分类: politics

  • Trump builds giant stage at White House for birthday cage fight

    Trump builds giant stage at White House for birthday cage fight

    For more than two centuries, the White House South Lawn has stood as the backdrop for some of the most consequential moments in American political history—from Richard Nixon’s 1974 farewell departure after the Watergate scandal to the iconic 1993 Oslo Accord handshake between Israeli and Palestinian leaders. Now, the iconic green space is undergoing an unprecedented transformation: U.S. President Donald Trump is constructing a full-scale Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) cage fighting arena on the grounds, set to host a major event on his 80th birthday, June 14, which also coincides with the U.S. national holiday Flag Day.

    AFP correspondents on site documented construction crews using heavy cranes to position massive metal arches for the event’s signature eight-sided Octagon ring on Tuesday. The spectacle, branded “UFC Freedom 250” to tie into this summer’s 250th anniversary of U.S. independence, will feature a six-fight card headlined by a lightweight championship bout between top competitors Ilia Topuria and Justin Gaethje, as first announced by the UFC in March.

    In remarks earlier this month from the Oval Office, surrounded by four of the event’s scheduled fighters, Trump framed the gathering as a one-of-a-kind historic occasion. “We’re having a big fight. It’s never going to happen again, never happened before,” he said, while displaying a concept rendering of the Octagon ring set against the White House facade, flanked by spectator seating. The president, a lifelong UFC fan with longstanding ties to the promotion, outlined that 4,500 attendees will be able to watch the fights directly on the South Lawn, with an additional 100,000 people expected to view the event for free on large outdoor screens just outside the White House perimeter.

    Political observers have widely noted that the event is strategically targeted at UFC’s core demographic of young men, a key voting bloc in the 2024 U.S. presidential election that Trump has actively courted through his repeated appearances at UFC events, where he regularly receives rock-star level receptions from crowds. This is not the first dramatic alteration Trump has made to White House grounds during his tenure: he has already paved over portions of the iconic Rose Garden and demolished the entire East Wing to construct a $400 million presidential ballroom, a permanent change that drew criticism from historical preservation groups.

    The plan has sparked significant controversy from the outset, with critics raising questions over both the extravagant cost and the decision to host a commercial combat sports event on one of the nation’s most revered public historical sites. The UFC’s parent company initially confirmed in February that staging the event would cost a minimum of $60 million, though organizers project they will recover roughly half of that sum through corporate sponsorships and other revenue streams. White House officials have pushed back against claims of public funding, telling AFP that “no taxpayer money is being used” and that the entire cost is being covered directly by the UFC.

    Even some of Trump’s own allies and supporters have questioned the timing of the spectacle. With the U.S. currently engaged in active conflict with Iran that has driven sharp increases in global oil prices and elevated domestic cost of living for American households, the multi-million dollar event has drawn accusations of being out of touch with public struggles. Popular podcaster Joe Rogan, who hosted Trump for a high-profile interview ahead of the 2024 election, commented in March that holding a major fight event at the White House amid an ongoing war felt “weird.”

    UFC CEO Dana White pushed back against criticism of the event in a Time magazine interview published Tuesday, rejecting claims that the gathering is a politically motivated campaign stunt. “You can make anything political if you want to,” White said. “This is basically me spending a shit-load of money to celebrate the 250th birthday of America, with America and the rest of the world.”

    Tight security arrangements are already in place for the open-air event, coming on the heels of a string of recent security incidents targeting Trump. Just this past Saturday, the U.S. Secret Service fatally shot a gunman who opened fire near the White House grounds, and an alleged assassination attempt was foiled at the White House Correspondents Dinner held at a Washington D.C. hotel in April.

  • Russia ‘relentlessly targeting’ critical infrastructure and democracy, GCHQ says

    Russia ‘relentlessly targeting’ critical infrastructure and democracy, GCHQ says

    In a highly anticipated inaugural public address set to be delivered Wednesday at Bletchley Park, the historic wartime birthplace of the UK’s signals intelligence program, GCHQ Director Anne Keast-Butler will deliver a stark warning: the United Kingdom now stands at a “moment of consequence” facing relentless hostile activity from Russia that directly targets the nation’s critical infrastructure.

    Keast-Butler will outline the full scope of evolving threats to UK national security and lay out the whole-of-society approach she says is required to counter these risks, according to pre-released excerpts of her speech. In her remarks, she will single out Russia as the most immediate aggressive actor, accusing Moscow of deliberately targeting not only core critical infrastructure, but also UK democratic processes, global supply chains, and public confidence in national institutions.

    For years, Russia has faced repeated accusations of orchestrating a series of high-profile espionage plots on British soil, and more recently, of waging an undeclared hybrid warfare campaign against the UK and other NATO member states. The Kremlin has consistently denied all allegations of hostile activity on UK territory. Notable past incidents blamed on Russian intelligence include the 2006 assassination of former KGB officer Alexander Litvinenko, who was poisoned with radioactive polonium in a London hotel, and the 2018 attempted murder of former Russian military intelligence officer Sergei Skripal, who was targeted with the deadly nerve agent Novichok at his home in Salisbury.

    Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and amid the UK’s sustained military and political support for Kyiv, accusations of Russian hybrid aggression against Western nations have grown. Keast-Butler will note that while Russian forces have struggled to make gains on the Ukrainian battlefield, Moscow has ramped up covert hostile activity against Western backers of Ukraine. A recent BBC Verify analysis has already highlighted that hundreds of Russian “shadow fleet” oil vessels have entered UK territorial waters since Prime Minister Keir Starmer threatened to intercept illicit Russian shipments earlier this year, underscoring the ongoing challenge of Russian maritime activity near UK borders.

