博客

  • ‘I think a part of it was Iran’: Trump acknowledges war’s impact on midterm election losses

    ‘I think a part of it was Iran’: Trump acknowledges war’s impact on midterm election losses

    In post-election reflections published Wednesday, former U.S. President Donald Trump publicly conceded that the ongoing military conflict with Iran was a contributing factor to the Republican Party’s devastating across-the-board losses in the latest U.S. midterm elections, which handed full control of both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate to Democratic candidates who ran heavily on anti-war platforms.
    During a series of one-on-one media interviews dissecting the scale of the GOP’s electoral defeat, Trump told reporters, “I think a part of it was Iran… Iran was a piece of it.” Even as he acknowledged the war’s political fallout, the president remained unapologetic for his 2025 decision to greenlight joint U.S.-Israeli military strikes on Iran, a move that directly contradicted the “no new wars” central promise of his 2024 presidential campaign. In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, he doubled down: “I did the right thing. I would have done it again.”
    The U.S. and Israel launched full-scale military operations against Iran in late February, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presented Trump with purported Mossad intelligence claiming the campaign would trigger a popular uprising among Iranian citizens that would topple Tehran’s ruling regime. Despite the operation succeeding in killing dozens of top Iranian government and military figures, including former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, the Iranian state remained fully functional. Iranian military forces subsequently seized full command of the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, triggering a global surge in crude oil prices that rippled directly to U.S. consumers via skyrocketing gasoline and general consumer goods costs — a line of attack that Democratic candidates across every U.S. district hammered on throughout their campaigns to tie the Republican incumbent to soaring cost-of-living burdens.
    Public polling has consistently shown the Iran war remains deeply unpopular with the American public, and Trump has repeatedly shifted his public framing of the operation’s stated objectives in the months since it began. When pressed by reporters in the aftermath of the midterm vote on unconfirmed reports that he had considered deploying nuclear weapons against Iranian targets, Trump brushed off the question, claiming, “I don’t need it, we’ve knocked them out already, 90 percent.”
    Across the globe in Tehran, senior Iranian officials reacted to the U.S. midterm results with public approval. Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf posted a statement on social media platform X on Wednesday that read, “Americans said NO TO WAR, and we endorse this message.”

  • Why Trump’s midterm rebuke won’t likely tank the buck

    Why Trump’s midterm rebuke won’t likely tank the buck

    TOKYO — The US dollar’s recent rally to a 17-month peak reflects far more than the relative strength of the American economy: it is a magnet drawing global capital chasing elevated yields and the high-flying, AI-fueled US growth narrative, creating cascading risks across emerging Asian markets even as the 2026 US midterm elections delivered a historic, sweeping victory for Democratic candidates that secured majorities in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The full scale of the Democratic rout of Donald Trump’s Republican Party remained unconfirmed for days after polling day, though Trump initially appeared to concede the lopsided defeat in public press interviews, defying widespread fears that he would attempt to interfere with vote counting as he did after the 2021 presidential election.

    Global financial markets swung sharply in the immediate aftermath of the results, as investors priced in potential policy pivots from a newly empowered Democratic legislature spanning fiscal spending, AI regulation, responses to the ongoing Iran conflict, and formal oversight investigations into the Trump White House. Broad US equity benchmarks trended upward in early post-election trading, while the dollar saw modest, temporary dips against the Japanese yen, British pound and euro. Even so, the broader market consensus points to another extended, seemingly gravity-defying run of dollar strength as the political dust settles.

    Analysts at MUFG Bank note that the Democratic sweep will likely deliver modest upside for Asian currencies, as the resulting legislative gridlock curbs expectations of unfettered new US government spending, easing pressure on Treasury yields and blunting some of the dollar’s upward momentum. Manulife Investment Management’s global head of asset allocation Nathan Thooft echoed that divided government will introduce a degree of policy stability that reduces near-term market volatility, but cautioned against overstating election outcomes as a long-term currency driver: foreign exchange movements are far more closely tied to cross-border differentials in growth, inflation, interest rates and capital flows than short-term political shifts. J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s Asia chief strategist Tai Hui added that Trump retains significant unilateral policy levers even with Democratic majorities in Congress, including authority over trade tariffs, foreign policy direction and existing regulatory frameworks, noting that Democrats would need a two-thirds supermajority in both chambers to override any presidential veto.

    A sustained dollar surge poses acute risks for Asian economies: it will push regional currencies lower, tighten global credit conditions at a moment when governments across the Asia-Pacific are already navigating economic headwinds from the Middle East conflict and the threat of new US tariff hikes. The region has painful historical precedent for this dynamic: the 1997-98 Asian Financial Crisis traced its origins to the US Federal Reserve’s 1994-95 tightening cycle under Chair Alan Greenspan, which doubled interest rates in 12 months, triggered a Mexican currency collapse, and drove a dollar rally that made the region’s long-standing currency pegs unsustainable. Thailand was the first to devalue, followed by Indonesia and South Korea, which collectively secured $118 billion in IMF-led bailout packages, while Malaysia and the Philippines teetered on the edge of collapse without requesting external support. Emerging markets have remained wary of Fed tightening cycles ever since, a risk that was clearly visible during the 2013 “taper tantrum” selloff in global assets.

    Today, the ongoing Iran war has reawakened the dollar’s historic potential to act as a destabilizing “wrecking ball” for regional markets. The Indonesian rupiah has fallen 8.8% in 2026 to hit all-time lows, the Philippine peso is down 7.7%, and both the Thai baht and South Korean won have dropped 7% — all despite persistent structural pressures on the US economy including record national debt, elevated inflation, protectionist tariffs, sweeping tax cuts and massive federal spending packages.

    A key, underappreciated factor driving the current dynamic is the performance of the Federal Reserve under Chair Kevin Warsh, who took office in May 2026 and has run the US central bank far more hawkishly than Trump anticipated when he appointed him. While Warsh could still pivot to cut rates to align with the president’s priorities, US inflation remains anchored at 3.7% — a key factor cited by analysts for the Republican Party’s heavy midterm losses — and the US labor market has proven far more resilient than forecast, leaving Warsh with a highly complex policy balancing act.

