分类: business

  • Grim forecast warns Australians face years of falling wages and longer hours

    Grim forecast warns Australians face years of falling wages and longer hours

    Australia’s post-pandemic economy is facing deep structural vulnerabilities that are leaving ordinary households trapped in a cycle of eroding purchasing power, with living standards stuck near multi-year lows and workers forced to make tough tradeoffs to keep up with rising costs, new reports from leading global and domestic economic bodies have confirmed.

    The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has issued a stark warning that persistent high inflation has outpaced wage growth across Australia, creating a sustained drag on household incomes that shows little sign of reversing even as the national labor market maintains a broadly solid headline performance. Unlike many other advanced economies that have bounced back from post-pandemic inflation shocks, Australia remains among a small group of OECD nations where real wage erosion is set to continue, with the country’s minimum wage set to fall in inflation-adjusted terms between April 2025 and April 2026. This decline disproportionately hits the lowest-paid Australian workers, compounding already severe cost-of-living pressures.

    Inflation-adjusted wage declines have been recorded in other wealthy nations including New Zealand, the Czech Republic, Italy and Sweden, but most of these European economies have since recovered lost ground. The OECD’s data confirms that both Australia and New Zealand are unique among developed countries for their failure to rebound, with living standards in both nations still stuck near the troughs hit after the COVID-19 pandemic.

    To offset the rising cost of basic goods and services, Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) chief economist Sarah Hunter outlined two primary coping strategies households are adopting: cutting discretionary spending entirely, or increasing their working hours to boost total incomes. Speaking at the recent Australian Conference of Economists, Hunter explained that post-pandemic data already bears out this trend. Joint research conducted by the RBA and the International Monetary Fund found clear evidence that households have responded to cost-of-living pressures by expanding their labor supply. Most notably, households with larger mortgage balances, which face greater exposure to rising interest rates, are significantly more likely to enter or re-enter the workforce to cover higher monthly repayments.

    But the ability of households to work their way out of financial pressure is set to be tested by a coming cooling in the labor market, a separate report from Deloitte Access Economics warns. The firm forecasts that the combination of persistent high inflation and elevated interest rates will push the national unemployment rate higher over the next 12 months, rising to an average of 4.9% in the 2026-2027 financial year before peaking near 5% by 2028. That increase in joblessness will only come after inflation cools sufficiently to allow the RBA to begin cutting interest rates.

    Deloitte projects that headline inflation will remain above 4% for the remainder of the 2026 calendar year, extending the financial strain on households that has already stretched budgets thin. Deloitte Access Economics partner Stephen Smith noted that multiple overlapping shocks have left the Australian economy exposed: inflation has reaccelerated, interest rates have already climbed to multi-year highs, and the oil price shock sparked by Middle East conflict remains unresolved. “To date, 2026 has revealed the vulnerabilities that have developed within the Australian economy over recent history. Australia is now structurally exposed in ways that have become hard to ignore,” Smith said.

    The firm predicts that the RBA will implement a fourth interest rate hike in August, lifting the official cash rate to 4.60% before holding rates steady for the following 12 months. The OECD echoes this downbeat outlook, projecting that real wages in Australia will fall a further 1% by September 2026, driven by a temporary inflation spike tied to the conflict between the US, Israel and Iran. The dispute led to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which disrupted 20% of global oil and gas supplies and pushed crude prices up to roughly $US120 per barrel before a tentative peace agreement was reached. While prices have since fallen back to pre-conflict levels around $US70 per barrel, the volatility has already left a mark on domestic inflation. Financial services firm AMP estimates that every $US10 increase in global oil prices adds an extra 10 cents per liter to Australian fuel prices.

    Australia’s most recent official inflation data, released for the 12 months ending May 2026, put annual inflation at 4.0%, down slightly from 4.2% in April. Both readings remain well above the RBA’s official 2-3% target inflation range. The modest cooling recorded in May was almost entirely driven by the federal government’s temporary cut to the national fuel excise, which halved the levy and pushed automotive fuel prices down 11.9% in May following a 7.0% drop in April.

  • Australia dock workers call for 28-hour week in AI talks

    Australia dock workers call for 28-hour week in AI talks

    As global port logistics giant DP World rolls out artificial intelligence and automated systems across its Australian operations, dockworkers represented by the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) have sparked a tense industrial debate by calling for a reduced 28-hour workweek with no corresponding cut to pay.

