博客

  • US troop deaths ignite anger over ‘war for Israel’

    US troop deaths ignite anger over ‘war for Israel’

    The Pentagon confirmed on Sunday that three American service members lost their lives and five sustained serious injuries during joint military operations with Israel against Iranian targets. This development marks the first US combat fatalities since the initiation of this conflict. According to US Central Command, several additional personnel received minor shrapnel wounds and concussions, with many already returning to active duty while major combat operations persist.

    The incident, reported by NBC News to have occurred in Kuwait based on US official sources, has ignited substantial political backlash within the United States. Critics from across the political spectrum have intensified their condemnation of Washington’s decision to engage in a conflict that many argue primarily serves Israeli strategic interests rather than American national security objectives.

    Prominent Republican figures including former congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene offered condolences to bereaved families while simultaneously denouncing the military intervention as “absolutely unnecessary and unacceptable.” Greene emphasized that she and other Trump allies had campaigned explicitly against foreign wars and regime change operations.

    Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen similarly criticized the escalation, noting that fallen soldiers “should still be with us” and characterizing the conflict as “Trump’s war of choice” despite campaign promises to avoid such entanglements.

    The criticism extends beyond traditional political channels, with influential voices from Trump’s own MAGA movement expressing vehement opposition. Longtime Trump ally Tucker Carlson described the joint US-Israeli operation as “absolutely disgusting and evil” during an ABC News interview, predicting substantial realignment within Trump’s political base due to this decision.

    Pro-Trump commentator Tim Pool joined the criticism, labeling the military action a betrayal of core campaign promises, while influential MAGA commentators Keith and Kevin Hodge explicitly rejected the intervention’s rationale, stating that freeing Iranian people was not their motivation for supporting Trump.

    The fatalities have intensified fundamental debates about whether American forces are effectively advancing national interests or primarily supporting Israeli strategic objectives in the region, raising questions about the future direction of US foreign policy in the Middle East.

  • Deadly strikes hit Israel as Iran promises to avenge Khamenei’s killing

    Deadly strikes hit Israel as Iran promises to avenge Khamenei’s killing

    The Middle East plunged deeper into a widespread military confrontation as Iran, reeling from the assassination of its Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, announced an interim governing council and vowed severe retaliation against the United States and Israel. For a second consecutive day, the region endured a relentless exchange of missile and drone attacks, marking a significant escalation in hostilities.

    Iranian authorities confirmed the deaths of several high-ranking officials, including Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Commander Mohammad Pakpour, Defence Council Secretary Ali Shamkhani, and Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh, attributing their killings to coordinated strikes by Israel and the U.S. Former U.S. President Donald Trump claimed that 48 Iranian leaders had been eliminated since operations commenced on Saturday.

    Despite these significant losses, Tehran continued its offensive operations. An Iranian missile struck a bomb shelter in the densely populated ultra-Orthodox town of Beit Shemesh, Israel, resulting in at least nine fatalities and raising the Israeli death toll to twelve since the conflict began. Simultaneously, Iranian forces launched attacks across the Gulf, targeting capitals including Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Manama, Doha, and Kuwait City, as well as Oman—a nation previously engaged in mediation efforts. Civilian casualties were reported, with three killed in the UAE and one in Kuwait.

    The U.S. military reported three personnel killed and five seriously wounded during ‘Operation Epic Fury.’ In a strategic move with global economic implications, Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for 20% of the world’s oil supply. Attacks on two vessels in the strait, including an oil tanker reported to be sinking, threatened to trigger a surge in crude prices. The U.S. claimed to have sunk an Iranian warship in the Gulf of Oman, while the IRGC asserted an attack on the USS Abraham Lincoln, a claim promptly denied by the Pentagon.

    In response to the leadership vacuum, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian appeared on state television alongside Judiciary Chief Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei and senior religious scholar Ayatollah Alireza Arafi, forming a three-man interim council. President Pezeshkian declared a ‘legitimate duty and right to avenge’ Khamenei’s killing, which he labeled a ‘historic crime.’

