博客

  • Netanyahu brands Britain an ‘Islamic republic’ as it prepares Israel sanctions

    Netanyahu brands Britain an ‘Islamic republic’ as it prepares Israel sanctions

    In a stunning and incendiary remark that has reignited debate over the tense relationship between Israel and one of its longest-standing European allies, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has branded the United Kingdom an “Islamic republic” in comments that lay bare his frustration with shifting public and political attitudes toward Israel’s actions in Gaza and the occupied Palestinian territories.

    The comments were made during an interview with Israel’s Army Radio, where Netanyahu contrasted the current UK media landscape with the widespread favorable coverage Israel received during the 1967 Arab-Israeli War. That conflict, which began with a surprise Israeli pre-emptive strike on Egypt, concluded with Israeli forces seizing control of key territories including the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, and Syria’s Golan Heights — territorial holdings that remain at the core of the decades-long Israeli-Palestinian conflict to this day.

    “Try to find that [1967-style favorable coverage] now in Britain, which you could call the Islamic republic of Britain,” Netanyahu told the interviewer. When the host pressed whether the same shift could be seen across the entire European continent, Netanyahu doubled down, claiming: “Yes, but you know, someone said the first Islamic republic with nuclear weapons will be the Islamic republic of Britain.”

    The Islamophobic remarks come at a pivotal moment in UK-Israel relations, multiple sources familiar with UK government planning told Middle East Eye. Downing Street is set to unveil a package of new policy measures targeting Israeli settlement activity in September, headlined by a proposed ban on imports of goods produced in Israel’s illegal West Bank settlements. The Foreign Office is also drafting plans to impose new targeted sanctions on individuals and groups connected to the Israeli settler movement that has expanded illegal housing and seized Palestinian land in the occupied West Bank.

    Critics have pointed out that Netanyahu’s inflammatory rhetoric ignores the long history of consistent UK support for Israel, even amid the current Gaza conflict. In July 2025, the newly elected Labour government under Prime Minister Keir Starmer designated the activist group Palestine Action as a proscribed terrorist organization. The group, which carried out targeted direct action at factories and facilities owned by companies supplying arms to Israel, now faces sweeping legal restrictions: membership and public expressions of support carry a maximum prison sentence of 14 years under UK counterterrorism law. Since the ban came into force, police have arrested more than 3,000 people and brought terrorism charges against over 1,200 activists.

    Beyond domestic crackdowns on pro-Palestine activism, the UK has provided direct operational support to Israel during its military campaign in Gaza. UK military forces carried out surveillance flights over Gaza and shared collected intelligence with the Israeli military, while the Ministry of Defence ran ongoing training courses for Israeli military personnel — only halting new participation in these programs late in 2025.

    This contradiction between emerging pressure to hold Israel accountable and long-standing military and political support is equally visible in UK arms export policy. In September 2024, the Labour government suspended 29 existing arms export licences for Israel after a government review concluded there was a “clear risk” that British-manufactured equipment could be used to violate international humanitarian law in Gaza. Then-Foreign Secretary David Lammy was quick to clarify that the move was “not an arms embargo”, preserving the vast majority of existing military trade links. By February 2026, Israel remained eligible for exports under 395 active, non-suspended UK licences. 203 of these cover military goods, with the total maximum value of non-F-35 military export licences reaching £130 million.

    UK support has also extended to Israel’s regional confrontations beyond Gaza. When the United States launched strikes against Iranian targets in March 2026, Starmer authorized US forces to use British military bases in the region to carry out the operations. Current Prime Minister Andy Burnham, who took over from Starmer, has continued to grant the US this access as of July 2026, backing a regional conflict that Netanyahu has long pushed for Western powers to join.

  • ‘De facto annexation’: Israel to shift civilian enforcement in West Bank from army to police

    ‘De facto annexation’: Israel to shift civilian enforcement in West Bank from army to police

    In a controversial step that analysts and regional observers warn further advances the de facto annexation of Israel’s occupied Palestinian West Bank, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced Friday he has ordered the country’s military to draft a plan that would transfer all civilian law enforcement powers in the territory from the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to national civilian police.

    According to a statement from Katz’s office, the proposed restructuring would task civilian police with building a dedicated force to manage all civilian-related matters in the West Bank, while allowing the military to refocus its resources exclusively on counterterrorism operations targeting Palestinian groups and securing national borders and Israeli communities in the region. Katz argued that the shift aligns with Israel’s governing structure, noting that civilian police oversee civilian affairs in every other part of the State of Israel.

    Notably, Friday’s announcement was rolled out without prior coordination with either the IDF or Israel’s national police force. Still, Israeli outlet Israel Hayom reported that military leadership has openly welcomed the proposal and has pushed for the administrative shift for weeks. The push comes in direct response to a request from IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, who has called for a reduction of the military’s growing non-combat workload in the West Bank amid plans to expand existing Israeli settlements and establish new outposts in the occupied territory.

    Two weeks prior to Katz’s announcement, Zamir told the Israeli cabinet that the IDF’s civilian responsibilities in the West Bank have expanded far beyond the force’s core mission, particularly as new settlements are set to be constructed. He specifically pushed back against the requirement that IDF soldiers intervene to address unrest caused by extremist Israeli settlers accused of intimidating and attacking local Palestinian communities, saying the arrangement is untenable. While Zamir confirmed the military has worked alongside police on these matters, he argued it is past time for the IDF to end its involvement in civilian law enforcement tasks. As of Friday, military spokespersons confirmed the IDF has begun preliminary internal staff work to assess a potential redivision of authority between Israeli security bodies operating in the West Bank.

    The announcement has already exposed internal political rifts within Israel’s governing coalition. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, who holds oversight authority over the national police force, was not notified of Katz’s planned statement ahead of its public release. As of Saturday, Ben Gvir has not issued any public comment on the proposal. But far-right settler leaders have been quick to praise the announcement, calling for further steps to formalize Israeli control over the entire occupied territory.

    Israel Ganz, head of the Regional Binyamin Council which represents Israeli settlements in the central West Bank, said Katz’s order should be followed by the formal cancellation of the 1993 Oslo Accords and the imposition of full Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank. “The time has come to move from temporary management to the full application of Israeli law,” Ganz stated.

