分类: politics

  • North Korea unveils a new plant to produce fuel for nuclear weapons

    North Korea unveils a new plant to produce fuel for nuclear weapons

    In a move that amplifies regional security concerns and escalates tensions on the Korean Peninsula, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un publicly introduced a new nuclear weapons fuel production facility on Thursday, reiterating his pledge to rapidly grow the country’s nuclear capabilities at an exponential pace.

    According to state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), the new site leverages far more sophisticated enrichment technology than existing facilities, though the outlet released no key operational details, including the plant’s geographic location or the date it began active production. Published photos from KCNA show a large industrial hall densely packed with centrifuges, leading independent nuclear analysts to conclude the facility is purpose-built to enrich uranium to weapons-grade purity.

    KCNA reported that Kim toured the new site on Wednesday, where he received briefings on its current operational output and reviewed its long-term production roadmap. The unveiling of the plant directly aligns with Kim’s repeated public commitments to expand North Korea’s nuclear program, a response he says is necessitated by growing U.S.-led military pressure on the Pyongyang regime.

    In comments carried by KCNA, Kim emphasized that expanding the quality and quantity of North Korea’s nuclear deterrent has become increasingly urgent amid intensifying confrontation with what he called “the most ferocious enemies” – a widely understood reference to the United States and South Korea. Kim added that other unstated security threats and ongoing crises further justify accelerating the buildup of the country’s nuclear capacity.

    The KCNA report also included Kim’s claim that North Korea’s total production capacity for weapons-grade nuclear materials has more than doubled over the past five years. No independent third party has been granted access to verify this assertion, and outside nuclear monitors have no ability to conduct on-site inspections of North Korea’s secretive nuclear infrastructure.

    Following an inspection tour and leadership meeting at the facility, Kim and top ruling party officials confirmed the prioritization of a long-term strategic plan to grow North Korea’s national nuclear forces exponentially, per KCNA. The outlet released photos showing Kim walking between rows of centrifuges, as well as images of him conferring with senior officials around a table holding a blurred graphic of a cone-shaped object – it remains unclear whether the graphic depicts a nuclear warhead design.

    Thursday’s public reveal comes less than two years after North Korea unveiled another covert uranium enrichment plant in September 2024. That disclosure marked the first public showing of a North Korean enrichment facility since 2010, when Pyongyang allowed a group of visiting American scholars to tour a centrifuges hall at the main Yongbyon nuclear complex. During his 2024 visit to that previously undisclosed plant, Kim delivered an identical message, calling for expanding the number of centrifuges to exponentially grow the country’s nuclear arsenal and pushing for the development of more advanced centrifuge technology.

    Last September, South Korea’s Unification Minister Chung Dong-young publicly confirmed that North Korea currently operates four separate uranium enrichment facilities, including the core complex at Yongbyon, and that all sites run continuously around the clock.

    Nuclear weapons can be constructed using either highly enriched uranium or plutonium, and North Korea has long maintained production capacity for both materials at the Yongbyon site. Since the collapse of high-stakes denuclearization diplomacy between Kim and former U.S. President Donald Trump in 2019, Pyongyang has prioritized expanding and modernizing its nuclear arsenal. Kim has repeatedly rejected overtures from the U.S. and South Korea to restart diplomatic negotiations on the country’s nuclear program.

    As early as April this year, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi told reporters that the organization had confirmed a rapid increase in operational activity across all known North Korean nuclear facilities, signaling Pyongyang’s accelerating push to expand its nuclear stockpile.

  • British MP asks government to clarify stance on Jordanian custodianship of Al-Aqsa

    British MP asks government to clarify stance on Jordanian custodianship of Al-Aqsa

    A British independent lawmaker has launched a formal call for the United Kingdom to take an unambiguous public stance against reported covert efforts by the United States and Israel to revoke Jordan’s centuries-old custodianship of Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque, a move that has sparked widespread outrage among Muslim communities globally.

    Shockat Adam, who represents Leicester South in the UK Parliament, made the demand in an official letter dated May 29 addressed to Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper, days after independent outlet Middle East Eye (MEE) published an exclusive report outlining the proposed power grab that would upend decades of agreed status quo for the holy site.

    MEE’s reporting, which cited anonymous confirmation from American, Jordanian, and Palestinian officials, details a plan spearheaded by former President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee. Under the proposal, Israel would secure unilateral authority to appoint imams and senior administrative staff at Al-Aqsa, and would also gain veto power over the content of weekly Friday sermons delivered at the mosque. Two senior US officials additionally confirmed to MEE that Washington has drafted a formal policy document outlining its vision for the site, which includes stripping Al-Aqsa of its exclusive Muslim religious identity to rebrand it as a multi-faith tourist landmark open to all three Abrahamic religions. One alternative provision floated in the proposal would replace Jordan’s permanent custodianship with a rotating oversight model involving multiple Arab states, according to a Western official and a source briefed by Jordan’s government.

