博客

  • Iraqi government orders probe over weapons smuggling to Hezbollah in Lebanon

    Iraqi government orders probe over weapons smuggling to Hezbollah in Lebanon

    In a high-stakes move that reshapes regional diplomatic dynamics, Iraq’s Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi has ordered the creation of a specialized high-level investigative committee to probe networks smuggling advanced weapons from Iraq through Syria to Lebanon’s Iran-aligned Hezbollah, in direct coordination with Syria’s new post-Assad administration.

    The announcement follows a confirmed seizure by Syrian security forces earlier this Thursday, which foiled an attempted smuggling operation along the Syria-Iraq border. According to Syria’s state-owned news agency Sana, citing an anonymous interior ministry source, the intercepted cache was explicitly bound for Hezbollah and contained a lethal arsenal including long-range missiles, anti-armor guided munitions, and unmanned aerial vehicles.

    Iraq’s Joint Operations Command, a military body that reports directly to the prime minister’s office, has pledged full accountability for any officials found complicit in the smuggling activity. The command emphasized that the investigation is focused on protecting the integrity of Iraq’s shared border, upholding national stability, and blocking actions that threaten the country’s national security.

    The probe comes against a shifting geopolitical backdrop in the Middle East. Syria’s current ruling administration took power in December 2024 after ousting former President Bashar al-Assad, a long-standing close ally of both Iran and Iraq. During Syria’s decade-long civil war, multiple Iraqi armed factions deployed into Syrian territory to back Assad against opposition forces, with some of these factions holding key influence over the Iraqi government that took office in May 2024.

    Like all preceding Iraqi governments, Iraq’s current administration has navigated a precarious balancing act between its eastern neighbor Iran and the United States alongside its Western and regional allies. Even as Baghdad has moved to build constructive diplomatic ties with Syria’s new government and support efforts to stabilize the war-torn country, it has faced sustained pressure from Washington to crack down on Iran-aligned armed groups operating within its borders, particularly those targeting U.S. and Israeli assets across the Middle East.

    The escalating standoff between the U.S. and Iran has pushed Iraqi leaders to reiterate their commitment to cooperation with Washington, with al-Zaidi overseeing negotiations to expand bilateral partnership during an official visit to the U.S. capital this week.

    Hayder al-Shakeri, a research fellow in the Middle East and North Africa program at London-based think tank Chatham House, explained that the investigation serves a clear diplomatic purpose. Al-Shakeri told Middle East Eye that the move allows Baghdad to demonstrate it operates independently of pro-Iran armed factions, sending a clear signal to the U.S. that the Iraqi government is ready to assert tighter control over unregulated cross-border networks.

    However, al-Shakeri also cautioned that the true nature of the policy shift remains to be seen. “But whether this reflects a genuine, sustained policy shift, rather than a tactical gesture, will depend on whether the government follows through with arrests, prosecutions, tighter border enforcement, and action against the political or security figures protecting these networks,” he said.

  • Israeli ministers taunt England and revel in Argentina’s World Cup win

    Israeli ministers taunt England and revel in Argentina’s World Cup win

    In a striking intersection of global football diplomacy and long-simmering political tensions, multiple senior Israeli politicians took to social media platforms on Wednesday to openly celebrate Argentina’s World Cup semi-final win over England, using the match result as an opportunity to taunt the United Kingdom while highlighting close ties between Israel and Argentina’s new right-wing administration.

    The most pointed jab came from Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who published his reaction on X within minutes of the final whistle. Smotrich, who was banned from entering the UK last year over his anti-Palestinian political positions, referenced his travel ban in his provocative post: “I indeed cannot enter Britain because I am exterminating the idea of the Palestinian state, but two goals got in nicely,” a nod to the two late match-winning goals Argentina scored against England.

    Smotrich went on to extend congratulations to Argentine President Javier Milei, whom he explicitly labeled a close friend of Israel. His far-right coalition partner, National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir – who was also sanctioned by the UK alongside Smotrich in 2023 – echoed the celebration. In a post on his own X account, Ben Gvir wrote, “Honour to whom honour is due, and now with faith toward the final.” Hours before kickoff, he had already made his allegiance clear, asking followers, “Do I really have to explain to you why I pray with all my heart for Argentina to win tonight and make it into the final?”

