作者: admin

  • Traders face big losses after Uganda closes Congo border over Ebola contagion fears

    Traders face big losses after Uganda closes Congo border over Ebola contagion fears

    Along the Uganda-Democratic Republic of Congo frontier at the Mpondwe border post, piles of perishable goods and lines of idling trucks tell the story of a public health measure that has brought cross-border trade to a near-standstill, leaving hundreds of traders and daily laborers facing crippling losses.

    Two weeks after Congolese authorities declared an Ebola outbreak in the eastern province of Ituri, Uganda implemented a full closure of its western border on May 28, a proactive step driven by rising alarm over cross-border transmission of the rare, untreatable Bundibugyo Ebola variant now spreading through eastern Congo. While narrow exceptions are carved out for emergency response, humanitarian aid, security operations, and cargo, local authorities in Kasese district – Uganda’s frontier district bordering the outbreak zone – have ramped up enforcement in recent days as virus transmission in Congo continues to outpace containment efforts.

    The new, stricter controls have left long convoys of cargo trucks stacked on both sides of the border, with perishable shipments at risk of rotting before they can clear inspection. For Leah Masika, a Ugandan trader, her 50-bag consignment of plantain destined for markets around Kampala is already leaking water, and will spoil within hours if the trucks do not move. “Our things are here rotting,” she told the Associated Press, adding that she cannot absorb the estimated $2,200 loss, and has no plans to order more goods from Congo until the outbreak is fully contained. “We are begging them to help us and open (the border). We will not go back to Congo.”

    Traders across the crossing say they understand the need for public health safeguards, but argue the current delays are excessive. Sylvia Asiimwe, a clearing agent at Mpondwe, notes that a queue of trucks stretching more than a mile along the Ugandan side includes seven carriers hauling Chinese-imported fish bound for Beni and Butembo – cities in North Kivu province, hundreds of kilometers from the Ituri outbreak epicenter. “The fish is going to spoil,” she said. “So much money.”

    The economic pain extends far beyond large-scale cargo traders. Mpondwe is Uganda’s busiest hub for informal cross-border trade, which the Uganda Bureau of Statistics valued at an estimated $131 million in 2023. For generations, the border has bound communities together: the Bakonzo people on the Ugandan side share deep family and cultural ties with the Banande on the Congolese side, and trade has long been the backbone of the local economy. Today, storefronts along the border route sit shuttered, and casual laborers who once made their living loading and unloading cargo pass the time idling on stools.

    Ismail Mumbere, a roadside snack vendor who depends on border traffic for customers, summed up the widespread despair: “The situation is bad. A lot of people earn from here, in many businesses. But now the government has told us there is Ebola. Ebola has wasted our work.”

    Public health officials defend the harsh restrictions, noting the unique danger posed by this specific Ebola outbreak. The variant spreading in eastern Congo is the rare Bundibugyo strain, which no existing licensed vaccines or treatments are effective against. Uganda has already recorded 15 confirmed Ebola cases, all linked to the Congolese outbreak, after infected Congolese nationals traveled to Kampala for treatment before the outbreak was publicly declared on May 15. Investigators believe the virus was circulating undetected for days or even weeks before that declaration, putting neighboring Uganda at extreme risk.

    Arafat Bwambale, a surveillance officer for Kasese district, explained that the tightened cargo controls are designed to limit unregulated human movement across the border, which stretches hundreds of miles and is crisscrossed by dozens of unmonitored footpaths outside formal crossing posts. Officials are currently working to block more than 24 informal footpaths to stop unauthorized crossings from Congo. “With movement of cargo, and maybe trucks, is mobility of people, and we want to reduce that,” he said.

    Uganda has a long, traumatic history with Ebola outbreaks dating back to 2000, when an outbreak killed more than 200 people. The virus, first discovered in 1976 in simultaneous outbreaks in what was then Zaire and present-day South Sudan, spreads through close contact with the bodily fluids of infected people or deceased victims. For this outbreak, local health authorities have prepared extensively: the nearest referral hospital in Kasese maintains a fully staffed isolation center and a local lab that can return Ebola test results within six hours. To date, 41 samples taken from suspected cases in the Kasese area have tested negative.

    The World Health Organization, which has classified the current outbreak as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), has openly discouraged widespread border closures, though it acknowledges neighboring countries face extremely high risk of imported cases. Even so, Ugandan officials are expected to impose even stricter, more systematic rules for cargo and truck movement in the coming days, after a meeting of the local Ebola task force.

    For the traders and workers who depend on the Mpondwe border for their livelihoods, the prospect of tighter restrictions only deepens their uncertainty. With perishable goods already rotting in idling trucks, many face financial ruin if the border remains closed for weeks more while authorities work to contain the outbreak across the frontier.

  • What to know about Pope Leo’s trip to Spain, from political scandal to Barcelona’s architectural gem

    What to know about Pope Leo’s trip to Spain, from political scandal to Barcelona’s architectural gem

    VATICAN CITY — When Pope Leo XIV embarks on his seven-day apostolic journey to Spain starting June 6, he will step into a nation once defined by its unwavering Catholic identity, now grappling with plummeting religious participation, deep political polarization, and ongoing reckoning with the Catholic Church’s decades-old clergy sexual abuse scandals. This marks the first papal visit to Spain in 15 years, the last coming from Pope Benedict XVI for 2011’s World Youth Day in Madrid, and it will unfold across three distinct stops, each with a targeted mission that intersects with Spain’s most pressing contemporary challenges.

