分类: world

  • Pope calls for robust regulation of AI in manifesto that ponders the future of humanity

    Pope calls for robust regulation of AI in manifesto that ponders the future of humanity

    On Monday, Pope Leo XIV, the first American-born pontiff in history, released a groundbreaking encyclical *Magnifica Humanitas* (Magnificent Humanity) that outlines sweeping calls for robust, enforceable regulation of artificial intelligence, demanding the technology’s developers prioritize the global common good over private profit amid growing anxiety over AI’s expanding impact on labor, warfare and human dignity.

    This first major teaching document of Leo’s pontificate has been highly anticipated since his election, when he immediately identified unregulated AI development as the single greatest contemporary challenge facing humanity. Tying his argument to the Catholic Church’s long tradition of social teaching, Leo frames the AI revolution as a defining modern test comparable to the Industrial Revolution that prompted Pope Leo XIII’s landmark 1889 encyclical *Rerum Novarum* — a text that laid the foundation for modern Catholic thought on workers’ rights and the limits of unregulated capitalism. The new encyclical was intentionally signed on May 15, the 135th anniversary of his namesake’s groundbreaking work, positioning it as the latest update of that teaching to address 21st-century technological change.

    At its core, the document denounces what Leo calls the “culture of power” driving the global AI race, calling out particular risks from the concentration of AI development and vast troves of user data in the hands of a tiny cohort of private tech firms. Leading AI developers OpenAI and Anthropic rank as the second and third most valuable private companies in the U.S., with valuations in the hundreds of billions of dollars that exceed the total GDP of many sovereign nations. Leo argues that this concentration of power poses unique harm to children and the world’s most vulnerable populations, writing that abstract ethical commitments from tech firms are insufficient: “It is not enough to invoke ethics in the abstract; robust legal frameworks, independent oversight, informed users and a political system that does not abdicate its responsibility are required. A more moral AI is not enough if that morality is determined by a few.”

    One of the encyclical’s most provocative stances comes on the use of AI in military affairs, where Leo declares it “not permissible” to cede irreversible, lethal decision-making authority to AI systems. He argues that AI-driven remote warfare has accelerated the “normalization of war” by desensitizing global publics to the human cost of conflict, and notes that the Church’s centuries-old “just war” framework, which outlines when the use of force is morally justified, is now outdated in the face of modern AI-enabled weapons technology. Leo demands full transparency and accountability from developers, requiring that the full chain of command for any AI-assisted strike remain traceable to human decision-makers. This position puts the pontiff in direct conflict with the Trump administration, which has aggressively pushed to deregulate AI development and expand military use of the technology.

    The encyclical also addresses growing public anxiety over AI’s impact on the global workforce, arguing that the pursuit of corporate profit can never justify mass displacement of human workers. “The pursuit of greater profits cannot justify choices that systematically sacrifice jobs, because the human person is an end, not a means, and the economic order must remain subordinate to human dignity and the common good,” Leo wrote. In an unexpected add-on to the document, the pontiff issued the first ever papal apology for the institutional role past popes played in legitimizing chattel slavery, acknowledging that previous popes explicitly granted European monarchs authority to subjugate and enslave non-Christian peoples — a step no prior pontiff has ever publicly taken.

    The encyclical’s official launch event at the Vatican included a appearance from Anthropic co-founder Christopher Olah, a choice that drew scrutiny given the firm’s ongoing high-profile legal battle with the Trump administration. In February, the administration banned all U.S. federal agencies from using Anthropic’s technology after the company refused to grant the U.S. military unrestricted access to its AI systems, and Anthropic has since sued the administration over the order. While critics have framed the invitation as an implicit papal endorsement of the firm, Vatican observers note it aligns with a 10-year Vatican effort to engage Silicon Valley stakeholders in dialogue about AI’s human impact. Brian Boyd, U.S. faith liaison for the nonprofit Future of Life Institute, characterized the invitation not as an endorsement, but as a recognition of Anthropic’s outsize role in the global AI race, noting the company has centered safety and risk mitigation in its public messaging and has demonstrated a willingness to engage with ethical questions.

    Across academia, tech and Catholic ethics circles, experts broadly agree that *Magnifica Humanitas* is poised to become a defining benchmark for the global AI policy debate, offering a framework that will guide policymakers, researchers and the general public as the technology continues to evolve at a breakneck pace. Paolo Carozza, a Notre Dame Law School professor and chair of Meta’s independent oversight board, called the document “a defining document for our era, a profound and prophetic document.” He added, “Pope Leo is offering a clear, comprehensive, and coherent voice urging us to take responsibility for constructing a world in which technology will serve humans rather than degrade them.” Taylor Black, a Microsoft AI executive and director of the Catholic University of America’s AI institute, noted the text pushes even AI insiders to confront fundamental questions about humanity’s role in an increasingly AI-driven world: “It lends itself to people who are at the forefront of these tools and able to see the incredible things that they’re able to do, to have questions about their own ‘What does it mean to be human?’”

