博客

  • Two killed in ‘massive’ Ukrainian drone attack on Moscow region, says Russia

    Two killed in ‘massive’ Ukrainian drone attack on Moscow region, says Russia

    The long-running Russia-Ukraine conflict has entered a new phase of intensified violence, with back-to-back large-scale drone strikes leaving multiple civilians dead and critical infrastructure damaged across both nations. The most recent escalation unfolded overnight, when Ukraine launched what regional Russian authorities described as a massive drone attack targeting the Moscow region.

    Andrei Vorobyev, governor of the Moscow region, confirmed that the attack left at least two civilians dead and six others injured. According to Vorobyev’s official statement, Russian air defense systems intercepted and shot down a total of 249 incoming drones during the assault. The wreckage of downed drones and direct strikes sparked blazes across multiple residential properties, a large commercial warehouse, and a key oil refinery located within Moscow city limits. In response to the security threat, Russian authorities implemented immediate flight restrictions at two of Moscow’s major civilian airports, Sheremetyevo, the capital’s busiest air hub, and Vnukovo, disrupting hundreds of scheduled passenger flights.

    Local casualty reports paint a grim picture of the civilian impact. In the town of Sofyino, a drone strike on a three-story residential building killed a 44-year-old woman and wounded five additional people, including two children. In the Orekhovo-Zuevo district, an elderly man was killed when a private residence was directly hit. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin later confirmed that a drone also hit a low-rise building near a central Moscow boulevard, and that sustained damage to the oil refinery forced facility operators to pause operations temporarily. Unverified footage circulated widely on social media platforms overnight captured large plumes of smoke rising from the burning warehouse and explosions lighting up the night sky over the Moscow region. Conflicting figures on intercepted drones have emerged from different Russian officials: Sobyanin put the number of downed drones targeting Moscow at 152, while Vorobyev cited a total of 249 across the wider region.

    This latest attack came just hours after Russian strikes targeting Ukrainian territory left seven civilians dead, including two children, across the Kyiv and Sumy regions on Saturday. In Fastiv, a city located outside of Kyiv, Kyiv regional governor Tymur Tkachenko confirmed that a Russian attack killed a mother and her two young children, a boy and a girl, and damaged multiple private homes. In the northeastern Sumy region, local administrative head Oleh Hryhorov reported that four civilians were killed when a Russian drone struck the passenger car they were traveling in.

    In recent weeks, both Russian and Ukrainian forces have sharply increased the frequency and scale of cross-border strikes, strategically targeting critical infrastructure including energy generation facilities, transport networks, and key logistics hubs. The escalating exchange of long-range attacks marks a significant widening of the conflict, which began when Russian President Vladimir Putin launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

  • Houthis claim strikes on Riyadh, Yanbu while Saudi coalition says attacks thwarted

    Houthis claim strikes on Riyadh, Yanbu while Saudi coalition says attacks thwarted

    Escalating tensions in the long-running Yemeni conflict spilled over into Saudi Arabian territory over the weekend, as Houthi forces launched a coordinated wave of missile and drone strikes targeting key sites in the Saudi capital Riyadh and energy infrastructure in the Red Sea coastal city of Yanbu. The assault, which marked a sharp escalation of hostilities between the Iran-aligned Houthi movement and the Saudi-led coalition, came as the Houthis have made rapid territorial gains across northern Yemen in recent weeks, pushing the Saudi-backed Yemeni government into a defensive position.

    The Houthi movement formally claimed responsibility for the attacks Saturday, with group spokesperson Yahya Saree confirming that the operation used a mixed arsenal of long-range missiles and unmanned aerial drones. Saree framed the strikes as a reciprocal response to what he called “criminal Saudi attempts” to target the Houthi-held Yemeni capital Sanaa, a recurring point of friction that has driven repeated cross-border attacks since a fragile 2022 truce collapsed last July.

    Shortly after the attacks were announced, coalition spokesperson Major General Turki al-Maliki released an official statement confirming that Saudi air defense systems had successfully intercepted and destroyed a ballistic missile aimed at Riyadh. Maliki added that defense forces also foiled additional attack attempts targeting four other locations across the kingdom — Taif, Baish, Farasan, and Yanbu — before any of the incoming projectiles could reach their intended targets. The coalition accused the Houthis of deliberately targeting civilian populations and critical civilian infrastructure, noting that the alliance retains full rights under international humanitarian law to deploy all appropriate defensive and retaliatory measures against the group in response to the escalation.

    In a marked shift from recent rounds of hostilities, Saudi authorities issued an immediate early-morning public alert ordering Riyadh residents to shelter indoors — the first official shelter order issued during this latest phase of conflict with the Houthis. Hours after the alert, multiple local residents speaking to AFP confirmed they heard multiple loud explosions reverberate across wide areas of the capital. Around the same time, emergency response teams extinguished an outbreaking fire at a fuel storage depot adjacent to Riyadh’s main international airport, where an Aramco-branded oil tanker had caught fire. Social media footage circulating widely online showed thick plumes of black smoke rising from the area, though officials have not yet confirmed a definitive link between the fire and the reported Houthi strikes.

    The weekend attack follows just days after Saudi officials accused the Houthis of launching an attempted strike on the holy city of Mecca, a site that draws millions of Muslim pilgrims annually. Riyadh labeled that alleged attempt a “cowardly terrorist attack,” a claim that Houthi representatives immediately rejected as entirely false. The Houthi movement has been waging a sustained ground campaign to seize full control of Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, a push that would put the strategic Bab al-Mandeb strait — one of the world’s busiest global shipping chokepoints — entirely under Houthi control. The group has faced near-constant Saudi air bombardment throughout this territorial campaign.