    Ahead of the trip, the Vatican confirmed late Friday that Leo will make space to meet with survivors of clergy sexual abuse during his visit, a mandatory inclusion for modern papal travel as the global Church continues to confront the fallout of abuse and institutional cover-up. Spain’s national Catholic hierarchy has only recently begun to acknowledge the full scope of abuse committed by clergy across the country over generations, a reckoning that has further eroded public trust in the institution amid already accelerating secularization.

    The first leg of the journey, held in Madrid from June 6 to 8, will make history in its own right: Leo will become the first pope ever to address a joint session of Las Cortes Generales, Spain’s national parliament. Papal addresses to foreign legislatures are extremely rare; the last such occurrence came in 2015, when Pope Francis spoke to a joint meeting of the U.S. Congress, and such speeches often rank among the most high-profile addresses of a pontificate.

    Leo will take the podium in a legislature deeply fractured along ideological lines. Spain’s ruling Socialist Party, led by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, is currently mired in a major political crisis driven by a string of high-profile corruption scandals, while the far-right party Vox has mounted fierce criticism of the government’s liberal migration policies. Beyond his parliamentary address, Leo will also meet with King Felipe VI and the Spanish royal family, and lead an ecumenical prayer vigil for young people in Madrid, a gathering that intentionally echoes the 2011 World Youth Day that brought Benedict XVI to the capital.

    Notably, the pope’s visit to Madrid will overlap with a much-anticipated pair of concerts from global Puerto Rican superstar Bad Bunny, part of the artist’s 10-show European run. The dual high-profile visits have prompted major traffic disruptions and security closures across large swathes of the Spanish capital, drawing widespread media attention to the unlikely overlap of the world’s most prominent religious leader and one of pop music’s biggest stars.

    From June 9 to 10, the papal trip shifts to Catalonia’s capital Barcelona, where the centerpiece of the visit will mark the 100th anniversary of the death of legendary Catalan architect Antoni Gaudí, a native son of the region whose work is already on the path to sainthood in the Catholic Church. Leo will celebrate open-air Mass at Gaudí’s iconic unfinished masterpiece, the Sagrada Familia basilica, and formally inaugurate the site’s new central spire, the Tower of Jesus Christ, a construction milestone that has earned Sagrada Familia the title of the world’s tallest church. While Gaudí’s sainthood cause will be a backdrop to the visit, the Vatican has confirmed no formal announcement on his canonization is scheduled. Leo will also make a pastoral stop at the Our Lady of Montserrat abbey, a site of deep spiritual and cultural significance for Catalonia, located on a sacred mountain outside the city.

    The final leg of the visit, held on the Canary Islands from June 11 to 12, fulfills a long-held priority of Pope Francis, who had long desired to visit the archipelago to minister to migrants who cross dangerous Atlantic routes from North Africa to reach European soil. Located far closer to the African coast than mainland Spain, the Canary Islands have long been the primary arrival point for irregular migration to Spain. Migrant arrivals peaked at nearly 47,000 in 2024, though numbers have dropped sharply to just over 2,000 in the first four months of 2026.

    Leo will visit two of the archipelago’s seven main islands over two days, meeting with recently arrived migrants and the humanitarian organizations that provide life-saving care and support to new arrivals. The stop comes as the Sánchez government has broken with the dominant policy trend across Europe and the United States, announcing plans to grant legal status to hundreds of thousands of undocumented migrants already living and working in Spain. Sánchez has framed the policy as an economic necessity, noting that legal migration will help offset Spain’s aging population and chronically low birth rate that have strained the country’s labor market.

    During the visit, Pope Leo is widely expected to double down on core papal priorities that cut across each of his three stops: calls for unity in a deeply polarized political landscape, a push for global peace amid ongoing armed conflicts around the world, a message of radical welcome for migrants, and words of hope for young Spaniards navigating the rapid changes brought by the artificial intelligence revolution.

    This Associated Press religion coverage is produced through a collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP retains sole editorial responsibility for all content.

  • Canada bans Texas cattle over flesh-eating screwworm outbreak in US

    Canada bans Texas cattle over flesh-eating screwworm outbreak in US

    A major agricultural emergency is unfolding in the United States’ top cattle-producing state, prompting Canada to enact sweeping border restrictions to block the spread of a dangerous parasitic pest. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) announced a temporary ban this week, barring entry for any cows and horses that stayed in Texas within 21 days of attempting to cross the Canada-US border.

    The emergency measure came shortly after the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed a second case of New World Screwworm in a Texas calf, marking the first active outbreak of the parasite in the contiguous United States in 60 years. Texas Governor Greg Abbott quickly responded by declaring a state of disaster Friday, warning that the infestation poses an imminent public and agricultural threat that is likely to expand as summer temperatures rise.

    New World Screwworm is a devastating parasitic fly that preys on living warm-blooded creatures, including humans. Female flies deposit their eggs in open wounds and moist mucous membranes; once hatched, hundreds of voracious larvae use sharp mouthparts to burrow through living host tissue, which is almost always fatal if the infestation is left untreated.

    The first confirmed case was detected Wednesday in a three-week-old calf in La Pryor, a small Texas town located just 48 kilometers from the Mexican border. This marked the first endemic case of the parasite in the U.S. since it was declared eradicated from the country in 1966. Just two days later, a second infected one-month-old calf was identified in Zavala County, fewer than 10 kilometers from the site of the first discovery, within the 20-kilometer-wide control zone officials established after the initial case. The USDA confirmed the find during targeted testing of high-risk suspected cases, and has already implemented strict quarantines, movement restrictions, and expanded surveillance across the control zone.

