分类: world

  • Is Lebanon part of the Iran war ceasefire?

    Is Lebanon part of the Iran war ceasefire?

    In the days following the announcement of a landmark two-week temporary ceasefire between the United States and Iran, deep uncertainty and contradiction have clouded whether the de-escalation agreement extends to neighboring Lebanon, where Israeli forces have continued offensive operations for more than a month. Pakistan, which served as the primary mediator for the bilateral truce, confirmed early on that the pause in hostilities would cover all fronts, including Lebanon. But Israel — which has been carrying out air bombardments and a ground invasion of Lebanon since early March — has flatly rejected this claim, maintaining its military campaign against Lebanese armed movement Hezbollah unabated. As of press time, Hezbollah itself has not released an official formal position on the ceasefire, though anonymous Lebanese sources close to the group told Reuters the movement had halted its own cross-border fire following the truce announcement, with a formal statement expected imminently.

    The expansion of conflict into Lebanon followed the outbreak of US-Israeli attacks on Iran in late February. Hezbollah launched a large-scale rocket barrage into northern Israel in direct response to the killing of Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, a key spiritual leader for the Lebanese resistance movement. The group has also maintained its actions were a preemption of a planned Israeli invasion of Lebanese territory, a assessment that has been corroborated by independent reporting in Israeli media outlets.

    Long before the ceasefire was reached, Iran had made any cessation of hostilities with the US conditional on an end to Israeli attacks on Lebanon, and Iranian officials have repeatedly stated the new agreement explicitly includes a halt to fighting on Lebanese soil. In an official statement, Iran’s Supreme National Security Council said the US had made a “fundamental commitment” to the “cessation of war on all fronts, including against the heroic Islamic Resistance of Lebanon” as a core term of the truce.

    US President Donald Trump, who negotiated the deal with Tehran, made no mention of Lebanon in his public announcement of the ceasefire, only noting that Washington considered Iran’s 10-point negotiation framework “workable”. Iranian state media has since confirmed the framework includes provisions to end active conflict across four zones: Iran itself, Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen. Nearly four hours after the truce was made public, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office released a statement confirming Israel supported Trump’s decision to suspend strikes on Iran for the 14-day period — but added a critical caveat that “the two-week ceasefire does not include Lebanon.”

    On the ground, the discrepancy in terms has translated to continued bloodshed. The Israeli military announced it had halted offensive operations inside Iran starting at 3 a.m. local time in line with the truce, but explicitly stated it would “continues fighting against Hezbollah.” In the early hours of Wednesday, Lebanese health ministry officials confirmed Israeli fighter jets carried out an air strike on the coastal Lebanese city of Sidon that killed eight people and wounded 44 more. The attack damaged a seaside cafe in the city, with photos of the destruction circulating widely across regional media. Additional heavy strikes were reported across multiple villages in southern Lebanon and in the eastern Beqaa Governorate.

    Amid the ongoing violence, the Lebanese army has issued an urgent advisory calling on thousands of displaced residents to avoid returning to their homes in southern Lebanon. The Israeli military has also ordered all residents in the coastal city of Tyre to evacuate the area ahead of planned planned strikes. International leaders have pushed back against Israel’s continued offensive. Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares called the continuation of attacks after the ceasefire announcement “unacceptable,” telling public radio RNE that “All fronts must cease, and all fronts also means Lebanon.” Earlier, French President Emmanuel Macron welcomed the US-Iran truce and publicly expressed hope that the agreement would be “fully extended to include Lebanon.”

    The current full-scale Israeli military campaign in Lebanon launched on March 2, breaking a previous ceasefire agreement signed between Israel and Hezbollah in November 2024 that had held for more than a year amid repeated violations. Since resuming offensive operations, Israeli ground forces have advanced up to five kilometers into southern Lebanese territory, expanding their incursion beyond the UN-monitored border. Lebanese authorities report that more than 1,500 people have been killed in Israeli air strikes and ground operations, and more than one million Lebanese residents have been displaced from their homes since fighting resumed.

  • Dilemma over crossings as fate of Hormuz ships remains uncertain

    Dilemma over crossings as fate of Hormuz ships remains uncertain

    In the wake of a last-minute bilateral ceasefire announcement between the United States and Iran that was meant to reopen the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, global shipping operators are still holding back, with barely a handful of vessels daring to transit the waterway just one day after the agreement. As of Wednesday, only three commercial ships had completed passage through the chokepoint, a stark contrast to pre-crisis traffic levels and a clear indicator of the deep uncertainty still hanging over one of the world’s most vital maritime trade routes.

