分类: world

  • Putin hosts leaders of Southeast Asia at Russia-ASEAN summit

    Putin hosts leaders of Southeast Asia at Russia-ASEAN summit

    A high-stakes two-day Russia-ASEAN summit has opened Wednesday in the Russian city of Kazan, where President Vladimir Putin is hosting top leaders from the 11-member Southeast Asian bloc to deepen economic, political and people-to-people ties across the partnership. This year’s gathering carries special significance, as it commemorates 35 years of formal relations between Moscow and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, a milestone that both sides have framed as a cornerstone of their evolving engagement.

    ASEAN has maintained official dialogue partner status with Russia for decades, holding annual top-level meetings to align on shared priorities. This summit is tasked with advancing the existing Russia-ASEAN strategic partnership, exploring new avenues for collaboration that span trade, investment, and regional governance. Ahead of the official leadership talks, a pre-summit business forum brought together private sector representatives from both sides. In a welcome message to attendees, Putin emphasized his expectation that the forum would unlock new opportunities for expanding mutually beneficial trade, investment, and industrial cooperation, while strengthening direct, open dialogue between Russian and ASEAN business communities.

    Kremlin foreign policy advisor Yuri Ushakov outlined the summit’s full agenda to reporters, noting that leaders will not only review progress on existing cooperative initiatives but also exchange candid views on pressing global and regional security challenges. A core unifying theme set to emerge from the gathering, Ushakov highlighted, is a shared commitment to building a fair, democratic multipolar global order rooted firmly in the principles of international law and the United Nations Charter. Beyond plenary discussions, the schedule includes one-on-one bilateral meetings between Putin and individual ASEAN leaders to address country-specific priorities and collaborative projects.

    The ASEAN bloc includes 11 diverse member states with varied geopolitical alignments: the Philippines, which currently holds ASEAN’s annual rotating presidency, is broadly aligned with the United States, while other member states maintain deep trade and security ties with both Russia and China. Since global energy prices spiked in the wake of heightened geopolitical conflict that disrupted regional oil markets, a number of major ASEAN economies including the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam have either moved to import Russian crude oil or publicly expressed interest in expanding purchases of the commodity, underscoring the practical economic drivers shaping the bloc’s engagement with Moscow.

  • Protesters block copper exports to China from Rio Tinto mine in Mongolia

    Protesters block copper exports to China from Rio Tinto mine in Mongolia

    On a clear sunny day in southern Mongolia’s Gobi Desert, a small group of activists from the domestic advocacy group Radical Reform Movement erected a makeshift barrier across the only two-lane road leading out of the massive Oyu Tolgoi copper and gold mine, halting all copper concentrate shipments bound for global markets Wednesday. The demonstration has thrown a spotlight on long-simmering public discontent over foreign ownership of Mongolia’s vast mineral wealth, and created an unexpected disruption to a critical copper supply chain that feeds into China’s booming renewable energy and electric vehicle sectors.

    Copper is a foundational material for electric vehicle batteries, wind turbines, and solar power infrastructure — industries where China holds global leadership in production and deployment. Oyu Tolgoi, located just 50 miles north of the Mongolia-China border, is projected to become the world’s fourth-largest copper mine once fully operational, holding one of the planet’s largest untapped reserves of the critical mineral. The project is a joint venture between British-Australian mining giant Rio Tinto, which controls a 66% stake, and the Mongolian government, which holds the remaining 34% share.

    For decades, Mongolian public discourse has centered on inequitable distribution of mining revenue: the country counts extensive deposits of copper, gold, coal and other critical minerals, yet widespread poverty remains pervasive across much of the population. The Radical Reform Movement, the group behind the blockade, has gone as far as calling for the full expulsion of foreign investors from the country’s mining sector, while even more moderate voices within the Mongolian government are pushing to renegotiate the original operating agreement with Rio Tinto to secure a larger share of project profits for the Mongolian public.

    Videos posted to Facebook by the advocacy group showed protesters gathering around the barrier, which included a tire wall and a large tree branch strung with a white banner emblazoned with red text reading “Stop Rio Tinto”, set across the road cutting through the arid Gobi landscape. As of Wednesday, it remains unclear whether the demonstration is a one-day action intended to raise awareness of the group’s demands, or the opening of an extended standoff that could trigger broader economic repercussions for both Mongolia and its key trading partner China.