    The UK’s 2023 sanctions on Smotrich and Ben Gvir came after then-Foreign Secretary David Lammy accused the two senior ministers of inciting extremist violence and perpetrating serious abuses against Palestinian human rights. Smotrich has spearheaded Israel’s push for de facto annexation of large swathes of the occupied West Bank, while Ben Gvir leads Israel’s prison and detention system – a facility network multiple international human rights organizations have documented as operating what they term “torture camps.” Both men have also been identified as key decision-makers in Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, which has drawn widespread international condemnation for mass civilian casualties.

    The political celebration of Argentina’s win was not limited to the two far-right ministers already sanctioned by the UK. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, who has Argentine ancestral roots and held talks with Lammy in London last year, joined in the taunting with a playful jab at England’s iconic fan chant. “How does the song go? ‘It’s coming home.’ Yes, it is. It’s coming home to Argentina. Vamos Argentina,” he wrote on X.

    Sa’ar is currently based in the United States for a series of diplomatic meetings with Latin American allies of Israel. A formal statement from Israel’s foreign ministry confirmed that alongside discussions about political shifts across Latin America and regional security threats, the delegation “also raised a glass to Argentina’s impressive victory in the World Cup semi-final.”

    Israel’s current government has positioned right-wing leaders across Latin America, including Milei, as key strategic allies, with most of these leaders publicly backing Israel’s actions in Gaza. Even ahead of Argentina’s win over England, Sa’ar secured a diplomatic breakthrough during meetings with Colombia’s incoming foreign minister Omar Bula Escobar, where the two sides agreed to restore full diplomatic relations after years of strained ties triggered by Colombia’s criticism of Israel’s Gaza war.

    Other senior Israeli figures also publicly backed Argentina ahead of and after the semi-final match. Israel’s Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon posted a simple, clear message of support: “Vamos Argentina.” Transport Minister Miri Regev, a senior member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud party, extended congratulations directly to the Argentine public and Milei, adding, “Keeping my fingers crossed for you in the final” – ahead of Argentina’s upcoming final match against Spain, one of the most vocal critics of Israel’s policies in Europe.

    Argentina’s progression to a second consecutive World Cup final, following their 2022 trophy win in Qatar, has not been without controversy. Multiple contentious refereeing decisions throughout the tournament have sparked widespread accusations that FIFA has shown undue favoritism to the South American side. Scrutiny has been particularly intense across the Arab world: after Argentina’s narrow last-16 win over Egypt, Egyptian head coach Hossam Hassan publicly accused FIFA of pushing Argentina through for commercial and marketing reasons, sparking a broad wave of criticism of both the governing body and the Argentine team.

  • Dua Lipa backs Albania’s ‘Flamingo Revolution’ against Kushner-backed resort

    Dua Lipa backs Albania’s ‘Flamingo Revolution’ against Kushner-backed resort

    Global pop superstar Dua Lipa has thrown her public support behind Albania’s growing environmental protest movement, dubbed the “Flamingo Revolution,” which opposes a $1.6 billion luxury coastal development tied to the Trump family that would tear into one of the country’s most ecologically vulnerable protected landscapes.

    The British pop icon, who has Kosovo Albanian heritage, shared her praise for the grassroots demonstrators during an episode of her Service95 book club podcast, in a conversation with prominent Albanian academic and author Lea Ypi. With grassroots protests entering their 46th consecutive week, Lipa emphasized that she finds the demonstrators’ unwavering commitment deeply inspiring.

    “ I find it so inspiring to see how much people really care. Day after day they’re hitting the streets, because the government has opened up this part of a beautiful nature reserve to a high-end beachfront development,” Lipa said in comments shared widely on social media following the podcast recording.

    Lipa’s high-profile intervention has already shifted global attention back to a months-long movement that Albania’s ruling government has been unable to suppress or dismiss. The protests were ignited by plans for the massive luxury development project led by Affinity Partners, the private investment firm founded by Jared Kushner, former President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior White House advisor. The project calls for construction of roughly 10,000 hotel and resort rooms across a largely untouched stretch of Albania’s Adriatic coastline, spanning ecologically sensitive Sazan Island and the Zvernec Peninsula, adjacent to the protected Vjosa-Narta wetland landscape.