    These cases are the northernmost extension of an ongoing screwworm outbreak that has been spreading through Central America and Mexico for months, a threat U.S. agricultural and public health officials have monitored closely for weeks. Governor Abbott’s disaster declaration frees up additional emergency resources to respond to the outbreak, noting that the infestation poses an imminent risk of widespread harm to Texas’ $100-billion-plus agricultural industry, the backbone of the state’s rural economy.

    While Canadian agricultural officials note that the country’s colder climate makes it unlikely that screwworm could establish a permanent population there — the parasite thrives exclusively in warm, humid environments — they are taking no chances. Canadian authorities have urged livestock producers to regularly inspect their herds for unusual wounds paired with abnormal discharge or foul odors, a classic sign of screwworm infestation, and have asked residents who travel to Texas to check their companion animals for signs of the parasite upon returning home.

    The Canada-U.S. border is one of the most active cross-border livestock trade routes in the world, with cattle and other livestock moving regularly between the two countries for slaughter, breeding, dairy production, and wool farming. According to Canada’s agriculture department, imports of U.S. cattle have grown steadily in recent years, reaching more than 550,000 head in 2025 alone, making rapid border action critical to preventing spread into Canada.

    While the U.S. declared screwworm eradicated in 1966, small isolated outbreaks have occurred since, including a larger incident in the 1970s. Adult screwworm flies can only travel short distances under their own power, meaning long-distance spread almost always occurs when infected livestock or animals are transported by humans. Regional officials across Latin America and North America have worked for six decades to control the parasite, with only inconsistent success in containing its spread.

    To combat the current outbreak, U.S. agricultural and health officials have rolled out a multi-pronged response plan that includes releasing hundreds of millions of genetically modified sterile male flies to curb population growth, alongside deploying specially trained sniffer dogs to detect infestations in cattle herds before they spread. Despite these proactive measures, some agricultural experts have raised questions about whether these existing tactics will be sufficient to stop the outbreak from spreading beyond Texas this summer.

  • Pope to find a secularized, polarized Spain where the Catholic Church has a complex legacy

    Pope to find a secularized, polarized Spain where the Catholic Church has a complex legacy

    VATICAN CITY — A new chapter in Vatican-European relations opens this weekend as Pope Leo XIV launches a week-long historical visit to Spain, a journey that will place the first American pontiff at the heart of a nation grappling with political upheaval, a decades-long Catholic credibility crisis, and shifting religious identity across modern Europe.

    The visit, the first papal trip to Spain in 15 years, marks a deliberate shift in papal outreach. Unlike Pope Francis, who prioritized smaller, far-flung Catholic communities over Europe’s traditional Christian heartlands, Leo is turning his attention back to the continent, which is currently roiled by multiple overlapping crises: the ongoing fallout from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, rising tensions stemming from the U.S.-Israeli conflict in Iran, and widespread public anxiety over the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence. Ahead of the Spain trip, Leo has already made short visits to Monaco and San Marino this year, with a four-day trip to France scheduled for September, all part of his push to spread a message of peace, unity, and universal human dignity across the continent.

    Leo’s visit will kick off Saturday in Madrid, where he will receive an official welcome from King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia, Spain’s Catholic monarchs. The first day will conclude with a prayer vigil drawing thousands of young people, many of whom will experience seeing a pope in their home country for the very first time. In a acknowledgment of the ongoing clergy sexual abuse scandal that continues to hang over the global Catholic Church, the Vatican confirmed late Friday that Leo will meet with survivors of abuse during his visit. Spain’s Catholic hierarchy has only recently begun to confront decades of widespread abuse and institutional cover-ups in what was once one of Europe’s most devoutly Catholic nations, making this meeting a long-awaited step for survivors and church reformers alike.

    The undisputed highlight of the Madrid leg of the trip will come Monday, when Leo becomes the first pope in history to address Spain’s bicameral national legislature, the Las Cortes Generales. No previous pope, including St. John Paul II, who visited Spain five times, and Benedict XVI, who traveled there three times, has ever addressed the national parliament. Papal addresses to national legislatures are rare events, and they often stand as defining moments of a pontificate. This milestone comes as Spain’s legislature faces extreme political polarization: the ruling Socialist Party led by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez is currently reeling from a string of high-profile corruption scandals. Opposition parties, including the center-right Popular Party and far-right Vox, have repeatedly called for Sánchez to step down ahead of scheduled 2027 elections, and have harshly criticized his government’s progressive migration policies.

    Madrid has already been overtaken by papal visit fever: Leo’s image covers subway cars, billboards, and metro station advertisements across the capital. Souvenir shops are stocking custom posters, magnets, and other papal memorabilia, while local bakeries are rolling out limited-edition papal-themed cakes and pastries. The pontiff will share the spotlight this weekend, however, with Puerto Rican global music superstar Bad Bunny, who is scheduled to perform two shows of his 10-concert Madrid residency during Leo’s visit. While small protests are expected over the trip’s estimated 15 million euro ($17.2 million) price tag, the parliamentary address still represents a landmark moment for Spain’s Catholic Church, which has been rebuilding its reputation after decades of crisis rooted in the nation’s turbulent modern history.

