分类: world

  • Israel rejects Trump’s 15-point plan for Gaza, Netanyahu says

    Israel rejects Trump’s 15-point plan for Gaza, Netanyahu says

    A decades-long volatile conflict between Israel and Gaza has hit another major roadblock, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu publicly rejected the 15-point Gaza peace framework crafted by former U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration, insisting no Israeli military withdrawal will occur until the armed group Hamas undergoes full, verifiable disarmament.

    Last month, Trump’s specially created Board of Peace announced that a tentative deal had been reached to achieve the full disarmament of Hamas and all other armed factions operating within Gaza. But Hamas quickly clarified that its willingness to surrender heavy weapons is conditional on Israel first ending all military aggression against the territory and pulling all Israeli forces out of Gaza entirely.

    Since agreeing to an initial ceasefire in October 2024, Israel has continued to carry out targeted air and ground strikes across Gaza, keeping tensions high and derailing early hopes of a durable peace. Speaking at a weekly cabinet meeting on Sunday, Netanyahu delivered a clear rejection of the U.S.-backed proposal: “Israel rejects the 15-point document.” He added that the Israeli military will not complete any withdrawal until Hamas is genuinely disarmed, and will continue operations to neutralize threats to both Israeli troops stationed in Gaza and Israeli civilians within the country’s borders.

    A senior Hamas official speaking to the BBC on Sunday pushed back against Israel’s rejection, reaffirming the group’s commitment to the negotiated 15-point framework and stating it is ready to engage in serious, responsible implementation of the agreement. The official also called on international mediators to pressure all parties to uphold their previously agreed commitments.

    Netanyahu’s rejection marks the second major setback for Trump’s Gaza peace initiative, which was first unveiled in September 2024. The original plan outlined the creation of the Board of Peace to oversee implementation, with core provisions including the full disarmament of Hamas, a full withdrawal of Israeli military forces from Gaza, and the launch of large-scale reconstruction projects to rebuild the war-ravaged territory.

    While Netanyahu’s rejection of the plan did not come as a surprise to regional observers, the weeks-long delay before he made his position public reflects the deeply fraught political position the Israeli leader currently occupies. He has made clear he finds the U.S. framework unacceptable, but he is also unwilling to openly alienate Washington, Israel’s closest and most powerful international ally.

    Just over a week before Netanyahu’s cabinet announcement, Trump hailed the tentative disarmament agreement as what he called a “monumental step toward lasting peace and security” — marking the first time Hamas had publicly agreed to give up its weapons, contingent on an Israeli withdrawal. On Sunday, Netanyahu made clear this sequence of events would not proceed during his leadership: disarmament must come first, he insisted, and it must be genuine, verifiable disarmament, not what he called “fictitious disarmament.”

    Independent peace negotiators have long noted that any workable agreement on disarmament and withdrawal would almost certainly require a phased, reciprocal approach from both sides, rather than the unconditional precondition Netanyahu has laid out. Netanyahu confirmed Sunday that his administration is currently in ongoing talks with U.S. officials to hash out a path forward, noting “They have ideas; some of them are acceptable to us and some are not, and we know how to stand our ground on these matters.”

    With just months remaining before Israel’s scheduled national elections, Netanyahu is facing intense pressure from hardline members of his right-wing governing coalition to take an uncompromising stance on Gaza. Far-right coalition members have already demanded a new cabinet vote to scrap the entire peace plan entirely; National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir has already publicly dismissed the 15-point draft as “not acceptable.”

    Against this political deadlock, the human cost of the ongoing conflict continues to mount. Earlier this week, tens of thousands of Gazans gathered in Gaza City for a mass funeral for 112 people, the vast majority of them women and children, who were killed in an Israeli strike on a residential neighborhood in late 2023. According to United Nations figures, roughly 1.9 million Gazans — more than 90% of the territory’s total population — have been displaced from their homes since the current war began.

    The war was sparked by the Hamas-led cross-border attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, which killed approximately 1,200 people and took 251 hostages. Israel responded with a full-scale military offensive in Gaza that, as of current figures from Gaza’s Ministry of Health — data the United Nations considers reliable — has killed more than 73,000 people in the territory.

  • Russia, Ukraine exchange overnight strikes that leave 7 dead, many injured

    Russia, Ukraine exchange overnight strikes that leave 7 dead, many injured

    In a fresh cycle of escalated cross-border hostilities between Russia and Ukraine, overnight mutual strikes have left multiple civilians dead and dozens injured across populated areas on both sides, regional officials confirmed this week.

    The deadliest assault on Russian territory unfolded in Belgorod, a border region that has faced repeated attacks in recent months. The regional administration announced that Ukrainian drone strikes resulted in five civilian fatalities and wounded 24 people, among them a four-year-old child. The attacks also caused widespread structural damage: 29 apartment buildings, five private residences, government administrative facilities, and multiple commercial sites were left damaged or destroyed by the blasts.

