Disturbing new testimonies from a Palestinian prisoners’ advocacy group and the fiancée of high-profile long-term detainee Hassan Salameh have confirmed that the 55-year-old was shot nine times by Israeli prison guards in a violent assault last month, weeks after far-right Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir filmed himself inside Salameh’s cell openly threatening to execute him. The Palestinian Prisoners’ Society (PPS), a leading independent monitor of detention conditions for Palestinian individuals held in Israeli facilities, verified details of the attack during a legal visit to Salameh conducted by one of its lawyers on Monday. Cross-referenced accounts from the legal team and Salameh’s fiancée Ghufran Zamel confirm the detainee was subjected to brutal, sustained physical beatings both before and after Ben Gvir’s unauthorised cell incursion, with Israeli security forces first storming the unit to assault Salameh repeatedly, including targeted blows to his face, before firing nine rounds at him at close range. Three full days after the violent incident, Salameh was briefly removed from his cell only for officials to document his injuries via photography, before being returned to his cell with no formal medical care administered, provided only basic over-the-counter painkillers despite the severity of his gunshot and blunt-force wounds. The recent legal visit confirmed Salameh remains in visibly poor health, severely exhausted and still suffering lingering, untreated effects of the assault, with critical details about the type of ammunition used in the shooting and the full sequence of events that triggered the attack still unaccounted for. PPS representatives noted that sweeping Israeli restrictions on legal and family prison visits have blocked access to additional corroborating evidence, deepening widespread alarm over Salameh’s safety. The organisation stressed the incident is not an isolated case, but part of an escalating, deliberate campaign targeting high-profile Palestinian detainees that far exceeds standard punitive measures, putting the lives of long-imprisoned prisoner leaders in immediate, mortal danger. These targeted figures face coordinated physical and psychological torture, systematic crackdowns, and repeated public death threats directly from Ben Gvir, who in September posted a viral video filmed inside Salameh’s cell surrounded by armed guards, stating he intended to execute the detainee and vowing to push for the death penalty for prisoners like Salameh if he is appointed defence minister. A native of the Khan Younis refugee camp in southern Gaza, Salameh became active in Palestinian resistance against Israeli occupation following the 1987 outbreak of the First Intifada, later rising to a senior leadership position in the al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas’ armed wing. He was handed 48 consecutive life sentences in 1996 after an Israeli court convicted him of orchestrating a series of bombings that killed and wounded dozens of Israeli civilians; Salameh has repeatedly stated the attacks were carried out in direct retaliation for Israel’s targeted assassination of prominent Hamas engineer Yahya Ayyash earlier that same year. Over the 30 years he has spent in Israeli custody, Salameh has already endured 14 cumulative years in prolonged solitary confinement. Reports of systemic abuse of Palestinian detainees held in Israeli facilities have surged dramatically since the outbreak of the Gaza conflict in October 2023, with dozens of human rights organisations documenting widespread patterns of torture, unprovoked physical assault, sexual violence, deliberate starvation, medical neglect, and public humiliation of prisoners across all Israeli detention centres. Two leading Israeli human rights groups, Physicians for Human Rights Israel and the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel, released a joint report last month compiling 21 separate first-hand testimonies confirming a rapidly spreading dangerous practice where Israeli prison guards fire rubber-coated steel bullets at prisoners from point-blank range inside their cells, causing catastrophic, often permanent injuries. One documented case details a Palestinian detainee whose right testicle was completely crushed by a close-range rubber bullet shot, requiring full surgical amputation. PPS warned that the ongoing implementation of these brutal policies, paired with sweeping bans on independent oversight and restricted access for legal representatives and medical personnel, creates a permissive environment that will inevitably lead to further fatal violations, stripping Palestinian detainees of even the most basic internationally recognised protections for incarcerated people.
博客
-
Trump says US will end $4bn annual military aid to Israel in 2027
In a surprise announcement made during a Tuesday appearance on Fox News, former U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed that his administration will halt the decades-long annual direct military aid package to Israel starting at the end of the current calendar year, a move he framed as the outcome of a months-prior bilateral understanding struck with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. As outlined by Trump, the existing $4 billion annual aid disbursement will cease entirely, but core U.S.-Israel military collaboration will remain fully intact, including unrestricted access for Israel to purchase U.S.-manufactured advanced weaponry, alongside ongoing joint defense initiatives.
Trump emphasized that the policy shift was rooted in a mutual assessment that Israel no longer requires direct monetary military assistance, noting that the Jewish state retains full authorization to procure any U.S. defense system it deems necessary, on par with allied European nations. He added that the U.S. would step in with targeted emergency support should Israel face unforeseen security threats, clarifying that the adjustment alters the structure of bilateral security ties rather than severing longstanding defense partnerships.