    Beyond the immediate Russian threat, Keast-Butler will also warn that China has emerged as a global science and technology superpower, with advanced capabilities across its intelligence, cyber, and military arms. On the rapidly evolving frontier of artificial intelligence and digital innovation, she will argue that the window for the UK and its international allies to maintain their competitive technological edge is closing rapidly, describing the shifting global technology landscape as the “ground beneath our feet” shifting beneath Western powers.

    To address these overlapping threats, the GCHQ chief will frame cross-sector collaboration as the only effective path forward. She will call for deepened partnership between government intelligence bodies, the private tech industry, academic institutions, and the general public to strengthen the UK’s cyber resilience. Beyond state-sponsored threats, GCHQ devotes a large share of its operational capacity to countering transnational organized criminal networks that routinely target British businesses, particularly small and vulnerable firms, with phishing scams and devastating ransomware attacks.

    Using the framing “from boardrooms to living rooms”, Keast-Butler will urge every segment of British society to take proactive steps to improve their own cybersecurity. In her address, she will outline concrete actions: for private citizens, this means immediately replacing weak, traditional passwords with more secure passkeys, while for industry and government, it requires embedding robust security protocols into all new emerging technologies, shoring up vulnerable global supply chains, and treating cybersecurity as a far more urgent national priority than it has been to date.

    As the UK’s largest intelligence agency, GCHQ – short for Government Communications Headquarters – is one of three core UK spy bodies, alongside domestic security service MI5 and foreign intelligence service MI6. Headquartered in Cheltenham in a distinctive circular building nicknamed “the Doughnut”, GCHQ specializes in signals intelligence and national cyber defense, and receives the largest share of the UK’s national intelligence budget due to its expanding technology-focused mandate.

  • Israel seizes control of historic Nabi Samuel mosque from Islamic waqf

    Israel seizes control of historic Nabi Samuel mosque from Islamic waqf

    In a move that has reignited international scrutiny of Israeli policy in the occupied West Bank, Israel’s civil administration – a body operating under the country’s defense ministry that enforces Israeli rule in the occupied territory – announced Tuesday it will expropriate 28 acres of land spanning the Palestinian communities of Beit Iksa and Nabi Samuel. The parcel includes the site of the Tomb of the Prophet Samuel (known locally as Nabi Samuel), a centuries-old religious landmark revered across three major Abrahamic faiths that has long been managed by the Islamic Waqf, a Palestinian religious endowment.

    The site, perched 885 meters above sea level on a hilltop just six kilometers northwest of Jerusalem, holds layered religious and historical significance for multiple communities. Byzantine Emperor Justinian first ordered the construction of a church on the site, believed to be the burial place of the prophet Samuel, and the Crusaders later revered it as the “Mountain of Joy”, the first vantage point from which they viewed Jerusalem. After the Crusader period, Muslim rulers built commemorative structures on the site, and the standing mosque today retains architectural features dating to the Ayyubid and Mamluk eras, with an on-site shrine that Muslim worshippers consider Samuel’s resting place, making it one of the most important Islamic religious sites in the region. Prophet Samuel is similarly venerated in Jewish and Christian tradition.

    Israeli authorities frame the seizure as a public benefit measure aimed at preserving the site’s archaeological heritage. But Palestinian analysts and officials universally condemn the action as the latest step in a long-running campaign of “Judaisation” – a term describing the Israeli government’s use of archaeology, religious policy and land control to erase Palestinian and Islamic cultural identity and assert exclusive Israeli claim over occupied Palestinian land.

    Map and settlement expert Khalil Toufakji, a leading researcher on Jerusalem affairs, confirmed that all seized land belongs to the Alami family, and has been held as a hereditary Islamic waqf for generations. This is not the first change Israeli authorities have imposed on the site since they occupied the West Bank in the 1967 Six-Day War. Over the past decades, Israel has built a synagogue in the underground chamber that houses the traditional tomb, restricted Palestinian access to large portions of the site, reduced allocated Muslim prayer space, and gradually shifted control of site facilities to Israeli management. In 1995, Israeli authorities designated the entire Nabi Samuel area a nature reserve, paving the way for large-scale excavation work. Toufakji says the latest land seizure amounts to de facto annexation, following a deliberate, incremental strategy first formalized by the Israeli Knesset: advance claims through archaeological and religious sites, then build Israeli infrastructure to solidify permanent control. This same tactic has already been used to forcibly displace Palestinian residents in Jerusalem’s Silwan neighborhood to make way for Israeli excavations searching for an alleged ancient “lost Jewish city”.

    Omar Rajob, head of the media office for the Palestinian Authority’s Jerusalem governorate, added that decades of Israeli excavations at Nabi Samuel have produced no evidence to support the exclusive Jewish historical narrative Israeli authorities promote. Instead, digs have uncovered extensive clear evidence of Islamic heritage, including the standing historic mosque itself. Despite this, Rajob says Israeli authorities use archaeology as a political tool: official information panels at the site only present a Jewish narrative of the site’s history, completely erasing its centuries-long Islamic and Palestinian heritage.

    Rajob emphasized that the current seizure goes far beyond controlling surrounding land; it aims to impose full Israeli sovereignty over the entire religious and archaeological landscape of Nabi Samuel, including the historic mosque itself. Today, he added, the Islamic Waqf’s only remaining function at the site is opening and closing the mosque’s doors.

