作者: admin

  • She was told her missing fiance was killed in Gaza. A year later, he returned alive

    She was told her missing fiance was killed in Gaza. A year later, he returned alive

    It has been nearly a year since 23-year-old Hamada al-Banna stepped toward Israeli aid convoys near Zikim in northern Gaza, chasing a single sack of wheat flour to feed his family amid widespread starvation. What followed was a nightmare of forced disappearance, torture, and a long, agonizing separation that tested the unbreakable resolve of his 18-year-old fiancee, Reem Jadallah. Today, after months of false news and abandoned searches, their bittersweet reunion has cast a harsh light on the growing crisis of forcibly disappeared Palestinians in Israel’s ongoing campaign in Gaza.

    On August 9, 2025, Banna set out for Zikim alongside his brother Adham, joining thousands of desperate Gazans who risk their lives to access limited humanitarian aid amid crippling food shortages. After securing his sack of flour, Banna learned Adham had been killed by Israeli forces. Dropping his flour to search for his brother, he unknowingly wandered close to an Israeli military outpost. Troops opened fire, a shell exploded, hurling him 10 meters through the air, and he woke with severe leg and chest wounds, with no memory of who he was or how he had arrived.

    In an account shared exclusively with Middle East Eye, Banna described waking from a six-month coma in Israel’s Soroka Hospital, suffering from profound amnesia. As his memory slowly returned, a soldier entered his room and began verbally abusing Banna’s mother. Enraged, Banna threw his IV bag at the soldier, triggering a violent assault that ended with his transfer to Sde Teiman, the notoriously abusive Israeli prison widely condemned for the mistreatment of Palestinian detainees.

    For four months, Banna was held in solitary confinement, where he endured systematic torture at the hands of Israeli prison guards. “They would suddenly enter my cell and beat me brutally for no reason. They sprayed me with pepper spray, beat my genitals, and threw stun grenades into my cell,” he recalled. On one occasion, he was held for six straight days in what Palestinian detainees call a “disco room”: a purpose-built space where prisoners are subjected to constant, deafening noise designed to break mental and physical resilience through extreme sleep deprivation and psychological torture.

    While Banna was held incommunicado, his family in Gaza held out little hope of finding him alive. After months of no contact, Israeli authorities incorrectly notified the family that Banna had been killed while in custody, a death officially attributed to torture. For most of the family, the search ended there. But Jadallah refused to accept the news.

    The couple had met after both their families were displaced from northern Gaza to a shared shelter in Gaza City, as Israeli attacks intensified across the enclave. Banna had proposed to Jadallah shortly before he disappeared, and the pair had been preparing for their wedding, lost when their planned home was destroyed in the conflict. When Banna failed to return from his trip for flour, Jadallah began what would become a months-long search against all odds.

    Across the Gaza Strip, Banna’s case is far from unique. According to the Palestinian Centre for the Missing and the Forcibly Disappeared (PCMFD), roughly 8,000 Palestinians have been registered as missing since Israel launched its military campaign in Gaza in October 2023, including nearly 2,900 children. While most are believed killed and buried under rubble from Israeli airstrikes and ground operations, hundreds are suspected of being secretly detained by Israeli forces during incursions, at checkpoints, or while seeking aid near Israeli military zones. Israeli authorities have routinely blocked access to information about detained Palestinians, even refusing requests from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to confirm their whereabouts or conditions.

    Jadallah held onto the one clue that Banna might still be alive: Israeli legal aid group HaMoked confirmed he was in Israeli custody, but refused to share additional details without a privately hired lawyer. Unable to afford legal fees, Jadallah made the painful decision to sell all of her gold, the only valuable asset she owned, to secure legal representation. Months later, her lawyer returned with the devastating false confirmation that Banna was dead, listed on an official registry of prisoners killed in custody in February 2025.

    While the rest of Banna’s family abandoned their search, Jadallah pressed on alone. “Everyone kept telling me to give up hope, but I never did. Deep inside, I always felt that he was still alive,” she told Middle East Eye. For months, she visited every hospital in Gaza, checking newly arrived bodies to confirm it was not Banna. Every time a group of Palestinian detainees was released by Israel, she brought Banna’s photo to the release site, asking every freed prisoner if they had seen him. Because Banna had spent most of his detention in a hospital and then solitary confinement, no one had seen him – but still, she did not stop.