    Data from multiple maritime industry analysts underscores the scope of the ongoing logjam. Ship tracking service MarineTraffic confirmed that beyond the three transits Wednesday, only a small number of additional vessels are currently scheduled to make the crossing, a number that amounts to no meaningful recovery of trade flow. Since March 1, maritime data provider Kpler records an average of just eight commodity-carrying ships transiting the strait per day, far below the usual 20-plus vessels that pass through daily during normal conditions. Maritime intelligence firm Lloyd’s List Intelligence estimates that more than 800 commercial vessels remain stranded across Gulf waters, with overall traffic through the strait plummeting by roughly 95% from pre-crisis levels.

    “Everybody across the global shipping sector is obviously on edge right now,” Richard Meade, editor-in-chief of Lloyd’s List, told Agence France-Presse. For the thousands of crew members who have remained confined to their stuck vessels for weeks, the ceasefire announcement does offer the first glimmer of hope after weeks of uncertainty. “The ceasefire has definitely calmed our nerves, and we’re holding out hope that the calm holds. The crew can finally take a breath after all this time,” an off-duty captain, whose vessel and crew remain stranded off the coast of Qatar, told AFP.

    Despite the tentative diplomatic breakthrough, major shipping industry bodies are still warning carriers against rushing to resume full transit through the strait, saying conditions remain too volatile for large-scale movement. “Heading out through the Gulf right now would not be advisable without explicit, verified coordination with both US and Iranian authorities,” Jakob Larsen, chief safety and security officer at the international shipping association Bimco, told AFP. His warning aligns with guidance from other leading industry groups, which all emphasize that the long-term stability of the waterway remains far from guaranteed. “We still have no clear confirmation that the area has truly become safe for regular transit,” the Japanese Shipowners’ Association told AFP Wednesday.

    Industry leaders add that core details of the agreement have yet to be clarified enough to restore shipping confidence. John Stawpert, principal director of marine affairs at the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), noted that much of the public discussion has centered on Iran’s 10-point framework for the deal, but key elements of that proposal remain undefined. That framework, presented by Iran as the basis for talks with the United States, does not align with the terms the White House has agreed to, a senior US official has confirmed.

    The International Maritime Organization, the United Nations’ maritime regulatory body, announced Wednesday that it is currently developing a formal mechanism to guarantee permanent safe transit through the strait for all commercial vessels. Beyond the ongoing geopolitical risk, a rushed, uncoordinated mass departure of hundreds of stranded vessels from the Gulf also raises major safety risks of collisions and groundings in already congested waters, Meade added.

    One of the biggest outstanding unresolved questions is the future of the limited transit system Iran implemented during the closure of the strait, which Lloyd’s List has dubbed the “Tehran Toll Booth” amid widespread reports that vessels were required to pay fees to secure passage permission. The Iranian 10-point plan explicitly includes language calling for “maintaining Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz”, a condition that conflicts with US demands for fully unrestricted, free passage.

    US President Donald Trump previously stated in a social media post that Iran had agreed to the “COMPLETE, IMMEDIATE, and SAFE OPENING of the Strait of Hormuz”. But an Iranian diplomatic source told reporters Wednesday that a new transit mechanism has been organized in partnership with Oman, “under which there has been and will be a right of passage” for all vessels. Oman’s government issued a statement Wednesday welcoming the ceasefire but declined to comment on the details of the proposed transit mechanism or any potential toll system.

    According to reporting from the Financial Times, Tehran is expected to demand a fee of one US dollar per barrel of oil passing through the strait, with payment required to be made in cryptocurrency to avoid US-led financial sanctions. Writing in an op-ed published Tuesday, Amir Handjari, a senior fellow at the US-based Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, argued that a joint Omani-Iranian arrangement to manage the strait is far from unrealistic. “Oman would gain a consistent new revenue stream and increased strategic relevance in the region. Iran would gain international legitimacy, much-needed hard currency, and a tangible diplomatic win to show its domestic population after the conflict,” Handjari wrote.

    The current effective shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz has no modern precedent. Even during the eight-year Iran-Iraq War between 1980 and 1988, the strait remained open to commercial traffic, despite a series of deadly tanker attacks that significantly slowed trade flows. More recently, in 2024, repeated attacks by pro-Iranian Houthi militias in the Red Sea cut traffic through the Suez Canal and Bab al-Mandeb Strait by half, France’s economy ministry confirmed.

  • French former detainees Cécile Kohler and Jacques Paris return home after more than 3 years in Iran

    French former detainees Cécile Kohler and Jacques Paris return home after more than 3 years in Iran