The remarks arrive against a backdrop of mounting electoral pressure on U.S. policymakers regarding Washington’s unwavering support for Israel in the lead-up to key national elections. A June Quinnipiac University public opinion survey revealed a dramatic shift in voter sentiment: 48% of all U.S. registered voters and 66% of Democratic respondents now believe the U.S. government is excessively supportive of Israel, a sharp jump from the 16% of total voters and 20% of Democrats who held that view when the same question was first fielded in 2017.
Under the current 10-year bilateral memorandum of understanding running from 2019 through 2028, the U.S. disburses $3.8 billion annually to Israel, comprising $3.3 billion in foreign military financing and $500 million earmarked for collaborative missile defense programs. The Israeli Ministry of Defense confirmed that formal negotiations between U.S. and Israeli representatives are already underway to draft a new long-term security cooperation framework, first launched in May, with core priorities centered on joint investment in defense research, development, and domestic weapons production capacity on both sides. The proposed new model is designed to reframe the U.S.-Israel security relationship from a dynamic of one-sided aid to a mutually beneficial, reciprocal strategic partnership.
A non-partisan July report from the Congressional Research Service, the independent policy advisory body serving the U.S. Congress, corroborated that senior officials from both nations have been exploring a post-2028 transition away from direct cash military aid toward collaborative joint defense programs for months prior to Trump’s public announcement.
-
UK Supreme Court to hear landmark appeal over Palestine Action ban
The UK government is set to mount a full defence of its controversial proscription of pro-Palestinian direct action network Palestine Action at a landmark two-day Supreme Court hearing kicking off Wednesday, a high-stakes legal showdown that is redefining the intersection of Britain’s counterterror legislation, fundamental free expression guarantees, and the statutory right to public protest.
A segment of the proceedings will be held behind closed doors, court administrators confirmed, to accommodate classified evidence tied to national security considerations that cannot be disclosed in open court. The appeal unfolds against a backdrop of escalating civil unrest across the nation, as law enforcement has ramped up crackdowns on demonstrators voicing solidarity with the group. Over the most recent weekend alone, hundreds of peaceful protesters were taken into custody outside the US Embassy in central London and in the Scottish capital of Edinburgh, simply for carrying placards bearing the six-word slogan: “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.”
Since the UK government formally banned Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act in July 2025, that very six-word phrase has evolved into a widespread rallying cry for pro-Palestine campaigners, resulting in more than 4,000 people being targeted for arrest under counterterror statutes. The affected groups include human rights legal practitioners, elderly long-time peace activists, and even Holocaust survivors, sparking widespread public outcry over the scope of the legislation. The proscription also ignited high-profile cultural controversy earlier this year, when celebrated Irish novelist Sally Rooney saw her works pulled from UK retail shelves after she publicly voiced her backing for Palestine Action, amplifying global concerns that the ban represents a sweeping overreach that violates core free speech protections.
The legal battle that has landed the case before the UK’s highest judicial body was initiated by Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori, who has navigated a winding, back-and-forth path through the British court system over the past 13 months. Shortly after the 2025 proscription, which criminalised both formal membership in Palestine Action and any public expression of support for the organisation, campaigners mounted an immediate legal challenge. In February 2026, the High Court handed Palestine Action a resounding victory, ruling that the government’s proscription was unlawful and constituted a disproportionate, unjustified infringement on basic human rights. That ruling was later overturned by the Court of Appeal in June 2026, which reinstated the group’s official terrorist designation. The Supreme Court formally granted Ammori permission to file a final, binding appeal in August 2026.
Representing Ammori in the upcoming hearing, leading human rights barrister Raza Husain KC will argue that classifying a grassroots direct action group that primarily targets arms manufacturing and supply firms under counterterror laws sets an extraordinarily dangerous precedent that opens the door to criminalising legitimate political dissent across the UK. In pre-filed written submissions to the Supreme Court, Ammori’s legal team highlighted internal Home Office assessments that found less than 1% of Palestine Action’s documented direct action protest activities over a five-year period met the legal definition of terrorism. Husain further clarified that of 385 total actions staged by the group across that five-year span, only three were ever assessed to fall under the Terrorism Act’s terrorism classification. He emphasised that the proscription had resulted in “the total destruction of a protest group which enjoyed widespread support from across civil society.”
Dozens of independent human rights organisations and international oversight bodies, including multiple United Nations special rapporteurs, have filed amicus curiae statements with the court, warning that upholding the ban will trigger a severe chilling effect across the entire UK civil society sector, discouraging legitimate grassroots advocacy on a wide range of social and foreign policy issues.
For its part, the UK government will argue that the Court of Appeal’s ruling that restored the proscription was fully consistent with long-standing, established legal principles, and contained no errors of law. Leading government counsel James Eadie KC noted in his written submissions that the lower appellate court’s factual conclusions were fully justified by the evidence presented to it. Two major UK Jewish representative bodies, the Community Security Trust and the Jewish Leadership Council, have also submitted supporting evidence to the court, arguing that maintaining Palestine Action’s proscription is necessary to protect the safety and security of Britain’s Jewish community.
