博客

  • Supreme Court says little about redress for Trump tariff damages

    Supreme Court says little about redress for Trump tariff damages

    In a landmark 6-3 ruling on Friday, the US Supreme Court declared that former President Donald Trump overstepped his executive authority by invoking emergency powers to impose sweeping global tariffs. Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, asserted that the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) contains no provision granting unilateral tariff-imposing power to the president.

    The decision in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump represents a severe judicial blow to Trump’s signature trade policy, which triggered international trade conflicts and imposed substantial financial burdens on American consumers and businesses. The ruling specifically invalidates two major tariff categories: country-specific ‘reciprocal’ tariffs (ranging from 34% on China to 10% baseline rates) and a 25% levy on certain goods from Canada, China, and Mexico related to fentanyl policy disputes.

    According to congressional Democratic analysis released following the verdict, the average American family has absorbed over $1,700 in additional costs since the implementation of these tariffs during Trump’s second term. The policy also failed to achieve its stated economic objectives, with manufacturing jobs declining by approximately 108,000 in the first year of implementation and no measurable improvement in the US trade deficit.

    While businesses may pursue tariff refunds through lengthy administrative processes, consumers face minimal prospects for recovering their increased expenses. Policy experts warn that economic repercussions will persist for years, with Groundwork Collaborative’s Alex Jacquez noting that ‘any consumer looking for relief from tariff-driven price hikes did not find it at the Supreme Court today.’

    The ruling has prompted immediate evaluation of alternative legal mechanisms within the Trump administration, including Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which provides broader tariff authority with fewer procedural constraints. Congressional Democrats have expressed concern that the decision may merely redirect rather than eliminate Trump’s tariff ambitions, with Representative Brendan Boyle warning of continued ‘unhinged economic sabotage’ through alternative statutory pathways.

  • Trump pushes back against Supreme Court ruling, says will impose 10% more global tariffs

    Trump pushes back against Supreme Court ruling, says will impose 10% more global tariffs

    In a defiant response to a recent Supreme Court decision, former US President Donald Trump has announced his intention to impose a new 10% global tariff, leveraging alternative legal mechanisms to circumvent judicial limitations on his trade agenda.

    Speaking at a press conference on Friday, Trump characterized the Court’s 6-3 ruling against his previous sweeping tariffs as “deeply disappointing,” expressing particular dismay with the justices who formed the majority. The Court’s decision specifically invalidated the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) as the legal basis for those tariffs.

    Undeterred, Trump revealed his administration’s alternative strategy: implementing the new across-the-board levy under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. This statute empowers the president to impose duties of up to 15% for 150 days to address “large and serious” balance of payments deficits. “We have alternatives that could bring us more money,” Trump stated, emphasizing that “the Supreme Court did not overrule tariffs, they only overruled a particular use of IEEPA tariffs.”

    Addressing potential financial repercussions from the overturned tariffs, Trump suggested refund litigation could extend over five years. Concurrently, his administration is initiating multiple Section 301 investigations targeting alleged unfair trade practices by foreign nations and corporations, signaling an intensified approach to trade enforcement despite judicial constraints.

  • US Supreme court rules against Trump tariffs; what does it mean for businesses?

    US Supreme court rules against Trump tariffs; what does it mean for businesses?

    In a landmark decision with profound implications for global commerce, the U.S. Supreme Court has invalidated the Trump administration’s use of emergency powers to impose sweeping import tariffs. The ruling determined that the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act did not provide legal authority for the broad tariff regime implemented by the former president.

    This judicial reversal triggers a complex refund mechanism that could return more than $175 billion to thousands of American businesses that paid tariffs under the contested program. According to economists from the Penn-Wharton Budget Model, companies across consumer goods, automotive, manufacturing, and apparel sectors—particularly those reliant on global supply chains—now face strategic decisions regarding pursuit of reimbursement claims.

    The immediate market response saw stock markets in both the United States and Europe rally, with luxury brands and import-dependent companies experiencing significant gains. Shares of LVMH, Hermès, and Moncler all climbed following the announcement.

    Legal experts caution that the refund process will be administratively complex and time-consuming. More than 1,800 tariff-related lawsuits have already been filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade since April—a dramatic increase from fewer than two dozen cases throughout 2024. Prominent plaintiffs include subsidiaries of Toyota, Costco, Goodyear Tire & Rubber, Alcoa, Kawasaki Motors, and EssilorLuxottica.