    PARIS – After more than three years of unlawful detention in Iran and weeks of stalled diplomatic negotiations, two French citizens have finally touched down on home soil, capping an extraordinary ordeal that unfolded against the backdrop of soaring regional conflict between Iran and the United States. Cécile Kohler, 41, and 72-year-old Jacques Paris crossed out of Iran by road on Tuesday, mere hours before a fragile tentative ceasefire was announced to end deadly cross-border clashes that have roiled the Middle East since Feb. 28. French President Emmanuel Macron welcomed the pair personally at the Elysee Palace Wednesday morning, framing their long-awaited release as a landmark diplomatic win for France. The two were initially granted prison release in November 2022 on spurious unsubstantiated charges, but were barred from exiting the country by Iranian authorities, forcing them to take shelter in the French diplomatic compound in Tehran for months before exit approval was granted Tuesday. In comments to reporters shortly after their arrival, Kohler described the moment as a narrow, hard-won escape. “We realize just how much we narrowly escaped, so to speak, because it could have been much worse,” she said, adding that the multi-stage journey left the pair exhausted after two straight days of travel without sleep. According to French officials, the pair traveled an approximately nine-hour overland route from Tehran to neighboring Azerbaijan in the care of French ambassador to Iran Pierre Cochard, before boarding a charter flight bound for Paris that landed Wednesday. A spokesperson for the Élysée confirmed that the release came after years of quiet diplomatic groundwork, but noted that urgent regional pressure sparked by the Iran-U.S. war forced negotiators to accelerate talks in recent weeks. Macron, who has worked to keep France distanced from direct involvement in the escalating Middle East conflict, has taken a lead diplomatic role in engaging with new Iranian leadership amid the recent crisis. He became the first Western head of state to hold direct talks with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on March 8, just days after the latest outbreak of open hostilities, with two follow-up phone conversations held on March 15 and March 24. French officials have publicly credited Oman with playing a critical mediating role in breaking the months-long deadlock, helping shuttle sensitive communications between Paris and Tehran in the final stages of negotiations. “Omani authorities made it possible, in the final stretch, to convey a certain number of messages within the Iranian system,” French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot told France 2 television Wednesday. “On Sunday evening, Easter Sunday, I received a call from my counterpart, Iran’s foreign minister, confirming that the decision had been made on their side.” Barrot declined to share further details of the closed-door negotiations, noting that all terms would remain confidential per the agreements reached between the two sides. But Iran’s state-run news agency IRNA released a statement Tuesday claiming the release was part of a formal prisoner swap agreement, in which France agreed to release Iranian national Mahdieh Esfandiari in exchange for Kohler and Paris. The Élysée has forcefully denied any such swap agreement was reached. Esfandiari was convicted in a French court last February on charges of inciting terrorism over public comments she made regarding the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel. She received a one-year prison sentence plus an additional three-year suspended term, and was permanently barred from entering French territory. She has since appealed the conviction, and had been held under house arrest while her appeal proceeded. Her attorney Nabil Boudi confirmed to the Associated Press that the house arrest order was lifted Tuesday afternoon, shortly after news of Kohler and Paris’ departure from Iran broke. Speaking publicly Wednesday, the two former detainees opened up about the brutal conditions they endured during their more than three years in Iran’s notorious Evin Prison, a facility long known for holding political prisoners and dissidents. Kohler called the facility “hell,” describing unrelenting daily horror for the pair throughout their detention. Paris added that the couple lived under constant psychological pressure during their detainment. “We had no right to read, no right to write. Whenever we left our cell, we were blindfolded,” he told reporters. “One of the goals was likely to break us. We are not broken. We will bear witness, we will speak out, and we will enjoy life again.” The pair were arrested while on a personal vacation in Iran in May 2022, a day before what would become more than three years of captivity cut short their trip.

  • Nigeria begins mass trial of 500 terrorism suspects

    Nigeria begins mass trial of 500 terrorism suspects

    Seventeen years after the Boko Haram insurgency first ignited in Nigeria’s northeast, the West African nation has launched one of the largest mass terrorism prosecutions in its history, moving to try more than 500 people linked to widespread militant violence that has torn through communities across the country.

    For decades, a glaring gap in Nigeria’s counterterrorism efforts has left families and affected communities frustrated: despite thousands of deaths and widespread displacement from bombings, raids, and ransom kidnappings, very few people accused of involvement in militant attacks have ever faced legal prosecution. Many detained suspects have spent years behind bars without ever appearing in court, fueling public anger and persistent rumors that accused militants are often quietly released to return to violent activity.

    That long-standing inaction took a sharp turn on Tuesday, when the mass trial opened at Nigeria’s capital Abuja’s High Court. According to federal Attorney General Lateef Fagbemi, 227 suspects were formally arraigned before a panel of 10 judges on the opening day, with the full proceedings set to unfold in successive phases. Extraordinary security measures were put in place for the session: suspects were transported in heavily armored convoys escorted by a combined force of military personnel, police officers, and intelligence agents, while international observers, representatives from human rights organizations, and members of the Nigerian Bar Association were granted access to monitor the process.

    The charges brought against the defendants cover a wide range of alleged ties to militant activity. While most of the accusations are linked to direct participation in attacks across northern Nigeria, other suspects face counts of facilitating terrorism through financing militants, trafficking illegal arms, and providing critical logistical support. In an early development, five of the accused have already received prison sentences ranging from seven to 20 years after entering guilty pleas, admitting to crimes including selling livestock, supplying food, and sharing intelligence with militant networks.

