分类: politics

  • Bolivia’s capital under siege as protests and blockades deepen crisis for President Paz

    Bolivia’s capital under siege as protests and blockades deepen crisis for President Paz

    Six months after Rodrigo Paz took office as Bolivia’s president, the South American nation is grappling with its most severe political and humanitarian crisis in decades, as nationwide protests and coordinated road blockades have left the country’s administrative capital La Paz effectively under siege. What began as scattered demands from disparate labor and social groups has evolved into a full-scale movement calling for Paz’s resignation, amplified by the shadow of influential former president Evo Morales, who is currently evading arrest on sexual assault charges.

    The unrest has stretched into its third week, led by a coalition of Bolivia’s largest labor union, the Bolivian Workers’ Central (COB), peasant unions, and mining groups. The sustained road closures have gutted local markets in La Paz, drained critical oxygen supplies at the capital’s hospitals, and already claimed at least three lives: emergency response vehicles were blocked from reaching medical facilities, leaving patients without urgent care. On Monday, clashes broke out between police and Morales supporters who joined the mass mobilization in the capital, intensifying pressure on a beleaguered administration that holds no legislative majority and lacks a cohesive, nationwide political party structure.

    For Paz, a business-friendly centrist who won office last year as part of a broader regional wave of conservative electoral gains, the uprising represents the existential threat of his young presidency. Despite his warning Friday that “Those seeking to destroy democracy will go to jail,” blockades have since expanded to cover nearly the entire country, leaving more than 5,000 vehicles stranded on national highways and draining the national economy of an estimated $50 million every single day, according to local business associations.

    The demands driving the protest are varied across participating groups. The COB initially called for significant wage hikes, while peasant groups have demanded a consistent, affordable supply of gasoline. Miners are pushing for expanded access to untapped mining territories, and public school teachers are conducting separate negotiations for salary increases. Presidential spokesperson José Luis Gálvez argues that most of these demands have already been addressed responsibly in line with Bolivia’s current economic constraints, claiming “dark forces” aligned with Morales are deliberately destabilizing the elected government.

    Paz has repeatedly emphasized that he inherited a “bankrupt state” from the previous government led by Morales’ Movement Toward Socialism (MAS). His critics, however, decry his slow, ineffective response to a national crisis that has seen annual inflation climb near 20% and persistent fuel shortages – the worst economic downturn the country has faced in 40 years. A damaging early controversy, dubbed the “junk gasoline” scandal, further eroded public trust: the government imported low-quality fuel that damaged thousands of vehicles, sparking initial transport strikes and forcing the resignation of two senior executives at the state-owned oil company.

    Morales, who led the MAS government for 14 years before leaving office in 2019, has emerged as the most high-profile figure behind the current unrest, organizing the latest mass march from his remote hideout in the Bolivian tropics. The former president has evaded an arrest warrant for 18 months stemming from allegations that he sexually abused a 15-year-old girl, charges he dismisses as politically motivated fabrication. In a recent post on social media platform X, Morales pushed back against claims he has lost his political influence, saying, “The government and the right wing claim that I am a political corpse and that I lack the ability to mobilize anyone, yet they continue to blame me. As long as structural demands — such as those concerning fuel, food and inflation — remain unaddressed, the uprising will not be quelled.” Most independent political analysts, however, argue Morales no longer holds the broad popular support he once commanded, and is instead stoking unrest primarily to distract from his legal troubles and avoid imprisonment.

    The collapse of the MAS, which governed Bolivia for 20 years before splitting into factions led by Morales and former president Luis Arce, left Bolivia’s political landscape deeply fragmented, with no single party holding a clear governing majority. Paz’s surprise electoral victory last year quickly unraveled when his own political vehicle, the Christian Democratic Party, fractured soon after he took office. Compounding his governing challenges, Paz is also locked in a public, bitter feud with his own vice president, former police officer Edman Lara.

    Early in his term, Paz positioned himself as a reformer, moving quickly to end the country’s international isolation that marked the MAS era and court foreign investment and loans. While he secured multiple pledges of international financial support, most of those funds have yet to materialize in Bolivian coffers. His first major domestic policy move, cutting long-standing fuel subsidies to stabilize public finances, did initially avoid mass unrest, but the subsequent low-quality fuel import scandal undermined what early goodwill he had with the public.