    On the Ukrainian side, Russian missile and drone attacks targeted three major population centers, leaving civilian infrastructure in ruins and causing further casualties. In Kharkiv’s Saltivskyi district, a Russian missile strike directly hit a multi-story residential apartment block, killing two people and wounding 13 others, regional governor Oleh Syniehubov reported. Separately, in the strategic Black Sea port city of Odesa, an assault involving “dozens of missiles and drones” left eight additional people injured, according to local regional head Oleh Kiper.

    Russia’s defense ministry pushed back on the Ukrainian civilian casualty accounts Sunday, claiming its overnight operations exclusively targeted military assets: it said strikes successfully hit Ukrainian drone storage facilities in the Kharkiv region, and destroyed fuel depots and military equipment stockpiles at the Odesa port. The ministry added that Russian air defense systems intercepted and downed 153 Ukrainian drones overnight, with engagements taking place over Russian-occupied Crimea, the Black Sea, and the Sea of Azov.

    This latest round of large-scale Russian missile attacks on major Ukrainian cities follows a now near-daily pattern that has emerged over recent weeks. Moscow has actively exploited a critical gap in Ukraine’s air defense capabilities: Kyiv currently faces a severe shortage of interceptor missiles for its U.S.-manufactured Patriot air defense systems, the only weapon in Ukraine’s arsenal capable of shooting down incoming Russian ballistic missiles.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has spent months lobbying Western allies, particularly the United States, to supply additional Patriot systems and ammunition. Global stockpiles of these critical defense components have already been depleted by high demand tied to the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran-backed groups, making additional deliveries far harder to secure.

    Failing to secure sufficient foreign supplies of Patriot interceptors, Zelenskyy has outlined two alternative contingency plans: establishing domestic production of Patriot ammunition within Ukraine, or securing approval from billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk to leverage his Starlink satellite communications network to guide Ukrainian strikes against Russian missile launch sites deep inside Russian territory.

    Meanwhile, Kyiv has continued its own campaign of long-range drone strikes against targets deep within Russian borders. Recent strikes have targeted Russian energy infrastructure, as well as high-profile domestic assets including Wildberries, Russia’s largest e-commerce retailer. These sustained attacks on energy facilities have already sparked widespread fuel shortages across parts of Russia.

  • Three Palestinians killed and dozens wounded in Israeli attacks across Gaza and West Bank

    Three Palestinians killed and dozens wounded in Israeli attacks across Gaza and West Bank

    A fresh wave of violence orchestrated by Israeli military forces and Jewish settlers across the occupied Palestinian territories left at least three Palestinians dead and dozens more injured in a single day of unrest on Saturday.

    Violence was concentrated primarily in the occupied West Bank, where multiple incursions and settler attacks unfolded across multiple communities. In the northern West Bank city of Tubas, Israeli military convoys pushed into urban areas, deploying infantry to secure key positions in the city center. Troops deployed tear gas against local residents, leaving 15 people in need of medical attention, which was provided on-site by teams from the Palestinian Red Crescent Society.

    Southeast of Tubas, near Ramallah, Israeli forces launched a raid on the village of al-Mughayyir. During the incursion, soldiers fired tear gas directly into a private family home, leaving all household members, including minor children, struggling with respiratory distress from the chemical agent. Additional Israeli incursions were recorded across the broader Ramallah governorate, including entries into the nearby town of Turmus Ayya, the village of Abu Falah, and the village of Kobar, where tear gas was fired into public streets to disperse local populations.

    Further south in the Hebron governorate, the violence escalated into armed attacks by Israeli settlers, who operated under explicit armed protection from Israeli military forces. In the Masafer Yatta community of Wadi al-Rakhim, settlers opened fire on local residents during a raid, wounding four Palestinians. A 57-year-old man was hospitalized after sustaining a bullet wound to his hand, according to local medical reports.

    In Idhna, a town west of Hebron, settlers backed by Israeli troops stormed the area surrounding the Prophet Saleh Mosque. The settlers assaulted local residents, discharged live ammunition, and illegally erected a makeshift tent on privately owned Palestinian agricultural land. When the assault was underway, Israeli soldiers entered the mosque itself and detained seven worshippers, including the mosque’s lead imam, Mu’taz Sa’di Tmaizi. During the raid, troops deployed live bullets, stun grenades, and tear gas, while settlers vandalized a privately owned Palestinian vehicle parked nearby.

    Settler violence also spilled over into Abu Falah, where armed groups fired weapons in close proximity to the village’s local school, endangering students and staff. Other separate groups of settlers entered the community of Beit Ur al-Tahta, and roamed through privately owned Palestinian farmland outside the village of Jaljalia, all while Israeli military forces provided armed security for the incursions.

