分类: politics

  • China’s UN envoy calls for protection of children

    China’s UN envoy calls for protection of children

    In a powerful address to the United Nations Security Council on Monday, China’s Permanent Representative Fu Cong issued an urgent appeal for enhanced protection of children caught in armed conflicts worldwide. The high-level session, chaired by U.S. First Lady Melania Trump, convened amidst growing international concern over escalating violence against educational institutions and minors in conflict zones.

    Ambassador Fu condemned in the strongest terms all actions targeting children, emphasizing that such violations represent a breach of fundamental humanitarian principles. “China vehemently denounces all acts that victimize children and demands that conflict parties honor their obligations under international humanitarian law,” stated Fu, adding that protecting children from warfare’s devastation represents “the minimum bottom line of human conscience.”

    The diplomatic gathering occurred against the backdrop of recent military actions in Iran, where reports indicated a girls’ elementary school in Minab suffered devastating strikes resulting in significant child casualties. Iranian state media alleged these attacks involved U.S. and Israeli forces, though these claims remain subject to international investigation.

    Fu specifically highlighted attacks on educational facilities as among the UN’s identified “six grave violations against children,” warranting universal condemnation. He called for strengthened investigative mechanisms and accountability measures for incidents harming children and damaging schools, urging collective action to prevent further atrocities.

    The Chinese envoy characterized children as “the most vulnerable population in armed conflicts,” noting with deep concern that violations against minors have increased annually amid proliferating global conflicts. Fu connected educational deprivation to broader stability issues, stating that when conflict disrupts schooling, it not only impairs healthy development but undermines national stability foundations.

    Fu proposed a comprehensive approach involving immediate ceasefires, political solutions to hotspot issues, and enhanced mediation efforts. He identified sustainable development as the long-term path to breaking cycles of violence, while advocating technology’s proper application to empower education in conflict zones—provided it remains people-centered and avoids politicization.

    The session revealed diplomatic tensions, with Iran’s UN Ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani criticizing what he termed American “hypocrisy” in hosting protection talks while conducting airstrikes. The meeting underscored the complex interplay between geopolitical conflicts and humanitarian protection efforts at the highest international levels.

  • Spain’s Pedro Sánchez hits back at Trump threat to sever trade saying ‘no to war’

    Spain’s Pedro Sánchez hits back at Trump threat to sever trade saying ‘no to war’

    In a resolute televised address from the prime ministerial residence at La Moncloa, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez delivered a robust rebuttal to U.S. President Donald Trump’s threat to sever all trade relations with Spain. The confrontation emerged following Madrid’s refusal to permit American military utilization of jointly operated bases at Morón and Rota for potential strikes against Iran.

    Sánchez articulated Spain’s unwavering diplomatic stance during his ten-minute national broadcast, emphasizing that the government’s position could be encapsulated in four definitive words: “No to war.” The Socialist leader drew parallels between current Middle Eastern tensions and historical conflicts, including the Iraq invasion of 2003 which he characterized as having failed its objectives while exacerbating civilian hardships.

    The Prime Minister asserted that one violation of international legality cannot justify another, explicitly referencing what he termed the “breakdown of international law” in contemporary warfare. This statement came shortly after his administration appealed for de-escalation and adherence to established international protocols in the Middle East.

    Trump’s condemnation emerged during discussions with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, where the U.S. president labeled Spain a “terrible partner” within NATO frameworks, citing insufficient defense budget allocations relative to agreed-upon GDP percentages. The American leader threatened comprehensive trade restrictions against Spain in retaliation for base access denial.

    Chancellor Merz subsequently clarified that he explicitly informed Trump that separate agreements excluding Spain were diplomatically untenable for Germany or the European collective. Meanwhile, Sánchez revealed that his government is developing economic countermeasures to shield Spanish citizens from potential conflict-induced repercussions.

    The Spanish leader, known for his vocal criticism of Israel’s military operations in Gaza following 2023 Hamas attacks, positioned current geopolitical tensions within broader historical and ethical contexts. He cautioned that military escalation against Iran could precipitate severe economic consequences affecting millions globally, while condemning the use of “fog of war” rhetoric to obscure policy failures.

    Sánchez concluded with a principled distinction: “The fundamental question isn’t whether we align with ayatollahs—nobody does—but whether we champion peace and international legality.”