    The seizure of Nabi Samuel is the third major takeover of a Palestinian-controlled religious and archaeological site in the occupied West Bank in less than six months. In November 2025, Israeli authorities seized 444 acres surrounding the Sebastia archaeological site, and in January 2026, the Israeli military stripped Palestinian authorities of municipal control over Hebron’s iconic Ibrahimi Mosque, a move widely condemned as a takeover of one of Islam’s most sacred sites.

    The action also aligns with a broader push by Israel’s far-right ruling coalition to consolidate control over Palestinian heritage sites in the West Bank. The Knesset is currently debating a bill that would create a new Israeli heritage authority to take full control of all West Bank archaeological sites from the civil administration, formalizing Israeli control. On the same day the Nabi Samuel seizure was announced, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich – leader of the far-right Religious Zionism party – held an election campaign event at Solomon’s Pools, a historic Palestinian-run reservoir in the West Bank, where he declared he would work to take the site from Palestinian control, calling it “inconceivable” that it remains under Palestinian management. Toufakji predicts the next target will be Joseph’s Tomb, a major religious site in Nablus currently under Palestinian Authority control.
    “What is happening in Nabi Samuel cannot be separated from broader Israeli policies in occupied Jerusalem, which are based on reducing the Palestinian presence, expanding colonial control, and linking the settlements surrounding the city into a single geographical belt,” Rajob explained. “Palestinian archaeological and religious sites are being transformed into political tools used to reshape the landscape demographically and symbolically.”

  • Can EU find a Russia whisperer to mediate an end to war in Ukraine?

    Can EU find a Russia whisperer to mediate an end to war in Ukraine?

    After nearly four years of all-out conflict between Russia and Ukraine, stalled US mediation efforts and escalating Russian military aggression have pushed Kyiv to call on the European Union to step into the diplomatic void, launching a new push for negotiated peace that will top the agenda at this week’s informal gathering of EU foreign ministers in Cyprus.

    Ukraine’s top diplomat Andrii Sybiha told the BBC that Kyiv is eager to inject fresh momentum into stalled peace talks, calling for a new negotiation format that includes far more active engagement from European powers. While names of potential European mediators have circulated in diplomatic circles – including former German Chancellor Angela Merkel and ex-Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi – Sybiha declined to confirm any specific candidates. A spokesperson for Draghi declined to comment on the speculation when contacted by the outlet.

    Finnish President Alexander Stubb, one figure who has been open to the possibility, said over the weekend that he would “probably not turn down” the mediation role if asked, though he stressed his participation would only come after Russia agrees to a much-needed ceasefire. To date, Russia has given no indication it is prepared to pause its military operations. Over the same weekend that Stubb made his remarks, Russian forces launched one of the most intensive missile and drone barrages on Kyiv of the entire war, and later threatened to carry out systematic strikes on the Ukrainian capital, urging foreign nationals to evacuate and warning residents to take shelter.

    Russia has repeatedly rejected any role for the EU in talks, accusing the bloc of arming Kyiv and undermining Washington’s previous peace efforts. Moscow has long preferred to negotiate directly with the US, a preference driven in part by a desire for greater geopolitical status, and in part by the far softer approach taken by Donald Trump’s administration envoys, who have consistently placed far more pressure on Ukraine than on Russia to make concessions.

    That US-led approach has ultimately failed to produce progress. Last week, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington was not willing to host “an endless cycle of meetings that lead to nothing”, though he later walked back the comment to confirm the US remains open to mediating if a viable opportunity arises. With US momentum drained, the EU is now moving to explore its own role, with the goal of ensuring any eventual peace deal protects both Ukraine’s sovereignty and European collective security.

    Russian President Vladimir Putin has claimed he is open to EU mediation as long as the appointed envoy has not previously made critical statements about Moscow. His only publicly suggested candidate is former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, a known close ally of the Kremlin and long-standing lobbyist for Russian energy interests. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas immediately rejected the suggestion, arguing Schröder would effectively be “sitting on both sides of the negotiating table”.

    The two-day informal meeting opening in Cyprus on Wednesday is designed to allow ministers to debate the proposal with far more flexibility than a formal EU summit, though deep divisions remain across the bloc. Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, most EU member states have adopted a policy of diplomatic isolation and sweeping economic sanctions on Moscow, and not all capitals agree that reopening even limited contacts is a wise move. Nations like Sweden and Lithuania argue Russia is already strategically overstretched and that the bloc should increase, not ease, pressure on Moscow. Others, including Italy, contend that Europe can no longer afford to remain on the diplomatic sidelines.

    Kallas first circulated preliminary discussion points back in March, which one senior EU official described as “food for thought” to guide early talks. Her goal is to agree a unified EU position on engagement with Russia and establish clear red lines before any formal contacts are opened. While the proposal of appointing an EU mediator – or even a group of mediators – will be discussed in Cyprus, any formal decision will be deferred to a meeting of EU heads of state scheduled for next month.

    For Ukraine, the priority is breaking the diplomatic deadlock without getting bogged down in procedural delays. An EU official confirmed Kyiv is pushing for rapid progress, with Sybiha warning: “This must not become a prolonged process focused only on discussions about who should represent, how many people, and what format. No. This must happen quickly.”

