasting trauma. Even with the rescue confirmed, families are still in a holding pattern, waiting for the chance to hug their loved ones for the first time in two months.

    Prof Wole Alamu, whose wife Rachael Folawe Alamu — headteacher of Community Grammar School — was among those abducted, told the BBC that his family endured particular distress after abductors released videos showing his wife and other captives. “It was a harrowing experience… but we thank God that it ended well,” Alamu said. “We are happy that they are out and we are grateful to everybody who has contributed in one way or the other for the release.”

    Hassan Ajibola, head of the Oyo State Teachers’ Union, told the BBC he felt “happy and elated” at the news of the rescue, but used the moment to pressure authorities to finally deliver on a 10-year-old national security pledge. Over a decade ago, following the infamous 2014 Chibok schoolgirls abduction that drew global attention, Nigeria launched the Safe School Initiative to protect educational institutions. Ajibola called on officials to fully implement the initiative’s outlined security measures, which include deploying armed security personnel to schools, installing CCTV surveillance, erecting perimeter fencing around school grounds, conducting regular patrols, and enlisting local security groups to reinforce understaffed high-risk areas. “I am very much convinced that should that program be fully implemented and as initiated, our schools will be very, very secured,” he said.

    Longstanding concerns about the failure to roll out the Safe School Initiative have intensified amid a recent resurgence of mass school kidnappings across Nigeria. Lawmakers and human rights groups have repeatedly called for a full audit of how public funds allocated for the program have been spent, citing ongoing gaps in school security that have left thousands of children vulnerable.

    The joint rescue operation brought together military units, national police, intelligence services, and local vigilante groups, according to military officials. Security forces were able to map out the abductors’ network, dismantle their support infrastructure including informant networks and hidden camps, and clear out sections of the Old Oyo National Park forest, a large, hard-to-access wilderness that has become a common hideout for criminal gangs and extremist groups. The military confirmed multiple suspect arrests but has not released details on how many attackers remain at large, nor the exact number of service members killed in the mission. Officials note additional security operations to clear criminal hideouts are already planned.

    The crisis has amplified conversations about national insecurity, a top campaign issue ahead of Nigeria’s 2025 general election. While the federal and state governments have pledged to boost security around schools and at-risk communities, critics argue these incremental steps are insufficient to curb the growing wave of kidnappings for ransom that have devastated communities across the country. Recent protests in Oyo State have centered on demands for better protection for education workers, with one prominent protest banner reading, “No teacher should die at work.”

  • Major German carmakers hit by steep China sales plunge as competition heats up

    Major German carmakers hit by steep China sales plunge as competition heats up

    The world’s largest automotive market, China, has delivered a sharp blow to top German automakers, with the April-June quarter of this year seeing double-digit sales declines that have hit global profit margins and forced strategic overhauls for major brands.

    Newly released corporate data from the past week reveals that all four leading German brands — Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Porsche — suffered year-on-year sales drops between 30% and 41% in the second quarter alone. For the first half of 2024, the decline extended across all four manufacturers, with each reporting a year-on-year fall of more than 20% in Chinese deliveries. These slumps have squeezed overall corporate profits, in many cases erasing sales and revenue gains secured in other regional markets around the world.

    The downturn in China comes at a particularly challenging moment for these legacy European automakers, who now face rising competition from Chinese brands not only in China but also in overseas markets, including their home region of Europe. Chinese EV leader BYD has already made significant inroads into European markets, challenging the historical dominance of German brands in their core segments.

    Industry analysts note that the latest quarterly declines are among the most severe recorded by German automakers in modern Chinese market history. For example, Volkswagen Group, which has staked its long-term growth on heavy investment in the Chinese market, reported a 36.6% drop in second-quarter deliveries, totaling 424,300 vehicles. This decline was severe enough to drag the group’s global sales down 8.6% year-on-year, even as Volkswagen recorded delivery growth in both the European and North American markets. In response to the steep drop, Volkswagen has announced plans to cut its existing model lineup by as much as half to streamline operations and cut costs.