    The release comes amid a period of intensifying global debate over AI’s future, with the technology sparking both utopian hopes for transformative human progress and deep existential fears that it will erase millions of high-wage jobs, erode human cognition and concentrate unprecedented power in the hands of a small elite. Pope Leo closes the encyclical with a direct appeal to AI developers and global policymakers: hit pause on the breakneck AI race, reflect on the long-term impacts of the technology, and commit to building AI that serves all of humanity, not just private profit and state power.

  • Gunman shot dead near White House

    Gunman shot dead near White House

    On a Saturday evening in downtown Washington D.C., a violent shooting incident unfolded just blocks from the White House, triggering an immediate security lockdown and leaving one assailant dead and an uninvolved civilian fighting for life, according to statements from United States law enforcement authorities.

    The chaos began when 21-year-old suspect Nasire Best positioned himself at the intersection of 17th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue — a high-traffic area steps from the secure White House complex — before pulling a firearm from his carry bag and opening fire, the U.S. Secret Service confirmed in an official post on the social platform X. In response, on-site Secret Service agents returned fire, striking the suspect. He was rushed to a nearby medical facility where he was later pronounced dead.

    A bystander was also hit by gunfire during the exchange and remained in critical condition as of the latest updates. Law enforcement officials noted that investigators have not yet determined whether the civilian was struck by bullets fired by Best or by the returning rounds from Secret Service agents. The agency confirmed no officers were harmed in the incident, and that former President Donald Trump, who was staying at the White House at the time, was never in danger and his schedule was unaffected. Trump had originally planned to spend the weekend at his golf club in New Jersey, but altered his plans a day prior to remain in Washington.

    Details released publicly later confirmed Best had a documented prior encounter with law enforcement near the White House. Court records from the District of Columbia show Best was arrested in July 2025 after he attempted to enter an unauthorized White House checkpoint, ignored repeated orders from officers to stop, claimed he was Jesus Christ, and explicitly stated he wanted to be taken into custody. Following an initial court hearing, a Pretrial Stay Away Order was issued — a standard protective measure that barred Best from entering the White House perimeter before his trial. When Best failed to appear for a scheduled follow-up hearing in August 2025, a bench warrant was issued for his arrest over documented noncompliance with court terms.

    In the hours after the shooting, evidence of the confrontation remained visible to onlookers outside the White House complex: yellow crime scene tape stretched across the sidewalk, investigators placed dozens of orange evidence markers to catalog bullet casings and other evidence, and discarded emergency medical supplies including purple surgical gloves and first aid kits were left at the scene. Journalists covering the White House who were on the North Lawn when shots rang out described a sudden, chaotic evacuation: multiple reporters said they heard what sounded like dozens of gunshots before being ordered to run to the secured press briefing room for shelter.

    “I was in the middle of taping a social media video from the White House North Lawn when we heard the shots,” ABC News White House correspondent Selina Wang told media outlets after the lockdown. “It sounded like dozens of gunshots. We were told to sprint to the press briefing room where we are holding now.”

    The incident marks the third shooting-related security scare near the U.S. president within a single month. Prior incidents included a weapons-related event at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner in April and another shooting near the Washington Monument earlier in May.

    Federal law enforcement teams have led the investigation into the attack. FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed in a social media statement that FBI personnel were deployed to the scene immediately and that the agency would release new public updates as more information becomes available.

  • Iranians find ‘peace and safety’ in Mecca during hajj

    Iranians find ‘peace and safety’ in Mecca during hajj

    For thousands of Iranian pilgrims gathering in Mecca for this year’s annual hajj, the sacred Islamic journey has offered a rare, precious escape from the chaos of devastating conflict unfolding back home.

  • In Sudan’s war economy, gold keeps flowing as miners risk mercury and collapse

    In Sudan’s war economy, gold keeps flowing as miners risk mercury and collapse

    Perched across the arid, mountainous terrain of northern Sudan’s Dalgo Mahas, a small crew of artisanal gold miners moves slowly across the landscape. Each man carries a handheld metal detector, sweeping the dry earth for traces of the precious metal that has come to define their nation’s tragedy. One kneels, driving a simple digging tool into the dirt, working without hard hats, respiratory protection, or any of the most basic safety protocols that govern formal mining operations around the globe.

    These unregulated small-scale miners are just a tiny fraction of the tens of thousands of Sudanese who have turned to informal gold extraction in recent years, a sector that has become both a lifeline for desperate families and the core driver of the devastating civil war that has pushed millions to the brink of famine.

    Sudan’s reliance on gold traces back to 2011, when the secession of South Sudan stripped the country of more than two-thirds of its historic oil revenues. Overnight, the nation’s economy was left reeling, and gold quickly emerged as the replacement backbone of government finances. In the years following South Sudan’s independence, gold exports accounted for 70% of Sudan’s total national revenue, supplying the cash-strapped state with critical foreign currency to keep basic operations running.