    Despite Riyadh’s recent negotiation of new defense cooperation agreements with Turkey and Pakistan, these pacts have so far failed to blunt the growing cross-border threat posed by advancing Houthi forces. In comments released Saturday, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan issued a formal condemnation of the attacks on Saudi territory and energy infrastructure, arguing that the kingdom should not be dragged into the broader regional standoff between Iran and the United States. Fidan added that Turkey stands ready to fulfill its obligations under the recent trilateral defense pact, including providing any military support Saudi Arabia may require in response to ongoing Houthi aggression. For its part, Pakistan confirmed that it has not yet held discussions about launching a coordinated military response under its existing defense agreement with Riyadh, but noted that the country will take action when “the time comes.”

    The United States, a long-time Saudi security partner, has offered only limited backing to Riyadh amid the escalating conflict. As recently as last week, American news outlet Axios reported that the White House rejected a direct Saudi request for U.S. military forces to carry out targeted strikes against Houthi positions in Yemen. Just days before the latest attacks, however, the U.S. State Department announced its formal approval of a $24.3 billion arms deal to supply the Saudi military with F-35 fifth-generation fighter jets. State Department officials said the deal will strengthen Saudi Arabia’s capacity to deter both current and future security threats.

    The current phase of the Yemeni civil war traces back to 2014, when Houthi forces seized Sanaa and large swathes of northern Yemeni territory, prompting the Saudi-led military intervention to restore the internationally recognized Yemeni government in March 2015. The 2022 truce that brought months of reduced violence collapsed last July after the Houthis allowed an Iranian commercial aircraft to land in Sanaa in defiance of Saudi-enforced airspace restrictions.

    The Houthi movement’s recent rapid advances along Yemen’s Red Sea coast have triggered growing global concern over the security of international maritime trade. The territorial gains add new disruptions to global shipping already strained by Iranian restrictions on traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, another critical global energy chokepoint. Houthi leaders have insisted that commercial shipping transiting the Bab al-Mandeb faces no threats from the group, with the exception of vessels with confirmed links to Saudi Arabia. With major outside powers offering only limited backing to Riyadh, Saudi officials have moved to expand the kingdom’s independent military operations inside Yemen to counter the growing Houthi advance.

  • Ed Sheeran admits ‘mistakes’ as he addresses Macklemore controversy

    Ed Sheeran admits ‘mistakes’ as he addresses Macklemore controversy

    Global pop superstar Ed Sheeran stepped onto the stage of Philadelphia’s Lincoln Financial Field Saturday night alone, opening his first in-person public address of the firestorm sparked by the removal of American rapper Macklemore from his tour lineup over pro-Palestinian comments with an unreserved apology to fans for missteps amid the ongoing fallout.

    “I never set out to be an activist musician, but this situation has forced me into the center of a heated, high-stakes debate over free speech and one of the most intractable political conflicts in the world,” Sheeran told the assembled crowd. The stripped-back show went forward without any supporting acts after multiple opening performers pulled out of the tour in response to the Macklemore dispute, marking the first time Sheeran has spoken directly to audiences about the controversy since it erupted.

    The controversy has already taken a visible toll on the North American leg of his *Loop Tour*. Ticket prices have been slashed, and sales have slumped for all remaining shows across the continent, which are scheduled to continue through North and South America in the coming weeks. Sheeran has repeatedly pushed back against blame for the decision to drop Macklemore, arguing that the choice was made exclusively by tour promoters, not by himself.

    Opening his set with a direct address to the audience, Sheeran emphasized that his concerts have always been intended as a safe, inclusive space for people of all backgrounds, and that his commitment to his fans was what brought him back to the stage after weeks of backlash. He then moved to address the core question at the heart of the conflict: his public position on the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Israel and Palestine.

    “Throughout my career, I have avoided stepping into political commentary, because I want my music and my shows to stand for unity, not division; for shared humanity, not partisan politics,” he said. “But this is first and foremost a humanitarian issue, and I can no longer stay silent about what I feel.” Sheeran went on to condemn the 7 October 2023 attacks in Israel, describing the violence as “horrific” and noting that it compounded centuries of intergenerational trauma for Jewish communities. He did not stop there, adding that “what is happening in Gaza is catastrophic, unjustifiable and disproportionate. My heart has been broken by the scale of the devastation and the loss of civilian and children’s lives, and the systemic injustice unfolding in the West Bank cannot be ignored.”

    Sheeran closed his statement by acknowledging the complexity of the issue, saying he is still learning, listening and working to identify tangible ways to support civilian victims of the conflict on both sides. He ended by reaffirming his hope that the concert would remain a gathering space for all fans, regardless of their personal political beliefs on the crisis.

    Even with deep discounts, some tickets to the Philadelphia show dropped as low as $32 (around £24), a steep markdown from the tour’s original pricing, amid the slump in demand. Multiple fans reported access to full ticket refunds ahead of the show, though official representatives from Ticketmaster and lead promoter Messina Touring Group have not confirmed any widespread refund policy.

    In the hours before the concert kicked off, hundreds of ticket holders streamed into the stadium, with most declining to speak to assembled press outside the gates. Dozens of protesters gathered near the nearest transit station, waving signs and flags ahead of the show, but the event proceeded with no major disruptions to its schedule.

