作者: admin

  • The agonising wait for Gaza’s missing

    The agonising wait for Gaza’s missing

    Three full years into the ongoing conflict in Gaza, thousands of Palestinian families are trapped in an agonizing limbo, still searching for any trace of loved ones who have vanished since the outbreak of hostilities. The disappearances have unfolded across every phase of the war: some went missing during Israeli ground incursions that leveled residential neighborhoods and displacement camps, others vanished while searching for life-saving humanitarian aid, checking on damaged family homes, or traveling near the heavily militarized Yellow Line. For these grieving families, the lack of any definitive answer has left them suspended between fragile hope and crippling grief, unable to move forward and unsure whether to hold out for a reunion or begin mourning their losses.

    Official data underscores the scale of this human crisis. The Independent Commission for Human Rights records that more than 11,000 people across Gaza remain unaccounted for. This staggering number includes both those believed to be buried under the rubble of thousands of destroyed buildings, and those classified as suspected enforced disappearances. The Palestinian Centre for Missing and Forcibly Disappeared puts the number of enforced disappearance cases between 2,500 and 3,000, spanning from the start of the war through the ceasefire announced on 9 October 2025.

    To date, the fate of these missing people remains entirely unknown. Israeli authorities have continued to withhold full lists of detainees held from the Gaza Strip, and have not provided identification for roughly 620 bodies that have been returned to Gaza. For the families left behind, this pervasive uncertainty is a daily torment: they carry the constant, unanswerable question of whether their relatives are still alive, detained by Israeli forces, buried under rubble, or among the growing number of unidentified dead.

    Middle East Eye spoke with three families grappling with this three-year wait, to document their fears, their fading but persistent hope, and the heavy toll that unresolved loss has inflicted on every part of their lives.

    Inside a cramped displacement tent on al-Nafaq Street in central Gaza City, 62-year-old Suhail al-Waheedi and his wife scroll through mobile phone photos of their son Nidal, a journalist who disappeared in the early hours of 7 October 2023. The photos are almost all they have left: the family’s home was destroyed in an Israeli bombing raid, and all of Nidal’s personal belongings were lost in the destruction.

    “We have nothing to do but look at his pictures and wait,” Suhail told Middle East Eye. “For three years, all we have done is wait and hope for any news about our son.” Nidal had left the family home that morning with colleagues to cover developments at the Erez crossing in northern Gaza, following an attack on the Israeli checkpoint there. Just minutes after arriving at the site, all contact with Nidal was lost.

    “Nidal is never far from our thoughts. We try to stay hopeful and keep waiting for some word from him,” Suhail said. But the family has grown deeply frustrated with international human rights organizations: Suhail says he reached out repeatedly to the Red Cross and other groups, but never received any information about Nidal’s fate. “None of the appeals we made to rights organisations helped us. In this war, sadly, there is no respect for human rights.”

    For the al-Waheedi family, the pain extends far beyond the uncertainty itself. The loss of Nidal, who was the primary breadwinner and emotional anchor of the family, has left a gaping hole in their daily lives. “Nidal was not just our son. He was our friend, the backbone of our family and my righthand man. I miss him most now. I keep thinking about how much easier these difficult days would be if he were here,” Suhail said.

    At the Palestine Stadium displacement camp in central Gaza, the Hajjaj family carries a similar burden of unresolved grief. Fifty-two-year-old Mona Hajjaj has lived in a tent since Israeli forces invaded northern Gaza, and every night before she sleeps, after taking medication for a heart condition brought on by grief, she and her two daughters sit together and share memories of Saeed, Mona’s husband, and Qasem, their son. Both men have been missing since 26 December 2023.

    “My mother developed heart problems from the grief of losing my father and younger brother,” 35-year-old Nisreen Hajjaj told Middle East Eye. “Her eyesight also became weaker because she cried day and night, missing them and not knowing what had happened to them.”

    The family was trapped in their home in the Sheikh Radwan neighborhood of northern Gaza when Israeli forces launched their invasion on 20 December 2023. After surrounding the area and destroying nearby homes, Israeli troops raided the Hajjaj family home. All the women were forced to evacuate to southern Gaza, while Saeed and Qasem were detained.

    “The last time we saw my father and brother was when they were naked, handcuffed, tortured and humiliated. Since then, we have known nothing about them – where they are or what condition they are in,” Nisreen said. Like the al-Waheedi family, the Hajjajs have contacted multiple human rights groups for help, but have received no answers.

    “They are still part of our lives, but we do not know whether to mourn them or wait for them,” Nisreen said. “We have been left without the people we depended on. Sadly, support organisations do not deal with us because they are not listed as martyrs or prisoners.”