    But today, that same gold wealth is funding the brutal ongoing conflict between Sudan’s regular military and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), according to independent United Nations expert investigators commissioned to track war financing. The RSF, which maintains tight control over major gold-producing regions across Darfur and Kordofan, has overseen the smuggling of massive volumes of unregulated gold out of Sudan to fund its military operations, the experts confirm.

    The human cost of the conflict has already been catastrophic. U.S.-based conflict monitoring organization the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project estimates that at least 59,000 people have been killed since the war began, though the group stresses this count is almost certainly a major undercount, given widespread restrictions on on-the-ground reporting and access to conflict zones. The war has also spawned the world’s largest humanitarian disaster, forcing more than 10 million Sudanese to flee their homes to escape violence. For many of these displaced people, artisanal gold mining has become the only viable way to put food on the table for their families.

    “Gold mining is the only thing I can rely on,” explained 28-year-old Atta al-Khazin, who abandoned his career as a small-scale farmer when rising global oil prices made agricultural inputs too expensive to turn a profit.

    Zahir Adam, a 35-year-old father from el-Fasher in Darfur who has worked in gold mining for more than a decade, said the sector has seen a massive influx of new workers since the war erupted three years ago. “They had no other option,” he said. “Many young people, and many families, depend on mining.”

    Official industry figures confirm Sudan’s gold production is growing, even as its war rages. The country produced 70 tons of gold in 2025, up from 64 tons in 2024, cementing its position as one of the top gold-producing nations in Africa. State-run Sudanese Mineral Resources Company data shows the sector generated roughly $1.8 billion in revenue for 2025.

    More than half of this production comes from informal, artisanal small-scale mines that operate almost entirely outside government oversight, with almost no adherence to global safety or environmental standards. The extraction process used by most informal miners carries major health risks for workers and nearby communities: after digging ore from the ground, miners crush the rock, then mix it with toxic mercury to bind gold particles into an amalgam. The mixture is then heated over an open stove to evaporate the mercury, leaving pure gold behind. The process releases dangerous mercury vapor into the air and leaches toxic waste into local water supplies, creating long-term public health risks that extend far beyond the mines themselves.

    The U.N. expert panel’s 2024 report found that more than 50% of all gold mined in Sudan never enters formal, regulated trade channels, and is instead smuggled across borders to illicit markets in neighboring countries.

    Lethal safety failures are also routine in the unregulated sector. Just last month, a mine collapse in Sudan’s Red Sea Province killed at least seven miners. Another collapse in South Kordofan Province in January claimed 13 lives.

    Efforts to bring the critical sector under government oversight have repeatedly fallen apart amid political upheaval. After the military ousted longtime dictator Omar al-Bashir in April 2019, a civilian-led transitional government that ruled for more than a year launched an initiative to regulate informal gold mining and crack down on smuggling. Those reform efforts were cut short by a military coup in October 2021, which paved the way for the full-scale civil war that broke out in 2023, leaving the gold sector more unregulated and conflict-fueled than ever before.

  • With ice cream and giant fans, hajj pilgrims battle searing heat

    With ice cream and giant fans, hajj pilgrims battle searing heat

    As one of the world’s largest annual religious gatherings gets underway in Saudi Arabia’s holy city of Mecca, extreme soaring heat has emerged as the most severe test for more than a million Muslim pilgrims arriving from across the globe, forcing worshippers to adapt their rituals and pushing authorities to deploy massive emergency response resources.

  • Deadly Israeli strikes pound south, east Lebanon

    Deadly Israeli strikes pound south, east Lebanon

    Fresh waves of deadly Israeli airstrikes have hammered swathes of southern and eastern Lebanon on Sunday, shattering the relative calm of a weeks-old ceasefire and pushing already soaring casualty numbers higher even as Hezbollah’s leader voiced cautious optimism that a forthcoming US-Iran agreement could end the broader regional conflict engulfing the country.

    Lebanon’s Ministry of Public Health announced Sunday that the cumulative death toll from hostilities in the country since March 2 has climbed to 3,123. According to official updates, two people – including a paramedic with the Hezbollah-affiliated Islamic Health Committee – lost their lives in Sunday’s raids. The ministry also confirmed that a single Israeli strike on the southern Lebanese village of Sir al-Gharbiyeh a day earlier killed 11 people, among them six women and one young child, an incident officials have decried as a deliberate massacre.

    The ongoing military operations mark a clear continuation of Israeli hostilities despite a ceasefire that first took effect across Lebanon on April 17 and was recently extended for an additional several weeks. Israeli military officials maintain that all strikes target legitimate Hezbollah positions aligned against the country. The Iran-backed armed group, for its part, has not ceased its own cross-border and frontline attacks: it claimed more than 20 separate assaults against invading Israeli troops in southern Lebanon and other targets inside Israeli territory on Sunday alone, ranging from rocket barrages and drone attacks to artillery shelling.

