博客

  • Israel pitched advanced drones to UAE, leaked emails reveal: Report

    Israel pitched advanced drones to UAE, leaked emails reveal: Report

    Fresh details of a secret arms deal negotiation between the United Arab Emirates and Israel have come to light, following a leak of internal emails from Israel’s largest defense contractor, Elbit Systems. The correspondence, published for the first time by Haaretz and Drop Site News, lays bare how Abu Dhabi accelerated push for the purchase of Israeli intelligence and surveillance drones just weeks after a deadly cross-border attack by Yemen’s Houthi movement in early 2022.

    The hacked emails, which cover a period from 2021 through the start of 2023, outline early discussions between Elbit Systems and UAE parties over a package of Israeli defense technology. The proposed deal includes Hermes 900 reconnaissance drones, SkyEye wide-area surveillance sensors, ground control infrastructure, as well as personnel training and long-term logistical support. According to the leaked documents, the entire transaction was reclassified as an “urgent priority” immediately after the January 17, 2022 Houthi missile and drone assault on Abu Dhabi that targeted key infrastructure including oil tanker facilities and Abu Dhabi International Airport.

    The cache of executive emails was obtained by Handala, an anonymous online hacking group that open-source intelligence researchers claim has ties to the Iranian government. Both Haaretz and Drop Site News independently verified the authenticity of the documents before publishing their reporting. Initial projections valued the core drone deal at $154 million, with optional system upgrades pushing the total projected contract value to $225 million. To date, the leaked correspondence offers no confirmation on whether the ordered drones and systems have been delivered to the UAE.

    To understand the scope of the technology on offer, the SkyEye surveillance system integrates high-resolution electro-optical cameras that allow aircraft to capture vast swathes of territory in real time. Footage captured by the system can be reviewed from multiple vantage points, enabling operators to trace moving objects and personnel back to their point of origin. The Hermes 900, Elbit’s flagship medium-altitude long-endurance drone, is designed for advanced reconnaissance and surveillance missions, with a maximum payload capacity of 990 pounds. Multiple defense industry reports note the platform can also be configured to carry up to eight surface-to-air missiles for offensive operations.

    Internal correspondence shows that just two months after the 2022 Houthi attack, a senior leader from the Israeli Ministry of Defense’s arms development directorate traveled to Abu Dhabi to present a formal proposal for the Hermes 900 sale. The proposal framed the drones as a critical operational solution to extend cross-border surveillance capabilities, specifically to detect incoming missile and drone launches before they reach UAE territory.

    The emerging drone deal negotiations come against a backdrop of rapidly warming bilateral defense ties between Tel Aviv and Abu Dhabi, which date back to the 2020 Abraham Accords. Brokered by the first Trump administration, the normalization agreement between Israel, the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco was explicitly positioned as a framework to deepen security and defense cooperation across the region. This new leak confirms long-held analyst assessments that cutting-edge Israeli defense technology has been a key driver of growing security partnerships between Israel and Gulf Arab states.

    Beyond the core Hermes 900 and SkyEye package, the emails also include passing references to two additional Elbit Systems products: the SkyStriker loitering munition – more commonly known as a “suicide drone” – and the smaller Hermes 650 reconnaissance drone. Today, the UAE stands as one of Israel’s closest partners in the Arab and Muslim world, and has joined Israel and the United States in a series of coordinated military strikes targeting Iranian assets across the Middle East in recent months. As early as May of this year, Middle East Eye first reported that Israel and the UAE had launched a joint defense investment fund to develop and acquire new advanced weapons systems, amid escalating regional tensions with Iran.

  • Pentagon is emailing military experts and asking best way to ‘punish’ Iran: Report

    Pentagon is emailing military experts and asking best way to ‘punish’ Iran: Report

    The Trump administration finds itself mired in a diplomatic and military quagmire of its own making over Iran, with new revelations showing the U.S. military is actively crowdsourcing innovative strategies from defense experts to break the prolonged stalemate and force Tehran into a deal favorable to President Donald Trump.

    According to a Monday report from CNN, a recent email circulated by an intelligence officer within U.S. Central Command (Centcom) explicitly called for “new creative and unconventional ways to pressure and punish Iran”, a signal that senior defense officials never anticipated the ongoing conflict would stretch on for as long as it has. While a Centcom spokesperson pushed back on framing the move as unusual, noting the command has a long track record of pursuing innovative problem-solving, the public request for outside ideas underscores the lack of a clear path forward for the White House.

    The intermittent, tit-for-tat military escalation between the U.S., Israel and Iran that began in late February has triggered cascading global consequences. In response to the hostilities, Iran moved to close off shipping access through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint that carries roughly 20% of the world’s daily oil supplies. The closure sent global energy prices soaring, a development that has directly hit the economic interests of Trump’s core voter base ahead of any potential election.

