分类: politics

  • Army will shut down a unit in Europe focused on learning drone warfare

    Army will shut down a unit in Europe focused on learning drone warfare

    In a move that follows a sudden leadership shakeup at the top of the U.S. Army, a specialized drone warfare battalion based in Europe has been ordered to abandon its experimental unmanned warfare mission and return to its roots as a traditional airborne infantry unit, multiple anonymous defense officials confirmed Thursday. The unit, part of the 173rd Airborne Brigade with installations across Italy and Germany, had spent nearly a year refining drone tactics pioneered by Ukrainian forces in their ongoing conflict with Russia, building a reputation as the service’s leading test bed for frontline unmanned technology.

    The specialized battalion was first stood up last November, bringing together 600 trained soldiers to operate as a dedicated deployable drone unit that could support any theater of operations where unmanned capabilities were needed. As recently as May 2025, Army public affairs highlighted the brigade’s work at its custom first-person view (FPV) drone lab at Italy’s Caserma Del Din, where soldiers designed and built their own attack drones, adapted systems to resist electronic jamming, and even experimented with artificial intelligence integration — a priority championed by current Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. At the time, brigade commander Col. Joshua Gaspard noted troops were eager to leverage the lessons widely visible from Ukraine’s battlefields, saying service members “see videos of FPV drones in Ukraine all over Instagram and the news media” and were excited to deploy these cutting-edge systems themselves.

    The order to disband the unit came from Gen. Christopher LaNeve, the Army’s current acting chief of staff, who took the top uniformed role in April after Hegseth abruptly fired his predecessor, Gen. Randy George. The decision marks a shift from the priorities George set during his tenure, when the former service chief made widespread integration of unmanned systems a core pillar of Army modernization through the Army Transformation Initiative, which sought to get new drone capabilities into the hands of all frontline troops, not just specialized detachments.

    The disbanding order comes even as ongoing conflict in the Middle East has underscored the urgent need for the U.S. military to expand its own drone warfare expertise, drawn from Ukraine’s experience. Iranian-made low-cost Shahed drones have been used to attack commercial and military shipping, strike regional bases, kill U.S. troops, down an Army helicopter, and force American forces to expend large stockpiles of expensive advanced air defense interceptors to counter the cheap, numerous unmanned threats. As of March this year, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed Kyiv was already sharing its drone countermeasure and tactical expertise with five nations in the Middle East and Gulf region, with the U.S. and European states also requesting Ukrainian support.

    In the weeks before George’s ouster, Army insiders widely expected the drone battalion to continue its experimental work after completing two planned major exercises in Germany scheduled for this month and next. A senior official familiar with internal deliberations noted that while the exercises had always been framed as a culminating evaluation event for the unit, most defense planners under George anticipated the battalion’s mission would be extended following the drills.

    In an official statement, the Army clarified that the drone unit will wrap up its scheduled exercises as planned, then compile all findings from its year-long experimentation to share with Army force design planners to inform future unmanned systems development. “The unit was tasked to study and absorb lessons from dedicated unmanned systems forces, including those developed by the Ukrainian armed forces, and to provide that feedback to the Army in support of the Department’s direction to accelerate U.S. military drone dominance,” the service said in its statement.

    LaNeve, who saw a rapid career advancement after Hegseth took office, previously served as George’s deputy before ascending to the top role. He was commanding U.S. Eighth Army in South Korea when he publicly welcomed President Donald Trump back to office at the 2025 inauguration Commander in Chief Ball, and was tapped for the vice chief of staff role by Trump last October before being elevated to acting chief in April. In a strategic guidance memo published Wednesday, LaNeve argued that “the next war will not look like our last” and called for faster innovation that pairs troop ingenuity with advanced technologies including autonomy and artificial intelligence. Notably, however, the memo makes no mention of drone development, and closes by emphasizing “timeless truths in war,” framing the ideal future Army as a force “disciplined, lethal, and relentless — an Army that closes with and destroys the enemy, leaving no doubt about the will and power of the United States.”

