博客

  • Israeli bulldozers uproot West Bank olive trees ahead of harvest season

    Israeli bulldozers uproot West Bank olive trees ahead of harvest season

    On a Wednesday just weeks before Palestinian farmers were set to begin their annual olive harvest, Israeli bulldozers moved into two Palestinian villages near Jenin in the occupied West Bank, felling dozens of olive trees in a continuation of a widespread campaign to uproot cultivated groves across the territory.

    This latest round of destruction targeted agricultural plots in Ajjah and Zububa, two villages located in close proximity to Israel’s controversial separation barrier. For local families who have tended these lands for multiple generations, the destruction has delivered a devastating blow to both their livelihoods and cultural heritage.

    Zaki Jaradat, who leads Zubaba’s Village Council, confirmed that the incident on Wednesday is far from an isolated action. He reported that since the beginning of 2024, Israeli forces have already uprooted more than 2,950 olive trees across more than 300 dunams (nearly 75 acres) of prime Palestinian agricultural land in the area.

    Fuad Yahya Maqalda is one of the dozens of local farmers whose generational landholdings were destroyed in the latest operation. From the rooftop of his home, which overlooks his family’s olive groves, he was forced to watch helplessly as bulldozers cleared the land, unable to reach the site to stop the work.

    “We are unable to do anything,” Maqalda told reporters from Middle East Eye. “We cannot understand the intentions behind this uprooting. The occupation uprooted olive trees that have stood on our land since the time of our grandparents.”

    The timing of the destruction has compounded the grief for affected families, with the annual olive harvest – the most economically important event of the year for thousands of West Bank Palestinian households – mere weeks away. Maqalda detailed the full scope of his own loss: three generational family plots were targeted, with 111 trees destroyed on one plot and an additional 215 cleared from a second. “Every single one of those trees has been removed,” he said.

    Tareq Ighbariya, a spokesperson for the Palestinian Commission Against the Wall and Settlements in Jenin, explained that the actual damage on the ground frequently exceeds the limits set out in formal Israeli military orders authorizing land clearing.

    “Military orders may specify a certain area for tree uprooting or land clearing, but when they are carried out, the affected area is often much larger,” Ighbariya told Middle East Eye. “In some cases, bulldozers enter agricultural land and begin clearing it without any prior military order.”

    The mass clearing in Zububa is part of a broader pattern of encroachment on Palestinian agricultural land across the Jenin governorate. Ighbariya noted that the commission has documented similar destruction across roughly 300 dunams of farmland in recent months, adding that ongoing assessments mean the final count of damaged and cleared land may be even higher than current records show.

    For Palestinian communities in the occupied West Bank, the annual olive harvest holds meaning far beyond economic survival. While the crop provides a critical, steady source of income for thousands of families, it is also deeply woven into Palestinian cultural and social identity, with groves passed from parent to child over centuries.

    In recent years, the lead-up to and during harvest season has brought growing levels of disruption and risk for Palestinian farmers across the territory. Reports have surged of increased restrictions on access to farmland, particularly near Israeli settlements and designated military zones, alongside widespread incidents of settler violence, deliberate vandalism, crop theft, and targeted uprooting of olive groves. For many farming communities, what should be a vital annual harvest has now become a period of significant uncertainty, with families bracing for potential loss of land or attacks as they attempt to tend and collect their crops.

  • Netanyahu’s ultra-Orthodox alliance shows signs of fracture before crucial election

    Netanyahu’s ultra-Orthodox alliance shows signs of fracture before crucial election

