博客

  • Join new Iran sanctions or leave the dollar system: Bessent

    Join new Iran sanctions or leave the dollar system: Bessent

    Six months into what critics describe as an illegal U.S.-Israeli war of choice against Iran, the Trump administration has shifted gears from failed military pressure to a sweeping new economic offensive, announcing harsh new secondary sanctions that threaten any global entity continuing commercial ties with Tehran. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent laid out the details of the new campaign, branded Operation Economic Outcast, during a formal press conference on Monday, framing the initiative as an all-out effort to cut off Iran’s remaining access to hard currency.

    During the briefing, Bessent left no room for interpretation about the administration’s stance, stating: “An economic engagement of any kind with this murderous regime will expose those responsible to the full reach of American power.” The campaign, which officials have dubbed an “economic D-Day,” targets five core pillars of Iran’s remaining international economic activity: technology, gold, aviation, shipping, and digital assets. The goal of the wide-ranging action is to choke off virtually every remaining stream of foreign currency flowing into the country.
    Bessent emphasized that the era of ambiguous compliance with U.S. policy is over, noting that Washington will no longer tolerate business activity in “gray spaces.” He also confirmed that the Treasury Department plans to announce sanctions against a major global financial institution as early as next week. When pressed on whether Chinese banks that maintain commercial ties with Iran would face penalties, the secretary made clear that “no one is above the reach of U.S. sanctions.” While he declined to name specific countries set for targeting, public trade data identifies China, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates as Iran’s largest remaining trading partners.

    In response to questions about why sanctions are not being imposed immediately, Bessent explained that the administration is granting a “cure period” to allow global actors to wind down existing activity with Iran. “Why would I want to blow up the global financial system?” he said, adding that the grace period will move quickly, and any entity that fails to comply with U.S. demands risks being cut off from the U.S. dollar financial system.

    Iranian officials have pushed back hard against the new sanctions threat, dismissing the campaign as an admission of U.S. military failure. Deputy Iranian Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi took to social media to mock the announcement, writing: “Is this a victory or an admission of America’s failure!? You say Iran’s military capability has been ‘dismantled,’ 100% of its military factories ‘destroyed’ and its nuclear program ‘buried’; but for this very Iran, the ‘largest financial assault in history’ and the mobilization of ‘all US institutions and authorities’ have been necessary!”

    Despite repeated claims from President Trump that the war is “over” or nearly over, on-the-ground developments confirm Iran holds the upper hand in regional shipping dynamics. Most commercial vessels have avoided the U.S.-supported shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz, instead opting for a corridor controlled by Tehran or steering clear of the waterway entirely.

    The escalating conflict is already carrying tangible economic costs for American households, in addition to the devastating toll on Iranian civilians. Disruptions to oil shipments through the key chokepoint have pushed U.S. national average gasoline prices above $4 per gallon, roughly $1 higher than the same period one year prior. Trump has brushed off public concerns about rising fuel costs, claiming $4 per gallon is “not very high” and vowing he will “never apologize” for the economic pain triggered by his administration’s policies.

    The impact of higher fuel prices extends far beyond the gas pump, as increased transportation costs push up prices for food and consumer goods, keeping overall U.S. inflation elevated. For Iranians, the economic strain is far more severe: Iran’s national currency, the rial, has already plunged to all-time lows amid a prolonged crisis driven by years of U.S. sanctions and the ongoing war.

    Beyond the borders of Iran and the U.S., the new sanctions framework carries major risks for the global economy, as it forces all nations to choose between trading with Iran and retaining access to the U.S.-dominated global financial system. At a press briefing in Beijing on Monday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian warned that unilateral sanctions only fuel further escalation and benefit no country. “China calls on parties to act rationally and with restraint and avoid taking any measures that may further escalate tensions or deal a blow to global economic growth and financial stability,” Lin said, adding that China will take all necessary steps to protect the legitimate rights and interests of its entities.

    International policy experts have widely criticized Operation Economic Outcast, warning that the gambit carries major risks for global stability and will fail to achieve Washington’s stated goals. Ryan Costello, policy director for the National Iranian American Council, described Trump as a “geopolitical gambler doubling down on a bad hand” in Iran. “What we’ve learned is that President Trump can impose extensive economic pain on Iran, but ordinary Iranians overwhelmingly bear the cost. The ruling elite in Iran remains largely insulated, while Tehran has repeatedly refused to capitulate to Washington’s demands,” Costello noted. He added that Trump’s reckless gamble risks further undermining U.S. national security, regional stability, and the global economy.

    Sina Toossi, a senior nonresident fellow at the Center for International Policy, observed that the new campaign is as much psychological warfare as it is economic, designed to project an image of inevitable Iranian isolation and amplify economic anxiety within the country. He noted that the administration’s tough rhetoric masks a core weakness: the military campaign failed to force Iran into concessions, and cutting off all of Iran’s economic lifelines requires compliance from major powers like China that openly reject Washington’s strategy. “Washington is effectively betting it can achieve through intensified economic strangulation what six months of war could not,” Toossi said. “The capacity to hurt Iran is clear. The path from pain to capitulation or collapse is not.”