    A critical detail that has amplified international and expert concern is that Katz’s statement applies to the entire West Bank, with no distinction drawn between the territory’s three administrative zones outlined in the Oslo Accords: Areas A and B, where the Palestinian Authority holds formal civilian control, and Area C, which remains under full Israeli civilian and military authority. While Israel has never formally announced a full annexation of the West Bank — a territory it has occupied militarily since the 1967 Six-Day War — regional and international policy experts have noted that the Israeli government has implemented a series of incremental measures over the past year that amount to de facto annexation. These measures include a consistent push to expand the role of Israeli civilian administrative bodies in the occupied territory while gradually rolling back the military’s formal authority over areas it has long controlled. Under both international law and Israeli domestic law, the IDF is recognized as the official occupying authority in the West Bank and holds all enforcement powers, including those covering civilian governance.

    Katz’s announcement also comes against a backdrop of a sharp, well-documented surge in extremist settler violence targeting Palestinian communities across the West Bank. Just days before the defense minister’s statement, dozens of Israeli settlers besieged multiple Palestinian homes in the village of Qusra, located south of the West Bank city of Nablus. Despite public commitments from the IDF that it would remove the settlers from the site, the group remained in place as of Friday.

    Veteran Ynet military correspondent Ron Ben-Yishai, who has covered the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for decades, recently argued that the IDF, national police, and Israel’s internal Shin Bet security service have become unable to enforce rule of law in the West Bank. He wrote last week that a small faction of extremist settlers has effectively become the de facto sovereign in large swathes of the territory, with the IDF limited to securing the settlers’ presence and carrying out their demands. Responding to Katz’s announcement Friday, Ben-Yishai confirmed the plan amounts to a formalization of de facto annexation. He also raised questions about the legality of the proposed shift, and noted that the Israeli national police currently lacks the sufficient number of officers required to effectively take over civilian authority across the entire West Bank.

  • ‘Mayfair means money’: A walk through the Gulf elite’s favourite part of London

    ‘Mayfair means money’: A walk through the Gulf elite’s favourite part of London

    On a sweltering Thursday morning in mid-August 2026, central London’s streets hit an unprecedented 30 degrees Celsius by 10 a.m., marking what climate officials confirm will be the United Kingdom’s hottest summer ever recorded. Just steps from Oxford Street’s iconic Selfridges department store, discarded newspapers carry headlines of spreading wildfires across the British countryside, while a unhoused man calls out for spare change under the unforgiving sun. Inside the cool, air-conditioned building, a Saudi Arabian coffee stand promotes the kingdom, a nod to the Saudi Public Investment Fund’s 40 percent controlling stake in the century-old luxury retailer.

    It was here just one week earlier that Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, ruler of Dubai and prime minister of the United Arab Emirates, faced a rare public confrontation during a walk through nearby North Audley Street. A Sudanese protester, shouting across the road at the delegation, called out “UAE is killing people in my country, stop killing my people” over the UAE’s widely reported involvement in Sudan’s ongoing civil conflict. A member of the Sheikh’s large entourage responded by hurling a racial slur at the protester, calling him a “Black bitch”.

    As of mid-August, Sheikh Mohammed has remained in London, where he has held closed-door meetings with UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan and been photographed visiting the upscale west London neighborhood of Chelsea. For Gulf’s wealthiest citizens, however, London’s Mayfair district—home to North Audley Street, one of the most expensive addresses in the world, lined with Michelin-starred restaurants, luxury supercar showrooms and five-star hotels—has long functioned as a home away from home.

    For Gulf visitors, the annual August pilgrimage to central London blends business, leisure, and familiarity, shaped by decades of historical and financial ties between Gulf states and the UK. Inside Selfridges, 15-year-old Khaled and his 53-year-old uncle Mohammed, visiting from Dubai, framed their regular trip as a natural extension of Gulf investments in the UK. “We come to London because we have a lot of investments here and we like to help them out,” Khaled told Middle East Eye, when asked about the confrontation with Sheikh Mohammed. Dismissing the Sudanese protester as “ignorant,” he added, “We are helping Sudan. We are sending humanitarian aid. It was disrespectful.”

    His uncle, who grew up in Dubai before the oil boom transformed the emirate into a global luxury hub, echoed the sentiment. “Yes, you can have freedom of speech, but you can’t say that to a leader; it’s not respectful,” he said, noting that today’s Emirates offer instant access to any service imaginable: “you can get whatever you want within minutes. Someone will bring it to you. You don’t even have to get up.”

    The pair are part of a decades-long pattern of Gulf leadership and elite families sending young people to the UK for education, with Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, and many other senior Gulf leaders all having attended British universities or received military training in the country. Khaled, who plans to enroll at a London university, says he prefers the British capital’s relatively cool summer temperatures to Dubai’s habitual 40-degree August heat, where even daily life is confined to air-conditioned spaces. Like many young Gulf visitors, he keeps his time in London limited almost exclusively to the capital’s most affluent central neighborhoods, avoiding working-class and migrant-heavy outer areas. “We don’t go to the areas where there are roadmen and lots of migrants and stabbings,” he explained, pulling up a phone map marked with what he calls “prime khaleeji hangouts”—all clustered within Mayfair, including high-end restaurants Cipriani, Ivy Asia, Sexy Fish, Supernova and Nobu.

    Khaled’s wariness of London outside its elite core is shared by many other young Gulf visitors. A Saudi woman, speaking on condition of anonymity, recalled the reaction of a 15-year-old Saudi student attending a residential summer school in the capital: the teen insists on hiring a personal bodyguard, claiming “people here are so poor they will try to stab me for my Hermes” bag. Even for middle-class Gulf families, London’s central luxury districts function as a self-contained enclave where visitors can easily encounter fellow Gulf citizens. Two teenage sisters from Bahrain, shopping in Selfridges, said they had unexpectedly run into multiple school friends during their trip, a common occurrence in Mayfair. “When we go to Harrods we see people from the Gulf, we see friends and family… It’s not hot, it’s nothing compared to back home where we spend all the time with the AC on,” the 17-year-old sister explained. Still, some aspects of London life remain unfamiliar: “We don’t really have or use public transport in Bahrain. The underground here is very crowded and chaotic. The architecture is different here too.”