    For almost 30 years, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has anchored his political power on a foundational alliance with ultra-Orthodox Jewish political parties, a partnership that has kept him in office through multiple terms. But as he prepares for one of the most competitive elections of his decades-long career, that long-standing governing coalition faces unprecedented strain, with the decades-long dispute over mandatory military conscription for ultra-Orthodox men pushing the partnership to a breaking point. The escalating conflict has laid bare deep fissures within Netanyahu’s right-wing bloc, leaving political observers questioning whether his two most reliable allies—United Torah Judaism (UTJ) and Shas, partners since his first term as prime minister in 1996—could abandon his bloc to align with a rival government. “There is deep disappointment and anger across the ultra-Orthodox public about their current standing,” Pnina Pfeuffer, director general of the Ultra-Orthodox Public Organisation, a civil society group focused on the community, told Middle East Eye. Pfeuffer notes that the future political alignment of ultra-Orthodox parties is now so uncertain that a break from Netanyahu is no longer a far-fetched scenario—including a potential shift to a government led by Gadi Eisenkot, Netanyahu’s most formidable challenger in years. “Eisenkot is not viewed as anti-ultra-Orthodox by the community,” she explained, referencing the former Israel Defense Forces chief’s reputation among religious voters. Avi-ram Tzoreff, an Israeli historian and human rights activist specializing in Jewish cultural, political and religious history, says the growing rift between Netanyahu and his ultra-Orthodox allies has opened unexpected new pathways for Israel’s opposition. “There is clearly a rupture between the ultra-Orthodox community and the right-wing bloc,” Tzoreff told MEE. Echoing a common slogan chanted at anti-conscription protests, Tzoreff added: “The ultra-Orthodox as a political force have made their position clear: they would rather die than be drafted. The alliance between ultra-Orthodox parties and the right is no longer a foregone conclusion.” Tzoreff argues that an Eisenkot-led opposition bloc could leverage these internal divisions to break apart what he calls the Israeli right’s “unnatural political alliance” with the ultra-Orthodox. For opposition parties aiming to oust Netanyahu, he says, a full rethink of traditional coalition-building strategies is necessary. “Once political alliances are structured around the question of ultra-Orthodox military conscription, it becomes far harder to build broad, inclusive coalitions,” he explained. “If the centre-left wants to take power, it needs to redefine how it draws the boundaries of its political camp.” The long-running exemption of ultra-Orthodox men from compulsory military service has existed for decades, allowing the group to focus on full-time religious study at yeshivas. But the issue exploded into Israel’s most divisive political flashpoint after the launch of Israel’s war on Gaza, which has seen hundreds of thousands of reservists mobilized for active duty. The unprecedented demand for military manpower has massively intensified public pressure to end the long-standing exemption. Netanyahu’s governing coalition has repeatedly failed to pass new legislation to regulate ultra-Orthodox conscription, triggering mass protests organized and backed by UTJ and Shas, and leading to the detention of dozens of ultra-Orthodox men charged with draft evasion. Last year, lawmakers from both ultra-Orthodox parties resigned from their cabinet posts to protest the coalition’s failure to advance a draft law that met their demands, though they continued to cooperate with the government on core legislative priorities. The dispute has also split Netanyahu’s own Likud party, where multiple sitting lawmakers have characterized attempts to pass a new conscription law that preserves most exemptions for ultra-Orthodox communities as an unacceptable concession to the alliance partners. Dan Illouz, a Knesset member who left Likud last month over the issue, told Israeli outlet Ynet that the right-wing bloc “has become idolatry” that “undermines our ability to advance right-wing economic and security policy,” including guaranteeing the Israeli military has sufficient personnel to meet its operational needs. For their part, ultra-Orthodox leaders have openly questioned their decades-long partnership with Netanyahu in recent months. In May, Rabbi Dov Lando, the influential spiritual leader of Degel HaTorah—one of the two factions that make up UTJ—publicly declared that “we no longer have trust in Netanyahu,” adding that the party was no longer politically “committed to him.” Last month, a senior Degel HaTorah official told Israeli newspaper Ma’ariv that “there is no such thing as a right-wing bloc anymore,” noting the party would open coalition negotiations with any political bloc that agrees to meet its core demands on conscription. Beyond the immediate tensions within Netanyahu’s coalition, the conscription dispute has laid bare deep ideological rifts among Israel’s ultra-Orthodox leadership over the country’s military campaigns and the role of the secular state. While most opposition parties across the political spectrum agree that ultra-Orthodox men should be required to serve, analysts say the debate also reflects starkly diverging views on Israel’s war in Gaza and broader regional military engagement. Those differences were thrown into sharp relief last month, when 96-year-old Rabbi Lando delivered an unusually harsh rebuke of the Religious Zionist movement, whose supporters have played a high-profile role in both the Gaza war and the expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. “They wage wars not for the sake of rescue, only for the sake of the state’s honour,” Lando said, accusing Religious Zionists of being “evil” and murderers. His comments drew widespread condemnation from across Israel’s political landscape, including from Netanyahu, who called the remarks “awful” and rejected them outright. But Lando’s statements are consistent with his long-held ideological positions. Last year, he claimed Religious Zionists had “brought physical disasters, not only spiritual ones, upon the Jewish people,” arguing that Zionist actions had left Arabs hating Jews “like never before.” Pfeuffer argues that Lando’s remarks should not be read as a direct political challenge to Netanyahu’s coalition. “Rabbi Lando is expressing an ethics-based position on the situation, not a political one, and as evidence, he never demanded leaving the government over the war,” she told MEE. Instead, she says the comments reflect a long-standing ultra-Orthodox worldview that distances the community from the Israeli state’s core military ethos. “The ultra-Orthodox don’t perceive the war as their own,” Pfeuffer said, noting that over the course of the nearly 10-month conflict, “life continued fairly normally” in ultra-Orthodox communities across Israel and the occupied West Bank. Even without immediate political fallout, Pfeuffer says Lando’s intervention is significant because it offers a clear alternative to the dominant Israeli narrative surrounding the war. “It represents moderation and restraint, which stems from a perception that our place in this land is not guaranteed and that we need to live alongside our enemies,” she explained. Tzoreff echoes that analysis, noting that Lando’s comments stem from a deeply held theological position rather than a tactical political move. “If you send someone to kill in the name of the honour of the state, you’re actually elevating the theological status of the state at the expense of Torah study,” he said. “This isn’t just a random statement. It was released to the media, and even if it doesn’t currently have broad public traction, its purpose was to build support for this position over time.” Even so, Lando’s anti-war, anti-conscription position sits uneasily with a broader shift toward the right among parts of Israel’s ultra-Orthodox electorate. According to Pfeuffer, far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir has made significant inroads among traditional Shas and UTJ voters, complicating the political calculations of ultra-Orthodox party leaders. “Part of Shas’s constituency aren’t classic Shas voters—they could vote for Ben Gvir or Likud, because they don’t live strictly ultra-Orthodox lives. Therefore, Shas needs to show that it is part of the right-wing bloc and aligned with Netanyahu,” she explained. While Pfeuffer notes that Shas remains far more committed to Netanyahu’s coalition than UTJ, Tzoreff says the party has steadily drifted toward the far right since the 2013 death of its founding spiritual leader, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef. Shas, he says, has “undergone a process of Ben Gvirization,” as hardline religious figures such as the late Rabbi Meir Mazuz have gained increasing influence over the party’s policy and ideological direction. “Rabbi Ovadia was a bulwark against moving rightward,” Tzoreff explained. “Since the revered spiritual leader’s death, Shas has been struggling to set clear red lines. The party’s leadership, similar to other parties, doesn’t act to lead public opinion, but acts to please it.” Tzoreff says this rightward shift extends beyond Shas, pointing to increasingly close ties between ultra-Orthodox communities and Israel’s settler movement, as well as the growing adoption of nationalist rhetoric within many ultra-Orthodox communities. He also notes the strengthening of links between settlers and ultra-Orthodox communities in the occupied West Bank, alongside the growing acceptance of the idea that Torah study itself contributes to Israel’s national security. “But on the other hand, there’s a strong movement against military conscription,” he added. For Israel’s opposition parties, Tzoreff argues, this internal contradiction within the ultra-Orthodox community creates a unique political opening. “The role of the centre-left is to divide and conquer within the right-wing bloc,” he said. Rather than automatically ruling out cooperation with ultra-Orthodox parties, he says Netanyahu’s opponents should pursue pragmatic engagement with the group. “They need to consider partnership with the UTJ and Shas not out of idealization of the ultra-Orthodox, but because there is a political opening that can be exploited,” he added.