    Shaped by brutal anticlerical violence during the 1936-1939 Spanish Civil War, the church has more recently faced a severe credibility crisis following widespread revelations of clergy sexual abuse and institutional cover-ups. Spain’s religious landscape has shifted dramatically since the end of Francisco Franco’s 1939-1975 dictatorship. Franco, a devout Catholic who framed his rule as a religious crusade against anticlerical leftist, anarchist, and secular movements, left a church that counted 90% of Spaniards as Catholic. After the transition to democracy, however, that number has plummeted to just 55% in 2025, according to polling from Spain’s state public opinion agency, and only 19% of those identifying as Catholic report attending Mass regularly.

    Despite decades of growing secularization across Europe, sociologists tracking Spanish religious attitudes say there are early signs of renewed interest in spirituality — particularly among young Spaniards. Narciso Michavila Núñez, president of polling firm GAD3, noted that recent surveys have detected a newfound openness to faith among Generation Z Spaniards, a shift highlighted by the massive commercial success of Spanish pop star Rosalía’s overtly spiritual hit album *Lux*. “God is not just a symbolic tattoo in Spanish society anymore,” Michavila said, ahead of the pope’s visit.

    After wrapping up events in Madrid, Leo will travel to Barcelona midweek, where he will celebrate Mass at the iconic Sagrada Familia basilica to mark the 100th anniversary of the death of the basilica’s legendary architect Antoni Gaudí. While Gaudí is currently under consideration for sainthood, Vatican spokesman Matteo Bruni confirmed no announcement about his canonization is planned during the visit. The Mass will also mark the official inauguration of the basilica’s new central Tower of Jesus Christ; the completion of the spire earlier this year earned Sagrada Familia the title of the tallest church in the world.

    Leo will close out his trip with a two-day stop in the Canary Islands, a Spanish archipelago off the coast of West Africa that has become a key entry point for migrants crossing the Atlantic from West Africa. A legacy of Pope Francis, who made outreach to migrants and refugees a core priority of his papacy, the stop will see Leo meet with migrants and representatives of humanitarian organizations that provide care to new arrivals. He is also scheduled to lay a wreath in the Atlantic Ocean from the Port of Las Palmas, which earned the infamous nickname “Dock of Shame” in 2020 when thousands of migrants were forced to sleep in the open for weeks during a sudden spike in arrivals.

    Leo has continued Francis’s legacy of prioritizing migrant advocacy, repeatedly calling for dignified treatment of migrants in his native United States. For migrants already living in Spain, the visit carries profound meaning. “For those of us who are immigrants with family far from home, having someone as important as the pope come here is truly something extraordinary,” said Constantina Nchama, an Equatorial Guinean migrant living in Madrid, in the days ahead of the visit. “This is a once-in-a-lifetime moment, and I am so very excited.”

    The trip comes as Spain’s Socialist government has broken with broader trends in Europe and the U.S. by announcing plans to grant legal status to hundreds of thousands of undocumented migrants already living and working in the country. Sánchez has framed the policy as an economic necessity for Spain, which faces a rapidly aging workforce and persistently low birth rates.

  • Armenia prepares for an election that could reshape ties with Moscow and the West

    Armenia prepares for an election that could reshape ties with Moscow and the West

    As Armenians head to the polls on Sunday for nationwide parliamentary elections, the small Caucasus nation stands at an unprecedented turning point in its modern history. For the first time, the entire election campaign has centered on one existential question: whether Armenia will formally shift its long-standing geopolitical orientation away from Moscow and toward closer integration with the European Union and the United States. Incumbent Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who leads the Civil Contract party widely forecast to retain its parliamentary majority, has already set the country on an unmistakable Western-facing trajectory, drawing fierce pushback from pro-Russian opposition blocs and direct economic pressure from the Kremlin.

    The rift between Armenia and its traditional ally Russia opened dramatically in 2023, when Azerbaijan reclaimed full control over the disputed Karabakh region after three decades of de facto control by ethnic Armenian forces backed by Yerevan. Pashinyan’s government accused Russian peacekeepers deployed to the region of failing to fulfill their security mandate and halt Azerbaijan’s military offensive. With Moscow heavily engaged in its ongoing conflict in Ukraine, the Kremlin rejected the accusations, noting its peacekeeping contingent was never authorized to intervene in the offensive. That episode shattered long-held public trust in Russia as a reliable security guarantor for Armenia. “Russia’s image as a guarantor of Armenian security was not grounded in reality, and it all collapsed after the 2023 Karabakh war,” explained Alexander Iskandaryan, director of the Yerevan-based Caucasus Institute.

    “These are the first elections in Armenia’s history where geopolitical orientation has become a decisive issue,” Mikayel Zolyan, an analyst and former Armenian MP, told the Associated Press from Yerevan. “Until now, Armenia has remained within Russia’s sphere of influence, and this was taken for granted, but now, for the first time, this status quo is being called into question.”

    Over the past two years, Pashinyan has moved cautiously but deliberately to loosen Russia’s grip on Armenian politics and policy. In 2023, Armenia joined the International Criminal Court, a move that angered the Kremlin, and in 2024, it suspended its participation in the Moscow-led Collective Security Treaty Organization, a post-Soviet military alliance. Yerevan has also formally declared its aspiration to join the European Union and hosted the high-profile European Political Community summit in its capital in early May. A clear election victory would give Pashinyan a popular mandate to lock in this geopolitical shift and finalize a long-awaited peace agreement with neighboring Azerbaijan.