    According to official statements from the Oyu Tolgoi joint venture, the mine contributes roughly 9% of Mongolia’s total annual government tax revenue. The company warned that a prolonged seven-day blockade would cut into government revenue by an estimated 35 billion Mongolian Tugrik, equal to roughly $13.3 million. Following the blockade, Mongolian Prime Minister Uchral Nyam-Osor directed the country’s justice and internal affairs minister at a weekly Cabinet meeting to uphold existing law, and hold all participants accountable for unlawfully disrupting legally authorized commercial operations, according to a post on the Mongolian government’s official Facebook page.

  • Takeaways from AP’s report on Latin America’s hard shift to the right

    Takeaways from AP’s report on Latin America’s hard shift to the right

    Across Latin America’s largest economies, a new political tide is rising: right-wing populist candidates are quickly gaining voter support, positioning their tough-on-crime, hardline immigration platforms as a direct counter to the left-wing populist wave that swept through the region just a few years ago.

    While overall regional homicide rates have fallen broadly over the past decade compared to 10 years prior, sharp upticks in violent crime in key nations and a widespread surge in non-violent criminal activity have created fertile ground for conservative populists. These candidates have echoed the heavy-handed security strategy popularized by El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, framing migrants as primary scapegoats for rising insecurity even as disaffected voters continue to embrace the approach, despite widespread warnings that it risks normalizing human rights violations and eroding democratic institutions.

    Data from InSight Crime, a leading think tank focused on organized crime in the Americas, paints a nuanced picture of regional crime trends. Between 2024 and 2025, the combined average homicide rate across Latin America and the Caribbean dropped by more than 5%, pushing the median regional rate down to roughly 17.6 homicides per 100,000 residents. But this overall decline masks dangerous spikes in countries at the center of the global cocaine trade. Peru and Colombia, the world’s two top cocaine producers, along with neighboring Ecuador—whose key shipping ports have become critical transit hubs for drug traffickers targeting European markets—have all seen sharp increases in drug-linked killings.

    In 2024, official data recorded 2,400 homicides in Peru and 14,780 in Colombia, marking the highest annual death tolls for both nations since at least 2020. In Ecuador, the surge was even more dramatic: homicides rose 31% year-over-year to hit 9,216, cementing public anxiety over growing criminal control.

    Adam Isacson, director for defense oversight at the Washington Office on Latin America, explains that while populist politics from across the ideological spectrum have performed well in recent elections, only right-wing candidates have been able to offer voters immediate, short-term security promises that deliver a perceived sense of safety within months—even when those promises come at the cost of democratic norms and human rights protections. Left-leaning candidates, by contrast, typically prioritize long-term, systemic solutions such as community violence prevention programs, improved police training, and comprehensive judicial and prison reform. These approaches are widely recognized as evidence-based, but they require years to produce tangible results that voters can feel.

    “It’s absolutely what you’re supposed to be doing, but people’s patience runs out,” Isacson noted. “So, there come the Bukeles of the world saying, ‘You want to feel better? We got this.’”

    The impact of this political shift is already playing out in high-stakes national elections across the region. In Colombia, where large swathes of rural territory have fallen back into armed conflict after a broken 2016 peace deal, pro-Trump businessman Abelardo de la Espriella has surged to the top of pre-election polls ahead of this weekend’s presidential runoff, having centered his entire campaign on a Bukele-inspired hardline security crackdown. In Peru, where extortion rates have jumped fivefold over the past five years, Keiko Fujimori—who has built her political brand on the authoritarian legacy of her disgraced late father, former President Alberto Fujimori—has advanced to the June 7 presidential runoff running on an unapologetic law-and-order platform, where she has vowed to deploy military forces to prisons and national border crossings.

  • The bikers battling extreme heat and armed conflict to smuggle Iranian fuel to Pakistan

    The bikers battling extreme heat and armed conflict to smuggle Iranian fuel to Pakistan

    In the sweltering, dust-scoured badlands of Pakistan’s Balochistan province – the country’s largest, poorest and most sparsely populated region – 38-year-old Mazaar (a pseudonym used to protect his identity) prepares for another deadly 350-kilometer journey across one of the hottest landscapes on Earth. His small, worn motorbike groans under the weight of five 70-liter plastic canisters holding 272 kilograms of petrol, tied precariously to its frame with frayed rope, leaving barely any space for him to sit. This is the dangerous daily reality for thousands of ordinary Baloch people who have turned to smuggling subsidized Iranian fuel into Pakistan, a trade that has surged dramatically in recent months amid escalating regional conflict tied to US-Israeli tensions with Iran.

