博客

  • ‘They almost killed my child’: Women in Syria’s Roj camp describe night of gunfire and fear

    ‘They almost killed my child’: Women in Syria’s Roj camp describe night of gunfire and fear

    On a Friday evening in northeastern Syria, gunfire rang out across the sprawling Roj detention camp, a facility that holds thousands of foreign women and children linked to suspected Islamic State fighters, leaving detainees trapped in a night of terror that has renewed global scrutiny of the camp’s long-troubled conditions. Multiple firsthand testimonies collected by Middle East Eye (MEE) confirm that Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) opened fire during a confrontation with protesting detainees, with bullets piercing through fabric tents where children were sheltering. While no casualties were reported in the incident, detainees describe widespread psychological trauma from the episode, which capped off several days of peaceful demonstrations by camp residents demanding an end to systemic abuse and urgent repatriation to their home countries.

    MEE has verified visual and audio evidence from inside the camp, including footage showing the immediate aftermath of the clash: scenes of panicked women and children fleeing for cover, and recordings capturing the crack of gunfire echoing across the facility. The unrest was not spontaneous: it grew out of months of escalating mistreatment, culminating in an early-week night raid where guards beat a Russian detainee who refused to surrender her personal cash and mobile phone, according to Dalal, a Bosnian detainee who requested anonymity for her safety. Dalal, who has been held in the camp since 2017 with her two children after her husband was killed in the conflict, said the violent assault was the final breaking point for residents who had endured repeated night raids, arbitrary beatings, and theft of personal belongings for years.

    “That night they hit her so hard that it echoed through the camp,” Dalal told MEE. “That night the women gathered their courage for the first time, and everyone came out to see what was happening. Since then we haven’t let them enter the camp.”

    According to multiple accounts, the Friday confrontation unfolded around 6 p.m., when SDF personnel entered the camp in armored vehicles and set up a defensive cordon on the camp’s main road. When curious women gathered to question the incursion, they were ordered to return to their tents immediately. Tensions boiled over when detainees challenged the SDF’s presence, leading forces to open fire, detainees say. Hoda Muthana, a high-profile detainee held in Roj, told MEE that the entire incident was a deliberate provocation designed for propaganda purposes.

    “The Kurds provoked the women for their own propaganda. The women then reacted, and the Kurds began to shoot in the air, but one soldier shot through the tent,” Muthana said. The bullet passed through a neighboring tent belonging to an Indonesian family before coming within feet of Muthana’s own young son, who had been lying in his tent at the time. “If the shot had been one or two feet lower, it would have hit my child,” she added. “I couldn’t move from fear. We were only a few feet apart. They almost killed my child.”

    Muthana and other detainees accuse the SDF of orchestrating the clash to frame the camp’s residents as dangerous and radical, in order to justify their continued detention and deter international pressure for repatriation. She said soldiers recorded the women’s panicked reactions on their mobile phones to craft a false narrative for international audiences. “The administration in Roj camp is propaganda con artists,” she said. “They are always thinking of ways to make us look inhumane and radical so the public and governments don’t sympathize with us.” Muthana added that the stand-off lasted roughly four hours, and several women who were closest to the guards were beaten during the clash.

    One anonymous detainee, who spoke to MEE on condition of anonymity for security reasons, emphasized that the women who confronted the SDF were unarmed and overwhelmingly vulnerable, with many suffering from untreated chronic illnesses and injuries. “Those moms in the camp, the majority are sick – no medical attention for years – or [have] had injuries from before, overweight and unarmed,” she said. “All they do is just gather to protect a child and to speak with the soldiers.” She described the wave of fear that swept through the camp after gunfire broke out, noting that her 7-year-old daughter ran to hide under a plastic chair, and that decades of conflict and prolonged detention have left nearly all camp residents living with post-traumatic stress disorder. “It’s a moment you can’t control, especially when your whole family is already living with PTSD,” she said. “We are humans, and those innocent children have rights too. For a decade we’ve been seeing our children live in extreme danger. Please react before it’s too late.”

    Detainees link the recent escalation of tensions to shifting political dynamics in northeastern Syria, as the Syrian government in Damascus gradually reasserts its authority over regions previously controlled by Kurdish-led forces. Many detainees believe that Kurdish-led administration officials are venting their frustration over the political transition on the vulnerable camp population. “I can tell the PKK [Kurdish Workers Party] and YPJ [Women’s Protection Units] are extremely angry with the coalition and the new government, and they take it out on unarmed, sick women and children,” one detainee told MEE.