    The crisis has drawn significant attention and response from across Latin America and the United States. Eight Latin American governments, ranging from Chile to Costa Rica, released a joint statement rejecting “any action aimed at destabilizing the democratic order.” Neighboring Argentina has stepped in to launch a week-long humanitarian airlift to bring critical supplies to Bolivia and alleviate widespread shortages of food and medical goods. The United States, which is rebuilding diplomatic and economic ties with Bolivia after decades of tense relations under Morales, has expressed public support for Paz’s efforts to “restore order for the peace, security and stability of the Bolivian people,” while also issuing a travel alert urging U.S. citizens in the country to exercise heightened caution amid ongoing unrest.

  • ‘Not a big fan’ – Top Senate Republican breaks with Trump on $1.8bn compensation fund

    ‘Not a big fan’ – Top Senate Republican breaks with Trump on $1.8bn compensation fund

    A high-stakes political rift has emerged within the Republican Party, as Senate Majority Leader John Thune has become the most prominent member of former President Donald Trump’s own party to publicly oppose the newly unveiled $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” a initiative created to compensate people the Trump administration claims were unfairly targeted by prior U.S. presidential administrations.

    Thune’s public criticism marks the most significant intraparty pushback against the plan to date. Speaking with reporters on Capitol Hill, the top Senate Republican made his stance clear: he is “not a big fan” of the fund and sees no clear justification for its existence. He added that he remains uncertain of the fund’s intended use, and called for a rigorous full vetting process by congressional lawmakers, noting that the widespread backlash following the announcement guarantees the proposal will face intense scrutiny moving forward.

    The fund was announced Monday by the U.S. Department of Justice, as part of a deal that saw Trump drop a $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) over the 2020s leak of his personal tax returns to national media outlets. Under the terms of the agreement, Trump, his adult sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, and the Trump Organization — all named plaintiffs in the original suit — will receive a formal apology from the agency, but no direct financial compensation. The $1.776 billion funding amount was intentionally chosen to mark the 250th anniversary of the United States’ 1776 declaration of independence from Great Britain.

    Governance of the fund will fall to a five-member commission, four of which will be directly appointed by the U.S. Attorney General, a structure that has drawn sharp criticism from lawmakers across the aisle. Democrats have already decried the initiative as an unaccountable “slush fund” designed to direct taxpayer dollars to Trump’s political allies, including many who faced criminal charges or convictions for their role in the January 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol.

    Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the fund during a Tuesday congressional hearing, pushing back against Democratic claims of partisan bias. Blanche argued the initiative is explicitly non-partisan, stressing that no groups are barred from filing claims, including Democrats. While he acknowledged the fund structure is unusual, he noted it is not without precedent in U.S. governance.

    Democratic lawmakers rejected Blanche’s defense, with senior Washington Senator Patty Murray calling the initiative open, blatant political corruption. “Trump and his cronies cash it. American taxpayers who are already being whacked with high prices are going to foot the bill,” Murray said during the hearing.

    The controversy has already sparked personnel upheaval: just hours after the fund was announced on Monday, Brian Morrissey, general counsel for the U.S. Treasury Department, resigned abruptly after just seven months on the job. Morrissey has not publicly shared his reason for stepping down, but a Treasury Department spokesperson confirmed his departure, noting he served the agency with “honour and integrity.”

  • Trump: White House ballroom to be ‘drone-proof’ with military complex

    Trump: White House ballroom to be ‘drone-proof’ with military complex

    In a recent announcement that has drawn widespread attention across U.S. political circles, former President Donald Trump has revealed plans for a major new development connected to the White House: a fully ‘drone-proof’ ballroom that will be integrated into a broader on-site military complex. The project, which Trump has framed as a lasting ‘gift’ to the American people, is designed to address growing security concerns around unmanned aerial systems that have emerged as a persistent threat to high-profile government sites in recent years.

    Beyond the hardened, drone-resistant event space, the proposed complex will also include a full-service on-site hospital and dedicated cutting-edge medical research facilities, according to Trump’s remarks. The integration of military and medical infrastructure is intended to enhance the White House’s ability to respond to emergency scenarios, from security incidents to public health crises, that could impact the executive branch leadership.

    The announcement comes amid ongoing conversations about the modernization of security infrastructure for the nation’s top government facilities. As drone technology has become more accessible and sophisticated, federal security agencies have repeatedly identified the need for upgraded counter-drone measures to protect the White House compound and other critical sites. Trump’s proposal frames this upgrade as a proactive step that combines ceremonial space with practical national security and public health capabilities, all wrapped into a single development that he says will serve the country for generations.