    For decades, cross-border fuel smuggling has been a quiet undercurrent of life along the 900-kilometer Iran-Pakistan border, but shifting geopolitics and economic chaos have supercharged the illicit trade. Rising tensions have disrupted oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, sending global fuel prices skyrocketing. That has driven explosive demand in Pakistan for far cheaper smuggled Iranian petrol and diesel, which benefits from heavy Iranian government subsidies for domestic consumers. Today, an estimated 2.4 million of Balochistan’s 15 million residents rely on the trade for their primary income, according to a leaked Pakistani intelligence report reviewed by Nikkei Asia in 2024 – a statistic that underscores how deeply the illicit business is woven into the province’s fragile economy.

    Mazaar is no organized crime kingpin; he is a former farmer driven into smuggling by crippling drought that destroyed his ability to earn a living tending crops. As the main breadwinner for his extended family, which includes his young child and several brothers, he has no other viable option for work. Temperatures in Balochistan regularly climb to 50 degrees Celsius during the hot season, turning the plastic fuel canisters soft and swollen, raising the constant risk of ruptures, leaks, catastrophic fire or even explosion. Dozens of smugglers die this way every year. Beyond the environmental and mechanical risks, the journey takes Mazaar through conflict-ridden territory where clashes between Pakistani security forces and separatist insurgents demanding greater regional autonomy have persisted for decades, with thousands of local residents having disappeared amid the violence. Even with these threats, Mazaar says he has no other choice: “We do this because we don’t have any other option. The weather is hot, the prices are high and we spend day and night on the road.”

    His story is not unique. Irfan, another smuggler whose name has also been changed for his safety, turned to the trade after a childhood polio infection left him with permanent mobility impairment in one leg and one hand. Unable to access most formal work, he transports diesel instead of petrol, saying the lower risk of ignition is the only small safety concession he can make: “I can’t carry petrol because what if it catches fire? If I can’t stand up, I’ll get badly burned.”

    Local economic leaders say deep-rooted systemic failure has left ordinary Baloch people with no alternative to the smuggling trade. Fida Hussain Dashti, former president of the Quetta Chamber of Commerce and Industry, notes that despite Balochistan’s vast territory and abundant mineral reserves, decades of underdevelopment have left it with poverty rates matching some of the world’s poorest regions. “Even a student who graduates with an MA degree ends up joining this oil business,” Dashti says. “People are helpless and have no other way. The Pakistani government should have done more to create employment opportunities in the region.”

    The impact of the booming smuggling trade is now being felt across Pakistan’s formal economy. In May 2025, Pakistan’s five largest oil refineries sent a formal letter to the federal government warning that cross-border smuggling was accelerating and urging official intervention. Earlier this month, the Oil Companies Advisory Council, which represents Pakistan’s domestic oil industry, confirmed that official domestic fuel sales have dropped to a 27-year low for this time of year, a decline directly tied in large part to the rise of cheaper smuggled Iranian fuel. An intelligence estimate cited by Nikkei Asia puts the annual value of smuggled fuel at nearly $1 billion, a staggering hit to formal industry and government revenue.

    Geopolitics has amplified the smuggling surge, according to analysts tracking illicit global markets. Paddy Ginn, a researcher with the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organised Crime, says large-scale smuggling is not just driven by desperate local workers – it is also enabled by powerful actors with ties to the Iranian government. “The main traffickers, we believe, are either part of or closely linked to IRGC [Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps],” Ginn says, noting that the trade helps Iranian actors avoid US economic sanctions and capitalize on price hikes driven by regional conflict. The BBC requested comment from the Iranian government on these allegations but received no response.

    For Pakistan, the issue presents a complicated policy dilemma. The country currently serves as a mediator between Iran and the United States, working toward a permanent end to hostilities, and the large-scale smuggling trade creates awkward diplomatic and political pressures. Islamabad has periodically launched crackdowns on the illicit trade, but efforts to fully eliminate it have always stalled. The remote, rugged terrain of the border region makes comprehensive policing almost impossible, and many within Pakistan’s government recognize that the trade is a critical lifeline for millions of impoverished Baloch residents who have no other source of income. Multiple smugglers told the BBC that Pakistani security officials often turn a blind eye to the trade in exchange for small bribes – a claim the Pakistani government denies, noting that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has ordered law enforcement to intensify crackdowns, with authorities seizing roughly $5 million worth of smuggled fuel over the past year.

    Even for the smugglers who rely on the trade, the recent regional conflict has eroded already meager profits. Mazaar says the price he pays for smuggled petrol has jumped sharply amid the tensions, but the price he can charge to downstream sellers has remained flat. After covering fuel for his bike, food, and motorbike lease costs, his daily income has fallen from 5,000 Pakistani rupees ($13) to 3,000 rupees ($7.80) – still roughly double Pakistan’s official minimum wage, but barely enough to support his large family. “The war started and we were ruined,” he says.