    Muthana echoed that analysis, arguing that the incident was deliberately staged to reinforce a narrative that justifies the SDF’s continued control of the camp. “They want to provoke us to create reactions, and these reactions are then shown to countries or the Syrian government to keep us under their control,” she said. She also condemned what she described as the collective punishment of all detainees, regardless of their individual circumstances. “The Kurds use a blanket judgement on us all and treat us inhumanely because they believe we came here to commit genocide against their people. I was 20 when I came to Syria and had never even heard of the Kurdish race before. Many younger women have said the same,” she said.

    This is not the first reported incident of SDF forces opening fire on detainees at Roj. Human Rights Watch documented a nearly identical incident in January of this year, when security forces fired weapons in the air outside a detainee’s tent and forced women out into freezing temperatures.

    Located in Syria’s Hasakah province near the Iraqi border, Roj camp is administered by the Democratic Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria and guarded by the SDF. It currently holds roughly 2,300 detainees, most of them foreign women and children who are relatives of suspected IS fighters, and became the country’s primary detention facility for this population after the larger al-Hol camp was dissolved in January. A 2024 report from Sweden-based advocacy group Repatriate the Children, which drew on testimony from more than 40 detainees between January and May, found that human rights violations inside the camp had increased “significantly in both frequency and severity” since the start of the year. Rights groups have repeatedly raised alarms about conditions at Roj and called for urgent international intervention to resolve the crisis.

    As the Syrian government works to expand its control across northeastern Syria, most detainees in Roj say they now view Damascus as their best path out of unbearable conditions, and overwhelmingly support a transfer of authority for the camp to the Syrian state. “If the devil offered us a safe haven away from the Kurds, we would take it,” Muthana said. “All we want is to go home and be with our families.”

    MEE reached out to the SDF for comment on the incident ahead of publication, but received no response by the time of reporting.

  • Israeli finance minister calls for building settlements near Gaza amid ongoing Israeli offensive

    Israeli finance minister calls for building settlements near Gaza amid ongoing Israeli offensive

    Against a backdrop of unrelenting Israeli military operations across Gaza and the occupied West Bank — violations of a ceasefire deal reached last October — Israel’s far-right Finance Minister and head of the country’s Settlements Administration Bezalel Smotrich announced a provocative push on Sunday for three new Israeli settlements to be built along Gaza’s northern border fence.

    In a public post on the social platform X, Smotrich openly called on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to immediately greenlight the proposal. “The Settlements Administration under my leadership is prepared to establish 3 settlements in the northern sector of the Gaza Strip, and I call on the Prime Minister to give the green light to the move,” Smotrich wrote.

    The far-right leader framed the plan as part of a broader push to “return” Israelis to communities evacuated in 2005, when then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon implemented a unilateral disengagement plan that withdrew all Israeli military forces and settlers from the Gaza Strip, dismantling every Israeli settlement in the enclave alongside four additional settlements in the occupied West Bank. Smotrich added that the expansion would extend far beyond Gaza, with a wave of new settlement construction planned for the occupied West Bank’s northern Samaria region. “Alongside the four settlements to which we are returning, we will establish a long line of new settlements in northern Samaria. On Mount Ebal, in the Dothan Valley, and in more than 10 additional points, we will strengthen and fortify the settlement,” he said.

    Smotrich’s announcement comes as the death toll from ongoing Israeli attacks continues to climb, even after the October 2024 ceasefire entered into force. Data from Gaza’s Palestinian Ministry of Health, released over the weekend, recorded six Palestinian deaths and 23 injuries from Israeli strikes in the 24-hour period ending Sunday morning. Cumulatively, the ministry reports that at least 73,356 Palestinians have been killed and 174,185 wounded since Israel launched its military campaign in Gaza in October 2023. Since the ceasefire took effect, an additional 1,230 Palestinians have been killed and more than 4,000 wounded, the ministry confirmed.

    Local on-the-ground reports have revised death tolls even higher. Al Jazeera Arabic reported that nine Palestinians, including three children, were killed in Israeli strikes across Gaza from dawn Sunday alone. Later updates from local media raised the death toll to 11 after an Israeli airstrike targeted a civilian vehicle in Deir al-Balah, a city in central Gaza.

    The Israeli military has confirmed a number of targeted strikes over the past two days. On Saturday, it announced it had killed Salem Jamal Abdelrahman Abu Labad, a man it identified as a commander in Hamas’s Nukhba special forces unit, in an airstrike in southern Gaza. Israeli officials claim Abu Labad took part in the October 2023 attack on Kibbutz Nir Oz. A separate strike in central Gaza on Friday killed Muhammad Abdelnasser Muhammad Khatib, who the military identified as a commander with Hamas’s Maghazi Battalion.

    Parallel to ongoing military operations, diplomatic efforts to reach a lasting truce remain mired in deadlock. Following U.S. President Donald Trump’s announcement that a U.S.-led “Board of Peace” had secured an agreement for the full disarmament of all Palestinian armed factions in Gaza, Hamas clarified Friday that any deal to disarm Palestinian groups would be conditional on both Washington and Tel Aviv fully honoring existing commitments under the 2024 ceasefire agreement.

