博客

  • Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan activate Mecca Pact amid war with Houthis

    Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan activate Mecca Pact amid war with Houthis

    In a high-stakes move set to reshape regional geopolitics in the Middle East, Turkey and Pakistan have formally committed to a rapid deployment of military forces to Saudi Arabia under a newly activated mutual defense agreement dubbed the Mecca Pact, a decision that is expected to further isolate Houthi forces amid an escalating Yemeni conflict.

    The joint pledge followed an emergency gathering of senior representatives from the three nations in Riyadh, where attendees issued a unified condemnation of recent attacks targeting Saudi territory — specifically strikes targeting the Islamic holy cities of Mecca and Medina — opting not to name the Houthis directly in their official communique. In the joint statement released after the meeting, the three allies reaffirmed their unwavering rejection of any act of aggression or threat targeting the kingdom’s national security and territorial sovereignty. They further agreed to move forward without delay with the practical execution of collective defense obligations, taking all required steps to deploy the pre-agreed military personnel and capabilities and ensure their swift positioning within Saudi Arabia.

    The emergency summit coincided with a major new offensive launched by Yemeni government forces, backed by Saudi-led military support, which aims to recapture all territory seized by the Houthis over the course of 12 years of full-scale civil war. To date, the immediate tactical effect of the Turkish and Pakistani troop deployment on the trajectory of the Yemeni war remains unclear. Pakistan already maintains a substantial troop presence in Saudi Arabia, and just last week, Reuters reported that Pakistan dispatched four plane loads of military weaponry to the Yemeni port city of Aden to reinforce the Saudi-backed Yemeni government. One Western official based in the Gulf told Middle East Eye that Pakistani personnel are already stationed in southern Yemen, though there is no public clarity on whether they are embedded with Saudi forces under private contracts or deployed as official Pakistani military units.

    While the operational impact remains to be seen, the timing of the deployment announcement — coming as the anti-Houthi offensive gains momentum — carries significant symbolic weight for all parties involved. A second anonymous Western Gulf official told Middle East Eye that Riyadh has been actively working to secure broad international and regional backing ahead of its large-scale counter-offensive against the Houthi movement.

    Both Pakistan and Turkey bring unique geopolitical leverage to the new alliance. Pakistan stands as the only nuclear-armed state in the Muslim world, and has long positioned itself as a neutral mediator between Iran and the United States, marketing itself as an impartial honest broker in regional disputes. Turkey, meanwhile, is a longstanding member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and has recently carved out a regional profile as a leading critic of Israel amid its ongoing military campaign in Gaza — a conflict that has sparked widespread anger across the Arab and Muslim world, with United Nations officials and leading human rights experts labeling Israel’s actions a genocide.

    For Saudi Arabia, formal activation of the Mecca Pact and the public backing of Pakistan and Turkey serves to underscore that its counter-offensive against the Houthis enjoys widespread support across the broader Middle East. Just last week, Saudi Arabia hosted United Arab Emirates Vice President Mansour Bin Zayed in a separate diplomatic push to demonstrate unified regional opposition to the Houthis.

    In a parallel diplomatic development on Monday, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman held a two-hour meeting with U.S. Democratic Senator Chris Murphy, Murphy confirmed publicly. Murphy has been one of the most vocal U.S. critics of the Saudi-led military intervention in Yemen, a stance that held through the 2022 United Nations-brokered ceasefire that paused large-scale fighting for two years. That truce collapsed in July 2024 after the Houthis resumed attacks on Saudi commercial and military vessels in the Red Sea. Two months after the ceasefire ended, Houthi forces launched their own offensive along the Red Sea coast. As of Monday, Saudi-backed Yemeni government forces announced they have recaptured the vast majority of coastal territory seized by the Houthis in that recent push.

    This report was published by Middle East Eye, a media outlet that provides independent, on-the-ground coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and surrounding regions.

  • Yemen: Video shows armoured vehicle ramming unarmed and armed men as fighting rages

    Yemen: Video shows armoured vehicle ramming unarmed and armed men as fighting rages

    New graphic video footage circulating across major social media platforms has drawn international attention to alleged war crimes committed by fighters aligned with Yemen’s internationally recognized government amid an ongoing counter-offensive against Houthi forces along the country’s strategic Red Sea coast. Three separate verified clips posted by open-source observers document repeated incidents of an armored military vehicle intentionally ramming and running over both armed combatants and unarmed surrendering fighters, raising urgent questions about compliance with international humanitarian law in the resurgent Yemeni civil war.