    This coastal wetland system is a critical protected habitat for a wide array of vulnerable wildlife, including greater flamingos, Mediterranean monk seals, endangered sea turtles, and dozens of species of migratory birds that rely on the undeveloped ecosystem for breeding and resting along intercontinental migration routes.

    Critics, including Lipa, have singled out the opaque and controversial process that cleared the way for the development. In 2024, Prime Minister Edi Rama’s administration pushed through amendments to Albania’s national protected areas legislation that rolled back longstanding construction restrictions in environmentally sensitive zones. After the regulatory changes, the government granted Affinity Partners’ project formal “strategic investor” status, which fast-tracked all approval processes and cut down on opportunities for public input and environmental review.

    “What I actually find concerning is the principle that the government could just change the law to remove the environmental protection without any kind of public consultation,” Lipa said, echoing a core grievance held by the protest movement.

    Rama has remained unyielding in his support for the project, dismissing widespread opposition and framing the investment as “a gift to Europe” and “an economic blessing” for Albania. He has repeatedly rejected calls to pause or cancel the development, stating publicly: “There is absolutely no chance that the investment will stop as long as I am here.”

    Lipa’s decision to speak out has been widely celebrated by social media users and activist communities, many of whom have praised the pop star for using her global platform to highlight grassroots environmental action at a time when many A-list celebrities avoid taking public stances on contentious political and environmental issues. One widely shared post on X noted that Lipa “really does shatter the imaginary belief that once someone attains a certain level of superstardom, they can’t talk about current events anymore because it’s ‘too complicated.’” Another commenter added that Lipa is proof celebrities can comfortably speak openly on pressing global and local issues, from policy to human rights to environmental protection, a step many in the entertainment industry refuse to take. The renewed global attention brought by Lipa’s endorsement has reignited pressure on the Albanian government to reconsider the project, as demonstrators continue their daily protests to protect the unique coastal ecosystem.

  • JD Vance says Epstein had connections to CIA and Mossad

    JD Vance says Epstein had connections to CIA and Mossad

    In a wide-ranging interview with prominent podcaster Joe Rogan this week, U.S. Vice President JD Vance made explosive claims linking disgraced convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein to the highest echelons of both American and Israeli intelligence circles, while also accusing hardline elements within the Israeli government of funding a covert influence campaign to derail the recent Iran negotiation agreement he spearheaded.

    Vance, who identified himself as an “original Epstein conspiracy theorist,” doubled down on long-circulated unconfirmed speculation about the late financier’s intelligence connections. When Rogan noted that a widespread popular narrative frames Epstein as an asset for Israel’s Mossad external intelligence agency, Vance said the connections could extend to either the Central Intelligence Agency, deep state actors in the U.S., Israeli intelligence, or a combination of multiple groups. He specifically pointed to ties between Epstein and left-leaning figures in Israel’s deep political establishment, naming former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak as a key example, noting that Epstein’s connections did not extend to Israel’s center-right political bloc.

    For decades, unsubstantiated theories have circulated about whether Epstein operated on behalf of a foreign or domestic intelligence service. The disgraced financier, who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting new sex trafficking charges, built a sprawling network of relationships with rich and powerful global figures, from former U.S. President Bill Clinton to pro-Israel billionaire retail magnate Les Wexner, senior British politician Peter Mandelson, and Prince Andrew, Duke of York, the late Queen Elizabeth II’s second son. Over his decades in elite social circles, Epstein was widely reported to have collected extensive compromising information on his high-profile contacts, a common intelligence tradecraft tactic for leverage.

    While no conclusive public evidence has ever emerged to confirm Epstein worked as an active intelligence asset for any nation, multiple official and unofficial records have hinted at potential connections. Earlier this year, a senior adviser to the Indian government publicly stated “100 percent” that Epstein was a Mossad asset when asked directly. The publicly released Epstein court documents confirm that the financier made donations to prominent Israeli causes, including Friends of the Israel Defense Forces and the Jewish National Fund, a group that supports Israeli West Bank settlements, and document his repeated personal connections to current and former members of Mossad. A 2020 FBI memo from the bureau’s Los Angeles field office also noted that an anonymous source had claimed Epstein was a “co-opted Mossad agent” who received formal spy training from the Israeli service.