  • Hearing set to decide ‘terror sentencing’ of activists who targeted Barclays

    Hearing set to decide ‘terror sentencing’ of activists who targeted Barclays

    A high-stakes upcoming hearing in the UK legal system will determine whether five Palestine Action activists, already convicted of felony criminal damage, will be subjected to exceptional terrorist sentencing, a move that has sparked fierce criticism over judicial process and overreach.

    The five defendants – Brendon O’Hagan, 28, Amanda Kelly, 31, Hmeera Atiqnisar, 31, Mohammed Malik, 28, and 70-year-old Alma Yaniv – were found guilty by a jury in June 2026 of causing more than £212,000 (equivalent to $283,000) in intentional damage to a Barclays bank location in Burnley back in August 2024. Notably, their direct action protest at the branch took place months before the UK government officially proscribed Palestine Action as a terrorist organization, and this specific incident is not included among the three group-related events the government has formally designated as terrorist activity – all of which are alleged to have caused more than £1 million in damage each.

    What has made this case unprecedented in legal procedure is that the question of terrorist sentencing was never raised to the jury during the entire trial process. After the guilty verdict was returned, the trial’s presiding judge, Phillip Parry, notified defense counsel that he would consider attaching a formal “terrorist connection” to the conviction, a designation that carries far harsher legal penalties. He then referred the sentencing decision to senior judge Robert Altham, who will hold a dedicated hearing on August 21 to rule on the terror designation, two weeks ahead of the formal sentencing scheduled for September 4.

    Judge Altham’s involvement in the case has already drawn significant scrutiny from activist and legal circles. A 2018 review by the UK Court of Appeal found that Altham had handed down “manifestly excessive” prison sentences to a group of anti-fracking activists convicted of public nuisance during a protest near Blackpool. The appellate court ruled the sentences were wholly inappropriate and ordered the immediate release of all activists. One of those activists, Simon Roscoe Blevins, who received a 16-month custodial sentence from Altham in 2018, has publicly criticized Altham’s role in the current case.

    “It is surely another gross overreach to add a terror connection to sentencing after failing to mention the possibility at any point before or during trial,” Blevins said. “And given his history, Judge Altham in particular cannot be trusted to make a fair ruling on this.”

    Criticism has also come directly from Palestine Action leadership. Huda Ammori, co-founder of the group, called Altham’s appointment to decide the terror designation “shocking.” Ammori noted that in both the current Barclays case and a separate high-profile Palestine Action case tried recently near Bristol, juries were given no indication that a criminal damage conviction could open the door to terrorist sentencing.

    “In both the Filton and the Barclays cases, the jury operated under the clear impression they were only deciding whether criminal damage occurred,” Ammori explained. “They had no idea that a conviction for this straightforward offense would effectively amount to convicting the defendants of terrorism.”

    The move to pursue terrorist designation follows a precedent set in the recent Filton case, where four activists convicted of criminal damage at an Elbit Systems facility were sentenced as terrorists despite only being convicted of non-terrorism criminal charges. Judge Parry circulated that ruling by Justice Johnson, the presiding judge in that case, to legal teams in the current Barclays trial after the conclusion of proceedings. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has since formally backed applying the terror sentencing, even though it never raised the possibility during the trial itself.

  • ‘We’ve run out of earthly solutions’: Inside Libya’s electricity crisis

    ‘We’ve run out of earthly solutions’: Inside Libya’s electricity crisis

    This summer, a striking and surreal offer laid bare the depth of Libya’s ongoing energy catastrophe. Al Robyan, one of Tripoli’s most beloved coastal seafood restaurants, took to Facebook earlier this month to advertise a deal no local business would ever normally propose: a full spread of fresh seafood for anyone willing to trade the restaurant “some fuel for the generator”.

    In a raw, frustrated caption, the restaurant wrote, “We’ve run out of earthly solutions.” The post went viral, racking up thousands of comments, many from locals joking that a generator fuel tank would cost far more than the entire seafood spread the restaurant was offering.

    Al Robyan’s desperate gambit is just one small example of how widespread the crisis has become. Across Libya this summer, residents have faced near-daily power outages stretching between six and 10 hours each day. The situation is all the more baffling and infuriating for Libyans, given that their nation is one of the most hydrocarbon-rich countries on the continent: it pumps more than 1.3 million barrels of oil per day, and counts a total population of just over 7.5 million people.