    The political atmosphere within Iran was deeply fractured. Organized pro-government rallies demanding ‘severe revenge’ dominated the streets of Tehran, Isfahan, and Qom. Conversely, celebrations erupted in some areas, such as the conservative holy city of Mashhad, where residents distributed sweets and openly flouted hijab laws, highlighting the nation’s internal divisions. The Iranian Red Crescent reported a preliminary toll of at least 201 killed and 747 wounded in airstrikes, with a devastating strike on a girls’ primary school in Minab claiming 153 lives, most of them children aged seven to twelve.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that the campaign would intensify, with 100,000 reservists called up and strikes continuing ‘at the heart of Tehran.’ He warned the situation would ‘only escalate in the days ahead,’ signaling no near-term de-escalation despite unverified claims from Trump about potential negotiations and a reported refusal from Tehran for a ceasefire.

  • Explained: Who will lead Iran now and what happens next?

    Explained: Who will lead Iran now and what happens next?

    Iran confronts an unprecedented leadership vacuum following the death of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who held power for nearly four decades. His passing triggers constitutional protocols that place temporary authority with a three-member council consisting of President Masoud Pezeshkian, Judiciary Chief Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei, and Ayatollah Alireza Arafi from the Guardian Council.

    The succession process reveals the complex architecture of Iran’s political system, centered on the concept of Marja al-Taqlid (source of emulation) in Shia Islam. The Assembly of Experts, comprising 88 high-ranking Shia scholars, holds constitutional responsibility for selecting the new leader. However, this body operates within a carefully constructed vetting system that ensures only Khamenei-loyal candidates participate in the selection process.

    Multiple structural challenges complicate the transition. The Guardian Council, with half its members directly appointed by the late leader, serves as the primary filter for Assembly candidates. Additional vetting comes from the Ministry of Intelligence and the IRGC’s intelligence branch, creating what analysts describe as an impenetrable loyalty screen.

    The practical difficulties of convening the Assembly during heightened regional tensions present further complications. Recent targeted strikes against Iranian officials have raised questions about the safety of gathering members physically, potentially delaying the selection process.

    Several names have emerged as potential successors, including Ayatollah Arafi (already serving on the interim council), former judiciary head Ayatollah Sadeq Larijani, former president Hassan Rouhani, and Khamenei’s son Mojtaba. Beyond formal qualifications requiring religious expertise, political vision, and administrative capability, the successful candidate must maintain functional relationships with the powerful Revolutionary Guards and navigate competing fundamentalist and conservative factions.

    The 1989 selection of Khamenei himself, despite his then-questionable religious credentials, suggests that political considerations may ultimately outweigh strict doctrinal requirements in determining Iran’s next supreme leader.

  • Iranian missiles kill nine in Israel, with UAE, Oman and Kuwait also targeted

    Iranian missiles kill nine in Israel, with UAE, Oman and Kuwait also targeted

    A significant escalation in Middle Eastern hostilities occurred on Sunday as Iranian ballistic missiles struck the Israeli city of Beit Shemesh, resulting in substantial casualties and structural damage. According to the Magen David Adom emergency service, the attack killed nine individuals and wounded at least 28 others, with two victims reported in serious condition.

    Israeli authorities confirmed a direct impact on a residential building located approximately 30 kilometers from Jerusalem. Emergency response teams, including search and rescue units and medical evacuation helicopters, were immediately deployed to the area. An Israeli military spokesperson stated that officials are thoroughly investigating the precise circumstances of the ballistic missile impact.

    Paramedic Yehuda Shlomo described the aftermath to AFP, recounting ‘a terrible scene’ with severe structural damage, widespread smoke, and numerous traumatized casualties emerging from damaged structures. This attack represents the most lethal strike on Israeli territory since the current conflict initiated.

    The Iranian offensive, reportedly in retaliation for earlier Israeli and American operations, extended beyond Israel’s borders throughout the Gulf region. United Arab Emirates authorities reported three fatalities and 58 injuries from the attacks, with victims identified as Pakistani, Nepalese, and Bangladeshi nationals. The UAE Defense Ministry disclosed intercepting 152 of 165 detected ballistic missiles and neutralizing 506 of 541 Iranian drones.