    In a statement ahead of the proceedings, Attorney General Fagbemi emphasized that the unprecedented scale of the trial demonstrates the Nigerian federal government’s unwavering commitment to ending decades of unaddressed militant violence. “The federal government is committed to ensuring that due process is followed while bringing those involved in terrorism to justice,” he said.

    The opening of the trial comes as Nigeria continues to grapple with near-daily militant violence. Just one day after the proceedings began, gunmen suspected to be linked to local kidnapping gangs and Islamist militant networks raided rural villages in Shiroro district of Nigeria’s western Niger State, killing at least 20 residents, according to local witnesses and AFP reporting. Since the Boko Haram insurgency first emerged in 2009, insecurity has spread far beyond the northeast, leaving vast rural areas across the country vulnerable to frequent attacks, kidnappings for ransom, and gang violence that has killed hundreds of people just in 2026 alone.

    Security analysts have broadly welcomed the mass trial as a turning point in Nigeria’s long fight against insurgency. Retired army major Bashir Galma, a leading Nigerian security expert, told the BBC that the proceeding marks a “positive development” and a “significant milestone” for the country’s counterterrorism efforts. He noted that for years, Nigerians have repeatedly raised demands to resolve the backlog of unprosecuted terror suspects held in long-term detention. “This will bring some level of peace for people whose loved ones were killed or injured,” Galma said, adding that the trial also addresses long-circulating rumors that suspects are regularly released to resume their terrorist activity.

    Even with this progress, Galma cautioned that some defendants may still be released in the coming months, as many of the suspects were arrested years ago, a legal circumstance that judges are required to consider during sentencing.

  • UN chief hails US-Iran 2-week ceasefire

    UN chief hails US-Iran 2-week ceasefire

    On Tuesday, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres issued a public welcome to the newly announced two-week ceasefire between the United States and Iran, according to an official statement released by his spokesperson. This tentative pause in direct hostilities marks a rare potential de-escalation of tensions that have gripped the already volatile Middle East region in recent weeks.

    In the formal statement, spokesperson Stephane Dujarric conveyed that Guterres is urging every party currently engaged in ongoing conflicts across the Middle East to honor their legal commitments under international humanitarian law, and to strictly adhere to the terms laid out in the new ceasefire agreement. The UN chief emphasized that this temporary cessation of violence lays critical groundwork needed to advance toward a long-term, comprehensive peace settlement that can bring stability to the entire region.

    The statement further stressed that an immediate end to active combat is an urgent global priority. A halt to hostilities is essential to protecting vulnerable civilian populations caught in crossfire, and to easing the widespread humanitarian suffering that has devastated communities across the area.

    Guterres also extended sincere gratitude to Pakistan and all other third-party countries that contributed diplomatic work to mediate talks and facilitate the finalization of the ceasefire. To advance ongoing peace efforts, the announcement confirmed that Jean Arnault, Guterres’ personal envoy for the region, is already deployed on the ground to coordinate UN support and back all initiatives working toward sustainable, long-term peace. The ceasefire announcement has raised cautious international hope that the temporary pause can open the door to further diplomatic negotiations to resolve long-standing tensions between the two nations.

  • Takeaways from AP’s story on how oil drilling is fueling a migrant surge in Brazil’s Amazon

    Takeaways from AP’s story on how oil drilling is fueling a migrant surge in Brazil’s Amazon

    Tucked away in the far northern reaches of Brazil’s Amapá state, the small, remote border city of Oiapoque is already grappling with the uneven, disruptive early impacts of a projected oil-fueled economic boom, months after state-owned energy giant Petrobras launched exploratory offshore drilling along the Amazon rainforest coast. What was once a quiet community reliant on fishing, informal gold mining and cross-border trade with neighboring French Guiana has been upended by an unprecedented influx of thousands of job-seeking migrants, who have cleared large swathes of intact forest to build makeshift informal settlements while waiting for the employment opportunities they expect to emerge once full-scale oil production begins.

    Local officials confirm that the rapid, unplanned population expansion has already overwhelmed the city’s limited, underfunded public infrastructure. Oiapoque city councilor Tiago Vieira Araújo reports that seven entirely new residential neighborhoods have sprung up across the city in just 12 months, with several carved out of pristine rainforest that stood undisturbed barely a year ago. Local residents have raised widespread complaints about overcrowded public schools, and the city’s only public hospital is currently operating at 100% capacity, unable to accommodate the sudden jump in population.

