分类: world

  • Netanyahu tours tunnels beneath Al-Aqsa as Ben Gvir raids Jerusalem holy site

    Netanyahu tours tunnels beneath Al-Aqsa as Ben Gvir raids Jerusalem holy site

    As the Jewish high holiday season kicked off last weekend, a series of provocative Israeli visits and incursions into the sensitive Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in East Jerusalem have stoked widespread regional and international anger, reigniting debates over the fragile decades-old status quo governing the contested holy site.

  • Iranian military says US preparing to attack again

    Iranian military says US preparing to attack again

    Escalating tensions between Iran and the United States have spiked sharply in recent weeks, after Iran’s top military command issued a stark warning Sunday that it has credible intelligence pointing to an impending new wave of direct American attacks on Iranian territory, ending a months-long period of relatively reduced hostilities between the two nations.

    The alert came from Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, the top command body that oversees all branches of Iran’s armed forces. In a formal statement released to the public, the military clarified that any nation that allows the United States to stage offensive operations from its territory, or hosts American military or strategic assets used in an attack, will be held legally and militarily accountable as a direct accomplice to the aggression.

    The current escalation comes on the heels of a deadly pattern of low-intensity conflict that the former Trump administration has sought to frame as something short of full-scale war, arguing that occasional intermittent skirmishes do not meet the threshold of an ongoing active conflict. However, official data and on-the-ground reports confirm that dozens of Iranian civilian lives were lost in American strikes carried out as recently as last month alone.

    In response to previous U.S. military action, Iran has already ramped up its own countermeasures: it has stepped up more precisely targeted strikes against U.S. military and energy infrastructure across the Persian Gulf region, while continuing to exercise unchallenged control over the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic chokepoint through which roughly 20% of the world’s global oil supplies pass every day.

    Alongside military pressure, the United States has dramatically escalated its economic campaign against Iran. Last month, U.S. Treasury Secretary announced the launch of what the agency has dubbed “Operation Economic Outcast,” a sweeping initiative designed to cut off Iran’s access to global financial markets and strangle its international economic activity. New sanctions are now being rolled out multiple times every week, with the most recent action coming this Thursday, when the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added BitBank to its sanctions blacklist. BitBank is a high-priority digital assets venture controlled by prominent Iranian financier Babak Zanjani, and the designation marks one of the first major U.S. sanctions targeting an Iranian digital asset platform.

    Senior officials from the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) have further reinforced Iran’s pledge of harsh retaliation in the event of a new attack, warning that the country will enact sweeping and unprecedented changes to its defensive and counteroffensive strategies. “If the United States goes ahead with a new round of attacks, there will certainly be significant changes in our defence and our counteroffensive,” an IRGC spokesperson said in a recent formal statement.

    “We will introduce new weapons with new capabilities into the battlefield, and the world will be surprised,” the spokesperson added. The statement also signaled a shift in Iran’s targeting approach, noting that “Our targets will not necessarily be the same as before either. We have new targets that have not yet been attacked.”

    This report, originally prepared by independent regional outlet Middle East Eye, provides on-the-ground coverage of ongoing developments across the Middle East and North Africa, with unrivaled independent analysis of shifting regional dynamics.

  • Mecca pact faces first trial by fire with Houthi escalation

    Mecca pact faces first trial by fire with Houthi escalation

    Last Thursday, former U.S. President Donald Trump made a startling public remark, announcing he faced an imminent ‘big decision’ regarding Iran’s ruling regime: ‘Do I want to go in and annihilate them or do I not? Anything could happen with me.’ This is not the first time the president has issued such an open-ended threat against Tehran, but the comment arrives at a uniquely precarious moment for the Middle East. What Trump once expected to be a short, decisive conflict has now stretched into its seventh month, with growing risks that the fighting will spill across borders and destabilize the entire region.