    Amid growing regional pressure to de-escalate, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman emphasized in a Sunday phone call with Trump the urgent need for dialogue to cool tensions, urging all parties to prioritize a truce that would open the door for negotiated diplomatic solutions.

    The situation has been further muddled by conflicting public statements over the status of talks. Last Saturday, Trump announced he had called off planned military strikes against Iran and claimed negotiations between Washington and Tehran would officially kick off on Monday. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday, Trump argued that Iran had clear motivation to negotiate: “Obviously, they don’t want to be attacked. Now what we’re doing is we’re talking to them in the form of a negotiation. It begins tomorrow afternoon.”

    But Iranian officials have flatly denied Trump’s claim that bilateral talks are underway. Esmaeil Baghaei, spokesperson for Iran’s foreign ministry, clarified during a press briefing that Tehran is currently holding only “constructive” discussions with Oman, focused on establishing new secure shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz. “We are not currently negotiating with the United States. Our negotiations are with Oman to secure passage through the Strait of Hormuz,” Baghaei stated. He added that the status quo in the strait will remain in place as long as the U.S. maintains its naval blockade of Iranian ports, and urged both regional and international powers to respond to Iran’s responsible diplomatic outreach with a constructive approach.

  • China steps up ‘propaganda blitz’ in Turkey amid investment fallout

    China steps up ‘propaganda blitz’ in Turkey amid investment fallout

    When Chinese electric vehicle giant BYD paused plans to construct a manufacturing plant in Turkey back in June, shifting its production priorities to existing European facilities, the decision sent ripples through bilateral relations between Ankara and Beijing. What made the reversal particularly awkward for Turkey’s ruling government was the suite of generous tax breaks Ankara had already granted to BYD for domestic vehicle sales, long before any ground was broken on the promised facility.

    The early incentives have already paid major dividends for BYD: the automaker’s Turkish sales skyrocketed to more than 45,000 units in 2025, and industry experts estimate the tax advantages have netted the firm between $500 million and $1 billion in extra profits from the Turkish market to date. The collapse of the plant deal left Beijing’s reputation in Turkey on shaky ground, prompting a sweeping public relations push to reverse the growing negative sentiment, according to a Turkish government consultant who spoke to Middle East Eye.

    Ankara, the consultant added, has grown increasingly frustrated with what it views as a pattern of Chinese negotiating behavior: creating the perception that a final binding agreement has been reached, only to return to the table later with an expanded list of new demands. For observers who track China’s activities in Turkey closely, the accelerated PR campaign has been impossible to miss.

    China’s embassy in Ankara has begun placing unsigned, pro-Beijing opinion pieces in pro-government Turkish media, emphasizing the strategic importance of high-level ties between the Chinese Communist Party and Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP). The embassy has also pushed widespread coverage of the launch of *Volume Five of Xi Jinping: The Governance of China* across government-aligned Turkish media outlets.

    Nurettin Akcay, a Turkish academic who specializes in Chinese affairs, confirms that the BYD collapse has undeniably amplified anti-China sentiment among the Turkish public. He notes, however, that the expansion of China’s public diplomacy work in Turkey is not an entirely new development—Beijing has long cultivated ties with Turkish journalists and opinion leaders, regularly organizing all-expenses-paid visits to China long before the BYD deal fell through.

    Turkey and China have navigated a fraught bilateral relationship for more than a decade, with the status of the Uyghur people serving as the most persistent and divisive sticking point. Until 2020, Ankara worked to limit critical Turkish media coverage of human rights abuses against Uyghurs in Xinjiang, holding out hope that the gesture would clear the way for large-scale Chinese investment. In a high-profile step to improve ties at Beijing’s request, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan visited the Uyghur-majority Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in June 2024, a trip billed as resolving one of the core barriers to closer economic cooperation. Yet despite months of negotiations in the wake of Fidan’s visit, the promised electric vehicle plant investments from both BYD and fellow Chinese automaker Chery have yet to move forward.

    Akcay, who earned his PhD from Shanghai University, has faced personal repercussions for his public tracking of Chinese lobbying efforts in Turkey. He recently revealed via social media platform X that Shanghai University sent him an official email notifying him that the institution had received dozens of complaints over his critical reporting on China. As a result, the university asked him to stop publicly referencing his PhD degree earned at the school, and Akcay says he now expects he will be permanently barred from re-entering China.

    Akcay explains that Beijing’s current outreach strategy in Turkey centers on what he terms “elite engagement”: a curated form of showcase diplomacy that invites prominent Turkish figures to visit carefully selected sites across China to project a sanitized, positive image of the country to the Turkish public. Last month, for example, the China-Turkey Friendship Foundation—a Chinese state-funded organization—organized an eight-day press tour to Xinjiang for journalists from leading Turkish opposition and independent outlets, including T24, Halk TV, Cumhuriyet and Haberturk TV.