    Interviews with a small group of attendees outside the venue revealed a wide range of perspectives on the controversy, most tied to a desire to enjoy a night of live music regardless of political disagreements. One couple who paid $450 per ticket said they respected Macklemore’s right to freedom of expression. Two other attendees noted they had snapped up discounted tickets to the show after prices dropped, explaining that they support Palestinian statehood while still being fans of Sheeran’s music. In a viral moment, two teenage fans interviewed by the BBC drew laughter when they responded to questions about Macklemore’s removal by asking, “Who is Macklemore?”

    One protester who identified himself as Cooper told the BBC he had joined the demonstration to stand in solidarity with the Palestinian people. “We need more artists like Macklemore, who have a public platform and a voice, to speak out for the Palestinian people and their struggle for liberation, especially here in the United States,” he said. Cooper added that his ideal outcome would be a full apology from Sheeran, but he held out little hope for that, saying, “I’d like to hear him acknowledge that genocide is real and that we have to do everything we can to stop it, but I’m not really expecting that.”

    Israeli officials have repeatedly rejected all claims of genocide, maintaining that their military operations in Gaza and the occupied West Bank are conducted as acts of self-defense and in full compliance with international law.

    This is a developing breaking news story, and additional details will be published as they become available. Readers can access real-time updates through the BBC News mobile app or by following @BBCBreaking on X.

  • Mum’s viral barefoot race sparks debate over India’s education crisis

    Mum’s viral barefoot race sparks debate over India’s education crisis

    In August, a 47-year-old widow from Maharashtra, western India, achieved something extraordinary that captured the attention of millions across the country: Ramabai Ranveer won her first-ever 3km community sprint – and she did it barefoot, with no formal training and not even a pair of proper running shoes. Her story, which quickly went viral on social media and in national press, is far more than a simple tale of athletic victory; it lays bare the deeply personal sacrifices that millions of low-income Indian families make to secure an education for their children, while igniting a long-simmering debate about gaps in India’s public education support systems.

    Ramabai’s motivation to enter the race grew out of quiet desperation. Since her husband’s passing in 2012, she has been the sole breadwinner for her family, taking on whatever casual manual labor she could find – from harvesting soybeans and chickpeas on local farms to processing and selling turmeric. Today, she works as a cook at a coaching center where one of her daughters prepares for a competitive police recruitment exam. She dropped out of school at age 13, and she has spent every year since determined to give her two daughters the educational opportunities that were denied to her.

    The immediate catalyst for her race entry came when her younger daughter, Arati, who lives in Nanded, was unable to afford required textbooks. Ramabai could not scrape together the funds to help her, and the stress of that left the pair not speaking for eight days. When Ramabai’s elder daughter, Pooja, mentioned the local 3km run with cash prizes earmarked for education expenses, Ramabai made the split-second decision to compete. During the race, her flip-flops kept slipping off her feet, so she removed them entirely, gathered up her sari, and ran the rest of the way barefoot. She crossed the finish line first in the women’s 30-60 age category, taking home a 3,000-rupee prize (equivalent to roughly $31 USD or £23 GBP) that went directly to buying Arati’s books. Pooja also placed second in her own age group, but she has said her mother’s courage outshines any prize she won.

    While the prize money covered the immediate cost of books, it barely makes a dent in the long-term expenses Ramabai faces. Both of her daughters are studying for competitive government recruitment exams – one for police service, the other for civil service – which are widely seen as the only path to stable, secure employment and social status in India. Preparing for these exams requires years of costly coaching classes and study materials, expenses that push many low-income families to the breaking point.

    Videos of Ramabai’s barefoot run spread across Indian social media within days, striking a powerful chord at a moment when India’s education system is already facing intense public scrutiny. Millions of Indian families share Ramabai’s belief that education is the only way out of intergenerational poverty, but the system is plagued by growing frustration: repeated allegations of exam question paper leaks, administrative irregularities, and uneven access to affordable coaching and study materials have eroded public trust, sparking large student-led protests demanding systemic reform.

    Public attention to Ramabai’s story has not only highlighted these broader systemic issues, it has also led to tangible support. Earlier this month, India’s Chief Justice Surya Kant ordered local authorities to provide Ramabai with one-time financial assistance of 50,000 rupees to cover her daughters’ educational expenses. But experts warn that one-off assistance cannot fix deeper structural gaps in government education outreach. Sukhadeo Thorat, former chairman of India’s University Grants Commission, argues that Ramabai’s struggle is a clear sign that existing government education support schemes are failing to reach the families that need them most. “Both the central and state governments run a variety of schemes. The problem is that implementation remains weak,” Thorat explained.

    For Ramabai, however, the broader national debate is secondary. Her only priority remains ensuring her daughters never have to endure the same hardships she faced growing up and working to support her family. “I don’t want them to struggle through mud or travel under the scorching sun and rain,” she said. “Whatever I have suffered, I don’t want my daughters to suffer the same.”

  • ‘I don’t even know if my parents are alive’ – the war heroes jailed 25 years ago

    ‘I don’t even know if my parents are alive’ – the war heroes jailed 25 years ago

    A quarter-century has passed since Eritrea’s ruling government swept away a group of senior reformist politicians, but for Hanna Petros Solomon, the pain of that moment remains as sharp as ever. In an emotional interview with the BBC, she broke down recalling how she and her three siblings effectively became orphans after her father was arrested and jailed without trial, followed months later by her mother — neither of whom the family has heard from since.