    In the days following Trump’s comment, the Iran-aligned Houthi movement in Yemen announced it had launched a coordinated missile and drone strike targeting ‘sensitive sites’ in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia’s capital. This escalation marks the first major test of the newly signed ‘Mecca Pact,’ a defense agreement between Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan that has already upended regional security alignments. For Trump, the stakes of mismanaging this crisis could not be higher: a failure to resolve the conflict threatens both his remaining term in office and the long-term global standing of the United States.

    ## Shrinking Options for the White House

    A confluence of interconnected developments has left Trump with fewer paths forward than ever before. The ongoing conflict has sent global energy prices soaring, inflicting persistent economic pain on consumers across the United States and the rest of the world. Over the same weekend as the Houthi attack, Iran publicly laid out its latest non-negotiable conditions for ending direct hostilities with the U.S.: a full ceasefire across all regional fronts, the unconditional release of billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets abroad, and an end to the U.S.-led naval blockade of Iranian territorial ports.

    Washington has yet to issue an official response to Tehran’s terms. While accepting the conditions would open the door to a resumption of diplomatic negotiations, the odds of a negotiated deal that quickly reopens the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz remain exceedingly low. The conflict has extracted a devastating human and material toll on the Iranian people, thanks to relentless U.S. military and economic pressure. But that pressure has failed to force Iran’s Islamist government to back down: the regime has maintained aggressive defensive operations, struck U.S. military bases across the region, kept the Strait of Hormuz effectively closed to commercial traffic, and continued to defy the U.S. blockade.

    ## The Conflict Spreads to New Fronts

    What began as a direct U.S.-Iran standoff has steadily expanded across the Middle East. It first spilled into Lebanon, where Iran’s ally Hezbollah has engaged in sustained confrontation with Israel, leaving the country devastated and its civilian population displaced. Now, the fighting has intensified on a second front in Yemen.

    Over the past two weeks, the Iran-backed Houthis, who have battled Yemen’s Saudi-backed internationally recognized Presidential Leadership Council for years, have seized key strategic territory across the country. The group already controls most of western Yemen, a stretch of southern territory, and the capital Sana’a. Its holdings border the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, a chokepoint on the Red Sea that carries roughly 10 to 12 percent of all global maritime trade. The Houthis have tightened their control over traffic through the strait, targeted commercial and military vessels linked to Saudi Arabia, and repeatedly struck Saudi oil infrastructure and critical economic facilities.

    Since the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, up to 70 percent of Saudi Arabia’s oil exports have been routed through a pipeline that carries crude from the Abqaiq oil fields in the country’s Eastern Province to the Red Sea port of Yanbu for global shipment. That key pipeline has now been damaged and shut down, with repairs expected to take several weeks. The disruption is already pushing global oil prices higher, with the potential to trigger ripple effects across the entire global economy.

    ## The Mecca Pact Faces Its First Major Challenge

    Amid the growing chaos, long-time U.S. allies in the Gulf Cooperation Council – including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates – have grown increasingly disillusioned with the Trump administration’s leadership. For years, these states have hosted U.S. military bases, but they have now concluded they can no longer rely on Washington as a reliable security partner.

    For Saudi Arabia, the search for alternative security arrangements led to the launch of the Mecca Pact, which entered into force in August. The agreement partners the kingdom with two major Sunni-majority states: Turkey, a NATO member with the alliance’s second-largest standing military, and Pakistan, the only Muslim-majority nuclear weapons state. To date, no other Arab states have joined the pact, and while Iran has publicly welcomed the framework and reports indicate it has been invited to join, Tehran has denied receiving any formal invitation.

    The Houthi attack on Riyadh has already put the new alliance to its first test of credibility. Both Turkey and Pakistan have issued statements affirming their commitment to defending Saudi territorial integrity, but neither has deployed military forces to the conflict yet. Analysts suggest the two countries are hesitant to act, given the Houthi offensive is not formal state aggression against Saudi Arabia. Even so, Turkey’s foreign minister recently indicated the country is prepared to meet any military support requests from Riyadh.

