博客

  • Spanish minister clashes with Israeli diplomat over migrants entering Ceuta

    Spanish minister clashes with Israeli diplomat over migrants entering Ceuta

    A massive unexpected wave of migration into Spain’s North African enclave of Ceuta has ignited not just a humanitarian emergency, but also a sharp diplomatic spat that has pulled Israel into the center of escalating accusations of foreign interference. Over the course of this week, roughly 60,000 migrants, including more than 8,000 children, crossed from Morocco into Ceuta — a small Spanish territory that, alongside the nearby autonomous city of Melilla, forms the only contiguous land border between the European Union and the African continent. Video footage shared widely on social media captured migrants navigating dangerous coastal waters around Ceuta’s border barrier, many clad only in swimsuits and relying on basic flotation devices to complete the risky crossing.

    As of Saturday, Spanish authorities reported that roughly 48,000 of the new arrivals have already been escorted back to Morocco by Spanish military personnel, though lingering tensions remain. Migrants have been spotted hiding in underground tunnels and moving through Ceuta’s residential streets, and humanitarian officials confirm at least 67 people have died attempting the crossing so far. The situation has already sparked ripple effects across the EU: France has moved to ramp up border checks with Spain, while Italy has floated the possibility of suspending Spain from the bloc’s Schengen Area open-border arrangement.

    While the root cause of the sudden migration surge remains unconfirmed, parallels are already being drawn to a 2021 incident, when 8,000 Moroccans entered Ceuta amid a diplomatic breakdown between Rabat and Madrid over the Western Sahara conflict. At that time, Spain accused Morocco of weaponizing migration to gain diplomatic leverage, a claim Rabat implicitly acknowledged by noting it had relaxed border controls in response to the diplomatic dispute. This year, many analysts and political figures point to another recent diplomatic shift: Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s high-profile visit to Algeria, Morocco’s long-standing regional rival and Spain’s largest natural gas supplier, which has left Rabat frustrated with Madrid. Lorenzo Gabrielli, a senior migration researcher at Barcelona’s Pompeu Fabra University, told the New York Times that the scale of the crossing makes Moroccan tacit involvement inevitable. “It is impossible for nearly 50,000 people to cross the border between Morocco and Spain in a single day without Morocco having a hand in it,” Gabrielli said. Morocco’s ambassador to Spain, Karima Benyaich, has pushed back against these claims, insisting Rabat has always prioritized “legal, orderly and safe migration” and that the crossings ran counter to the government’s policy goals.

    What has elevated this local migration crisis into an international diplomatic controversy are widespread claims from Spanish political figures and commentators that Israel and the United States are quietly orchestrating the chaos to punish the current Spanish government for its vocal opposition to Israel’s military campaign in Gaza and US-backed actions against Iran. Spanish Transport Minister Óscar Puente became the first sitting Spanish government official to hint at this narrative after responding to a post on X by Danny Danon, Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations. Danon had used the crisis to mock Spain, which has repeatedly criticized Israeli policy in recent months: “Spain, which never misses an opportunity to lecture Israel, has declared a state of emergency in Ceuta following the crisis over its immigration policy. Maybe before it continues lecturing us, it’s time it explained to the world why it still maintains colonial enclaves in Africa,” Danon wrote. In reply, Puente wrote simply: “Well, it all seems to be becoming quite clear” — a line widely interpreted as confirmation of the interference claims.

    Other Spanish political figures have gone further. Gabriel Rufián, parliamentary spokesperson for the left-wing Catalan Republican Left party, argued publicly that the crisis directly serves American and Israeli strategic interests. Spanish journalist José Vizner also resurfaced a 2019 social media post from Yair Netanyahu, son of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that referenced alleged Israeli support for separatist movements in Ceuta. Even former Portuguese minister and political commentator Bruno Maçães added weight to the claims, noting: “whether or not the US and Israel were involved before the fact, they were deeply involved and intensely active after the fact, especially trying to use it against the current Spanish government.”

    The crisis has even drawn comment from former US President Donald Trump, who framed the Ceuta emergency as a warning of what could come to the United States if he is not returned to office. Calling the situation a “catastrophe,” Trump added that “if we’re not in office our country will be invaded at levels that will make Spain look small time.”

    For the local government in Ceuta, the migration wave is first and foremost a threat to Spanish sovereignty. Ceuta President Juan Jesús Vivas condemned the crossings as a “violation of Spain’s territorial integrity,” as authorities work to bring the emergency under control and address the growing humanitarian toll of the disaster.