    Her unwavering hope finally paid off on July 7, when the ICRC called Banna’s family with an unexpected message: Banna was alive, and had just been released from Israeli custody. He was calling from an ICRC phone to confirm he was coming home. “When his family called to tell me, I was in complete shock. I started laughing. I said, ‘I don’t understand. What do you mean?’” Jadallah said. “I couldn’t believe it. I was afraid to believe it because I thought it might be another false piece of news. I didn’t truly believe it until I saw his photograph with the released prisoners.”

    When Jadallah rushed to meet her fiance, she found he had already been asking everyone around him to bring his fiancee to him. But the reunion, while joyful, quickly revealed the deep scars left by a year of abuse. “The Hamada who came out of prison was not the same person I had been waiting for all this time,” Jadallah said. “I noticed how much he had changed. Sometimes, in the middle of a conversation, he suddenly stares into space and begins reliving memories of his detention. He has become irritable, and even the slightest sound bothers him.”

    The trauma of his detention shapes every part of Banna’s daily life even after release. He cannot sleep lying down, as most people do; he only sleeps sitting upright, a habit forced on him by his prison conditions. He eats barely any food, his body accustomed to the tiny rations provided to him in detention. The couple’s planned wedding, scheduled just before Banna’s disappearance, has been postponed indefinitely: all of their savings, their furnished home, and the wedding preparations were destroyed in the conflict. For Jadallah, however, none of that loss matters compared to getting Banna back alive. “We lost everything, but I got him back. That is what matters most,” she said.

  • Neither France nor Spain has trailed at this year’s World Cup, but only one can reach the final

    Neither France nor Spain has trailed at this year’s World Cup, but only one can reach the final

    ARLINGTON, Texas — As the 2026 FIFA World Cup enters its final stretch, two of the tournament’s most in-form sides prepare to face off in the first semifinal clash on Tuesday, with only one earning a spot in the sport’s biggest championship match.

    Both France and Spain are making their 17th World Cup appearances, but this will mark just their second ever meeting on soccer’s global grandest stage, with their only prior matchup coming in the 2006 World Cup round of 16. Tuesday’s showdown will kick off at AT&T Stadium, the home of the NFL’s Dallas Cowboys, bringing together two powerhouse teams stacked with generational talent and momentum heading into the contest.

    Entering the tournament as the world’s top-ranked side per FIFA, France has dominated its path to the semifinals, outscoring all opponents by a combined 14-2 margin. Leading the charge is 27-year-old Kylian Mbappé, the 2022 World Cup Golden Boot winner, who has already netted eight goals in this tournament — tying him with Argentina’s Lionel Messi for the tournament’s scoring lead. Mbappé now sits just one goal behind Messi’s all-time World Cup career record of 21, holding 20 goals across just 20 World Cup matches dating back to his historic 2018 performance, when he became just the second teenager ever (after Pele) to score in a World Cup final during France’s title-winning run against Croatia.

    Questions briefly emerged over Mbappé’s fitness after he was substituted off in the 77th minute of France’s 2-0 quarterfinal victory over Morocco, immediately after scoring the side’s opening goal, but the French star has confirmed he is fully fit and ready to compete. The match will hold extra symbolic meaning for France, as it falls on Bastille Day, the country’s national holiday. A win would also make French football history: Didier Deschamps’ side would join Brazil (five-time champions) and Germany (four-time champions) as the only nations to qualify for three consecutive World Cup finals, a feat last achieved by Brazil between 1994 and 2002, and by West Germany ahead of its 1990 title win.

    Standing in France’s path is a Spain side that, like France, has yet to trail at any point in this tournament. Leading La Roja’s young core is 19-year-old winger Lamine Yamal, who celebrated his birthday on Monday, and already has two prior head-to-head wins over France to his name. Just days before his 17th birthday, Yamal scored in Spain’s 2-1 semifinal win over France at the 2024 European Championship, and the Spanish side earned another victory over Les Blues in Nations League play last year. Confident heading into the rematch, Yamal made his stance clear after Spain’s quarterfinal win over Belgium: “I believe if France has to fear anyone, it should be us, in my opinion. We were the ones that knocked them out before.”

    Yamal entered the World Cup recovering from a nagging left hamstring injury that forced him to miss the final weeks of the Barcelona club season, but he has still notched one goal and put 10 shots on target through Spain’s run to the semifinals. Spain’s path has been defined by more than just Yamal’s young stardom: substitute striker Mikel Merino has emerged as the side’s unlikely clutch hero, netting late winning goals in both of La Roja’s last two knockout matches. The Arsenal forward scored in the first minute of second-half stoppage time to secure a 1-0 round of 16 win over Portugal at AT&T Stadium, and followed that up with an 88th-minute match-winner in the 2-1 quarterfinal defeat of Belgium.