    This stance has thrown the Bank of Japan into extreme policy disarray. Markets are already pricing in additional Fed rate hikes before the end of 2026, a dynamic that pulls capital away from Japanese assets and into higher-yielding US Treasuries, threatening to derail the Nikkei’s multi-year bull run. The weak yen that previously boosted Japanese corporate profits has now left the country exposed to skyrocketing import costs and renewed inflationary pressure, as Japan teeters on the edge of stagflation: 2026 growth is tracking at just 0.7% while inflation hovers around 2%. The Bank of Japan’s September rate hike to 1% — a 31-year high — is widely expected to be the last tightening move for the foreseeable future, leaving a policy gap between a hold-harsh BOJ and a tightening Fed that sets the stage for renewed sharp yen depreciation.

    No market participants can reliably forecast the Fed’s policy path six months from now, nor how Trump — who previously attempted to fire and prosecute former Fed Chair Jerome Powell — will react if his hand-picked Fed leader refuses to deliver the rate cuts he has long demanded. A surging dollar amid a new Fed tightening cycle was nowhere on Asian policymakers’ 2027 risk outlook, but it has now emerged as a top-tier threat. HSBC chief Asia economist Frederic Neumann notes that regional monetary authorities will have to remain on high alert for the foreseeable future: “A bouncy US dollar means there is little reprieve for now, and a sharp rally threatens to suffocate Asian currencies and leave governments across the region scrambling to sandbag their financial systems.”

    Despite the prevailing bullish sentiment on the dollar, there are seven distinct, well-documented reasons to believe that current optimism over the currency may be misplaced. First, US political instability persists: the American political system has never fully recovered from Trump’s 2021 attempt to overturn his presidential election loss, and lingering chaos from the 2026 midterms is likely to cloud policy clarity for months. Second, oil and Middle East geopolitics remain a dominant wild card: CIBC head of foreign exchange strategy Sarah Ying notes that oil prices are the most important near-term driver of dollar movements, and any sharp shift in energy markets will easily outweigh midterm election impacts, adding that her team is positioned for dollar downside given the Trump administration’s recent more conciliatory tone toward Iran. Third, the Fed may prove far less aggressive than markets currently price in: Warsh could eventually argue for rate cuts to stabilize the US economy, a move that would narrow US-yield differentials with peer economies and push capital flows toward Europe, Japan and emerging markets. Fourth, US economic growth is likely to lag the rest of the world in 2027, weighed down by tighter Fed policy and Trump’s tariff regime, even if the country avoids a formal recession: as China’s economy stabilizes, Europe’s industrial recovery gains traction, the Bank of Japan slows its hiking cycle and emerging market fundamentals hold steady, global investors will have clear incentives to rotate capital away from US assets. Fifth, the AI investment boom that has driven most recent US capital inflows carries significant downside risk: total debt held by major US tech firms has swelled 90% in six months to $3.2 trillion, and if AI investment returns disappoint and valuations correct sharply, the dollar will lose its core fundamental support. Deutsche Bank’s global head of FX research George Saravelos adds that the AI dynamic cuts both ways: foreign purchases of US stocks currently fully fund the entire US current account deficit, but roughly 90% of the $20+ trillion in US equities held by overseas investors reflects price appreciation rather than new net inflows, leaving the market highly vulnerable to sudden outflows.

    Sixth, America’s twin fiscal and current account deficits are reaching unprecedented levels, with total national debt now exceeding $40 trillion. The US has long benefited from the “exorbitant privilege” of issuing the world’s dominant reserve currency, a term coined by 1960s French Finance Minister Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, but that status relies entirely on global investor confidence. If that confidence erodes, the dollar could face downward pressure not seen since the 1970s, and Treasury yields could surge past levels last recorded in the early 2000s. Seventh, cross-market wildcards could upend current trends: the dollar could extend its rally further if AI bubble fears prove overblown, or if Trump de-escalates the Iran conflict or rolls back tariffs, while Japan represents a major countervailing force: after decades of exporting capital in search of higher overseas yields, Japanese institutional investors could begin repatriating funds as the Bank of Japan shrinks its balance sheet and domestic JGB yields rise. Standard Chartered’s global head of FX research Steve Englander argues that higher Japanese government bond yields will make the yen far more attractive, and its low market beta, undervalued pricing and newly restored yield advantage will drive sharp appreciation if global markets shift into risk-off mode unrelated to oil price shocks.

    Massive regional holdings of US Treasuries add another layer of systemic risk: Japan holds nearly $1.1 trillion in US government debt, China roughly $620 billion, and the broader Asia-Pacific region holds more than $2.5 trillion in total. Even a small hint of coordinated selling from Tokyo or Beijing to defend their domestic currencies could trigger panic among other major US creditors including the UK, Canada, the Cayman Islands, Luxembourg and Taiwan. This dynamic explains why US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent joined Japan’s Ministry of Finance in coordinated yen buying operations starting in July 2026, a move Trump publicly framed as a gesture of “friendship” that in reality reflected deep mutual fear: a disorderly yen selloff would send shockwaves across global markets, and Tokyo could retaliate by selling US Treasuries to support its currency, sending US yields spiraling higher. Notably, Bessent funded the intervention with euro reserves rather than newly printed dollars, a deliberate choice to avoid expanding the US money supply.

    If US efforts to deliberately weaken the dollar backfire, policymakers in the Bessent Treasury could end up facing far higher Treasury yields than they currently project. The dollar’s decades-long strength rests entirely on global credibility and the widespread belief that US officials will not manipulate its value for short-term political gains, and recent ambiguous signals from the Treasury have reopened a deeply unpopular question on Wall Street: is Washington actively trying to push the dollar lower?

    Asian governments face a cascade of additional policy risks in the post-midterm landscape. A wounded, lame-duck Trump White House could unleash a new wave of punitive tariffs, lash out at China for refusing to agree to a proposed “grand bargain” trade deal, pressure Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi to accept a $550 billion “signing bonus” to secure a bilateral trade agreement and increase annual payments for hosting US military bases, use Taiwan’s political status as a bargaining chip in negotiations with Beijing, or hold an unplanned high-profile summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un that upends regional security arrangements.

    As 2026 draws to a close, the surging US dollar has once again upended Asia’s economic development plans for the coming year. The world’s most powerful capital magnet is siphoning away the liquidity Asian economies need to fund fiscal deficits, stabilize domestic bond markets and support buoyant equity valuations, and widespread uncertainty over the long-term direction of Warsh’s Fed policy is amplifying regional anxiety. For Asia, the core risk is no longer simply that the dollar keeps rising: it is that the world’s dominant reserve currency is evolving into the single most destabilizing force threatening regional financial stability for years to come.