    Headquartered in Dubai, DP World ranks among the world’s biggest port operators, employing more than 126,000 people globally and managing over 10 percent of the world’s total container shipping volume. In Australia alone, the firm controls port infrastructure in Sydney, Melbourne and other major coastal hubs, moving millions of containers annually and accounting for approximately 40 percent of all container shipments entering the country. That outsized market share means any changes to its operations carry major implications for Australia’s entire supply chain and logistics sector.

    According to an MUA-commissioned study from the Centre For International Corporate Tax Accountability and Research, DP World has been ramping up testing of AI tools for workforce management and scheduling, with broader plans to introduce AI-assisted remote-controlled cranes and autonomous driverless vehicles across its Australian terminals. The research warns that this automation push is being rolled out without meaningful consultation with workers, and could threaten as many as 1,000 roles – more than 60 percent of DP World’s current Australian dock and maintenance workforce.

    The MUA argues that the adoption of new AI technology should benefit workers rather than only boost corporate profits, framing the 28-hour workweek demand as a way to share the productivity gains from automation. Currently, DP World dockworkers average between 32 and 35 hours of work per week, with minor variations based on terminal location, according to the *Australian Financial Review*, which first broke news of the ongoing negotiations.

    “If DP World wants AI and automation, then they must pay the social dividend. The new technology doesn’t have to cost our members their jobs or put their livelihoods at risk just so a terminal operator can boost profits,” the union stated. In a 3 July announcement formalizing the demand, the MUA added: “The technology should be used to improve workers’ lives, not destroy them.”

    As of this reporting, the BBC has reached out to DP World for official comment on the union’s claims and the automation program, and has also requested additional details from the MUA. No responses have been released publicly, leaving the future of the negotiations and DP World’s Australian automation rollout unclear.

  • Australians paying $10m a day in interest on soaring credit card debt

    Australians paying $10m a day in interest on soaring credit card debt

    Australian households are facing growing financial pressure amid a soaring national credit card debt crisis, with fresh data from the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) laying bare the scale of the burden now weighing on family budgets. The central bank’s latest figures show that consumers added an additional $1.1 billion in credit card charges during May, pushing the month’s total national credit card spending to $29.9 billion.

    In a striking shift that signals growing cost-of-living stress, debit card transactions – where consumers draw on their own savings rather than borrowed money – dipped by $11 million to $59.6 billion over the same period. Most alarmingly, RBA data confirms that the total stock of interest-accruing credit card debt held by Australians now sits at $19.4 billion, a sum so large that the collective daily interest bill already outpaces the annual earnings of many full-time workers across the country.

    Sally Tindall, director of data insights at financial comparison platform Canstar, explained that more and more households are turning to credit cards as a temporary buffer to cover ongoing essential expenses, as wage growth fails to keep pace with rising inflation and living costs. At the current trajectory, Tindall calculated that Australian borrowers collectively pay an estimated $10 million in credit card interest every single day.

    “That’s money that could otherwise be going towards savings, paying down a mortgage or simply helping with everyday living costs,” Tindall noted. The financial analyst warned that the situation could rapidly worsen if borrowers continue to build up balances: if consumers maxed out their current credit limits and carried those balances forward, the collective daily interest cost would surge from $10 million to roughly $55 million at the current national average interest rate of 18.61%.

    Tindall stressed that credit cards are not inherently problematic – they can serve as a helpful financial management tool for households that pay off their full balance before the due date each billing cycle. The risk emerges when routine monthly spending rolls over into long-term debt, which accumulates interest at the steep average rate that eats away at household disposable income.

    To avoid long-term financial strain, Tindall encouraged Australian borrowers to target a zero credit card balance each month. She added that while most consumers have not yet reached their credit limits, that fact should not be interpreted as permission to keep increasing spending. “Just because your bank has approved you for up to a certain amount, doesn’t make it a good idea to hit that number,” she said, warning that persistent high-interest credit card debt can push already vulnerable households deeper into financial instability.

  • Getty scraps $3.7B Shutterstock deal after UK antitrust requires key sale

    Getty scraps $3.7B Shutterstock deal after UK antitrust requires key sale

    In a sudden development that has sent ripples through the global stock imagery industry, Getty Images announced Tuesday it has formally pulled the plug on its planned $3.7 billion merger with rival content provider Shutterfish — no, Shutterstock — after refusing to meet a critical divestment requirement imposed by UK antitrust authorities. The proposed combination, which was first unveiled last year with the goal of creating an undisputed dominant giant in the licensed visual and audio content space, has been terminated via official written notice delivered to Shutterstock, Getty confirmed in a regulatory filing this week.