    “Since these massive shortages started, every business in Libya has been affected,” explained Alaeddin Muntasser, a retired Tripoli-based businessman, who calls the current situation an “electricity disaster.” Speaking to Middle East Eye, Muntasser described the cascading impacts of extended blackouts, noting that one local water-bottling facility was knocked offline for weeks, leading to widespread drinking water shortages across parts of the capital. Without power to operate pumps and filtration systems, the plant could not produce bottled product, leaving communities without a reliable supply.

    Muntasser added that the crisis has already pushed countless small local eateries to close permanently. Only a small number of operations that can afford to purchase and fuel a private generator have managed to stay open. For ordinary households, the impact has been equally devastating: many families enduring the longest blackouts have lost all the perishable food stored in their refrigerators and freezers, adding unnecessary financial strain to already stretched household budgets.

    The crippling power shortages have already sparked mass public protests across multiple Libyan cities, including Tripoli, Zawiya, and Misrata. Demonstrators are not only demanding urgent action to restore a consistent power supply; they have also called for the resignation of Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibah, whose internationally recognized government controls western Libya.

    To understand why a nation with Africa’s largest proven oil reserves faces such constant power shortages requires looking at decades of structural collapse and political division. Libya generates roughly 70% of its electricity from domestic natural gas, with the remaining share coming from oil. This makes the national power grid extremely vulnerable to declining production and operational disruptions at gas fields and along pipeline networks, problems that have mounted for years.

    “The electricity crisis and related protests is one of those problems that will not go away until Libya’s government can implement a longer-term strategy that ensures a more reliable electricity supply, whether that be through refined fuels or renewable energy sources,” explained Hamish Kinnear, principal Middle East and North Africa analyst at risk intelligence firm Verisk Maplecroft, in an interview with Middle East Eye. Kinnear noted that while energy crises are not uncommon across the region, “for citizens of a country with the largest oil reserves and the fifth largest gas reserves in Africa, as well as significant solar power potential, blackouts are a particular source of frustration.”

    The roots of today’s crisis stretch back more than a decade, to the 2011 NATO-backed uprising that toppled and killed longtime leader Muammar Gaddafi and threw the country into years of chaotic division. In the years since the uprising, Libya has split into two rival governing blocs: the internationally recognized administration led by Dbeibah in the west, and a separate eastern government backed by military forces under General Khalifa Haftar and aligned with foreign powers.

    Years of systemic underinvestment in both gas production and power grid infrastructure, combined with this year’s record-breaking heatwave that pushed temperatures above 50°C, have combined to create the perfect storm that collapsed the system this summer.

    “Oil wealth only becomes reliable electricity when institutions can convert it, and Libya’s institutions have been fractured for over a decade,” said Karim Elgendy, executive director of the Carbon Institute, a think tank focused on energy and climate issues across the Middle East and North Africa. “Rival authorities issue competing decisions over the same grid and the utility recovers almost none of its costs. Years of deferred maintenance have left the network running on ageing equipment with no margin for error. So every summer becomes a stress test the grid is not ready for,” Elgendy told Middle East Eye.

    In a bid to ease the immediate shortfall this summer, Libya turned to its neighbor Egypt for emergency assistance. Earlier this year, the two nations signed a memorandum of understanding to deepen energy sector cooperation, with senior officials from both sides meeting in July to discuss expanding energy ties. Following July’s widespread blackouts, Egypt increased its electricity exports to Libya by around 43%, bringing total shipments to 100 megawatts. Even with this sharp increase, however, the additional supply meets only a small fraction of Libya’s total needs, covering less than 10% of the country’s current generation shortfall. Libya also settled $90 million in outstanding unpaid energy dues to Egypt as part of the agreement.

    On paper, energy cooperation between the two nations makes intuitive sense: Libya holds massive untapped hydrocarbon reserves, while Egypt has existing refining capacity, power generation infrastructure, and engineering contractors that could help Libya develop its resources. “The complementarity between the two economies is real: Libya has the hydrocarbons, Egypt has the refining, the generation fleet and the contractors,” Elgendy noted. But he added that “genuine integration begins when both sides commit to a long-term commercial framework with obligations running both ways,” a commitment that has yet to materialize.

    There is also a hidden risk to Libya relying on Egyptian electricity imports: Egypt itself is facing growing energy security challenges, as its domestic natural gas production has declined amid depleting mature reserves. “Egypt’s own power system leans heavily on imported gas it does not control, and recent supply interruptions showed how quickly that exposure travels down the chain. A country importing electricity from Egypt is, indirectly, importing Egypt’s gas risk,” Elgendy explained. Egypt has already turned to foreign suppliers to meet its growing gas demand, signing a landmark $35 billion deal with Israel in 2025 that will nearly triple Egyptian imports from the Israeli Leviathan offshore gas field.

    Many analysts remain deeply skeptical that the recent energy cooperation agreements between Libya and Egypt will deliver meaningful long-term relief for Libyans. Jalel Harchaoui, a Libya specialist at the Royal United Services Institute, argues that the recent diplomatic outreach is “not to be taken seriously” as a solution to Libya’s electricity crisis. Harchaoui believes that energy needs are not the primary driver of the recent diplomatic engagement, framing it instead as a superficial diplomatic gesture. “I think it would be very incorrect to say that the electricity situation is the reason for the meeting,” he told Middle East Eye. “There has been a pattern whereby Tripoli tends to say to Egypt: ‘Let’s talk. And by the way, I notice you’re suffering from energy shortages. Libya has a small population and a lot of energy, Tripoli is happy to help you, Egypt.’” He called the gesture “more of a diplomatic trick than something really genuine, especially during a summer when Libya itself is grappling with a very serious electricity crisis.”