  • FBI arrests woman over alleged plot to bomb New York capitol building

    FBI arrests woman over alleged plot to bomb New York capitol building

    U.S. law enforcement agencies have foiled a planned terrorist attack targeting New York’s state capitol building in Albany, arresting a local woman who federal prosecutors say had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State (IS) and intended to kill state lawmakers in the assault.

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation took 35-year-old Jessica Bowie, a resident of Albany, into custody this week following a months-long undercover investigation that involved confidential informants and agents posing as IS operatives, according to court documents. Prosecutors outline that Bowie spent weeks refining her attack plot, ultimately selecting the Albany statehouse as her target because she viewed it as a softer target than the White House, with her end goal being to inflict systemic damage to U.S. governing institutions.

    Court records detail that Bowie conducted pre-attack reconnaissance at least five times, taking photos of the building’s layout and security protocols to prepare for the strike. She mapped out a plan to conceal an explosive device inside a DoorDash food delivery bag — a photo of which is included in the official charging documents — and intended to use large nails as shrapnel to maximize casualties.

    As the investigation progressed, undercover agents provided Bowie with $200 to purchase bomb-making components from a local Home Depot hardware store, driving her to the location for the purchase. Law enforcement has released surveillance images showing Bowie pushing a shopping cart through the store while selecting the materials needed to build her explosive device. After completing her purchase, investigators quote Bowie as asking the undercover operatives, “I hope the nails are big enough… because the nails work as shrapnel, right?”

    When Bowie was taken into custody on Wednesday, agents found she was carrying multiple knives, a written oath of allegiance to IS, and a fake explosive device and non-functional firearm that had been provided to her by the undercover agents as part of the sting operation.

    Federal charging documents additionally note that Bowie was an active social media user who regularly spread anti-American rhetoric on public platforms. She was banned from multiple platforms for violating terms of service, and had used her accounts to praise the al-Qaeda 9/11 terror attacks. In conversations with investigators, Bowie shared that she converted to Islam approximately five years ago, and had shifted her ideology from being a patriotic child waving an American flag in the aftermath of 9/11 to displaying stickers of the collapsing World Trade Center towers to show support for terror attacks.

    It currently remains unclear whether Bowie intends to enter a guilty plea or challenge the charges brought against her, which include one count of providing material support and resources to a designated foreign terrorist organization.

    New York Governor Kathy Hochul issued a public statement thanking the FBI and New York State Police for their work disrupting the plot and taking Bowie into custody. She noted that the foiled plot comes as the U.S. has seen a rise in political violence and targeted threats against public officials, adding that her administration had already implemented new security upgrades at the Albany statehouse and across all state government facilities earlier this year to mitigate these risks.

  • Jailed Pakistan ex-PM Imran Khan taken to hospital for treatment

    Jailed Pakistan ex-PM Imran Khan taken to hospital for treatment

    Former Pakistani Prime Minister and legendary cricket captain Imran Khan, who has remained behind bars on politically disputed charges since August 2023, has been transferred to a leading private hospital in Islamabad’s capital city to receive long-delayed medical care, following a binding order from the country’s Supreme Court.

    Local Pakistani media outlets confirmed that Khan was moved from Adiala Jail, located in Punjab’s Rawalpindi, to Shifa International Hospital early this week, escorted by a heavy contingent of security personnel to maintain order and prevent unauthorized gatherings. The transfer was carried out in strict compliance with a 48-hour deadline issued by a three-judge Supreme Court panel, which mandated that the 73-year-old opposition leader receive a comprehensive medical evaluation from independent specialists.

    Khan, who has been at the center of Pakistan’s political turmoil since he was removed from office via a no-confidence vote in 2022, has faced more than 100 separate legal charges since his ousting, ranging from corruption and illegal sale of state gifts to leaking classified state information. All charges have been consistently dismissed by Khan and his legal team as coordinated political retribution designed to remove him from the country’s political landscape. Most recently, late last year, both Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi were sentenced to 17 years of imprisonment in a separate corruption case related to state gifts.