    Western powers have already moved to demonstrate the tangible benefits of closer alignment with Armenia. In August, former U.S. President Donald Trump hosted Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev to sign a landmark declaration ending decades of cross-border hostilities, which includes provisions to establish a new transit corridor connecting Azerbaijan to its Nakhchivan exclave. A preliminary agreement reached in February could clear the way for a U.S. firm to construct a new nuclear reactor to meet Armenia’s domestic energy needs. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has also pledged that the EU is ready to invest heavily in Armenia’s energy sector and its fast-growing digital economy, and has publicly endorsed Pashinyan’s reform agenda. Trump has personally backed Pashinyan, calling him a “great friend” and a leader who is building a “strong, wealthy, and very secure” Armenia.

    Against this Western outreach, Armenia’s fragmented political opposition remains dominated by staunchly pro-Russian groups that broadly oppose the normalization of ties with Azerbaijan and blame Pashinyan for the loss of Karabakh. Nineteen separate political forces – two electoral blocs and 17 individual parties – are contesting the 100 parliamentary seats. Pashinyan’s main challenger is the Strong Armenia Party, led by Armenian-Russian billionaire Samvel Karapetyan, who is currently on trial on charges of calling for the overthrow of the current government, charges he firmly denies. Strong Armenia advocates for deepening economic and political ties with Moscow and accuses Pashinyan of intentionally provoking conflict with Russia. Another prominent contender is the Hayastan Bloc, led by former Armenian President Robert Kocharyan, who has repeatedly accused Pashinyan of “seriously undermining” Armenia’s historic relationship with Russia.

    The Kremlin has gone far beyond rhetorical support for the opposition to apply direct economic pressure on Armenia in an attempt to derail Pashinyan’s Western pivot. Russian President Vladimir Putin has openly compared Armenia’s current trajectory to that of Ukraine, warning that pursuing EU membership carries the same dire consequences. In recent weeks, Moscow has imposed sweeping new import restrictions on Armenian agricultural and manufactured goods, citing unsubstantiated sanitation violations to block shipments of Armenian flowers, select grades of cognac and wine, eggplants, potatoes, dried fruit, fish and other key exports. Armenia’s membership in the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union (EEU), a post-Soviet customs union, has been placed under formal review following a May member summit in Kazakhstan, with explicit threats to fully suspend Yerevan’s membership by the end of 2025. The EEU’s four other member states – Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan – also demanded Armenia hold a public referendum on whether to remain in the bloc or pursue EU membership, a demand Pashinyan has flatly rejected.

    Official Armenian government data shows that 38% of the country’s total exports went to EEU member states in 2025, with the overwhelming majority bound for Russia, compared to just 8% of total trade directed to the EU. In response to Russia’s trade restrictions, von der Leyen announced last Thursday that the 27-nation EU would provide 50 million euros ($58 million) in emergency financial support to Armenia, calling Russia’s actions blatant “economic coercion” that weaponizes interdependent trade ties to achieve political goals.

    Many analysts warn that even with Western backing, Armenia faces a deeply uncertain path as it seeks to reduce its reliance on Moscow. Russia retains extensive leverage over the country, controlling large portions of Armenia’s key energy and infrastructure networks and continuing to supply heavily discounted natural gas. “It’s completely unrealistic to say that Armenia can somehow overcome Russian influence in a short period of time,” Zolyan noted.

    Armenian civil society groups and international election monitors have also documented widespread attempts at foreign interference in the lead-up to the vote. Independent Armenian election watchdog the Union of Informed Citizens has recorded multiple instances of Russian meddling, including coordinated social media disinformation campaigns, cyberattacks against government and civil society targets, illicit vote buying, and bribes paid to pro-Russian journalists. The Kremlin has repeatedly denied any interference in Armenia’s electoral process. These findings align with a recent assessment from a delegation of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, which visited Yerevan in May. The delegation confirmed that foreign interference includes illicit political financing, cyber operations, economic coercion, and direct attempts to manipulate vote outcomes. “These hybrid tactics aim not only to sway public opinion but to secure long-term geopolitical leverage over Armenia,” the delegation said.

  • Mock political party for India’s young ‘cockroaches’ set to hold first protest in New Delhi

    Mock political party for India’s young ‘cockroaches’ set to hold first protest in New Delhi

    What started as a throwaway online joke has snowballed into a viral youth-driven movement that is set to take its first step from digital feeds to physical streets in India’s capital this weekend. The Cockroach Janata Party (CJP), which has collected millions of young followers across social media platforms in just three weeks, will hold its first public demonstration Saturday at New Delhi’s iconic Jantar Mantar, a historic site long favored for political protests. The gathering marks the movement’s first major test: whether its explosive online popularity can translate into tangible on-the-ground grassroots mobilization around widespread youth frustration over stagnant economic prospects, scarce jobs, and a failing education system.

    The unexpected origins of the movement trace back to a controversial comment from India’s Chief Justice Surya Kant back in May. During a public hearing, the justice compared unemployed youth and government critics to cockroaches, sparking immediate backlash from young Indians already frustrated by limited opportunity. Abhijeet Dipke, a political communications strategist and Boston University student originally from India, seized on the insulting label to launch a parody political party, rebranding the cockroach as a badge of resilience rather than an insult.

    The movement’s growth has been staggering. Within just seven days of launching its website and social media profiles, CJP’s Instagram page alone amassed more than 15 million followers, and the movement’s reach has only expanded since. Its supporters proudly call themselves “cockroaches,” leaning into self-deprecating, satirical humor that masks sharp political criticism. Content shared across CJP channels — from memes to short videos — skewers widespread corruption, systemic unemployment, and long-standing political dysfunction in India. Supporters lean into the joke: they openly describe themselves as unemployed, chronically online, and locked out of meaningful political power, but beneath the punchlines lies a serious critique of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling government. CJP supporters argue that ordinary young Indians have been left with far fewer economic and social opportunities than promised by current leadership.