  • Kentucky primary vote tests Trump’s grip on Republican base

    Kentucky primary vote tests Trump’s grip on Republican base

    On a primary election day across multiple U.S. states, all eyes are fixed on Kentucky, where a high-stakes House contest has emerged as the most significant recent measure of former President Donald Trump’s unchallenged influence over the modern Republican Party. The battle pits seven-term incumbent Thomas Massie, a self-described libertarian and one of the few congressional Republicans willing to break publicly with Trump, against Trump-endorsed challenger Ed Gallrein, a retired Navy SEAL and local farmer.

    Trump has pulled out all the stops to oust Massie, launching a months-long personal attack campaign that has seen the former president label the incumbent a disloyal “moron,” “nut job,” and “major sleazebag.” Speaking to reporters shortly after polls opened Tuesday, Trump doubled down on his criticism, claiming Massie is not a true Republican or libertarian and repeatedly mislabeling him a “Dumb-ocrat” to mock his occasional breaks from the party line.

    What makes the contest particularly notable is that Massie maintains a pro-Trump voting record by almost any measure: he has aligned with Trump’s positions roughly 90 percent of the time during the former president’s second term, a statistic Massie has highlighted repeatedly throughout his campaign. Massie frames the race not as a challenge to Trump, but as a test of whether the Republican Party still has space for independent thinking among its elected officials. “Most of the people voting for me support President Trump like I do,” Massie told Fox News amid Trump’s latest round of attacks.

    The incumbent has earned Trump’s wrath for a series of high-profile breaks with the party, including his opposition to U.S. military intervention in Iran and Venezuela, public criticism of large-scale aid packages to Israel, resistance to some elements of Trump’s policy agenda, and his support for releasing sealed documents connected to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    The race has also made history as the most expensive House primary contest in U.S. history, with total ad spending surpassing $32 million. A large share of that spending has come from pro-Israel groups that have mobilized to defeat Massie over his critical stance on aid to the country.

    A notable controversy emerged ahead of voting day when Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth made an in-person campaign appearance for Gallrein in Kentucky’s 4th Congressional District on Monday. Federal law bars federal employees from engaging in partisan political activity while on official duty, but Hegseth’s office clarified he was acting in a personal capacity and no taxpayer money was used for the trip. Trump later confirmed that Hegseth traveled to Kentucky just hours before the U.S. was on the cusp of launching a new military strike against Iran, an operation that was ultimately postponed.

    The Kentucky contest follows a string of recent victories for Trump-aligned candidates over party dissidents: last week, Trump-backed challengers defeated Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy—who voted to convict Trump during his 2021 impeachment trial after the Capitol riot—who failed even to advance to a runoff, while Trump allies defeated resistant state lawmakers in Indiana who pushed back against his redistricting priorities.

    While Kentucky dominates national attention, primary contests are unfolding across multiple states Tuesday. In Georgia, voters are selecting nominees for U.S. Senate and governor, but the most closely watched races are for the state’s supreme court, where Democrats have mounted an unprecedented effort to unseat two incumbent justices. Former President Barack Obama and other top Democratic figures have endorsed the challengers, a race that carries outsize importance in the key swing state. No incumbent Georgia supreme court justice has lost a reelection bid in more than 100 years, making the contests a critical bellwether for Democratic momentum ahead of November’s general midterm elections.

  • Irish president continues first official visit to GB

    Irish president continues first official visit to GB

    Irish President Catherine Connolly is in the middle of a three-day official visit to the United Kingdom, marking her first trip to Great Britain since her inauguration last November. This visit, only her third official overseas engagement since taking office, has taken on added international attention after Israeli military forces intercepted a Gaza-bound aid flotilla in international waters that included Connolly’s own sister, Dr. Margaret Connolly.

    The visit got underway on Monday, when Connolly kicked off her schedule with a stop at the Irish Cultural Centre in Hammersmith, London. During her time there, she addressed a pressing domestic challenge facing Ireland, noting that a growing number of Irish citizens are leaving the country due to widespread housing shortages that have made affordable accommodation inaccessible for many. She also connected with local Irish communities, meeting students enrolled in an Irish language course and enjoying traditional cultural performances of Irish music and dance. Later that same day, Connolly held a historic audience with King Charles III, where she extended a formal invitation for the King to undertake a state visit to the Republic of Ireland, an invitation the monarch graciously accepted.