    Israeli officials have publicly pushed back against Trump’s announcement, making clear that the Israeli government rejects the framework. Former Israeli Ambassador Alon Pinkas told Al Jazeera that Israel was “absolutely not” satisfied with the arrangement. “Israel is presented with a situation where the U.S. president says there’s an agreement, but there isn’t really an agreement, and so I am extraordinarily skeptical that this is going to work out,” Pinkas said. He added that Netanyahu views the proposed deal as a “colossal failure,” and noted that Israel has refused to implement core obligations outlined in the framework, including withdrawing Israeli forces to the pre-agreed “Yellow Line” buffer zone, allowing unimpeded entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza, and halting all offensive military operations.

    Amid rising tensions, reports have emerged of expanding U.S. military support for Israel. Israeli outlet Ynet, citing unnamed Israeli security officials, reported that the U.S. plans to deploy an additional 10 aerial refueling aircraft to Israel in the coming days. The aircraft will join more than 30 U.S. refueling planes already stationed at Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion Airport, according to the report.

    Conflict has also escalated in the occupied West Bank, where Israeli forces carried out new raids over the weekend. Palestinian news agency Wafa reported that Israeli troops detained five Palestinians during operations in Bethlehem and Nablus. During the raids, forces raided multiple private homes and posted threatening notices on the exterior walls of Bethlehem’s Salah al-Din Mosque. The latest raids come one week after a sharp escalation of violence that saw armed Israeli settlers launch attacks on Palestinian villages near Nablus, leaving four Palestinians and two Israelis dead.

    In diplomatic developments over the weekend, a Hamas delegation led by Zaher Jabarin met with leaders from Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Cairo on Saturday to discuss coordinated efforts to end Israeli attacks on Gaza and address recent developments in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. Following the meeting, both factions released a joint statement stressing the need to force a full Israeli withdrawal from all of Gaza and calling for deeper unity and coordination between all Palestinian political and armed groups.

  • Japan’s Kuwaki wins women’s British Open to clinch first major title

    Japan’s Kuwaki wins women’s British Open to clinch first major title

    On a sun-baked, tension-charged weekend at Royal Lytham & St Annes, 23-year-old Japanese golfer Shiho Kuwaki etched her name into golf history, clinching her first-ever major championship title at the 50th edition of the Women’s British Open. The victory came after a nerve-wracking two-hole playoff against Germany’s Esther Henseleit, capping a pulsating finale that lived up to the tournament’s milestone anniversary.

    Kuwaki entered the final day of regulation play locked in a tight battle for the top spot, wrapping up four rounds at an impressive five under par. It was Henseleit who forced the overtime showdown, sinking a stunning long-range birdie putt on the 18th green to match Kuwaki’s final score, sending the crowd into a frenzy and setting the stage for the dramatic playoff.

    The first extra hole ended with both players tied: Kuwaki landed a precise wedge shot to secure par, while Henseleit’s 15-foot title-winning putt rolled just wide of the cup. On the second playoff hole, a costly miscue derailed Henseleit’s bid: her tee shot deflected off a course marshal and landed deep in thick gorse bushes, leaving her with an impossible recovery that only resulted in a bogey. Kuwaki stayed calm under pressure, rolling in a short putt to seal the historic win.

    This breakthrough comes as a stunning rise for the young Japanese pro, who only turned professional in 2021. Her previous best finish at a major was a tie for 14th place at this year’s Women’s US Open, and she missed the halfway cut in her only prior Women’s British Open appearance last year. Ahead of the tournament, she already claimed one title in 2024, winning the Japan LPGA Tour Championship Ricoh Cup. Renowned for her bold fashion choices, Kuwaki turned heads all week in a bright mint green top paired with a luminous green golf ball—an eye-catching look that matched her standout performance on the course.

    With the win, Kuwaki extends Japan’s recent dominance at the Women’s British Open, becoming the second consecutive Japanese golfer to lift the trophy after Miyu Yamashita’s 2023 victory in Porthcawl. She is also the fourth Japanese woman to claim the title overall, following Ayako Okamoto and Hinako Shibuno alongside Yamashita. Beyond the glory of the major title, Kuwaki also takes home a tournament record $1.5 million in prize money, a payout that pales in comparison to the achievement for the rising star.

    In the wake of her win, Kuwaki took a moment to send support to her home country, which recently faced a devastating earthquake that killed at least 36 people. “Recently we had an earthquake in Japan and I’d like to wish people a speedy recovery and best wishes,” she told reporters after the win, adding, “It’s an amazing feeling to win again as a Japanese player. I hope as team Japan we can continue to light up the golf world.”