    Both Ankara and Islamabad have also attempted to mediate the crisis, pressuring Tehran to rein in Houthi military operations. Both countries share borders with Iran and maintain constructive working relations with the regime: Ankara has long emphasized unity across the Muslim world, while Islamabad has a long history of acting as an intermediary between Tehran and Washington. These competing priorities make it difficult for either country to fully activate the Mecca Pact’s defense provisions.

    ## Uncertainty Looms Over Trump’s Next Move

    For its part, the Trump administration has so far rejected Saudi requests to launch direct U.S. strikes against Houthi targets, a choice many analysts read as a sign the president has come to recognize the limits of American power projection in the region. Trump’s hesitation to open another active front of conflict has further eroded Riyadh’s confidence in U.S. reliability. U.S. Vice President JD Vance has signaled that Washington is open to mediating negotiations between the Houthis and Saudi Arabia, while the Houthis have committed not to target U.S. commercial or military vessels in the Red Sea.

    Trump has repeatedly stated he is eager to end the conflict and stabilize the Middle East, promising the war will be concluded immediately after November’s U.S. midterm elections. The president has offered no details on how he plans to achieve this goal, leaving observers to assume the outcome hinges on his pending decision on Iran. Hardliners within Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps-dominated leadership show no sign of offering Trump an easy out, however: the regime has continued preparations for further escalation rather than de-escalation, even amid crippling economic and financial pressure at home.

    The risk of further escalation remains high. Once midterm elections conclude, Trump could choose to ramp up military action against Iran – unless Democrats retain control of both chambers of Congress and move to block the move under the U.S. War Powers Act. At this juncture, there is no clear indication of where this escalating crisis will lead the Middle East and the broader global order.

    This analysis was contributed by Amin Saikal, Emeritus Professor of Middle Eastern Studies at the Australian National University, University of Western Australia, and Victoria University, and is republished under a Creative Commons license from The Conversation.

  • ‘Our land is not for sale’: Italian activists challenge Israeli-linked solar projects

    ‘Our land is not for sale’: Italian activists challenge Israeli-linked solar projects

    In the quiet small town of Ribolla in Italy’s Tuscany region, a grassroots movement led by local advocacy group Diritti in Palestina has ignited a widespread campaign against a planned agrivoltaic solar park, after investigators traced the project’s ultimate ownership to an Israeli firm with well-documented ties to Israel’s military and illegal occupation of Palestinian territories.

    The campaign launched in early September, after activists conducting routine scrutiny of the proposed development uncovered that the project was being fronted by a Milan-based special-purpose vehicle (SPV) called SPV Energy 3, a shell company with no registered employees and just €2,500 in share capital. This opaque corporate structure, designed to obscure ultimate ownership, led the team to dig deeper, revealing the firm is a subsidiary of Tel Aviv-based Shikun & Binui, a multinational conglomerate with operations spanning real estate, energy and global infrastructure development.

    Shikun & Binui has ambitious plans to build five utility-scale solar plants across Tuscany, using a network of five separate SPVs registered in northern Italy to hide the company’s ultimate control of the projects. Land lease documents reviewed by Middle East Eye confirm SPV Energy 3 is the formal signatory for the Ribolla development, a structure legal experts say is intentionally designed to limit transparency.

    “This suspicious lack of basic corporate substance prompted us to dig deeper, especially as we have seen a surge of Israeli investments into our region’s renewable energy sector in recent years,” explained 72-year-old Alessandra Bertero, co-founder of Diritti in Palestina, in an interview with Middle East Eye. After the project was first announced in May, Bertero and four fellow activists filed multiple freedom of information requests to map the firm’s operations, uncovering a pattern of Shikun & Binui operating across multiple European Union member states under different local branch and shell company names.

    Critics of the project point to a long record of violations tied to the conglomerate: in September 2025, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights added Shikun & Binui to its official blacklist of companies operating illegally in Israel’s occupied West Bank and occupied Golan Heights. The firm’s roots stretch even further back, tracing to historic construction firm Solel Boneh, which collaborated with the Israeli military during the 1948 Nakba, the mass violent expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their ancestral land.

