分类: politics

  • US announces new tariffs over forced labour concerns

    US announces new tariffs over forced labour concerns

    In a renewed push for hardline trade policy after a major judicial setback earlier this year, the Trump administration has rolled out a new round of import tariffs ranging from 10% to 12.5% on dozens of U.S. trading partners, framing the move as a response to alleged failures by these nations to crack down on forced labor in global supply chains.

    This announcement marks the second major tariff action from the White House since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a large portion of Trump’s previous import duties in February. In that earlier ruling, the court invalidated the controversial “Liberation Day” tariffs that Trump imposed on a wide swath of countries across the globe in April 2025. Trump publicly denounced the ruling at the time, calling it “terrible” and labeling the justices who rejected his trade policy “fools”. Immediately following the Supreme Court decision, the administration implemented a temporary 10% global tariff, after floating a potential 15% rate that never took effect. That temporary measure is set to expire in July unless Congress votes to extend it.

    The 60 trading partners targeted in the new tariffs read like a who’s who of major global economies, including the United Kingdom, the European Union, Canada, and Japan. Combined, these nations account for a staggering 99.4% of all goods imported into the United States, meaning the new duties will touch nearly every segment of U.S. cross-border trade. The new tariffs stem from a broad investigation the U.S. Trade Department launched back in March, which examined the forced labor enforcement frameworks of all 60 trading partners. After concluding the probe, the agency announced Tuesday that every nation under review had “failed both to impose a legal prohibition on the importation of goods produced wholly or in part with forced labor (forced labor goods) and to effectively enforce such a prohibition”.

    U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer defended the policy, arguing that allowing unregulated trade with nations that do not police forced labor creates an unfair system for American workers. “It creates a dynamic where American workers are forced to compete globally on an unlevel playing field”, Greer said. The U.S. government’s formal position holds that engaging in trade with countries that permit goods made with forced labor constitutes unfair competition for the United States. Still, the policy has drawn sharp criticism from trade analysts and political opponents, who warn that Trump’s broad-based tariff strategy has already driven up consumer prices in the United States and caused economic disruptions in global markets, with new duties set to exacerbate these upward pressures on costs.

  • UK government condemns violence at protest over teen’s stabbing death

    UK government condemns violence at protest over teen’s stabbing death

    Fresh political and social unrest has erupted in the United Kingdom following the sentencing of an 18-year-old’s killer, after clashes broke out between protesters and police at a demonstration in the southern coastal city of Southampton this week.

    The fatal December 2024 stabbing of Henry Nowak, a white teenager, has roiled national discourse in recent weeks after his killer, 23-year-old Vickrum Digwa — a Sikh man — was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison with a minimum 21-year term on Monday. The case ignited outrage after it was revealed that when responding to the scene, officers initially treated the wounded Nowak as a suspect rather than a victim, after Digwa falsely claimed he had been the target of a racist attack by Nowak. Police body camera footage released after sentencing shows Nowak, who was handcuffed as he lay dying, repeatedly telling officers he had been stabbed and could not breathe, only to be dismissed by responding personnel. The judge in the trial explicitly rejected Digwa’s unsubstantiated racism claim, ruling there was no evidence Nowak made any racist remarks before the attack.

    In the aftermath of the sentencing, hundreds of protesters gathered in Southampton on Tuesday to demand answers over the handling of Nowak’s death. But the demonstration quickly turned violent, as a subset of attendees hurled chairs, metal cans, rocks and flares at responding police officers. The incident has deepened an already bitter national debate over policing, knife crime, and systemic bias, after far-right political actors and activists seized on the case to push claims that the UK justice system is inherently biased against white people. That narrative has gained traction among far-right circles, who have weaponized the case to push the popular far-right talking point of “two-tier policing,” which falsely claims law enforcement disproportionately favors ethnic minority groups over white Britons.

    Britain’s newly appointed Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood swiftly condemned the Tuesday violence, labeling it “completely unacceptable.” In a statement following the clashes, Mahmood emphasized that the Nowak family itself had already called on the public not to allow Henry’s death to be twisted to fuel further societal division. “There can be no justification for hijacking this tragedy to stir up violence and disorder,” Mahmood said. “Those responsible can expect to face the full force of the law.”