    Hanna was just 10 years old when she last saw her father, Petros Solomon. She remembers him leaving the house that September morning in 2001, a towel slung over his shoulders, heading out for his daily morning workout like he always did. Petros Solomon was no ordinary citizen: alongside Hanna’s mother Aster Yohannes, he had fought in Eritrea’s decades-long war of independence from Ethiopia, emerging as a senior leader and national hero for his critical role in securing the country’s freedom in 1993. After independence, he served sequentially as defense minister, foreign minister, and eventually head of the fisheries ministry, and had even met former U.S. President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton during his time in office.

    In May 2001, Petros Solomon joined 14 other high-profile Eritrean politicians to sign an open letter to then-and-current President Isaias Afewerki. The letter called for the implementation of the post-independence ratified constitution and demanded long-promised national elections. The group became known as the G-15, and their public criticism of Isaias’ authoritarian rule did not go unanswered.

    While the world was distracted by the September 11 al-Qaeda attacks on the U.S., the Eritrean government moved to eliminate the G-15 opposition. In the early hours of September 18, security forces deployed outside the homes of 11 senior G-15 officials in the capital Asmara, acting on direct orders from the president. Petros Solomon was arrested by agents as he left his house that morning, still in his tracksuit.

    At the time of the arrest, Aster Yohannes was studying in the U.S., so Hanna and her siblings went to stay with their paternal grandmother. It did not take long for the cruelty of the situation to sink in for a 10-year-old Hanna: “My classmates told me that my father sold out his country. That is when I understood how serious the situation was, and how people framed my dad and his colleagues who fought for the independence of their country. I was hurt.”

    From the U.S., Aster was devastated by news of her husband’s disappearance. She requested that the Eritrean government issue passports for her children so they could join her, but officials refused and demanded she return to Eritrea. After two years of agonizing waiting, and reportedly receiving assurances of her safety directly from President Isaias, she agreed to come home. On December 11, 2003, Hanna and her siblings waited for Aster at Asmara International Airport, holding flowers to welcome her. But she never emerged through the arrivals gate. Friends confirmed she had boarded her flight in the U.S., and eventually airport officials called to ask that someone collect Aster’s unclaimed luggage. The family soon learned she had been detained upon arrival.

    In the months that followed, all of the family’s requests for information about their missing parents were ignored, and authorities even warned Hanna’s grandmother to stop asking questions. Later, the family learned Aster was being held in the infamous Karshelli prison in central Asmara, while Petros and the other G-15 members arrested in September 2001 were believed to be held in the remote, highly secretive Ela-Ero prison in Eritrea’s eastern lowlands. Accused of treason, none of the G-15 have ever been put on trial or allowed to receive visits from family members. At the same time the G-15 were arrested, the government shut down all of Eritrea’s fledgling independent newspapers and detained their editors and journalists, who are also believed to be held in Ela-Ero.

    The Eritrean government, including its embassy in the U.K., has never responded to the BBC’s repeated requests for comment on the whereabouts of the detained G-15 members or whether any of them are still alive.

    Like thousands of other young Eritreans fleeing forced conscription and political repression, Hanna eventually left Eritrea, crossing the border secretly without a passport. Now 35, she lives in the U.S., where she works as a trauma specialist — though she says she still carries the trauma of losing her parents. She often stares at old family photos, worried that her memories of happy days before the arrests — family gatherings, birthday parties, her father’s car singing competitions on coastal trips, her mother’s famous egg and potato sandwiches — will fade over time. For Hanna, September, once a month filled with the joy of Orthodox Christian festivals and the Geez New Year, now brings only pain.

    Hanna is not alone in her grief. Ibrahim Sherifo, now 38 and living in exile in the Netherlands where he holds asylum, also lost both of his parents, who were senior members of the ruling People’s Front for Democracy and Justice and part of the G-15. He was just 13 when security agents knocked on the door early one morning and took his mother away in her pyjamas, and learned his father had already been arrested while out for his morning exercise. “For me 18 September 2001 is a dark day, but not only for me, it is a dark day for Eritrea and its people, because it is the day when law and democracy was detained,” he told the BBC.

    Both Hanna and Ibrahim say they are forever grateful to the friends and family who supported them as they grew up without their parents, despite the risks of aiding the family of political dissidents. They are also proud of their parents’ courage to demand reform in a country that had only just won its independence. “They had conscience and couldn’t observe idly while what they fought for had been hijacked by Isaias and his coterie,” Ibrahim says. He accuses the Eritrean government of seeking to erase all memory of the G-15 political prisoners, and says the very least the family deserves is to know whether their loved ones are still alive.

    Hanna echoes that call, and also demands that the world hear the stories of thousands of other Eritreans whose relatives have disappeared over the decades under Isaias’ rule. International human rights groups, including the United Nations, recognize the G-15 as prisoners of conscience and have repeatedly called for their release. Now 80 years old, Isaias Afewerki has still never implemented the 1997 constitution he promised to bring into force, and has held onto power for three decades without ever holding a national election.

    Looking back to the eve of her father’s arrest, Hanna recalls a childhood premonition of what was to come. She had a bad feeling, crept into her father’s bed while he slept, and tied his legs to her own with string. In the morning, he woke up, pulled her leg to free himself, and laughed when she begged him not to leave. He assured her he would be back after his run.