    The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority, the country’s top competition watchdog, had already completed its in-depth review of the proposed merger and granted conditional approval, but that approval came with a non-negotiable catch: the combined entity would be required to sell off Shutterstock’s entire editorial content division to a third-party buyer that meets the CMA’s approval standards. Regulators raised red flags during their probe, warning that a merged Getty-Shutterstock would substantially reduce competition in the UK market for licensed content. They argued that reduced competition would ultimately leave British media outlets, advertising firms, and other content buyers with fewer options and force them to pay inflated prices for visual and audio content.

    The CMA’s findings laid out that both Getty Images and Shutterstock operate as major suppliers of licensed content — ranging from professional photos and illustrations to royalty-free music and video clips — to a broad swathe of customers across the UK, including major national media organizations, global advertising agencies, book publishers, independent designers, and small and medium-sized businesses operating across the creative sector. Last week, Getty’s board of directors held a vote and unanimously rejected moving forward with the transaction under the terms demanded by the CMA, opting instead to scrap the merger entirely rather than comply with the divestment order.

    News of the collapsed deal immediately hit share prices of both companies during Wednesday morning trading. Getty Images’ stock declined by 6.8% in early trading, while Shutterstock’s shares also dipped, recording a 2.4% drop following the official announcement. Industry analysts note that the collapse of the merger leaves both companies to operate independently in an increasingly competitive market for licensed content, where free user-generated content platforms and new AI-generated image tools have already disrupted traditional business models in recent years.

  • Louis Vuitton court victory against Chinese tea chain stirs up a debate over copyrights

    Louis Vuitton court victory against Chinese tea chain stirs up a debate over copyrights

    A recent high-stakes trademark infringement ruling from a Chinese court has ignited a fierce public and media debate over cultural ownership of iconic design motifs, pitting French luxury giant Louis Vuitton against a small domestic Chinese tea chain.

    The Suzhou-based court found that Molly Tea — a 2021-founded beverage chain specializing in jasmine and floral-infused drinks — had violated Louis Vuitton’s registered trademark, ordering the domestic company to pay 10.3 million yuan (equivalent to $1.5 million) in damages to the French brand. As of this report, Molly Tea has confirmed it intends to appeal the decision, and its four-petal flower logo remains visible on the company’s official website. Neither LVMH, Louis Vuitton’s parent company, nor Molly Tea have issued any additional public comment in response to requests for further clarification.

    Louis Vuitton’s signature four-petal monogram, which the brand is currently celebrating for its 130th anniversary, is officially described on LVMH’s website as drawing inspiration from 19th century neo-gothic ornamentation and the Japonism artistic movement, framed by the brand as a “universal symbol of creativity.” But the ruling has sparked widespread pushback across China, with state media outlets and thousands of online commentators arguing the motif has far older roots in traditional Chinese cultural design.

    Chinese state media have led the charge in questioning the ruling and Louis Vuitton’s claim to exclusive ownership of the pattern. Beijing Daily, a prominent state-owned newspaper, argued in a viral Weibo post that the verdict exposed critical gaps in China’s legal protections for its own ancient cultural heritage and symbols. The Global Times, China’s official English-language state outlet, went further in a headline accusing the luxury brand of attempting to monopolize a traditional Chinese motif, reporting widespread public frustration over a foreign company holding exclusive legal rights to a design many Chinese citizens view as core to their national cultural heritage. To back their claims, the outlet published a side-by-side comparison of Louis Vuitton’s monogram and a four-petal flower pattern carved into a Tang Dynasty rosewood pipa, a traditional Chinese stringed instrument, proving the motif existed in Chinese art centuries before Louis Vuitton created its monogram in 1896.

    Cross-border intellectual property disputes between global and domestic Chinese brands are not a new phenomenon in the Chinese market. Major international brands ranging from U.S. footwear giant New Balance to numerous other Western luxury and consumer goods companies have regularly brought trademark and copyright claims against domestic Chinese firms in local courts, with foreign brands securing favorable rulings in a large share of these past cases. But this particular ruling has gained unusual traction on Chinese social media, where it has remained a top trending topic for days, as it taps into growing conversations over cultural ownership and the treatment of traditional Chinese heritage in modern intellectual property law.