    Despite this victory for free trade advocates, uncertainty persists within the business community. Trump administration officials have indicated they will pursue alternative legal authorities to implement tariffs, including statutes addressing unfair trade practices and national security concerns. Fitch Ratings’ head of U.S. economics, Olu Sonola, noted that “the odds that tariffs reappear in a revised form remain meaningful,” creating ongoing operational and legal challenges.

    The ruling highlights how approximately 90% of tariff costs were ultimately borne by American consumers and companies, according to Federal Reserve Bank of New York research, contradicting administration claims that foreign entities absorbed the financial impact.

    Many businesses, anticipating a protracted refund process, have already begun selling their rights to future refunds to external investors at discounted rates. Meanwhile, companies like German logistics firm DHL are developing technological solutions to streamline potential reimbursement procedures for their clients.

  • Saudi health authority summons medic for viral video with ‘misleading claims’

    Saudi health authority summons medic for viral video with ‘misleading claims’

    Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Health has initiated disciplinary proceedings against a medical professional following the viral dissemination of a video containing dangerously misleading information about cholesterol medications. The controversial video, which circulated extensively across social media platforms, contained unsubstantiated claims regarding statin drugs that prompted numerous patients to abruptly discontinue their prescribed treatments without medical consultation.

    The health authority confirmed it has formally summoned the physician responsible for the content to provide an official statement regarding the circulated misinformation. The ministry emphasized that the unauthorized cessation of statin medications exposes patients to significant health risks, particularly those with existing cardiovascular conditions requiring consistent pharmaceutical management.

    In an official statement, the ministry reiterated that all medical decisions must be made exclusively under proper physician supervision rather than based on unverified social media content. The regulatory body further warned that legal measures will be enforced against any individual found to be distributing misleading medical information or violating established healthcare profession ethics.

    This incident represents the latest in Saudi Arabia’s ongoing efforts to combat medical misinformation online, following recent actions against individuals spreading false information about criminal cases and inciting public opinion through digital channels. The ministry’s prompt response demonstrates the government’s commitment to maintaining evidence-based medical practices and protecting public health from potentially dangerous misinformation.

  • Trump administration pursuing nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia, opening path to enrichment: Report

    Trump administration pursuing nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia, opening path to enrichment: Report

    The Trump administration has formally notified Congress of its intent to pursue a civil nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia that notably omits stringent non-proliferation safeguards traditionally required by the United States, according to a Reuters exclusive. This proposed ‘123 Agreement’ marks a significant departure from established US policy by not explicitly prohibiting the kingdom from enriching uranium or reprocessing spent nuclear fuel.

    Unlike previous nuclear pacts with nations such as the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which made US cooperation conditional on a commitment to forgo enrichment, the preliminary document with Saudi Arabia stipulates only ‘additional safeguards and verification measures’ for the most sensitive areas of cooperation. This language leaves the door open for Riyadh to potentially develop domestic enrichment capabilities—a move analysts consider far more transformative for the region than the concurrent pursuit of advanced F-35 fighter jet sales.

    US law mandates that a 123 Agreement must be in place before significant nuclear exports can be licensed. Furthermore, lawmakers have historically insisted that partners also adopt the ‘Additional Protocol,’ which grants the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) enhanced inspection powers. The UAE, the only other Gulf state with a US nuclear partnership, signed this protocol in 2009. However, the Trump administration’s November notification to congressional committee heads indicated it is not pursuing this protocol with Saudi Arabia.

    The administration’s report positions US industry at the forefront of Saudi Arabia’s civil nuclear development. The finalized agreement could be submitted to Congress as early as February 22nd, triggering a 90-day review period. During this time, both the House of Representatives and the Senate would need to pass resolutions of disapproval to block the pact in its current form.

    This diplomatic approach underscores President Trump’s deal-centric foreign policy, which often prioritizes economic exports over the non-proliferation concerns of the traditional foreign policy establishment. The concession on enrichment appears to be a key to securing the deal, aligning with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s ambition to capitalize on the kingdom’s vast uranium reserves. Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman has publicly stated the intent to enrich and sell uranium, framing it as both an economic imperative and a matter of national pride.

    The nuclear negotiations are part of a broader suite of potential deals with Riyadh. Concurrent discussions on F-35s have involved assurances to lawmakers regarding the maintenance of Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge (QME), with sources indicating the proposed sale involves a lower-grade variant of the jet. Simultaneously, Saudi Arabia is exploring alternative defense partnerships, including a fighter jet co-production deal with Turkey and potential investment in a UK-Italy-Japan next-generation fighter program.