The highly charged public debate around the ban has even drawn public comment from senior cabinet officials, including UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband, who acknowledged earlier this year that the proscription had produced unforeseen, absurd outcomes that saw “grannies and vicars” arrested on terror-related charges. “I don’t think anyone’s intent was to have those people criminalised,” Miliband told LBC News in a public interview, adding that the Supreme Court’s deliberations would be critical to resolving the dispute, and that the government would keep the policy under active ongoing review.
-
Hours before midterm elections, Trump bombs Iran’s Qeshm Island
Hours before American voters cast their ballots in the 2026 midterm elections, the Trump administration carried out a previously unannounced targeted aerial strike on Iran’s Qeshm Island, a strategic territory situated in the critical Strait of Hormuz, according to an exclusive initial report from the Wall Street Journal. The operation, which the U.S. military chose not to publicly acknowledge, was framed by an anonymous U.S. official as a purely defensive response to recent Iranian surface-to-air missile deployments targeting American forces that have been engaged in hostilities against Iran since February of that year. Per the Journal’s corroborated reporting, the immediate trigger for the Monday night strike came when a unit of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps launched a surface-to-air missile at a patrolling U.S. fighter jet, prompting the aircraft to return fire in self-defense before the broader targeted operation on Qeshm Island was executed. The administration has deliberately kept its recent string of limited, small-scale strikes on Iranian territory under wraps, the Journal confirmed, in a deliberate effort to avoid signaling to domestic and international audiences that it intended to restart large-scale, open combat operations against the Iranian state. This development directly contradicts public assurances made by former President Trump just one month prior, when he publicly pledged that the United States would not launch any attacks on Iran in the lead-up to the midterms, and claimed that bilateral talks between the two nations were producing “productive discussions.” Vice President JD Vance also echoed this tone of cautious optimism just hours before the strike was publicly revealed, stating that both he and Trump held positive outlooks for reaching a negotiated diplomatic settlement to end the widely unpopular, devastating ongoing conflict with Iran. The revelation of the unreported strike has sparked immediate alarm among policymakers and advocacy groups focused on Iranian-American relations. Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran’s deputy foreign minister, issued a stern public statement on Tuesday affirming that Tehran is fully prepared for any potential scenario, and that the nation retains its inherent right to legitimate self-defense until all acts of foreign military aggression against its territory are fully and permanently halted. Jamal Abdi, president of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), noted that prior to the strike reports, many observers had held cautious hope that after eight months of an unauthorized, illegal war, a diplomatic end to the conflict was finally within reach. “These deeply alarming revelations suggest we may be heading in precisely the opposite direction,” Abdi warned, emphasizing that every day Congress fails to intervene, the Trump administration is granted leeway to wage unapproved military campaigns, conceal its operations from the public, and gamble with the lives of millions of people across the region. Abdi called on Congress to immediately demand full transparency from the administration, reject any further unauthorized military action, and leverage its legislative power to cut off all funding for the unapproved Iran war, adding that the window to prevent a catastrophic wider escalation is rapidly closing. The confirmed Qeshm Island strike follows closely on public warnings from Democratic Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy, who shared details from a closed classified congressional briefing to alert the public that the Trump administration was weighing an “insane” plan to roll out large-scale renewed attacks on Iran in the immediate aftermath of the midterm elections. Murphy cautioned that if such a plan moves forward, it would trigger devastating regional escalation and effectively shatter longstanding U.S. commitments to global rule of law principles. While Murphy did not explicitly state that the administration was considering deploying nuclear weapons against Iran, public anxiety over a worst-case scenario spiked over the weekend after prominent conservative commentator Tucker Carlson, a vocal critic of the Iran war, claimed that the Trump administration could be mere days away from launching a nuclear strike on Iranian soil. In an official response, NIAC stated that regardless of whether such reports reflect formal military planning or reckless political posturing, the very existence of a credible possibility of a U.S. nuclear attack on Iran represents an unconscionable, unacceptable horror that demands immediate congressional oversight and public pushback.