  • Big four banks rally but fail to stop miners dragging down ASX

    Big four banks rally but fail to stop miners dragging down ASX

    The Australian share market closed in negative territory on Tuesday, dragged down by two major global shocks: a projectile attack on a Qatari LNG carrier in the strategic Strait of Hormuz that sent crude oil prices surging, and unexpected volatility in global tech markets following mixed results from Samsung Electronics. The benchmark ASX 200 index shed 27.10 points, or 0.31%, to settle at 8803.90, while the broader All Ordinaries index dropped 32.30 points, or 0.36%, to close at 9004.70. The Australian dollar also edged lower, declining 0.17% against the U.S. dollar to trade at 69.43 U.S. cents.

    Seven of the 11 major sectors tracked on the ASX recorded losses for the session, with the materials sector – led by large-scale mining and gold producers – suffering the steepest declines. Major miners slumped an average of 2.64% as rising energy costs increased operational expenses for the resource extraction industry. BHP shares fell 1.92% to $58.87, Rio Tinto declined 1.77% to $168.14, and Fortescue Metals Group slipped 0.76% to $18.38.

    The attack on the Qatari state-owned LNG carrier, which occurred as the vessel transited the Strait of Hormuz – a critical global energy chokepoint through which roughly 20% of the world’s oil and LNG supplies pass – pushed Brent crude oil prices up 1.2% to a one-week high of $72.85 U.S. per barrel. The oil price surge also spilled over to gold markets, pulling gold prices down 0.8% to $4130 U.S. per ounce. That decline hit gold producers hard: Northern Star Resources dropped 5.10% to $20.66, Evolution Mining fell 5.31% to $11.94, and Newmont declined 2.43% to $137.61. Rare earths miner Lynas Rare Earths also closed 6.37% lower at $16.91, following its announcement of a $50 million ordinary equity investment in JS Link to support construction of a new magnet processing factory in Malaysia.

    Losses across the materials and mining space were partially offset by strong gains for Australia’s four largest retail banks. Commonwealth Bank of Australia rose 1.24% to $166.70, Westpac Banking Corporation surged 2.38% to $36.13, National Australia Bank jumped 1.47% to $39.22, and ANZ Group added 1.26% to $35.44.

    Beyond the energy market disruption, the ASX also faced downward pressure from broad weakness in overseas equity markets. U.S. futures traded in negative territory during Australian trading hours, with Nasdaq 100 futures down 0.7%. In South Korea, the tech-heavy KOSPI index plummeted 8% in early trading, triggering a 20-minute market-wide circuit breaker that halted all trading activity. The sell-off was sparked by unexpected investor reaction to Samsung Electronics’ quarterly results: even though the global tech giant projected a 19-fold jump in second-quarter operating profit, its share price still fell 8% on the day, dragging down broader market sentiment.

    Marc Jocum, senior product and investment strategist at Global X, noted that the domestic Australian economic calendar is unusually light this week, leaving local markets highly sensitive to offshore market developments. “That leaves the Australian share market vulnerable to every twist in the global narrative, whether it’s developments in the Middle East, Asian market volatility, or the resilience of the AI trade, with overseas headlines likely to matter more than domestic data over the coming days,” Jocum explained.

    Despite the overall market downturn, a number of individual stocks posted notable gains on Tuesday. Logistics technology firm WiseTech Global saw its shares soar 5.65% to $37.37, after billionaire founder Richard White announced he would step down from his role as executive chairman. White will retain a seat on the company’s board and will take up the new position of chief innovation officer. Media companies Nine Entertainment and Sky New Zealand both closed higher after announcing they had secured joint broadcast rights for both men’s and women’s NRL competitions from 2028 to 2034 for their respective home markets. Nine’s shares gained 0.50% to $0.92, while Sky New Zealand’s rallied 3.75% to $2.77. Wealth management firm Netwealth also climbed 6.73% to $24.43 after upgrading its forecast for funds under administration, projecting growth of between 17% and 30% by the 2027 financial year. Finally, casino operator Star Entertainment gained 1.05% to $0.096 after announcing it had settled a long-running tax dispute with the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) related to pre-2020 junket operations. As part of the settlement, Star will receive a $33 million refund from the $88 million it had previously paid to the tax office to resolve the dispute.

  • Deloitte forecasts weak economic growth not seen since 1990s recession

    Deloitte forecasts weak economic growth not seen since 1990s recession

    One of Australia’s big four accounting firms has delivered a grim new economic outlook, projecting the nation will enter an extended stretch of stagnant growth not seen since the deep recession of the early 1990s, with another interest rate increase coming this year and no rate cuts on the table until late 2027.