    Harchaoui argues that the core problem has been ignored by Libyan policymakers for more than a decade. Libya holds massive onshore and offshore natural gas reserves, “but the error that Libya made, and it’s a profound error with long-time consequences, is that it hasn’t kept up in terms of natural gas production capacity.” While natural gas generates roughly three-quarters of the country’s electricity, “years have gone by with no new natural gas project of any significance even being launched.”

    As a result, existing gas infrastructure is seeing declining output, and even if a major new project were approved today, Harchaoui said it would take at least seven to eight years to come online. If current trends continue, he warned, Libya could be forced to import natural gas within just a few years — a deeply humiliating reversal for a major hydrocarbon producer that would eliminate any narrative of complementary energy ties between Libya and Egypt.

    Harchaoui attributes the failure to both cultural priorities and systemic corruption. For decades, Libya’s economy has centered almost entirely on crude oil production, leading policymakers to treat natural gas development as an afterthought, even though it powers the vast majority of the country’s electricity. Systemic corruption has also slowed progress dramatically, not only diverting public funds away from infrastructure projects but also dragging out decision-making as officials negotiate bribes. “To do a corrupt project, you need more time than to do an honest project, because you have to make sure all the key officials are satisfied with their bribes,” Harchaoui said, alleging that some power plant units purchased between 2022 and 2025 were actually secondhand equipment that was misrepresented as new to siphon off public funds.

    Political division has also shaped where public anger over the crisis has boiled over. Harchaoui noted that Dbeibah has repeatedly unfulfilled promises to “resolve” the electricity crisis since taking office in 2021, leading to concentrated unrest in western Libya, where public protest is far easier to organize than in eastern Libya under Haftar’s tighter authoritarian grip. Blackouts have hit eastern and southern Libya just as hard, Harchaoui stressed, but public discontent there has not translated into the same level of visible political unrest.

  • UN chief denounces Russia, Ukraine for civilian deaths

    UN chief denounces Russia, Ukraine for civilian deaths

    After more than four years of full-scale conflict between Russia and Ukraine, a sharp escalation in long-range mutual strikes has pushed civilian casualty numbers to new highs, prompting the United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to publicly condemn attacks on population centers on both sides and call for an immediate end to violations of international humanitarian law.

    The cycle of violence accelerated this week. On Wednesday, a Russian ballistic missile strike hit a commercial warehouse complex on the outskirts of Kyiv, killing at least 17 people and destroying storage facilities held by multiple retail operators. The attack was widely interpreted as a direct retaliation for repeated Ukrainian strikes on assets linked to Wildberries, the Russian e-commerce giant often called “Russia’s Amazon” that has emerged as a recent target for Ukrainian forces.

    Overnight into Thursday, Ukraine launched one of its deepest cross-border drone attacks of the war, striking two key Russian oil refineries located hundreds of kilometers from the front lines. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed that targets were hit in the Yaroslavl region, 700 kilometers from the conflict zone, and Bashkortostan, 1,300 kilometers inland from the front. The governor of Yaroslavl called the assault the “most massive” drone attack on the region since the war began, with Russian defense officials reporting that 92 of more than 600 total Ukrainian drones downed overnight were shot down over the region. A drone also struck a Wildberries logistics center in Russia’s Tver region, extending Ukraine’s recent campaign against the e-commerce firm.

    Russian forces responded quickly to the Ukrainian attack with new strikes across Ukrainian territory. Overnight strikes killed two civilians at a train station in Lozova, located in Ukraine’s northeastern Kharkiv region. In the Black Sea off Ukraine’s Odesa coast, a Russian strike hit a commercial cargo vessel carrying Ukrainian grain, leaving one crew member dead, according to Odesa’s regional governor. Kyiv’s air defense forces were unable to intercept any of the Russian missiles launched in this wave of attacks, intensifying Zelensky’s urgent pleas for additional air defense supplies from Western allies.

    Speaking through his spokesperson Farhan Haq on Thursday, Guterres highlighted the alarming pattern of escalating strikes on populated areas that has driven the rising civilian death toll. “Attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure are a clear violation of international humanitarian law, and must stop immediately,” Haq told reporters. Zelensky framed Ukraine’s deep strikes into Russian territory as a step toward eventual negotiations, saying in a social media post alongside footage of burning Russian infrastructure that “Russia must choose peace.” But four years into the full-scale conflict, diplomatic talks remain completely stalled, with both sides continuing to ramp up the intensity of long-range attacks.

    In a parallel development announced Thursday, Zelensky will make his first visit to Serbia since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion this coming Saturday. Serbia has long been a traditional ally of Moscow and is one of the few European countries that has refused to impose sanctions on Russia over the invasion. A senior Ukrainian official told Agence France-Presse that the visit amounts to a “slap in the face for the Russians,” while Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic confirmed the official visit, noting that talks will cover both countries’ EU accession bids, as well as economic and energy cooperation. Vucic emphasized that Serbia’s current policy toward the conflict will remain unchanged “until further notice” despite Zelensky’s upcoming visit.

    Separately on Thursday, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) issued an urgent warning over growing safety risks at the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, Europe’s largest nuclear facility. IAEA Director Rafael Grossi said that the plant has seen a sharp rise in unplanned off-site power outages, a trend that he called “deeply concerning and clearly not sustainable.” Plant personnel continue to report regular military activity and explosions close to the facility site multiple times every day, Grossi added, repeating the agency’s longstanding call for “maximum military restraint” around the plant. Located close to active front lines, the Zaporizhzhia plant has repeatedly lost external power, forcing it to rely on emergency diesel generators to maintain cooling for its nuclear reactors. The facility most recently lost off-site power briefly on Tuesday, though the cause of the outage remains unconfirmed as of Thursday.