    The first clip, which has been viewed hundreds of thousands of times since being posted, captures the armored vehicle accelerating directly into a gathered crowd of opposing fighters. While some men in the group carry rifles, two individuals are clearly seen with their hands raised above their heads in a clear gesture of surrender. The vehicle driver strikes both surrendering men without hesitation, before continuing over multiple prone men lying along the roadside. As the vehicle rolls over the motionless and twitching bodies on the ground, the driver and a passenger are heard shouting “Allahu Akbar” (God is Great). Distinct thuds of the vehicle’s chassis impacting bodies are audible over the camera’s shaky recording, with intermittent small arms gunfire audible in the opening seconds of the clip – though it remains unclear which side initiated the shooting.

    A second video shows another encounter along the same stretch of road, where a lone armed man stands on the ground aiming his rifle at the oncoming armored vehicle. After striking the first man, the driver turns the vehicle toward a group of men lying on the ground, who open fire on the vehicle as it accelerates toward their position. The third clip, filmed in a coastal beach area, captures the armored vehicle searching for additional targets after the earlier clashes. The driver spots an armed man lying alone on the sand, yells an Arabic insult translating to “this dog” before ramming and running the man over. After the impact, the vehicle comes to a stop, and at least one occupant opens fire on a group of unarmed men walking slowly along the beach who do not return fire. Multiple men can be seen falling to the sand after being hit by gunfire from the vehicle.

    While independent outlet Middle East Eye has not been able to independently confirm the affiliation of the vehicle crew or the men targeted in the clips, leading open-source conflict analysts have assessed that the armored vehicle is operated by soldiers serving under Yemen’s Saudi-backed government. The disturbing footage emerged just days after the internationally recognized Yemeni government launched a large-scale counter-offensive to retake Red Sea coastal territory captured by the Iran-aligned Houthi movement just one month prior.

    In an official announcement Sunday, Yemeni government officials confirmed the sweeping goal of the new campaign: to recapture all territory lost to Houthi control over the 12 years of ongoing civil conflict. By Monday evening local time, Saudi-led coalition forces and Yemeni government allies announced they had already seized control of the Arabian Gulf flank of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, as well as the strategic Red Sea port city of Mocha, which Houthi fighters captured from government forces in September.

    The ramming footage is just one slice of the brutal, chaotic fighting unfolding across Yemen’s Tihamah Plain, the low-lying coastal strip at the center of the current offensive. Other videos circulating from the region show dozens of teenage boys, allegedly recruited as child soldiers by the Houthi movement, who have been captured by advancing pro-government forces.

    Yemen’s devastating civil war first erupted in 2014, when Houthi fighters seized control of the capital city of Sanaa, forcing the internationally recognized government into exile in the southern port city of Aden. The following year, a Saudi-led military coalition intervened to back the Yemeni government, launching a large-scale air and ground campaign aimed at ousting the Houthis from power. A fragile UN-brokered ceasefire that brought a rare period of reduced violence to the country in 2022 collapsed in July of this year, allowing fighting to resume across multiple front lines.

    The recent Houthi advance along the Red Sea coast has elevated the stakes of the conflict for global security, adding a new transnational dimension to the years-long civil war. After seizing the coastal territory, the Houthi movement declared a naval embargo against all commercial vessels owned by Saudi Arabia operating in the Red Sea – a critical global shipping corridor that carries a large share of Saudi Arabia’s oil exports. The strategic waterway has also become a new flashpoint in ongoing tensions between the United States and Iran, which have clashed repeatedly over access to the nearby Strait of Hormuz.

  • Israeli lecturer charged over plot to kill hundreds of Palestinians and force mass expulsions

    Israeli lecturer charged over plot to kill hundreds of Palestinians and force mass expulsions

    In a high-stakes case that has thrown renewed focus on surging far-right extremism targeting Palestinian communities across Israel and the occupied territories, a 60-something mathematics lecturer from Tel Aviv’s Bar-Ilan University has been formally indicted on charges of plotting coordinated mass casualty attacks designed to force hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their homes. Details of the chilling plot, first reported by leading Israeli outlet Yedioth Ahronoth, are laid out in a detailed prosecution indictment, with the suspect’s identity remaining sealed under a court-ordered gag order.