    Beyond the occupation ties, the project has sparked fierce local pushback over its strategic location: Ribolla sits roughly 110 kilometers from the port of Livorno, a key transit hub for arms shipments headed to Israel, a detail that has amplified community concerns about the development’s broader implications.

    Activists stress there is still time to block the project, as it has not yet received the required Single Energy Authorization, a permit that falls under the oversight of Tuscany’s regional government. If approved, the development would see 36,000 solar panels installed across agricultural land in the town.

    Michela Arricale, a jurist providing legal support to the campaign, argues that allowing capital linked to Israeli occupation to move forward with the project would directly violate the principle of non-recognition laid out in the International Court of Justice’s landmark July 2024 advisory opinion on Israeli occupation. “We hope we can stop this project, set a legal precedent for communities across other affected regions, and deter similar harmful developments in the future,” Arricale said.

    The controversy also comes amid growing broader criticism of agrivoltaics, a model marketed as a win-win for food production and renewable energy that installs panels high enough to allow crops and grazing to continue underneath. Promoted by European energy lobbies in Brussels as a green solution to land abandonment and climate change, agrivoltaics has expanded rapidly across the continent, but critics warn that poorly regulated projects often amount to greenwashing, delivering few of the promised environmental and social benefits.

    Fabrizio Garbarino, president of Italy’s Rural Association, argues that agrivoltaic projects deployed by foreign multinationals to date have failed to deliver tangible benefits for local farmers or food production. “We have carried out dozens of on-the-ground tests, and none have resulted in meaningful benefits for farmers or viable edible crop production,” Garbarino told Middle East Eye. “This so-called green approach, masked as sustainability, reinforces a neocolonial mindset that exploits crisis-hit rural areas to meet the energy needs of multinational corporations with no connection to local farming – they get praised for their work, but only on paper.”

    Italy’s regulatory landscape has opened the door to this wave of foreign investment: since 2021, permissive national land use rules and generous post-Covid green transition funding have created ample opportunities for international firms to acquire large swathes of Italian agricultural land. In 2023, retail giant Amazon and French energy firm ENGIE launched Europe’s largest agrivoltaics park in Sicily, but three years on, promises of community benefits have yet to materialize.

    At the same time, Israel has positioned itself as a leading player in the global sustainability sector with EU backing and funding, while multiple reports have documented that the country’s green industry contributes to the system of apartheid imposed on Palestinians in the occupied West Bank.

    The unfolding controversy in Tuscany has pushed farmers and campaigners to call for far greater transparency around land ownership and the beneficiaries of Italy’s green transition. “Israel has substantial economic resources, so its investment in profitable greenwashing projects across our country is not surprising,” Garbarino noted, adding that his team has reviewed dozens of contracts from local farmers approached by suspicious foreign investors, most of which use the same shell company structure as SPV Energy 3, with minimal share capital and no prior experience in energy or agriculture.

    Giancarlo Innocenti, head of the retired workers’ association for one of Italy’s largest farming unions and former mayor of Roccastrada, the Tuscan district where the agrivoltaics projects are planned, has also traced a string of recent farmland acquisitions back to Israeli investors or their European front companies. “Recently, a local farmer reached out to me to mediate a conversation in English with an Israeli man who wanted to buy his land,” Innocenti recalled. He has documented a pattern where intermediaries target struggling farmers facing low crop yields and wildfire damage, snapping up land at cut-rate prices during bankruptcy auctions.

    After 40 years working in agriculture across Tuscany’s rolling fertile hills, Innocenti draws a careful parallel between the gradual displacement of Italian farmers by foreign multinationals and the decades-long displacement of Palestinians by Israeli settlement expansion, while acknowledging the profound difference between the two contexts: Palestinians live under direct military occupation and face systematic ongoing land theft. “Our farmland, which is meant to feed our communities, is increasingly exploited for profit,” he said. “Farmers are being quietly, forcibly pushed out of our territories little by little to make room for multinationals, and our historic olive groves are falling to this process. But these protests are our attempt to defend and take back our land – it is impossible not to see this as a metaphor.”