    As Mazaar and a group of 11 fellow motorbike smugglers set out from the Mastung open-air fuel market toward Sindh province, they are immediately hit by a brutal heat storm: a prolonged heatwave paired with blinding dust storms. When asked about the constant risk of deadly injury or death, Mazaar shrugs off the danger with a fatalism forged by poverty and lack of choice: “I don’t worry about it. I have to die one day anyway. I could die now. Who knows? That is Allah’s decision, whether he lets me live or takes my life.”

  • ‘We fear for our lives’ – deadline for migrants to leave South Africa looms

    ‘We fear for our lives’ – deadline for migrants to leave South Africa looms

    As South Africa counts down to a self-imposed June 30 deadline for all undocumented migrants to leave the country, the nation has become a landscape of fear for thousands of foreign-born residents. What started as a series of mostly peaceful public protests led by anti-migrant groups and opposition political actors has erupted into widespread targeted intimidation, pushing even documented refugees and long-term residents to flee their homes and seek voluntary repatriation to their home countries.

    One of the thousands living in crisis is Esnat Joseph, a 36-year-old Malawian mother of one-year-old triplets. Sitting in an open-air Durban field where as many as 7,000 displaced foreigners have gathered over the past two weeks, the mother struggled to calm her crying infants as she recalled the armed attack that forced her family from their informal settlement home. “A group of 10 South African men showed up at my door carrying machetes and whips, telling me we had to go back to our country,” Joseph explained. “They grabbed my husband, cut his head and neck, holding his throat like they intended to kill him. By the grace of God he survived, but he is still recovering in a hospital.”

    Joseph, who moved to South Africa three years ago to work as a domestic servant before having her children, lost her passport and immigration paperwork in a robbery three years ago, leaving her with no formal legal status. Like hundreds of other Malawians stranded in Durban, she has signed up for a repatriation bus organized by the Malawian consulate, which has arranged voluntary departures with funding from public donations. She is far from alone: over the past four weeks, Ghana, Mozambique, Nigeria and Zimbabwe have all organized air and bus repatriation efforts, with roughly 3,500 foreign nationals having already chosen to leave South Africa voluntarily. South African authorities confirm that more than 500 recently repatriated Nigerians were in the country without valid documentation.

    Benjamin, a Nigerian returnee who arrived in Lagos last week after living nine years in South Africa, summed up the sentiment of many who have left. “South Africans do not welcome foreigners, especially Nigerians,” he told the BBC. “It is a place where your life can be taken at any moment, it is not safe to stay.”

    The June 30 deadline was first put forward by a coalition of anti-migrant groups including the organization March and March, as well as opposition party ActionSA. Marchers carrying wooden sticks have taken to streets across the country for months, chanting the Zulu phrase *Mabahambe*, which translates to “They must go.” Organizers reject accusations that their movement is xenophobic, arguing that they are pushing for enforcement of existing immigration laws and policy prioritization for South African citizens. “If you enter the country on a 30-day visitor visa and stay for 50 days, two years, even five years, you know you are breaking the law,” March and March leader Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma told reporters at a Durban rally. “South Africa cannot become a refugee camp for every struggling state on the continent. Every country puts its own citizens first, and we demand our government does the same.”

    Protesters’ anger is rooted in deep-seated economic hardship that has plagued South Africa for years. Official government data puts national unemployment at 32.7%, one of the highest rates in the world, with 350,000 jobs lost in the first quarter of 2026 alone, most held by young workers. Protesters argue undocumented migrants strain already overstretched public services, taking scarce jobs, education seats and hospital access from native citizens. “We fight to get our own kids into school, we struggle to get our elderly into hospital beds,” Mecha Ramorola, a protester at a Pretoria march, explained. “Scarce resources should go to South Africans first.”

    Despite this economic context, the current wave of tension has also been amplified by political opportunism, analysts note. South Africa is set to hold local government elections this coming November, and multiple parties have weaponized migration anxiety to win votes. A widely debunked claim that South Africa holds 15 million undocumented migrants, first pushed five years ago by ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba (who is currently campaigning to become mayor of Johannesburg), continues to circulate on social media. “Political parties are scraping the bottom of the barrel, lying to voters that all of South Africa’s problems can be fixed by getting rid of migrants,” said Sharon Ekambaram, a human rights lawyer with the movement Kopanang Africa Against Xenophobia. “This scapegoating has a long history in our politics, and it always gets worse around election season.”