  • Italy putting nearly all major cities on highest heat alert

    Italy putting nearly all major cities on highest heat alert

    A sweeping heatwave, fueled by a strengthening North African subtropical anticyclone hovering over the Mediterranean, has pushed most of Italy’s major urban centers into the country’s highest temperature risk category, triggering urgent public health warnings across the continent as wildfires rage through multiple southern European nations.

    Italian health authorities confirmed Saturday that 19 cities stretching from the northern industrial hub of Milan to the southern metropolis of Naples, including the capital Rome and canal city Venice, are already under a red alert for extreme heat. By the start of the coming week, that number will jump to 25 of Italy’s 27 major population centers, leaving only two locations – Reggio Calabria on the southern tip of the Italian mainland and the Sicilian city of Messina – on the second-highest amber warning level.

    Officials stress that the risk of heat-related illness extends beyond traditionally vulnerable groups, which include older adults, infants and young children, and people living with chronic medical conditions. Even healthy, physically active people face dangerous health impacts from the current conditions, they warn. Residents in high-risk areas have been instructed to stay indoors between 11 a.m. and 6 p.m., avoid prolonged exposure to heat and direct sunlight, and maintain steady hydration to prevent heat stroke and other heat-related emergencies.

    Italy’s extreme heat alert comes as a cascade of overlapping heatwaves across the continent has created tinder-dry conditions ideal for the spread of destructive wildfires. Across Greece, France, Portugal and Spain, thousands of firefighters are working around the clock to contain blazes that have already burned hundreds of thousands of hectares of land.

    In southeastern France, local authorities reported Friday evening that a wildfire that had been contained for several days reignited in the Var region, forcing the evacuation of roughly 2,500 residents and visitors. In the southwestern Gironde region, by contrast, a large wildfire that displaced hundreds of thousands of people has finally been brought under control, allowing roughly 200,000 evacuated residents to return to their homes over the weekend.

    In Greece, hundreds of people, the majority of whom were traveling tourists, were evacuated by sea from the coastal town of Viotia after wildfires surrounded the area, cutting off overland escape routes. EU climate data shows that 2026 is already on track to be an unprecedented year for wildfire damage across the Iberian Peninsula: Spain has seen more than 200,000 hectares of land burned by August, a total roughly five times the average amount burned over the same period in a typical year. Portugal has also recorded far more burned area than the seasonal average.

    The cascading extreme weather events align with long-term climate trends documented by leading scientific bodies. The Copernicus Climate Change Service confirms that climate change is driving global temperature increases, and Europe is warming faster than any other continent – heating at twice the rate of the global average. This accelerated warming has triggered a steady rise in the frequency and intensity of summer heatwaves, increased strain on regional water supplies, and created more favorable conditions for large, destructive wildfires across the continent.

  • Lorena Wiebes wins opening stage of Women’s Tour de France

    Lorena Wiebes wins opening stage of Women’s Tour de France

    The fifth edition of the prestigious Women’s Tour de France kicked off in dramatic fashion on Saturday, with Dutch cycling star Lorena Wiebes of the SD Worx-Protime squad claiming the opening stage win on the roads surrounding Switzerland’s Lausanne.

    The opening 137-kilometer route, which started and finished in the heart of Lausanne, treated spectators and competitors alike to stunning Alpine scenery, with the peloton winding past two glacial lakes set against the backdrop of the snow-dusted Swiss Alps. By the final sprint to the line, Wiebes outmatched the field to take the first yellow jersey of this year’s race, with Luxembourg’s Kim Le Court crossing just behind in second place.

    Third place went to pre-race favorite Demi Vollering, who has already notched multiple major victories this season, including an overall win at the women’s Giro d’Italia. Vollering’s late attack forced Wiebes to make a tough chase, setting up one of the most dramatic opening stage sprints in recent race history.

    In a post-race interview, an elated Wiebes shared her surprise at the result: “I can’t believe it. The entire SD Worx-Protime team worked incredibly hard to put me in this position. When Demi attacked, I immediately knew I had to stick with her. That sprint felt like it went on forever, but I’m so proud we pulled this off.”

    Notable finishers in the opening stage include last year’s overall winner, French rider Pauline Ferrand-Prévôt, who crossed the line in eighth place, while Vuelta champion Paula Blasi claimed 12th position overall.

    Over the next eight days, riders will compete across a total 1,175-kilometer route that travels from Switzerland into southern France. The race’s most challenging test comes on Friday, when competitors will tackle the iconic climb of Mont Ventoux, before the overall winner is crowned in Nice on the French Riviera on the final Sunday. The opening of the women’s race comes one week after Slovenian cycling great Tadej Pogačar secured his fifth overall title at the men’s Tour de France, wrapping up the men’s competition last weekend.