  • Israel’s Shin Bet arrests activist amid incitement over Palestinian electoral gains

    Israel’s Shin Bet arrests activist amid incitement over Palestinian electoral gains

    In a late-night operation on Tuesday, Israeli security forces detained high-profile Palestinian political organizer and journalist Abd Abu Shahadeh from his private residence in Jaffa, transporting him to an unannounced location, per reporting from regional news outlet Arab48. Approximately 15 security personnel, a subset of whom wore face-concealing masks, forcibly entered Abu Shahadeh’s home around midnight, carrying out the arrest in full view of his two young children. During the raid, officers seized a range of personal electronic devices and multiple printed books, and initially refused to share any details regarding the justification for the detention or which governing body had taken Abu Shahadeh into custody. Israeli police later confirmed the case was under joint oversight by the Tel Aviv Central Investigative Unit and Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic intelligence service, before a local court issued a sweeping publication ban tied to claims of a “security-focused ongoing investigation.”

    The detention unfolds against a sharply charged political backdrop, marked by a surge in targeted rhetoric directed at Palestinian citizens of Israel in the immediate wake of last week’s national elections, where Palestinian voter participation hit a historic high and Palestinian-aligned political parties secured unprecedented electoral gains. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud party publicly alleged the elections had been “stolen” by Palestinian political factions, citing isolated, minor claims of electoral fraud. Opposition lawmakers have pushed back hard against the claims, accusing Likud of amplifying unsubstantiated allegations as a deliberate tactic to discredit and invalidate the official election results. Palestinian-led political parties have categorically rejected all fraud accusations, and Israel’s independent Central Elections Committee formally certified the final election results on Wednesday, announcing its exhaustive review had uncovered no evidence of systemic irregularities that would compromise electoral integrity or alter the final outcome of the vote.

    Even with the official certification complete, Shin Bet director David Zini, a close political ally of Netanyahu, has moved forward with plans to summon top leaders of Palestinian-led parties for formal, cautionary interrogations. The list of targeted figures includes United Arab List head Mahmoud Abbas, Ta’al party leader Ahmed Tibi, and Balad party chief Sami Abu Shehadeh. Reporting from Israeli daily Haaretz confirms this push is moving forward even as rank-and-file police officials and state prosecutors have not been presented with any tangible evidence to back up the Likud-originated claims of mass electoral fraud tied to Palestinian voting blocs.

    Speaking publicly on Wednesday, Balad leader Sami Abu Shehadeh framed Abd Abu Shahadeh’s arrest as a deliberate step in a coordinated campaign by Netanyahu and Zini to overturn the legitimate election outcome. “Abd’s detention is not an isolated incident: it is one piece of a wider, systematic effort of targeted arrests, coercive interrogations, and explicit threats against grassroots political activists, deployed to weaponize law enforcement and intelligence agencies to invalidate the will of the voting public,” he stated. “None of these heavy-handed tactics can erase the unassailable fact that Netanyahu lost this election, driven by the record-breaking turnout of Arab Palestinian citizens who turned out in droves to vote him out of office.” Abu Shehadeh went on to characterize the unacknowledged detention as a “serious, unlawful abduction,” emphasizing that the intimidation campaign would not succeed in suppressing Palestinian civic participation. “We will not be bullied into silence, and we will never allow them to steal an election that our community turned out in historic numbers to decide,” he added.

    A respected community leader, Abd Abu Shahadeh serves as the elected head of Jaffa’s Islamic Council, sits on the editorial board of Arab48, and is a frequent contributing opinion writer for independent regional news outlet Middle East Eye.

  • ‘Complicit’: World Medical Association criticised for rejecting calls to suspend Israel

    ‘Complicit’: World Medical Association criticised for rejecting calls to suspend Israel