    Mona Hajjaj refuses to declare the men dead without official confirmation, holding out for even the smallest glimmer of hope that they will return home. That commitment came at a steep cost: when Nisreen’s younger sister was offered a university scholarship that required a death certificate for Qasem, the family turned down the opportunity rather than accept his death.

    The uncertainty has stolen future moments the family once looked forward to. When Qasem was detained, his wife was nine months pregnant, and Saeed had long been waiting to meet his first grandchild. By the time the baby was born, Saeed was gone. “What hurts us most is when his children ask: Where is our father? Why can’t we see him anymore? When will he come back?” Nisreen said.

    In the al-Zahra area south of Gaza City, 48-year-old Alaa Abu Shaaban carries on the search for his younger brother Mohammad, who has been missing since 7 October 2023. Alaa regularly posts Mohammad’s photo to a WhatsApp group for families of missing Gazans, asking any members if they have seen or heard news of his brother.

    Alaa recalled the day Mohammad disappeared: when Israeli airstrikes began hitting Gaza on 7 October 2023, Alaa traveled to eastern Deir al-Balah to evacuate Mohammad’s wife and children to the safer family home further from the Israeli-Gaza border. Mohammad chose to stay behind to guard their empty house. “He told me things would end soon, and there was no point leaving the house empty,” Alaa said. “We spoke that afternoon and tried to convince him to leave. He said he would leave and come. That was the last time we spoke before we lost contact with him.”

    Two months after the disappearance, a relative received a text message from Mohammad’s phone: it said he was in the Kissufim area, inside Israeli territory adjacent to Deir al-Balah, and asked the family to come retrieve him. But the area was too heavily militarized and dangerous for the family to reach, and they were unable to get to him. No contact has been made since.

    “For three years, we have not known what happened to my brother, how he disappeared, where he is or whether he is alive,” Alaa said. “Some released prisoners told us they had heard his name in Ofer prison. We contacted all the rights organisations, but received neither confirmation nor denial. We have lived through this painful wait all this time. We now look after his family. But his eldest son was killed while waiting for aid.”

    The constant uncertainty has gravely harmed the health of Alaa’s elderly parents, who still cling to the hope that Mohammad will return. “My father and family believe Mohammad will come back one day. They hold on to that hope despite the pain. But not knowing anything about him leaves them overwhelmed with anxiety and grief,” he said.

    Today, Alaa waits for every newly released detainee, pulling out Mohammad’s photo to ask if they have seen him or heard his name inside Israeli prisons. “Many nights, I fall asleep in tears because I miss my brother and the support he gave me. It also breaks my heart that his eldest son was killed and we could not protect him while his father was gone,” he said.

  • Watch: At the scene of student protests in Lille

    Watch: At the scene of student protests in Lille

    In the northern French city of Lille, thousands of students have gathered for a large-scale demonstration that has drawn national attention amid growing unrest over government education reforms. The BBC’s senior Europe correspondent, Nick Beake, has been reporting live from the protest site, capturing first-hand accounts of the unfolding demonstration and the frustration driving participants onto the streets.

    Local media estimates put the number of protesters in the thousands, with many participants being secondary school and university students who have walked out of classes to voice their opposition to the government’s proposed changes to the national education system. The reforms, which include adjustments to university entrance requirements and cuts to education funding in low-income regions, have sparked weeks of rolling protests across multiple French cities, with Lille emerging as one of the key hubs of resistance this week.

    In his on-site reporting, Beake documents chants echoing through the city centre, where demonstrators have carried signs decrying the reforms and calling for the resignation of Education Ministry officials. Many participating students told the BBC that the changes will disproportionately disadvantage working-class young people, restricting access to higher education and worsening already stark educational inequalities across the country.

    Local law enforcement has maintained a visible but largely low-key presence at the demonstration, with no immediate reports of major clashes or widespread violence. Protesters have emphasized their commitment to peaceful demonstration, though there are growing concerns that ongoing dissatisfaction could lead to wider disruption across the country in the coming weeks.

    As the protest enters its second day in Lille, organizers say they have no plans to disperse until the government agrees to enter formal negotiations to roll back the proposed reforms. The demonstration in Lille is one of dozens of similar actions that have been organized across France since the reforms were first announced earlier this month, highlighting the depth of public opposition to the government’s education agenda.