  • US embassies urge citizens to consider departing Middle East

    US embassies urge citizens to consider departing Middle East

    On Saturday, diplomatic missions of the United States across multiple Middle Eastern capitals issued a rare, sweeping security alert urging American citizens currently residing or traveling in the region to prepare for potential evacuation amid growing fears of unanticipated regional conflict escalation. The public warning, published simultaneously on official online channels of US embassies in Bahrain, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, came just 24 hours after former US President Donald Trump threatened that Iran would face “very hard” retaliation for recent escalatory actions.

    Open hostilities between the United States and Iran have been ongoing since February 28 this year. While a temporary ceasefire brought a brief period of reduced violence to the region, that truce collapsed in recent weeks as both sides resumed targeted strikes. For months, the open conflict has upended daily life for civilian populations across the Middle East and sent shockwaves through global energy markets, with no clear diplomatic offramp to de-escalation in sight.

    “Americans in the region should consider departing, or be prepared to depart should there be escalation,” the joint security alert stated. Beyond the general call for evacuation preparedness, embassies urged citizens to confirm the status of commercial flight bookings continuously and comply with all safety guidance issued by local host government authorities. The warning also noted that travelers should anticipate widespread travel disruptions, including sudden flight cancellations, temporary airspace closures, and unplanned interruptions to ground transit networks.

    Targeted guidance was issued for citizens in specific hotspots: Americans in Jordan were instructed to avoid all US military bases in the country, which have recently come under Iranian missile attack, while those in Israel were told to locate and familiarize themselves with the nearest bomb shelter. In a post on its official platform, the US Embassy in Jerusalem highlighted the unpredictability of the Iranian government, pointing to recent unprompted attacks on regional targets and the expansion of strikes to previously unaffected areas such as Egypt. The US Embassy in Beirut added that Lebanon remains under “ordered departure status” for US mission personnel, meaning non-emergency diplomatic staff have already been relocated outside the country.

    Iran swiftly pushed back against the US warnings Saturday, accusing Washington of intentionally inflaming regional tensions. In a statement carried by Iranian state television, Ali Abdollahi, head of Iran’s military central command, warned that any nation that offers itself as a defensive shield for what he called “criminal and aggressive America” will be consumed by the conflict. Mohammad Mokhber, an adviser to Iran’s supreme leader, issued an additional warning against any US strikes on Iranian critical infrastructure.

    “You calculate through military equations, but we respond with the logic of history,” Mokhber wrote on the social platform X. “Attacking Iran’s infrastructure directly awakens the fault lines on which 250 years of your hegemonic architecture have been built.”

    Overnight exchanges of fire between US and Iranian forces resumed last month following a days-long lull in fighting, though no strikes were reported between Friday night and Saturday morning. The rising tension comes on the heels of two recent maritime incidents that have further raised alarm: On Wednesday, a drone attack hit a US-owned gas tanker moored in an Egyptian port, sparking a large fire. Egyptian authorities are still investigating the attack and have not yet publicly named a perpetrator. Separately, a British maritime agency reported Saturday that an “unknown projectile” struck an oil tanker off the coast of Oman, as the US and Iran remain locked in a standoff over control of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical chokepoints for global energy trade.

    Since the outbreak of hostilities on February 28, Iran has asserted de facto control over commercial navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, requiring all transiting vessels to secure official permission and pay mandatory transit fees to access the waterway. Data from maritime trade analytics firm Kpler, published Friday, shows that commercial traffic through the strait has dropped “sharply” amid the heightened risk. “With US and Iranian public positions still at odds, operators are closely monitoring traffic volumes, routing behaviour and any diplomatic developments that could reshape risk across regional shipping lanes in the days ahead,” the firm noted in a post on X.

    The broader regional conflict erupted when the United States and Israel launched joint opening strikes against Iran, which responded with widespread missile and drone attacks targeting positions across the Middle East. On the Lebanese front Saturday, the Israeli military announced it had killed three Hezbollah fighters in southern Lebanon during an operation, while one Israeli soldier sustained moderate injuries in a close-quarters engagement with Hezbollah militants.

  • Current Ebola outbreak worst ever in DR Congo, WHO says

    Current Ebola outbreak worst ever in DR Congo, WHO says

    The World Health Organization has confirmed that the ongoing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has become the largest in the nation’s recorded history, with case numbers continuing to climb at an alarming rate months after the outbreak was first declared.

    As of July 30 this year, national and global health authorities have documented 3,605 confirmed Ebola infections, with 1,587 people dying from the virus – putting the current fatality rate at 44 percent. This outbreak, which was officially announced on May 15, 2026, is driven by the Bundibugyo strain of Ebola, and has already exceeded the size of the previous largest DRC outbreak recorded between 2018 and 2020, which registered just under 3,500 total cases. That earlier outbreak, caused by a different strain, recorded roughly 2,300 fatalities.