    Overnight leader Yealimi Noh saw her three-shot lead slip away on Sunday, finishing the tournament in third place at four under par. World number one Nelly Korda, who was chasing a historic third major title of 2025 after winning the Chevron Championship and Women’s US Open earlier this year, settled for a share of fourth place alongside Thailand’s Jeeno Thitikul at two under par. South Korea’s Ryu Hae-ran, also vying for a third 2025 major title after clinching the Women’s PGA Championship and Evian Championship, finished tied for sixth at one under par.

    Speaking after her win, Kuwaki shared she stayed focused on one shot at a time throughout the tense final round and playoff. “I just can’t believe it. To be on a stage like this is an honour and every hole I was just focused on shot by shot. I just tried to enjoy it as much as I could,” she said, capping a transformative trip to the UK that confirms her status as one of golf’s most exciting rising stars.

  • Australia name 16-strong under-19 squad for multi-format tour of India

    Australia name 16-strong under-19 squad for multi-format tour of India

    One of cricket’s most demanding environments is about to become a critical training ground for Australia’s most promising young cricket talent, as Cricket Australia has confirmed a 16-player under-19 squad will travel to the Indian subcontinent next month for a high-stakes bilateral series against India’s age-group side.

    Scheduled to run from September 13 through October 9, the series will split across two host cities – Rajkot and Ahmedabad – and pit the young Australians against their Indian counterparts in three 50-over contests and two four-day red-ball matches. The tour will be led by experienced Australian cricket coach Tim Nielsen, who already guided this core group of players to a semi-final finish at last summer’s Under-19 Cricket World Cup, a resume that officials say makes him the ideal leader for the developmental trip.

    Regular tours of India for under-19 squads have long been a core part of Cricket Australia’s youth development strategy, designed to expose the nation’s top emerging players to the unique subcontinent conditions – from spinning pitches to high heat and humidity – that test even the most seasoned international cricketers. This year’s squad brings a mix of proven youth talent and comeback stories: pace bowlers Will Byrom and Kasey Barton are tapped to lead the Australian bowling attack, while New South Wales batter Neel Patel is expected to anchor the top of the batting order. One of the most compelling narratives surrounds Victorian batter Jack Czosnek, who missed all of last domestic summer recovering from a major ACL injury, but has worked his way back to full fitness and found form in Darwin grade cricket during the Australian winter to earn his spot in the side.

    Sonya Thompson, Head of National Development at Cricket Australia, emphasized that the tour is far more than just a series of exhibition matches – it is a foundational step in building the next generation of Australian senior international cricketers. “We believe this group has the talent, resilience and character to represent Australia strongly, and this tour will provide an outstanding opportunity for our players to continue their development,” Thompson said in a statement announcing the squad. “Touring India will be a valuable experience for these aspiring cricketers. Playing against high-quality opposition in challenging conditions will test our players both technically and mentally across formats.”

    Thompson also highlighted the unique value Nielsen brings to the program, pointing to his long track record of player development and prior success at the international level as a senior Test coach and most recently with the under-19 program. “We are also delighted to have Tim Nielsen leading the program. Tim brings a wealth of coaching experience and has a deep understanding of player development with him,” Thompson added.

    The full 16-player squad for the tour is: Kasey Barton (TAS/Mosman CC), Hayden Barbulovic (SA/Tea Tree Gully DCC), Eli Brain (QLD/Northern Suburbs District Cricket Club), Will Byrom (NSW/Northern District CC), Blake Cattle (NSW/Keira CC, Illawarra), Jack Czosnek (VIC/Richmond CC), Spencer Green (QLD/Toombul District Cricket Club), Connor Gregory (SA/Sturt DCC), Charlie Henderson (QLD/University of Queensland Cricket Club), Zed Hollick (WA/Scarborough CC), Matthew Lough (WA/Claremont Nedlands Cricket Club), Neel Patel (NSW/University of NSW Cricket Club), Jacob Pietz (VIC/Camberwell Magpies CC), Patrick Sullivan (VIC/Geelong CC), Theo Tsingos (QLD/Sandgate Redcliffe District Cricket Club), Thomas Vaseo (QLD/Redlands Tigers Cricket Club).

  • Shiho Kuwaki of Japan wins the Women’s British Open on second playoff hole

    Shiho Kuwaki of Japan wins the Women’s British Open on second playoff hole

    At the iconic Royal Lytham & St. Annes links in Lytham St. Annes, England, Japanese golfer Shiho Kuwaki secured the biggest win of her professional career on Sunday, outlasting Germany’s Esther Henseleit in a dramatic sudden-death playoff to claim her first major championship at the Women’s British Open.