    Analysts based in Kyiv caution that any EU mediation effort is doomed to fail unless the bloc approaches talks from a position of clear strength. Yaroslav Smovzh, a security analyst at the Adastra think tank in Kyiv, argued that Europe has in recent years lost much of its diplomatic agency on the global stage, particularly when it comes to this large-scale war on the continent. “If Europe wants to act as an independent and neutral intermediary it will not yield any results, just like the US did not achieve any success,” Smovzh said, adding that Russia can only be pushed to meaningful talks if it faces credible pressure and deterrence. “So far Europe’s response to Russia’s behaviour in its territory has been somewhat unconvincing,” he added.

    As EU diplomats prepare for this week’s talks, Ukraine has been stepping up its own independent pressure on Russia, carrying out repeated long-range strikes on key Russian oil export infrastructure – strikes Kyiv describes as its own “long-range sanctions”. Russia’s recent large-scale escalation of attacks on Ukrainian cities indicates the strikes have shaken the Kremlin, but that does not mean serious peace negotiations are imminent.

    Ehor Chernev, a Ukrainian lawmaker from President Volodymyr Zelensky’s ruling Servant of the People party, acknowledged that there are currently no signals Russia is ready to end the war. Even so, Chernev said that with US interest in pushing for peace waning, Europe is well positioned to bring new energy to the diplomatic process. “They will represent the EU, which clearly understands the threat from Russia,” he noted.

  • Watch: UFC arena construction begins at White House ahead of fight

    Watch: UFC arena construction begins at White House ahead of fight

    Construction crews have broken ground on a large-scale temporary UFC arena directly on the White House campus, launching preparations for an unprecedented professional cage fighting event tied to America’s milestone 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. The undertaking marks a highly unusual addition to the national anniversary festivities, bringing elite mixed martial arts action to the heart of U.S. political power for the first time in modern history. Multiple project updates confirm that the massive purpose-built structure is taking shape on schedule, with work focusing on erecting the steel framework for the arena and installing the iconic octagonal fighting cage that has become synonymous with the Ultimate Fighting Championship. Organizers say the event is designed to blend American cultural celebration with popular professional sports entertainment, drawing spectators from across the country to the nation’s capital for the historic anniversary. While the event has drawn some public discussion about hosting a commercial combat sports event on White House grounds, preparations continue moving forward ahead of the scheduled anniversary celebrations.

  • India’s communists once ruled millions. What happened to them?

    India’s communists once ruled millions. What happened to them?

    For the first time in 69 years, India is left without a single state government led by a communist party, marking a defining turning point for one of the world’s longest-running experiments in democratic communist politics. The recent electoral defeat of the Communist Party of India (Marxist)-led Left Democratic Front (LDF) in Kerala, which closed out a decade of Left rule, brings to a close a chapter that reshaped the country’s political landscape for generations.

    At the height of their influence, India’s communist parties controlled governments across key states spanning West Bengal, Kerala, and Tripura, touching the daily lives of more than 100 million people through deep roots in trade unions, peasant movements, student organizations, and a tightly disciplined cadre network. In West Bengal, the Left Front held uninterrupted power from 1977 to 2011, standing as one of the longest-serving elected communist administrations in global history. Across Tripura, the Left governed for a total of 35 years, including a 25-year unbroken stretch before it was ousted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in 2018. Today, West Bengal’s once-mighty communist bloc holds just one seat in the state’s 294-member legislative assembly, a stark marker of its collapse.

    Kerala carved out a unique political trajectory from the start. In 1957, it became one of the first regions in the world to vote a communist government into power, led by iconic leader EMS Namboodiripad. For decades after, power rotated consistently between the Left and the national Congress party, cementing the communists as a durable, if never permanently dominant, political force. That democratic legacy made Kerala’s recent defeat all the more significant in closing the book on communist-led state government across India.

    Nationally, Indian communism once exerted outsize influence on the country’s federal politics. In 1996, Jyoti Basu, CPI(M) founding member and then chief minister of West Bengal, came within a hair’s breadth of becoming India’s prime minister at the head of a national coalition government. The party ultimately rejected the offer, a decision Basu later famously called a “historic blunder.” A decade later, in 2008, Left parties pulled their parliamentary support from former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s government over its landmark civil nuclear deal with the United States. Holding 62 seats in the lower house of parliament at the time, the Left forced Singh into a high-stakes confidence vote before the deal ultimately passed.

    Beyond electoral politics, communist thought shaped India’s economic, intellectual, and cultural life far beyond its regional strongholds, even as critics pointed to economic stagnation in West Bengal and slipping educational outcomes during decades of Left rule. Today, that influence has faded dramatically, and the movement survives in fragmented form across the country. While the LDF suffered defeat in Kerala, the party remains a major political force there; in Tamil Nadu, communists persist largely through alliance with larger regional parties; in Bihar, the breakaway CPI (Marxist-Leninist) has built an active grassroots presence in some rural pockets; and Left-backed student groups still perform well in the country’s top universities.

    But in the former communist strongholds of West Bengal and Tripura, the movement has been reduced to a shadow of its former self. Nationally, the CPI(M)’s share of the national popular vote has plummeted from more than 6% at its 1980s peak to less than 2% in recent national elections.

    Communist leaders attribute the decline to larger structural shifts that have reshaped Indian politics over the past 30 years. CPI(M) West Bengal secretary Mohammed Salim argues that the simultaneous rise of Hindu nationalism and market liberalization starting in the 1990s created a “religious, political and economic onslaught” that squeezed the Left from all directions. The new political order sold the middle class on a vision of development, modernization, and infrastructure growth that stoked new consumer aspirations, he says, while a growing politics of caste and religious identity fractured the class solidarity that formed the backbone of communist organizing. “Politics of division weakened class unity,” Salim notes.