-
Israeli forces kill 19 Palestinians in three days of Gaza attacks
Official data from Palestinian and Gaza Strip governing health and administrative bodies paints a devastating picture of ongoing violence against Palestinian civilians, even after the US-mediated October 2025 ceasefire was meant to end hostilities and ease humanitarian access. The Palestinian Health Ministry released updated casualty figures on Tuesday afternoon, confirming 19 Palestinians have been killed across the Gaza Strip by Israeli military operations since the preceding Saturday. Of these fatalities, 13 occurred over the weekend, with an additional six lives lost in the 24-hour window leading up to the Tuesday announcement. Among the recent victims was a Palestinian civilian who succumbed to his injuries early Tuesday after Israeli forces bombed the displacement camp he was residing in Khan Younis, alongside another person killed in an airstrike that targeted a group of civilians near the University College of Applied Sciences (UCAS) in the same southern Gaza city. The targeting of educational spaces has escalated sharply in recent weeks, coinciding with the launch of the new academic term. Data from the Palestinian Ministry of Education and Higher Education shows 14 school students and four teachers were killed across Gaza in October alone, while three staff members from the Islamic University lost their lives in a direct Israeli bombing of the campus last month. Education officials further warn that over 97% of Gaza’s formal schools and university campuses have been completely destroyed by Israeli military assaults, with the handful of remaining functional educational sites and makeshift alternative learning spaces facing constant, imminent risk of further attack. Separately, Gaza’s Ministry of Interior confirmed an Israeli airstrike targeted a gathering of local police and security personnel in Khan Younis’ Al-Mawasi area, resulting in an unconfirmed number of fatalities and injuries, with final casualty counts still being tallied by first responders. The wave of ongoing attacks directly violates the terms of the US-brokered October 11, 2025 ceasefire, which was designed to end Israel’s long-running campaign of bombardment and fully lift barriers blocking critical humanitarian aid from entering the enclave. Instead of adhering to the agreement, Israeli military forces have carried out near-daily airstrikes, home demolitions, and ground incursions across Gaza. Cumulative data from the Palestinian Health Ministry records nearly 1,600 Palestinians killed since the ceasefire went into effect, more than 340 of whom are children, with an additional 5,700 people suffering non-fatal injuries. The total Palestinian death toll dating back to the start of the military campaign in October 2023 now stands at no fewer than 74,600, with thousands more people still unaccounted for, trapped under the rubble of destroyed buildings. Israeli authorities have also maintained strict, punitive restrictions on the entry of essential goods and humanitarian supplies into Gaza, allowing an average of just 200 aid trucks to enter the territory per day. This figure is a third of the 600 daily truckloads explicitly agreed upon in the ceasefire terms, and far below the minimum threshold humanitarian agencies estimate is required to meet the basic survival needs of Gaza’s remaining civilian population. Gaza’s Government Media Office has documented a total of 5,989 distinct ceasefire violations committed by Israeli forces since the agreement took effect, ranging from airstrikes and live fire incidents to home demolitions, military raids, and mass arbitrary arrests of Palestinian residents.
-
French judges open war crimes probe into Israeli strike that killed seven in Beirut
Two French investigating magistrates have formally initiated a judicial inquiry into a suspected war crime tied to an Israeli aerial bombardment of a Beirut residential high-rise in November 2024 that claimed the lives of seven unarmed civilians, including the mother and father of dual Franco-Lebanese contemporary artist Ali Cherri. The formal probe was triggered by a legal complaint filed back in April by Cherri alongside the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), a leading global human rights advocacy network. Legal representatives for Cherri and FIDH confirmed to Agence France-Presse that this marks the very first time French judicial authorities have opened a formal investigation into alleged offenses committed by the Israeli military in Lebanon since the Israel-Hezbollah conflict erupted with Israeli military operations in October 2023. In an interview with AFP, Cherri shared that he had spent nearly two years advocating for accountability for the strike that killed his parents and five other local residents, emphasizing that the newly launched inquiry represented a landmark milestone for his grieving family even as he acknowledged the long, arduous path to full justice that still lies ahead. Cherri further stressed that the attack on his family was not a one-off isolated incident, framing his legal fight as a broader campaign to uphold the dignity of all civilian casualties caught in cross-border hostilities, and expressing hope that the investigation would dismantle the long-standing culture of impunity that has shielded Israeli officials accused of targeting civilian populations across Lebanon and Palestine. The deadly air strike took place on November 27, 2024, just 10 and a half hours before a mutually agreed ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah was set to go into full effect. The targeted 12-story apartment complex in Beirut’s densely populated Noueiri district suffered catastrophic damage, with three entire floors of the building completely destroyed in the blast. The French judicial inquiry draws on rigorous independent on-the-ground research conducted by Amnesty International and the specialized forensic investigation collective Forensic Architecture. In a public report released in April 2025, Amnesty International investigators documented no evidence of any active military target operating in the immediate vicinity of the residential building at the time of the 5:30 p.m. strike. The human rights group also recovered physical debris from the attack site confirming the munition used was a U.S.-manufactured GBU-39 precision-guided bomb, concluding there was a well-documented reasonable basis to suspect the incident constituted a clear violation of international humanitarian law, and formally calling for the strike to be probed as a potential war crime. A source close to the case speaking to AFP confirmed that France’s specialized National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor’s Office (PNAT), which holds national jurisdiction over all alleged war crime cases, formally requested the opening of full judicial investigations into the incident back in September 2025, after prosecutors reviewed evidence and confirmed the existence of serious, consistent corroborating indicators that the alleged offenses had been committed. The formal investigation is grounded in French domestic legal provisions that classify the deliberate targeting of civilian non-military property as a prosecutable war crime. Cherri’s lead legal counsel Clemence Bectarte explained that the core mandate of the ongoing inquiry is to fully reconstruct the sequence of events that led to the bombing, identify all parties responsible for ordering and carrying out the strike, and establish formal accountability. Due to limits on French court jurisdiction, the scope of the case is restricted specifically to the destruction of Cherri’s own apartment in the targeted building, as French legal authorities do not hold jurisdiction over the deaths of the five non-French civilians killed in the blast, meaning Cherri cannot file formal homicide charges in French courts over his parents’ deaths. This new Beirut probe is part of a broader slate of ongoing war crime proceedings overseen by PNAT: the prosecutor’s office has already launched separate preliminary investigations into alleged acts of torture and war crimes tied to Israeli military interceptions of humanitarian aid flotillas bound for Gaza in 2025 and 2026, and at the end of 2025, PNAT requested Paris-based investigating judges open a separate formal war crimes inquiry into the 2023 Israeli bombing in Gaza that killed two French minor children. Multiple sources close to the Gaza case confirmed that prosecutors have formally ruled out pursuing charges of genocide and crimes against humanity in that separate ongoing investigation.