    Alan Eyre, a former State Department Iran specialist and current distinguished fellow at the Middle East Institute, argued that the new campaign actually pushes the U.S. toward becoming an economic outcast in global markets. Prominent financial commentator Peter Schiff echoed that criticism on social platform X, noting that the new sanctions are a direct response to the failure of the U.S. military campaign. “However, Operation Economic Outcast will not only fail, but the economic noose that actually tightens may end up being the one wrapped around our neck,” Schiff wrote.

  • Trump removes Syria from ‘terrorism list’

    Trump removes Syria from ‘terrorism list’

    In a historic shift in U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East, the Trump administration announced Monday that it has formally stripped Syria of its decades-old designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism (SST), a policy change that lifts longstanding U.S. export restrictions and paves the way for American military assistance to Damascus.

    Alongside the delisting of Syria, Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed in an official statement that the U.S. has also revoked the Specially Designated Global Terrorist classification of Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the armed group now led by Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who is widely known by his former nom de guerre Abu Mohammed al-Jolani. Sharaa previously led HTS as an offshoot of al-Qaeda before the group broke ties with the global terror network.

    Rubio framed the dual delistings as another landmark step forward by President Trump to open a path toward greater economic prosperity for the Syrian people. The policy change comes just one week after Israel carried out an airstrike on Syria’s Abu al-Duhur airbase, an attack that inflamed existing tensions between Washington, Damascus, and Syria’s key international backer Turkey. Last week, U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and Syria Envoy Tom Barrack described the Israeli strike as “serious and worrying” in a media interview, noting that the attack appeared to be an attempt to bait Turkey into open military conflict.

    The formal delisting on Monday follows months of deliberate signaling from the Trump administration that it planned to remove Syria from the terrorism blacklist. President Trump officially launched the delisting process last month during his high-profile visit to the NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey, where he held a landmark bilateral meeting with Sharaa on the sidelines of the official summit proceedings. That meeting marked another milestone in the rapidly warming relationship between the two leaders: Sharaa was first introduced to Trump just over a year ago in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, before becoming the first Syrian leader in decades — and the first with a past designation as a U.S. terrorist — to visit the Oval Office and exchange gifts with the U.S. president last November.

    Syria was first added to the U.S. SST blacklist in 1979, when the country was led by Hafez al-Assad, father of former longtime president Bashar al-Assad. At the height of the Cold War, Syria received substantial economic and military support from the Soviet Union. While Hafez al-Assad maintained quiet diplomatic channels with the U.S. alongside his alliances with Cold War adversaries, relations between Washington and Damascus collapsed over disagreements over Lebanon and Assad’s open support for Palestinian resistance groups.

    Trump’s rapid diplomatic embrace of Sharaa over the past 12 months stands out as one of the most unconventional foreign policy moves of his second term, a step that analysts agree no recent Democratic or Republican U.S. president would have been willing to take. Trump has publicly praised Sharaa repeatedly, describing him as “fantastic,” “highly respected,” and “tough” in public remarks.

    Monday’s formal delisting is rooted in an executive order Trump issued in June 2025, which ordered targeted sanctions relief for Syria based on what the White House called verifiable positive changes and effective counterterrorism actions by Sharaa’s government, plus formal security assurances provided by Damascus.

    “Over the past year, the Government of Syria has taken significant steps to counter terrorism, to include formally joining the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS in November and conducting operations to disrupt the terror networks of ISIS, al-Qa’ida, Hizballah, and Iran-aligned groups,” Rubio said in his statement.

    Rubio added that revoking both Syria’s SST designation and HTS’ terror label removes the last major barriers to private sector investment in Syria, creating new opportunities for the country’s economic recovery and reintegration into the global economy.

    Analysts have described the policy shift as a transformative moment for Syria. Natasha Hall, an associate fellow in the Middle East and North Africa programme at London-based think tank Chatham House, previously called the delisting “earth-shifting” for the country in comments to Middle East Eye. She noted that the terror designation was one of the final major obstacles blocking Syria’s path to economic recovery.

    The Syrian American Council, a grassroots advocacy group that lobbied extensively for the delisting, said it was grateful for the Trump administration’s action. “This is a clear win for US policy… from just the American national security perspective,” the group’s grassroots officer Alberto Hernandez told Middle East Eye. “This is the right way for engagement.”

  • Families of detained Chinese Christians cling to faith in legal limbo

    Families of detained Chinese Christians cling to faith in legal limbo

    Four-year-old Huanle clasps her small hands together each night, whispering a quiet prayer for the mother she has not seen in nearly a year. It has been 12 months since Chinese security forces raided the family’s home, arresting her mother Wang Cong, a pastor with the unregistered Zion Church — one of China’s largest unofficial Christian congregations — in a nationwide crackdown on unapproved religious groups. Since that night, Wang and seven other detained Zion Church members have remained in custody, their cases entangled in a legal limbo that has left their loved ones clinging to faith amid mounting uncertainty.