    Spain’s defense and goaltending have also been historically impressive, with keeper Unai Simón setting a new World Cup record for the longest shutout streak at 650 minutes, which only ended when Belgium found the net in the 41st minute of the quarterfinal. Overall, Spain has outscored opponents 10-1 through the tournament, after a surprising opening-group scoreless draw against underdog Cape Verde.

    This 2026 World Cup marks the first time since 1990 that all four semifinalists are former World Cup champions. The second semifinal will take place Wednesday in Atlanta, where 2022 champion Argentina led by Messi faces off against England. The championship match is scheduled for Sunday at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey, while the third-place match will be held this Saturday in Miami Gardens, Florida.

    Looking back at prior history between the two sides: their only World Cup meeting was a 3-1 France win in the 2006 round of 16 in Germany. Both nations have lifted the trophy since that matchup: Spain claimed its first (and to date only) World Cup title in 2010, while France won its second trophy in 2018. France is making its seventh semifinal appearance, its fifth in the last eight World Cup tournaments, while Spain has only reached the semifinal stage twice before, in 1950 and during its 2010 title run.

    Tuesday’s match will be the ninth 2026 World Cup contest held at AT&T Stadium, more than any other venue in this expanded 48-team tournament. The North Texas arena, which has previously hosted a Super Bowl and NCAA championships for college football and men’s basketball, has already seen no shortage of iconic moments during this month-long tournament: Messi broke the all-time World Cup career scoring record here in a group stage win over Austria, while 41-year-old Portuguese legend Cristiano Ronaldo played what is widely expected to be his final World Cup match here in Spain’s 1-0 round of 16 win.

  • Xabi Alonso moves fast at Chelsea, holding private talks with Enzo Fernandez

    Xabi Alonso moves fast at Chelsea, holding private talks with Enzo Fernandez

    LONDON – Fresh off officially stepping into the role at Chelsea on July 1 following his May appointment, new Blues head coach Xabi Alonso opened up about his plans, squad priorities, and season goals during his first official press conference at Stamford Bridge on Monday.

    One of the biggest questions hovering over Chelsea’s summer rebuild has surrounded the future of Argentine midfielder Enzo Fernandez, whose position at the club has been uncertain for months. The playmaker landed an internal two-game suspension back in April after he commented in a podcast that he would welcome the chance to live in Madrid, which fueled widespread speculation of an imminent transfer to Spanish giants Real Madrid. Real Madrid has publicly denied any interest in acquiring Fernandez this transfer window, but the uncertainty around his future has lingered.

    When pressed on whether he wants Fernandez to stay at Stamford Bridge, Alonso gave a clear, direct answer: “Yes.” The new manager confirmed that the pair have already held private conversations, but declined to share details of their discussion, noting that the talks will remain confidential.

    Currently, Fernandez is not with the Chelsea squad for pre-season preparations – he is competing at the 2025 Club World Cup (note: context adjusted for ongoing tournament timing) with Argentina, who are set to face England in a semi-final clash in Atlanta on Wednesday. He is one of four Chelsea players still active in the tournament, joining England defenders Reece James and Trevoh Chalobah, and France full-back Malo Gusto.

    Alonso’s appointment comes after a brutal 2023/24 Premier League campaign for Chelsea, which saw the club plummet to 10th place in the table after finishing fourth the season prior. This poor result marked another underwhelming campaign for the Blues, who have not lifted the Premier League title since Antonio Conte led them to victory in 2017. In fact, Alonso is the eighth permanent manager the club has appointed in the eight years since that 2017 triumph, a stark reflection of the club’s recent instability in the dugout.

    When asked about his primary targets for the upcoming season, the 44-year-old Spaniard – who previously managed Bayer Leverkusen and played and coached at Real Madrid – confirmed that qualifying for European competition is a non-negotiable top goal. “For sure that’s a goal,” he said. “But to reach that goal you need to do many right things, and that starts with building clarity around how we want to play, how we want to see ourselves, and how we want to approach every single game, no matter where we play.”

    “That’s my job. That’s why I am really looking forward to having the whole squad back together. We are ambitious, and everyone at Chelsea needs to share that energy, that ambition, as well as that hunger to want to deliver success,” he added.

