作者: admin

  • Trump announces $700 mn support for US coal projects

    Trump announces $700 mn support for US coal projects

    U.S. President Donald Trump made a sweeping policy announcement Thursday, invoking a 75-year-old Cold War-era emergency law to unlock $700 million in public funding for a nationwide slate of coal development projects, marking his most aggressive step yet to ramp up production and use of the world’s most carbon-intensive fossil fuel.

    Under the plan, the allocated funding will support operations across 10 U.S. states, extending the lifespan of more than a dozen existing coal-fired power plants and 42 active coal mines. It also paves the way for construction of two brand-new coal facilities and a large-scale coal export terminal on California’s coast, which Trump says will have annual handling capacity of 12 million tons of the fossil fuel. To redirect funds toward the new projects, the Trump administration is shifting $200 million originally earmarked for climate change initiatives—with portions going to a coal plant in Maryland, and the two new facilities in Alaska and West Virginia respectively.

    The funding drawdown is authorized through the Defense Production Act (DPA), a 1950 law that grants sitting U.S. presidents broad emergency authority over domestic industrial production. In remarks at the announcement, Trump framed the initiative as a win for working-class households, claiming it would cut energy prices and reduce cost-of-living burdens for all Americans. Echoing language he has used throughout his political career, he referred to coal as “clean, beautiful” — a characterization that directly contradicts established climate science that labels coal the largest single source of greenhouse gas emissions driving global warming.

    This move is consistent with the Trump administration’s broader energy agenda, rolled out after he returned to the presidency last year. A long-time skeptic of anthropogenic climate change, Trump has repeatedly dismissed the scientific consensus that human activity causes global warming as a “hoax”, and has moved systematically to roll back decades of federal environmental regulations that restrict fossil fuel extraction and use. Thursday’s announcement is not the first pro-coal action his administration has taken in 2025: on February 11, he signed an executive order directing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to negotiate long-term coal supply contracts with domestic power plants. At that public White House event, Trump was surrounded by hard-hatted coal miners and celebrated as the “undisputed champion” of the U.S. coal industry. The very next day, he repealed the Environmental Protection Agency’s 2009 “endangerment finding”, a foundational regulatory ruling that has underpinned all federal U.S. climate policy for 16 years. That rollback is already facing legal challenge from a broad coalition of environmental and public health groups.

    Industry and climate data underscores how far the Trump administration’s policy deviates from global trends. Analysis from energy research group Global Energy Monitor shows that while the world added more coal power capacity in 2025, overall coal consumption declined across most major economies — with the United States standing alone as the only large economy to register a substantial increase in coal-fired electricity generation. As of 2025, federal U.S. Energy Information Administration data puts coal’s share of domestic power generation at 17 percent.

    The announcement comes as global climate leaders have issued renewed warnings about the risks of expanding coal use. Just last week, the United Nations warned that global average temperatures are on track to remain at or near record highs over the next five years. UN Climate Change Executive Secretary Simon Stiell reiterated that the primary driver of anthropogenic global warming is the continued burning of fossil fuels — with coal identified as the single largest contributor to rising temperatures. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright defended the administration’s policy in comments on the initiative, framing coal as “a critical source of our electricity, also a critical source for our industry.”

  • Israel’s military creep killing Gaza peace plan

    Israel’s military creep killing Gaza peace plan

    In recent weeks, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has directed the Israel Defense Forces to expand its territorial control in Gaza to 70% of the enclave, marking an 11% increase from the roughly 60% the military already holds. This new expansion aligns with an updated map distributed to Gaza-based aid agencies in late March, which draws a new “orange line” marking Israel’s newly claimed restricted military zone. This boundary extends 11% beyond the “yellow line” demarcation agreed upon during the October 2024 ceasefire deal with Hamas.

    Compounding this territorial shift, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant has publicly reaffirmed the Israeli government’s plan to relocate large numbers of Palestinian residents out of Gaza “when conditions are appropriate and the process is carried out appropriately.” These unfolding moves come amid heightened domestic political upheaval in Israel: the country’s parliament, the Knesset, voted to dissolve itself on May 20, clearing the path for a snap national election to be held as early as this September.

    Experts and international observers have already flagged that Israel’s expanding push directly contradicts the 20-point Gaza peace plan brokered by the U.S.-led Board of Peace. That framework explicitly calls for a phased withdrawal of Israeli military forces from the enclave and includes explicit language guaranteeing that “No one will be forced to leave Gaza, and those who wish to leave will be free to do so and free to return. We will encourage people to stay and offer them the opportunity to build a better Gaza.” Even U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged this mismatch during a recent congressional hearing, confirming that the peace plan “doesn’t call for” expanded Israeli military control over Gaza.

    As Israel expands its hold, the 2.1 million Palestinian residents of Gaza are increasingly squeezed into a shrinking, war-ravaged, overcrowded strip of coastal land, with little meaningful intervention from the global community to halt the territorial shift. To understand the gravity of these actions, it is necessary to examine them through the lens of established international law, which places clear limits on military occupation of foreign territory. While international law permits temporary occupation to achieve legitimate wartime objectives, two core rules are non-negotiable.

    First, an occupying force cannot assert a permanent legal claim to the territory it seizes. Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter explicitly outlaws territorial conquest as an instrument of war, a principle the global community enforced firmly in response to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, where breaches were widely recognized as the crime of aggression. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) reaffirmed this principle in its 2024 advisory opinion on Israeli actions in occupied Palestinian territories, making clear that Israel cannot claim sovereignty over any part of Gaza.