  • Benin prepare for ‘historic’ role in Messi’s Argentina farewell

    Benin prepare for ‘historic’ role in Messi’s Argentina farewell

    Twenty-one years after Lionel Messi first etched his name into global football folklore by lifting the FIFA Under-20 World Cup against an African opponent, another West African side will step onto the pitch to cap the closing chapter of his legendary international career. On Tuesday, Benin will face Argentina at Buenos Aires’ iconic Monumental Stadium for a star-studded farewell match celebrating the 39-year-old’s decorated tenure with the Albiceleste, where Messi will earn his 208th senior international cap.

    For Benin assistant coach Tunde Adelakun, the fixture carries a perfect, full-circle symmetry that ties Messi’s entire international journey to African football. “Africa has been at the heart of Messi’s remarkable career,” Adelakun told BBC Sport Africa. “I was actually there in the stands when they beat Nigeria in that 2005 final, where he won the tournament’s most valuable player award. It’s an absolute honor that when he closes the book on his international career, Benin gets to be part of this historic moment.”

    Messi first announced his retirement from international football in August 2026, following Argentina’s narrow defeat to Spain in the 2026 FIFA World Cup final in North America. As Argentina’s all-time leader in both caps and goals, the captain has notched 125 goals across his 207 previous senior appearances, a record that solidifies his status as one of the greatest players to ever represent the national side. The Argentine Football Association organized Tuesday’s tribute match to honor his legacy, with all members of the nation’s 2022 World Cup-winning squad invited to take part in the pre-match and post-match celebrations.

    For Benin, a side currently ranked 93rd in the FIFA global rankings that has never qualified for a senior World Cup, the unexpected invitation to this high-profile event caught the entire program off guard. “Everybody was absolutely over the moon when we got the call,” Adelakun recalled. “It came right in the middle of our preparation for two critical Africa Cup of Nations qualifying matches, but there was no question we would make the trip.” The Benin side has started its qualifying campaign strong, earning a 1-1 away draw against Burkina Faso before picking up a 2-1 victory over Mauritania in their opening two fixtures.

    Benin head coach Gernot Rohr, a German manager with deep ties to African football who previously led Nigeria, acknowledged that the occasion will carry a celebratory tone, but stressed his team will not travel to Buenos Aires simply to play the role of guest opposition. “We’re here to enjoy a historic moment with Messi, but we’re also here to compete,” he noted.

    The long-running connection between Messi’s international career and African opposition stretches all the way back to that 2005 Under-20 World Cup final in Utrecht. Then an 18-year-old prodigy, Messi scored two penalties to lift Argentina to a 2-1 win over Nigeria, finishing the tournament as top scorer and claiming the Golden Ball for best player. Three years later, the two sides met again in a gold medal match at the 2008 Beijing Olympics, where a young Argentine side featuring Messi, Angel Di Maria, Sergio Aguero and Javier Mascherano claimed Olympic gold with a 1-0 win, powered by Di Maria’s match-winning goal.

    Across six senior World Cup appearances, Messi has faced off against African opposition six times. After three consecutive meetings with Nigeria in 2010, 2014 and 2018, he faced Algeria, Cape Verde and Egypt during Argentina’s run to the 2026 World Cup final. Rohr, who coached Nigeria during the 2018 World Cup meeting in Russia – a 2-1 Argentine win where Messi scored the opening goal – has called Tuesday’s match an unparalleled “historic moment” for his current side.

    Adelakun’s own personal connection to Messi dates back to that 2005 under-20 final, making the invitation even more meaningful for the Benin coaching staff. This match marks the first time Benin will ever face Argentina at the senior international level.

    While Benin captain Steve Mounié, who has represented the side since 2015, will not be able to take the pitch due to injury, that has not stopped him from making the trip to South America. “When I realized I would have to miss the match, my first thought was ‘Oh no, I can’t miss this,’” Mounié explained. He ultimately paid for his own travel to be part of the occasion, and hopes to sit on the bench alongside the Benin technical staff for the match. “Football is my passion, I couldn’t miss this once-in-a-lifetime moment.”

    For the Benin program, the fixture represents far more than a friendly exhibition: it is a rare opportunity to showcase the talent of the nation’s players on a global stage that few lower-ranked African sides ever get to access. “I’ve told my players over and over that this is their big chance to show what they can do to the entire world,” Adelakun said. Mounià echoed that sentiment, saying he hopes the match will “prove to the world that Benin can compete with the best teams in football.” He described the Benin side as a tight-knit unit built on collective effort: “We fight for each other, we’re a team like a family.”

    Adelakun added that supporters back in Benin are far more excited about the historic occasion than they are focused on the final scoreline. “I don’t think many people back home are even talking about what the result will be,” he said. “What we’re celebrating is the fact that Benin is getting this huge moment on the international football map in such a big way.”