    Wang was among more than 20 Zion Church members taken into custody during coordinated raids last October, a sweep that targeted one of the most prominent of China’s so-called “underground churches”. Millions of Chinese Christians opt to worship in these unregistered communities rather than attend the government-approved Protestant and Catholic associations the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP) formally recognizes. The CCP requires all its members to be atheist and has long viewed unregulated organized religious activity as a potential challenge to its authority, despite a constitutional provision that guarantees Chinese citizens freedom of religious belief.

    For believers who choose unregistered congregations, official oversight of state-sanctioned churches is too extensive, granting the government unacceptable control over church leadership, service content, and religious doctrine. Since Xi Jinping took office as China’s president, nationwide scrutiny of unapproved religious groups has intensified, even as enforcement levels shift across regions. Zion Church was first forced to shut down its physical gathering spaces in 2018, but the congregation grew rapidly by moving online during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns that forced most social activity digital.

    Ezra Jin, Zion’s founding pastor, was also detained in last October’s crackdown, but was released from custody this July — just weeks after then-U.S. President Donald Trump raised Jin’s case during talks with Xi. Jin has since reunited with his family, who relocated to the U.S. in 2018 as pressure on the church mounted. But for Wang and the seven other remaining detainees, their legal process has only moved forward. Their trials, originally scheduled for mid-August in Beihai, the southern coastal Chinese city where Jin previously resided, have been postponed, and authorities have formally indicted the group on charges of fraud and operating an unlicensed business.

    Ren Zhong, Wang’s husband and himself a preacher with the church, described the night of the raid to AFP in an interview at his temporary Beihai home. Seven unidentified officers forced their way into the family’s then-Beijing residence, he said, pinning him to the floor as four-year-old Huanle watched from her mother’s arms, before officers tore the child away and led Wang away. A full year later, the family has still not been allowed to speak to her directly. Ren initially held out hope that Jin’s release would pave the way for his wife’s freedom, but the opposite happened: authorities moved to indict the group just two weeks after Jin left China to join his family in the U.S.

    “After I heard the news of Jin’s release, I was shocked and afraid to believe it,” Ren, 36, told reporters. “But after joy came worry, worry for my wife, because she was still inside, suffering.”

    According to legal documents reviewed by Ren, the core of the prosecution’s case hinges on the collection of church offerings by Wang and other leaders. Because Zion Church is not registered with the government, authorities argue the collection of roughly 660,000 yuan ($98,000) in donations between 2019 and 2024 counts as fraudulent activity. Ren rejects this framing entirely, noting that the collection of tithes from congregants to pay pastor salaries and cover church costs is a core tenet of Christian practice worldwide. “If it’s because of this that my wife has been charged with fraud, then I think this is actually not an accusation against my wife,” he said. “It is a denial of the Christian faith as a whole.”

    Relatives of the other detainees say the legal outcome makes little sense after Jin’s release. Gao Guangjun, 76, whose son Gao Yingjia is among the detained pastors, argues that it is unjust for senior church leadership to be released while lower-profile members remain in custody. “It shouldn’t be that the head pastor is fine, but people below him… are in trouble,” Gao said. “It’s a little hard to justify.”

    From his new home in the United States, Jin said he carries deep guilt over his freedom while his former colleagues remain detained. “I am deeply conflicted, truly torn. I am free, yet in reality, I am not,” the 57-year-old pastor told AFP. He recently drafted a message through his legal team urging the eight detainees to hold fast to their beliefs, writing, “I hope that one day their children will understand that their parents’ separation from them — and their current detention — is a source of honour. For the sake of a higher conviction, they are paying a price.”

    Back in Beihai, Ren has given up his full-time work to care for Huanle and advocate for his wife, sharing updates about the case on his X account, which has just a few hundred followers. To outside observers, the young girl appears largely carefree — dancing around the small apartment to imagined music — but Ren says the trauma of the raid still lingers. There are nights, he says, when Huanle refuses to sleep, telling him she is scared and misses her mother.

    When asked for comment on the detentions, China’s foreign ministry stated that Beijing “manages religious affairs in accordance with the law”. AFP reached out to the Beihai Public Security Bureau and local detention facilities for additional comment, but officials declined to accept interviews.

    Ren says he faces the real possibility that Wang could be convicted and sentenced to up to 10 years in prison on the fraud charge, but over the past year, his worry has given way to quiet conviction. “I believe God is just,” he said. “I know God has not forgotten about these eight people.” Gao, also a Christian, echoed that quiet faith, acknowledging that the final outcome rests entirely in the hands of Chinese authorities. “It’s for leaders to decide,” he said. “It’s not something ordinary citizens can influence.”

  • NZ religious sect leader jailed over death of elderly follower

    NZ religious sect leader jailed over death of elderly follower

    In a high-profile criminal case that has drawn cross-border attention, a self-proclaimed spiritual leader has been handed a more than 10-year prison sentence by a New Zealand court after being convicted of the manslaughter and kidnapping of a 70-year-old Chinese follower whose body was discovered dumped near Auckland.