    Second, all occupying powers are bound by international humanitarian and human rights law, which requires them to protect the welfare of the civilian population under their control and preserve the existing demographic composition of the occupied territory. This means forced displacement of the local population and transfer of the occupying power’s own civilian settlers into the territory are strictly prohibited. These obligations have applied to Israel since it seized Gaza from Egypt during the 1967 Six-Day War, launching a decades-long occupation that continued in a legal sense even after Israel withdrew its ground troops and dismantled settlements in 2005.

    Despite these clear legal standards, enforcing compliance with Israel’s international obligations has proven slow, fragmented, and largely ineffective to date. After the ICJ’s 2024 ruling ordered a full Israeli withdrawal from all occupied Palestinian territories on the grounds that Israel’s presence violates the core principles of Palestinian self-determination and the ban on territorial conquest, the UN General Assembly endorsed the ruling and set a September 14, 2025 deadline for completion of the withdrawal. Israel simply ignored the deadline. Enforcement of ICJ rulings falls exclusively to the UN Security Council, where the U.S.’s permanent veto power has blocked any meaningful action to compel compliance.

    Worse still, the clear legal prohibitions on conquest, forced displacement, and settlements are being intentionally muddied by the Trump administration-brokered 20-point peace plan and the Board of Peace overseeing its implementation. In November 2025, the UN Security Council endorsed the plan, which aimed to end the conflict, disarm Hamas, and establish a transitional Palestinian government overseen by the Board of Peace and a multinational International Stabilisation Force. But from its inception, the ceasefire deal was riddled with critical gaps: it included no binding provisions defining the scope of Israel’s military presence in Gaza, no mechanism for holding actors accountable for alleged war crimes, and no clear roadmap for demilitarization.

    Unsurprisingly, the entire peace process has ground to a standstill since the ceasefire took effect. Israeli airstrikes and ground operations have continued, killing more than 900 Palestinians, aid deliveries remain drastically insufficient to meet the desperate needs of the civilian population, and Hamas has refused to disarm without concrete, binding guarantees for full Palestinian self-determination in the future.

    This stalemate works entirely in Israel’s strategic interests. Under the original ceasefire map, Israel was allowed to maintain military control of all territory behind the “yellow line”, which already gave it control of just over half the enclave, squeezing the majority of Gaza’s population into a small coastal pocket. Within the territory it already controlled, Israel has already undertaken two key projects that reveal its long-term political goals.

    First, the military has completely flattened entire residential neighborhoods and hundreds of civilian structures, turning large swathes of northern and eastern Gaza into uninhabited wasteland cleared of all civilian infrastructure and residents. On this cleared land, Israel has since built an extensive network of permanent military infrastructure, including new access roads, fortified outposts, barriers, and tall earthen berms. This creates a de facto permanent Israeli-controlled zone emptied of its Palestinian population, a status quo that amounts to unlawful forced displacement and territorial conquest under international law.

    Day by day, the area available to Palestinian residents of Gaza shrinks, as Israel reshapes the territory’s borders through bulldozers and permanent fortifications. Netanyahu has already indicated that Israel has no intention of stopping at 70% control and depopulation. The Israeli government may seek to establish a large permanent buffer zone across much of Gaza, mirroring similar permanent Israeli military presences it has built in southern Lebanon and occupied Syrian territory, or it could even revive plans to establish new Israeli settlements in the strip – a project already being aggressively expanded across the occupied West Bank.

    All of these unfolding moves violate clear international law and the text of the very “peace plan” that was supposed to resolve the conflict, while offering no viable long-term path to justice or self-determination for the Palestinian people. This analysis is by Michelle Burgis-Kasthala, Professor of International Law at La Trobe University, republished with permission under Creative Commons license.

  • Watch: Guide stranded on Everest for six days rescued

    Watch: Guide stranded on Everest for six days rescued

    A high-stakes mountain rescue operation on the world’s highest peak has concluded successfully, after a professional mountain guide spent six grueling days stranded in the deadly altitude of Mount Everest. The dramatic sequence of events that led to the guide’s entrapment and eventual safe extraction has been reconstructed through on-the-ground reporting by the BBC’s South Asia correspondent Rajini Vaidyanathan.

    Everest’s notoriously unpredictable weather and unforgiving terrain have long turned climbing expeditions into life-or-death tests, and this incident is no exception. Details of exactly what left the guide cut off from other climbers and descending teams have emerged gradually, with harsh wind chills, low visibility and sudden ice movement reported to have blocked his planned route off the mountain early last week. Left without a clear path to descend and unable to call for immediate help due to communication disruptions at extreme altitude, the guide was forced to hunker down in a exposed high-elevation campsite, surviving on limited emergency rations as rescue teams coordinated their response from base camp.

    Mountain rescue operations on Everest are among the most challenging in the world, requiring careful coordination between local Sherpa teams, expedition organizers, and air support units that can only operate in narrow windows of clear weather. Multiple days of poor visibility pushed the rescue effort back, extending the guide’s stranding to six full days, raising serious concerns among rescuers and expedition officials that he would not survive the exposure to sub-zero temperatures and oxygen deprivation at more than 8,000 meters above sea level.

    In the end, a break in the weather allowed a specialized rescue team to reach the stranded guide, pull him to safety and transport him to lower elevation for medical evaluation. As of the latest update, the guide is reported to be in stable condition, receiving care for mild frostbite and altitude sickness.

    The incident has once again drawn attention to the persistent risks mountaineers and professional guides face every climbing season on Everest, even as safety technologies and expedition protocols continue to improve. Climbing officials have noted that the successful rescue stands as a testament to the skill and courage of the Nepalese rescue teams that operate in some of the harshest conditions on Earth.