    Prosecutors lay out a premeditated, years-long plan that the accused codenamed “AIT”, an abbreviation for a Hebrew phrase translating to “the nation will carry out transfer” — a reference to the forced ethnic expulsion of Palestinians. The indictment outlines that the lecturer began conceptualizing the attack blueprint in February 2023, months after widespread intercommunal violence ripped through Israel in 2021. He dramatically escalated his organizational work following the October 7, 2023 attacks led by Hamas on southern Israel, the document claims.

    According to the prosecution’s narrative, the plot was structured to deploy 72 armed attackers, including the lecturer himself, divided into 12 six-person cells. Each cell would be outfitted with firearms, axes, and hammers to carry out synchronized strikes across a broad range of targets: Palestinian citizens of Israel, Bedouin communities within Israel’s recognized borders, Palestinian residents of occupied East Jerusalem, and Palestinian communities across the occupied West Bank. The end goal, prosecutors allege, was to inflict mass casualties that would trigger widespread panic and force all targeted Palestinians to flee permanently to Jordan, Lebanon, and the Gaza Strip.

    Court documents detail that the accused carried out pre-attack surveillance on multiple target locations, including the Bedouin community of Tuba-Zangariyye in northern Israel, where he mapped potential entry routes for attackers. Over more than a year, he repeatedly attempted to recruit co-conspirators to carry out the plot, but prosecution records confirm no individuals agreed to join. The lecturer also allegedly reached out to far-right Israeli politician Moshe Feiglin, leader of the Zehut party, in an attempt to secure help sourcing participants. When Feiglin failed to respond to his outreach, the suspect resorted to blackmail, sending threatening letters that warned he would release damaging private information to ruin Feiglin’s public reputation. Feiglin and his party’s members immediately reported the threats to Israeli law enforcement, a move that ultimately uncovered the full plot.

    The case is now working its way through Israeli courts, with both sides presenting opposing arguments on pre-trial detention. Prosecutors have formally requested that the suspect remain in full custody through the conclusion of all legal proceedings, arguing that his violent far-right ideology and the advanced, detailed nature of his attack planning mark him as an immediate threat to public safety. The lecturer has pushed for release to house arrest, telling a recent court hearing that he poses no current danger to any person and needs to return home to grade student exams, reporting Israeli news outlet Ynet.

    Bar-Ilan University, the suspect’s employer, has already taken formal action: officials announced the lecturer’s immediate suspension pending the outcome of the trial, and issued a formal statement condemning the allegations, noting the institution maintains “zero tolerance” for any violent or extremist activity that matches the accusations.

    This indictment comes at a moment of already intense international scrutiny over rising far-right settler violence targeting Palestinians in Israel and the occupied West Bank, particularly after the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza war in October 2023. Data from the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) documents a staggering surge in attacks: between January 1 and September 14, 2024 alone, OCHA recorded more than 1,600 settler attacks that left Palestinians injured, caused property damage, or both. Since the start of 2023, more than 1,300 Palestinians have been killed in violence across the occupied West Bank.

    Earlier in 2024, the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory labeled the ongoing escalation of Israeli settler violence against Palestinian communities as “unprecedented” and sustained. The commission’s report further found that the Israeli government actively enables these attacks through a combination of direct financial backing, logistical support, and military protection for extremist settlers.

    This independent reporting on the case was first published by Middle East Eye, a media outlet focused on original, in-depth coverage of the Middle East, North Africa, and broader global affairs.

  • Turkey condemns deployment of space weapons after American weapons reach orbit

    Turkey condemns deployment of space weapons after American weapons reach orbit

    In a landmark address that marks the first public condemnation of orbital weapon deployment by a NATO leader, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has spoken out against the militarization of outer space, following the United States’ unprecedented confirmation last month that it has placed an armed military asset in Earth’s orbit.

    Speaking at the 77th International Astronautical Conference (IAC), hosted this year in Antalya, southern Turkey, Erdogan told an audience of senior diplomats, global space agency representatives and industry leaders that the cosmos should be reserved exclusively for peaceful scientific discovery, not turned into a new battlefield for great power conflict.

    “Sending weapons to space, or turning space into a ground for an arms race, will be totally wrong,” Erdogan stated during his keynote address on Monday. “It will be a direct threat to the joint future for humanity, and I see that this race is becoming widespread – which, of course, we do not welcome.”