-
China’s tech boom borrowing the playbook of its property bust
On October 28, 2026, Unitree Robotics, China’s leading humanoid robotics firm, published its first quarterly financial report since making its public debut on Shanghai’s STAR Market. The filing revealed a 17.4% year-over-year drop in third-quarter net profit, even as the firm’s public shares traded at a staggering 465 times trailing earnings. This stark mismatch between operational performance and market valuation offers clear context for the unsmiling, somber demeanor of Unitree founder Wang Xingxing on the day of his firm’s Shanghai listing two months prior. That August 19, as Wang struck the ceremonial gong to mark Unitree’s public launch, the firm’s opening market capitalization hit 445 billion yuan (US$66 billion), catapulting the engineer founder to instant billionaire status, yet he showed no trace of celebration. Just 24 hours later, Xu Jiayin, the once ultra-wealthy founder of collapsed property giant Evergrande and formerly China’s richest individual, stood in a courtroom with a head of white hair, where he was formally sentenced to life in prison for financial crimes. In the immediate aftermath of these two back-to-back events, most mainstream Chinese media commentary framed the pair’s contrasting fates as a symbolic generational handover: the old, property-driven era of the Chinese economy ceding ground to a dynamic new technology-focused growth model. But a deeper analysis reveals a far more nuanced throughline: both men accumulated extreme personal wealth via state-granted authorization, separated by a gap of roughly two decades. For Xu Jiayin, his entire career revolved around converting state-controlled land use quotas and easily accessible state bank loans — resources that central authorities retained full power to revoke at any moment — into private balance sheet assets and hidden offshore trusts. His eventual life sentence serves as a public demonstration that this state-granted permission can be fully and abruptly withdrawn at any time. The 445 billion yuan sky-high valuation attached to Wang Xingxing’s Unitree rests on a nearly identical foundation of state backing. Where a generation ago, government-issued land development permits were the core asset that unlocked private wealth, today, official approval for a high-tech firm to list on China’s domestic stock exchanges is the functional equivalent: Beijing is now swapping its control over valuable public land for direct equity stakes in fast-growing tech firms. For more than 30 years, China’s local governments funded massive nationwide infrastructure and urbanization projects via a system widely known as “land finance”, generating trillions in revenue by selling long-term land leases to property developers. This once reliable growth engine is now grinding to a halt as the country’s property market enters a prolonged structural contraction. The new replacement model, which Chinese policy analysts refer to as “equity finance”, raises public funds by leveraging state-held equity stakes in domestic enterprises rather than selling off state-controlled land parcels. Both models are built on the core logic of spending projected future wealth to fund present-day development: the old land finance system was a collective bet that millions of rural and urban migrants would pour into newly built cities, driving up land values indefinitely, while the new equity finance model is a bet that China’s domestic tech champions will eventually generate enough real profits to justify the sky-high valuations retail investors have already paid for their shares. For now, equity finance remains far smaller in scale than the old land finance system. In 2025, Chinese local governments collected a total of 4.15 trillion yuan from land sales, compared to just 464.4 billion yuan in dividends and proceeds from sales of their stakes in state-owned and incubated enterprises. Land sale revenue contracted by a further 27.9% in the first nine months of 2026, widening the revenue gap local authorities are struggling to fill. Because dividend payouts from state-backed firms alone cannot come close to plugging this massive shortfall, local governments have designed a new circular capital flow system: municipal authorities first allocate public funds to incubate and nurture targeted high-tech startups, support those firms through regulatory fast-tracking to win public listing approval, and then Chinese household savers pour their accumulated bank savings into purchasing the newly issued public shares. The wildly successful “Hefei Model” pioneered by the capital of inland Anhui province exemplifies this new system. ChangXin Memory Technologies, a domestic semiconductor manufacturer, accumulated a total of 36.65 billion yuan in net losses during its decade-long development phase, but saw its market capitalization soar past 3 trillion yuan on its first day of trading on the STAR Market. Over 10 years of targeted