    While a single unnamed US official has issued a blanket denial of the reported conspiracy, the revelations have already triggered sharp pushback from Muslim communities and political leaders. Adam confirmed in a public Twitter post accompanying a photo of his letter that his urgent appeal comes against the backdrop of ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict in Gaza, framing the proposed change to Al-Aqsa’s status as unacceptable interference in a highly volatile regional context.

    In his letter, Adam notes that he has been inundated with messages from constituents in Leicester South expressing profound anger and deep alarm over the reported plans. He emphasized that for Palestinian people and Muslim communities across the globe, Al-Aqsa is far more than a site of daily worship: it stands as a core symbol of national and religious identity, collective dignity, and a bulwark against the ongoing displacement of Palestinian people from their historic lands.

    Adam has put four key questions to the UK Foreign Secretary to force a clear government position: whether ministers have already raised the controversial reports directly with their US and Israeli counterparts; whether the UK continues to formally recognize and support Jordan’s long-standing custodianship role; what official assessment has been made of the risks of escalating ethnic violence, further displacement of Palestinians, and regional instability that would follow any attempt to alter the holy site’s existing status; and whether the government will commit to a clear public rejection of any effort to undermine Jordan’s internationally recognized custodianship.

    The UK has long held an official policy of acknowledging Jordan’s custodianship over all Muslim and Christian holy sites located in East Jerusalem. MEE has contacted the UK Foreign Office for official comment on Adam’s letter and the reported plan, but has not yet received a public response.

    MEE, an independent media outlet focused on exclusive coverage of the Middle East and North Africa, first broke the story of the proposed US-Israeli plan last week, bringing international attention to the highly sensitive issue that threatens to upend decades of fragile regional diplomacy around Jerusalem’s holy sites.

  • Starmer accuses Farage of inciting rage in wake of Southampton riot

    Starmer accuses Farage of inciting rage in wake of Southampton riot

    A fierce political debate has erupted in the UK Parliament after Reform UK leader Nigel Farage called for “pure cold rage” over the conviction of a murderer in a high-profile stabbing case, drawing sharp condemnation from Prime Minister Keir Starmer for overriding the explicit wishes of the victim’s grieving family.

    The case at the center of the controversy is the 2023 murder of 18-year-old Henry Nowak, who was stabbed to death in Southampton by 23-year-old Vickrum Digwa, a British Sikh man. Digwa was found guilty of murder last week, but new details that emerged after the verdict amplified existing tensions. Circulating police body camera footage shows Digwa falsely claimed Nowak had assaulted him, leading officers to handcuff the teenager even as he repeatedly told them he had been stabbed and could not breathe. Nowak died at the scene.

    Right-wing political and media figures have seized on the case to push claims of so-called “two-tier policing”, alleging authorities deliberately prioritized Digwa’s account over Nowak’s because of the victim’s white identity and the perpetrator’s non-white background. Under mounting pressure from Restore, a new far-right party founded by former Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe – who once led Southampton Football Club and is currently mired in scandal over an unexplained £5 million donation from crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne – Farage doubled down on the rhetoric this week.

    In a post on X Tuesday, ahead of a violent far-right riot in Southampton that saw known neo-Nazis clash with police, Farage wrote: “The fear of being called racist was greater than dealing with Henry Nowak’s murder. We should respond to this with pure cold rage. Britain’s historic way of life is being thrown away.” A close ally of Farage told Middle East Eye the Reform leader was standing firmly by his conviction that two-tier policing is a national reality, and that he has no concern about being outflanked on the far right by Lowe’s new party. “The issue isn’t Nowak, but what caused Nowak,” the source said.

    What makes Farage’s call for rage particularly controversial is that it directly contradicts a clear public plea from Nowak’s own family. On Monday, outside the courtroom following the guilty verdict, Henry’s father Mark Nowak addressed reporters, urging political actors not to twist his son’s death for divisive ends. “We do not want his death to be used to create further division, hatred or tension. We want his story to make our streets safer for everyone,” Mark Nowak said. “As the prosecution lawyer summed up in court: This is not a case about Sikhism. This is not a case about racism. This is a case about murder.”

    When the matter came to Parliament on Wednesday, Starmer echoed the family’s plea and launched a blistering attack on Farage for his actions. The prime minister accused the Reform leader of exploiting the tragedy to stoke national grievance and division, in open disregard of the family’s explicit request.

    Starmer said: “A grieving family have asked us not to respond in the way that the leader of Reform has responded… They have lost their son in the most appalling circumstances. They make a simple plea of us as human beings to please not exploit that. Rage – that’s his response to a father who has lost his son and asked for that not to happen. Exploiting this tragedy to create grievance and division would be wrong in any circumstance, but to do it when the family are expressly saying ‘please don’t’ is unforgivable.” He also rejected the core of Farage’s claim, stating: “I don’t believe there is two-tier policing in this country.”