    Erdogan’s condemnation comes just weeks after the U.S. Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall III (referred to as Troy Meink in the original report) confirmed that the U.S. has deployed an “on-orbit” space-control weapon, designed to counter what U.S. military officials describe as “evolving threats” from rival powers. While Kendall declined to share specifics on the weapon’s launch date, capabilities or exact orbital location, he confirmed that the deployment aligns with long-standing U.S. policy to achieve and maintain “space superiority” – a goal that U.S. military leaders argue is necessary to counter Chinese and Russian programs designed to disable or destroy American satellites in the event of future conflict.

    Beyond the U.S.’s confirmed deployment, Israel has also publicly hinted at plans to develop its own space weapons, with the stated goal of protecting Israeli satellites from hostile spacecraft and developing strike capabilities that can target locations on Earth from orbit. China has already issued its own formal condemnation of the U.S. announcement, calling on Washington to reverse course and “stop expanding its military capabilities and preparing for war in outer space.”

    The current framework governing activities in outer space, the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, only prohibits the deployment of weapons of mass destruction in orbit. This leaves a critical legal gap that major global powers including the U.S., China, and Russia have exploited in recent decades to develop anti-satellite capabilities, targeting systems critical to enemy military communications, surveillance, and navigation operations.

    Beyond his remarks on space militarization, Erdogan used his keynote address to the summit – the first IAC ever hosted by Turkey – to outline Ankara’s expanding ambitions in the global space sector. The Turkish president announced plans to construct a new spaceport in Somalia and confirmed that Turkey is moving forward with plans to send its own national astronauts to the lunar surface.

    The annual IAC summit, first established in 1950 during the early days of the Cold War to maintain open scientific communication across global space research communities, serves as a key global platform where government space agencies, private commercial firms, and international delegates gather to announce new mission plans, negotiate bilateral cooperation agreements, and debate the future of global space policy. This year’s summit in Antalya marks a major milestone for Turkey’s growing role in the international space sector.

  • Thousands transferred from Syria to Iraq face possible execution over alleged IS links, HRW says

    Thousands transferred from Syria to Iraq face possible execution over alleged IS links, HRW says

    A urgent new warning from Human Rights Watch (HRW) has drawn global attention to the grave danger facing nearly 5,700 men and boys transferred to Iraq from northeast Syria earlier this year, with the rights organization saying the group faces widespread abuse, unfair prosecutions, and even the threat of execution.

    The detainees, who include more than 440 children as young as 12 years old, represent a diverse cross-section of nationalities: roughly 3,500 are Syrian, 2,200 are Iraqi, and the remaining come from 65 other countries around the world. For up to seven and a half years before their transfer between January 21 and February 12, 2026, the group was held in Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) facilities in northeast Syria, where conditions had already been documented as life-threatening. The sudden transfer was triggered by escalated fighting between the SDF and Damascus’ transitional government, which sparked widespread fears of mass jailbreaks that would allow detainees to reoffend. With only a few days’ advance notice to Iraqi authorities, U.S. military forces coordinated the transfer of all 5,704 detainees, moving them across the border by airlift and ground transport.

    HRW’s assessment paints a grim picture of the risks the detainees now face in Iraq. Adult detainees face imminent prosecution in deeply flawed trials that regularly fail to meet international due process standards, with convictions often followed by mandatory death sentences. Multiple reports from inside Iraqi detention facilities confirm systemic torture, unsanitary living conditions, and preventable deaths in custody. Adding to the public health crisis, more than 1,100 transferred detainees arrived with serious contagious illnesses, including active tuberculosis, which can spread rapidly through overcrowded detention populations.

    Letta Tayler, senior counterterrorism advisor at HRW, emphasized the dual responsibility of the international community and Iraqi authorities in a public statement. “The thousands of boys and men sent to Iraq deserve humane treatment and due process, just as the thousands of survivors of ISIS crimes deserve genuine justice,” Tayler said. “The international community shouldn’t leave Iraq to manage this immense responsibility on its own.”

    The background of this crisis stretches back more than a decade, when the Islamic State group seized large swathes of territory across Iraq and Syria in 2014. Backed by a U.S.-led international coalition, Iraqi forces declared victory over the group’s territorial control in 2017, and the Islamic State lost its final remaining stronghold in Syria in 2019. For the seven years following that defeat, SDF forces held thousands of suspected IS affiliates in makeshift detention facilities, struggling with limited resources and mounting security pressure.