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer echoed that condemnation, while also acknowledging the legitimate public concern over the police handling of the case. Starmer told reporters he was “sickened” by the newly released police body camera footage, and confirmed there are pressing unanswered questions about how unproven accusations of racism shaped officers’ on-scene decision-making. The Independent Office for Police Conduct, the national watchdog that probes alleged police misconduct, has launched a full investigation into the actions of officers from the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary, who responded to the stabbing. In a move to address systemic gaps exposed by the incident, the National Police Chiefs’ Council has also announced it will conduct a full review of national anti-bias training and guidance for officers.

    Notably, the victim’s own family has pushed back against efforts to frame the case through a racial or religious lens. Mark Nowak, Henry’s father, said in a statement after the sentencing that his son’s death should not be used to stoke division, and that the family’s priority is pushing for safer streets across the UK rather than fomenting hatred. “This case is not about racism or religion,” he emphasized.

    That appeal has not stopped high-profile far-right figures from exploiting the tragedy for political gain. Nigel Farage, leader of the anti-immigration Reform UK party, used the sentencing to double down on the two-tier policing narrative Tuesday, urging supporters to respond to the incident with “pure cold rage” and claiming “white lives matter just as much as Black lives.” X (formerly Twitter) owner Elon Musk and notorious British far-right activist Tommy Robinson have also amplified baseless claims of systemic anti-white bias to their massive online audiences, stoking further public anger. The case has also reignited a fringe political push to ban Sikhs from carrying kirpans, the ceremonial religious dagger many Sikh people wear as a symbol of faith. The trial judge confirmed that while Digwa carried a small traditional kirpan, the weapon used to kill Nowak was an 8-inch sheathed dagger separate from the ceremonial item.

    The unrest comes as UK political parties grapple with rising far-right influence ahead of upcoming local elections, with critics warning that the exploitation of Nowak’s death risks deepening racial and religious division across the country at a time of already heightened social tension.

  • Barnaby Joyce admits majority of Australians not ‘pro-life’ after attending Sydney anti-abortion rally

    Barnaby Joyce admits majority of Australians not ‘pro-life’ after attending Sydney anti-abortion rally

    A high-profile Australian One Nation politician has openly acknowledged that his anti-abortion position does not align with the majority public opinion in the country, following his public appearance at an anti-abortion gathering in Sydney last week.

    Barnaby Joyce, the federal MP for New England, was among attendees at the Sydney Life Rally on Tuesday evening. The event was organized to build public support for a private member’s bill that will be debated this week in the New South Wales (NSW) state parliament, which aims to criminalize abortions performed exclusively for the purpose of sex selection.

    Notably, sex-selective abortion is already prohibited under existing NSW Health policy, and the NSW parliament formally rejected restrictions on abortion access in 2019, when a cross-party majority voted to decriminalize the procedure across the state. In a social media statement shared after the rally, Joyce argued that sex selection can never be a justified reason for terminating a pregnancy, adding that clear legislative boundaries are necessary in this debate. “This law in NSW must be passed or otherwise we all accept that sex selection is appropriate,” his post read.

    In a heated interview with Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) on Wednesday, Joyce reaffirmed his self-identification as pro-life, and conceded when prompted that this position is not held by most Australians. “I would agree to that,” he stated. “I don’t go out to engage in this debate to become popular. If I wanted to be, I’d stay away from it. I engage with it because I believe it is the correct thing to do and I feel I would be an unsubstantial person if I start stepping away from my beliefs.” When asked about widespread public disagreement with his views, Joyce noted that dissent against his positions is not a new occurrence, and repeatedly clarified that he is not advocating for a full nationwide ban on abortion.

    Citing a 2023 Edith Cowan University analysis of national birth data collected between 1994 and 2015, Joyce claimed that only around 13 to 14 out of 15,000 studied abortions were explicitly self-reported as being for sex selection. Still, he argued that even one case of sex-selective abortion is unacceptable. Joyce also pushed back against criticism of a line in his social media post that critics interpreted as implying that girls are inherently less valuable than boys, explaining the comment was intended as rhetorical, and distorted by political opponents who refuse to engage with his argument in good faith.

    The Tuesday rally also drew prominent anti-abortion voice Dr Joanna Howe, an academic at the University of Adelaide who last year launched a threat of a grassroots campaign against former NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman over his support for legislation to expand abortion access in the state. At that time, NSW Premier Chris Minns condemned Howe’s activism as “American-style misinformation”.