    During his own parliamentary address, Farage doubled down on his claims, repeating that “it is now clear to growing millions in this country that we are living under two-tier policing” and calling on Starmer to acknowledge what he called reality. When Farage referenced the violent unrest that had erupted in Southampton the previous night, multiple members of parliament interrupted in outrage, calling on him to condemn the rioting – a demand he did not fulfill. He only warned that public anger “is in danger of getting considerably worse if the public lose trust in being treated fairly by the police.”

    This incident has laid bare the growing friction between mainstream UK politics and an emboldened far right, which has increasingly sought to frame individual violent crimes as evidence of systemic bias against white Britons, even when victims’ families reject that framing.

  • Protesters clash with police in Chile’s capital over President Kast’s education cuts

    Protesters clash with police in Chile’s capital over President Kast’s education cuts

    On a busy Wednesday in the Chilean capital of Santiago, a large-scale demonstration against President José Antonio Kast’s sweeping education budget cuts and broader austerity agenda descended into violent clashes between thousands of demonstrators and law enforcement. The outpouring of public anger marks the most significant domestic pushback yet against the ultraconservative leader’s fiscal agenda, which he launched immediately after taking office on March 11.

    Kest’s administration has made aggressive fiscal consolidation a core policy priority, pledging to slash a total of $6 billion in public spending over an 18-month period to shore up Chile’s national fiscal accounts. To hit this ambitious target, the government has imposed an approximately 3% across-the-board budget reduction on all federal government ministries, with education services facing notable cuts that have mobilized educational communities across the country.

    The backlash to the austerity plan has extended far beyond Chile’s traditional opposition parties, with even some moderate factions within Kast’s own governing coalition voicing public criticism of the rapid and deep spending cuts. Wednesday’s demonstration was coordinated by the Confederation of Chilean Students, with formal backing from a broad coalition of allied groups, including the national Chilean Teachers’ Union, secondary school student associations, and multiple national feminist organizations.

    What began as an orderly, peaceful march through central Santiago quickly shifted as tensions boiled over, leading to open clashes between protesters and police. To clear the gathered crowds, law enforcement deployed tear gas and high-pressure water cannons, while a subset of demonstrators responded by throwing rocks and other projectiles at officers. The unrest disrupted daily life across the capital, leaving major downtown streets blocked and forcing the temporary closure of multiple downtown subway stations.

    Protest leaders accused the administration of intentionally provoking the unrest to create a pretext for a harsh crackdown on dissent. “The government sought to provoke this, to create this situation to justify repression,” Mario Aguilar, head of the Chilean Teachers’ Union, told reporters on the scene.

    Beyond opposition to education cuts, demonstrators also gathered to protest Kast’s controversial National Reconstruction bill, a wide-ranging legislative package branded a “mega-reform” by political observers. The bill is designed to cut state spending, attract private sector investment, and stimulate long-term growth for the Chilean economy, but critics argue it will erode public services and reduce protections for working Chileans. The legislation already passed the Chamber of Deputies in late May and is currently scheduled to move to the Senate for its next round of debate.

    For young Chilean students who made up a large share of the protest crowd, the cuts represent a direct threat to access to affordable education. “They want to silence us, but we are not going to stop,” said 21-year-old student Magdalena Correa. “They’re taking away our resources and rights, and we have to fight back.”

    As of Wednesday evening, neither Chilean national police nor senior Kast administration officials had issued an official statement responding to the clashes or the protest. However, reporters on the ground from the Associated Press confirmed that at least a dozen protesters were arrested during the unrest, and multiple people—both demonstrators and officers—sustained injuries in the clashes.

  • More Israelis leaving country than arriving: Press review

    More Israelis leaving country than arriving: Press review

    Over the past two years, Israel has confronted a cascade of interconnected political, security and demographic challenges, alongside an unexpected milestone in its defense export industry, according to multiple official findings and leading Israeli media reports.

    First, a new demographic study commissioned by Israel’s parliament has uncovered a troubling net emigration trend that experts warn poses a long-term strategic risk to the country. Data published by Israeli outlet Ynet this week reveals that more Israelis have left the nation than have returned in recent years, with a dramatic acceleration of this outflow following the outbreak of the Gaza war in October 2023. Between 2022 and 2024 alone, more than 210,000 Israelis emigrated — a sharp jump from the annual average of roughly 40,000 recorded between 2009 and 2021. Over this two-year period, the net outflow of citizens hit 140,000.