    For Indigenous communities that have long called the region home, the drilling project and its aftermath have brought outright displacement and broken promises. Renata Lod, a representative of Oiapoque’s Indigenous council, harshly criticized Petrobras’ arrival in the region, noting that the company entered with robust political backing and marketed the project as a transformational development effort that would turn the remote city into a prosperous, Gulf-like economic hub overnight. “They promised we would go to sleep a small fishing town and wake up like Dubai,” she said. Instead, the region has faced chaotic unregulated growth and the illegal invasion of protected Indigenous territorial lands.

    Still, for thousands of economic migrants, the prospect of stable, high-wage work in the new oil sector has outweighed concerns about environmental risk and uncertainty. Reginaldo Nunes Fonseca, one such migrant, relocated to Oiapoque from Brazil’s northeastern state of Maranhão just weeks after seeing a televised report that Petrobras had secured its exploration license. “I’m going there,” he recalled thinking, drawn by the promise of opportunity that has eluded many working-class people across Brazil’s poorer interior regions.

    Beyond the immediate strain on urban services, the drilling project has sparked widespread alarm over potential long-term environmental harm to one of the world’s most biodiverse ecosystems. Environmental advocacy groups warn that even a small offshore oil spill would cause irreversible damage to the region’s sensitive coastal wetlands and critical commercial fisheries, which support the livelihoods of thousands of local families. Indigenous leaders add that the project’s expansion threatens the survival of their traditional way of life and the intact forest lands that their communities have stewarded for centuries.

    Brazilian federal prosecutors have already filed a formal request asking the country’s national environmental regulator to annul or suspend Petrobras’ exploration license, arguing that the company’s environmental impact assessments are incomplete and that it has hidden the full scope of potential harm the project could cause. As of early 2026, no court or regulatory ruling has been issued on the request.

    Petrobras has pushed back against these criticisms, stating that it completed comprehensive oil spill modeling as part of its license application and has deployed a network of floating monitoring devices to track ocean currents in the drilling area since operations launched in October 2025. Even so, the company was fined 2.5 million reais (equivalent to roughly $470,500) by IBAMA, Brazil’s federal environmental enforcement agency, after a drilling fluid leak in January 2026 that forced a temporary halt to operations.

    The situation unfolding in Oiapoque lays bare a central contradiction at the heart of Brazil’s current climate and energy policy under President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Just last year, Brazil hosted the 30th UN Climate Change Conference (COP30) in Belém, where Lula and his negotiating team championed a global agreement to phase out fossil fuels, the leading driver of human-caused global climate change. Brazil has also joined dozens of other nations in committing to sharp cuts in greenhouse gas emissions over the coming decades.

    Yet for many developing countries including Brazil, the tension between climate action and economic development remains unresolved. Many local residents in Oiapoque and across the Amazon region hold out hope that new oil revenues will lift local living standards and lift the region out of persistent poverty. The expansion of oil drilling into the Amazon basin, even in this offshore project, also raises significant questions about whether Lula will fulfill his high-profile campaign pledge to protect the Amazon rainforest from destructive extractive development, a key promise that helped power his return to the presidency in 2022.

  • ‘I’m going there.’ Oil drilling fuels a migrant surge in isolated city in Brazil’s Amazon

    ‘I’m going there.’ Oil drilling fuels a migrant surge in isolated city in Brazil’s Amazon

    Deep in Brazil’s northern Amazon state of Amapá, along the remote border with French Guiana, the small riverside city of Oiapoque is undergoing a chaotic transformation sparked by a single prospect: offshore oil development. One recent rainy morning, Reginaldo Nunes Fonseca leaned against the porch rail of a friend’s makeshift wooden home in Nova Conquista — a new settlement carved out of pristine old-growth rainforest just 12 months prior — smoking a cigarette as heavy rains washed over the muddy, cleared plots. The downpour kept him from continuing work on his own small house or picking up casual day labor for other new arrivals, but the rain is far from the only barrier to the prosperity he traveled hundreds of miles to find.

    Like thousands of migrants who have flooded into Oiapoque over the past 18 months, Fonseca chased a promise of economic boom that arrived after Brazil’s state-owned energy giant Petrobras secured federal environmental approval last year for exploratory drilling in the Equatorial Margin, a vast offshore basin roughly 112 miles off Amapá’s coast near the mouth of the Amazon River. After seeing a televised report on the licensing last January, the unemployed father left his home in Brazil’s drought-prone northeastern state of Maranhão, drawn by the expectation of a growing city and abundant job openings. “I thought, well, that’s good — the city is going to grow, there will be a lot of job opportunities,” he explained. “So I started calling friends and said: ‘I’m going there because here I’m unemployed and not doing anything.’”

    Amapá has long ranked among Brazil’s poorest and most isolated states, cut off from the rest of the country by a lack of major road connections and surrounded by rivers and the Atlantic. Oiapoque’s pre-oil economy depended on small-scale fishing, rampant unregulated gold mining, and cross-border shoppers from French Guiana, who trade stable euros for local goods. But the promise of oil wealth has sparked unbridled optimism even as it triggers unplanned, strainful growth in a city already crippled by inadequate public infrastructure.