    The current bill before parliament was put forward by Libertarian Member of the Legislative Council (MLC) John Ruddock. If enacted, it would impose penalties of up to AU$22,000 in fines or five years of prison for anyone convicted of performing or facilitating a sex-selective abortion. While the bill will be introduced for debate this week, a formal vote on the legislation is not scheduled for some time, and political analysts widely expect it to fail, with neither the ruling Labor Party nor the left-wing Greens expected to support the measure.

    Speaking to reporters on Wednesday alongside an announcement expanding the NSW Labor government’s program allowing pharmacists to prescribe and dispense contraceptive pills, Premier Minns reiterated that sex-selective abortion is already illegal in NSW, and official demographic data shows no evidence of systemic sex selection termination occurring in the state. “I’ve looked at the data. The demographic data does not indicate that there is sex selection terminations taking place in NSW and we know that because we see in minute detail the number of people and pregnancies that are born each and every year,” Minns said. He added that while protesters have a legal right to gather and express their views, he would not support the bill even if it advanced to a vote in the NSW Legislative Assembly.

  • Investigators search Indonesian free meals agency after its leader was fired

    Investigators search Indonesian free meals agency after its leader was fired

    On Wednesday, law enforcement investigators from Indonesia’s Attorney General’s Office launched a full-day search of the National Nutrition Agency’s Jakarta headquarters, barring regular staff from the building. The operation came exactly 24 hours after Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto dismissed the agency’s top leader, Dadan Hindayana, amid mounting public and political backlash over the administration’s flagship free meals initiative.

    The massive free meals program was a core campaign pledge from President Prabowo, who took office with a promise to tackle widespread malnutrition across Indonesia’s 17,000-island archipelago by providing free daily meals to nearly 90 million children and pregnant women. It was also designed to support domestic agricultural producers by sourcing food directly from local farmers, with a total projected budget of $28 billion running through 2029. Despite its ambitious public health and economic goals, the program has faced intense scrutiny since its rollout, driven by widespread concerns over ballooning operational costs and multiple confirmed outbreaks of food poisoning among school-aged children who received the program’s meals.

    Following Tuesday’s leadership shakeup, State Secretary Minister Prasetyo Hadi outlined the official justifications for Hindayana’s dismissal, citing failures to adhere to mandatory standard operating procedures, breakdowns in good governance, and lapses in enforcing the National Nutrition Agency’s own strict food quality protocols. Hindayana was immediately replaced by his former deputy, Nanik S. Deyang, in an effort to maintain continuity. Minister Hadi stressed that the Indonesian government remains fully committed to advancing the free meals program, emphasizing that essential public services must not face any interruptions amid the leadership transition.

    To date, government officials have not confirmed whether Wednesday’s office search is connected to a formal criminal investigation into the program’s mismanagement. Mochamad Jeffry, acting spokesperson for the Attorney General’s Office, only confirmed that the search operation was ongoing as of Wednesday and declined to share any details on the scope or focus of the inquiry.

    Critics of the initiative have long raised broader questions beyond recent food safety incidents, challenging whether the $28 billion program is fiscally sustainable for the Southeast Asian nation, and whether it can be effectively logistically implemented across a country of more than 282 million people spread across thousands of remote islands.

  • Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass advances to run-off in race to run California’s biggest city

    Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass advances to run-off in race to run California’s biggest city