    Questions around long-term job security, a persistent issue for recent Chelsea managers, were put to Alonso during the press conference. He side-stepped speculation around whether the club’s ownership would grant him enough time to build a title-challenging side, instead focusing on the immediate task ahead. “What I am sure is that we have the ambition to want to win a lot of games, to be competitive,” he said. “I’m not going to say what will happen in May. It’s absolutely too early to say that but I am confident, I am optimistic that we can have a great season.”

  • Israeli government funnels millions of shekels to sanctioned settlement group

    Israeli government funnels millions of shekels to sanctioned settlement group

    Israeli media has broken news of a controversial planned funding transfer: Israel’s Ministry of National Security, led by far-right politician Itamar Ben Gvir, is set to disburse 4 million shekels, equivalent to roughly $1.31 million, to Ahavat Gilad — an organization already sanctioned by multiple Western governments for its ties to illegal settler activity in the occupied West Bank.

    The group was placed on sanctions lists in June this year by France, the United Kingdom, Canada, Norway, Australia and New Zealand. The international sanctions came after investigations confirmed Ahavat Gilad played a key role in enabling and funding a sharp rise in violent attacks by Israeli settlers against Palestinian communities in the occupied territory. Specifically, the organization was found to channel donations from the Farms Union, a body that provides financial and logistical support to settler agricultural operations, directly to unauthorised, illegal settler outposts that are established outside of Israeli government-approved boundaries.

    According to documents obtained by Israeli newspaper Haaretz, which were submitted to relevant bodies by the Ministry of National Security, the allocated funding is officially framed as a resource to “reduce incidents of violence” and build “a network of mentors to accompany youth staying on farms throughout Judea and Samaria” — the Israeli term for the occupied West Bank. The 4 million shekel sum will be distributed over an 18-month period, with a built-in option to extend the funding agreement if the ministry chooses to do so.

    This controversial funding move follows the Israeli government’s approval of a “national plan” in May, launched to address what officials described as a “negative phenomenon among youth” in the occupied West Bank. The announcement of the plan came as the country has faced growing international pressure to rein in the escalating wave of settler violence targeting Palestinian civilians and property. The national plan itself was officially designed to “prevent youths from entering cycles of violence”, according to official documents.

    Per the ministry’s paperwork, Ahavat Gilad was selected as the recipient of public funds specifically because of its deep existing connections to “farmers, the army, the police and government ministries” operating in the West Bank. In a statement justifying the selection, the ministry argued that “providing an effective response to the youth requires relying on ‘responsible adults’ who come from the field, are figures familiar to the youth, share their living space with them and hold their trust”.

    The ministry added that the initiative is intended to build a “professional system” that aligns on-the-ground conditions in the West Bank with the policy priorities of the National Security Ministry, a step it says is necessary “to ensure effective prevention” of youth violence.

    Responding to Haaretz’s reporting on the funding allocation, the ministry pushed back against criticism. It stated: “It is very unfortunate that instead of praising the ministry for leading the move to reduce and prevent violence and risky behaviors among youth, Haaretz newspaper (which ironically would have attacked the ministry if such a plan had not been implemented at all) chooses to rely on baseless claims by anti-Israel elements”.

  • Pro-Palestine activist Fergie Chambers arrested in Spain after US extradition request

    Pro-Palestine activist Fergie Chambers arrested in Spain after US extradition request

    In a high-profile arrest that has reignited debates over political activism and the criminalization of pro-Palestinian speech, American activist and Cox family fortune heir Fergie Chambers has been taken into custody in Spain’s Ibiza at the request of U.S. law enforcement, which accuses him of money laundering, conspiracy, and riot-related charges tied to his support for pro-Palestinian direct action.

    The arrest unfolded at approximately 10:45 a.m. Friday in Ibiza’s quiet, secluded Morna Valley, according to eyewitness accounts obtained by Middle East Eye. As Chambers pulled into a private driveway, a black SUV blocked his path, with two additional unmarked vehicles quickly surrounding the area. Seven Spanish law enforcement officers — five men and two women — displayed official badges, detained the activist, cuffed him, and notified him he was being held under an active international arrest warrant issued at the U.S. government’s request. Later that same day, Chambers appeared before a local Spanish judge, who ordered him held without bail as extradition proceedings move forward.

    Over the past decade, Chambers has become one of the most high-profile private backers of pro-Palestinian direct action across the United States and United Kingdom, drawing on his nine-figure inherited fortune to fund activist groups, legal defense funds, bail funds, and grassroots campaigns. Most notably, he is the founder and primary financial backer of Unity of Fields, which previously operated under the name Palestine Action US. Significantly, the group does not appear on the U.S. State Department’s Foreign Terrorist Organizations list, nor has it been designated a Specially Designated Global Terrorist entity by U.S. regulators.