    Kaixiao Liu, a former Chinese talent show contestant who relocated to New Zealand in 2017 and gained permanent residency, was found guilty of the charges stemming from the March 2024 death of Shulai Wang, a retired woman who traveled from China’s Hainan Island to join Liu’s inner circle of followers in August 2023. Wang’s remains were found wrapped in rice bags by a local fisherman near Gulf Harbour’s marina, triggering a months-long homicide investigation that ultimately implicated Liu and his entire immediate family.

    Throughout the legal proceedings, Liu maintained his innocence, rejecting allegations that he leads a secretive religious cult. He has repeatedly claimed he only amassed followers through his musical work, which includes a self-created project called the Universal Choir that produces cosmic-themed orchestral pieces. Online, Liu built his following on Chinese social platforms by sharing religious discussions, personal video diaries, and clips of his singing performances. Before moving to New Zealand, Liu also previously studied at a Chinese military-focused university, and competed on the national televised talent program *China’s Got Talent* in 2011, where viral footage showed him performing a song while blindfolded on stage.

    Court documents and trial testimony revealed that Wang moved into Liu’s Auckland residence—dubbed “the Ark” by the leader—alongside multiple other female followers. Prosecutors told the court that the women lived in conditions of servitude, with every aspect of their daily lives tightly controlled by Liu, who required them to address him as “Lord” or “Master.” Wang’s daily routine consisted of caring for Liu’s young children, studying religious texts written by Liu, and growing vegetables on the property. Due to her advanced age, Wang struggled to adapt to the group’s strict rules and faced repeated disciplinary action for non-compliance.

    According to court accounts, Wang attempted to escape the compound in March 2024, but was quickly captured and restrained by Liu and his associates. She died later that same day. Following her death, Liu, his family members, and close followers transported Wang’s body to Gulf Harbour and dumped it near the marina, with Liu bringing his own children along on the trip to act as a cover for the activity. Investigators ultimately linked the crime to Liu after tracing the specific brand of rice used to wrap the body back to him: Liu had made an unusually large bulk purchase of the rice shortly before Wang’s death.

    Alongside Liu, his wife Lanyue Xiao received a nearly eight-year prison sentence after being convicted on overlapping charges of kidnapping and manslaughter. Liu’s parents, Xiuyun Li and Jingui Liu, have already been found guilty of kidnapping and improper handling of human remains, and are scheduled to receive their official sentences later this year.

    During Tuesday’s sentencing hearing, Liu’s legal team requested judicial leniency, telling the court that their client feels genuine remorse for his actions and repeated his claim that he is not a cult leader. However, Justice Mathew Downs, the presiding judge, rejected these appeals, issuing harsh criticism of Liu’s actions. In his remarks from the bench, Downs stated that Liu had demonstrated “callous indifference” to Wang’s well-being, adding: “Because of you, Ms Wang died a lonely, frightening death. You display no remorse whatsoever. You should feel shame.”

    New Zealand police have also released an official photo of Shulai Wang as part of the public records of the case, confirming her identity as the victim who left her home in China to join Liu’s group.

  • Mortgage holders near peak stress as RBA keeps rate hikes an option

    Mortgage holders near peak stress as RBA keeps rate hikes an option

    Australian mortgage borrowers already grappling with strained household budgets are bracing for additional financial pressure after the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) confirmed it has not ruled out further interest rate increases in its ongoing battle against persistent inflation. Newly released minutes from the central bank’s latest Monetary Policy Board Meeting reveal that mortgage repayments as a percentage of household disposable income are already approaching the 2024 peak, with additional mild pressure expected as the full impact of previous rate hikes filters through to borrower balance sheets.

    While the RBA acknowledged the growing strain on home loan holders, it also noted that most Australian mortgagors remain able to absorb higher repayment costs, in large part due to substantial prepayment buffers built up during periods of lower interest rates. The minutes state that while extra voluntary mortgage payments have eased in recent months, they are still hovering around their long-term average when measured against disposable income, providing a continued cushion for many households.

    The newly published meeting notes also pull back the curtain on internal board deliberations, which saw members debate between holding the cash rate steady or implementing a 25 basis point increase. Notably, there were no arguments made in favor of cutting interest rates at this meeting. Proponents of a rate hike emphasized ongoing upside risks to inflation forecasts, pointing to three key sources of concern: the potential for a sharp spike in global oil prices stemming from geopolitical tensions between the United States and Iran, an unexpected AI-driven boom in business investment that could drive up demand, and slower-than-required cooling in domestic consumer spending that could keep inflation elevated.

    Proponents of pre-emptive tightening argued that if inflation risks were heavily skewed to the upside, acting early to raise rates would help mitigate those threats. They also noted that any trade-off for faster inflation reduction – specifically a sharper loosening of labor market conditions – would likely be less severe than in past historical episodes given the current state of the Australian economy.