  • Ireland facing EU court case over peat extraction

    Ireland facing EU court case over peat extraction

    ### European Commission Initiates Legal Action Against Ireland at Court of Justice Over Peat Extraction Regulation Failures

    The European Commission has announced it is referring the Republic of Ireland to the European Court of Justice, the bloc’s highest judicial body, over persistent claims that Irish authorities have failed to fully enforce strict EU environmental regulations governing commercial peat extraction. This latest development comes years after Ireland implemented a national ban on the sale of peat for fuel use over widespread environmental concerns, but the practice of commercial mining for horticultural compost production remains active.

    While the EC has openly acknowledged that Ireland has taken “significant action” to curb large-scale peat cutting, most notably reining in operations by the state-owned extraction firm Bord Na Móna over the past six years, it argues that regulatory and enforcement gaps remain for smaller extraction sites covering less than 50 hectares. According to the commission, numerous active extraction operations on these smaller sites proceed without required planning permissions or mandatory environmental impact assessments (EIAs) — core requirements under EU law for projects expected to cause major ecological harm. “Despite evidence of these ongoing illegal activities, enforcement action at the local level is not being taken,” the EC said in its official statement announcing the legal referral.

    Peat extraction itself is not banned under EU legislation, but it is subject to stringent oversight due to the severe ecological damage unregulated extraction can cause. Peatlands are recognized globally as one of the most critical carbon sinks, capable of storing far more carbon per hectare than most forest ecosystems, making them a key natural defense against climate change. They also provide unique, rare habitats for a wide range of native Irish wildlife species.

    Irish environmental advocacy groups have welcomed the commission’s legal move. Tristram Whyte, policy officer for the Irish Peatland Conservation Council, a leading charity focused on protecting Ireland’s native bogs, described the long-term damage caused by unregulated commercial extraction. “They go into a bog, strip off the surface and then also drain the bog into the local rivers and lakes,” Whyte explained in an interview with BBC News NI. He added that this practice creates what he calls “brown deserts” across Ireland’s midlands, with far-reaching consequences: silt clogs waterways, and drained peat converts to ammonia, which kills aquatic life. Whyte also noted that commercial peat extraction generates large profits for the horticultural industry, with much of the harvested resource exported abroad, while Ireland is left with permanent ecological damage and degraded habitats.

    Irish government bodies have pushed back on the commission’s claims, pointing to existing regulatory frameworks and enforcement efforts already underway. Ireland’s Department of Climate, Energy and the Environment has emphasized that commercial peat extraction is a formally regulated activity in the country. Under current Irish rules, any extraction on sites larger than 50 hectares requires a pollution control license from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). For sites between 30 and 50 hectares, both local authority planning permission and an EIA are mandatory. For sites smaller than 30 hectares, planning permission and an assessment are required if the project is expected to cause significant environmental harm, the department explained.

    The department also noted that the EC has already acknowledged the “significant enforcement” carried out by the EPA against unauthorised extraction on sites larger than 50 hectares, work that has pushed some private operators to end their activities. All EPA inspection reports are published publicly on the agency’s website and shared with the European Commission, the department added. When it comes to enforcement on smaller sites, the Department of Climate stated that responsibility falls to local planning authorities and the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage.

    That claim has drawn clarification from the Department of Housing, which says it has no direct role in enforcement or penalty imposition beyond creating the underlying legislation. According to the department, city and county councils hold full responsibility for planning enforcement, including addressing violations of planning rules. If an operator fails to comply with an official enforcement notice, local planning authorities can refer the case to the national courts, where guilty findings can result in criminal convictions, fines, and even prison time.

    This latest dispute over peat extraction comes against a long backdrop of tension over peat policy in Ireland. For centuries, cutting peat (known locally as turf) for domestic heating has been a deeply rooted cultural tradition for rural Irish families, passed down through generations. More than a decade ago, the introduction of EU restrictions on turf cutting at 53 protected bog sites sparked large, defiant protests across rural communities. In 2022, the Irish national parliament, the Dáil, voted to ban the commercial sale of turf, but carved out explicit exemptions for small-scale domestic cutting for personal use.

    Whyte emphasized that the current legal action brought by the EC does not target these domestic exemptions at all, and will not change the existing rules for personal turf cutting. Instead, the case focuses exclusively on unregulated industrial-scale commercial peat extraction, which continues to operate despite its well-documented environmental harms. “Ireland must demonstrate that it takes its environmental responsibilities seriously,” Whyte added.

    The Court of Justice’s core mandate is to ensure that EU law is interpreted and applied uniformly across all 27 member states of the bloc. A ruling against Ireland could result in financial penalties and force the country to tighten enforcement across all sizes of peat extraction sites.

  • In public letter, Ukraine’s Zelenskyy calls on Putin for direct negotiations in a neutral country

    In public letter, Ukraine’s Zelenskyy calls on Putin for direct negotiations in a neutral country

    In a historic, unprecedented public move that marks the first direct outreach from Kyiv to the Kremlin since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy issued a formal invitation Thursday for direct, in-person negotiations with Russian President Vladimir Putin, framing the summit as a critical step to end a grinding conflict that has stretched into its third year. The public letter, addressed straight to Putin, is far more than a simple invitation for talks: it includes a sweeping rebuke of Putin’s 26-year tenure in power and lays out Ukraine’s assessment of Russia’s current strategic positioning on and off the battlefield.