    For Adelakun, Messi’s enduring greatness comes as much from his unmatched longevity and competitive mentality as it does from his trophy haul and goal records. “He is the very best to ever do it,” he said. “I wish he was African.”

    When asked whether Benin’s players planned to compete to swap shirts with Messi after the final whistle, Mounià said the moment should be reserved entirely for the Argentine legend. “To be honest, if I was in his position, I wouldn’t give my jersey to anyone after this match,” he said. “He needs to enjoy this moment as the football legend he is, and he deserves every second of this celebration to himself.”

  • AfD candidate elected speaker of German regional parliament for first time

    AfD candidate elected speaker of German regional parliament for first time

    Just one month after Germany’s far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party secured a landmark electoral victory in the eastern state of Saxony-Anhalt, the faction has achieved another unprecedented breakthrough: its candidate Tobias Rausch has won election as the state parliament’s speaker, marking the first time a far-right party has claimed this prestigious parliamentary post since the end of World War II.

    Despite the AfD holding three fewer seats than the 42-seat majority required to control the 83-member legislature on its own, the 35-year-old candidate secured a comfortable victory in Tuesday’s vote, drawing backing from nine lawmakers across rival political parties. Five of those cross-party votes came from members of the hard-left Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW), while the identities of the remaining four supporters remain undisclosed – a detail that has sparked intense political speculation across the country. Political observers have openly questioned whether the four unknown votes came from members of Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), a party that has publicly ruled out any cooperation with the AfD. All 15 CDU state lawmakers had previously pledged not to support Rausch, but only five abstained from the vote as planned, leaving unaccounted-for voting behavior that has fueled ongoing questions.

    Following his win, Rausch, a trained real estate agent who has served as a state lawmaker for a decade and is a close confidant of regional AfD leader Ulrich Siegmund, rejected the long-standing post-war German political consensus that erected a “political firewall” to block far-right politicians from institutional power. “The days of political firewalls should be a thing of the past,” Rausch said in his post-vote remarks.

    While the role of parliament speaker is largely ceremonial in Saxony-Anhalt, it carries significant institutional authority: Rausch will now preside over parliamentary debates, regulate access to the state parliament building in Magdeburg, and serve as the official representative of the legislature at state and national public events. Ahead of the inaugural session, the AfD also successfully pushed to shift its seating from the far-right fringe of the legislative chamber to the center, another symbolic shift that underscores the party’s growing institutional influence in the state.

    The election result triggered immediate condemnation from across Germany’s mainstream political spectrum. Susan Sziborra-Seidlitz, leader of the Saxony-Anhalt branch of the Green Party, called the outcome a watershed moment that had crossed a fundamental red line in post-war German politics. “A line has been crossed,” she said. “We will not let ourselves be intimidated, and we will not sit by when rights are curtailed either here or for people in the state.”

    Outside the Magdeburg parliament building, more than 300 protesters gathered to voice their opposition to Rausch’s win, holding aloft banners reading “Never again is now” – a deliberate reference to Germany’s post-war commitment to preventing the reemergence of extremist politics. Crowds surrounded regional AfD leader Siegmund as he spoke to reporters, repeatedly displaying the anti-far-right protest signs to push back against the party’s breakthrough.

    Germany’s domestic intelligence agency has already classified the Saxony-Anhalt branch of the AfD as a “right-wing extremist” organization, a label the party’s leadership has repeatedly rejected. The AfD is widely known for its pro-Russian policy stance, anti-immigrant agenda that includes proposals to segregate child refugees in public schools, and documented intolerance toward LGBTQ+ communities.

    Siegmund, the popular and charismatic regional AfD leader, is now set to run for the post of state premier in a December legislative vote, a bid that will also require the support of 41 additional lawmakers to win. Just as with Rausch’s speaker bid, Siegmund will need cross-party backing to secure the role, but the BSW has already ruled out entering a formal coalition with the AfD. The hard-left party has instead announced it will back an independent non-partisan candidate for state premier and abstain from the December vote, leaving Siegmund’s path to the top state office uncertain at this stage.

  • Lawyer for one of Cornell 7 case calls for special prosecutor to be removed over previous comments

    Lawyer for one of Cornell 7 case calls for special prosecutor to be removed over previous comments

    A high-profile sexual assault case involving seven Cornell University students has triggered two major new developments: a defense lawyer’s demand that the appointed special prosecutor step aside over pre-investment public comments, and a looming faculty no-confidence vote aimed at the university’s top leadership over its handling of the 2024 incident.

