博客

In a striking divergence from European allies, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has adopted an unequivocal position against the US-Israel military campaign in Iran, echoing his country’s traumatic memory of the Iraq War. On March 4, just days after the initial strikes, Sánchez addressed the nation with a four-word manifesto: “No to the war.” This rhetorical stance has been reinforced by concrete actions, including closing Spanish airspace to US military aircraft involved in the operations and denying access to domestic military bases.

The government’s opposition carries profound historical resonance. Sánchez explicitly referenced the 2003 Iraq invasion—a conflict that remains a painful national memory—warning that “the nightmare of Iraq will repeat itself, but this time on a much larger scale.” The parallel is particularly poignant given that Spain’s conservative government under José María Aznar had joined the “coalition of the willing,” a decision supported by only 10% of the population at the time according to polls.

This foreign policy stance is generating significant domestic political consequences. Recent polling by 40dB for El País reveals over two-thirds of Spaniards oppose the military intervention in Iran, with opposition strongest among left-wing voters. The conservative Partido Popular (PP) and far-right Vox party appear divided, with PP leader Alberto Núñez Feijoo taking nearly three weeks to formulate a coherent position after initially supporting the strikes.

Political scientist Pablo Simón of Carlos III University notes that Sánchez’s approach serves multiple purposes: “He is using this as a tool to build soft power globally and to position himself as a leader who stands up to Donald Trump.” The strategy mirrors Sánchez’s 2024 recognition of Palestinian statehood during European elections, which aligned with both his left-wing base and majority public opinion.

The political benefits remain uncertain however. While the Socialist Party gained modest polling boosts after the Palestine recognition, the economic ramifications of the Iran conflict could ultimately damage the government. Spain imports approximately 70% of its energy, and tourism—accounting for 13% of GDP—faces potential disruption from rising fuel costs and security concerns. Industry experts note that while Spain may benefit from being perceived as safer than destinations like Egypt or Turkey, the sector remains vulnerable to broader regional instability.

The government’s stance has drawn fierce criticism from US President Donald Trump, who threatened to cut off all trade with Spain and dismissed its leadership as “not so good.” Nevertheless, Spain’s position appears to be gaining traction elsewhere in Europe, with Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosetto similarly emphasizing that Italy “did not support this war.”

At the 2026 Boao Forum for Asia Annual Conference in Hainan, China’s deepening economic integration with Global South nations has been identified as a crucial stabilizing force in an increasingly volatile global landscape. According to Li Xing, Yunshan Leading Scholar at the Guangdong Institute for International Strategies and adjunct professor at Denmark’s Aalborg University, China’s sustained openness has positioned it as a cornerstone of worldwide development despite mounting Western protectionism.

Professor Li revealed that China’s trade relationships with Global South countries have demonstrated remarkable resilience following the initiation of US-led tariff conflicts. “Since the US started a global tariff war, China’s trade with the Global South has remained largely unaffected,” Li stated, attributing this durability to mutual recognition of shared economic interests and China’s status as the primary trading partner for many developing nations.

Statistical evidence underscores this tectonic shift in global trade patterns. S&P Global’s 2025 report indicates China’s goods exports to Global South nations have doubled since 2015, dramatically outpacing the 28% growth to the US and 58% to Western Europe. Currently, China sells $1.6 trillion more merchandise to the Global South than to the US and Western Europe combined.

This reorientation represents a fundamental transformation from previous decades when Western economies dominated China’s trade portfolio. Li emphasized that China’s strategic preparation for potential Western decoupling efforts through enhanced Global South collaboration has proven economically astute.

The scholar contextualized this evolution within broader globalization trends, noting that China’s reform era witnessed massive transfers of labor-intensive industries from Western nations accompanied by substantial raw material imports from Global South countries. “As long as China’s industrial chain remains strong, its demand for raw materials and cooperation with Global South countries will only grow further, creating a win-win situation,” Li asserted, directly countering Western allegations of “neocolonialism” or “debt trap” diplomacy.

Regional integration mechanisms, particularly the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), have further solidified China’s economic architecture. Li highlighted that ASEAN has maintained its position as China’s largest trading partner since 2019, establishing crucial strategic balance in US-China regional dynamics.

The recent operationalization of Hainan Free Trade Port, marking 100 days of island-wide special customs operations, represents another milestone in China’s high-standard opening strategy. Rather than competing with established hubs like Singapore, the initiative aims to generate novel regional cooperation opportunities, including tariff-free mainland market access for products undergoing minimum 30% value-added processing in Hainan.

Amid escalating unilateralism and protectionism globally, Li concluded that China’s consistent commitment to international cooperation and openness has demonstrated its emergence as an indispensable pillar of global stability and development.

China’s top anti-corruption authorities have launched a formal investigation into Yue Puyu, a former senior legislative official from Shanxi province, for alleged serious breaches of Communist Party discipline and national laws. The announcement was made public on Monday through official channels by the Communist Party of China Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the National Commission of Supervision.

Yue Puyu, 66, a lifelong Shanxi native, began his government career in June 1982 and became a Party member in September 1985. His extensive career included significant leadership roles such as chairman of Taiyuan Heavy Machinery Group Co., Ltd and mayor of Linfen city. He ascended to the position of deputy head of the standing committee of Shanxi’s provincial people’s congress in January 2020, representing the highest legislative body in the region.

Despite his professional accomplishments, which included receiving the National Scientific and Technological Progress Award and being recognized as an outstanding entrepreneur in Shanxi, Yue now faces serious allegations. The anti-corruption watchdogs have not disclosed specific details regarding the nature of the violations, maintaining the investigation’s confidentiality during ongoing proceedings.

A groundbreaking parliamentary report is demanding a fundamental restructuring of Britain’s security strategy, advocating for reduced dependence on the United States and development of an autonomous nuclear deterrent. The Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy issued these recommendations amid deteriorating UK-US relations following conflicts in the Middle East.

The comprehensive assessment warns that Britain’s current ‘strategic dependencies on the United States for core capabilities in nuclear, intelligence and conventional defence’ creates vulnerability. The committee explicitly calls for planning ‘to move away from a bilateral relationship with the United States that is so dependent’ on American resources for critical security operations.

The report emerges during significant diplomatic strain between the two traditional allies. Recent tensions escalated when Britain initially denied US requests to utilize the joint UK-US base on Diego Garcia for strikes against Iran, though Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s administration later reversed this decision twice within weeks.

Committee members, including Foreign Affairs Select Committee chair Emily Thornberry alongside cross-party representatives from Labour, Liberal Democrat, and Conservative parties, emphasize preparing for scenarios where ‘Europe does not have US backing in a crisis.’ The document urges collaboration with European allies to develop ‘greater European leadership’ within NATO frameworks.

Notably, the assessment acknowledges Britain’s diminished global influence and recommends strengthening partnerships with ‘middle powers’ including Canada, Australia, and India to navigate escalating US-China competition. The committee warns that increasing tensions between superpowers ‘will go down, making conflict more likely’ without proactive diplomatic measures.

The recommendations arrive weeks after Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey publicly advocated for a ‘fully independent British nuclear deterrent,’ citing concerns about reliance on unpredictable US leadership. Currently, Britain maintains operational control of its nuclear arsenal but depends on American-supplied Trident missiles for weapons delivery.

As the strategic landscape evolves, the report insists that a ‘credible, sustainable and independent UK nuclear deterrent is integral to UK national security’ and serves as essential protection against proliferation risks in an increasingly volatile global environment.