    For months, Khan’s legal team has raised urgent alarms over his declining health behind bars, claiming that prison authorities have repeatedly blocked him from accessing specialized medical care that he requires. The most pressing concern has been severe deterioration of Khan’s eyesight: in February, his legal team told the court that Khan only retains 15% of his vision in his right eye, a decline that was preventable if authorities had approved a specialist examination in a timely manner. Pakistani government officials have disputed these allegations, claiming that Khan has been provided appropriate care while in custody.

    In its written ruling, the three-judge panel emphasized its core constitutional and legal duty to protect the fundamental rights of all prisoners, regardless of their charges. “We are mindful of the constitutional and legal obligation… to safeguard the life, health, dignity and security of the prisoner,” the order read. The court also specified that a qualified eye specialist must lead the medical evaluation and any subsequent treatment for Khan during his hospital stay.

    In a joint appeal to avoid unrest, both the Supreme Court judges and leaders of Khan’s political party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), have warned Khan’s supporters against gathering in large groups outside Shifa International Hospital. Both parties noted that any unapproved public assembly would constitute a direct breach of the Supreme Court’s order, and could put Khan’s access to care at risk.

    Khan’s imprisonment in August 2023 sparked massive nationwide protests across Pakistan by his thousands of supporters, which were ultimately met with a harsh crackdown by incumbent government authorities. Even more than a year after being jailed, Khan remains one of the most influential and popular political figures in Pakistan, with a large, dedicated base of supporters that cuts across regional and demographic lines.

  • Exclusive: UK condemns ‘abhorrent’ Ben Gvir comments on killing Palestinians

    Exclusive: UK condemns ‘abhorrent’ Ben Gvir comments on killing Palestinians

    The United Kingdom has issued a sharp rebuke of extreme, violence-inciting comments from Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, labeling his calls for the nightly targeted killing of 30 to 40 Palestinians in Gaza as “abhorrent” and “dehumanizing” in an exclusive statement to independent news outlet Middle East Eye (MEE).

    In public remarks made earlier this week, Ben Gvir not only advocated for mass nightly assassinations in Gaza, he expanded the scope of his call to include Palestinians who do not pose an immediate security threat. “There are people there who are not worthy of life. They shouldn’t live. They’re not even people,” the far-right Israeli cabinet minister added. He also openly boasted about constructing a purpose-built facility to execute Palestinian prisoners held by Israel, claims MEE brought to the attention of the British Foreign Office for comment.

    A senior Foreign Office spokesperson responded to MEE’s inquiry making clear that the UK views language that dehumanizes an entire people and open calls for violence from a sitting Israeli government minister as completely unacceptable. “These remarks… serve only to further inflame an already catastrophic situation,” the spokesperson added. The UK is calling on the Israeli government to take formal action against ministers who use rhetoric that fuels intercommunal violence, and to crack down on rising violence perpetrated by Israeli settlers against Palestinian communities in the occupied territories.

    This is not the first time Ben Gvir has faced British repercussions for his anti-Palestinian incitement: he is already one of two sitting Israeli cabinet ministers, alongside far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, to be sanctioned by the UK for inciting violence against Palestinians. The spokesperson reaffirmed the UK’s ongoing commitment to working toward a long-term sustainable peace between Israelis and Palestinians, including an urgent end to the widespread humanitarian catastrophe unfolding in Gaza and equal security for all people living in the region.

    The condemnation of Ben Gvir comes as the UK government prepares to roll out a package of new policy measures targeting Israeli settlement activity in September, MEE has previously reported. Senior UK officials, particularly Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband, are pushing for stronger punitive action, and Miliband has held extensive consultations with civil society groups to shape the upcoming policies. One of the most anticipated measures is a ban on imports of goods produced in illegal Israeli settlements built on occupied Palestinian land.