    Unlike more widely studied Ebola strains, there are currently no formally approved vaccines or targeted treatments available for the Bundibugyo variant, a gap that has made controlling the outbreak far more challenging. However, research teams in the United Kingdom and Singapore are actively advancing candidate vaccine development, with the WHO naming a candidate being developed in Singapore as the most promising for rapid deployment. Clinical trials for a second potential vaccine have already launched in the UK.

    In a public statement posted to the social platform X, the WHO warned that the outbreak is intensifying, with sustained community transmission driving consistent increases in both new cases and deaths. In the seven days leading up to July 30, the outbreak hit a new grim milestone: 567 new confirmed cases and 296 deaths, the highest weekly caseload recorded since the outbreak began. WHO officials noted that these numbers highlight the exceptional speed at which the virus is spreading through vulnerable populations.

    Multiple overlapping challenges are severely hampering international and local response efforts, health officials say. The outbreak is centered in DRC’s northeastern Ituri Province, which shares borders with South Sudan and Uganda. It has since spread to neighboring North and South Kivu provinces, large swathes of which are controlled by the M23 armed group, a militia supported by Rwanda. Chronic insecurity, mass population displacement from conflict zones, unregulated cross-border movement, and limited access to affected communities have all combined to slow emergency response work and raise the risk of the virus spreading further afield.

    To date, the outbreak has crossed international borders: 20 confirmed cases have been recorded in Uganda, one case has been reported in France, and two Congolese patients have been transferred to Germany for treatment. Over the past half-century, Ebola – which spreads through direct contact with infected bodily fluids – has killed more than 15,000 people across the African continent, with most major outbreaks concentrated in Central Africa.

  • Trump threatens to revive controversial $1.8bn compensation fund as standoff with Senate Republicans deepens

    Trump threatens to revive controversial $1.8bn compensation fund as standoff with Senate Republicans deepens

    A high-stakes partisan standoff has erupted between former president and current U.S. President Donald Trump and two Senate Republican incumbents over the confirmation of his attorney general nominee, with Trump threatening to bring back a scrapped, ethically questioned $1.8 billion compensation fund for his political allies if the lawmakers block the nomination.

    Todd Blanche, who has served as acting attorney general since April, requires unanimous support from all Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee to move his confirmation forward to a full Senate vote. But two outgoing Republican senators — John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, whose current terms both end in January — have refused to throw their support behind Blanche, citing their deep opposition to the potential resurrection of Trump’s so-called anti-weaponisation fund.

    In a public post to his social platform Truth Social Saturday, Trump hit back at the two holdout senators, claiming their opposition stems from his refusal to endorse their re-election campaigns. The president warned that if the pair blocks Blanche’s nomination, the dormant compensation fund will immediately be reintroduced and enacted. He added that even if confirmation is derailed, he will retain Blanche as acting attorney general and continue pushing aggressively to pass formal legislation authorizing the fund.

    First proposed earlier this year, the fund was designed to settle a personal lawsuit Trump brought against the Internal Revenue Service over the unauthorized leak of his confidential tax returns. Under the original proposal, allies of the president would be eligible to claim compensation for what they frame as politically targeted prosecutions carried out by prior U.S. administrations. The plan drew immediate bipartisan backlash from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle over its ethical implications, leading Blanche — who led original negotiations for the fund — to scrap the proposal. A federal judge later formally blocked the fund, issuing a ruling that raised clear concerns the initiative violated federal ethical guidelines.

    Cornyn and Tillis have demanded that Blanche provide a written commitment that the U.S. Department of Justice will not revive the fund at any point in the future. To date, the Trump administration has refused to issue such a guarantee, escalating the deadlock.

    Responding to Trump’s Saturday threats on social platform X, Tillis pushed back against the president’s reversal on the fund’s status. He noted that just one day prior, the administration had publicly stated the fund was permanently dead. “President Trump clearly intends to resurrect the payout pot for punks either by inappropriately establishing another bogus fund or pushing Congress to vote for a bill that the majority of Republicans in the Senate would be against,” Tillis wrote. He added that it is regrettable that Blanche, who he personally considers qualified to hold the attorney general post, will see his nomination stall over this policy reversal, but expressed hope the impasse could be resolved before the committee’s scheduled vote Tuesday.

    The Senate Judiciary Committee has scheduled a procedural meeting for Tuesday to hold a potential vote on advancing Blanche’s nomination. The BBC has reached out to Cornyn’s office for additional comment on the standoff, but has not yet received a response.