    Young people make up more than 25% of India’s total population, and many have grown increasingly disillusioned with traditional political institutions. Critics of Modi’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) point to rising religious polarization, widening economic inequality, and mounting cost-of-living pressures as core sources of discontent that have fueled CJP’s rapid rise.

    Dipke, the movement’s founder, is set to return to New Delhi from the United States Saturday morning to lead the demonstration, with local authorities already preparing for his arrival: steel barricades have been installed at the arrivals area of New Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport ahead of his landing.

    Organizers have rallied supporters online for weeks ahead of the protest, with a core demand that Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan step down. The call for his resignation grew out of a May exam irregularity scandal that quickly expanded into a broader reckoning with India’s underfunded, unequal education system and its connection to persistent youth unemployment. Participants have been instructed to bring only two items: India’s national flag, and a book, which CJP says symbolizes the universal right to education and equal opportunity for all. Organizers have also repeatedly stressed that the demonstration must remain peaceful, and urged attendees to avoid any confrontation with law enforcement. On Friday, the official CJP account on X posted a defiant call to action: “Time to turn this tiny joke into a revolution.”

    Skeptics, most notably supporters of the ruling BJP, have dismissed CJP as nothing more than a fleeting social media gimmick. They argue that the movement’s massive online following will not translate to large street turnout, and that its viral rise will fade as quickly as it began.

    Even beyond questions of turnout, the movement faces significant structural barriers. Over the decade that Modi has held office, Indian authorities have repeatedly moved to suppress anti-government dissent, cracking down on high-profile protests ranging from demonstrations against a controversial citizenship law to the year-long farmers’ protests that brought parts of north India to a standstill. Many protest organizers and activists have faced legal action, and hundreds have been arrested on vague or politically motivated charges, part of what critics call a broader campaign to eliminate opposition to the Modi government.

    CJP’s rapid ascent is not an isolated incident: it mirrors a growing regional trend across South Asia, where social media-born youth movements have increasingly led large-scale anti-government uprisings. In recent years, similar movements have powered the overthrow of sitting governments in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, and fueled sustained unrest in Nepal, signaling a shifting landscape of political dissent led by young, digitally native populations.

    While it remains unclear how many demonstrators will turn out for Saturday’s protest, the gathering will serve as a critical early indicator of whether what began as an online joke can grow into a sustained political force that challenges the status quo in the world’s largest democracy.

  • India wins the toss and chooses to bat against Afghanistan in a one-off cricket test

    India wins the toss and chooses to bat against Afghanistan in a one-off cricket test

    Cricket fans across South Asia turned their attention to New Chandigarh on Saturday, as the only Test match between India and Afghanistan got underway with a pre-match coin toss that set the tone for day one. After winning the toss, India’s captain Shubman Gill made the call to send his side in to bat first against the Afghan side, a decision shaped by pitch conditions and match strategy.

    This historic fixture marks just the second time India and Afghanistan have faced off in the five-day Test format of international cricket. Their first encounter came back in 2018, when India hosted Afghanistan for the nation’s maiden Test match in Bengaluru. In that match, the Indian side claimed a dominant victory by an innings and 262 runs, setting a high bar for Saturday’s rematch.

    For Afghanistan, this fixture is only their 13th Test match in the nation’s young history as a Test-playing country. Unlike many top-tier bilateral Test series, no points will be awarded to either side from this game toward the ongoing ICC World Test Championship standings, meaning the match will serve more as a developmental and competitive opportunity for the growing Afghan side than a ranking contest.

    Heading into the match, India enters coming off a disappointing 2-0 home series loss to South Africa back in November, leaving the side looking for a confidence-boosting performance to reset their domestic Test campaign. To address their bowling needs, Gill’s side has opted for a balanced attack featuring two fast bowlers: Prasidh Krishna and Mohammed Siraj. The spin department brings four total wicket-taking options, highlighted by the Test debut of 23-year-old left-arm spinner Manav Suthar. Veteran left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep Yadav and all-rounder Washington Sundar round out India’s four spin options.

    On the Afghan side, led by captain Hashmatullah Shahidi, the team’s selection strategy leaned heavily into spin, with three specialist spinners named in the starting XI. The side also celebrates a debut of their own: 22-year-old left-arm spin all-rounder Nangeyalia Kharote will earn his first Test cap for Afghanistan in the fixture.

    Local ground staff and cricket analysts expect the New Chandigarh pitch to favor batters in the opening days of the match, with spin gradually becoming a more decisive factor as the match wears on and the surface wears in.

    Full Starting Lineups:
    India: Lokesh Rahul, Yashasvi Jaiswal, Sai Sudharsan, Shubman Gill (captain), Rishabh Pant, Dhruv Jurel, Washington Sundar, Manav Suthar, Kuldeep Yadav, Mohammed Siraj, Prasidh Krishna
    Afghanistan: Sediqullah Atal, Rahmanullah Gurbaz, Abdul Malik, Rahmat Shah, Hashmatullah Shahidi (captain), Afsar Zazai, Azmatullah Omarzai, Sharafuddin Ashraf, Nangeyalia Kharote, Ziaur Rahman, Mohammad Saleem

  • Slovenia’s new prime minister takes down Palestinian flag in pro-Israel turn

    Slovenia’s new prime minister takes down Palestinian flag in pro-Israel turn

    Within hours of being sworn in for his fourth term as Slovenia’s prime minister, Janez Jansa has upended the small European nation’s Middle East policy, starting with the immediate removal of the Palestinian flag that had flown outside Ljubljana’s central government building for two years.