    None of the participating journalists published coverage echoing international allegations of systemic mistreatment of Uyghurs in Xinjiang; instead, their reports focused on what they described as terrorist threats from radical groups in the region and China’s economic integration policies. Multiple outlets used nearly identical phrasing in their coverage, highlighting Xinjiang’s central role to China’s industrial growth and the Belt and Road Initiative, while framing tourism as a core driver of the region’s development.

    This curated narrative directly contradicts findings from global human rights organizations. Human Rights Watch’s 2026 World Report documented that Chinese authorities have tightened ideological controls across Xinjiang and Tibet over the past year, while continuing a harsh campaign of forced assimilation against Uyghur and Tibetan communities. The organization notes that there has never been accountability for crimes against humanity in Xinjiang, where hundreds of thousands of Uyghurs remain arbitrarily detained. Since 2017, the Chinese government has detained hundreds of thousands of Uyghurs in extrajudicial “re-education camps,” demolished thousands of mosques and Islamic cemeteries, and banned religious education for Uyghur communities across Xinjiang.

    “Everything is planned, and China gets precisely what it wants because visitors are shown only what they are intended to see,” Akcay said. “Consequently, journalists who visit China encounter a positive picture without fully understanding the broader context of human rights abuses in the region.”

    Beyond outreach to journalists and ruling party allies, China’s recent influence campaign in Turkey has expanded to include direct engagement with Turkey’s opposition parties, including the conservative Islamist New Welfare Party and the nationalist Victory Party. A New Welfare Party delegation traveled to China in June, and Chinese Ambassador to Turkey Jiang Xuebin met the party’s chairman Fatih Erbakan just last month. Akcay says Beijing has worked to build positive ties with nearly all of Turkey’s opposition factions, regardless of size, with the Uyghur issue once again serving as the core motivating factor.

    Right-wing opposition parties in Turkey can speak relatively openly about the Uyghur issue because it resonates strongly with their conservative, nationalist voter bases, Akcay explains. By cultivating ties across the entire political spectrum, Beijing aims to blunt rising domestic criticism of China within Turkey, and prevent that criticism from escalating into large-scale grassroots campaigns against Chinese investment or policy. While Akcay does not believe the campaign has completely reshaped Turkish public opinion of China, he assesses that the strategy has been partially successful in preventing the emergence of a coordinated, radical counter-movement.

    “China is seeking to minimise domestic criticism within Turkey by pursuing a broad engagement strategy,” he noted, adding: “It may not completely transform public perceptions, but it is pursuing an effective strategy to prevent the emergence of a radical counter-campaign.”

  • Israeli court blocks Ben Gvir crocodile moat plan for prisons holding Palestinians

    Israeli court blocks Ben Gvir crocodile moat plan for prisons holding Palestinians

    A controversial plan by Israeli far-right national security minister Itamar Ben Gvir to place Nile crocodiles in moats surrounding facilities holding Palestinian prisoners has been temporarily blocked by a Jerusalem District Court ruling, Israeli media has confirmed.

    The scheme, which had secured backing from Ben Gvir’s own ministry and the Israel Prison Service (IPS), had already seen preliminary construction work underway: crews had begun digging trenches around a portion of Ketziot Prison, located in Israel’s Negev desert. Under the proposal, predatory Nile crocodiles would be stationed in these newly dug moats as an added security perimeter around the prison complex.

    The court’s temporary injunction was issued just hours after Israeli animal welfare group Let the Animals Live filed a legal petition against the plan, naming Environmental Protection Minister Idit Silman, Ben Gvir, and the IPS as respondents. Notably, the legal challenge centered exclusively on risks to the crocodiles and potential harm to prison personnel, rather than addressing the longstanding documented abuses faced by Palestinian detainees held in Israeli custody.

    The pathway for Ben Gvir’s proposal was cleared earlier in July 2025, when Minister Silman issued a regulatory order reclassifying Nile crocodiles from a protected native species to a “tended animal,” removing legal barriers to their transfer and deployment at the prison site. The petition disputes this regulatory change, arguing Silman sidelined formal input from legal experts and the Nature and Parks Authority, and calling for the crocodile’s protected status to be reinstated.

    In his Sunday ruling, Judge Avraham Rubin found that the claims of potential harm to the crocodiles were serious enough to warrant immediate intervention. “The claims regarding the expected harm to the crocodiles merit investigation and justify issuing an order prohibiting the transfer, or any action related to locating or preparing crocodiles for transfer,” Rubin wrote in his decision. The temporary injunction will remain in effect until a full ruling on the case, with Silman, Ben Gvir, and the IPS given until Wednesday to submit formal responses to the court.

    Israeli environmental and conservation bodies have voiced opposition to the plan from its earliest stages. Both the Environmental Protection Ministry and the Nature and Parks Authority have publicly stated that Silman’s reclassification of the Nile crocodile lacks any scientific foundation, and have echoed concerns that relocating the large predators to a high-traffic prison site puts correctional staff at unnecessary risk.