  • South Africa’s anti-apartheid veteran and ex-defense minister Mosiuoa ‘Terror’ Lekota dies at 77

    South Africa’s anti-apartheid veteran and ex-defense minister Mosiuoa ‘Terror’ Lekota dies at 77

    JOHANNESBURG — South Africa’s political landscape is in mourning following the passing of Mosiuoa “Terror” Lekota, the renowned anti-apartheid stalwart and former defense minister, who died at 77 after an extended illness. His political organization confirmed his demise on Wednesday, marking the end of an era for South African politics.

    Lekota’s legacy as a formidable opponent of white minority rule was forged during his eight-year imprisonment on Robben Island (1974-1982), where he shared incarceration with Nelson Mandela and other legendary freedom fighters. His activism continued relentlessly even after his release, resulting in additional detentions for his unwavering opposition to apartheid.

    Following South Africa’s historic democratic transition in 1994, Lekota ascended to significant leadership roles, serving as Defense Minister from 1999 to 2008 and occupying the national chairmanship of the ruling African National Congress. His political trajectory took a dramatic turn in 2008 when he severed ties with the ANC following the contentious removal of President Thabo Mbeki, who had previously lost the party presidency to Jacob Zuma.

    In a bold political maneuver, Lekota established the breakaway Congress of the People (COPE) party, which achieved remarkable success in the 2009 elections by capturing over 7% of the national vote and securing 30 parliamentary seats. This schism substantially weakened the ANC’s electoral dominance, drawing away numerous disaffected members and officials.

    Despite his monumental contributions to strengthening multiparty democracy, internal factionalism within COPE precipitated its gradual decline, culminating in the party’s failure to win any legislative representation in the 2024 elections. Lekota’s departure from active politics in 2025, prompted by health considerations, preceded the ANC’s own historic loss of parliamentary majority that same year.

    Political leaders across the spectrum have paid tribute to Lekota’s enduring legacy. Bantu Holomisa, Defense Deputy Minister and opposition leader, praised Lekota for fundamentally transforming South Africa’s opposition landscape by establishing a credible alternative to ANC hegemony, noting that he and other ANC dissidents remained committed to the original principles of the liberation struggle.

  • Canada PM says Israeli-US strikes on Iran ‘inconsistent with international law’

    Canada PM says Israeli-US strikes on Iran ‘inconsistent with international law’

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has publicly characterized recent US-Israeli military actions against Iran as fundamentally incompatible with established international legal standards. During an address at Sydney’s Lowy Institute think tank on Wednesday, Carney articulated Canada’s official position calling for immediate de-escalation in the Middle East conflict while simultaneously condemning Iran’s regional influence.

    While acknowledging Canada’s support for initiatives aimed at transforming Iran’s governmental structure—which Carney identified as the ‘primary catalyst for instability and terrorism’ in the region—the Prime Minister maintained that the military strikes ‘would appear, prima facie, inconsistent with international law.’ Carney cautiously noted that definitive legal assessment ‘is a judgement for others to make,’ acknowledging his own limitations in international jurisprudence.

    The diplomatic remarks occurred during the second day of Carney’s official visit to Australia, part of a broader Asia-Pacific tour designed to strengthen economic partnerships and reduce reliance on United States leadership. This strategic pivot reflects Carney’s frequently expressed concerns about the deterioration of the US-led global order, a theme he emphasized at January’s World Economic Forum where he warned of systemic ‘rupture’ in international governance.

    Carney’s administration has experienced persistent tensions with the Trump White House, including economic threats and tariff impositions against Canada. The Prime Minister framed the Middle East conflict as ‘another example of the failure of the international order,’ while reaffirming Canada’s commitment to international legal principles that ‘bind all belligerents.’

    The military strikes that prompted Carney’s comments resulted in the death of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, occurring just two days after US diplomats engaged in nuclear negotiations with Iranian counterparts in Geneva. Subsequent retaliatory actions by Iran have targeted US diplomatic and military installations across the region, with allied groups escalating attacks on Israeli positions.

    Despite his legal objections, Carney endorsed the strategic objectives behind the strikes, citing Iran’s refusal to dismantle its nuclear program and continued support for militant organizations. However, he expressed disappointment that international diplomatic efforts failed to achieve peaceful disarmament and noted with concern that the United States and Israel acted ‘without engaging the United Nations or consulting with allies, including Canada.’

    Carney’s Australian itinerary includes meetings with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and parliamentary addresses in Canberra, with discussions expected to focus on economic security, critical minerals collaboration, and defense cooperation between the two middle-power nations.

  • Five-year plans the ballast for stable growth

    Five-year plans the ballast for stable growth

    For over seventy years, China’s systematic approach to national development through five-year planning has provided the foundational framework for the country’s remarkable economic transformation and social advancement. These comprehensive blueprints have evolved into sophisticated governance instruments that effectively translate strategic leadership vision into actionable national policy.