    Kuwaki entered the final round positioned to contend for the title, and she delivered a steady final round carding a 1-under-par 70. For much of the final 18 holes of regulation play, it appeared her consistent performance would be enough to seal an outright victory. However, Henseleit produced a moment of incredible clutch putting on the 18th green: sinking a 40-foot birdie putt to also finish with a round of 70, which forced the playoff after both players ended regulation tied at 5-under-par 279 overall.

    The first extra hole brought a stroke of good fortune for Henseleit, as Kuwaki found herself in thick deep rough just short of a greenside bunker. Left with no clear path to the putting surface, Kuwaki was forced to lay up well short of the green, setting up what looked to be an easy opportunity for Henseleit to claim the title. But Kuwaki responded under pressure, hitting a crisp wedge shot that left her ball within 3 feet of the hole, allowing her to save par and extend the playoff. When Henseleit narrowly missed a 15-foot birdie putt that would have given her the win, the two competitors moved on to the second extra hole.

    There, Kuwaki once again held her nerve and carded a par to secure the major crown, capping off a memorable week of golf at one of the sport’s most prestigious venues.

  • How ransom notes could help catch Nancy Guthrie’s kidnapper

    How ransom notes could help catch Nancy Guthrie’s kidnapper

    Half a year after 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie, mother of prominent American news anchor Savannah Guthrie, was abducted from her Arizona residence, law enforcement has taken a new step to generate leads in the stalled investigation: releasing two authenticated ransom notes linked to the kidnapping, hoping distinctive linguistic patterns in the documents will help identify the perpetrators.

    Guthrie went missing from her Tucson-area home in January this year, launching a months-long probe that has yielded little in the way of solid leads or persons of interest. The two notes, both sent to local Tucson television stations in early February, carry conflicting core claims: the first, sent February 2, demands a multi-million dollar ransom paid in Bitcoin, assures the Guthrie family that Nancy was alive but unhurt, and threatens to kill her if payment is not received by a specified deadline. The second, dated February 6, claims Guthrie died of an undiagnosed heart-related issue shortly after being taken, and states her body was buried in an unmarked natural location. Local authorities have not independently confirmed Guthrie’s death as of the release date.

    Investigators are pinning new hope on forensic linguistic analysis of the notes, arguing that every individual carries a unique “language fingerprint” — called an idiolect — that can distinguish their writing from that of any other person, even when the writer attempts to hide their natural style. William Eggington, a retired Brigham Young University linguistics professor and veteran forensic consultant, broke down key clues hidden in the short documents for the BBC.

    Eggington’s analysis identifies multiple revealing patterns in the first note. The writer’s consistent reliance on passive voice and structured “if-then” sentence construction suggests they have at least a high school education, and may have completed some post-secondary schooling. A notable inconsistency also appears: the writer correctly spells “received” in one sentence, but misspells it later in the text. Eggington says this inconsistency indicates either a lack of familiarity with the word’s correct spelling, or that the writer failed to closely proofread the final document before sending it.

    In the second note, Eggington points out that the writer refers to Guthrie exclusively in the third person, framing her death as the result of her own unaddressed health issues rather than a consequence of the kidnapping. This, he argues, works to dehumanize Guthrie and deflect responsibility for her death from the kidnappers. The note also uses unusually formal, restricted academic phrasing that may not reflect the writer’s natural voice, indicating a likely attempt to disguise their idiolect to avoid detection.

    Despite the potential for disguise, Eggington confirms one key finding: the same person wrote both notes. He cites consistent stylistic quirks, most notably the repeated habit of using a comma where a full stop is grammatically required to separate two independent clauses, as clear evidence of a single author.

    Forensic teams will use these small, unique details to build a behavioral and linguistic profile of the kidnapper. Once a person of interest is identified — either through investigative work or a tip from the public — investigators can compare the suspect’s known writing samples to the ransom notes to find a match. This method has led to successful arrests in high-profile cases before: in 1995, the Unabomber Theodore Kaczynski was identified after his brother recognized his unique writing style in the manifesto Kaczynski forced major publications to publish.

    Still, some criminology experts are skeptical that the notes will break the case open. Jeffrey Adler, a University of Florida professor who studies the history of American crime, points out that kidnapping is an extremely rare offense in the U.S., with most incidents involving internal family custody disputes rather than stranger abductions for ransom. With six months already passed and no solid leads to work from, Adler calls the odds of identifying the kidnapper via the notes “a stretch.”

    Police confirmed they consulted extensively with the Guthrie family before agreeing to release the redacted ransom notes to the public. Hours after the release, Savannah Guthrie issued an emotional public appeal for information, saying her family is desperate for answers and urging anyone who recognizes the writing style, or has any information related to the abduction, to come forward to authorities.