    The crocodile moat scheme is only the latest in a string of harsh measures pushed by Ben Gvir aimed at worsening already poor detention conditions for Palestinians held in Israeli custody. Previous proposals and implemented policies have included restrictions on family visitations, reduced food access, deliberate denial of medical care, extended solitary confinement, and reports of routine torture.

    The court ruling came on the same day that video footage of Ben Gvir circulated widely on social media, showing the far-right politician mocking a female Palestinian detainee who had raised complaints about inhumane conditions inside her facility.

    According to data collected by Palestinian prisoner advocacy organizations, more than 9,600 Palestinians are currently held in Israeli detention facilities as of 2025. That population includes 84 women and 350 minor children, with widespread documentation of ongoing abuses including medical neglect, physical assault, sexual violence, and rape that human rights groups characterize as systematic torture against the detainee population.

  • German court rules comparing Israel to Nazi Germany constitutes ‘protected speech’

    German court rules comparing Israel to Nazi Germany constitutes ‘protected speech’

    In a landmark ruling that clarifies the boundaries of political expression amid heated global debate over the Israel-Gaza conflict, Germany’s Zweibrucken Higher Regional Court has overturned a lower court’s conviction and acquitted a woman who faced a €2,400 ($2,700) fine for sharing two critical Instagram posts comparing Israel’s military operations in Gaza to the atrocities of Nazi Germany.

    The posts were published at the peak of Israeli military campaign in Gaza, a period that has drawn widespread international condemnation and mass grassroots protests calling for an end to the violence. The first post featured a side-by-side table outlining parallels between Israel’s conduct in Gaza and the historical actions of the Nazi regime, paired with a split image combining the Israeli flag and the Nazi flag, with a portion of a swastika visible. The second post showed Israeli soldiers opening fire into an enclosed space, with blood depicted pooling below the structure, and overlaid a swastika inside the Star of David. Both posts were tagged with the pro-Palestinian hashtags #FREEPALESTINE and #GAZAUNDERATTACK.

    In its ruling, the court emphasized that the imagery and text included in the posts were unambiguously rooted in condemnation of Israeli military actions in Gaza, not endorsement of Nazi ideology. The judgment clarified that even when it involves the use of symbols legally banned in Germany, such speech falls under the protection of freedom of expression when the broader context clearly frames the content as criticism, political commentary, or rejection of extremist ideology. Judges noted that the #FREEPALESTINE hashtag made the woman’s political position unequivocal, and far-right sympathizers would not misinterpret the posts as promotion of neo-Nazi beliefs.

    The court explicitly rejected the common argument that any comparison between Israeli state policy and Nazi Germany automatically constitutes trivialization of the Holocaust or incitement to religious or ethnic hatred. The ruling held that sharp, critical commentary targeting the actions of a sovereign state does not automatically cross the legal threshold for criminal prosecution on these grounds. The same logic was applied to the contested combined swastika-Star of David image: the court found that the depiction of soldiers attacking unarmed civilians, paired with the #GAZAUNDERATTACK tag, made the image’s condemnatory purpose entirely clear, rooted in criticism of Israel’s military offensive rather than hateful extremism.

    While the ruling does not grant blanket immunity for all such comparisons, it establishes a critical legal precedent: Germany cannot automatically criminalize comparisons between Israeli actions and Nazi conduct when the speech in question is clearly part of an unmistakable condemnation of ongoing Israeli violence in Gaza. Following the appellate judgment, the woman was cleared of all charges against her.

  • How Lamine Yamal became a symbol of Spain’s identity debate

    How Lamine Yamal became a symbol of Spain’s identity debate

    In the immediate aftermath of Spain’s 2026 World Cup final win over Argentina, one image cut through the chaos of post-match celebrations and on-pitch scuffles to capture global attention: 19-year-old Lamine Yamal, the youngest starter to win a World Cup final since Pele and Kylian Mbappé, dropped to his knees in prayer, the iconic red of Spain’s national team draped over his shoulders. What began as a quiet, personal moment of gratitude for a historic sporting achievement quickly exploded into the center of a decades-long conversation in Spain over what it means to be Spanish, and who gets to claim that identity.

    Yamal’s background places him directly at the intersection of Spain’s complex multicultural present. Born in the working-class neighborhood of Rocaforda in Mataró to a Moroccan father and an Equatorial Guinean mother, the young Barcelona star has never hidden his Muslim faith. He has spoken openly about reciting a traditional dua taught by his grandmother before every match and fasting during Ramadan while training at Barcelona’s Camp Nou stadium. Earlier in the World Cup, after scoring against Saudi Arabia in the group stage, he performed sujud – a common prostration of gratitude practiced by Muslim athletes around the world. That gesture alone sparked immediate backlash: while many fans celebrated Yamal’s open embrace of his identity, others argued his public prayer had no place on the pitch when he was representing Spain.