  • Pegula extends dominance over Anisimova, reaches Dubai final

    Pegula extends dominance over Anisimova, reaches Dubai final

    American tennis star Jessica Pegula demonstrated exceptional resilience on Friday, overcoming a disastrous start to defeat compatriot Amanda Anisimova 1-6, 6-4, 6-3 in the Dubai Duty Free Tennis Championships semifinals. The world number five showcased her championship mentality by reversing momentum after being thoroughly outplayed in the opening set.

    The victory extends Pegula’s perfect record against Anisimova to 5-0 and marks her second consecutive win over the 24-year-old following their Australian Open quarterfinal encounter last month. This impressive performance continues Pegula’s remarkable consistency on tour, representing her second WTA final appearance since August 2025, with five additional tournaments during this period resulting in semifinal finishes, including both the US Open and Australian Open.

    Pegula attributed her sustained excellence to the intensive training regimen implemented by her coaching team since 2025. This dedication was evident as she weathered Anisimova’s powerful game, which produced seven aces throughout the match. After dropping the first set and falling behind 3-1 in the second, Pegula mounted her comeback with two critical breaks to force a deciding set.

    The match’s turning point came in the fourth game of the third set when Pegula secured another break against her younger opponent, ultimately maintaining her composure to close out the victory. Pegula now advances to face the winner of the other semifinal between two-time Grand Slam champion Coco Gauff of the United States and two-time Dubai titleholder Elina Svitolina of Ukraine.

    In doubles action, the pairing of Russia’s Vera Zvonareva and Germany’s Laura Siegemund earned their place in the final with a 6-3, 7-6(6) victory over Romanian duo Jaqueline Cristian and Elena-Gabriela Ruse. They will compete for the title against Canadian Gabriela Dabrowski and Brazilian Luisa Stefani, who overcame Aleksandra Krunić and Anna Danilina 4-6, 6-2, 10-6 in their semifinal encounter.

  • Seven Chinese tourists, driver dead after bus sinks into Russia’s Lake Baikal

    Seven Chinese tourists, driver dead after bus sinks into Russia’s Lake Baikal

    A devastating incident on the frozen expanse of Russia’s Lake Baikal has resulted in the feared deaths of seven Chinese tourists and their local bus driver. The catastrophe occurred when the ice beneath their vehicle fractured, causing the bus to plunge into the frigid waters of the world’s deepest lake.

    According to a statement released by Igor Kobzev, the regional governor, via his Telegram channel on Friday, the accident prompted an immediate emergency response. Miraculously, one tourist managed to escape the submerged bus. Search and rescue operations are actively continuing for the remaining victims in the harsh Siberian conditions.

    The Irkutsk regional prosecutor’s office has initiated a criminal investigation to determine the precise circumstances that led to the breach of the ice road, a route commonly traversed by tourist vehicles during the winter months. Located north of Mongolia, Lake Baikal is a UNESCO World Heritage site and an immensely popular destination, particularly for adventure seekers.

    This tragedy casts a somber shadow over the rapidly growing tourism ties between China and Russia. Tourist traffic from China to Russia has seen a significant surge in recent years, a trend bolstered by deepening political alignment and a “no limits” strategic partnership formalized last year. This cooperation was further streamlined by the introduction of a mutual visa-free travel regime, facilitating easier movement between the two nations.

  • Israeli settlers kill another teenaged US citizen in occupied West Bank

    Israeli settlers kill another teenaged US citizen in occupied West Bank

    A 19-year-old Palestinian-American citizen, Nasrallah Abu Siyam, was fatally shot by Israeli settlers during an attack on the village of Mukhmas, located east of Ramallah in the occupied West Bank. The incident occurred on Wednesday when Abu Siyam and fellow villagers intervened to protect a local farmer under assault by a group of settlers, according to an eyewitness account provided to the Associated Press.

    Raed Abu Ali, a resident of Mukhmas, reported that Israeli military forces arrived at the scene and deployed tear gas, sound grenades, and live ammunition to disperse the crowd. Social media footage circulating online appears to capture the moment Abu Siyam was shot and his body being removed from the area.

    Middle East Eye contacted the US State Department for comment but had not received a response by publication time. This killing marks the latest in a series of violent incidents targeting Palestinian communities in the West Bank, which have intensified significantly since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel and Israel’s subsequent military operations in Gaza.

    Abu Siyam becomes at least the sixth US citizen killed by Israeli settlers or security forces in 2024 alone, joining Tawfic Abdel Jabbar, Mohammad Khdour, Ayşenur Ezgi, Amer Rabee, and Sayfollah Musallet. Accountability for these deaths remains largely absent despite growing international concern.