  • In Ceuta, some migrants cling to hopes of someday reaching mainland Spain

    In Ceuta, some migrants cling to hopes of someday reaching mainland Spain

    Five days after swimming across to the Spanish North African territory of Ceuta with her teenage sister and cousin, 20-year-old Moroccan migrant Dikra has no certainty of where her next meal will come from — all her meals so far have been donated by generous local residents. One thing she is completely sure of, however, is that she will not return to her home country. “I want to stay. I want to reach mainland Spain,” Dikra told reporters, requesting her last name be withheld to protect her family back in Morocco for safety reasons.

    By Sunday afternoon, Dikra counted herself among the small group of remaining holdout migrants in Ceuta, after more than 59,000 of the 60,000 people who breached the Morocco-Ceuta border on Thursday and Friday of the previous week voluntarily crossed back into Morocco. The unprecedented mass crossing left at least 72 people dead during the dangerous journey, and the sudden humanitarian crisis sparked by the surge has reignited long-simmering debates over immigration policy across Europe and the rest of the globe.

    For Dikra, the decision to leave Morocco grew out of urgent personal need. While she worked as a cleaner in the coastal city of Tangier, she fled her home to escape an abusive alcoholic father. She holds a professional diploma in hairdressing, and hopes to put that qualification to work building a new life in mainland Spain — a goal that remains out of reach for now, separated by the Strait of Gibraltar and the European Union’s layered, often slow-moving asylum system.

    Migrants who have chosen to stay in Ceuta are left in limbo, with no clear information on what authorities will do with them next. Thirty-five-year-old Abdel Karim, another migrant from Morocco, waited outside Ceuta’s official migration reception center all day Sunday, desperate for any updates on his case. Karim was unemployed in Morocco, and had previously lived in mainland Spain years before the crossing. He was later expelled from France, where he had been living homeless on the streets after leaving Spain.

    “In Morocco, I’m labeled a deportee,” Karim explained. “Anyone who has been deported knows what that label brings — constant stress, chronic depression, crippling anguish.” Karim said he saw viral social media posts about the mass border crossing, and chose to seize the chaotic window of opportunity. He crossed into Ceuta with just 10 euros in his pocket, and showed reporters his feet, blistered and sore from the long journey. He says he is willing to take any work he can find in Spain, and remains unshaken by the bureaucratic hurdles standing between him and the mainland.

    Ceuta, along with its sister Spanish enclave Melilla on the Moroccan coast, is not part of the European Union’s Schengen Area of free movement. Any migrant seeking to travel from either enclave to mainland Spain must pass through mandatory official border checks and asylum processing before being allowed entry.

    By Sunday evening, hundreds of recent arrivals gathered on one of Ceuta’s public beaches. Some clustered around military trucks as Spanish armed forces personnel distributed bottled water to the crowd. A short distance away, outside a local migrant shelter, 25-year-old Senegalese migrant Cesse Aliou rested with a group of other sub-Saharan African migrants who had made the crossing together. Aliou said he had worked at a call center in Morocco, earning roughly 279 euros ($322) per month, but the position was irregular and offered no long-term stability.

    He traveled by train from Casablanca to Tangier, then on to the border town of Fnideq, before swimming the short distance across to Ceuta. Just a short distance from where Aliou rested, on a wooded patch of public land across the street from the shelter, a violent scuffle broke out between a group of migrants over access to drinking water that had been dropped off by local volunteers. “We are all exhausted here,” Aliou said, gesturing toward the ongoing fight. “Finding food, finding a place to sleep — it’s all incredibly hard right now. You can see for yourself what the situation is like.”

  • ‘Spider-Man’ soars to huge $355 million opening in North America

    ‘Spider-Man’ soars to huge $355 million opening in North America

    The global box office has received a much-needed jolt from Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios’ latest superhero blockbuster, *Spider-Man: Brand New Day*, which notched one of the largest opening weekends in North American cinema history, industry analysts confirmed Sunday.

    Led by British star Tom Holland in his return to the title role of Peter Parker/Spider-Man, the film pulled in an eye-watering $355 million in ticket sales across the United States and Canada during its first three days in theaters. When compared to unadjusted box office records, that debut lands in second place all-time, falling just $2 million short of the 2019 record holder *Avengers: Endgame*, according to data from box office tracking site Box Office Mojo.

    The ninth live-action theatrical outing for the iconic web-slinger – who has previously been brought to life on screen by actors Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield – boasts a star-studded supporting cast that includes Zendaya (Holland’s real-life spouse), Mark Ruffalo, Florence Pugh, and breakout star Sadie Sink. The latest entry in the franchise follows a broken Parker, who has stepped back from public life after erasing all public knowledge of his superhero identity, navigating a radical personal shift while fending off deadly new antagonists.