    This oil rush lays bare a defining dilemma for resource-rich developing nations across the globe: how can countries cut greenhouse gas emissions to slow catastrophic climate change, when untapped fossil fuel reserves represent the fastest path to lifting impoverished regions out of systemic poverty? It also puts President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s landmark environmental pledges to the test. Since taking office, Lula has made halting Amazon deforestation a core policy priority, even hosting the United Nations COP30 climate summit in Brazil last year. Still, during a 2023 visit to Amapá, the president framed oil exploration as a matter of regional justice: “We don’t want to pollute a single millimeter of water, but no one can stop us from lifting Amapá out of poverty if there is oil here.”

    Exploratory drilling at the offshore site launched in October 2023, and is projected to wrap up after five months. If substantial commercial oil reserves are discovered, full extraction would require additional layers of federal permitting, a process that can stretch on for months or even years. For now, Oiapoque’s formal role in the operation is limited: the city serves only as a helicopter base for offshore crews, while all administrative operations are centered in Belém, the major Amazonian port nearly 1,000 miles away in neighboring Pará state.

    Even with massive uncertainty hanging over future extraction and Oiapoque’s small formal role in current operations, speculative fever has already remade the city’s landscape. Official 2022 census data put Oiapoque’s population at just 27,482, but no updated count has been conducted to track the recent inflow. Oiapoque city councilor Tiago Vieira Araújo, who raised public concerns during a March 10 community meeting where Petrobras presented its operational plans to local leaders, estimates that “in the past 18 months, Oiapoque has seen significant population growth.” That growth has already spawned seven new informal neighborhoods — including Nova Conquista — and brought a wave of overlapping social problems with it.

    Brazil’s national geography and statistics institute IBGE data underscores the city’s pre-existing infrastructure crisis: less than 2% of all households have access to adequate sewage systems, and just 0.2% of city streets meet formal construction standards. Conditions in the new settlements, known locally as “invasões” or invasions, are far worse. New arrivals have cleared swathes of public rainforest to stake informal claims to land, erecting simple shacks with just a kitchen, bed and rudimentary outdoor bathroom out of rough-cut lumber. Fresh tree stumps dot the muddy ground between makeshift plots. “We know it’s not right to clear the forest. Everyone knows it’s wrong,” Fonseca acknowledged. “But space is limited.”

    For local boosters like Yuri Alesi, a 34-year-old land rights lawyer and former city councilman running for vice mayor in an April special election, the oil boom could turn Oiapoque into an “Amazonian Dubai” modeled after the Gulf state’s oil-fueled transformation. “Dubai is in the middle of a desert, an unlikely place to grow,” Alesi argued. “The industry that drove its development was oil.”

    Geologists estimate the full Equatorial Margin, stretching from the Suriname border down to Brazil’s northeastern coast, holds as much as 10 billion barrels of untapped oil and gas, worth an estimated $719.7 billion at current market prices. Alesi projects that oil royalties alone could generate roughly $19 million per month for Oiapoque — a sum equal to the city’s entire annual GDP, per Brazilian government data.

    The Amazon basin plays an irreplaceable role in regulating the global climate, as its dense forests store massive volumes of carbon that would otherwise enter the atmosphere as greenhouse gases. Amapá has long been one of the basin’s best-protected regions: roughly 82% of the state remains covered in old-growth forest, according to MapBiomas, a non-profit that tracks Amazon land use. Its isolation has shielded it from the large-scale deforestation that has ravaged the southern Amazon for cattle ranching and soy cultivation.

    But history offers a cautionary tale for Oiapoque’s would-be transformation. Forty years of oil and gas exploration in Coari, another Amazonian city, has failed to lift its population out of poverty: a 2023 study by public policy non-profit Agenda Pública found 72% of Coari residents live in extreme poverty. Closer to home, Amapá has already seen repeated cycles of resource boom and bust linked to mining. Forty-six-year-old Selma Soares experienced that whiplash firsthand: she moved from Maranhão to the Amapá mining town of Pedra Branca in 2008, lured by an iron ore boom that drew thousands of workers. She opened a small grocery store, only to see the industry collapse after a 2013 port accident killed six workers and halted production. When new owners suspended operations permanently, the local economy collapsed. “People who had shopped with us for years struggled to eat,” Soares recalled. Last year, she heard rumors of Oiapoque’s new boom, moved her family to the city, and opened a small grocery on the outskirts — joining hundreds of other former mining boom refugees waiting for oil to deliver the prosperity mining never did.

    Today, the city’s mood is a tangled mix of fevered hope and simmering anxiety. At the river border with French Guiana, small port boats display green-and-yellow stickers emblazoned with a slogan pushed by local politicians: “Oil yes! Development yes!” But just a 20-minute boat ride away, members of the Indigenous Galibi Kali’na community, whose ancestral territory spans this stretch of the Amazon coast, say they have already paid a price for the promise of oil.