    Political analysts, however, argue the decline cannot be blamed solely on external forces. Unlike communist parties in China or Vietnam, India’s communist parties only ever governed states within the country’s federal democratic system, says Sanjay Ruparelia, a politics professor at Toronto Metropolitan University. This structure left regional communist governments under constant pressure to attract private investment and deliver rapid economic growth, creating internal contradictions that ultimately undermined their support. In West Bengal, that contradiction erupted publicly: the party that rose to power through landmark pro-peasant land reforms was later accused of forcibly dispossessing small farmers to clear land for industrial development.

    Kerala’s communist model, while widely celebrated for its achievements, faced its own unaddressed strains. The state earned global acclaim for decentralized governance, top-tier social indicators, near-universal literacy, dramatic poverty reduction, and a robust public health system. But it remained heavily dependent on remittances from overseas workers, a revenue stream that has grown increasingly volatile, leaving the state with mounting fiscal pressures and chronic job shortages, particularly among young people. Most notably, Kerala’s communist leadership gradually shifted toward the very pro-market economic model it once opposed: a 2022 CPI(M) policy document explicitly embraced private investment, public-private partnerships, private universities, and global integration of the state’s technology sector. For Ruparelia, this shift reveals a deeper truth: India’s communist parties have long been better understood as social democratic movements than revolutionary communist ones. Rather than pursuing systemic overthrow, they functioned primarily as parliamentary parties focused on advancing welfare, labor rights, and economic redistribution.

    CPI(M) general secretary MA Baby defends that trajectory, noting that state governments in India’s federal system always operated within tight constraints. “They have limited financial and administrative powers. The real power lies in Delhi,” he says. “We used state governments to show that even within the capitalist socio-economic structure, pro-people policies and alternatives are possible despite limited powers.”

    Still, the social base that sustained that model has eroded steadily over time. Organized labor, the core of communist support, has always been a small minority in India’s vast informal economy. As welfare politics has shifted away from class-based mobilization toward direct cash transfers and identity-based electoral coalitions, the Left has lost its traditional foothold. The 2020 nationwide farmers’ protests against Modi’s controversial agriculture laws underscored this shift: while the Left joined the movement, serving as what analyst Shikha Mukherjee calls “the voice of conscience,” it no longer led the movement. That leadership role has been taken over by regional parties and independent farm unions.

    “The Left has lost its place as the principal voice of rights and entitlements. It has struggled to adapt to the modern economy, and ideological confusion now lies at the heart of the movement,” Mukherjee says. The irony, analysts note, is that modern India is now grappling with soaring economic inequality, persistent youth unemployment, and deepening working-class insecurity – conditions that once would have created fertile ground for a resurgence of Marxist politics. As Ruparelia puts it, “the objective conditions, as leftists are wont to say, should benefit them.” Yet the Left has failed to capitalize on this discontent. “The Left should have been out on the streets. Where are they?” Mukherjee asks.

    This paradox is not unique to India. After the 2008 global financial crisis, new left-wing parties emerged across Europe, but many have struggled to compete with nationalist populist movements that mobilize working-class voters around anti-immigrant sentiment and ethnonationalism rather than class solidarity, Ruparelia notes. India’s Left faces a parallel challenge from the BJP’s brand of majoritarian Hindu nationalism.

    Even so, writing off the Indian communist movement entirely is premature. For decades, it has survived internal splits, state repression, and repeated electoral collapses, and its diminished organizational networks still maintain a presence across large swathes of the country. The question now is whether the movement can reinvent itself to rebuild political relevance. Mukherjee argues the CPI(M) must adapt to operate within the liberalized economic order created by 30 years of reform, rather than simply opposing it.

    In West Bengal, Salim says the party is already in the process of “regrouping, repositioning and rejuvenating.” Eager to shed its reputation as an ageing, change-resistant movement, the party has elevated a new generation of younger leaders to prominent roles. “Communists must constantly rejuvenate themselves. The only constant is change itself,” Baby says.

    The scale of the Left’s electoral decline remains undeniable, however: in West Bengal’s most recent election, the CPI(M) won just one legislative seat and captured barely 4% of the popular vote. Kerala remains the outlier: even in defeat, the LDF held roughly a third of the popular vote, confirming that the communists remain a major force in state politics there, while a return to power in Tripura remains distant for the foreseeable future. Still, party leaders insist that electoral results do not tell the full story of their ongoing social and political relevance. “Are we hopeful? Of course,” Baby says. “In fact, we ask: without us, what future is there? Seats matter, but our place in the hearts of the people matters more.”

  • Republicans in South Carolina defy Trump to reject voting map changes

    Republicans in South Carolina defy Trump to reject voting map changes

    With just six months remaining until the critical November 2026 U.S. midterm elections, a surprising rebellion within Republican ranks and a landmark federal court ruling have thrown a months-long Republican push for partisan gerrymandering into disarray, just weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court upended decades of voting rights protections.

    In the first unexpected development, South Carolina Republican lawmakers refused to bow to pressure from former President (now incumbent President) Donald Trump, blocking a proposed voting map redraw that would have dismantled the safely Democratic-held congressional seat of Jim Clyburn, the state’s only Democratic U.S. House member. The move eliminates the GOP’s chance to flip the seat to expand their House majority, with lawmakers arguing that it would be improper to disrupt an election process that has already begun.