    He is not the first Muslim player to wear the Spanish national team jersey – Munir Al Haddadi earned that distinction back in 2014 – but Yamal’s unprecedented profile has made him the face of this national debate. As the heir to Barcelona’s legendary number 10 shirt, once held by Lionel Messi, every choice he makes is scrutinized, and his loyalty to the country of his birth has been called into question repeatedly in public discourse.

    The debate has pulled in high-profile Spanish politicians, laying bare deep divisions over multiculturalism and immigration. Former minister and leading Podemos party figure Ione Belarra has positioned Yamal as a symbol of a more inclusive modern Spain, saying she “liked the Spain of Lamine Yamal much more than the Spain being promoted by the conservative People’s Party and far-right party Vox.” Like many of Yamal’s supporters, she celebrated the image of his younger brother running through the stadium cheering on Spain in a national team shirt as proof of his family’s deep connection to the country.

    But conservative and far-right voices have framed Yamal’s faith and identity as a threat to Spanish national culture. Santiago Abascal, leader of the far-right Vox party, defended anti-Yamal rhetoric on social platform X, arguing that critics overreacted to what he framed as a legitimate display of native Spanish identity. “They expect Spaniards to silently put up with the Islamist invasion and the mafia government,” he wrote. Long before Yamal rose to global fame, Vox already described his working-class hometown neighborhood of Rocaforda as a “multicultural shithole.”

    Data from the Spanish Observatory on Racism and Xenophobia underscores the intensity of the backlash: the organization recorded more than 40,000 pieces of online hate content targeting Yamal, with sport accounting for 16% of all monitored hateful posts, and Yamal named as the primary target in many of them. Hostility only grew after his sujud gesture, with commentators leaving comments claiming “our roots have been humiliated” and “he is not worthy of being Spanish.”

    Yet in Rocaforda, residents reject that divisive framing. Juan Carlos Serrano Muñoz, owner of a local café decorated with murals of the neighborhood’s most famous residents, including iconic bullfighter El Cordobés, dismissed far-right rhetoric as a political tactic to stoke division. “They want to focus on migration, on delinquency, but what Lamine did was give a kick to these people and tell a different story about this neighbourhood; a better story about the integration of the many cultures that live here,” he told Middle East Eye.

    Institutional leaders in Spanish football have also moved to build more inclusive spaces for athletes of all faiths and backgrounds. While Spain’s broader cultural landscape still carries deep traces of its Catholic heritage, the country is formally a secular state, and athletes of any religion are eligible to represent the national side. The Royal Spanish Football Federation (RFEF) established an Equality Department in 2023, a year before Yamal made his international debut at Euro 2024, formalizing protections against discrimination in sport for players regardless of background or faith. Individual clubs across the country have also implemented their own measures to ensure equal opportunity and welcoming environments.

    Many native-born white Spaniards have also publicly backed Yamal, embracing a vision of Spanish identity that can accommodate multiple heritages. In a public survey conducted by The New Arab, one respondent put it simply: “He is Spanish, and regardless of his origins, he has defended his country, as the Spaniard that he is.” This view does not erase Yamal’s cultural and religious background, but holds that his identity as a Spaniard and his Muslim faith can coexist.

    Today, that viral image of Yamal on his knees in prayer, surrounded by post-match chaos, carries two wildly different meanings for the Spanish public. For supporters, it is nothing more than a young athlete’s quiet moment of gratitude, no different than a Christian player crossing himself before a match or pointing to the sky to honor a loved one. For critics, shaped by years of anxiety over immigration and multiculturalism stoked by far-right parties, the gesture has become a political flashpoint in a debate that extends far beyond the football pitch.

    Spain already has one of the highest densities of public sports facilities in Europe, and football remains the country’s greatest unifying cultural force. As more young Muslim players rise through the grassroots ranks, their presence on national and club sides will only continue to grow. The RFEF’s formal anti-discrimination measures and the growing public support for athletes like Yamal point toward a future where open displays of faith by multicultural players are a normal, accepted part of Spanish football. But the ongoing political backlash surrounding Yamal also reveals another possible future: one where every gesture he makes is pulled into an old, unresolved debate about national identity that stretches far beyond the sport.

    Unlike Achraf Hakimi, another Spanish-born player who chose to represent his parents’ homeland of Morocco rather than Spain, Yamal never defused the identity debate by choosing another flag. He stayed, he scored, he prayed, and he won the biggest prize in global football – making it impossible for either side of Spain’s identity divide to make their argument without invoking his name.

  • ‘They want to make us leave’: Israel destroys West Bank wells serving Palestinian herders

    ‘They want to make us leave’: Israel destroys West Bank wells serving Palestinian herders

    Dawn breaks slowly over the spread-out tent homes and livestock enclosures of Ras al-Ahmar, a small Palestinian community tucked into the arid northern Jordan Valley. The only sound cutting through the still morning air is the desperate bleating of thirsty cattle and sheep, waiting for water that will not flow from the community’s destroyed wells.