    Kuwait’s health ministry confirmed one death and 32 injuries, while Oman experienced its first direct involvement in the conflict when two drones targeted the port of Duqm. One strike injured a foreign worker at mobile accommodations, while the other landed near fuel tanks without causing additional damage. Subsequent reports indicated an oil tanker attack off Oman’s coast that injured four crew members.

    Bahrain’s capital Manama saw drone strikes targeting its airport and the Crowne Plaza hotel, prompting the US embassy to advise citizens to avoid area hotels. Social media footage revealed smoke and flames emanating from high-rise residential buildings struck by drone debris.

    Qatar, host to the region’s largest US military base, reported intercepting most of the 65 missiles and 12 drones launched toward its territory, though eight people sustained injuries with one in critical condition. Witnesses reported visible smoke near US military installations in Abu Dhabi, Manama, and Kuwait as American bases throughout the region came under fire.

  • Iran’s regime was built for survival and a long war is now likely

    Iran’s regime was built for survival and a long war is now likely

    The Middle East has descended into open warfare following the targeted assassination of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a joint US-Israeli military operation. Tehran responded with immediate retaliatory strikes against Israeli and US military installations across the region, marking a significant escalation in longstanding tensions.

    US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu publicly acknowledged their objective of facilitating regime change in Iran, though the immediate consequences have been widespread conflict rather than political transformation. The assassination represents the most significant blow to Iran’s Islamic regime since the 2020 killing of Qassem Soleimani, though historical precedent suggests the regime possesses considerable resilience.

    Khamenei’s dual role as both political and spiritual leader complicates the succession process. The Assembly of Experts must now convene to appoint an interim or permanent successor, with three primary candidates emerging: Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje’i (head of judiciary), Ali Asghar Hejazi (Khamenei’s chief-of-staff), and Hassan Khomeini (grandson of the republic’s founder).

    The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and paramilitary Basij forces remain firmly committed to regime preservation, having previously demonstrated willingness to suppress domestic dissent through lethal force during the 2025-2026 protests. The regime’s survival apparatus appears intact despite the leadership decapitation.

    Iran’s retaliatory measures have extended beyond direct military strikes to economic warfare tactics. The IRGC has initiated operations to choke the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of global oil and 25% of liquefied gas transit daily. This strategic maneuver threatens severe disruptions to worldwide energy markets and economic stability.

    International responses have highlighted the conflict’s global implications. China, Russia, and United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres have condemned the US-Israeli actions and called for de-escalation, though diplomatic solutions appear increasingly remote. The attacks occurred amid ongoing nuclear negotiations that Omani mediators described as nearing successful resolution.

    Analysts suggest the conflict may extend for weeks rather than days, with both sides demonstrating willingness to cross previously established red lines. The Trump administration appears to be using the confrontation to assert continued US global dominance, while Netanyahu seeks to cement Israel’s regional hegemony.

    The humanitarian consequences are expected to be severe, with Iranian civilians, regional stability, and global economic interests all facing significant collateral damage from what observers characterize as a war of choice for geopolitical advantage.

  • Which senior Iranian figures have been killed by US-Israeli attacks?

    Which senior Iranian figures have been killed by US-Israeli attacks?

    A coordinated military offensive by the United States and Israel has resulted in a catastrophic decapitation of Iran’s political and military hierarchy, with casualties estimated in the hundreds. The most significant loss confirmed by Iranian state media is the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who had governed the Islamic Republic since 1989. A state television broadcaster, visibly emotional, announced that the 86-year-old cleric “achieved his long-cherished wish of martyrdom in the holy month of Ramadan.” Several members of his immediate family, including his daughter, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, and granddaughter, were also reported killed.

    The assault extended far beyond the supreme leader, systematically eliminating the upper echelons of Iran’s security apparatus. Among the high-profile casualties is Mohammad Pakpour, Commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC); Ali Shamkhani, Secretary of the Defence Council and a key nuclear negotiator; and Amir Nasirzadeh, the nation’s Defence Minister. Abdolrahim Mousavi, Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces, was also killed, continuing a pattern of targeting military successors.