    Beyond his claims about Epstein, Vance used the Rogan interview to level serious accusations about Israeli interference in American domestic and foreign policy, specifically targeting the Iran nuclear negotiation framework he spent months negotiating. The preliminary memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran, signed just last month, has already collapsed, and the two nations have resumed direct cross-border military strikes in recent weeks.

    According to Vance, a well-funded, covert campaign is actively working to scuttle the Iran deal to perpetuate ongoing military conflict. He specifically confirmed that some of the funding for this campaign originates from Israeli government-linked actors, referencing a recent Time magazine exposé detailing an organized Israeli influence operation targeting the Make America Great Again (MAGA) conservative base that Vance is courting as he positions himself as a potential 2028 Republican presidential candidate and a political heir to former President Donald Trump. The Time report alleges that Brad Parscale, who served as digital campaign strategist for Trump’s 2020 presidential run, receives $1.5 million per month to run the influence operation. Vance said the operation pays multiple American influencers to attack his Iran negotiation efforts, and that these critics have launched vicious personal attacks against him in an effort to keep the U.S. tied to indefinite military escalation against Iran.

    “I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that there have been people within the Israeli government who are trying to, like, actually shift us away from that policy [the Iran negotiations] because they want to continue the military campaign,” Vance told Rogan.

    The vice president pushed back against hardline hawks in the U.S. political system who have opposed the Iran deal, challenging them to present a viable alternative to negotiations. He framed himself as a “reasonable moderate” in the deeply polarized American debate over Israel policy, noting that he has faced widespread baseless accusations of antisemitism for his push for negotiations with Iran, which he called “insane.”

    When asked whether the U.S. would have entered its most recent open war with Iran if not for Israeli influence efforts, Vance replied, “Yes, yes I do.” He clarified that he shares the Biden administration’s core position that Iran must not be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon, a stance he said the president holds independent of external pressure.

    Vance also rejected the theory that Israel is able to coerce former President Trump using the Epstein files or other compromising material, calling that claim “crazy.”

  • White House teleprompter operator accused of making $100k off Trump speech bets

    White House teleprompter operator accused of making $100k off Trump speech bets

    A former White House teleprompter technician is at the center of a federal investigation after being accused of exploiting confidential access to President Donald Trump’s prepared speeches to place illegal insider bets that netted nearly $100,000 in potential profits, multiple major U.S. news outlets have confirmed.

    Gabriel Perez, who had served on the White House staff since Trump first took office in 2016, allegedly placed wagers on Kalshi, a digital prediction marketplace that allows users to bet on the outcome of real-world events, including specific word choices in high-profile political addresses. The scheme focused on major public remarks from the president, most notably the annual State of the Union address, where Perez used his advance knowledge of the speech’s text to bet that specific pre-selected terms would appear in the address.

    In an official statement shared with the BBC, Kalshi representatives confirmed that their internal risk team first flagged suspicious activity in March, when analysts identified irregular patterns in betting on the platform’s so-called “mention markets” — contract listings that let users predict whether a public speaker will reference specific topics, countries, economic phrases or campaign slogans during a given address.

    “The words of top political leaders, from presidents to Federal Reserve chairs, can move billions of dollars across foreign exchange markets, oil futures and global stock markets,” Kalshi noted in its comment, underscoring the inherent risk of insider activity on prediction contracts tied to public policy remarks.

    After cross-referencing account details and user information, the company confirmed that the account linked to the suspicious trades belonged to Perez, a federal employee responsible for drafting and operating the president’s teleprompters. Acting quickly to block potential illicit gains, Kalshi froze the account before Perez could withdraw more than $90,000 in accumulated profits.

    Robert DeNault, Kalshi’s head of enforcement, confirmed the firm immediately reported the suspicious activity to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the federal regulator that oversees prediction market platforms operating in the United States, and turned over all collected evidence to investigators.

    White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed Tuesday that President Trump had been briefed on the allegations against Perez. She stated that Perez has been placed on unpaid leave and will no longer serve on the White House staff, ending his tenure that began in 2016.