    On Tuesday, the second day of her official tour, Connolly first attended the world-famous Chelsea Flower Show, one of London’s most high-profile annual horticultural events. In the afternoon, she traveled to the London Irish Centre in Camden to meet with Irish expatriates and community leaders based in the capital.

    The context for Connolly’s UK visit comes shortly after King Charles III and Queen Camilla completed their first visit to Northern Ireland of 2026, marking a continued period of incremental diplomatic engagement between Ireland, the UK, and the British royal household. The trip will draw to a close on Wednesday, when Connolly travels to Leeds to visit the University of Leeds and the Leeds Irish Centre. While in Leeds, she will receive an official briefing on the operations of the Irish Health Centre, a critical community resource for Irish residents in the region, and will hold meetings with leadership from Irish community centers across the broader Yorkshire area.

    Parallel to Connolly’s diplomatic trip, a major international incident unfolded on Monday when Israeli armed commandos intercepted the Global Sumud Flotilla, a 60-vessel humanitarian convoy carrying aid to the blockaded Gaza Strip. In a live stream broadcast from the flotilla, commandos can be seen boarding one of the convoy’s vessels in international waters. Flotilla organizers confirmed that Israeli forces intercepted 10 of the 60 boats participating in the mission. Dr. Margaret Connolly, the Irish president’s sister, was among the passengers on the flotilla and was detained during the raid. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended the operation, framing it as a necessary action to neutralize what he described as a deliberate attempt to breach the Israeli blockade imposed on Hamas-controlled Gaza.

  • Trump shows off site of new $400-mn ballroom

    Trump shows off site of new $400-mn ballroom

    On May 19, 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump led reporters on a tour of the active construction site for his proposed new White House ballroom, a massive project that has already become a central flashpoint in the lead-up to November’s critical midterm congressional elections. Against a constant backdrop of clanging hammers, buzzing saws and the hum of construction work, the former real estate magnate leaned into his comfort zone as he walked journalists through the cavernous concrete excavation that will form the base of the 400 million dollar development.

    Standing beside bright yellow safety railings at the edge of the construction pit, Trump framed the initiative as a contribution to the nation. “This is a gift to the United States of America,” he stated, emphasizing that the construction costs are drawn from his personal funds and contributions from private donors, and carry no tax burden for the project itself. As he laid out details of the planned development, Trump highlighted the unconventional multi-functional design of the building: the ballroom itself will sit above six underground levels that he says will house secure military facilities, classified research laboratories and a fully operational on-site hospital. He described the above-ground ballroom as a protective barrier for the sensitive infrastructure below, noting that the reinforced roof would deflect unauthorized drone incursions, and that the building’s layout would offer strategic advantages for security snipers.

    The property developer’s signature enthusiasm for design was on full display as he outlined the building’s architectural inspiration: one facade will draw from classical ancient Greek styling, while a second will reflect the grandeur of ancient Roman architecture. Initially estimated to cost $200 million, the project’s price tag has doubled since it was first proposed, a shift that has added to growing scrutiny. Trump has repeatedly maintained that all construction costs are covered by private donations from his wealthy supporters and a range of corporate contributors, but his political opponents have pushed back hard on the project, particularly over a proposed $1 billion taxpayer-funded security allocation tied to the development.

    Critics argue that the extravagant ballroom, paired with broader infrastructure refurbishments across Washington D.C., reveals a damaging lack of awareness of economic hardship facing American households. Amid soaring cost of living driven by the ongoing Iran war, the project has landed as tone-deaf to widespread voter anger over stagnant wages and rising prices for everyday goods. Critics also point to a recent controversial comment from Trump, who said last week that “I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation” when it comes to the Iran conflict, noting his priority is blocking Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon.

    With less than six months remaining until the midterm elections that will determine which party holds control of both chambers of Congress, Democrats have seized on both the ballroom project and Trump’s recent comment to frame the incumbent president as out of touch with working American needs. The opposition has made the controversy a core line of attack against congressional Republican candidates as they fight to flip control of the legislature.

  • Watch: Can a Republican win an election while at war with Trump?

    Watch: Can a Republican win an election while at war with Trump?