    Most alarmingly, the departure rate is disproportionately high among the country’s most highly skilled young demographics, the core of Israel’s technology and knowledge-driven economy. Of all recent emigrants, 48% fall between the ages of 20 and 44, a group that makes up just 32% of Israel’s total population. In terms of educational attainment, 33.2% of emigrants hold a bachelor’s degree, 21.5% have a master’s degree, and 3.7% hold a PhD. Graduates specializing in high-demand fields including mathematics, computer science and physics are particularly overrepresented among those leaving. The study also notes that a slight majority of 2024 emigrants — 52% — were born in Israel. Knesset member Gilad Kariv of the opposition Democratic Party emphasized that the exodus of tomorrow’s leading scientists and entrepreneurs, leaving at a rate far exceeding their share of the population, constitutes a clear strategic threat to Israel’s long-term future.

    In a separate development related to Israel’s military leadership, Ynet confirmed that Yisrael Shomer, head of the Israel Defense Forces Operations Division, has been removed from his senior post amid an active investigation into sexual misconduct involving a subordinate. Shomer, who had been widely tipped for promotion to lead either the IDF Personnel Directorate or the West Bank Command, was ousted over the alleged inappropriate relationship with a junior service member. This dismissal comes nearly 11 years after a controversial 2015 incident in which Shomer shot and killed 17-year-old Palestinian Muhammad Ali Kosba in the occupied West Bank town of al-Ram. Kosba, who was shot three times including once in the head while fleeing after allegedly throwing a stone at Shomer’s armored vehicle, became a symbol of excessive military force after the killing was captured on camera, sparking widespread international criticism that delayed Shomer’s promotion at the time. No criminal charges were ever filed, however, as the Military Advocate General closed the case in 2016. The IDF characterized this week’s dismissal as a response to clear moral violations.

    On the political front, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s already fragile right-wing governing coalition is facing a growing threat of collapse, centered on a long-running dispute over military conscription exemptions for ultra-Orthodox Jewish men. Aryeh Deri, leader of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party and a decades-long ally of Netanyahu, has publicly held the prime minister responsible for the growing rift, accusing him of putting coalition unity at serious risk over the failure to pass the desired exemption legislation. The crisis came to a head this week when the Knesset held a vote on self-dissolution, after Dov Lando, spiritual leader of Degel HaTorah (one of two factions making up the ultra-Orthodox United Torah Judaism party), ordered his party’s lawmakers to support the dissolution motion in protest of Netanyahu’s handling of the conscription issue. Deri warned in closed-door discussions, as reported by Israel’s Channel 13, that UTJ lawmakers are willing to defect to form a left-wing government if new elections are held, adding that one senior UTJ figure is already actively working to bring such a center-left coalition to power. While Deri confirmed he personally would not join a left-wing administration, the warning aligns with recent opinion polling that puts Netanyahu’s current right-wing bloc on track to win only around 50 of the Knesset’s 120 seats — 11 seats short of the 61-seat majority required to form a new government.

    Against this backdrop of domestic political and demographic unrest, Israel’s defense export sector has hit an unexpected all-time high. The Israeli Defense Ministry announced this week that total arms sales revenue reached a record $19.2 billion in 2025, marking a 30% increase from the previous year’s figures. According to reporting from Haaretz’s economic affiliate TheMarker, sales to countries that signed the Abraham Accords — the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan — have surged dramatically, rising from just 3% of total Israeli arms exports in 2023 to 15% in 2025. More than half of 2025’s total revenue, approximately $10 billion, came from direct government-to-government arms deals. Regional export shifts show that European purchases fell from 54% of total sales in 2024 to 36% in 2025, while sales to Asia and the Pacific rose from 23% to 32% over the same period. Smaller export volumes were recorded for North America, Latin America and Africa. By product category, missile, rocket and air defense systems made up 29% of total revenue, while sales of surveillance and optronic systems jumped from 6% in 2024 to 22% of 2025 sales. Overall, Israeli arms exports accounted for 12% of the country’s total $160 billion in national exports in 2025, up 4.5 percentage points from 2022 levels. Defense Minister Israel Katz celebrated the record figures, attributing the growth to the combat experience and proven capabilities of the IDF and Israeli security forces operating across Gaza, Lebanon, Iran and Yemen.

  • ‘Crazy’ phone call between Trump and Netanyahu complicates Iran talks

    ‘Crazy’ phone call between Trump and Netanyahu complicates Iran talks

    A high-profile rift between U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rocked Washington’s diplomatic efforts with Iran, marking the latest chapter in a long history of friction between Israeli leaders and sitting U.S. presidents.

    The conflict erupted following an Israeli strike on Lebanese territory that triggered a sharp backlash from Tehran, which threatened to walk away from ongoing talks with the U.S. The development represents a major setback to Trump’s core goal of exiting the unpopular U.S.-Iran conflict, while also putting the future of the Strait of Hormuz — a critical global shipping artery — at risk as the U.S. works to broker a extended ceasefire and open negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program.