    The United Nations human rights agency released a report on Thursday suggesting that the systematic attacks by Israeli settlers and soldiers in the West Bank may constitute ethnic cleansing. The document cites systematic unlawful use of force by Israeli security forces, widespread arbitrary detention and torture of Palestinians, and extensive unlawful demolition of Palestinian homes as evidence of systematic discrimination and oppression against the Palestinian population.

  • 18 dead in Egypt after minibus carrying fish-farm workers collides with truck

    18 dead in Egypt after minibus carrying fish-farm workers collides with truck

    A devastating traffic collision in Egypt’s Dakahlia governorate has resulted in 18 fatalities after a minibus transporting fish-farm workers collided with a heavy truck on Thursday. The accident occurred along the June 30 Axis, a major northern transportation corridor, as workers were traveling from their homes near Port Said to their workplace.

    Local media outlet Al-Shorouk reported that preliminary investigations point to excessive speed combined with poor weather conditions that severely reduced visibility as primary factors behind the tragedy. While authorities have yet to release an official death toll, multiple sources have confirmed the casualty count.

    Egyptian Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly has extended formal condolences to the families of victims and directed that financial compensation be provided to affected families. Dakahlia Governor Tarek Marzouk publicly mourned the deceased, referring to them as ‘martyrs’ in an official statement released through his office’s Facebook platform.

    This incident highlights Egypt’s ongoing struggle with road safety, where traffic accidents remain alarmingly frequent due to poorly maintained infrastructure and widespread violation of traffic regulations. Government statistics from 2024 recorded over 5,200 road fatalities nationwide, underscoring the severity of the problem.

    The Interior Ministry’s recent report of 111,583 traffic violations occurring within a single 24-hour period further illustrates the scale of traffic law non-compliance throughout the country. This tragic event represents one of the deadliest road accidents in Egypt thus far in 2026, raising renewed concerns about transportation safety measures and enforcement mechanisms.

  • Explained: Why a UN report found RSF committed genocide in Sudan’s el-Fasher

    Explained: Why a UN report found RSF committed genocide in Sudan’s el-Fasher

    A comprehensive United Nations investigation has concluded that Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) committed systematic atrocities during their capture of el-Fasher in October that demonstrate clear indicators of genocide. The report documents a pattern of large-scale crimes targeting specific ethnic groups in North Darfur’s capital.

    The UN mission established that the RSF’s offensive displayed three fundamental elements of genocide under international law: mass killings of protected groups, intentional infliction of severe physical and psychological harm, and deliberate creation of conditions calculated to bring about physical destruction. The investigation specifically identified the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa communities as primary targets, noting these groups received protected status under the Rome Statute during previous ICC proceedings against former president Omar al-Bashir.

    Evidence reveals the RSF implemented a coordinated strategy of extermination through multiple mechanisms. The paramilitary forces besieged el-Fasher for eighteen months, systematically cutting off food, water, medical supplies and humanitarian assistance while conducting relentless attacks on civilian infrastructure. Drones and heavy weapons targeted communal kitchens, medical facilities and places of worship, including a dawn prayer attack on Al-Safiya Mosque that killed approximately 70 civilians, including 11 children.

    The report details how RSF fighters employed explicit genocidal language, with survivors recounting statements such as “We want to eliminate anything black from Darfur” and “We will carry out extermination against you, an extermination like what we did to Masalit.” The forces constructed earthen berms and trenches to trap civilians without adequate sustenance, leading to widespread starvation where residents resorted to eating animal fodder and tree leaves.

    During the actual capture of the city between October 24-26, the RSF engaged in indiscriminate killings, including executions at checkpoints where men were separated from women and children. Fighters recorded themselves executing civilians while chanting racist slogans and using ethnic slurs. The notorious commander known as Abu Lulu personally conducted executions, with video evidence showing him shooting a pregnant woman seven times in the abdomen after inquiring about her pregnancy term.

    The investigation further documented systematic sexual violence targeting women and girls aged 7-70 from non-Arab communities, particularly the Zaghawa. Victims reported gang-rapes, sexual slavery, and brutal physical assaults, often conducted in front of family members. The mission confirmed cases of women being abducted and subjected to repeated rape over multiple days, with many remaining missing.

    The UN has called for immediate international intervention to halt the violence and bring perpetrators to justice, emphasizing that the documented crimes represent some of the most severe violations of international law witnessed in recent conflicts.