    While Tehran has signaled that any framework for a de-escalation understanding with Washington to end the broader regional war would explicitly include Lebanon, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday that US President Donald Trump had reaffirmed unwavering support for Israel’s inherent right “to defend itself against threats on all fronts, including in Lebanon.” In an official statement, Israeli military Chief of Staff Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir emphasized that “we continue to strike Hezbollah across all dimensions… the security of civilians and the safety of our forces remain paramount.”

    Lebanon’s official National News Agency documented Israeli airstrikes hitting more than 30 separate locations across southern and eastern Lebanon on Sunday, with multiple strikes resulting in casualties. Agence France-Presse correspondents on the ground reported large plumes of black smoke rising from impacted areas across the region. The Israeli military has issued mandatory evacuation orders for more than a dozen villages in southern Lebanon and the eastern Bekaa Valley, a move that has displaced hundreds of additional civilian residents.

    Lebanon’s civil defense agency confirmed that its regional headquarters in the key southern city of Nabatieh was completely destroyed in an overnight Israeli strike. An AFP photographer witnessed civil defense teams sifting through rubble to recover usable equipment, and as of Sunday afternoon, the Israeli military had not responded to repeated requests for comment from AFP’s Jerusalem bureau on the attack on the facility.

    Speaking amid the renewed violence, Hezbollah Secretary General Naim Qassem expressed hope that a prospective agreement between the United States and Iran would be finalized “God willing” and that Lebanon and Hezbollah would be included in any full cessation of hostilities. However, Qassem doubled down on the group’s longstanding rejection of direct bilateral negotiations between the Lebanese government and Israel, a landmark process that launched recently under US mediation. The talks are scheduled to hold their fourth round in early June, with a preparatory meeting between military delegations set to take place at the Pentagon on May 29.

    “Abandon the direct negotiations… Don’t be with them and stab us in the back,” Qassem warned Lebanese authorities. He also ruled out any discussion of Hezbollah disarmament, stating bluntly that “disarmament is annihilation and we cannot accept it.” Adding that “we and our people face an existential threat,” Qassem stressed that “we will not bow, even if the whole world turns against us.”

    In response to Qassem’s remarks, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Hezbollah of actively seeking to drag Lebanon “back into chaos.” The current cycle of regional violence was triggered in early March, when Hezbollah opened fire on Israel with a massive rocket barrage in retaliation for the US-Israeli airstrike that killed Iran’s supreme leader.

    Under the terms of the ceasefire published by the White House, Israel retains the right to carry out military operations against what it defines as “planned, imminent or ongoing attacks” originating from Lebanese territory. Israeli forces that have invaded southern Lebanon also continue to operate within an Israeli-declared “yellow line” that extends roughly 10 kilometers, or six miles, deep into Lebanese territory along the border.

  • Morocco wants tourists to visit Western Sahara. Some say it’s tightening its control

    Morocco wants tourists to visit Western Sahara. Some say it’s tightening its control

    A low-cost promotional email from Irish carrier Ryanair, advertising cheap €30 return flights from Madrid to the coastal Saharan city of Dakhla as a “Moroccan adventure”, has pulled back the curtain on a growing controversy at the intersection of global tourism and a 50-year-old unresolved territorial dispute. As the $35 ticket price and a flood of new accommodation options from budget hostels to luxury retreats draw growing numbers of international tourists to the region, the labeling of Dakhla and other Western Sahara destinations as part of Morocco has ignited fierce debate over international law, corporate responsibility, and the sovereignty of the Sahrawi people.

    Western Sahara, classified by the United Nations as a non-self-governing territory, has been mired in conflict since Spanish colonial withdrawal in 1976. Morocco promptly claimed the resource-rich territory as its own “southern provinces”, launching an armed conflict against the indigenous Sahrawi independence movement, the Polisario Front. A 1991 UN-brokered ceasefire established a framework for a binding referendum on self-determination, but the vote has never been held. Today, Morocco occupies and administers roughly 80% of the territory, while the Polisario Front controls a small eastern sliver and continues to advocate for full independence.

    Tourism to the Morocco-controlled portion of Western Sahara has surged in recent years, official data from Morocco’s Ministry of Tourism shows. Visitor numbers have jumped more than 50% over the past seven years, rising from 490,297 in 2019 to 743,133 in 2025. This rapid growth has been driven heavily by expanded air access: alongside Morocco’s national carrier Royal Air Maroc, major European airlines including Ryanair, Transavia France, and Binter Canarias now operate direct routes to the territory from European hubs. Most of these carriers, including Ryanair and Transavia France, explicitly list Western Sahara destinations as part of Morocco in their marketing and booking platforms. Only Binter Canarias breaks from this approach, correctly labeling the territory as Western Sahara. Transavia France has stated it only operates routes in line with official authorizations it has received, while Ryanair has declined to comment on the controversy.

    Tourists who have traveled to the region note the tourism sector is still in its early stages. Tom Ruck, a 29-year-old British traveler who flew to Dakhla with Ryanair, reported that dozens of new resort developments remain largely empty, with only a small trickle of family holidaymakers visiting so far. Ruck added that he received a Moroccan entry stamp in his passport, and Moroccan flags are displayed universally across the city, reflecting Rabat’s de facto control of the area.