    The World Medical Association (WMA), the global 118-member governing body tasked with upholding foundational medical ethics first established in 1947 in the aftermath of Nazi Germany’s documented medical war crimes, is facing widespread, intensified backlash for repeatedly declining to suspend the Israeli Medical Association (IMA), despite decades of verified allegations that Israeli doctors have been complicit in the torture of Palestinian detainees and widespread human rights abuses in Gaza. Last month, during the WMA General Assembly convened in Rotterdam, Netherlands, a coalition of health advocacy groups under the “IMA Out!” campaign submitted a formal petition signed by 6,500 medical professionals, demanding the IMA’s full expulsion from the global body. Hundreds of attending doctors staged concurrent protests, many carrying a ceremonial shroud emblazoned with the names of 18,000 Palestinian children killed amid ongoing violence in Gaza. Critics argue the IMA has systematically failed to enforce core medical ethics standards, declining to discipline members accused of overseeing torture of Palestinian detainees and the deaths of Palestinian healthcare workers in Israeli detention facilities. Parallel to the WMA advocacy push, the Hind Rajab Foundation (HRF) — an organization dedicated to pursuing accountability for alleged war crimes, crimes against humanity and human rights violations targeting Palestinians — filed a historic complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC) last month, marking the first time a WMA member association has been referred to the global court. The complaint calls for investigations into potential involvement of Israeli doctors, the IMA, and senior officials from Israel’s health and defense ministries in systemic torture of Palestinian civilians. Retired British general practitioner Dr Jonathan Fluxman, a Jewish heritage physician and core organizer for the IMA Out! campaign who attended the Rotterdam protests, stated that both the WMA and IMA have for 30 years deliberately buried verified reports from independent human rights agencies documenting torture and the targeted killing of healthcare workers. He accused the WMA of mirroring the stance of U.S. and UK governments by enabling unaccountable actions against Palestinian populations, arguing the global body has become complicit in the IMA’s alleged violations and is abandoning its mandate as the global guardian of medical ethics. The WMA’s founding 1975 Declaration of Tokyo explicitly prohibits physician participation in torture and imposes a mandatory duty on all medical professionals to report such abuses. The only prior suspension in WMA history dates to 1976, when South Africa’s national medical association was barred from two consecutive general assemblies for its members’ documented complicity in apartheid-era torture. Efforts to hold the IMA accountable stretch back to 2009, when 725 physicians from 43 countries submitted human rights findings to a WMA General Assembly hosted in Tel Aviv — a gathering led at the time by then-WMA president and sitting IMA head Yoram Blachar, who dismissed the allegations as defamatory. A 2016 campaign by 71 UK-based doctors calling for IMA suspension was also rejected by WMA leadership. Critics note the IMA, which represents more than 90% of Israel’s practicing doctors, holds multiple influential leadership positions within the WMA: its current president Zion Hagay chairs the WMA’s socio-medical affairs committee, while its chief executive Leah Wapner sits on the WMA’s finance, socio-medical affairs, and medical ethics committees. Dr Fluxman emphasized that 30 years of “inclusion and dialogue” with the IMA have only led to worsening abuses, granting the Israeli association unimpeded leeway to act without ethical oversight. Since October 2023, approximately 1,700 Palestinian healthcare workers have been killed by Israeli forces. The formal push for IMA suspension was first tabled last year by the South African Medical Association (SAMA), but the motion failed to secure the required majority for expulsion proceedings. The WMA instead passed a non-binding resolution calling on the Israeli government to protect Gaza healthcare facilities and personnel, and requesting all member associations issue public statements condemning attacks on hospitals — a call the IMA has entirely ignored. SAMA became the first national medical association to formally sever ties with the IMA, followed shortly by the British Medical Association and Turkish Medical Association. SAMA also withdrew its representatives from the WMA’s Taipei Working Group on Ethics, which is chaired by an Israeli medic, citing the inherent conflict of having an association facing mass abuse allegations holding oversight of global medical ethics policy. SAMA chair Dr Mvuyisi Mzukwa noted that the WMA’s reputation is being irreparably tarnished by the IMA’s continued full membership, and that the Israeli association should have been suspended pending full, independent investigations into the allegations. Dr Mzukwa and most of his SAMA colleagues were ultimately barred from attending the Rotterdam General Assembly after their visas were inexplicably rerouted to Pretoria instead of their usual processing location in Durban, making it impossible to collect the documents in time for the event. He stated he had planned to deliver a public speech formally calling for the IMA’s expulsion, and noted he has strong suspicions the visa disruption was a deliberate intervention to prevent his advocacy. The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not respond to requests for comment on the incident by the time of publication. SAMA, which aligns with the South African government’s 2023 genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, held a tripartite meeting with the IMA and WMA in late July to raise urgent concerns over detained Palestinian paediatrician Dr Hussam Abu Safiya, former head of Gaza’s Kamal Adwan Hospital, who has been held in Israeli custody since December 2024 and subjected to documented brutal beatings. Dr Mzukwa stated the IMA claimed it had requested Israeli authorities conduct independent medical exams and allow external physicians access to Dr Abu Safiya, but provided no verifiable evidence to support the claim, a development SAMA flagged as a major red flag. Dr Derek Summerfield, honorary senior lecturer at King’s College London who has spent nearly two decades researching the psychiatric impacts of Palestinian detention and torture, described both the WMA and IMA as ethically compromised institutions, noting that decades of peer-reviewed, verified evidence confirms Israeli doctors are not just complicit, but actively participate in torture operations at detention sites. He added the IMA acts as a state-backed institutional buttress shielding Israeli officials from accountability for abuses targeting Gaza’s healthcare system. Additional documentation reveals the IMA’s internal ethical policies allow Israeli doctors to override core WMA principles and defer unconditionally to military and security officials on healthcare access and protection of medical personnel, in direct violation of WMA rules on medical neutrality. Rather than condemning attacks on Gaza’s healthcare system, the IMA has actively campaigned to shield Israeli state actions from international criticism: during this year’s WMA General Assembly, the IMA installed public banners outside the Rotterdam convention center urging member associations not to boycott it, and referencing the 7 October 2023 attacks to justify its positions. In November 2023, IMA president Professor Hagay refused to call for a ceasefire and publicly defended Israeli military strikes on Gaza hospitals, claiming the facilities were being used as “terror bases” that required military intervention. That same month, 81 Israeli doctors signed an open letter endorsing the bombing of Gaza hospitals, a position the IMA refused to condemn, in direct contravention of WMA protections for healthcare infrastructure. Further, Dr Liav Goldstein, a senior member of the IMA’s ethics bureau and chief medical officer of the Israeli Prison Service, formally approved a deliberate starvation diet imposed on thousands of Palestinian prisoners after 7 October by Israeli national security minister Itamar Ben Gvir. Internal IMA correspondence obtained via whistleblower reports shows that in May 2024, after the British Medical Journal published a damning exposé on the death in Israeli custody of prominent Palestinian orthopaedic surgeon Dr Adnan al-Bursh, former head of Al-Shifa Hospital’s orthopaedic department, IMA president Hagay wrote to the Israeli Prison Service requesting any information that could help “refute this claim” to avoid damage to Israel’s global public reputation. Whistleblower testimonies from the Sde Teiman military base in the Negev desert, converted into a mass detention camp at the start of the Gaza conflict, have documented systemic, widespread abuse of Palestinian detainees, including deliberate denial of medical treatment by Israeli medics, conditions where prisoners are held naked, shackled, and forced to wear nappies, and routine amputations performed without anaesthesia. Thousands of Palestinian civilians, including healthcare and humanitarian workers, have been detained at Sde Teiman under Israel’s “unlawful combatants” law, which strips detainees of basic legal protections and allows indefinite detention without charge or trial. Multiple detainees have died in the facility. IMA ethics board director Yossi Walfisch has dismissed all abuse allegations, claiming prisoners at Sde Teiman receive “appropriate medical care.” Dr al-Bursh was held at Sde Teiman before being transferred to Ofer Prison, where he died; released fellow detainees testified he was repeatedly subjected to brutal beatings, torture, and sexual violence during his detention. HRF director general Dyab Abou Jahjah noted that evidence proves physician participation in abuse at Sde Teiman is structural, stating Israeli medics have abandoned their medical neutrality by treating chained detainees and covering up evidence of torture. He demanded the WMA publicly explain why an association that provides institutional cover for systemic torture is still granted full voting membership at its governing tables. For its part, the WMA issued a statement to Middle East Eye claiming “inclusion sits at the core of the WMA’s identity,” and asserting that its members, including the IMA, “regularly call out injustices and violations of medical neutrality even when their own governments are involved.” The IMA did not respond to repeated requests for comment by the time of publication.