    One day after Super Tuesday primary voting across multiple U.S. states, political observers are still waiting for final results in two high-profile California contests, with Democratic incumbent Karen Bass the first to lock in her spot on the November general election ballot for Los Angeles mayor. According to projections from CBS News, the BBC’s U.S. election partner, Bass has advanced out of California’s nonpartisan “jungle primary” system, which advances the top two vote-getters regardless of party affiliation. Her November opponent remains undecided as counting continues, with two candidates locked in a tight race for the second spot. Currently holding second place is Republican political newcomer Spencer Pratt, a reality television star who entered the race in January 2026 on the one-year anniversary of the devastating 2025 Palisades Fire that destroyed his home. Tailing Pratt by roughly 8 percentage points with nearly half of all ballots counted is left-wing Democratic city councilmember Nithya Raman. The eventual winner of November’s general election will lead the United States’ second-largest city for the next four years, and will oversee the city’s final preparations for the 2028 Summer Olympic Games while tackling long-running crises of unhoused populations and a lack of affordable housing. If Bass wins in November, it will mark her second and final four-year term as mayor, capping a decades-long career in Los Angeles politics and community organizing. Before her first mayoral term, Bass represented Los Angeles in the U.S. House of Representatives for six terms, chaired the Congressional Black Caucus, and served as a prominent member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. She was even widely discussed as a potential vice presidential running mate for Joe Biden during his 2020 presidential campaign. Bass’s first term has been defined largely by her efforts to address LA’s homelessness crisis and respond to federal immigration enforcement actions, but her tenure faced significant backlash following the January 2025 Palisades Fire. The blaze killed 12 people, destroyed thousands of homes across Southern California, and stands as one of the most destructive wildfires in state history – and Bass’s administration drew widespread criticism for its slow emergency response. That criticism has become the core of Pratt’s underdog campaign. The 42-year-old political outsider, who holds a degree in political science but has never held public office, first rose to fame in 2007 as a cast member on MTV’s hit reality series *The Hills*, where he became known for his dramatic, abrasive on-screen persona. Today, he campaigns on a platform of “fixing broken Los Angeles,” framing the city as unsafe and unkempt, and pushing for mandatory drug treatment programs as a solution to homelessness. For Raman, her entry into the mayoral race came as a surprise to many political observers: the 44-year-old urban planner and first-term city councilmember endorsed Bass shortly before reversing course and entering the race just ahead of the candidate filing deadline. A member of the Democratic Socialists of America, Raman has drawn comparisons to New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani for her progressive politics. Her campaign centers on expanding access to affordable housing, accelerating progress on reducing homelessness, and revitalizing job growth in Hollywood’s entertainment sector, arguing that Bass has failed to deliver meaningful change on the city’s most pressing issues. Bass has already secured enough support to move on to November under LA’s primary rules: a candidate wins the contest outright only if they earn more than 50% of the primary vote, a threshold no candidate is on track to hit this cycle, meaning the top two will advance to the general election. Tuesday’s LA mayoral primary was just one of dozens of contests held across California, Iowa, New Jersey, and New Mexico that day, all part of the 2026 national midterm election cycle that will determine control of Congress and dozens of state and local offices across the country. In the other high-profile California contest, the race for governor, vote counting is also ongoing, with the contest already making history as the most expensive gubernatorial race in U.S. history. No clear front-runner has emerged through the primary, with three leading candidates locked in a tight race to advance to November. California has been led by Democratic governors since 2011, but the state’s high cost of living and ongoing homelessness crisis have created a competitive 2026 cycle. The leading contenders include Steve Hilton, a British-American conservative commentator and former policy adviser to ex-British Prime Minister David Cameron who played a key role in shaping Conservative strategy during the Brexit process. Endorsed by former President Donald Trump, Hilton campaigns on a platform of “disrupting the status quo” in Sacramento, promising to address the homelessness crisis, roll back California’s decades-long sanctuary state immigration policies, and increase cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. He is also known for his casual California-inspired style, often appearing barefoot and without a tie at campaign events. Close behind Hilton is Xavier Becerra, a longtime California politician and former U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services during the Biden administration. Becerra has centered his campaign on his decades of governing experience at both the state and federal level, promising to push back against any policy changes pushed by Trump and his allies, and to freeze rising insurance and utility rates for cash-strapped California residents. The third leading contender is billionaire progressive activist Tom Steyer, who is campaigning on a platform of sweeping progressive policy change, including implementing a single-payer universal healthcare system in California and closing tax loopholes to force the state’s highest earners to pay a greater share of taxes. The race comes as California holds the highest cost of living in the United States, leaving many low- and middle-income residents struggling to cover basic housing, food, and utility costs, a reality that has shaped policy debates across all 2026 contests in the state.

  • Former Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra freed early from parole after receiving royal pardon

    Former Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra freed early from parole after receiving royal pardon

    BANGKOK – In a move that reshapes Thailand’s volatile political landscape, former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra has officially wrapped up all court-mandated legal obligations after King Maha Vajiralongkorn granted a royal pardon that cut short his four-month probation period, with the decree taking full effect on Wednesday.

    The 76-year-old billionaire populist, whose influence has rippled through Thai politics for more than 20 years, walked out of a Bangkok prison last month to throngs of cheering supporters. Ever since his release, political observers have engaged in intense speculation over whether he will continue to wield significant sway over the Pheu Thai Party, the leading faction in Thailand’s current governing coalition, even as his family has suggested he may be preparing to step away from frontline politics.