    The practice of labeling Western Sahara as part of Morocco has drawn sharp criticism from human rights campaigners, legal experts, and the Polisario Front, who argue that it normalizes and legitimizes what they view as Morocco’s illegal occupation in violation of international law. Erik Hagen, a spokesperson for advocacy group Western Sahara Resource Watch, warned that mislabeling the territory distorts public understanding of its status and raises critical questions about corporate due diligence in occupied, politically sensitive regions. Major international travel booking platforms, including Expedia, Booking.com, and Trivago, have also been drawn into the row: all three currently list hotels in Western Sahara as located in Morocco. Booking.com says it adds general disclaimers for disputed regions and advises travelers to check official government travel advisories, while Expedia has declined to comment and Trivago has not yet issued a statement.

    Andrea Maria Pelliconi, an expert in international human rights law at the University of Southampton, argues that airlines and booking platforms have a clear legal obligation to distinguish Western Sahara’s disputed status from sovereign Moroccan territory. She warns that companies that fail to make this distinction could face potential litigation on multiple fronts, including violations of international law and the Sahrawi people’s inherent right to self-determination, as well as breaches of EU consumer protection and fair competition rules.

    Pressure from advocacy groups has already yielded some shifts in industry practice: last year, home-sharing platform Airbnb changed its policy and stopped labeling Western Sahara listings as part of Morocco.

    For the Polisario Front, the growing tourism push is a deliberate strategy by Morocco to cement its claim to the territory through a fait accompli, while leaving most tourists uninformed of the underlying dispute. Sidi Breika, the Polisario Front’s representative to the UK and Ireland, emphasized that all economic and tourism projects in the illegally occupied territory violate the Sahrawi people’s inalienable right to self-determination, a right explicitly recognized by the United Nations. Breika added that the movement is monitoring Ryanair’s activities closely and is actively considering legal action against the carrier.

    Recent diplomatic developments have tilted in Morocco’s favor: in October 2024, the UN Security Council voted to prioritize Morocco’s proposal for an autonomous status for Western Sahara as a path forward, while extending the mandate of the UN peacekeeping mission in the region for another year. The push for the resolution was led by the United States, which first formally recognized Morocco’s claim to Western Sahara in 2020 under the Trump administration, as part of a deal that saw Morocco normalize relations with Israel. Despite this shift, the formal international legal position still requires a mutually agreed political solution to the dispute under UN supervision, and the Polisario Front has repeatedly rejected Morocco’s autonomy proposal.

    Breika stressed that the Sahrawi people’s position remains unwavering: investments in tourism and other economic projects can never replace the Sahrawi people’s right to freely determine their own future.

  • Young men storm a Congo hospital treating Ebola patients to demand bodies of their kin

    Young men storm a Congo hospital treating Ebola patients to demand bodies of their kin

    On Sunday evening, violent unrest disrupted the frontline of the Democratic Republic of Congo’s fight against a rapidly expanding Ebola outbreak, when a group of angry young men breached the compound of Mongbwalu General Hospital — a key facility treating Ebola patients in the heart of the epidemic zone in eastern Congo. As gunfire echoed through the surrounding area, medical personnel were forced to make a frantic, rushed evacuation of all patients receiving care at the site.

    Dr. Richard Lokudu, the hospital’s medical director, confirmed to the Associated Press in a phone interview that the attackers’ core demand was the handover of two bodies of their relatives held at the facility. In the chaos of the incursion, no immediate information on injuries or casualties was available. Lokudu noted that the entire hospital had been placed on full alert amid the unfolding situation, and he was unable to provide additional details as events continued to develop.

    This attack marks the third act of violence targeting Ebola healthcare infrastructure in just seven days, laying bare the deep, multi-layered challenges facing public health workers as they attempt to contain an outbreak the World Health Organization has already designated a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Local resistance to Congolese public health rules has been driven by cultural traditions around burial, which conflict with mandatory safety protocols designed to stop Ebola transmission.

    Bodies of Ebola victims carry extremely high levels of the virus, and traditional funeral practices — including close contact during preparation for burial and large community gatherings — are major drivers of further spread. To curb this risk, Congolese authorities have issued a mandate requiring that all burials of suspected Ebola victims be overseen by trained official personnel wherever possible. This policy has sparked repeated backlash from local communities, who often reject restrictions on accessing their loved ones’ remains. Just two days before the hospital attack, the government announced a ban on funeral wakes and any gatherings of more than 50 people in the affected northeastern region to slow transmission.

    The string of attacks began on Thursday, when a separate treatment center in the nearby town of Rwampara was burned to the ground by community members after officials blocked family members from retrieving the body of a local man who had died from suspected Ebola. Two days later, on Saturday, residents of Mongbwalu attacked and set fire to an isolation tent set up by the international humanitarian organization Doctors Without Borders for suspected and confirmed Ebola cases. In that incident, 18 patients with suspected Ebola infections fled the facility and remain unaccounted for, a development that poses major new transmission risks, according to Lokudu.