    The upcoming legislative review of China’s national development planning law represents a significant milestone in institutionalizing this proven governance model. The proposed legislation, comprising six chapters and 37 articles, establishes comprehensive legal procedures for the formulation, review, approval, and supervision mechanisms for national development plans. This legal framework aims to enhance macroeconomic governance while maintaining the planning system’s adaptive capacity.

    International observers recognize China’s five-year plans as critical windows into the nation’s medium to long-term policy direction. According to Zamir Ahmed Awan of the Global Silk Route Research Alliance, these documents represent more than mere policy prescriptions—they constitute a disciplined governance approach that strategically aligns national objectives with market mechanisms and local implementation. The plans provide macroeconomic guidance while preserving market vitality, identifying priority sectors, and establishing clear performance metrics that ensure policy coherence across ministries and regions.

    The historical significance of China’s planning system cannot be overstated. Since the inaugural Five-Year Plan in 1953, the country has progressed from an impoverished agricultural society to the world’s premier manufacturing hub and second-largest economy. Each successive plan has reflected evolving national priorities—from industrialization and economic reform to sustainability and innovation—while maintaining consistent focus on national development and prosperity.

    The planning process itself exemplifies meticulous consensus-building, incorporating expertise from diverse disciplines, multiple governmental levels, and public consultation mechanisms. This comprehensive approach ensures that strategic goals transform into operational realities, with institutional designs that maintain development continuity across political cycles.

    As China prepares to implement its 15th Five-Year Plan (2026-2030), international attention focuses on how the world’s second-largest economy will navigate contemporary challenges. The new plan signals a strategic emphasis on technological self-reliance, green transformation, and institutional modernization—critical priorities for sustaining development amid global geopolitical tensions and domestic structural evolution.

    President Xi Jinping has emphasized that China’s planning system represents both a crucial governance experience and a distinctive advantage of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The system’s stability and predictability provide confidence to businesses and citizens alike, particularly during periods of global uncertainty. Moreover, China’s development planning increasingly carries global significance, offering international partners stable expectations and cooperative opportunities as the nation further integrates with the world economy.

  • Nation’s green development accelerating

    Nation’s green development accelerating

    China’s environmental landscape has undergone a remarkable transformation over the past decade, evolving from severe pollution challenges to becoming a global leader in green development initiatives. This shift stems from President Xi Jinping’s consistent emphasis on maintaining ‘strategic resolve’ in building an ecological civilization, particularly highlighted during annual Two Sessions meetings with national lawmakers and political advisers.

    The turning point came in 2014 when President Xi raised pointed questions about PM2.5 pollution levels for three consecutive days during the Two Sessions deliberations. At that time, images of smog-shrouded Chinese cities dominated international headlines, making air quality a subject of global concern. Today, the term PM2.5 appears far less frequently in public discourse as China’s air quality reached its best recorded level in 2025, with average PM2.5 concentrations dropping to 28 micrograms per cubic meter.

    This environmental improvement represents more than just targeted pollution control—it signifies a fundamental philosophical shift in China’s development approach. Professor Christoph Nedopil Wang of Griffith University, specializing in Asia-Pacific green economic transitions, notes that China has moved from reactive pollution control to “a proactive, systemic economic transformation.”

    President Xi’s consistent messaging during successive Two Sessions meetings has reinforced this transformation. In 2015, he declared that “protecting the environment is ensuring livelihood,” while in 2016 he advocated for environmental protection red lines. By 2018, he emphasized building a “Green Great Wall” along China’s northern borders.

    The commitment reached its pinnacle in September 2020 when China announced its ambitious dual carbon goals: peaking carbon dioxide emissions before 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality before 2060. This marked Beijing’s first concrete timeline for net-zero emissions.

    According to Wang Xiaoli, associate professor at the National Academy of Governance, green and low-carbon industries now account for over 18% of China’s GDP, with advanced manufacturing, green technologies, digital transformation, and AI emerging as new growth engines.

    Institutional support has strengthened through the establishment of a new “environment and resources” sector within the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference in 2023, reflecting heightened priority on ecological protection in national policy planning.

    As China enters its 15th Five-Year Plan (2026-30) period, international observers are closely watching for further policy signals regarding China’s green development. Key areas of interest include expanding the national carbon market to heavy industries, integrating AI into green manufacturing, and developing new incentives for transition finance. How China balances domestic carbon goals with its role as a leading exporter of green energy equipment amid rising trade tensions will be particularly scrutinized in the coming years.