    In the letter, Zelenskyy acknowledged the rapidly shifting priorities of global powers, noting that Kyiv cannot afford to idly wait for U.S. policy to refocus on the war amid Washington’s growing preoccupation with escalating tensions in Iran. “I am proposing a meeting,” Zelenskyy wrote plainly. The proposal quickly drew a response from U.S. President Donald Trump, who reacted positively to the prospect of direct talks. “It would be great” if the two leaders met, Trump told reporters. “They should get it done.” When pressed to share details of concessions he has reportedly pushed Russia to make to reach a settlement, Trump declined to elaborate but emphasized that both sides would need to meet halfway to reach a deal. “They’re going to both make compromises,” he said. “I suggested those compromises.”

    The outreach comes at a pivotal inflection point for the war, a moment when Kyiv has clawed back limited but meaningful battlefield leverage thanks to advances in its long-range strike capacity, which has disrupted Russian military advances and logistical lines across occupied and Russian territory. That small gain for Kyiv has been matched by a sharp escalation from Moscow, which has ramped up its devastating nationwide aerial campaign, capitalizing on Ukraine’s ongoing shortages of air defense systems and persistent vulnerability to Russian ballistic missile attacks.

    Zelenskyy proposed holding the summit in a neutral third-party country, ruling out venues in both Moscow and Kyiv, and named Switzerland, Turkey and various Arab states as suitable potential hosts. “It is leaders who resolve the key issues. That has always been the case, and it always will be,” he wrote. “I propose to set a clear date for such a meeting.”

    Drawing on Ukrainian intelligence assessments, Zelenskyy warned that Russia is actively planning to extend the full-scale war into 2027 and 2028, and is increasingly shifting to a strategy of sustained ballistic missile strikes to make gains that its underperforming ground campaign has been unable to secure. He also accused Moscow of moving to draw neighboring Belarus deeper into open conflict and working to destabilize the security situation around Transnistria, the Russia-backed breakaway region of Moldova.

    The Ukrainian leader argued that Russia is now feeling the mounting human and economic cost of its invasion, pointing to a steady stream of Ukrainian drone strikes deep inside Russian territory, widespread domestic economic strain, growing fuel shortages, rising consumer prices, and the repeated rounds of military mobilization the Kremlin has been forced to implement to sustain its campaign. Zelenskyy claimed Russian forces suffered more than 30,000 soldiers killed or seriously wounded in the month of May alone, noting that Kyiv holds video evidence of these battlefield losses and that these steep casualty levels have remained consistent month after month. He added that while Ukraine has a far more favorable casualty ratio than Russia, Ukrainian forces and civilians continue to endure devastating, painful losses.

    To build trust ahead of any potential peace process, Zelenskyy put forward several immediate confidence-building steps: Ukraine is prepared to implement a full, nationwide ceasefire that would remain in place for the entire duration of negotiations, and he proposed an “all-for-all” prisoner exchange as an opening confidence-building measure. He also called for the immediate return of all Ukrainian civilians and children who have been forcibly deported to Russia since the invasion began. Closing his letter, Zelenskyy pushed back on the narrative that the international community has grown weary of supporting Ukraine: “The world has not grown tired of Ukraine, as you long hoped it would. But there is growing fatigue with Russia,” he wrote.

  • SpaceX IPO: rockets, AI losses and Musk in control

    SpaceX IPO: rockets, AI losses and Musk in control

    As Elon Musk’s aerospace and technology firm SpaceX moves toward one of the most highly anticipated initial public offerings (IPOs) in modern history, it is asking investors to place a massive bet on the billionaire’s long-term vision: interplanetary human settlement on Mars and a new generation of artificial intelligence data centers orbiting Earth. But for all the excitement surrounding the offering, the deal comes with a series of unusual caveats, steep ongoing losses, and structural safeguards that cement Musk’s permanent control over the company, even as it opens its doors to billions in new public capital.

    For decades, Musk’s track record of turning once-skepticized projects like Tesla into global industry giants has earned him a reputation as a visionary who can anticipate the next technological shift and build sustainable, world-leading businesses around it. It is this reputation that underpins SpaceX’s sky-high pre-IPO valuation of nearly $1.8 trillion, a figure that hinges entirely on investor expectations that Musk will pull off his most ambitious goals yet. Yet current financial results tell a far more uncertain story: while the company is growing rapidly, it is burning through cash at an unprecedented rate. In 2025, SpaceX posted $18.7 billion in annual revenue, a 33% jump from the prior year, but rising operating costs pushed its net loss to $4.9 billion. That downhill trajectory accelerated in the first quarter of 2026, where the company recorded another $4.3 billion in losses, on track for a full-year deficit that could exceed $15 billion.

    Despite these ongoing losses, SpaceX’s IPO projection forecasts that annual revenue could eventually surge past $28.5 trillion. The company frames its future profit streams as rooted first in Starlink, its growing satellite internet constellation, and ultimately in space-based AI data centers, a new market that Musk argues will outcompete terrestrial infrastructure for low-latency AI workloads. That said, Musk’s standalone AI subsidiary xAI has so far failed to keep pace with leading industry rivals: current annual AI revenue for the firm sits at roughly $500 million, a tiny fraction of the top-line revenue posted by OpenAI and Anthropic.

    One of the most defining structural features of the post-IPO SpaceX is that Musk will retain absolute control over all major company decisions, even after thousands of new investors buy into the stock. The company uses a dual-class share structure, a system adopted by other major tech giants including Google, Meta, and Snap to preserve founder control after going public. Ordinary retail and institutional investors will purchase Class A shares, which grant one vote per share. Musk, by contrast, holds Class B shares that carry 10 votes per share, putting roughly 82% of the company’s total voting power firmly in his hands, enough to override any collective decision from other shareholders.