    As violence against health workers has escalated, official case counts have shown a sharp jump in the scope of the outbreak. Earlier on Sunday, the Congolese Ministry of Communication announced via the social platform X that the country had recorded 904 suspected Ebola cases, most concentrated in northeastern Ituri Province. That number marks a significant increase from the previous count of just over 700 cases shared just days prior. The ministry also reported a total of 119 suspected deaths from the virus, though a breakdown of regional figures it released added up to 220 fatalities. Officials could not be reached immediately to clarify the discrepancy in the death toll.

    This outbreak is caused by the Bundibugyo strain of Ebola, a rare variant for which no targeted vaccine is currently available. The virus spread undetected through Ituri for weeks after the first reported death in late April in Bunia, the provincial capital, because authorities initially tested for a more common Ebola strain and returned negative results, delaying detection and response.

    New developments have also called into question the timeline of the outbreak’s origins. On Saturday, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies announced that three of its volunteer workers had died from Ebola in Mongbwalu. The agency reported that the three workers believe the volunteers contracted the virus on March 27, while handling dead bodies during a humanitarian mission unrelated to the Ebola response. If this infection date is confirmed, it would push the start of the outbreak back by nearly a month, explaining how the virus was able to spread widely before being detected. The WHO has assessed that the outbreak poses a “very high” risk to Congo — an upgrade from its previous “high” rating — while noting that the risk of global spread remains low.

  • Hajj pilgrims press on despite Iran war uncertainty

    Hajj pilgrims press on despite Iran war uncertainty

    For Shahid Ali and his wife, the dream of completing Hajj was decades in the making. For years, the East London couple stashed savings in a dented tin box hidden in their home, skipping vacations, putting off home repairs and cutting out all non-essential luxuries to afford the once-in-a-lifetime religious journey they hoped to take before old age stole their chance. But when open conflict broke out between Israel, the United States and Iran, what should have been a period of quiet anticipation curdled into worry and doubt.

    “My children asked us to reconsider, but we have waited our lives for this,” Ali told Middle East Eye shortly before his departure. “There was massive uncertainty after mass flight cancellations, but we never changed our plans. It still looks like we’re going.”

    Ali’s anxiety is shared by Muslim pilgrims gathering in homes and mosques across the globe ahead of this year’s annual pilgrimage to Mecca, one of the five central pillars of Islam. Yet that shared uncertainty has not stopped hundreds of thousands of worshippers from moving forward with their long-planned journeys, even as the regional conflict upends travel logistics and drives up costs.

    The ongoing conflict has already disrupted regional air travel, pushed up living costs worldwide, and forced commercial carriers to implement costly detours and new surcharges to navigate restricted airspace. Even with these disruptions, Saudi authorities announced Saturday that more than 1.5 million international pilgrims have already arrived in the kingdom for this year’s Hajj – a number that already surpasses the total international arrivals recorded in 2024.

    The shadow of geopolitical tension has hung heavily over the pilgrimage season. Earlier this week, two senior officials confirmed to Middle East Eye that former U.S. President Donald Trump delayed a planned offensive against Iran after senior Gulf allies and his own national security team warned against launching new military operations during the Hajj. In subsequent statements, Trump noted that a new agreement was “largely negotiated,” and multiple reports over the weekend indicated that Washington and Tehran are close to finalizing a 60-day extension of an existing ceasefire alongside a formal memorandum of understanding.

    For Muslims worldwide, Hajj is a sacred religious obligation that every believer is expected to complete at least once in their lifetime if they are physically and financially able. For many working-class and low-income families, saving for the journey takes decades, and waiting lists for official Hajj slots in many parts of the Global South can stretch to 10 years or more. For elderly pilgrims in particular, postponement is unthinkable: many worry they will not live long enough to get another chance.

    “There’s uncertainty everywhere now,” said Farzana Begum, a retired teacher from Birmingham who is preparing to depart for Mecca. “But if God has invited you, you cannot refuse because of politics.”

    Despite the hopeful signs of a ceasefire, the conflict has created severe logistical hurdles for travel operators and pilgrims alike. Airspace restrictions and fears of sudden escalation have forced Gulf commercial airlines to reroute all flights passing through sensitive areas of the region, with some carriers suspending routes entirely. The longer flight paths and elevated fuel costs have caused Hajj package prices to spike sharply in recent weeks, according to travel operators based in Jordan, Pakistan and Indonesia.

    “Every single day the situation changes,” explained one Jordan-based Hajj organizer who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the topic. “Flights are being rerouted constantly, prices shift from one day to the next, and pilgrims are calling every hour asking if the journey is still safe. When the war first started, anxiety was through the roof, but that panic has mostly died down now.”

    Saudi officials have moved quickly to reassure pilgrims, emphasizing that the kingdom has put extensive contingency plans in place to ensure the safety and smooth operation of the pilgrimage. Even so, some countries with large Muslim populations have passed on the new added costs to worshippers. India, for example, has added an extra 10,000 rupees ($105) to all official Hajj packages, while Indonesia – home to the world’s largest Muslim population – has announced it will absorb the additional costs to avoid burdening pilgrims.