    In its monthly Business Outlook report released Tuesday, Deloitte Access Economics laid out a downbeat assessment that warns Australia’s economy will “limp” through the next two years of weak expansion, capping a slow-burn build-up of systemic vulnerabilities that have become impossible to ignore.

    “To date, 2026 has revealed the vulnerabilities that have developed within the Australian economy over recent history,” said Stephen Smith, partner at Deloitte Access Economics. “Australia is now structurally exposed in ways that have become hard to ignore. Deloitte Access Economics has rarely adopted such a downbeat assessment of the short-term outlook.”

    The firm’s projections call for the Reserve Bank of Australia to implement one final 25 basis point interest rate hike in August, as policymakers continue working to tamed persistent inflation. Following that increase, the central bank is expected to hold the cash rate steady for 12 full months, with the first rate cut not arriving until the final quarter of 2027.

    Inflation has proven far stickier than many analysts predicted: headline inflation currently sits at 4%, and Deloitte projects that rate may hold steady into 2027. Trimmed mean inflation, a key core measure tracked by the RBA, climbed to 3.6% in April, and the firm forecasts this metric will peak in early 2027 and will not drop below the RBA’s 2-3% target band until 2028.

    These persistent price pressures and rising interest rates will act as a major drag on national output, according to the report. Deloitte projects Australia will record annual growth below 2% for the next two full years, marking the longest continuous stretch of sub-2% expansion since the 1990-1991 recession. That downturn saw official interest rates hit 17% and unemployment surge to 2.5 times Australia’s current jobless rate.

    Australian households are already shouldering enormous pressure from cumulative rate hikes, with the average mortgage holder paying an extra $350 per month compared to pre-tightening levels. While recent policy and wage adjustments including tax cuts, nominal wage growth, and increases to award and minimum wages that took effect July 1 have offered some relief, Smith said most gains are being erased by persistent economic headwinds.

    “Renewed inflation pressure, high interest rates and volatile fuel costs were eating most of those gains,” Smith explained.

    Beyond domestic pressures, the report highlights deep structural vulnerabilities tied to Australia’s reliance on commodity exports. The ongoing conflict in the Middle East, Smith noted, serves as a sharp reminder that Australia, as a small open economy with a concentrated export base, is extremely vulnerable to global geopolitical disruption, swings in international demand, commodity price volatility, and disruptions to global trade routes.

    “The interaction of geopolitical exposure, weak productivity, stretched household balance sheets and a constrained supply side was easy to overlook when interest rates were low, commodity prices were high and population growth kept aggregate growth ticking along,” Smith said. “They are harder to dismiss now that inflation is sticky, investment needs are rising and the global environment is more uncertain.”

  • Australian motorists feel ‘gouged’ at the pump as fuel prices jump sharply

    Australian motorists feel ‘gouged’ at the pump as fuel prices jump sharply

    Australian drivers are already feeling significant financial strain at petrol pumps just days after the federal government halved the temporary fuel excise discount introduced to offset sky-high global fuel prices, new data and industry analysis confirms.

    Finder’s latest consumer research reveals that 79% of Australian motorists believe they are being overcharged by fuel retailers following the June 30 reduction of the total per-litre discount from 32 cents to 16 cents. Automobile advocacy group the NRMA has recorded dramatic price surges across New South Wales, with regular unleaded petrol in Sydney jumping 17 cents per litre to hit 164.4 cents in the week after the discount cut. Sydney diesel prices rose even faster, climbing 21.1 cents per litre to 182.2 cents.

    Worse price increases are on the horizon for drivers across the state, the NRMA’s fuel watch program warns. “Prices are expected to rise a further 3 cents per litre in Sydney over the next week or so,” the group said in its latest update. “Regional price increases in the order of at least 6 cents per litre will take longer to pass through to consumers, but the final size of the increase depends on when individual retailers replenish their stock.”

    The staggered rollback of the fuel excise cut is part of a policy response to geopolitical turbulence that roiled global energy markets earlier this year. The original 50% cut to fuel excise was introduced on March 30, following the outbreak of conflict between the United States and Iran that led to the temporary closure of the Strait of Hormuz — the critical global chokepoint through which 20% of the world’s daily energy supplies flow.