    In the 25 years since that morning, Hanna describes her life as like living deep under the sea. “Sometimes it is calm and you can float, but other times the sorrow comes back to you like a wave and drowns you deep down. Sometimes you lose hope and you are out of breath.”

    When asked what message she would send to her parents if she could, Hanna says: “Don’t worry about us. Like you survived the struggle through sheer steadfastness, we hope you can pull through this too and return to us.”

  • Our head teacher was an abuser. We joined forces to get justice – now we’re married

    Our head teacher was an abuser. We joined forces to get justice – now we’re married

    For decades, allegations of sexual abuse in Indonesia’s Islamic boarding schools have been shrouded in silence, pressured into darkness by institutional loyalty, social stigma, and systemic cover-ups. But a small group of brave former students from Lombok’s Abu Barokat school have risked everything to pull these allegations into the open, sparking a national reckoning with a crisis that activists call a national emergency.

    The story begins with two former star pupils, Ziadatur Rahmah (known to friends as Zia) and Yusron Azzahidi, who reconnected years after graduating while studying at university—Yusron in Jakarta, Zia in Cairo. During a late-night conversation about their old school days, Zia shared a devastating secret she had carried for years: when she was 16, their highly respected head teacher Ahmad Imanuddin Sumar, known affectionately to students as “Abah” (father), sexually assaulted her.

    Zia recalled that Abah intercepted her on school grounds when she left class to use the toilet, convinced her to follow him to his on-campus home, and assaulted her there. She only escaped when one of Abah’s children knocked on the locked front door, forcing Abah to let her slip out the back. The trauma left Zia feeling “dirty, ruined, and lost.”

    Yusron, who had long revered Abah and been taught the school’s core motto “We hear, and we obey,” struggled with the revelation. But he could not shake Zia’s story, and suggested they work with two other former classmates to gather corroborating evidence from other potential victims. As they reached out to old school friends via encrypted messaging, more accounts of abuse began to surface.

    One of the most alarming accounts came from 17-year-old Sukma Rohana, who was still a student at the school at the time. She told the group that Abah had lured her to his home for New Year’s prayers, then attempted to rape her. She only escaped after mustering the strength to kick him in the stomach and flee.

    Slowly, the group built a seven-page document outlining allegations of abuse against six students, including Zia, Sukma, and four others. The group arranged a meeting with leaders of Nahdlatul Wathan Diniyah Islamiyah (NWDI), the powerful organization that runs Abu Barokat and hundreds of other Islamic schools across Indonesia, to present their evidence. NWDI representatives initially promised to help the group take the case to police.

    But weeks later, Yusron received an urgent text from his sister asking him to call her immediately. When he did, it was not his sister on the line—it was Abah, who was in Yusron’s family home after NWDI had shared the group’s evidence document with him. What followed was a brazen attempt to force the students into silence.

    Abah pleaded with Yusron to cover up the allegations, sobbing “Cover the shame of your teacher. Everyone makes mistakes, my child,” and warning that if the story leaked to the press, he would be destroyed. He pressured Yusron to retract his evidence and lie for him, then called Zia to exert the same pressure. Unbeknownst to Abah, both Yusron and Zia recorded every word of these calls.

    The pressure did not end there. Sukma was summoned to Abah’s home, where she found two police officers and an NWDI lawyer waiting. They forced her to sign a document retracting all her allegations, a confrontation she also secretly recorded. When she later challenged Abah’s wife Hurmiati about the retraction, Hurmiati was captured on tape telling Sukma to respect the “agreement” that nothing happened, warning her that the allegations would “haunt you for the rest of your life” and ruin her chances of getting married.

    Abah even pressured Yusron’s parents to travel from Lombok to Jakarta to find Yusron at his university. Yusron hid in a hotel to avoid them, but the ordeal left his mother so stressed that she begged Yusron to drop the investigation. Reluctantly, he agreed, putting his pursuit of justice on hold.

    Throughout this ordeal, the friendship between Zia and Yusron had grown into a long-distance romance, but the trauma of the investigation left Zia struggling emotionally. Eight months after Yusron paused the probe, they learned of a grassroots advocacy group raising awareness of sexual abuse in Islamic schools, founded by a young activist named Ayu Masruroh, who had helped another survivor secure justice after an assault by a teacher at a different school. Ayu’s public calls for survivors to speak out inspired Zia to post a call for other survivors to contact her on Instagram.

    What she discovered confirmed their worst fears: even after Abah had begged Zia and Yusron for silence and promised to change his ways, he had allegedly abused another student at the school just a year later. This revelation convinced the pair that Abah had never intended to stop, and that their work for justice could not wait any longer.

    Yusron’s parents finally agreed to let the pair continue their quest, and this time they worked with Ayu to connect with an experienced lawyer who specialized in representing sexual abuse survivors. He advised them to move forward with Sukma’s case, which he deemed the strongest for prosecution. Sukma filed a formal police complaint against Abah in February of last year. To date, police have taken no action, and Abah remains in his post as head teacher.

    When the BBC reached out to Abah and his wife for comment on the allegations, they declined to respond. NWDI has stated that it is conducting an internal investigation and denies any attempt to cover up abuse claims, saying it has a “duty to safeguard the organisation from being tarnished by the alleged actions of individuals.”