    Having weathered years of shareholder lawsuits against his other publicly traded firm Tesla, Musk has also built an unprecedented legal fortress around SpaceX to limit investor legal recourse. All shareholder disputes against the company must be filed in a specialized Texas business court under the terms of the IPO filing. If a judge declines to hear the case, disputes are pushed into private arbitration, which eliminates the right to a jury trial and blocks class-action lawsuits – the primary legal tool that shareholders use to hold large corporations accountable for misconduct. The filing explicitly acknowledges that courts could eventually strike down these provisions if they are challenged, but they will remain in effect unless a ruling overturns them.

    In a break from traditional IPO structures that reserve the vast majority of offering shares for large Wall Street institutional investors, SpaceX has set aside 30% of its IPO shares for everyday retail investors, opening up access to the offering directly to Musk’s large global fanbase. This unusual allocation shifts the composition of early ownership away from hedge funds and mutual funds, some of which have already expressed skepticism about the company’s lofty valuation and ongoing losses. However, the broader access to retail investors also carries a notable downside: it could increase early stock volatility, as large numbers of enthusiastic retail buyers rushing to acquire shares could spark a sharp initial price spike.

    Beyond the enthusiasm of retail investors, a quirk of index fund rules guarantees a massive wave of automatic buying for SpaceX stock once it goes public. More than 60% of all U.S. stocks are held by passive index funds that track major benchmarks such as the Nasdaq 100. In a change that benefited SpaceX directly, Nasdaq revised its rules in May to cut the waiting period for new listed companies to join the index from three months to just 15 trading days. That means the trillions of dollars held in Nasdaq 100 index funds – which count millions of U.S. retirement plans among their investors – will be required to purchase SpaceX shares almost immediately after its IPO to keep their funds aligned with the index. Compounding this forced buying pressure is the fact that only 4% of SpaceX’s total $1.8 trillion valuation will be made available for public purchase, an extremely thin float that leaves far more buyer demand than available shares. The combination of forced index buying, retail enthusiasm, and limited supply could push SpaceX’s share price to sharply elevated levels in the first days of trading, even as the company continues to post billions in annual losses.

  • In open letter to Putin, Zelensky calls for meeting and ceasefire

    In open letter to Putin, Zelensky calls for meeting and ceasefire

    In an unprecedented public diplomatic move that marks one of the highest-profile direct outreach attempts from Kyiv to the Kremlin since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky formally proposed a face-to-face negotiating meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin alongside a temporary full ceasefire for the duration of talks in an open letter published Thursday. The appeal landed just hours after Putin acknowledged growing gaps in Russia’s air defense networks, amid a sharp uptick in long-range Ukrainian drone strikes penetrating deep into Russian territory, including attacks on targets in Saint Petersburg this week.

    Zelensky’s public letter laid out the core terms of his proposal clearly: an immediate, full ceasefire that would remain in place throughout the negotiations, and a set meeting date for direct talks between the two heads of state. “Ukraine proposes ending this war through direct engagement between us — you and me. I am proposing a meeting,” the letter read. “I propose to set a clear date for such a meeting. Ukraine is ready for a full ceasefire for the duration of the negotiations.” The Ukrainian president also issued a stark warning: “If you do not personally come to the conclusion that it is time to end this war, Ukraine will continue fighting for its existence.”

    The timing of the appeal was significant: it came one day after Ukrainian drones carried out strikes in Saint Petersburg, Putin’s hometown, which was playing host to the high-profile Saint Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), a landmark annual event often called Russia’s equivalent of the World Economic Forum in Davos. This direct public address to Putin from Zelensky remains a rare occurrence, even after more than three years of open conflict. Zelensky has long held that only direct, face-to-face talks with the Russian leader can produce a viable territorial peace agreement, after months of US-facilitated indirect negotiations failed to bring the two warring parties any closer to a breakthrough deal.

    Russia has set hard preconditions for any formal peace talks, demanding that Ukraine withdraw all its military forces from the entirety of the Donbas region in eastern Ukraine, large swathes of which remain under Kyiv’s control more than three years into the invasion. Ahead of the publication of Zelensky’s letter, Putin spoke to international reporters in Saint Petersburg and repeated longstanding Russian questions over Zelensky’s constitutional legitimacy, arguing that the expiration of Zelensky’s original five-year presidential term in 2024 required further “analysis” of his status. Ukraine has held that the country’s martial law, which bans national elections during wartime, gives the current administration full legal standing, and Zelensky has previously offered to hold a public vote or referendum on any final peace settlement once a full ceasefire is implemented.

    Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov responded to the letter publicly shortly after its release, noting that Putin had not yet been presented with the document, but claimed that “Zelensky can come at any time to Moscow” for talks. This proposal was already explicitly rejected by Zelensky in his original letter, ruling out any meeting on Russian territory. Putin has for months maintained that he will only meet Zelensky to sign off on a fully pre-negotiated deal, refusing to hold open-ended talks before an agreement is already finalized.

    The public exchange comes amid shifting battlefield dynamics that have worked in Ukraine’s favor in recent months. After accelerating its long-range retaliatory strikes against Russian military and energy infrastructure in response to relentless Russian nightly missile barrages across Ukraine, Kyiv has managed to recapture more territory than it lost to Russian forces for two consecutive months, according to an Agence France-Presse analysis of data from the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War. Russia’s overall offensive advance across the front line has slowed sharply since late 2025, with Ukrainian forces pushing back in multiple sectors.

    During his forum address in Saint Petersburg, Putin struck a defiant tone amid shifting realities, hailing what he called his forces’ battlefield achievements and rejecting suggestions that the full-scale invasion has become a strategic failure for Russia. “We are advancing along the entire line of contact,” he told reporters, adding that “We are absolutely ready and willing to reach an agreement with Ukraine through peaceful means.” At the same time, he conceded the urgent need to upgrade and reinforce Russia’s air defense networks in the wake of the Saint Petersburg drone strikes: “Russia has an air defence system. Yes, we must improve it. Yes, we must strengthen it. And we will do so.”