    The closure disrupted global oil and gas markets, pushing benchmark crude prices up to roughly $US120 per barrel before a fragile peace agreement calmed tensions. After the deal, oil prices retreated to near pre-conflict levels of around $US70 per barrel.

    The initial excise cut reduced fuel costs by 26.3% per litre, cutting the cost of filling a 50-litre tank by $16 and an 80-litre tank by $21 for Australian motorists. State governments later agreed to return excess GST revenue generated by the higher fuel prices to consumers, bringing the total combined discount to 32 cents per litre. Fuel prices briefly dropped to a five-year low nationwide as a result of the combined policy action.

    Starting July 1, the total discount was halved to 16 cents per litre as part of a planned gradual return to pre-conflict tax levels, which will be fully restored by August 2, 2026.

    Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers defended the gradual rollback, framing the extended partial discount as responsible cost-of-living support for households still grappling with broader inflationary pressure. “This extension of the fuel tax cut recognises there’s still a lot of uncertainty in the Middle East and the global economy more broadly, and our action provides a graduated return to normal settings for the fuel excise,” Chalmers said.

    “The additional relief we’re providing means that from 1 July, we’ll have more temporary help with the cost of living with this extension to the fuel tax cut, and more permanent help with the cost of living with another round of tax cuts for every taxpayer,” he added. “We thank the states and territories for contributing to the fuel tax cut.”

    Economics analysts note that Australian fuel prices are highly sensitive to shifts in global crude markets: according to financial services firm AMP, every $10 increase in global oil prices translates to an extra 10 cents per litre paid by consumers at Australian pumps.

    As prices climb, Australia’s competition regulator has moved to crack down on potential price gouging by fuel retailers. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) sent a formal warning letter to retailers late last week, reminding businesses they must not exploit the partial excise restoration to overcharge consumers at the pump.

    “We will closely examine fuel price movements and market behaviour, both in the lead-up to and following the increase in fuel excise,” ACCC Commissioner Anna Brakey said. “We will not hesitate to take action if retailers make false or misleading statements about price movements or if there is evidence of anti-competitive behaviour.”

  • AI chip boom lifts Samsung profits by 1,800%

    AI chip boom lifts Samsung profits by 1,800%

    South Korea’s flagship technology conglomerate Samsung Electronics has projected a staggering 19-fold surge in second-quarter profits, a remarkable gain fueled entirely by the red-hot global demand for artificial intelligence-focused memory chips, the company announced this week.

    The leading global smartphone and semiconductor manufacturer estimates its operating profit for the April-to-June period will hit 89 trillion won, equal to roughly $58 billion and £44 billion. This milestone marks three consecutive quarters of record-breaking operating profits for the firm, a streak unmatched in its recent corporate history.

    Like most major public companies based in South Korea, Samsung releases preliminary earnings guidance weeks ahead of its full, detailed financial report to give investors clear market context ahead of official results. Tuesday’s forecast drop, which comes ahead of the full results set to publish later this July, arrives amid a global semiconductor market defined by strained supply chains that have failed to keep pace with exploding AI-related demand, a mismatch that has driven chip prices steadily upward this year.

    Per Samsung’s guidance, the company pulled in approximately 171 trillion won in total revenue during the second quarter, more than twice the revenue recorded in the same period in 2025. Industry analyst Marc Einstein, who covers global semiconductor markets for Counterpoint Research, called the projected results one of the strongest quarterly performances ever recorded by a large tech firm, noting that it comes close to the all-time sector record set by chip designer Nvidia earlier this year.

    “This has everything to do with the AI boom as memory companies continue to ride a tidal wave driven by limited supply and unprecedented demand,” Einstein explained. In response to persistent tight supply, Samsung has already implemented multiple price hikes for its high-bandwidth memory chips, the core component required to power large language models and generative AI systems.

    As one of the world’s largest semiconductor producers, Samsung manufactures chips for major tech players including Nvidia and Google, in addition to producing its own full line of consumer electronics from smartphones to home appliances. The global AI boom has sent share prices for most leading chip manufacturers soaring in recent months: Samsung’s own market capitalization has more than doubled since the start of 2026, while its South Korean competitor SK Hynix has seen its share price jump more than 200% over the same period.

    Even with the blockbuster profit forecast, Samsung’s shares dipped roughly 4% on the Seoul stock exchange during Tuesday morning trading. Despite this single-day dip, the strong momentum from Samsung and SK Hynix has lifted South Korea’s benchmark Kospi index by more than 80% so far this year.