    Iraq’s legal system has long faced criticism from global rights groups over its handling of terrorism cases. To date, Iraqi courts have handed down hundreds of death sentences and life imprisonment terms to people convicted of terrorism-related offenses, including hundreds of foreign citizens. These convictions are routinely issued after summary, unfair trials that fail to meet basic international fair trial standards. Just last week, Iraqi authorities executed 10 people convicted of terrorism charges under the country’s sweeping Anti-Terrorism Law Article 4, security and health officials confirmed to Agence France-Presse.

    HRW is calling on foreign governments to step up and accept responsibility for their citizens held among the transferred detainees, urging widespread repatriation rather than leaving the group to face the well-documented risks of Iraq’s broken judicial system. The organization also emphasized that any response to terrorism must balance accountability for atrocities with respect for basic human rights, calling for systemic reform to ensure fair justice for both detainees and survivors of IS violence.

  • Trump says ‘threat’ led US to pull bombers from RAF Fairford

    Trump says ‘threat’ led US to pull bombers from RAF Fairford

    In a development that has tightened transatlantic security tensions, former U.S. President Donald Trump has confirmed that the relocation of American bombers from the UK’s RAF Fairford was a direct response to specific threats targeting the Gloucestershire-based airbase. The Pentagon confirmed Sunday that approximately 12 B-1 bombers, previously deployed at the forward operating site, had been flown back to their home stations in the continental United States.

    During a press gaggle with reporters ahead of a trip to Nebraska on Monday, Trump explicitly acknowledged the security trigger for the sudden redeployment. When asked whether a specific threat prompted the withdrawal, Trump responded: “Yeah I think we can say that. They didn’t fly out by accident. There were some threats. And rather than tempting the enemy, we’ll capture the enemy and beat the enemy. But why should we leave them there? So we moved them around a little bit. Not very far.”

    The president added that U.S. intelligence officials already have identified the parties behind the threat, though he declined to name specific actors or groups publicly. The redeployment follows a suspicious incident at the Cotswolds base on September 27, when counter-terrorism police responded to reports of three suspicious vehicles in the area surrounding the installation. Six men, including one UK-Iranian national, were arrested on suspicion of terror-related offenses in connection with the incident, and all six have since been released on bail.

    UK Downing Street earlier Monday reaffirmed that RAF Fairford remains secure, pointing to Trump’s own comments from the previous week in which he praised British police, defense and security agencies for their work protecting the base. U.K. Prime Minister Andy Burnham acknowledged days after the incident that there are “strong indications” of Iranian involvement, though he offered no additional evidence to support the claim. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, for his part, has stopped short of directly linking the September incident to the bomber relocation, framing the movement as a routine adjustment. “It’s not unusual to see movement of assets to different parts of the world based on exercises, redeployments, people changing out and new people coming in, new planes coming in and old planes going out,” Rubio told reporters, adding that the U.S. retains full confidence in the security of all its overseas bases and that British security officials have been fully cooperative throughout the investigation.

    U.S. Vice President JD Vance, however, framed the withdrawal as an “abundance of caution” that aligned with longstanding U.S. concerns about Iranian activity. “Washington feels Iran is doing what it has done for 49 years… which is engage in acts of terrorism against the US and against a lot of other people,” Vance said. Rubio also echoed the framing of foreign involvement in the incident during an interview on Fox News, saying it “clearly involve[d] the hands of a foreign actor” without elaborating.

    Tehran has forcefully rejected all accusations of involvement. Back in July, Iranian officials issued a warning that “any base used for aggression against Iranian territory constitutes a legitimate target for our forces.” That warning came after the UK approved a U.S. request to use RAF Fairford as a staging point for defensive strikes against Iran, with American B-1 and B-52 bombers having flown missions to the Middle East from the British base in recent months. RAF Fairford has hosted U.S. Air Force operations as a key forward operating location for decades, and Whitehall sources have not denied that the U.S. decision to pull out the bombers was directly tied to the September incident at the base.