    Miliband publicly confirmed this week that the UK will announce formal measures against Israel over its latest settlement expansion plan in the E1 corridor, a strategically sensitive area east of Jerusalem that, if fully developed, would cut the occupied West Bank geographically in half and make the creation of a contiguous, independent Palestinian state impossible.

    On Tuesday, Israeli authorities opened public tenders for the construction of 1,234 new settlement housing units in the southern portion of the E1 plan, moving one of the most controversial and long-delayed settlement projects out of the planning phase and into active implementation. Miliband said he directly conveyed to Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar that the Israeli government must immediately halt the E1 development, withdraw the construction tender, and end all settlement expansion across the occupied West Bank.

    “The impact of settler violence and terrorism has been catastrophic for Palestinian communities. Settlement expansion and attempts to create irreversible divisions on the ground threaten peace, security and the prospects for a viable Palestinian state,” Miliband said.

  • Colombia’s far-right government waives visas for Israel

    Colombia’s far-right government waives visas for Israel

    In a dramatic reversal of its previous Middle East foreign policy, Colombia’s new far-right administration has implemented a series of swift, pro-Israel policy changes headed by a mutual visa waiver agreement that will take effect for citizens of both nations starting September 1. The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs made the announcement public this Thursday, following high-level discussions between Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar and Colombian Foreign Minister Omar Bula Escobar.

    The visa liberalization deal comes at a moment when Israeli travelers, including large numbers of active-duty Israeli soldiers, are facing growing international scrutiny and public backlash across much of the globe over Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Gaza and its long-standing apartheid regime in the Israeli-occupied West Bank. The agreement removes a key barrier for Israeli visitors seeking entry to Colombia, opening the South American nation to far more Israeli tourism than previous policies allowed.

    This visa waiver is just the latest step in President Abelardo de la Espriella’s systematic rollback of the independent foreign policy forged by his predecessor, Gustavo Petro. Under Petro’s leadership, Colombia made international headlines in May 2024 when it severed full diplomatic relations with Israel, with Petro explicitly labeling Israel’s military operation in Gaza as both a genocide and a crime against humanity. Petro’s administration also threw its full support behind international legal efforts to hold Israeli leadership accountable for actions in Gaza, including the ongoing genocide case brought before the International Court of Justice. Currently, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also faces an active arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity stemming from the Gaza conflict.

    Since de la Espriella took office on August 7, his government has moved at breakneck speed to reverse every pillar of Petro’s Middle East policy. As early as July, before he formally assumed office, Sa’ar and Bula Escobar met in Washington D.C. to agree on a full roadmap to restore full diplomatic and economic ties, exchange ambassadorial appointments, and expand cross-border cooperation across multiple sectors. The new Colombian administration has also publicly announced plans to open a full Colombian embassy in Jerusalem, a move that deviates from the long-standing international norm of locating embassies in Tel Aviv ahead of a final negotiated resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    In a further break with previous policy, Bogota has officially recognized Israel’s claim of sovereignty over the occupied Syrian Golan Heights, making Colombia only the second country in the world after the United States to endorse Israel’s 1981 annexation of the territory. Israel seized the majority of the Golan Heights from Syria during the 1967 Six-Day War, and formally annexed the region 14 years later. The United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 497 immediately after the annexation, which explicitly declared the move null and void and without any binding international legal effect, a ruling that has been reaffirmed by the global community repeatedly in the decades since.

    Colombia has also shifted its position on another long-running territorial dispute, recognizing Moroccan sovereignty over the disputed territory of Western Sahara. This move abandons Petro’s administration’s previous support for the right to self-determination of the Sahrawi people, and aligns Colombian foreign policy with shared priorities of both Israel and the United States.

    Taken together, the visa waiver agreement, the plan for a Jerusalem embassy, and the recognition of Israeli and Moroccan territorial annexations add up to a complete foreign policy realignment that has unfolded in less than two weeks. These rapid policy changes have already repositioned Colombia as one of Israel’s closest political allies in Latin America, even as Israel continues its military offensive in Gaza and pushes forward with the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territory.