    Worryingly, the current tension has echoes of past waves of deadly xenophobic violence that have struck South Africa: in 2008, anti-migrant riots killed 62 people (including 21 South African citizens) and displaced thousands more, with further outbreaks in 2015, 2016 and 2019. Just last month, the Mozambican government reported that five of its citizens had been killed in anti-foreigner attacks in Western Cape province, a claim South Africa’s foreign minister disputed, saying only two Mozambicans died and investigations into the circumstances are ongoing.

    Social media has played a major role in amplifying hostility in recent weeks. Viral videos showing protesters harassing foreign nationals have spread widely, including one clip of a Ghanaian man being ordered to leave the country that prompted the Ghanaian government to summon South Africa’s ambassador to demand improved protections for Ghanaian citizens. Another viral video features prominent anti-migrant activist Nkosikhona Ndabandaba, a Facebook creator with 1.4 million followers who is known publicly as Phakel’umthakathi, approaching a Congolese man at the roadside. Without asking for proof of his immigration status, Ndabandaba politely told the man: “June 30 is the deadline. You don’t have to wait until then. Leave now.” Ndabandaba has amplified fears further by warning that he cannot control public anger after the deadline passes.

    Critically, even foreign nationals with valid legal status in South Africa are being targeted. Dozens of documented refugees have camped outside Durban’s Home Affairs department to seek government protection. One Burundian mother of four, who has official refugee status, said she has been targeted regardless. “I have all the valid paperwork proving I can stay here, but we are all being chased out,” she said, wrapping herself in a blanket to ward off the southern hemisphere winter chill. “I fear for my life, my children are terrified. We get insulted just walking down the street, my kids get bullied even at school.”

    Even long-term residents with deep roots in the country live in fear. A Malawian beauty therapist who has lived in Cape Town for 16 years (and who does not have formal legal status) said even routine trips to the grocery store have become intimidating. She, her husband and their nine-year-old daughter were recently confronted by their Uber driver, who demanded to see their immigration papers and questioned their origin because of their accent. Her daughter has stopped attending school entirely because of the family’s fear of attack. She says she supports President Cyril Ramaphosa’s plans to reform immigration policy, but stresses that all people, regardless of status, deserve to be safe. “My child can’t even go to school because we are terrified,” she said. “We don’t know what will happen next.”

    President Ramaphosa has pushed back against the intimidation and scapegoating, warning in a recent national address that no individual or group has the right to demand proof of nationality from people in public spaces, and that the government will take action against vigilante harassment. “There is no place for xenophobia, racism, intolerance of any kind in South Africa,” he said, unveiling a five-point plan from his coalition government to address the migration crisis. The plan includes rejecting asylum claims from people who have already passed through other safe countries, introducing quotas for citizenship naturalization, expanding digital identity systems for non-citizens, and imposing jail sentences for employers that hire undocumented migrants for below-minimum wage work.

    Analysts say the policy targeting of underpaid informal work reflects a longstanding pattern of exploitation. “You see undocumented migrants taking jobs that South Africans won’t accept, paying less than the legal minimum, because migrants are desperate and open to exploitation,” noted Professor Shepherd Mpofu, an immigration analyst. Ramaphosa’s plan also includes cracking down on systemic corruption within South Africa’s border and immigration system, a problem that is well-documented. One 36-year-old Malawian salon owner in Johannesburg, who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation, told the BBC she has been paying border officials bribes every few months for years to get her passport stamped without having to leave the country. She has now closed her salon and plans to return to Malawi to keep her young children safe.

    In Johannesburg, the government’s enforcement campaign, called Operation New Broom, has already resulted in the bulldozing of hundreds of informal roadside shops that officials say are mostly run by undocumented migrants, which they label hotbeds of criminal activity. During a recent visit to the area, Ethiopian migrants watched in horror as their life’s work was demolished, even after advance warning from authorities.

    Across the country, the growing pressure has left all foreign-born residents feeling trapped. Even the third-largest political party, uMkhonto we Sizwe (MK) led by former President Jacob Zuma, which holds major support in KwaZulu-Natal, has stopped short of endorsing the June 30 deadline but backed the movement’s core anti-undocumented migrant stance. “We all agree that undocumented migrants are breaking the law, they must leave the country peacefully without violence or intimidation,” MK member Bonginkosi Khanyile said.

    Still, fear is tangible nationwide. Long lines of vehicles are backed up at border posts with Mozambique as foreign nationals rush to leave before the June 30 deadline. Back at the open displacement camp in Durban, where aid groups have been distributing blankets and food to thousands of displaced people, terrified Malawian migrants can’t wait to leave. When the first repatriation bus pulled in on Sunday, crowds cheered and chanted the Zulu phrase *Siyahamba*, meaning “We are leaving.”