    “Neither my conscience nor my common sense would allow me to stop an election that is already underway,” said Republican State Sen. Richard Cash during the floor vote on the measure.

    This South Carolina setback for Trump-aligned Republicans comes on the heels of another win for voting rights advocates and Democrats: a federal district court in Alabama issued a temporary block on a Republican-drawn congressional map that had been intended for use in November’s election. The three-judge panel ruled the map, which reduced the number of majority-Black congressional districts from two to one, constituted intentional racial discrimination in violation of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The court ordered Alabama to retain the race-aware map with two majority-Black districts first used in the 2024 election cycle.

    Both of these outcomes directly follow a controversial U.S. Supreme Court decision handed down last month, where the court’s 6-3 conservative majority reversed decades of legal precedent tied to the 1960s-era Voting Rights Act. The ruling held that the landmark civil rights law does not require states to draw congressional districts that allow racial minority groups to elect candidates in proportion to their share of the state’s overall population. Only explicit, overt racial discrimination, the court ruled, qualifies as a valid reason to strike down a state’s map, meaning partisan gerrymandering designed to give one party an advantage remains constitutional even if it indirectly dilutes minority voting power.

    The Supreme Court’s ruling immediately opened the door for Republican-led legislatures across the American South to move rapidly to dismantle court-ordered majority-minority districts, which have historically been held by Black Democrats due to consistent voting patterns, and replace them with maps that favor Republican candidates. This push is part of a broader national strategy by Republicans to lock in control of the U.S. House of Representatives ahead of November’s midterms, which will shape the trajectory of Trump’s policy agenda for the second half of his current term.

    Trump first sparked what many have called a “partisan map arms race” last summer, when he publicly called on Texas to redraw its congressional maps to pick up additional Republican House seats. Since the Supreme Court’s ruling last month, multiple other Republican-led states including Florida, Tennessee and Mississippi have begun moving forward with their own redistricting plans, with votes scheduled over the coming weeks.

    Democratic leaders have condemned the coordinated Republican redistricting push as an undemocratic power grab. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, the top Democrat in the chamber, accused Trump and congressional Republicans of seeking to rig the electoral map to hold onto House majority. “There will be a free and fair election in November,” Jeffries said in a statement to CBS News.

    The nation’s oldest civil rights organization, the NAACP, praised the Alabama court’s ruling as an important win to protect Black representation, but warned that the fight over voting rights is far from over. “Redrawing maps to silence the voices of entire communities cannot be tolerated. It goes against the very values of democracy that our ancestors fought and died for,” said NAACP President Derrick Johnson. “While this is good news, it is not the end of this fight.”

  • Iran: ‘shot down Reaper drone’ after US launched new strikes

    Iran: ‘shot down Reaper drone’ after US launched new strikes

    A spiraling cycle of cross-border attacks between U.S. and Iranian forces has thrown fragile ongoing peace negotiations into deep uncertainty, just days after U.S. President Donald Trump claimed progress toward a potential end to the illegal U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. The escalation, which unfolded across roughly 24 hours, has underscored deep divisions between the two sides and cast serious doubt over whether a diplomatic breakthrough can be reached.

    The sequence of hostilities began on Monday, when U.S. Central Command announced it had carried out what it framed as “self-defense strikes” against targets in southern Iran. The military command said the raids targeted Iranian missile launch sites and naval vessels that it accused of planning to deploy mines, framing the action as a necessary measure to protect U.S. troops deployed in the region. The strikes came mere hours after Trump publicly claimed that peace talks with Tehran were moving forward smoothly.

    Early Tuesday, the Iranian military issued a sharp response, confirming that its air defense units had downed a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone, and had engaged an RQ-4 surveillance drone and an F-35 fighter jet that had entered Iranian airspace. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which issued the official statement carried by multiple Iranian state news outlets, characterized its actions as legitimate self-defense, and insisted it retains the full right to respond to any violation of sovereign Iranian territory by aggressive U.S. forces.

    Independent experts have laid out a more detailed sequence of events than either side has publicly released, based on Iranian sources. Hamidreza Azizi, a foreign policy researcher and visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, explained that the exchange escalated through multiple sequential rounds. “It reportedly began when U.S. forces attacked two IRGC naval boats, killing four Iranian military personnel,” Azizi said. “Iran responded with anti-ship missiles targeting U.S. vessels. Iranian air defense systems then shot down at least one – some reports say three – U.S. drones operating in the area. After that, the U.S. hit Iranian anti-ship missile positions and air defense sites, prompting a second Iranian response targeting U.S. ships in the Arabian Sea with additional anti-ship missiles.”

    To date, independent verification of casualty counts, damage assessments, and which side initiated the clash remains severely limited. The competing accounts of the incident fit a well-established pattern in the conflict, with both nations framing their own military actions as just responses to the other’s aggression. What is clear, however, is that the multi-round escalation over a single day is far harder to de-escalate than an isolated one-off incident, raising urgent questions about the future of the indirect peace talks currently underway between the two countries.

    Diplomatic efforts have been on shaky ground for days, even before the latest military clash. Trump has publicly claimed that a final peace deal is close at hand, and on Monday evening released a social media post laying out his demand that Iran hand over all its enriched uranium to the U.S. for destruction, or destroy it under international supervision. Tehran has not accepted this proposal, and Iranian officials have pushed back hard on Trump’s claims that an imminent deal is near.