    Indonesia’s National Commission on Violence Against Women has labeled sexual abuse in Islamic boarding schools a national emergency. Legal experts note that the vast majority of cases never reach court, as victims are pressured to withdraw their allegations or stay silent entirely. Joko Jumadi, the lawyer representing Zia, Yusron, and Sukma, has handled 20 such cases in West Nusa Tenggara province over the past three years, and says the known cases are “just the tip of the iceberg.” He credits the students with exceptional courage, noting that their secret recordings of pressure to stay silent—including admissions of abuse from Abah himself—are invaluable evidence that will help cut through the culture of silence.

    For Zia and Yusron, the shared struggle for justice has forged an unbreakable bond. Earlier this year, three years after they began working together, Yusron moved to Cairo to be with Zia, and the couple married last month. “I was exhausted. Jakarta had been intense, because I was dealing with the police case the whole time. So when I saw Zia… it was like medicine,” Yusron says. Zia adds, “He came all the way to Egypt for me. I trust him. That’s why I’m with him.”

    For Sukma, the fight continues. “I don’t want what happened to me, to happen to any other students. I want justice,” she says. Her courage, and the courage of Zia and Yusron, has opened a national conversation about a long-ignored crisis, giving hope to hundreds of other survivors who have remained silent for far too long.

  • Trump says US will form ‘AI Force’ and appoint an artificial intelligence tsar

    Trump says US will form ‘AI Force’ and appoint an artificial intelligence tsar

    As global alarm over artificial intelligence’s potential existential and societal risks reaches a fever pitch, former U.S. President Donald Trump has shaken up the policy conversation with a new announcement: he plans to establish a dedicated national ‘AI Force’ and appoint a senior White House-level ‘AI tsar’ to lead the country’s AI strategy.

    In a social media statement published Saturday, Trump pushed back against the growing chorus of experts and industry leaders calling for a temporary slowdown in cutting-edge AI development until robust safety guardrails can be put in place. He emphasized that under his leadership, the federal government would not place unnecessary barriers that would curb the rapid expansion of the U.S. AI sector. Going further, Trump dismissed widespread public and expert concern over AI’s potential harms as a deliberate ‘hoax’, a stance he has repeated in recent public comments.

    Trump framed AI as a transformative technological shift on par with — and far more impactful than — the first Industrial Revolution or the rise of the internet. He projected that AI could eventually account for as much as 25% of U.S. gross domestic product, and stressed that his top priority is maintaining U.S. technological leadership over China in this critical emerging field. AI innovation has already emerged as a core point of competition between the world’s two largest economies, and the issue is expected to be on the agenda when Trump meets Chinese President Xi Jinping next week, according to pre-summit briefing expectations. The former president added that for bad actors who misuse AI for harmful purposes, his administration would leverage existing criminal and civil legal frameworks to hold wrongdoers accountable. Notably, Trump offered no specific structural details, policy outlines, or implementation timeline for his proposed ‘AI Force’ in his initial announcement.

    Trump’s proposal comes amid a wave of urgent warnings from AI researchers, top industry leaders, and policymakers across the Western world about the risks posed by unregulated development of increasingly powerful AI systems. In recent weeks, multiple current and former AI researchers have sounded the alarm about existential risk, with one prominent figure estimating a greater than 10% probability that unconstrained AI advancement could lead to human extinction. Major AI companies are currently locked in a global race to roll out increasingly powerful models, with many working toward the development of so-called ‘superintelligence’ — a theoretical AI system that would outperform humans across virtually all cognitive and strategic tasks.

    In recent months, three of the world’s largest AI developers — Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google, creators of leading chatbots Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini respectively — have publicly reported security gaps and incidents where their platforms were exploited for malicious activity. Earlier this year, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei became the latest top AI leader to call for an industry-wide slowdown in advanced AI development, paired with binding government regulation and independent third-party monitoring of high-risk model training. Amodei’s call has been backed by other prominent industry figures, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and xAI founder Elon Musk. Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark told the BBC in a recent interview that mandatory ‘kill switches’ — remote shutdown systems that can be activated by independent third parties to disable misbehaving models — should be required for all high-capacity AI systems.

    While U.S. lawmakers have already begun drafting new AI-focused legislation in response to growing safety concerns, Altman acknowledged this week that federal regulators and policymakers have struggled to keep up with the breakneck pace of AI innovation, leaving a gap in effective oversight. Altman pushed back against heavy-handed government intervention, however, arguing that the public and policymakers should place greater trust in AI companies to self-regulate and develop safety systems. ‘The world should trust that we are going to do the right thing because it’s the right thing and we feel the magnitude of this,’ Altman told a tech industry conference in San Francisco.

    Across the Atlantic, the debate over AI regulation is also accelerating. In the United Kingdom, cross-party MPs and members of the House of Lords have warned that existing national laws are not equipped to mitigate human rights risks posed by rapidly advancing AI systems. The parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights has released a new report calling for a dedicated new AI bill to address what it describes as the ‘scale and seriousness’ of these emerging threats to public rights and safety.

  • Israel seeks US weapons ‘compensation’ after Saudi F-35 deal

    Israel seeks US weapons ‘compensation’ after Saudi F-35 deal

    A new report from Israeli media has revealed that Israel intends to approach the United States to seek expanded weapons transfers and enhanced defense capabilities, framing the request as compensation for Washington’s recent greenlighting of a potential F-35 fighter jet sale to Saudi Arabia.

    Israeli digital news outlet Walla first broke the story Friday, citing sources familiar with Israeli government planning that indicate senior Israeli officials will ask the Trump administration to approve a series of advanced weapons systems that the U.S. has previously rejected transferring to Israel.