    A high-stakes Republican primary race in Kentucky has emerged as a critical test case for a question roiling the U.S. conservative movement: can a GOP candidate win elected office while openly clashing with former President Donald Trump? At the center of this fight is Thomas Massie, the incumbent congressman who gained national attention earlier this year for spearheading efforts to force the release of previously sealed court documents connected to the Jeffrey Epstein case. Now, Massie faces a fierce challenge from a political opponent who has secured the full endorsement and active support of Trump, a move that has amplified national attention on this down-ballot contest. The race is being closely watched by political strategists across the ideological spectrum, as it will offer key insights into the depth of Trump’s hold over the modern Republican Party. For years, intra-GOP challengers backed by Trump have ousted incumbent lawmakers who broke with the former president on key issues, from policy to personal loyalty. Massie’s high-profile push to unseal the Epstein files, a move that has put pressure on political figures from both major parties, has made him a test case for whether GOP voters will still back an incumbent who has not aligned fully with Trump’s agenda and political preferences. The outcome of the primary will have ripple effects for future GOP contests, as incumbent lawmakers weigh the political risks of breaking with the party’s dominant figure ahead of the 2024 election cycle.

  • Slovenia set for a right-wing government and a comeback for former Prime Minister Jansa

    Slovenia set for a right-wing government and a comeback for former Prime Minister Jansa

    Nearly two months after Slovenia held its closely contested parliamentary election, a path to a new government has finally emerged, with veteran right-wing politician Janez Jansa on track to retake the post of prime minister following his official nomination to the national parliament on Tuesday.

    A 67-year-old political figure who has already held the prime minister’s office three times previously, Jansa received his formal nomination from legislators of his own Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS). If confirmed by parliament, he will helm a new right-leaning coalition government that brings together multiple conservative-aligned groups, with extra backing provided by a first-term anti-establishment party that entered the legislature in the latest vote.

    As of Tuesday, parliamentary authorities had not yet announced a firm date for the final confirmation vote on Jansa’s premiership and his proposed cabinet. Slovenia’s public broadcaster RTV Slovenia has confirmed that Jansa already commands the support of 48 of the 90 total lawmakers in the country’s national assembly, putting him within reach of the backing needed to form a government.

    A successful confirmation would shift the small European Union member state sharply to the right politically, ending four years of liberal governance under outgoing Prime Minister Robert Golob. Jansa, a known admirer of former U.S. President Donald Trump and a long-time close ally of populist Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, most recently held the prime ministership from 2020 to 2022. It was in that year’s election that Golob’s liberal Freedom Movement party unseated Jansa’s government.

    Jansa has emerged as one of the most vocal critics of Golob’s outgoing administration, taking particular aim at the liberal government’s 2024 decision to formally recognize Palestinian statehood.

    The April 22 parliamentary election left Slovenia’s two major political blocs deadlocked: Jansa’s SDS and Golob’s Freedom Movement finished with nearly identical seat shares in the assembly. After weeks of negotiations, Golob ultimately failed to cobble together a viable liberal-led coalition, clearing the way for Jansa to step in and build his own right-wing government.

    The latest electoral process has been mired in controversy from the start, with widespread allegations of foreign interference and corrupt campaign practices. The Alpine nation, which has a total voting population of just 1.7 million, remains deeply politically split between liberal and conservative factions, a divide that is expected to shape the new government’s term in office.

  • Russia holds massive drills of its nuclear forces as Ukraine steps up its drone attacks

    Russia holds massive drills of its nuclear forces as Ukraine steps up its drone attacks

    On Tuesday, Russia initiated a sweeping, three-day set of exercises for its nuclear-capable military forces, a major show of strength that comes as Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian territory have grown dramatically in frequency and intensity in recent weeks.

    According to statements from the Russian Defense Ministry, the maneuvers are among the largest planned nuclear drills in recent years, involving a massive deployment of military hardware and personnel: 64,000 active troops, more than 200 missile launch systems, over 140 military aircraft, 73 surface warships, and 13 submarines. Eight of the participating submarines are armed with nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), putting the full scope of Russia’s sea-based nuclear deterrent on display. The drills will include live practice launches of both nuclear-capable ballistic missiles and cruise missiles, the ministry confirmed.

    The core focus of the exercises, Defense Ministry officials noted, is refining protocols for “the preparation and use of nuclear forces under the threat of aggression.” The drills also integrate joint training with Belarus, Russia’s closest western ally that already hosts Russian nuclear weapons on its territory, including the advanced new Oreshnik intermediate-range nuclear-capable missile system.