    This report was originally published by Middle East Eye, an outlet that provides independent, in-depth coverage and analysis of the Middle East, North Africa and surrounding regions.

  • Pakistan may consider private hospital treatment for imprisoned ex-PM Khan, minister says

    Pakistan may consider private hospital treatment for imprisoned ex-PM Khan, minister says

    ISLAMABAD – In a development tied to the legal and medical status of imprisoned former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, a senior cabinet official confirmed Thursday that the ruling government stands ready to comply with a Supreme Court order mandating a formal medical evaluation for the jailed ex-leader, and is open to moving Khan to a private medical facility or even abroad for treatment if sufficient care cannot be provided through public government institutions. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Tariq Fazal Chaudhry outlined the government’s position, noting that officials had submitted a request to the Supreme Court seeking clarification on whether the medical accommodations granted to Khan would apply exclusively to the former prime minister, or if similar provisions could be extended to other incarcerated individuals across the country. Chaudhry also emphasized in a post on the social platform X that the government’s clarification request was not an act of defiance or an attempt to delay the court’s order, and that the administration remained committed to full compliance with the ruling. The minister’s public statement came just hours after security forces were reinforced at a major Islamabad hospital, as political observers and media outlets anticipated that Khan would be transferred to the facility imminently. Dozens of reporters have gathered at the hospital site, waiting to capture visual footage of the former leader, who has not made any public appearance since he was first imprisoned on corruption charges in 2023. This latest exchange between the government and the Supreme Court follows a request from Pakistani authorities Wednesday to review or fully withdraw the court’s order requiring Khan to undergo a medical examination at a private hospital selected by Khan himself. The Supreme Court rejected the government’s request on procedural technical grounds, instructing officials to complete all required formal documentation before resubmitting any application. Per the terms of the original Supreme Court ruling, Khan must be transported to the designated hospital by midnight Thursday, where a multi-doctor medical board that includes Khan’s own personal physician will conduct the evaluation. The Pakistani government’s longstanding policy holds that incarcerated people receive routine medical care directly within prison facilities, and are only transferred to public government-run hospitals when their condition requires more advanced intervention. Public concerns about Khan’s overall health first surged in late January, when members of his family announced that he had lost approximately 85% of his vision in his right eye. The claim was immediately disputed by government officials, who later released a statement asserting that Khan had recovered roughly 70% of the vision in the affected eye and that his medical status was steadily improving. A former international cricket star who pivoted to national politics, Khan was removed from office via a parliamentary no-confidence vote in April 2022. He has remained behind bars since 2023 after being convicted on multiple corruption-related charges stemming from investigations launched following his ouster.

  • FBI seizes former Congressman Eric Swalwell’s devices and searches his home as part of investigation

    FBI seizes former Congressman Eric Swalwell’s devices and searches his home as part of investigation