    The current chip boom follows a similar trend set by Nvidia earlier this year: in May, the AI chip leader reported record quarterly sales and profits that pushed first-quarter revenue past the $80 billion mark. Yet Nvidia’s share price also dropped following that strong report, a movement many analysts attributed to growing investor anxiety over rising competition in the fast-growing AI chip sector.

    To capitalize on this sustained demand, the South Korean government unveiled an $880 billion national investment plan in June led by Samsung and SK Hynix, designed to massively expand the country’s domestic chip manufacturing capacity over the coming decade. The massive South Korean push is part of a broader global trend: rival chip producers across Japan, China and Taiwan have also announced billions in new factory investments to meet the continuing surge in global AI chip demand.

  • Can China repeat its EV success with robotaxis?

    Can China repeat its EV success with robotaxis?

    Across multiple major Chinese cities, driverless robotaxis are no longer a distant vision of the future — they are already weaving through daily commuter traffic. In Beijing’s high-tech Yizhuang district, these steering-wheel-empty vehicles share asphalt roads with traditional human-driven cars, while autonomous delivery vans cruise dedicated lanes moving packages to pickup hubs across the area. The district has emerged as one of China’s flagship testing and commercialization zones for autonomous driving technology, with domestic industry leaders including Baidu, WeRide, and Pony.ai already offering paid commercial robotaxi rides within clearly demarcated zones. Booking a service takes just a few taps on a mobile app; within minutes, an uncrewed vehicle arrives, and after confirming the destination on an in-car touchscreen, it smoothly merges into Beijing’s dense, chaotic mix of buses, cyclists, electric scooters, and pedestrians, navigating varied hazards with surprising confidence. The underlying technology is still maturing, but one pressing question is already at the forefront of global industry discussion: can Chinese firms replicate the success they achieved in electric vehicles, and turn robotaxis into another globally dominant sector?

    Chinese autonomous vehicle developers already hold a critical structural advantage: the sprawling industrial ecosystem that turned China into the world’s largest EV market, which now overlaps directly with self-driving technology. Unlike Tesla, which develops most of its autonomous driving hardware and software in-house, China’s self-driving sector is built on an interconnected network of specialized suppliers and manufacturers. Established domestic automakers such as BYD, Chery, Geely, and SAIC build the base vehicles, while dedicated technology firms develop and refine the autonomous driving software. Critically, autonomous vehicles rely on most of the same core components as electric cars: batteries, sensors, processing chips, and onboard computing hardware. Since these supply chains already operate at massive, proven scale in China, companies can iterate on technology far faster and at much lower development costs than many global competitors. “What you see is a pace of innovation and adaptation in the Chinese EV industry that I don’t think is matched anywhere else around the world,” explained Kyle Chan, a foreign policy fellow at the Brookings Institution. “China’s EV capacity doesn’t just stop there. It actually spills over into other related industries through something that I call these overlapping tech industrial ecosystems.”

    Supportive government policy has also accelerated the rollout. National and local governments have rolled out pilot programs across dozens of cities that allow companies to test fully driverless vehicles on public roads, creating the space for real-world refinement beyond closed testing tracks. China also offers an unrivaled training ground for autonomous algorithms: extremely diverse and complex real-world driving conditions. A single trip through a major Chinese city can expose a self-driving system to everything from jaywalking pedestrians to illegally parked scooters, mixed-traffic buses, and unpredictable last-minute maneuvers from other road users. “The traffic environment here in China is very complex,” Maeve Zhang, chief marketing officer at WeRide, told the BBC. This variety of road scenarios generates massive volumes of unique driving data that developers use to refine and improve their software at an accelerated rate.

    While China-based driving data is a major asset, companies face significant hurdles when planning rapid expansion into overseas markets, each with their own unique environmental challenges that domestic data cannot fully prepare systems for. “In the Middle East, the temperature is very high. In South East Asia, there is heavy rain… and in Switzerland, winter temperatures can be very, very low,” Zhang notes. Extreme heat and cold can degrade battery performance and reduce component lifespan, while heavy precipitation, fog, and snow interfere with the cameras and lidar sensors that autonomous systems depend on to detect surrounding obstacles.

    Robotaxis are just one pillar of China’s broader autonomous driving ambitions. QCraft, another major domestic player, is adapting its autonomous software for passenger cars, public transit buses, and last-mile delivery vehicles. The company reports its autonomous buses are already operating in more than 20 Chinese cities, and it is actively expanding into international markets. “It’s very promising on the technology side that maybe the next five, seven, at most 10 years, it will get into everybody’s life,” said James Yu, QCraft’s chairman and chief executive.