  • How Syria’s captagon trade shifted to Sweida after Assad’s fall

    How Syria’s captagon trade shifted to Sweida after Assad’s fall

    Eighteen months after the collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria, a new chapter of the global captagon trade is unfolding in the country’s southern border province of Sweida, where dismantled drug networks have reconstituted themselves amid fragmented governance and rising regional tensions. Once a key transit corridor for Assad’s multi-billion dollar narcotics empire, the strategically located province has rapidly evolved into one of Syria’s most active captagon production and smuggling hubs, presenting a major test for Damascus’s new transitional government and neighboring security forces alike.

    Under Assad’s decades-long rule, captagon – an inexpensive, highly addictive amphetamine – functioned as a de facto source of state revenue. Western and regional security officials repeatedly documented that the regime’s elite Fourth Armoured Division, commanded by Assad’s brother Maher, and the Military Intelligence Directorate ran an extensive industrial network of captagon factories. At the trade’s peak, the UK government confirmed in 2023 that this network produced roughly 80% of the world’s entire captagon supply. When the new transitional government led by President Ahmad al-Sharaa took power in December 2024, it launched an aggressive nationwide crackdown on this legacy infrastructure, with official data from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) showing that by November 2025, authorities had shuttered 15 large-scale production labs, 13 smaller storage facilities, and seized more than 500 million tablets across Syria.

    But while the national crackdown has succeeded in disrupting networks in most regions, Sweida has emerged as a stark exception. Local investigations reveal that as production hubs were dismantled elsewhere, trafficking factions in Sweida retained local control and reorganized their operations, turning the province into a strategic reserve for captagon raw materials and stockpiles left over from the Assad era. For decades under the former regime, Sweida’s position along the Jordanian border made it the primary transit route for narcotics heading to Jordan and consumer markets across the Gulf, with the Assad government relying on alliances with local Bedouin and Druze communities to facilitate cross-border smuggling. That structure has not only survived the regime’s collapse but grown more powerful following sweeping political changes in the province.

    In July 2025, sectarian violence erupted in Sweida that left an estimated 1,700 people dead and triggered the withdrawal of Damascus government forces from most of the province. More than 40 local Druze factions merged into the Druze-led National Guard, which now holds de facto control over Sweida, with explicit political and military backing from Israel. Israel has long positioned itself as a protector of Syria’s Druze minority, and views an autonomous, fragmented southern Syria as a critical strategic buffer against a unified central government in Damascus.

    Security data collated by Syria Weekly confirms that cross-border smuggling from Sweida into Jordan has surged by more than 325% since the National Guard seized control of the province. Between January and July 2025, Jordanian border forces intercepted just 21 trafficking attempts originating in Sweida; over the subsequent nine months, that number skyrocketed to 128 interceptions. Local reporting from Sweida-based outlet Suwayda 24 estimates that 12 to 15 captagon production facilities are now operating across the province, ranging from permanent industrial factories to mobile pill presses hidden inside civilian vehicles. One newly built facility was documented operating in a dense residential neighborhood in the center of Sweida city, directly overseen by National Guard forces, who use local civilian residents as human shields to deter potential airstrikes. The report adds that the operation relies on local technicians who received advanced training from Hezbollah experts prior to Assad’s fall – a continuation of the longstanding alliance between the Iranian-backed Lebanese group and the ousted Syrian regime. Hezbollah has repeatedly denied any involvement in the captagon trade.

    Jordanian intelligence assessments have concluded that Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari, the Druze religious leader who heads the National Guard, has intentionally built a permissive operating environment for traffickers in exchange for significant revenue, replicating the corrupt financial model that propped up Assad’s rule for decades. For Jordan, the expansion of captagon production on its northern border represents one of the most pressing national security threats, prompting Amman to launch direct military action inside Syrian territory. In early May 2026, the Royal Jordanian Air Force launched F-16 airstrikes targeting at least six suspected captagon facilities across Sweida, an operation officially named “Operation Jordanian Deterrence” that targeted factories, storage warehouses, and smuggling staging hubs. This strike marked the fifth cross-border attack Jordan has carried out since Assad’s fall, and the third since the National Guard took control of Sweida.

    Retired Jordanian Major-General Mamoun Abu Nowar framed the strike as a clear strategic message in comments to Al Jazeera, stating: “This is a warning to groups inside Sweida cooperating with Israel, and to Israel itself: do not advance destabilizing projects along our border. Jordan will not hesitate to strike these smuggling nests.” Retired Air Force Colonel Abdullah al-Sarhan added that the strikes were a pre-emptive measure, noting that traffickers have rapidly adopted increasingly sophisticated smuggling technologies to evade detection, from small quadcopter drones to large GPS-guided helium balloons fitted with timed remote release mechanisms that can carry far larger loads across the border at a fraction of the cost.

    A Jordanian government official confirmed that Amman will not tolerate active drug production hubs operating along its shared border, stressing that the May 2026 strikes were coordinated with Damascus’s transitional government, consistent with a January 2025 bilateral agreement to establish a joint security committee to combat cross-border smuggling of narcotics and weapons. As part of this growing cooperation, Jordan recently hosted a 300-strong cohort of Syrian Internal Security Forces officers at the Jordanian International Police Training Centre for advanced training in modern counter-narcotics tactics, physical fitness, self-defense, and weapons handling. Trained officers are set to deploy soon to rural areas of Sweida still under central government control to bolster border security.