    The royal pardon decree, announced to mark Queen Suthida’s birthday, was published in the official Royal Gazette on Tuesday evening. Under Thailand’s constitutional monarchy framework, the king holds exclusive final authority over pardon grants for convicted individuals. The pardon applied to a broad group of qualifying inmates who met pre-set eligibility criteria; Thaksin qualified for full clemency because he had already been released on probation and had fewer than 12 months left on his original commuted sentence.

    Thaksin first entered politics as a telecommunications tycoon, launching his own political party in 1998 before winning the prime ministership in 2001. His time in office ended abruptly in 2006, when a military coup ousted him while he was traveling overseas, triggering nearly 20 years of deep political polarization that continues to define Thai public life.

    Even during 15 years of self-imposed exile following the coup, political parties aligned with Thaksin repeatedly won general elections and returned to power. His signature populist policies, which expanded access to public services and microloans for low-income households, built a fiercely loyal base among working-class and rural voters, particularly in Thailand’s northern and northeastern regions. But his overwhelming popularity and confrontational governing style also created intractable divisions between his grassroots supporters and the country’s established urban elite, royalist factions, and military establishment.

    Thaksin returned to Thailand in 2023, after which he began serving an eight-year prison sentence handed down on corruption-related charges, including convictions for abusing his prime ministerial authority to benefit his personal business holdings and improperly approving a state lottery project that caused public financial losses. Shortly after his conviction, King Maha Vajiralongkorn commuted his sentence to one year, and Thaksin was initially allowed to serve his term in a private suite at Bangkok’s Police Hospital on medical grounds.

    After widespread public outcry over claims of unfair preferential treatment, Thailand’s Supreme Court ordered Thaksin moved to a mainstream prison to serve his sentence in September 2025. He was granted parole on May 11, having served eight months of his one-year commuted sentence. As a condition of his parole, he was required to wear an electronic monitoring ankle bracelet, with his original four-month probation period set to run through early September. His legal representative, attorney Winyat Chatmontree, confirmed to the Associated Press on Wednesday that all legal restrictions have now been lifted, though administrative procedures to remove the monitoring bracelet will take several additional days to complete.

    The early end to Thaksin’s sentence comes as Thailand’s governing coalition navigates shifting internal dynamics, leaving open the question of how much the former premier will participate in national politics moving forward.

  • Former CFMEU head John Setka tells court he’s received death threats

    Former CFMEU head John Setka tells court he’s received death threats

    One of Australia’s most high-profile former union figures has made headlines again after revealing he has been targeted with death threats, as he fronts a Melbourne court over allegations of abusive and harassing correspondence with a Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) administrator.

    Sixty-one-year-old John Setka, who served for decades as secretary of the CFMEU’s Victorian and Tasmanian branch before stepping down in July 2024, appeared before Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday to face charges stemming from alleged improper communications sent last year. Law enforcement officials allege that Setka sent a series of threatening, offensive, and abusive emails to the union administrator in October 2024, followed by an additional harassing message sent on Christmas Day. The former union heavyweight has confirmed he will contest all charges against him.

    During the Wednesday hearing, Setka’s legal team requested an adjournment to the proceeding, explaining that they had submitted a formal request to Victoria Police to turn over key undisclosed documents related to the case. Alex Turner, the police prosecutor handling the matter, told the court that of the six documents Setka’s team has requested, police intend to raise objections to the release of several. Turner noted that some of the requested materials are held by the CFMEU itself, not by Victoria Police, while other requests are overly broad and would place an unreasonable administrative burden on law enforcement to fulfill.

    The court confirmed that a subpoena will be issued to compel the production of the contested documents, with a dedicated two-hour hearing scheduled for September to resolve the disclosure dispute. When media outlets applied for public access to court records linked to the case, Setka’s legal team requested that the former union leader’s residential address be redacted from all publicly available files. Setka’s lawyer told the court that the redaction was necessary because his client is currently the target of active death threats, which are still being investigated by Victoria Police.

    Speaking to reporters outside the courthouse following the hearing, Setka brushed off the threats, responding “I’m really happy about it” when asked how he felt about the ongoing danger. Setka was arrested in November 2024 in relation to the harassment charges, and stood down from his long-held leadership role with the CFMEU three years ago [correction: July 2024], citing what he called “ongoing false allegations” as the driving force behind his decision. The case is scheduled to return to Melbourne Magistrates’ Court for the next procedural step on September 3.