  • ‘Warning fire went up’: Couple on board yacht describe encounter with Russian warship

    ‘Warning fire went up’: Couple on board yacht describe encounter with Russian warship

    A routine yachting trip in the English Channel turned into a terrifying ordeal for a retired British couple, who have spoken publicly about their unexpected and dangerous run-in with a Russian warship that ended with the vessel firing warning shots close to their small leisure craft.

    The pair, who were enjoying time on board their private yacht in one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes, suddenly found themselves in an escalating confrontation when the Russian frigate approached their position. In their first public account of the incident, the couple described the moment the situation escalated dramatically, with warning shots being fired from the warship as the yacht remained in the nearby area.

    “We saw the warship approach, and then the warning fire went up,” the couple stated in interviews with media outlets, describing the shock and fear that gripped them as the military interaction unfolded near their civilian vessel. The incident has drawn fresh attention to military activity in the English Channel, a key strategic waterway that connects the North Sea to the Atlantic Ocean and sees constant civilian and military traffic from nations across the globe.

    Defense analysts note that encounters between civilian vessels and foreign military craft in international waters are not unheard of, but the firing of warning shots near an unarmed leisure yacht marks a rare and alarming escalation that has raised questions about maritime safety protocols and the current state of military navigation in the channel. As details of the encounter continue to emerge, authorities on both sides have not yet issued full formal comments on the context that led to the frigate’s decision to fire warning shots close to the civilian boat.

  • Some ‘Lost Canadians’ told to surrender new citizenship certificates

    Some ‘Lost Canadians’ told to surrender new citizenship certificates

    Hundreds of people who successfully secured Canadian citizenship under a landmark law designed to resolve the decades-long ‘Lost Canadians’ issue are now facing sudden uncertainty, after immigration authorities ordered dozens of approved applicants to surrender their newly issued citizenship certificates pending a fresh case review.

    The policy controversy centers on the 2024 Canadian law passed to grant citizenship to descendants of Canadian citizens who were stripped of their nationality through generations of outdated legislation, a group long known as the Lost Canadians. The law allows people with a verifiable ancestral tie to Canada to claim citizenship, even if they did not qualify under previous rules. Since the law entered into force last December, immigration data shows more than 12,000 people submitted applications in just the first six weeks, with a majority of applications coming from the United States, followed by smaller groups from Mexico and the United Kingdom.

    But in recent weeks, dozens of applicants who already received formal approval and physical citizenship certificates have been sent formal letters from the Office of the Registrar of Canadian Citizenship, stating they “may not be entitled” to the citizenship they were already granted and ordering them to return the documents for re-evaluation. Immigration authorities have confirmed only that a “limited number of files” are under review, but have declined to release the exact number of people affected by the sudden review.

    For affected applicants, the order has upended long-held plans and created deep emotional distress. Shawn Davis Mooney, who permanently relocated from California to Victoria, British Columbia, with his husband earlier this year after securing citizenship approval, called the notice devastating. Mooney, who applied after the new law passed, submitted 114 pages of documentation proving his great-great-grandparent was born in New Brunswick, and received urgent approval and his citizenship certificate in February. When he received the surrender letter signed by Registrar Peggy Sun, which claimed he had failed to submit sufficient qualifying documentation, he said he was left disoriented. “I had to read it three times, I couldn’t understand it,” Mooney told reporters. “The worst part is it’s making us feel like frauds, or we’ve done something wrong. Now I have no clear idea what my legal status in this country actually is.”

    Another affected applicant, Rana Charron of Cleveland, Ohio, described the notice as one of the biggest disappointments of her life. Charron used available census records to prove her great-great-grandmother was a French-Canadian born in Quebec, since 19th century birth and baptismal records for her ancestor were no longer accessible. Her application was approved, and she received her physical citizenship certificate earlier this month, before being ordered to return it. “I was very excited to be formally Canadian,” Charron said. “Growing up, my family was very aware of our Canadian heritage… it mattered a lot to me. Now the experience has left me distrustful of the entire process. If they can just yank that back, what’s going to stop them from doing it two years from now, or 10 years from now, when people have really settled down and put roots?” Charron added that she still plans to fight to retain her citizenship, but the uncertainty has left her future plans in limbo.

    Immigration lawyers say the situation is unprecedented and damaging to Canada’s reputation as a welcoming country for new citizens. Lisa Middlemiss, a Montreal-based immigration lawyer who represents several affected applicants, noted that Canadian law only allows citizenship revocation in very rare, exceptional circumstances, such as cases of proven fraud. All the people now receiving surrender letters, she emphasized, completed every step of the application process as required by current immigration law, and had already passed official review to receive their certificates. “This sends such a bad message for Canada,” Middlemiss said.