    The timing of the maneuvers is not accidental. They unfold against a backdrop of sharply escalating Ukrainian drone strikes deep inside Russian territory. Over the weekend, a large drone barrage targeted Moscow’s outlying suburbs, killing three civilians and damaging multiple residential and industrial buildings. These increasingly frequent and impactful strikes have created a growing challenge for the Kremlin, which has long attempted to frame the ongoing conflict in Ukraine as a distant operation that does not disrupt the daily lives of ordinary Russian citizens. The spread of attacks to major population centers close to the Russian capital has undermined that narrative.

    This nuclear saber-rattling aligns with a long-standing strategy Russian President Vladimir Putin has pursued since launching the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022: repeatedly drawing global attention to Russia’s massive nuclear arsenal to deter Western nations from expanding military support to Kyiv. Tuesday’s drills also kicked off on the same day that Putin began a high-profile two-day official visit to China, where he is set to reaffirm the deepening strategic partnership between Moscow and Beijing.

    Just one week before the drills, Putin publicly celebrated the successful test launch of the new Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile, a system designed to replace aging Soviet-era ICBMs and bolster Russia’s long-range nuclear strike capacity. In 2024, Putin enacted a revised Russian nuclear doctrine that significantly lowered the threshold for a potential Russian nuclear response: the document states that any conventional attack on Russia backed by a nuclear-armed power will be treated as a combined attack on the Russian state. Analysts widely view this revision as a direct warning to the West aimed at blocking Ukraine from gaining access to longer-range Western weapons that can strike deeper into Russian territory.

    Hardline Russian commentators and military hawks have long pressured the Kremlin to take harsher retaliatory action against Ukrainian drone attacks, arguing that Russia should target production facilities in NATO member European countries that supply Ukraine with drone components. Last month, the Russian Defense Ministry took an unprecedented step, publishing a public list of European factories it says are involved in manufacturing drones and parts for the Ukrainian military. The ministry issued a clear warning that any Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian territory using European-built hardware carry the risk of “unpredictable consequences” for the countries hosting those facilities, a threat that has raised tensions between Russia and the Western alliance even further.

  • Honduran ex-president controversially pardoned by Trump speaks to BBC

    Honduran ex-president controversially pardoned by Trump speaks to BBC

    Just one month before U.S. special forces removed Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro from power, a starkly different outcome played out for another former Latin American head of state: Juan Orlando Hernández, ex-president of Honduras, who had been convicted on nearly identical drug trafficking charges, walked free after receiving a full presidential pardon from former U.S. President Donald Trump.

    Hernández had spent nearly four years behind bars at West Virginia’s maximum-security Hazelton Federal Correctional Institution, serving a 45-year sentence for his 2024 conviction on conspiracy charges linked to a transnational cocaine trafficking ring that moved 400 tonnes of the drug into the United States. Trump announced the pardon on his Truth Social platform on November 28, just 48 hours before Honduras’ general election. In the same post, Trump threatened to cut U.S. aid to Honduras unless his preferred candidate – Nasry Asfura of Hernández’s conservative National Party – won office. After a tightly contested race and delayed vote count, Asfura ultimately claimed victory.

    In an exclusive interview with the BBC from his current residence in the U.S., Hernández described his sudden release as an extraordinary turnaround, saying he is “thankful and just trying to rebuild my life” after half a decade of incarceration. He has forcefully rejected claims that the pardon was granted for political reasons, aligned with Trump’s long-stated regional policy rooted in a reinterpretation of the Monroe Doctrine, which frames the Americas as Washington’s exclusive sphere of influence.

    Most notably, Hernández pushed back hard against comparisons between his case and that of Maduro. Both right- and left-leaning sitting presidents were ultimately accused of large-scale drug trafficking, but Hernández secured Trump’s backing while Maduro faced forced removal. “My case is completely different,” he insisted, arguing that the entire criminal narrative around him was constructed by “leftist politicians in Honduras in tandem with left-wing politicians in Venezuela.” He claims upcoming evidence in Maduro’s upcoming U.S. drug trial will reveal that corrupt, drug-linked connections actually lie with members of Honduras’ left-wing Libre party, not his conservative administration.