    The investigation was first reported by ABC News, and the BBC’s U.S. news partner CBS News later independently confirmed key details of the case. Sources close to the probe told reporters that Perez has been fully cooperative with CFTC investigators throughout the inquiry. As of this report, federal prosecutors in Manhattan have declined to open a criminal investigation into the matter. When reached for comment by the BBC to confirm the ongoing probe, a CFTC spokesperson said the agency could not “confirm or deny” the existence of any ongoing investigation.

  • Watch: What to know as Genoa bridge disaster trial ends

    Watch: What to know as Genoa bridge disaster trial ends

    Eight years after one of Italy’s deadliest modern infrastructure failures, the high-profile criminal trial over the 2018 collapse of Genoa’s Morandi Bridge is reaching its final stage. The tragic incident, which claimed 43 lives when a 200-meter span of the busy highway bridge crumbled onto residential and industrial areas below during a heavy rainstorm, has gripped the nation for years, sparking fierce debates over infrastructure maintenance, corporate accountability, and regulatory oversight.

    At the heart of the proceeding held in Genoa’s courthouse are more than 50 defendants facing a range of charges, including manslaughter, negligence, and failure to maintain critical infrastructure. The accused group spans a wide cross-section of stakeholders: senior executives from the companies responsible for the bridge’s design, construction, and decades of upkeep, as well as former infrastructure agency officials and public works managers who oversaw safety inspections and approval processes for the aging structure.

    The collapse immediately raised urgent questions about the state of Italy’s aging transportation network, with critics pointing to decades of underinvestment in maintenance and alleged conflicts of interest between private concessionaires and public regulatory bodies. Over the course of the trial, prosecutors have presented thousands of pages of evidence, including engineering reports, internal corporate communications, and testimonies from survivors and expert witnesses, arguing that the disaster was preventable, caused by long-known structural flaws that were left unaddressed by responsible parties.

    As the court prepares to deliver its verdict, families of the victims have pushed for full accountability, saying that justice for the 43 lives lost is the only way to prevent similar tragedies from occurring in the future. The trial’s outcome is also widely expected to set new precedents for infrastructure safety regulations and corporate liability across Italy, prompting broader reforms to how the country inspects and maintains its network of aging bridges and highways.

  • Trump speech to focus on election ‘integrity’

    Trump speech to focus on election ‘integrity’

    Nearly six years after his disputed 2020 presidential election loss, second-term U.S. President Donald Trump is preparing to deliver a primetime national address Thursday focused on what the White House frames as protecting election integrity, a move that has amplified partisan friction and stoked unease within his own Republican Party. The 80-year-old commander-in-chief has spent years amplifying unsubstantiated claims that widespread voter fraud cost him victory in the 2020 race, and this televised speech marks his latest high-profile push to advance that narrative ahead of November’s critical midterm congressional elections.

    White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt confirmed the core focus of the 9:00 pm ET (0100 GMT Friday) address in comments to reporters, framing it as a necessary intervention to address widespread voter concerns about electoral processes. “President Trump will deliver a major address to the nation on protecting the integrity of our elections, and we encourage every American to tune in,” Leavitt said, adding that the speech would include what she described as fact-backed claims that would “shock” viewers. She did acknowledge, however, that Trump will likely open his remarks with brief mentions of two top voter priorities: the ongoing Iran war and soaring U.S. cost of living, issues that Republican leaders worry Trump has largely neglected in recent public messaging.

    The path to Thursday’s address has been shrouded in incremental reveals. Trump first announced he would deliver a national speech this week on Monday, offering no details on its topic. A day later, he teased “really big news” related to “free and fair elections” but still declined to share substantive specifics about the address’s content.

    New reporting from CBS News has shed light on underreported elements of the speech’s planned content: according to the outlet, Trump will lay out previously unrevealed allegations that China interfered in U.S. elections, including claims that Beijing gained unauthorized access to American voter data. He is also expected to accuse U.S. intelligence agencies—including the Central Intelligence Agency—of failing to disclose knowledge of the alleged Chinese interference to him during his first presidential term. CBS added that the heads of the CIA, FBI, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and Department of Homeland Security have all been invited to attend the speech in person.