  • Australian troops embedded with US, UK playing ‘defensive’ role as Iran war looms

    Australian troops embedded with US, UK playing ‘defensive’ role as Iran war looms

    Fresh escalations between the United States and Iran around the Strait of Hormuz have thrown a spotlight on Australia’s hidden military footprint alongside its key Western allies, with the nation’s top defence official confirming that more than 700 Australian Defence Force (ADF) personnel are currently embedded with American and British armed forces.

    Addressing a Senate estimates hearing on Wednesday, Chief of Defence Admiral David Johnston revealed the exact figure stands at 729 active ADF troops, with an additional 96 Australian public servants also deployed alongside allied commands. Johnston noted that the actual number of personnel embedded with US forces alone is likely even higher than the current official count, though only a small fraction of these troops are assigned to frontline tactical units.

    With regional violence on the edge of a major widening, Johnston emphasized that strict Australian government rules limit all embedded personnel to strictly defensive roles, clarifying that Australia is not participating in any offensive operations targeting Iran. He pointed to the recent deployment of an E-7A Wedgetail airborne early warning and control aircraft to the United Arab Emirates as a key example of this constrained mandate, explaining that the jet supports defensive security efforts for Gulf states rather than engaging in offensive strikes.

    The hearing saw intense questioning from Greens Senator David Shoebridge, who pressed Johnston over the risks of blurred rules of engagement, particularly for Australian personnel posted aboard US submarines. Past disclosures have already confirmed that Australian service members were present on a US submarine that sank an Iranian frigate in the Indian Ocean, raising questions about how Australian personnel navigate conflicting operational orders.

    Johnston pushed back against concerns, asserting that all deployed personnel have full clarity on what actions they are authorized to take, and that he is unaware of any case where troops have faced uncertainty over their rules of engagement. When asked whether Australia’s presence on the submarine that sank the Iranian vessel aligned with national interests, Johnston framed the embedding as a critical training opportunity: Australian personnel are gaining hands-on experience operating Virginia-class submarines, a capability Australia is set to introduce under the AUKUS pact, to ensure they can safely and proficiently operate the platforms when they enter Australian service.

    Beyond troop deployments, the hearing also shone a light on Australia’s controversial contract with US spyware firm Palantir, with officials confirming the ADF has paid roughly AU$14.4 million for access to the company’s data aggregation software. Senator Shoebridge highlighted that Palantir’s tools are used by both the US and Israel — two powers actively engaged in conflict against Iran and its regional allies — including for target identification operations in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran.

    Australian Army Major-General Richard Vagg, head of land capability, confirmed that the ADF is using the same product suite that includes AI-powered targeting functions, but stressed that Australian use of the software is limited to non-offensive applications. Vagg explained that the ADF runs the platform in an isolated “sandbox” environment disconnected from main defence networks, using it only to practice aggregating multiple data streams to improve commanders’ situational awareness and battlefield target selection training, rather than for active offensive targeting operations.

    The disclosures come as renewed tensions between Washington and Tehran have stoked fears of a full-scale regional war, prompting new scrutiny of Australia’s military commitments alongside its allies and the potential for the nation to be drawn unintentionally into a wider conflict.

  • US says it plans extra tariffs of 10% or more for most trading partners after forced labor probe

    US says it plans extra tariffs of 10% or more for most trading partners after forced labor probe

    The Trump administration has unveiled a sweeping new proposal to impose additional tariffs of 10 percent or higher on imports from dozens of the United States’ major trading partners, stemming from a high-stakes probe into foreign nations’ failure to block goods produced with forced labor from entering global supply chains. In a report released publicly early Wednesday, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) laid out a two-tiered tariff structure: a 10 percent additional levy will apply to imports from Canada, Mexico, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and a handful of other jurisdictions deemed to have fallen short of enforcing their own forced labor import bans. A steeper 12.5 percent additional tariff is proposed for a larger group of economies including China, Japan, India, South Korea, Brazil, and Switzerland, among dozens of other nations.

    USTR Ambassador Jamieson Greer defended the proposed measures in an official statement, arguing that the persistent failure of key U.S. trading partners to crack down on forced labor-produced goods creates an unfair competitive landscape that disadvantages American workers. “This creates a dynamic where American workers are forced to compete globally on an unlevel playing field,” Greer said, adding that every trading partner has a responsibility to strengthen enforcement to prevent trade from enabling and entrenching exploitative forced labor practices across the world.