    Renata Lod, a representative of Oiapoque’s Indigenous council, says Petrobras sold a fairy tale of overnight transformation to local leaders: “Petrobras arrived with strong political backing, promising progress as if we would go to sleep one way and wake up like Dubai.” The reality, she says, is “completely disorganized population growth, invasions of Indigenous lands.” Lod notes that both Indigenous and non-Indigenous residents already face overcrowded public schools, and the city’s only hospital is already operating over full capacity. Most alarming is the risk of an offshore oil spill: the region’s coastal Indigenous territories are made up of fragile flooded wetlands, where oil contamination is nearly impossible to fully clean up. “Most Indigenous lands are flooded wetlands. How do you clean a wetland? Once oil enters the rivers, there is no way to remove it,” Lod said. An oil spill could quickly spread pollutants across the region’s coasts and rivers, destroying fishing grounds and mangrove ecosystems that the community depends on for survival.

    Petrobras has defended its operations, saying it conducted detailed spill risk modeling to secure its environmental license, and has deployed monitoring devices to track ocean currents since drilling began. Still, the company already faced a penalty for a safety incident: in January 2024, a leak of drilling fluid forced a temporary halt to operations, leading federal environmental regulator IBAMA to fine Petrobras roughly $470,500.

    For Araújo, the city councilman, local residents already see Petrobras as a silver bullet for Oiapoque’s generations of poverty. “But even a remedy has side effects,” he noted. “And we’re already experiencing the side effects before seeing any of the benefits.”

    Environmental and Indigenous organizations have already filed lawsuits against the federal government and Petrobras to halt exploration, arguing that the licensing process failed to require proper consultation with traditional communities, underestimated spill risks, and ignored the full long-term climate impact of extracting new fossil fuel reserves. Federal prosecutors have also asked IBAMA to annul or suspend the environmental license, saying Petrobras’ environmental impact studies are incomplete and the company has hidden the full scope of potential harm. No ruling has been issued on the challenges yet, leaving Oiapoque’s future hanging in the balance.

  • Cameroon ‘military contractors’ killed in Russia-Ukraine war – BBC confirms leaked message

    Cameroon ‘military contractors’ killed in Russia-Ukraine war – BBC confirms leaked message

    The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has taken on a new, underreported dimension with the confirmation that dozens of citizens from across the African continent have died after being recruited to fight alongside Russian forces, sparking growing outcry over deceptive recruitment practices and government inaction.

    For Cameroon, the development marks the first implicit confirmation of its nationals’ involvement in the war, after a diplomatic source verified to the BBC the authenticity of a leaked foreign ministry note that acknowledged 16 Cameroonians had been killed while serving as military contractors for Russia. The leaked document, dated March 5 and addressed to the Russian Embassy in Cameroon, has not been addressed publicly by Russian officials, as multiple attempts to secure comment from the embassy went unanswered.

    Cameroon’s government has faced sharp public criticism for its months-long silence on the issue, and has yet to issue a formal public statement acknowledging the deaths. In a low-key development on Monday, the country’s foreign ministry sent a brief statement to state-owned broadcaster CRTV that listed the names of 16 Cameroonians said to be resident in Russia. The broadcast, which aired Monday evening, only asked relatives of the listed individuals to contact authorities for an urgent matter, offering no further context that would confirm the deaths.

    This quiet confirmation aligns with earlier findings from All Eyes on Wagner, an independent research group that tracks global mercenary activity, which estimated that 94 Cameroonians had died in the conflict between 2023 and 2025. Internal government documents obtained by Reuters also reveal that Cameroon’s defense ministry raised alarm over the issue as early as March 2025, when the defense minister issued a memo expressing concern over active-duty soldiers leaving the country to enlist in the war, and ordering unit commanders to step up monitoring of personnel.

    The crisis stretches far beyond Cameroon’s borders. Ukrainian intelligence officials estimate that more than 1,700 individuals from 36 different African countries have been recruited to fight for Russia in Ukraine. Multiple African governments have already documented deaths, missing persons, and deceptive recruitment rings targeting their citizens.

    Ghana, another West African nation that has been heavily impacted, has publicly called on Russia to halt all recruitment of its citizens, confirming that at least 55 Ghanaians have been killed in the conflict. In Kenya, authorities have cracked down on criminal recruitment networks that lured job seekers with false promises of well-paying work abroad. Kenya’s foreign ministry confirmed in February that more than 600 suspect recruitment agencies have been shut down, with official data showing 16 Kenyans remain missing in Russia and 47 have returned home after escaping deployment to the front lines in Ukraine.