    The violence extended to the blockaded Gaza Strip, where Israeli troops shot and killed one Palestinian near the border in northern Khan Younis. The injured survivor was transferred to Nasser Medical Complex for emergency care. Gaza’s Ministry of Health confirmed that two additional Palestinians died on Saturday from injuries sustained during earlier Israeli attacks in the enclave. As of Saturday, the official Palestinian casualty count for the ongoing Israeli military campaign in Gaza, which launched in October 2023, stands at 73,384 people killed and 174,242 others wounded. Even following the ceasefire that took effect in October 2025, Israeli forces and settlers have killed 1,257 Palestinians and wounded an additional 4,131 people across the occupied territories. This report is drawn from independent on-the-ground coverage by Middle East Eye, a media outlet specializing in original, unfiltered reporting on the Middle East and North Africa region.

  • Shanghai cancels 1,300 flights as China prepares for Typhoon Dolphin

    Shanghai cancels 1,300 flights as China prepares for Typhoon Dolphin

    As Typhoon Dolphin tracks toward eastern China after drenching northern Taiwan over the weekend, regional authorities have enacted sweeping emergency measures, including mass evacuations and widespread flight disruptions, to mitigate the impact of the powerful storm.

    The storm’s outer rain bands first reached northern Taiwan, including the island’s capital Taipei, on Saturday, dumping heavy downpours across the region. In response, multiple Taiwanese air carriers scrapped all scheduled flights bound for mainland China on Sunday, leaving hundreds of passengers stranded at airports across the island.

    As of Sunday morning, official meteorological data placed the typhoon’s maximum sustained wind speeds at roughly 162 kilometers per hour (101 miles per hour), marking it as a significant weather event capable of causing widespread damage. Forecasters projected the storm would make landfall along the coasts of Zhejiang province and the northern section of neighboring Fujian province by late Sunday, bringing torrential rainfall that raises major risks of flash flooding and dangerous landslides.

    In the most hard-hit forecast zones, accumulated rainfall over the coming days is expected to reach between 200 and 400 millimeters (7.9 to 15.7 inches), according to Chinese national meteorological services. Officials in Zhejiang have issued repeated urgent warnings about elevated landslide risks across the province’s mountainous and hilly areas, urging residents to heed evacuation orders immediately.

    In Shanghai, the country’s busiest aviation hub, both of the city’s major international airports – Pudong and Hongqiao – have canceled more than 1,300 flights scheduled for Sunday, accounting for roughly 60 percent of the day’s planned operations, per reports from Shanghai-based state media outlet The Paper.

    Emergency evacuation efforts have been underway across the region since Saturday evening. In the Zhejiang city of Taizhou alone, officials have relocated more than 390,000 residents from low-lying and high-risk areas. Shanghai authorities have also evacuated more than 30,000 people from coastal and flood-prone zones, bringing the total number of relocated residents across the affected regions to more than 720,000.

    In additional safety measures, Zhejiang provincial authorities have suspended all water-based recreational and commercial activities, including inter-island ferry services and passenger cruise operations, until the storm passes and safety inspections can be completed.

  • The political black hole over the Strait of Hormuz

    The political black hole over the Strait of Hormuz

    Uncertainty over the status of Iran’s supreme leader and deepening internal power rifts have pushed the country to the brink of state failure, sending ripple effects of instability that reach all the way to China’s doorstep and leaving Beijing facing a tricky diplomatic dilemma. At the center of current regional tensions is a newly emerging Iran-Oman agreement that regime-affiliated media in Iran claims will formalize Tehran’s continued control over the Strait of Hormuz, the critical chokepoint through which roughly a fifth of global oil supplies pass daily. From Washington’s perspective, any international recognition of Iran’s full control over the strait would deliver a major blow to U.S. and global commercial interests, granting Tehran a powerful strategic tool to blackmail the international community during future political disputes by threatening to block traffic through the waterway.

    With U.S. midterm elections approaching and high-stakes multilateral negotiations underway with Beijing across a range of issues, the Biden administration is strongly motivated to block international recognition of Iran’s claim, a move that carries major stakes for U.S. global influence. But behind what appears to be a political win for Tehran lies a far more concerning, underreported transformation inside Iran’s ruling regime that points to accelerating fragmentation of central power and looming systemic chaos.

    On August 5, China’s state-run Xinhua News Agency published remarks from Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, who openly acknowledged that communication with Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has become extremely difficult in recent weeks. Analysts say this unusual public comment, amplified by a major Chinese state media outlet, may be a quiet signal that Beijing itself is struggling to establish reliable lines of communication with Tehran’s top decision-makers, raising questions about who actually holds power in the country. Iranian media reports have further fueled these doubts, claiming Pezeshkian was only granted a brief meeting with a figure presented as Khamenei, held in a dark, tinted-window vehicle at a secret location outside the capital.

    It remains unclear whether Mojtaba Khamenei, the son of Iran’s late long-time supreme leader Ali Khamenei, even exercises full control over his own circumstances, let alone the affairs of the entire country. These disclosures from Iran’s own elected president confirm long-running rumors of bitter, intractable splits at the highest levels of Iran’s leadership. The most radical factions within the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) are widely believed to have seized de facto ultimate power, using Mojtaba as a largely powerless figurehead to legitimize their rule. This arrangement has isolated both Mojtaba and the hardline IRGC leadership, creating a cascade of disruptive internal power dynamics that threaten to unravel central governance.