    Notably, the proposed tariffs will not go into effect immediately. The plan will first undergo a formal period of public comment and regulatory review, giving stakeholders and affected nations time to weigh in before any final action is taken.

    The entire probe that led to this proposal was conducted under Section 301 of the 1974 U.S. Trade Act, a legal framework that analysts say would allow the Trump administration to bypass the restrictions the U.S. Supreme Court placed on the president’s tariff authority earlier this year. In a February ruling, the high court found that Trump had exceeded his constitutional and statutory power when he used the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad, sweeping tariffs on U.S. trading partners.

    The USTR’s report formalizes a clear definition of forced labor consistent with international standards, describing it as “work or service exacted from a person under the menace of any penalty for its nonperformance and for which the worker does not offer himself voluntarily.” The proposal marks a major shift in the administration’s trade policy strategy, coming in direct response to the Supreme Court’s limits on emergency tariff authority, while framing the new measures around a globally shared goal of combating labor exploitation.

  • Indonesia’s Prabowo fires head of free meals scheme plagued by poisonings

    Indonesia’s Prabowo fires head of free meals scheme plagued by poisonings

    Indonesia’s flagship free school meals initiative, a cornerstone of President Prabowo Subianto’s 2024 presidential election platform, has been roiled by widespread public health incidents, corruption probes, and mounting political pressure, leading to the dismissal of the agency chief tasked with overseeing the multi-billion-dollar project.

    The ambitious programme was designed to deliver daily free meals to 80 million school-aged children across the country, aimed at addressing childhood malnutrition and easing household financial burdens. But within months of its January 2025 launch, the initiative began to face cascading crises. As of April this year, local education advocacy group Network for Education Watch has linked at least 33,000 cases of food poisoning across the archipelago to the programme, forcing authorities to confront widespread public anger and demands for a full suspension of the scheme.

    Last week, Indonesia’s anti-corruption commission formally filed a complaint over documented budget inconsistencies across hundreds of programme food preparation kitchens. Just seven days after that filing, on Wednesday, Prabowo moved to remove Dadan Hindayana, an entomologist who had served as head of the National Nutrition Agency, the governing body responsible for the free meals initiative. Hours before the dismissal was announced, officials from the Attorney General’s Office executed a raid on the National Nutrition Agency’s headquarters, blocking staff from accessing the building as investigators collected documents.

    Dadan has been replaced by his former deputy, Nanik Sudaryati Deyang, a former journalist who worked as a member of Prabowo’s 2024 presidential campaign team. The leadership shakeup has drawn mixed reactions from the Indonesian public and policy analysts. While some welcomed the change as a necessary first step to address the programme’s failures, many critics have dismissed it as a superficial cosmetic fix that does not address deep-rooted structural flaws. “What the programme needs right now isn’t just swapping people, but a total overhaul of the concept and system. Without that, it’ll just keep being a source of problems,” Indonesian social media user Ahmad Arif wrote on platform X. Additional criticism has centered on Nanik’s lack of relevant professional experience: she has no background in nutrition or food safety management, a gap that has raised concerns about her ability to turn the troubled initiative around.

    Beyond the public health crisis, Dadan also faced backlash for a series of controversial public statements, including a recommendation that all Indonesians drink two liters of milk per day and a proposal to incorporate insects and sago worms into the free meal menus. The programme itself has also drawn intense scrutiny over its enormous price tag, at a time when Indonesia is facing mounting economic headwinds including shrinking trade surpluses and a depreciating national currency. Just recently, authorities scaled back services from six days a week to five, a cut framed as a necessary response to global economic volatility spurred by the ongoing conflict between the U.S.-Israel alliance and Iran.

    President Prabowo has not shied away from acknowledging the programme’s shortcomings. In a speech delivered last month, he admitted the scheme was beset “with many problems” and pledged to take firm action against any individuals found violating rules or abusing public authority. Even amid the scandals, however, the president maintains that the programme retains broad support among ordinary Indonesians. “Free nutritious meals are so important for our nation,” he said. “Everywhere I go, I meet ordinary people, farmers, saying, ‘sir, please don’t stop the free nutritious meals programme, this really helps my grandchildren to be able to eat’.”

    Additional on-the-ground reporting for this story was contributed by Astudestra Ajengrastri in Jakarta.