    A sweeping federal law enforcement action targeting former Democratic U.S. Representative Eric Swalwell unfolded over the weekend, as FBI agents stopped the California politician at a U.S. airport, seized his personal electronic devices, and executed a search warrant at his Washington, D.C., residence. The operation marks a significant new development in an ongoing federal investigation into multiple claims of sexual misconduct leveled against Swalwell earlier this year. Multiple U.S. law enforcement and media sources, including CBS News — the BBC’s official U.S. news partner — have confirmed details of the enforcement action. The 45-year-old former congressman, a frequent cable news commentator who built a national profile as a prominent critic of former President Donald Trump, has been facing overlapping probes from multiple jurisdictions since the first allegations became public. The accusations, which come from multiple female accusers, include claims that Swalwell raped one woman while she was severely intoxicated and unable to consent, and that he sent unsolicited nude images to other women. Soon after the allegations were first reported publicly earlier this year, Swalwell stepped down from his seat in the U.S. House of Representatives and abandoned his campaign for California governor — a race where he had been leading in early polling at the time. Following his departure from Congress, the House Ethics Committee terminated its own parallel investigation into the claims, which had been launched after House Democratic leadership faced pressure to remove Swalwell from committee assignments over the allegations. Swalwell has repeatedly and unequivocally denied all accusations of sexual misconduct. His attorney, Sara Azari, has characterized the claims as entirely manufactured, calling them a deliberate, transparent political attack targeting her client. “These accusations are false, fabricated, and deeply offensive — a calculated and transparent political hit job,” Azari stated when the allegations were first made public. The BBC has reached out to Swalwell and his legal team for additional comment following the weekend FBI action, but has not yet received a response. Beyond the sexual misconduct investigations, new developments emerged this week in a separate decade-old FBI investigation tied to Swalwell. On Monday, the White House declassified and released previously sealed documents detailing long-reported allegations of a past relationship between Swalwell and Christine Fang, a woman suspected of being a Chinese intelligence operative. While most key details of the 2015 relationship have been public knowledge for years, Swalwell never faced any criminal charges related to the alleged connection. Multiple major U.S. media outlets, including CBS News, have reported that FBI Director Kash Patel spearheaded the push to declassify and release the previously sealed investigation files. In addition to the federal probe being carried out by the FBI, Swalwell also faces active criminal investigations into the rape and sexual assault allegations from two separate local law enforcement agencies: the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office in New York and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department in his home state of California.

  • Israel issues veiled threat to Turkey following airbase strikes in Syria

    Israel issues veiled threat to Turkey following airbase strikes in Syria

    A recent Israeli airstrike on the Abu al-Duhur military airbase in northern Syria, located just 70 kilometers from the Turkish border, has ignited a sharp diplomatic standoff between Jerusalem and Ankara, reigniting long-simmering regional tensions that diplomatic efforts had sought to ease. On Thursday, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz issued a thinly veiled warning to Turkey in a public social media statement, accusing Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of leading his country into risky, destabilizing military actions across Syria. Katz emphasized that Israel would not permit any foreign or regional actor to jeopardize its national security, urging Erdogan to rein in his frequent anti-Israel rhetoric instead of challenging Israel’s commitment to defending its territorial and strategic interests. Jerusalem’s core allegation centers on claims that Syria was on the brink of breaking a long-standing security status quo negotiated with Israel by allowing Turkish military personnel to deploy permanently at the Abu al-Duhur facility. However, both Ankara and Damascus have forcefully rejected these claims, offering consistent, detailed accounts that contradict Israel’s justification for the strike. The Turkish Ministry of Defense issued an official statement categorically denying that any Turkish military forces were present at the airbase either before or during the “unacceptable” Israeli attack, calling for an immediate end to what it described as reckless Israeli military incursions into Syrian territory. While Syrian officials confirmed that a small Turkish technical team had been deployed to the base to repair damaged infrastructure including the runway and air traffic control tower, they stressed no uniformed Turkish military personnel were stationed at the site. The last of the reconstruction crew had departed the base two full days before the Israeli strike, according to senior Syrian officials. Turkish authorities clarified that their work in Syria is focused on helping rebuild the Syrian military’s infrastructure and capabilities under the framework of the “single army” principle, which supports the development of a strong, sovereign Syrian military capable of defending the country’s own borders. Turkish officials emphasized that these efforts are not targeted at Israel, nor do they include plans for a permanent Turkish military deployment at any Syrian base. Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani echoed this denial in an interview with Axios earlier this week, stating that he had explicitly communicated to Israeli officials that there were no plans to host a permanent Turkish military presence at the site, which is being rehabilitated exclusively for use by the Syrian Air Force. This latest exchange of strikes and accusations has renewed open friction between Turkey and Israel, despite a series of high-level diplomatic talks held in 2023 that resulted in the creation of a dedicated bilateral diplomatic hotline designed to prevent accidental military clashes and miscommunication. Turkish officials speaking to Middle East Eye claim that Israel deliberately chose not to activate this hotline ahead of the strike, in a deliberate attempt to provoke the Ankara government. Diplomatic sources in Ankara also noted that U.S. authorities appear to have tipped off Turkish officials about the impending strike, providing clarity on why Israeli aircraft were operating near the Turkish border and easing immediate concerns of an intentional attack on Turkish assets. The Turkish presidency has further framed the Israeli strike as a politically motivated move by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is campaigning ahead of Israel’s general election scheduled for October. Netanyahu pushed back on this narrative, confirming that Israel had issued explicit warnings to Syria ahead of the strike to prevent any Turkish deployment to the base, telling reporters “Our message was very clear: Don’t. I guess they didn’t quite understand the message.” For its part, Damascus has rejected Israel’s justification as entirely illegitimate, with al-Shaibani reiterating that Israel had no right to carry out the bombing on sovereign Syrian territory. In the wake of the strike, U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Syria and Iraq Tom Barrack told reporters from Reuters that Washington is currently working to establish a formal deconfliction mechanism that would bring together Israel, Turkey, and Syria to prevent future military miscalculations. Analysis from Israeli media, quoting a senior Syrian source close to the Damascus government, suggests that the strike is likely to backfire on Israeli strategic goals. The source noted that while Syria does not seek an expanded permanent foreign military presence on its territory, repeated Israeli threats and military incursions are pushing the Syrian government to deepen its strategic alignment with Turkey. “The Israeli government is getting the opposite result of what it hopes to achieve,” the source added.