    While a ceasefire agreement appears imminent, concerns persist that tensions could reignite at any moment. The Gulf region hosts some of the busiest and most congested air corridors in the world, and any sudden escalation of hostilities would trigger widespread further disruption to global travel networks. Most pilgrims traveling from Europe, South Asia and Africa transit through major regional hubs including Doha, Dubai and Jeddah, leaving their travel plans vulnerable to any sudden shift in security conditions. For many, this persistent uncertainty has added a heavy layer of emotional stress to what is already an intensely spiritual and costly journey.

    At London’s Heathrow Airport earlier this week, groups of British pilgrims gathered around luggage trolleys stacked with suitcases and rolled prayer mats, waiting for their flights. Some said they were nervously refreshing news updates every few minutes ahead of departure, while others chose to avoid political coverage entirely to focus on their pilgrimage. One woman traveling with her 78-year-old mother said her entire family had begged the pair to cancel their trip and rebook for next year.

    “My brothers said we should wait another year,” she explained. “But my mother said: ‘What if I don’t have another year?’”

    This year’s Hajj is also shaped by the broader wave of turmoil roiling the Middle East. Many pilgrims preparing for the journey say they carry deep sorrow over the ongoing wars and humanitarian crises across the region, particularly the conflict in Gaza. For many, the fact that thousands of Palestinian Muslims trapped under siege and war are unable to perform Hajj this year weighs heavily on their hearts.

    “We will pray for them when we are there,” Begum said. “You cannot separate Hajj from what is happening to Muslims elsewhere.”

    Historically, the Hajj has persisted through wars, pandemics and political upheaval across the centuries. Long before the advent of commercial aviation, pilgrims traveled for months by foot, camel and ship to reach Mecca, even during periods of regional conflict. More recently, the global COVID-19 pandemic forced Saudi Arabia to restrict Hajj to only a tiny handful of domestic worshippers, the first such large-scale cancellation in modern history, leaving millions of believers around the world heartbroken.

    The return of large-scale international Hajj after the pandemic initially brought widespread renewed optimism for both travel operators and worshippers. The new tensions sparked by the Iran conflict have introduced a fresh wave of uncertainty to the pilgrimage season. Analysts note that the situation lays bare just how vulnerable global religious travel has become to sudden geopolitical shocks.

    “Hajj depends on massive international coordination across dozens of countries,” explained one Gulf-based aviation expert who requested anonymity over fears of professional repercussions. “When airspace becomes militarized or unstable, the consequences spread quickly through the entire travel network. Some pilgrims may even end up stuck in Saudi Arabia longer than planned if disruptions worsen.”

    Yet for most pilgrims, fear takes a backseat to faith. At a pre-Hajj informational seminar held at a mosque in west London earlier this week, organizers walked attendees through emergency protocols, insurance requirements and potential travel delays. Time and again, however, the conversation circled back to spiritual purpose rather than political risk. Imams leading the seminar reminded attendees that hardship has always been an inherent part of the Hajj journey.

    “The essence of Hajj is sacrifice,” one speaker told the congregation. “People throughout history traveled under far more dangerous conditions than we face today.”

    That message has resonated deeply with worshippers preparing to depart. Some pilgrims openly acknowledge they feel afraid, and many say their family members remain deeply worried for their safety. But almost none are willing to abandon plans they have spent decades of sacrifice and saving to bring to fruition.

    For Shahid Ali and his wife, canceling their journey now is unthinkable. “We don’t know what will happen in the world,” he said quietly before his departure. “There is war everywhere. But we believe if God wants us to complete Hajj, we will complete it.”

  • She was told to marry in a country which bans girls’ education. So she got in a taxi and fled

    She was told to marry in a country which bans girls’ education. So she got in a taxi and fled

    Five years have passed since the Taliban administration implemented a sweeping ban on secondary and higher education for girls across Afghanistan, a policy that has systematically dismantled millions of young women’s aspirations and narrowed their life options to a single socially expected path: early marriage. For 19-year-old Alia—whose real name has been withheld to protect her from retaliation—escaping that fate required a dangerous, hundreds-of-miles journey from her rural home in Daykundi to the capital city of Kabul last year.

    Traveling by taxi with her female cousin, the pair fully covered in line with the Taliban’s strict gendered dress rules that leave only eyes exposed, their trip flouted a separate regulation banning women from making long-distance journeys without a male family escort. At any checkpoint, Taliban enforcers could have stopped them and imposed harsh punishment—but by an unforeseen stroke of luck, the pair slipped through all checkpoints without incident and reached Kabul safely.

    Alia lied to her family about her purpose for travel, telling them she planned to meet old friends and former classmates. The truth, she reveals, was stark: if she had remained in Daykundi, her family would have forced her to marry immediately. Once in Kabul, Alia put an alternative plan into action: she enrolled in a private short-term English language course, one of the only limited learning options available to girls who have finished primary school in modern Afghanistan, alongside religious madrasas. Neither of these alternatives, however, can replace the structured formal education that girls were once guaranteed.