    Across North Audley Street from Selfridges, at the historic Marlborough pub, temperatures continue to climb through the afternoon. Apart from a small group of regulars drinking pints, the street is dominated by Gulf visitors. Two Kuwaiti fashion and lifestyle influencers, Sarra and Elaf, pose for photos against the street’s Georgian townhouse facades, as a Bugatti supercar roars past. “We mainly spend our time here in Mayfair,” Sarra said. “We come for the weather, the people, the shopping. In our country we can’t find a lot of the brands you have here… For us, it’s good weather. We also come in November because we love the cold, and we love the Christmas vibes.”

    For local Mayfair businesses, the annual August influx of wealthy Gulf visitors is not just a seasonal trend—it is the backbone of their annual revenue. At Grays Antique Market, a historic covered market housing more than 80 independent luxury dealers, one senior jeweller says he never takes holiday in August, relying on Gulf shoppers to make his year. “They are an integral part of the business, especially in August; I can’t go away now,” he explained, noting that members of the royal families of Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and the UAE are all regular customers. “Mayfair is the mecca of the Arab world in a way. They love fine things. The men come here to buy silver jewellery, the women come here because they know they can get brands like Cartier, Tiffany and Bulgari at a steep discount.” He added that young Gulf shoppers regularly spend four-figure sums on small luxury items, and one customer recently purchased an £18,500 piece without hesitation—half the price she would have paid back home.

    The jeweller also noted a dramatic shift in the source of luxury capital in London over the past four years. Before Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the city was widely nicknamed “Londongrad” for the massive flow of Russian oligarch money into its luxury sector. “I used to deal with a lot of Russians, but they’ve all left like rats from a sinking ship,” he said. “The Russians still here don’t have any money.” Today, that void has been filled by capital from Gulf states, which now own major London landmarks including Selfridges and Harrods, the rival Knightsbridge department store purchased by Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund in 2010.

    At the heart of Mayfair sits Grosvenor Square, which housed the United States’ diplomatic mission to the UK from 1785 until 2018. The former embassy building has since been converted into a luxury hotel, home to the Qatari-owned Qinwan Cafe, another popular gathering spot for Gulf visitors, where three small chicken sandwiches sell for £20 and authentic Palestinian dates—familiar to Gulf visitors—are on offer. On a recent afternoon, women in abayas and men in designer polo shirts sat at outdoor tables, scrolling through social media and posting photos of their coffee to Instagram.

    For London’s working-class residents, however, Mayfair’s wealth is a distant, often stark contrast to their own economic struggles. Sitting in his delivery van outside the square, Hash, a delivery driver from south London, waited for his next job amid the 30-degree heat. “Mayfair means money,” he said, reflecting on how his own earnings have fallen over the past six years. “There was a time six years ago, when he could make £500 a day driving a delivery to Scotland and back. Now he says he is lucky to earn more than £100 a day.”

    A short walk away, long queues of Gulf tourists wait outside Marchesi, the historic 19th-century patisserie, while a Ferrari dealership glints in the midday sun on Berkeley Square. Deep underground at Green Park Underground station, temperatures climb close to 40 degrees Celsius, as station announcements warn passengers of partial line closures and severe delays across the London Underground network—an inconvenience most Gulf visitors never encounter, confined as they are to the air-conditioned comfort of Mayfair’s luxury spaces.

  • Palestinians in West Bank village remain under Israeli settler siege for sixth day

    Palestinians in West Bank village remain under Israeli settler siege for sixth day

    For six straight days, three Palestinian families have been trapped under a settler siege in the occupied West Bank village of Qusra, near Nablus, in a standoff that has exposed alarming gaps between Israeli military announcements and on-the-ground action, even as settler violence across the occupied territories surges to record levels.

    The blockade began last Sunday, when a group of Israeli settlers surrounded three residential properties on Qusra’s Ras al-Ain hilltop, erecting tents directly outside the homes in what local residents describe as a deliberate campaign to seize Palestinian-owned land by forcing the families to abandon their properties. Settlers quickly cut off access to running water and electricity for the besieged homes, leaving children and adults trapped inside without reliable access to basic supplies including food and critical medicine.

    When the trapped families called on the Israeli army for intervention, arriving troops were captured on online footage socializing with the settlers—drinking and praying alongside them—rather than executing orders to remove the interlopers. After the incident gained widespread international attention, the Israeli military officially announced it had launched an operation to evict the settlers and designated Qusra a closed military zone. To date, however, no settlers have been removed from the area, and no arrests have been issued in connection with the illegal blockade.

    Far from targeting the settlers, Israeli forces responded by deploying more than 1,000 troops to Qusra, where they forcibly evicted approximately 20 Palestinian families from their homes and seized eight residential properties to convert into military outposts. Village council head Abdul-Azim Wadi told reporters that military liaison officials informed local leaders the army intended to seize 16 homes, giving residents only immediate eviction orders with no explanation for the seizure. When soldiers later withdrew from some of the seized properties, returning residents found widespread damage: one home had $1,500 stolen and all furniture destroyed, while others had personal property looted. Multiple properties were left with graffiti reading “We will return” scrawled on interior walls by troops.

    Qusay Abu Rida, who has been sheltering in one of the three besieged homes to guard the property on behalf of his brother (a U.S. resident who built the home in 2023), said settlers have targeted the land for months. Previous attacks have seen settlers break through the home’s gate, destroy security cameras, and steal outdoor belongings, forcing Abu Rida and his family to move into the property four months ago to defend it from seizure. “They would constantly come into the yard, shouting and vandalising things. Then, on Sunday, they came and erected a tent directly in front of the house, cutting off our electricity and water,” Abu Rida explained to Middle East Eye.

    Abu Rida added that Israeli forces have not only failed to remove the settlers, but have actively increased pressure on the trapped families. Soldiers forced Abu Rida and his neighbors out of two homes, confining them to a single smaller property, cut off all remaining access to essential supplies, and banned residents from leaving even to retrieve necessities from their abandoned homes. Though soldiers eventually withdrew from Abu Rida’s home after causing internal damage, and dismantled one settler tent, they also destroyed all security camera footage documenting the siege. Settlers quickly re-erected their tents, restoring the blockade.

    Abu Rida noted the pattern of harassment mirrors an incident in nearby Jalud just one month prior, where repeated settler attacks backed by Israeli military inaction forced the al-Tubasi family to abandon their home, which settlers subsequently seized.