    Israeli military spokespersons claimed responsibility for eliminating a wider circle of senior officials, though these reports await independent verification. According to intelligence sources cited by major news outlets, the operation was based on meticulously gathered intelligence. The New York Times reported that the CIA had been monitoring Khamenei’s movements for months and recently identified a high-level meeting at a leadership compound in Tehran. This intelligence was subsequently shared with Israeli forces, who launched a simultaneous multi-target strike. CBS News, citing intelligence sources, placed the death toll among officials at approximately 40.

    The list of presumed deceased includes Mojtaba Khamenei (a son and potential successor to the supreme leader), Esmail Qaani (head of the IRGC’s Quds Force), and several heads of military intelligence and research agencies. In the wake of this power vacuum, Iranian state media announced that interim governance would be transferred to a three-member council consisting of President Masoud Pezeshkian, Judiciary Chief Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei, and jurist Alireza Arafi. The scale and precision of the strikes mark an unprecedented escalation in the ongoing shadow conflict between the powers, potentially reshaping the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East.

  • 6 killed in Iranian missile attack in Israel’s Beit Shemesh: rescue service

    6 killed in Iranian missile attack in Israel’s Beit Shemesh: rescue service

    A residential neighborhood in Beit Shemesh, located west of Jerusalem, became the target of a devastating Iranian missile attack on Sunday, resulting in significant casualties. According to Zaki Heller, spokesperson for Israel’s Magen David Adom rescue service, the assault claimed six lives and left at least 23 individuals injured.

    The attack represents a significant escalation in ongoing regional tensions, with Iranian forces launching missile barrages in response to prior military actions by the United States and Israel. Emergency personnel were immediately dispatched to the impact site, working tirelessly to extract victims from the debris and provide critical medical assistance to the wounded.

    Beit Shemesh, typically a quiet residential community, has now become the latest flashpoint in the intensifying conflict between the two nations. The strike on civilian infrastructure marks a concerning development in the military exchanges that have recently escalated between Iran and Israel.

    The international community continues to monitor the situation closely as tensions in the region reach new heights, with concerns growing about potential further retaliation and the broader implications for Middle Eastern stability.

  • Israelis unite across political divides in support of ‘justified’ war against Iran

    Israelis unite across political divides in support of ‘justified’ war against Iran

    Tel Aviv’s streets transformed into scenes of urgent preparation Saturday morning as air raid sirens sent residents scrambling—some toward bomb shelters, others loading children and belongings into vehicles to evacuate. This latest escalation with Iran has created what locals describe as a ‘new war routine’ in Israeli life, simultaneously familiar and unprecedented.

    Despite underlying fears, the conflict has generated remarkable national cohesion, temporarily bridging Israel’s deep political divisions. Orly Hareuveny, a physiotherapist and self-described leftist, sheltered from missile explosions while explaining to Middle East Eye that war has become an intrinsic part of Israeli existence—’the same as the weather is for people in England.’ Though traditionally supporting Palestinian coexistence, she views the current conflict as ‘very justified,’ characterizing Iranian leadership as ‘enemies of the world’ whose threat parallels historical persecution.

    The national consensus appears overwhelming. Central Israeli couple Osnat and Haiem (using pseudonyms) asserted that ‘everyone in Israel agrees that this war should happen,’ citing October 7th as demonstrating existential threats to Zionism. Media commentary reflects this unity, with prominent writer Ben-Dror Yemini declaring the conflict a ‘war of commandment’ representing both moral duty and national necessity.

    Even typically oppositional figures have rallied behind military action. Yair Golan of the left-wing Democrats party emphasized giving ‘full backing’ to military forces, while centrist leader Yair Lapid declared ‘no coalition and no opposition, only one people.’ Only Ayman Odeh, representing Palestinian citizens, offered dissent, noting Israel contained ‘fifty shades of militarism.’

    Political commentator Meron Rapoport confirmed widespread support, referencing polls showing half of Israelis favored striking Iran regardless of diplomatic outcomes. The conflict is widely rationalized as a ‘pre-emptive attack’ against an ‘existential threat,’ though Rapoport acknowledged underlying public fear and trauma from recent conflicts. Reports suggest military leadership has privately warned of potentially devastating consequences while publicly maintaining silence about risks.