    In a statement provided to the BBC, a spokesperson for Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada defended the ongoing review, saying that the process is intended to guarantee all cases are evaluated consistently and in compliance with current law. The spokesperson confirmed that all applications were initially reviewed by trained immigration officers before certificates were issued, and that applicants who received surrender requests will have the opportunity to submit additional evidence to support their claim. If the review confirms an applicant is entitled to citizenship, the spokesperson noted, the certificate will be returned.

    Still, for affected applicants like Mooney and Charron, the damage of the uncertainty has already been done, leaving their plans for work, family, and permanent residency hanging in the balance while they wait for a final decision on their status.

  • ‘From outlier to trailblazer’: How Oman offers a glimpse into the post-war Gulf

    ‘From outlier to trailblazer’: How Oman offers a glimpse into the post-war Gulf

    When former U.S. President Donald Trump threatened military action against Oman over its refusal to side with Washington’s war on Iran, few could have predicted that this small Gulf sultanate would emerge as the primary beneficiary of the new regional order being negotiated between the U.S. and the Islamic Republic. This surprising turn of events, which may seem counterintuitive at first glance, is reshaping regional power dynamics, with Western, Arab, and even U.S. diplomatic sources acknowledging that Oman stands to gain the most from the shifting landscape.

  • German broadcaster removes TV intro after Elon Musk takes legal action

    German broadcaster removes TV intro after Elon Musk takes legal action

    A major controversy has erupted after Germany’s leading public broadcaster ZDF was forced to retract and remove a misleading segment from a primetime news program that falsely claimed tech billionaire Elon Musk directly called for anti-migrant hunts amid post-attack unrest in Northern Ireland. The incident comes against a backdrop of rising international tension over social media’s role in amplifying divisive discourse around migration, an issue that has become increasingly politically charged across both Europe and North America.

    The unrest that sparked the report began in Belfast last week, shortly after a brutal street knife attack left a victim seriously wounded — court documents confirm the victim lost their left eye in the assault. Police quickly took a Sudanese man into custody at the scene, and he has since been remanded in custody on charges of attempted murder. The attack triggered widespread violent disorder in the city, with rioters setting fire to residential properties and vehicles, drawing global media attention to the escalating tensions in Northern Ireland.

    Migration has emerged as one of the most polarizing political issues in Germany in recent years, making the Belfast unrest a natural topic for national news coverage. On June 12, ZDF’s flagship live news magazine *ZDFheute Live* aired a segment framed around the question “How Musk is fuelling the protests.” In the opening introduction of the segment, which has since been deleted, the program’s presenter made the unsubstantiated claim: “A brutal attempted murder on a public street in Belfast. Someone takes a video which goes viral. Following that, a racist mob is hunting migrants. The call for that came from a British right-wing extremist and tech billionaire Elon Musk.”

    This claim misrepresents the actual sequence of events. British far-right activist Tommy Robinson shared posts about planned protests on Musk’s social media platform X on June 9, writing that “the whole of the United Kingdom is hitting the streets tonight at 7pm following yet another invader attack on our people.” Robinson has himself denied ever explicitly calling for rioting. Musk did quote Robinson’s post and add his own comment: “Only by protesting REPEATEDLY and LOUDLY will there be any change!!” He never issued a personal call to hunt migrants, contrary to ZDF’s original wording.

    The false claim was brought to widespread public attention by Julian Reichelt, a prominent German journalist who heads the newer media outlet NiUS, which is often compared to conservative-leaning outlets like UK’s GB News and US’s Fox News. After Reichelt highlighted ZDF’s inaccurate reporting, Musk responded publicly, confirming he was moving forward with legal action against the public broadcaster over what he called “outrageous lies.”

    Through his German legal team, Musk issued a formal cease and desist demand to ZDF. In a public statement to the BBC on Tuesday, a ZDF spokesperson confirmed the network had complied with the demand, removing the contested passage from the segment’s introduction. The spokesperson added that ZDF had already added a corrective transparency notice to the broadcast as early as Saturday, before fully removing the inaccurate wording, and acknowledged the original language had been “imprecise and therefore misleading.” In its formal clarification, ZDF confirmed the correct facts of the incident: it was Tommy Robinson who called for protests following the Belfast knife attack, and the post was only shared and amplified by Musk.