    Local Qusra activist Hani Odeh described the ongoing crisis as “heartbreaking”, saying settlers and soldiers take turns pressuring Palestinian residents to abandon their land. Three out of four of the village’s expansion zones have already been seized by Israeli forces and settlers, leaving northern Qusra’s Ras al-Ain area as the only space remaining for the village to grow. Odeh explained that settlers have targeted Ras al-Ain for its strategic position overlooking five villages south of Nablus, despite the area being classified as Area B under the 1995 Oslo Accords—an administrative designation that puts the zone under Palestinian civil control, with only security responsibilities shared with Israel. Until recently, the nearest Israeli settlement activity was located 15 kilometers away.

    According to Odeh, the encroachment began quietly months ago, when a single settler started grazing livestock in the area. More settlers gradually joined, launching repeated attacks on Palestinian homes to drive residents out. Attempts to deliver aid to the trapped families have been repeatedly blocked by Israeli forces: even Israeli activists who attempted to bring food last Friday were turned away, and an ambulance carrying supplies was also stopped and turned back at checkpoints. “This whole situation is worrying all the residents of Qusra. We don’t know where the settlers will go next after attacking homes in an area classified as Area B. The soldiers do not have the authority to remove the settlers; they only oppress us,” Odeh said.

    The ongoing siege in Qusra comes amid a documented sharp spike in deadly settler violence across the occupied West Bank. The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) reports that as of July 20, 2026, it has recorded more than 1,330 settler attacks that caused casualties or property damage across 250 Palestinian communities since the start of the year—an average of more than six attacks per day. So far in 2026, settler violence has killed at least 18 Palestinians, wounded 880 more, and displaced more than 2,300 people from their homes.

    Currently, approximately 700,000 Israeli settlers reside in roughly 300 settlements and outposts across the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. The International Court of Justice has repeatedly ruled that all Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territory violate international law. In recent years, despite the Oslo Accords’ administrative divisions, settlers have increasingly expanded their illegal activity into Area B, a zone previously not targeted for large-scale settlement encroachment.

  • Iran formalises Strait of Hormuz control as US struggles to sustain war it launched with Israel

    Iran formalises Strait of Hormuz control as US struggles to sustain war it launched with Israel

    Tensions over one of the world’s most critical energy chokepoints have escalated sharply this week, as Iran advances legislative steps to cement its de facto control of the Strait of Hormuz, while the U.S. struggles with mounting military and political fallout from its ongoing confrontation alongside Israel and threatens historic new sanctions against Tehran.

    An Iranian parliamentary committee has signed off on the core framework of a sweeping strategic plan that governs security and development across the Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf, Valiullah Bayati, spokesperson for the parliament’s internal affairs and councils committee, confirmed to Tasnim News Agency on Friday. The approved outline will now move forward for additional parliamentary review and deliberation.

    Under the terms of the proposed plan, vessels and maritime equipment owned by the U.S., Israel, and any other nation Iran classifies as hostile will be barred from transiting the strategic waterway. Bayati emphasized that the restriction is a direct response to longstanding hostile actions taken by these nations against Iran and its people, framing the policy as a defensive measure against ongoing aggression, according to reporting from Al Jazeera.

    The move has drawn an immediate harsh response from Washington, which has threatened sweeping new economic penalties even as U.S. military forces have failed to challenge Iran’s effective control of the corridor through which roughly 20% of the world’s oil supplies pass. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Newsmax that the Trump administration will unveil the new sanctions next week, promising measures unprecedented in the history of global economic isolation.

    “Watch this space for more announcements coming next week because we are going to apply measures that have never been seen in the history of economic isolation on a country,” Bessent said, adding that the package will combine unprecedented global economic isolation with a continued naval blockade designed to cut off all traffic to and from Iranian ports.

    For its part, Iran has doubled down on its claim of full authority over the waterway, with senior Iranian military officials asserting complete control over all maritime movement in the strait. “The Strait of Hormuz is closed. Our control over movements is complete and decisive,” Rear Admiral Ali Ozmaei of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy told Tasnim on Friday. “No movement in this strait escapes the eyes of the IRGC Navy fighters,” he added, noting that “the reality should be seen in the field, not in the communiques and statements of U.S. officials.”

    Independent shipping data bears out Tehran’s claim of severely restricted traffic. Maritime analytics firm Kpler recorded just nine commercial commodity vessels passing through the strait on Thursday, an increase from five on Wednesday but still far below the August daily average of 12. Of the nine vessels, five entered the Persian Gulf and four sailed toward the Gulf of Oman, with the vast majority using the Iranian-controlled shipping channel. The count does not include vessels operating with their automatic identification tracking systems disabled, meaning actual unreported traffic could shift the overall total.

    Tehran is also moving to insulate its economy from U.S. financial pressure by expanding access to alternative global financial institutions not controlled by Washington. Abdolnaser Hemmati, governor of Iran’s Central Bank, announced this week that Iran will soon complete its accession to the Brics-backed New Development Bank, though the multilateral lender has not yet publicly confirmed the move.

    Global energy markets have already responded to the escalating standoff, with crude prices climbing in response to the threat of prolonged disruption to oil supplies. Brent crude climbed above $88 per barrel on Friday, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude rose past $82 per barrel.

    The escalating crisis has also exposed deepening strains on U.S. military capabilities, as the extended deployment of an American aircraft carrier in the region has stretched resources and sparked bipartisan political backlash. The U.S. is currently repositioning the USS George Washington to the Middle East to relieve the USS Abraham Lincoln, whose crew has now spent more than 260 consecutive days at sea without port access. The deployment will leave the Pacific region without a U.S. aircraft carrier for an unknown period, a clear sign of the widening military costs of the Biden administration’s legacy Iran campaign that the current Trump administration has continued.

    Reports of severe shortages, unsanitary living conditions, and deteriorating mental health among the Abraham Lincoln’s crew have sparked alarm from military families and sitting members of Congress. Four U.S. lawmakers, led by California Representative Mike Levin, have called on the Pentagon to provide an explanation for the extended deployment, noting that existing relief plans are insufficient to address the crisis.