    Just days after Israeli military forces demolished three of the village’s primary water wells, hundreds of residents are locked in a desperate race to secure enough water to sustain their households, their subsistence crops, and their grazing livestock — all in one of the occupied West Bank’s most parched, water-scarce regions.

    For 60-year-old Ali Bani Odeh, the demolition of the wells was far more than the loss of basic infrastructure. A father of four and grandfather to 14 children, Odeh has spent his entire adult life working this land, tending crops and raising animals to support his extended family. Today, he and dozens of other local families face an uncertain future: with no consistent water source, it is unclear how much longer they can remain on their ancestral land.

    “Water is everything for us,” Odeh told reporters from Middle East Eye. “Without water, we cannot live. We need it for our families, our sheep and our crops. Since the wells were destroyed, we have been forced to bring water from town at a much higher cost, and even then, we’re not always allowed to pass.”

    Families are now forced to haul water from distant urban centers at prices three times the standard rate, while Israeli military checkpoints and strict movement restrictions often block or delay water tankers from reaching the isolated village entirely.

    Abdullah Bisharat, head of the Ras al-Ahmar village council, described the destroyed wells as the beating heart of the community. “The wells were the lifeline of this community,” Bisharat said. According to his accounting, the three wells supplied more than 47 local families, totaling more than 600 residents, and irrigated roughly 7,500 dunams (more than 1,850 acres) of working farmland. They also provided water for thousands of sheep and goats, the primary source of household income for nearly all families in the community.

    “Their destruction has affected every aspect of daily life, from drinking water and agriculture to livestock, leaving dozens of families struggling to meet their most basic needs,” Bisharat added.

    Residents note that the demolition of the wells marks the most severe escalation in a months-long water crisis driven by repeated attacks from Israeli settlers. For months, settlers have repeatedly cut the above-ground pipelines that brought water to the community, forcing families to already rely on overpriced water tankers. This attack, however, eliminated the community’s last independent water source by destroying the wells themselves.

    Obeida Bani Odeh, Ali’s son, says the loss of the wells threatens not just his family’s livelihood, but their ability to remain in Ras al-Ahmar at all. “We cannot survive here without water,” he said. “For months, the pipelines supplying our community were repeatedly cut, and we had to bring water from nearby towns, often at three times the usual cost. Now the wells have been destroyed, and there is no reliable source of water left for our families or our livestock.”

    He explained that the crisis extends far beyond water scarcity. Frequent settler violence and strict movement controls have made it nearly impossible to bring in not just water, but animal feed and other essential supplies. “The settlers attack everyone, from the young to the old,” Obeida said. “They want to make people afraid and force them to leave. But we have been living on this land for generations.”

    Today, roughly 700,000 Israeli settlers reside in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem, spread across more than 300 formal settlements and unauthorized outposts. The International Court of Justice has repeatedly ruled that all Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territory violate international law, a finding that Israel has repeatedly rejected.

    Settler violence and targeted attacks against Palestinian herding and farming communities in the West Bank have spiked dramatically in recent years. United Nations data shows that between January 2023 and April 2026, at least 5,910 Palestinians have been internally displaced from their homes in the West Bank as a direct result of settler violence.

    Aref Daraghmeh, a prominent Palestinian human rights activist working in the Jordan Valley, says the demolition of water infrastructure in Ras al-Ahmar is part of a broader, systematic campaign to take control of the region’s limited natural resources. “Water has become a silent war against Palestinians in the Jordan Valley,” Daraghmeh told Middle East Eye. “The occupation has taken control of many Palestinian water sources, while the water available to Palestinian communities is insufficient for agriculture and sustaining life on the land.”

    Daraghmeh explains that restricted water access has gutted Palestinian agricultural activity across the Jordan Valley, making it increasingly impossible for small-scale farmers and herders to maintain their livelihoods. As water becomes harder to access, communities face mounting pressure to abandon their land, even as Israeli settlement agriculture expands across the region. Strict movement controls have compounded these challenges, he added. “The Jordan Valley is effectively under closure,” Daraghmeh said. “Military checkpoints control movement, roads are restricted, and residents often have to wait for hours before they can enter or leave their communities.”

    These restrictions also block farmers from accessing grazing lands and transporting livestock, crops, and supplies to market, piling additional pressure on communities already crippled by water scarcity.

    For Ali Bani Odeh, however, leaving Ras al-Ahmar is not a choice he is willing to make. Displaced from his original family home as a child, he says he will not be forced to move again. “I have left before, but I will not leave this place,” Ali said. “If we leave, they will take over the land. We are staying because this is where our lives and our history are.”

  • Russia says seven killed and 40 injured by Ukrainian drone hitting busy beach

    Russia says seven killed and 40 injured by Ukrainian drone hitting busy beach

    A deadly drone strike on a crowded Black Sea holiday beach in southern Russia has left seven civilians dead, including three children, and injured dozens more, regional authorities confirmed this week. The incident, which unfolded near the small coastal village of Arkhipo-Osipovka in Krasnodar Krai, has amplified tensions over escalating cross-border attacks amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.