  • US ‘watching closely’ after plague researcher dies in Russia, Rubio says

    US ‘watching closely’ after plague researcher dies in Russia, Rubio says

    Following the death of a laboratory technician at a Siberian plague research institute, global health authorities are moving to assess potential risks tied to the incident, with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirming that American officials are keeping the situation under close observation.

    The deceased, identified by Russian media as 20-something Daria, died recently after working at the Anti-Plague Institute of Siberia and the Far East in Irkutsk. Multiple unconfirmed reports have emerged surrounding the circumstances of her infection: one suggests she became ill after accidentally breaking a test tube containing the Yersinia pestis pathogen, while another notes she had recently taken a field trip to Buryatia, a region bordering Mongolia where the bacteria is naturally endemic in wild rodent populations such as marmots.

    Regional officials have released mixed updates on the cause of death. Irkutsk Governor Igor Kobzev stated that the preliminary cause of death has been recorded as “pneumonia of undetermined etiology”, adding that testing of Daria’s biological samples found no trace of the micro-organisms she worked with at the institute. Quoting Russia’s federal consumer health and safety watchdog Rospotrebnadzor, Kobzev also confirmed that no other staff from the institute have sought medical care for related symptoms, and a specialized biosafety inspection of the facility found no emergency situation. As a precautionary measure, Russian media reported last week that roughly 200 people who had contact with Daria are currently under medical observation.

    Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has moved to quell public speculation, urging citizens to disregard unsubstantiated rumors and only trust official statements released by Rospotrebnadzor.

    In comments to reporters this week, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio addressed American monitoring of the incident. “It seems that there was a worker at the lab that was infected and there’s concern that that, you know, could have spread, at least internally — you’ve seen them do quarantine of this and that nature,” Rubio said. “If something like that gets out, it can quickly spread. So we’re watching and monitoring it closely. I don’t think it’s cause for alarm, but it is cause for focus and the cause to just keep an eye on it and we’re doing that.”

    Public health experts have weighed in on the risks associated with the incident, noting that while pneumonic plague — the most infectious form of the disease caused by Yersinia pestis — carries a high fatality rate when left untreated, it can be effectively cured with prompt antibiotic treatment. Dr. Simon Clarke, an associate professor of cellular microbiology at the University of Reading, explained that the primary source of concern stems from the fact that pneumonic plague can transmit from person to person, which explains the proactive precautionary measures taken by Russian authorities.

    Clarke also pushed back against widespread public anxiety that echoes the disruptive lockdowns and safety measures seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that such measures are extremely unlikely to be needed in this case. He added that while the pathogen could theoretically be studied for use as a biological weapon, the far more plausible explanation is that the potential exposure occurred either through natural contact in the endemic region or an accidental lab incident.

    Clarke emphasized that plague is not a disease of the past: Yersinia pestis remains endemic in many parts of the world, including regions of Russia, which justifies ongoing research into the bacteria. The Anti-Plague Institute of Siberia and the Far East at the center of this incident was founded just over 100 years ago in response to a major regional outbreak in the 1920s, and has long conducted critical research into plague prevention and treatment.

  • Labour MP Emily Thornberry urges Britain to defy Israeli order to close Jerusalem consulate

    Labour MP Emily Thornberry urges Britain to defy Israeli order to close Jerusalem consulate

    A growing diplomatic standoff has emerged in occupied East Jerusalem, after senior British lawmaker Emily Thornberry, chair of the UK Parliament’s influential Foreign Affairs Committee, has publicly called on the British government to reject Israel’s order to shut down the historic British consulate general in the region.

    Thornberry’s intervention comes as widespread anxiety mounts among Palestinian communities over whether Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband will cave to Israeli pressure and implement the closure as scheduled this Thursday. Sources close to diplomatic circles tell Middle East Eye that Miliband’s upcoming decision is being closely monitored by other European diplomatic missions based in East Jerusalem, including the French and Spanish consulates. Both nations fear that if Britain complies with the order, their own diplomatic presences in the occupied territory will be the next targets of Israeli expulsion demands.

    Speaking to Middle East Eye on Monday, Thornberry condemned the planned closure as a blatant act of retaliation against the United Kingdom for upholding international law. She stressed that the closure order itself violates established international legal standards. “I hope that Israel will not go through with closing this consulate, which has continuously served British nationals and Palestinian communities since 1838,” Thornberry said. “Britain should never allow Israel to enforce this unlawful measure.”