  • Three Palestinian parties in Israel form joint list ahead of elections

    Three Palestinian parties in Israel form joint list ahead of elections

    Ahead of Israel’s upcoming parliamentary elections scheduled for October 27, three Palestinian-led political parties operating within Israel announced a historic electoral alliance this Wednesday, reviving the Joint List framework that has historically united Palestinian political factions under a single electoral banner. The coalition, which brings together Hadash (the Democratic Front for Peace and Equality), Balad (the National Democratic Assembly), and Ta’al (the Arab Movement for Renewal), was formed to counter what the parties describe as mounting “fascist and racist” threats targeting Israel’s Palestinian citizen community.

    In a shared official statement, the alliance laid out its core political objectives: to consolidate the collective political influence of Palestinian citizens of Israel and convert that momentum into more robust representation in Israel’s 120-seat legislature, the Knesset. “Our task is to harness our collective political weight and translate it into stronger representation in the Knesset,” the statement read. Beyond increasing representation, the parties emphasized their mission to center the interests of Palestinian citizens and their core national principles, while building a unified political force capable of unseating the current far-right Israeli government.

    Talks to revive the Joint List have been underway for months, driven by growing pressure on fragmented Palestinian parties to set aside internal divisions. The original Joint List was first launched in 2015, formed in direct response to a controversial legislative change that raised the electoral threshold for Knesset entry from 2 percent to 3.25 percent of the national vote — a change widely interpreted as a deliberate tactic to exclude Palestinian political parties from parliament. The original coalition included the current three alliance members plus the United Arab List (Ra’am), but internal ideological and strategic disagreements led the bloc to fracture first in 2019, and again in 2022.

    The push to reunify gained new urgency amid two unfolding crises: the ongoing military campaign in Gaza that many global observers and Palestinian leaders characterize as genocide, and a sharp rise in violent crime within Palestinian communities inside Israel. A nationwide mass strike and large-scale protests against gun violence held in the northern Israeli city of Sakhnin this January pushed leaders of all four former Joint List parties to sign a formal pledge to revive the unified electoral alliance. However, Ra’am leader Mansour Abbas confirmed in June that his party would not join the new coalition, choosing instead to run an independent electoral slate. Ra’am has even held preliminary discussions about adding Yoav Segalovich, a Jewish former Israeli police commander, to its candidate list.