    Data from independent analysts shows the scale of the smuggling challenge: Charles Lister, Senior Fellow and Syria Director at the Middle East Institute, reports that Jordanian forces have intercepted at least 46 million captagon pills from Sweida since July 2025, most of which were being smuggled via GPS-guided helium balloons. In mid-May 2026, Syrian authorities announced they had foiled a plot to smuggle 142,000 pills into Jordan using the same balloon technology, underscoring how rapidly trafficking networks are refining their tactics to evade enforcement.

    Today, the majority of captagon flowing through Sweida originates in Lebanon, where remnants of Assad’s regime have taken refuge alongside Hezbollah, which maintained a close alliance with the ousted president for decades. Syria’s transitional government has cracked down heavily on Hezbollah-linked trafficking operations across the country, and official data from Syria Weekly shows that in the past six months alone, Syrian authorities have seized nearly 33 million captagon pills entering from Lebanon – accounting for 77% of all captagon seized by the government nationwide. In one major operation in January 2026, Syrian counter-narcotics forces in Yabroud, just 20 to 25 kilometers east of the Lebanon border, seized 226 smuggling balloons, 106 kilograms of hashish, 650,000 captagon pills, 238 grams of crystal meth, and $30,000 in counterfeit currency, all originating from Lebanon and bound for Jordan and the Gulf.

    In response to the shared threat, security cooperation between Damascus and Lebanon’s new government has expanded dramatically in recent months. In April 2026, coordinated operations between anti-narcotics agencies from Syria, Lebanon, and Kuwait dismantled an international trafficking ring plotting to smuggle 85 kilograms of narcotics to Kuwait. The same month, Syrian authorities arrested one of Lebanon’s most wanted captagon traffickers after he crossed into Syrian territory, and later transferred him back to Lebanese judicial authorities through the Masnaa border crossing in a demonstration of growing cross-border judicial cooperation. Beyond Jordan and Lebanon, Syria’s transitional government has also launched joint counter-narcotics operations with Iraq and Turkey over the past six months.

    Despite these coordinated efforts, regional security analysts warn that trafficking networks have proven remarkably adaptable to post-Assad political shifts, exploiting gaps in central government authority to re-establish their operations in weakly governed areas like Sweida. The combination of fragmented local control, foreign patronage, and persistent demand across the Middle East has ensured that what was once Assad’s state-run captagon empire survives in new form, threatening regional security years after the former regime’s collapse.

  • Polanski and Corbyn join calls for Britons who served in Israeli army to be tracked

    Polanski and Corbyn join calls for Britons who served in Israeli army to be tracked

    A heated debate has erupted across British politics after two senior party leaders added their voices to growing demands that the UK government track and monitor British citizens who have served in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), following allegations of widespread war crimes and genocide in Gaza.

    Zack Polanski, leader of the Green Party, and former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn were among the high-profile signatories of an open letter coordinated by investigative outlet Declassified UK, addressed to UK Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood and Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper. The letter calls on authorities to systematically track the movements of British nationals who have served in the IDF, and implement mandatory secondary screening for these individuals at UK ports of entry when deemed necessary. It also pushes for full, rigorous war crimes investigations that adhere to both domestic UK legislation and international legal frameworks.

    Current data suggests that approximately 2,000 British-Israeli dual nationals have served in the IDF during Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Gaza, a conflict that a United Nations commission of inquiry formally ruled constituted genocide in 2024. Since the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack that killed roughly 1,200 people in southern Israel, Israeli military operations in Gaza have killed nearly 73,000 Palestinians, injured more than 170,000, and left thousands more unaccounted for, presumed dead under the rubble of destroyed civilian infrastructure.

    In the text of the open letter, signatories — a cross-group coalition of politicians, legal professionals, human rights advocates, journalists, and other public figures — argue that monitoring the entry of IDF-serving dual British nationals into the UK and investigating potential ties to war crimes serves a clear public interest. The letter notes that many of these individuals have returned to the UK after fighting in Gaza and now reside in British communities, even holding positions in public institutions including hospitals, law enforcement agencies, and schools. It adds, “Nobody wants to live next to a potential war criminal – not least members of the Palestinian community in the UK who have family or friends who have been subjected to war crimes.”

    This latest push for action comes after London’s Metropolitan Police sparked outrage in April 2025 when it announced it would not open investigations into 10 British nationals accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity for their service with the IDF in Gaza. The decision came more than a year after the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) and the UK-based Public Interest Law Centre (PILC) submitted a 240-page evidence dossier to the Metropolitan Police’s dedicated War Crimes Team. The dossier outlined detailed allegations that the 10 British nationals, a number of whom hold dual UK-Israeli citizenship, participated in targeted killings of civilian bystanders and humanitarian aid workers, carried out indiscriminate strikes on densely populated civilian areas, attacked hospitals and other protected civilian sites, and aided in the forced displacement of Palestinian civilians. In justifying its refusal to move forward with the case, the Met claimed there was no realistic prospect of securing a conviction and that a thorough, effective investigation could not be completed.

    Alongside Polanski and Corbyn, the open letter has secured support from multiple sitting UK parliamentarians, including independent lawmakers and high-profile Labour Party rebels John McDonnell and Diane Abbott.

    The move has drawn fierce condemnation from opponents on the opposite side of the political and ideological spectrum. Conservative Party chairman Kevin Hollinrake criticized the initiative in an interview with The Telegraph, arguing that “At a time when anti-Semitism is on the rise, Zack Polanski should not be stoking further division and hostility in our society.” The Board of Deputies of British Jews, a leading UK Jewish community organization that has publicly backed Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, echoed that criticism, saying the letter represented “another attempt to demonise Israelis and promote an atmosphere of intimidation against British Jews.”