    The swift, symbolic action immediately telegraphed a dramatic pro-Israel reversal for Slovenia, under a new leader long known for his close alignment with former U.S. President Donald Trump and hardline Israeli leadership. In a post to the social platform X on Friday, Jansa framed his administration’s approach as a “responsible” foreign policy “rooted in facts” — language widely interpreted as a deliberate rebuke of the previous government’s outspoken condemnation of Israeli actions in Gaza and commitment to upholding international law.

    Jansa’s pro-Israel stance is no new development. He has spent months criticizing his center-left predecessor Robert Golob, labeling the previous government’s formal recognition of Palestinian statehood illegal, openly endorsing Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, and repeating the unwavering mantra: “We stand with Israel”. He has also repeatedly called for relocating Slovenia’s Israeli embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, a step that would directly contradict longstanding international consensus and international legal rulings that designate East Jerusalem as occupied Palestinian territory.

    The policy shift has been met with swift celebration from Israeli officials. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar personally thanked Jansa for the move and announced that Israel would open its first resident embassy in Ljubljana “without delay”.

    The reversal marks a stark break from the previous Golob administration, which held office for four years and emerged as one of the most outspoken European critics of Israel’s military actions in Gaza. Over 73,500 Palestinians have been killed in the besieged enclave since the escalation of conflict in October 2023, according to local health authorities. Golob repeatedly accused Israel of violating international law and perpetrating “clear genocidal acts” against Palestinian civilians in Gaza. Under his leadership, Slovenia became the first European Union member state to implement a full ban on all weapons trade with Israel, a move Golob defended as a moral obligation for responsible global powers.

    “People in Gaza are dying because humanitarian aid is systematically denied to them. They are dying under the rubble, without access to drinking water, food and basic medical care,” Golob stated when announcing the ban. “This is a complete denial of humanitarian access and a deliberate prevention of basic conditions for survival. In such circumstances, it is the duty of every responsible state to take action, even if it means taking a step ahead of others.”

    In May 2024, Slovenia joined Spain, Ireland and Norway to formally recognize Palestinian statehood, becoming one of the few Western European nations to take the step. The Golob administration went further in July 2025, imposing targeted sanctions on far-right Israeli government ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, and putting in place a travel ban on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who faces an active arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza.

    Reacting to the removal of the Palestinian flag, Golob told Slovenian daily newspaper Dnevnik that the new government’s very first official action “says more than a thousand words”. He argued the flag had stood not only as a symbol of solidarity with the Palestinian people, but as a representation of core values: justice, human dignity, compassion, humanity and peace. Golob condemned the policy reversal, saying it would write Slovenia onto a “shameful page of history”.

    Analysts expect Jansa to roll back nearly all of the previous government’s pro-Palestine policies in the coming weeks, with the formal revocation of Slovenia’s recognition of Palestinian statehood high on the new administration’s agenda.

  • Giant banquets rile radical left in France

    Giant banquets rile radical left in France

    Across provincial France, a viral trend of massive communal feasts has quickly escalated from a popular pastime into one of the country’s most heated pre-election political flashpoints. Last weekend, 3,500 attendees gathered in a sprawling hangar on the outskirts of Colmar, the picturesque medieval Alsace town famous for its half-timbered city center, for the latest installment of these massively popular banquets géants organized by events company Le Canon Français.

    For an €81 (£70) ticket, guests get a four-course menu of regional Alsatian specialties, unlimited local wine, and hours of collective sing-along camaraderie. Many male attendees adopt an unofficial uniform of berets and braces, while some women wear traditional local dress. Platters of charcuterie and choucroute are followed by regional cheeses and the iconic kougelhopf pudding, and between courses, crowds pause to belt out mid-20th century French classics from artists like Michel Delpech and Joe Dassin – songs that younger attendees in their 20s and 30s know by heart.

    But what started as a post-pandemic revival of communal dining has drawn fierce condemnation from France’s radical left party La France Insoumise (LFI), which claims the events have a hidden far-right agenda. LFI points to multiple red flags: documented allegations of racist chanting, insults directed at immigrant staff, and a menu centered heavily on pork, which the party argues is intentionally designed to exclude Muslim diners and vegetarians.

    Most notably, LFI highlights the financial backing of Pierre-Edouard Stérin, a billionaire ultra-conservative entrepreneur who made his fortune in the experience gift voucher sector. Stérin funds a prominent right-wing think tank that pushes an agenda of cutting immigration, rolling back abortion rights, and promoting France’s Christian heritage. Emma Fourreau, an LFI Member of the European Parliament, argues the involvement of Stérin is no coincidence. “If they were acting in good faith, Le Canon Français would never have accepted Stérin as an investor,” Fourreau explained. “That is because they share the same political ecosystem, whose aim is to bring the far right to power.” LFI calls the events a backward-looking caricature that does not reflect modern France’s diverse identity, and has successfully lobbied local authorities to cancel one planned banquet in the Brittany town of Quimper. French police have also opened a preliminary investigation into allegations of racial provocation at an April banquet held in Caen.

    Organizers and attendees reject these claims out of hand, dismissing the controversy as a politically motivated overreaction ahead of next year’s national elections. Le Canon Français was founded during the COVID-19 pandemic by two young entrepreneurs, Pierre-Alexandre de Boisse and Géraud de la Tour, who first began selling wine online to support a struggling vintner friend before expanding to small fundraisers for French heritage projects. The massive banquets, de Boisse argues, are just a revival of a centuries-old French tradition of communal popular feasts that once existed in every village across the country.