    This incident is far from an isolated controversy for Musk, who owns not just X but also leading tech firms Tesla and SpaceX, and counts more than 240 million followers on his social media platform. He has faced repeated accusations from political leaders and digital watchdog groups of using his massive online platform to inflame social tensions and spread disinformation around migration. Most recently, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer accused Musk of attempting to “whip up division” surrounding the death of 18-year-old student Henry Nowak, who died in Southampton after being stabbed by Vickrum Digwa, who falsely claimed he had been the victim of a racist attack.

    Musk has forcefully pushed back against these accusations. In a post on X dated June 10, shortly after the Belfast attack, he wrote that it was “murderous migrants targeting innocent people in their home town that is making people angry, not ‘social media!’”

    Watchdog groups have continued to criticize Musk’s role in the unrest. The US-based Centre for Countering Digital Hate recently released an assessment concluding that social media played a “significant role” in fuelling the Belfast violence, and alleged that Musk had intentionally “amplified anti-migrant narratives” promoted by far-right actors, extending their reach to millions of global users.

  • African and Commonwealth nations in Kenya urge quick execution of a key treaty protecting oceans

    African and Commonwealth nations in Kenya urge quick execution of a key treaty protecting oceans

    The 11th annual Our Ocean Conference opened this week in Mombasa, Kenya, marking the first time an African nation has hosted the landmark global gathering focused on reversing decades of damage to the world’s oceans. The event, which brought together hundreds of senior delegates from 56 Commonwealth nations, the United States, the European Union, and climate-vulnerable small island states across the Caribbean and Pacific, opened with a unified call to turn long-stated ocean conservation pledges into tangible, on-the-ground action — starting with immediate execution of the historic High Seas Treaty.

    Formally named the Agreement on Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction, the treaty entered into force in January this year after securing ratification from 60 countries around the globe. For the first time in history, the agreement establishes a binding legal framework to create fully protected marine areas in international waters, a critical step toward hitting the global 30×30 conservation target that aims to safeguard 30 percent of the world’s land and oceans by 2030.

    Speaking at the opening of the Commonwealth Ocean Ministers’ Roundtable during the conference, former U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry highlighted the slow pace of progress despite the treaty’s entry into force. While the global community has now hit a milestone of protecting 10 percent of the world’s oceans, Kerry noted that only 3 percent of that area qualifies as highly or fully protected. Most existing ocean protections, he argued, remain nothing more than lines drawn on official maps, with no meaningful enforcement or conservation measures in place.

    Kerry further criticized unregulated industrial fishing activity, pointing out that large distant-water fleets travel thousands of miles from their home ports and deploy massive nets that capture non-target marine life indiscriminately, devastating vulnerable open-ocean ecosystems. He urged all nations that have not yet ratified the treaty to complete the process immediately, and called on parties that have already ratified to begin full implementation without delay. Key decisions shaping the treaty’s long-term governance framework are scheduled to be made next year, making the coming months a critical window for action.

    Kenya’s Cabinet Secretary for Maritime Affairs, Hassan Joho, echoed this call, emphasizing that global conservation efforts must shift from making promises to delivering measurable results. Since the first Our Ocean Conference was held in 2014, the global gathering has generated more than 2,900 separate conservation pledges totaling over $169 billion in committed funding. Joho stressed that the core challenge now facing the global community is turning these financial and policy pledges into effective, long-term management of fragile marine ecosystems that benefit coastal communities and national economies alike.

    The 56 member states of the Commonwealth collectively control 36 percent of the world’s total ocean jurisdiction and hold stewardship over nearly half of the planet’s coral reefs, giving the bloc an outsized role and unique responsibility in global marine conservation. For its part, Africa is increasingly emerging as a leading voice in global ocean governance, a shift Kerry highlighted during his remarks. He praised the continent for leading transboundary conservation efforts, pointing specifically to a landmark commitment by eight Gulf of Guinea nations to sustainably manage 100 percent of their collective national waters by 2030.

    “Africa, a region long framed as a victim of unregulated ocean exploitation, is now stepping forward to lead global conservation action,” Kerry said.

    As host of this year’s conference, Kenya has already implemented a series of progressive ocean policies: it has adopted integrated coastal zone management frameworks, expanded the total area of its national marine protected areas, and ramped up enforcement efforts to crack down on illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing. The East African nation’s 400-mile coastline and extensive exclusive economic zone support key economic sectors including commercial fishing and coastal tourism, which sustain livelihoods for millions of Kenyans.

    As delegates continued negotiations in Mombasa, many attendees noted that the policy and regulatory decisions made over the coming months will determine whether the High Seas Treaty becomes a transformative tool for global marine conservation, or joins a long list of unfulfilled international environmental promises.

    This coverage from the Associated Press receives philanthropic funding from multiple private foundations, with the AP retaining full editorial control over all content.