    Despite acknowledging during a Friday cabinet meeting at Camp David that the fund was currently “dead”, Trump made clear that the initiative remains a top policy priority for his administration. The president told reporters that he continues to support compensation for individuals he claims were wrongfully targeted and abused by the U.S. Department of Justice under previous leadership. “I think people are horribly treated. Horribly abused,” Trump said. “I’d like to see them compensated for the pain. People they were very successful that wanted to go to a rally or an event…ended up spending the rest of their lives in horror. They’ve agreed to not have a fund, but there are a lot of people that are very set about it.”

    Even as outgoing lame-duck lawmakers, Cornyn and Tillis have become unexpected obstacles to Trump’s policy and personnel agenda, despite Trump’s public claims that he has already ended their political careers. Tillis first drew the president’s anger when he opposed Trump’s signature “One, Big, Beautiful” tax and spending package, while Cornyn — a long-time Trump ally — broke with the president after Trump endorsed his Republican primary challenger, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

  • Colombia’s deforestation rises slightly as Amazon forest loss holds steady

    Colombia’s deforestation rises slightly as Amazon forest loss holds steady

    BOGOTA, COLOMBIA — As the administration of Colombian President Gustavo Petro prepares to hand over power to a new government next week, the country’s top environmental and climate agencies have released long-awaited 2025 nationwide deforestation data that paints a mixed picture of progress on the president’s signature Amazon conservation agenda.

    Data released late Friday by the Colombian Environment Ministry and the Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and Environmental Studies (IDEAM) shows the country lost 119,483 hectares (roughly 295,000 acres) of forest cover in 2025 — an area roughly equal to the entire land area of the city of Los Angeles. This marks a 5% uptick in deforestation compared to 2024 levels.

    Despite the small annual increase, the outgoing administration has highlighted that it still far outpaced its four-year national deforestation reduction goal. Compared to the 2021 baseline year when Petro took office, total annual forest loss is down 31% — exceeding the administration’s target of cutting deforestation by at least 20% from 2021 levels.

    The new numbers, however, also underline a persistent challenge: after achieving dramatic, record-breaking reductions in deforestation in 2023, the country has struggled to maintain those gains. Forest loss rose 43% in 2024, erasing much of the prior year’s progress, and while the pace of growth slowed sharply in 2025, total deforestation remains well above the historic low recorded two years ago.

    Pressure on the Colombian Amazon, which holds more than 60% of the country’s total forest cover, has stayed largely unchanged. More than 65% of all 2025 forest loss occurred in the Amazon biome, with 77,805 hectares cleared this year — only a marginal 681-hectare increase from 2024. Government monitors identified 10 active deforestation hot spots concentrated in the northwestern Amazon, clustered in the country’s long-troubled “arc of deforestation” — a swathe of remote rainforest that saw a surge in illegal activity after the 2016 peace deal with the FARC guerrilla group left a power vacuum in isolated border regions. The municipalities with the highest deforestation rates in 2025 were Cartagena del Chaira in Caquetá, Mapiripán in Meta, San Vicente del Caguán in Caquetá, and Calamar in Guaviare — all located within this high-risk zone, where illegal land grabbing, unregulated cattle ranching, and informal infrastructure expansion have remained the primary drivers of forest clearing.

    On a more positive note, the data shows deforestation inside Colombia’s protected national parks fell nearly 19% year-over-year, dropping to 9,388 hectares. Officials credited this progress to community-focused conservation programs that pay local residents to protect forest cover, large-scale landscape restoration projects, and the country’s first forestry concession, which grants rural communities long-term legal rights to sustainably manage public forest lands.

    Outgoing Environment Minister Irene Vélez framed the 2025 results as a product of shifted policy approaches, including closer collaboration with rural communities, expanded financial incentives for conservation, and a move away from past policies that criminalized small-scale farmers. She also highlighted a recent high-impact investigation in Mapiripán that led to the arrest of 17 people linked to a criminal network engaged in illegal land grabbing, deforestation, and unregulated cattle ranching. Officials reiterated that the core drivers of national deforestation remain illegal land seizure, expansion of extensive cattle ranching, and unplanned road construction — not coca cultivation, which has long been the focus of Colombia’s national anti-drug strategies.

    Petro made protecting the Amazon a central pillar of his presidential environmental agenda, and his administration passed a landmark cattle traceability law designed to block beef produced on illegally cleared forest land from entering domestic and global supply chains.

    The release of the 2025 data followed weeks of public criticism from incoming Environment Minister Fabio Arjona, who accused the outgoing Petro administration of deliberately delaying publication on the social platform X, claiming the government hid the numbers because it knew the “scenario is tragic.”