    In response to the backlash, a spokesperson for Polanski defended the call for action, noting that the IDF has faced credible, well-documented allegations of catastrophic war crimes in Gaza from leading global human rights bodies including the UN Human Rights Council, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International. The spokesperson emphasized that “the UK Government should be taking robust action against any British citizen complicit in these crimes.”

    The renewed debate comes amid escalating Israeli military operations in Gaza. Data from the Palestinian Ministry of Health recorded 119 Palestinian deaths at the hands of Israeli forces in May 2025, marking the highest single-month death toll since November 2024. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has confirmed that the IDF continues to expand its territorial control across Gaza, currently holding roughly 60 percent of the enclave with plans to push that figure to 70 percent in coming operations.

  • EU invests in ocean monitoring as US cuts funding

    EU invests in ocean monitoring as US cuts funding

    As climate change accelerates ocean warming and amplifies extreme weather events worldwide, and the Trump administration moves forward with deep cuts to a critical U.S. ocean observation program, the European Union is stepping into the gap with a €92 million ($107 million) investment to expand its international ocean monitoring network. Named OceanEye, the new initiative was announced Wednesday by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who said the funding will position the EU at the forefront of global efforts to map and study Earth’s largely underexplored oceans.

    Oceans cover more than 70% of the planet’s surface, underpinning global life systems by producing half the world’s oxygen and absorbing roughly 30% of human-caused carbon dioxide emissions. But decades of greenhouse gas emissions have pushed ocean temperatures to record highs, with warming accelerating faster in recent decades than at any point in modern recorded history. This warming has supercharged tropical cyclones, extended drought conditions, bleached and killed 50% of the world’s coral reefs, and pushed thousands of marine species toward extinction — threats compounded by overfishing and industrial ocean pollution. Scientific projections warn that climate change will continue to increase the intensity of heatwaves and severe storms across Europe in the coming decades, making accurate ocean data more critical than ever for disaster preparedness and mitigation.

    Systematic, continuous ocean monitoring is the foundation of effective marine protection: it maps existing ecosystem damage, identifies emerging threats, and provides the empirical data needed to craft evidence-based regulations to halt biodiversity loss. “This is about using science and good governance to understand our ocean and secure our future,” von der Leyen emphasized in her announcement of the initiative.

    The EU’s investment comes at a moment of growing gap in global ocean observation capacity. In May of this year, the Trump administration signaled plans to eliminate funding for the U.S. Ocean Observatories Initiative, a 10-year-old network of more than 900 fixed and mobile ocean sensors that cost $386 million to build. Funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation, the initiative has collected free, real-time ocean data on everything from circulation patterns to marine ecosystem shifts, climate change trends and extreme weather activity. That open-source data has supported more than 500 peer-reviewed scientific studies, and the project was originally scheduled to operate for another 15 to 20 years before the funding cuts were proposed.

    Prior to the U.S. funding announcement, global ocean observation efforts were coordinated through the UN-affiliated Global Ocean Observing System, with the United States historically collecting more than half of all global ocean observation data, Europe contributing roughly 25%, and the remainder coming from Japan, Australia, India and China. EU officials and ocean scientists say the funding gap created by U.S. cuts makes increased European investment an urgent priority.

    “Europe needs to do more,” explained Pierre-Yves Le Traon, oceanographer and scientific director of Toulouse-based Mercator Ocean International. Under the OceanEye plan, the EU has set an ambitious target to take responsibility for 35% of global ocean monitoring by 2035, and to become the world’s leading provider of standardized “ocean intelligence” data for researchers, governments and private industries.

    Ocean observation data powers far more than just climate research. Data collected by underwater drones, robotic sensors and orbiting ocean-focused satellites is shared with shipping companies, commercial fisheries, emergency disaster response agencies, and research institutions. Mercator Ocean International is currently building the Digital Twin Ocean, a real-time interactive virtual reality replica of the world’s oceans that relies entirely on continuous observational input to model changes. Le Traon noted that this data is critical not just for climate adaptation, but for a wide range of coastal and maritime sectors including aquaculture, Arctic shipping, coastal tourism, agriculture, and even maritime security operations. “Knowledge is essential if we want to manage the ocean,” Le Traon said. “We really have to be very active for the monitoring and protecting of the ocean because the ocean matters to everyone: for life at sea, for life on Earth.”

    Odran Corcoran, a policy advisor for the marine conservation non-profit Oceana, added that systematic observation is particularly critical to filling gaps in existing scientific knowledge that hold back effective policy. Only by collecting consistent data from the deep ocean — which remains one of the least understood environments on Earth — can lawmakers craft evidence-based regulations for sustainable fisheries management, marine protected area expansion, and marine ecosystem restoration projects. “Europe does not just need more ocean data; it needs data that closes biodiversity and seabed knowledge gaps,” Corcoran said.

    Funding from the OceanEye initiative will go toward two core priorities: supporting private sector innovation incubators for ocean monitoring technology, and expanding the capacity of existing international coordination bodies including the Global Ocean Observing System. Of the EU’s 27 member states, 22 have coastal territories bordering the Baltic Sea, Atlantic Ocean, Black Sea and Mediterranean Sea. France holds the bloc’s largest network of ocean science institutions and the most extensive maritime boundaries, stretching from Réunion in the South Pacific to Saint Martin in the Caribbean to the Scattered Islands in the Indian Ocean.

    This reporting is supported by a grant from the Walton Family Foundation, with The Associated Press retaining full editorial control over all content.