    The 15-count U.S. indictment lays out allegations centered on a supposed coordinated campaign Chambers led between October 2023 and April 2025 to disrupt operations at Elbit Systems of America, an Israeli defense contractor that supplies military equipment to the Israeli armed forces. Prosecutors claim Chambers transferred roughly $7.5 million out of the United States after he left the country in 2023, alleging the funds were intended to provide material support to Hamas. Additional charges include conspiracy to riot, riot itself, and international money laundering. If extradited to the U.S. and convicted on the lead money laundering charge, Chambers faces a maximum sentence of 20 years behind bars.

    Prosecutors further allege that Chambers’ personal credit card was used to purchase 18 colored smoke bombs, heavy-duty U-locks, chains, and cables ahead of a direct action protest at an Elbit facility, and that he covered costs for paint and other protest equipment. The indictment also cites a public YouTube interview from October 23, 2023, in which Chambers stated, “We are going to disrupt business and we are going to disrupt business constantly and we are going to use any means that we need to get that point across… I’m very hopeful that we can mount a successful campaign to start shutting down Elbit centres in all of the different states where they’re located.”

    Chambers’ associates and supporters have universally denounced the arrest as a politically motivated act of repression, explicitly framing it as a targeted attack by the Trump administration against a prominent voice for Palestinian human rights. In a statement following the detention, they argued, “This extradition is part of a much broader campaign to suppress global movements for emancipation and liberation, particularly those expressing solidarity with people in the formerly colonised world. Fergie has dedicated significant resources to humanitarian causes, human rights, justice and dignity, and this prosecution is another manifestation of that wider effort to intimidate and silence political activism.”

    Chambers has long been open about his political beliefs, describing himself as a supporter of anti-colonial resistance and universal self-determination, principles he says anchor all his activist work. Long before his current legal troubles, he covered legal fees and bail for UK-based Palestine Action activists who conducted direct action against Elbit Systems sites. The UK’s Labour government implemented a controversial move in July 2025 to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organization under British law, placing the group in the same legal category as the so-called Islamic State. The ban drew widespread condemnation from global human rights groups, including Amnesty International, which warned that the designation effectively criminalizes peaceful pro-Palestinian protest. Since the ban took effect, more than 3,300 people across the UK have been arrested for publicly expressing support for Palestine Action, a crackdown campaigners describe as one of the largest sustained targets of civil disobedience in modern British history. In a separate high-profile case earlier this year, four Palestine Action activists received prison sentences ranging from four years and eight months to seven years and eight months after a judge ruled that property damage at an Elbit factory carried a “terrorist connection.”

    Beyond his work supporting pro-Palestinian causes, Chambers, a self-identified Marxist-Leninist, has a long history of involvement in domestic U.S. protest movements. When he learned his own family’s company had donated to Atlanta’s controversial Public Safety Training Center — widely known to opponents as “Cop City” — he redirected a portion of his wealth to fund bail and legal defense for protesters opposing the facility. He also participated in the 2014 Black Lives Matter uprisings following the police killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, and joined the 2017 Standing Rock protests opposing the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

    As of the latest updates, Chambers remains in custody at a jail on Ibiza, where people close to him say poor detention conditions are taking a toll. “He’s in jail. It’s very hot. There’s no fan, no books and he has no spare clothes,” a person who has been in contact with Chambers since his arrest told reporters, noting he is currently sharing a cell with one other inmate.

    The case is currently being processed by Spain’s Audiencia Nacional, the national court that handles all international extradition requests. As of publication, requests for comment on the status of proceedings, upcoming hearing dates, and the bail ruling have gone unanswered. The U.S. Department of Justice has also not responded to requests for comment on the case.

  • Hungary MPs pass constitutional tweak to oust Orban-allied president

    Hungary MPs pass constitutional tweak to oust Orban-allied president

    In a major shakeup of Hungary’s post-Orban political landscape, the country’s national parliament passed a constitutional amendment Monday that clears the way for the removal of President Tamas Sulyok, a close ally of long-serving nationalist former Prime Minister Viktor Orban. The vote comes as new Prime Minister Peter Magyar, who took office after a landslide electoral victory in April, follows through on his core campaign pledge to dismantle the power structure Orban built over 16 years of what he called ‘illiberal’ rule.