    Industry analysts have called the opening nothing short of extraordinary, noting the film arrived at a time when the summer box office had gone two months without a major tentpole action release. “This is a colossal opening,” said David A. Gross, head of entertainment research firm Franchise Entertainment Research. “The summer has been without a big action title for nine weeks – an eternity at the box office. The market is ripe-ripe-ripe for this film.”

    Beyond North American borders, the film’s performance has been equally impressive. It earned an additional $570 million from international markets in its opening weekend, pushing its total global haul to a staggering $928 million by the end of the weekend, data from industry tracker Exhibitor Relations shows. Gross added that strong performance in key international markets, including a rare positive opening result in China for a major Hollywood release, has positioned international ticket sales to make up more than 60% of the film’s final global total.

    The Spider-Man juggernaut has also lifted the entire North American box office, with other top releases seeing stable holdovers alongside the blockbuster’s massive debut. Christopher Nolan’s latest original epic *The Odyssey* from Universal Pictures held onto the second spot in its subsequent weekend, pulling in $51 million to push its domestic total to nearly $400 million. Adapted from Homer’s ancient Greek epic poem, the film stars Matt Damon as Odysseus, the hero struggling to return home after the Trojan War, with Anne Hathaway as his wife Penelope and Tom Holland in a supporting role as his son Telemachus.

    “The combination of *Spider-Man* – a legacy superhero sequel – and *The Odyssey* – a big original production – is taking the box office to new highs by a comfortable margin,” Gross noted.

    Rounding out the top five highest-grossing films for the weekend were Disney-Pixar’s *Toy Story 5* in third place with $6.3 million, Universal’s animated outing *Minions & Monsters* in fourth with $5.8 million, and Disney’s live-action remake of its animated hit *Moana* in fifth with $5.3 million. The remaining spots in the weekend top 10 went to *Hadestown: The Musical* ($2 million), *The Invite* ($1.2 million), *I Want Your Sex* ($600,000), *Evil Dead Burn* ($525,000), and *Young Washington* ($478,000).

  • Trump ‘cancels’ Iran strikes as Israeli attacks on Gaza continue

    Trump ‘cancels’ Iran strikes as Israeli attacks on Gaza continue

    Tensions across the Middle East reached a critical boiling point over the weekend before an unexpected announcement from former US President Donald Trump paused imminent military confrontation between Washington and Tehran, even as deadly Israeli operations in Gaza continue to drive a rising civilian death toll.

    Trump said Saturday via his Truth Social platform that he has called off a planned major US attack on Iran, conditional on the rapid completion of a new agreement centered on two core demands: the full, permanent reopening of the strategic Strait of Hormuz and a permanent end to what he frames as Iran’s nuclear threat. The pause came at the request of Iran and unspecified other Middle Eastern nations, Trump added, noting the decision was made “for the future benefit of the WORLD and, likewise, the survival of a successful and prosperous Iran.” He also confirmed Israel shares the commitment to this diplomatic path.

    The sudden de-escalation follows a sequence of tit-for-tat military moves and diplomatic pressure from regional powers. Hours before Trump’s announcement, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps confirmed it had launched multiple ballistic missile strikes targeting a US F-35 repair hangar and aircraft ramp at Jordan’s Al-Azraq Base. The strike came as US military forces were reportedly positioning for major retaliatory attacks on Iran’s energy infrastructure. Prior to that, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had warned his counterparts from Turkey, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia that Iran would respond “decisively” to any new act of US aggression.

    Multiple sources confirm regional leaders pushed aggressively for Trump to step back from military action. Axios, citing anonymous US officials, reported that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman placed a direct call to Trump Saturday urging de-escalation and urging him to abandon the planned strikes. In an official statement carried by Saudi state media Sunday, the crown prince reinforced that position, stressing “the necessity of prioritising dialogue to de-escalate tensions and the importance of exerting all possible efforts to achieve a truce, which paves the way for diplomatic solutions.” He added that diplomatic negotiations are the only way to preserve regional security and stability and prevent the entire area from being dragged into a far wider, more devastating conflict.

    While the US-Iran standoff has temporarily eased, violence continues to escalate in Gaza, where Israeli military operations have now killed more than 73,000 Palestinians since October 2023, according to Gaza’s Ministry of Health. Al Jazeera Arabic reported Sunday that fresh Israeli air strikes across the enclave left nine Palestinians dead, including three children. Over the prior two days, the Israeli military announced it had killed two senior Hamas commanders in targeted air strikes: Salem Jamal Abd al-Rahman Abu Labad, a cell commander in Hamas’s elite Nukhba special forces, and Muhammad Abd al-Nasser Muhammad Khatib, a battalion commander in the Maghazi area of central Gaza.