    U.S. Central Command has denied unconfirmed reports that any sailors have died aboard the carrier, issuing a statement saying that “the Sailors and Marines of the Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group remain resilient and resolved after more than 260 days at sea.” U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has embraced the informal moniker “Secretary of War,” has dismissed reports of poor conditions as “completely misrepresented.”

    The crisis has sparked fierce political pushback, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer calling for Hegseth’s immediate removal. “When Pete Hegseth was nominated, everyone knew he was completely incompetent. Now our brave sailors are paying the price in a horrific and unfathomable way,” Schumer said. “Pete Hegseth must be fired immediately.”

  • What next for Nigel Farage after beating Count Binface to become MP once more?

    What next for Nigel Farage after beating Count Binface to become MP once more?

    Twelve months ago, Nigel Farage stood at the pinnacle of British political influence. As leader of the Reform UK party, his movement commanded commanding leads in national opinion polls, with Farage and his allies dictating the terms of the UK’s national political conversation. Keir Starmer’s governing Labour Party found itself stuck in a reactive posture, and many prominent political commentators openly speculated that a Reform UK general election victory was no longer a question of if, but when.

    Today, that political momentum has vanished entirely, and Farage’s own long-term political future is now hanging in the balance, tied up in a parliamentary ethics investigation over an undeclared £5 million ($6.74 million) gift from Thailand-based crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne. To clear his name and put his fate to voters, Farage resigned his seat as the Member of Parliament for Clacton, a coastal constituency in eastern England, last month, triggering a special by-election.

    When votes were counted in the early hours of Friday, official results confirmed Farage had retained the seat with 22,239 votes – a slight increase of 1,000 votes over his 2024 general election majority, secured on a lower overall voter turnout than the previous contest. But what exactly did this win deliver for the veteran Brexit architect?

    From the start of the campaign, the contest followed an unusual path: all major mainstream UK parties, including Labour and the Conservatives, made the decision to boycott the by-election, arguing it was an unnecessary political stunt staged by Farage for personal gain. With no big-party candidates on the ballot, the field swelled to 34 contenders, a chaotic mix of independent candidates, representatives from tiny minor parties, and novelty joke candidates – including three hopefuls from the Official Monster Raving Loony Party, a long-running UK satirical political group.

    Farage’s closest competitor ended up being a novelty candidate who performs under the name Count Binface, a self-described “intergalactic space warrior” who campaigns while wearing a full costume shaped like a waste bin. In a result that stunned many political observers, Count Binface secured 9,455 votes, equal to 26.9% of the total vote share, against Farage’s 63.3% – an unusually strong performance for a satirical candidate.

    That strong showing for a novelty contender has left Farage’s victory ringing hollow. Attempting to spin the result, Farage attempted to frame Count Binface as a proxy for the political “establishment” he has long railed against – a narrative that has gained little traction with the general public. Responding to Farage’s accusation from the vote count, Count Binface delivered a cutting rebuke:

    “Someone who has been an MP, been an MEP, who was one of the chief architects of Brexit and one of the dominant figures in British politics over the last 20 years, and is reputedly a member of the East India gentleman’s club, which apparently does not admit women – I would say that’s arguably slightly more establishment than a lone wolf space warrior with a Ceefax fixation,” he said. “But you know what? It’s up to you.”

    Notably, Farage himself was absent from the official vote count. He claimed police advice over alleged plans to disrupt the result forced his absence, but acting returning officer Ian Davidson clarified that the decision to skip the count was Farage’s personal choice. Political observers have widely speculated Farage avoided the event to avoid being photographed alongside his unlikely rival. Instead of attending the count, Farage appeared at “Farage Fest”, a campaign celebration held on a farm on the outskirts of Clacton complete with festival tents and a ferris wheel, where he hailed the result as a “resounding victory” and claimed “the result in Clacton speaks for itself.”

    But few independent analysts accept that framing. A year on from Farage’s poll peak, the political landscape has shifted dramatically: new Prime Minister Andy Burnham now sets the national political agenda, the Labour government is enjoying a steady boost in national polling, and there is growing speculation Burnham could call an early snap general election this autumn if current polling trends hold.

    Farage is no longer the figure dictating the terms of national political debate; instead, he is clearly on the defensive. To rebuild Reform UK’s political standing and advance its policy platform of national restructuring and mass deportations, Farage will need far more than a by-election win against a field of novelty and minor candidates.

    Worse for Farage, his return to Parliament means the suspended parliamentary investigation into the undeclared £5 million gift has now resumed, and the cloud of ethics scrutiny hanging over his political career has returned. Whether he can survive this controversy politically remains an open question.

    For his part, Count Binface has already claimed a victory of his own: “I came first in the Clacton by-election! Of the candidates who bothered to turn up for the results.”

  • He wandered two quake-shattered landscapes. Now an AP photographer reflects on what his lens saw

    He wandered two quake-shattered landscapes. Now an AP photographer reflects on what his lens saw

    In the wake of two catastrophic earthquakes that struck across northern South America, leaving a trail of destroyed infrastructure, fractured communities and lost lives, one seasoned photojournalist has opened up about the ethical and emotional weight of capturing disaster on camera. After two decades documenting breaking news across the region for the Associated Press, Fernando Vergara stepped back this week to share his reflections on working through physical risk and emotional distress, and the delicate balance journalists must strike when bearing witness to human tragedy.

    Vergara spoke to AP Thursday while working at a Bogota aid collection center, where donations are being sorted and shipped to survivors of the August 10 earthquake that centered near Pereira, Colombia. He drew direct comparisons between the destruction he documented in Pereira and the damage he witnessed following the late-June earthquakes that hit Venezuela’s northern coastal region.

    According to Vergara, the impact of the Venezuelan earthquakes was far more severe. Multiple high-rise apartment buildings collapsed in the heavily populated La Guaira state, driving a far higher death toll than the Colombian event. Photographs from the region show crumpled concrete structures, rescue teams picking through rubble pile by pile, and heartbroken relatives grieving the loss of family members. Vergara recalled the visceral, unshakable details of working in the disaster zone: streets choked with fine dust, the pervasive stench of decomposing bodies lingering in the thick, hot air, and rescue crews working around the clock under brutal, nearly impossible conditions.