  • How the UAE-Israel-Morocco threat pushed Algiers to send troops to Niger

    How the UAE-Israel-Morocco threat pushed Algiers to send troops to Niger

    Last Friday, an Algerian military convoy crossed into Niger, marking the North African nation’s first overseas force deployment in 52 years, dating back to 1973 when Algeria dispatched troops to back Egypt during its conflict against Israeli occupation of the Sinai Peninsula. This move represents a landmark break from Algiers’ decades-old foundational policy of non-interference in other sovereign nations’ internal affairs. The deployment follows a late August decision to send four fighter jets to Niger to block an attempted coup targeting the country’s de facto leader Abdourahamane Tiani, even though Algeria had publicly opposed the 2023 military coup that originally brought Tiani to power. The deployment was formally requested by Tiani’s administration, with Algerian Senator Belkacem Boulghiti clarifying in a Sunday public statement that the deployed forces will not engage in offensive combat operations, but will instead focus on safeguarding critical economic infrastructure and oil facilities operated by Algerian state-owned enterprises. The shift in Algeria’s long-held foreign policy posture is rooted in mounting concerns over spiraling instability across the Sahel region, which senior retired Algerian diplomat Amar Belani detailed in an October published analysis. Belani framed growing unrest in Niger and neighboring Sahel states as the product of a coordinated destabilization campaign backed by the United Arab Emirates, Morocco, Israel, and aligned French proxy actors, warning that prolonged chaos in Niger would directly erode Algerian national interests, most notably jeopardizing the landmark Nigeria-Niger-Algeria Trans-Saharan Gas Pipeline project. Zine Ghebouli, a visiting fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, explained that evolving regional geopolitics have imposed urgent new security priorities on Algiers, forcing the government to take concrete steps to shield its high-stakes energy sector interests. Tensions between Algeria and the UAE boiled over in September, when Algiers formally severed all diplomatic ties after officials stated they had exhausted every diplomatic channel to resolve disputes over Abu Dhabi’s alleged hostile regional actions. The Algerian foreign ministry issued a public statement noting that repeated formal warnings to the UAE over its destabilizing behavior had been ignored, and that Abu Dhabi’s persistent interference in regional sovereign nations’ internal affairs had crossed a threshold that could no longer go unanswered. Ghebouli emphasized that the decision to fully cut diplomatic relations demonstrated that Algerian leadership viewed Emirati regional maneuvers as fundamentally explosive and incompatible with peaceful bilateral coexistence. The UAE’s pattern of interventionist policies across the Middle East and Africa has drawn widespread condemnation from other regional governments in recent years: Sudan severed ties with Abu Dhabi over well-documented evidence that the Emirati state funded and fueled Sudan’s brutal ongoing civil war, while Somalia, Libya, and Yemen have all publicly accused the UAE of undermining their territorial integrity by arming and financing rival armed factions and separatist movements. Ghebouli added that Algerian officials view Emirati financial, diplomatic, and military backing for disparate armed groups across the region from Libya to the Sahel as a deliberate strategy to foment division, and that Abu Dhabi’s aggressive lobbying to expand the US-brokered Abraham Accords normalization deals between Israel and Arab states – including Morocco – further deepened rifts with Algiers. Over the past few years, the UAE has steadily built deep ties with ruling military regimes across the Sahel through high-level diplomatic outreach, gold trading partnerships, and targeted investment, with Emirati minister Sheikh Shakhboot bin Nahyan holding a summit with the leaders of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger in May 2025 to discuss cooperation spanning economic development, energy, and security sectors. Analysts note that Algeria has long viewed the entire Sahel as a natural extension of its own national security perimeter, and that the government is now moving decisively to defend that space. Ghebouli added that longstanding Algerian taboos against overt military deployments abroad have been discarded amid intensifying geopolitical rivalries and foreign intervention in the region, as Algiers now uses visible military presence to clearly mark its non-negotiable national security redlines. Another key source of Algerian concern is the influence of UAE-backed eastern Libyan strongman Khalifa Haftar, whose Libyan Arab Armed Forces have been expanding military control toward the border corridors linking Libya and Niger, raising alarms about growing Emirati sway along Algeria’s entire southern national border. Libya analyst Jalel Harchaoui, affiliated with the Royal United Services Institute, noted that Algeria has maintained frosty relations with the Haftar family for years, with tensions flaring during the August 2025 Niger coup attempt, as Haftar’s son Saddam openly backed Mahamoud Sallah, a leading political opponent of Niger’s Tiani. Harchaoui clarified that the current Algerian military mission is limited to Niger’s borders, and there is no evidence to suggest Algiers is planning direct intervention in Libya at this stage. Recent diplomatic shifts, including Turkey’s October rapprochement with Haftar, may create new opportunities for Algeria to shore up its position in the Sahel, as Ankara and Algiers share close bilateral ties and aligned interests in stabilizing Libya and Sudan. Reports also indicate that Morocco has recently pursued outreach to the Haftar clan, with Khalifa Haftar’s son and eastern Libyan forces chief of staff Khaled Haftar making an official state visit to Morocco in the previous month. Complementing these geopolitical priorities are Algeria’s high-stakes economic and energy interests in Niger. Algerian state energy giant Sonatrach, alongside the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation and the Nigerien government, is leading development of a 4,000-kilometer Trans-Saharan Gas Pipeline designed to transport Nigerian natural gas through Niger and Algeria to export markets in Europe. Dr. Fatiha Dazi-Heni, a senior political scientist specializing in Arabian Peninsula affairs at Paris-based research institute Irsem and Sciences Po Lille, confirmed that the deployed Algerian troops are explicitly tasked with protecting Sonatrach’s energy projects and the planned route of the Trans-Saharan pipeline. The project faces direct commercial competition from a rival Nigeria-Morocco Atlantic coastal gas pipeline that would draw on the exact same Nigerian gas reserves to supply European markets, with the UAE committing to provide full financial and technical backing to the Moroccan-led project. Dazi-Heni noted that Niger is geographically impossible for the overland Trans-Saharan pipeline route to bypass, meaning that by securing stability in Niger, Algeria is actively defending its core strategic asset against the competing Morocco-UAE alliance – a dynamic where Israel also holds indirect stakes via its formal normalization partnership with Morocco. Dazi-Heni added that this unprecedented military deployment reflects a major evolution in Algeria’s traditionally cautious, low-profile strategic culture, as policymakers adjust to the harsh new geopolitical constraints reshaping the entire North and West African region.