    The newly released figures set a clear benchmark for the incoming administration of President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella, who has already announced plans to expand oil and mining development across the country and review many of Petro’s signature environmental policies.

  • UEFA target Infantino after FIFA shelve World Cup private investment plan

    UEFA target Infantino after FIFA shelve World Cup private investment plan

    Gianni Infantino, the embattled president of global football governing body FIFA, has failed to defuse rising tensions over his leadership despite announcing the withdrawal of a deeply divisive plan to bring private investment into World Cup operations on Saturday. The controversial proposal, which sparked widespread backlash across international football’s governing bodies, was first unveiled to stakeholders earlier that week, and the decision to scrap it marks a humiliating reversal for the FIFA leader just 12 months before he was expected to cruise to an unopposed final third term.

    FIFA’s original initiative would have established a new commercial subsidiary, FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), to manage flagship competitions including the men’s World Cup and Club World Cup. The governing body framed the plan as a transformative funding play, projecting that a private investment stake could unlock as much as $4.2 billion in new capital based on a $20 billion valuation of the new entity. If approved, the windfall would have delivered a one-off $20 million payment to each of FIFA’s 211 member associations by early 2027, and nearly tripled core funding allocations for the 2027-2030 cycle from $8 million to $20 million per member.

    But the proposal drew immediate and fierce pushback from European football’s governing body UEFA, which had threatened to boycott all FIFA competitions if the plan moved forward. Even after Infantino backed down, UEFA doubled down on its criticism, issuing a blistering statement that the 56-year-old Swiss executive had lost the confidence of UEFA and a wide swath of the global football family over what it called a “shabby, back room, opaque deal.”

    The rebuke comes less than two weeks after Infantino celebrated the widely praised 2026 World Cup, the first edition of the tournament expanded to 48 teams and co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico. UEFA argued that Infantino has broken core commitments he made when he was first elected FIFA president in 2016: to run the organization with full transparency, and to uphold the principle that FIFA’s financial assets belong to its member associations, not the sitting president.

    “On both these promises, he has failed to deliver,” UEFA said in its statement. “The shabby, back room, opaque deal he hatched and tried to force through were anything but transparent. And with reserves standing at over $5bn, he has also failed to use associations’ money for the benefit of the game.”

    Other continental confederations echoed the criticism, albeit in more measured terms. The Asian Football Confederation (AFC), which represents 47 member nations across Asia and Oceania, said any major change affecting global football must be “presented and discussed with the Confederations, the FIFA Council, Member Associations and other stakeholders in a timely, transparent and meaningful manner.” The confederation of North American, Central American and Caribbean football (CONCACAF) — which counts the 2026 World Cup co-hosts the U.S., Canada and Mexico among its members — also joined the condemnation of the original plan.

    UEFA’s sharp opening salvo was followed by equally blunt statements from two of Europe’s most powerful national football associations. England’s Football Association called for “a full and robust review of FIFA’s leadership and governance to ensure that the global game is run transparently.” The German Football Association (DFB) pushed for sweeping cultural reform at FIFA’s highest levels. “Together with UEFA and other confederations, we must ensure that a fundamentally different culture takes hold at FIFA — a culture where, above all, decisions are once again discussed and made by members within the governing bodies,” the DFB said.

    In his official statement announcing the plan’s cancellation, Infantino framed the proposal as a well-intentioned effort to deliver greater resources to member associations, noting that it was never intended to proceed without majority support from stakeholders. “Having listened carefully to all the views, it has become clear that the project has created divisions of a nature that, regardless of the level of support, are no longer in the interest of the objective set out in the first place,” he said.

    The beleaguered FIFA president added that he would now prioritize repairing rifts within the global football community and continuing efforts to grow the sport worldwide. “Moving forward, my intent is to bring all interested parties back together in the coming days and weeks in the spirit of shared interest in our game, and with the objective to continue growing football everywhere, particularly in those countries that mostly need our support,” he said.

  • Venezuelans watch a new round of talks between the government and opposition with cautious optimism

    Venezuelans watch a new round of talks between the government and opposition with cautious optimism

    CARACAS – As Venezuelan stakeholders prepare to launch a new round of U.S.-facilitated reconciliation dialogue between the country’s ruling party and opposition this Saturday, the nation is holding its collective breath, holding cautious optimism after four prior negotiation cycles collapsed without delivering the political unity the country has long craved. This latest round of talks arrives in an unprecedented political context: just months after U.S. forces captured former longtime president Nicolás Maduro, and the negotiations are framed around two core goals: entrenching democratic governance and restoring fundamental civil liberties after nearly 30 years of socialist leadership.