    The case dates back to October 2024, when a female student, identified only as Jane Doe in court filings, alleges she was drugged and repeatedly raped by seven men over the course of several hours during a fraternity party on the Ivy League campus in Ithaca, New York. She has since filed a lawsuit against both the seven accused men and Cornell University, claiming the institution failed to uphold its responsibility to protect her from harm.

    The allegations have sent shockwaves across the campus and drawn national outrage. Last week, in response to widespread criticism over how local law enforcement and university officials handled the initial response to the claims, New York Governor Kathy Hochul appointed New York State Attorney General Letitia James to serve as the special prosecutor overseeing the independent investigation.

    But just days before Hochul announced her appointment, James made public remarks on social media platform X that have now called her impartiality into question. In a September 28 post, James wrote that “what this young woman has been forced to endure is horrific and unacceptable,” adding “I’m holding her in my heart and in my prayers. To her, and to all survivors: you’re not alone. We stand with you.”

    Now, a defense lawyer representing one of the seven accused men is calling on James to voluntarily recuse herself from the case, arguing that her pre-investigation comments cast an unnecessary cloud over the inquiry’s integrity and independence.

    In a statement shared with CBS News, the BBC’s US media partner, the lawyer clarified that the demand does not accuse James of corruption, bad faith, or professional incompetence, nor does it claim a court has already ruled her legally disqualified from the role. Instead, the argument centers on the avoidable doubt her public comments have created: voluntary recusal, the lawyer says, would eliminate that question mark and preserve the investigation’s credibility. James’ comments, the statement argues, run counter to the core requirement of an impartial probe that evaluates evidence without pre-judgment.

    Alongside the controversy over the special prosecutor, Cornell’s central administration is facing growing backlash from within the institution over its alleged mishandling of the incident. According to US media reports, Cornell’s Faculty Senate — the governing body made up of professors and other academic staff — will hold a vote on a no-confidence resolution targeting university leadership next week.

    A majority vote of no confidence would carry largely symbolic weight, but it would send a clear signal of widespread discontent among faculty and ramp up public pressure on the administration to implement meaningful changes in how it addresses sexual assault on campus. The case has already spurred mass public demonstration: hundreds of students and faculty gathered on campus Monday to protest the university’s response to Jane Doe’s allegations.

    The BBC has reached out to Cornell University for official comment on the upcoming no-confidence vote and the ongoing controversy. During a recent press conference addressing concerns over James’ impartiality, Governor Hochul defended the appointment, saying James would “follow the facts” wherever they lead. “She’ll examine the evidence and go wherever it leads, and if the evidence supports charges, she will pursue them,” Hochul told reporters.

  • Russia responds to US help offer after death of plague researcher

    Russia responds to US help offer after death of plague researcher

    In a surprising moment of diplomatic exchange amid long-standing global tensions, Russia has issued an official response to a United States offer of assistance extended following the passing of a prominent plague researcher. The brief but notable interaction has also revealed a two-way gesture of cooperation: both Moscow and Washington have now publicly extended offers of mutual support to one another in the ongoing fight against dangerous infectious diseases. This exchange comes at a time when global public health challenges remain a pressing shared concern, even as geopolitical rifts between the two nuclear powers continue to define much of their bilateral relationship. While few additional details have been released regarding the specifics of the assistance offers or the circumstances surrounding the researcher’s death, the reciprocal gestures stand out as a rare point of potential collaboration between the two nations in a critical public health domain. Experts note that infectious disease research, particularly into high-risk pathogens like plague, requires international coordination to mitigate global health risks, making even limited cooperation between major powers a development worth monitoring.

  • US televangelist Jim Bakker, disgraced from sex scandal and fraud, dies at 86

    US televangelist Jim Bakker, disgraced from sex scandal and fraud, dies at 86

    Jim Bakker, the polarizing American televangelist who built a sprawling Christian media empire before its dramatic collapse amid fraud convictions and public scandal, has died at the age of 86. His second wife, Lori Bakker, confirmed the news in a statement Monday, but did not disclose a cause of death.

    Bakker first rose to prominence in 1974 alongside his first wife, Tammy Faye Messner, when the pair founded *The PTL Club* – a Christian television program whose name stood for both “Praise the Lord” and “People That Love”. At the height of its popularity, the daily show drew more than 13 million viewers across the United States, turning Bakker and Tammy Faye into household names in evangelical circles.

    Building on the show’s success, the couple expanded their media enterprise into a multi-million dollar empire. They constructed Heritage USA, a sprawling 2,300-acre Christian theme park complex in Fort Mill, South Carolina, that employed more than 2,000 workers. The pair embraced a notoriously lavish lifestyle, counting a private jet, multiple luxury residences, high-end vehicles, expensive jewelry, and even an air-conditioned dog house among their assets.