  • Trump goes meekly as Democrats take Senate and House

    Trump goes meekly as Democrats take Senate and House

    As vote tallies rolled through late election night Tuesday, uncounted competitive US Senate races remained outstanding, but election decision desks across major outlets confirmed Democrats had flipped enough seats to seize unchallenged majorities in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, marking a sweeping, nationwide voter repudiation of former and sitting President Donald Trump’s Republican Party. The series of decisive Democratic Senate upsets included projected victories for Josh Turek in Iowa, Roy Cooper in North Carolina, Annie Andrews in South Carolina, Adam Hamilton in Kansas, Troy Jackson in Maine, incumbent Sherrod Brown holding his Ohio seat, and James Talarico delivering a shocking blue flip in deep-red Texas. Notably, Democrats did not lose a single Senate seat they previously held going into the election, and their projected majority is large enough that they will not require the vote of centrist Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, who has frequently broken with his party on high-stakes issues including ongoing overseas military conflicts. MSNBC NOW anchor Chris Hayes broke down the unprecedented scale of the wins on live air, emphasizing that the Democratic performances were not narrow, marginal victories decided by 10,000 or 20,000 vote gaps. “This is a total shellacking,” Hayes stated, highlighting that the Texas Senate and gubernatorial races, in particular, were blowout results in a state that had operated as an unchallenged one-party Republican stronghold for nearly 30 years. Talarico is on track to win his Texas Senate seat by a commanding 7 to 8 point margin, a result so lopsided Hayes noted local Republican candidates were “getting their clocks cleaned.” In his victory address, Talarico rallied supporters, declaring “we just took back Texas” and sent a clear message to wealthy billionaire megadonors across the country that “in this state, in this country, power belongs to the people.” Earlier that evening, when decision desks first projected Democratic control of the House, Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Greg Casar, a Texas Democrat, framed the results as a historic turning point for working class Americans. “Working people came together to change the course of American history. From coast to coast, Americans are demanding a country that works for all of us, not just corrupt politicians and billionaires,” Casar said. Moments after the Senate majority was also called for Democrats, Casar made a direct public call to eliminate the Senate legislative filibuster, a longstanding procedural rule that requires 60 votes to advance most bills. Senior Democratic senators laid out immediate oversight and legislative priorities in the hours following the projected wins. Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, the likely incoming chair of the powerful Senate Finance Committee, cited sweeping oversight subpoenas as a top priority, a sentiment echoed by Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts who joked that federal authorities “are going to need to plant new forests for all of the subpoenas we’ll be printing” to hold the Trump administration to account. The dual chamber majorities grant Democrats unprecedented leverage to block the remainder of Trump’s second term legislative agenda, launch sweeping formal oversight investigations into administration conduct, and even open the door to a historic third presidential impeachment in modern US history. Trump, who has posted historically low approval ratings amid widespread public anger over his administration’s illegal military conflict in Iran and a crippling national cost-of-living affordability crisis, took to his Truth Social platform late Tuesday to push back on the results, writing “I wasn’t on the Ballot and if I was, we would have won IN A LANDSLIDE!” For months prior to the election, election watchdogs warned Trump would likely refuse to concede unfavorable results, following his 2020 refusal to accept his presidential election loss. But in a late night phone interview with The New York Times shortly before 10:30 pm Eastern Time, Trump struck an uncharacteristically conciliatory tone toward the incoming Democratic congressional majority, stating “We’ll, you know, look forward to working with them… We’ll probably work something out.” Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin formally laid out the party’s governing mandate in an official statement after the majority projections were confirmed, noting the party had run aggressive campaigns across traditionally red districts to hold Republicans accountable for unpopular policies, elect working-class champions, and flip the Senate. Martin pledged the new Democratic majority would prioritize lowering grocery and energy costs, expanding healthcare access, reducing housing and childcare expenses, protecting labor rights, ending the costly Republican-led war in Iran, rolling back reckless Trump-era tariffs, investigating administration corruption, and directing new investment into underserved communities nationwide.