    Leading the discussions are delegates from Venezuela’s current National Assembly, which holds a heavy pro-government majority, alongside a cohort of former opposition legislators who previously organized efforts to remove Maduro from power. U.S. officials have clarified their role will be limited to facilitation, not direct control of the process.

    For ordinary Venezuelans like 58-year-old homemaker Soraida Martínez, the stakes of these talks could not be higher. “I hope those in government finally understand that we cannot move forward with the same arbitrary actions of the past; they have to respect the agreements they sign,” Martínez said. “Both sides have to give ground for the good of this country.”

    Saturday’s opening session comes nearly seven weeks after an initial exploratory meeting in Caracas between Jorge Rodríguez, president of the National Assembly and brother of current acting president Delcy Rodríguez, and Dinorah Figuera, a former opposition lawmaker who made her first return to Venezuela in nearly eight years of exile. In 2023, Figuera was selected to represent opposition legislators from the 2015 National Assembly, a body widely recognized as Venezuela’s last democratically elected legislative body. She has echoed the Trump administration’s framing that the top priority is building an institutional agenda that prioritizes national interests over the competing goals of individual political factions.

    Following the capture of Maduro and his wife by U.S. forces, the Trump administration laid out a three-phase roadmap for Venezuela: stabilization, post-disaster and economic recovery, and full democratic transition. On the eve of the opening talks, the U.S. State Department emphasized that Washington has no intention of dictating the terms of Venezuela’s upcoming electoral process, acknowledging the unique challenges of organizing a vote while the country continues to recover from a pair of devastating earthquakes that killed thousands in late June.

    “Our role is to help facilitate, not dictate, a reconciliation process that lets the will of the Venezuelan people be fully expressed,” the State Department said in a statement. The department outlined its core priorities for the talks: encouraging all political factions to shift from protest-based organizing to formal institutional political participation, advancing protections for a free and independent media, building an impartial, transparent electoral council, and guaranteeing the safety and security of all polling locations and voters. “This process will require time and patience,” the statement added.

    Negotiators from both sides have also framed the talks as an opportunity to rally national unity in the wake of the June 24 earthquakes, which the latest official data confirms killed more than 5,500 people, injured more than 16,700, and left more than 20,000 Venezuelans homeless.

    Even with the collapse of four previous dialogue efforts between 2017 and 2024, a large majority of Venezuelan voters hold out hope for a positive outcome from this round, a shift driven by the country’s entirely new political landscape following Maduro’s ouster and the new U.S.-backed framework for talks. Many Venezuelans believe that even a limited, incremental agreement could meaningfully improve daily life across the country.

    Still, political analysts warn that a full transition to stable democracy remains a long-term goal, with a free, fair election unlikely to materialize in the near term. Setting a binding electoral timeline and establishing the conditions for a legitimate vote does not appear feasible in the immediate future, they argue.

    John Magdaleno, a political consultant and professor at Caracas’ Andrés Bello Catholic University, notes that democratic transition does not start with the opening of a dialogue session. “It begins with the recognition and restoration of guarantees that have been violated for years,” he said. For Magdaleno, the first non-negotiable step is restoring core civil liberties and political rights: freedom of expression, press freedom, freedom of assembly and association, the inviolability of private communications, and all other basic human rights guarantees that have been eroded over decades of authoritarian rule.

    Associated Press reporter Matthew Lee contributed reporting from Washington, D.C.

  • After Israel killed her three sons, she found hope in a newborn. Then he was killed too

    After Israel killed her three sons, she found hope in a newborn. Then he was killed too

    Deep in the al-Bureij refugee camp in central Gaza, 15-month-old Zaid Nofal lay sleeping in the sweltering pre-dawn darkness of a Gaza summer. Without a blanket to combat the oppressive heat, the toddler had been left by an open window to catch what little breeze stirred the humid air at 3 a.m. That quiet, ordinary moment was shattered in an instant when an Israeli airstrike slammed into the family’s home, burying Zaid beneath the crumbled concrete of what had just been a place of refuge.

    Just meters from the collapsed rubble, Zaid’s 38-year-old mother Fatima Nofal stood frozen in disbelief, her clothes stained with blood and dust as neighbors screamed around her. For the Palestinian mother, this was not an entirely new horror. Zaid was the fourth son she had lost to Israeli violence, three older boys having been killed in a separate attack just two years prior. This home, partially destroyed in earlier conflict, had only just been rebuilt after a ceasefire was announced in October 2025.

    “I still haven’t processed what happened. I remain in a state of profound shock,” Nofal told Middle East Eye in an interview from hospital, where she is recovering from burns to her feet. “All I remember is waking up just minutes before the strike. I moved to another spot because of the severe heat, leaving my little Zaid by the window so the breeze could help him sleep.”