    Local religious leaders have added their voices to the campaign to save the mission, holding special intercessory prayers at Jerusalem’s Anglican Cathedral on Sunday morning that centered on preserving the consulate and protecting its local Palestinian staff, almost all of whom face immediate unemployment if the facility is shut down.

    Richard Sewell, Dean of St George’s College Jerusalem, told Middle East Eye he is deeply alarmed by the imminent closure. He framed the move as a targeted attack on the Palestinian community in East Jerusalem that will cause severe, long-lasting damage to the UK’s long-standing relationship with the Palestinian people. Beyond its impact on Palestinian residents, Sewell warned that closing the consulate will also disrupt critical consular services for UK citizens residing in East Jerusalem, as well as British pilgrims and international tourists visiting the holy city. “It is absolutely critical that this unjust move is resisted,” he added.

    The planned closure has also disrupted long-standing commemorative traditions: there are growing fears that the UK will be left without any official diplomatic representation at the annual Remembrance Day service scheduled for next month at the Commonwealth War Graves Commission cemetery on Jerusalem’s Mount Scopus. For more than a century, the British consul general has traditionally led the commemoration, which is followed by a public reception hosted on consulate grounds. The cemetery honors the more than one million Commonwealth troops, including thousands of British service members, who died in Palestine during the First and Second World Wars.

    Beyond the consulate itself, the future of the British Council’s East Jerusalem office, which relies entirely on British diplomatic status to operate, is now also at serious risk.

    The United Kingdom currently maintains two separate diplomatic missions for Israel and Palestine: an embassy in Tel Aviv focused on relations with the Israeli state, and the East Jerusalem consulate dedicated exclusively to Palestinian affairs, based in the contested Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood. For years, Palestinian residents of Sheikh Jarrah have faced repeated forced eviction threats and ongoing Israeli settlement expansion in the area.

    Multiple Palestinians who spoke to Middle East Eye on condition of anonymity emphasized the unique and irreplaceable role the East Jerusalem consulate plays in documenting human rights abuses against Palestinians in the occupied territories and reporting those findings directly to British policymakers in London — a function the UK’s Tel Aviv embassy cannot fulfill. They warned that closing the British mission would set a dangerous precedent that could lead to the exit of other foreign diplomatic presences, as part of a broader Israeli campaign to erode Palestinian national identity across East Jerusalem and the occupied West Bank.

    Middle East Eye withheld the full identities of all Palestinian sources who contributed to this report due to growing repression under Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. Palestinian residents who openly criticize Israeli policies now face heightened risks of arrest, imprisonment, and even torture, abuses that have been well-documented by leading human rights organizations including the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem.

    Israel’s decision to close the consulate was first announced by Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar last month, explicitly framed as retaliation for the UK’s recent policy banning trade with Israeli settlements located in the occupied Palestinian territories. Many Palestinians who spoke to MEE noted that Saar’s choice to target the East Jerusalem consulate, rather than the Israeli embassy in Tel Aviv, was a deliberate strategic choice. By targeting the consulate, Israel has made it far more difficult for the UK to retaliate against Israeli diplomats based in London. More broadly, the move aligns with a long-running Israeli government strategy to disrupt and ultimately force out foreign organizations operating in occupied East Jerusalem, including international aid groups, multilateral bodies, and diplomatic missions.

    Palestinian legal observers and analysts have repeatedly pointed out that the closure order is inherently unlawful, because Israel’s 1967 annexation and ongoing occupation of East Jerusalem is widely recognized as illegal under international law. The position was recently reinforced when Miliband officially endorsed the landmark July 2024 ruling from the International Court of Justice, which found that Israel’s prolonged occupation of Palestinian territories, including East Jerusalem, violates international law.

    In a legal opinion published last week, former British Attorney General Dominic Grieve KC backed this assessment, writing that Israel has made an unlawful claim to full sovereignty over occupied Palestinian territory. Grieve noted that successive British governments have consistently affirmed that Israel’s legal standing in East Jerusalem is only that of an occupying power, not a sovereign state. “Israel is asserting a right it does not legally possess as an occupying power, to impose sovereign control over East Jerusalem,” Grieve wrote. He further added that British consuls general in East Jerusalem do not hold formal accreditation to the state of Israel for their work in the occupied territory, meaning Israel has no legal standing to withdraw that accreditation to force the consulate’s closure.