  • Demography is destiny: China will grow old before it gets rich

    Demography is destiny: China will grow old before it gets rich

    LONDON — When China’s landmark 15th Five-Year Plan (2026–2030) was formally adopted by the National People’s Congress in March 2026, it explicitly flagged two interconnected demographic headwinds reshaping the nation’s social and economic fabric: accelerating population aging and sustained plummeting birth rates. The policy framework formally coined the term “silver economy” to frame the sweeping set of economic opportunities and challenges tied to its fast-expanding 65+ population, as household structures across the country undergo an unprecedented transformation. Two decades prior, nearly 50% of Chinese households had a child residing at home, while just 12.5% were led by a householder aged 65 or older. By 2036, those figures will flip dramatically: only 29% of households will include a resident child, while 18% will be headed by a senior citizen. This seismic demographic pivot places China on a trajectory that mirrors, and in critical ways outpaces, the aging crisis that has weighed on Japan since 1996, when the 65+ age group crossed 15% of Japan’s total population — a milestone China is set to hit in 2026. Projections from independent global data analytics firm World Data Lab show that by 2050, roughly 31% of China’s total population will be aged 65 or over, matching Japan’s current demographic profile today. Even in the near term, the ripple effects of this shift are already rippling through China’s labor market: Reuters reported in January 2026 that hundreds of millions of workers are poised to exit the workforce in the coming years, the Financial Times has documented manufacturing firms racing to deploy AI-powered industrial robots to offset looming labor shortages, and Nikkei Asia has outlined new regulatory frameworks designed to encourage workers to remain in the labor force past traditional retirement ages. This shrinking, aging workforce has already introduced unforeseen complications for Beijing’s long-stated policy priority of boosting domestic household consumption to drive economic growth. What makes China’s aging trajectory uniquely challenging compared to Japan’s historical experience is the relative lack of accumulated wealth among its senior population. Japan hit the 20% 65+ population threshold in 2005; China will not reach that mark until 2032, at which point its per capita consumer spending at purchasing power parity will stand at just 60% of what Japanese consumers spent back in 2005. Over the next 24 years, China’s working-age population (ages 15 to 64) will plummet by 245 million people, dropping from 990 million today to roughly 745 million by 2050, while the 65+ cohort will surge from 214 million to 390 million. The share of total national consumer spending coming from retirees will jump from 1 in 7 yuan today to 1 in 3 yuan by 2050, with the vast majority of these older consumers operating on tight, modest household budgets. Even with these constrained individual spending capacities, the sheer scale of China’s senior population will make it one of the largest consumer markets on the planet. By 2035, the 313 million people aged 65 and over in China will generate $3.2 trillion in annual consumer spending, averaging $10,300 per person. If this group were treated as a standalone national economy, it would rank as the fifth largest consumer market in the world outside of China, trailing only the United States, India, the United Kingdom, and Germany. Geographic distribution of this silver market is also undergoing rapid, unanticipated shifts. Today, of China’s 212 cities with populations exceeding 500,000, only 7 have a 65+ population share of 20% or higher; major megacities including Shenzhen (4%), Beijing (15%), and Shanghai (17%) all fall well below that threshold. By 2040, that number will surge to 187 of these 212 large cities, with Beijing’s 65+ share climbing to 26% and Shanghai’s hitting 30%. Only 25 large cities will retain a relatively young demographic profile, led by Shenzhen, which will still have just 7% of its population aged 65 or over in 2040, sustained by a constant inflow of young migrant workers from across the country. Contrary to common assumptions, less than a third of total senior consumer spending today occurs in these large cities, with just 25% of China’s total 65+ population residing in them. Half of all the growth in senior consumer spending through 2040 will come from small towns and rural areas outside of urban centers with populations of 50,000 or more. Across all geographies, the vast majority of older Chinese consumers have far lower disposable incomes than their peers in high-income economies. By 2033, 24% of China’s adult population will be aged 65 or over — a share identical to that of the United States today — but China’s per capita household income at purchasing power parity will sit at roughly $20,000, compared to the $60,000 current U.S. per capita household income level. Even by 2050, when China’s population will be far older than the U.S. population is today, its per capita household income will only reach 55% of current U.S. levels. Presently, 5 out of 6 older Chinese adults have a monthly budget of less than $1,400, placing them in the low-income or lower-middle class brackets. The country’s fragmented pension system does little to lift this group’s spending power: most rural residents and urban workers without formal employment-based pensions are enrolled in the national residents’ pension scheme, which pays out an average monthly benefit equal to just 1/14 of the pension disbursed to retired formal-sector urban employees. The International Monetary Fund has noted in a 2026 working paper that these extremely low pension replacement rates severely limit retirees’ ability to maintain stable, consistent consumption levels. While the number of upper-middle-class and wealthy older Chinese consumers is projected to rise from 7 million today to 72 million by 2050, with this group accounting for roughly half of all incremental senior spending growth over that period, the average older Chinese consumer will still only spend around $15,900 per year in purchasing power parity terms by mid-century. For global and domestic brands targeting this fast-expanding demographic, the data makes clear that China’s silver economy will represent the largest source of new senior consumer spending outside the United States over the next decade, but success will require product and pricing strategies tailored explicitly to modest, budget-conscious older households rather than the premium-focused offerings designed for high-income senior markets in the West.

  • Rwanda’s army team removed from Africa league after US sanctions, NBA says

    Rwanda’s army team removed from Africa league after US sanctions, NBA says

    The National Basketball Association (NBA) has officially disclosed the long-withheld reasoning behind its decision to exclude Rwanda’s army-founded Armée Patriotique Rwandaise (APR) basketball club from the 2026 Basketball Africa League (BAL), confirming the move is a direct response to sweeping U.S. sanctions levied against Rwandan military entities earlier this year. The clarification came in a formal response to a bipartisan inquiry from two U.S. senators, who had raised sharp criticism of the league’s ongoing ties to Kigali over alleged human rights violations and regional destabilization.
    U.S. legislators Senator Jeffrey Merkley, a Democrat, and Senator Marsha Blackburn, a Republican, penned a letter dated October 23 that demanded the NBA justify its partnership framework with Rwanda, issuing a November 2 deadline for a written explanation of the league’s policies on collaborating with foreign governments accused of systemic human rights abuses. The pair warned the NBA risked being labeled complicit in “sportswashing” by maintaining ties to the Rwandan state, which U.S. authorities have accused of actively fueling the years-long violent insurgency in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) through its support for the M23 rebel group. In a separate announcement last week, the U.S. government extended sanctions to cover Rwanda’s entire defense ministry over its documented backing of the M23 faction, which has seized swathes of territory in eastern DRC and displaced millions of civilians. Rwandan officials have repeatedly denied all allegations of supporting the M23 rebels, despite widespread independent evidence corroborating the claims.
    NBA Deputy Commissioner Mark Tatum confirmed in remarks first reported by sports outlet ESPN that APR has been formally removed from BAL competition, and the ban will remain in full effect for the duration of the active U.S. sanctions. APR, one of Rwanda’s most decorated domestic basketball sides, previously represented the nation in the 2024 and 2025 BAL seasons, securing a third-place finish in 2025 before being replaced by the RSSB Tigers for the 2026 tournament cycle.
    The BAL, a landmark pan-African professional basketball competition co-founded by the NBA and international basketball governing body FIBA, has maintained a high-profile commercial partnership with Rwanda since its inaugural 2021 season. Kigali pays millions of dollars annually to secure official BAL partner status, and has hosted every BAL finals and playoff series except one at the 10,000-seat BK Arena in the Rwandan capital. DRC officials have for years publicly condemned Rwanda’s string of high-value international sports sponsorship deals – spanning partnerships with top European football clubs, Formula 1 events, and the NBA – arguing these agreements allow Kigali to rehabilitate its global public image while violence persists across eastern DRC.
    Prior to the formal disclosure of the sanctions-linked ban, the NBA had only announced APR would not compete in the 2026 BAL season without offering a public rationale for the exclusion, leaving the decision open to widespread public and media speculation.