    A core policy priority tied to the speech is Trump’s push for Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, a sweeping piece of legislation that would install new voting restrictions across the U.S. Despite Trump’s aggressive lobbying, the bill has garnered little support even among congressional Republicans, who hold majority control of the chamber ahead of the midterms. Many of the bill’s requirements, such as proof of citizenship to register to vote, are already mandated by federal and state election laws. The proposal also adds new requirements for photo ID at polling places and imposes stricter limits on mail-in voting, a voting method Trump has repeatedly attacked since 2020.

    Trump’s refusal to accept the results of the 2020 election, in which he lost to Democrat Joe Biden, has had lasting consequences for U.S. politics. In January 2021, months after the election was called, Trump incited a crowd of his supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol in an attempt to block the certification of Biden’s victory, an act that led to his second impeachment during his first term. Now, as the country prepares for midterm elections that will determine control of the House and Senate for the final two years of Trump’s second term, the president faces a new threat: if Democrats retake control of the House of Representatives in November, he could be impeached for a third time.

    This speech marks Trump’s first major national address since April 1 of this year, when he delivered his first full public justification for the U.S.-Israeli military campaign in Iran, more than a month after the operation launched. For many congressional Republicans, the decision to center a primetime national address on election integrity, rather than top voter priorities like the Iran conflict and cost of living, has sparked deep concern that the party is misaligned with what ordinary voters care about ahead of the high-stakes midterms. For their part, Democrats have pushed back hard against the speech, arguing that Trump is spreading unproven voter fraud claims to tilt public opinion in his party’s favor ahead of the November vote.

  • Video captures tree trimmers falling 45ft

    Video captures tree trimmers falling 45ft

    A shocking on-the-job accident has been captured on camera, showing two professional tree trimmers plunging 45 feet from elevated work position while carrying out vegetation maintenance work. The incident involved Isaac Reyes and Andrew Reyes, two workers who were performing routine trimming duties at the time of the fall. According to local emergency response reports, both men sustained critical, life-threatening injuries immediately after the impact and were rushed to a nearby medical facility for urgent surgical intervention and intensive care. After several days of targeted treatment and monitoring from the hospital’s care team, the pair have made enough progress in their recovery to be released for outpatient rehabilitation and at-home care. The footage of the fall has spread across local community networks, prompting renewed discussions about worksite safety protocols for arboriculture workers who often operate at significant heights. Local occupational safety officials have not yet announced whether a formal investigation into the incident will be launched to identify the root cause of the accident and prevent similar events in the future.

  • UK school with hundreds of Muslim students evacuated after bomb threat

    UK school with hundreds of Muslim students evacuated after bomb threat

    On the last day of the 2023-2024 academic year, a prominent Muslim-faith private school in Birmingham, United Kingdom, was forced to evacuate all 450 of its 11 to 16-year-old students following a emailed bomb threat that disrupted planned end-of-term celebrations, local media has confirmed.

    Hamd House School, an institution rated “Outstanding” and lauded as “highly inclusive” by education regulator Ofsted, received the threatening email early Tuesday morning, with a copy of the message also sent directly to Ofsted itself. The threat came as students and staff gathered to distribute annual academic awards and mark the start of summer break with a day of community-focused festivities, turning a joyful annual tradition into an emergency scenario.

    Israr Khan, the school’s proprietor, told local outlet Birmingham Live that the incident caused significant unnecessary disruption to a day meant for celebration. “School was full and pupils were celebrating the last day before summer, we were giving out awards and having a day of celebration and fun on this special day, and this was hugely disrupting,” Khan said.

    Emergency response teams from West Midlands Police, including canine units trained to detect explosive materials, were dispatched immediately to sweep the entire school campus. After a thorough search of the grounds and buildings, authorities cleared the school as safe and lifted the evacuation order.

    Khan told reporters that the school appears to have been deliberately targeted, noting that this bomb threat is not an isolated event: the institution and its staff have faced a string of separate hostile incidents in recent weeks. He added that law enforcement has formally logged the incident as harassment, with an active investigation still ongoing. “The matter remains an open police investigation. An unusual and bizarre quirk to this situation is that the threat was also sent to Ofsted. The police have logged this incident as harassment,” Khan said, confirming that the school would continue full cooperation with investigating authorities.

    Neither West Midlands Police nor Hamd House School has issued additional public statements beyond the initial details shared by Khan, despite requests for comment from independent outlet Middle East Eye.