    When pressed by reporters about an Axios report claiming he called Netanyahu “effing crazy” and accused the prime minister of ingratitude during a tense Monday phone call, Trump did not deny the outburst. Speaking to the *Pod Force One* podcast in an interview that aired Wednesday, Trump clarified: “I wouldn’t say angry. I was a little bit perturbed at his constantly fighting with Lebanon, you know.” He quickly added that he holds affection for Netanyahu, saying “I like Bibi a lot. And I work very well with him.”

    Netanyahu downplayed the tensions, framing the disagreement as a routine difference common between close allies. “Sometimes we have, as in the best of families, you have these tactical disagreements,” he told CNBC in a Wednesday interview. “We always find a way to work them out, and we do so as great friends. We can disagree in the morning and be in agreement by afternoon.” Despite the repeated public disagreements between the two leaders, Netanyahu has long called Trump the “greatest friend” Israel has ever had in the White House.

    Regional and foreign policy experts warn the public clash reflects deeper misalignment between U.S. and Israeli priorities, nearly 100 days after the two nations launched joint strikes on Iranian targets in late February. Brett Bruen, a former U.S. diplomat and president of crisis communications firm the Global Situation Room, told the BBC that Netanyahu has a well-documented pattern of pursuing his own agenda regardless of input from Washington. “Trump… decided to take the plunge with him, and is now learning a really hard lesson about what happens when you get into war with a pretty mercurial leader that has an agenda which doesn’t always align with your own priorities,” Bruen explained.

    While both leaders share the core goal of blocking Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, their priorities diverge sharply on Lebanon. Israel has pledged to continue targeting the Iran-backed Hezbollah militia even as U.S.-Iran talks progress, while Iran has made a full ceasefire that includes Lebanon a non-negotiable condition for continued negotiations.

    The friction comes as public opinion in the U.S. has shifted sharply against longstanding American support for Israel. A Pew Research Center poll published in April found that 60% of U.S. adults now hold a negative view of Israel, up from just 42% before the 2023 Hamas war began. Even prominent conservative figures have broken ranks, with some publicly claiming that Israeli lobbying pushed Trump into launching the war with Iran — a claim both the White House and Netanyahu’s office deny.

    Joe Kent, former director of the National Counterterrorism Center, resigned in March over the issue, saying “we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.” In response, leading pro-Israel lobbying group the American Israel Public Affairs Committee accused Kent of pushing “old antisemitic tropes.”

    Some analysts argue that Trump has political incentives to distance himself from Netanyahu to appeal to growing anti-war and critical voices among the U.S. electorate. “I think there is a political necessity now to create daylight between Israel and the US,” Bruen noted. “Whether it’s in Lebanon or in Gaza, there are things that Netanyahu has chosen to do which are politically problematic even for Trump or the Republicans.”

    Trump’s current frustration with Netanyahu is far from unprecedented: the Israeli prime minister has a decades-long track record of clashing with sitting U.S. presidents from both parties. He had a well-documented public fight with Bill Clinton over implementing the Oslo Peace Accords, and his relationship with Barack Obama collapsed entirely after he delivered a 2015 speech to Congress criticizing Obama’s Iran policy without coordinating with the White House first. His relationship with former president Joe Biden also soured after Netanyahu publicly claimed the U.S. was withholding military ammunition, drawing sharp criticism from White House officials who called the comments “vexing” and “deeply disappointing.”

    Natan Sacks, a U.S.-Israel relations expert at the Washington-based Middle East Institute, told reporters that Netanyahu has a long history of tense negotiations with U.S. leaders. “He is a very difficult negotiator, not just in terms of being tough, but in terms of being very suspicious,” Sacks said. Even so, Sacks noted that Trump and Netanyahu have largely enjoyed a warm relationship: Trump broke longstanding diplomatic norms on Middle East policy, a shift that aligned closely with Netanyahu’s goal of rewriting regional rules to more aggressively confront Iran and its allied militias.

    It remains unclear whether this latest public disagreement will cause lasting damage to the bilateral relationship between the two leaders. “It’s potentially significant. We don’t know if it was a one-time event or a harbinger of broader things,” Sacks said. “I would not rule that out. The president has changed his mind about many people in the past.” As thousands of civilians flee southern Beirut and traffic grinds to a halt across the region, the rift has left the future of the ceasefire, nuclear talks and global energy security hanging in the balance.

  • Poland and Lithuania confirm exploring a bigger role in nuclear deterrence

    Poland and Lithuania confirm exploring a bigger role in nuclear deterrence

    In recent developments reshaping transatlantic security architecture, Poland and Lithuania have officially acknowledged they are engaged in early-stage negotiations regarding their potential expanded participation in NATO’s U.S.-led nuclear deterrence framework, a shift that comes as the alliance re-evaluates its defense posture in the wake of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    The discussions, which remain in their preliminary and classified phases, emerge against a backdrop of shifting U.S. defense priorities: former U.S. President Donald Trump had advanced efforts to reduce Washington’s conventional military footprint in Europe, leaving many eastern NATO allies seeking clearer guarantees of ongoing American security commitment. Expanding the scope of NATO nuclear deterrence has been floated as one pathway to reinforce those guarantees for frontline allies located closest to Russia.