    Diplomatic efforts to broker a ceasefire are ongoing in Cairo, where a Hamas delegation held talks Sunday with leaders of Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Both factions issued a joint statement stressing the priority of forcing Israel to end its military offensive and withdraw all forces from Gaza. They called for coordinated joint action and a unified national Palestinian position to protect civilian lives and secure the Palestinian people’s long-standing legitimate rights.

    Negotiations remain deadlocked over key terms of any potential agreement. Last week, Trump stated that a so-called “Board of Peace” would oversee the collection of Hamas’s weapons as the group begins disarmament, a claim that contradicted the board’s own earlier announcement that a Palestinian technocratic governing body would take on that responsibility. Hamas has since clarified that any agreement for full disarmament of Palestinian factions in Gaza is conditional on the United States and Israel upholding all commitments laid out in the 10 October ceasefire deal. Hamas representative Ghazi Hamad told Reuters Friday that the group will retain its weapons until Israel halts all military operations, allows increased humanitarian aid and commercial goods into the blockaded enclave, and completes a full withdrawal of its forces from Gaza.

  • Trump’s on-again-off-again war against Iran: in his own words

    Trump’s on-again-off-again war against Iran: in his own words

    Among all modern U.S. presidents, few have delivered public threats of military aggression as stark and contradictory as 80-year-old Republican incumbent Donald Trump when it comes to conflict with Iran. Since escalations between the two nations broke out on February 28, Trump’s stance on a U.S. confrontation with Tehran has shifted dramatically, sometimes reversing course within mere hours of making a bold statement. Time and again, he has prematurely declared victory over Iran’s military capacity, only to adjust his timeline of conflict or issue fresh threats of new strikes days or weeks later.

    What makes these reversals even more striking is the whiplash in Trump’s assessments of Iran’s ruling faction. On June 17, he praised Iran’s new leadership as “very smart” and “far less radicalized” than their predecessors, who were killed in joint U.S. and Israeli strikes. Just three weeks later on July 8, a visibly frustrated Trump discarded that positive framing entirely, telling reporters: “I don’t want to deal with them anymore, they’re scum.”

    To understand the erratic nature of Trump’s approach to Iran, a timeline of his public statements reveals the pattern of extreme threats followed by quick retreats:

    On March 21, Trump took to his Truth Social platform to issue an ultimatum: If Iran did not fully open the Strait of Hormuz to unimpeded global shipping within 48 hours, the United States would target and completely destroy the country’s power infrastructure, starting with its largest facilities. The threat drew immediate international scrutiny, as deliberate attacks on civilian critical infrastructure like power plants are broadly classified as war crimes under international humanitarian law.

    Just two days later, on March 23, Trump walked back the deadline, extending it by five days and citing “very good and productive conversations” with Iranian diplomatic representatives. He would soon extend the pause on planned strikes against power plants for another 10 days, pushing the new deadline to April 6 to allow for ongoing diplomatic negotiations to continue.

    As the 10-day extension neared its end on Easter Sunday, April 5, Trump issued an obscenity-laced follow-up threat, writing: “Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell,” before adding the incongruous closing line: “Praise be to Allah.”

    Two days later, on April 7, Trump issued an even more extreme warning, writing in a Truth Social post that “A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again.” The comment was widely interpreted by global policymakers and analysts as an explicit threat to eradicate Iran, a nation of more than 90 million people.

    But just hours after that alarming statement, Trump announced he would suspend all planned bombing and attacks on Iran for a two-week period. He confirmed he had accepted a truce proposal put forward by international war mediators, after a phone call with Pakistan’s prime minister.

    The pattern repeated again on June 11: Early that day, Trump posted that “The United States will be hitting Iran… VERY HARD TONIGHT” and added that “at some point in the not too distant future, we will be taking Kharg Island” — Iran’s key oil export terminal — along with other major oil infrastructure sites.

    Once again, the reversal came almost immediately: Five hours after issuing his threat of imminent strikes, Trump announced he had “cancelled the scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran this evening,” citing new progress in peace negotiations aimed at securing a permanent end to the conflict.

    By late June, an interim peace deal to end the cross-border fighting was finalized. But the truce collapsed within a month, with Iran launching attacks on U.S. military facilities across the Middle East, and U.S. forces responding with strikes on Iranian coastal defenses while expanding target lists to include civilian infrastructure and bridges.

    Speaking at a cabinet meeting on July 31, Trump reaffirmed his aggressive stance, telling attendees: “We’ll be hitting them very hard, and you know at some point they’re going to say, ‘We just can’t take it anymore.’”

    Again, a reversal came the next day. On August 1, Trump announced: “We have just been asked by Iran, and other Middle Eastern Countries, to hold off any attack.” He added that the core perimeters of a permanent peace deal had already been agreed to by both sides. Iran’s state-run media quickly and forcefully denied the claim, stating that no such request for a delay had been sent by the Islamic republic.