investment, the Hefei municipal government poured 24.8 billion yuan of public funds into ChangXin, and its municipal investment platform now holds equity stakes in the chipmaker with a paper value of nearly 900 billion yuan. Once a portfolio company completes its public listing, the municipal investment platform can pledge its newly liquid publicly traded shares to local banks as collateral to secure large new loans, which are then recycled into funding the next batch of promising high-tech startups. In this system, publicly traded shares have fully replaced land parcels as the dominant form of collateral, keeping the cycle of robust local government borrowing operating exactly as it did during the peak of the land finance era. Back in 2020, Alibaba co-founder Jack Ma publicly criticized Chinese domestic banks for operating with a “pawnshop mentality”, where no financing could move forward without hard, tangible collateral. Just days after that speech, regulators abruptly suspended Ant Group’s planned $37 billion record-breaking public listing. Six years later, that same pawnshop-style financial system remains fully intact — the only major change is that the accepted collateral has shifted from land to publicly traded tech stock. The same financial regulators that halted Ant’s listing now operate a streamlined fast-track approval system for high-tech firms handpicked for state support. Reports indicate more than 40 robotics startups are currently queuing for STAR Market listing approval, and Unitree secured its listing greenlight in a record-shattering 104 days. For decades, Beijing has faced persistent challenges encouraging Chinese households to increase domestic consumption, and this wave of fast-tracked tech listings is explicitly designed to mobilize the massive pool of household savings currently sitting idle in domestic bank accounts, where deposits earn roughly 1% annual interest. Strict Chinese capital control policies prevent most ordinary households from moving their savings into foreign stocks or overseas investment funds, leaving the domestic A-share market as the only major accessible channel for higher returns. But participation in the STAR Market, where most of these newly listed tech firms trade, carries strict eligibility requirements: investors must hold a minimum of 500,000 yuan in combined stocks and investment funds, and have at least two full years of prior stock trading experience, barring the vast majority of ordinary Chinese households from direct participation. Even for eligible investors, the odds of securing an allotment of Unitree’s hotly anticipated new shares were just 1 in 5,500. Stock trading stamp duty revenue jumped 57.8% in 2025, and rose a further 65.1% in the first nine months of 2026, meaning even households that cannot access new share offerings directly are indirectly contributing to government revenue via increased transaction taxes. This new equity finance model could potentially nurture a small number of globally competitive world-class technology champions, but it carries significant structural risks. If state authorities were inherently skilled at running profitable commercial businesses, China would not have spent the past 40 years undertaking market-oriented economic reforms. Under the old land finance system, local governments would sell a land parcel, collect their revenue, and move on to the next project. Under equity finance, local governments remain permanent major shareholders in their incubated listed firms, and pledge their stock holdings as collateral for large bank loans. That means any competing firm from a neighboring province that erodes the local tech champion’s market share and drives down its share price will directly shrink the local government’s collateral base and risk its ability to repay bank loans. Once local governments become financially dependent on the performance of their locally listed tech firms, they will have strong incentives to erect hidden inter-provincial trade barriers to protect their home-grown companies, directly undermining Beijing’s long-stated policy goal of building a unified, frictionless national domestic market. Wang Xingxing’s grim, unsmiling expression on his firm’s listing day tells a larger story about the nature of wealth generation in contemporary China: access to extreme wealth depends not on operational performance alone, but on how close a founder stands to the state officials who write the market rules. Unitree recorded total revenue of just 278 million yuan in 2025. At that current operational pace, it would take the firm roughly 1,600 years to generate enough cumulative profit to match its 445 billion yuan debut market valuation — a calculation Wang, a highly trained robotics engineer, is perfectly capable of making. Where Chinese households paid for the decades-long property boom via decades of mortgage repayments, they are now being called on to fund China’s new tech boom via their accumulated life savings.