    Poland’s Deputy Defense Minister Paweł Zalewski confirmed the negotiations in comments to Polish Radio Wednesday, noting the talks are aimed at strengthening deterrence capabilities and carving out a more meaningful role for Warsaw in the alliance’s nuclear posture. At the same time, Zalewski emphasized that Poland has no current plans to permanently host U.S. nuclear weapons, describing such a step as “an extremely serious matter” with profound political ramifications.

    Lithuania’s Defense Minister Robertas Kaunas similarly confirmed ongoing talks Tuesday, telling reporters via the BNS press agency that “Lithuania is certainly not standing on the sidelines” of the discussions, while declining to share further details due to classification rules.

    The official confirmations follow a Tuesday Financial Times report citing anonymous sources, which claimed the U.S. has signaled openness to potentially stationing elements of its nuclear arsenal in additional NATO member states beyond the six current host countries that participate in the alliance’s longstanding nuclear sharing program.

    That report also noted Poland and the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania — all NATO members sharing borders with or located adjacent to Ukraine and Russia — have expressed interest in potentially hosting bases for U.S. dual-capable aircraft, platforms engineered to carry both conventional and nuclear warheads.

    When contacted for comment, the Pentagon declined to issue an official statement. A senior Defense Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity due to speaking unofficially, noted that the U.S. and NATO “continuously assess the security environment” and regularly update their deterrence frameworks to remain effective against evolving threats.

    The U.S. has maintained a stockpile of nuclear weapons on European soil for decades, as a core component of Washington’s collective security guarantees to NATO allies. In the years following Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine and the heightened security threat Moscow poses to eastern NATO members, calls to expand U.S.-led nuclear cooperation with European allies have grown louder.

    A NATO official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, clarified to the Associated Press that the alliance’s work to assess and adapt its nuclear deterrence posture has been ongoing for several years, and is not tied to any U.S. decision to adjust its conventional force footprint in Europe.

    Today, NATO’s nuclear sharing program includes U.S. nuclear weapons deployed across six existing host nations: Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. The alliance structure relies on dual-capable aircraft operated by both the U.S. and allied nations, while the U.S. retains permanent, full control over all deployed nuclear weapons.

    Poland has signaled interest in expanding its role in the U.S. deterrence program since 2022, when Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Former Polish President Andrzej Duda even publicly expressed openness to hosting U.S. nuclear weapons on Polish territory. The current Polish government led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk has taken a more cautious approach, framing its position only around seeking a larger role in deterrence efforts rather than full hosting.

    Artur Kacprzyk, a nuclear deterrence analyst at the Warsaw-based Polish Institute of International Affairs, explained that Washington has repeatedly warned that stationing permanent nuclear weapons in eastern NATO member states would be excessively provocative to the Kremlin. Instead, Kacprzyk said a middle ground option — dubbed “nuclear sharing light” — has emerged as a likely compromise. Under this framework, eastern NATO allies would certify their own aircraft to carry U.S. nuclear weapons when needed, but no nuclear warheads would be permanently deployed on their territory. The certified aircraft would act as a backup reserve, ready for deployment if existing nuclear-capable aircraft in western Europe were disabled before they could be deployed in a crisis.

    Beyond U.S.-led deterrence efforts, Poland and a number of other European allies have moved to expand cooperation on nuclear deterrence with France, the only remaining nuclear-armed member of the European Union following the UK’s 2020 Brexit exit. Earlier this year, Poland confirmed it would join the French-led initiative to coordinate deterrence efforts across European allies.

    Kacprzyk noted that the French initiative is complementary to U.S.-led NATO deterrence, but operates with a separate structure. Alongside Poland, Britain, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Greece, Sweden, Denmark and Norway have all expressed interest in the French framework, which allows for temporary deployments of French nuclear-capable aircraft to allied territory, permits partner nation participation in French deterrence exercises, and opens opportunities for allied non-nuclear forces to support French nuclear activities.

    Polish Defense Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz confirmed Tuesday that expanded nuclear deterrence cooperation will be a key topic for discussion at the upcoming NATO defense ministers meeting scheduled for June 18 in Brussels, noting both the French initiative and the U.S. led program will be on the agenda.

    While increased nuclear cooperation can help the U.S. offset planned conventional force reductions in Europe, Kacprzyk emphasized that expanded nuclear participation cannot fully replace the forward deployment of conventional troops, particularly for eastern NATO allies that border Russia. He argued that deterrence requires consistent, cohesive signaling to avoid sending mixed messages to potential adversaries: “Communicating ‘I might risk nuclear war to defend an ally but I don’t want to send my soldiers into the fight’ is a conflicting signal. You need coherent signals at all levels of deterrence.”