  • Progressive Democrat Abdul El-Sayed wins Michigan Senate race

    Progressive Democrat Abdul El-Sayed wins Michigan Senate race

    In a fiercely contested Michigan U.S. Senate race defined by relentless partisan attacks, unprecedented intra-party rifts, and record levels of outside campaign spending, progressive Democratic candidate Abdul El-Sayed has secured a landmark victory, cementing his place as the first Muslim American ever elected to the U.S. Senate. The hard-fought contest saw El-Sayed defeat Trump-endorsed Republican rival Mike Rogers, even as he weathered a coordinated smear campaign that included baseless attempts to tie him to terrorist organizations, unfounded accusations of communist sympathies, and repeated attacks targeting his Egyptian immigrant heritage and Muslim faith. Adding to the unprecedented turbulence of the race, El-Sayed’s former Democratic primary opponent Haley Stevens — a staunchly pro-Israel congresswoman whose campaign received millions in funding from the influential American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) — made headlines days before Election Day by publicly endorsing Rogers, a move that Democratic leadership condemned as a “despicable betrayal” and that prompted mass resignations from Stevens’ own congressional staff. The endorsement followed a bitter public feud between the two Democrats, sparked by El-Sayed’s unflinching campaign stance that labeled Israeli actions in Gaza as a genocide and called for an immediate end to U.S. military aid to Israel — a policy position that carried unique weight in Michigan, home to the second-largest Arab American population in the United States. A former public health administrator, El-Sayed ran on an unapologetically left-wing platform centered on universal single-payer healthcare, a targeted wealth tax on the nation’s billionaire class, and sweeping reforms to eliminate corporate money from U.S. political systems, with high-profile campaign support from leading progressive figures including Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. For hours on election night, El-Sayed’s supporters gathered in watch parties across the state, tracking Democratic gains nationwide before erupting in deafening, jubilant cheers when the race was officially called for their candidate. Thousands of attendees held up smartphones to capture the historic moment as El-Sayed took the stage shortly after midnight on Wednesday morning, chanting his name in unison and repeating his core campaign slogans back to him: “Money out of politics, money in your pocket and Medicare for all.” Many in the diverse crowd, including dozens of Arab American and Muslim community members, embraced tearfully, with many telling BBC reporters the victory represented a long-overdue rebuke to the surging wave of Islamophobia that has swept across the United States in recent years. During his victory address, El-Sayed thanked voters for taking a chance on what he described as “the unlikeliest of candidates,” noting that the coordinated campaign against him had been among the ugliest, most bigoted electoral efforts that Michigan residents had witnessed in their lifetimes. He opened his remarks with the Arabic phrase “Alhamdullah” — meaning “praise be to God” — adding a playful jab at right-wing critics by clarifying the phrase for conservative operatives in the room. The 42-year-old new senator, a first-generation American raised in the post-9/11 era, framed his win as a breakthrough for a generation of Muslim and Arab American young people who have long been made to feel unwelcome or excluded from U.S. political life. Analysts had flagged the Michigan Senate seat — left open by retiring Democratic incumbent Gary Peters — as one of the most competitive, high-stakes contests of the 2026 midterm cycle, and El-Sayed’s decisive win further expanded Democratic control of the U.S. Senate even as the party posted unexpected gains in traditionally deep-Republican districts. The race has also been widely framed as a critical test of the political strength of the Democratic left in a key swing state, after a string of recent primary victories for democratic socialist candidates in safely blue districts. For local Arab American Muslim activist Roula Allouch, the victory was a deeply personal, transformative milestone. “I had literal goosebumps watching this campaign cross the finish line,” she told the BBC. “I am so proud of Abdul, of the race he ran, and of his whole family for persevering through every bit of hate and Islamophobic rhetoric that was thrown their way for months.” Another Muslim attendee at the victory celebration echoed that sentiment, noting that El-Sayed’s win would send a powerful message to marginalized communities across the country. “He makes us all so proud,” she said. “It makes us stand a little taller, hold our shoulders a little broader, and know that someone finally has our back, someone who is going to Washington to actually fight for all of us.”

  • Trump takes aim at Republicans but says Democrats did a ‘good job’

    Trump takes aim at Republicans but says Democrats did a ‘good job’

    In a striking post-2026 U.S. midterm election turn of events, sitting President Donald Trump has publicly acknowledged that Democratic candidates delivered a standout performance that secured the party full control of both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, a historic electoral upset that broke decades of Republican dominance in key statewide races including Texas.
    The president shared his unvarnished reactions across multiple platforms in the hours after results were finalized, starting with a candid, uncharacteristically generous assessment posted to his Truth Social account where he stated flatly, “Democrats did a good job.” That praise for opposing party success was paired with scathing criticism of his own Republican allies, most notably outgoing Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who suffered a shocking defeat at the hands of Democratic challenger Gina Hinojosa — marking the first time a Democrat has claimed the Texas governorship in more than 30 years. Trump attributed Abbott’s loss entirely to what he framed as the incumbent’s recent ideological drift, writing that Abbott would have easily secured re-election if he “hadn’t become a RINO in the last six months” of his campaign, invoking the widely used partisan acronym for “Republican in Name Only” that the GOP’s most hardline factions deploy to label officials they deem ideologically disloyal.
    Trump went on to claim that his presence on the ballot during the midterms would have delivered a landslide victory for Republican candidates across the board, while simultaneously affirming to *The New York Times* that he fully and unreservedly accepted the certified election results. He told the paper he was prepared to collaborate with the new Democratic congressional majority to advance shared priorities, noting, “We’ll probably work something out” after a period of expected legislative friction.
    In a parallel interview with Fox News, the president admitted he had been caught off guard by the scale of the Republican losses, and laid out a clear governing roadmap for the months ahead: he predicted the new Democratic majority would send a slate of what he called “insane” partisan bills to his desk, all of which he would veto immediately. He projected that after roughly two months of sustained vetoes, Democratic leaders would reach out to negotiate compromise legislation that both parties could support. To underscore this planned strategy, Trump shared an image on Truth Social of a custom red cap modeled after his iconic “Make America Great Again” campaign headwear, emblazoned with the single word “VETO” in bold lettering.
    As the full scope of the Republican Party’s underperformance became clear, Trump announced his intention to publish a series of unfiltered political analyses breaking down exactly why certain GOP candidates won and others lost, framing the post-election review as a transparent reckoning for the party. He went on to distance himself from multiple failed Republican contenders, telling CBS News that many losing candidates had been unpopular with voters to begin with, and that a large number of those underperforming candidates were not even personal allies of his.
    The president also directed pointed criticism at long-time conservative media ally Fox News in a string of additional Truth Social posts, accusing the network of devoting excessive airtime to covering Democratic candidates during election night coverage. He claimed the network’s plummeting viewership ratings were not tied to his own recent coverage of the outlet, but stemmed from Fox’s purported bias against him. He specifically called out the network’s decision to feature an interview with former New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, whom he derided as the worst mayor in the city’s entire history, adding that de Blasio left office in disgrace after inflicting incalculable harm on New York City residents.