    In Pereira, by contrast, most damaged structures were low-rise residential buildings between one and three stories tall. Even so, Vergara documented harrowing rescue efforts, including the emotional moment 24-year-old survivor Daniela Largos Sanchez was pulled alive from collapsed rubble the day after the earthquake.

    For the veteran photographer, moments like that are the ones he prioritizes capturing amid widespread chaos and grief. In his reflections shared from the earthquake zone, Vergara broke down his approach to ethical photojournalism in the wake of disaster.

    “Compared to the earthquake in Colombia, the one in Venezuela was a bit stronger, considering the losses. Venezuela had many tall buildings. A lot of people were living in apartment buildings, and the number of deaths was much higher than in Colombia. Recently in Pereira, the number of deaths are lower. It remains dramatic, but the buildings there were a bit shorter. The damaged houses were one to three stories tall, compared to Venezuela, where the buildings were much, much taller,” Vergara explained.

    Describing conditions on the ground in La Guaira, he said: “What I witnessed in Venezuela, walking through the streets in La Guaira, the smell of rot was overwhelming, the dust in the air and the heat made the rescue of those trapped under the rubble much more dramatic.”

    Central to Vergara’s practice is a core commitment to respecting the privacy and dignity of people experiencing their worst possible moments. “What is the photograph that I, as a reporter, seek in an earthquake or in a situation of such calamity? It’s important not to disrespect the victims’ families with my photographs. On the other hand, it’s about showing the situation with great sensitivity as it unfolds and to convey a message to people with my photographs,” he said.

    Amid the widespread sorrow and loss that define disaster zones, Vergara actively seeks out and captures moments of hope and joy, most of all the miracle of a live rescue. “The most important message is the rescue of a person alive during an earthquake. Seeing someone alive brings immense joy. When a rescue team, firefighters, civil defense, or even volunteers rescue a person alive, everyone embraces with happiness, and that is the happiness I seek to capture with a photograph in an earthquake,” he added.

  • Who are the Chawinga sisters leading Malawi’s bid for Wafcon glory?

    Who are the Chawinga sisters leading Malawi’s bid for Wafcon glory?

    Malawi’s Cinderella run at the 2026 Women’s Africa Cup of Nations (Wafcon) has captivated football fans across the globe. As the lowest-ranked side in the tournament, sitting at 153rd in the FIFA global rankings, the tournament debutants have defied all expectations to advance to Sunday’s final against Cameroon, and their astonishing success can be traced directly to one incredible pair: sister strikers Tabitha and Temwa Chawinga.

    Between them, the siblings have netted nine of Malawi’s 12 goals throughout the tournament, with 27-year-old Temwa currently tied atop the golden boot race with five goals, alongside Zambia’s Barbra Banda. What makes their combined impact even more remarkable is that both have long compiled impressive goal tallies and titles for some of the biggest professional clubs across the world, long before their breakthrough on the continental stage.

    Thirty-year-old Tabitha, the elder of the two, was born in May 1996 in Rumphi, a rural northern district of Malawi. She grew up playing informal football with boys in her village, kicking balls handmade from plastic and paper, and never saw herself as less capable than her male peers. “Growing up, I never saw myself as different from boys,” she told the BBC. “Whatever they did I believed I could.”

    Tabitha faced steep pushback from her community and even her family early on. Her mother would beat her for playing, embarrassed by local gossip that claimed Tabitha would never marry or value education. Even her peers told her that women had no place in professional football. But she refused to abandon the sport she loved, and her path to stardom began when she joined DD Sunshine, a top club based in Malawi’s capital Lilongwe. A devout Christian, she frequently credits her faith for carrying her through the hardest stages of her journey.

    Her move to European football came by chance in 2014, when an American NGO worker who had trained with DD Sunshine relocated to Sweden and joined third-tier side Krokom Dvarsatts. DD Sunshine owner David Dube suggested the club give Tabitha a trial, and when the side hesitated, Dube even offered to cover her visa and flight costs to make the trip happen. Tabitha left an immediate impression on the Swedish side, who praised her physical strength, sharp dribbling, long-range shooting, and clinical finishing. She made her debut after her 18th birthday, becoming the first Malawian woman to play professional football in Europe, and scored an incredible 39 goals in just 14 matches.

    Her career only accelerated from there: she scored 43 goals to earn promotion for second-tier club Kvarnsveden, then claimed the Swedish top flight’s golden boot in 2017. A six-year spell in China followed, where she won three league titles, three golden boots, and two Player of the Season awards. A 2022-23 loan spell at Inter Milan brought another golden boot in Italy’s Serie A, and after that success, she declared: “My goal is to achieve for African people. I need to play for the girls in Africa. They need to see there are women in this world that can play football like men.”

    Paris Saint-Germain signed Tabitha next, and in 2023 she became the first Malawian woman to play and score in the UEFA Women’s Champions League. She later moved to Olympique Lyonnais, France’s most decorated women’s side, where she helped the club win back-to-back domestic league titles, and started in last season’s Champions League final, where Lyon fell to Barcelona.

    Temwa, born in September 1998 (whose name means “love” in the local Tumbuka language), followed directly in her older sister’s footsteps, and credits Tabitha as the foundational force behind her own success. “She made connections for me to leave Malawi to play abroad, but most importantly has always advised me to fight hard, to know what I want and to pursue it without listening to distracting people,” Temwa told BBC Sport Africa. Tabitha first recommended Temwa to her Swedish club Kvarnsveden, where the pair played together, and when Chinese agents asked Tabitha for referrals for talented strikers, she once again pointed them to her younger sister.

    Like her sister, Temwa has built a legacy of prolific goalscoring. She netted 35 league goals in Sweden in 2019, then joined Wuhan Jianghan in China, where she helped the club win four consecutive league titles, including the 2021 championship that she shared with Tabitha. In 2023, she outscored some of the biggest names in men’s football—including Erling Haaland, Cristiano Ronaldo, and Lionel Messi—finishing as the top goalscorer across top global leagues with 63 goals combined for her club and country. “When I found out I was so happy. I didn’t believe it, but it was so amazing,” she said of the milestone.

    In 2024, NWSL side Kansas City Current signed Temwa, and she claimed the league’s golden boot in her debut season with 20 goals, followed by 15 goals in 2025 that helped the club earn the top regular season record. She was named league MVP in both of her first two seasons in the United States.