    Across every conversation with Palestinians in East Jerusalem, a consistent message emerged: a UK decision to comply with the closure would be widely viewed as a major political victory for the Israeli government, and a devastating setback for Palestinian aspirations and diplomatic representation internationally.

  • Spain PM pins hopes on housing crisis to help win snap election

    Spain PM pins hopes on housing crisis to help win snap election

    Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has announced a snap general election for 29 November, a strategic political move triggered by a recent narrow parliamentary defeat that exposed the crumbling majority of his left-wing coalition government. The catalyst for the early vote came Friday, when a sweeping package of tenant protection legislation designed to curb skyrocketing rental costs was voted down by unified opposition from right-wing parties, formally confirming that Sánchez’s administration no longer held the legislative upper hand in congress.

    Contrary to characterizations of the decision as a panicked reaction to defeat, political observers note the move aligns with a long pattern of calculated gambits throughout Sánchez’s political career. In recent months, the prime minister’s Socialist Party (PSOE) has faced mounting headwinds on multiple fronts: high-profile corruption scandals have implicated former senior party leaders Santos Cerdán and José Luis Ábalos, while ex-Socialist Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero has faced unproven accusations of financial profiteering from a state airline bailout, claims he has repeatedly denied. Most significantly, Sánchez’s wife Begoña Gómez is scheduled to stand trial on charges of misappropriating public funds and influence peddling—allegations both Gómez and Sánchez have forcefully rejected as politically motivated smears.

    Compounding these political challenges has been the unresolved crisis in Ceuta, Spain’s North African exclave, where an unexpected influx of more than 70,000 migrants in July sparked widespread public backlash. While most migrants have since crossed back into Moroccan territory, the logistical and political fallout of the crisis has remained a persistent liability for the prime minister, drawing thousands of protestors across the country to demonstrate against his administration’s handling of the border emergency.

    Until just weeks ago, Sánchez had repeatedly pledged to serve out the full term of his legislature, with the next election scheduled for summer 2026. But mounting public fury over Spain’s affordable housing crisis—consistently ranked as the top concern for Spanish voters in recent opinion polling—handed Sánchez a politically opportune moment to pivot away from scandals and the Ceuta crisis and call an early vote.

    Addressing progressive and left-leaning supporters on Monday, Sánchez issued a mobilization call, urging voters to turn out to deliver a larger progressive majority that can “defeat the elites, advance social rights, and continue transforming Spain.” On the campaign trail, Sánchez will almost certainly center his platform on housing, highlighting that right-wing opponents the conservative People’s Party (PP) and far-right Vox uniformly rejected his legislation, which would have strengthened tenant eviction protections, reformed rental contract terms, and restricted large investor purchases of residential property.

    For their part, the PP and Vox have framed Sánchez’s government as illegitimate for years, citing its reliance on Catalan and Basque nationalist parties to pass legislation as well as the ongoing corruption scandals. Ideologically, right-wing parties have long opposed direct state intervention in the housing market, arguing that policies like those Sánchez proposed are ultimately counterproductive to increasing housing supply and lowering costs.

    Earlier in 2026, when Sánchez gained international and domestic political capital for his high-profile criticism of Israeli military actions in Gaza and public clashes with U.S. President Donald Trump, political analysts widely speculated he would call an early election then. But Sánchez opted to wait, a choice that political analysts say reflects his calculation that the housing crisis is a far more potent issue for mobilizing left-wing turnout.

    Despite this strategic positioning, polling data consistently shows the PSOE trailing the opposition PP heading into the campaign. While framing the election around housing gives Sánchez a potential boost to unify progressive voters, securing a new mandate to remain in office is widely viewed as the toughest political challenge of his decades-long career.

  • Turkey supplies Korkut air defence systems to Ukraine, sources say

    Turkey supplies Korkut air defence systems to Ukraine, sources say

    Since the full-scale escalation of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Turkey has emerged as a key supplier of defensive military equipment to Kyiv, and a newly revealed transfer of advanced air defence systems highlights the depth of this military cooperation. Multiple anonymous sources familiar with the deal told independent outlet Middle East Eye that Ankara shipped a batch of Turkish-made Korkut anti-drone air defence systems to Ukraine earlier in 2024, granting Ukrainian forces the opportunity to field-test the new hardware while strengthening Ukraine’s air defence capabilities against Russian aerial attacks.