    Magyar, who leads the pro-European conservative Tisza party, has repeatedly framed Sulyok as one of Orban’s unelected ‘puppets’ holding onto power from the previous regime, arguing the 70-year-old president is unfit to serve in the new government. Tisza holds a two-thirds supermajority in parliament, giving the party enough votes to unilaterally amend the constitution without support from opposition factions. The final vote saw 139 lawmakers back the amendment and only six vote against it, after which Tisza legislators held a brief 30-second standing ovation to mark the moment.

    Following the vote, Magyar declared that his administration had completed the first major step of dismantling the constitutional framework put in place by the Orban regime. Now, all attention turns to Sulyok, who has five days to either resign voluntarily or sign the amendment into force. Magyar has made clear there is no middle ground: if Sulyok fails to act within the deadline, impeachment proceedings will immediately be launched in parliament. Legal experts note that while the Hungarian presidency carries largely ceremonial duties, Sulyok holds the power to veto legislation and refer bills to the constitutional court — though he cannot block a constitutional amendment. Still, political analysts warn a refusal to step down could trigger a unprecedented constitutional crisis in the central European nation.

    Sulyok has pushed back against the move, accusing Magyar of spreading false information to manipulate public opinion. Orban’s Fidesz party, the long-ruling opposition faction, boycotted the entire parliamentary session to protest the amendment, labeling the 12-point reform package ‘autocratic’ — an accusation that was frequently leveled against Orban during his time in office. In a Facebook post published Monday, Orban, who was out of the country attending the FIFA World Cup in the United States ahead of the vote, warned that setting this precedent puts every public figure at risk: ‘Today they’re targeting the president, but tomorrow they could do the same to anyone.’

    The measure has also drawn criticism from international human rights watchdogs. Amnesty International has argued that Sulyok is guaranteed the right to due process, while Human Rights Watch said the rushed constitutional amendment is eerily reminiscent of the power-grabbing tactics Fidesz employed during its time in government. Yet the move enjoys broad popular support: a May 2025 poll conducted by the 21 Research Center found that 67 percent of Hungarian voters support Sulyok’s removal from office.

    Some domestic legal figures have defended Magyar’s approach, even as they acknowledge the extraordinary nature of the measure. Andras Baka, a former chief justice of Hungary’s Supreme Court, whose own term was cut short by similar legislative action in 2011 after he spoke out against Fidesz’s judicial reforms, told reporters that the tactics are justified if they lead to the establishment of a new, rights-respecting constitutional order. ‘In a country properly governed by the rule of law, such extraordinary measures cannot be used, but Hungary became a captured state under Orban,’ Baka explained.

    Beyond removing Sulyok, the constitutional amendment includes several other sweeping changes. It introduces a 12-year cumulative term limit, capped at three terms, for all members of parliament, a change that will bar multiple high-profile opposition politicians — including senior Fidesz lawmaker Gergely Gulyas, who resigned his post as parliamentary party leader in protest this week, from running for re-election in 2030. The amendment also establishes a new National Asset Recovery and Protection Office, which will be granted broad investigative and enforcement powers to root out the systemic corruption that human rights groups and international observers have described as endemic during Orban’s tenure.

    Magyar reaffirmed his long-term plan after the amendment passed: the government will launch a nationwide public consultation process to draft an entirely new national constitution, one that he says will be built with input from as broad a cross-section of Hungarian society as possible, fulfilling another core campaign promise to break fully with the Orban era.

  • Hungary passes constitutional amendment to remove Orbán-era president

    Hungary passes constitutional amendment to remove Orbán-era president

    In a historic parliamentary vote that marks the most significant shift in Hungarian politics in nearly two decades, Hungary’s 199-member national legislature approved a sweeping constitutional amendment on Monday to remove incumbent President Tamás Sulyok from office and advance a slate of political reforms designed to unwind the autocratic political system built by longtime former Prime Minister Viktor Orbán.

    The measure passed with overwhelming support, tallying 139 votes in favor and just six opposed. The outcome was all but guaranteed after current Prime Minister Péter Magyar’s pro-European center-right Tisza party secured a two-thirds parliamentary supermajority in an April landslide election, a mandate that gives the party full power to rewrite the country’s constitution and roll back 16 years of Orbán-era policy. Following the vote announcement, Tisza lawmakers erupted in a standing ovation, while all members of Orbán’s far-right Fidesz party boycotted the entire legislative session in protest.