    Despite both sisters’ long list of individual and club honors, neither has ever been named African Women’s Footballer of the Year, an award that has eluded them to date. At the international level, they have been the backbone of Malawi’s national team, the Scorchers, for more than a decade: Tabitha made her debut in 2011 and usually serves as captain, while Temwa earned her first cap in 2016 and lifted the team’s first ever regional title as skipper at the 2023 COSAFA Women’s Championship.

    Tabitha, who has played in top European competitions for years, said ahead of Wafcon: “I’ve been playing big games in Europe, but I tell the girls ‘Don’t be shy, don’t be scared.’” Those words have inspired Malawi’s historic run: the side opened the tournament with an upset win over 10-time defending champions Nigeria, finished ahead of 2022 semi-finalists Zambia in Group C, came from behind to beat Ghana 2-1 in the quarter-finals (a win that also secured qualification for the 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup), and beat Algeria in the semi-finals, with both Chawinga sisters finding the back of the net in that match.

    Temwa summed up the team’s mindset after the semi-final win: “I’m so happy because a lot of people didn’t give us a chance at this level, but we showed the world that we have a good team.”

    Malawi Football Association president Fleetwood Haiya credits recent funding from FIFA for helping grow the women’s program and fuel this success, but both sisters have urged for greater domestic investment in girls’ football across the country. “If we can put money in Malawi to support girls’ football I think there can be so many like me and Tabitha,” Temwa said.

    On Sunday, the Scorchers will face three-time tournament runners-up Cameroon, vying to become just the fourth nation to win the Wafcon title, following Nigeria, Equatorial Guinea, and South Africa. If they lift the trophy, the credit will go first to two sisters from humble rural beginnings, who overcame doubt and barrier after barrier to put the small southern African nation on women’s football’s global map.

  • ‘They’re all catastrophic’: The paediatric war wounds Dr Abu Sittah tries to heal in Lebanon

    ‘They’re all catastrophic’: The paediatric war wounds Dr Abu Sittah tries to heal in Lebanon

    BEIRUT, Lebanon — In a sunlit office in central Beirut, prominent British-Palestinian plastic and reconstructive surgeon Dr. Ghassan Abu Sittah leans over a stack of patient files, his weekend operating schedule filled with names that tell a devastating story of Israeli military campaigns across Lebanon and Gaza. All 11 patients waiting for his care are children, each bearing catastrophic, life-altering injuries from ongoing conflict.

    Among the cases he reviews are two siblings carrying unexploded shrapnel from the 2024 cross-border war that has only recently begun to trigger dangerous secondary complications. There is a young boy with a partial foot amputation in need of complex reconstruction, another who requires final work on an amputation stump to prepare for prosthetic rehabilitation, and a child with a severe elbow injury that will demand hours of delicate surgery to save the joint from permanent disablement. “And so on, they are all like that… catastrophic,” Abu Sittah told Middle East Eye in an interview.

    One of those waiting for their next procedure is 12-year-old Fatima al-Jabal, the youngest of three surviving sisters who escaped death when an Israeli strike flattened their family home in the small mountain village of Libbaya, located in Lebanon’s Bekaa Valley, on March 7. The attack killed Zainab, their 10-year-old fourth sister, whose body was torn apart in the blast and never fully recovered. Their mother, who was severely wounded in the strike, later died of her injuries in a Beirut hospital.

    Fatima survived, but she lost an eye, suffered a dislocated jaw and extensive foot damage that has already required multiple surgeries. Now, Abu Sittah plans to remove remaining shrapnel embedded in her face and back to stop recurrent, life-threatening infections.

    Days before her upcoming procedure, a Middle East Eye reporter visited the three surviving sisters and their father, 60-year-old Hassan Ali al-Jabal, in their temporary two-bedroom hotel apartment in Beirut’s Hamra neighborhood, where they have stayed while receiving ongoing care at the American University of Beirut Medical Centre. The smell of caramelized onion hung in the air as Hassan cooked moudardara, the traditional Lebanese lentil and rice dish that is his daughters’ favorite. In the corner of the living room, the three girls, still in soft pajamas, sat shoulder to shoulder stringing blue and pink beads into bracelets and phone straps to sell for pocket money, snacking on barbeque-flavored potato chips. Leaned against the balcony wall, a folded wheelchair waited – a reminder that only months ago, all three girls relied on it to move.

    When 16-year-old Malak, the eldest sister, instinctively tugged her lavender nightdress down to cover the extensive burns that scar her legs, Hassan gently reassured her there was no reason for shame. Malak suffered the most devastating injuries of the three surviving girls: a traumatic brain injury, multiple compound fractures across her body, and permanent disfigurement that left her reliant on round-the-clock care for months. After months of intensive physiotherapy, she has reclaimed small but vital pieces of independence. “I can now go to the bathroom on my own, so I have improved a lot,” she said, weeks after spending months in intensive care following the strike.

    Fourteen-year-old Kawthar now walks with the support of a walker, but an external fixation frame held in place by metal pins drilled into her bone still stabilizes a finger on her right hand and her entire left leg. A thick scar stretches across half her face, a permanent marker of the attack.

    “All three have progressed a lot, but they still have a long road ahead and it can take a long time,” Hassan said, as he stirred his pot of lentils and rice. He explained that each girl faces a unique, lifelong set of medical challenges: Kawthar’s leg requires months more of reconstruction to regain function; Malak still carries extensive unhealed back injuries from broken vertebrae, and spent two and a half months unable to move on her own, her skin shredded from shrapnel that required multiple skin grafts to repair. “It was like something was eating off her body because of all the shrapnel,” Hassan said of Fatima’s recurrent wound infections, common for blast injuries where shrapnel carries contaminants deep into tissue.

    None of the three girls wanted to speak about the harrowing weeks they spent in intensive care after the strike. But when Hassan teased them about their contrasting personalities – Malak the responsible, caring oldest sister, Kawthar the quiet stubborn thinker, Fatima the rambunctious youngest – giggles filled the small apartment, and for a few minutes, the space felt like any other family home. When he began to recount anecdotes of their quiet life in the village before the strike, the moment of soft warmth held, until he turned to the day he dug his surviving daughters out of the rubble that had been their home.