    Alia’s case is rare for two reasons: not only does it showcase extraordinary courage to defy the status quo, but her family also has the financial means to support her studies in Kabul—a privilege out of reach for most Afghans, three-quarters of whom cannot cover their basic daily needs according to United Nations data. While Alia’s parents supported her dream of becoming a pilot before the education ban, they too have been worn down by the constraints of life under Taliban rule. Today, they urge her to marry, arguing that there is no other future for her when school, university and formal work are all closed off.

    Alia has already received multiple marriage proposals, and she lives in constant fear that she will eventually be forced to accept one that will end her dreams forever. “Some families can be very restrictive. It is possible they could tell me to forget my dreams. I don’t feel positive at all about it,” she says. Even so, her determination to resist remains unshakable. “If my family don’t force me to get married, I will wait. I will resist it until my very last breath.”

    For thousands of other girls across Afghanistan, that resistance has already failed. In a sparse, small apartment in western Kabul, 22-year-old Shama shares the story of the future she lost. If the Taliban had not seized power and closed girls’ schools, she would be nearly finished with her education and on track to achieve her lifelong dream of becoming a doctor. Instead, at 18, just four years after the ban took effect, her widowed mother Kamila had no choice but to push her into marriage. Today, Shama is the mother of two young daughters, and her own dreams of professional and personal fulfillment remain unfulfilled.

    Kamila, who worked as a cleaner to fund her daughters’ education after her husband died six years ago, says she felt immense pressure from Taliban enforcers to marry off Shama before she drew unwanted negative attention as an unmarried young woman. “I had wanted her to be educated, work and contribute to society. I am illiterate so I am like a blind person. But I wanted my girls to learn. She had so many dreams. But it didn’t happen for her,” Kamila explains.

    Shama, who was treated well by her husband, still carries the permanent grief of being barred from reaching her potential. “Having a husband is not the only dream a woman has. She needs to stand on her own two feet first, become independent and then she can marry and start a family. But I went into this new life with none of that. My dreams remain unfulfilled,” she says. Even small, everyday moments trigger her pain: when she watches a movie that shows women working or studying, she is flooded with stress and longing. “I feel like I am trapped in my home. I only live for my children,” she adds.

    Shama’s 18-year-old sister Nora now waits in fear for the same fate. “I’m too young to get married. I want to continue my education. It’s like being in prison. I fear going out because of the government, and at home my mother tells me I must get married,” says Nora, who still dreams of returning to the classroom she was forced to leave. She has no hope that the Taliban will ever lift the ban, even after years of waiting for a reversal.

    Since the Taliban returned to power in 2021, government officials have offered a rotating series of justifications for the ongoing education ban, with no clear timeline for reopening schools. In a September 2021 interview, a Taliban spokesman initially promised schools would reopen soon, saying the government was only working to improve security conditions. A year later, the explanation shifted to claims that religious scholars had raised concerns about girls traveling to and from school. By 2024, officials were simply deferring the question to the country’s supreme leadership. When the BBC recently asked deputy spokesman Hamdullah Fitrat to justify the ongoing ban, he deflected the question to the Ministry of Education, which never responded to repeated requests for comment.

    While internal divisions over the ban have been reported within the Taliban government, the country’s supreme leader has only hardened his stance against lifting restrictions in recent years. For the girls who lost access to education the day the ban went into effect, that day remains etched in their memory. Alia recalls: “All I did was cry and sob the whole day and night. I could not sleep for a week. I felt like I was walking around like a dead body. When I see men my age who have graduated and are going to university – I feel very bad, I feel like I am burning in hell.”

    The education ban is just one of dozens of sweeping restrictions placed on women and girls by the Taliban, with other rules barring women from most public sector jobs, limiting their ability to travel, and confining them largely to the home. In recent weeks, the Taliban government codified new rules that effectively legalize child marriage, allowing a minor’s silence to be interpreted as consent to wed. Fitrat defends the Taliban’s record, pointing to thousands of business permits issued for women and the government’s claims to have resolved hundreds of cases of forced marriage and inheritance discrimination. But on-the-ground reporting confirms that forced and underage marriage rates are rising sharply, directly driven by the lack of education options for girls.

    Today, many Afghan women and girls report a growing sense of abandonment by the international community, as the systemic discrimination they face has faded from global headlines. “If we hadn’t been forgotten, then something would surely have been done by now,” Alia says. For Kamila, the lost opportunities for her daughters represent a complete erasure of the future she fought to give them. She has a message for mothers across the globe who live in countries where girls can still freely learn and work: “In a world where your daughters are allowed to study and work, let them do it. Let them become independent. Here in Afghanistan, it’s over for us.”

    According to UN projections, if the education ban remains in place through 2030, more than two million girls will have been denied a secondary education, leaving Afghanistan with one of the lowest female literacy rates on Earth.