  • UK: Dozens of MPs urge Shabana Mahmood not to block evacuation from Gaza

    UK: Dozens of MPs urge Shabana Mahmood not to block evacuation from Gaza

    A cross-party coalition of more than 85 Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom has sounded the alarm over allegations that the UK government is halting the evacuation of dozens of vulnerable Palestinian women and children from conflict-ravaged Gaza, penning an official letter to Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood to demand urgent action. The correspondence, organized by Labour MP Kim Johnson and sent Thursday, draws attention to a months-long administrative freeze that has left eligible families trapped in a war zone, separated from loved ones already residing in the UK.

    The crisis traces back to September 2024, when the Home Office paused all new refugee family reunion applications to draft stricter replacement regulations. Five months on, those new rules have yet to be published, leaving pre-suspension applicants – many of whom are Gaza-based families waiting to join immediate family members already settled in Britain – in legal limbo, with their journeys to safety completely blocked.

    Johnson, in comments to independent outlet Middle East Eye, emphasized that family reunification is far more than a bureaucratic procedure for families surviving the catastrophic violence in Gaza. “Family reunification should never be treated as a political bargaining chip,” she said. “For families enduring the horrors of Gaza, it is a lifeline – often the only hope of safety and the chance to hold their loved ones again.” She went on to argue that unnecessary administrative delay is indefensible in the face of mass trauma, adding, “At a time of unimaginable loss and trauma, the very least we should be doing is ensuring those with a legal right to be together are not torn apart by needless Home Office obstruction. We cannot allow bureaucracy to stand in the way of humanity.”

    Signatories to the letter stretch across the UK political spectrum, including high-profile Labour MPs such as Diane Abbott, John McDonnell, Richard Burgon, Abtisam Mohamed and Diane Abbott, all three Green Party Westminster MPs, multiple members of the Parliamentary Independent Alliance, and several MPs from the Liberal Democrats and Scottish National Party.

    The letter outlines serious allegations of discriminatory treatment against Palestinian applicants. It notes that the Foreign Office has already given approval for many UK-based Palestinians to evacuate their family members from Gaza, but the Home Office has repeatedly refused to issue the required travel documentation needed to complete the journey. In some cases, the Home Office has even launched legal challenges to block entry – a harsher approach than that applied to refugee families from other global conflict zones seeking reunion, the letter claims.

    MPs also highlighted that the government’s pledged medical evacuation scheme, which promised to bring 300 seriously ill Palestinian children in need of life-saving treatment from Gaza to the UK, has still not delivered on its commitments. They highlighted the specific case of two teenage evacuees, 12-year-old Mahmoud Mansi and 15-year-old Obaida Atwan, who met former Prime Minister Keir Starmer in December 2024. At that meeting, Starmer publicly promised to use all his power to help the boys reunite with their remaining family still trapped in Gaza. As of this week, the families have received no update on their applications, more than four months after the meeting.

    The letter lays out two clear demands for Mahmood: first, to urgently restart the family reunification process for eligible Palestinian applicants and coordinate with Foreign Office counterparts to facilitate the immediate evacuation of all people already approved for entry to the UK; second, to revise Home Office policy to ensure Palestinian applicants from Gaza receive equal treatment to refugees from other regions applying for family reunion visas. Middle East Eye confirmed it has reached out to the Home Office requesting a formal response to the allegations and demands.

    This intervention comes amid growing internal pressure on the Starmer administration over its approach to the Gaza conflict. Earlier this month, leading Labour figure Andy Burnham publicly apologized for his party’s early response to Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, shortly before he took office as prime minister. “I know many people feel that at the start of Israel’s military action in Gaza, my party didn’t get it right, and I am sorry about that. The response has too often not been good enough. We need to do better,” Burnham said. He described the “unbearable suffering” in Gaza as a “scar on our collective conscience” and called for greater diplomatic pressure on the Israeli government to end its expanding occupation of Gaza territory.

    This pressure also comes amid revelations of UK military involvement in the region: declassified records confirm the UK carried out hundreds of surveillance flights over Gaza during the military campaign, sharing intelligence with Israeli forces, a move the government has insisted was solely for hostage rescue operations. The Starmer administration has taken some limited steps toward accountability, imposing a partial arms embargo on Israel in 2024 and formally recognizing Palestinian statehood last September.

  • Iran: Trump says he’d rather make deal than ‘kill people’ amid reports of weapons shortages

    Iran: Trump says he’d rather make deal than ‘kill people’ amid reports of weapons shortages

    Volatility has surged across the Middle East this week, as overlapping diplomatic and military developments create a fragile security landscape spanning from the Persian Gulf to the Eastern Mediterranean. The most consequential shift came from U.S. President Donald Trump, who announced Wednesday evening during a Las Vegas public event that Washington is currently engaged in direct talks with Iran, and that the administration prioritizes a negotiated agreement over new large-scale military action against Tehran.

    Trump surprised attendees by revealing that the U.S. had finalized plans for what he called “the biggest attack since World War II” before Iranian leadership requested negotiations. “I would rather make a deal with Iran because I don’t want to kill people,” he stated, while doubling down on his long-held policy that Iran will never be permitted to develop a nuclear weapon under his administration.