  • Canadian PM Mark Carney takes veiled swipe at Trump, urges closer Australia ties

    Canadian PM Mark Carney takes veiled swipe at Trump, urges closer Australia ties

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has delivered a strategic address in Sydney advocating for strengthened cooperation among middle-power nations, while offering subtle critiques of American unilateralism under Donald Trump’s leadership. Speaking at the Lowy Institute during his multi-day state visit, Carney outlined Canada’s vision for a \”no regret strategy\” that prioritizes diversified international partnerships over dependence on any single global hegemon.\n\nThe Prime Minister articulated concerns about the current \”rupture in the international system,\” emphasizing that traditional norms of the rules-based order are being systematically erased. He positioned Canada and Australia as pivotal players in a coalition of democracies that collectively possess economic and strategic advantages exceeding those of the United States. \”When we only negotiate bilaterally with the hegemon, we negotiate from weakness,\” Carney stated, in what observers interpreted as a reference to U.S. dominance.\n\nCarney revealed significant economic leverage held by the proposed coalition, noting that Canada and Australia collectively control a $25 billion investment fund for critical minerals projects, one-third of global lithium and uranium reserves, and 40% of iron ore supplies. He further highlighted that the broader coalition including Japan, South Korea, and European nations represents a GDP larger than the United States, triple China’s trade flows, and the world’s largest research and development expenditure.\n\nOn defense matters, the Canadian leader disclosed that 70 cents of every dollar spent on defense capital currently goes to the United States, underscoring the need for strategic diversification. He praised the Coalition of the Willing supporting Ukraine as demonstrating the effectiveness of ad hoc international groupings that value sovereignty and territorial integrity.\n\nWhen pressed about managing relations with a potential Trump administration, Carney advocated for an approach of \”respect, but not obsequiousness,\\” noting that private directness proves more effective than public confrontation. He expressed measured criticism of recent U.S. and Israeli actions against Iran undertaken without UN consultation, while simultaneously affirming Canada’s support for regime change in Tehran.\n\nThe address positioned middle powers as having underestimated influence in shaping a more prosperous and just international order through variable geometry cooperation—forming different coalitions for different global challenges.

  • Khamenei’s son reportedly chosen as Iran’s next supreme leader

    Khamenei’s son reportedly chosen as Iran’s next supreme leader

    Iran faces a critical leadership vacuum following the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei during ongoing military operations by the United States and Israel. Opposition channel IranIntl reports that the Assembly of Experts has elected Mojtaba Khamenei, the late leader’s eldest son, as successor, though official confirmation remains pending.

    The constitutional succession mechanism has been activated through the Assembly of Experts—88 Islamic scholars rigorously vetted for loyalty to the regime. This body now faces the extraordinary challenge of selecting leadership during active warfare, with the explicit goal of US-Israeli operations being regime change in Iran.

    Potential candidates include Mojtaba Khamenei, who has recently increased his public visibility; Hassan Khomeini, grandson of the Islamic Republic’s founder; and Alireza Arafi, a member of the Guardian Council with significant religious and political standing. The unexpected death of President Ebrahim Raisi in a 2024 helicopter accident eliminated what many considered the most likely successor.

    An interim council consisting of Arafi, moderate President Masoud Pezeshkian, and hardline judiciary head Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Eje’i is currently governing. However, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) appears to be driving military strategy, closing the Strait of Hormuz and launching attacks on neighboring states hosting US bases.

    These aggressive actions have damaged Iran’s recently improved relations with Arab neighbors, including Saudi Arabia, with whom diplomatic ties were only restored in 2023. Gulf Cooperation Council members now reportedly consider abandoning neutrality and striking back against Iranian attacks.

    The regime’s survival strategy appears to focus on enduring aerial strikes while inflicting sufficient economic and military damage to undermine US resolve. Tehran calculates that prolonged conflict will demonstrate the impracticality of regime change, potentially causing the Trump administration to reconsider its military campaign.

  • Kathmandu empties as around 800,000 Nepalis head home to vote

    Kathmandu empties as around 800,000 Nepalis head home to vote

    Nepal is witnessing an unprecedented domestic migration as approximately 800,000 citizens have departed the densely populated Kathmandu Valley over the past week, undertaking arduous journeys to their ancestral hometowns to participate in Thursday’s pivotal parliamentary elections. This massive movement represents a significant portion of the valley’s population, where about 10% of Nepal’s 30 million residents reside for employment and educational opportunities.