    The Ribolla campaign unfolds against a complex national political backdrop: Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s government lists Israel as one of its closest European allies, despite broad grassroots support for Palestinian rights across Italian civil society. The Ribolla project is not an isolated case, but a symptom of a much larger underreported trend of growing Israeli investment in Italy’s agricultural and renewable energy sectors, which is now drawing scrutiny across the country’s southern regions.

    In Puglia, one of Italy’s most productive agricultural regions, foreign investors have targeted large tracts of land for both renewable energy and real estate developments. Across the Strait of Otranto in Albania, widespread public protests have already broken out against real estate projects backed by former US President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner in protected coastal areas, raising broader awareness of how foreign capital – including growing Israeli investment – is targeting vulnerable Mediterranean communities.

    Similar tensions have erupted on the island of Sardinia, where the rapid expansion of large-scale renewable projects has prompted fierce pushback from farming communities and local authorities concerned about uncontrolled land use and irreversible damage to the island’s iconic landscape. Sicily, meanwhile, has become a major magnet for solar development after Amazon’s early investment and public comments from Elon Musk highlighting the island’s potential utility for large-scale energy production. Arricale, the campaign’s legal advisor, says she is currently monitoring two additional Israeli-linked SPVs buying land in western Sicily under local wine grape names Nerello and Nero d’Avola, which are planning large-scale projects with a combined total capacity of 126 megawatts.

    Inspired by the mobilization in Ribolla, residents of the nearby town of Lavaiano have now launched their own campaign to stop a second 22-hectare Shikun & Binui agrivoltaics project, fronted by another shell company called SPV Energy E32. Tuscan regional councillor Lorenzo Falchi has even submitted a national parliamentary inquiry, pushing for the regional government to reject the Israeli-linked projects and set a formal precedent to block similar developments in the future.

    Arricale argues that the controversy exposes the urgent need for clearer national legislation that classifies large agrivoltaics projects as infrastructure, rather than routine agricultural interventions, which would tighten scrutiny and prevent speculative, bad-faith investors from accessing land. “This is a battle that matters to all of us,” she said. “The energy transition is a critical challenge we must overcome, but not at the cost of accepting large-scale speculative projects that hurt working farmers forced to sell their land out of financial desperation – especially when that capital is tied to the illegal occupation of Palestine and violates international and humanitarian law.”

    Bertero echoes this call, urging communities across Italy to increase scrutiny and mobilize to keep foreign speculative projects out of local agricultural land. “Most of the time these deals go through because no one is paying attention,” she said. “The problem is that citizens are not informed, especially in this current political climate, about what is happening right in their own backyards. Our land is the most precious thing we have, and just as Palestinians have shown us, it should not be sold for harmful, self-serving purposes.”

    Middle East Eye, which first reported on this campaign, is an independent media outlet covering the Middle East, North Africa and global issues connected to the region. Requests for republishing this content can be submitted via the outlet’s official contact form.

  • First UK charges brought over 1994 Rwanda genocide

    First UK charges brought over 1994 Rwanda genocide

    For the first time in United Kingdom legal history, a Rwandan man who has resided in north London for years has been formally charged with crimes connected to the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda, the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has confirmed.

    The accused, 65-year-old Dr. Vincent Brown, who previously went by the name Dr. Vincent Bajinya, faces seven criminal counts in total: one charge of aiding genocide, and six additional charges of assisting murder, which prosecutors classify as a crime against humanity.

    According to Frank Ferguson, who leads the CPS’s Special Crime and Counter Terrorism Division, Brown is accused of organizing and encouraging other actors to carry out acts of murder and genocide during the 1994 violence. The defendant is scheduled to make his first court appearance at Westminster Magistrates’ Court this coming Tuesday.

    Ferguson explained that the decision to pursue charges came after a thorough review of evidence compiled by the Metropolitan Police’s specialized War Crimes Team. “We concluded that our legal test for bringing criminal charges had been met,” he stated in an official press statement.