    To compound this instability, Iran’s military command structures were deliberately decentralized and devolved to local regional units years ago to pre-empt the risk of U.S. decapitation strikes on top leadership, and there is little sign these structures can be re-centralized any time soon to restore clear top-down command. Unconfirmed but persistent rumors also suggest Israeli intelligence has cultivated close contacts with senior Iranian officials who are prepared to launch a coup against the current hardline regime, fueling a culture of pervasive paranoia and mutual suspicion across all levels of government. Under this climate, any official, for any reason, can be targeted and purged on accusations of treason, making it nearly impossible to build consensus or implement consistent policy.

    The result is a broken decision-making system: any proposed compromise with external powers can be immediately vetoed by radical factions that dismiss any deal as a “traitor’s surrender,” while the official supreme leader remains a distant, opaque figure controlled by unelected hardline factions behind the scenes. Despite this political chaos, Iran still retains active production capacity for missiles and drones, as well as large stockpiles of these weapons, creating a dangerous scenario: a fractured state with plentiful tools to project destabilizing force across the region.

    This portrait adds up to a country mired in deep institutional disarray, on the edge of full state failure. Yet history shows that failing states can survive for years while remaining a major threat to regional security, as seen in Myanmar, where years of brutal civil conflict have failed to unseat the ruling military junta. A collapsed, failing Iran would expand a broad arc of instability stretching from Central Asia all the way to the Mediterranean coast. The U.S. has thus far avoided being drawn into the messy Iranian quagmire, but even if Tehran retains de facto control over the Strait of Hormuz, the country’s political fragmentation poses unique new risks to regional security and global oil markets.

    One potential path to de-escalation that has been floated by geopolitical analysts involves offering security guarantees to Mojtaba Khamenei and other top Iranian leaders in exchange for Tehran rolling back its claims to full control over the strait. On a more positive note, Iran’s growing internal instability has paradoxically helped unify regional states that were once deeply divided over how to address Tehran’s expansionist threats. Middle Eastern nations are now converging on coordinated strategies to limit Tehran’s harmful regional influence, building new medium- and long-term pressure campaigns to constrain the regime. This has also accelerated regional plans to build oil and gas export pipelines that bypass the Strait of Hormuz entirely, a shift that will ultimately restrict Iranian trade and further isolate the country’s hardline religious leadership.

    For China, the current situation creates a tricky diplomatic balancing act. While Beijing would likely welcome any setback to U.S. interests in the region, its demonstrated inability to intervene and mediate the dispute for Gulf allies has left China sidelined from evolving regional political dynamics, which are increasingly dominated by the U.S. and Israel. Finding common ground with Washington and Jerusalem to address the Iranian crisis would be a major challenge for Beijing, in large part because it is not clear what strategic benefits Beijing would gain from such collaboration. However, the emergence of a large, unstable political black hole along China’s western border will almost certainly create new security and economic risks for Beijing in the near term. The Iranian meltdown is unfolding at the same time that Russia faces ongoing military setbacks and struggles to hold its position in Ukraine, meaning China could soon find itself bordered by multiple zones of active instability – a outcome that Beijing has long sought to prevent.

  • Turkey and Saudi Arabia’s rocky relations: A brief history

    Turkey and Saudi Arabia’s rocky relations: A brief history

    In a moment laden with religious and geopolitical symbolism, the leaders of three major Muslim nations gathered this week in Islam’s holiest city of Mecca to perform Friday prayers together, capping years of gradual reconciliation and marking a new chapter in regional security cooperation. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif joined the collective worship at the site, a public display of unity that follows years of strained ties between Ankara and Riyadh.

    The symbolic prayer service comes on the heels of a landmark breakthrough: the signing of a historic trilateral joint defense agreement between the three countries, which for the first time places the three regional powers under a unified security framework. While Pakistan has long maintained warm, stable diplomatic and economic ties with both Saudi Arabia and Turkey, the relationship between Ankara and Riyadh has been defined by centuries of rivalry and decades of alternating détente and open rupture.

    To understand the gravity of this week’s developments, it is necessary to trace the long, fraught history of relations between the two nations. Tensions over claims to leadership of the global Sunni Muslim community date back to the founding of both modern states in the early 20th century, with roots stretching even further to the 19th-century Ottoman-Saudi war, when Ottoman forces crushed an early Saudi expansion across the Arabian Peninsula. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after World War I, the House of Saud defeated local rivals to seize control of Mecca and Medina in 1925, ending more than 350 years of continuous Ottoman rule over Islam’s two holiest sites. Formal diplomatic relations between the newly established Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Republic of Turkey were not established until the 1930s, and the two sides maintained generally cordial ties for decades after: both backed Iraq during the 1980s Iran-Iraq War (with Saudi support far more public) and aligned with the United States during the 1991 Gulf War.