    The extraordinary exodus has created remarkable scenes across the Himalayan nation, with photographs capturing extensive crowds congregating along major highways amidst fleets of jeeps, minibuses, and vans. Transportation authorities have reported severe traffic congestion lasting several hours throughout the weekend as citizens comply with electoral regulations requiring them to vote in their registered constituencies—typically their birthplaces.

    This election marks Nepal’s first national vote since September 2025, when youth-led anti-corruption demonstrations successfully toppled the previous government. The political significance of this moment is not lost on voters like Saroj Chapagain, who endured a 14-hour bus journey from Kathmandu to his hometown in Bardiya district. “I have come home to cast my ballot in order to safeguard the constitution and the system,” the 38-year-old stated, emphasizing that while his single vote might not determine the outcome, it carries profound symbolic importance for Nepal’s democratic foundations.

    However, electoral enthusiasm is not universal. Ophthalmologist Rabindra Singh Thakuri represents a segment of the population expressing skepticism toward political newcomers. He and his colleagues prefer established political parties, fearing that inexperienced leadership might hinder national progress.

    The electoral process will involve approximately 19 million eligible voters, including nearly one million first-time participants. They will select 275 parliament members through a mixed electoral system: 165 via first-past-the-post voting and the remainder through proportional representation. Notably, nearly one-third of the 3,400 candidates are under 40 years old, reflecting a generational shift in Nepalese politics.

    In preparation for the election, authorities have suspended all non-essential public and private transportation from Wednesday through Thursday, while air travel continues uninterrupted. The government has additionally declared Wednesday through Friday as public holidays, coinciding with both the election and the Fagu festival (also known as Holi), celebrated by South Asian communities worldwide.

    Among the most closely monitored races is the Jhapa-5 constituency, traditionally a stronghold of former Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, who resigned during last year’s protests. He faces a formidable challenge from ex-rapper Balendra Shah, who gained initial prominence through provocative musical critiques targeting Nepal’s political establishment.

  • Texas tests party fault lines as US midterms begin

    Texas tests party fault lines as US midterms begin

    The American political landscape entered a pivotal phase as Texas Republicans advanced to a runoff election, revealing profound internal divisions within President Donald Trump’s party during Tuesday’s primary elections. This electoral battleground has emerged as a critical testing ground for both major parties as they strategize for the remainder of Trump’s second term and prepare for November’s consequential congressional elections.

    Voters across the Lone Star State participated in selecting U.S. Senate candidates through contests that effectively measure the political temperament of the electorate. These races serve as a barometer for whether voters prioritize legislative experience and stability or favor candidates who embody political confrontation, even when such positioning might compromise general election viability.

    The primary season commenced with Texas anchoring the initial slate of contests, accompanied by simultaneous elections in North Carolina and Arkansas. These early votes will significantly influence the impending struggle for congressional control. The November general election will determine all 435 House seats and 35 Senate positions, ultimately deciding whether President Trump will govern with a cooperative legislative branch or face a Democratic majority capable of blocking presidential initiatives and launching investigative proceedings.

    Republicans begin this electoral cycle defending a narrow 53-47 Senate majority and an exceptionally slim House advantage. Democratic strategists seek to leverage any public backlash against the Trump administration’s policy agenda to regain legislative power.

    According to Peter Loge, Professor of Political Communication at George Washington University, “Donald Trump remains the central figure in all these primary contests, regardless of individual candidates’ preferences.”

    The electoral proceedings occurred shortly after the United States entered armed conflict alongside Israel against Iran, though political analysts remain uncertain whether this geopolitical development will substantially affect voter turnout or sentiment during the early campaign period.

    In the marquee Texas contest, four-term Republican Senator John Cornyn faced a formidable challenge from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a dedicated Trump ally who has cultivated substantial grassroots support despite enduring multiple ethics controversies and a 2023 impeachment trial. Major news networks projected that neither candidate achieved the required 50 percent threshold, forcing a May runoff election. Cornyn has cautioned party members that nominating Paxton could potentially jeopardize a Senate seat that Republicans cannot afford to lose in November.

    Meanwhile, Democratic primary voters weighed strategic alternatives between U.S. Representative Jasmine Crockett’s confrontational approach and state representative James Talarico’s appeal to moderate conservatives. Crockett maintains her combative style can energize Democratic turnout in a state where the party hasn’t won statewide office in three decades, while Talarico positions himself as capable of attracting disaffected Republicans and independent voters.

    The potential for extended runoff campaigns raises concerns about prolonged intraparty conflicts and the depletion of crucial financial resources needed for the general election battles ahead.