    Trump’s announcement comes amid conflicting reports surrounding severe munitions shortages within the U.S. military, which multiple anonymous sources have tied to the decision to halt planned large-scale strikes against Iran. The Washington Post first reported last week that Trump confronted Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during a cabinet meeting over the unaddressed critical deficit in key weapons stockpiles, which had been depleted by ongoing conflict with Iran. According to sources familiar with the exchange, Hegseth pushed back against criticism and placed blame on Deputy Defense Secretary Stephen Feinberg, accusing him of failing to keep the president fully informed about the true state of U.S. munitions reserves.

    Multiple U.S. outlets have since corroborated the severity of the stockpile shortfall. CNN reported Wednesday, citing three unnamed defense sources, that the Pentagon’s stock of critical air defense interceptors has dropped to dangerously low levels following months of combat operations against Iran. The outlet confirmed that roughly 80 percent of the U.S. military’s pre-war THAAD anti-missile inventory has been expended, while half of all Patriot air defense interceptors have been used since the opening of hostilities. One senior defense source added that “virtually all” of the military’s most accurate long-range surface-to-air weapons have been deployed and exhausted in the same period.

    The White House has forcefully denied all reports of a munitions crisis. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed the Washington Post story as “100 percent fake news” and said Trump retains “the utmost confidence” in Hegseth. Trump doubled down on this pushback in posts to his social media platform Truth Social, insisting that the U.S. military maintains massive stockpiles of key munitions and that domestic weapons manufacturing is expanding at historic rates. “The US has massive amounts of ‘munitions’, especially of certain types,” he wrote, adding that large volumes of new weapons are being produced and shipped to the Middle East “as needed”. He also claimed that “Defense companies are building the largest number of plants and factories in our country’s history”, before threatening harsh action against officials who leaked information about the stockpile issue, writing: “‘Leakers’ of these treasonous statements are being hunted down… long term jail sentences will be sought.”

    Simultaneously, violence has intensified along the Lebanon-Israel border even as U.S.-brokered peace negotiations enter their third day in Rome, marking the seventh round of talks to de-escalate the months-long conflict. Lebanon’s health ministry confirmed Thursday that an Israeli strike on the southern Lebanese town of Burj Shemali left eight people wounded. The attack followed a broader escalation of Israeli operations across southern Lebanon, including what Lebanese state media called a “wide-scale aggression” targeting the coastal city of Tyre. The Tyre strikes wounded four people, forced their evacuation to nearby hospitals, and displaced dozens of local residents from their homes.

    The current diplomatic push is deadlocked on core demands: Lebanese negotiators are insisting that Israel end all cross-border bombardment and withdraw its forces from roughly 60 Lebanese villages and towns that Israeli forces occupied during a ground offensive launched in March. Israeli negotiators, by contrast, are demanding that the Lebanese military fully disarm and dismantle Hezbollah’s military infrastructure across southern Lebanon. Israeli military and political leaders have signaled they are prepared to escalate operations if talks do not deliver their desired outcome. Israel’s public broadcaster reported Thursday that the military’s response to alleged Hezbollah border violations “has not ended”, and that sensitive offensive operations are ongoing. Israeli Channel 12 also reported that senior military commanders are asking the country’s political leadership to approve a “stronger and more decisive” military campaign across southern Lebanon.

    In a separate incident in the Persian Gulf early Thursday, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) reported that a commercial tanker transiting the Strait of Hormuz recorded two explosions approximately nine nautical miles southeast of the Omani village of Kumzar. The advisory confirmed that the vessel and all crew members escaped unharmed, and no leaks or environmental damage have been detected. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most critical chokepoints for global energy supplies, with roughly 20 percent of the world’s daily oil consumption passing through the waterway.

  • TikTok star Sydney Towle, who shared her cancer journey online, dies aged 26

    TikTok star Sydney Towle, who shared her cancer journey online, dies aged 26

    Sydney Towle, a beloved 26-year-old social media creator who turned her personal journey with a rare and aggressive cancer into a global platform for awareness and hope, has passed away from complications of her long-standing illness. Her family confirmed her death in an announcement posted across her social media channels Thursday, revealing that cholangiocarcinoma — the rare bile duct cancer she fought for nearly three years — had spread to multiple organs across her body.

    In a joint TikTok video posted alongside their mother, Towle’s brother Austin shared that the young influencer died peacefully, just days after she was transferred to hospice care for end-of-life support. At the time of her death, Towle, who resided in New York City, had built a community of more than 1.2 million followers across TikTok and Instagram, where she openly documented every step of her experience as a young person navigating chemotherapy, treatment setbacks, and the messy, beautiful complexity of living with a terminal diagnosis.

    In a formal statement shared after her passing, Towle’s family emphasized how proud they were of her relentless fight and her choice to open her life to the public. “She wanted to raise awareness for rare cancers and was passionate about promoting self-advocacy,” the statement read. “We will continue her legacy and honour her in every way we can.”

    News of Towle’s death sparked an outpouring of grief and tribute across her social platforms, with thousands of followers leaving messages of gratitude for her transparency and celebrating the impact she had on their own lives. Many shared how her unflinching honesty about cancer changed their perspective on their own struggles, while others sent condolences to her family for their loss.

    Towle’s journey with advanced cancer was marked by consistent courage and unshakable optimism, even in the face of devastating prognosis updates. In May of this year, she shared a series of videos from her hospital bed, revealing that her cancer had spread to her peritoneum — the thin membrane that lines the abdomen and protects internal organs. In a widely viewed video posted May 19, she sat beside her mother and shared that her longtime oncologist had decided to stop active treatment and recommended she transition to end-of-life care. Refusing to surrender, Towle announced she would switch to a new specialist and continue her fight.