    The investigation traces its origins back to September 2019, when the Rwandan government formally submitted a request to UK authorities to investigate individuals suspected of participating in atrocities in Rwanda’s Rugenge district of Kigali that took place in April 1994.

    In a statement released by the Metropolitan Police, the current charges cap off what the department describes as “a complex and extensive seven-year investigation”. Commander Helen Flanagan, who leads Counter Terrorism Policing London, emphasized that this case sends a clear message that the United Kingdom will not serve as a safe refuge for people suspected of perpetrating severe international crimes.

    “The War Crimes Team remains committed to ensuring those suspected of involvement in genocide and other atrocity crimes are held accountable through due legal process,” Flanagan said. She also added that multiple other active investigations are still ongoing targeting other individuals currently located in the UK who are suspected of involvement in similar crimes connected to the 1994 Rwandan genocide.

  • Watch: Timelapse shows typhoon barrelling towards Japan

    Watch: Timelapse shows typhoon barrelling towards Japan

    Striking new timelapse footage has laid bare the relentless advance of a large typhoon as it churns directly toward Japan, bringing with it the threat of widespread disruption and dangerous downpours across the nation’s eastern coastal regions. The captured time-compressed video offers a vivid, big-picture view of the massive storm system’s scale and speed, showing how it has steadily closed the distance to Japan’s shoreline over recent hours. As of the latest updates, the typhoon is currently tracking along Japan’s eastern coast, and its passage has already begun to trigger heavy rainfall that is raising concerns about flash flooding and landslides in vulnerable areas. Beyond the precipitation, the storm’s strong winds and large storm surge are expected to bring major disruption to daily life: transportation networks including regional flights, train services, and ferry routes have already faced widespread cancellations and delays, while local authorities have issued evacuation advisories for tens of thousands of residents in high-risk zones. Weather forecasters are continuing to monitor the typhoon’s track and intensity closely, updating warnings as the system moves across the region, urging residents to stay alert to changing conditions and follow official guidance to stay safe.

  • US strikes on alleged drug boats could be crimes against humanity, says UN

    US strikes on alleged drug boats could be crimes against humanity, says UN

    Two days after the U.S. military published imagery of its latest strike on a vessel accused of drug trafficking in the Caribbean, a United Nations investigation has delivered a damning conclusion: the ongoing U.S. campaign of airstrikes on maritime targets outside American territorial waters violates international law, and may qualify as crimes against humanity. The findings, released Monday in an official briefing note by the UN Human Rights Council, come from special rapporteur Ben Saul, who has documented the scale of the operations launched by the U.S. as part of its counternarcotics initiative.
    Saul’s investigation confirms that between September of last year and the present, the U.S. has carried out no fewer than 68 such strikes across the Caribbean and Pacific, resulting in the deaths of more than 220 people. Even in cases where targets can be accurately verified as members of internationally designated terrorist or drug trafficking groups, Saul argues the strikes do not meet the legal standard for triggering the right to self-defense under international law. For self-defense to apply, the targeted group would need to have launched an active armed attack against the U.S. — a threshold the U.S. has not met in any of these cases, according to the report.
    The UN findings land just 48 hours after U.S. Southern Command, the military body overseeing operations in the region, confirmed its latest attack. In an official statement accompanying grainy aerial footage of the strike, the command said confirmed intelligence proved the targeted vessel was actively involved in narco-trafficking, and that the operation killed four individuals labeled as narco-terrorists. But Saul’s report pushes back hard on the legal justification for the entire campaign, noting that the strikes amount to a pattern of serial extrajudicial killings that violate the fundamental right to life. “Such attacks are unjustified in national or personal self-defence or under international humanitarian law, the international law of the sea, narcotics suppression conventions, or international counter-terrorism law,” Saul wrote in the briefing.
    Going a step further, the special rapporteur concluded that there are reasonable grounds to believe the 68 documented strikes that killed 223 people meet the definition of the crime against humanity of murder under customary international law.
    The U.S. launched its expanded counternarcotics air campaign, codenamed Operation Southern Spear, in early September of last year. From its launch, the initiative has faced sharp criticism and controversy. U.S. defense leaders have defended the mission, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth previously stating the operation focuses on removing “narco-terrorists from our hemisphere” and protecting the U.S. from the flow of illicit drugs that kill thousands of American citizens annually. However, the U.S. has yet to publicly release definitive, verifiable evidence proving all targeted vessels were actively engaged in drug trafficking.
    Critics of the operation have included regional leaders, but two of the most prominent opponents have been removed from power in controversial circumstances over the past year. Nicolás Maduro, the then-Venezuelan president who repeatedly spoke out against the strikes, was captured by U.S. forces in a dramatic, widely contested overnight raid on Caracas earlier this year. Meanwhile, Gustavo Petro, the left-wing former president of Colombia who also opposed Operation Southern Spear, left office in August after a Trump-backed candidate won the country’s June presidential election.
    As of Tuesday, the UN report has not yet received an official response from the U.S. government. BBC News has reached out to the White House and State Department for comment on the findings.