    Multiple overlapping factors have driven the slump in sales for foreign automakers. China’s ongoing economic slowdown and prolonged downturn in the property sector have weighed heavily on consumer confidence, pushing many households to delay large-ticket purchases like new vehicles. Within the auto market itself, years of aggressive price competition have put established European brands under severe pressure, as cost-conscious consumers increasingly shift to more affordable models from domestic Chinese manufacturers.

    Official industry data underscores the scale of the market contraction: the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers reports that total domestic passenger vehicle sales fell 24% year-on-year in the first half of the year, dropping to just under 8.3 million units. Global consultancy AlixPartners projects that full-year 2024 light vehicle sales across China will decline by roughly 10% from 2023 levels.

    Beyond weak consumer demand, structural shifts in the Chinese auto market are working against German manufacturers. Unlike domestic Chinese brands, which have prioritized rapid expansion in the fast-growing electric vehicle (EV) segment, German automakers still retain their core strength in conventional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, a segment that is contracting far faster than the overall market in China, where EV sales have outpaced ICE vehicle growth by a wide margin.

    Chinese brands also hold an additional operational advantage: they refresh their model lineups far more frequently than foreign legacy manufacturers, allowing them to respond faster to shifting consumer preferences and introduce new technology at a quicker pace.

    “Foreign automakers are going to have to fight for every share of the market,” Stephen Dyer, Asia-Pacific leader of the automotive practice at AlixPartners, noted in a recent news briefing. Independent auto analyst Lei Xing echoed this assessment, saying, “The German automakers are bearing most of the brunt” of the current market downturn and competitive shift, a sentiment echoed by brand representatives. Porsche, a Volkswagen Group subsidiary, described China’s current market conditions as “challenging” in an official statement, while Mercedes-Benz acknowledged that China is facing “a significantly weaker overall market and macroeconomic environment.”

  • US citizen tests positive for Ebola in Congo

    US citizen tests positive for Ebola in Congo

    KINSHASA, Democratic Republic of Congo – As Central Africa’s largest nation grapples with an expanding and increasingly dangerous Ebola outbreak, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed Friday that an American citizen employed by an international humanitarian organization operating in the country has contracted the virus.

    The CDC announced in a public statement that it has launched a coordinated response alongside the infected worker’s employer, multiple U.S. federal agencies, Congolese national public health officials, and local in-country partners. The primary priorities of the collaboration are to stop secondary spread of the virus and trace every close contact the patient has had since testing positive. No additional personal or clinical details about the case have been released to protect privacy.

    The current outbreak has already carved a grim path across the continent, the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed earlier this week. It is now the fastest-growing Ebola outbreak ever recorded in Africa, with 1,830 confirmed cases reported within Congo’s borders and 648 recorded deaths. The virus has also spilled across national borders, with confirmed cases detected in neighboring Uganda, raising alarms about a wider regional spread.

    This is not the first time an American has been infected during the current outbreak. In the opening week of the crisis, a U.S. doctor working in the country tested positive for Ebola and was evacuated to Germany for specialized medical care.

    Earlier in the response, the Trump administration had announced a policy to evacuate any U.S. citizens exposed to Ebola while working in the region to a new isolation and treatment facility in Kenya, rather than transporting them back to the United States. That plan has since been put on hold, however, after a Kenyan court issued an order suspending the project.

    According to the World Health Organization, Congolese authorities only formally declared the current outbreak on May 15, marking a weeks-long delay in official detection after the virus began spreading silently through communities.

    Adding to the complexity of the crisis, this outbreak is caused by the rare Bundibugyo Ebola virus, a strain for which no officially approved vaccine or targeted treatment currently exists. Containment efforts have been further undermined by a series of overlapping challenges: a critical gap in international funding for the response, repeated violent attacks on health facilities operating in the outbreak zone, and a long-running armed conflict in eastern Congo, where the outbreak is centered.

    Just last week, the first round of clinical therapeutic trials got underway, after researchers launched a long-awaited research study designed to test potential life-saving treatments for the strain.