    Despite these calls for an immediate increase, the RBA board ultimately voted to hold the official cash rate steady at 4.35 percent. So far in 2026, the central bank has raised rates at three of five scheduled meetings, accumulating a total 75 basis point increase that has lifted the cash rate from 3.60 percent to its current level. The RBA’s current policy framework projects that these increases will gradually pull inflation back into its official 2 to 3 percent target range over the coming years.

    Recent inflation data underscores why the central bank remains cautious: Australia’s trimmed mean inflation, which strips out volatile price swings to give a clearer picture of underlying inflation, hit 3.6 percent for the 12-month period ending in June 2026, while headline inflation came in at 3.8 percent. Both readings remain well above the RBA’s target band. As part of its dual mandate of price stability and full employment, the central bank is also closely monitoring movements in the national unemployment rate. The minutes confirm that an unexpected strengthening in the already robust labor market would create more space for the RBA to implement additional rate hikes.

    Looking forward, the RBA currently judges the current cash rate setting to be “sufficiently restrictive” to bring inflation back to target by 2027. Recent data has aligned with this outlook: inflation has come in slightly lower than central bank forecasts (though still far above target), and the unemployment rate rose a touch more than projected in May. Under the central bank’s baseline forecast, inflation will return to the midpoint of the 2 to 3 percent target range by late 2027 if the cash rate remains at its current level through the forecast period. Even so, the RBA has left the path open for further tightening if inflation risks do not abate as expected, leaving cash-strapped mortgage holders facing continued uncertainty about future repayment costs.

  • Burnham planning to visit US in September to lobby Trump on Ukraine

    Burnham planning to visit US in September to lobby Trump on Ukraine

    Fresh off his first official international trip to Kyiv, UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham has announced plans to travel to the United States next month alongside fellow European leaders to press the Trump administration to ramp up defense support for Ukraine, as Kyiv faces critical shortages of key air defense systems ahead of an expected winter surge in Russian attacks on critical infrastructure.

    In an exclusive interview with Bloomberg, Burnham confirmed that he intends to join the UN General Assembly gathering in New York this September, adding that while final logistical details of the trip have not been fully locked in, a visit is highly likely. This journey will mark his first official visit to the US since he took office as UK Prime Minister in July.

    During his Monday visit to Ukraine, Burnham held high-stakes talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv, and chaired the first gathering of the so-called “coalition of the willing”, a UK-France joint initiative originally launched under previous Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Following the meeting, Burnham made clear his policy priorities for the coming weeks, reaffirming the UK’s unwavering commitment to pressuring Moscow over its illegal full-scale invasion.

    In a key new commitment to boost Ukraine’s domestic defense production capacity, the UK has agreed to share technical blueprints for British-manufactured components of the Scalp cruise missile — the French equivalent of the UK’s Storm Shadow long-range cruise missile. The transfer of these blueprints will allow Ukraine to begin producing this advanced long-range weapon within its own borders, strengthening its ability to strike Russian supply lines and military positions deep behind front lines.

    Burnham’s visit came amid a sharp escalation of Russian strikes across Ukraine in recent weeks, including a deadly attack on a crowded civilian shopping center that claimed the lives of at least 16 civilians. The UK Prime Minister used the visit to double down on longstanding UK support for Kyiv, reaffirming that backing would hold firm for as long as Ukraine needs it.

    A core point of urgency driving the upcoming US lobbying mission is Ukraine’s critical shortage of Patriot air defense interceptor missiles, systems that Kyiv relies almost entirely on US supplies for to shoot down incoming Russian ballistic missiles. Recent high demand for these interceptors, driven in part by conflicts in the Middle East including Iran, has depleted global stockpiles, leaving Ukraine’s populated areas and critical energy infrastructure increasingly vulnerable to Russian attacks ahead of the winter months.

    Zelensky has publicly stated that Kyiv aims to secure 300 additional Patriot interceptors before winter, when Russia has a well-documented pattern of launching massed strikes on Ukraine’s energy networks to leave civilians without heat or power during the coldest months of the year. While Burnham told Bloomberg he is “really confident” that the supply gap can be addressed through coordinated diplomacy, he noted that solutions will not come solely from Washington.

    “There are other players who could help in the mix who we have influence with,” Burnham said. “It’s probably going to be a solution that involves a lot of layers and a lot of negotiation.”

    The push for more Patriot supplies comes as the Trump administration has already backtracked on a earlier proposal to allow Ukraine to produce the Patriot systems domestically. Just three weeks after floating that offer in July, Trump told a cabinet meeting that “We have not agreed to that. We’re talking about it. But it’s a hard thing to give away, that kind of technology. These weapons are incredible. We have to be very careful about letting somebody build them.”

    Following the Kyiv meeting of the coalition of the willing, Burnham joined the group’s co-chairs — French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz — in releasing a joint statement that prioritized strengthening Ukraine’s air defense capabilities as an “urgent priority”. The leaders also strongly condemned Moscow’s “systemic and escalating strikes against Ukraine’s cities, critical infrastructure and civilians”, and pledged to further tighten pressure on Russia’s war funding by expanding sanctions and cracking down on the shadow fleet of vessels used to evade Western oil price caps.