  • How is America celebrating its big birthday?

    How is America celebrating its big birthday?

    As the United States prepares to mark its 250th year of independence, anticipation is growing nationwide for a slate of landmark celebrations — but a series of events organized by a President Donald Trump-founded organization have sparked heated debate over whether the national anniversary is being turned into a political platform.

    Two main entities are leading the national commemorations: America250, a nonpartisan body created by Congress a decade ago to plan inclusive, unpolitical celebrations, and Freedom 250, a public-private partnership established by Trump himself. Congress has allocated $150 million in federal taxpayer funding for the overall anniversary events, with Freedom 250 contributing millions more in additional spending for its own programming.

    One of Freedom 250’s flagship events is a 16-day Great American State Fair, running June 25 to July 10 along the National Mall between the U.S. Capitol and the Washington Monument. The fair is set to showcase exhibits from all 50 U.S. states and six territories, alongside a multi-artist concert series that has already made headlines for high-profile drop-outs. Multiple scheduled performers including Martina McBride, The Commodores, Young MC and Bret Michaels have pulled out of the lineup, citing the event’s close ties to the Trump White House. Some artists added they only learned of the affiliation with Freedom 250 after they initially agreed to participate.

    The walkouts prompted a sharp response from Trump on social media, where he threatened to scrap the entire concert series and replace it with a massive “Make America Great Again” rally, dismissing the departing artists as “overpriced singers, who nobody wants to hear, whose music is boring, and yet who do nothing but complain.” Vanilla Ice and Flo Rida remain on the event’s performance schedule as of press time.

    Another high-profile Freedom 250 event coming to the nation’s capital is a UFC fight hosted on the White House South Lawn, scheduled for June 14 — which also marks Trump’s 80th birthday. Construction crews are currently building a custom fight arena on the South Lawn to accommodate an estimated 90,000 attendees. Trump first announced the plan to bring a UFC event to the White House last year, a proposal many political observers dismissed as unworkable at the time. While the event is organized by Freedom 250, both the White House and UFC president Dana White have confirmed that the mixed martial arts organization is covering the entire cost of the event, which will offer free tickets to attendees. White told the Sports Business Journal in January that “We’re eating the whole thing.”

    This year’s annual July 4 Independence Day fireworks display in Washington D.C., normally managed by the National Park Service, has also been taken over by Freedom 250. The organization has planned a 40-minute show featuring more than 860,000 individual fireworks — a dramatic jump from the roughly 10,000 fireworks and less than 20-minute runtime of a typical annual display. According to *USA Today*, Freedom 250’s only requirement for pyrotechnics firm Pyrotecnico was that the display break the 2016 Guinness World Record for the largest fireworks display, currently held by the Philippines.

    Beyond the national capital, events are planned across all U.S. states and territories under both America250 and local leadership. New York City’s Times Square will host a special ball drop modeled after the iconic New Year’s Eve tradition, with eight separate drops marking midnight across each of the country’s time zones, each featuring a unique custom design. In Philadelphia, the birthplace of American independence, America250 will oversee the burial of a time capsule that will remain sealed until the nation’s 500th anniversary in 2276. “When it is opened in 2276, we want future generations to have a clear, authentic window into who we were at 250 – what we valued, what we built, and how we saw ourselves as a nation,” said Rosie Rios, chair of America250. Other national events include a 50,000-person concert at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum and community block parties in cities including Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

    The anniversary preparations have also included a series of city beautification projects led by the Trump administration in Washington D.C., which have drawn both praise and criticism. The most controversial project is the repainting of the historic Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, the 2,030-foot landmark stretching between the Lincoln Memorial and the Washington Monument, which workers began painting blue last month. Trump has framed the project as a much-needed restoration that will fix long-standing leaking problems, claiming the blue paint will last 40 to 50 years and eliminate maintenance issues. However, the work is facing a legal challenge from a nonprofit conservation group that argues Trump bypassed federal laws designed to protect historic landmarks from unapproved alterations, calling for a halt to the project.

    The overlapping planning by two separate organizations — one nonpartisan and one closely aligned with the sitting president — has fueled ongoing questions about whether the national birthday celebrations are being politicized to benefit Trump ahead of what will be a pivotal presidential election year.

  • Montenegro blocks entry to 87 Serbs over security concerns ahead of EU summit

    Montenegro blocks entry to 87 Serbs over security concerns ahead of EU summit

    Days ahead of a high-stakes European Union summit gathering Western Balkan leaders on Montenegro’s Adriatic coast, Montenegrin authorities have taken the controversial step of barring entry to 87 Serbian citizens, citing verified intelligence that the group poses a direct threat to national and internal security.