    Even during this period of calm, however, low-level frictions persisted. Turkey repeatedly criticized Saudi Arabia for demolishing historic Ottoman-era sites across the kingdom, including fortresses, cemeteries, and 19th-century railway infrastructure. The most high-profile dispute came in 2002, when Turkey’s culture ministry condemned the demolition of the 220-year-old Al-Ajyad Fortress, which overlooked Mecca’s Grand Mosque. Turkey’s then-parliament speaker called the destruction “sinful behaviour in breach of the moral values of Islam”, but Saudi Arabia defended the move as a exercise of its sovereign right to redevelop the site to accommodate growing numbers of religious pilgrims. The site was later redeveloped to house the Mecca Clock Tower, one of the tallest structures in the world.

    This era of cordiality, interrupted only by minor disputes, collapsed into deep strategic disagreement after the 2010 Arab Spring. While both Riyadh and Ankara backed efforts to oust longtime Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, their approaches to regional uprisings diverged sharply across the Middle East. In Egypt, Turkey openly supported the first democratically elected president Mohamed Morsi and fiercely condemned the 2013 military coup led by Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, a close ally of Saudi Arabia. For years after the coup, Ankara hosted Egyptian opposition media outlets and dissident groups, and Erdoğan refused to recognize Sisi’s government, calling for the release of tens of thousands of political prisoners.

    Strategic rifts widened across the region in subsequent years. During the 2017 Saudi-led blockade of Qatar, which accused Doha of supporting terrorism and meddling in regional affairs, Ankara sided openly with Qatar and deployed military forces to the Gulf state. In post-revolution Libya, where power fractured into rival factions after 2011, Turkey backed the internationally recognized government in Tripoli, while Riyadh threw its support behind eastern-based warlord Khalifa Haftar. Tensions boiled over into open hostility in early 2018, when Mohammed bin Salman labeled Turkey part of a “triangle of evil” alongside Iran and extremist religious groups.

    Relations hit their modern lowest point later that year, following the killing of veteran Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, a former contributor to Middle East Eye, who was murdered by Saudi operatives inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in October 2018. Turkish prosecutors indicted 20 Saudi citizens over the killing, building a case based on phone records, entry and exit logs, witness testimony, and analysis of Khashoggi’s personal devices. Erdoğan publicly stated the killing had been ordered at the “highest levels” of the Saudi government. In the years that followed, Riyadh imposed an unofficial boycott on Turkish goods that saw Turkish exports to Saudi Arabia plummet 92% year-on-year in 2021, after systematically pressuring local businesses to drop Turkish products from store shelves. Both sides also blocked each other’s state media outlets.

    After more than four years of open rupture, Ankara and Riyadh formally ended their dispute in 2022, as part of a broader wave of regional rapprochement led by Saudi Arabia. That June, Mohammed bin Salman traveled to Ankara for his first visit since Khashoggi’s killing, meeting Erdoğan at the presidential palace and agreeing to deepen cooperation across trade, defense, energy, and tourism. A key concession from Turkey that cleared the way for reconciliation was the transfer of the Khashoggi murder trial to Saudi courts, meeting a core Saudi demand for restoring ties.

    The reconciliation between Ankara and Riyadh fits into a broader regional shift: Saudi Arabia has moved to end disputes across the Middle East in recent years, including ending its three-and-a-half-year rift with Qatar, launching peace talks with the Houthi movement in Yemen, and restoring full diplomatic relations with Iran in a 2023 deal brokered by China. For Turkey, mending ties with oil-rich Gulf states was also an economic priority, as Ankara grappled with a collapsing national currency and widespread economic instability. Since the 2022 reconciliation, the two sides have signed a series of major deals on technology, defense, and renewable energy, highlighted by a 2023 Saudi agreement to purchase Turkish drones in what remains the largest defense contract in Turkey’s history.

    In recent months, growing strategic alignment on regional issues has pushed the two countries even closer. In Syria, both now back the new government led by Ahmed al-Sharaa and have joined forces to lobby the United States to lift crippling sanctions on Damascus. In Libya, once a point of sharp division, both now back the internationally recognized unity government. In war-torn Sudan, both Riyadh and Ankara support the Sudanese Armed Forces led by Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, while the UAE backs the rival Rapid Support Forces. In Somalia, too, Ankara and Riyadh stand together in supporting the internationally recognized central government, while the UAE backs Somaliland’s bid for independence. Notably, a growing public rift has emerged between Saudi Arabia and its one-time closest Gulf ally the UAE, with Turkey increasingly aligned with Riyadh on these issues, even as Ankara avoids taking an open public stance to protect its own substantial financial ties with Abu Dhabi.

    This week’s joint prayer service and historic defense pact cement the completion of a years-long reconciliation process, reshaping the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East and creating a new trilateral security bloc connecting South Asia, the Anatolian Peninsula, and the Arabian Gulf.

  • Hormuz talks positive, Oman says, as Iran warns deal would not open strait

    Hormuz talks positive, Oman says, as Iran warns deal would not open strait

    Diplomatic discussions between Oman and Iran over a new security agreement for commercial shipping through the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz are moving forward in a positive direction, Omani officials have confirmed, though Iranian leaders have cautioned that no immediate full reopening of the waterway can be expected even if a deal is reached.