    By the late 1980s, however, the empire began to unravel. In 1987, a decade-old sexual encounter between Bakker and former church secretary Jessica Hahn came to light, prompting Bakker’s immediate resignation from the PTL ministry. Hahn later accused Bakker of sexual assault, a claim he repeatedly denied, insisting the encounter had been consensual. Further investigation revealed that Hahn had been paid $265,000 in hush money using PTL ministry funds, leading the Assemblies of God to defrock Bakker, revoking his formal ministerial credentials.

    In 1989, Bakker was found guilty on 24 counts of mail fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy connected to deceptive fundraising for the Heritage USA theme park. He served more than four years in federal prison for his crimes. Though Tammy Faye stood by Bakker throughout his trial, she filed for divorce in 1992 while he was still incarcerated; she never faced any criminal charges connected to the PTL scandal, and died of cancer in 2007.

    After his release from prison in 1994, Bakker expressed public remorse for his actions, publishing a memoir titled *I Was Wrong* that detailed his rise, fall, and time behind bars. He rebuilt his personal and professional life in the following years, marrying Lori Bakker in 1998, and the pair launched a new television ministry in 2003. Five years later, they began production on *The Jim Bakker Show*, which became the anchor of his second act in evangelical broadcasting.

    In her statement announcing Bakker’s death, Lori Bakker remembered her late husband as a trailblazer for Christian television. “He was my best friend, and the man I was honoured to walk beside through so many seasons of life and ministry,” she wrote. For many American evangelicals and observers of 20th-century religious media, Bakker leaves behind a complicated legacy: a figure who revolutionized Christian broadcasting while bringing disgrace to the movement through his financial and personal misconduct.

  • Trump on Iran: ‘Let them take out LA, let them take out San Diego’

    Trump on Iran: ‘Let them take out LA, let them take out San Diego’

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump has sparked fierce public debate after making a series of extraordinary remarks regarding escalating tensions with Iran. In comments that have sent shockwaves through political circles, Trump argued that even major hostile actions from Tehran—including strikes that would destroy major American cities like Los Angeles and San Diego—would qualify as a worthwhile sacrifice. He went on to frame such devastating outcomes as merely a “small price to pay” for upholding long-term global security, even as he acknowledged that this stance would likely lead to sharp increases in American gasoline prices.

    The comments mark an extraordinarily hardline turn in discourse around U.S.-Iran relations, breaking with longstanding norms that place the protection of American civilian lives and infrastructure as the non-negotiable top priority for any presidential administration. Political analysts across the ideological spectrum have highlighted that the framing of a major attack on two major U.S. population centers as an acceptable cost represents a dramatic shift in how national security tradeoffs are discussed in mainstream American politics. Critics have already slammed the remarks as reckless, arguing that no national security goal can justify accepting the loss of hundreds of thousands of civilian lives and the destruction of major economic and cultural hubs. Supporters of Trump’s hardline approach to Iran have framed the comments as a rare honest admission of the high stakes involved in confronting Iranian regional aggression, arguing that long-term global security requires a willingness to accept short-term risks.

  • From films to streaming prices – how the Warner Bros deal could affect you

    From films to streaming prices – how the Warner Bros deal could affect you

    After months of negotiations and regulatory reviews, two of Hollywood’s most iconic legacy studios, Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros Discovery, have officially closed their $110 billion mega-merger, creating a new entertainment giant named Skydance that unites globally beloved franchises ranging from *Harry Potter* to *Game of Thrones*. The transformative deal, however, comes with a series of binding regulatory conditions that dictate everything from annual film output quotas to the structure of newsroom oversight, setting off widespread discussion about how the merger will reshape what audiences watch, how content is made, and the future of Hollywood’s workforce. Below is a breakdown of the four most significant shifts that will follow this industry-altering combination.

    ## Higher Streaming Costs Ahead for Subscribers
    Warner Bros Discovery previously operated HBO Max, the streaming home to hit series including *The Sopranos*, *House of the Dragon*, and *Euphoria*, while Paramount Skydance ran Paramount+, which hosts popular titles such as *Yellowstone*, *Parks and Recreation*, and *NCIS*. Industry analysts broadly expect the two platforms will eventually combine into a single integrated service or a discounted bundled offering, but consumers should prepare for long-term price increases despite potential short-term savings for dual subscribers.
    The newly formed Skydance carries an eye-watering $80 billion in debt from the merger transaction, even as leadership has targeted $6 billion in annual cost cuts to improve profitability. Forrester Research research director Mike Proulx acknowledges that the merger will give subscribers access to a far larger combined content catalog, but he notes that price hikes are inevitable for most users. “There’s no way that a combined Paramount+ and HBO Max streaming service won’t end up costing more for those who subscribe to only one of the services,” Proulx told the BBC.