    The pardon granted Hernández unconditional legal clearance for all the charges he was convicted of, leading the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss his pending appeal as moot, since the conviction no longer carried legal weight. The Trump administration has framed the pardon as a correction of what it calls a wrongful prosecution carried out under the Joe Biden administration.

    But for many Hondurans, the pardon does nothing to change their view of Hernández, who remains the most controversial Honduran president in recent memory, and was extradited to the U.S. in shackles to face trial. The decision sparked widespread protests both among Honduran communities in the U.S. and across Honduras, with demonstrators gathering outside the U.S. embassy in Tegucigalpa to condemn the move. “It’s a mockery for Honduras. This country doesn’t deserve that,” one local resident told Honduran television at the time.

    At Hernández’s 2024 sentencing, U.S. District Judge P. Kevin Castel branded him a “two-faced politician” who leveraged his presidential authority and Honduras’ national security forces to protect drug traffickers who bribed his administration and funded his political career. Prosecutors alleged he turned Honduras into a narco-state, a particularly notable charge given the country’s long-standing role as a key transit point for South American cocaine bound for U.S. consumers.

    Hernández has repeatedly denied all charges, pointing to a extradition law passed by his own administration – the same law that allowed his extradition to the U.S. for trial – as proof of his commitment to combating drug trafficking. He claims the law angered traffickers who ultimately coordinated to testify against him in retaliation.

    Among the most damning evidence introduced at trial was an alleged quote attributed to Hernández, in which he reportedly told a senior Honduran trafficker: “We’re going to shove the drugs right up the noses of the gringos.” Prosecutors also claimed he accepted a $1 million bribe from infamous Mexican drug lord Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán. Pressed on these claims, Hernández dismissed them as “false and ridiculous,” noting that El Chapo was already known to U.S. law enforcement at the time of the alleged meeting and was never in Honduras. “If you look at El Chapo’s trial, he doesn’t even mention Juan Orlando Hernández,” he told the BBC.

    He also rejected another key piece of prosecution evidence: handwritten ledger entries from a major Honduran trafficker that purportedly documented bribes paid to both him and his younger brother, Tony Hernández, a former Honduran congressman who is currently serving a life sentence in the U.S. for drug trafficking. Tony Hernández’s conviction two years before his brother’s trial was a core part of the prosecution’s case against Juan Orlando; Tony was secretly recorded meeting with a top Honduran trafficker, who later testified against both siblings, alleging a $250,000 bribe was paid for protection while Juan Orlando was running for president. When asked what Tony was doing at that meeting, Hernández acknowledged: “I ask myself the same question, it was a grave mistake.”

    Hernández has framed the entire case against him as a “political operation” built on the testimony of witnesses motivated by revenge, reduced sentences and entry into witness protection programs. He claims the prosecution was backed by an international alliance of left-wing politicians, including Democratic leaders in Washington, targeting him as a conservative leader. He and his family echo Trump’s description of the case as a “horrible witch-hunt” carried out by a politicized Biden-era Department of Justice, arguing the pardon merely corrected a gross injustice.

    However, multiple current and former officials from the Department of Justice, State Department and Drug Enforcement Administration who worked on the case told the BBC their investigation was conducted with full due process and no improper political interference. They emphasized that the investigation into Hernández began during Trump’s first term, and was not a Biden administration initiative. Ana María Méndez Dardón, Central America director at the Washington Office on Latin America research organization, confirmed the years-long investigation was built on solid evidence. “The conviction had strong evidence that supported finding Juan Orlando Hernández guilty as a drug trafficker,” she said. “There were many witnesses which exposed linkages with other transnational drug organisations, including El Chapo Guzmán. It was huge. And it goes beyond Juan Orlando Hernández as a former president and a former convicted drug trafficker.”

    Five months after his release, Hernández has still not been reunited with his family in person. He remains facing outstanding corruption and misappropriation of state funds charges in Honduras, and his wife Ana García Carías has been subject to U.S. visa restrictions since his 2020 arrest. Hernández says his top priority is securing permission to return to Honduras to be with his family, and he has ruled out any return to politics: “I’m not interested [in returning to politics]. My interest is in my family. I’ll never get back those four years I lost. Even today, I still haven’t seen them.” With his former National Party colleagues back in power in Tegucigalpa, however, Hernández is growing increasingly hopeful he will be allowed to return home. If he does, he will face the massive challenge of convincing the Honduran public, many of whom are frustrated by corrupt political elites avoiding accountability, of his version of events.