    Wounded in the blast, Nofal refused to evacuate before rescuers found her son. Neighbors poured in to help, slowly shifting piles of concrete and debris to reach the trapped toddler. When they finally pulled Zaid out, wrapped in a thin blanket, he was already dead. The attack reopened old wounds that had barely begun to scab over: the trauma of October 13, 2023, when an earlier Israeli airstrike took the lives of her three other sons.

    That strike came early in the war that has ravaged Gaza since October 2023. Back then, Nofal and her family had fled their original home in al-Bureij, convinced they would find safety in the al-Sawarha area of the coastal town al-Zawaida, far from the border. “We realised the gravity of the situation and decided to flee because we thought it would be safer than staying near the border,” she recalled. “But we never imagined that the place we went to for safety would become where I’d witness the killing of my three sons and most of my husband’s family.”

    That attack killed 16-year-old Amin, 11-year-old Hamza, and Ahmed, her newborn son who was just 22 days old. Nofal and her two young daughters were wounded, their home destroyed, forcing them into the cycle of repeated displacement that has defined life for nearly every Palestinian in Gaza over the past two years.

    Ten months after she buried her three older boys, a glimmer of hope cut through the darkness: Nofal discovered she was pregnant. When she learned she was carrying another boy, her quiet hope grew into profound joy. Zaid was born on April 16, 2025, born into a war that never ended, but for his family he was more than a baby — he was a chance to fill the gaping hole left by the children they had lost.

    “Zaid’s birth was the most significant event in our lives during the war,” Nofal said. “His arrival brought immense joy to the whole family; everyone celebrated him as a small miracle that came to light up our lives after long months and nights of pain and tears.” When relatives suggested naming him after one of his late brothers, Nofal refused. “I wanted him to have his own name and his own destiny,” she explained.

    In the 15 months of his short life, Zaid became the beating heart of the home. His two sisters adored him, never wanting to be apart. “Whenever I took him to the clinic for vaccinations or check-ups, his sisters would wait for him on the stairs. They could not bear being away from him, even for a few hours,” Nofal said.

    The latest airstrike that killed Zaid also left Nofal’s family fractured once more. Her eldest daughter Baraa suffered minor injuries, but 15-month-old Lina, her youngest daughter, is still hospitalized with head trauma. “When I visited her, the first thing she asked about was Zaid. I could not bring myself to tell her the truth while she was still wounded. I told her he was fine and waiting for her,” Nofal said, her voice heavy with unspoken grief. “I don’t know how I will tell her the truth when she is discharged.”

    Nofal’s grief is compounded by the stolen childhood Zaid never got to live. “On the day he was killed, he was restless in the afternoon and wanted to go outside. I told his sisters how much I wished I could take him out, but there are no places left for children to play,” she said. “He spent his whole life indoors. Even his cousins had been killed in Israeli air strikes, so he had no one to play with.”

    Zaid’s death is far from an isolated tragedy. Despite a ceasefire agreement reached in October 2025 that was meant to end the two-year war in Gaza, Israel has continued to carry out near-daily airstrikes across the besieged enclave. Official counts put the death toll from Israeli strikes at more than 1,200 people since the ceasefire took effect 10 months ago, with a total of more than 73,000 Palestinians killed since the war began in October 2023.

    Children have borne the brunt of this ongoing violence. The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) reported in June that roughly 260 children have been killed in Gaza since the ceasefire began — an average of one child killed every day. UNICEF spokesperson James Elder called the situation a “cruel and deadly illusion of a ceasefire.”

    On the same day Zaid was killed, another child lost her life in a separate Israeli strike: nine-year-old Ratil al-Abadla died when a bomb hit her uncle’s tent in al-Mawasi, where she had traveled just two days earlier for a brief break from the horrors of war. A video of her father, Abdullah al-Abadla, holding her small body and asking what his daughter had done to deserve such a fate spread rapidly across social media, a searing reminder of the pain shared by thousands of Gaza families.

    The United Nations’ independent commission of inquiry has already confirmed it found clear evidence that Israeli forces have deliberately targeted Palestinian children, noting that these actions form part of the pattern of conduct that led the commission to conclude Israel has committed acts of genocide in Gaza.

    For Nofal, however, no official report or global condemnation can bring back her four sons. As she divides her time between recovering from her own injuries and sitting by her injured daughter’s hospital bed, she now faces two new overwhelming struggles: finding a new place to call home after her house was destroyed once more, and finding the words to tell Lina that her baby brother will never come home.

    “Israel is intent on killing us, and it needs no justification to do so,” Nofal said. “The fire is burning in my chest, and I do not know who will extinguish it.”