    Verified social media footage shared by the BBC captures the drone diving toward a coastal cliff before slamming into the sand below, erupting into a massive fireball as shocked tourists scattered on the shore and in shallow water. Krasnodar Governor Veniamin Kondratyev announced that 40 people were injured in the strike, with 17 requiring urgent hospital treatment. The regional governor immediately pinned responsibility on Ukraine, calling the incident a deliberate attack on unarmed civilian vacationers. Ukraine has not issued any official response to the accusation, and both sides have consistently denied intentionally targeting civilian populations since the full-scale Russian invasion began in February 2022.

    The target of the drone remains unconfirmed, with conflicting accounts emerging about what led to it crashing on the beach. Some Ukrainian independent outlets on the messaging platform Telegram have argued the drone veered off course after Russian electronic warfare systems jammed its navigation signal. Multiple eyewitnesses quoted by Russian media reported hearing sustained gunfire moments before the explosion, suggesting Russian air defense units attempted to shoot the drone down before it impacted the crowded coastline. Shockingly, tourists and local residents reported no air raid sirens were activated ahead of the strike, leaving vacationers completely unprepared for the attack. Many shared harrowing accounts of the chaos: one holidaymaker described hiding under sun loungers as the blast hit, while another recalled hearing machine gun-like fire before the earth-shaking explosion. One parent, whose children witnessed the incident firsthand, told reporters their child is now suffering from a severe nervous breakdown.

    Arkhipo-Osipovka’s beach has long been a top summer destination for domestic Russian tourists, a popularity that has grown even more since international sanctions imposed after the invasion barred most Russians from leisure travel to Western countries. The strike is one of a growing string of long-range attacks carried out by Ukraine deep inside Russian territory over the past 12 months, targeting energy infrastructure and commercial sites Kyiv says are being used to support Moscow’s military effort. Cross-border strikes have increasingly caused civilian casualties over recent weeks: eight civilians across multiple Russian cities were killed in attacks just last weekend.

    Separately, Ukraine has focused recent targeting campaigns on warehouses operated by Wildberries, Russia’s largest domestic e-commerce platform often called the “Russian Amazon.” The latest strike hit a Wildberries facility in the Vladimir region, roughly 100 miles east of Moscow, overnight on Monday. Dozens of the company’s warehouses scattered across Russia – many located thousands of kilometers from the Ukrainian border – have now been hit in these attacks. Kyiv argues that Wildberries depots are being repurposed to store and distribute supplies for the Russian military, a claim the Kremlin and the company reject. Public records show that until recently, the platform openly sold a range of military-related equipment including body armor, as well as dual-use materials that can be adapted for both civilian use and drone production.

    The latest civilian casualties on both sides come as long-range strikes have intensified on either side of the front line. Just on Saturday, Russian ballistic missile strikes on Kyiv killed at least nine people and injured dozens more, according to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko confirmed a residential apartment building in the city’s central Shevchenkivskyi district was partially destroyed, leaving multiple people trapped under rubble. A week earlier, a Russian strike on a residential structure in Kryvyi Rih killed an entire family of 10. Since the start of its full-scale invasion, Russia has launched thousands of strikes on Ukrainian urban residential areas, killing and wounding thousands of Ukrainian civilians.

  • Iran denies talks with US as Trump halts strikes at the last minute

    Iran denies talks with US as Trump halts strikes at the last minute

    In a sharp contradiction of former U.S. President Donald Trump’s public announcement that bilateral negotiations with Iran would kick off on Monday, Tehran has firmly denied that any direct talks with Washington are currently underway. The dispute comes just days after Trump announced he would call off planned new military strikes against Iran, a decision he framed as a step to clear the way for a diplomatic agreement.

    Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday, Trump claimed that negotiations would get underway the following afternoon, arguing that Iran had clear incentive to reach a deal. “Obviously, they don’t want to be attacked,” Trump stated. But Iran’s foreign ministry quickly pushed back on that narrative, confirming that Tehran is currently engaged in talks only with Oman focused on securing navigation through the strategic Strait of Hormuz, not with the United States.

    Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei emphasized during a formal press briefing that discussions with Oman have been constructive, with the core goal of finalizing an agreement for new safe shipping routes through the strait. “We are not currently negotiating with the United States. Our negotiations are with Oman to secure passage through the Strait of Hormuz,” Baghaei said. He called on both regional and international powers to recognize Iran’s responsible approach to the issue and engage constructively with Tehran’s efforts. Baghaei also warned that as long as the U.S. maintains its naval blockade on Iranian ports, the volatile security situation in the Strait of Hormuz will remain unchanged.

    Despite the conflicting statements from the two sides, global oil markets reacted strongly to Trump’s initial announcement, with benchmark crude prices dropping sharply in trading on Monday. As of 09:15 GMT, October-delivery North Sea Brent crude, which traded as the global benchmark contract for the first time in this session, fell 4.59% to settle at $83.89 per barrel.