    The group traveled to Montenegro’s coastal town of Tivat on Wednesday via a chartered Air Serbia flight, and was immediately flagged as part of heightened pre-summit security screening organized by Montenegrin law enforcement and intelligence agencies. In an official joint statement issued by the country’s national police force and National Security Agency, officials confirmed the entry ban stemmed from concrete operational and intelligence findings that confirmed the group’s presence would undermine stability ahead of the Friday gathering.

    Photos released by Montenegrin police show the group was carrying communications equipment and banners emblazoned with “Serbia wins” — the signature campaign slogan of populist Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic and his ruling Serbian Progressive Party. Vucic is scheduled to attend the upcoming summit in the resort town, adding a layer of political tension to the incident.

    Regional media reports from both Montenegro and Serbia have identified multiple members of the banned group as known pro-Vucic government activists, several of whom have been linked to violent attacks on student demonstrators during the 12-month wave of street protests opposing the Serbian president’s administration. Montenegrin police added that a number of the barred individuals hold prior criminal records and have a documented history of participating in high-risk public disorder events. Along with the entry ban, authorities seized two buses used to transport the group after it arrived in the country.

    As of Wednesday, there has been no official response from the Serbian government to the move. The incident comes amid already strained bilateral relations between the two countries: Vucic recently declined to attend Montenegro’s 20th-anniversary ceremonies marking the country’s 2006 independence split from Serbia, and has repeatedly thrown his public support behind pro-Serbian political factions in Montenegro that oppose the country’s NATO membership and advocate for closer alignment with Russia.

    The upcoming EU-Western Balkans summit in Tivat centers on advancing EU accession prospects for six Western Balkan candidate states: Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, Kosovo, North Macedonia and Montenegro. Each nation is at a distinct stage of the integration process, with Brussels prioritizing reforms across the region to counter growing geopolitical influence from Russia and China in the Western Balkans.

  • Colombian presidential candidate de la Espriella thanks Trump for endorsing his campaign

    Colombian presidential candidate de la Espriella thanks Trump for endorsing his campaign

    As Latin America navigates a noticeable political shift toward conservative ideologies, Colombia’s upcoming presidential runoff has become a high-stakes political flashpoint, amplified by a public endorsement from former U.S. President Donald Trump for leading conservative candidate Abelardo de la Espriella. De la Espriella, who secured the top spot in the election’s first round and has earned the nickname “El Tigre” for his combative political style, publicly thanked Trump for his backing this Wednesday.

    Trump first made his endorsement official via Truth Social one day prior, throwing his full, unreserved support behind de la Espriella. In his post, he framed the Colombian conservative as a sharp, resilient leader set to face off against what he called a “radical leftist Marxist” — progressive candidate Iván Cepeda — in the June 21 runoff. Trump also added that he anticipates far stronger bilateral relations between the two nations if de la Espriella claims victory, a prediction he later shared on the social platform X.

    In his public response posted to X, de la Espriella wrote, “With my head held high and a heart full of patriotic gratitude, I receive your words and your steadfast support. Thank you, Mr. President!”

    This endorsement does not mark Trump’s first foray into backing candidates in foreign electoral contests, a pattern that has repeatedly drawn sharp condemnation from critics who argue U.S. political figures should not interfere with the domestic sovereignty of other nations. Last year, Trump threw his support behind Nasry “Tito” Asfura, the National Party presidential candidate in Honduras, who ultimately won the race. He also backed libertarian leader Javier Milei during critical Argentine legislative elections that cleared a path for Milei’s ambitious policy agenda after he won the presidency.

    Trump’s involvement in Colombia’s election also lays bare the growing diplomatic friction between Washington and Bogota that has emerged under current Colombian President Gustavo Petro, a progressive. Over Petro’s tenure, bilateral relations have soured dramatically over a string of sharp disagreements: from migration policy and Israel’s military campaign in Gaza to long-debated anti-narcotics strategy, most notably the controversial practice of bombing drug trafficking boats in the Caribbean. Even though the U.S. remains Colombia’s largest export market, and Bogota was long considered Washington’s most critical ally in the Western Hemisphere, ties have cooled rapidly under the Petro administration.

    Petro has publicly pushed back against Trump’s endorsement, rejecting the former U.S. president’s involvement and urging Colombian voters to cast their ballots independently to avoid “becoming anyone’s slaves or colony.” On X, Petro wrote, “When a country intervenes in the decisions of another country, freedom dies.”

    Preliminary election results confirm de la Espriella led the first round with 43.74% of the vote, just edging out Cepeda, a sitting senator and close Petro ally, who captured 40.90% of ballots. The conservative candidate, who holds dual Colombian-U.S. citizenship, is an open Trump ally and member of the U.S. Republican Party, with no prior experience holding elected office. He has repeatedly stated his policy positions align closely with longstanding U.S. priorities, especially in the area of counternarcotics. De la Espriella has made a key campaign promise to eradicate thousands of hectares of coca leaf crops — the primary raw material for cocaine — and crack down on drug trafficking networks that ship the drug to the United States.