    Even through the most grueling rounds of treatment, Towle refused to let cancer define her joy. She regularly posted lighthearted, uplifting content of herself dancing, getting ready for outings, and spending time with friends, choosing to focus on the small, happy moments that make life meaningful. Just weeks before her death, she checked a long-held dream off her bucket list: she walked the runway as a model at Miami Swim Week, featuring a swimsuit look for The Chemo Club x Post Swim show.

    Towle was also celebrated for her openness about the physical changes that came with her treatment, often sharing unedited photos of her abdomen where a hepatic artery pump was implanted to deliver targeted chemotherapy. “I have only recently started seeing the resilience and beauty in this body,” she wrote alongside swimsuit photos posted last year. “Scars that remind me of how far I’ve come. And I’m reminded that dreams only end when you allow them.”

    Beyond her own journey, she was passionate about driving progress in cancer research, often organizing fundraisers with her community. “Rich in life because my friends choose to spend a Saturday fundraising for cancer research,” she shared in a March post. In another post from 2023, she offered a message of perspective that resonated with thousands of followers: “Go get a pint of Ben and Jerry’s, watch your favourite movie, remember that life is good and bad things happen sometimes but that doesn’t make it a bad life.”

  • How Ukraine is taking the war ‘deeper’ into Russia

    How Ukraine is taking the war ‘deeper’ into Russia

    Over recent weeks, the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia has entered a new phase, as Ukrainian offensive operations have pushed the scope of war deeper into Russian territory by focusing on critical infrastructure that underpins Moscow’s military and economic capacity. Multiple targeted strikes have hit key nodes of Russia’s military supply chains, which are responsible for moving ammunition, equipment, and troop reinforcements to frontline positions. Additionally, critical economic assets, including energy infrastructure, logistics hubs, and industrial facilities that support Russia’s war effort, have also been struck.

    This shift in strategy marks a notable departure from earlier phases of the conflict, when most Ukrainian defensive and offensive operations were concentrated within its internationally recognized borders. By extending strikes into Russia itself, Ukrainian military planners aim to disrupt the flow of resources that sustain Russia’s invasion force, increase pressure on Moscow’s political and military leadership, and expose vulnerabilities in the Russian rear that have long been considered secure.

    Military analysts note that this strategy has already created significant logistical challenges for Russian command, forcing them to reroute supply lines and divert defensive resources away from frontline areas to protect critical domestic infrastructure. At the same time, the development has raised international concerns about the potential for the conflict to escalate further, drawing neighboring countries into broader hostilities and increasing the risk of unintended confrontations between nuclear-armed powers. While Ukrainian officials frame the strikes as a legitimate act of self-defense against an unprovoked invasion, Russian authorities have condemned the attacks as acts of terrorism and have pledged retaliatory measures against Ukrainian infrastructure.

  • South Korea space agency shares Moon images after SpaceX rocket debris crash

    South Korea space agency shares Moon images after SpaceX rocket debris crash

    On Wednesday, a discarded upper stage of a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket made an unplanned, high-speed crash into the lunar surface, and South Korea’s national space body has now released unprecedented imagery capturing the event. The Korean AeroSpace Administration (KASA) obtained new shots of the impact site from its Danuri lunar orbiter, pairing the post-crash photographs with earlier clear images of the same section of the Moon to document the collision’s effect. According to KASA’s official timing, the debris made contact with the Moon at approximately 06:35 GMT. SpaceX has publicly confirmed that the impact was never part of the mission’s original design.

    This incident is the end of an 18-month uncontrolled drift for the 4,000-kilogram empty rocket stage, roughly the volume of a five-story building. The Falcon 9 launch that left the stage adrift took place from Cape Canaveral, Florida in January 2025, with the rocket’s core mission being to deliver two lunar landers toward their lunar trajectory. After completing the burn that sent the landers out of Earth’s orbit on their moon-bound path, the spent upper stage was left drifting in a wide looping orbit that crossed between Earth and the Moon. Over a year and a half, cumulative subtle gravitational pulls from the Earth, Moon, and Sun, combined with faint pressure from solar radiation, gradually altered the stage’s orbit. Astronomers tracking the debris calculated months ago that these small incremental shifts would eventually send the object crashing into the Moon at a projected speed of around 8,700 kilometers per hour (5,400 miles per hour), matching the final impact.

    Even for dedicated amateur astronomers working with advanced professional-grade telescopes, the brief, faint flash generated by the collision was nearly impossible to detect, as the impact occurred during daylight hours for most populated regions of the globe. That has left large institutional observatories, including KASA’s orbiting lunar research platform, to collect and analyze the only usable data from the event. While the crash posed zero risk to human life or infrastructure on Earth, it has reignited longstanding concerns among astronomy and space experts about the growing crisis of uncontrolled space debris.

    Matt Bothwell, an astronomer at the University of Cambridge, noted that near-Earth and cislunar space are growing increasingly crowded as commercial and government actors launch hundreds of new satellites and mission components every year. “It could feasibly be within a few decades that it’s actually quite hard to get past Earth’s orbit because space is so crowded,” Bothwell warned, highlighting the growing risk of catastrophic collisions that could render key orbital regions unusable for future missions.

    Notably, the first-stage booster from the same January 2025 Falcon 9 mission is still in active, reusable service, and is scheduled to lift off on its 18th operational flight as early as August 10. The upcoming mission will carry 29 new Starlink internet satellites to low-Earth orbit, continuing SpaceX’s routine commercial launch cadence amid the debris discussion.