    Both nations issued updates on Saturday confirming that negotiations are advancing, but no clear timeline for the finalization of any agreement has been set. Oman’s foreign ministry has issued a urgent warning against shipping attacks that could derail the ongoing diplomatic process.

    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi noted that talks have entered their final stages, but a full resumption of unobstructed transit through the strait remains tied to the fulfillment of additional unspecified conditions. Tehran has maintained an effective blockade of the strait – a chokepoint through which roughly 20% of the world’s daily oil and natural gas supplies transit – since the United States and Israel launched military operations against Iran in February.

    Recent negotiations have centered on a proposed joint Omani-Iranian framework for managing a secured shipping route through the waterway, a plan that backers hope will pave the way for the gradual return of commercial traffic. Araghchi clarified that full reopening depends on Iran receiving compensation from the U.S. for what Tehran frames as violations of the June ceasefire Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the two sides. That earlier deal collapsed within days of being signed, with tit-for-tat military hostilities resuming shortly after.

    In a separate comment to semi-official Iranian news outlet Tasnim, Iran’s top security official Mohammad Baqer Zolqadr went further, stating that the Strait of Hormuz will not reopen until the U.S. fundamentally revises its policy toward Iran. He outlined six core Iranian demands, including an end to U.S. threats against Tehran, the lifting of the U.S. naval blockade on Iranian ports, and the release of billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets.

    The broader Middle East maritime disruption has expanded in recent months: Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthi movement has imposed a separate blockade on commercial shipping approaching Saudi Arabian ports in the Red Sea since July 20.

    U.S. officials have offered mixed signals on the pace of a potential deal. Earlier this week, former President Donald Trump said an agreement with Iran could come “soon”, but Vice President JD Vance struck a more cautious tone during an appearance on Fox News Saturday. Vance emphasized that negotiations remain far from complete, saying “We’re really in the middle of the game here. This thing is not over.”

    Vance added that the U.S. is deploying a full suite of diplomatic, economic, and military tools to secure an outcome that serves American interests. He also claimed that Gulf oil export volumes have remained unchanged since the launch of U.S. military operations in late February, though he offered no data to support that assertion. “What we’re really working through now is how you can actually set up a traffic scheme so that the ships can pass through safely,” he explained.

    A major point of contention between Washington and Tehran has been reports that Iran plans to impose transit fees on commercial vessels passing through the strait. Reuters previously cited an anonymous Iranian official reporting that Tehran was seeking fees equal to between 5% and 7% of the value of each vessel’s cargo. Vance pushed back on these reports Saturday, saying “The Iranians have told us they have no plans to toll the Strait of Hormuz.”

    Oman’s warning against shipping attacks came on the same day that the United Arab Emirates (UAE) accused Iran of carrying out a hostile missile attack on an oil tanker affiliated with ADNOC, the UAE’s state-owned energy giant, as it transited the region. The UAE foreign ministry said the strike caused no casualties. Later Saturday, the UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) agency reported that a vessel had been hit by an unknown projectile off the coast of Oman, sparking a fire that was later extinguished with no reported injuries. It remains unconfirmed whether UKMTO was referencing the same ADNOC tanker targeted in the UAE statement.

  • Ukraine denies targeting Bulgaria as drone explodes near pipeline

    Ukraine denies targeting Bulgaria as drone explodes near pipeline

    A fresh incident of an errant drone has escalated tensions in Eastern Europe, after an unmanned aerial vehicle carrying a substantial payload of explosives detonated close to a critical energy infrastructure site in northeastern Bulgaria, near the country’s border with NATO member Romania. Ukraine has issued a categorical denial that it deliberately targeted Bulgarian territory, in the wake of the blast that has put the spotlight on growing risks of conflict spillover into NATO member states amid Russia’s ongoing full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    The explosion unfolded around 1 kilometer from a compressor station of the Trans-Balkan gas pipeline, a strategic artery that transports natural gas from Turkey through Bulgaria to Ukraine. The drone ultimately crashed in an unoccupied sunflower field near the Kardam border crossing with Romania, close to the Black Sea coast, Bulgarian Prime Minister Rumen Radev confirmed in an official video address following an emergency security council meeting with his cabinet. While no injuries or fatalities were reported in the incident, Radev emphasized that the amount of explosives on board the drone was “significant”, noting the blast produced a loud shockwave visible as black smoke that was detected by border patrols in both Romania and Bulgaria.

    Notably, neither Bulgarian nor Romanian air surveillance systems detected the drone before it crashed, a gap Radev acknowledged reflects the widespread challenge facing European nations in countering unidentified unmanned aerial threats. Following an initial analysis of the drone debris, Bulgaria’s defense ministry stated the UAV is a model commonly deployed by the Ukrainian military, though officials also confirmed that there is currently no conclusive evidence the incursion was deliberate. In response to the event, Bulgaria’s foreign ministry has summoned Ukraine’s ambassador to Sofia for an emergency meeting scheduled for Monday.