    ## Binding Quotas Secure Cinematic Releases for the Next Five Years
    As part of a regulatory settlement with U.S. states that had raised antitrust concerns about the merger, Skydance has agreed to mandatory minimum film release requirements for the next five years. For the first two years, the company must release 30 feature films annually, rising to 32 films per year for the remaining three years, for a total of 156 new films over the mandate period. The majority of these releases must be wide theatrical releases, and the company is also required to distribute at least four independent films each year.
    Failure to meet these quotas would trigger a severe penalty: Skydance could be forced to sell its 49% controlling stake in Miramax, the historic studio co-founded by disgraced former media mogul Harvey Weinstein. Corporate attorney Breanne Gilliam, of Maddin Hauser, notes that the quota requirement is a meaningful win for theatrical exhibition, even though it is only temporary. “Once those obligations expire, the company will have far more flexibility,” Gilliam explained. “Temporary rules cannot permanently fix a structural market shift.”
    History suggests that after regulatory obligations lapse, mega-mergers often lead to fewer wide theatrical releases, as companies prioritize content for their internal streaming platforms. Following Disney’s $71 billion acquisition of 21st Century Fox in 2019, 20th Century Fox’s annual theatrical slate shrank from 12 to 17 films per year to just 3 to 6 releases annually under Disney’s leadership.

    ## Thousands of Industry Jobs At Risk Amid Consolidation
    For entertainment workers across Los Angeles, the merger has been greeted with deep alarm, with on-the-ground creators describing the combination as an industry disaster. Actors, writers, and crew recently gathered to protest the deal outside Paramount Studios in Los Angeles, accusing federal and state regulators of failing to protect working people’s livelihoods in the entertainment sector.
    Kirsten Vangsness, best known for her role on the long-running series *Criminal Minds*, told the BBC she was “heartbroken” by the approval of the deal. “It’s people that make this city,” Vangsness said. “It’s people that make entertainment, it’s the everyday creatives that this industry is built on – this is who it hurts.”
    An independent analysis from consultancy CVL Economics, commissioned by Los Angeles County, estimates the merger could eliminate roughly 4,500 direct film and television jobs over three years, cutting total industry wages by $1.26 billion in the region. The projected job losses would hit a local industry that has already shed roughly a third of its total workforce – equivalent to 50,000 positions – since 2020. National University business professor Syleecia Thompson notes that the damage extends far beyond cast and crew, hitting small local businesses that rely on film and TV production. “it hits small businesses, vendors, caterers and local communities,” Thompson said, warning that Hollywood could gradually shift from a centralized production hub to a more geographically dispersed network of production locations.
    While the regulatory settlement established a special workforce fund to retrain workers displaced by consolidation, the agreement does not include any restrictions on layoffs. “Nothing in the settlement limits layoffs,” attorney Gilliam confirmed.

    ## Questions Remain Over Newsroom Independence at CNN and CBS
    The merger brings two of the United States’ most prominent national television news operations under single corporate ownership: Paramount previously controlled CBS News, while Warner Bros Discovery owned CNN. Both outlets have faced intense political pressure in recent years – CNN was among a small group of major news organizations banned from White House access during the first Trump administration – and both have undergone repeated leadership shifts amid broader media industry consolidation.
    As part of the regulatory settlement to address public concerns over journalistic independence, the merger agreement creates a special news editorial independence board, whose members will be appointed directly by Paramount. Paramount chief executive David Ellison has requested that CNN head Mark Thompson, the former director-general of the BBC, retain his leadership role post-merger, and Bari Weiss will remain editor-in-chief of CBS News. Even with these guardrails in place, newsroom staff remain concerned that Skydance’s push for billions in cross-company cost cuts will lead to widespread layoffs at both CNN and CBS News.
    Beyond potential job losses, press freedom advocates and legal experts remain deeply skeptical that the newly created board can meaningfully protect independent journalism. Seth Stern, chief of advocacy at the Freedom of the Press Foundation, called the Paramount-appointed oversight board “worthless”. “The board creates the same First Amendment problems it claims to solve, the government meddling in news,” Stern said. Gilliam echoed that critique, noting that paper commitments do not replace actual enforceable authority. “An oversight board only has as much power as the agreement gives it. Oversight without authority is just observation,” she said.