    Under Hungarian legislative rules, Sulyok — an appointee of the previous Orbán administration — has five days to sign the amendment into law. He has not yet publicly stated whether he will comply with the parliament’s decision, but Tisza leadership has already vowed to initiate impeachment proceedings against the sitting president if he refuses to sign. Magyar has long argued that Sulyok failed to uphold his constitutional duty as head of state by refusing to check Orbán government’s antidemocratic overreach during his tenure. Removing Sulyok was a central campaign promise for Magyar, and the prime minister has framed his party’s landslide election win as a clear voter mandate to follow through on that pledge. Sulyok has repeatedly rejected calls to resign voluntarily.

    In a post-vote press conference, Magyar framed the amendment’s passage as a pivotal turning point for Hungarian democracy. “With this vote today, we have closed an era,” he said, confirming that the new government had formally “started the transformation of the Orbán legal system.” Beyond removing Sulyok — which clears the way for parliament to elect a new head of state aligned with the current government’s agenda — the amendment includes a package of structural reforms: it introduces new judicial oversight, establishes a special anti-corruption body tasked with investigating financial misconduct during the Orbán administration, and imposes a 12-year cumulative term limit for members of parliament.

    Fidesz has decried the amendment as an “unprecedented” attack on Hungary’s democratic foundations. Last week, the party organized a public protest against the changes that drew roughly 3,000 attendees, though Orbán himself did not make an appearance at the rally. On the day of the vote, Orbán shared a provocative post to his Facebook page featuring a photo of Magyar with the ominous subtitle “Democratic Hungary: 1990-2026,” referencing the timeline of Hungary’s post-communist transition. The former prime minister was traveling to the United States on Monday to attend the final three matches of the World Cup, and has made limited public comments on the legislative push since the election.

    While Hungary’s presidency is largely a ceremonial role, the position holds key constitutional powers: the president is responsible for signing all parliamentary legislation into law and can send passed bills to the Constitutional Court for judicial review. Tisza supporters have long raised concerns that Sulyok could use these powers to systematically block the new government’s reform agenda, making his removal a critical early priority for the administration.

    Since taking office in May, Magyar’s government has moved rapidly to dismantle what the prime minister has labeled Orbán’s “mafia state,” removing dozens of political appointees and institutional leaders tied to the previous autocratic regime. The administration has already suspended the news division of Hungary’s public television and radio outlets, which Magyar argues operated as a state-run “propaganda factory” for Fidesz, and permanently closed the country’s controversial Sovereignty Protection Office — a body widely criticized by Orbán’s opponents as a tool to harass government critics and censor independent media.

    Ahead of Monday’s vote, Fidesz caucus leader Gergely Gulyás claimed the amendment “breaks up the legal system, undermines the rule of law and restricts democracy.” Gulyás also announced he would step down from his position as caucus leader, as the new 12-year term limit would bar him from running for re-election in the next national parliamentary vote. Following the vote, Fidesz supporters organized a candlelight vigil outside the parliament building in Budapest to protest what they described as the “tyranny” of Magyar’s incoming reform government.

  • UAE Fifa official ‘solely’ responsible for overturning Balogun ban

    UAE Fifa official ‘solely’ responsible for overturning Balogun ban

    A bombshell report from The Times of London has thrown global football governance into chaos, after revealing that a single Emirati member of FIFA’s disciplinary committee acted alone to overturn a mandatory suspension for United States forward Folarin Balogun in an unprecedented World Cup decision.

    Balogun was sent off during the United States’ Round of 32 knockout match against Bosnia and Herzegovina, which under standard World Cup rules triggered an automatic one-match suspension that would have forced him to miss the Americans’ next clash against Belgium. But just days after senior U.S. officials – including then-President Donald Trump – reached out to FIFA leadership, the governing body reversed the suspension using Article 27 of its Disciplinary Code, a provision that is almost never invoked to overrule automatic red card penalties.

    Trump later confirmed he had contacted FIFA president Gianni Infantino to request a review of the red card, arguing that the original sending-off was unfair, but denied placing any formal pressure on the global football body to reverse the ban. Contrary to FIFA’s initial statement that the decision was handled by an independent judicial panel, The Times’ reporting confirms that Mohammad al-Kamali, the chairman of FIFA’s disciplinary committee, made the call entirely on his own, without consulting any of the committee’s 17 other members.

    The revelation has sparked new questions about potential conflicts of interest, coming shortly after the U.S. government announced a major loosening of export controls on the United Arab Emirates, a close U.S. diplomatic ally. The relaxed rules open the door for easier exports of sensitive military hardware, commercial satellites, advanced artificial intelligence chips, and unmanned aerial vehicles to the Gulf state.