  • Inside a camp for Yemeni refugees who have fled to Djibouti

    Inside a camp for Yemeni refugees who have fled to Djibouti

    The ongoing military conflict on Yemen’s western coast has triggered a new wave of displacement, driving thousands of vulnerable civilians to seek safety across a key maritime border. Amid escalating clashes that have shattered daily life in coastal Yemeni communities, many families have packed their few belongings and boarded small, overcrowded boats to cross the Bab al-Mandab Strait, a strategically critical waterway that separates Yemen from the Horn of Africa. Their destination is Djibouti, a small East African nation that has opened its borders to absorb the growing influx of people fleeing violence in their home country. Right now, these newly arrived refugees are sheltering in purpose-built camps across Djibouti, where aid organizations are working around the clock to provide basic necessities including clean drinking water, food, emergency medical care and temporary housing. The displacement crisis adds to already mounting pressure on regional humanitarian systems, as Djibouti continues to grapple with the economic and social strains of hosting a growing population of displaced people from Yemen’s nearly decade-long civil conflict.

  • Seven Ethiopian rebel groups form new alliance

    Seven Ethiopian rebel groups form new alliance

    After years of fragmented, regional armed unrest across Ethiopia, seven major and minor rebel factions have announced a unified coalition aimed at removing the national government in Addis Ababa, rekindling international concerns over stability in the Horn of Africa nation.

    The newly formed bloc, dubbed the Alliance for Survival, unites some of the most prominent armed opposition groups operating across the country. It brings together the Amhara-region Fano militia, the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA), the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), and four smaller factions based in Ethiopia’s Ogaden, Afar, and Benishangul-Gumuz regions. Combined, the alliance represents groups operating in six of Ethiopia’s 12 regional states, covering half of the country’s administrative subdivisions.

    In the statement announcing the coalition, the seven groups levied severe accusations against Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s administration, claiming his leadership has overseen widespread war, systematic genocide, mass infrastructural destruction, and crippling economic poverty that has left Ethiopia at risk of national disintegration. As of initial reporting, federal government officials have not issued a formal response to the formation of the alliance.

    The unification of these groups marks a significant escalation of long-simmering conflict that has gripped Ethiopia for years. Armed unrest has persisted for years in Oromia and Amhara, the country’s two most populous regional states, while the northern Tigray region has seen a sharp resurgence of tensions in recent months. A brutal two-year civil war in Tigray that ended with an African Union-brokered peace deal in 2022 killed an estimated hundreds of thousands of people and displaced millions more. Though the formal conflict was halted, both the federal government and TPLF have repeatedly accused one another of violating the terms of the peace agreement, leaving the region on the brink of a return to full-scale war.

    Notably, the Fano militia once fought alongside federal Ethiopian forces against the TPLF during the Tigray civil war. However, the group launched an insurgency against the Abiy administration less than a year after the war concluded, when it refused federal orders to disarm and integrate into national security forces. The OLA, meanwhile, has waged an insurgency against the Ethiopian government since 2018.