    The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday that negotiators have been working toward a 14-point memorandum of understanding that would implement an immediate ceasefire, open the Strait of Hormuz to global shipping after a U.S. blockade, lift some sanctions on Iran, unfreeze Iranian assets held abroad, and set up a 30-day window for broader negotiations that would later address Iran’s nuclear program. According to anonymous sources cited by the outlet, the U.S. is pushing for upfront commitments from Iran on its nuclear program, while Iranian negotiators are demanding concrete, detailed guarantees of sanctions relief before any final agreement is signed.

    During a press briefing on Monday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei acknowledged that significant progress has been made on many core issues, but rejected any suggestion that a final deal is imminent. “It is correct to say that we have reached a conclusion on a large portion of the issues under discussion,” Baghaei stated. “But to say that this means the signing of an agreement is imminent – no one can make such a claim.”

    Baghaei emphasized that the top and only priority of current negotiations is ending the war on all fronts, including the ongoing Israeli offensive in Lebanon. Contradicting Trump’s public claims, he confirmed that nuclear program issues and the long-term governance of the Strait of Hormuz are not on the table in this round of talks. “How this region should be managed concerns the littoral states,” Baghaei said, referring to Iran and Oman. “We understand that the security of the Strait of Hormuz is a concern for the entire world.”

    The spokesperson also hit out at shifting U.S. negotiating positions and what Tehran says is consistent Israeli efforts to sabotage the diplomatic process. A major sticking point in the talks, he noted, is Iran’s demand that any ceasefire agreement must include an end to Israeli attacks on Lebanon, which have killed or wounded more than 12,000 people to date. Even after a Pakistan-brokered ceasefire took effect in early April, Israel escalated its strikes, killing and wounding more than 1,400 people in a single 24-hour period. “One should expect nothing from Israel except the sabotage of any process,” Baghaei added.

    Trump later tempered his earlier claims of an imminent deal, posting on his Truth Social platform that “Negotiations with the Islamic Republic of Iran are proceeding nicely! It will only be a Great Deal for all or, no Deal at all – Back to the Battlefront and shooting, but bigger and stronger than ever before – And nobody wants that!” Trump also added a new demand to the negotiations: that all regional mediating countries including Turkey, Pakistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Jordan be required to join the U.S.-brokered Abraham Accords normalization agreements with Israel, and suggested that Iran itself should also normalize ties with Israel as part of any deal, a proposal Tehran has not engaged with publicly.

    Analysts warn that the latest military escalation has created an extremely high-risk environment for the negotiations. “Fighting and talking at the same time is quite a common thing in a negotiation at the end of a conflict that has been very intense and hasn’t been resolved,” said Samir Puri, a visiting lecturer in war studies at King’s College London. “The key … is to keep talking and to not allow the talks to collapse by these escalations – because these may not be the last escalations. What we don’t know is whether this is the storm before the calm or the calm before the storm. We don’t know whether these negotiations need to be sustained and to absorb these sorts of escalations for days, for weeks, for months. It could be a very long negotiation process still to come.”

    Domestic political opposition to a potential deal has emerged on both sides of the conflict, as well as from Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday that he supports U.S. diplomatic efforts, but insisted that any final deal must eliminate what he calls Iran’s nuclear threat – a position that contradicts long-standing assessments from both U.S. and Israeli intelligence, which confirm Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in the early 2000s and has not resumed it. Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid joined pro-war Republican U.S. lawmakers in criticizing the emerging framework, calling the proposed deal “bad for Israel, bad for the region, bad for the citizens of Iran.”

    Some U.S. Congressional Democrats have also raised objections to the terms of the potential deal, even as they support an immediate end to the conflict. The war has already killed or wounded more than 30,000 Iranians, most of them civilians, according to the Iranian Ministry of Health. “If this deal with Iran is real, I will welcome it because every day this insane war goes on, America gets weaker,” Sen. Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, said Sunday. “The priority is to end the war – now. But make no mistake: These are Iran’s terms. Our nation emerges humiliated.”

    Murphy, a long-time opponent of the war, noted that Trump, who withdrew the U.S. from the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) nuclear deal during his first term, has failed to achieve any of his stated war goals. “A hardline regime is still in charge. Iran still has its ballistic missile and drone program. They still have a navy that can close the strait,” Murphy said. “And now that we are dropping sanctions, we have less leverage to get them to give more in future negotiations. Of course, none of those things could be accomplished by an air campaign – which is why so many of us opposed this war. And now the new regime is emboldened. They took our best shot and beat us. Iran emerges more powerful.”

    Iranian military leaders have reaffirmed that their forces are fully prepared to resume and escalate hostilities if negotiations collapse. “Look, Americans talk too much and keep changing their story by the minute,” Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters Commander Ali Abdollahi Aliabadi said Monday. “We’ve said it many times before: On the battlefield, we’ll show what we’re capable of.”

  • African nations seek security ties with Turkey through ‘Somalia model’

    African nations seek security ties with Turkey through ‘Somalia model’

    Over the weekend, Turkish Defense Minister Yasar Guler confirmed a growing trend across the African continent: a rising number of African states are pushing to adopt the long-developed ‘Somali model’ partnership that Ankara and Mogadishu have built over more than a decade, aiming to secure Turkish security and economic support to strengthen their own national capacity. Speaking on the sidelines of the Efes military exercises held in western Turkey, Guler emphasized that Turkey continues to deliver specialized military training and technical assistance to armed forces across African nations in response to their formal requests, supporting steady progress in local defense capacity building. ‘In this context, several other countries are requesting the same comprehensive model we implemented in Somalia,’ Guler noted, adding that Turkish officials are currently reviewing each incoming request.