    According to Walla’s reporting, the scope of Israel’s requested capabilities stretches far beyond cutting-edge fighter aircraft and stealth technology. The proposed request covers a range of high-end military assets, including space-based weapons platforms and support for the domestic development and manufacturing of interceptor aircraft. Additionally, Israeli officials are set to ask for bunker-busting munitions and specialized underground military systems engineered to operate deep beneath rugged, rocky mountain terrain. All of these asks are tied directly to the U.S.’s approval of the potential Saudi F-35 deal, with Israel seeking a compensatory package to preserve its military positioning in the Middle East, the outlet reported.

    The revelation of Israel’s planned request follows a formal announcement from the U.S. State Department, which gave preliminary approval to a potential $24.3 billion arms package that would deliver 48 F-35 Lightning II fifth-generation fighter jets to Riyadh. Alongside the aircraft, the proposed deal includes 49 Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-100 engines, specialized communications and cryptographic security equipment, electronic warfare support systems, pilot and maintenance training, and full logistics support, according to the formal notification the State Department submitted to Congress.

    Despite the State Department’s preliminary approval, the proposed sale still faces a key procedural hurdle: it must secure final approval from the U.S. Congress before it can move forward.

    Middle East Eye (MEE), an independent outlet focused on regional coverage, has tracked the progression of the deal for months, with multiple U.S. and Arab sources confirming that negotiations have moved at an accelerated pace. In November, MEE first reported that the F-35 purchase would be fast-tracked as part of a new comprehensive defense partnership between Washington and Riyadh, an agreement finalized during Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s high-profile visit to the White House. A follow-up MEE report in December revealed that the Trump administration had launched a formal review of Israel’s long-recognized qualitative military edge in the region, a required step in processing the Saudi sale.

    Early this year, senior U.S. military officials held a series of closed-door, confidential meetings with members of Congress to brief lawmakers on the details of the proposed deal. This summer, Saudi Defense Minister Khaled bin Salman made multiple trips to Washington, with advancing the F-35 deal a top priority on his agenda, multiple U.S. officials confirmed to MEE.

    If the sale is finalized, Saudi Arabia will become the first Arab nation to operate the F-35, the most advanced stealth fighter jet in current U.S. military inventory. For the moment, Israel remains the only country in the Middle East that operates the aircraft.

    As international news outlet Reuters noted, the proposed sale puts Washington’s decades-long policy of guaranteeing Israel’s qualitative military edge over all regional adversaries to the test.

    The move to acquire advanced fighter jets comes as Saudi Arabia faces escalating security threats from ongoing Houthi missile and drone attacks on its territory. At the same time, the Saudi-backed, internationally recognized Yemeni government has struggled to repel a recent Houthi offensive that has allowed the group to seize control of Yemen’s entire Red Sea coastline, as well as the Arabian Gulf side of the strategic Bab al-Mandeb Strait.

  • EU presses Washington to reverse visa ban on Palestinian UN delegation

    EU presses Washington to reverse visa ban on Palestinian UN delegation

    For the second straight year, Washington has blocked travel visas for Palestinian Authority officials seeking to attend the United Nations General Assembly in New York, drawing sharp international criticism from the European Union and top UN officials over what observers call a clear violation of US hosting obligations.

    The European Union’s diplomatic service publicly called on the United States to reverse its decision Saturday, stressing that Washington holds binding legal responsibilities under its headquarters agreement with the United Nations as the host of the global body’s headquarters. EU spokesman Anouar El Anouni stated, “In light of its existing headquarters agreements with the UN and its obligations as host state, we urge the United States for this decision to be reconsidered.” The bloc also expressed deep regret over the continuation of the travel ban, which bars the official Palestinian delegation from taking part in in-person UNGA proceedings.

    UN Secretary-General António Guterres has already aligned with the EU’s position, saying he holds serious concern that the visa refusals directly undermine the State of Palestine’s ability to fully participate in UN institutional work. In a partial workaround, the UNGA recently passed a vote to allow Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to address the upcoming 81st General Assembly session via a pre-recorded video statement.

    The US State Department confirmed earlier this week that it is extending visa restrictions to cover both PA and Palestine Liberation Organization officials. Washington has justified the ban by leveling multiple accusations against Palestinian leadership, claiming the PA has failed to implement required domestic reforms and pursues actions that harm prospects for two-state peace. Specific US grievances include the PA’s push for international recognition of Palestinian statehood outside of direct negotiations with Israel, and its practice of providing financial stipends to the families of Palestinians imprisoned by Israeli authorities.

    Critics have highlighted a stark double standard in Washington’s visa policy: no comparable travel ban has been imposed on Israeli officials, even as the International Criminal Court has an active arrest warrant outstanding for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over alleged war crimes in the Gaza Strip.

    Even with the in-person travel block, Abbas’s pre-recorded address, scheduled for next week, is expected to ramp up international pressure for widespread formal recognition of Palestinian statehood. The speech will build on growing momentum over the past year, as major Western nations including the United Kingdom, France, and Canada have extended formal recognition to the Palestinian state. Abbas is also set to draw global attention to the catastrophic humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza, the accelerating expansion of illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, and rising violent attacks against Palestinian communities by Israeli settlers in the territory.

    Palestine’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has welcomed the UNGA resolution allowing a virtual address, framing the vote as a meaningful victory over efforts to exclude Palestine from the annual UNGA gathering.