    At the height of the Joint List’s electoral success in 2020, the alliance secured 15 seats in the Knesset, earning its place as the third-largest political bloc in parliament. Latest pre-election polling indicates the new three-party alliance could win approximately 8 seats, while independent Ra’am is projected to claim an additional 6 seats. In recent years, Palestinian political parties have taken on growing strategic importance in Israeli politics, as traditional Jewish-led political blocs have consistently failed to secure the 61-seat majority needed to form a government on their own. This has repeatedly positioned Palestinian parties as potential kingmakers, able to throw their support behind either bloc to help form a ruling coalition.

    Current polling mirrors this dynamic, indicating that both the bloc led by incumbent Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the competing opposition bloc headed by Gadi Eisenkot will fall short of a majority without the parliamentary support of Palestinian parties. Despite this, both major Israeli political blocs have publicly ruled out any partnership with Palestinian-led parties following the October election.

  • US warns allies, China to back economic war on Iran

    US warns allies, China to back economic war on Iran

    Six months into a deeply unpopular U.S. military engagement in Iran, the White House has announced a dramatic strategic shift, launching what it calls the most sweeping coordinated economic isolation campaign in modern history to topple the Tehran government. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent outlined the new initiative to reporters at the White House on August 20, 2026, framing the economic push as an alternative to expanding costly large-scale military operations that have faced mounting domestic backlash ahead of critical midterm elections.

    Speaking to CNBC, Bessent confirmed that the administration is demanding full participation from both U.S. allies and major competing powers including China, issuing a stark “you are either with us or against us” ultimatum to the global community. When pressed about how Washington will compel Beijing to align with the campaign, Bessent declined to share public details, noting that sensitive discussions are often held privately, but explicitly called on China to “get with the program.” The issue of Iran is set to be a top agenda item when Chinese President Xi Jinping visits the White House on September 1, a follow-up to the Iran discussions that took place during Trump’s May summit in Beijing.

    Bessent emphasized that the ramped-up economic pressure is intended to reduce the likelihood of resuming large-scale kinetic military action against Iran, though he stopped short of ruling out future military deployments. “If we are doing the maximum economic pressure, then that means that likely there will not be a large-scale kinetic restart, but I will emphasize that is for now,” he said, adding that full details of the new sanctions and enforcement measures will be released during a formal press conference scheduled for Monday.

    Iran has swiftly rejected the new campaign, dismissing it as a cynical distraction from growing economic troubles facing the United States. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi took to X to point out that the so-called “Economic D-Day” comes as the U.S. grapples with unprecedented national debt and soaring interest costs, while the Iranian foreign ministry labeled the new sanctions threats a clear act of “economic terrorism.”

    The strategic shift comes amid a months-long military stalemate following the U.S. and Israeli launch of military operations against Iran on February 28. Currently, Tehran maintains partial closure of the strategic Strait of Hormuz, while the U.S. enforces a naval counter-blockade of Iranian trade. After six months of combat, the U.S. has failed to force Iran to abandon its enriched uranium program or its stated plans for civilian nuclear energy, a core demand of the Trump administration, which has insisted it will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon.

    Domestic criticism of the administration’s war handling has intensified in recent weeks, after reports of abysmal living conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, which has been deployed to the Middle East since November 2025. The vessel reportedly faced widespread food shortages, broken plumbing systems, and multiple suicide attempts among crew, prompting the Pentagon to replace it with the newly arrived USS George Washington carrier strike group, which arrived in the region Wednesday.

    This new economic campaign is not the first time Trump has prioritized economic pressure against Iran. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump withdrew from the landmark nuclear deal negotiated by former President Barack Obama and implemented a harsh “maximum pressure” sanctions regime. Despite decades of sweeping U.S. sanctions and the earlier maximum pressure campaign, Iran has managed to continue exporting oil largely via a shadow fleet of sanctioned tankers, with China remaining its largest crude oil customer. In his initial announcement of the new campaign on Truth Social, Trump called for an immediate end to all activities that facilitate Iranian oil trade, including what he termed “oil smuggling, swap lines, cash transfers, exchange houses, ship registries, front companies,” though he did not name any specific countries aiding Iran in these activities.