    As Haaretz documented via Instagram, Israelis have adapted to what they term ‘coffee and arak in the parking lot’—maintaining casual routines amid emergency protocols. Yet beneath this surface normalcy, hundreds remain displaced from previous conflicts, with many suffering lasting psychological trauma, indicating the profound human cost of Israel’s perpetual war footing.

  • Israel’s military confirms Khamenei killed in operation by Israeli Air Force

    Israel’s military confirms Khamenei killed in operation by Israeli Air Force

    In an unprecedented military escalation, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have officially confirmed the successful execution of a high-profile operation resulting in the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The targeted airstrike, conducted on Sunday, directly hit Khamenei’s central leadership compound in Tehran, according to an official military statement.

    The operation, characterized by Israeli authorities as one of the most complex intelligence-driven missions in recent history, eliminated the long-serving Iranian leader who had governed the Islamic Republic since 1989. The precision strike was carried out by the Israeli Air Force utilizing advanced capabilities and was guided by what the IDF described as ‘exceptionally accurate intelligence assets.’

    Initial reports indicate that the targeted facility served as Khamenei’s primary office and command center, where he was reportedly meeting with several senior Iranian officials at the time of the attack. The confirmation marks a significant escalation in the ongoing regional tensions between the two Middle Eastern powers and represents the most dramatic development in the conflict to date.

    The operation’s success demonstrates Israel’s capability to penetrate deep into Iranian territory and execute precision strikes against highly secured locations. Military analysts anticipate substantial geopolitical repercussions across the region, with potential implications for global security dynamics and Middle Eastern power structures.

  • Israel closes Rafah crossing and all other checkpoints in the West Bank and Gaza Strip

    Israel closes Rafah crossing and all other checkpoints in the West Bank and Gaza Strip

    In a significant escalation of movement restrictions, Israeli authorities implemented a comprehensive closure of all crossings and barriers throughout the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip on Saturday. This security measure coincided with the commencement of joint military operations by Israel and the United States targeting Iranian assets.

    The Israeli Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT), the military body governing Palestinian civilian matters, announced the indefinite shutdown of all transit points including the critical Rafah crossing. The directive permits exceptions solely for Palestinians holding pre-approved ‘essential worker permits,’ which would be processed through designated terminals.

    Despite COGAT’s assertion that the Gaza closure wouldn’t exacerbate humanitarian conditions, immediate consequences emerged across the territories. In the West Bank, approximately 1,000 barriers and iron gates separating Palestinian communities were sealed, stranding hundreds of travelers. Many were compelled to sleep in vehicles or seek temporary shelter with relatives, while others faced arduous detours that transformed routine 45-minute commutes into multi-hour ordeals.

    The Palestinian Education Ministry responded to the mobility crisis by transitioning all academic institutions to remote learning, acknowledging the impossibility of students and educators reaching campuses. Medical services faced severe disruption as ambulance crews experienced significant delays in patient transfers, particularly affecting those requiring dialysis and other critical treatments.

    The Karameh border crossing connecting the West Bank with Jordan was similarly shut down, trapping numerous Palestinians including returning Umrah pilgrims. Anas Hreibat from Hebron described his family’s grueling 24-hour wait under difficult conditions with elderly relatives before being granted limited re-entry.

    Concurrently, Israeli forces implemented closures at major religious sites including Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque and Hebron’s Ibrahimi Mosque, forcibly evacuating worshippers and installing metal barriers—a security protocol previously enacted during June’s conflict with Iran.

    According to activist Bashar al-Qaryouti, these measures represent an established Israeli policy of imposing collective punishment through movement restrictions during security emergencies. He warned that prolonged closure could precipitate humanitarian disaster by severing aid and food supplies to vulnerable populations.

    In Gaza, the Rafah crossing’s closure—just one month after reopening following a two-year shutdown—further tightened the siege on over two million residents. Ismail al-Thawabta, director of the Gaza Government Media Office, condemned the action as illegal collective punishment under the Fourth Geneva Convention that directly endangers civilian lives by blocking medical access for thousands of wounded and ill Palestinians.