    Ahead of his Ukraine visit, which coincided with the 35th anniversary of Ukraine’s independence from the Soviet Union, Burnham delivered a message of solidarity to the Ukrainian people. “the Ukrainian people should be in no doubt: the UK is behind you today and for as long as it takes,” he said. “I am proud of the contribution our country has made to Ukraine and I want the Ukrainian people to hear it directly from me that our support will not waver. After all, Ukraine’s security is our security.”

    He added that the deep friendship between the UK and Ukraine would survive long after Russia’s illegal invasion ends, sending a clear message to the Kremlin: “Russia should be in no doubt of our resolve. We will not back down until there is a just and lasting peace.”

  • French tourist dies in Death Valley after car gets stuck in mud

    French tourist dies in Death Valley after car gets stuck in mud

    As a crippling record heatwave grips much of the United States, a 68-year-old French traveler has become the latest heat-related fatality after succumbing to extreme temperatures in California’s Death Valley, a region already notorious as the hottest place on the planet.

    According to official statements from Death Valley National Park and local law enforcement, the victim, identified as Pierre Michel Formosa, was exploring the iconic desert park alongside a traveling compatriot last Monday when their vehicle veered off the graded West Side Road and became mired in soft mud. Trapped without access to immediate help, the pair made the decision to trek across the park’s vast, open salt flats to flag down assistance. After covering roughly 1.3 miles under the relentless 116°F (46.6°C) sun, Formosa could no longer continue the journey.

    His companion was eventually able to stop a passing motorist to alert authorities, triggering an coordinated search response from park rangers and local police. By the time search teams located Formosa later that same afternoon, he had already been overcome by the extreme heat. Park officials confirmed that his body was discovered near the park’s salt flat area. A local coroner’s office will conduct a formal examination to confirm the exact cause and manner of death.

    The tragedy has underscored the deadly risks posed by this summer’s unprecedented heat across the American West. In a public statement following the incident, Death Valley National Park Superintendent Mike Reynolds emphasized that the harsh desert environment poses hidden threats even to seasoned visitors. “This is a heartbreaking reminder of how quickly conditions here can turn dangerous,” Reynolds said. “Death Valley is an extraordinary place, but its heat, vast distances, and remoteness can be dangerous, regardless of experience.” He extended the park community’s condolences to Formosa’s family and friends, and thanked first responders for their efforts in the search.

    Formosa’s death is far from an isolated incident this summer. A widespread, prolonged heatwave has pushed temperatures to record-breaking levels across much of the United States, leaving more than a million people under extreme heat warnings and causing dozens of confirmed heat-related fatalities nationwide. Earlier this summer in Arizona, four separate hikers died while trekking in Grand Canyon National Park amid similarly dangerous high temperatures.

    Currently, an extreme heat warning remains in effect for all of Death Valley, which has long held the title of the hottest place on Earth after recording a global record high temperature of 134°F (57°C) back in 1913. The National Weather Service has forecast that Southern California will see the most intense heat of the entire 2026 summer season this week, with temperatures expected to remain well above dangerous thresholds for the foreseeable future.

  • Trump veers from boredom to denial after six months of Iran war

    Trump veers from boredom to denial after six months of Iran war

    Six months after launching a military offensive against Iran that he predicted would end in a rapid, decisive victory, U.S. President Donald Trump has increasingly avoided discussing the ongoing conflict, shifting between boredom and outright denial as the war drags on and becomes a growing political liability ahead of pivotal midterm elections.

    At an impromptu White House press event last week focused on renovations to the presidential residence, Trump spent far more time gushing about upgraded infrastructure than addressing the Iran conflict. After leading reporters on a walking tour of the South Lawn to showcase his recent construction changes, he talked at length about new helipad upgrades, the planned presidential ballroom, and imported granite paving stones – uttering the word “granite” 13 times over the 36-minute appearance, while mentioning Iran just three times. When pressed directly on the state of the conflict, Trump brushed off questions, claiming “the situation is so good.”

    Official Pentagon data tells a far grimmer story: at least 18 American service members have been killed in the war, and more than 750 have been wounded. Casualty counts are far higher in Iran and neighboring Lebanon, where thousands of civilians and combatants have died since the conflict began in February, when the U.S. joined Israel in launching operations against Iran.

    For Trump, the war has not unfolded according to his original plan. He initially expected a quick win, mirroring what he framed as a successful operation earlier this year that led to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. After a brief ceasefire was announced in April, Trump prematurely declared “total and complete victory.” But the truce quickly collapsed, and Iran refused to capitulate to U.S. demands. As the conflict dragged on, Trump shifted his strategy from large-scale military action to economic pressure, while altering his justifications for launching the war – from pushing for regime change to preventing Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran has also maintained control over the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global energy chokepoint that became a flashpoint only after the conflict began.

    By June, Trump himself acknowledged his growing disengagement with the stalled talks, telling reporters “Frankly, I thought they started to get very boring.” Foreign policy experts point to Trump’s well-documented short attention span as a key factor in his shifting stance. “He was convinced that he could repeat what happened with Venezuela – a rapid show of force that ended quickly,” explained Garret Martin, a foreign policy expert at American University. “I think now he’s in a position where there is no easy exit.”