  • Halal food at the wedding? Hard-right Restore leader’s son marries daughter of Libyan academic

    Halal food at the wedding? Hard-right Restore leader’s son marries daughter of Libyan academic

    A growing far-right nativist British political party that has drawn high-profile backing from X owner Elon Musk is facing internal backlash and public scrutiny just weeks ahead of a critical by-election that could reshape the country’s political landscape. Led by former Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe, Restore Britain has risen rapidly in prominence over recent months, galvanized by viral mobilization on the social media platform X, where Lowe and party-aligned accounts collectively boast hundreds of thousands of followers.

    Restore Britain built its support base on a hardline anti-immigration, anti-Muslim platform, promising to roll back what it labels the “Islamisation of Britain”, ban kosher and halal animal slaughter, and achieve net-negative migration through mass deportations. The party’s explicitly nativist ideology sets it apart from even the right-wing Reform UK: in February, party spokesperson Charlie Downes made clear that while Reform UK holds that any person from any background can become British, Restore Britain defines British national identity as tied to indigenous ancestry and the Christian faith. The party has also called for the British armed forces to prioritize recruitment from the “native majority” rather than recruiting from minority communities, and Lowe has repeatedly made inflammatory public comments targeting immigrant groups from Muslim-majority nations, claiming foreign men from these backgrounds harass women and disrupt public order.

    The party has shaken up the race for the upcoming Makerfield by-election, where popular Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham is running as the Labour Party candidate. A Labour win would put Burnham in position to mount a leadership challenge to Prime Minister Keir Starmer. A late Survation poll the previous week placed Labour at 43% support, Reform UK close behind at 40%, and Restore Britain at 7% in third place. Multiple campaign sources, however, have told reporters that on-the-ground canvassing data shows Restore Britain outperforming this polling number significantly. Elon Musk’s public endorsement of the party – including a recent post declaring “Only Restore Britain can save Britain” – has supercharged its growth, and the party now claims more than 123,000 registered members. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has accused Musk of deliberately splitting the right-wing vote to tip the race to Labour, saying “Quite what he’s trying to achieve, I have no idea.” With the right-wing vote split between Reform and Restore, polling and political analysts agree that the split is helping Burnham maintain his lead in the constituency, which is largely working-class and majority-white, where right-wing parties draw higher overall support than Labour.

    The party’s momentum has hit a major crisis following the wedding of Lowe’s son Angus over the previous weekend, after Lowe posted a wedding photo of the couple to X that drew immediate outrage from his own far-right base. The bride, Yasmin Mezran, is the daughter of Karim Mezran, a prominent Libyan-Italian academic who currently serves as director of the North Africa Initiative and resident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Rafik Hariri Center for Middle East Programs. Mezran, a well-known expert on political Islam and Mediterranean geopolitics, has a decades-long track record of advocating for Muslim integration and religious pluralism in Europe, and has publicly criticized anti-Muslim nationalist policies from far-right European governments. Outrage among Restore Britain supporters intensified after it was confirmed that a halal meal option was available for Muslim guests at the wedding reception – a direct contradiction of the party’s official policy to ban halal slaughter nationwide. Mezran himself reposted a social media note highlighting the contradiction between the wedding’s arrangements and Restore’s official platform.

    Mezran’s long career of academic and policy work stands in stark ideological opposition to Lowe and Restore Britain’s core mission. In 2013, he published a major paper arguing that Muslim communities in Italy needed a formal agreement with the Italian state to guarantee their equal rights, noting that previous attempts at such an agreement had been blocked by widespread prejudice among the Italian public and a lack of political courage from state institutions. He has repeatedly advocated for pluralistic integration that aligns with the democratic values of constitutional tolerance, and in 2022 warned the Italian government of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni that its anti-Muslim nationalist rhetoric would damage Italy’s diplomatic relations with Middle Eastern nations. Following Pope Francis’ death in 2025, Mezran praised the late pope for his public advocacy for Palestinian rights during the war in Gaza. He has also pushed back against stereotypes of Islamist political groups, arguing in 2012 that Libya’s elected Muslim Brotherhood did not fit common negative tropes, and called for cross-ideological cooperation between liberal and religious conservative politicians in the country. In a 2023 analysis, he framed Algeria as a critical pillar of regional stability for Italy and the European Union, arguing that closer Italian-Algerian ties would strengthen Mediterranean security.

    Lowe, a millionaire former businessman, farmer, and ex-chairman of Southampton FC, was suspended from Reform UK in March 2024 after he publicly criticized Nigel Farage and called Reform a “protest party led by the Messiah”, prompting his split to form Restore Britain. He is no stranger to public controversy: last year he drew widespread condemnation after revealing he had asked his gamekeeper to shoot his 17-year-old pet dog in the head after the dog lost the use of its hind legs, a decision he defended as humane. Advocacy group Hope Not Hate CEO Nick Lowles noted that Restore Britain’s aggressive on-the-ground campaign in Makerfield is being heavily amplified by far-right vloggers and Musk’s platform, and that Reform UK’s focus on attacking Restore Britain is inadvertently boosting its appeal to racist voters across the country. Middle East Eye has reached out to Karim Mezran for additional comment on the ongoing controversy.