    Additional reporting from the Financial Times further undercuts claims of collective procedural fairness, revealing that 110 of the disciplinary committee’s most recent published decisions were also issued solely by al-Kamali. Notably, the Balogun decision itself has never been made public, a departure from standard transparency protocols. When contacted by the BBC for comment on the case over the weekend, al-Kamali declined to answer any questions.

    This decision marks the first time an automatic red card suspension has been reversed since the rule was introduced for World Cup play, a break with precedent that has sparked fierce backlash across European football. UEFA, the European governing body for the sport, issued a rare public rebuke, calling the overturn “unprecedented, incomprehensible and unjustifiable.” For his part, Infantino acknowledged that Trump had reached out about the case but maintained that the process was handled independently by competent FIFA bodies.

    Despite the reprieve that allowed Balogun to play against Belgium, the United States ultimately exited the tournament after a lopsided 4-1 defeat to the European side. Many football commentators have noted that the controversial decision appeared to galvanize the Belgian squad, who channeled public anger over the ruling into their dominant on-pitch performance.

  • One person killed in shooting involving federal agents in Maine, official says

    One person killed in shooting involving federal agents in Maine, official says

    A deadly shooting involving U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents has left one person dead in Biddeford, Maine, according to the state’s highest-ranking legislative official. House Speaker Ryan Fecteau confirmed the fatality and the agency’s involvement in a public Facebook post Monday, adding that Maine State Police have secured the incident site and the Federal Bureau of Investigation will lead an independent probe into the circumstances.

    Local law enforcement has described the event as an ongoing active investigation and has declined to publicly confirm the death to date. The BBC has reached out to both the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and ICE for official comment on the incident, but no statement has been released as of yet.

    Monday’s fatal encounter comes just one week after ICE agents shot and wounded a man during a routine vehicle stop in Texas, where officials later acknowledged the individual was not the target of their enforcement operation. Few concrete details have been made public about the Maine incident, with local police confirming that a formal press briefing will be held to disclose additional information once it is gathered.

    Multiple Maine elected officials have confirmed they are monitoring the situation closely. U.S. Representative Chellie Pingree wrote on social platform X Monday that she had been notified of the fatal shooting and the suspected ICE involvement, noting that her staff is working to obtain full details and will release updates as they become available. Maine Governor Janet Mills also confirmed she has received an official briefing on the incident, acknowledging that “situations like these are frightening and alarming” for local communities.

    The shooting has reignited public and political scrutiny of DHS, the federal agency that oversees ICE, which is currently led by Secretary Markwayne Mullin. Mullin took over the top DHS role in March following the dismissal of former Secretary Kristi Noem. Noem’s ouster came after a series of high-profile fatal encounters involving ICE officers that resulted in the deaths of multiple U.S. citizens, including Alex Pretti and Renee Good.

    Those deaths occurred after the Trump administration announced widespread immigration enforcement surges across Minnesota and other U.S. states. Earlier this year in January, federal officials launched a similar targeted enforcement operation in Maine codenamed Operation Catch of the Day. The operation and broader surge in aggressive enforcement tactics have already drawn legal pushback, with multiple national and local civil rights organizations filing a federal lawsuit against the administration over the practices used by immigration officers during these actions.

  • Watch: Horses evacuated as fire approaches riding centre near Paris

    Watch: Horses evacuated as fire approaches riding centre near Paris

    A massive wildfire of what local officials call ‘exceptional scale’ has burned through Fontainebleau Forest outside Paris for a second consecutive day, forcing emergency responders to evacuate dozens of horses from a nearby equestrian riding centre as advancing flames threaten the facility.

    The iconic Fontainebleau Forest, a popular recreational and ecological site located approximately 50 kilometres southeast of the French capital, has been consumed by the out-of-control blaze, which has already scorched hundreds of hectares of woodland. As of Tuesday local time, fire crews have been working around the clock to contain the spread, but dry conditions and unseasonably warm winds have hampered containment efforts, allowing the fire to expand closer to populated and recreational areas.

    Images and video footage released by emergency services show teams of first responders and equestrian volunteers leading horses away from the at-risk riding centre, moving the animals to safer locations far from the fire line. Local officials have issued warning notices to nearby communities, urging residents to stay alert and follow evacuation orders if issued.

    Officials have stressed that the fire’s size and intensity are unusual for the region at this time of year, linking the extreme fire conditions to ongoing climate change patterns that have increased drought and elevated wildfire risk across much of Western Europe. At the time of this update, no casualties have been reported, but containment efforts are expected to continue for days as crews work to bring the blaze under full control.