    “Nowadays people waste so much of their time alone, in their homes, on social media. They’ve lost the habit of being together and talking. What gives us the most pleasure is when we see the lawyer sitting next to the baker, chatting away,” de Boisse said. He denies all allegations of exclusion or extremist ties, noting the events have a publicly posted code of conduct all attendees agree to when purchasing tickets. He refutes claims the menu exclusively serves pork, and calls allegations of Nazi salutes at events completely unfounded. De Boisse also says he has never even met Stérin, who purchased a 30% minority stake purely because the events are profitable. While he acknowledges most attendees lean conservative, matching shifting voting patterns in rural France, he argues the events are focused solely on food and community, not political organizing.

    Attendees echoed this sentiment during the Colmar event. Many told the BBC they came for the food, drink, atmosphere, and chance to connect with friends, and none interviewed supported LFI’s claims of political ulterior motives. “None of this was an issue, but then Stérin became a shareholder and that gave the LFI an excuse to attack. Don’t forget there are elections next year,” said Quentin, an attendee from Besançon. On the ground in Colmar, the BBC observed no offensive language or behavior, and noted the crowd, while predominantly white, was not exclusively homogeneous. For organizers, the controversy has only amplified calls for left-wing politicians to step back. “I create jobs, I create happiness for the people who come to the banquets,” de Boisse said. “Why can’t they just leave us alone?”

  • Anthony Albanese waters down criticism of CGT as Australia signs new trade agreement with New Zealand

    Anthony Albanese waters down criticism of CGT as Australia signs new trade agreement with New Zealand

    In a high-stakes bilateral meeting held in Noosa on Saturday, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon moved to defuse fleeting speculation of cross-border tension, putting playful budget-related rivalry aside to sign a landmark new cooperation agreement set to deepen economic, security and strategic ties between the two nations.

    The minor diplomatic stir emerged earlier this year after Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers handed down the federal budget in May, which included a policy change to cut the 50% discount on the capital gains tax (CGT) concession for Australian businesses. New Zealand Finance Minister Nicola Willis quickly seized on the reform to pitch New Zealand as a more attractive destination for Australian entrepreneurs, saying in a public statement: “Australians looking to start or grow a business have an epic opportunity, and that opportunity is to do it in New Zealand.”

    Willis highlighted New Zealand’s existing no CGT policy, simple low-rate broad-base tax system, accelerated depreciation rules and pro-growth, deregulatory government agenda as key draws for cross-border investment. But both prime ministers moved quickly last weekend to frame the comment as nothing more than lighthearted banter, not a serious attack on Australian domestic policy.

    When asked about the exchange, Albanese laughed off any suggestion of lasting hostility, emphasizing the inherently playful nature of the decades-long trans-Tasman relationship. “We have a relationship which is often a bit tongue in cheek,” Albanese joked. “The Wahs (New Zealand Warriors), sign our players, but we have a few Kiwis in Australia too – 638,000 of them – or one in eight New Zealanders live here. It is a good relationship, occasionally there is a bit of cheekiness to the relationship and long may that continue.”

    Luxon echoed that sentiment, noting Willis’ comments were made in the context of New Zealand’s domestic political debate and had been taken out of context. “Her comments were really in the context of that debate domestically rather than commenting on the CGT here in Australia,” Luxon explained. “The Prime Minister covered it, it was done in good humour and yes it was cheeky, but what is important is we don’t comment on each other’s domestic economic policies because there are different contexts and history and she didn’t do that.”

    Beyond clearing up the minor rivalry, the core outcome of the meeting was the signing of a new bilateral agreement that lays out eight concrete policy actions designed to boost economic productivity for both nations. Luxon outlined that the deal will not only keep the two countries’ longstanding defence partnership adaptive to modern geopolitical challenges, but also deepen joint cooperation with Pacific island neighbors, strengthen technology-driven security and economic resilience, and expand trans-Tasman scientific research collaboration.

    A key highlight of the new agreement is the opening of new opportunities for New Zealand businesses to bid on major infrastructure projects tied to the 2032 Brisbane Olympic Games, a development expected to lift tourism and infrastructure profiles across both countries. Luxon had already held separate talks with Brisbane 2032 Olympic Committee leaders earlier to advance New Zealand industry participation in the massive infrastructure overhaul underway for the Games. That overhaul includes a new $3.8 billion, 63,000-seat stadium in Victoria Park, major upgrades to existing sporting venues including The Gabba, the Queensland Tennis Centre and Netball Centre, and the National Aquatic Centre, alongside public transit upgrades to the Brisbane Metro and new green river crossing projects.

    Albanese emphasized that the deepened partnership comes at a critical moment, amid widespread global political and economic volatility that makes close regional cooperation more important than ever. He called the meeting one of the most productive bilateral engagements of his prime ministership, noting that extensive pre-meeting preparation ensured the talks delivered tangible outcomes. “We’re very sharp, and a lot of work went into the preparation, clearly, to make sure it was a very effective use of our time,” he said.

    The meeting underscores the enduring closeness of the trans-Tasman economic relationship: Australia is New Zealand’s third-largest trading partner, while New Zealand ranks as Australia’s seventh-largest. As of 2025, two-way investment between the two countries totals $308 billion, while annual two-way trade in goods and services surpassed $38 billion, making the partnership one of the most economically significant for both nations.