    The political fallout from the conflict has already pulled Trump’s approval ratings down sharply. Since his return to office in 2025, his public support has steadily declined, with the drop accelerating after the war began. A Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in mid-August put his approval rating at just 33 percent, the lowest mark of his current term. Other major national surveys also show Trump with net negative approval across the country.

    Even core supporters from his Make America Great Again (MAGA) base are questioning the conflict. Trump ran on a campaign promise of avoiding new foreign entanglements, yet now the U.S. is mired in a conflict with no clear exit strategy. “Is there a rabbit in the hat? No, I think the hat is empty,” said William Galston, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, in an interview with AFP.

    The war has also had a direct impact on American household finances, stoking widespread voter anger. Gasoline prices have surged to well over $4 per gallon nationwide, up from a $3.14 average a year ago, and the energy price spike has driven broader inflation across consumer goods. Joe Plenzler, a 20-year veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps, summed up the discontent shared by many voters: “I think it’s completely unnecessary, and that it was a reckless war, and I think it’s going very badly. The impact on the American consumer has gone up tremendously.” Plenzler noted that dissatisfaction is growing even in rural Virginia, a typically solid Republican region.

    The coming November midterm elections represent the first major political reckoning for Trump over the Iran war. Analysts warn that widespread voter discontent could cost Republicans their narrow majority in the House of Representatives, and potentially flip control of the Senate as well. A Democratic takeover of either chamber would derail Trump’s remaining legislative agenda and put him at risk of a third impeachment trial before his second term ends in 2029.

    While Trump has largely avoided discussing the conflict in public, experts do not believe he has completely disengaged from managing it. His focus on building a legacy ahead of leaving office in 2029 means he will continue to look for a path out of the quagmire. “I think he cares about his standing in history,” Galston said. But he added that Trump seems to be prioritizing cosmetic projects over policy achievements: “Maybe he believes that statues and buildings and other things named for him will substitute for the kind of performance in office that makes you a memorable president.”

  • Peru court hands lengthy prison terms in killing of Indigenous Amazon defender

    Peru court hands lengthy prison terms in killing of Indigenous Amazon defender

    In a landmark ruling closely watched by environmental and Indigenous rights advocates globally, a Peruvian court has convicted four men of murder-for-hire in the November 2023 killing of Indigenous Amazon rainforest defender Quinto Inuma Alvarado, handing down stiff prison sentences that mark an unprecedented step toward ending impunity for violence against land and environmental activists in the region.

    The convictions carry profound symbolic and legal weight, as they mark the first time in Peru’s history that such severe sentences have been issued for the killing of an Indigenous environmental defender. Genix Saboya Saboya and Limber Ríos Ruiz, the two men who directly carried out the attack, each received 35-year prison terms. Segundo Juan Villalobos Guevara, a local timber operator whom prosecutors proved ordered the assassination after Inuma publicly denounced his illegal logging operations, was sentenced to 28 years and four months in prison. Jerly Saboya Saboya, convicted as an accomplice in the plot, received a 15-year prison sentence. The court also ordered total compensation of nearly $300,000: roughly $223,500 for Inuma’s surviving family, and $74,500 for Axeldina Barbarán Tapullima, the companion who was shot and wounded during the attack. The convictions can still be appealed within five days of the defendants receiving the full written ruling.

    Inuma, a 50-year-old leader of the Kichwa Indigenous community, was gunned down on November 29, 2023, while traveling by boat back to his home community of Santa Rosillo de Yanayacu in Peru’s northern Amazonian San Martin region. He was returning from a national gathering of environmental and land defenders when the attack occurred. For years, Inuma had led his community in documenting and denouncing illegal logging, drug trafficking, and outside encroachment on the community’s ancestral forest territory. Between 2016 and 2023 alone, community members filed 13 formal complaints with Peruvian prosecutors over environmental crimes and illegal activity on their land, according to the Lima-based Legal Defense Institute, which has supported the Inuma family and Indigenous organizations throughout the case.

    Despite repeated warnings about threats to Inuma’s life, state protection failed. Peru’s Justice Ministry classified Inuma as high-risk in 2021 and ordered formal police protection for him and his brother, and local authorities issued official protection orders against illegal logging groups. But court documents cited by the Legal Defense Institute show police later admitted they could not conduct required preventive patrols in the remote Amazon territory, citing lack of funding for boats and extremely challenging terrain that limits state presence across much of the Peruvian Amazon.

    The ruling came nearly three years, or 1,000 days, after Inuma’s assassination, following an eight-month trial that included on-site hearings in the Amazonian city of Tarapoto, where judges heard testimony from Inuma’s relatives, witnesses, and the attack’s surviving victim. Rights advocates say the lengthy sentences break a long pattern of impunity for killings of environmental and Indigenous defenders in Peru, which has one of the highest rates of violence against land activists in South America.