    Ukraine’s foreign ministry has pushed back against any suggestion of intentional targeting. “We can say with certainty that the Ukrainian Armed Forces did not intentionally direct any assets toward Bulgaria,” said ministry spokesman Georgiy Tykhyi. Kyiv added that it is maintaining close communication with Bulgarian authorities to fully clarify the circumstances of the incident, and placed blame for the stray drone incident on the broader context of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

    This event marks the latest in a rising string of unauthorized drone incursions into NATO territory, a trend that has stoked concerns about accidental escalation of the Ukraine conflict. For months, neighboring Romania, a NATO member that shares a long border with Ukraine, has faced repeated drone incursions, including multiple crashes on Romanian soil. In late July, Romania expelled a Russian embassy staff member in response to the escalating incursions.

    Bulgaria itself has maintained a nuanced position on the Ukraine conflict: in June, Sofia halted all military aid to Kyiv, with Radev stating the country does not wish to join the coalition of arms-supplying allies and prioritizes diplomatic efforts to end the war. Following Saturday’s drone incident, however, Radev announced immediate security upgrades: Bulgaria will boost border surveillance, redeploy additional troops to its northern and eastern borders, and implement new anti-drone countermeasures to prevent similar events.

    The Black Sea, where both Russian and Ukrainian forces conduct regular drone operations, has become an increasingly volatile flashpoint in recent weeks. Just earlier this week, Turkey reported that a drone attack on two civilian cargo vessels transiting the Black Sea left multiple crew members injured, and Ankara voiced deep concern over the escalating military activity in the international waterway.

    The spillover risks are not limited to Eastern Europe, either. On the same day as the Bulgarian drone incident, German military officials confirmed that unidentified drones were spotted earlier this week over a sensitive army installation in western Germany. The Mechernich base houses an underground weapons depot that stores components for US-made Patriot air defense systems, a weapons system that Ukraine has long requested to defend its cities and infrastructure. The sightings come just days after an explosives-laden drone was discovered near a Ukrainian cargo plane at Leipzig-Halle Airport, a key hub for military cargo shipments for the German military and NATO allies.

  • ‘Used as human bait’: Leaked image shows elderly Palestinian men before execution by Israeli forces

    ‘Used as human bait’: Leaked image shows elderly Palestinian men before execution by Israeli forces

    A newly leaked photograph has reignited international scrutiny of Israeli military conduct in northern Gaza, offering fresh visual evidence of alleged human rights abuses against Palestinian civilians. The image, published by Palestinian journalist Younis Tirawi on the social platform X, depicts two blindfolded elderly Palestinian men from Beit Lahia, identified as Nadi Marouf and Ali Marouf, standing among Israeli military personnel. Tirawi confirms the photo was captured just hours before the pair were killed by Israeli forces in November 2024.

    According to Tirawi’s previous reporting from October 2025, troops from the 92nd Battalion of Israel’s Kfir Brigade abducted the two elderly men from their hometown, holding them as human shields for multiple days before executing them. This account aligns with an earlier October 2025 report from *The Palestine Chronicle*, which detailed that the men were detained, stripped to their underwear, and shot after being released near al-Tawam roundabout. The report added that the pair were forced to enter buildings ahead of Israeli soldiers, a practice that independent investigations have repeatedly documented across Gaza. Ramy Abdu, chairman of the Geneva-based Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, confirmed that relatives found the men’s bodies three days after their killing, confirming they were executed following their use as human shields.

    This leaked photograph is the latest addition to a growing body of testimonies and visual evidence documenting the systematic use of Palestinian civilians as human shields during Israeli military operations in Gaza. Multiple independent probes have already confirmed the widespread nature of this practice: an Associated Press investigation published in 2025 gathered testimony from both Palestinian civilians and Israeli soldiers confirming the tactic was common, with Palestinians forced to enter potentially booby-trapped buildings and tunnels ahead of Israeli troops to clear for explosives or fighters. Al Jazeera later corroborated these findings, interviews with seven Palestinians and two Israeli military officers who described the routine use of this tactic. A United Nations investigation has previously ruled that forcing civilians to enter structures ahead of soldiers constitutes the use of human shields, a clear violation of international humanitarian law. In May 2025, the Israeli military acknowledged that the practice is “strictly prohibited” under its standing orders and announced it had opened investigations into multiple reported cases.

    Alongside these latest allegations of extrajudicial killing and human shielding, reports continue to emerge of abusive conditions for Palestinian detainees held by Israel. On June 21, 71-year-old Dr. Mazen Rantisi — a prominent Palestinian physician widely known as the “doctor of the poor” and chairman of the Health Work Committees, a leading Palestinian medical services organization — was arrested during a pre-dawn Israeli raid on his Ramallah home. In statements relayed through his lawyer, Rantisi confirmed that prison authorities at Ofer Prison withheld his essential daily medication for the first 10 days of his detention, and continue to deny him access to one critical drug. He also reported repeated cell raids by prison security that have included beatings of detainees, and that he has suffered rapid weight loss due to inadequate, unfit food rations consisting of mouldy bread, near-rotten tomatoes, uncooked hummus and foul-smelling rice. Belgian human rights organization Viva Salud has issued a statement expressing grave concern over the health and access to care for Rantisi and a second Health Work Committees official arrested alongside him.