-
Death toll rises in Ukraine after Russia attacks aid centre, hospice and hospital
Over a brutal 24-hour period, coordinated Russian aerial assaults across multiple Ukrainian regions have claimed the lives of no fewer than 38 civilians and left hundreds more with life-altering injuries, targeting humanitarian aid distribution points, medical facilities, and critical civilian energy infrastructure. The deadliest single incident unfolded late Monday night in the village of Komyshuvakha, in the southeastern Zaporizhzhia region, where nine 3,000-kilogram glide bombs detonated as local residents gathered at a public school to collect urgently needed humanitarian aid. When the first blasts hit, dozens of civilians sought shelter in the building’s underground basement, but the force of the subsequent explosions collapsed the shelter’s roof, trapping scores of people beneath tons of concrete and debris. As of initial official tallies, 33 civilians have been confirmed dead in the Komyshuvakha strike, with regional governor Mykhailo Semikin noting that the full scale of the tragedy is still being uncovered, as rescue teams continue to sift through rubble for more than 50 people still listed as missing. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky publicly denounced the attack as one of the deadliest single mass civilian atrocities perpetrated by Russian forces since the full-scale invasion began, revealing that the strike came as a deliberate retaliation for Kyiv’s proposal to extend and expand a temporary local ceasefire brokered just days earlier in the Kherson region, which had allowed for safe civilian evacuations from the Russian-occupied frontline village of Oleshky. Moscow’s Ministry of Defence released a statement claiming the Komyshuvakha strike targeted Ukrainian military positions and killed 25 service members, but independent reporting from BBC News Russian defence correspondent Ilya Abishev confirmed there is no verifiable evidence of any military presence or major military-industrial sites in the small residential village, even as it sits on a key local transport route supporting Ukrainian defensive lines near Zaporizhzhia city. The United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine further emphasized that the public, widely advertised nature of the school’s humanitarian aid distribution means the strike almost certainly violated core tenets of international humanitarian law. The wave of violence extended well beyond Zaporizhzhia: in the central city of Dnipro, a Russian missile levelled a local hospice housing nearly 50 terminally ill residents, the oldest of whom was 90 years old. Dnipro Mayor Boris Filatov shared graphic photos on Telegram showing elderly, bedridden patients surrounded by shattered glass and collapsed ceiling debris, writing that he was intentionally sharing the distressing imagery to push global political leaders and diplomats to confront the reality of attacks on non-combatants. Two additional civilians were killed and 18 wounded in a separate concurrent strike in Dnipro, while five more people lost their lives to drone and aerial bomb assaults in the eastern Donetsk region. In the northeastern city of Kharkiv, a direct hit on a civilian hospital left 73 people injured, the vast majority of whom were elderly inpatients. Beyond direct attacks on populated areas, Russian forces launched coordinated strikes on energy infrastructure across nine Ukrainian regions, triggering cascading disruptions to heating, water, and power access for millions. Kyiv’s primary water utility Kyivvodokanal announced that the capital’s entire municipal water supply had been fully cut off due to critical damage to energy infrastructure, forcing the complete suspension of the city’s metro public transit system, with Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko warning that the city’s power grid is facing an increasingly dire, unstable operating situation. This latest surge in civilian carnage comes even as diplomatic efforts to de-escalate the long-running conflict appear to be slowly advancing: the Kremlin confirmed it will send representatives to a US-brokered three-way peace negotiation in Abu Dhabi scheduled for November 10–11, marking the first formal trilateral meeting between Russia, Ukraine, and the United States since February of this year. The White House also announced that First Lady Melania Trump, who was widely credited with mediating last week’s temporary ceasefire to enable evacuations from Oleshky, will host separate bilateral meetings with Russian and Ukrainian envoys at the White House the following Thursday, though no further details on participating delegates or meeting agendas have been released. Speaking to reporters during an official visit to Berlin, President Zelensky stated that he has not yet seen any credible signals that Russia is prepared to engage in good faith on permanent ceasefire terms and a just peaceful settlement, noting that prior rounds of late 2024 ceasefire negotiations collapsed after Russian officials refused to back down from maximalist demands that would effectively force Ukraine to surrender large swathes of its sovereign territory. Zelensky also highlighted Ukraine’s growing, life-threatening air defence shortfalls, caused by delayed Western weapons deliveries and critical shortages of US-made Patriot interceptor missiles, which have left the country’s civilian population far more exposed to the recent surge in mass Russian missile and drone attacks. The UN previously warned last month that civilian casualty rates across Ukraine had hit an all-time record high, as stalled Russian ground advances on the front lines have led Moscow to shift its operational strategy to widespread, systematic long-range bombardment of civilian population centres and critical utility infrastructure.