    Chinese companies are already expanding globally at a rapid pace, and their primary commercial rivals remain based in the United States. Waymo, Alphabet’s standalone robotaxi division, still holds the position of global commercial leader, operating paid fully driverless services in multiple U.S. cities. Amazon-owned Zoox and Tesla are moving forward with development far more cautiously, while Uber abandoned in-house autonomous vehicle development years ago, after a fatal 2018 testing crash derailed the program. Today, both Uber and its U.S. ride-hailing rival Lyft are actively partnering with Chinese autonomous driving firms to bring driverless services to their platforms. This partnership model gives U.S. ride-hailing firms immediate “access to millions of customers that they wouldn’t have if they created their own app,” explained Tu Le, founder of automotive industry consultancy Sino Auto Insights. “Through these partnerships, they’re able to commercialise and broaden their scope.”

    Despite Chinese firms’ advantages in low-cost manufacturing, Waymo has spent years building out mature customer service systems and app infrastructure that many newer competitors have not yet matched. “Having experienced Waymo and the WeRides and the Ponys… I would have to say the user experience for Waymo is much better than all the other competitors. I feel like Waymo is really becoming a standard mode of transportation for California,” Le noted.

    Public and political perceptions of driverless technology also differ sharply across global markets. In the U.S., labor unions have raised widespread alarms that mass deployment of robotaxis could displace hundreds of thousands of workers in taxi, delivery, and freight industries. In China, policymakers frame wide-scale automation as a solution to the country’s shrinking working-age population, but broad public discussion of potential downsides is limited by government censorship of dissenting views, making it difficult to accurately measure broader public opinion. Chinese President Xi Jinping has positioned AI and robotics as core components of the country’s push to develop “new quality productive forces” that will create high-skilled jobs and drive long-term economic growth, giving companies strong policy and financial incentives to invest heavily in autonomous driving development.

    Proponents of the technology argue that widespread robotaxi adoption could deliver major public benefits, particularly for underserved groups. “If we can bring the cost down for a robotaxi ride so that it’s as cheap – or maybe even cheaper – than hailing an Uber with a normal driver, then it really helps broaden mobility,” Le said. “Elderly folks, folks that are disabled – these robotaxis really allow them a lot more ability to travel.”

    Even with these potential benefits, widespread public and regulatory acceptance faces major headwinds, particularly around safety concerns. Earlier this year, a software glitch in Baidu’s Apollo Go robotaxi service left roughly 100 uncrewed vehicles stranded across Wuhan, with some passengers reporting they were trapped inside after doors automatically locked following the malfunction. Baidu suspended services in the city for several weeks, though the company says it remains on track to launch commercial service in the United Kingdom later this year. The incident underscored how high-profile technical failures can quickly erode public trust in the technology, mirroring similar issues that have derailed autonomous driving projects elsewhere. General Motors shuttered its Cruise robotaxi division last year to refocus its autonomous development efforts on personal consumer vehicles, after California regulators suspended Cruise’s operating permit in 2023 following a crash where one of its robotaxis dragged a pedestrian several meters after she was first struck by a human-driven vehicle.

    These challenges have led many analysts to argue that robotaxis will be far harder to export globally than electric vehicles. Deploying a commercial robotaxi network requires far more than building a capable vehicle: developers must navigate complex local regulatory approval processes, build high-resolution local road maps, establish on-the-ground local operation and maintenance teams, and win sustained public trust — all hurdles that even well-established U.S. firms have struggled to overcome. Chinese companies also face growing geopolitical barriers to global expansion. Unlike traditional electric vehicles, robotaxis continuously collect large volumes of mapping, location, and visual road data, which makes them a target for national security concerns in many overseas markets that are wary of Chinese-based technology firms accessing sensitive geographic information.

    Despite these well-documented challenges, industry leaders remain optimistic that regulatory attitudes are shifting in favor of autonomous driving. “We see very positive attitudes and very good policies and regulations coming out from governments both here in China and in some other international markets,” Zhang said.

    For Brookings’ Chan, the global race to commercialize robotaxis represents far more than just the arrival of a new transportation option. “China is trying to create this sort of high-tech economy that’s digitally connected, that’s AI-powered, and that builds on its existing strengths today in batteries, EVs, motors and other related technology,” he explained.