    “This is a decisive step toward justice,” said Tom Younger, Peru program coordinator for the Forest Peoples Programme. “This ruling makes clear that impunity for killings of Indigenous defenders is not inevitable.”

    Cristina Gavancho, a lawyer with the Legal Defense Institute, called the sentence “exemplary”, noting that it sets a critical precedent for future cases across the country. “This case is significant not only for the prison terms, but also because the court recognized the right to compensation for Inuma’s family and the survivor,” she said.

    For Inuma’s family, the verdict brought a complex mix of relief and lingering grief. “We received the verdict with a mixture of happiness and sadness after waiting nearly three years for justice,” Kevin Arnol Inuma, the defender’s 30-year-old son, told the Associated Press. “Before, there was no response from the state, so attackers were not afraid to kill. Now this sets a precedent for Indigenous peoples, a precedent for environmental defenders. Although they can no longer give us our father back, we hope other families will not have to wait this long for justice. Now my father can rest in peace because justice has been done.” Even so, the family remains on edge: they still do not feel fully safe, and hold fears about the risk of those convicted being released in the future.

    The gravity of the threat facing Indigenous Amazon defenders was underscored just 24 hours before the court issued its ruling, when another Indigenous leader was killed in a separate incident. Américo Pascuala Tomisha, a 57-year-old Ashéninka Indigenous leader and former head of the Onconashari Indigenous community, was shot dead Sunday while patrolling his community’s territory in Peru’s Ucayali Amazon region. Regional Indigenous organization ORAU reported that Pascuala encountered a group of outsiders illegally extracting copaiba oil from trees inside community land, and was killed in a confrontation after confronting the group. Pascuala had repeatedly reported incursions by outside settlers and illegal extractors before his killing, and ORAU has called on Peruvian authorities to launch a full investigation and expand protection measures for at-risk Indigenous leaders.

    The killing came just weeks after Asháninka communities along the Peru-Brazil border issued urgent public warnings about armed incursions into their Indigenous territories. In July, Indigenous leaders in the Brazilian side of the border requested government protection after five armed men carrying machine guns entered their territory, threatened resident families, and searched for community leaders. In response to the rising cross-border violence, Brazil and Peru recently announced an agreement to strengthen joint cooperation to protect Indigenous territories along their shared Amazon border.

    Inuma’s killing has become a symbol of the systemic risks facing Indigenous people who protect the Amazon, a region where illegal logging, unregulated mining, drug trafficking, and land grabbing have expanded rapidly into remote territories that lack consistent state presence. Environmental and human rights groups say while this ruling marks an important turning point, it also highlights how much work remains to protect at-risk defenders and prevent future killings in one of the world’s most critical carbon sinks and biodiversity hotspots.

  • Australia’s top music charts ban AI songs

    Australia’s top music charts ban AI songs

    In a landmark move to safeguard the core human creativity at the heart of music, Australia’s peak music industry body has officially implemented new rules barring wholly artificial intelligence-generated tracks from the country’s leading music charts. The Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA) announced the policy update on Tuesday, with the new guidelines set to take full effect this coming Friday.

    Under the revised framework, only music that is substantially created by human artists is eligible for inclusion on the ARIA Charts, the country’s most influential ranking of popular music. The rules specifically exclude any tracks that rely on generative AI to produce the entire work or the majority of its core creative components, including lyrics, composition, and primary vocal performance. Crucially, the policy does not ban all AI use in music: recordings that leverage generative AI as a supporting tool for processes like mixing, mastering, or minor creative assistance still retain their eligibility for chart placement.

    The regulatory change comes amid a rapidly growing wave of concern across the global music industry over the explosive rise of unregulated AI-generated music flooding streaming platforms and airwaves. The catalyst for Australia’s new policy came in July this year, when an AI-generated cover of Madonna’s iconic hit *Like a Prayer* climbed to the top of Australian music charts, triggering widespread industry scrutiny after the use of AI-generated vocals and percussion was revealed to the public.

    Data from major streaming platforms underscores the scale of the AI shift in the industry: a senior Apple Music executive confirmed earlier this year that more than one-third of all new tracks uploaded to the platform are created entirely using generative AI. Global industry players have already begun moving to address the trend: streaming giant Spotify has announced plans to introduce a dedicated “AI Persona” badge that will clearly label AI-generated content created to mimic real human artists, helping listeners distinguish between human-made and AI work.

    Just months before ARIA’s policy update, a coalition of major global music industry organizations unveiled a proposed universal labelling framework for AI-generated content, calling for widespread adoption across all platforms to bring transparency to the rapidly evolving space. ARIA chief executive Annabelle Herd framed the new chart rules as a deliberate defense of artistic authenticity in a fast-changing digital landscape.

    “These changes reflect our intent to remain dynamic and promote the human nature of artistry in what is — to say the least — a rapidly developing space,” Herd said. She added that the ARIA Charts have always maintained a mission to serve as a transparent, accurate measure of the music that Australian audiences consume, and allowing unlicensed AI output to compete on the charts would undermine the core purpose of the organization, which exists to support and represent human-created recorded music.