    The formal formation of the Alliance for Survival comes months after unconfirmed reports emerged of a separate secret alliance between the TPLF and Eritrea, Ethiopia’s northern neighbor. Speaking to national lawmakers in July, Abiy dismissed those earlier threats, asserting he had full confidence in Ethiopia’s defensive capabilities. “Even if others were added, we do not have an iota of fear regarding Ethiopia’s sovereignty,” the prime minister said at the time.

    The coalition announcement also follows Ethiopia’s June 2024 general election, where Abiy’s Prosperity Party retained its overwhelming parliamentary majority. The election, however, was widely marred by ongoing armed conflict, opposition accusations of state repression, and minimal participation from major opposition groups. Both Fano and the OLA rejected the election and its final results, while the entire Tigray region, home to roughly six million Ethiopian citizens, was fully excluded from participating in the poll.

  • Haiti extradites 18 suspects in assassination of president to US

    Haiti extradites 18 suspects in assassination of president to US

    Half a decade after the shocking assassination of Haitian President Jovenel Moise sent the already unstable Caribbean nation into a tailspin of chaos, 18 alleged co-conspirators in the killing have been transferred by air from Haiti to South Florida to face trial in U.S. courts.

    The attack that took Moise’s life unfolded in July 2021, when a team of gunmen, most of whom were identified as Colombian mercenaries, stormed the president’s private residence in Port-au-Prince and fatally shot him in his bedroom. The brazen, high-profile murder sent immediate shockwaves across Haiti and the international community, as observers and everyday Haitians alike grappled with how a sitting head of state could be killed with such startling impunity.

    For years, formal investigations into the assassination in Haiti have ground to a complete halt. Widespread gang domination of large swathes of the country and a total breakdown of law and order have left the Haitian justice system unable to pursue viable cases against the remaining suspects. That institutional collapse has placed the full burden of pursuing accountability on U.S. law enforcement and prosecutors, who have chosen to try the suspects in Florida courts.

    According to official statements from U.S. authorities, the planning and financial backing for the assassination plot were coordinated across three locations: Florida, the neighboring Dominican Republic, and Haiti itself. To date, 30 individuals have been formally indicted on charges connected to Moise’s killing, and Sunday’s extradition marks a major milestone in the long-running investigation.

    In a public post on X, Jason Reding Quiñones, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, framed the extradition as a key new step in the ongoing push for justice. “Five years later, we are still bringing defendants before American courts, and we are not finished,” he wrote. FBI Special Agent Brett Skiles echoed that commitment, noting that the multi-national, coordinated operation to take the suspects into custody demonstrates the bureau’s unwavering dedication to holding every person involved in the plot accountable.

    The group extradited on Sunday includes 17 former Colombian soldiers and one high-ranking former Haitian government official: Joseph Badio, who served in the anti-corruption unit of Haiti’s Ministry of Justice at the time of the assassination. Prosecutors have alleged that a Miami-based private security firm played a central role in recruiting the Colombian ex-soldiers to carry out the plot.

    Four co-conspirators already received convictions in a Miami court back in May for their roles in the conspiracy. Their charges include conspiracy to kidnap or kill Moise and conspiracy to provide material support for the assassination, and all four face the possibility of life sentences if the convictions hold. Several other suspects connected to the plot were shot and killed by Haitian police in the immediate aftermath of the 2021 attack.

    Notably, the Colombian former soldiers charged in the case have long maintained they were misled about the plot’s end goal. They claim they believed they were hired to take part in a political coup to remove Moise from power, and had no advance knowledge that the operation intended to assassinate the president.

    In the five years since Moise’s death, Haiti has been consumed by an unprecedented wave of gang-led violence that has devastated communities and paralyzed daily life. Data from the United Nations Integrated Office in Haiti shows that between April and June 2026 alone, at least 1,408 people were killed and another 656 injured in gang-related conflict across the country. The Haitian government is currently scheduled to hold the first presidential and legislative elections since 2016 on December 13, though the vote remains contingent on whether the country’s volatile security situation can stabilize enough to support a free and fair electoral process.