    The incident has drawn sharp criticism from the anti-Islamophobia NGO Mend, which says there has been widespread “near silence” from mainstream media and political leaders over the threat against the Muslim-majority school. In a post on social platform X, the organization questioned the double standard in how such incidents are covered and prioritized: “Ask yourself what the reaction would be if 450 children at any other school were threatened this way. The quiet tells you something about whose safety is treated as a story and whose is treated as background noise.”

    Mend has called for authorities to reclassify the investigation as a hate crime probe, arguing the threat intentionally targeted Muslim children against a backdrop of rising anti-Muslim hostility in the UK, consistent with the pattern of earlier incidents against the school and its staff.

  • Israeli opposition tops new poll as Netanyahu allies explore voting restrictions

    Israeli opposition tops new poll as Netanyahu allies explore voting restrictions

    As Israel prepares for its 27 October parliamentary election, a newly released public opinion survey from broadcaster Channel 13 has delivered a potentially game-changing projection: a coalition of opposition parties united by the goal of ousting long-serving Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would win the slimmest possible governing majority, securing 61 out of the 120 seats in the Knesset. This marks the first major poll released in over a month that shows the anti-Netanyahu bloc capable of forming a majority government without relying on support from Palestinian-majority political parties.

    Breaking down the projected seat shares, the poll forecasts that former Israeli army chief Gadi Eisenkot’s Yashar party will capture 21 seats, falling just one seat short of Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud party, which is projected to take 22 seats. Following the two leading blocs are former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett’s Together alliance at 15 seats, Yair Golan’s Democrats at 11 seats, and Avigdor Lieberman’s Yisrael Beiteinu at 10 seats. The final four seats required to push the opposition bloc across the 61-seat threshold would go to a new alliance led by Yoaz Hendel and Chili Tropper.

    By contrast, the current coalition of far-right and ultra-Orthodox parties aligned with Netanyahu falls well short of a majority in the projection. United Torah Judaism is forecast to win 8 seats, while Shas and Itamar Ben Gvir’s Jewish Power take 7 seats apiece, and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich’s Religious Zionism party is projected to win 6 seats. For Palestinian-majority parties, the poll projects Hadash-Ta’al will win 5 seats and Ra’am will take 4, while the Balad party and former Defense Minister Benny Gantz’s Blue and White both fail to cross the minimum electoral threshold required to gain parliamentary representation. Notably, Channel 13 has not released public details of the poll’s sample size or margin of error, leaving its methodological transparency unconfirmed.

    While Eisenkot has positioned himself as a leading figure in the movement to oust Netanyahu, his past policy stances suggest little substantive shift in Israeli policy toward the Gaza Strip if he enters government. As a member of Netanyahu’s wartime war cabinet in 2024 during the ongoing conflict in Gaza, Eisenkot privately discussed plans to restrict humanitarian access that would exacerbate widespread starvation among Palestinian civilians, a policy that Netanyahu ultimately implemented to push Gaza into a state of famine.

    The release of the poll comes amid growing controversy over efforts by Netanyahu’s allies to restrict ballot access ahead of the vote, moves widely interpreted as an attempt to suppress turnout among voters likely to oppose the prime minister. Israeli newspaper Haaretz recently reported that senior officials in Transportation Minister Miri Regev’s office held discussions about imposing strict restrictions on incoming international flights immediately before election day, including limits on charter travel. Officials involved in those talks acknowledged the policy was motivated by fears that tens of thousands of Israeli citizens living overseas would return home to cast votes against Netanyahu.

    In a separate restrictive move, a Knesset committee has advanced legislation that would eliminate dedicated polling stations at retirement and assisted-living facilities across the country. The change is projected to impact approximately 37,000 eligible voters, a population demographic that overwhelmingly opposes Netanyahu, and that number roughly equals the total number of votes required to secure one full Knesset seat.

    While consecutive recent polls have consistently shown Netanyahu’s incumbent coalition at risk of defeat, Israel’s deeply fragmented political landscape still creates significant uncertainty for the opposition’s path to power. Even if the anti-Netanyahu bloc secures a narrow majority, negotiating a stable governing agreement across its multiple competing factions could prove a major challenge.