    Zimbabwe has also reported 15 of its citizens killed after being recruited, with more than 60 still trapped in active combat zones. Earlier this year, South Africa successfully repatriated 17 of its citizens who told officials they had been tricked into deploying to Ukraine’s Donbas region to fight for Russia, and were left stranded after being pushed to the front lines.

    The widespread recruitment of African nationals has prompted growing regional concern, with governments scrambling to crack down on illegal networks and hold those responsible accountable for the deceptive tactics that have left hundreds of families facing grief and uncertainty over missing loved ones.

  • Attacks on 2 villages in northern Nigeria leave at least 20 people dead, residents say

    Attacks on 2 villages in northern Nigeria leave at least 20 people dead, residents say

    In north-central Nigeria, a pre-dawn coordinated attack on two rural communities has left local officials and residents at odds over the number of casualties, deepening concerns over the West African nation’s worsening security crisis. Multiple local witnesses confirmed the assault unfolded in the early hours of Tuesday, targeting the villages of Bagna and Erena in the Shiroro district of Niger state, roughly 250 kilometers — a four-hour drive — from the country’s capital Abuja.

    Jibrin Isah, a long-time Erena resident, described the chaotic, sudden nature of the incursion. “They arrived on motorbikes and immediately opened fire,” Isah said. “It was a total surprise; most people were still asleep in the early hours when the attack began.”

    Accounts of the death toll diverge sharply between local communities and law enforcement officials. Residents put the confirmed death count at no fewer than 20 people, with an unknown number of additional civilians still unaccounted for in the attack’s aftermath. Muhammad Tukur, another Erena resident, confirmed the community’s count to the Associated Press, stating that the final number of fatalities would likely exceed 20.

    However, local police have released a far lower casualty count. In an official statement, Niger state police spokesperson Wasiu Abiodun confirmed three security-linked deaths: two volunteer vigilante members and a driver assigned to the area’s joint security task force. Abiodun added that several other people were wounded during the hours-long operation.

    Witnesses reported that the gunmen held control of the two villages for multiple hours, looting residential properties and forcing hundreds of local residents to abandon their homes and seek refuge in safer adjacent communities.

    As Africa’s most populous nation, Nigeria has grappled with an interconnected, multi-front security crisis for more than a decade, particularly across its northern and north-central regions. Long-running insurgent activity in the country’s northeast has killed tens of thousands of people and displaced millions, according to United Nations estimates. Beyond insurgent violence, the region also faces frequent outbreaks of violence rooted in long-simmering resource disputes: conflicts over land and grazing access between mostly Muslim Fulani herding communities and largely Christian farming populations regularly escalate into deadly mass clashes. Criminal gangs focused on ransom kidnapping also operate widely across rural north-central and northwestern states, taking advantage of weak security presence to target communities.

  • Turkey detains 9 over attack outside the Israeli Consulate in Istanbul

    Turkey detains 9 over attack outside the Israeli Consulate in Istanbul

    A violent shootout outside the building hosting Israel’s closed consulate in Istanbul has left one attacker dead and sparked a cross-provincial counter-terrorism operation that resulted in the detention of nine suspects, Turkey’s state-run Anadolu Agency confirmed Wednesday.

    The incident unfolded Tuesday in Istanbul’s central business and financial district, when three assailants opened fire on Turkish police officers deployed near the consulate building. A rapid exchange of gunfire left one attacker killed on site, while the other two — identified as brothers Onur C. and Enes C. — were wounded and taken into custody immediately. Two responding police officers also suffered minor injuries in the clash, Turkish officials confirmed.

    In the wake of the attack, Turkish security forces launched sweeping arrest operations across three regions: Istanbul itself, as well as the provinces of Konya and Kocaeli, where the nine suspects were ultimately apprehended. All nine detainees are now being questioned alongside the two wounded captured attackers, according to Anadolu Agency, which did not release additional details on the suspects’ backgrounds or alleged ties to the attack.

    Turkey’s Interior Minister Mustafa Ciftci confirmed that the attackers traveled to Istanbul from Izmit, a city in Kocaeli province, in a rented vehicle. He also noted that one of the captured attackers — Onur C. — has a prior criminal record connected to drug offenses. Speaking on the ideological links of the cell, Ciftci stated that one of the assailants has connections to a group that “exploits religion,” though he stopped short of publicly naming the organization. The region has a history of large-scale deadly attacks carried out by the Islamic State group, which has targeted Turkish soil multiple times in recent decades.

    Context for the empty consulate building dates back to the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza. Shortly after hostilities began earlier this year, Israel withdrew all its diplomatic personnel from Turkey and shuttered the Istanbul consulate, citing growing security risks and rapidly deteriorating bilateral relations between Jerusalem and Ankara. At the time of Tuesday’s attack, no Israeli diplomatic staff were present in the building.

    Shortly after the clash, Israel’s Foreign Ministry issued an official statement condemning the attack, and expressed gratitude to Turkish law enforcement for their rapid response that prevented a higher death toll.