    The smiles faded quickly. A framed portrait of Zainab, decorated with painted flowers, sits on the mantelpiece above the girls’ shared bed. “There is no point in a nice picture,” Hassan said, his voice thick with anger. “People tell me that my daughter is in heaven. I want her here, with me, not in heaven. I raised her for 10 years.” This is not the first time Hassan has lost a family member to Israeli war: his brother was killed during Israel’s 1982 full-scale invasion of southern Lebanon, 44 years to the month before Zainab’s death. The pain of the past has blurred into the present, leaving him struggling to untangle the multigenerational tragedy that has destroyed his family.

    For years, Hassan had built a quiet life in the Bekaa Valley village, nursing a dream to build four stacked apartments for his four daughters, so they would always live close to one another. He never once considered leaving Lebanon, he said, until the day the strike hit. Now, he wonders what the future holds. “Kawthar said no. She doesn’t want to live elsewhere,” he said. “It is nice in Lebanon, but you need a future. And wars keep happening. I am 60, so I have lived my life. I don’t know how long I have left.”

    Malak, Kawthar and Fatima still long to return to the Bekaa Valley to see their old friends and the home they loved, even as they know nothing will be the same. Israeli military operations and demolitions continue across southern Lebanon, and Israeli officials have repeatedly stated they have no plans to withdraw from territory seized during the 2024 offensive. “We used to love our lives before,” Malak said, her voice carrying a gravity no teenager should ever have to hold. “We were all good students in school… We will certainly go back, carry on, and love life. But, of course, things won’t be the same as before. We want to be a support system to each other and want to go back and divide the work in the house and be like our mum would want us to be.”

    The al-Jabal sisters are just three of more than 400 children across Lebanon who have received care through the Ghassan Abu Sittah Children’s Fund, launched by the surgeon in January 2024 to provide free reconstructive care to child war victims in both Gaza and Lebanon. For decades, Abu Sittah – who resides primarily in London – has traveled to conflict zones to treat the most vulnerable victims of war, from the First Intifada in Gaza to the Gulf War, Yemen and Syria.

    He says the pattern of pediatric injuries he is treating in Lebanon today is “almost identical” to what he witnessed in Gaza when Israel launched its full-scale military campaign in October 2023. As of August 2026, Israel has killed more than 73,200 Palestinians in Gaza since the offensive began, including more than 1,250 after a May 2025 ceasefire took effect, with thousands more still buried under rubble. Across the Lebanese border, more than 4,330 people have been killed by Israeli strikes since March 2024. Combined, more than 185,000 people across both fronts have been wounded by Israeli military action.

    “These children were wounded when Israel bombed their homes… so all of their injuries are either a direct result of the blast wave – shrapnel injuries, burns and tearing of tissue – or they were pulled under the rubble and they have crush injuries,” Abu Sittah explained. “And you rarely get a child with a single injury. It is usually a head injury and a fracture and a burn and other things, and they are all severe.”

    Nearly all of his young patients have sustained life-altering injuries that will leave them with permanent disability or disfigurement, he said, with roughly 80 percent requiring intensive care at the time of their first treatment. Saving a child’s life is only the first step of care; ongoing reconstruction will require an average of 12 to 16 surgeries before the child reaches adulthood, as growing bodies require repeated re-intervention: scar tissue and damaged tissue does not grow at the same rate as healthy tissue, leading to complications that require additional procedures as children age.

    Even after the U.S.-brokered ceasefire that took effect on April 16, 2024, the number of injured children requiring care continues to climb, as previously undiagnosed complications emerge and delayed care becomes available. Lebanon’s already fragile, heavily privatized healthcare system has been pushed to the breaking point by the crisis, leaving NGOs like Abu Sittah’s fund to fill gaps in care.

    For children like the al-Jabal sisters, a ceasefire cannot undo the harm already done, nor does it guarantee safety in the future. Abu Sittah acknowledges that the cumulative weight of working with such profound daily suffering is difficult to process, but he says action is the only antidote to despair. “I deal with it by seeing it within the bigger picture and by being grateful that I have ended up in a junction in my life that I am able to not feel paralysed and not feel like a spectator,” he said. “Being a spectator is probably the worst thing that you can do when you are watching this horror unfold.”

  • Italian police recover stolen Renoir, Cezanne and Matisse worth 9 mn euros

    Italian police recover stolen Renoir, Cezanne and Matisse worth 9 mn euros

    In a major breakthrough for Italian law enforcement, authorities announced Friday the successful recovery of three stolen Impressionist masterpieces created by Auguste Renoir, Paul Cezanne and Henri Matisse, valued collectively at more than 9 million euros. The artworks were stolen in a brazen, lightning-fast heist from the Magnani Rocca Foundation villa, a small museum located near the northern Italian city of Parma earlier this year.

    Security surveillance footage published by police reveals the meticulous and rapid planning behind the robbery. Two masked suspects, fitted with headlamps to navigate the property in low light, gained access to the villa by smashing through a ground-floor window. Instead of searching for other high-value targets, the intruders moved directly to the gallery room where the three paintings were displayed, prying them off the walls in seconds. They passed the artworks through the broken window to a third accomplice waiting outside, and the entire group fled the scene before any security response could be mobilized. The entire heist took less than three minutes from start to finish.

    The stolen works recovered by police include Renoir’s *Fish*, valued at 6 million euros, Cezanne’s *Still Life with Cherries*, worth 3 million euros, and Matisse’s *Odalisque on the Terrace*, which carries an estimated value of 20,000 euros. The Magnani Rocca Foundation, situated roughly 20 kilometers outside Parma, holds the private art collection assembled by influential Italian art historian Luigi Magnani. The foundation’s permanent collection includes dozens of other iconic works by globally celebrated artists such as Albrecht Dürer, Peter Paul Rubens, Anthony van Dyck, Francisco Goya and Claude Monet, none of which were targeted in the robbery.

    This high-profile theft is part of a growing string of brazen art robberies targeting major cultural institutions across Europe in recent years. Just five months before the Parma heist, in October of the previous year, thieves carried out an equally audacious robbery at the Louvre Museum in Paris— the world’s most visited art museum. In that incident, intruders gained access to the museum in broad daylight, stole high-value jewelry pieces worth an estimated $102 million, and escaped in under eight minutes, shocking cultural security agencies across the continent.