-
Mining giant joins fight to stop killer toad march across Australia
Global mining giant Rio Tinto has announced a A$28 million (£14.5 million) collaborative initiative to block the toxic invasive cane toad from reaching the ecologically sensitive Pilbara region of Western Australia, home to the company’s sprawling iron ore operations. Teaming up with Perth-based Curtin University, Indigenous land stewardship groups, and local environmental authorities, the five-year program set to launch in 2027 will establish a purpose-built “toad containment zone” spanning 7,500 square kilometers between the Great Sandy Desert and the Indian Ocean. The core strategy of the project targets the cane toad’s critical biological vulnerability: during arid seasonal periods, the species requires access to fresh water every few days to survive, and in the absence of natural water sources, it relies on man-made cattle dams, irrigation storage tanks, and other ground-level water facilities to sustain its westward expansion. The project will modify and secure these artificial water points to cut off the toads’ access to moisture, halting their southward advance long before they can cross into the Pilbara. The highly poisonous cane toad was intentionally introduced to Australia in 1935 as a biological control measure to manage pest beetles damaging the country’s sugar cane crops, but it quickly became one of the nation’s most destructive invasive species. Lacking any native predators or naturally occurring diseases to curb its population, the toad has steadily marched across northern Australian landscapes at a rate of 40 to 60 kilometers per year, per official Australian government data. Curtin University professor Ben Phillips, a leading invasive species researcher, warns that without targeted intervention, the toxic amphibians will inevitably reach the Pilbara within the next 20 years, spelling catastrophic harm for the region’s unique native fauna, including the already declining northern quoll, goanna lizards, and rare ghost bats, all of which are fatally susceptible to the toad’s neurotoxin. For Rio Tinto, the initiative also forms a key component of its ongoing efforts to rebuild trust with local Indigenous communities, four years after the company faced widespread public condemnation and regulatory backlash for destroying two 46,000-year-old sacred Aboriginal rock shelters in the Pilbara to access underlying iron ore reserves, a controversy that ultimately led to the resignation of the company’s former chief executive. Roberta Hunter, a ranger with the Nyangumarta Warrarn Indigenous Protected Area, emphasized that protecting the Pilbara’s land and wildlife from the cane toad is a top priority for First Nations stewards: “Cane toads poison water sources and kill native animals. When they get close to our traditional lands, we step in to stop them, because we cannot allow our country to be destroyed.” Project leaders note that the cross-sector collaboration represents a rare, actionable chance to stop one of the world’s most harmful invasive species in its tracks, rather than attempting costly, large-scale eradication after the toad has already established a permanent population in the Pilbara.
-
Libya’s top religious authority rules against wearing Nike clothes
Libya’s most prominent state-affiliated religious body, the Tripoli-based Dar al-Ifta, has formally released a new Islamic legal ruling (fatwa) prohibiting Muslim residents across the country from purchasing, selling, or wearing any apparel emblazoned with the iconic Nike swoosh logo. The edict, officially signed off by Libya’s Grand Mufti Sadiq al-Gharyani, grounds its argument in the origin story of the global sportswear brand: it notes Nike was named for the ancient Greek deity of victory, with its signature curved logo directly inspired by the goddess’s wings, framing public display of the mark as a form of endorsing symbols tied to polytheistic, multi-god worship that runs counter to Islamic monotheistic teachings. The institution also points to Libya’s own local historical heritage as context, highlighting the well-preserved ruins of the ancient Greek city of Cyrene, where a surviving statue of the same Greek victory goddess remains a prominent archaeological landmark. Beyond the religious symbolism claim, the Dar al-Ifta ruling ties the prohibition to broader regional tensions tied to the ongoing Gaza conflict, referencing a November 5, 2023, statement from its internal Council for Research and Sharia Studies that called for a widespread boycott of all Western corporations deemed to provide material or public support to Israel. It explicitly counts Nike among these targeted firms. Crucially, the fatwa is not a formal government-issued legal ban, and no official penalties have been outlined for people who continue to buy or wear Nike-branded goods. As a politically divided nation split between rival governing blocs in its eastern and western regions in the years following the 2011 ousting of long-time autocrat Muammar Gaddafi, Libya has no unified national legal framework that would automatically enforce religious edicts, even as rulings from the influential Dar al-Ifta carry significant social sway among devout segments of the population. This is far from the first controversial symbolic edict the body has released: in 2023, it issued a similar fatwa targeting products from French luxury brand Van Cleef & Arpels, arguing its signature four-leaf clover motif was tied to Christian traditions and secular luck-seeking practices that conflict with Islamic doctrine. Public reaction across Libyan social media platforms has been deeply split: a subset of users praised the ruling as a faithful adherence to core religious principles, while a large contingent of critics dismissed it as an ironic, misplaced distraction from far more urgent crises facing the war-torn nation, from crumbling public infrastructure to ongoing political instability. The announcement lands amid a steadily growing public debate over the rising tide of religious conservatism seeping into Libyan public life. Earlier in 2025, authorities in eastern Libya rolled out sweeping restrictions on rap music, public theatre productions, and dance performances, citing violations of public morality and Islamic values, rules that were later extended to territory under western Libyan control; the Dar al-Ifta has previously issued separate edicts criticizing public musical performances, though no direct link to the 2025 entertainment restrictions has been formally documented. Notably, Nike has no official corporate retail presence or authorized distributor network operating within Libya. Despite that, the brand’s athletic apparel and footwear remains extremely popular with local consumers, sold widely through independent local sportswear shops, alongside a thriving market for low-cost counterfeit Nike goods that are ubiquitous in open-air markets across the country, a pattern mirrored across much of North Africa where major international sportswear labels have massive grassroots consumer demand.