    These developments unfold against the backdrop of a rapidly worsening humanitarian catastrophe across the Gaza Strip. Gaza’s Ministry of Health has confirmed that more than 73,000 Palestinians have been killed since the outbreak of war in October 2023, a figure that is widely understood to be an undercount: thousands of bodies remain trapped beneath the rubble of thousands of destroyed buildings, making a full accounting of casualties impossible. On August 4, Gaza held a mass funeral for 112 people killed in an Israeli air strike in 2023, whose remains were only recovered in recent excavation efforts. Gaza authorities estimate thousands more people remain buried under collapsed infrastructure.

    The crisis of food insecurity and malnutrition has reached catastrophic levels, according to United Nations data. The UN has already recorded 193 deaths from malnutrition in Gaza, 96 of which are children. In July 2025 alone, screening found 11,877 children between the ages of six and 59 months suffering from acute malnutrition, including 2,562 cases of severe acute malnutrition, the most life-threatening form of the condition. Projections cited by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs estimate that by October 2026, more than 100,000 children in the same age group will suffer from acute malnutrition, with over 31,000 facing severe, life-threatening cases. UN humanitarian agencies have repeatedly warned that critical levels of food insecurity and malnutrition will persist as long as severe restrictions on the entry of food, medicine and other essential supplies remain in place.

    The growing accumulation of allegations of abuse against Palestinian civilians, detainees and the dead has intensified global scrutiny of Israel’s military conduct in Gaza, as humanitarian organizations continue to document crippling restrictions on access to life-saving aid.

  • Ukraine warns of tough winter as Russia strikes kill 4 in Kyiv region

    Ukraine warns of tough winter as Russia strikes kill 4 in Kyiv region

    On Saturday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky made his first official visit to Belgrade as head of state, where he delivered a stark warning about the coming winter amid a fresh wave of deadly Russian long-range strikes that claimed multiple civilian lives, including a young child, in the Kyiv region.

    During a press conference alongside Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic, Zelensky confirmed that Russian overnight missile and drone barrages, paired with intensified shelling across frontline communities, had killed 13 civilians across Ukraine in the 24-hour period. Among the fatalities was a three-year-old boy killed in a strike on a village outside Kyiv; four additional people, including the child’s parents, his 15-year-old brother, and a neighbor who rushed to provide aid, were hospitalized after a follow-up double-tap strike on the residential site. Local reports and on-the-ground accounts from AFP correspondents in Kyiv documented roughly a dozen explosions across the capital region, as Ukrainian air defense units issued urgent alerts for incoming ballistic attacks from the north.

    Zelensky emphasized that Russian forces are deliberately targeting Ukraine’s critical energy infrastructure to break civilian morale, leaving the country with virtually no undamaged thermal power plants as it prepares for the winter heating season. Thermal power facilities serve as a critical backup to Ukraine’s nuclear energy fleet, which forms the backbone of the country’s national power grid. With more than three years having passed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion, both sides have sharply escalated long-range strike operations, leading to a steady rise in civilian casualties. Moscow has ramped up attacks on Kyiv in recent months, primarily using salvos of ballistic missiles that are notoriously difficult for existing air defense systems to intercept, prompting repeated Ukrainian appeals for additional U.S.-manufactured Patriot interceptor missiles and other advanced Western air defense systems. In response to the intensified strikes, Kyiv has launched a growing number of drone attacks against targets inside Russian territory.

    During his meetings with Serbian leadership, Zelensky renewed his call for tougher international sanctions on Russia, aiming to cut off the flow of missile components that he says are reaching Moscow from nearly every continent, including from some of Ukraine’s closest international partners. “These components arrive, and then missiles strike people, killing children, civilians and soldiers,” he told reporters, reiterating that expanded access to interceptor missiles is a non-negotiable priority to counter the growing wave of long-range attacks.

    Serbia, which maintains long-standing close ties to Moscow, remains one of the only European countries that has refused to implement formal sanctions against Russia. While Vucic’s government has provided non-military humanitarian assistance to Ukraine, it has not altered its long-held neutral policy on the conflict. Vucic confirmed that no military cooperation agreements were discussed during Saturday’s meeting, noting that any future arrangements would be addressed only after the war concludes. He reaffirmed that Serbia’s policy of recognizing Ukraine’s territorial integrity remains unchanged, and has repeatedly denied Kremlin accusations that Serbian firms have supplied munitions to Kyiv. Vucic previously traveled to Ukraine for a regional summit in 2025 and visited Kyiv earlier this year, but has declined to sign any formal declaration of support for Ukraine in the ongoing conflict.

    Zelensky’s visit to Belgrade comes as part of his years-long global diplomatic tour to rally international support for Ukraine, a campaign he has led consistently since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022.