    The diplomatic back-and-forth also follows a key phone call between Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Trump over escalating regional tensions, confirmed by Saudi state media over the weekend. During the conversation, the crown prince stressed that prioritizing diplomatic dialogue to de-escalate conflict is critical, and that all possible efforts should be made to reach a truce that creates space for long-term diplomatic solutions. He added that such diplomatic outcomes are essential to preserving regional security and stability, and preventing the area from being pulled into a wider, more destructive conflict. The conversation came after Saudi Arabia publicly raised concerns about Trump’s original plans for military strikes on Iran.

    The ongoing clash between the U.S.-Israel bloc and Iran, which launched in February, has already killed thousands of people and inflicted massive economic harm across the Gulf region, where repeated Iranian attacks have disrupted daily economic activity. The persistent threat of closure to the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint through which roughly 20% of global oil shipments pass, has been one of the most damaging disruptions to regional economic activity, making the permanent reopening of the waterway a top priority for all parties involved.

    In a separate update on Monday, Hassan Qashqavi, spokesperson for Iran’s parliamentary National Security Committee, noted that Tehran is close to finalizing its agreement with Oman over the Strait of Hormuz. He also confirmed that Omani mediators are currently working to revive the 2015 nuclear deal-era Memorandum of Understanding between Iran and the United States.

  • Hundreds of migrant children are stranded in Spain’s Ceuta after mass crossing

    Hundreds of migrant children are stranded in Spain’s Ceuta after mass crossing

    In the early hours of last Thursday, a massive wave of more than 60,000 migrants pushed across the border from Morocco into Spain’s North African enclave Ceuta, in one of the largest single mass crossing events in recent Mediterranean migration history. Four days later, as most adult migrants have been repatriated or voluntarily returned to Morocco, hundreds of unaccompanied migrant minors remain stranded in the territory, facing dangerous conditions and an uncertain future.

    Among them is a 17-year-old girl from Tangier, whose story lays bare the human cost of this sudden migration crisis. She, her 8-year-old younger brother, and her mother joined the thousands of people who attempted to swim around the border breakwater to reach Spanish soil, all chasing the promise of better economic and life opportunities unavailable in their home country. While the teenager successfully made it through the rough Mediterranean surf to shore, her brother drowned before he could reach land. Spanish authorities pulled his small body from the water, the girl told an Associated Press photojournalist, on condition of anonymity to protect her safety as a vulnerable minor. In the chaos of the mass crossing, she was also separated from her mother, who remains missing.

    In the four days since she arrived, the teen has survived on the kindness of local Ceuta residents, who shared food, clothing, and a chance to bathe with her. When she sought support at the government-run youth care center, she found the facility already overwhelmed and at full capacity. “I saw people stepping on the dead,” she recounted through a translator, who stepped in because she does not speak Spanish. “Now we are children begging on the street.”

    Local official data confirms she is not alone. As of Monday, roughly 860 migrant minors remained in Ceuta after the surge, making up a large share of the 3,000 to 5,000 migrants who have avoided expulsion from the original 60,000 who crossed. Official death tolls underscore the danger of the crossing: Spanish authorities have confirmed 72 fatalities, most from drowning, and Morocco’s separate count of 11 additional deaths is not included in that total. Beyond the 17-year-old’s story, AP reporters on the ground have documented other minors begging for food in the streets of Ceuta, with resources stretched far beyond capacity.

    Spanish law mandates a specific legal framework for migrant care: while adult migrants can apply for asylum, most Moroccan adults face extremely low approval rates for humanitarian protection, and those rejected face expulsion. By contrast, unaccompanied migrant minors are legally required to receive state protection and care. But on-the-ground reporting shows enforcement of this rule is inconsistent. An AP journalist witnessed Spanish soldiers escorting a crying unaccompanied Moroccan boy to the border for repatriation, only halting the process at the last minute after local residents and media protested that the child qualified for protection under Spanish law.

    Beyond the remaining Moroccan migrants, Ceuta’s remaining population of stranded migrants also includes people from across Africa and the Middle East: Sudanese fleeing civil war, Palestinians from Gaza, Afghans escaping instability, and people from multiple other sub-Saharan African nations.

    Ceuta’s primary migrant reception center, built to hold just 600 people, has been completely filled for days, leaving hundreds of migrants to sleep on public beaches and the surrounding hills. Food and clean water are already scarce among the stranded population. Local migration activist Ramsés Mohamed Azumik, with the Ceuta-based advocacy group Asociación Elín, says the current situation is no accident. “The strategy is that hunger, thirst and exhaustion forces these people to finally decide to voluntarily return to Morocco,” Azumik explained.

    For the hundreds of stranded minors, the goal of reaching mainland Spain, just across the water visible on the hazy horizon, remains out of reach for now, leaving their lives and futures hanging in the balance.