  • Paramount takes over Warner Bros in $110bn Hollywood merger

    Paramount takes over Warner Bros in $110bn Hollywood merger

    After months of high-stakes legal battles, public scrutiny, and competitive bidding, the $110 billion merger that will redefine Hollywood’s power structure is finally complete: Paramount Skydance has formally taken over Warner Bros Discovery, creating a new entertainment giant that will reshape how audiences worldwide access film, television, and news content.

    The combination of two of Los Angeles’ largest and most storied studios was anything but straightforward. The deal faced fierce opposition from regulators and critics, who warned that sweeping consolidation would suppress market competition, drive up costs for consumers, and disrupt the existing media ecosystem. Even with final approval secured, the merger’s far-reaching impacts are already rippling across the industry, from streaming platforms that serve millions of households to the future of major U.S. news outlet CNN, which now enters a period of uncertain transition.

    Beyond structural change, the merger unites a roster of the world’s most recognizable media brands under one umbrella. Iconic properties including HBO, CBS, Nickelodeon, Showtime, Comedy Central, DC Studios, and Food Network will now fall under the new corporate umbrella. Perhaps most notably, the combined entity brings under single ownership some of the highest-grossing and culturally defining media franchises in modern history, spanning Harry Potter, *Game of Thrones*, *The Lord of the Rings*, and *Mission: Impossible*.

    The newly formed corporation will operate under the name Skydance Corporation, a brand that traces its origins to the independent production house founded by David Ellison, who has now led the acquisition of both Paramount and Warner Bros Discovery. Ellison, who will serve as chairman and chief executive officer of the new entity, framed the completed deal as a transformative milestone for the global entertainment industry.

    “From the start, our ambition was to bring these two storied studios together and create a stronger competitor, with the talent, resources, and reach to tell great stories in every genre, on every platform, for audiences everywhere. Now that ambition is a reality,” Ellison said in a statement following the merger’s closing.

    The road to this final approval has been mired in controversy from the earliest stages of negotiations. Initially, streaming giant Netflix had secured a deal to acquire a portion of Warner Bros Discovery, but Paramount Skydance launched a competitive bidding war that ultimately pushed Netflix to abandon its plans and exit the process. Soon after, attorneys general from roughly a dozen U.S. states—led by California—filed a suite of lawsuits seeking to block the merger entirely. Regulators argued the combination would stifle competition, raise consumer prices for streaming and cable services, and inflict substantial harm on movie theaters, independent cable distributors, and ultimately audiences across the country.

    A settlement reached between the states, Paramount, and Ellison last month removed the final legal barrier to the deal’s completion, clearing the way for the formal takeover. As a core condition of that settlement, several strict guardrails were put in place to address key regulatory concerns. To address widespread fears of political interference in news coverage, Paramount agreed to establish a dedicated “news editorial independence board” tasked with protecting independent, fact-based reporting at both CNN and CBS. Concerns over editorial independence at CBS first emerged in 2025, when Skydance Media completed a separate merger with Paramount that brought the broadcaster under its control. Ellison, who hosted a dinner for U.S. President Donald Trump earlier this year, has repeatedly sought to reassure the public and journalists that the outlet’s editorial independence will remain intact.

    The settlement also includes strict requirements designed to protect film production, domestic job growth, and content authenticity. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who led the multi-state lawsuit and subsequent settlement negotiations, noted the agreement is structured to guarantee the merged entity delivers on promises to produce large-scale original films that drive economic activity and create U.S. jobs. To prevent the company from meeting annual production quotas with low-budget or algorithmically generated content, the deal includes explicit restrictions on reliance on AI-generated films. Under the terms, Paramount must release a minimum of 30 full feature films annually. If the company fails to meet this quota for any year, it will be required to sell its 49% stake in Miramax, the legendary independent studio founded by disgraced media mogul Harvey Weinstein and his brother Bob.

    Additional terms also mandate domestic production growth to support U.S. industry workers: 20% of all film production must take place within the United States for the first two years after the merger, rising to more than 30% for the following three-year period.

    Both merging studios carry century-long legacies of industry success. Warner Bros, founded 103 years ago, has taken home more than 100 Academy Awards over its history, including a dominant performance at last year’s Oscars ceremony, where it tied the record for most wins in a single year with 11 Oscars spread across *One Battle After Another*, *Sinners*, and *Weapons*. Paramount, whose origins date back to 1912, also boasts more than 100 Academy Awards for genre-defining classics ranging from *The Godfather* to *Titanic*, though the studio has not matched its historic award success in recent years. It received no Academy Award nominations for any of its projects last year, with its most recent Oscar win coming in 2022 for *Top Gun: Maverick*.