    In a contrasting move that has drawn further attention to US visa policy, the State Department announced this week that it has approved visas for a limited number of Iranian officials to attend the UNGA, after weeks of uncertainty. The announcement came via a cryptic post on X from State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott, who framed the restricted access as a punitive measure against the Iranian government. “While ordinary Iranians endure brutal repression, water and electricity shortages, and soaring inflation, the regime’s officials want to go on shopping sprees in New York. Not on our watch,” Pigott wrote. He added that the US would not allow Iranian regime elites to use the UNGA gathering for luxury shopping sprees funded by Iranian public money, at a time when the regime diverts national wealth to support what the US labels terrorist proxy groups.

    According to reporting from The New York Times, the approved visas include strict geographic restrictions that limit the Iranian delegation’s movement within Manhattan, and the total number of visiting officials will be smaller than the delegation that attended last year’s UNGA. The delegation is expected to be led by newly elected Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who has served as Iran’s lead nuclear negotiator with the US alongside parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. This UNGA gathering comes as cross-border tensions between the US, Israel and Iran have remained elevated for seven consecutive months.

  • Analysis: Trump ramps up feud with media after week of setbacks

    Analysis: Trump ramps up feud with media after week of setbacks

    In a sharp escalation of his long-running battle with the national press corps, former and current President Donald Trump has cut off full White House access to three major U.S. media outlets, triggering immediate legal pushback and fierce condemnation from press freedom advocates. On Saturday morning, correspondents from CNN, Politico, and MS Now were barred from entering White House grounds for official work, and their permanent press credentials were seized outright. The unprecedented move was announced by Trump himself a day earlier on his Truth Social platform, where he justified the ban by accusing the three outlets of consistently publishing what he calls ‘fake news’.

    Speaking further on the decision Friday, Trump argued that the United States has allowed intentionally negative coverage of his administration to go unchecked for too long. ‘If they want to write them, that’s fine,’ he said of critical reporting. ‘I don’t have to let them into the people’s house,’ he added, referencing the White House as a public facility.

    The president’s latest crackdown on the press comes on the heels of a punishing week that delivered a string of high-profile defeats across his policy and political agenda, leaving him facing mounting headwinds just months before critical 2026 midterm congressional elections. First, the U.S. Supreme Court – a body that includes three justices appointed by Trump himself – blocked his administration’s plan to impose new restrictions on mail-in voting ahead of the November vote. An infuriated Trump lashed out at the court, saying, ‘These are not the people I interviewed to serve on the United States Supreme Court.’

    Next, the U.S. Federal Reserve, the nation’s central bank, defied months of public pressure from Trump to cut interest rates and instead announced a rate hike. Shortly after that, a federal judge issued an order blocking the Trump administration from making any changes to Washington DC’s iconic Kennedy Center arts venue for 30 days, a response to Trump’s recent public threat to ‘rip down’ the facility. Compounding these setbacks, Trump’s job approval rating has recently sunk to a historic low for his second term in office, according to public polling.

    Legal experts say the new press ban raises serious constitutional questions under U.S. law. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from restricting press freedom, and federal courts have consistently ruled that executive branch officials cannot discriminate against media outlets based on the content of their reporting. All three targeted organizations have already confirmed they will file lawsuits to challenge the administration’s order.

    While the scope of this latest action is without precedent, it is far from the first time the Trump White House has moved to restrict press access for critical mainstream outlets. During Trump’s first term in office, the administration revoked the press pass of CNN correspondent Jim Acosta, triggering a legal battle that ended with a federal court ordering Acosta’s credentials restored. The White House also briefly suspended the press pass of a reporter who clashed with former Trump advisor Sebastian Gorka, a move that was also blocked by courts.

    Last year, the administration barred Associated Press reporters from joining the presidential press pool – the group of reporters that accompanies the president for public and off-the-record appearances – after the news outlet refused to comply with Trump’s order to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the ‘Gulf of America’. That dispute spiraled into a long-running, still unresolved legal battle, and ultimately led the White House to revise press pool rules to eliminate guaranteed access for all major wire services.

    Unlike these earlier actions, which targeted individual reporters, the latest ban applies to entire media organizations and blocks access to all areas of the White House grounds, not just presidential press pool events. That marks a dramatic escalation of the administration’s long-running conflict with the national press. Trump has been open about his disdain for critical coverage, which dates back to his entry into national politics more than a decade ago, but he told reporters Friday that no single specific incident prompted this week’s ban.

    Political analysts note the timing of the move comes as Trump faces multiple layers of political vulnerability. Beyond the string of recent legislative and judicial defeats, the president is overseeing an unpopular and protracted war of choice in Iran that has driven up energy and consumer prices across the United States, eroding his support among American voters. Polling consistently shows Trump’s Republican Party faces a steep challenge to retain control of the U.S. House of Representatives, and could also lose its majority in the U.S. Senate, in the upcoming midterm elections. Recent efforts to boost public support by highlighting administration accomplishments at campaign rallies and last month’s Republican National Convention in Texas have so far failed to move polling numbers in the GOP’s favor.

    While there may be underlying strategic calculations behind Trump’s decision to target the press this weekend, many analysts see it as a raw expression of presidential frustration at a growing wave of political setbacks, many of which stem from decisions made by Trump himself. As the legal battle over the press ban gets underway, the confrontation adds another layer of volatility to an already charged lead-up to the 2026 midterms.